►
From YouTube: Scarborough Community Council - November 9, 2020
Description
Scarborough Community Council, meeting 19, November 9, 2020
Agenda and background materials:
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/decisionBodyProfile.do?function=doPrepare&meetingId=17148
A
Good
morning
I'm
councillor
jennifer
mckelvey,
I
am
the
chair
of
scarborough
community
council.
The
clerk
has
confirmed
that
we
have
quorum.
So
I'd
like
to
now
call
meeting
19
to
order
welcome
everyone.
Today's
meeting
is
being
held
with
members
of
council
participating
by
video
conference
city
staff
are
also
connecting
to
the
meeting
by
video
conference.
As
city
hall
remains
closed,
the
public
can
continue
to
participate
electronically
and
can
watch
the
meeting
streaming
live
on
youtube
at
youtube.com
toronto
city.
Council
live.
I
ask
everyone
for
their
patience
with
any
delays
and
technical
issues.
A
The
clerk
staff
have
connected
all
registered
speakers
to
the
meeting
by
audio.
The
list
of
speakers
can
be
viewed
online
by
visiting
the
scarborough
community
council
page
at
toronto,
dot,
ca,
council
and
clicking
the
speakers
box.
For
today's
meeting,
I
would
like
to
remind
staff
to
keep
their
mics
muted
and
their
videos
turned
off
unless
they
need
to
answer
questions
or
speak
to
the
committee.
This
will
make
it
easier
for
me
to
observe
the
participants
as
they
debate
and
vote
on
items
as
part
of
each
agenda
item.
A
I
will
ask
members
to
raise
their
hand
or
unmute
their
mic
if
they
wish
to
speak.
I
will
then
create
a
speaker's
list
and
will
call
on
members
when
it
is
their
turn
to
speak.
When
voting
on
an
item
or
motion,
I
ask
that
members
ensure
they
turn
on
their
video,
if
applicable
and
raise
their
hand
to
indicate
their
vote
members.
I
want
to
remind
you
that
you
must
submit
and
approve
your
motions
by
email
staff
are
available
at
scc
at
toronto.ca
to
help
with
your
motions.
A
Although
we
are
in
different
locations
and
meeting
remotely
today,
the
community
council
would
like
to
acknowledge
that
the
land
we
are
meeting
on
is
the
traditional
territory
of
many
nations,
including
the
mississaugas
of
the
credit,
the
anishinaabe,
the
chippewa,
the
hodnessoni
and
the
wendat
peoples.
It
is
now
home
to
many
diverse
first
nations
inuit
and
metis
people.
We
acknowledge
that
toronto
is
covered
by
treaty
13
with
the
mississaugas
of
the
credit.
A
A
A
A
A
B
A
Absolutely
okay
items
and
sorry
that
was
2746
and
2800
kingston
road
zoning
amendment
application
final
report,
ward,
20,
statutory
planning,
act,
rso
1990.!
That
brings
us
to
item
19.2,
3268,
finch,
avenue,
east
zoning,
amendment
application,
final
report,
ward,
22,
statutory
planning,
act,
rso
1990!
Would
somebody
be
able
to
hold
this
there's
three.
B
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Okay
item
carries
it
brings
us
to
the
new
item:
sc
19.9,
imagining
21st
century
employment
areas,
request
for
a
planning
and
transportation
study
for
the
coronation
drive
employment
area.
I
have
pre-circled
pre-circulated
it.
I
know
counselor.
Sorry,
deputy
mayor
thompson
has
an
amendment.
Does
anybody
have
question
questions
on
the
item
before
he
moves
that?
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Maybe
if
the
clerk
would
just
put
this
on
the
screen-
and
hopefully
it's
a
friendly
amendment,
madame
tyrion,
just
basically
providing
where
it
says,
positive
attributes
as
part
of
your
plan-
and
I
think
this
is
a
a
good
opportunity
for
us
to
look
at
areas
where
commercial
areas,
business
areas
where
there's
a
residential
area,
that's
in
close
proximity
and
so
on.
C
And
of
course
this
is
something
that
you
know
that
exists
right
across
the
city,
and
I
think
this
will
be
a
good
framework
and
or
blueprint
to
decide
how
we
handle
these
types
of
impact
in
residential,
as
well
as
that
of
business
and
commercial
areas
and
so
on.
So,
thank
you
very
much,
madam
chair,
for
moving
the
motion,
and
I
offer
this
amendment
piece,
which
I
believe
it
to
be
friendly
to
enhance
your
motion.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
anybody
else
to
speak
to
this
item
so
I'll
speak
quickly.
I
absolutely
find
your
deputy
mayor
thompson's
amendment
to
be
friendly
and
very
helpful,
and
I
absolutely
agree
that
we
need
to
find
the
positive
attributes,
because
that's
what
we
want
to
bring
more
of
to
this
area.
This
area
is,
was
traditionally
fed
by
rail
and
now
it's
being
fed
by
trucks.
So
we
need
to
find
a
way
to
make
this
work
with
the
residential
makeup
of
the
surrounding
area.
So
I'm
fully
supportive
of
his
amendment.
A
A
E
Thank
you.
So
my
name
is
sean
mcgaffey.
I'm
a
senior
planner
and
urban
designer
with
wnd
associates,
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
kingston
road
residences
inc,
who
is
the
applicant
for
this
property
since
submission
of
the
application
in
early
2018,
we
have
worked
with
staff
to
refine
the
massing
of
the
11
story
and
the
22-story
residential
apartment
buildings,
as
well
as
provide
for
the
inclusion
of
a
500
square
meter,
pops
area
along
kingston
road.
A
D
A
F
I
I
first,
I
read
the
recommendations
that
were
about
the
first
application
when
it
was
only
13
and
16
stories.
So
I
I
can't
I
have
to
admit
I
haven't
read
the
final
recommendations
for
this
site.
So,
however,
I
did
I
was
concerned
about
the
the
development
that
was
going
to
happen
and
because
I
live
in
the
building
that
abuts
to
the
site
that
this
development
would
have
be
at,
and
I
went
to
my
neighbors
in
the
community.
F
So
we
were
very
concerned
when
I
went
to
the
seniors
building
that
the
the
sunlight
and
skyline
would
hi
greatly
affect
them,
because
that
was
the
22-story
building
that
would
be
closest
to
their
building.
They
are.
Many
of
them
are
long-term
residents,
as,
as
are
the
people
in
the
atwelpa
cooperative
housing,
building
that
I'm
in
many
people
have
lived
here,
25
to
almost
30
years,
and
it
will
have
an
impact.
F
There's
been
major
traffic
issues,
and
that
was
a
concern
at
a
previous
meeting
that
happened
in
june
of
2019,
and
even
though
I
know
the
applicant
did
their
own
studies.
I
don't
know
if
the
city
actually
did
a
study
on
on
the
the
traffic
plus
the
parking
issues
that
have
occurred
in
the
neighborhood.
So
these
were.
F
We
felt
that
these
were
great
concerns.
When
I
went
to
the
people
in
the
neighborhoods,
we
also
noticed
that
there
was
sorry
we
felt
that
there
could
be
a
vision
that
was
different.
This
didn't
have
any
mix
of
anything
other
than
residential,
and
yet
it's
supposed
to
be
mixed-used
land
use,
which
other
other
developments
that
are
on
kingston
road
have
incorporated
some
commercial
sundry
kind
of
commercial,
small,
small
commercial
buildings
with
our
units
within
the
building,
the
residential
building.
So
we
wanted
to.
F
We
felt
that
that
would
be
in
that
would
make
more
sense
to
have
that.
Also
here,
because
we
have
all.
The
tourists
that
are
coming
down
into
bluffers
park
are
looking
for
even
washrooms
they're
going
they're
going
to
residential
homes
to
seek
washrooms.
So
so
there's
a
need
there
in
that
area,
for
beyond
residential,
just
strictly
residential
and
and
we,
we
would
hope
that
you
would
deliberate
a
little
bit
longer
on
this.
I
know
you
want
to
vote
on
this
quickly.
F
You've
had
they've
had
time
to
go
over
this,
and
I
know
the
two
representatives
that
have
come
to
speak
on
the
behalf
of
this
development
are
wanting
to
see
it
push
forward.
So
I
just
hope
that
you
will
thoughtfully
take
into
account
that,
even
though
I
I
appreciate
that
we
appreciate
the
redevelopment
of
the
neighborhood-
and
I
know
people
have
been
happy
to
see
some
of
the
motels
that
have
been
changed,
we
do
see
that
a
need
for
other
other
pieces
to
be
put
into
this
development.
B
You
had
council
carpenter,
a
quick
question.
Yes,
thank
you.
I
appreciate
you
coming
and
listen.
I
do
recognize
the
concerns
that
you
have
boys
there.
They
are
real
concerns
from
you.
I
just
wanted
to
just
if
you're
aware
so
I'll
be
moving
a
motion,
and
I
think
one
of
the
deputies
mentioned
that
it
was
a
holding
provision.
B
So,
in
fact,
what
that'll
mean
is
we're
going
to
be
holding
back
on
a
number
of
provisions
from
engineering
that,
with
regard
to
water
with
regard
to
solid
waste,
and
all
of
that
that,
in
fact,
they
will
not
be
able
to
move
forward
on
this
application
until
they
satisfy
all
that
plus
a
number
of
different
departments
in
the
city?
So
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
make
you
aware
through
a
question
is
where
you
were
that
this
holding
provision
will
ensure
that
all
of
the
issues
that
you
just
mentioned
will
be
dealt
with.
B
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
you're
aware
of
that,
and
also
too
with
regard
to
the
site
application.
So
this
is
a
process
we'll
be
approving
the
zoning
and
then
from
there
we
begin
the
site
plan,
application
process
and,
and
many
of
the
concerns
that
you
also
mentioned
with
regard
to
traffic
traffic
infiltration.
All
of
that
will
actually
be
part
of
that
process.
F
They
ask
you
whether
the
approval
of
oh,
if
you
make
the
approval
for
the
height,
though
that's
that's
another
piece
of
it,
because
they
know
there
was
a
second
zoning
bylaw
that
had
to
be
to
be
approved
and
that's
the
high
rise,
and
I
felt
that
that
didn't
really
fit
into
the
neighborhood,
not
just
myself.
But
you
know
many
people
look
at
looking
at
overall,
where
what
was
happening.
B
So
again,
as
unfortunately,
the
chair
make
sure
that
sherry
doesn't
step
in,
we
can't
ask
questions,
but
what
I'll
forward
in
a
question?
So
I
will
I
I
will
be
asking
staff
that
particular
question
after
you
know,
with
regard
to
the
density
with
regard
to
the
height
and
give
them
the
opportunity
to
explain
the
rationale
behind
how
they
came
that
height.
So
I
will
just
let
you
know
that
I
will
be
doing
that
in
a
few
minutes.
A
B
Yes,
I
have
questions
madam
councillor
crawford,
so
I
just
want
to
through
the
planning
department.
Can
you
just
talk
very
quickly
about
the
uniqueness
of
the
site
and
how
you
and
I'll
be
getting
into
more
specific
questions
about
dancing,
although,
but
just
talk
about
the
uniqueness
of
this
site
when
you're,
comparing
neighborhoods
and
and
how
you
have
to
this
will
get
us
to
get
into
the
density
aspect
of
that.
But
just
talk
a
bit
about
the
uniqueness
of
this
site
and
the
size
of
it.
D
B
G
Okay,
yeah
there
was
a
delay
there,
so
in
terms
of
the
uniqueness
of
the
site,
this
is
such
a
large
site
that
would
be
able
to
support
a
smaller
density
at
a
higher
height
and
in
terms
of
the
location
of
the
site.
It
is
very
separated
from
the
neighborhoods
area
so
because
of
the
increased
separation
distances,
there
be
less
impact
on
the
neighborhood
area.
B
G
B
B
Also,
now
again,
as
the
deputy
and
a
number
of
community
people
have
mentioned
what
they
we
originally
had,
the
maximum
story
of
the
one
building
at
16..
It's
gone
up
to
22
stories.
So
when
you
look
at
the
site
just
quickly,
it
looks
like
we've
increased
density.
We
have
a
building
that
is,
it
goes
a
little
beyond
the
mid-rise
guidelines.
It's
actually
22
stories.
B
So
can
you
just
talk
about
a
bit
about
number
one?
Is
this
a
precedent?
This
is
in
the
community
that
we're
gonna
we're
starting
to
increase
density
along
kingston
mode.
All
of
a
sudden.
Now
we
have
tall
towers,
we're
gonna
be
getting
tall
towers
everywhere.
So
you
can
just
talk
about.
You
know
how
you
came,
how
you
you
actually
decreased
density,
but
you
have
a
larger
tower
as
part
of
the
application.
G
G
So,
although
you
might
have
longer
shadowing
with
the
22-story
building,
because
it's
a
slimmer
building,
it
would
be
faster
moving
and
there
be
overall,
less
waterway
impact
in
terms
of
whether
this
would
be
presence
and
as
part
of
the
review,
we
did
have
the
developer
submitted
block
contacts
plan
just
to
evaluate
how
the
block
could
potentially
redevelop
in
this
area,
and
we
would
find
that
this
was
over
only
site.
That
was
deep
enough
large
enough
and
sufficiently
separated
enough
from
the
neighborhoods
area
to
allow
for
this
type
of
height.
B
Great,
and
also
can
you
comment
to
as
part
of
the
process
and
the
changes
that
occurred
in
fact,
and
this
brings
into
why
the
tower
was
probably
22
stories,
but
there
there's
more
open
space
and
green
space
that
is
actually
on
the
site
now
compared
to
the
first
application.
I
know
there
was
a
pops
a
park
put
in
there,
but
can
you
just
talk
a
bit
about
having
a
little
bit
more
open
space
and
green
space
on
this
new
application,
as
opposed
to
the
first
one.
G
Right
sorry,
I
forgot
to
bring
that
up
earlier,
so
one
of
the
changes
through
the
review
was
also
about
the
top.
Of
course,
taller
building
is
now
set
back
further
away
from
the
street,
so
we're
allowed
we're
able
to
have
this
publicly
accessible,
privately
owned,
open
space
that
would
be
essentially
park
space
that
the
public
would
be
able
to
you
great.
G
A
D
B
I
do
have
a
technical
motion
that
has
been
provided
to
me
by
staff
if
I
could
first
of
all
move
that-
and
this
is
in
essence,
a
holding
provision,
a
typical
holding
provision
that
we
put
in
to
ensure
certain
criteria
are
met
prior
to
giving
all
approvals
to
build
the
site.
That's
in
essence,
what
that
is,
there's
some
issues.
Around
engineering
staff
gave
that
to
me
and
they're.
Supportive
of
that.
B
The
community,
my
community,
you
know
when
I'm
looking
up
from
victoria
park.
All
the
way
out
to
markham
road
are
generally
supportive
of
the
in
the
development
that
is
taking
place
because
they
recognize
we
do
need
to
revitalize
kingston
vote,
and
I
think
my
other
two
colleagues,
council,
ainsley
and
mckelvey
would
recognize
that
as
well.
They
recognized
that
you
know
kingston
road,
40
or
50
years
ago
you
know
was
a
major
thoroughfare
in
and
out
of
the
city,
it
was
kind
of
a
gateway.
B
We
had
lots
of
motels,
we
had
car
lots,
car
repairs,
all
kinds
of
other
businesses
and
it
had
a
different
purpose
40
50
years
ago.
It
has
a
different
purpose.
Now,
as
we
start
seeing
this
revitalization
and
then
really
what
changes
that
are
occurring
and
we're
starting
to
see.
A
lot
of
that
is
to
look
at
more
attractive,
mixed-use
residential
commercial
areas,
walkable
livable
areas,
and
I
think
the
policies
that
the
province
and
the
city
have
are
trying
to
push
towards
that.
B
As
I
said,
we're
starting
to
see
that
one
of
the
main
concerns
from
my
community-
and
I
think
other
communities
is
density
and
they
ask
the
question
of
how
much
is
too
much
and
that's
I
know.
What's
the
impact
on
the
neighborhoods
when
this
kind
of
density
comes
in,
I
get
that
those
are
valid
questions
that
the
community
has
and
they
should
be
having
them,
and
they
should
be
questioning
that
when
we're
looking
at
the
process
or
the
development
process,
it's
a
long
process.
B
B
This
application
is
removing
two
of
those
motels
down
to,
I
think,
to
maybe
one
maybe
three
motels
left
in
that
particular
site.
It
is
a
unique
site.
It's
a
triangle
between
kingston
road,
saint,
claire
and
brimley.
It
is
an
area
that
has
three
apartments.
It
has
a
bell,
canada
center.
It
has
a
canadian
tire
and
it
has
some
town
homes
on
the
north
side
by
sinclair.
B
It
is
a
large
site,
as
city
planning
have
mentioned,
and
but
through
this
process
we
have
actually
reduced.
The
density
planning
have
suggested
that
this
particular
site
can
manage
a
higher
density
just
because
of
the
sheer
size
of
that,
and
but
what
we
have
done
through
this
process
is
opened
up
more
green
space.
We've
opened
up
actually
more
more
space.
We
actually
have
a
park
there
on
kingston
what
a
500
meter
park
that
will
enable
the
community
to
to
benefit
from
that.
B
It
did
start
out
as
a
13
to
16
story,
but
again
it
has
now
looking
at
the
proposal.
You
have
is
11
and
22
stories,
and
I
think
that
has
been
one
of
the
big
concerns
in
the
community,
and
understandably
too,
is
that
you
know
it's
going
from
16
to
22
stories,
thinking
that
we're
actually
adding
more
density,
we're
actually
adding
more
people
there.
B
A
lot
of
those
issues
in
fact
will
be
dealt
in
the
next
process,
which
is
the
site
plan
application
process.
Where
we'll
be
looking
at
detail
on
the
traffic
infiltration
on,
you
know
the
water
and
sewage
and
that
the
motion,
I
just
moved
again,
it's
a
holding
provision
to
ensure
that
we
don't
move
forward
until
we
look
at
all
those
issues.
B
But
you
know
staff
have
said,
and
you
know
recognizing,
that
it
is
a
process
that
they
do
now
feel
comfortable
with
this
application
before
them.
And
I've
had
some.
You
know
community
members
say
well,
we
need
to
defer
this.
We
need
to
have
more
community
consultation.
I
just
want
to
let
them
know
if
they're
listening,
that,
in
fact
we
are
continuing
to
have
that
conversation.
Just
because,
if
this
is
passed
today,
doesn't
mean
that
the
conversations
do
not
stop.
B
So
on
that,
madam
chair,
I
will
be
supporting
this
application,
recognizing
that
it
is
part
of
a
lot
of
change
happening
on
kingston
road,
and
we
need
to
ensure
that
we
always
have
the
right
conversations
with
the
community
as
we
move
forward
on
that.
So
on
that,
I
just
want
to
thank
planning
for
the
incredible
work
that
they've
done
over
the
last
year
and
a
half
and,
of
course,
the
applicant
for
working
with
me
and
the
community
on
this
application.
Thank
you.
A
A
I
have
just
been
informed
that
one
of
the
deputies
had
been
trying
to
get
into
the
meeting
and
was
not
able
to
so
the
staff
are
recommending
that
we
continue
to
hold
this
item
for
a
few
more
minutes.
While
we
try
to
connect
her
and
then
I
will
give
councillor
crawford
again
the
time
to
to
speak
again
to
the
item,
so
we
will
hold
this
and
move
quickly
to
19.2,
but
then
we
will
come
back.
Should
we
be
able
to
connect
the
deputy
so
item
19.2
we
have
three
debutants.
H
Good
morning,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
committee,
as
you
know,
my
name
is
sophia
canavez
gonzalez,
I'm
from
embaja
planning
and
design
limited
the
planning
consultant
for
the
owner.
The
proposed
application
at
three
two
six,
eight
finch
east
and
scotch
avenue
east
in
scarborough,
seeks
to
construct
the
13-story
mid-rise
building
with
a
total
number
of
276
units
and
314
parking
spaces
in
a
three
level
underground
parking
garage,
total
gross
floor
area
is
25
885
square
meters
with
that,
so
that
results
in
a
floor
space
index
of
three
point.
H
H
My
client
has
been
in
discussions
with
the
owners
at
2900
finch
avenue
east
and
has
agreed
to
provide
additional
relief
on
the
east
side
yard
setback
from
0.3
meters
to
3
meters.
We
ask
that
it
be
reflected
as
a
technical
change
under
recommendation
3..
This
is
regarding
the
performance,
standard,
568
and
attachment
seven,
I'm
here
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank
you.
A
C
C
C
H
C
H
C
H
C
A
G
A
D
Peter
smith,
thank
you.
I'm
I'm
a
land
use,
planner
and
partner
with
bausfields
and
we're
acting
for
the
owners
of
bridalwood
mall
which
surrounds
the
site
at
32,
68
finch
to
the
north
and
east,
and,
as
has
been
noted,
our
client
did
have
concerns
related
to
the
east
side
yard
setback
where
it
abuts
our
clients,
property.
Obviously,
no
fundamental
objection
to
the
proposal
at
all,
just
that.
That's
that
one
concern
in
terms
of
the
setback,
and
so
in
that
regard.
A
C
D
I
I
Yes,
this
was
a
site
identified
in
the
in
the
finch
ward
and
revitalization
study
as
a
strategic
site
for
redevelopment
and
also
encompassing
the
adjacent
like
bridal
wood
mall,
which
the
final
deputent
represents.
So
this
site
allows
for
densities,
to
kind
of
step
up
into
the
mall
site,
which
would
have
a
tower
redevelopment
most
likely
on
the
outskirts
of
the
mall,
incorporating
them
all
in
some
point,
so
we
feel
an
appropriate
transition
from
surrounding
neighborhoods
to
the
mall
redevelopment.
C
I
Yes,
I
would
agree
yeah
it
does
it's
not
exactly
what
the
study
sort
of
saw,
but
the
redevelopment
process
allowed
for
us
to
work
through
those
matters.
And
ultimately
we
feel
that
this
amendment,
which
I
believe
you're
you're
willing
to
move,
addresses
the
defidence
from
bodywood
malls
concerns
and
also
creates
the
ability
to
even
better
integrate
the
two
development
sites.
C
C
C
So
it
really
talks
about
investing
in
that
and
and
the
indexing
and
so
on,
but
it
also
then
says
in
b
and
it
actually
goes
into
bc
and
it
talks
about.
If
the
funds
are
not
used
within
three
years,
it
will
be
used
for
something
else
in
conjunction
with
the
local
council
and
swan
will
these
funds
which
are
allocated
to
the
kids
town
water
park
is,
will
it
be?
Will
it
be
utilized
for
that
purpose?
I
mean
I
haven't
seen
the
water
park
lately.
I
I
A
C
Thank
you
very
much,
madam
chair.
First
of
all,
I
want
to
thank
the
speakers
who
have
spoken,
and
I
want
to
thank
the
collaboration
between
the
applicant,
certainly
and
representatives
and
by
extension,
the
owner
of
bradwood,
the
mall
itself
and
I'd
heard
some
concerns
and
rumblings
about.
You
know
the
the
requirement
and
change
and
clearly
the
the
applicant
has
demonstrated
a
a
good,
neighbor
approach
with
respect
to
working
with
a
neighbor.
In
order
to
in
as
much
as
the
bylaw
says,
it's
0.3
meters.
C
They
have
extended
it
well
beyond
to
address
the
concerns
that
their
neighbor
had,
and
I
think
that's
really
good.
I
think
that
the
so
my
I'm
here
I
have
the
motion
in
front
of
us.
If
staff
could
just
put
up
the
motion,
please
which
really
addresses
the
three
meter
increase
and
this
motion
by
the
way
the
motions
have
been
crafted
by
legal
and
planning
staff
and
they've
asked
me
to
submit
them.
C
Staff
with
respect
to
their
professionalism
and
keeping
in
in
in
consistent
with
respect
to
what
the
planning
process
which
took
place
as
part
of
the
finch,
warden,
revitalization,
study
and
review
are
ensuring
that
this
mixed
use.
Development
that
will
take
place
in
this
area
will
be
very
much
in
keeping
with
respect
to
the
plans
and
growth
for
this
area,
as
well
as
the
other
areas
of
scarborough
that
council
crawford
spoke
about
when
he
spoke
about
kingston
road
and
the
changes
that
are
taking
place.
C
C
Mr
ashby
others
and
christian
has
responded
to
the
question
and
mr
zuliany
and
the
entire
planning
team
in
the
in
the
in
the
east
district,
as
we
call
them
the
all-star
last
week
when
we
met
at
council
in
terms
of
the
work
that
they're
doing
the
goal
and
mile
they've
actually
been
paying
a
lot
of
attention,
bringing
forward
a
lot
of
really
good,
build
form
and
design
and
so
on.
And
this
is
an
example
of
that
with
respect
to
this
application.
C
So
I'm
very
pleased
to
move
the
amendments
that
has
been
drafted
by
legal
staff
and
planning
on
behalf
of
of
the
the
process,
and
I
speak
because
there
isn't
a
counselor
representing
the
area
at
the
moment
and
so
on.
And
so,
madam
chair,
those
are
remarks,
and
I
just
simply
want
to
again
reiterate
and
thank
the
staff
for
the
work.
Thank
the
applicant
thank
the
collaboration,
the
good
neighbor
policy
that
is
working
in
in
effect
here
right
in
front
of
our
own
eyes,
and
I'm
very
pleased
to
see
this.
C
So
thank
you
very
much
and
kidstown
looking
forward
to
the
investment
into
the
community
for
our
young
people
in
in
in
the
scarborough
area,
I
think
it's
a
big
win
for
them.
So
thanks
very
much
for
this
great
contribution
in
section
37,
because,
as
we
see
and
we'll
see
this
very
clearly
within
two
years,
section
37
benefits
are
going
to
be
much
less
and
it's
going
to
have
a
huge
impact
for
the
community
as
such.
With
respect
to
the
introduction
of
bill
197.
A
J
I
don't
think,
but
you
know
if
we
can
change
for
the
better
and
build
a
more
vibral,
vibrant
community.
I
think
we're
all
here
to
do
so,
so
I
just
wanted
to
commend
the
the
applicant
as
well
as
as
the
neighbor
just
to
we
have
to
work
together
to
make
our
economy
grow,
and
this
is
a
very
good
example
of
how
we
can
work
together
and
collaborate
all
the
efforts.
Thank
you,
madam.
A
A
A
A
Okay,
I
think
we've
exhausted
options
to
connect
over
here,
so
we
will
remind
anyone
that
is
listening
or
watching.
You
can
still
submit
written
submissions
on
this
item
as
it
will
be
carried
forward
to
council
at
the
end
of
the
month.
So
with
that,
then
I
did
say
that
I
would
finish
if
there
were
any
additional
speakers
on
this
item.