►
From YouTube: W6 Transparency WG: Preparation for the next trial audits and discussion on mutual accountability
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - Intentions and distractions
2:26 - Call recorders
3:25 - Upcoming transparency trial audits
5:11 - Monitoring performance and metrics (mutual accountability)
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/DDr5kYU
or say hello on Telegram http://t.me/CommonsStack
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/CommonsStack
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
B
Okay,
so
my
intention
is
just
to
sync
with
you,
because
I
don't
have
so
much
things
going
on
for
transparency,
so
I
need
to
know
what
we
have
to
do
for
transparency,
except
for
except
to
prepare
for
the
for
the
call
for
with
eduardo
tomorrow.
So
that's
all
I
know
so.
I
wanted
to
also
know
if
there
are
other
things
that
we
have
to
work
on
this
week.
Aside
from
that,
and
I
have
zero
distraction,
so
opacity
is
sam.
C
C
A
Awesome
I
I
would
first
do
the
first
two
points
of
on
the
agenda
just
to
distinguish
ivy,
and
then
we
have
like
the
whole
time
for
the
for
the
monitoring
thing,
so
we
can
brainstorm.
On
that
I
mean
the
idea
was
brainstorming
that
and
yeah
have
input
from
everyone.
I
mean
I
have
some.
B
A
A
A
Okay,
there
is
also
there
is
a
colon
I'm
singing
here
there
from
omega,
but
yeah
I'll,
be
there
it's
okay,
okay,
next
point,
yeah
what
I
that's
just
to
think
with
you.
This,
like
we
have
the
audit
with
eduardo
tomorrow
and
then
levy
also
show
interest
on
undo
the
audit
yeah.
We
should
sing
with
her
and
yeah.
Do
you
have
any
questions
regarding
the
audit
from
tomorrow.
B
Yeah,
so
tomorrow
is
only
for
the
hatcher's
group.
Hatcher's
outreach
group
only
right
or
we
will
leave
you
also
right.
Is
it
only
gonna,
be
eduardo.
B
Okay,
and
is
there
anything.
A
A
I'll
I'll
give
him
the
the
document
and
what
we
are
going
to
be
doing
is
yeah.
It's
like
the
first
I
mean
gravity,
did
the
audit
by
themselves
and
with
eduardo.
I
was
talking
to
him
to
do
it
together,
so
we
also
know
the
process.
He's
meanwhile
he's
doing
it.
So
we
can
help
and
and
improve
it
if
like,
if
there
is
any
any
places
where
he
doesn't
don't
feel
comfortable
or
anything
hello,
heart.
A
A
I
think
we
as
a
transparency,
should
check
on
that
and
post
and
communicate
to
the
rest
of
the
community.
What's
going
on
so
I
I
was
basically
using
this
code
to
do
a
breast
and
brainstorm
with
all
of
you
guys
to
yeah
to
think
how
we
will
do
that
like
how
will
will
monitor
make
like
the
the
monitor
themselves.
A
So
what
I
was
thinking
is.
B
Just
to
clarify,
so
this
performance
is
in
relation
to
the
audit.
Is
it
in
which
performance
are
we
going
to
monitor
here.
A
Yeah,
I
think
I
think
the
audit,
like
the
thing
is
like
the
performance
of
the
of
the
of
the
working
groups.
Let's
say
because
of
the
working
groups
can
money,
I
mean
they
do
the
audit
themselves,
so
they
can,
they
can
put
their
whatever
they
want
and
our
job
as
transparency
is
to
get
to
check
that
what
they
do
is
not
it's
correct
and
it's
not
like.
We
are
going
behind
them
until
hey.
A
You
that's
wrong,
but
it's
more
like
we're
checking
it,
and
if
someone
is
saying
something,
that's
not
true
or
hiding
information.
We
could
talk
with
them
or
I
mean
it's
just
some
monitoring
and
I
think
those
things
are
they're
going
to
be
posted
from
the
on
the
forum
like
any
member
or
the
community
can
do
it,
but
as
transparent
working
group,
it's
like
we
have
to
do
it
if,
if
like
in
the
worst
case,
like
nobody
is
doing
it,
we
should
do
it.
B
Okay,
so
it's
like
we're
going
to
monitor
their
transparency
or
like
do
the
audit
or
monitor
the
audit
every
month,
so
the
transparency
of
that
every
month.
A
I
put
I
put
monthly
here,
but
it
doesn't
have
to
be
monthly.
It's
just
to
it
can
be
weekly
daily
annually.
B
Because
I
remember,
or
what
we
talked
before
was
every
three
months:
we
will
monitor
their.
We
will
do
the
transparency
audit
every
three
months
so
right
now
we
will
do
it
on
a
monthly
basis.
A
Yeah
but
well,
I,
like
the
working
groups,
are
doing
the
the
audience
every
three
months,
but
we
should
keep
auditing
well,
maybe
before,
like.
Let's
say
they
update
something
in
their
manifesto
and
or
if
they
keep.
I
mean
the
big
audit
is
every
three
months,
but
I
was
thinking
we
should.
A
We
could
monitor
like
more
orderly,
okay.
D
C
From
my
side,
I
think
that
making
the
working
groups
how
to
evaluate
themselves
is
in
is
made
in
order
to
move
that
responsibility
from
transparency,
and
this
is
important
because
you
don't
want
to
be
still
as
the
police
or
as
the
inspectors,
and
so
you
can
keep
in
a
in
a
profile
that
it's
more
like.
We
are
helping
you
reach
to
the
rest
of
the
community
with
what
you
are
doing.
We
are
just
here
to
help
in
order
to.
C
These
are
the
things
that
all
the
working
groups
are
doing
it.
It
will
be
very
nice
if
you
also
comply
with
those-
it's
not,
but
it's
not
mandatory,
and
it's
something
that
we
always
said
that
it
was
not
a
mandatory
thing.
It
is
just
in
order
to
understand
which
is
the
state
of
the
broad
of
each
one
of
the
working
groups.
C
If
and
well,
I
kind
of
like
this
this
way
of
doing
things,
but
it
is
up
to
you
to
do
things
differently.
Of
course,
you
can
also
see
transparency
as
the
fourth
power
like
in
a
democracy
in
which
the
press
is,
it
is
called
the
prayer
right.
The
press
is
the
is
the
fourth
power
that
makes
the
other
three
powers
accountable.
C
So
you
could.
You
could
also
think
about
something
like
that
which
you
are
seeing,
what
the
working
groups
are
doing
and
then
the
poor
thing.
If
there
is
some
inconsistency
or
ask
for
these
inconsistencies,
you
will
make
people
or
the
working
groups
more
uncomfortable.
I
think
I
mean
the
press.
The
first
power
is
is
about
making
the
powering
comfortable.
C
The
idea
that
I
had
was
that
we
have
discussed
previously
was
that
you
that
you
were
helping
the
groups
to
be
accountable.
Not
you
were
enforcing
the
groups
to
be
accountable,
and
you
I
mean
it's
very
difficult
in
a
in
a
small
dow
that
people
like
or
because,
if
they
are
lies
that
don't
have
very
long
legs
and
I
I
don't
think
that
it's
the
the
work
of
transparency,
the
work
of
transparency
is
more
like
help.
C
You
were
saying
that
day
that
this
is
this
was
happening,
and
now
it's
happening
another
thing.
So
what
is
going
on,
and
that's
also
the
the
super
good
thing
of
recording
everything
in
which
you
can
say
what.
But
what
is
going
on
here,
I
don't
know,
maybe
that's
what
I
I
think,
that
we
could
shift
a
little
bit
into
making
transparency
the
fourth
power,
but
I
still
prefer
that
it's
just
a
working
group
that
helps
the
other
working
groups
to
be.
E
Transparent,
I
I
agree
with
sam.
I
think
that
maybe
we
could
have.
We
could
have
the
audits
every
three
months
and
post
them
in
the
forum
so
that
everyone
knows
like
the
work
that
has
been
done,
but
we
can
also
say
that
anyone
in
the
community
can
ask
for
like
a.
E
For
for
like
an
an
extraordinary
audit,
maybe
like,
if,
if,
if
someone
notices
that
the
things
that
are
in
the
audit
are
not
like
to
the
reality
of
the
working
group,
they
can
maybe
ask
for
a
for
extraordinary
audit.
E
E
But
I
think
that
three
months,
it's
like
a
good
time
lapse
and
also
to
not
have
like
too
much
time
taken
from
other
activities.
I
think
maybe
just
like
if,
if
someone
asked
for
for
an
and
anyone
in
the
organization
can
ask
for
for
an
extraordinary
audio
and
and
in
that
way,
we
we
practice
that
kind
of
mutual
monitoring
that
anyone
in
the
organization
can
signal
or
or
try
to
report.
A
A
A
Like,
like
all,
we
were
saying
now,
it's
like
how
the
audit
was
built
initially,
so
you
guys
think
like
just
doing
that
out.
It
is
enough
to
have
like
the
mutual
accountability.
A
I
was
thinking
more
like
yeah,
I
mean
I
agree
with
them
like
the
lies,
have
a
small
legs,
but
if
they
are
evaluating
themselves,
who
who.
D
Yeah,
I'm
just
a
bit,
I
I
think
real
real
accountability
will
come
when
people
need
to
propose.
You
know
to
the
dow
that
for
funding
and
we're
just
you
know
it's
hard
to
think
about
that
right
now,
because
it
doesn't
exist,
but
in
the
end
everyone
will
have
to
make
a
proposal
on
some
regular.
D
D
A
I
mean
the
way,
that's
great
right
now.
It's
like
every
working
group
is
doing
doubted
themselves,
so
we
don't
impose
anything,
it's
not
mandatory
and
the
thing
is
we're
helping
the
the
working
group-
and
that's
where,
like
my
like,
since
they
are
evaluating
themselves
hope
are
we
going
to
say
like
like.
A
If
they
I
mean,
if
they
are
doing
the
score
from
the
themselves,
then
when
they
ask
for
the
I
mean,
I
can't
agree
on
what
sam
say
like
if
they,
but
the
thing
is,
let's
say
any
working
group
say
they
have
green
score,
but
they
lie
so
what's
the
transparency
job
there
or
or
the
community
job
or
where
we
handle
that.
E
Well,
I
think
that
this
is
something
that
I'm
getting
from
from
the
session.
That
levy
did
last
thursday,
and
it's
like
the
importance
of
mutual
accountability
is
that
anyone
can
report
like
an
unwanted
behavior.
E
So
I
think
that
it's
good
that
the
the
steroids
of
the
working
group
are
the
ones
that
feel
the
the
audit
themselves,
but
the
the
community
is
the
one
that
that
ultimately
like
legitimate
the
transparency
of
their
work,
because
if
they
don't
feel
that
the
audience
is
correct,
they
can
ask
for
an
extraordinary
audit
to
to
like
check,
if
or
to
like
double
check.
If
the
things
that
they
say,
they're
doing
are
the
things
that
are
happening
so
so
that
that
the
accountability
comes
from
the
community.
E
Not
from
no
not
from
transparency
but
like
if
everything
is
okay,
just
the
document
is
uploaded
and
anyone
like
comments
on
it
or
or
there's
no
bigger
deal,
but
if
there
is,
if
we
upload
a
a
transparency
audit
and
it
doesn't
reflect
the
reality,
anyone
in
the
community
can
say
hey.
This
is
not
what
is
really
happening.
B
E
E
B
Don't
know
yeah,
I
think
that
can
yeah
it
can
once
it
can
be
all
one
way
to
do
it
like
making
a
soft
announcement
in
the
community
call-
or
I
don't
know
if
we
can
also
make
a
soft
announcement
in
the
discord
channel,
just
send
them
the
link
every
time
an
audit
is
finished.
F
B
Yeah
we
can
maybe
we
can
use
the
transparency
channel
because
we
have
our
own.
This
word
channel
right,
so
maybe
we
can
announce
everything
in
our
channel
and
then
the
members
can
just
go
to
our
channel
and
check
the
updates
on
the
audits.
A
I
like
the
idea
of
posting,
like
reviews
on
the
forum,
but
then
we
can
also
have
all
of
them.
In
I
mean
we
can
have
one,
I
I
mean
like
two
databases,
one
on
the
forum,
like
everyone
can
see
it
there
and
one
other
on
the
transparency
channel.
C
A
A
C
C
B
In
terms
of
monitoring
performance,
since
we
will
do
the
actual
audit
every
three
months,
maybe
we
can
do
like
every
month
or
within
those
that
span
before
the
actual
audit.
Again
like
you
and
I
can
have
a
working
session
or
invite
others
just
to
like
check
if
the
if
the
documents
on
the
forum
are
still
updated
after
the
first
audit,
like
in
the
middle
of
the
first
audit
and
the
next
audit,
like
maybe
we
can
check
if
the
documents
are
still
updated.
B
So
it
won't
be
too
much
work
for
them
to
update
the
manifesto
before
the
actual
and
before
the
next
audit,
by
just
checking.
If
the
documents
are
still
updated
like
it
won't
be
reflected
on
the
audit
result.
But
it's
like
our
help
for
for
them
to
monitor
if
yeah,
if
the
documents
are
still
up
to
date,
and
we
can
offer
also
some
recommendations
how
to
improve
or
something
like
that.
D
A
A
F
Yeah,
I
think
we
can.
We
can
write
in
the
proposal.
A
Okay,
so
if
we
don't
have
anything
else,
I
I
we
only
have
those
points
on
the
agenda.
A
Maybe
since
you're
here
libby,
do
you
wanna
talk
how
we
are
going
to
handle
the
software
audit
for
this
sprint?
Maybe,
for
example,
juan
did
it
by
himself
and
then
we
sing,
but
with
every
we
are
going
to
do
it
together
because
yeah
we
just
want
to
use
the
from
different
systems
just
to
rather
the
better
feedback
since
you're.
Here,
who
would
you
like
to
approach
this
audit
for
this
sprint.
F
F
What
about
tomorrow
at
5
p.m?
Europe
time.