►
Description
Planning and Housing Committee, meeting 10, Novemeber 13, 2019 - Part 1 of 2
Agenda and background materials:
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/decisionBodyProfile.do?function=doPrepare&meetingId=15430
Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUbsUUdIrsY
Meeting Navigation:
0:14:23 - Call to order
B
Okay,
good
morning,
everybody
welcome
to
meeting
10
of
the
planning
and
Housing
Committee
for
those
in
the
room
with
us.
The
screen
at
the
back
of
the
room
provides
real-time
updates
concerning
where
we
are
in
the
agenda
and
what's
coming
up
next,
you
can
follow
the
agenda
and
the
bait
on
your
computer
tablet
or
smartphone
at
WRC
a-slash
council,
and
we
acknowledge
the
land.
We
are
meeting
on.
B
It's
the
traditional
territory
of
many
nations,
including
the
Mississauga's
of
the
credit,
the
Neshoba,
the
Shippo,
a
Oda
Shawnee
and
the
windaq
peoples
and
is
now
home
to
many
diverse
First,
Nations,
Inuit
and
métis
people's.
We
also
acknowledge
that
Toronto
is
covered
by
treaty.
Thirteen
with
the
Mississauga's
of
the
credit.
Are
there
any
declarations
of
interest
under
the
municipal
conflict
of
interest
Act,
seeing
none
can
I
have
a
motion
to
confirm
the
minutes
of
the
October
15
to
tap
2018-19
meeting
councillor
perks,
perks,
all
those
in
favor
that
carries
okay.
B
Let's
now
go
through
the
agenda
item.
One
city
initiated
priority
retail
street
zoning.
Bylaw
amendments
find
a
final
report.
It's
time
for
at
9:45
item
2
housing,
now
777
Victoria,
Park,
Avenue.
Zoning
amendment
final
report
times
for
10:00
o'clock
and
we
do
have
deputies
on
this
item:
item
10.3,
inclusionary,
zoning,
public
consultation,
comments
and
updates.
We
have
speakers,
10.4
amendments
to
chapter
3,
54
apartment
buildings
and
progress,
update
on
rent
safety
yo.
We
also
have
speakers
and
a
presentation
and.
B
B
D
Okay,
my
name
is
Marcie
stone
and
I'm.
A
Toronto
acorn
member
in
our
western
chapter,
I
moved
to
Toronto
three
years
ago
and
live
in
a
one-bedroom
apartment
with
my
daughter
and
my
grandson,
I'm,
a
retired
senior
living
on
a
fixed
income
every
month
who
applied
to
a
senior's
building
in
my
area
as
well
as
Toronto
Community,
Housing
Corporation
for
the
Weston
Road
area
and
both
say
I'm
on
a
waiting
list.
As
far
as
I
understand
it,
the
Toronto
Community
Housing
waitlist
is
at
least
14
years
or
more
I'm,
not
sure
how
often
that's
updated.
D
One
of
the
first
things
I
notice
after
moving
here,
was
how
unaffordable
Toronto
is
to
live.
I,
know
people
that
have
moved
here
and
then
ended
up
moving
back
home
because
they
could
not
afford
to
live
in
Toronto
when
I
see
a
new
development
being
advertised
as
affordable
housing.
I
know
that
it
doesn't
really
mean
it's
affordable.
D
That's
what
I've
grown
used
to
affordable
to
the
city
means
one
thing
and
to
low
and
moderate-income
families.
It
means
something
else
to
me:
affordability
is
rent
gear
to
income
or
subsidized
housing,
not
average
market
rent.
The
definition
of
affordable
needs
to
be
changed
by
policy
at
all
levels
of
government,
as
this
is
not
just
a
crisis
in
Toronto,
but
across
Canada.
The
city
is
quick
to
build
new
condos
on
public
lands,
but
fail
to
listen
to
working
people
who
can't
afford
to
live
in
them.
D
The
airport
you
see
a
lot
of
condos
sitting
around
empty
is
their
public
lands
and
District
five
that
can
be
turned
into
rent
gear
to
income
or
subsidized
housing.
It
seems
that
improvements
or
some
of
the
plans
are
in
the
downtown
areas,
not
the
areas
that
it's
needed.
The
most
I
would
never
be
able
to
afford
to
live
in
an
apartment,
building
and
pay
market
rent
by
myself.
Even
though
I'm
a
retired
federal
government
employee,
even
new
senior
housing
developments
that
are
being
built
in
my
own
neighborhood,
are
not
affordable.
D
D
The
city
needs
to
move
forward
with
inclusionary
zoning
and
to
do
everything
that
they
can
to
ensure
everyone
has
affordable
housing
at
our
monthly
acorn
meeting
in
Weston.
Many
people
share
how
fifty
to
eighty
percent
of
their
income
goes
just
to
paying
the
rent.
So
where
do
you
pay?
How
do
you
pay
for
food?
How
do
you
pay
for
other
things?
D
In
every
new
development,
there
needs
to
be
20
to
30
percent
set-aside
of
affordable
units,
and
a
affordability
needs
to
be
based
on
your
income.
These
units
should
also
be
affordable
forever,
not
just
for
25
years.
All
these
new
condo
developers
in
that
coming
into
the
city,
they're,
getting
wonderful
incentives,
25
years
or
more
that
they
don't
have
to
pay
tax,
but
we
have
to
pay
rent.
We
have
to
pay
our
taxes
and
we're
not
getting
the
services
that
we
require.
The
city
needs
to
act
now
and
move
forward
with
inclusionary
zoning.
D
E
B
E
My
name
is
Josie
we're
I'm
an
eight-core
member
from
East
York
I
was
born
in
Toronto
and
I'm.
A
student
in
my
second
year
of
college
I
can't
afford
to
pay
for
market
value.
Rent
I
live
with
a
friend
who
is
willing
to
charge
me
seven
thousand
two
hundred
for
rent
per
year
for
a
small
room
in
her
house.
I
get
only
nine
thousand
eight
hundred
a
year
from
OSAP.
One
third
of
this
is
a
student
loan.
How
is
it
possible
to
live?
E
I
hear
all
the
time
from
other
acorn
members,
our
meetings
about
the
rent
being
a
major
issue,
people
getting
above
guideline
rent
increases
of
3%
5%
8%,
the
average
cost
of
a
one-bedroom
apart
in
Toronto,
is
1200
$70
a
month.
That's
15,000
a
year,
but
in
my
neighborhood
the
beaches
area,
I
looked
online,
a
1
bedrooms
are
1800
a
month
plus
hydro,
that's
over
21,000
a
year
and
the
highroad
and
the
hydro
just
went
up
before
1980
I
had
never
seen
any
homeless.
People
on
the
street
now
they're
everywhere.
E
There
are
so
many
condos
being
built
all
over
Toronto
and
we
need
inclusionary
zoning
to
make
sure
that
there's
affordable
units
being
built
in
those
condos.
This
is
our
city
and
we
shouldn't
be
allowing
developers
to
take
it
over
low
and
moderate
income.
People
need
to
benefit
from
development,
not
just
the
rich
and
powerful.
E
So
it
seems
like
everyone
in
Toronto
is
an
agreement
with
horns
demands
based
on
this
report.
20
to
30%
of
developments
should
be
set
aside
as
affordable
housing.
The
units
should
be
affordable
forever.
There
should
be
deep
affordability,
and
this
should
happen
all
over.
The
city.
Doug
Ford
is
trying
to
mess
up
inclusionary
zoning
because
he
doesn't
care
about
the
people
just
his
wealthy
developer
friends.
We
need
our
city
councils
to
sign
up
Doug
Ford
and
his
crew
knees
and
keep
moving
forward
every
day
that
inclusionary
zoning
is
delayed.
E
F
The
chair,
my
name,
is
Christine
Abbot
I'm,
a
Toronto,
a
core
member
in
the
East
gr
chapter
I.
Thank
you
for
allowing
me
to
speak
today.
I've
lived
in
Toronto
for
over
50
years
and
in
this
building
nine
and
I
love
my
neighborhood
I'm
attended
at
110
unity
Road,
which
is
a
non-profit,
independent,
living
seniors
building
in
East
York.
My
church
is
here
my
community's
here.
F
My
life
is
here,
and
the
years
I've
lived
here,
I've
seen
such
such
unaffordability
in
Toronto
I
pay
a
thousand
and
sixty
nine
for
rent
in
a
one-bedroom
unit
and
to
have
a
monthly
income
of
twenty
nine
hundred
dollars.
That's
with
three
pensions
I
have
a
number
of
health
issues
that
require
frequent
doctor's
visits
and
a
high
cost
of
medication.
There's
there
is
also
living
and
traveling
expenses
that
I
have
to
cover
as
well.
F
There's
damage
to
furniture
and
clothing.
If
I
move
out
of
my
building
I
wouldn't
be
able
to
afford
housing
anywhere
near
my
community,
it
would
also
mean
that
I
have
to
choose
between
paying
rent
and
not
eating
or
paying
for
medication.
We
need
the
city
to
move
forward
in
inclusionary
zoning
because
we
are
currently
living
in
a
housing
crisis.
Some
of
my
neighbors
have
opted
out
of
taking
medication
every
day
because
they
can't
afford
it
if
they
pay
rent,
that's
unacceptable.
F
This
is
why
we
need
deep
affordability,
so
nobody
has
to
choose
between
being
able
to
feed
themselves
and
their
family,
buying
essential
medication
or
being
able
to
pay
rent
in
every
new
development.
There
needs
to
be
at
least
20
to
30%
of
affordable
units,
and
that
needs
to
be
affordable
forever,
not
25
years.
Market
rent
is
not
affordable
for
myself
and
thousands
of
other
low
to
moderate
income
people
in
the
city.
This
is
why
rent
needs
to
be
geared
to
income,
not
average
market
rent.
F
B
G
Thank
you,
my
thanks
to
the
chair
and
to
the
counselors
for
this
opportunity
to
speak
on
the
matter
of
inclusionary
zoning.
My
name
is
Robert
field
I'm,
the
current
chair
of
the
Federation
of
Metro,
Tennis,
Association
and
I'm.
Also
a
tenant
Association
president
up
in
Dodd
Mills
with
me,
is
Geordi
dent
the
executive
director
of
our
Federation,
so
I
just
had
some
opening
commentaries
to
make.
You
know,
there's
been
a
full
participation
in
in
consultations
etc.
G
The
current
provincial
government
changed
some
of
the
provisions
for
an
inclusionary
zoning,
and
now
it's
only
available
in
certain
areas,
and
my
thoughts
would
be
that
that
should
be
Toronto
wide
because
everybody's
affected
by
this
affordable
housing.
Is
it
emerging
not
just
emerging?
It's
been
around
for
a
long
time
as
an
issue,
and
we
need
to
address
it
so
I'm
asking
of
course,
council
to
take
next
more
steps
on
this
matter.
G
We
were
participants
in
the
consultation
process,
and
that
is
always
an
interesting
scenario
when
you've
got
different
stakeholders
with
different
views
on
the
matter.
We
believe
that
we
should
make.
We
should
build
as
many
affordable
units
as
we
are
required,
not
as
other
stakeholders
may
try
to
minimize,
etc.
There
is
a
lot
of
units
on
the
market
that
would
need
to
be
built.
The
city
report
says
that
only
2%
of
to
the
230,000
new
units
were
designated
as
affordable.
G
Perhaps
that
should
be
somewhere
in
the
nature
of
30
to
35
percent
or
more
so
I
would
ask
you
to
be
looking
at
that.
Another
issue
is
the
length
of
the
period
that
there's
that
covers
this,
and
we
don't
want
that
to
be
a
short
period,
because
I
won't
meet
the
needs
and
I
looked
also
at
the
Boston
report,
where
they
were
looking
at
something
like
50
years.
That
may
be
a
good
start,
but
I'll
leave
that
all
up
to
you,
Geordi
nope,
no
other
comments,
all
of
which
is
respectfully
submitted.
Thank.
H
I
G
I
If
this
province
comes
back
and
says,
here's
the
maximum
you're
allowed
to
do,
and
it's
not
something
that
city
council
or
the
members
of
acorn
or
the
city
at
large
thinks
is
enough
to
address
the
affordability
crisis
that
we
have
in
housing
in
our
city.
Do
you
think
we
have
much
recourse
given
the
province
would
have
just
passed
regulations
telling
us
what
we
could
do
well.
J
Can
tell
you
that
I,
you
know
I
hear
a
lot
of
times
from
various
councillors
in
Toronto,
City
Council,
that
there
are
things
you
can
try
and
I
only
mentioned
that,
because
it's
a
crisis
there
are
maybe
extreme
measures
or
difficult
measures
or
measures
that
put
might
put
you
into
conflict
with
the
province,
but
I.
Think
in
our
opinion,
that's
what
you
do
during
a
crisis
because
people
dying
on
the
streets,
it's
not
a
status
quo.
You
can
accept.
J
H
J
H
J
H
J
J
J
H
B
B
B
K
L
K
B
M
M
Given
that
I
think
there's
a
strong
feeling
in
the
community
and
hopefully
around
the
council
table
that
we
need
to
be
moving
as
swiftly
as
humanly
possible
to
be
implementing
inclusionary
zoning
and
as
bill
108,
unfortunately
imposed.
There
are
several
legs
to
that
process.
Now,
all
of
which
require
us
to
be
moving
quickly
and
bringing
pieces
of
the
puzzle
in
place.
We
need
to
be
identifying
protected
major
transit
areas
where
we
can
do
inclusionary
zoning
under
bill
108.
There
is
policy
direction
that
needs
to
go
to
staff.
To
begin
to
draft
the
bylaws.
M
There
are
draft
bylaws
that
need
to
be
developed
that
need
to
reflect
content.
That
shows
what
it
is
that
the
community
really
wants
from
this.
All
of
this
requires
several
steps
in
the
process
and
delaying
the
beginning
of
that
process
means
missing
out
on
2,400
units
a
year
every
year,
as
that
process
moves
forward
waiting
for
bill.
108
regulations
is
in
that
context,
not
a
great
idea.
M
There
is,
as
far
as
we
can
see,
no
deep
compulsion
on
the
part
of
the
province
to
move
forward
with
those
regulations
swiftly
and
give
the
City
of
Toronto
clear
guidance
around
inclusionary
zoning.
They
have
gone
a
considerable
period
of
time
already
without
issuing
issuing
those
regulations
and
though
those
regulations
will
be
a
useful
part
of
doing
that
work.
M
That
we've
had
a
conversation
about
the
report
in
front
of
you
lays
out
in
fairly
compelling
detail
what
the
community
said
about
the
existing
policy
direction,
and
it
said
very
very
clearly
that
temporary
affordability,
the
25-year
affordability
that's
been
proposed,
is
not
a
great
idea.
The
community
was
not
alone
in
that
the
City
of
Toronto
invited
to
the
YWCA.
Last
week,
the
Commissioner
of
housing
for
New,
York
City,
who
said
almost
word-for-word,
do
not
pursue
temporary
affordability
periods.
M
You
should
never
have
to
recommit
the
same
affordable
units
over
and
over
and
over
again
she
was
a
great
speaker
and
a
wonderful
guest
and
deeply
insightful
and
I
encourage
you
to
take
her
advice.
The
community
encouraged.
It's
the
same:
deeper
affordability
was
another
thing
that
both
the
commissioner
of
housing
from
new
york
city
and
the
community
talked
about
very
very
clearly.
Inclusionary
zoning
can
work
in
a
lot
of
different
ways.
M
M
And
last
but
not
least,
there
is
a
deep
feeling
that
we
should
be
moving
as
New
York
City
does,
as
most
us
jurisdictions
that
use
inclusionary
zoning
due
to
thinking
about
affordability
in
terms
of
what
people
can
actually
afford.
Not
what
landlords,
rent
for,
and
so
an
income
based,
affordability
measure
would
be
a
huge
help.
We
do
know
that
inclusionary
zoning
doesn't
work
if
the
development
industry
comes
to
a
screeching
halt.
M
108
isn't
going
to
change
that,
even
if
it
sets
different
levels
of
cost
for
other
community
contributions,
we
are
going
to
continue
to
need
to
be
sensitive
to
a
changing
environment
of
what
developers
can
afford,
and
so
there
really
isn't
an
impediment
to
moving
forward
right
now
with
inclusionary
zoning
strategies,
even
if
the
province
of
Ontario
decides
to
drag
its
feet
and
not
bring
those
regulations
forward.
Thank
you.
H
M
Not
been
creating
a
lot
of
our
GI
units
there,
there
are
tools
that
you
can
use
to
create
units
that
are
accessible
to
people
at
income
levels
that
are
typical
of
people
in
our
GI
units,
at
least
the
higher
end
of
that.
But
you
do
have
to
get
down
to
roughly
40%
of
Amr,
which
is,
is
a
very,
very
low
cost.
It's
a
cost
that
basically
has
to
eliminate
almost
the
entire
cost
of
the
original
development.
So
it's
it's
it's
tricky
to
do,
but
you
do.
H
M
H
M
And
that's
exactly
what
the
Commissioner
of
housing
from
New
York
City,
but
you
need
to
do
is
vary
the
set-aside
to
get
more
depth.
If
you
want
more
depth,
then
you
have
to
give
up
some
volume.
If
you
want
more
volume,
you
have
to
give
up
some
depth
and
all
I'm
mentioning
is
that
that,
right
now
in
the
City
of
Toronto,
the
people
most
profoundly
affected
by
this
are
the
people
who
need
deeply
affordable
housing,
and
so
we
cannot
ignore
them
in
the
inclusionary
zoning
bylaw.
It
would
be
a
huge
mistake
that.
M
H
M
H
H
Unit,
not
in
our
GI,
so
if
indeed
the
province
does
have
that
ability
to
create
new
RG
eyes.
Should
that
not
also
be
a
focus
on
the
province,
I,
don't
know,
there's
only
63,000
I,
don't
think
that's
changed
in
years,
and
yet
we
have
a
much
greater
population
and
a
much
greater
need.
Is
there
anybody
you're,
aware
of
that
is
campaigning
to
increase
our
GIS
so.
M
The
folks
that
have
been
working
on
inclusionary
zoning,
the
housing
issues
group
that
meets
in
Toronto
monthly,
also
was
intervening
on
the
villa
108
policy
and
has
been
intervening
with
the
minister
of
housing
to
try
and
press
for
a
housing
policy
that
actually
reflects
the
real
needs
of
people
who
are
struggling
in
the
housing
crisis.
Bill
108
did
not
achieve
that.
The
response
from
Minister
Clark
was
frankly
inadequate
to
what
the
community
was
asking
for.
M
It
was
helpful
in
a
couple
of
areas,
mostly
technical
areas
around
how
affordable
housing
is
managed,
but
did
not
make
what
is
the
fundamentally
most
important
thing
about
addressing
the
housing
crisis,
which
is
meaningful
public
investments
in
the
construction
of
units
that
are
purpose-built
rental,
affordable
units?
However,.
N
H
M
M
In
fact,
to
a
large
extent
does
what
we're
finding
and
if
you
talk
to
most
managers
of
rents,
ups
and
most
affordable
managers
who
don't
have
the
bricks-and-mortar
is
that
the
availability
of
units
that
you
can
apply
rents
up
to
an
RG?
I
RG
I
funding
to
is
pretty
limited
and
if
we
don't
actually
increase
affordable
supply,
an
increase
in
rents,
ups
or
IDR
GI
funding
is
going
to
be
very
challenging
to
apply.
M
M
H
H
M
M
Been
working
with
a
residence
group
that
has
been
creating
a
community-based
strategy
for
the
Golden
Mile
to
add
to
articulate
that
the
needs
for
and
the
goals
for,
affordable
housing,
but
also
other
kinds
of
community
benefits
they
meet
at
the
Working
Women's
hub
in
Victoria
Village,
a
fantastic
group
of
very
mobilised
residents
who
are
are
raising
exactly
the
issues
you're
describing
because,
as
you
say,
yes,
we
critically
need
those
affordable
units
in
all
of
the
places
where
we're
densifying
this
and
the
Golden
Mile,
certainly
one
of
them.
How.
M
H
H
I
You
very
much
I'm,
so
staff
we're
proposing
that
we
wait
until
the
province
comes
out
with
their
regulations
and
then
sort
of
reconvene
our
work
as
on
the
on
an
inclusionary
zoning
policy.
What
faith
do
you
have
that
the
province
will
set
a
rate
or
or
allow
the
municipality
to
actually
achieve
anything
through
its
ins
inclusionary
zoning
policy
to
towards
some
of
the
goals
that
the
housing
organizations
of
Toronto
are
trying
to
achieve?
I
haven't.
M
Seen
a
lot
of
indications
from
the
province
of
Ontario
that
suggests
that
they
are
eager
or
in
any
kind
of
a
hurry,
to
give
the
City
of
Toronto
the
tools
it
needs
to
be
able
to
implement.
Inclusionary
zoning
and
I
do
think
that
there
is
room,
even
under
the
current
reg
and
under
the
current
legislation,
for
us
to
get
a
lot
of
the
homework
done
and
and
in
fairness
to
the
planning
staff.
M
O
You
and
thank
you,
Sean
I,
think
everyone
in
the
rooms
in
agreement
that
the
the
goal
is
to
get
to
long,
permanent
affordability
and
and
deep
affordability.
I
think.
Maybe
we're
arguing
about
tactics
here
and
I
wanted
to
ask
you
so
you're
aware
that
when
the
City
of
Toronto
does
approve
an
inclusionary
zoning
bylaw,
it's
appealable
to
the
new
OMB
yeah?
O
M
O
M
No
quite
the
inverse
right
now
and-
and
this
is
entirely
on
the
province-
the
the
way
they've
structured
things.
There
are
a
lot
of
legs
to
this
process.
The
more
legs
there
are,
the
better
it
is
to
get
rolling
early
to
find
it
major
transit
stations
that
we
want
to
start
with.
Get
them
identified
decide
what
our
overall
policy
direction
is
going
to
be
get
that
nailed
down
begin
to
draft
a
bylaw.
If
we
wait
till
108
regs
come
out
and
then
begin
that
work,
that's
gonna,
be.
O
M
A
P
B
K
We
all
want
to
get
this
right,
as
the
summary
of
the
consultations
released
last
week
highlights.
Most
of
us
have
been
involved
so
far,
and
many
more
will
be
getting
involved
in
the
coming
months
as
we
finally
get
to
hone.
The
official
policy
plan
want
to
maximize
the
amount
of
affordable
housing.
This
city
can
require
of
future
developments.
I
echo
many
of
the
recorded
deputations
to
come
when
I
say
it's
exciting.
To
know
this
will
mean
a
lot
higher
proportion
of
affordable
housing
and
new
developments
than
the
old
policy
directions
recommended.
K
The
feasibility
assessments
you
commissioned
along
with
Steve
Pomeroy
is
excellent.
Corroborating
study
make
it
clear
that
developers
and
land
owners
could
still
enjoy
a
decent
profit
if
we
require
20
and
in
some
cases,
30%
affordable
units
in
most
condo
developments.
All
over
the
city-
and
we
could
even
make
some
of
those
units
affordable
to
those
quite
low
income
communities
who
need
it
most.
So
that's
a
whole
lot
of
affordable
housing.
We
could
be
adding
to
our
stock
and
relatively
quickly
if
we're
serious
about
making
the
most
of
inclusionary
zoning.
K
There
are
so
so
many
applications
in
the
pipeline
right
now
with
so
much
opportunity
for
the
next
year
or
two
alone.
We
really
can't
delay
it
makes
one
realize
how
crucial
a
time
this
is,
for
you
all
to
stand
up
and
loudly
explain
to
Doug
Ford
and
the
whole
province.
There
is
no
way
Toronto
or
any
municipality
should
sit
with
their
tails
between
their
legs,
as
he
crushes
our
eyes,
ed,
to
only
apply
to
a
tiny
portion
of
our
cities.
K
I
know
that,
just
as
you
and
other
councillors
fought
so
inspiringly
against
Ford's
retroactive
cuts
and
one
back
funding
for
our
city's
public
health,
childcare
and
other
essential
services,
and
just
like
you're
gonna
fight
for
and
win
against
his
next
round
of
cuts
to
those
and
other
an
Oakland
ishutin.
We
all
want
to
see
you
make
Ford
back
down
on
his
plan
to
crush
I,
said
I
a
comb
any
advocates
around
our
city
when
I
request
that
you
keep
moving
forward
with
a
made
in
Toronto
inclusionary
zoning
program.
K
Don't
ask
planners
to
put
this
I
said
process
on
hold
to
wait
for
what
could
be
many.
Many
monks
before
all
the
gags
that
Ford
wants
to
bind
our
city
with
are
spelled
out
in
bill
wanna,
wait.
We
want
you
to
push
forward
and
call
his
bluff
I,
don't
even
think
we'll
see
the
details
of
the
cops
they're
gonna
place
on
the
so
called
community
benefits
or
the
details
on
the
diameters
of
the
transit
zones
anytime.
Soon,
that's
not
in
Fords
interests.
K
He
doesn't
want
to
get
into
another
fistfight
with
municipalities,
especially
not
the
905
and
outer
reasons
which
really
care
about
this
changes.
And
it's
not
like
we're
asking
you
to
waste
planners
time
or
city
resources
and
moving
ahead
with
drafting
official
plan
policies
if
they
prepare
the
feasibility
study
and
outline
it
for
us,
even
if
it
gets
batted
down
in
half
a
year,
we'll
have
at
least
forged
ahead
with
much
the
work
that
needs
to
be
done
to
implement
a
made
in
Toronto
izd
policy.
K
Let's
keep
moving
forward
to
remind
Ford
and
the
rest
of
Toronto
what's
at
stake
and
will
be
damned
if,
after
decades
of
advocating
for
a
tool,
we
need
more
than
ever
a
tool
which
most
of
our
peer
cities
have
been
using
for
decades
is
going
to
be
ripped
from
our
hands
right
at
the
finish
line.
Now
the
first
time
I
ever
defeated
here
was
a
year
and
a
half
ago
when
the
Wynn
administration
had
released
its
draft
izd
policy
regulations,
they
were
terribly
respective
and
though
I
was
nervous.
I
came
out
and
cheered.
K
K
This
provincial
governments,
starting
to
look
like
it,
wants
one
even
less
so,
please
seriously
consider
the
deputations
I
have
the
pleasure
of
introducing
you
today
and
push
forward
the
fight
and
continue
a
winning
against
his
domineering
province
right
now,
when
hundreds
of
thousands
of
lower
honto
nians
needed
to
implement
these
powers
more
than
ever
so
I'm
gonna
plug
in
some
videos,
and
if
you
can
say
like
a
moment,
but
there
are
five
minutes
each
and
there
are
three
of
them.
So
we
don't
want
to
waste
that.
A
A
D
Everyone,
my
name,
is
Beryl
alarm
and
I
live
in
the
park
community.
For
the
past
25
years
and
one
of
the
things
I
observed
my
community
that
there
are
more
than
one
family
members
living
in
a
two
and
three-bedroom
apartment
because
they
can't
afford
to
live
in
their
own
individual
apartment
because
they
just
can't
afford
to
later,
but
they
just
aren't
making
enough
money,
whether
you're
working
for
minimum
wage
or
they
making
18,000
our
or
they
are
an
odious
team
of
Ontario
Works.
My.
D
Q
A
N
O
G
K
A
A
portable
housing
in
the
most
area
is
a
city,
I,
think
zone
II
what
it
across
the
entire
city,
not
only
in
certain
neighborhoods
in
certain
areas,
ripple
housing
that
includes
all
levels
of
financial
ability,
from
an
average
income
low
income
and
for
those
who
are
at
risk
of
homelessness,
and
we
need
Lutz
housing.
A
variety
of
housing,
size,
1,
2,
3
bedrooms,
not
only
bachelor.
Q
K
B
Q
I'm
Karl
my
live
I'm
living
with
bipolar
and
I'm
attending
Ryerson
University.
To
obtain
my
Bachelor
of
Commerce
degree.
Affordable
housing
is
important
to
me
because
I
have
a
limited
and
low
income.
I
have
calculated
that
to
afford
one-bedroom
apartment
today.
One
must
make
at
least
$75,000
a
year
I'm
paying
only
578
for
per
month
for
a
one-bedroom
unit,
because
when
I
moved
here,
a
relative
of
mine
owned
the
building,
so
I
was
able
to
get
paid
out
about
about
that
market
price
right
so
that
price
so
below
market
value.
Q
Q
That,
where
I'm
living
right
now,
the
new
landlord
I
have
a
lighting
fixture
that
needs
I
told
to
to
get
to
replace,
because
the
lighting
fixture
is
is
not
giving
adequate
light
and
they
haven't
responded.
The
landlord
hasn't
responded
as
I
suspect
that
the
landlord
would
rather
have
me
move
out,
so
he
can
renovate
it
and
offer
the
apartment
at
the
current
market
value.
Q
So
that's
what
I'm
suspecting
so
so
right
now
I
receive
ODSP,
which
is
about
eleven
hundred
dollars,
but
need
to
borrow
five
hundred
interest
free
money
from
my
my
uncle
every
month
to
live
comfortably.
So
that's
like
sixteen
hundred
dollars
a
month
that
I
can
live
fairly
comfortably
with,
but
it's
getting
it's
getting
more
expensive.
Now
everything
in
Tehran
is
getting
expensive,
especially
food,
so
I'm
more
and
more
needing
to
rely
on
places
that
give
free
meals.
Q
Keeping
up
with
this
changing
economy
is
very
challenging.
So
I
recommend
that
all
levels
of
government
provide
more
supports
to
help
me
overcome
the
challenges
that
I
face
and
make
so
any
affordable
for
affordable
units
in
this
city.
So
I
can
move
around.
You
know
in
my
career
I
can
move.
You
know
where
I
need
to
close
to
close
to
work
right
so
close
to
work.
So
thank
you.
Thank.
B
L
Hello,
hello,
my
name
is
Anitha
Tessa
Portillo
I
work
as
the
community
benefits
organizer
with
Part
L
people's
economy
at
Parkdale
activity,
recreation
center.
We
published
the
Part
L
community
benefits
framework
in
November
2018
a
17
month,
long
participatory
planning
process
from
which
minimum
standards
for
equitable
development
in
the
areas
of
decent
work,
affordable,
housing,
affordable
commercial
space,
community
assets,
an
equitable
equitable
process,
were
articulated.
L
The
party'll
community
benefits
framework
follows
this
work
by
centering
communities
that
have
been
historically
and
continuously
economically
and
politically
marginalized
and
centering
value
and
community
driven
processes.
I
would
like
to
take
this
opportunity
to
share
the
affordable
housing
inclusionary
unit
recommendations
put
forward
in
the
party'll
community
benefits
framework
as
minimum
standards
for
equitable
development.
L
All
private
residential
development,
less
than
8
storeys
be
required
to
build
a
minimum
of
20%
permanently
affordable
housing
on
the
total
number
of
units,
and
not
simply
the
density
increase
out
of
those
inclusionary
units.
We
recommend
20%
be
accessible,
30%,
be
2
bedrooms,
10%
be
three-bedroom
units.
The
framework
also
recommends
that
the
inclusionary
units
include
a
range
of
affordability.
L
Depths
40%
be
deeply
affordable,
supporting
community
members
on
fixed
incomes,
shelter,
allowance
or
rent
gear
to
income,
30%
be
very
affordable
from
60
to
80
percent
average
market
rent
and
30%
be
affordable
from
80
to
a
hundred
percent
average
market.
Rent
I
see
from
the
citywide
consultation
and
communication
summary
that
the
committee
has
taken
note
of
the
public's
disappointment
with
the
inclusionary
zoning
policy
directions
that
were
proposed.
L
The
attack
on
tenant
rights,
increasing
homelessness,
increasing
food
prices
and
decreasing
availability
of
decent
work
with
living
wages
require
decisive
and
courageous
action.
I
emphasize
I
empathize,
with
the
difficult
position
councillors
find
themselves
in
bill
108
in
particular,
the
implications
of
the
new
called
the
new
so-called
community
benefits.
Authority
is
a
looming
unknown.
L
K
Wanted
to
quickly
conclude
by
saying
in
May,
there
was
a
Toronto
Star
a
tackle.
It
came
out
that
we
were
all
very
that
reflected
the
city's
excitement
that,
against
the
looming
threat
of
bill
108
the
councillors
here
and
notably
Anna.
You
said
that
we
are
gonna
forge
ahead
and
we
can't
wait
the
the
two
years
or
more,
that
this
would
set
us
back,
and
there
was
a
poll
done
within
that
actual
within
the
article
that
showed
that
only
a
fifth
of
Torontonians
would
have
disagreed
with
on
that.
K
R
Yes,
then,
thank
you
for
the
deputation
I'm,
sorry
that
the
the
audio
video
didn't
work
at
this
point
in
time,
but
but
your
your
presentation
was
very
coherent,
I
think
it's
very
powerful.
The
messages
is
that
we
need
to
move
with
greater
urgency
and
I
believe
what
you're
saying
is
don't
slow
down.
Is
that
correct?
Yes,.
L
R
K
Correct,
thank
you.
That's
correct
and
explicitly
there's
a
second
round
recommendation
of
two
that
says
the
committee
directed
city
planning
report
staff
report
back
at
the
earliest
possible
date
with
draft
Izod
Official
Plan
policies,
once
provincial
regulations
on
the
new
community
benefits
Authority
have
been
issued,
I
would
like
that
part
to
be
reductive.
We.
R
R
Is
the
concern
that,
if
we
stand
back
and
wait
for
the
regulations
from
the
province
to
be
issued,
first
will
be
then
negotiating
from
a
position
of
weakness
as
opposed
to
forging
ahead
and
saying?
This
is
what
the
City
of
Toronto
and
its
residents
have
stated
it
wants,
and
this
is
what
we
will
stand
to
fight
for.
Yes,.
L
We
have
to
confront
this
gesture
of
compliance
and
have
making
us
feel
as
though
we
have
to
fit
into
a
predetermined
box
that
someone
is
telling
us
from
above.
So,
yes,
we
need
to
take
a
strong,
courageous
position
forward
and
really
reflect
the
needs
and
what
the
community
and
community
consultations
have
been
indicating
and.
R
You're
suggesting
an
alternative
route
is
to
regardless
of
whether
what
what
the
outcome
of
the
regulations
are,
the
details
we
will
sort
out
later
is
that
we
should
still
draw
that
line
in
the
sand
and
say
these
are
the
things
in
the
eysie
policy
that
we
must
have,
and
this
is
what
we
must
stand
and
fight
for,
regardless
of
what
the
regulations
will
say,
which
which
could
end
up
gutting.
The
draft
Official
Plan
policies.
K
It
wouldn't
be
going
on
the
back
step
because
you
want
to
be
moving
forward
with
a
maiden
Korando
inclusionary
zoning
policy.
Even
when
these
bums
get
kicked
out
in
two
years
and
I.
Don't
see
that
as
as
being
a
waste
of
our
resources
to
boldly
move
forward.
But
to
know
what
Toronto
wants
for
inclusionary
zoning
and.
R
Will
this
give
us
an
opportunity,
assuming
that
we
take
your
course
of
action
to
to
socialize
the
the
details
of
the
eysie
policy
to
go
out
to
communities
to
tell
them?
This
is
what
we
need
to
stand
and
fight
for,
recognizing
that
there
will
be
a
fight
ahead
of
us.
Does
that
give
us
that
opportunity
if
we
are
clear
about
what
it
is
that
we
want,
because
right
now,
those
of
us
were
in
the
room
and
who've
been
hit
paying
attention
to
this
report.
R
We'll
know
what's
in
the
report,
but
the
details
are
still
not
before
us,
not
even
from
the
province,
but
we
haven't
sorted
out
those
details
internally,
yet
is
it?
Does
it
give
us
a
better
RB
in
a
stronger
fighting
position,
despite
the
fact
that
this
is
a
day
bit
and
Goliath
fight,
but
are
we
even
a
stronger
David
if
we
put
the
policies
out
first,
I
think.
L
You're
right,
if
we
put
the
policies
out
first
and
draw
that
line
in
the
sand,
what
we'll
be
doing
is
actually
having
meaningful
consultation
with
folks
and
because
they
will,
the
policies
will
be
actually
reflecting
what
people's
needs
are.
If
we
wait
until
bill
108
comes
forward
and
try
to
socialise
the
eysie
afterwards,
it'll
be
a
policy,
that's
foreign
to
folks
here
in
the
community,
and
it
doesn't
reflect
their
needs,
so
it
wouldn't
make
much
sense
and
we'd
be
much
more
powerful
to
situate
ourselves
and
ground
ourselves
in
people's
real
lives.
Real
lived
realities,
yes,.
K
H
I,
don't
know
you're
aware
that
when
the
city
owns
land
and
it's
part
of
a
development
that
we
have
an
ability
to
basically
undertake
our
own
inclusionary
zoning,
have
you
been
aware
of
any
of
those
where
the
city's
owned
any
land
and
you've
been
able
to
intervene
to
get
affordable
housing
into
a
development
in
your
area
or
any
other
areas
of
town?
Well,.
K
In
our
area,
we,
just
after
many
years
had
the
city
buy
an
lcbi
site
ran.
My
understanding
is
that
there's
a
good
chance,
we're
gonna
get
all
social
housing
on
that
for
playing
with
with
mental
health
chatons
forty
units,
so
we're
really
excited
about
the
next
step
and
and
absolutely
I
think
that
all.
H
To
talk
about
that,
do
you
do
you
support
1.5
as
a
so-called
affordable
housing
target.
As
you
know,
that's
the
proposal
on
key
side
for
supposedly
forty
percent
affordable
and
that's
to
have
1.5
percent
of
affordable
rent.
So
it
wouldn't
just
be
80.
It
would
be
a
one
and
a
half
times
the
affordable
I'm.
Assuming
you
don't
support
that
as
a
model
I,
don't.
K
Think
we
need
a
trillion
dollar
surveillance
firm
to
help
us
build
the
affordable
housing
that
we
we
already
know.
We
can
build
I
think
we
need
to
be
building
up
our
cooperative
housing
sector
and
our
nonprofit
developers
to
make
use
of
the
precious
assets
we
have
and
I
think
that
among
many
other
sites
is
a
great
opportunity
to
begin
doing
so
so
you're
aware.
H
H
L
B
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
I
I
do
have
a
couple
of
questions
so
other
when
I
talk
to
people
from
other
cities,
one
of
the
things
that
they
keep
advising
us
is
the
financial
model
that
it's
the
most
important
thing,
because
in
order
to
get
units
in
as
part
of
the
inclusionary
zoning,
we
need
to
have
buildings
being
built,
and
so
things
have
to
be
physical.
Are
you
aware
that
we
have
to
provide
a
financial
feasibility
impact
study
as
part
of
this
by
law?
I'm.
K
B
The
what
I've
heard
from
staff
is
that
they
would
like
to
know
what
the
Community
Benefit
charge
is
going
to
be
to
calculate
that
properly
to
take
as
much
for
us
for
affordable
housing
as
possible.
Would
you
agree
that
that
is
a
wise
thing
that
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we
take
as
much
as
we
possibly
can
you
know
it's
that
font,
that
middle
line
that
you
need
to
push
push
until
you
can't
no
more
that
what
do
you
want
us
to
do?
I'm.
B
K
N
My
name
is
Loretta
and
I
am
currently
an
acorn
Scarborough.
Member.
Approximately
ten
years
ago,
I
lived
in
a
condo
for
almost
14
years,
where
I
brought
up
my
kids
in
a
great
neighborhood
with
other
condo
owners.
We
thought
we
were
condo
owners,
what
we
were
rudely
until
we
were
rudely
renovated
and
given
repair
costs
of
fifteen
to
eighteen
thousand
on
top
of
our
rent
to
pay
before
two
years,
most
of
our
small
condo
neighborhoods
could
not
afford
this
and
our
homes
were
stolen.
In
this
way
it
was
a
slow
and
painful
process.
N
N
Apparently,
it's
written
into
the
law
that
the
landlords
can
just
tell
us
that
we
can
that
they're
fixing
things,
and
then
we
have
to
move
where
am
I
going
to
move
next
time
that
will
be
affordable
and
where
are
all
the
ladies
and
my
friends,
apartment
building
at
birch,
mound
and
Finch,
going
to
move
that
is
affordable,
the
landlord
of
their
building,
putting
new
elevators
new
lobby
floors,
new
windows,
etc,
nothing
wrong
with
the
old
ones,
but
now
it's
new
and
the
rents
for
these.
Ladies
and
their
families
are
going
up
next
year.
N
The
increase
is
almost
a
thousand
dollars.
How
is
this
a
safe
environment
for
anyone?
I
can
attest
from
personal
experience
that
the
stress
is
devastating,
while
just
waiting
for
the
axe
to
fall,
it's
the
same
as
being
in
a
hurricane,
but
the
end
result
dragging
my
belongings
to
a
shelter
so
acorn
and
myself
are
urging
you
to
keep
up
to
keep
working
on
inclusionary
zoning,
so
human
beings
in
Toronto
can
actually
live
affordably.
Thank
you.
So
much
for
listening.
N
H
C
So
I
know
that
you
get
what
we're
talking
here
about.
I
know
that
you
really
care
but
I
going
to
say
my
spiel
is
still
even
though
I
know
that
you
I
know
that
you
understand-
and
we
know
that
you
understand
but
I
know
you're
very
concerned,
or
many
of
you
are
very
concern
what
the
province
is
going
to
say
for
the
Velo
ahead,
but
I
going
to
tell
you
something
that
there's
no
measure
by
numbers
is
they
will
be
not
the
city
as
a
whole
as
a
soul.
C
C
We
are
in
a
city
right
now
that
is
lacking
a
hope.
I
come
in
from
Bogota
I
see,
do
12
million
people
and
what
I
see
if
we
don't
care
right
now.
This
is
what
is
going
to
happen
to
Toronto.
What
is
happening
right
now
in
Bogota
is
cows.
Why?
Because
there's
a
lot
of
gentrification,
because
housing
people
were
separated
to
the
outs
of
the
city
because
didn't
have
the
money
to
pay.
C
So
if
we
don't
do
this,
inclusionary
zoning
right
we're
going
to
suffer
in
the
future
and
I
know
that
you
are
very
sensible
and
you
say
well,
if
we
don't
do
it,
how
we
see
that
the
and
our
premier
are
going
to
always
respecting
what
we're
going
to
hot
0,
but
I
prefer
or
we
prefer
at
this
point
on
time
we
have
been
softening
so
much.
We
prefer
that
you
go
with
all
your
strength
and
do
it
right
so
I
could
have
been
involved
with
I
see
since
2005.
C
We
have
been
in
all
consultations
since
that
time
now
I
see
had
become
campaign
very
dear
to
our
heart
and
for
telling
you
a
truth.
I
only
had
a
one
child,
but
I
see
become
my
second
child.
The
problem
is
that
we
push
we
push,
but
this
baby
doesn't
come
out
in
the
way
that
we
want
it.
So
we
know
that
the
city.
Do
you
like
to
hear
that
we're
in
a
crisis?
But
again
we
had
to
see
this?
Is
a
crisis
and
and
I
know
that
the
sense
he
will
seem
to
do?
C
We
know
that,
since
it
will
seem
to
do,
is
to
take
advantage
of
the
e
I
see
to
a
max.
So
we
did
a
public
consultation
or
you
guys
did
a
public
consultation
and
the
public
consultation
agree,
and
these
three
points
that
Akon
has
been
pounding
all
the
tiny
knees
that
we
need
this.
These
are
the
time
who
shall
be
forever.
C
The
IC
shall
be
applied
to
a
whole
entire
building,
not
only
to
a
density,
and
the
percentage
should
be
between
twenty
to
thirty
percent,
and
the
consultation
doesn't
show
really
what
how
much
was,
but
we
don't
know
it's,
because
maybe
it
was
bigger
than
thirty
percent.
This
is
why
you
don't
show
it
I,
don't
know.
What
is
that
reason?
But
we
are
asking
between
twenty
to
thirty
percent
or
the
IC.
C
C
C
No
questions
I,
say.
B
H
I
want
to
ask
a
question
again
and
I'm
sure
you'll
tell
everybody
about
the
run
of
Ixion's
meetings,
because
there's
people
here
worried
about
staying
in
their
housing
as
well
as
making
sure
we
build
new,
affordable
housing,
and
you
know
that
many
of
the
rents
that
people
are
paying
are
more
affordable
than
new,
affordable
housing.
But
I
just
want
to
ask
you
about
how,
while
we're
waiting
for
this
to
roll
out,
how
strong
should
the
city
be
about
our
properties,
city-owned
properties
or
agency,
owned
properties
where
they're
going
to
go
into
a
new
development?
H
H
Have
housing
now
sites
there's
been
how
we
can
achieve
that
on
right
now
on
properties
that
we
have,
whether
they're
TCH
see
properties,
whether
they're
TCC
properties,
whether
they're
Toronto
parking
authority
properties,
whether
they're
city
direct
properties?
We
have
an
ability
there.
If
a
developer
wants
to
build
something
to
insist
on
certain
things,
should
we
insist
strongly
on
affordable
housing
on
those
sites
of.
C
Course
we
should
actually
we
had
their
double
power
using
it,
because
it's
our
land,
its
and
really
and
truly
what
is
going
to
happen
is
that
the
developer
is
only
going
to
make
5
percent,
but
it's
in
Ireland,
so
they
normally
do
twenty
percent.
Well,
let's,
let's
do
five
percent
it's
time
that
they
really
get
a
little
bit
because
they
have
been
taken
and
taken
from
us.
So
it's
time
that
they
get
a
little
bit
more
and
yeah
I
agree
that
we
should
get
a
stronger
with
the
affordability
and.
H
We
should
have
our
staff
focus
very
strongly
when
they're
looking
at
planning
applications,
whether
it's
in
Scarborough
Etobicoke,
North,
York,
Toronto,
East,
York
on
that
concept,
city
property
include,
affordable
housing
as
part
of
the
development
or
don't
sell
it
totally
agree.
So
would
you
be
surprised
to
hear
at
Toronto
parking
authority
that
we
can't?
Would
you
agree?
This
can
never
happen
again,
that
a
five
storey
garage
on
Cumberland
was
sold
to
a
developer.
There's
a
40-story
and
a
60-story
building
a
hundred
stories
that
site
and
not
one
affordable
unit
was
placed
there.
C
H
Are
you
watching
all
the
development
applications
that
come
in
well
make
sure
that
if
it's
partly
city
land
is
somebody
doing
that,
keeping
us
going
to
Community,
Council
and
Scarborough
and
other
places
and
watching
to
say,
increase
city
land
increase,
make
sure
you
put
enough
affordable
housing
on
there,
because
once
it's
gone,
it's
gone
so
I'm,
just
gonna
count
on
all
you
folks
to
really
watch
closely
doesn't
have
as
much
to
do.
This
is
our
own
internal
inclusionary
zoning.
While
we're
getting
this
other
piece
right,
we
have
to
get
this
right
very.
C
S
C
I
Thank
you
very
much,
just
just
a
couple
questions
to
confirm
the
time
line,
because
it
seems
to
only
go
back
on
the
on
the
chart
here
to
2018.
In
2010
there
was
an
update
given
to
council
about
inclusionary
zoning
in
2015.
Inclusionary
council
instructed
staff
to
start
preparing
a
bylaw
for
inclusionary
zoning
in
preparation
of
the
province,
correct.
I
A
I
F
A
F
I
I
A
A
I
A
I
A
Think
that
I
would
frame
it
as
that
understanding
that
direction
from
the
province
in
terms
of
bill
108
in
the
community
benefits
charge,
is
critical
to
us
being
able
to
go
back
and
update
our
pro
forma
analysis
in
terms
of
all
of
the
inputs
that
we
put
into
our
Pro
Form
analysis
for
inclusionary
zoning
for
us
to
understand
where
there
may
be
opportunities.
Okay,.
R
Thank
you
with
respect
to
some
of
the
early
comments
that
have
come
from
the
community.
There
seems
to
be
a
gap
between
what
the
community
has
said
largely
and
what
the
staff
are
then
drawn
as
a
conclusion.
So,
for
example,
the
affordability
period
members
of
the
community,
through
public
consultation,
said
that
they
want
to
have
the
longest
period
possible,
many
of
them
suggesting
99
years
or
permanent
affordability.
The
staff
have
come
back
and
said
the
units
remain
affordable
at
25
percent.
R
A
Actually
haven't
before
a
recommendation,
yet,
as
you
may
recall,
our
policy
directions
from
May
we're
25
years,
we've
undertaken
very
robust
consultation.
We
did.
The
the
majority
of
people
gave
us
feedback
that
they
wanted
longer,
preferably
permanent,
affordability
and
again,
as
we
go
back
now
and
revisit
all
of
those
comments
and
all
of
the
the
feedback
that
we
got
and
we
input
that
interpret
for
my
analysis,
we're
sort
of
have
to
push
and
pull
on
all
these
different
things
we
heard.
So
we
have
no
final
recommendation
K.
So
we.
T
R
Then
to
clarify,
then
there
could
be
a
big
shift
in
what
was
originally
proposed
in
the
policy
direction
and
where
staff
will
ultimately
end
based
on
the
consultation
outcomes.
Is
that
correct,
that's
correct,
and
so,
if
the
draft
policy
does
go
back
out,
even
within
the
absence
of
1:08
recognizing
that
you
do
have
some
numeric
holes
that
you
have
to
plug
into
your
perform
abut?
Let's
just
say
you
could
you
could
probably
take
an
educated
guess
of
what
the
development
Lobby
is
asking
the
province
for
best
worst
case
scenario
for
the
residents?
R
What
could
be
a
best
case
scenario
based
on
the
things
that
we
believe
could
help
us
bridge
that
affordability,
housing
gap
and
then
somewhere
in
between
the
most
likely
case?
Let's
just
say,
you
were
able
to
use
the
the
computers
in
a
way
that
would
give
you
some
projections
on
educated,
informed
guests.
Does
that
mean
if
you
went
out
with
those
scenarios
that
you
could
still
solicit
feedback
from
the
community
on
the
Giraffe
proposal?
The
draft
policy
to
ask
the
community
to
respond
to
the
perhaps
three
or
four
options?
A
R
They
don't
want
inclusionary
zoning
at
all,
like,
let's
just
assume,
that's,
what's
going
to
come
out
and
the
he
says:
that's
that's
a
model
we
absolutely
reject,
but
you
given
they've,
given
you
some
very
clear
indication
of
of
how
they
prefer
around
the
best
case
and
most
likely
case
scenario.
We
still
need
to
go
back
out
to
do
further
consultations.
What
you're
saying
so
they'll
be
the
third
third
round.
F
Threw
the
chair,
perhaps
I,
can
add
to
this
assuming
in
terms
of
some
timelines.
Assuming
the
province
comes
forward
with
its
regs,
this
fall.
We
will
go
back
and
do
the
financial
analysis
that
we
need
to
do
to
be
supportive
of
the
direction.
We're
going
we're
going
to
take
the
comments
that
we
received
through
the
consultation
and
then
we're
going
to
come
back
with
very
policies
that
reflect
what
we've
heard.
R
T
F
I
would
suggest
one
of
the
pieces
of
work
that
we
will
continue
to
events
which
is
protected
major
transit
station
areas,
because
this
is
one
of
the
areas
that
we
have
to
where
we
can
apply
inclusionary
zoning.
So
we
will
continue
to
advance
that
piece
of
the
framework,
because
that's
a
crucial
component,
because
we
can
only
apply
inclusionary
zoning
within
the
PMT
essay,
which
is
approved
by
the
minister
development
permit
system
or
where
the
minister
directs.
So
we
will
continue
to
advance
that
piece
of
the
framework
in
the
interim.
So.
R
O
Thank
you.
I
just
want
to
pursue
what
councillor
Wong
Tam
was
asking
a
little
further,
so
we
did
a
model
we
brought
in
some
consultants
to
do
a
model
when
we
envisioned
that
there
would
be
inclusionary
zoning
citywide.
We
could
just
draft
her
own
bylaw
right,
yes,
yeah
and
that
model
looked
at
the
sensitivity
of
the
market
in
different
parts
of
the
city,
and
if
you
put
this
kind
of
cost
on
you,
you
know
you
would
stop
development.
He
didn't
put
that
much
cost
on
the
development
would
go
ahead
and
you
get
the
unit's
right.
O
O
Of
the
variables
in
that
model
were
things
like
the
percentage
of
affordability,
the
period
of
affordability
and
the
depth
of
affordability.
Right,
yes,
could
we
based
on
the
consultation
that
has
been
provided
to
us
where
the
public
has
told
us.
We
want
more
permanent
affordability
and
deeper
affordability.
Could
we
apply
those
changes
to
that
model
and
present
to
us
a
council,
a
sense
of
how
many
units
of
what
type
we
could
have
got
if
we
had
been
able
to
do
the
citywide
by
law.
T
On
more
can
I
just
stop
you
plan
can
I
just
supplement
that
I
think
I
heard
you
say,
council
and
I
think
I
think
the
question
was
about
running
some
models
which,
if
you're
thinking
that
that's
information
that
you
would
want
at
the
next
council
meeting.
First
of
all,
this
report
isn't
headed
to
the
next
council
meeting.
So
we
would
likely
need
some
time
with
our
consultant
team
to
run
those
models.
I.
A
H
A
So
we're
in
the
process
right
now
developing
a
work
program
on
our
Mt
SAS
and
bringing
forward
PMT
SAS
in
terms
of
what
we've
achieved
across
the
Eglinton
crosstown,
we
have
the
in.
Through
the
Don
Mills
crossing,
we
were
able
to
secure,
affordable
housing
on
the
large
site
that
has
come
through
so
far
in
that
secondary
plan
area
and
through
the
Golden
Mile
secondary
plan
area.
Right
now
that
that
work
is
being
advanced
and
that
work
is
not
finalized.
Yet
so.
H
H
T
These
are
the
existing
tools
that
we
have
to
secure.
Affordable
housing
be
happy
to
do
that,
and
then
I
would
just
add
that,
as
the
eysie
policy
and
approach
comes
online
in
the
next
year
or
so
you,
you
expect
that
the
city
would
be
looking
at
its
major
transit
station
areas
and
updating
various
planning
frameworks
to
make
sure
that
we
have
the
ability
to
use
that
tool
across
the
the
geography
of
the
city
where
the
province
permits
it
to
be
used.
So.
H
H
A
H
There
are
no
deputation,
so
I'm
just
going
to
go
back
to
the
chief
planner
six
to
nine
preliminary
reports.
That
means
six
to
nine
large
sites
20%
on
each
site.
Would
you
be
willing
to,
as
you've
mentioned,
perhaps
through
the
chair
of
the
committee
gather
together
those
who
are
interested
in
that
20%
what
the
sites
are
and
the
preliminary
reports,
so
they
would
be
ready
to
engage
at
Scarborough
Community
Council
when
those
came
forward.
H
Read
there's
22,000
units
that
are
in
the
pipeline
on
Eglinton
eath,
so
quickly
that
would
be
4,400,
I
think
yes,
affordable
units
that
would
be
targeted
on
Eglinton
East
minimum,
and
if
you
have
that
undertaking
then
I
think
I'll
probably
move
something
or
try
to
the
the
deputies
here,
after
figure
out
how
you
can
get
your
briefing
and
I'll
speak
about
that
when
I
speak.
Thank
you
thank.
S
There's
been
a
lot
of
questions
are
just
gonna
clarify
a
couple
things
I
think
what
we're
hearing
from
the
deputations
and
folks
today
is
that
we
don't
want
to
take
a
back
seat
while
the
province
is
working
on
the
regulations
and
the
parameters
around
the
community
benefit
charges.
It
sounds
like
we're.
Gonna
see
some
motions
related
to
that,
so
maybe
to
the
chief
planner.
S
T
As
staff
have
indicated
to
the
chair
in
answers
so
far,
and
certainly
that's
been,
the
the
direction
since
2018
is
to
advance
in
every
possible
way
our
readiness
for
implementing
the
inclusion,
zoning
power
I'm
sensitive
to
taking
up
the
time
on
your
your
time,
but
I
do
have
an
explanation
of
three
critical
pieces
that
are
legislatively
or
from
a
regulatory
point
of
view,
required
here
to
literally
stand
up,
inclusionary
zoning
three
legs
of
that
stool.
So
I'm
happy
to
do
that.
But
I'm
sensitive
to
other
questions.
You
may
have
well.
S
Yeah,
no
I
think
that's
fine,
the
basically,
where
I'm
going
is
you
know
whatever
the
CBC
amount
is?
Is
there
a
range
of
CBC
values
or
scenarios
that
we
can
prepare
for
to
help
advance
the
policy
work
now?
But
if
you
want
to
think
about
that
and
then
address
your
three
pillars,
that
would
be
great
and
that's
it
for
me.
So.
T
A
We
can
look
at
various
scenarios
absolutely
and
to
try
to
get
a
sense
of
the
the
sensitivity
of
different
of
different
components
of
an
Isaac
framework.
But
again
they
still
at
the
end
of
the
day,
would
be
sort
of
scenarios
or
possibilities
that
would
need
to
be
reconfirmed
once
the
regs
came
out.
I'm.
Sorry
I
didn't
quite
hear,
though,.
S
Okay,
so
I
have
like
a
lot
of
basic
questions
initially
about
what
are
those
discussions
like
with
the
province
like
I
would
think
that
right
now
at
the
table,
there's
a
discussion
where
here's
sort
of
the
scenarios,
here's
where
we
might
land
here's,
what
we're
contemplating
for
a
CBC
framework
and
then
I
would
think
that
you
would
be
able
to
take
those
sort
of
scenarios
and
run
the
analysis
on
that
to
inform
our
thinking
on
this.
But
that
isn't
the
case,
and
you
know
I
didn't
want
to
go
down
that
rabbit
hole.
It.
T
Wouldn't
characterize
it
as
an
iterative
discussion:
okay,
there's
no
ongoing
discussion.
There
is
we're
waiting
for
regulations
to
be
published.
We've
we
formally
provided
input
as
have
municipalities
across
the
province,
including
large
misspell,
is
like
Mississauga
and
Hamilton.
Who
would
been
in
direct
conversation
with
about
our
approach,
but
it
it
is
a
period
of
you
know.
We
comment
and
we
write.
We
wait.
Okay,.
T
Yeah,
so
if,
if
I
may,
through
the
chair,
the
it's
important
literally
to
stand
this
up-
that
we
consider
a
couple
of
matters
and
I
appreciate
it's
complicated,
and
this
is
certainly
with
full.
You
know
empathy
to
the
issues
that
have
been
raised
today,
but
it
is
imperative
that
we
consider
these
things.
One
is
the
the
major
transit
station
areas.
People
have
heard
that
I
said
can
only
be
deployed
in
major
transit
station
areas
and
or
or
in
an
area
where
there
was
a
development
permit
system.
T
S
T
Secondly,
for
for
izd,
as
we've
heard,
we
are
developing
a
an
eyes,
II
official
plan
amendment
that
will
set
out
in
detail
the
approach
and
councillor
wong-tam,
for
example,
asked
questions
about
how
we're
evolving
that
that
direction
to
reflect
consultation.
That
OPA
ultimately
would
come
here
and
it
it
to
would
be
sent
to
the
province.
However,
it's
yet
it
can
be
appealed
to
the
L
Pat
by
the
province.
So
there
again,
whatever
this
city
decides
the
city
council
decides,
would
be
subject
to
appeal.
T
Thirdly
and
importantly,
each
and
every
protective
management
station
area,
major
transit
station
area,
or
maybe
maybe
bundles
of
those
we
would
deploy
the
izd
in
in
those.
So
you
can
imagine
us
deploying
I,
said
in
a
grouping
of
transit
station
areas
around
Yonge
and
Eglinton,
for
example,
or
in
the
Golden
Mile.
Each
of
those
isay
bylaws
would
be
subject
to
ministerial
appeal
to
the
L
pad
so
with
each
legs
of
the
stool
or
each
legislative
or
regulatory
steps
that
this
city
has
to
take.
T
They
are
all
subject
to
some
variety
of
either
ministerial
and/or
referral
to
the
L
pad,
so
it
is
a
highly
conditioned
process
that
we
have
to
go
through,
and
that
is
why
we
have
emphasized
to
you
that
we
need
as
a
critical
input
on
understanding
a
clear
understanding
of
the
community
benefits
regulations,
because
the
financial
feasibility
and,
ultimately
the
you,
know
the
argument
that
we're
going
to
put
forward
our
best
foot
forward
rests
on
the
the
the
good
work
that
we
can
do
to
defend.
It
wit,
together
with
our
financial
impact
consultants.
T
H
T
We
will
be
highlighting
in
that
report
completions
in
2019
and
our
work
program
work
work
in
progress,
I
think
we
can
try
to
identify
in
all
of
those
various
studies
where
we're
undertaking
an
opera
or
where
there
is
an
opportunity,
if
you
will
for
an
engagement
on
affordable
housing,
I
think
that's
something
that
we
can
try
to
facilitate.
So
we
will
include
something
like
that
in
our
January
report.
So.
H
H
H
So
then,
we'll
also
do
that
create,
so
that
would
perhaps
they
could
be
here
as
well.
There's
lands
that
they
have.
There
are
small
portions
of
lands
that
are
out
there.
That
agencies
have
that
are
included
in
a
development
application
like
I'm
just
going
to
mention.
838
Broadview
is
one
there.
Our
city
has
one
acre
of
land
at
key
side.
That
still
is
our
acre
of
land.
So
what
would
our
requester
requirement
be
around
affordable
housing?
H
There
I,
don't
think
we've
articulated
that
I'm,
just
letting
you
know
what
I'm
gonna
ask
at
from
their
annual
report,
because
I
understand
there
is
great
in
Treme,
be.
This
is
my
speech,
but
you
can
include
a
number
of
these
things.
The
question
you
can't
include
a
number
of
these
things,
plus
options
that
we
would
have
in
order
to
achieve
them.
T
Through
the
chair
are
the
emphasis?
Are
they
the
nature
of
our
of
our
work
program
report
is
identifying
planning
studies
and
other
initiatives
underway
by
the
City
Planning
Division
I
would
suggest
that
you,
this
could
be
supplemented
by
a
request,
I
think
radio
board
meeting
for
a
similar
kind
of
ask
for
lands
that
are
being
engaged
in
in
development
that
are
under
the
auspices
of
create
tío
or
the
city's
real
estate
division.
That
might
be
a
better
way
of
getting
at
those
other
than
through
the
city
plantings
work
program,
so.
H
Just
to
clarify,
perhaps
you
might
like
a
letter
for
me
to
clarify
exactly
I'm
looking
for
Ike
sent
to
you
and
create
EO,
but
we
have
a
number
of
identified
sights
on
Eglinton.
There
may
be
a
number
of
identified
sites
for
the
Ontario
Line
and
where
are
they?
What
are
in
play
right
now,
where
there's
bloomin
area
reports?
What
planning
staff
would
do?
Those
are
not
create
teo
sites?
Am
I
right,
those
are
privately
owned.
That's.
T
The
chair
might
be
able
to
provide
some
commentary
again.
Our
January
report
emphasis
is
on
the
work
program.
It's
not
on
the
hundreds
of
development
applications
that
we
have
across
the
city,
so
I
think
where
we
have
a
large
development
operation
else.
I'll
identify
another
one.
Mr.
Christie's,
for
example,
we
are
deploying
our
existing
policy
framework,
so
we
would
be
looking
at
the
large
site
policy.
I.
Think
Kerry
wants
to
comment
as
well.
F
H
Would
come
to
this
committee
because
it's
employment
convert?
Yes,
it
should,
and
therefore
anyone
who
has
signed
up
for
inclusionary
zoning
today
would
be
advised
of
that
application
coming
forward
in
order
to
express
their
strong
opinions
about
adding
affordable
housing
on
these
large
sites
through.
H
T
J
You
but
I,
but
I
what
I,
what
I
thinking
very
clearly
through
the
comments
and
the
feedback
that
we
received
from
residents
from
across
the
city
with
respect
to
inclusionary
zoning
is
that
this
is
about
inclusionary
zoning.
But
it's
really
bad
affordability
and,
if
I
z,
is,
is
a
tool
to
be
able
to
enable
us
to
achieve
more
affordable
housing
in
the
city.
And
there
are
many
more
you
know.
J
So,
yes,
this
is
about
Isay,
but
it's
also
about
affordability,
and
how
do
we
make
this
city
more
affordable
for
the
majority
of
our
residents?
How
do
we
get
there?
Well,
yes,
we
need
to
have
committee
meetings
like
this
in
council
meetings
and
have
discussions
about
what
we
are
arguing
for
and
demanding
and
requesting,
but
ultimately
in
councilor
bradford
alluded
to
this
earlier,
and
this
is
why
I
wanted
to
speak
to
continue.
The
I
think
momentum
that
we
have
towards
achieving
a
city
charter,
because
what
do
we
keep?
J
What
is
the
wall
that
we
keep
finding
our
heads
being
bashed
against?
We
have
to
ask
the
province
for
virtually
every
single
thing
that
we
want
to
do
when
we
had
the
recent
tribulations
with
respect
to
the
unilateral
public
health
and
child
care
cuts.
It
was
all
about
with
the
province,
would
either
giveth
or
taken
away
when
our
election
was
ripped
up
in
the
midst
of
it.
J
It
was
about
what
the
province
would
wanted
to
do
on
a
whim
and
I
could
just
point
to
so
many
other
examples
of
where
we
keep
coming
to
the
same
problem.
We
spent
so
much
energy
and
effort
having
these
discussions
here
at
City
Hall,
but
really
the
province
is
going
to
do
what
they
want
to
do.
We
can
put
pressure,
but
ultimately
it's
their
decision.
So,
yes,
we
need
to
fight
for
inclusionary.
Zoning
I
would
like
to
see
it
far
greater
than
five
percent
I'd
like
to
see
it
go
far
further
than
transit
nodes.
J
I
would
like
to
see
any
area
of
our
city
where
a
new
build
is
going
to
happen,
be
subject
to
inclusionary
zoning
so
that
we're
not
begging
builders
to
be
considerate
to
how
people
need
to
live
in
their
affordability.
But
we're
just
saying
this
is
the
way
it's
going
to
be.
This
is
how
we're
gonna
plan
our
city.
These
are
the
people
we
are
serving
and
that's
the
way
it's
going
to
be.
We
don't
have
that
power,
so
I
hope.
J
While
we
are
asking
for
more
abilities
to
implement
inclusionary
zoning,
we
also
at
the
same
time,
need
to
be
demanding
that
we
have
the
powers
of
the
city
level
to
provide
real
local,
accountable
government
so
that
we
don't
keep
coming
to
the
same
frustration
in
the
same
situation.
Over
and
over
again.
Thank
you.
I
Thank
you
very
much:
more
affordability,
deeper
affordability,
longer
affordable
term.
Yes,
that
is
what
we
heard
from
the
community
when
we
did
out
when
we
went
out
and
did
public
consultation.
That
is
what
we
heard.
The
city
needs.
I.
Think
all
of
us
know
that's
what
the
city
needs.
The
reality
is
for
the
last
20
years.
The
city
has
been
waiting
to
implement
inclusionary
zoning,
certainly
at
least
the
last
ten
years
before
many
of
us
were
city,
councilors,
counselor,
counselor,
Vaughn,
put
forward
a
motion
saying
give
us
an
update,
2010
right
before
the
election.
I
I,
don't
think
that
update
was
ever
given,
but
he
asked
for
it
and
then
we
had
an
election
in
2015
council
gave
direction
to
say,
prepare
an
inclusionary
zoning
policy
so
that
when
the
province
moves,
we
can
enact
it
now.
The
the
past
provincial
government
didn't
do
us
any
favors
in
this
regard,
they
waited
to
the
end
of
a
two-year
majority
term
to
first
pass
a
set
of
recommendations
that
wasn't
good
enough,
and
many
of
us
fought
very
hard
to
get
them
changed
and
then
they
passed
regulations
with
such
a
high
bar.
I
We
still
haven't
been
able
to
to
meet
them
in
about
a
year
and
a
half
because
of
the
studies
that
were
required.
We
weren't
able
to
achieve
what
the
bar
the
province
had
set,
but
at
least
they
were
allowing
us
to
do
more,
because
this
provincial
government
is
narrowing
it
so
much
the
possibility
of
us
implementing
a
policy
that
will
make
a
difference.
I
I
Eventually
our
our
regulation,
our
bylaw,
will
have
to
fit
the
provincial
model
it
will
have
to.
If
we
want
to
implement
it,
it
will
have
to,
but
I
don't
think
that
we
should
wait
to
let
the
government
tell
us
the
paper,
the
picture
we
want
to
paint.
We
should
paint
that
picture
ourselves
and
if
they
want
to
take
away
if
they
want
to
take
away
affordable
units
and
have
us
continually
miss
this,
the
the
potential
twenty
five
hundred
units
a
year,
I
missed
the
second
round
of
questions,
I'm
sure
they
got.
I
This
is
what
is
possible
and
then
have
the
province
do
what
they
will
do
and
we
can.
We
can
go
on
fighting
to
try
to
make
our
policy
a
reality.
I
was
I
was
happy
to
hear,
though,
and
and
I
know
that
we
had
experts
down
from
Boston
and
New
York
City
and
I
had
heard
that,
while
using
these
financial
models
are
critical,
it's
our
job
as
elected
officials
to
push
that
to
say
it's
not
just
about
the
bottom
line
of
the
developers.
I
It's
also
about
how
much
a
city
values
and
puts
an
emphasis
on
building,
affordable
housing
and
New
York
City
their
construction
didn't
die
as
a
result.
We
have
more
cranes
in
the
sky,
yes,
but
no.
The
construction
of
units
did
not
stop
in
New
York
City.
When
council
went
beyond
when
their
council
went
beyond
what
was
being
recommended
by
staff
and
and
pushed
that
that
bit
of
an
extra
mile,
so
I
don't
think
we
can
afford
to
wait
for
the
province.
I
B
O
You
I'd
like
to
begin
by
moving
a
motion
to
direct
the
chief
planner
executive
director,
City
Planning,
to
report
the
Planning
Housing
Committee
on
February
12
2020
on
the
potential
number
of
units
and
level
of
affordability.
That
may
have
been
achieved
by
an
inclusionary
zoning
policy
based
on
the
pre
108
policy
framework
and
the
P
feedback
received
through
the
public
consultation.
O
O
We
are
in
a
crisis
in
the
City
of
Toronto.
It
is
the
single
biggest
crisis
facing
us
as
a
government.
Many
say
it's
our
transit
system.
Many
say
that
you
know
it's.
It's
our
childcare
system,
no
having
a
decent
life,
begins
with
a
decent
place
to
live.
This
is
the
fundamental
problem
facing
us
as
a
city
as
a
community
and
as
a
government,
and
we
have
been
working
on
a
range,
a
suite
of
tools
next
month.
O
We
expect
to
see
a
big
policy
piece
on
what
we're
going
to
do
generally
in
terms
of
affordable
housing
in
the
City
of
Toronto.
We've
established
a
subcommittee
to
work
on
trying
to
prevent
renovations
from
happening
and
we'll
be
discussing
that
soon,
but
there
was
also
a
piece
around
inclusionary
zoning
and
we
had
been
working
through
as
councillor
Layton
said,
a
path
to
getting
there
on
the
path
to
getting
there.
We
had
a
conversation,
we're
planning
staff,
gave
some
initial
advice.
O
We
need
to
challenge
that
the
way
that
we
challenged
the
province
going
after
public
health
and
the
province
going
after
child
care,
the
difference
being,
though,
when
the
province
is
taking
away
something
we've
already
got.
We
can
say
it's
this
many
dollars.
It's
this
many
childcare
spaces.
It's
that
public
health
thing.
O
What
we
lack
here
is
a
clear
picture
of
what
bill
108
took
away
from
the
future
of
Toronto
and
if
the
Premier
of
Ontario
is
gonna
run
around
telling
everybody
I've
learned
my
lesson:
I'm
a
nicer
guy,
now
I,
listen
to
people,
I
I,
I,
reverse
my
cuts,
I'm,
not
the
big
ogre
that
this
Toronto
City
Council
said.
I
was
then
we're
going
to
have
to
prove
it.
We're
gonna
have
to
put
it
right
in
the
face
of
the
premier.
This
is
what
you
took
away.
O
You
took
away
a
system
that
would
have
produced
this
many
housing
units
every
year
into
the
future.
Yeah.
We
need
that
information
now
I've
been
told
it's
a
it's
a
difficult
proposition
to
just
run
it
in
a
week,
fair
enough,
we'll
give
the
staff
till
February,
and
even
if
the
province
comes
out
with
their
regulations
before
February
we're
not
going
to
settle
the
question
of
inclusionary
zoning
by
then,
because
there
will
be
developers
who
push
back
against
whatever
we
do
and
we'll
be
in
a
process.
O
We
also
need
to
make
it
clear
to
the
mayor
of
Toronto
that,
just
because
you
cut
a
deal
on
transit
doesn't
mean
we
have
a
kinder
gentle,
pervert
gentler,
provincial
government.
A
kinder
gentler
provincial
government
would
actually
develop
policies
that
house
two
people
in
the
City
of
Toronto,
so
we
need
as
a
council,
to
have
this
information
in
front
of
us.
So
we
can
have
a
clear
fight,
a
clear
fight
about
what's
wrong
with
bill
108
about
whose
interests
are
being
protected
by
the
provincial
government
and
what
Torontonians
want
for
their
city.
H
I'm
gonna
move
motion
that
planning
and
Housing
Committee
direct,
the
chief
planner
and
executive
directors,
City
Planning
in
collaboration
with
create
tio2
report
to
the
Planning
and
Housing
Committee
on
February
12
2020
just
happens
to
be
more
hearing
about
these
units
with
a
list
of
large
sites
or
other
sites
where
affordable
housing
could
be
created,
using
our
current
and
available
tools,
and
that's
our
official
plan
tools
and
our
land.
So
I'm
happy
to
speak
with
you
later
and
let
you
know
everything
that
I
think
should
go
there.
H
This
is
a
bigger
housing
question
that
we're
talking
about
today.
If
bhooshan
rezoning
is
one
piece
but
I
just
want
to
say
that
the
crisis
that
were
in
to
me
right
now,
the
city
needs
to
find
its
way
through
to
messaging
the
provincial
government
about
run
evictions,
because
the
number
of
people
who
are
being
renovated
by
that
we
cannot
build
housing
as
fast
as
landlords
can
renovate
tenants
and
it's
wrong
so
to
build
the
housing.
You
start
with
an
application.
H
You
go
there's
four
or
five
years,
think
of
the
number
of
people
that
will
be
run
evicted
or
a
four
or
five
year
period
in
our
city.
It's
number
one
for
me
to
find
a
way
to
keep
people
in
their
home
those
many
of
them
longtime
tenants.
Those
are
still
affordable,
rents
at
Logan,
245
people
are
paying
$900
a
month.
The
landlord
wants
to
charge
guess
what
$2,400
a
month
after
a
renovation,
shame
this
cannot
be
happening
in
our
city.
H
We
do
not
have
all
the
tools,
but
this
is
a
place
to
go
with
the
Ontario
government,
the
Landlord
and
Tenant
board.
They
can't
simply
be
approving
renovating
people
out
of
their
long
term
homes
and
people
need
to
know
they
have
the
right
to
go
back
at
a
similar
rent
and
people.
Don't
know
that
so
I
get
very
upset
about
renovations,
so
I
want
everybody
here
to
come
again
on
November.
The
20th
at
7
o'clock
hear
your
stories.
Give
us
your
advice.
Let's
have
a
plan
to
deal
with
that.
Okay,
are
you
with
me?
H
So
that's
immediate,
there's,
also
a
number
of
other
immediate
things
that
are
taking
place
and
I
want
you
all
to
be
involved
in
that
here
today.
Those
are
the
11
housing
now
sites
which
we
have
a
report
coming
up
later
for
7777
Victoria
Park,
the
city's
sites,
where
we
own
that
land
outright
and
create
tío
is
doing
the
negotiations
is
for
50%
affordability,
that's
much
greater
than
any
inclusionary
zoning
50%
have
to
be
affordable
and
then
we've
reduced
it.
H
So
a
whole
number
of
them
must
be
at
40%
of
average
market
rent
which
you've
talked
about
today.
This
is
11
sites
of
our
land.
I
want
you
to
be
part
of
this
really
important
process,
because
this
is
actually
building
their
applications
out
there.
The
next
thing
is
those
lands
that
we
heard
about
today.
Those
lands
that
are
on
the
transit
line,
the
lands
where
there's
22,000
houses
in
the
pipeline.
H
Where
there's
preliminary
reports,
that's
a
planning
term
that
are
at
Scarborough,
Community
Council,
where
we've
heard
from
the
planners,
nobody
has
gone
there
to
talk
about
affordable
housing.
Will
you
go
to
Scarborough
and
talk
about
affordable
housing?
Yes,
we
need.
You
our
chair,
is
going
to
organize
something
for
you
with
the
chief
planner
in
order
to
understand
exactly
where
we're
at
and
what
you
can
ask
for.
Those
are
real.
Those
are
applications.
Those
are
to
be
built.
H
22,000
units
using
the
city's
Official
Plan
is
4000,
affordable
homes
on
a
transit
line,
I
think
it's
worth
fighting
for.
I
hope.
You
agree
with
me.
So,
let's
move
on
all
fronts
forward.
Every
front
possible
for
housing,
stop
the
run.
Evictions,
the
ones
that
are
currently
in
the
pipeline,
build
the
housing,
build,
affordable
housing
and
get
a
good
inclusionary
zoning
as
best
as
we
can
from
a
government
that
doesn't
really
care.
Thank
you
everybody
for
coming
here
today
and
let's
keep
going
there's
more
to
do.
Thank.
R
H
Would
be
create
geo
and
thank
you
for
asking
that,
because,
when
I
took
over
the
Don
Somerville
site
from
the
former
counselor,
there
was
no
new,
affordable
housing
on
that
site.
No
hundred
units
not
easy
everybody's
breaking
through
to
a
new
place,
and
yes,
I
expect
every
bit
of
city-owned
land
where
there
can
be
affordable,
housing
to
be
reported
on
and
counselor.
You
know
very
well
that
TCH
see
has
now.
The
development
function
will
go
to
create
tio.
So,
yes,
they
will
report
on.
R
H
When
I
would
anticipate
to
see
that
listed
as
30
percent
above
the
20%,
that
council
has
that
was
a
motion
council
supported
that
I
may
and
on
key
side,
which
is
our
one
acre.
We
really
do
control
that
I,
don't
know
about
the
other,
but
we
should
have
a
pretty
good
discussion
on
if
one
and
a
half
times
average
market
rent
is
something
we
would
be
supporting
at
this.
R
And
is
the
expectation
also
to
see
staff
report
back
on
any
potential
joint
ventures
that
the
City
of
Toronto
may
have
with
respect
to
cold
development
if
we're
in
conversations
around
building
schools,
together
with
with
the
TDSB
or
TC
dsb,
that
that
should
also
that
should
also
be
captured
in
there
along
with
hydro
lands,
provincial
lands?
No,
no
just
all
city-owned
lands,
I
think
that
we.
H
R
H
My
expectation,
okay,
well,
that
would
include
the
large
sites
which
does
include
all
of
our
Portland's
and
one
acre
isn't
a
large
site,
but
that
agency
is
Waterfront.
Toronto
were
part
of
that
agency,
so
I
would
expect
that
they
would
be
part
of
the
city's
official
plan
in
order
to
achieve
as
much
housing
as
possible
on
the
waterfront
and
note
that
that,
unfortunately,
according
to
the
Auditor
General
Waterfront
Toronto
is
only
managed
to
achieve
12%
on
all
the
sites,
rather
than
the
20
that
they're
mandated
for
across
the
water.
Thank
you
thank.
S
Very
much
like
to
thank
all
the
deputies
for
taking
your
time
out
of
your
days
to
be
with
here
here
with
us
this
morning,
at
City,
Hall
and
sharing
your
perspectives.
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
alignment
here
in
this
committee
room
and
certainly
we've
all
had
a
chance
to
work
very
closely
with
many
of
you
over
the
past
months
and
years,
and
that
work
is
is
heard
and
it's
appreciated.
S
I
think
one
thing
that's
very
clear
abundantly
clear
is
we
need
every
possible
tool
in
the
toolkit
to
address
our
affordable
housing
crisis
and
and
it's
one
frankly
that
has
been
exacerbated
by
legislation
that
has
come
to
us
from
the
province
over
a
number
of
years.
This
we
didn't
just
get
here
overnight.
We
didn't
just
get
here
with
the
last
election,
but
it's
certainly
gotten
worse.
I
want
to
thank
our
staff
for
all
their
work
on
this
file.
It's
it's
been
a
journey
and
one
that's
been.
S
We've
been
on
for
a
number
of
years
so
whose
genera
zoning
has
been
challenging
for
a
number
of
reasons,
and,
and
it
didn't
just
get
challenging
you
know
last
year.
This
is
something
that
the
City
of
Toronto
has
been
asking
the
province
for
since
prior
to
amalgamation
sort
of
like
a
long
time,
and
we
actually
thought
we
were
finally
there
with
bill
107
when
that
landed
in
2018.
But
then,
when
the
draft
regulations
came
out,
you
know
from
plantings
perspective.
S
So
then,
right
before
the
election,
the
province
opens
the
doors
to
minute
municipalities
to
actually
implement
Isaiah
in
a
more
flexible,
quicker
way,
and
then,
of
course,
the
election
happened,
and
here
we
are
again
with
what
should
be
one
of
the
most
straightforward,
most
effective
tools
that
we
have
as
a
city
on
the
planning
side
to
a
secure,
affordable,
housing
and
and
yet
we're
left
in
the
lurch.
We
bill
108,
so
I
hear
your
frustration.
S
I
feel
that
frustration,
I,
think
all
of
us
here
actually
feel
that
frustration,
certainly
staff
as
well,
and
the
question
is:
how
do
we
move
forward?
The
issue
is
that
we
have
a
province,
as
we
see
time
and
time
again,
that
will
literally
pass
legislative
changes
to
move
forward
their
agenda
here
at
Toronto,
City,
Hall
and
I.
Don't
I,
don't
think
that's
right.
We
saw
it
with
the
TTC
upload
discussions.
They
rewrote
the
legislation
to
achieve
their
own
goals.
So
the
question
is:
what
are
we
doing?
S
S
But
I
think
this
is
going
to
allow
us
to
no
one
will
ever
know
we.
We
don't
have
any
answer.
No
one
will
ever
know
in
any
case,
I
think
this
is
thoughtful,
because
this
is
a
sort
of
ammunition.
This
is
the
information
that
we
need
to
have
that
conversation
of
what
the
I
said.
Framework
looks
like
pre
and
post
bill
108
and
that's
that's
the
sort
of
stuff
and
we're
gonna
come
back
in
February
again,
not
soon
enough,
but
a
practical
amount
of
time
for
our
staff
to
do
that.
S
Work
to
equip
us
with
the
information.
That's
actually
going
to
allow
us
to
have
that
conversation
with
them
and
really
push
for
a
framework
that
is
going
to
deliver
the
most
amount
of
units,
the
deepest
amount
of
affordability
and
for
the
longest
amount
of
time.
So
I
do
want
to
thank
you
all
for
coming
out
today.
It's
been
very
valuable,
it's
been
helpful
for
us,
and
hopefully
we
can
move
this
forward,
I'm
very
much
looking
forward
to
seeing
all
of
you
back
at
our
subcommittee
to
protect
affordable
rental
housing.
S
B
R
Thank
you
very
much
and
I
I
just
really
enjoy
this
committee,
especially
when
we
have
these
moments
of
brotherhood
and
sisterhood
I
I
want
to
thank
the
deputy
for
coming
out
and
speaking
as
passionately
as
you
have
I
recognize.
This
is
not
the
first
time
that
you're
appearing
before
the
committee,
and
it's
also
not
the
say,
it's
not
the
it's
another
new
message
and
I
want
to.
R
Thank
you
for
all
the
time
that
you
have
appeared
before
us
and
rec
that
you're
taking
time
out
of
your
busy
days
and
schedules
away
from
work
and
family
and
other
applications
to
be
here
for
the
hours
that
you
have
and
I
also
want
to
recognize
that
you
know,
as
we
perhaps
make
requests
of
you
to
go
to
Scarborough
or
to
North
York.
Is
that
again
we're
asking
you
of
your
time
freely
and
I
just
want
to
respect
that
that
your
time
is
valuable.
R
I
do
want
to
acknowledge
that
that
is
not
because
you
are
timid
and
that's
not
because
you
don't
want
to
get
this
right
or
get
this
done
and
I
I
don't
want
to
take
anything
away
from
the
fact
that
the
staff
are
trying
to
take
a
look
at
how
to
advance
this
important
instrument
of
policy
and
without
getting
quashed
in
it.
You
know,
because
you're,
anticipating,
where
the
next
punch
and
body
blow
will
come
from
and
I
know
that
you
folks
are
very
smart.
R
I
do
think,
and
this
is
not
a
but
but
it's
just
an
add-on.
I
do
think
that
it's
important
for
us
to
take
a
not
a
pause,
but
rather
a
step
forward,
even
if
it's
not
the
biggest
step
that
we
would
like
and
that's
why.
I
think
that
the
motion
is
coming
from
councillor
perks,
councillor,
Fletcher
and
I
went
what
our
chair
is
going
to
advance
is
absolutely
critical
in
making
sure
that
we
take
another
step
forward
and
get
into
fighting
position
with
more
tools
and
more
strength
in
in
our
counter
when
the
province.
R
What
we
anticipate
is
going
to
probably
need
not
be
good
news.
I,
think
that
when
we
talk
about
the
province,
whether
it's
the
previous
government,
the
Liberal
government
or
this
government
as
a
PC
government,
we
talk
about
the
province
not
listening
to
the
to
Toronto
residents
or
perhaps
not
respecting
Toronto
City,
Council
I
think
we
need
to
go
a
little
bit
deeper,
I'd
like
to
follow
the
money
and
and
I
think
we
need
to
really
recognize
the
we're,
not
really
just
fighting
with
another
order
of
government.
R
The
puppets
which
is
in
this
case
this
time
around
is
just
happens
to
be
premier
forward
and
Minister
Clark.
But
do
not
take
your
eye
off
the
the
fight
that
our
bigger
opponent
is
right
behind
them.
You
will
not
see
them,
they
operate
in
the
shadows,
and
that
is
the
very
powerful
development
lobby.
I
don't
want
to
paint
a
brush
at
all
developers,
because
that's
not
the
case,
but
certainly
when
it
comes
to
global
finance.
The
where
money
is
is
moving
how
hedge
funds
are
behaving,
how
private
equity
funds
are
behaving?
R
How
private
commercial
bank
is
behaving
you're
gonna
I
will
bet
you
anything
that
they
are
not
going
to
take
and
adopt
inclusionary
zoning,
no
matter
how
how
soft
and
gentle
our
policy
could
be
thinking
that
we
could
get
it
passed,
they're
going
to
fight
us
too,
and
now
so
that's
that's.
What's
gonna
be
resting
in
front
of
us?
We
should
not
kid
ourselves,
but
I
know
that
if
we
get
louder
as
they
get
softer,
sometimes
it
happens.
R
B
Thank
You
counselor
I
do
have
a
motion
and
I
want
to
start
by
thanking
all
the
deputies
to
come
here
and
also
thank
all
the
counselors
here.
I
think
there
is
actually
some
really
good
committee
work
that
was
done
here
just
on
this
issue,
because
we
all
got
here
I
think
with
the
perception
that
we
needed
more
from
the
report,
because
we
had
two
issues
in
front
of
us.
B
To
have
that
done,
but
that
we're
also
gonna
have
in
front
of
us
what
we
could
have
had,
which
I
think
will
be
really
powerful,
come
in
February
and
we'll
see
if
the,
if
the
regulations
are
out
or
not,
but
you'll
actually
be
really,
it
would
be
really
powerful
to
actually
have
the
two
scenarios,
the
two
worlds
of
what
we
could
get
could
have
gotten
back
and
what
we
will
we
will
be
getting
so
I
appreciate
the
work
that
we've
all
done
in
here.
I
hope
I
can
get
your
support.
B
I
know
that
we
have
quite
a
bit
of
work
to
staff,
but
the
reality
is.
This
is
a
major
issue
for
the
prosperity
of
our
city
and
our
power
citizens
most
important.
This
is
human
dignity.
This
is
this
is
home.
This
is
the
base
of
everything,
and
so
do
we
have
to
ask
our
staff
to
just
work
a
little
bit
faster.
Yes,
but
I
think
that
we
all
we
all
have
you
know
we
all
have
family.
We
all
have
neighbors
that
are
facing
this.
B
Really
tough
housing
market
out
there
and
we
all
see
it
out
there
in
our
city-
and
we
say
our
city
can
do
better,
so
I
think
that
our
staff
will
be
right
behind
us
to
say:
okay,
let's
get
this
done
and
give
us
the
tool
so
that
we
can
do
our
political
work
and
do
our
political
fighting
that
we
need,
while
they
do
the
good
work
of
working
with
everybody
and
creating
a
robust
bylaw
with
the
tools
that
they'll
end
up
with
and
I.
Think
that's
what
we
would
obtained
here
today.
B
H
B
A
The
motion
from
councillor
Fletcher,
all
those
in
favor
councillor,
Bradford
councillor,
perks,
councillor
Fletcher
councillor
by
Lao,
tells
her
wong-tam
any
opposed.
None.
That
motion
carries
unanimously
and
motion
three
from
councillor
by
Lao
councillor,
all
those
in
favor
councillor,
Bradford,
councillor,
perks,
channeler
Fletcher
councillor
by
Lao
and
councillor
Vaughn
tam,
and
that
motion
carries
as
well
all
those
in
the
as
amended
recorded
vote
as
well.
Okay,
councillor
Bradford,
councillor
perks,
councillor
Fletcher
councillor
by
Lao
accounts
for
long
tam.
That
motion
carries
unanimously
as
well.
R
I,
if
I
may
and
I
recognize
that
this
might
be
coming
at
a
bit
of
an
all
time,
we're
about
to
break
for
lunch.
There
are
a
number
of
deaf
mutants
here
who
are
speaking
to
item
number
four,
many
of
them
who
are
wearing
red
t-shirts.
They
I
recognise
that
we're
heading
to
to
item
number
two
I
was
wondering
if
there.
R
B
B
B
12.1,
which
is
a
city,
initiated
priority
retail
streets.
Zoning
bylaw
amendments
final
report.
Are
there
any
speakers
on
this
item
seeing
none
questions
of
staff,
seeing
none
speakers
seeing
none
motion
to
approve
councillor
Wong
tab,
all
those
in
favor
that
carries
okay
item
10.2
housing
now
housing
now
777
Victoria,
Park
Avenue
zoning
amendment.
We
do
have
a
staff
presentation
on
this
item.
Do
we
have
a
staff
presentation
on
7/7?
Yes,
so
a
very
short
one.
So,
hopefully
we'll
complete
this
before
lunch.
B
P
P
What
you're
going
to
see
today
is
a
reflection
of
a
lot
of
staff
work
as
well
as
significant
public
input
into
what
can
happen
and
should
happen
on
a
city-owned
piece
of
property
in
their
neighborhood
in
terms
of
housing.
Now
again,
this
is
the
city
putting
forward
its
best
foot,
some
of
its
best
assets,
to
address
our
biggest
challenge,
which
is
affordability
in
this
city.
P
We
have
spent
three
hours
this
morning
talking
about
the
housing
challenges.
The
communities
well
briefed
on.
Those
I
won't
spend
much
more
time
on
them
other
than
just
to
emphasize
the
fact
we
accept
this
as
being
in
crisis.
We
accept.
This
is
something
that
the
city
can
act
upon
by
putting
forward
its
resources
in
this
manner.
P
Through
this
process
we
have
11
sites
and
those
will
be
coming
forward
through
the
winter
and
through
next
year,
we're
estimating
that
we
can
deliver
over
3700
units
of
affordable
rental
housing
across
the
city
and
specifically
that
affordable
housing
is
targeted
towards
those
earning
roughly
between
twenty
and
fifty
thousand
dollars
a
year.
11
sites
are
across
the
city
today
we're
talking
about
Victoria
Park
Avenue,
but
we
have,
as
you
noted
on
the
map,
many
sites
immediately
approximate
to
transit.
P
It's
very
important
to
emphasize
again
the
fact
that
these
are
some
of
the
best
city-owned
properties
to
the
point
councillor
Fletcher
was
bringing
up
earlier
today,
some
of
the
best
city-owned
properties.
We
have
dedicated
towards
again
our
greatest
challenge:
affordable,
affordability
and
affordable
housing.
P
P
What's
shown
in
the
report
is
both
a
development
concept
prepared
through
that
process
delivering
over
500
residential
units,
half
of
which
would
be
affordable
rental
to
buildings
on
site
and
what
we're
also
recommending
through
the
report
is
a
zoning
framework,
a
zoning
envelope
that
allows
for
the
actual
development
of
that
building.
In
the
immediate
term,
this
you
have
here
the
building
and
it's
conceptual
massing.
It's
important
to
note
that
there's
the
affordable
housing
component
here,
but
also
retail
uses
childcare
and
community
space
serving
a
neighborhood
improvement
area.
P
Just
finally,
now
the
recommendations
that
we'll
be
considering
now
and
after
lunch,
I
expect
our
proposals
from
staff
on
revising
the
zoning
bylaw
in
a
manner
that
allows
for
the
development
of
the
concept.
I
just
showed
you
and
also
two
further
recommendations
moving
this
and
development
process
along
in
terms
of
addressing
it,
passenger
pickup
drop-off
facility
on
site,
as
well
as
possible
use
of
a
public
parking
and
in
your
future.