►
From YouTube: W37 Transparency WG: Audit updates
Description
The Transparency Working Group promotes transparency, openness and mutual monitoring as a high-level ideal that we're moving towards at the TEC. The way that we get there is by empowering people to share this experience with the Transparency Audits and making information available to everyone.
We gather every Monday at 5pm CET.
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
B
A
Yeah
yeah,
that's
I've
got
no
issues
with
that
I
mean
honestly.
I
mean
I
like
the
meetings,
but
I
can.
I
can
use
the
extra
one
hour
in
my
life
for
sure
so
yeah,
I'm
fine
with
that.
C
Yeah,
I
will
be
on
vacation
next
week
and
I
won't
be
able
to
record
so
if
you
think
we
don't
need
a
sync
next
week.
That
would
be
fine
and
like
what
rachel
said.
Even
if
I
I
mean
this
can
be
a
good
time
for
us
to
work
on
other
keep
just
to
just
keep
working
on
the
audit
async.
C
So
if
we
don't
have
any
important
updates
by
next
week,
so
that's
my
my
thoughts,
so
I
welcome
acid
laser.
I
pass
it
to
you.
D
Well,
my
intentions
are
just
too
dark
singing
with
you
guys
and
distractions.
Yesterday
I
have
my
third
kobe
vaccine
and
I'm
destroyed,
but
everything
fine
back
to
you
septim.
Thank
you.
E
E
C
I
can
go
first,
I
have
a
question
because
I
haven't
progressed
a
lot
in
the
in
my
part
of
the
audit,
but
I
have
a
question
I
was
like
in
the
I
know,
you
and
zip.
Is
it
you
zep
you
and
I
talked
about.
We
made
this
structure
for
the
audit
and
for
the
processes.
There
is
a
part
where
it
says
when
the
process
has
been
created,
and
why-
and
I
don't
know
if
it's,
if
it's
how
we
can
track
it
like?
C
Is
it
the
time
when
it's
been
posted
somewhere
or
is
this
information
important
or
I
know
that
they
and
and
when
the
process
has
been
stopped,
and
why
these
two
things,
because
my
understanding
right
now
I
mean
when
we
were
structuring
this
audit,
it
wasn't
still
very
clear
until
we
really
until
we
until
the
comments
upgrade,
but
now
that
I
think
about
this
again.
We
said
that
we
will
cover
the
period
that
will
be
covered
or
those
from
january
into
march.
C
So
does
it
mean
that
the
processes
that
we
will
report
in
this
audit
are
those
that
have
been
created
during
this
period
or,
though
do?
We
include
all
those
existing
process
that
started
before
the
before
january
and
that's
still
happening
in
this
period.
C
C
But
what
about
those
processes
that
we
we
had
last
year
and
has
been
stopped
already?
Do
we
still
want
to
include
them.
B
In
my
opinion,
what
would
be
so
cool
is,
like
you
know,
have
active
processes
in
the
tc
and
then,
if
we
stop
using
a
process
because
a
decision-
and
it's
very
related
with
what
ratios
is
also
working
in
my
opinion,
so
you
know
when
I,
when
we
you
know
know
sometimes
it's
like
small
decisions
like
how
do
we
share
credentials
with
you
know,
with
a
contributor?
That's
something
like
we
came
here
in
the
transparency
working
group.
It
doesn't
affect
so
much
everyone.
B
Maybe
a
little
bit
comes
because
they
need
to
do
some
processes,
but
overall
the
community
is
not
being
affected
by
that
decision,
and
then
you
know
this
is
a
process
that
is
still
active.
B
So
I
would
include
you
know,
even
if
it's
from
before,
I
would
still
including
it
like
in
my
head,
how
I
envision
it
it's
like.
Now
we
have
all
the
active
processes
and
then
the
processes
that
are
stopped
being
used-
and
we
say,
like
you,
know,
inactive
processes
that
were
inactive
in
this
period
of
the
audit.
B
C
I
mean
we
will
include
the
process
that
we
had
last
year,
even
if
they
we
don't
use
those
processes
anymore.
Is
it.
A
I
don't
know
I'll
be
a
little
frustrated
if
we
actually
go
back
and
use
stuff.
That
is
not
part
of
this
year,
because
all
of
my
I
mean
not
that
there's
a
tremendous
amount
of
work
to
be
done
on
that
front,
but
I
mean
it's
like
that
should
have
been
stated
in
the
beginning.
If
we
were
going
to
go
back
to
2001
before
any
auto
was
done.
A
A
If
you
I
don't
know
my
my
thing
is:
if
you
want
to
add
what
happened
like
in
2021,
then
that's
gonna,
you're
gonna,
be
that's,
gonna,
take
more
resources
and
more
time,
and
it
depends
on
what
you
want.
I
mean
because
I
literally
have
to
I
mean
not
that
there's
a
lot.
I
think
I
looked
at
it,
but
I
think
the
sheet
is
hidden
on
the
on
the
actual
decision,
workbook,
so
yeah,
I
don't
I
don't.
A
A
I
mean
it's
doable,
I'm
just
it's
just
gonna,
it's
just
more
time
that
people
are
gonna
have
to
spend
on,
and
I
do
understand
the
value
to
the
community
because
it'd
be
nice
to
see,
for
instance,
like
how
many
decisions
were
made
in
2021
versus
the
first
quarter
of
2022.
But
then
that's
not
really
a
good
correlation,
because
you're
talking
about
the
entire
year
of
2021
versus
the
first
quarter
of
2022.,
I
can
see
maybe
doing
an
annual
report.
A
B
That
yeah-
and
I
agree
completely
with
you-
I
don't
know
about
the
others,
but
I
think
yeah
hearing
you.
What
we
could
do
is
like
yeah.
Just
you
know
in
the
part
of
the
processes
that
ivy
is
working
on
the
process
that
that
started
in
2021
and
stopped
in
2021
like
we
don't
need
to
mention
those
anymore.
So
because
it's
like
what
you
just
said
like
it,
doesn't
make
sense
to
compare
a
full
year
with
one
quarter,
yeah
yeah,
I
agree
with
you.
It
makes
no
sense
so
yeah.
B
A
Sorry,
no
go
ahead.
Auntie
go
ahead,
go
ahead.
E
E
We
could
probably
have
like
a
paragraph
saying,
like
you
know,
maybe
like
thing
like
just
stating
some
of
the
processes
that
change,
but
not
going
like
too
deep
into
them
and
as
far
as
comparing
maybe
we
can
come
up
with
a
way
in
which,
from
now
on,
we
we
get
like
a
small
data
set
of
things
like
like
a
conclusion
on
each
outed
that
we
can
easily
take
after
each
audit
and
then
compare
like
we're
going
to
make
about
three
audits
for
a
year.
E
So
if
we
can
structure
the
audits
in
a
way
that
we
can
pull
out
easily
a
small
data
set
of
relevant
information,
we
can
compare
pitch
audit.
That
would
be
nice.
But
if,
like
I
don't,
I
don't
think
the
last
year
is
as
relevant
anymore.
A
I
was,
I
was
just
going
to
say
on
top
of
what
anti
said
I
do
think
like
it
would
be,
is
not
saying
like
you
completely
whatever
deleted
or
or
whatever
just
I'm
not
saying
not
to
that.
2021
was
not
important,
but
I
think
it'd
be
better
off
on
an
annual
report
which
would
be
much
more
intuitive.
B
A
Yeah
I
can
I'll
share
my
screen
and
y'all.
Just
let
me
know
if
this
is
the
I
mean
it's
still
rough,
but
the
data
is
there,
so
just
want
to
get
y'alls
input
on
it.
If
y'all
don't
mind.
A
A
There's
not
much,
there's
not
much
difference
between
the
two,
because
there
are
so
few
and
the
same
here.
This
is
for
and
again
they're,
not
labeled.
So
here's
the
charts
went
through
and
aggregated
the
data,
I'm
still
working
on
the
rank
choice
and
trying
to
figure
out
how
best
to
present
that
information
and
anyway
there.
A
So
basically,
this
is
aggregation
of
all
the
data
from
the
decision
tracking,
then
yeah,
so
that's
it
there-
and
this
is
this
chart
at
the
bottom-
is
just
like
an
aggregation
of
and
again
it's
not
labeled
completely.
A
But
it's
an
aggregation
of
all
the
different
voting
metrics
and
the
goal
here
is
to
actually
show
I
mean
it,
although
the
different
the
the
various
voting
schemes
are
different
is
still
good
to
show
like
which
I
think
it
is
to
show
which
voting
scheme
is
actually
used
more
frequently
and
how
much
yeah
anyway,
to
find
out
the
use
of
the
different
voting
schemes
which
ones
are
effective,
which
ones
are
working
which
ones.
It's
just
good
insight.
A
It's
not
any
decision
making
here,
but
it's
supposed
to
be
information
that
you
can
actually
look
at
and
determine
whether
or
not
there
might
be
need
to
be
changes
or
something
of
that
nature
down
the
road.
A
And
it's
not
something
that
you
know
that
I
make
obviously
so
and
so
here's
the
that's
the
log,
that's
the
logarithmic
scale,
starting
off
at
one
one
thousandths,
because
that's
too,
it
gets
difficult
when
you're
throwing
votes
in
here
and
vote,
which
is
a
percentage
and
then
you're,
also
throwing
in
whole
numbers,
which
is
the
voting
weight.
A
So
anyway,
that's
that's
pretty
much
what
I
have
on
that.
That's
all
from
the
decision,
tracking
information
and.
A
I
have
not,
I
have
not
gone
through
the
forum
yet
to
check
the
advice
process,
but
that's
I
would
do
something
similar
to
that
as
well,
for
the
advice
process
to
like
figure
out
how
many
and
that
would
be
more
time
consuming
than
this
is
to
go
through
and
see
how
many
advice
processes
were
were
published
and
how
many
of
them
actually
went
to
proposal
versus
how
many
did
not
so
yeah.
That's
it.
I'm
just
hopefully
provide
me
some
input
on
this.
B
Yeah,
thank
you
for
sharing
it.
I
think
it
looks
awesome
yeah
regarding
the
advice
process.
I
think
it
would
be.
You
know
also
very
nice.
If
we
could.
B
You
know
we
see
like
for
the
money
decisions,
make
it
into
the
advice
process
and
then
how
many
decisions,
actually
you
know,
made
it
to
proposal
and
is
there
any
decision
that,
after
advice
process,
it
got
implemented
like
sometimes?
Actually
it
happened
with
like
sometimes
like
giving
in
transparency.
We
were
posting
some.
B
B
They
agree
with
the
process,
so
there
was
no
need
to
make
a
form
a
vote.
So
if
we
could
also
put
those,
I
think
it
would
be
pretty
relevant
for
the
especially
for
sofkoff.
A
Yeah,
no,
that's
that's
perfect.
I
appreciate
that.
I
didn't
even
think
about
that.
I
didn't
know
that
was
actually
it
was
actually
possible,
so
yeah
I'll
definitely
get
on
to
that.
That's
my
next
stage
in
collecting
this
data.
E
Honestly,
I
don't
have
much
to
say
my
parts
were
fairly
easy.
I
guess
if
anyone
needs
some
help
with
with
theirs
I'll
be
glad
to
to
help
of
it,
but
as
far
as
my
parts,
I'm
I'm
more
than
okay,
I
have
yet
to
sort
of
structure
them
a
bit
better,
but
I
have
pretty
much
all
the
information
so
yeah,
I
don't
know
if
well
let
me
share
my
screen
briefly.
E
I
don't
know
if,
like
there's
something
else,
we
could
add
to
the
governance
tokens
so
far.
I
don't
have
this
kiss.
It
wasn't
going
to
okay
but
yep
the
part.
Five,
it's
pretty
straightforward.
E
I
have
the
a
table
here,
usually
the
the
top
ranking
with
multi-six-
and
you
know
the
top
30
percent,
including
non-addresses,
and
the
type
top
study
exploding.
The
known
addresses
you
know
addresses
are
like
the
multi-six
and
such
and
then
for
the
part.
Seven.
I
have
these
the
part
a.
I
don't
have
the
part
b
because
we
said
like
I
don't
think
it's
really
possible
to
know
how
many
tokens
are
really
available
from
the
total
supply,
and
then
I
have
this
which
is
like
you
know.
E
I
have
the
12
supply
the
total
support.
It's
from
the
gardens.
E
B
Yeah,
thank
you
actually
yeah.
You
know
like
we
are
go
doing
like
when
we're
feeling
like
doing
doing
stuff
like
I,
if
you
you
know
like
feel
like
you
want
to
work
more
on
gathering
data
than
instruction
dot
it.
Your
part
like
you
know
we
can
also
collaborate.
You
know
I
I
wouldn't
mind
like.
If
you
take,
you
know
when
I'm
part
of
what
I'm
doing
as
long
as
we
keep
thinking
and
we
don't
do
work
twice.
B
You
know
it
doesn't
matter
who
does
what
like
what's
important
is
like
we
coordinate,
so
we
don't
repeat
work,
but
if
you
feel
like
yeah,
if
you
feel
like
you
know,
like
you,
have
everything
ready
on
your
part
and
you
want
to
collaborate
on
other
parts,
at
least
for
me
like
just
yeah
reach
me
and
we
sing,
and
then
we,
because
actually
my
part,
is
like
quite
big
like
I
have
to
reach
every
working
group
and
then
you
know
like
I
could
work
in
that
reaching
out
to
people
and
then
you
could
help
me
like
structuring
or
yeah
work,
working,
organizing,
the.
D
A
I
have
a
question
about
that
auntie
because
I
think
you're
anyway,
I
think
you're
tr
you're
tracking,
like
the
the
pairs
right,
the
trading
pairs,
also
yeah
of
t.
You
see-
and
I
know
there's
that
I
think
it's
a
proposal
actually
for
tit
for
gift
gift.
Give
for
the
gift
token.
A
Are
you
tracking
that
as
well
you
adding
that
to
the?
I
don't
know
how
you
would
add
that
on
there,
if
there's
not
currently
a
trading
pair
or
actually
I
don't
know-
that's
I
don't
know,
would
that
fall
in
into
your
area?
I
guess
is
what
I'm
getting
at,
because
yeah.
E
Yeah
so
far,
what
I
have
is,
more
than
anything
like
a
template,
and
so
the
last
week
of
the
audit
I'll
just
I'll,
go
back
to
all
the
dexes
and
collect
the
data.
If
they
give
us,
if
they
give
ntc
proposal
passes
I'll
I'll
sure
add
it.
A
E
B
A
I
do
have
a
one
quick
question.
I
know
we've
already
passed
my
turn,
but
it's
for
the
advice
process.
Do
you
think
it'd
be
beneficial?
I
mean
I'm
gonna
have
to
do
it
anyway,
but
do
you
think
it'd
be
beneficial
to
actually
put
that
in
the
decision?
Tracking
workbook
like
create
another
another
yeah
another
table,
basically
for
the
advice,
advice
tracking?
Basically,
since
there's
not
one
in
there.
B
B
Hey,
yes,
is
I
mean
you're
just
joined
to
sing
today,
so
I
I
feel
like
like.
Is
there
something
like
you
would
like
to
participate
in
the
update,
or
maybe
like
you
I
don't
know
like?
Maybe
you
want
to
work
like
structuring
a
little
bit,
how
it
will
look
like,
or
I
don't
know
like?
Is
there
any
task
you
would
like
to
contribute
to
the
to
the
audit,
or
you
were
just
more
like
looking
see,
see
what
these
people
is
doing
and.
D
Yeah
I
was
more
into
that
body
if
you
think
that
I
can
help
something.
I
don't
know
if,
if
this
this
document
is
going
to
have
a
desired
presentation
or
something
maybe
I
could
help
could
help
with
that.
But
I
was
more
into
looking
what
what
are
you
doing
guys?
C
I
think
what
I
know,
nt
and
ray
show,
are
working
on
different
documents.
Aside
from
the
master
file
that
we
have,
maybe
it
will
be
helpful
if
you
can
also
drop
the
link
to
those
documents,
so
we
can
check
also
like
sometimes
I
would
love
to
see
what
what's
being
mentioned
in
that
part.
C
So
I
don't
know
if
I
can,
if
I
still
have
to
mention
it
in
my
part,
so
yeah
just
to
see
what's
being
done
for
each
part
and
if
there's
some
overlap
and
then
once
especially
for
anti-spark.
C
I
think
if,
if
that
link
will
be
available
for
acid
laser,
maybe
acid
laser
can
also
start
conceptualizing
on
how
we
can
visually
represent
those
I
mean
he
can
already
start
thinking
about.
How
we
can
visually
represent
those
information.
I
mean
he
doesn't
have
to
create
the
visuals,
yet
the
graphics.
Yet,
but
at
least
he
has,
he
will
have
an
idea
on
what
will
what
data
will
be
presented,
that
we
might
need
a
graphic
for.
B
Actually,
I
said
literally
if
you
would
like
to,
I
think
it
would
also
be
super
helpful
to
me
if
we,
you
know
make
like
two
hours
or
yeah.
I
think
two
hours
would
be
enough
call
and
then
we
go
through
the
whole
of
it
like,
and
we
start
you
know,
making
the
titles
see
like
make
this
structure.
I
feel
like
we're
not
advancing
so
much
with
the
others,
because
we're
lagging
the
structure
and
I
feel
like
we
are
kind
of
blocking
that
part.
B
So
maybe
if
we
could
do
like
two
hours
where
we
just
you
know,
present
everything
how
we
want
it
to
be,
and
then
you
know
like,
for
example
like
we
can,
you
know,
do
I
don't
know,
transparency,
working
group
and
then
sock
of
gravity
and
all
these
other
workings
are
going
to
used
to
be
the
same
as
a
transparency,
the
structure.
B
A
Let's
talk
about
just
making
a
like
templating
the
presentation,
I
guess
right.
A
That
that's
interesting
also
as
far
as
like
what
you're
talking
about
different
work
groups,
I
don't
think
about
that,
but
to
to
for
the
decision
making
for
the
workbook
that
the
community
actually
sees.
I
think
I
want
to
put
yeah
anyway.
I
want
to
change
it
up
a
little
bit
put
more
information
in
there.
B
Yeah
awesome
and
if
you
want
to
edit
the
git
book
ratio
like
yeah,
we
could
sync
with
libby,
so
you
get
access
to
it
and
then
you
can
edit.
If
you
feel
like
you
need
to
edit
something.
A
Well,
I
just
I'm
going
to.
I
want
to
put
a
column
in
there
that
puts
that
has
the
working
group,
because
I
think
that'll
be
because
I
didn't
think
about
doing
that
like.
I
can
also
take
all
the
all
the
proposals
that
were
funded
or
voted
on
and
kind
of
determine
which
which
working
groups
are
putting
in
the
most
proposals,
that
type
of
thing,
and
it's
not
that
it's
a
good
thing
or
a
bad
thing.
It's
just
to
present
it
to
the
community
in
that
manner.
A
But
right
now
that
requires,
unless
it's
in
the
title
it
requires
actually
going
to
the
proposal
and
trying
to
figure
out
which
team,
and
so
it's
like
a
retroactive
activity
right
now,
whereas
if
it's,
if
that
column,
is
there,
then,
when
you're
filling
it
in?
You
can
just
whoever,
if
it's
me
forever,
if
somebody
else
takes
over
the
decision
tracking,
they
can
put
in
the
word
group
when
they're
looking
up
looking
up
been
filling
in
that
that
book.
As
far
as
who
submitted
it,
which
working
group
submitted.
B
And
is
there
anyone
thinking
like?
We
should
have
a
thing
next
week
or
we
could
have
like
two
weeks
for
full
working,
everyone,
asing
and
then
in
two
weeks
we
coordinate,
I
think
yeah.
That
would
be
and
we
would
end
the
call
with
that.
Like
do
you
think,
like
it's
necessary,
so
we
coordinate
next
monday
or
not
I'll
pass
it
to
the
show.
I
think
I
think
we
need
to
meet.
A
A
C
Yeah,
I
won't
be,
I
won't
be
able
to
join
the
call
next
week,
even
if,
if
you
decide
to
have
a
call-
but
I
think
yeah
like
I
mentioned
earlier
since
we
don't
have
I
mean
if
we
have
questions
or
clarifications
around
our
part,
we
can
just
we
can
think
each
other,
and
instead
of
having
this
call,
we
can.
C
We
can
use
this
time
to
actually
work
on
the
audit
rather
than
discussing
unless
there
are
concerns,
and
I
think
we
don't
need
to
wait
for
the
for
the
weekly
sync
to
ask
our
questions
we
can
just
you
know
we
can
send
a
message
to
each
other.
If
we
have
clarifications,
if
we
decide
to
progress
on
our
part
in
the
middle
of
the
week,
I
pass
it
to
nt.
E
D
B
Yeah
thanks
everyone
and
I'll
dmu
later
on
it's
later,
so
we
can
schedule
a
time
thanks.
Everyone.