►
Description
The Transparency Working Group promotes transparency, openness and mutual monitoring as a high-level ideal that we're moving towards at the TEC. The way that we get there is by empowering people to share this experience with the Transparency Audits and making information available to everyone.
We gather every Monday at 5pm CET.
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Okay,
so
yeah
intentions
for
the
call.
My
intention
is
just
to
go
through
the
agenda,
especially
yeah,
organize
a
little
bit
the
week.
There's
some
issues
on
the
board
that
we
should
address
and
yeah
just
go
to
the
war
and
see
how
we
can
make
those
issues
happen.
B
Yeah
intentions
just
to
keep
track
of
all
the
various
proposals.
What's
open
closed
I'll
start
working
on
the
my
section
of
the
report,
which
I
have
questions
of
the
transparency
audit,
which
I
have
questions
about
we'll
discuss
later
and
distractions
today,
no
distractions
pass
it
ivy.
C
Thanks
rachel,
my
intention
is
to
yeah
get
updates
from
from
the
team
and
see
where
I
can
support,
because
I
feel
like
I'm
kind
of
missing
out
on
some
things
because
of
my
distraction.
So
my
distractions
are
I'm.
C
I
still
have
to
work
on
a
lot
of
tweets
for
common
stock
and
yeah
so
basically,
and
I'm
also
eating
because
I'm
this
is
the
only
chance
I
get
to
have
my
dinner-
it's
like
12
midnight
for
me.
Oh
yeah,
opacity,
nt,.
D
A
Great,
let
me
open
the
agenda
here
show
my
screen.
A
Okay
yeah
the
first
thing
like
I'm,
making
a
forum
post
for
the
transparency
around
the
the
multi
six
and
yeah.
We
were
chatting
about
it
a
little
bit
in
softcup
and
basically
like
me,
and
I
we
are
building
a
document
where
we
have
like
multi
saves
and
those
are
linked
to
names
and
basically
like
the
question
is
like
if
we
want
to
make
it
like
public
document
for
the
whole
community,
or
we
want
to
keep
it
more
private
yeah.
A
The
intention
is
like
to
post
it
on
advice,
process
in
the
community
and
yeah
discuss
a
little
bit
in
the
forums
and
by
the
end
of
the
week
or
next
week
make
the
the
vote
so
how
we
want
to
handle
that
yeah
these
things
in
the
community
yeah,
I
don't
know
like
if
I
maybe
I
can
paste
the
link
on
transparency.
If
anyone
wants
to
make
some
comments
before
I
post
it,
I
probably
want
to
post
it
today,
but
if
someone
wants
to
share
some
thoughts,
yeah
I'll
leave
it
there.
A
A
So
if,
if,
if
you
guys
want
to
make
some
changes
like
the
best
way,
is
just
either
create
a
github
issue
or
tm
me.
But
it's
looking
pretty
strong
like
this
is
the
10
top
trades
on
the
abc
and
10
top
trades
on
the
on
honey
swap,
and
we
can
also
label
the
dates
here.
For
the
audit,
which
is
great.
A
A
Wow,
that's
great.
This
is
new
yeah.
We
also.
We
are
planning
some
changes
here
on
the
proposals,
but
then
for
the
rest,
yeah,
it's
it's
like
it's
almost
done.
So,
if
there's
any
feedback
to
share,
please
do.
B
Yes,
I'll
give
you
some
feedback,
so
is
that
how
we
want
to
propose
for
the
proposal
voting?
Is
that
how
you
want
it
set
up
and
like
so
is
how
how
is
doom
analytics
going
to
do
auto
tracking
of
proposals,
and
my
second
input
would
be-
I
don't
know
what
section
it's
under,
but
the
apparently
the
three
new
graphs.
I
guess
the
t,
e
cell
honey
swap
te
cells
and
tribute
those
should
be
if
we
want
to
stay
fluid
with
all
the
with
the
other
graphs
of
similar
type.
B
I
think
monthly
would
probably
be
a
better.
My
that's
my
opinion.
I
don't
know
I'm
you
know,
I'm
probably
not
in
here.
So
for
me
it
doesn't
make
sense
and
then
further
down
with
the
milky
thick
treasuries.
A
I
mean
the
thing:
is
all
those
graphs
are
going
to
save
that
data
into
three
months
and
you
can.
You
will
always
going
to
see
the
last
three
months-
okay,
at
least
on
the
daily
ones,
this
monthly,
probably
we
can
set
up
two
so
it's
a
year
and
then
the
intention
is,
if
you
want
to
see
like
something
I
know
we
are
in
2024
and
you
want
to
see
something
for
2022.
B
Okay,
all
right,
okay,
yeah
and
then.
E
B
Back
to
the
proposals
where's
that
data
coming
from
and
yeah,
this
comes
directly
from.
A
Conviction
voting,
so
it's
it's
actually
like
you
know
like
we
can
conviction.
Voting
is
where
we're
going
to
get
more
decisions,
but
I
think
we
could
also
keep
the
decision
tricky
dog,
so
we
can,
you
know,
have
both
places
because
yeah,
I
think
it's
it's
great,
and
here
also
like
we're
going
to
see
like
I
need
I
well.
I
was
just
asking.
A
I
don't
know
if
it's
going
to
be
possible,
but
we
can
also
see
the
state
status
and
then
it's
if
you
know
if
it's
passing,
if
it's
actually
like
we're
going
to
use
the
same
ones
from
gardens.
B
Yeah,
well,
it
doesn't
have
towel
voting
in
here
either.
B
No,
it's
just
for
conviction.
So
then
the
title
should
probably
say
conviction
like
make
it
make
it
known
that
this
is
only
conviction.
Oh.
A
Yeah
yeah,
that's
great.
B
A
B
A
Mean
with
with
this
thing,
like
you
see,
like
I
mean
you
can
just
go
on
blog
scout,
oh
wait!
It's
not!
I
mean
you
can
just
copy
the
address
and
you
know
and
you
go
to
vlog
scout
and
you
can
see
like
all
the
movement,
all
the
links
of
this
multisig.
But
then,
if
you
want,
I
don't
know
you
want
to
see
what
laser
tag
is
doing
so
laser
tag
they
just
make
in
this
amount
of
tc
this
amount
of
it
and
they
didn't
make
anything
out.
A
But
if
you
put
the
name
of
the
multi
you
want
to
track
here,
then
you
can
see
all
the
all
the
movement
and
again
like
we
can
also
set
up
for
three
months
on
the
dates.
So
we
only
see
the
ones
that
we
care
and
then
yeah
like
for
the
multi-six,
it's
yeah.
Actually,
it's
not
like
how
much
transparent
we
want
to
be
with
the
imp.
A
For
example,
in
my
opinion,
like
it
should
be
transparent,
because
it's
not
you
know,
it's
not
safety's
money
or
ibis
money,
the
one
that's
holding
on
the
multisig,
it's
tc
money
right,
yeah,
we're
just
making
ourselves
accountable
and
nature.
Like
very
nice
feedback
like
saying
when
you
want
to
be
transparent,
you
know
you
have
to
have
reputation
on
stake
yeah,
to
make
yourself
a
comfortable
yeah.
That.
B
Yes,
and
going
back
to
the
dashboard
to
the
dune
analytics,
I
don't
know
if
it's
possible,
so
that's
just
the
all
right.
I
apologize.
I
guess
it
would
be
under
the
inflow
and
outflow
is
there?
Would
there
be
a
way
to
see
to
show
what
the
like
is?
This?
Is
this
breaking
down
individual
payments,
or
is
this
like
funding
proposals
like
if
say,
if
late,
let's
say
like
we
pay
out
the
monthly
distribution,
actually,
will
that
be
annotated
at
monthly
distribution.
B
A
Actually,
that's
the
intention,
but
I'm
seeing
it
here
now,
like
I
remember
with
transparency
me
and
I
will
just
send
one
die
and
send
it
back
and
it's
not
reflecting
here
and
the
movements
so
yeah
probably
also
target
edge.
A
C
In
the
yeah
I.
A
F
C
B
Okay
or
if
you
can
even
I
mean
I
don't
know
if,
if
it's
even
possible
to
color
code,
the
the
balance
amount
like
a
green
inflow,
red
outflow,
whichever
I
think
probably
a
negative,
would
probably
be
easier
yeah
I
mean
I.
B
But
the
use
the
the
actual
details
of
what
it's
doing
like
for,
like
in
what
you
have
now,
with
all
the
with
all
the
inflows
and
outflows
there
should
be
a
call.
I
would
think
there
should
be
a
column
that
says
like
proposal
funding
or
you
know,
monthly
distribution
or
yeah
a
description
of
what
the
actual
transaction
is.
A
B
I'm
sorry
go
ahead,
go
ahead.
Go
ahead.
I
was
gonna
say
maybe
if
he
puts
an
editable
field
in
there
that
working
group
members
like
a
note
field,
I
don't
know
if
that's
possible,
but
I
still
I
mean
if
it's
transparency,
this
should
still
show
regardless.
If
it's
on
a
blockchain
or
not,
it
should
still
so
show
a
description
of
the
transaction.
C
I
think
we
can
cover
that
those
information,
those
pieces
of
information
and
the
audit
report
like
because
I
think
this
dashboard
is
more
automated
and
yeah.
I
don't
know
if
it's
possible
to
add
a
note
field
and
that
it's
something
that
edit
that
anybody
can
edit.
C
I
guess
the
goal
is
like
to
to
show
what's
actually
going
on
in
the
in
the
blockchain.
So
I
think
those
information
can
be
reflected
on
the
on
the
audit
report.
What
do
you
think
zip.
D
A
Sheet,
but
no
no,
my
intention
was
you
know
we
have
this
forum
post
where
the
proposal
where
we
ask
the
money
from
the
community
and
then
you
know
every
time
we
are
distributing
funds,
make
a
comment,
how
we
use
those
funds
and
then,
at
the
end
of
the
three
months
we
say.
Oh,
this
is
you
know
we
carry
over
this
money.
You
can
either
use
that
money.
A
You
know
for
the
new
proposal
or
send
it
back
to
the
common
poor
or
yeah,
but
be
transparent
on
the
forum
post
right
and
then,
as
ivy
was
saying
like
cover
it
on
the
on
the
audit
and
then
because
also
like,
if
we
make
this
like,
even
if
it's
possible
to
make
it
editable
like
it's
it's
impossible
to
track,
you
know
from
one
working
group
track
all
the
working
groups,
unless
you
say
you
obligate
the
other
working
groups
to
also
update
this.
D
Is
of,
like
you
said,
the
dune
tracking,
like
the
doomboard,
has
the
name
of
the
multisig
based
on
the
address,
so
you
could
do
the
same
for
like
take
the
common
pool
of
the
tech
and
say:
okay,
if
the
transaction
is
from
these
address,
you
know
it's
from
the
common
pool
and
just
have
a
couple
of
address
from
the
most
used
things
on
the
take,
and
that
probably
can
can
can
be
a
like
a
way
to
self-track
to
automatically
track
at
least
the
most
relevant
movements.
D
No
but
like
you
can
have
a
new
column
that
says
like
where
it's
from
and
have
the
address
that
sent
the
the
the
funds
to
that
multi
c,
and
so,
if
the
address
is
unknown
address
say,
for
example,
common
point:
you
can.
D
D
B
Is
is
there
a
a
proposal
template
that
people
have
to
follow
yeah?
I
don't
know
if
that
template
can
be
changed,
but
you
were
saying
for
like
when
payouts
when
there
are
payouts
to
put
it
on
the
forum.
I
think
that
should
probably
be,
if,
like
edit,
the
main
edit,
the
main
entry
to
show
the
payment
instead
of
burying
it
somewhere
in
the
conversation.
A
A
A
A
A
Okay,
then
yeah.
Do
we
capture
all
the
feedback
we
wanted
to
capture
for
the
detain.
A
B
I'm
pretty
sure
I
lose
money.
If
I
do
that,
I
think
dunes
pretty.
I
think
we
pretty
much
beat
up
dune
and
as
far
as
all
the
changes
that
need
to
be
addressed
or
considered.
A
Great
and
then
yeah
weekly,
I
was
I
thought,
like
you,
I
oh
go
ahead.
C
Sorry,
I
was
just
checking
something
on
the
forum.
That's
why
I
wasn't.
But
let
me
just
go
back
to
suggestion
like
for
this
forum
to
update
the
main
post
and
add
the
payout
yeah.
F
C
But
the
thing
is,
for
example,
I
if
I
will,
I
think,
not
all
of
us
have
the
the
edit
powers
to
the
forum
post.
C
C
Yeah
I
can
share
my
grace.
I
mean
before
we
suggest
that
a
that
idea,
maybe
it's
good,
to
check
first,
if
it's
possible
to
edit.
So
this
is
my
post
before.
C
So
yeah
there
is
no
edit
option.
If
I
click
this,
I
will
only
see
the
the
versions,
but
there
is
no
way
for
me
to
edit
my
own
post,
who.
C
F
D
I
think
a
possible
solution
see
that
is
like
having
a
document
linked
to
the
to
the
to
each
proposal
or
something
that
maybe
a
sheet
or
something
that
has
all
the
movements
or
the
most
relevant
information.
So
if
I
want
to
go
and
see
the
state
of
the
of
that
proposal,
I
can
just
go
to
the
document
and
see
okay.
D
They
spent
that
much
over
this
time
or
they
did
this
and
this
and
there's
only
two
to
keep
updating
and
like
because
probably
you
want
to
have
an
out
and
a
document
with
objects
anyways.
So
you
can
just
link
that
document
and
there
that
way.
There's
no
need
to
to
continuously
go
to
the
forum
and
vote
against
in
yeah.
A
Yeah
but
the
thing
with
documents
like
they
can,
you
know,
be
deleted
or
whatever,
and
then
they
just
can't
like
in
the
forum
at
least
the
touch
registry,
and
you
can
always
go
back
to
the
registry.
D
C
I
think
there
might
must
be
a
reason
for
not
keeping
it
for
not
allowing
everybody
to
edit
their
post,
so
maybe
it
should
be
discussed
with.
A
D
Well,
I
I
think
I'd
rather
have
it
on
the
comments
just
thinking
about
it,
because
enabling
people
to
edit
their
posts
after
a
long
time
may
maybe
it's
probably
too
risky
in
my
opinion,
because,
like
okay,
most
of
us
are
hopefully
good
actors,
but
then
you
can
go
back
one
year
and
change
the
information
of
whatever
pose
and
who
knows
what
was
the
the
truth
right.
C
A
It's
not
accurate
because
I
don't
know
like
if
there's
a
post,
even
I
deleted
the
post,
that
the
admins
can
go
and
look
at
it
right.
They
just
see
it
in
red
and
if
I
I
don't
know
yeah
yeah,
but
I
don't
think
it's
worth
it
this
this,
for
example,
like
this
forum
post,
is
not
relevant.
So
I
come
here
and
edit
and
I
say.
A
A
I'm
actually
editing
a
post,
I
just
okay,
I
save
the
edit
now
and
then
you
see,
then.
B
C
Admins
yeah
just
the
admin,
so
I
think
if,
if
we
want
everybody
to
have
the
editing
power,
I
don't
know
if,
because
I'm
not
an
admin,
but
maybe
only
admins
can
they'll
be
able
to
edit.
B
B
A
It's
definitely
worth
having
a
conversation,
and
I
really
think
it's
you
know
having
this
the
flow
just
right
after
the
you
know
in
the
post
itself.
I
think
it
it.
It
helps
on
the
visibility
and
it's
actually
more
transparent.
I
mean
if
the
if
the
ultra
is
there
lost
in
the
comments
in
the
comments
it's
still
transparent
because
it's
there
but
yeah
it's
it's
like
hiding
the
information.
Somehow.
B
A
A
Okay,
okay,
next
topic:
it's
like
ivy!
You
need
to
put
your
your
hours
or
oh,
you
did.
A
A
And
yeah,
actually
my
biggest
thing
like
what
I
want
to
you
know
we
focus
on
is
like
structure
like
you
know
the
workflow
in
the
audit.
I
hear
it
like
eurasia,
you
say,
like
you
already
start
thinking
of
working
on
it,
which
is
awesome,
but
I
think
it
would
be
worth
like.
You
know,
having
a
call
and
maybe
I
will
have
30,
we
still
have
30
minutes
and
chat
how
we
want
to
actually
approach
the
audit.
B
You
know
like
slides?
What's
the
agreed-upon
format.
A
Maybe
it's
worth
half
a
ping
pin
this
message.
B
C
Information,
I
think
we
can
start
using
this
document.
First
like
the
yeah,
yes,
and
then
we
can,
let's
see
what
information
we
have
and
then
we
can
decide
later
on
on
how
to
make
the
presentation
better.
But
I
think
what
we
talked
previously
is
to
make
a
google
document
and
then
change
it
to
pdf
once
it's
ready.
A
C
So
yeah,
I
think
this
is
the
working
file
and
then
everybody
can
edit
at
the
same
time
like
a
live
document.
So.
A
C
C
So
we
should,
it
should
cover,
maybe
yeah.
Maybe
we
should
specify
it
here
in
the
document
like
this.
Is
it's
here
february
to
april
2022
yeah,
the
the
period
is
stated
in
the
title
of
the
document.
E
C
C
A
Yeah
I
mean,
what's
where's
the
questions
you
have
ratio
you're
taking
three
right.
C
F
A
I
I
feel
I
might
personally
I'd
be
working
on.
You
know
all
of
them,
but
most
like
you
know
like
right
now,
I'm
doing
four
or
five.
We
know
that
you
know
it
is
with
us,
but
you
know
I'm
also
coordinating.
I
feel
like
I'll
be
yeah
for
sure.
Like
I've
been
looking
at
all
of
them
and
then
you
know
whatever.
C
Maybe
we
can
put,
can
can
we
already
put
the
name
so
it's
easier
for
me
to
assign.
F
C
On
on
zenhub.
A
A
I
also
feel
like
this
is
going
to
be.
You
know.
Also,
you
know,
tracy
is
taking
care
of
of
this
one.
A
A
Actually
there
was,
I
mean
yeah,
and
actually
I
think
this
part
should
I
don't
know
if
it's
on
the
c.
You
know
what
happened
right
now
is
like
we
relate
to
the
commons.
So
we
we
have.
We
are
not
in
the
know
from
all
the
tc
holders
like
before
the
upgrade.
We
will
know
everyone
to
have
tokens
because
without
the
addresses
from
all
the
hatchers,
that
was
a
requirement,
but
right
now
anyone
can
buy
tdc.
I
can
also
buy
dc
into
account
so
quality
voting.
A
It
doesn't
make
sense
anymore,
so
we
like
we
reached
a
decision
actually
on
a
soft
call.
Without
you
know
much
voting
or
anything
that
instead
of
quadratic
voting,
is
going
to
be
just
weighted
boating
and
for
sure
this
has
to
make
it
to
the
audit.
B
The
the
decision
tracking
on
page
one.
F
I
have
a
question:
is
it
just
this
call,
that's
mostly
focused
on
numbers
here
because
you're
doing
an
audit.
F
I
don't
come
to
a
lot
of
these
calls,
but
because
I
think
it's
normally
a
little
early
for
me,
but
you
know,
given
my
recent
experience,
I'm
I'm
taking
a
lot
more
of
an
interest
in
what
what's
going
on
now,
so
I'm
trying
to
sort
out
you
know
what
the
priorities
are
and
figure
out
how
you
guys
do
things
so.
A
G
F
G
F
This
document
for
gravity-
and
I
didn't
see
anything
you
know
so,
do
we
not
report
like
how
many
gravity
cases
we
dealt
with
or
things
like
this
I
mean.
A
A
A
Treasure
is
yeah
here
and
then
we
are
going
here
and
we
can
type
gravity
and
then,
when
gravity
have
a
multisig
with
fans,
we
can
see
all
the
movement
from
gravity,
but
then
the
you
know:
gravity
wanna
handle
the
transparency
around
the
cases,
that's
something
that
is
out
of
the
transparency
working
group
scope,
it's
more
on
on
gravity
because
we
don't
want
to
be.
You
know
like
these
inspectors
that
go
and
make
questions
to
everyone.
We
just
fostering
transplants.
A
Yeah,
no,
we
don't
wanna
yeah,
we
don't
wanna,
go
and
ask
you,
know
everyone,
oh,
what
what's
below
this
pillow
right
or
whatever?
No,
we
don't
care.
We
you
do
with
your
stuff.
You
know
we
care
about.
What's
in
the
tc
fund,
you
know
like
everything,
that's
tc
money
that
we
trace
it,
but
the
rest
up
to
you
guys.
F
G
A
Yeah
exactly
and
you
know,
if
someone
is
asking
money
and
they
are
not,
you
know,
oh,
give
me
one
million
dollars
because
I'm
going
to
build
a
huge
stuff
and
then
you
don't
build
it
or
you
might
use
the
funds.
Then
you
are
going
to
go
to
conviction
voting
again
and
then
who
is
going
to
give
you
money?
No
one,
because
you
know
you
are
not
being
transparent
with
your
funds
and
actually
we're
chasing
the
you
know
the
funds,
if.
B
Yeah,
I
don't
I
don't
know
how
to
say
this,
but
I
understand
what
durgados
is
saying,
but
I
mean
I'd
be
willing
to
take
on
if,
if
these
other
working
groups
want
to
provide
information,
stats
specs,
whatever
metrics,
I
mean
I'll,
be
more
than
happy
to
work
on
a
section
of
that
for
the
audit
group,
but
I
mean
there's
only
three
of
us,
so
pretty
much
mandating
or
tracking
transparency
throughout
the
entire.
All
the
working
groups
is
the
sense
of
overlapping
meetings
and
everything
else
I
mean
it
would
be
rather
difficult.
G
C
A
Encourage
everyone
to
use
the
you
know
how
they're
using
the
funds
and
actually
like
the
two
proposals
that
passes,
have
how
to
be
transparent
with
who
are
they
using
the
funds?
A
A
F
C
I
actually
have
a
question
because
I'm
not
a
graviton
and
I
don't
know,
what's
the
process
for
handling
handling
conflicts,
but
my
question
is
like:
does
this
gravity
have
like
this
confidentiality,
something
like
that
inhaling
conflicts,
because
if,
if
if
they
there
should
be
confidentiality
in
those
cases,
then
it's
going
to
be
contradicting
the
transparency.
F
Well,
I
mean
what
I
was
saying:
is
you
know
if
we,
if
we
handled
ten
cases
this
month
and
and
you
know
a
thousand
cases
the
next
month,
it
seems
to
me
that
that
would
be
a
thing
that
we
should
be
reporting
on,
and
I
guess
I
guess
in
my
mind
you
know,
given
my
recent
experience,
what
I'm?
F
What
I'm
I
mean,
I
I
mean
for
me
what
I
think
that
the
transparency
group
should
be
is
not
just
this,
but
more
like
the
the
free
press
and
a
democracy
where
it's
it's
the
job
of
them
to
go
around
and
take
the
temperature
of
the
group
and
to
talk
about
it
and
to
investigate.
So
my
experience
was
brought
about
because
there
was
a
misunderstanding,
but
not
only.
There
was
a
misunderstanding.
F
There
was
a
misunderstanding
and
there
was
no
transparency
at
all
regarding
any
of
it
and
it
went
on
for
a
really
long
time
right.
So
so
you
know
when
I'm
when
I'm
when
I'm
thinking
about
this
right-
and
here
we
are,
we
have
a
group
called
transparency,
but
really
is
that
the
right
name
for
it?
Do
you
see
them
saying
like
that's
that's
what
I'm
asking
so
I
understand
that
you're
only.
What
is
the
mandate
of
of
that
group?
You
know
so
I
mean.
Maybe
I
need
to
look
into
this
more.
F
I
think,
and
a
lot
of
people
that
I
talked
to,
who
apologized
for
being
bystanders
in
my
in
my
issue
later
were
like
yeah.
We
thought
either
gravity
was
dealing
with
this
or
that
transparency
might
know,
or
you
know
what
I'm
saying
like
they're
just
because
we
have
these
groups,
people
assume
that
we
have
these
these
sort
of
processes
to
sort
of
handle,
all
of
it
and
everyone's
like
well,
I'm
just
going
to
leave
it
up
to
that
existing
process.
Well,
our
existing
process
isn't
what
we
think
it
is.
Do
you
know
what
I'm
saying.
A
What
we're
trying
since
the
beginning
of
the
transparency
working
group
is
foster
mutual
monitoring,
so
you
know
if,
because
if
I'm
the
monitor,
then
I
can
say:
oh
gravity
did
10
cases,
oh
no,
they
did
12
and
then
I
just
put
some
money
in
in
my
pocket
right
like
the
intention
is
like
make
it
so
the
community
is
monitoring
itself,
so
we
yeah
we
where
our
main
intention
is
not.
A
F
Than
that,
well
I
I
don't
know
that
transparency
and
enforcement
are
even
remotely
the
same.
You
know
I'm
saying
enforcement
is
so
if
you
look
at
a
democracy,
enforcement
is
an
entirely
different
wing
of
governance.
You
know
I'm
saying
like
that's,
that's
all
handled
completely
differently.
On
the
other.
G
F
You
know
there
are
laws
that
are
set
up
to
you
know
continue
to.
You
know,
make
sure
that
there
is
transparency
and
accountability
right.
So
you
know
the
question
is,
it
seems
like
what
you
guys
are
doing
is
to
some
degree
accountability,
because
you're
literally
I'm
looking
at
you
doing,
accounting
right,
so
transparency
and
accountability
would
seem
to
go
hand
in
hand,
and
I
I
guess
what
I'm
saying
is-
is
that
you
know
having
a
little
emotional
distance
from
it
now.
You
know.
F
The
only
thing
that
I
could
think
was
was
all
of
the
processes
that
I
thought
would
help
me
failed
me
during
that
time.
Do
you
know
what
I'm
saying
there
was
no
transparency,
in
fact,
for
a
really
long
time
because
it
was
griff.
Do
you
know
what
I'm
saying
so
like
it
was
just
oh
yeah
that
guy's
trustable
and
mutual
monitoring
and
blah
blah
blah,
but
that
that
process
failed
me
too
right.
So
what
what
do
I
do?
You
know
I
would
have
loved
to
come
to
transparency,
but
you
guys
aren't
looking
at
those
things.
F
F
Lesson
you
know
for
the
group
feeling
like
I
know
for
a
fact
that
I've
been
reached
out
to
by
a
number
of
people
saying
that
they
all
had
a
similar
experience
where
there
were
these
structural
issues
and
things
were
falling
through
the
cracks,
and
I
just
wanted
to
make
the
the
people
who
are
working
on
transparency,
aware
that
you
know
this,
this
passive
approaches
is
is
is
having
consequences
for
people,
and
it
did
for
me.
A
A
To
understand
I
mean
because
you're
saying,
like
you're,
trying
to
be
transparent
with
you
know
what
the
other
person
says,
but
actually
you
know
even
grief
saying
whatever
he
said.
Like
you
know
we
we
don't
have
at
that
moment,
we
didn't
have
a
process.
A
So
so
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
talk
about
it
now,
but
you
know
so
we
did.
We
were
not
you.
C
Trying
to
say
is,
like
transparency
is
not
really
passive
because
like
what
he
said
that
we
didn't
have
that
process.
But
then
we
created
the
process
to
make
it
transparent
to
make.
You
know
like
to
have
a.
F
C
F
A
F
The
root
cause
of
it-
and
I
wouldn't
have
known
if
I
hadn't,
had
somebody
come
and
just
tell
me
personally.
You
know
that
this
had
been
going
on
for
a
long
time
and
so
yeah.
So
it's
it's.
It's
actually
just
my
question
to
you
guys.
You
know,
in
terms
of
I
had
a
I
had
a
thing
which,
for
me
continues
to
resonate.
F
Had
this
misunderstanding
with
me,
and
was
you
know,
sort
of
you
know
creating
an
issue
for
me
for
for
more
than
a
year,
and
what
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
out
is.
F
Is
that
that
what
is
it
that
we're
changing
in
terms
of
transparency's
processes
to
make
it
so
that
that
sort
of
thing
doesn't
happen
to
other
people,
because
I
know
it's
happening
to
other
people,
not
with
just
with
grip,
but
I
just
mean
there
are
structural
issues
like
that,
where
people
kind
of
assume
oh
gravity
and
they
assume,
because
it's
griff
he's
a
good
guy
and
blah
blah
blah.
Do
you
see
what
I
mean?
Nothing
against
grift
here,
I'm
not
beating
them
up
or
anything.
F
I'm
just
saying
that
structurally
people
are
going
to
appeal
to
authority
they're
going
to
appeal
to
you,
know,
reputation,
they're,
going
to
appeal
to
all
these
things,
and
so
but
transparency's
job.
It
seems
to
me
just
in
the
mandate,
just
in
the
name
is
to
try
to
make
sure
that
things
within
within
that,
actually,
you
know
become
become
better,
and
so
I'm
just
trying
to
sort
out.
How
is
it
that,
despite
having
a
group
like
this
and
despite
having
gravity
and
despite
having
all
these
things,
we
still.
C
C
How
can
being
transparent
with
individual
cases
like
this
will
be
beneficial
to
the
community,
because
I
feel
like
in
the
and
when
we
were
working
on
our
manifesto.
I
think
what
we
had
in
mind
is
like.
We
should
be
transparent
with
things
with
with
everything
that
affects.
F
C
No,
not
the
money,
but
the
processes.
You
know
that
affect
the
whole
community,
but
I
feel
like
if
there
are
individual
issues
like
this
and
that
that
don't
really
affect
the
community
that
should
be
handled
by
gravity.
C
F
That
you,
that
that
the
fact
that
you're
thinking
of
it
as
an
individual
case
that
doesn't
affect
the
entire
community
is,
is
really
really
wrong.
I'm
telling
you
that
what
I
experienced
is
the
result
of
a
structural
problem.
It's
not
not
a
personal
problem
between
me
and
griff.
It's
not
any
of
these
things.
It's
a
structural
problem
within
the
way
we
run
our
our
community.
A
F
A
A
So
we
need
center,
you
know
and
when
you
have
like,
when
you
have
an
account,
you
have
a
person
who
is
responsible
for
having
this
account
and
then,
if
you
want
to
type
on
this
account,
you
have
to
ask
to
this
person
and
if
this
person,
for
whatever
reason,
is
not
giving
you
the
account,
you
know,
but
the
problem
is:
is
that
it's
because
we're
using
centralized
tooling.
F
F
Yeah,
so
if
we
have
centralized
tooling,
then
we
must
have
a
structure
in
place
to
interrogate
the
effectiveness
and
the
transparency
of
that
centralized
group.
It's
it's
it's
the
lack
thereof
which
I'm
speaking
to
specifically,
do
you
know
what
I'm
saying
it's
so
so
what
I'm
saying
is
either
we
we.
F
We
do
a
completely
decentralized
thing
where
we
don't
have
the
token
engineering
comms
as
a
single
voice,
like
you
said,
and
we
just
have
all
the
participants
talking
about
what
we're
doing
here
and
or
you
know,
we
we
interrogate
and
and
m
and
monitor
specifically
so
mutual
monitoring
is
one
thing,
but
but
I
guess
I
guess
my
point.
G
F
D
I
probably
don't
know
enough
about
the
specific
situation,
but
I
think
I've
noticed
that
it's.
It
feels
like
it's
a
bit
hard
to
access
information
in
the
tc.
That's
in
some
in
some
extent
like
I
was
I'm
in
the
in
the
thecommons.org
page,
and
I
just
clicked
on
the
handbook
and
there's
like
I.
D
I
thought
that
was
some
kind
of
wiki
for
documentation
that
the
information
there
seems
a
bit
poor
for
some
extent,
and
I
think
I
don't
know
if
that's
one
possible
solution
to
some
problems
but-
and
I
don't
know
if
that's
a
transparency
matter,
risk
or
responsibility
whatever,
but
I
think
information
about
of
the
outlines
for
working
groups.
The
outcomes
for
whatever
the
tc
does
should
be
more
accessible
for
maybe
someone
like
me
who
is
new
to
the
community
or
for
someone?
That's
just
looking
for
the
tc.
D
Where
is
it
where's
the
documentation?
You
know
like,
I
probably
have
to
spend
a
couple
of
hours
going
through
the
forum
or
whatever
to
get
a
grasp
of?
What
does
each
group
has
like
what
are
the
responsibilities
of
each
group
and
such,
and
I
have
to
agree
that
I
don't
know
which,
whose
responsibility
is
that?
But
I
have
to
agree
that
if
every
working
group
has
some
goals,
there
should
be
a
way
to
to
measure
those
goals
to
meet
those
goals,
to
see
yeah.
F
D
These
communities
are
usually
pretty
large
and
complex
and
weird
in
some
senses,
and
so,
for
me,
proper
documentation
is,
is,
is
really
important.
F
I
guess
what
I'm
saying
is:
if
I
looked
at
this
audit,
what
I
would
think
is
the
name
of
this
group
was
accounting,
not
accountability,
not
transparency,
but
accounting.
F
You
know
what
I'm
saying,
and
so
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
that
out
right
because
we're
concerned
mostly
about
numbers-
and
I
just
wonder-
I'm
really
trying
not
to
give
you
a
hard
time
here,
but
I'm
just
I'm
just
very
aware
right
now
of
the
the
lack
of
transparency
and
in
some
specific
situations
where
I
know
we're
leaving
people
behind
in
our
community
and
as
a
person
who
experienced
it
precisely
that
I
want
to
affect
some
kind
of
change
in
some
way
right,
so
I
can
show
up
in
these
groups
and
derail
everything
until
I
feel
like
it's
better.