►
From YouTube: W16 Transparency WG: BOT, Youtube Descriptions
Description
This is the Transparency Working Group! We help promote transparency, openness and mutual monitoring as the high-level ideal that we're moving towards at TEC. The way that we get there is by empowering people to share this experience with the Transparency Audits and making information available to everyone.
We gather every two weeks on Mondays at 3pm CET.
Stewards: Ivy and Zeptimus
Agenda
- Bot - Making issues for the community
- Making the digital security documentation more transparent Gitbook
- Make audit a big thing
- Youtube WG description Hack sesh
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Oh,
it's:
it's
a
boat
name
it
it's
it's
random!
Yeah
like
it's,
the
the
developer,
just
decided
it
was
going
to
be
called
power,
but
actually
we're
going
to
change
the
name.
If
we
want
like,
if
we
want
to
add
him
another
name,
we
can
do
it,
but
but
I
think
we
should
start
with
intentions
and
distractions
yeah.
A
A
C
My
intentions
for
this
goal
is
to
see
how
can
I
help
to
transparency
working
group,
since
I
have
less
work
done
at
outreach,
also
to
see
how
you
guys
are
doing
also
and
see.
Is
there
any
updates
on
on
your
group
and
then
distractions,
I'm
editing
some
photos
so
yeah.
That
will
be
my
only
session
for
the
moment.
What
about
you.
D
Thanks
in
the
water,
though,
my
intention
is
maybe
to
get
to
talk
about
the
youtube
description
with
you
and
I'm
happy
that
you
put
it
there
in
the
agenda
and
the
distraction
is
the
heat
here
in
my
room,
it's
really
hot
and
also
the
tweet.
I
haven't
wrapped
the
ticket
for
the
extension
of
these
run
of
both.
So
those
are
my
distractions
and
they
pass
it
to
you.
One.
B
A
Yeah
awesome
actually,
like
I
added
an
agenda
like
the
bot,
because
I
really
wanted
to
feel
like
if
it's
easy
for
everyone
like
what's
the
feeling
on
the
community
like,
for
example,
yeah
with
the
what
and
what
about
you
ivy
do
you
feel
like
editing
the
videos
and
everything
to
upload
it
to
youtube
it's
easier.
It
takes
more
time
yeah
just
around
on
the
feelings
pass
it
to
juan.
A
A
C
Okay,
yeah,
I
mean,
I
think,
that
for
the
community
they
don't
notice
the
difference.
Oh,
unless
it's
bringing
to
attention
like,
for
example
like
it,
takes
more
time
for
ivy
to
edit
the
videos
or,
if
it
add
another
section,
the
youtube
uploading
process
then,
but
that
only
gets
to
know
by
by
you
guys
so
the
community.
I
think
it's
pretty
much.
I
mean
I
really
like
the
idea
that
that
we
can
manually
sort
of
do
it
will
rely
on
you
having
to
obtain
every
call
if
it
is
needed.
D
I
think
there's
one
time
that
power
stopped
recording,
so
I
feel
like
we
still
have
to
back
up
the
calls
like
right
now.
I'm
also
recording
it
using
obs,
because
this
is
the
second
time.
The
first
time
I
did
it
was
with
was
on
the
legal
call
and
it
stopped
recording
and
had
a
backup
so
yeah.
I
was
gonna.
Ask
you
also,
if
you
still
back
up
all
the
videos,
because
I
was
checking
our
youtube
channel
and
the
recent
calls
that
we
had
are
screen
recordings
and
not
a
voice
recording.
A
Yeah,
I
actually
feel
like
what
ed
was
saying.
You
know
like
the
we
can't
just
still,
if
we're
on
the
call.
We
can
just
record
it
because
it's
faster,
you
know,
and
it's
also
the
video
in
there
but,
for
example,
if
I
don't
want
to
join,
I
don't
know
some
calls
or
you
or
someone
probably
does
the
job
for
us,
but
the
thing
it's
like
yeah
and
sometimes
it
stops
like.
Actually
when
there
is
a
success
or
when
you
know.
A
A
A
C
Why
don't
why
don't
we
do
an
open
call
for
people
in
the
community
to
see
if
someone
can
it
knows
or
knows
this
code,
so
they
can
edit
it.
So
we
can
open
an
ignition
piece
to
just
like
tweak
it
to
to
this
little,
since
we
already
have
it.
I
think
it's
just
a
matter
of
okay.
How
can
we
improve
it
and
in
order
to
improve,
we
need
for
other
people
to
know
how
to
code
it?
C
So
it's
just
like
two
things
specifically
that
we
require,
for
example,
time
not
limited
time
and
and
if
it
stops
at
the
immediately
we
start
it
will
start
again
like
a
auto
kind
of
thing.
So
we
can
just
ask
for
these
two
functions
or
any
other
function
that
you
think
is
reliable
and
just
post
it
on
on
the
community
and
see
if
someone
knows
how
to
do
it.
A
C
Yeah
we
can,
we
can
ask
also
to
any,
for
example,
a
swarm
called
just
just
to
ask
them
if
they
know
anyone.
It's
just
it's
just
a
question
of
simplicity.
We
just
need
to
know
what
the
code
is,
what
language
it
is
and
just
asking
like
hey,
I
mean
I
like
to
let
gender
of
harams
or
any
of
these
calls
swarms
calls
and
since
they
are
coders,
so
it's
like
hey.
We
have
this
question
added
to
agenda.
Can
you
just
refer
to
us?
If
you
know
anyone,
that's
it.
A
It's
I
yeah
the
same.
I
didn't
keep
working
on
that
document
and
I
was
talking
with
libby
and
she
told
me
like
it
would
be
nice
with
what
access
we
polish
it
and
then
we
post
it
on
the
giveaway,
because
she
thinks
that's
a
good
word
and
there,
and
since
you
hear
one
I
was
thinking,
you
were
thinking
something
similar
for
the
graviton.
Would
it
be
worse
to
have
it
on
the
same
place
with
this
document,
or
do
you
prefer
have
something
separated
on
the
hitbox.
A
Maybe
it's
just
amazing,
but
what
I
think
that'd
be
cool.
You
know
like
use
of
these
columns
on
this
document.
You
have
like
gravitons
and
then
you
add
everyone,
that's
graviton,
but
then
in
parenthesis
you
say
this
gravity
don't
have
a
type
of.
Let's
say
you
put
a
t
and
the
registry
an
error,
and
if
this
graviton
has
both
you
put
t
and
l,
and
if
these
gravitons
have
nothing,
you
put
nothing,
you
know.
But
do
you
still
mark
an
x
for
a
graviton,
something
like
that?
A
B
C
B
A
C
Yeah,
there
is
a
point
that
it's
also
interesting
for
us,
which
is
the
process,
I'm
working
the
framework
for
closing
the
working
group
and
what
document
will
be
after
that
happen,
like
a
leftover
kind
of
documentation
not
left
over.
It's
not
a
leftover,
but
like
the
the
same
way,
we
have
a
manifest
at
the
beginning
to
have
a
closing
manifesto
to
say
so,
so
it
will
be
a
more
textual,
probably
version
than
than
the
audit
like
that.
A
C
A
A
C
I
think
it
would
be
nice
to
probably
have
30
minutes
or
more
of
the
normal
weekly
sync
of
the
working
group,
or
maybe
people
who
want
to
stay
after
the
call
of
the
working
group
depends
of
the
working
group,
of
course.
So
it
is
a
consensus
in
between
everyone.
So
it's
not
the
store
who
holds
the
like.
C
So
it's
it
could
be
an
exercise
that
everyone
knows
will
happen
once
a
month
once
every
two
months,
where
whatever
rhythm
you
want,
but
that
is
it
that
it
is
included
in
that
agenda
every
month,
every
couple,
every
period
of
time
that
you
want.
So
in
that
way
it
doesn't
become
best
to
our
soul
point
of
view,
but
it
becomes
like
a
consensus
from
the
working
group.
Sums
will
be
harder,
but
in
others
will
be
really
fast.
C
D
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
love
eduardo's
idea,
because
it's
we
can
yeah.
We
can
engage
people
that
and
one
thing
that
I
they
think
of
is
like
announce
or
promote
on
twitter
that
hey.
They
know
that
tec
has
a
transparency
audit.
You
know
just
so.
Everyone
knows
that
we're
doing
it
like,
because
it's,
I
think,
we're
the
first
dow
to
do
it.
B
D
C
I
also
think
it
would
be
nice
to
add
every
audit
from
every
working
group
to
their
own
manifesto
and
and
to
sort
of
like
to
their
posts.
That
explains
what
they
do.
So
when
people
arrive
to
a
working
group
and
we
always
send
them
to
the
manifesto,
they
can
also
see
the
things
that
sort
of
like
the
temperature
check
that
gives
the
output.
A
For
instance,
with
the
power
thing,
it
would
be
nice.
You
know
like
get
the
working
group,
the
not
like
having
the
recordings.
It's
something
like
the
working
group
should
be
more
worried
about
you
know
and
if
they
have
it
all
of
them,
then
you
know
I
one
one
idea
to
promote
it.
It's
hard
on
the
audit
and
you
know
like
when,
oh
you
say:
oh
yes,
I
have
them
all
and
they
are
here.
A
C
B
A
Yeah,
that's
an
awesome
idea,
one
and
I
think
we
could
use
this
for
make
like
they.
You
know
like
here
is
the
data,
but
I
you
know
like.
I
was
the
idea.
I
see
how
they
work
news
revolution
for
those
fines,
it's
yellow,
but
if
then
it's
green,
you
know
it's,
it
shows
improvement,
but
if
we
do
infographics,
I
think
that
would
be
even
more
accurate
because
you
see
the
percentage
and
that'd
be
super
cool.
B
Yeah,
it's
it's!
It's
that
the
idea
of
making
information
more
easily
accessible
to
people
so
that
they
don't
have
to
like
go
through
everyone
clicking
and
and
you're
just
like
going
through
one
place,
and
they
know.
Okay,
the
overall
transparency
of
the
tc
and
of
each
working
group
has
like
this
highlight
so
yeah.
It's
just
an
idea
and
we
have
like
a
lot
of
people
who
can
like
jump
on
that.
A
Yeah,
that's
awesome
another!
Well,
I
is
not
in
the
agenda,
but
another
topic
I
was
thinking
it
would
be
very
cool
if
transparency
does
it
because
at
this
moment
it's
not
that
much
of
a
thing
like
internal
communication
like
coming
comes,
is
getting
currently
like
the
external
communications
to
the
people
from
outside,
but
I
feel
sometimes
the
internal
communication
is
lacking.
Something.
A
C
C
C
We
are
missing
a
lot
and
like
yeah,
I
there's
people
who,
like
even
sept
them,
asked
me
like
what
votes,
what
part
of
the
votes-
and
you
know
like,
which
is
fine
like
she
has
a
lot
of
stuff
or
she
got
confused,
doesn't
matter,
but
even
people
who,
like
maryland
and
and
people
who
are
distant
or
closer
to
the
community,
doesn't
matter,
but
they
do
not
we're
aware.
So
I
think
there's
this.
Oh,
we
had
the
example
of
ygg
ygg.
C
For
example,
he
hadn't
paid
his
membership
views
because
he
had
forgotten
simply
enough.
His
ygg
like
come
on
so
so
we
are
missing
some
internal
communication
and
I
do
not
know
how
to
fix
it
besides
sending
manually
messages,
but
that
could
be
overwhelming
after
a
month
of
doing
so.
So
I
do
not
know
how
to
solve
it,
but
I
just
yeah,
you
are
right.
Sometimes
it's
I
I
knew
it
probably.
We
were
missing
out
this
just
because
we
were
not
sending
messages
to
people
letting
them
know
that
the
votes
are
on.
C
I
haven't
received
any
mail
saying,
votes
are
on
for
for
params
and
proposals
and
so
on,
but
then
not
only
that,
but
the
fact
that
now
that
I
have
the
proof
that
people
are
saying
no,
at
least
with
many
people,
I
will
keep
sending
messages
today,
so
I
will
figure
out
more.
But
that
says
we
are
failing
at
some
level
in
the
in
the
sense
of
internal
communication.
A
Yeah
totally,
I
was
thinking
a
smaller
role,
like
you
know,
like
sending
the
communications
we
see
and
have
something
you
know
like
in
the
stores
channel,
something
like
that
and
then
hs2
should
carry
on.
For
example,
if
it's
about
voting
and
maybe
it's
params
or
comms
or
you
know,
but
this
what
just
to
see
it'd
be
nice
like
everyone
knows
it
right
and
yeah.
That's
the
idea
I
have,
but
that
that'd
be
a
thing
like
boss,
hatch,.
C
I
do
not
want
to
underestimate
the
fact
that
we
we
are
thinking
so
much
about
post
hatch
right
now
and
I
think
there's
there
are
some
key
parts
of
prehatch
that
we
should
not
forget
about,
and
then
we
should
like
really
pay
attention
like
the
voting
and
so
on,
because
then
we
for
me
it's
about.
We
will
then
giving
a
community
a
set
of
proposals
or
a
set
of
parameters
that
they
didn't
know
anything
about.
A
And
it's
it's
very
scary,
like
I
don't
want
to
go
against
any
proposal,
but
there's
one
proposal
where,
like
the
50,
gets
to
the
builders-
and
you
know
it's
a
lot
on
a
minimum
goal
and
it's
winning-
you
know
it's
because
people
just
think.
Oh
these
people
are
cool.
They
deserve
that
right.
But
it's
crazy
like
if
you're,
if
you
are
a
baker.
B
A
A
C
B
We
we
have
the
the
the
the
like
a
lot,
a
lot
of
blog
posts
and
in
the
community
calls
we
we
show
the
work,
but
it
would
be
good
to
work
in
a
you
know,
yeah.
I
I
think
I
am
thinking
of
like
an
infographic
thing
where,
where
we
can
like
yeah,
inform
people
even
outside
to
the
community
so
that
they
can
like
keep
track
of
everything.
C
Yeah,
there
is
sort
of
interruption
there
is
this
thing
where
transparency
doesn't
mean
access
to
information,
and
I
think
we
are
very
transparent,
but
we
are
not
guaranteed
that
people
who
will
be
stakeholders
on
the
hatch
have
have
access
to
the
information
that
will
affect
them.
So
these
two
things
are
very
key
for
me
like,
yes,
we
are
transparent.
Yes,
we
share
everything,
but
it
doesn't
mean
we're
making
an
effort
on
letting
people
know
these
changes
so
being
transparent.
C
D
C
Access
to
this
process
of
the
params,
just
the
idea
that
people
are
not
aware
that
they
can
vote,
I
mean
we
have.
We
have
the
parties
and
that's
that's
amazing,
like
it's,
it's
good,
but
if
we
have
the
same
people
always
in
the
parties,
that
shows
clearly
that
we
are
transparent,
but
we
are
not
having
access
to
information
for
the
rest
of
the
community.
C
D
D
A
Yeah,
no,
I
was
just
going
to
say,
but
I
think
edo
is
trying
to
say
like
there
are
people
who
is
putting
money
in,
but
they
are
not.
You
know
they
are
not
deeply
into
the
tc.
They
just
care
about
the
project
because
it's
cool,
but
you
know
they
are
not
watching
the
medium.
They
are
the
twitter.
You
know
they're
following
a
bunch
of
people
and
maybe
get
lost
like
these
people
who
you
know
reach
to
them
and
make
some
internal
communications
with
them,
not
like
posting
it
on.
D
D
C
Yeah
yeah
that,
for
example,
I
really
don't
have
the
ask
for
this-
I
don't.
I
think
we
have
very
little
time
to
sort
of
create
something
new
to
do
this,
that's
why
we
are
doing
manualities
with
tim
and
I
to
just
reach
back
to
people
that
we
onboarded
to
just
say:
hey,
we
onboarded
you,
but
now
you
can
also
do
something,
but
before
you
couldn't,
which
is
voting
so
go
and
vote.
C
But
the
thing
is
that
that
that
we
can
do
it
now
that
when
the
next
voting
comes,
we
will
have
to
do
the
same
again,
so
it's
or
when
the
new
change
that
needs
to
be
voted
in
the
in
after
hatch
or
pre-hatch
or
during
the
hatch.
It
doesn't
matter
like
how
do
we
tackle
this
and
how
we
assure
that
we
have
always
a
higher
level
of
understanding
that,
because
we
are
the
same
10
people
in
all
the
to
say
that
the
community
is
aware
of
the
things
that
these
10
people
are
talking
to.
C
D
Actually,
I
think
a
craig
is
already
working
on
the
hub
spot
and
I
think
once
it's
done,
it
will
be
a
very
big
help
in
distributing
the
distribution
of
this
email.
So
yeah
everybody
can
get
a
first
individual
email.
When
we
have
this
another
process
in
the
future,
so
yeah,
I
think
the
hubspot
can
help
play
that.
C
A
Yeah,
okay,
we
still
have
30
minutes
and
it
would
be
super
helpful
if
we
all
jump
on
this
document.
It's
on
the
transparency
chat,
for
example,
there
are
some
working
groups
that
are
already
done
from
halters
or
reaches
done
by
trump
communities
towards
it's
done
too.
Transparency
is
done,
but
there
are
some
working
groups
like
there
is
a
bunch
of
information
like
gravity
legal
comms,
params
omega.
Oh
my
god.
A
C
A
C
B
C
C
A
D
C
C
B
A
C
The
other
thing,
the
thing
that
I
will
add
to
all
these
descriptions
is
the
timing
of
their
meetings,
the
link
to
maybe
the
maybe
the
forum,
description
or
or
the
telegram
handles
of
the
stewards
or
just
letting
know,
which
is
the
steward's
name,
just
the
first
name,
just
to
know
who
they
address,
because
if
someone
picks
attention
on
a
transparency,
call
they're
like
okay,
but
who
do
I
talk
to
here?
Yeah
and
also
when
this
call
happens.