►
From YouTube: W25 Transparency WG: Transparency survey & audit, Discord analytics, orientation calls, etc.
Description
The Transparency Working Group promotes transparency, openness and mutual monitoring as a high-level ideal that we're moving towards at the TEC. The way that we get there is by empowering people to share this experience with the Transparency Audits and making information available to everyone.
We gather every two weeks on Mondays at 3pm CET.
Timecodes:
00:00 - Intentions and distractions
1:39 - Discord & forum analytics
7:51 - Transparency survey
19:55 - Transparency audit
30:28 - Transparency training
35:36 - Medium or other platform analytics
37:51 - Orientation call recording
44:10 - How do we handle feedback?
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
B
C
D
Thank
you,
honka
intentions.
I
want
to.
I
have
a
thing
to
add
to
the
agenda,
which
is
how
do
we
handle
feedback
that
is
publicly
shared
and
then,
besides,
that
I
want
to
see
if
the
data
for
members
it's
around
and
that's
it
it's
my
two
intentions
and
destruction.
There
is
none
at
the
moment.
How
about
you,
ivy.
A
B
Thanks
ivy
yeah,
maybe
I'll
I'll,
just
talk
about
this
since
everyone
wants
to.
I
don't
know,
if
that's
your
only
intention,
but
we
can
talk
about
the
the
discord
formats
and
the
thing
is
like
everything
is
like.
I
have
all
the
data-
and
I
was
thinking
on
yeah
during
today-
make
it
something
presentable,
let's
say,
and
then
I
would
love
to
have
a
call
with
you
tomorrow,
so
we
could
edit,
whatever
you
you
know
like
to.
B
I
will
put
all
the
data
I
have
and
then
you
will,
like
my
intention
is
with
you
sync
and
say:
okay,
this
is
what
is
more
relevant
for
communitas.
This
is
more
less
relevant,
so
we
built
the
template
and
then
we
can
do
this
analysis,
like
I
don't
know
if
you
need
them
every
month,
every
two
months
like
it's
super
easy,
so
it
even
if
it
would
be
like
every
two
weeks.
It's
not
a
big
deal
but
yeah
to
see
how
recurring
you
need.
B
D
Okay,
the
thing
too
about
this
data
is
that
on
wednesday
we
have
a
scene,
I
mean
we
have
the
community.
That's
working
group
called
today,
but
on
wednesday,
where
it
is
important,
is
that
on
wednesday
we
have
a
small
workshop,
where
we
will,
like
the
new
first
part
of
the
morning
journey,
which
is
the
bots
that
we're
gonna
use.
We
are
finishing
that
part
and
it
will
be
hopefully
finished
on
wednesday.
D
It's
just
available
for
in
theory,
stewards
and
and
also
for
coordination
orientation
coordination
coordinators,
but
in
the
new
in
the
new
disk
or
the
data,
will
go
to
a
database
that
will
compile
information
like
personal
information
about
the
people
and
the
reasoning
why
they
join
and
so
on.
So
I
would
like
to
add
and
to
have
like
check
who
has
access
to
this,
so
whoever
how
whatever
we
want
to
handle
this
nothing.
Let's
just
have
that
in
mind,
so
yeah.
So
basically,
this
is
one
end.
D
So
I
would
like
to
have
this
data
also
to
contrast
it
to
understand
like
okay
for
the
past
three
weeks,
there
was
there
any
increase
of
participation
or
not,
because
that's
the
timing
that
we
have
been
doing
the
they
are
rich
to
people.
So
I
just
wanna
like
know,
I
just
wanna,
know
information
before
pulling
out
the
new
discord
journey.
B
D
It
I
mean
it
has
to
be
defined
because
right
now
the
only
person
who
is
accessing
it,
it's
timer
and
me
we
have
yeah.
We
have
a
few
more
people
that
eventually
will
do
that
and
right
now
there
is.
If
you
go
to
the
correct
to
the
category
of
orientation
coordinators,
you
will
see
the
people
who
have
access
to
that
channel.
Besides
this
word,
there
is
no.
There
is
no.
D
There
is
nothing
to
take
advantage
of
that
information,
because
it's
just
two
questions
that
people
answer.
So
that's
fine,
but
just
to
like
sort
of
keep
track
of
that
just
in
case
for
good
practices,
so
yeah
yeah
for
me
tomorrow.
What
time
you?
What
in
the
morning
would
be
ideal
but
yeah?
I
will
see
if
it.
B
You're
so
cool,
okay
yeah,
I
send
you
the
invitation
so
yeah
tomorrow
we
fix
that
like
for,
like
I,
I've
been
having
this
data
for
so
long,
but
I'm
struggling
like
like
you
know.
I
have
to
do
this.
Oh
maybe
now
I
do
some
sport,
oh
maybe
now
you
know,
but
for
today
is
going
to
be
100
percent
done
like
I
have
all
the
data
I
just.
D
Have
to
put
it
in
there
is
there
anything
that
you
think
it's
worth
like
right
now.
Is
there
anything
that
comes
to
your
mind,
that
is
worth
like
intro
that
was
interesting
or
worth
sharing
to
the
rest,
like
something
that
you
like?
Oh,
I
didn't
know
about
this.
Like
this
data
told
me
this
or
I
don't
know,
if
you
have
anything.
A
F
D
Think
yeah,
sorry,
no
go
ahead.
You'll
go
first
yeah.
I
think
there
is
this
timing
thing
that
it's
quite
interesting
to
see
in
the
bigger
spec
in
the
in
the
bigger
picture
like
right.
Now
we
have
this
sort
of
curves
of
things
to
do
like
if
you're
a
contributor
right
now
in
the
dc,
you
attend
to
calls.
D
If
you
have
issues
open
for
you
or
you
have
users
inside
you
do
those
issues,
but
there
is
not
much
else
to
actually
do
so.
We
can
time
for
these
things.
For
example,
if
we
have
params
party
this
outlet
of
this
survey
that
you
want
to
do,
it
could
be
nice
to
have
it
after
two
or
three
params
parties
in
a
way
that
people
have
other
things
to
do
and
sort
of
know
they
take
advantage
of
the
timing
of
people
joining
or
people
just
engaging
more.
D
So
we,
after
the
params
party,
for
example,
you
can
say
hey,
we
have
this
survey
or
you
might
only
tag
people
or
whatever
you
do
or
all
general,
but
I
think
we
can
use
these
little
exercises
of.
Oh
these
people
actually
got
this.
You
know
kind
of
thing
to
our
advantage
and
and
rather
than
having
like
in
a
let's
say
monday,
and
no
one
pays
attention.
We
don't
know,
what's
in
the
server
at
seven
a.m,
to
timing
it
in
a
way
that
people
take
advantage
of
the
engagement
people
are
having.
C
I
also
think
that
it
would
be
really
good
to
make
it
like
a
regular
practice,
because
it's
not
very
good
if
we
only
say
like
okay,
this
is
how
transparent
we
are
feeling
or
how
the
community
is
feeling
about
the
transparency,
but
also
to
have
like
a
baseline
and
be
able
to
measure
that
with
time
and
yeah.
I
think
it
would
be
a
really
good
tool
for
evaluation
and
monitoring
and
like
see
how
are
we
doing
but
yeah?
C
I
I
think,
then
it
would
be
good
not
to
have
it
like
only
focused
on
transparency,
but
maybe
it
can
be
like
like
overall,
like
how
do
you
think
we're
going
like?
How
are
you
feeling
and
and
yeah
what?
What
are
your
risks
or
fears
in
this
moment?
And
that
way
we
could
yeah
like
a
big
hit
temperature
check,
like
the
one
we
do
with
the
stewards
each
week,
but
like
with
the
bigger
community.
D
Yeah,
I
agree
with
that.
I
think
this
exercise
and
it
happens
with
every
working
group
like
it
happens,
with
comes
when
they
they
when
they,
when
they
want
an
information
about
the
new,
whatever
they
are
doing
or
or
I
think
the
only
working
group
that
works
a
little
bit
more
kind
of
community-wide.
It's
gravity
in
the
sense
that
it's
it's
more
like
your
activities
or
your
things
are
community
for
the
community.
D
So
I
think
this
kind
of
audits
or
small
things
rather
than
having
it
in
a
format
of
audit.
It
could
be
just
a
community
exercise
kind
of
thing.
You
know,
so
we
we
frame
it.
We
get
the
information
that
we
need,
but
we
also
add
other
few
questions
that
could
be
referral
or
could
be
like
just
basic
empathy.
D
You
know
whatever
you
want
to
call
it,
but
in
a
way
that,
in
a
way
that
it
can
become
a
a
thing
for
the
community
to
to
engage
with
and
not
think
only
on,
what
are
the
needs
for
transparency
to
know.
You
know
it's
like.
Okay,
people
probably
have
things
for
transparency
but
I'll
sorry,
probably
transparency,
things
from
from
the
community,
but
also
you
need
anything
from
transparency.
D
B
Yeah
and
I
feel
it
should
be
something
like
an
extra
like
we
could
do,
for
example,
in
lunch
or
in
the
tc
lunch,
or
something
like
that,
because
otherwise
I
feel
like
people
if
we
make
so
many
questions
you
know
like.
Maybe
we
put
transparency,
gravity
community
questions
like
maybe
it's
a
bit
long
and
people
would
say
like.
B
A
F
B
I
just
wanted
to
say,
like
the
mind
objective,
for
the
transparency
audit.
This
was
more
or
less
to
because
right
now,
like
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
had
the
chance
to
read
the
the
new
transparency
audit,
but
the
intention
with
the
survey
is
like
to
improve
that,
like
you
know
like
when
people
feel
like
something
is
missing
from
the
audit
like.
Oh,
this
data
is
not
here
because-
and
I
need
it
because
otherwise
this
is
not
respond.
That's
the
way,
like
the
community
monitor
transparency,
let's
say:
yeah
go
ahead.
A
Yeah,
I
I
also
realized
that
that
this
survey
is
bigger
than
what
we
originally
planned
it
to
be
zetty,
but
I
feel
like
like
what
you
said:
people
don't
engage
with
the
surveys
when
it's
too
long,
so
I
think
the
challenge
here
is
to
find
out
the
right
questions
to
ask
in
that
service
in
that
survey,
like
maybe
limited
to
only
five
questions,
if
possible,
but
yeah
the
one.
The
thing
that
we
have
to
think
about
is
what
are
the
right
questions
to
ask
when
it
comes
to
transparency.
D
Yeah,
I
think
there
is
also
people,
don't
understand
the
need
of
the
audits,
and
I
think
people
don't
read
or
engage
with
the
audits
of
the
working
groups
because
they
don't
see
the
need
of
it.
So
I
think
there
is
a
follow-up
process
of
this
like,
for
example,
what
has
changed
from
the
first
audit
you
did
in
march
april
to
now
and
and
if
people
see
what
actions
has
been
taken
to
improve
x
situation,
then
you
will
have
a
risk,
like
this
kind
of
things
that
people
are
not
used
to
do.
D
People
are
used
to
be
to
have
audits
in
their
doubts.
I
don't
think
that's
something
common
in
and
that's
what
I
have
seen
so
far
is
not
so
common,
but
these
good
practices
kind
of
tools.
I
think,
since
you
are
putting
effort
on
doing
so,
it
should
become
part
of
the
community
kind
of
guidelines,
cultural
good,
cultural
practices.
But
how
do
we
match
this
in
a
way
the
community
feels
empowered
by
it
not
bored
by
it?
D
Because
the
question
here
is
how
the
community
then
wants
to
be
transparent,
because
the
audit
sort
of
it's
it's
the
goal
to
accom
to
accomplish-
and
I
think
the
community
still
just
is
a
little
bit
on
on
on
the
gray
like
they
don't,
and
I
don't
know
how
I
still
don't
know
how.
But
I
feel
this
we
can.
We
can
push
a
little
bit
this
audit
concept
into
a
more
digestible,
not
that
just
it's
already
digestible
but
like
in
a
more
community
driven
exercise.
D
We
can,
for
example,
I'm
just
making
this
up,
for
example,
in
the
in
the
in
the
community
in
medical.
We
can,
for
example,
do
a
small
round
of
one
question
only
from
the
audience
to
be
honest
with
the
people.
So
in
that
way
we
get
out,
we
get
you
know,
we
sort
of
people
are
aware
that
they
exist,
or
rather
than
just
mention
it
on
on
the
transparency
working
group
part,
it's
just
like
hey.
What
about
do
you?
D
How
do
you
feel
the
params
party
was
executed
this
this
week
because
it
was
a
highlight,
so
everyone
has
one
minute
to
say:
yes,
no,
whatever
good,
but
one
to
ten.
You
know.
So
it's
a
way
to
sort
of
make
it
more
community
entertainment.
So
it's
it
can
amplify
the
message
that
you
guys
are
trying
to
come
across,
but
I
stopped
talking.
B
Yeah,
basically,
we
also
wanted
to
make
instead
of
making
a
lot
of
outages
from
all
working
groups.
We
also
now
we
want
to
make
one
big
audit
for
the
whole
tc.
That
working
groups
will
be
a
section
of
that
audit
and
yeah
the
thing
with
transparency.
Is
it's
been
hard
because
fancy
you
know?
Meanwhile,
there
is
no
money.
It's
hard
to.
You
know
like
people
care
less
like,
but
the
transparency
work
it
it
should.
B
You
know,
get
stronger
when
money
is
in,
so
you
know
then
people
care
and
if
someone
is
not
being
transparent
with
what
they
are
doing
with
the
funds
like,
maybe
when
they
ask
for
more
funds,
maybe
the
community
will
say:
hey
you.
Maybe
you
explain
what
you
did
with
these
previous
funds
and
then
I
will
decide
if
I
fund
your
project
or
not
and
yeah.
That's
the
biggest
like
the
biggest
problem.
Right
now
is
because,
like
transparency
is
not
very
meaningful
before
their
hard
money.
D
A
D
Money,
because
we,
you
know
in
a
sense
that
if,
if
money
is
a
condition
where
you
be
are
going
to
be
transparent,
that's
a
little
bit
weird
it
could.
It
could
be,
it
could
be
fun,
it's
good
at
the
end,
if
you
accomplish
being
transparent,
that's
okay,
but
I
think
this
good
practices
could
be
could
start
to
become
more
embedded
on
the
on
on
our
community
in
a
way
that
people
are
more
used
to
it.
D
B
Well,
it's
good.
I
have
my
camera,
and
so
you
could
see
me
talking
things
I
mean
yeah.
I
was
saying
like
also
like
the
next
point
of
the
agenda.
Is
the
transparency
added?
So
maybe
it
would
be
worth
looking
into
it
and
and
yeah
and
get
your
like.
Maybe
like
get
some
from
feedback
from
you
guys
so
yeah.
Basically,
we
we
want
to
make
like
a
big
audit
and
then
we
are
going
to
yeah.
B
It's
probably
going
to
be
like
a
long
document,
but
we
are
going
to
monitor
our
processes,
our
decisions
so
also
the
baltic
and
resource
of
the
governance,
the
funding
pool.
You
know,
like
the
tc
revenue
influence
from
the
bonding
curve,
the
common
pool.
Then
the
t
project
like
this
is
for
going
for
the
working
groups,
but
also
for
projects
and
then
also
like
the
the
history
management
and
rewards
like
the
this.
These
are
going
to
be
separate,
towels.
B
Okay,
five
and
six:
it's
the
same,
I
think
holding
data
yeah.
Basically,
it's
a
monitor
like
this
is
like
the
more
controversial
part
like
we
are
planning
to
monitor
addresses,
so
this
information
is
available
on
the
blockchain.
So
it's
it's
not
like
we're
showing
something,
but
this
is
more
controversial
like
if
you
guys
would
like
to
share
some
comments
like
ikea,
because
you
know
like
yeah.
B
Basically,
what
we
are
going
to
do
is
going
to
use
an
app,
that's
called
dude
analytics
and
we
are
going
to
see
like
all
the
addresses
and
you
know
and
see
who
like
what
the
wells
are
doing,
how
hatches
are
behaving
and
yeah
that
that
could
be
interesting
also
for
the
common
stock,
so
to
monitor
the
hatchers
and,
and
also
this.
This
seven
point
is
we're
going
to
see
like
governance.
B
Tokens
like
you
know
like,
because
when
people
have
tokens
on
lp's
or
in
other
stuff
like
it's
not
in
their
wallet,
they
cannot
really
vote
with
those
so
yeah.
It's
also
to
see
the
governance
tokens
who
are
they
behaving
so
yeah,
basically
for
yeah
just
to
know
it's
actually.
All
this
information
is
to
no
one,
and
actually
we
also-
we
say
here
like
maybe
like
we
on,
for
example,
on
these
working
groups.
Then
we
do
funding
proposals.
B
However,
the
funds
are
being
used
and
carryover
and
footy,
but
at
the
same
time,
if
any
working
groups
are
struggling
with
their
transparency
and
they
are
having
problems
to
communicate
with
the
community,
who
are
also
willing
to
do
individual
outlets
for
working
groups,
but
only
if
they
ask
for
like,
if
they
do
not
ask
for
then
this
should
cover
the
audit.
Basically
like
with
information
we
have
available
on
the
blockchain
should
be
enough,
but
if
they
ask
for
yeah
just
to
help
to
communicate
what
they
are
doing,
we
volunteer
into
offer
hub,
but
yeah.
C
C
D
D
I
I
will
always
go
back
to
bank
list
now,
because
the
presentations
are
really
good,
but
I
think
that
this
could
be
really
interesting
to
work
it
out
with
as
a
laser
as
like
the
highlights
points,
the
ones
that
are
more
community
driven,
for
example,
let's
say,
votes
and
results.
I
will
do
it
in
graphics
rather
than
having
a
document.
D
That's
bringing
attention
to
something
that
I
don't
know
if
it
needs
to
be
public
and
ranking
addresses
with
a
respective
percentage,
even
if
it's
public,
I
don't
know
if
it
needs
to
be
put
it
out
there
like.
I
would
just
bring
the
example
of
how
I
felt-
and
this
is
a
personal
opinion-
how
I
felt.
Sometimes
people
put
pressure
on
you
september's
because
you
were
a
whale
on
on
the
counting
of
the
holding
and
people
were
like.
D
Oh,
but
your
opinion,
or
you
know
it's
like
because
when,
when
you
cast,
when
you
put
that
information
into
public
people,
people
make
assumptions
or
whatever
it
is
so
the
number
fifth
is
the
one
that
I
will
not
make
public.
I
will
make
that
information,
but
I
will
not
make
it
public
because
I
don't
think
it's
necessary
for
matter
of
transparency
already.
So
I'm
not
going
to
repeat
it.
Yeah.
B
D
Address
yes,
but
people
can
like
people
will
still
we
talked
about
this
like
these
addresses
people
have
access
to
who
they
are,
and
there
is
online.
There
is
registry
of
this
of
people,
knowing
who
this
is
so
I'm
not.
I
do
not
feel
comfortable
with.
I
don't
see.
I
don't
see
how
this
information
is
so
important
that
I
have
to
sacrifice
people's
privacy
like
I
don't
see
how
how
important
it
is
to
in
order
to
exchange
it
for
the
possibility,
which
is
five
percent
of
someone
accessing
these
people's
information.
B
D
So
but
it
doesn't
have
to
be
public
like
it
could
go
to
common
stack
and
be
part
of
common
stack
processes.
It
doesn't
mean
that
you
have
to
bring
this
information
out.
You
know
yeah,
but
I
can
go
to
your.
I
can
go
to
your
ethereum
account
one
of
the
ones
you
have
see.
How
many
do
you
have
there
and
I
can
suddenly
tomorrow,
go
to
your
house
and
steal
you.
Why?
Because
that
information
that
I
didn't
know
it
was
related.
D
B
Yeah,
no
thank
you
and
it's
so
available
yeah,
just
maybe
like
the
yeah.
The
intention
like,
I
think,
for
example,
do
not
like
this
point.
Neither
and
you
know,
and
you
need
it
like.
If,
if
you
guys
comment
on
the
forum,
I
I
don't
like
this
blah
blah
blah
and
then
like
the
intention
of
being
an
advice
process
is
just
to,
and
I
would
like
to
know
like
all
the
stores
opinion
regarding
that
matter,
so
we
I
mean,
I
mean
I.
If
we
decide
not
to
do
it,
I
don't
I
don't.
B
Do
it
like
it's
not
like.
My
life
is
going
on.
You
have
to
do
this
because
you
have
to
get
inspired
right
like
if
the
community
is
decide
for
somehow
like
okay,
let's,
let's
keep
it
quiet
like
it's
there.
Everyone
knows
it's
there,
but
let's
keep
it
quiet
and
you
know
for
me,
like
I,
I
think,
always
transparency
and
like
if
the
information
is
there
everyone
and
if
we
are
monitoring
it,
I
really
feel
in
depth
with
the
community
like
we
are
monitoring
them.
D
A
I
think
eduardo
captured
all
my
all
the
things
that
I
wanted
to
say
because
we've
been
arguing-
and
I
have
been
arguing
on
these
points
for
like
an
hour,
and
we
can't
really.
We
couldn't
agree
on
that.
You
know
because
we
were
only
there
were
only
the
two
of
us
talking,
so
it's
good
to
have
other
people's
opinion.
You
know
just
to
like,
like
the
break
break
yeah,
so
yeah
thanks
eduardo
for
for
your
feedback.
B
Okay,
yeah
they
also.
The
next
point
is
the
transparency
training,
but
I
also
think
this
iv
should
be
more
like
in
the
future
like,
and
I
just
update
juan
and
nedo
yeah.
Basically,
I've
been
talking
with
grief
and-
and
he
was
telling
me
like,
because
we
at
the
beginning,
we
wanted
to
do
offer,
like
the
you
know,
like
the
transparency
audits
and
everything
like
offer
it
to
other
dolls.
B
But
give
me
a
good
point
like
like
to
build
the
transparency
and
or
also
to
monitor
and
like
it
takes
so
much
time
it
like.
You
cannot
do
like
more
than
without,
let's
say
so.
The
intention
is
like
to
yeah
just
to
like
in
this
course.
We
would
have
like,
like
the
basics
like
how
to
record
how
we
do
the
audio
like.
B
Basically
what,
but
I
feel
like
this
should
be
done
like
when
we
have
a
good
practice
on
the
tc,
and
the
intention
is
when
we
have
those
educate
more
people,
so
they
can
also
implement
on
especially
from
other
commons
like
in
the
future,
when
we
common
start
with
more
common,
like
every
commons,
can
have
like
the
transparency
being
held.
Somehow
similar
to
tc-
or
you
know,
of
course,
like
it's
open
source,
anyone
can
make
it
differently
differently,
but
these
two
have,
you
know
not
start
from
scratch,
start
from
something
and
yeah.
B
Basically,
it's
going
to
be
like
I
I
like
the
things
I
feel
like
right
now.
It
should
be
included
in
the
courses
like
the
art
of
recording,
how
do
the
audits
and
how
to
like,
I
feel
potential.
So
if
fabio
could
explain
to
the
community
how
to
use
dune
analytics
because
it's
going
to
be
a
very
strong
tool
for
transparency
and
yeah,
I
mean
in
the
time
we
will
see
what
else
we
can
add
but
yeah.
That's
we
have
the
intention
of
doing
that.
B
A
B
Now
do
you
say
that
I
thought
that
was
saying
we
should
work
also
and
have
a
final
proposal.
Maybe
we
could
maybe
we
could
do
a
work
session
this
week
if
you're
available.
So
we
discuss
this
point
like
the
orientation
data
I
feel
tomorrow,
since
I
will
be
with
edu
I'll
I'll
sing
with
him,
I
have
to
get
more
to
see
exactly
what
they
need
from
that.
B
B
B
A
B
B
B
B
A
We
checked
it
back,
I
mean
we
checked
what
we
had
that
we
have
in
our
youtube
channel.
What
we
had
before
is
tec
ama,
that's
what
we
previous,
that's,
what
we
stopped
recording
and
we
actually
haven't
had
a
single
orientation
call
yet
in
our
in
our
youtube.
So
maybe
we
can.
We
don't
have
to
keep
doing,
keep
doing
it,
but
maybe
have
at
least
three
to
five
recordings
of
the
orientation
call
just
put
it
in
a
playlist.
D
I
think
there
could
be
a
small
exercise
to
train
others
towards
of
basically
how
to
record
properly,
because
what
orientation
called
it's
good
for.
It's
also
that
other
stores
join,
so
you
don't
have
to
burn
yourself
joining
every
rendition
called
like
just
as
an
exercise
for
stewards
to
come
and
join
and
they
participate
and
they
engage
because
it's
a
community
driven
call.
So
we
need
people
that
are
from
other
stores
to
join
this
call.
D
So
if
we
can,
the
first
step
will
be
to
train
everyone
to
know
how
to
record
their
own
calls.
You
know
where
we
can
sort
of
leverage
you
from
that
process,
but
also
to
for
them
to
join.
This
call-
and
you
know
like
just
check
every
week
who
who's,
which
of
the
stores
are
free
this
week
to
join
orientation.
Calling
you
okay,
do
you
know
how
to
record.
A
D
Basically,
the
only
thing
that
I
see
the
reasoning
of
productiveness
or
higher
orientation
call
is
that
the
people,
if
they
go
to
youtube
and
they
look
for
you-
have
meetings
for
everything,
but
that
single
meeting
doesn't
have
a
recording.
So
people
don't
know
what
to
expect
visually.
So
there
is
some
people
who
join
who
join
the
tc
and
they
go
directly
to
youtube,
and
there
is
very
this
potential
people
take
advantage
of
having
these
sessions
recorded.
D
So
because
a
lot
of
it's
the
only
call
that
we
have
that
we
actually
grow
through
the
content
and
we
actually
go
through
the
discord
and
how
it
works,
and
it's
the
only
call
we
do
that.
There
is
another
content
youtube
that
we
have
so
far.
That
explains
our
cultural,
build
our
praise
system.
How
do
we
praise
in
a
in
a
single
goal
so
yeah?
D
What
I
would
suggest
to
do
is
that
I
will
record
three
or
four
sessions
and
out
of
those
three
four
sessions,
I
will
make
a
single
video
that
says
orientation
call
that
could
be
highlighted
in
youtube
or
whatever.
That
would
be
with
these
questions
or
this
process
already
answered.
So
we
can
always
send
those.
B
D
B
D
B
D
This
thought
yeah
yeah,
so
that's
based
on.
If
you
guys
go
to
feedback
channel
below
on
support,
you
will
see
lbs
feedback
that
was
shared
two
days
ago.
Regarding
the
praise
and
that's
something
that
I
actually
I
didn't
comment,
but
I
that
is
something
I
actually
share.
I
get
annoying
every
time
I
get
to
like
a
lot
of
kind
of
unmatched
place,
so
I
got.
I
have
to
shake
everything
in
order
to
know,
and
I
have
to
go
to
the
channels
whatever
you
know.
D
It's
like
that
bothers
me,
but
that's
besides
me
is
to
understand
how
we
handle
feedback
in
the
humidity
and
what
mechanisms
do
we
have
to
to
sort
of
answer
this,
because
this
feedback
could
be
non-productive
or
it
could
be
productive?
We
don't
know
yet,
but
so
yeah.
So
basically,
how
do
we
handle
feedback?
D
And
how
do
we
acknowledge
it?
Because
for
me,
it's
okay,
we
can
handle
it.
We
can
send
her
a
message
privately
whatever.
How
do
we
acknowledge
this
feedback?
I
don't
know
like
question.
I
don't
know
the
answer
for
this,
but
no
praise
is
just
saying:
hey,
thank
you.
So
how
do
we
actually
transform
a
feedback
into
if
it
is
constructive,
constructive?
How
do
we
like
who
manages
this?
Who
manage
the
feedback?
B
I
I
feel,
and
it's
just
a
feel,
I
feel,
for
example,
like
last
stewards
call
we
were
talking
about
the
treasury
management
and
I
was
like,
but
what
about
the
parameters?
You
know
like
the
snapshot
parameters
from
the
hearts
now.
Are
they
going
to
be
like
like
this
all
the
time
like,
and
this
was
somehow
feedback
and
then
libby
opened
a
firm
thread
to
discuss
that
and
but
I
feel
like.
A
Think
the
feedback
I
mean
eduardo's
question
was:
who
should
handle
the
feedback?
I
think
it
depends
on
what
the
feedback
is
about,
because,
usually
when
we
receive
feedback
on
transparency,
we
yeah
we
talk
about
that
feedback
in
our
in
our
weekly
sync.
So
I
think
if
if
this
two
word
means
is
that
feedback?
Maybe
we
can
just
tag
this
two
word?
Who
should
take
it
on
or
do
you
do?
We
want
like
a
single
person
or
a
single?
D
Sorry,
it
just
made
me
fun
what
I
would.
What
would
be
ideal
for
me
is
that,
for
example,
I
just
use
an
example.
Transparency
takes
care
of
the
feedback
channel,
so
you
guys
sort
of
are
redirecting
people
or
matching
people
feedback,
because
then
what
will
happen
right
now.
Is
that
me
or
any
of
the
community
that's
working
through
people
who
have
to
go
to
this
channel
and
then
send
it
to
whoever
you
know
it's
another
process.
D
A
I
think
the
best
role
to
handle
feedback
is
a
community.
Is
the
community
manager,
but
we
don't
have
that
yet
I
mean
I
don't
know
if
we
have
assigned
someone
with
that
role
but
yeah.
If
no
one
can
do
it
like
it's
okay,
for
transparency
to
do
and
for
me
I
can
always
check
the
feedback
channel
and
direct
them
to
the
right
people,
but
yeah.
I
feel
like
this
task
is
specifically
for
the
community
manager.
D
C
C
Besides
your
own
working
group
channel,
which
other
channels
do
you
regularly
visit
and
like
which
channels
can
you
commit
to
to
to
to
to
yeah
to
to
give
response,
because
it's
not
good
to
to
to
just
give
that
responsibility
to
one
person
but
yeah.
Like
I
I
mean
I
I
I
always
check
gravity,
but
I
I
know
that
I
can
check
that.
There
are
some
other
channels
that
I
don't
check
too
much.
C
So
maybe
we
can
yeah
like
spread
the
load
between
the
the
steroids
of
of
like
yeah
being
on
top
of
some
of
the
channels
and
also
revisiting
some
of
the
text
channels
in
the
in
the
token
engineering
discord,
because
I
I
see
that
there
are
people
as
the
channels
are
not
bridged.
I
see
there
are
some
people
that
interact
there
and
they
never
have
a
response
in
in
the
in
the.
In
the
te
token,
engineering
discord.
D
Yeah,
that's
another
topic.
I
don't
know
like
I.
This
is
regarding
the
d.
This
word,
that's
something
I
still
don't
figure
it
out,
which
is
the
band
like
I'm
not
gonna,
say
boundary,
but
like
do
they
have
a
community
manager
in
the
te
discord
like?
Is
there
someone
taking
care
of
that
so
yeah?
That's
something
still
like.
I
still
don't
know,
because
there's
a
bunch
of
people
who
are
coming
from
the
te
discord
but
yeah,
I
don't
know
I
don't
want
to
like
jump
into
people's
work
in
the
discord.
B
D
B
That's
that's
what
we
need
to.
I
mean
I'm
very
more
worried
about
what
on
the
tc
right
now
until
we
bridge
or
do
whatever
right
now
like,
and
I
really
like
the
idea
of
juan
like
like
doing
understood.
Okay
to
us,
we
really
need
to
get
all
these
channels
answered
like
let's
commit
to
visit
them
daily
and
if
you
can
visit
delete
those
like
you
commit
and
if
and
it's
okay
to
say,
okay,
I
I
do
not
commit
to
any,
and
it's
fine
like
if
you
know
but
like.
A
Yeah
what
one
said
this
is
a
good
point.
Like
stewards
it'd
be
more,
you
know
it's
like
spend
more
time
in
some
channels.
I
actually
used
to
do
that
sometime
in
july,
but
then
I
got
you
so
yeah
for
me.
I
always
check
the
praise
channel
because
some
people
don't
get
the
praise
giver
role.
So
I
always
make
sure
that
everyone
who
wants
to
this
dish
race
is
able
to
praise
so
yeah.
Maybe
we
can
add
it
to
the
stewards
all
agenda,
but
I'm.
A
D
Yeah
I
mean
if,
for
me
it's
this
thing:
where
do
we
do?
We
then
join
also
the
twitters.
Do
we
also
join
the
mediums?
Do
we
also
join?
You
know?
It's
like
there
is
a
yeah.
I
do
not
like
yeah.
I
do
not
like
the
going
backwards
kind
of
thing.
Anyways
yeah.
I
think
the
feedback
part
going
back
to
the
reasoning
of
this
small
point.
It's
it
could
be.
It
could
be
nice
to
acknowledge
within
the
praise
or
at
least
explain
the
person
who
is
providing
feedback.
D
The
reasoning
of
oh,
it's
like
going
a
little
a
step
further
with
the
whatever
feedback
is
providing
all
right
right
now
to
lbs.
I
don't
know
what
to
reply
to
her
like
for
me.
It's
true
like
I
feel
it's
too
much
messages
for
praise,
but
then,
on
the
other
side,
I
understand
the
fact
that
that's
the
only
way
people
get
to
know
the
system
if
they
get
a
message
that
explains
the
system.