►
From YouTube: City Council - February 26, 2019 - Part 2 of 2
Description
City Council, meeting 3, February 26, 2019 - Part 2 of 2
Agenda and background materials:
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/decisionBodyProfile.do?function=doPrepare&meetingId=15349
Part 1 of 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=el4bmUVyhqM#t=10m36s
Meeting Navigation:
0:04:53 - Meeting resume
A
A
A
Members
hold
on
okay
members
of
council
I
like
to
welcome
the
great
five
and
six
students
and
teachers
and
parents
from
st.
Aidan's
Catholic
school
Scarborough
war
22
encounter
care,
Genesis
Ward
welcome
their
our
teachers
are
Karen,
Raksha,
practical
and
Erin
McDormand
parents,
Kristina
Castro
and
Jennifer
joven.
B
Sure
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
to
to
yourself
for
accepting
the
students
and
thank
the
teeth
these
students
for
coming
down.
We
certainly
had
a
great
day.
They
learn
everything
about
municipal
municipal
government
and
other
governments
and
I
think
they're,
probably
one
of
the
smartest
classes
that
we
have
visiting
here
today,
this
very
moment
and
I
want
to
thank
you
for
being
here
in
their
teacher,
have
a
good
trip
back
up.
E
E
A
A
Carried,
that's
it
okay,
so
maybe
we
can
release
some
some
of
these
ones
that
we
had
that
we
remember.
As
a
council,
there
were
a
few
members
motions
that
we
introduced
prior
to
lunch
and
they
have
been
circulated.
So
we
can
move
the
item
3:15
by
councillor,
Fillion
council
Fillion.
Would
you
like
to
move
it?
A
A
G
C
A
J
Now
I'm
getting
mixed
up
with
Telstra
Carol,
but
all
women
look
the
same.
So
that's,
okay,
I
just
wanted
to
ask
Council
to
welcome
the
grade.
5
students
from
Jackman
junior
public
school
here
with
us
today
and
they're
located
in
Ward,
14,
Toronto
Danforth
and
their
group
leader
is
Sarah
Chang,
so
welcome
students.
J
A
K
Speaker
I
just
want
to
be
very
brief
on
this
and
ask
cancerous
to
take
a
few
minutes
and
probably
skim
through
the
report.
We
had
an
opportunity
to
have
a
presentation
and
discussion
that
at
committee-
and
this
is
there's
a
lot
of
good
information-
a
lot
of
it-
that
many
of
us
are
listening
to
and
hearing
from
our
residents
day
in
and
day
out,
but
this
will
inform
the
discussions
that
are
going
to
start
in
a
few
weeks
about
our
housing
opportunities
plan.
K
We're
gonna
be
reaching
to
each
and
every
one
of
you
hopefully
you'll
be
able
to
participate.
We
want
the
participation
of
all
the
counselors.
We
want
the
participation
of
Torontonians
and
planning
the
next
housing
plan,
and
this
is
important
information
that
was.
This
is
a
report
that
was
commissioned
a
third
party
commission
that
has
relevant
information
that
we
hope
to
inform
the
next
10-year
housing
plan.
Thank.
A
D
I
can
read
it
out
because
it's
in
front
of
me
as
well
that
City
Council
advised
the
Ministry
of
Municipal,
Affairs
and
housing,
that
the
city
of
jex
to
the
closure
of
the
local
planning
appeal
support
center,
that
the
the
report
very
clearly
outlines
that
this
new
local
planning
appeal
body
is,
has
an
enormous
backlog,
but
something
that
just
happened
last
week.
So
I
think
that's,
maybe
why
it
didn't
make
its
way
into
the
recommendations.
Was
that
one
of
the
central
tenants
of
the
new
L
Pat
was
that
it'd
be
more
accessible
to
our
communities.
D
Community
organizations
could
participate
in
the
process
and
not
feel
like
they
had
to
walk
in
with
either
a
degree
in
planning
or
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
pay
for
planning
lawyers,
and
so
one
of
the
things
that
was
done
at
the
alp
at
that
to
improve
a
public
access
over
the
OMB.
Was
this
notion
of
a
local
planning
appeal,
Support
Center,
where
individuals
and
resident
groups
could
go
for
support
in
preparing
their
case
and
heading
to
the
L
pad?
D
Well,
I
don't
know
where
last
week,
just
as
this
agency
and
it
was
getting
up
running,
it
was
cut
not
only
cut,
it
was
eliminated
entirely
if
you
go
to
their
website
now.
It
says
well
in
about
a
month's
a
month
from
now
two
months
from
now
we're
just
not
going
to
exist,
and
it
sends
us
right
back
to
a
state
where,
unless
you
have
a
planning
degree
or
$100,000
to
pay
a
lawyer,
our
communities
do
not
have
access
to
the
appeal
body
of
the
province,
and
that
is
critical.
That
is
what
we
fought
for.
D
D
I
was
at
at
least
three
dozen
meetings
that
councillor
Matt
Lowe
got
up
and
said
down
with
the
OMB
and
that
cow,
so
perks
got
up
and
said
the
same
thing
that
counselor
I
wasn't
at
those
meetings
with
you,
councillor
Robinson,
but
I'm
sure
you
said
it
because
we've
all
said
it
here,
and
one
of
the
main
reasons
was
not
only
that
they
made
poor
decisions
but
specifically
that
people
didn't
have
access
to
decision-making.
Well,
they're
right
at
it
again.
D
D
L
So
do
you
do
you
would
agree,
though,
that
it
would
at
least
provide
some
guidance
to
residents
who
have
never
navigated
the
system,
that's
confusing
and
overwhelming,
whereas
the
developers
have
and
have
the
you
know
the
the
money
to
funding
to
do
that
and
the
resources.
So
would
it
atleast
lessen
that
I.
M
M
Yes,
thank
you.
I
want
to
again
stand
up
to
commend
the
counselor
for
moving
this
and
pointing
this
out,
because
talk
about
history
and
the
Ontario
Municipal
Board
I.
Think
at
a
couple
of
decades
ago,
I
moved
to
motion
to
eliminate
the
OMB
took
a
couple
of
decades
to
get
it
done,
so
it
was
finally
done,
but
here
we
are
where
the
public
has
clearly
stated
over
and
over
again,
these
are
Toronto
citizens,
taxpayers
of
all
walks
of
life
in
all
parts
of
Toronto,
I'm
sure
we've
all
run
across
them.
M
The
system
of
dealing
with
a
an
application,
a
committee
of
adjustment
matter,
a
development
application.
You
really
have
to
be
a
Bay
Street
lawyer
to
navigate
the
system.
There
were
some
improvements
made,
but
here
this
is
a
retrogressive
step
where
they're
taking
away
something
that
was
put
in
place,
basically
to
make
it
easier
for
ordinary
citizens
to
be
heard
and
to
basic
present
their
case
to
some
higher
body
so
that
they
could
maybe
have
a
little
bit
of
say
in
their
neighborhood.
M
So
what
this
does
this
slams
the
door
shut
in
their
face
again
and
says
we
don't
want
to
hear
from
you.
You
have
no
place
in
the
planning
approval
process.
That's
going
to
affect
your
neighborhoods.
That's
what
this
does.
They've
shut
down
this
resource
center,
which
basically
meant
that
people
who
didn't
have
a
law
degree
or
weren't
you
didn't
have
a
master's
degree
in
planning-
can
actually
understand
the
mumbo
jumbo
disassociated
with
planning
processes.
M
A
local
planning
issue
is
just
preposterous
that
if
we
can't
give
people
a
bit
of
help
to
essentially
navigate
the
system,
and
so
where
do
they
go
to
and
I
know
some
of
you
have
the
same
situation.
I'm
in
where
you
know,
I've
got
about
a
hundred
development
applications.
I
could
probably
use
one
of
these
specifically
for
my
ward
now,
where
do
I
tell
people
to
go
to
get
help?
Well,
you
can
get
pro
bono
work,
try
and
get
pro
bono
work
and
planning
impossible.
M
So
now
this
has
been
done
again
in
the
dark,
without
consultation
without
public
notice.
The
media
has
not
even
noticed
this,
and
we
at
least
have
to
speak
out
and
let
the
public
know
that
this
is
wrong
and
it's
a
a
door
being
slammed
in
the
face
of
the
citizens
of
Toronto.
These
taxpayers
deserve
to
have
a
system
that
they
can
at
least
understand.
N
Kessler
want
a
man
I
brought
forward
emotion
that
was
strongly
supported
by
this
council
to
support
the
abolishment
of
the
cap
of
the
of
the
Ontario
Municipal
Board,
and
we
worked
really
hard,
along
with
several
community
members
and
several
of
our
colleagues,
to
convince
the
previous
provincial
government
to
make
significant
reforms
to
the
appeals
body.
The
abolish
deal
would
be.
N
Every
time
a
big
developer
goes
to
an
appeal:
they've
got
well
financed,
they've
got
a
well
financed
organization,
they've
got
deep
pockets
and
the
average
resident
isn't
able
to
fundraise,
to
the
extent
that
they're
able
to
to
have
the
same
kind
of
representation.
Doug
Ford
is
now
taking
that
away
and
there's
a
trend
here.
What
he's
doing
with
with
with
with
with
the
L
pad
is
the
same
thing
that
he's
doing
with
this,
what
he
wants
to
do
with
our
subway
lands
and
the
air
rights
and
what
he
wants
to
do.
N
Everybody
would
have
liked
to
do
with
the
Greenbelt.
There's
a
trend
here
where
developers
that
contribute
to
his
campaigns
are
getting
rewards
and
that's
not
the
way
that
our
government
should
be
working.
I'm
really
concerned
about
that.
I
see
a
trend
happening.
We
should
not
have
a
government
that
is
there
representing
developers
for
the
developers
on
behalf
of
the
developers.
N
O
You
very
much
madam
Speaker
I'm,
also
rising
to
in
support
of
councilor
late
news
motion
and
and
also
in
the
recommendation
letter
from
councilor
by
Lao.
So
much
has
already
been
said
by
councilor
mallow
as
well
as
counselor
counselor.
Layton
I
would
just
only
echo
some
of
the
sentiments
and
recognize
that
we
are
in
a
massive
fight
regarding
the
future
of
the
City
of
Toronto.
O
I
said
it
earlier
in
my
remarks,
with
respect
to
the
proposed
items
to
the
the
growth
plan
for
the
greater
Golden
Horseshoe
and
these
introduction
of
the
peasants
and
the
interference
with
the
municipal,
comprehensive
review,
much
of
the
fate
of
the
city
and
how
we
build
in
planner.
Our
city
is
under
attack
and
I
think
that
this
is
happening
incrementally
piece
by
piece:
the
dismantling
of
the
powers
of
the
L
pack,
as
well
as
perhaps
going
back
to
to
the
OMB
or
perhaps
taking
away
land
use
planning
powers
from
the
city
of
Toronto.
O
This
is
all
a
coordinated
and
orchestrated
very,
very
stealth,
movement
that
is
taking
place
and,
and
we
cannot,
we
cannot
defend
the
city's
interest
for
our
neighborhood
interests.
If
we
don't
take
a
coordinated
approach
and
a
stronger
stand
in
how
we
respond
to
the
provincial
government,
when
we,
when
they
do
attack
the
institutions
that
are
created
to
support
local
planning
and
decision-making,
and
it's
important
to
note
that,
of
course
much
has
been
said
by
a
number
of
colleagues
and
those
who
are
actively
reviewing
land
use
planning
matters.
O
O
Ontario
Place
will
be
gone,
the
subways
will
be
gone,
the
Greenbelt
will
be
dismantled,
it
is
coming
and
you
can
see
it
piece
by
piece:
I
love
the
city.
I
know
you
love
this
city
and
we
cannot
think
that
a
bit
here,
shaved
off
and
a
bit
here
shaved
off
is
okay,
because
accumulator
lead
together,
it
is
going
to
dramatically
change
the
way
the
City
of
Toronto
manages
its
land
use,
planning
affairs,
Thank,
You,.
L
Thank
you,
madam
Speaker
I'll.
Just
take
a
minute
to
echo.
Some
of
the
comments
have
been
made
and
just
to
say
how
important
councillor
Layton's
motion
is
I.
Think
it's
one
of
the
most
important
motions
we're
dealing
with
today,
quite
frankly,
because
it's
about
the
future
of
our
communities
that
we
represent.
So
many
of
us
actually
wanted
to
see
the
OMB
fully
abolished.
I
certainly
did
given
the
impact
it's
had
on
the
neighborhoods
I
represent
that
didn't
happen.
L
We
got
a
reformed
body,
the
L
pat
and
one
of
the
one
of
the
good
things
that
came
out
of
this
was
the
Local
Planning
Appeals,
Support
Centre,
and
now
this
is
being
taken
away,
and
this
is
all
about
facilitating
and
helping
regular
people,
navigate
a
very
complex
system
and
very
complex
processes.
So
to
pull
this
piece
out
of
the
puzzle
is
quite
damaging
to
our
neighborhoods
and
so
I
hope
that
we
can
get
full
support
today
for
this
motion,
because
it's
critical
that
this
gets
put
back
in
to
the
puzzle.
L
It
was,
as
I
said,
one
of
the
great
great
outcomes
we
didn't
get
it
fully
abolished,
but
it's
the
the
l-pod
is
here
to
stay,
and
one
of
the
pieces
must
be
that
we
have
this
support
for
our
residents,
who
are
trying
to
navigate
a
very
challenging
process.
So
I
hope
that
you'll
support
this.
This
is
about
this
motion
is
truly
about
neighborhoods
and
the
neighbors
that
we
represent
at
this
table.
Thank.
F
A
G
G
G
G
G
Typing
it
it's
very
simple
amendment,
if
you'd
like
me
to
just
so
the
amendment
is
simply
this:
the
Scarborough
Community
Council
requested
this
information,
a
consultation
with
the
city
manager,
the
TTC
staff,
the
chief
planner
and
executive
directors,
City
Planning
and
Metrolinx
report
back
in
the
second
quarter
of
2019
to
Scarborough
Community
Council,
with
updated
ridership
projections
along
the
proposed
Sheppard
Avenue
East
corridor.
Madam
Speaker,
the
amendment
that
I
presented
in
writing
is
simply
that
this
be
reported
back
to
executive
committee.
That
is
the
pattern.
Transit
is
a
citywide
matter.
G
It's
not
a
community
council
matter.
We
generally.
If
we're
going
to
incorporate
that
many
senior
bureaucrats
into
a
report,
then
we
are
talking
about
something
of
citywide
concern.
That's
what
executive
committee
is
for
and
they
can
disposition
it
from
there
I'm.
Also
adding
madam
Speaker
that
it
should
be
in
the
third
quarter
of
2019,
not
the
second
quarter,
because,
as
you
know,
we're
having
kind
of
a
quiet
time
here
in
March
but
come
April
come
May.
G
We
are
going
to
have
a
very,
very
busy
agenda,
an
executive
and
I,
dare
say
all
the
standing
committees
and
so
I've
simply
moved
it
along
to
give
staff
the
time
to
to
prepare
this
update
and
to
put
it
on
the
agenda
at
a
time
when
it
can
get
due
consideration
so
I'm
simply
amending
it.
Third
quarter
of
2019
to
executive,
as
opposed
to
the
local
community
council.
G
C
A
N
G
A
A
N
Madam
Speaker,
the
South
Hill
residents
as
I,
was
saying:
I've
had
very
legitimate
and
consistent
and
and
really
significant
concerns
about
the
height
precedent
being
being
an
issue
right
in
the
heart
of
a
stable
neighborhood,
where
the
majority
of
homes
are
single-family
dwellings
and
they
don't
want
to
see
Heights,
just
increasing,
increasing
increasing
where
we
do
have
grandfathered.
You
know
higher
higher
level
buildings
in
the
heart
of
the
neighborhood,
so
they
were.
N
N
We
also
worked
very
hard
in
good
faith
with
the
the
applicant
to
arrive
at
a
resolution
that
that
the
planning
staff
and
the
applicant
and
the
residents
could
live
with.
This
has
not
been
an
easy
process.
There
been
a
number
of
early
morning,
late-night
conversations
back
and
forth,
but
we
arrived
and
what
I'm
putting
forward
is
something
that
our
planning
staff
endorsed
the
residents
support
as
a
resolution
and
the
applicant
agreed
to
come
down
significantly
on
the
height
to
address
the
concerns
of
the
community.
N
You
know
when,
when,
when
grown-ups,
when
well-meaning
people
decide
to
arrive
at
a
solution
and
the
solution
is
the
goal
and
the
object
of
a
win
is
not
about
defeating
the
other,
but
actually
arriving
at
a
resolution
that
all
could
at
least
accept,
as
admittedly
imperfect
but
perfectly
workable,
then
we
arrive
somewhere
and
we
can
move
forward.
What
the
community
and
I
recognize
is
that,
with
a
positive
planning
report
for
the
initial
application,
our
chances
I.
N
But
they
showed
a
lot
of
courage
on
behalf
of
their
neighbors
to
be
able
to
be
willing
to
arrive
at
a
resolution,
and
you
know
I
wish
that
this
you
know
wasn't
in
front
of
us,
but
it
is
and
I
think
that
we
made
the
best
out
of
a
very
difficult
situation
and
also
again
want
to
acknowledge
our
planning
staff
for
working
with
us
to
make
sure
that
this
is
something
that
they
could
I
get
behind
as
well.
So
thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
C
A
C
The
there's
a
confidential
attachment
that's
been
circulated.
This
is
some
very
minor
refinements
to
the
staff
report
and
the
changes
are
supported
by
both
planning
and
legal
staff.
So
I'm,
just
moving
the
City
Council
amend
confidential
attachment
one
to
the
report.
February
15
2019
from
the
city
solicitor
accordance
with
the
confidential
attachment
to
this
motion
on.
F
F
F
Usually
when
we
change
alcohol,
the
hours
of
serving
alcohol,
we
do
it
through
committee.
We
have
told
nobody
about
this,
and
extending
the
hours
of
serving
alcohol
is
I.
Think
an
important
community
issue.
There's
no
report,
there's
no
feedback
from
neighborhoods,
there's
nothing
at
all,
and
so
well,
we
cannot
wave.
F
We
cannot
send
this
to
committee
because
we
waived,
we
waive
notice-
and
it's
here
before
us,
but
I'm
not
going
to
support
it
because
I
think
then
we're
when
we're
doing
something
used
to
be
important
when
we
were
changing
the
time,
the
times
of
serving
alcohol,
that
that
we
would
send
it
through
a
process
and
that
we
would
have
a
serious
discussion
and
that's
what
I
want
to
have.
Maybe
the
counselor
would
like
to
bring
it
back
at
a
future
date
to
consider
this
I,
don't
think
on
a
serious
map.
F
You
know
seriously
that
her
constituents
or
any
businesses
are.
You
know
that
their
businesses
are
gonna
are
going
to
close
by,
but
I
think.
Actually
we
shouldn't
deal
with
it
here
today.
It
should
go
through
a
proper
process
and
the
counselor
should
go
to
the
proper
committee
and
present
it
there
Thank.
A
J
Going
to
say
a
speaker
that
this
is,
since
the
the
province
changed,
the
purchase
hours
for
wine
and
beer
in
grocery
stores
to
9:00
a.m.
it
just
seems
very
unfair
that
small
business,
a
small
restaurant
serving
brunch
on
the
weekend,
can't
take
advantage
of
an
earlier
time.
So
we
don't
have
the
right
to
do
that,
but
we
can
ask
the
province
it's
a
fairness
issue
for
me.
J
You
can
buy
marijuana,
you
can
buy
a
bottle
of
wine,
but
you
can't
at
the
same
time
go
and
have
a
glass
of
wine
at
a
restaurant
for
a
brunch.
So
it's
pretty
simple
and
I
do
hope
that
we
can
not
spend
a
long
time
which
we
would
a
committee
with
a
lot
of
clerks
time
reporting,
but
simply
do
this
here
today
and
I
do
take.
You
know,
there's
a
lot
of
brunch
places
everywhere:
there's
lots
of
people
that
are
serving
meals
that
start
their
businesses
early
in
the
day
and
they
end
early.
J
They
never
need
the
two
o'clock
time.
They
never
need
a
4
o'clock
extension
because
they're
finished
they're
finished
at
11:00,
sometimes
they're
finished
just
after
supper,
so
we're
missing
a
whole
number
of
businesses
that
also
need
some
help
in
these
difficult
times.
That's
what
this
is
for.
Thank
you,
I
hope,
you'll
support
it.
Thank.
M
M
That
I,
but
it
did
bring
to
mind
those
and
I,
can
see
the
counselors
talking
about
the
fairness
and
that
and
the
change
in
hours
to
match
the
marijuana
laws
was
done
without
any
consultation
either
they
just
changed
that
overnight
you
can
have
marijuana
in
the
morning.
You
got
to
have
your
now
we're
following
suit
in
terms
of
the
alcohol
extension
which
is
based
on
the
marijuana
extension
hours,
so
the
only
thing
is
sort
of
when
I
looked
at
and
talked
with.
My
colleague
here
from
North
York.
M
Is
that
sort
of
touched
a
nerve
with
me,
because
I've
been
having
some
serious
issues
that
the
speaker
knows
full
well,
and
that
is
that
we,
as
local
councillors
on
behalf
of
our
communities,
have
virtually
no
say
in
the
operation
of
licensed
premises.
They
are
like
a
law
unto
themselves
and
I've
got
a
couple
recently
and
the
speaker
knows
full
well
what
I'm
talking
about
I
have
two
serious
gun,
shootings
coming
from
licensed
premises.
M
M
Disinterested,
never
return
calls!
So
when
I
see
this
extension
taking
place,
it's
not
that
it's
going
to
really
be
the
end
of
the
world,
but
it's
all
part
of
the
community
basic
League
and
the
local
councilors
and
city
officials
have
any
kind
of
controls
or
levers
over
licensed
establishments
when
they
don't
behave
properly
because
95%
of
the
licensed
establishments
don't
give
us
any
trouble,
but
it's
the
5%
that
again,
their
hangouts
they're
doing
drug
dealings,
because
where
there's
guns
and
shootings
there's
drugs
guaranteed,
so
I
I
thought
I
could
get.
M
M
We've
contacted
the
police,
so
it
is
just
very
frustrating
for
the
community
to
say
how
can
that
place
operate
when
there's
people
with
guns
shooting
outside
the
premise
when
they're
selling
drugs
inside
the
premise
outside
the
premise
and
they
have
a
liquor
license,
and
you
can't
do
anything
about
it
now
here
we're
going
to
say:
well,
let's
extend
the
hours,
so
they
could
come
and
start
drinking
7:00
o'clock
in
the
morning
or
whatever
this
thing
here
says
they
got
to
have
their
booze
at
9:00.
Now
you
know
it's
water.
H
M
M
They
can
terrorize
a
whole
strip
plaza
because
one
bad
actor
where
the
drug
dealers
hang
out
and
where
the
guys
with
guns
hang
out-
and
you
can't
do
anything
about
it
and
the
poor
police
officers
are
running
around
trying
to
do
something
costing
them
all
kinds
of
hours
and
they
have
no
way
of
dealing
with
these
people
and
if
they
ever
do
catch
them.
As
you
know,
madam
Speaker
they've
got
to
go
undercover
and
they
may
be
undercover
for
six
months
to
catch
one
bad
actor
and
then
they
go
to
court.
M
You
think
the
courts
take
this
seriously.
They
say:
oh
well,
you
know
the
owner
of
that
premise:
he's
not
responsible
for
the
drug
dealing
and
the
gun
runner's
in
the
restaurant
in
the
bar
says
not
his
fault,
so
who
you
going
to
punish,
because
you
know
the
the
owner
said
and
I've
had
the
case.
I
told
you
I,
don't
quit?
Haven't
you,
madam
Speaker,
where
they
found
a
gun
taped
to
the
back
of.
A
P
Madam
Speaker
I
hadn't
planned
to
speak
on
this,
but
I
guess
a
couple.
Things
have
come
up
that
I
just
thought
I
would
address,
but
also
then
indicating
that
I'll
support
the
motion.
First
of
all,
the
whole
notion
that
we're
sitting
here-
and
this
speaks
indirectly
to
the
point
of
the
deputy
mayor-
the
whole
notion
that
we're
sitting
here
having
a
discussion
about
a
motion
which,
when
you
look
at
what
it
says,
it
just
asks
some
body
somewhere
else
in
some
other
government
about
our
rules
that
we
apply
in
our
sophisticated
large
city
of
Toronto.
P
I
do
want
to
associate
myself
with
with
some
of
the
remarks
of
the
deputy
mayor
in
the
context
of
us
having
to
do
a
better
job,
going
forward
of
things
that
just
sort
of
appear
here
relative
to
the
priority
that
they
represent
relative
to
the
urgency
that
they
may
represent,
and
so
I
think
in
that
sense,
there's
a
point
that
I
hope.
Maybe
the
Governance
Committee
will
take
a
look
at
because
I
think
you
know
what
ends
up
happening.
This
council
meeting
is
a
relatively
light
load
compared
to
other
ones.
P
I
think
this
is
going
on
more
and
more
and
more
and
I
think
it's
not
the
best
use
of
the
council's
time
and
it
doesn't
allow
for
the
kind
of
thorough
examination,
including
public
input
that
that
might
be
received
on
these
things.
So
to
that
extent,
I
think
the
deputy
mayor
is
right.
You
know,
I
will
say
this,
that
this
short
debate-
we're
gonna
have
here
about
this,
far
exceeds
any
debate
that
was
held
at
Queen's
Park
before
they
changed
the
rules
of
the
sale
of
liquor.
P
It's
a
very
fair
point
and
I
think
it
is
something
that
I
think
the
people
who
are
working
hard
in
a
low
margin,
business
called
restaurants
and
hospitality
would
appreciate
us
raising
this
fairness
issue,
as
would
I
think
many
people
who
would
just
like
to
get
one
of
these.
Finally
I
didn't
know
who
to
issue
this
challenge
to,
and
maybe
it
should
be
the
deputy
mayor
just
so
that
he
can
get
practiced
up
with
this.
P
The
actual
of
this
is
a
little
known
fact
that
people
won't
know
here,
but
the
original
name
of
the
mimosa,
which
would
have
been
easier
for
councillor
Cole
to
deal
with
was
Bucks
Fizz
and
I
wanted
to
challenge
the
deputy
mayor
to
get
on
his
feet
and
say
Bucks
Fizz
five
times
fast
and
see
how
that
ends
up
the
drink
was
then,
as
laura.
Has
it
popularized
by
Alfred
Hitchcock
I
have
no
idea
why
that's
relevant
it
probably
isn't.
I
have
no
idea
what
it
means
that
Alfred
Hitchcock
popularized,
Bucks
Fizz,
but
I
just
thought.
P
A
E
I
I
E
I
There
was
a
request
madam
Speaker
made
in
2012
the
flag
raising
again
was
denied
at
point
and
I
point
out
that
the
House
of
Commons
recognized
this
event,
not
through
a
flag-raising
but
through
a
private
member's
motion,
and
likewise
council
has
the
ability
to
recognize
these
world
events
through
a
member
announcement
or
a
proclamation
which
would
be
in
order,
and
certainly
there
are
other
programs
and
services
that
would
enable
groups
like
the
one
making.
This
request
to
commemorate
and
raise
awareness
of
this
event
is.
E
I
E
I
E
B
B
Okay,
has
our
country
and
the
fighters
of
our
country
if
you're
aware
I'd
do
any
one
of
the
staff
if
they
can
answer
this,
these
are
the
people
that
are
fighting
along
you,
nice,
the
ISIS
are
the
our
foreign,
are
our
soldiers,
so
they
were
wearing
the
Kurdistan
flag
on
their
on
their
sleeve.
If
anybody
aware
of
that,
these
are
the
these
are.
These
are
our
soldiers,
men
and
women
that
we
put
in
harm's
way.
Do
they
were
the
Kurdistan
flag
on
their
sleeve
through.
B
B
B
B
Of
our
armed
forces
are
fighting
Isis
in
Iraq
and
in
Syria,
and
they
wear
the
curtain
flag
on
their
shoulder.
The
only
thing
that
the
community
is
asking
that
we
recognize
what
happened
and
the
atrocities
that
were
committed
against
them
by
lying
us
to
raise
the
KRG.
This
is
the
Kurdistan
Region
of
Iraq
flag,
the
KRG
flag
flies
in
Iraq
a
flies
throughout
the
world
in
many
places,
and
for
us
to
do
this
would
only
recognize
the
atrocities
that
were
dealt
against
them.
I
realized
that
we
have
a
policy.
The
policy.