►
From YouTube: W6 Transparency WG: Preparation for the next trial audits and discussion on mutual accountability
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - Intentions and distractions
2:26 - Call recorders
3:25 - Upcoming transparency trial audits
5:11 - Monitoring performance and metrics (mutual accountability)
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/DDr5kYU
or say hello on Telegram http://t.me/CommonsStack
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/CommonsStack
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
B
Okay,
so
my
intention
is
just
to
sync
with
you,
because
I
don't
have
so
much
things
going
on
for
transparency,
so
I
need
to
know
what
we
have
to
do
for
transparency,
except
for
except
to
prepare
for
the
for
the
call
for
with
eduardo
tomorrow.
So
that's
all
I
know
so.
I
wanted
to
also
know
if
there
are
other
things
that
we
have
to
work
on
this
week.
Aside
from
that,
and
I
have
zero
distraction,
so
opacity
is
sam.
C
A
B
A
A
A
Okay,
there
is
also
there
is
a
colon
I'm
singing
here
there
from
omega,
but
yeah
I'll,
be
there
it's
okay,
okay,
next
point,
yeah
what
I
that's
just
to
think
with
you.
This,
like
we
have
the
audit
with
eduardo
tomorrow
and
then
levy
also
show
interest
on
undo
the
audit
yeah.
We
should
sing
with
her
and
yeah.
Do
you
have
any
questions
regarding
the
audit
from
tomorrow.
B
A
A
I'll
I'll
give
him
the
the
document
and
what
we
are
going
to
be
doing
is
yeah.
It's
like
the
first
I
mean
gravity,
did
the
audit
by
themselves
and
with
eduardo.
I
was
talking
to
him
to
do
it
together,
so
we
also
know
the
process.
He's
meanwhile
he's
doing
it.
So
we
can
help
and
and
improve
it
if
like,
if
there
is
any
any
places
where
he
doesn't
don't
feel
comfortable
or
anything
hello,
heart.
A
I
think
we
as
a
transparency,
should
check
on
that
and
post
and
communicate
to
the
rest
of
the
community.
What's
going
on
so
I
I
was
basically
using
this
code
to
do
a
breast
and
brainstorm
with
all
of
you
guys
to
yeah
to
think
how
we
will
do
that
like
how
will
will
monitor
make
like
the
the
monitor
themselves.
B
A
Yeah,
I
think
I
think
the
audit,
like
the
thing
is
like
the
performance
of
the
of
the
of
the
working
groups.
Let's
say
because
of
the
working
groups
can
money,
I
mean
they
do
the
audit
themselves,
so
they
can,
they
can
put
their
whatever
they
want
and
our
job
as
transparency
is
to
get
to
check
that
what
they
do
is
not
it's
correct
and
it's
not
like.
We
are
going
behind
them
until
hey.
A
You
that's
wrong,
but
it's
more
like
we're
checking
it,
and
if
someone
is
saying
something,
that's
not
true
or
hiding
information.
We
could
talk
with
them
or
I
mean
it's
just
some
monitoring
and
I
think
those
things
are
they're
going
to
be
posted
from
the
on
the
forum
like
any
member
or
the
community
can
do
it,
but
as
transparent
working
group,
it's
like
we
have
to
do
it
if,
if
like
in
the
worst
case,
like
nobody
is
doing
it,
we
should
do
it.
A
B
A
D
C
From
my
side,
I
think
that
making
the
working
groups
how
to
evaluate
themselves
is
in
is
made
in
order
to
move
that
responsibility
from
transparency,
and
this
is
important
because
you
don't
want
to
be
still
as
the
police
or
as
the
inspectors,
and
so
you
can
keep
in
a
in
a
profile
that
it's
more
like.
We
are
helping
you
reach
to
the
rest
of
the
community
with
what
you
are
doing.
We
are
just
here
to
help
in
order
to.
C
These
are
the
things
that
all
the
working
groups
are
doing
it.
It
will
be
very
nice
if
you
also
comply
with
those-
it's
not,
but
it's
not
mandatory,
and
it's
something
that
we
always
said
that
it
was
not
a
mandatory
thing.
It
is
just
in
order
to
understand
which
is
the
state
of
the
broad
of
each
one
of
the
working
groups.
C
If
and
well,
I
kind
of
like
this
this
way
of
doing
things,
but
it
is
up
to
you
to
do
things
differently.
Of
course,
you
can
also
see
transparency
as
the
fourth
power
like
in
a
democracy
in
which
the
press
is,
it
is
called
the
prayer
right.
The
press
is
the
is
the
fourth
power
that
makes
the
other
three
powers
accountable.
C
So
you
could.
You
could
also
think
about
something
like
that
which
you
are
seeing,
what
the
working
groups
are
doing
and
then
the
poor
thing.
If
there
is
some
inconsistency
or
ask
for
these
inconsistencies,
you
will
make
people
or
the
working
groups
more
uncomfortable.
I
think
I
mean
the
press.
The
first
power
is
is
about
making
the
powering
comfortable.
C
The
idea
that
I
had
was
that
we
have
discussed
previously
was
that
you
that
you
were
helping
the
groups
to
be
accountable.
Not
you
were
enforcing
the
groups
to
be
accountable,
and
you
I
mean
it's
very
difficult
in
a
in
a
small
dow
that
people
like
or
because,
if
they
are
lies
that
don't
have
very
long
legs
and
I
I
don't
think
that
it's
the
the
work
of
transparency,
the
work
of
transparency
is
more
like
help.
C
You
were
saying
that
day
that
this
is
this
was
happening,
and
now
it's
happening
another
thing.
So
what
is
going
on,
and
that's
also
the
the
super
good
thing
of
recording
everything
in
which
you
can
say
what.
But
what
is
going
on
here,
I
don't
know,
maybe
that's
what
I
I
think,
that
we
could
shift
a
little
bit
into
making
transparency
the
fourth
power,
but
I
still
prefer
that
it's
just
a
working
group
that
helps
the
other
working
groups
to
be.
E
E
But
I
think
that
three
months,
it's
like
a
good
time
lapse
and
also
to
not
have
like
too
much
time
taken
from
other
activities.
I
think
maybe
just
like
if,
if
someone
asked
for
for
an
and
anyone
in
the
organization
can
ask
for
for
an
extraordinary
audio
and
and
in
that
way,
we
we
practice
that
kind
of
mutual
monitoring
that
anyone
in
the
organization
can
signal
or
or
try
to
report.
A
A
A
D
D
D
A
I
mean
the
way,
that's
great
right
now.
It's
like
every
working
group
is
doing
doubted
themselves,
so
we
don't
impose
anything,
it's
not
mandatory
and
the
thing
is
we're
helping
the
the
working
group-
and
that's
where,
like
my
like,
since
they
are
evaluating
themselves
hope
are
we
going
to
say
like
like.
E
E
So
I
think
that
it's
good
that
the
the
steroids
of
the
working
group
are
the
ones
that
feel
the
the
audit
themselves,
but
the
the
community
is
the
one
that
that
ultimately
like
legitimate
the
transparency
of
their
work,
because
if
they
don't
feel
that
the
audience
is
correct,
they
can
ask
for
an
extraordinary
audit
to
to
like
check,
if
or
to
like
double
check.
If
the
things
that
they
say,
they're
doing
are
the
things
that
are
happening
so
so
that
that
the
accountability
comes
from
the
community.
E
Not
from
no
not
from
transparency
but
like
if
everything
is
okay,
just
the
document
is
uploaded
and
anyone
like
comments
on
it
or
or
there's
no
bigger
deal,
but
if
there
is,
if
we
upload
a
a
transparency
audit
and
it
doesn't
reflect
the
reality,
anyone
in
the
community
can
say
hey.
This
is
not
what
is
really
happening.
E
E
F
B
A
C
A
A
C
C
B
In
terms
of
monitoring
performance,
since
we
will
do
the
actual
audit
every
three
months,
maybe
we
can
do
like
every
month
or
within
those
that
span
before
the
actual
audit.
Again
like
you
and
I
can
have
a
working
session
or
invite
others
just
to
like
check
if
the
if
the
documents
on
the
forum
are
still
updated
after
the
first
audit,
like
in
the
middle
of
the
first
audit
and
the
next
audit,
like
maybe
we
can
check
if
the
documents
are
still
updated.
B
So
it
won't
be
too
much
work
for
them
to
update
the
manifesto
before
the
actual
and
before
the
next
audit,
by
just
checking.
If
the
documents
are
still
updated
like
it
won't
be
reflected
on
the
audit
result.
But
it's
like
our
help
for
for
them
to
monitor
if
yeah,
if
the
documents
are
still
up
to
date,
and
we
can
offer
also
some
recommendations
how
to
improve
or
something
like
that.
D
A
A
Maybe
since
you're
here
libby,
do
you
wanna
talk
how
we
are
going
to
handle
the
software
audit
for
this
sprint?
Maybe,
for
example,
juan
did
it
by
himself
and
then
we
sing,
but
with
every
we
are
going
to
do
it
together
because
yeah
we
just
want
to
use
the
from
different
systems
just
to
rather
the
better
feedback
since
you're.
Here,
who
would
you
like
to
approach
this
audit
for
this
sprint.