►
Description
Toronto and East York Community Council, meeting 12, January 8, 2020
Agenda and background materials:
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/decisionBodyProfile.do?function=doPrepare&meetingId=17150
Meeting Navigation:
0:14:29 - Call to order
A
A
Want
to
begin
the
chair
and
members
of
Toronto
East
York
Community
Council
greatly
acknowledged
that
we
are
meeting
on
the
traditional
territory
of
many
nations,
including
the
Mississauga
of
the
credit,
the
Anishinaabe,
the
Chippewa,
the
Haudenosaunee
and
the
wind
at
people's
and
is
now
home
to
many
diverse
First
Nations
into
it
and
may
cheat
people.
We
acknowledge
that
Toronto
is
covered
by
treaty
13
with
the
Mississauga's
of
the
credit
members.
This
morning,
many
of
you
will
have
heard
the
news
that
Ukrainian
International
Airlines
flight,
seven,
five
two
crashed
in
Tehran.
A
A
To
begin,
the
meeting
can
I
ask
if
there
are
any
declarations
of
interest
under
the
municipal
conflict
of
interest
Act,
seeing
none
can
I
have
a
motion
to
confirm
the
minutes
of
the
meeting
of
December
3rd
councillor
Fletcher.
Thank
you.
So
much
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
members
will
start
our
agenda
run-through
on
page.
B
A
B
A
B
A
Already
baked
in
so
we'll
just
take
the
motion
as
presented
all
those
in
favor
opposed
Kerry.
Yep
item
te,
twelve
point:
two:
four
one:
one
one
through
one
to
five:
River
Street
official
plan
amendment
and
zoning
amendment
application
and
rental
housing,
demolition
applications.
Preliminary
report,
councillor
wong-tam.
G
Yes,
thank
you
very
much.
I
would
ask
the
clerk's
to
put
the
emotion
onto
the
screen.
I
may
have
also
fallen
into
the
trap,
if
not
neck,
recognizing
that
recommendation
number
is
already
included,
but
certainly
in
recommendation
number
one
should
be
advanced,
and
that
is
that
that
there
be
light
per
the
provision
of
light
refreshments,
as
well
as
child
carrot
and
eggs.
Any
accessibility
accommodations
provided
at
the
meeting
to
be
born
that
all
cost
be
borne
by
the
the
applicant
and
then
an
additional
recommendation.
G
And
if
I
can
just
speak
very
briefly
to
this
particular
clause.
It's
come
to
my
attention
that
we
actually
have
tenants
who
are
being
displaced
from
this
particularly
fight.
This
particular
rezoning
application
on
River
Street.
The
tenants
the
tenant
has
claimed
that
she
signed
a
an
eleven
form
to
terminate,
perhaps
under
duress
that
she
did
not
get
adequate
advice,
and-
and
certainly
these
this
all
took
place
prior
to
even
the
submission
of
the
rezoning
application.
G
Prior
to
any
approval
of
the
rezoning
application
prior
to
the
appeal
process,
we
know
that
sometimes
it
takes
years,
these
tenants
have
been
asked
to
leave
their
home
and
and
that
one
of
those
tenants
is
now
living
in
a
shelter
known
as
one
twenty
nine
Peter
Street.
So
the
message
to
the
applicant
to
the
developers
and
all
who
are
part
of
the
land
development
assembly
process
is
to
follow
the
rules
to
recognize
that
the
City
of
Toronto
is
working
under
a
housing
crisis.
G
We
don't
certainly
need
to
see
any
additional
hardships
directed
at
the
tenants
and
and
I
recognize
that
for
the
tenants
who
are
not
here
to
speak
for
themselves,
who
are
not
aware
of
what
this
planning
process
is
even
about
what
they
do
know
is
that
they
are
now
without
a
home.
They
do
know
that
they
are
struggling.
G
A
You
so
we'll
take
counselor
Wong,
Tam's
motions
and
the
item
together.
All
those
in
favor
opposed
carried.
Thank
you
for
bringing
that
to
our
attention.
Councillor,
wong-tam
members,
while
I'm
on
this
just
so
you'll
know.
If
I
could
have
the
attention
of
members
of
Toronto
East
York,
Community
Council.
A
C
A
A
G
Thank
you
very
much.
This
is
the
second
of
third
preliminary
reports
for
Ward
13.
The
first
motion
I
would
like
to
move
is
to
ensure
that
we
have
the
provision
of
light
refreshments.
When
people
are
coming
to
the
meeting
post
work,
they
may
have
not
had
time
to
go.
Get
dinner,
childcare
provision,
accessibility,
accommodations,
including
sign
language
interpretation.
G
Recommendation
number
two
can
be
struck
because
we
know
that
it's
already
included
in
the
body
of
the
report
and
then
recommendation
number
three.
The
additional
last
recommendation
is
to
ensure
that
we
can
create
a
site
plan
working
group
with
the
local
community
prior
to
any
final
approvals
from
stuff.
A
G
A
A
Okay,
now
we
go
to
item
12
point
two:
eight,
which
is
Danforth
Avenue
planning,
study,
city,
initiated
official
plan
amendment
preliminary
report,
Broadview
Avenue,
two
Coxwell
Avenue
members,
I'm
informed
by
the
planning
staff
that
some
of
the
necessary
documentation
for
this
has
not
been
completed,
and
we
will
not
be
able
to
consider
this
item
at
this
time.
So
I
have
a
motion
to
defer
it
to
the
next
meeting.
A
I
A
A
So
I
have
a
motion
to
forward
it
to
Toronto
City
Council
without
recommendations.
All
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
item
te.
Twelve
point:
three:
three
installation:
removal
of
on
street
accessible
parking
spaces,
December
2019,
delegated
I'll,
move
that
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
item
te.
Twelve
point:
three
for
installation
of
on-street,
accessible
parking
spaces,
December,
2019,
delegate
non
delegated
councillor,
Fletcher.
B
A
B
A
A
And
then
circulate
them,
so
we
can
all
see
where
we
were.
Thank
you
item
te
twelve
point.
Three,
eight
roadway
alteration
and
traffic
parking
amendments,
Dundas,
West
and
Howard
Park
I'll
move
approval.
All
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
item
te.
Twelve
point:
three:
nine
parking
amendments,
Edna
Avenue.
A
A
A
B
A
A
B
B
A
So
on
the
motion
to
defer
pending
a
site
visit,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
item
te.
Twelve
point:
four
six
turn
prohibitions,
Belsize
Drive,
councillor
Matt,
lo
I
move
in
favor
of
the
recs.
All
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
item
te.
Twelve
point:
four:
seven
always
stop
control,
poplar,
Plains,
Road
and
Clarendon
Avenue
north
intersection
with.
B
G
A
A
A
A
B
A
You're
here
for
twelve
point
three
that
and
you're
listed
there
as
well:
okay,
very
good!
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
who
want
to
make
a
deputation
on
item
12.1,
seeing
none?
Oh
I've
lost
counselor
by
law
counselor
by
Lau.
If
we
could
just
dispose
of
item
the
public
naming
of
the
lane
north
of
Bloor
Street
from
westerly
to
Brock?
B
A
A
A
A
A
L
I
was
at
the
first
public
meeting
about
this
proposal
and
I
do
see
that
some
of
the
issues
highlighted
were
addressed,
but
most
of
the
changes
that
were
addressed
since
the
me
seem
to
do
with
the
interior
of
the
building.
So
they
did
address
accessibility,
indoor
amenities
and
I'm
happy
with
the
change
of
unit
types
having
more
two
bedrooms
and
some
three
bedrooms.
L
So
I
don't
know
how
much
time
city
staff
who
wrote
this
report
have
spent
on
that
site
and
if
they
lived
in
the
area,
they
would
know
that,
when
you're
walking
by
you're
walking
your
dog
you're
singing
on
the
grass
there
that
green
space
does
provide
important
habitat
for
birds.
You
can
hear
blue
jays
all
the
time
and
that
Corner's
also
used
sometimes
by
the
community
for
things
like
yard
sales.
So
the
report
does
say
that
the
owner
agrees
to
provide
an
on-site
public
privately
owned,
publicly
accessible
open
space.
L
But
it
says
that
the
final
location,
size,
design
and
program
of
that
will
be
discussed
after
the
approval
process.
If
I'm
understanding
correctly
so
I'm
I
guess
confused
about
how
the
if
the
location
and
size
is
not
part
of
the
approved
proposal,
it
seems
kind
of
meaningless
to
me.
So
I
would
like
to
see
the
city
have
a
required
size
for
the
green
space
that
they're
gonna
keep
and
make
it
larger
than
what's
in
the
current
design
and
ensure
that
the
location
of
that
pops4
trees
on
the
site
to
be
preserved.
L
A
couple
other
things
I
wanted
to
note
out
in
the
report.
It
does
say
that
Toronto
official
plans
section
two
point
three
point:
one
healthy
neighborhoods
says
that
apartment
neighborhoods
are
residential
areas
considered
to
be
physically
stable
and
development
in
these
areas
should
be
consistent
with
respecting
the
existing
open
space
patterns
in
the
area
policy.
L
Three
point
two
point
three
point:
one
says
that
maintaining
and
enhancing
expanding
the
park
system
requires
the
following
actions
and
then
one
of
them
letter
C
says
protecting
access
to
the
existing,
publicly
open
spaces
and
developing
open
space
linkages
and
then
policy.
Four
point
two
point:
three
states
that
compatible
infill
developments
may
be
permitted
an
existing
site,
but
that
it
will
and
then
letter
D
maintain
adequate
sunlight
privacy
and
areas
of
landscaped,
open
space
for
new
and
existing
residents.
L
So
I
don't
find
that
the
current
plan
does
this,
because,
even
though
it's
shorter
and
height
than
the
main
tower,
the
podium
still
creates
a
face
to
face
situation
where
you
have
one
building,
that's
directly
fronting
another,
and
that
podium
is
so
big
that
again,
it
removes
all
of
the
green
space
on
the
site.
So
I
think
that
if
the
podium
could
be
removed
and
just
the
tower
caps
that
would
allow
for.
L
So
if
the
the
podium
was
removed,
which
you
know
is
wouldn't
remove
too
many
units
from
the
proposal
and
the
towers
kept,
then
there
could
be
more
green
space
at
the
corner
of
that
of
that
intersection.
That
could
remain
and
it
would
be
a
lot
more
in
line
with
the
current
open
space
patterns
in
the
neighborhood,
where
you
don't
have
one
building
fronting
another.
So
the
existing
pattern
in
the
neighborhood,
for
example,
you
should
still
be
able
to
see
the
entrance
to
299
Glen
lake
from
the
street.
L
The
other
thing
I
wanted
to
note
in
the
report
is
that
there's
a
lot
of
talk
in
the
report
and
other
reports
in
sorry.
Other
proposals
in
this
neighborhood
about
programming,
these
green
spaces
with
outdoor
amenities
and
the
reason
I
have
these
photos
here
is
I
was
at
the
first
public
meeting
about
this.
Is
the
Daniels
building
on
that
front.
Spiller
Street,
between
Oak,
Mountain
and
Pacific
and
I
was
at
the
very
first
public
meeting
about
this
building.
If
you
guys
could
be
quiet,
I'm.
L
Sorry,
it's
hard
for
me
to
concentrate
and
I
think
this
was
a
really
model.
Example
of
the
developer,
listening
to
the
public,
they
revised
their
proposal
and
you
can
see
how
much
green
space
they
preserved
on
this
site.
So
this
is
the
north
side
of
the
building.
This
is
like,
so
they
created.
You
know
a
very
simple,
passive,
green
space
with
just
a
couple
of
benches.
L
They
kept
a
lot
of
mature
trees,
they
kept
just
a
plain
sort
of
open,
grassy
area,
and
so
again,
what
I
like
about
this
is
that
it's
not
overly
developed
or
fancy.
It's
just
a
quiet,
green
space
with
big
trees.
So
we
already
have
you
know
high
park
that
has
lots
of
amenities
and
playgrounds.
Lithuania
Park
is
almost
kiddy
Korner.
L
A
You
very
much
thank
you.
Thank
you.
So
I
do
I,
have
a
question
for
you
before
you
go.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
I.
There
was
a
lot
in
there,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
I
got
the
key
points.
You're
concerned
that
the
floor
plate
will
affect
the
amount
of
green
space
and
trees
that
the
floor
plate
creates
a
problem
in
terms
of
facing
distances.
Yes,
you
want
a
better
understanding
of
the
location
in
the
size
of
the
green
space,
and
those
were
the
key
points
you
made
right.
Yes,.
L
L
Good
morning,
I'm
Suzanne
MacDonald
from
SGL
planning
and
design
I'm
the
planner
representing
the
applicant
on
this
file.
We
really
wanted
to
come
up
here
today
to
thank
planning
staff
for
their
work
on
this
application.
We
fully
support
the
staff
report
as
well
as
staffs
recommendation,
including
withdrawal
of
the
peel
as
written.
L
This
proposal
was
developed
in
tandem
with
the
High
Park
neighborhood
apartment
character,
area
study.
We
participated
as
part
of
the
study
on
the
working
group
as
well.
At
the
same
time
as
this,
we
also
worked
with
planning
staff
on
our
application
and
met
with
the
many
times
discussed
it
with
them
and
made
multiple
revisions.
L
As
a
result,
our
proposal
fully
conforms
with
the
with
the
policies
of
OPA,
419
and
SAS
551,
including
those
related
to
setbacks
to
the
street
setbacks
between
buildings,
the
height
of
building
and
the
requirement
that
65%
of
the
site
be
maintained
as
open
space
in
as
well
in
response
to
comments
and
discussions
with
city
staff
and
members
of
the
public.
A
number
of
improvements
to
the
existing
building
is
proposed,
as
described
in
the
recommendations
in
the
staff
report,
which
we
also
support.
L
M
N
A
N
My
name
is
Tom
Dempsey
and
I'm,
a
retired
science
teacher
who
lives
in
a
building
next
to
the
/
right
next
to
the
proposed
development
of
299
Glen
Lake,
this
corner
lot
southwest
corner
of
Glen,
Lake
and
Pacific
Avenue
contains
a
substantial
biological
community
with
a
mix
of
15,
healthy
trees,
shrubs
and
green
space
with
significant
value.
This
green
space
is
part
of
a
natural
wildlife
corridor
connecting
the
railroad
tracks
just
north
of
Dundas,
with
High
Park
just
to
the
south.
So
this
is
a
natural
wildlife
corridor.
While
walking
my
dog
shamrock
on
evening
walks.
N
We've
often
we
have
seen
coyote
foxes,
raccoons
and
skunks
in
close
proximity
to
this
green
area
green
space.
So
during
the
day
we
sometimes
see
semi
rare
birds
such
as
Cardinals
and
finches,
looking
for
nesting,
space,
squirrels
and
sparrows
are
abundant
in
this
area.
Stalks
fly
overhead
and
land
in
the
trees
at
times,
so
biologically
it's
it's
a
green
stamp
smaller
than
high
part,
but
this
is
an
important
stamp
in
our
neighborhood.
It's
the
biggest
green
area,
around
High
Park,
at
least
in
that
vicinity.
Ok,
recent
studies
have
discovered
the
dangers
of
dust.
N
That's
the
dangers
of
dust
in
heavy
construction
areas.
This
can
cause
lung
disease
and
cancer,
there's
crystalline
silica
in
the
sand
and
mortar
and
bricks,
and
this
releases
dust
which
can
lead
to
a
disease
called
silicosis.
This
has
been
documented
in
the
Toronto
Star
research.
Recently,
my
neighbor
Sid
is
extremely
concerned
about
this
dangerous
pollution
with
the
dust
and
the
noise
there's
lots
of
people
that
live
right
next
to
this
lots
of
people
and
the
potential
loss
of
green
space
is
important
in
today's
world.
N
During
nice
weather
lots
of
families
with
who
live
nearby
with
children
and
dogs
picnic
and
play
here
during
heavy
rainstorms,
and
we
are
getting
more
of
those
there's
dangerous
amounts
of
water
runoff
in
the
non
green
areas
and
dangering
pedestrians
walking
on
the
sidewalks
I've
almost
got
washed
off
my
feet:
walking
up
High
Park
when
the
water
streams
out
of
the
driveways
coming
north
along
High
Park.
So
this
whole
community
is
being
affected
by
them.
This
whole
community
is
being
affected
by
the
massive
development
we're
extremely
dense
in
the
in
this
High
Park
community.
N
Local
schools
like
the
Keele,
primary
and
Humberside
collegiate,
are
filled
to
capacity
and
anybody
moving
into
this
neighborhood,
who
has
students,
there's
going
to
be
busing
requirements
to
different
area
schools,
there's
other
infrastructure
deficiencies
which
may
include
water
and
electrical
water
supply
and
and
water
treatment
electrical
grid
and
the
ability
of
the
sandy
soil
just
to
support
the
additional
massive
developments
in
the
addition
to
the
buildings
already
there
in
case
of
earthquakes
or
underground
garage
collapse.
That
could
be
that
could
be
really
terrible.
There's
a
huge,
huge,
huge
buildings
there.
N
N
A
You
very
much
thank
you.
I
just
have
a
couple,
a
quick
question
for
you:
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
heard
your
concerns
correctly
you're
concerned
about
the
impact
ecologically
on
the
various
species
present
dust
control,
visitor
parking,
runoff
into
the
sewer
system,
school
capacity,
electrical
capacity
and
the
stability
of
the
buildings,
the
engineering
of
the
buildings
as.
N
A
O
Morning,
everyone,
my
name,
is
Margaret
Van,
Dyke,
Fondation,
Dutch
I'll,
take
the
English
version
and
I'm
a
retired
community
college
teacher.
We've
already
heard
some
very
good
presentations
from
Barbie
Lazarus
and
mr.
Dempsey
here.
I
want
you,
although
to
think
very
carefully,
because
you
are
all
involved.
Every
single
one
atmosphere
can.
O
Everyone
here
is
guilty
about
the
state
of
the
planet.
We're
watching
Australia
burn,
we're
hearing
people
saying
how
is
it?
Scott
Morrison
took
no
notice
of
the
scientists,
the
fire
chiefs,
the
people
who
told
him
about
research
that
was
done
in
the
fair
area.
How
is
it
indeed
when
Toronto
City
Council
also
pays
no
attention
to
the
research
that's
available
on
tall
buildings
and
high
density?
How
is
it
when
Ontario
votes
for
people
like
fog
fraud
will
get
rid
of
all
the
green
space?
He
could
so
I?
O
Don't
think
any
of
us
here
have
any
way
of
feeling
self-righteous.
Just
because
we
don't
have
fires
burning.
At
the
moment
we
will
have
floods.
We
will
have
wind
tunnels,
we
will
have
respiratory
diseases.
There
is.
Nobody
here
seems
to
care
about
particulate
matter.
Mercury,
carbon
dioxide.
All
these
things,
they're
all
written
about
I
have
a
reading
list.
Is
research
done
fine
research
done
in
Hong
Kong,
the
Chinese
won't
listen
to
it
from
mainland
China,
but
it's
excellent
from
Hong
Kong
Polytechnic
developed
the
environment
Hedley
environmental
index.
We
should
all
think
about
that.
I.
O
Remember
time
when
Toronto
used
to
care
about
the
height
of
buildings,
when
John
Sewell
was
here
now
we
won't
call
birds
like
Cardinals
and
finches
semi,
something-or-other
semi
present.
They
should
always
be
here.
We
should
keep
pedestrian
comfort.
Wind
tunnels
are
a
major
problem
with
high
density.
When
you
had
the
two
towers
down
in
New
York
Nicholas
er
move
from
Western
University
wrote
about
the
dangers
of
the
wind
there
and
how
nobody
could
sit
out
for
pleasure
in
the
plaza.
We
have
many
people
in
Canada
writing
fine
research,
but
does
anyone
listen
to
them?
O
No
I
can
give
you
a
whole
look.
The
developers
just
want
profit.
The
planet
is
being
destroyed
by
greed
and
willful
ignorance
and
I.
Don't
care
about
the
shareholders,
I
care
about
the
place
that
I
live
and
the
people
who
live
round
near
me,
I
care
about
the
community.
I
hope
you
all
start
to
do
the
same.
We
need
affordable
housing,
but
there
are
other
ways
of
doing
it
and
you
don't
have
to
do
sky-high
developments
that
are
owned
by
people
who
are
not
even
then
non
Dom's.
They
don't
even
live
in
the
country.
O
A
You
are
there
any
questions.
No,
are
there
any
other
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item?
Okay,
seeing
none
we'll
move
to
questions
of
staff,
so
a
couple
of
questions.
First
of
all,
I
a
general
question,
so
this
application
fell
within
some
planning
guidelines
developed
in
a
special
area
plan
for
the
area.
Is
that
correct.
A
P
P
A
P
P
A
B
P
A
P
A
A
This
merely
puts
it
into
the
zoning,
bylaw,
sort
of
a
belts
and
suspenders
kind
of
thing.
So
I'd
like
to
move
those
two
amendments
and
then
move
approval
of
the
staff
recommendations.
Members.
This
area
that
the
high
Park
Darrien
north
of
High
Park
that
apartment
neighborhood,
as
you
heard
in
answers
from
planning
staff,
actually
won
a
national
award
for
planning
in
an
apartment
neighborhood
just
this
year,
it's
one
of
the
most
thorough
treatments
of
maintaining
an
open
and
green
feel
and
maintaining
ecological
integrity
of
any
secondary
plan.
A
The
City
of
Toronto
has
ever
done
and
what's
interesting
about
this
particular
development,
is
that
it
was
developed
in
parallel
to
that
secondary
plan
and
conforms
entirely
to
the
principles
in
that
secondary
plan.
That
secondary
plan
is
quite
an
achievement,
and
it's
something
that
I
think
we
you
know
should
acknowledge
as
a
good
victory
here
in
the
City
of
Toronto.
A
So
on
that
basis,
I'm
going
to
ask
you
to
support
this
application
with
these
two
amendments
or
any
questions
of
the
mover
or
anyone
else
to
speak.
No,
so
we'll
take
that
as
a
package,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
that
carries.
Thank
you
very
much.
Okay.
We
now
move
to
item
I've
lost.
My
green
sheep
took
it
away
from
me
to
item
12.4
Oh.
A
B
C
You
chair,
so
I
am
delighted
to
move
the
recommendations
in
the
report
here
to,
after,
as
we
heard
from
staff,
more
than
a
decade,
bring
the
King
Spadina
secondary
plan
to
completion.
And
if
members
of
this
committee
would
indulge
me
for
two
minutes,
I'd
like
to
say
a
few
words
on
King
Spadina
as
I've
done
before.
C
It's
really
a
little
piece
of
history,
which
I
love
around
King
Spadina,
is
that
if
we
go
back
to
the
early
days
of
our
city
and
the
Town
of
York
beforehand,
where
we
had
the
Downtown
East
was
the
site
of
the
Parliament
Buildings
and
a
lot
of
the
early
residential
neighborhoods,
the
downtown
West.
You
couldn't
build
west
of
Peter
Street,
because
that's
how
far
the
cannon
shot
from
the
fort.
And
so
when
you
look
at
Victoria,
Memorial
Square.
C
The
location
of
that
cemetery
prior
to
the
emergence
of
Draper,
Street
and
resident,
was
because
of
the
fort.
That's
it.
It
was
very
much
our
originals
and
you
can
trace
the
history
of
our
city
in
many
ways
in
King
Spadina,
the
growth
of
manufacturing,
alongside
the
railway,
the
decline
of
manufacturing
in
the
emergence
of
surface-level
parking
lots
and
then
in
the
mid
90s
the
regeneration
zone,
to
spur
what
is
now
a
vibrant,
mixed-use,
downtown
neighborhood,
and
so
it's
been
well
more.
Almost
30
years
since
we've
had
a
comprehensive
update
in
King,
Spadina,
I
and
I.
C
Think
it's
fair
to
say:
everybody
would
know
it
that
regeneration
is
complete.
It's
now
we
are
into
a
mixed
use:
neighborhood
and
a
successful
one.
Nine
hundred
and
forty-five
people
living
here
in
ninety
six,
four,
twenty
twenty
two
thousand
two
years
ago.
It's
probably
twenty
six
thousand
today
and
growing,
and
it
just
carries
on
and
on-
and
the
vision
has
set
out
here-
is
for
a
mixed
use.
C
Neighborhood
it's
for
a
livable
neighborhood,
it's
for
a
vibrant
neighborhood
that
includes
culture
and
I,
won't
belabor,
all
the
specifics
around
the
different
precincts
we've
identified
and
the
planning
rationale
around
Heights
and
setbacks
and
the
livability,
but
just
to
say
that
this
has
been
a
decade
in
the
works.
It
is
done
in
concert
with
tÃo
core
very
appropriately
and
I'm
delighted
that
it's
moving
forward
and
I
want
to
commend
our
city
of
Toronto
planning
staff.
Those
who've
been
working
on
this
for
ten
years.
C
A
E
E
Q
Was
careful
consideration
of
the
height
regime
in
respect
to
policies
relating
to
transition
from
west
to
east?
So
that's
where
we
landed
with
250
Dundas
was.
We
feel
an
appropriate
transition
from
the
building
to
the
east
at
at
480
university
and
the
building
to
the
to
the
west
at
292,
Dundas
and
then
appropriately
scaled
down
to
the
building
to
the
north.
At
one
part
place
could.
E
You
could
you
comment
because
they
one
of
the
core
issues
around
this
site
was
the
the
shadowing
of
the
podium
on
an
existing
courtyard
in
between
the
buildings
that
that
are
to
the
to
the
north
of
of
the
proposed
site.
Can
you
comment
on
what
the
impacts
of
those
of
the
the
proposed
shadowing
are
compared
to
the
as
of
right
of
the
building
on
the
site?
Sure.
Q
We
were
attempting
to
balance
the
objectives
of
replacing
and
expanding
upon
office
uses
in
the
area
while
at
the
same
time
ensuring
that
we
weren't
creating
adverse
impacts
on
the
courtyard
of
the
the
condominium
to
the
north,
where
we
landed
on
was
that
the
base
building
is
exactly
or
within
a
meter
of
what
the
as
of
right
height
is
for
that
for
this
property,
we
were
also
careful
to
ensure
that
the
sculpting
of
that
base
building
worked
to
help
preserve
the
existing
vegetation
in
that
Court.
The
building
to
the
north
I
think.
Q
Certainly,
there
were
folks
who
would
have
hoped
for
a
lower
base
building
but
I
think
meeting
the
city's
objectives
with
respect
to
mixed-use
buildings
adjacent
to
transit,
note
so
ensuring
that
there's
not
only
replacement
of
employment,
but
expansion
of
employment
well,
at
the
same
time
ensuring
that
that
there
were
no
additional
adverse
impacts
on
the
the
condominium
to
the
north.
We
think
we
landed
on
the
right
spot
and.
Q
E
This
is
item
number
five,
which
will
send
it
without
recommendation
to
Council
and
some
direction
to
staff,
to
report
directly
to
the
January
29th
council
meeting
with
the
supplemental
report,
reflecting
amendments
to
the
section
37
contribution
by
increasing
the
affordable
housing
units
from
22
to
25,
which
brings
us
to
5%
and
then
there's
an
additional
public
realm
amount
as
well
in
there
listen.
There
is
no
denying
that
this
is
an
appropriate
site
for
density.
It's
close
to
public
transit.
It's
consistent
with
the
downtown
secondary
plan.
E
What's
difficult
is
it
would
also
be
very
difficult
to
argue
at
the
Local
Planning
Appeal
Tribunal
that
this
that
this
application
is
not
in
keeping
with
the
spirit
of
the
city's
existing
policy,
which
is
what
the
test
would
be
what's
problematic,
is
how
some
of
our
policies
impact
very
unique
situations,
and
it's
an
existing
built
context
to
the
north.
That
will
be
tremendously
impacted
by
the
base.
The
base
building
I
think
that
what
what
staff
have
tried
to
do,
however,
is
try
to
make
the
best
of
what
is
I
I.
E
Think
a
an
unfortunate
situation
where
we
have
a
green
space
that
will
be
surrounded
by
tall
buildings
by
existing
tall
buildings
that
were
built
when
they
built
when
the
Greens
built
this
space
was
built.
I
can't
imagine
that
at
the
time
they
they
didn't
contemplate
the
the
as
of
right
height
of
the
building
to
the
south.
E
What
the
actual
impacts
of
some
of
these
of
some
of
the
various
iterations
of
the
proposal
that
came
forward
would
would
in
fact,
be
but
I'm
not
ignoring
the
fact
that
there
are
some
problematic
issues
related
to
this
application
with
respect
to
the
existing
neighborhood
to
the
north,
and
the
problem
is
as
you've
heard
from
our
city
staff.
It
would
be
incredibly
difficult
to
argue
anything
else,
and
so
we
make
the
best
of
that
situation.
In
this
case.
That's
ensuring
5%
of
the
new
building.
E
A
G
Don't
want
to
keep
cancer
Laden
so
voice
going
for
too
long,
but
I
do
have
a
question
regarding
the
number
of
units
that
are
going
from
22
to
26
and
by
way
of
increasing
the
number
of
units
it
looks
like
the
the
market.
Rents
are
going
to
be
now
adjusted
to
ninety
percent
from
eighty
percent
of
market
rents.
Are
you
using
that
10
percent
variance
to
increase
the
number
of
units
so.
E
Yes,
but
it
also
told
that
it
increased
it.
The
overall
value
of
the
package
as
well,
and
so
we
wanted
to
see
the
number
higher
the
the
developer
came
back
and
said.
We
can
do
that,
but
only
if
we
increase
the
the
average
market
rent,
but
it
were
I'm
told
that
affordable
the
affordable
housing
office
was
favorable
to
this
arrangement
as
well,
because
what
they
saw
was
a
total,
an
increase
in
the
total
value
of
what
was
being
presented
to
the
city
through
the
section
through
sale
and.
G
E
Q
G
E
A
A
A
M
M
Several
government
officials
have
been
involved
in
the
discussions
around
in
this
application,
including
ministers
at
various
ministries,
economic
development,
infrastructure
finance
and
the
Treasury
Board
they've
all
been
briefed
on
the
project
and
the
university
has
received
nothing
but
an
excited
response
from
these
government
officials.
So
the
letter
that
was
received
from
infrastructure,
Ontario
staff
raised
some
concerns
with
respect
to
setback
in
separation,
distances,
tower
separation
and
shadow
impacts,
in
particular
on
the
childcare
center
outdoor
spaces
that
are
located
on
the
two
provincial
properties
to
the
north
I'm.
M
Building
is
13
point
6
metres
from
the
north
property
line
at
the
northeast
corner,
in
particular,
where
the
building
is
closest
to
the
north
property
line.
The
setback
at
grade
is
4
meters
and
8.5
meters
at
the
upper
floor
and
as
I
said,
we
worked
through
this
with
staff.
Had
various
meetings
with
infrastructure,
Ontario
staff
as
well
and
staff
were
supportive
of
these
setbacks.
M
We
also
completed
a
detailed
tower
separation
study
and
determined
that
the
infrastructure
Ontario,
the
provincial
property
sites
to
the
north
were
constrained
not
only
by
heritage
but
by
the
shadow
impacts
on
Queens
Park
itself.
Staff
also
concluded
in
their
report
that
they
did
not
see
these
provincial
properties
as
tall
building
sites.
M
With
respect
to
the
shadow
impacts
on
the
outdoor
spaces
for
the
childcare
centers,
we
did
submit
a
shadow
impact
study
and
it
demonstrated
that
even
in
some
instances,
the
as
of
right
condition
would
actually
be
worse
than
what
is
being
proposed
because
of
how
this
building
will
be
sited
and
pulled
back
from
the
north
property
line.
At
most.
There
is
a
one-hour
increased
shadowing
impact
for
the
proposal,
briefly
between
on
in
June
for
the
Frost
site,
which
is
the
provincial
building
just
to
the
north.
M
A
E
A
E
A
E
C
They
would
be
consistent
with
what
we
would
likely
be
recommending
for
this
site
and
and
we're
going
to
build
on
those
through
the
update
to
the
secondary
plan
and
design
guidelines
to
ensure
that
there's
additional
open
space,
appropriate
separation.
All
of
these
important
things
will
be
secured
in.
E
C
C
That
says,
through
the
submit
of
a
zoning
bylaw
amendment,
you
can
apply
to
increase
the
heightened
density
of
those
potential
development
sites
that
were
identified,
and
we
felt
that,
through
the
review
of
this
application,
it
was
consistent
with
the
direction
that
we
were
moving
in
for
this
site
and
in
the
direction
that
we
have
talked
about
at
many
different
consultation
meetings
for
the
secondary
plan
for
this
area
of
the
campus.
So
we
dug,
we
didn't,
have
a
concern
with
making
this
recommendation
at
the
time.
Okay,
thank
you.
E
Thank
you
very
much.
I'll
move
the
staff
recommendations
and
just
very,
very
briefly
congratulate
the
University
of
Toronto
on
an
exciting
project
moving
forward.
It
was
I
guess
about
a
year
ago,
when
there
was
a
very
exciting
announcement
made
about
a
contribution
to
the
university
that
would
be
going
to
to
this
facility
and
I.
E
Maroons
Park,
that's
for
certain,
but
I
think
in
with
the
the
the
architecture
will
will
do
so
in
a
in
a
quite
dramatic
and
positive
way.
I
will
comment
the
simply
to
say
that,
given
the
the
constant
shadow
that
that
is
over
Queens
Park
these
days,
I
am
I
I,
don't
think
I,
don't
think
an
extra
hours.
Gonna
do
much
have
much
of
an
impact
but
I'm
glad
that
the
applicant
took
it
seriously
and
as
an
as
ensured
that
it
will,
it
will
be
limited
because
we
do
know
that
brighter
days
are
ahead.
A
You're,
a
funny
guy
I
sold
on
the
items,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
I
will
next
call
te
12.7,
1151,
Queen,
Street,
East,
owning
amendment
application,
Ament
zoning
amendment
final
report:
I
have
a
deputy
Michael
Bessette.
If
I
could
just
make
sure
that
someone
alerts
councillor
Fletcher
that
we're
on
this
item,
please
you
could
just
yeah
call
her
or
something
yeah
good
morning.
Michael
you'll
have
five
minutes.
Q
As
fields
and
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
hallmark
the
applicant,
just
in
brief,
it's
47
new
purpose-built
rental
units
on
what
was
a
7-eleven
at
larch,
Mountain,
Queen,
just
east
of
Carla
on
Queen
Street.
The
application
is
six
stories:
20
meters
in
height,
there's
the
counselor
consistent
with
the
recently
approved
OPA
469.
We
have
reviewed
the
staff
report
and
words.
We
have
are
in
support
of
its
recommendations,
I'm
here
just
in
summary
to
say,
I'm
here
to
answer
any
questions
that
may
be
available.
Q
A
B
I
have
a
lengthy
motion:
I,
don't
know
if
see
it
there.
It
is
there
for
basically
around
the
construction
requirements.
It's
a
very
dense,
neighborhood,
it's
right
by
a
school.
So
having
this
a
platinum
construction
project
is
pretty
important
as
well
to
exempt
the
permit
parking
and
to
let
anybody
who's
buying
there.
No.
This
was
one
of
the
many
7-eleven
sites
that
were
closed
down.
I
think
we
all
had
those,
and
some
of
them
are
still
just
boarded
up.
B
One
on
the
Danforth
is
a
horrible
boarded
up
graffiti
graffiti
location,
and
this
is
for
me
the
first
7-eleven
site
that
I've
seen
come
in
and
it
meets
all
the
requirements.
The
community
is
very
supportive
currently
is
operating
as
a
art
galleries.
That
will
be
a
sad
moment
when
that
gets
closed
down,
but
this
is
up
for
approval
and
it's
gone
through
everything
and
it's
just
six
stories.
So
that's
it.
I'll
move
approval
with
those
motions,
miss
okay,.
A
A
R
R
The
axe'
are
the
proximity
to
the
property
line,
and
so
on
and
I
will
leave
it
to
them
to
speak
to
those
issues
in
greater
detail
and
with
greater
authority
than
me,
and
just
say
that
I
very
strongly
agree
with
what
the
points
that
they
will
make
and
today
I'll
start
with
a
briefly.
With
a
personal
perspective.
R
My
wife
and
I
have
been
in
a
home
at
the
south
end
of
the
dead
end
on
wheeler
effected
by
this
development
for
a
little
over
five
years,
I
think
everything
I
had
and
everything
I
could
borrow
into
buying
a
house
on
the
street,
partly
because
the
street
is
what
it
is.
It's
a
tiny,
narrow,
little
dead
end
with
no
sidewalks
and
very
little
parking.
R
But
despite
that,
one
where
the
many
kids
on
the
street
can
safely
walk
to
and
from
school
and
can
play
in
the
street
because
it's
a
closed
knit
community
and
because
there's
very
little
traffic,
this
proposal,
which
gives
the
the
units
and
the
development
pedestrian
access
to
wheeler,
would
inevitably
bring
service
vehicles
and
couriers
and
skip
the
dishes.
Uber
eats
ubers,
taxis,
friends
who
are
looking
for
a
parking
space
driving
up
and
down
the
street
that
doesn't
have
a
turn
around.
R
At
the
end,
it
will
dramatically
change
the
character
of
the
street
and
not
just
the
character
of
it,
but
I
strongly
caution
that
it
will
affect
the
safety
of
the
kids
in
the
neighborhood
and
it
seems
to
be
very
directly
at
odds
with
the
vision,
zero
initiative
of
the
cities
and
I
say
it's
inevitable
that
the
development
and
the
pedestrian
access
from
the
development
would
bring
that
traffic,
because
it's
so
difficult
to
park
on
on
Kingston
Avenue.
There's
there's
no
way.
R
This
is
frustrating
for
us,
because
the
earlier
development
proposal
a
couple
of
years
ago,
had
no
pedestrian
access
in
the
proposal
and
our
understanding
was
that
the
city
planner
attached
to
it
at
the
time
wouldn't
approve
pedestrian
access.
This
proposal
from
a
different
developer
reduced
the
height
and
the
scale
of
the
building,
but
it's
actually
worse
than
the
initial
one,
because
it
has
that
pedestrian
access
and
that
inconsistency
from
city
staff
from
one
planet
to
the
next
doesn't
frankly
inspire
confidence.
R
It's
also
to
me
personally
offensive
that
the
proposal
essentially
uses
the
Kingston
Road
address
to
sell
luxury
units
based
on
the
access
to
wheeler
Avenue
under
this.
Under
this
proposal
and
and
I
think,
that's
we're
just
wrong
now,
despite
everything
I'm
saying
and
despite
the
fact
that,
what's
currently
sky
and
trees
and
the
northern
horizon
from
my
house
will
become
a
big
ugly
building
I'm
not
actually
opposed
to
development.
You
know
I
know
the
city
needs
to
increase
density.
We
need
to
accommodate
a
rapidly
growing
population,
I,
just
really
strongly
believe.
R
A
A
D
Good
morning
everybody,
my
name
is
Marissa
Nelson
I
live
at
the
corner
of
Juniper
and
wheeler.
I.
Think
the
important
part
for
this
committee
to
understand
is
this
is
an
incredibly
unusual
property,
as
Dave
budge
said
we're
not
opposed
to
development
on
Kingston
Road.
We
need
intensification,
but
this
particular
property
has
two
sets
of
zoning
the
front
half
which,
which
is
zoned
on
Kingston
Road,
respects
the
Kingston
Road
context,
the
back
half
of
the
property
respects
the
lower
wheeler
level
level.
D
Context
and
I
think
it's
important
for
you
to
understand
the
context
of
this
particular
property.
The
the
wheeler,
the
wheeler
dead-end,
has
zero
turnaround
at
the
end
it
was
created
in
the
mid
1800s.
This
photo
that
I'm
showing
you
here,
it's
actually
outside
my
dining
room
window.
So
this
is
the
width
of
the
wheeler
Avenue.
What
I
would
say
is
it's
almost
a
lane
way
because
it
is
so
narrow?
We
we
have
19
kids
that
live
on
this
little
dead-end
and
everyday.
D
We
have
children
intermingling
with
traffic
because
they
have
to
walk
through
traffic
in
order
to
get
to
school,
because
there
are
no
sidewalks
and
there
is
no
capacity,
as
you
can
see,
to
put
sidewalks
in
the
other
thing,
I
would
say
is
probably
once
a
month.
We
do
not
get
city
AK.
We
do
not
got
city
services
on
our
street
because
somebody
has
parked
either
legally
with
a
disabled
parking
permit
on
the
east
side
of
this
street
or
illegally
particularly
construction
trucks.
D
And
what
ends
up
happening
is
the
garbage
trucks,
salt
and
snow
trucks
can't
get
up
they
already.
As
you
can
see
here,
this
is
reversing.
This
is
the
garbage
truck
on
December
31st,
reversing
up
wheeler,
and
just
this
summer
we
had
firemen.
Instead
of
bringing
the
fire
truck
up
the
dead
end,
they
decided
to
walk
up
to
investigate
an
open
burn
complaint
because
they
didn't
want
to
have
the
hassle
of
actually
having
to
get
the
truck
up.
D
D
What
we're
seeing
is
that
they're
trying
to
take
advantage
of
the
access
to
the
lower
community,
and
if
you
want
to
have
access
to
the
lower
community,
you
need
to
respect
integrating
into
the
lower
community
and-
and
this
proposal
doesn't
do
that,
so
we
feel
a
bit
like
if
you're
gonna,
if
you're
gonna,
integrate
with
our
community,
live
up
to
the
zoning
bylaws
that
are
already
on
the
back
part
of
that
property.
If
you
want
have
a
Kingston
Avenue
property,
that's
great,
but
you
need
to
respect
that.
It's
a
Kingston,
Road
property.
D
A
few
other
points
that
I
that
the
neighborhood
is
concerned
about
is
that
the
setback
is
on
the
rear
is
zero
they're
measuring
the
setback
from
Kingston
Road,
so
they
step
back
on
the
back
zero.
We're
very
concerned
because
that
dead
end
actually
at
the
moment
has
a
has
virtually
the
only
green
space
that
we
have
within
sort
of
a
four
block.
Radius
is
at
the
end
of
this
dead
end.
D
The
other
thing
I
would
just
say,
because
I
know
it
will
come
to
this
committee
later.
Is
we
certainly
don't?
We
can't
have
construction
happen
from
this
tiny
dead
end?
You
can
imagine
little
children
walking
amongst
all
of
the
construction
vehicles,
the
pickup
trucks,
the
cement,
the
diggers
and
all
of
that,
as
I
said
like
you
can
see
this.
D
R
Name
is
fishy.
You
can
hear
me
and
I
think
I
live
on
two
or
nine
wheeler
Avenue
right
behind
this
building.
Each
storey
building
and
we're
talking
about
today
and
I've
got
a
couple
of
items
that
I
want
to
raise
and
I'll
keep
it
very
short
and
succinct
for
the
benefit
of
everybody.
It's
the
first
thing,
I
want
to
reiterate
what
Marissa
and
Dave
had
mentioned.
R
So
basically,
we
understand
that
the
front
axis
for
the
cars,
a
majority
of
the
pedestrians,
are
from
Kingston
rule,
but
the
information
we
received
is
that
for
seven
units
on
this
building,
the
axis
is
true
wheeler.
However,
technically
all
thirty
units
will
have
access
through
wheeler
through
parking
level
p2,
which
means
that
for
every
person
in
the
30
units
and
their
family
and
friends
they're
going
to
have
access
through
wheeler,
they
can
come
in
and
go
as
they
please,
which
is
gonna
considerably
increase
the
traffic
on
wheeler,
both
pedestrian
and
motorists.
R
You
saw
the
picture
that
Marissa
pointed
out
it's
a
very
narrow
street
and
it
doesn't
have
a
good
you
turn.
Even
the
trucks
that
come
in
have
to
back
in
come
in
and
back
out,
it
can't
just
take
a
u-turn
at
all.
It's
gonna
change
the
way
of
our
life.
The
children
today
play
on
the
streets,
and
then
they
have
like
basketball
and
then
they
actually
paint
on
the
road
itself.
All
of
that
is
going
to
completely
change.
The
way
of
living
is
going
to
change
and
we
already
have
parked
cars
that
are
full.
R
If
we
increase
the
traffic,
it's
gonna
be
make
it
considerably
difficult
for
all
of
us.
That's
the
one
point
I
wanted
to
make,
and
then
the
second
point
is
that
the
setback
I
think
Marissa
mentioned
that
as
well.
Today,
we
have
like
trees
there.
If
you
have
some
what
we're
seeing
that
the
setback
is
almost
like
zero,
it's
practically
not
if
you
have
a
setback
that
is
almost
zero.
You're
gonna
have
like
an
eight
story,
building
right
on
the
street
on
the
street.
That
has
not
more
than
two
or
three
stories.
R
R
This
is
my
two
main
items
that
I
want
to
bring
for
your
consideration
and
the
third
last,
but
not
the
least,
is
deconstruction
that
Marissa
pointed
out
it's
probably
not
for
today,
but
for
later
that,
once
the
building
starts,
if
we're
gonna
have
all
the
trucks
and
constructions
and
coming
in
through
wheeler,
especially
with
the
narrow
street,
it's
gonna
make
it
so
hard
for
us
to
live
there.
So
these
are
the
three
items
I'd
like
to
raise.
A
H
H
Since
that
time
it's
gone
through
a
number
of
revisions.
The
initial
proposal
was
for
a
nine
story,
building
with
57
units.
The
current
proposal
is
for
an
eight
story,
building
with
30
units,
so
that's
about
almost
a
reduced
by
half,
and
we
thought
that
it
was
a
very
collaborative
process
and
we're
pleased
that
planning
staff
is
now
in
support
and
just
a
few
matters
that
I'd
like
to
bring
to
your
attention.
The
site
is
located
on
the
south
side
of
Kingston
Road
and
what's
unique
about
Kingston
Road.
H
Is
that
it's
actually
an
apartment
corridor
essentially
but
designated
neighborhoods,
and
that
was
a
unique
aspect
that
staff
took
into
their
consideration
on
this
application.
You
could
see
the
proposed
development
is
at
seven
storeys,
with
the
eight
story
stepped
back,
and
that
was
in
direct
discussions
with
city
staff
in
order
to
decrease
the
size
and
prominence
of
that
eight
story,
so
that
the
proposal
is
now
very
much
in
context
with
the
other
buildings
on
the
street,
which
are
also
at
seven
storeys,
seven
storeys
five
stories
right
adjacent,
so
it's
been
quite
sensitively
designed.
H
There
have
been
some
light
wells
that
have
been
designed
in
the
middle
of
the
building
with
secondary
windows.
Those
there's
a
recommendation
that
we
support
to
further
refine
that,
through
the
site
plan
process,
perhaps
with
clerestory
windows.
So
there
has
been
quite
a
bit
of
attention
paid,
there's,
also
a
terracing
down,
and
I
just
like
to
address
some
of
the
comments
made
by
the
Deputy
about
wheeler
Avenue.
Wheeler
Avenue
is
at
the
south
end
of
the
site.
H
It
is
actually
a
through
lot
and
there's
a
significant
grade
change
and
and
that's
why
the
unique
approach
was
required
here.
The
back
of
the
building
is
actually
at
a
much
lower
elevation,
and
that
means
that
the
the
p1
and
p2
levels
are
actually
exposed,
and
so,
rather
than
essentially
putting
up
a
blank
wall
and
and
exposing
something
unattractive
to
the
end
of
the
street
what's
been
done
instead,
is
that
it's
been
skinned
with
three
townhouse
units,
I
think
in
the
staff
report.
H
It
explained
that
there
were
more
than
that,
but
here
is
that
ground
floor
plan
and
it's
townhouse
unit
one
to
three
and
they
have
direct
access
from
the
outside
from
the
end
of
wheeler.
So
those
three
units
will
have
access
out
to
the
back
of
wheeler
as
normal
townhouses
would
if
they
address
the
neighborhood,
and
it
is
a
townhouse
scale.
H
H
H
All
vehicular
access
will
be
from
Kingston
Road,
which
is
yeah
so
right
there
is
Kingston
Road.
This
is
the
vehicular
access
and
the
primary
pedestrian
access
is
from
Kingston
Road.
It
has
a
Kingston
address,
which
means
that
any
deliveries,
drop-offs
or
pick
ups,
will
occur
off
of
Kingston
Road
and,
as
you
can
see,
this
is
the
ground
level.
The
ground
level
at
the
rear
is
actually
elevated
because
of
the
green
change,
but
it's
set
back
so
the
lower
load
is
the
grade.
Change
between
Kingston
down
to
wheeler,
I.
Think
it's
about
five
or
six
metres.
H
It's
about
the
equivalent
of
two
storeys,
approximately!
That's
why
the
P,
p1
and
p2
levels
are
exposed,
but
they're
skinned.
So
if
you
were
on
Kingston
Road
and
then
you
were
on
wheeler,
you
think
it's
only
five
metres.
It's
about
five
or
six.
That's
my
understanding.
I
can
check
the
site.
Elevation
I'll
clarify
with
stuff-
and
you
mentioned,
that
it's
three
units
skinning
three
towns
correct.
So
when
were
these
drawings
submitted,
so
these
are
the
site
plan.
H
Drawings
I
believe
that
they're
consistent
with
the
previous
drawings
that
were
prepared
and
they're
actually
two
storey
units,
so
each
unit
has
a
second
story.
Those
are
the
second
stories
when
you've
read
it
and
you've
read
the
staff
report.
That's
yes,
I
have,
which
doesn't
say
three
I,
believe
it
more
units.
Yes,
was
that
something
that
you
flagged
for
staff?
No
I
did
not
you
provide
those
comments
and
say
hey.
Actually,
it's
three
knots
in
fact,
I
just
noticed
that
okay,
did
you
just
read
it
this
morning
that
part
of
it?
H
A
A
Q
Ahead,
my
concerns
are
focused
on
a
walkway,
a
wheeler
in
the
proposal.
The
zoning
bylaws
referenced
or
that
of
Kingston's,
but
having
access
to
wheeler
means
that
the
stricter
zoning
bylaws
that
govern
that
Street
should
also
be
respected.
There
will
be
a
direct
impact
to
the
neighborhood
I
can
point
to
a
number
of
studies
and
stats
that
find
that
as
population
density
increases,
the
rate
of
property
crime
increases
as
well.
The
variance
in
the
zoning
laws
for
Kingston
are
not
as
Extreme
as
the
variance
in
the
wheeler
zoning.
Q
If
all
residents
of
the
building
have
access
to
wheeler,
then
the
massing
will
affect
the
safety
and
character
of
the
neighborhood.
As
for
the
positive
impacts
listed
in
the
proposal,
I'm
sorry
sure
the
positive
impacts
us
in
the
proposal.
They
do
not
hold
up
to
any
level
of
scrutiny.
The
building's
proximity
to
Lee
Avenue
means
that
any
impact
listed
for
wheeler
would
be
the
same
for
Lee,
which
is
already
used
by
the
residents
of
the
numerous
mid
rises
along
Kingston
taxes.
Queen
the
TTC
operates
24
hours
a
day
along
Kingston.
Q
Meanwhile,
it
is
a
15-minute
walk
to
Queen.
Therefore,
there
is
no
truth
to
the
statement
in
the
report
that
suggests
the
walk
would
reduce
car
dependency.
In
fact,
it
will
only
increase
car
traffic
in
the
area.
The
assumption
that
deliveries
and
pickups
are
based
on
address
alone
is
naive.
The
way
that
apps
work
is
that
users
can
drop
a
pin
on
the
map
at
any
point
and
if
they
want
to
use
wheeler
as
a
pickup
point,
there
is
nothing
stopping
them.
Q
Q
E
E
But
us
pulling
up
some
numbers
on
stat
scan
and
actually
actually
showing
a
correlation
between
the
two
are
completely
different
things
right.
You
there
needs
to.
You
need
some
causal
link
there.
You
can't
just
kind
of
fabricate
that
and
make
that
assertion
and
say
you
had
you.
You
have
lots
of
data
to
support
that.
Well,.
E
A
H
J
You
chair,
it
was
not
me
that
received
the
initial
application,
but
initially
there
was
as
the
as
Andrew
said,
there
was
a
nine-story
proposal
for
57
units.
There
was
an
iteration
that
came
before
community
council
prior
to
the
close
of
council
prior
to
the
election
that
was
seen.
That
was
a
seven-story
addition.
Iteration
it
had
a
similar
kind
of
rear
access.
It
was
reduced
to
30
units.
J
H
We
heard
a
little
bit
of
concerns
about
some
of
the
site,
back
setback
and
the
green
space
at
the
rear,
as
it
connects
or
rears
with
wheeler
I
know
it's
an
unusual
site
with
a
significant
grain
change,
not
a
ravine
lot,
but
certainly
a
sort
of
ravine
context.
Can
you
talk
about
the
measurement
of
the
setback
as
it
is
adjacent
to
wheeler.
J
You
could
see
in
the
zoning
diagrams
the
actual
setbacks
that
they're
going
for
so
it
ranges
from
2.8
on
the
eastern
end
of
the
building
increases
up
to
5
on
the
western
end
of
the
building,
and
that
actually
approaches
a
portion
of
the
building.
That's
one
meter
in
height
and
they
continually
setback
the
building
as
they
increase
the
height.
J
J
P
If
I
may
ask
add
to
that
the
setbacks
of
the
development
at
per
dimitra's
guidelines,
we
also
measured
that
actual
setback
from
residential
properties
on
wheeler
and
that
7.5
meters
of
setback
from
the
neighborhood
property
to
the
building
phase,
and
we
further
added
that
no
windows
and
no
balconies
were
allowed
within
10
meters.
So,
besides
a
7.5
meters,
an
additional
2.5
meters
were
was
said
that
was
added
to
allow
any
type
of
users
that
will
have
windows
directly
facing
Wheeler's
Avenue.
You.
J
A
B
J
H
Thanks
very
much
I
just
have
a
motion
recognizing
we're
doing
the
zoning,
but
with
two
recommendations
to
build
off
of
the
comments
that
we
heard
today.
I
want
to
thank
the
community
for
their
involvement.
This
was
an
application
that
came
forward
prior
to
the
election.
As
we've
heard,
it's
had
several
iterations
and
evolutions
over
the
years
and
I
do
want
to
thank
staff
for
their
work
on
this
as
well.
It's
been
contentious
on
a
unique
site
and
a
unique
context,
and
you
know
it's,
you
know,
there's
been
learning
for
me.
H
H
So
what
we're
trying
to
do
here
is
put
in
some
controls
and
security
through
the
site
plan
process,
making
sure
that
it's
just
emergency
access
through
wheeler
and
have
the
manager
of
Transportation
to
remove
the
permit
parking
for
this
building,
excluding
it
from
the
nine
seat
area.
It's
all
my
comments.
A
Questions
the
mover
anyone
else
to
speak,
seeing
none
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried.
Okay.
That
takes
us
to
item
te.
Twelve
point:
nine
residential
demolition
application
to
four
five:
two
Bloor:
are
there
any
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item?
Seeing
none
I
have
a
motion
on
this.
A
A
C
A
A
A
A
B
A
A
E
F
B
E
A
Not
me
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
item
te
12.1
7
refusal
of
a
sidewalk
full
of
our
vending
permit
application
located
at
two
five:
seven:
five
Danforth
Avenue.
Sixteen
point:
five:
zero
meters,
east
of
Main
Street
on
the
south
side
of
Danforth
Avenue
I,
did
have
a
deputy
enlisted,
but
they've
withdrawn.
Is
there
anyone
who
does
want
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item?
Seeing
none
councillor
Bradford.
A
Staff
recommendation
to
refuse
all
those
in
favor
opposed
that
carries
item
te,
12.1
8
report
on
the
cancellation
of
the
Union
Station
sidewalk
Boulevard
vending
locations
due
to
the
closure
of
Front
Street
West
adjacent
to
the
Northside
of
61
Front
Street
West
between
York
Street
and
Bay
Street.
Sometimes,
staff
give
me
telling
posters.
A
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item?
Seeing
none
councillor,
cressie
I
will
move
the
staff
recommendations.
All
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
item
te
12.1,
9,
commercial
Boulevard
parking
appeal,
1,
7,
0,
Bedford,
Road,
fee
calculation
and
alternative
use
option.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item?
I've
got
to
say:
I've
never
had
one
like
this
before,
but
it's
in
councilor
lady's
hands
so
we'll
see
how
we.
A
P
A
B
A
B
A
A
B
A
B
A
M
J
We're
a
more
mature
residence
group,
we're
fortunate
to
have
quite
a
few
architects
people
with
development
experience,
as
well
as
people
who've
been
in
the
area
for
quite
some
time
on
our
board
and
on
our
development
committee,
and
we've
spent
a
fair
amount
of
time
involved
in
the
consultation
process
for
the
planning
framework
and
have
been
very
fortunate
with
our
interactions
with
Josh
Matt
Lowe,
our
counselor
and
the
staff.
So
we
really
appreciate
all
the
the
commitment
to
consultation
and
we
will
continue
to
engage
in
that.
J
Our
group
is
fairly
strong
and
I
would
say,
though,
based
on
the
public
consultation
in
October,
that
the
views
of
our
board
and
our
group
are
very
consistent
with
what
we
heard
from
other
residents.
So
I,
wouldn't
I
would
just
want
to
make
sure
it's
understood
that
we
represent
more
than
really
more
than
just
our
membership.
We're
trying
to
represent
the
entire
area
and
we
put
in
a
written
submission
and
then
and
then
a
response
to
the
planning
framework
which
I'm
sure
you
have
in
front
of
you.
J
J
We
haven't
seen
what
the
city's
views
are
on
that
we've
had
our
own
information
based
on
an
Virata,
confirm,
ation
and
our
point
in
raising.
That
is
to
make
sure
that
when
we
have
applications
in
front
of
us
that
are
going
to
be
within
the
area
for
the
planning
framework
that
would
possibly
raise
our
population
by
50%
that
the
kinds
of
development
like
infrastructure
development
that
needs
to
come
with
that
are
considered.
We
already
have
residents
who
regularly
are
unable
to
get
on
the
subway
who
are
constrained
as
far
as
traffic
and
all
the
rest.
J
We
wanted
to
reinforce
our
concern
about
setbacks.
There
is
reference
in
the
planning
framework
document
to
those
setbacks,
and
we
understand
the
you
know,
parameters
around
what
can
be
said
about
that.
The
reason
that
we
wanted
to
reinforce
that
point
is
that
we,
the
stretch
of
Yonge
Street
in
particular
that
that
we
have
in
our
neighborhood,
is
very
narrow.
The
sidewalks
are
very
narrow
and
we're
just
concerned
about
the
future.
You,
the
future,
needs
of
those
stretches
and
want
to
make
sure
that
that's
an
issue.
J
That's
really
well
understood
that
if
we
decide
in
five
years
that
we
really
need
more
sidewalk
space
and
there's
already
several
buildings
up
we're
sort
of
stuck,
so
we
just
want
to
make
sure
that
that's
on
the
minds
of
the
staff
and
and
the
developers
as
they
are
putting
in
in
their
applications,
next
point
is
wanted
to
make
sure
there
was
an
appreciation
of
our
concern
about
the
height
of
towers.
We
understand
there
will
be
growth
in
our
area.
We
understand,
there's
an
interest
in
towers.
J
J
J
B
Just
to
add
a
few
comments,
we've
been
very
pleased
with
the
interest
of
residents
in
our
neighborhood
and
with
the
support
of
the
planners,
who
we
are
really
responding
to
the
issues
we
raised.
Like
the
transportation
study
issue
was
really
not
on
the
agenda
and
now
it's
it's
forefront
because
of
the
street
configuration
in
the
area
and
the
problems.
B
We
understand
that
this
study
is
the
beginning
of
a
more
comprehensive
secondary
plan
review
for
young
and
st.
Clair,
which
we
really
appreciate
because
of
the
growth
potential
of
the
neighborhood
and
the
interest
of
residents
and
making
sure
it
keeps
being
the
livable
area
that
we
really
appreciate
and
think
it's
a
model
of
mixes
of
uses
and
housing.
Types
for
of
the
city.
A
I
So
my
name
is
John
Torino
I
am
a
member
and
a
board
member
of
the
DPR
G,
as
well
as
Street
safety
committee
from
Fonterra
and
I'm,
a
member
of
cycle,
Toronto
Midtown
as
well.
I
am
making
this
deputation
as
an
individual,
although
what
I
were
going
to
say
is
going
to
be
tightly
aligned
to
what
we've
heard
from
the
DPR
G
and
cycle
Toronto
Midtown
I
just
wanted
to
reiterate
that
the
planner
is
working
on.
This
study
have
done
a
fantastic
job
of
listening
to
the
community's
feedback
and
our
needs.
I
We
when
it
comes
to
street
safety
and
transportation.
However,
these
two
after
development
are
the
top
two
concerns
in
our
neighborhood
study
after
study
meeting
after
meeting
these
issues
are
always
popping
up
and
a
young
Sinclair.
We
have
a
50
year
old
street
design
that
is
no
longer
meeting
the
needs
of
our
community.
It
hasn't
been
designed
for
safety,
it's
not
working
for
transportation
and
it's
a
challenge
getting
through
in
one
piece.
I
We
have
a
lot
of
people
walking
it's
one
of
two
intersections
north
of
Bloor,
any
we're
gonna
City
to
have
more
pedestrians
and
vehicles.
There's
kids
seniors
people
going
to
work
that
are
not
safe.
Getting
around
there's
a
lot
of
people
driving
through
the
neighborhood
there's
a
lot
of
automobile
traffic
that
is
increasing
having
a
hard
time
getting
around.
I
We
have
people
on
bikes
that
are
up
no
provision
for
safety
whatsoever
and
all
kinds
of
new
mobility
modes
are
going
to
be
coming
down
the
pipeline
things
like
kick
scooters,
electric
bicycles,
motorized,
wheelchair
there's,
no
room
for
them.
Delivery
vehicles
are
littering
the
streets,
we
have
servicing
challenges,
vehicle
loading,
and
on
top
of
this,
it's
not
working
today
in
the
next
few
years,
we're
gonna
be
adding
thousands
of
people
out
of
another
50%
of
the
population
around
young
as
st.
I
Claire
and
the
challenges
we
face,
a
young
said
Claire
a
little
bit
different
than
other
neighborhoods
I
like
the
downtown.
We
actually
don't
have
as
many
streets.
There's
no
alternate,
so
you
have
young,
you
have
st.
Claire,
that's
it
their
street.
Right-Of-Way
is
incredibly
narrow
like
the
downtown,
so
we
don't
have
that
much
extra
room
to
play
with
and
we're
not
building
new
streets
here
anytime
soon.
So
to
deal
with
this,
thankfully
we
working
with
councilor
Matt
Lowe
to
look
at
starting
up
some
transportation
studies.
It's
they're
overdue.
I
We're
gonna
have
the
youngest
Sinclair
neighborhood
transportation
study,
starting
up
next
year,
hopefully,
and
followed
by
the
multi
corridor
study
looking
at
Yonge
and
Avenue
Mun
pleasant
in
2021.
These
should
have
started
earlier.
They
didn't
so
we
don't
know
what
the
recommendations
are.
We
don't
know
what
the
needs
are
for
reconfiguring
these
streets
for
better
transportation
and
safety
right
now
we
are
making
transportation
decisions
or
we're
making
planning
decisions
that
will
guide
the
development
of
young
a
sink
for
the
next
50
years.
I
We
need
to
make
sure
we
do
it
right,
not
just
for
this
generation
but
for
future
generations,
because
we
don't
know
what
the
transportation
recommendations
are.
The
prudent
thing
to
do
is
to
ensure
that
we
are
protecting
the
space
for
future
needs.
So
that's
why
we
have
a
number
of
people,
not
just
myself.
Others
have
asked
get
as
much
space
as
we
can
from
the
future
developments
so
that
when
we
decide
what
we
need
to
do
with
the
streets,
we
have
a
space
available.
I
The
ask
has
been
for
eight
meters
total
five
meters
from
the
property
line,
which
is
a
bit
more
than
what
the
city
standards
are
of
six
meters
total.
Once
we
do
the
transportation
studies
in
two
years,
then
we'll
know
maybe
that
space
can
be
used
for
things
like
street
safety
improvements.
Maybe
it's
going
to
be
additional
space
for
pedestrians,
baby.
It's
things
like
mobility
lanes.
Maybe
it's
actually
public
realm
that
will
be
given
for
things
like
patios
and
planters.
I
A
K
Good
morning,
chair
members
of
the
Toronto
and
East
your
community
council,
thank
you
for
having
me
today
to
speak
on
this
important
matter
before
you.
I
also
want
to
specifically
thank
councillor,
Matt
Lao
and
his
amazing
staff
for
their
care
and
attention
to
this
file,
the
numerous
public
and
stakeholder
consultations
that
they
have
hosted
for
this
matter
and
the
real
commitment
that
they've
shown
to
making
sure
everyone's
coming
to
the
table
and
helping
to
contribute
to
a
vibrant
and
successful
future
for
the
young
in
st.
Claire
area.
So
thank
you
very
much.
Members
of
council.
K
My
name
is
McKenzie
Keast
I
am
the
executive
director
of
the
young
in
st.
Claire
Business
Improvement
area.
The
youngest
st.
Claire
BIA
is
among
the
city's
newest
BIA
s
formed
in
2018
and
represents
one
of
the
most
important
intersections
and
commercial
hubs
in
Toronto.
Each
workday
young
st.
Claire
welcomes
nearly
15,000
employees
to
over
450
businesses
in
the
neighborhood
office.
K
Clair
is
also
one
of
Toronto's
best
connected
neighborhoods
when
it
comes
to
transit,
representing
the
intersection
of
the
st.
Clair
streetcar,
and
line
one
subway
line.
Indeed,
a
significant
number
of
employees
and
visitors
to
this
community
come
by
transit,
starting
or
ending
their
trips
by
foot
on
the
neighborhood's.
Many
sidewalks.
This
public
space
in
the
pedestrian
environment
is
one
of
the
young
in
st.
Claire.
Bia
is
most
urgent
priorities,
giving
us
an
opportunity
to
improve
the
public
realm
and
make
our
community
a
safer
and
more
attractive
place
to
shop
work
and
do
business.
K
The
streetscape
master
plan
was
developed
by
the
BIA
through
extensive
consultation
with
our
member
businesses
and
property
owners,
local
residents,
stakeholder
groups
and
our
municipal
partners
separately,
Council
rightly
directed
staff
to
undertake
a
new
planning
framework
for
the
area
to
help
shape
new
built
form,
as
well
as
the
public
realm.
This
has
been
an
intensive
process
that
myself
and
our
BIA
board
has
been
to
be
a
part
of,
and
we're
excited
to
be
here
today
to
see
it
come
closer
to
its
completion.
The
BIA,
however,
requests
that
priority
endorsement
of
this
planning
framework.
K
That
staff
include
the
following
three
refinements,
and
this
is
just
a
summary
of
what
was
included
in
my
letter
to
you
that
I
sent
yesterday
through
the
clerk.
So
first
we
ask
that
some
manner
of
implementation
be
spoken
to
in
this
document.
I
understand,
in
my
conversations
with
the
project
team,
that
these
are
guidelines
that
are
outside
typical
implementation
instruments,
but
we
do
feel
it's
important
to
provide
some
sort
of
context
as
to
how
staff
and
council
expect
this
document
to
be
utilized
further.
K
We
feel
that
the
implementation
of
this
document
can
include
a
directive
to
new
applicants
for
development
in
the
area,
alongside
city
staff,
during
the
review
of
the
their
review
process
to
consult
with
the
BIA
in
order
to
align
public
realm
plans
with
our
own
streetscape
master
plan.
This
will
ensure
that
we
can
coordinate
on
our
shared
goals
to
improve
the
public
environment
of
Yonge
and
st.
Clair
and
help
us
potentially
reduce
costly
delays,
overlaps
or
oversights.
Secondly,
we
ask
that
the
planning
framework
include
broader
recognition
of
a
mix
of
built
form.
K
Finally,
we
ask
that
the
implementation
of
the
young
and
Sinclair
BIA
street
improvements
envisioned
through
our
streetscape
master
plan,
be
part
of
the
objectives
of
all
big
moves
identified
in
the
planning
framework.
Well,
it
is
tangentially
included
in
some
of
these
sections.
We
feel
this
language
should
be
expanded,
such
that
there's
a
wide
recognition
in
this
document
of
the
BIA
streetscape
master
plan
in
the
design
details
that
we
have
identified
within
it.
Thank.
A
F
Motions
to
add
to
the
recommendations
and
I
want
to
begin
by
thanking
our
community
led
by
the
Deer
Park
residents
group,
who
I've
worked
incredibly
closely
with
both
to
initiate
the
framework
study
to
begin
with,
but
also
on
a
wide
array
of
different
priorities
in
the
neighbourhood,
often
on
an
ad
hoc
basis.
But
on
this
a
more
holistic
and
comprehensive
view
on
how
our
area
is
going
to
grow.
I
also
want
to
thank
the
BIA
McKenzie
and
the
entire
board
for
their
dedication
to
improving
the
the
main
streets,
which
are
our
village
main
streets.
F
They
both
serve
as
the
heart
of
the
City
of
Toronto,
but
they
also
are
the
local
Deer,
Park
and
summer
hill
neighborhood
main
streets
where
people
run
into
each
other
and
shop,
and
we
want
it
to
be
vibrant
and
successful
and
I
can
commit
to
them
that
as
we
move
forward,
they,
as
they
always
have
been,
will
be
right
at
the
table,
both
literally
and
figuratively.
When
we
are
discussing
how
the
area
is
going
to
grow
and
I
want
to
thank
staff,
David
Rieger,
Kevin,
Friedrich,
orange
Muir
and
everyone
involved
in
planning.
F
The
for
this,
this
phase
is
a
first
phase,
so
the
framework
is
primarily
about
improved
public
realm,
as
John
Toronto
alluded
to
earlier,
ensuring
that
the
public
realm
is
not
only
improved
for
for
today,
but
also
to
ensure
that
that
we
create
opportunities
for
a
multimodal
young
in
st.
Claire
in
the
future.
Improved
improved
public
realm
for
all
users-
and
it's
about
built
form
young
Sinclair
is-
is
a
really
special
area
it
it.
It's
got
a
number
of
Art
Deco
buildings.
F
It's
got
this
kind
of
cool,
a
columnist
say
I
once
referred
to
as
sort
of
the
crooner
of
Toronto
crooner
yeah,
but
Glenn
Gould
lived
in
the
area.
I
used
to
hang
out
at
the
old
friends
which
is
now
pub
on
the
south
side
of
st.
Clair.
There's
something
just
really
really
unique
about
it,
and
over
several
years
developers
would
buy
up
property
after
property
after
property,
to
consolidate
them
to
to
build
something
in
the
future.
But
what
happened
was
the
neighborhood
that
we
knew
and
loved
in
past
years?
The
Bregman
is
the
the
cinemas.
F
All
of
that
you
remember
Bregman.
My
parents
used
to
take
me
there
when
I
was
a
kid
and
that
was
lost
and
I
think
there's
a
consensus
in
the
area,
whether
you
consider
yourself
pro
development
or
anti
development
or
somewhere
in
between
that
the
status
quo
isn't
good
enough
anymore.
That
there
needs
to
be
some
redevelopment,
that
it
is
tired
and
it
needs
to
grow
and
change.
F
The
debate,
obviously,
is
what
does
that
look
like,
and
what
we
want
to
make
sure
of
is
that
that
growth
is
respectful
to
the
neighborhoods
in
the
community,
as
Cynthia
said
earlier,
that
it
has
built
right
into
it.
The
assurance
of
sufficient
infrastructure,
great
public
realm
services.
So
whether
you
have
two,
you
know
two
people
or
two
million
people
in
any
given
part
of
our
city,
that
everybody
should
be
able
to
access
their
local
school.
Everyone
should
be
able
to
get
onto
transit.
Everyone
should
have
a
library
nearby.
F
Everyone
should
have
childcare,
that's
what
we
all
want
for
our
neighborhoods
and
that's
what
we're
working
on
through
these
initiatives.
The
next
phase
of
it
is
in
my
motion
is
to
review
the
apartment
neighborhoods,
because
we
are
having
more
and
more
infill
pressure
within
our
apartment,
neighborhoods,
and
that
has
to
be
a
priority
for
us
and
then,
lastly,
the
transportation
study,
which
is
important,
because
not
only
do
we
want
to
make
sure
that
it's
that
we
have
transportation
flowing
in
the
future,
but
we're
already
having
the
issues
that
are
exacerbated
by
the
pressure
today.
F
I'll
end
with
with
this,
because
I've
got
a
lot
that
I
wanted
to
cover
and
I'm
getting
signals
from
the
chair
that
he
wants
us
to
move
on
there.
There
is
going
to
be
much
more
work
to
do
to
make
sure
that
the
vision
that
we
have
through
this
framework
is
seen
through
to
fruition,
but
we're
gonna
have
to
work
together
with
our
development
partners
in
the
area,
the
BIA,
the
residents
and
all
of
us
to
ensure
that
how
the
area
grows
is
for
the
community
and
we're
going
to
work
together
to
see
that
through.
A
Thank
you.
Are
there
any
questions
for
the
mover,
seeing
none
anyone
else
to
speak?
No,
we'll
take
the
amendments
and
the
item
together.
All
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
members.
It's
conceivable
we'll
be
done
by
12:30.
We
have
a
few
things
left
to
do:
we're
not
ready,
introduce
councillor
Fletcher's
motion.
J
J
A
59
through
62
could
I
have
a
motion
introduce
them
councillor
Fletcher,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carry.
We
now
go
to
te
12.3
7,
Toronto,
East,
York,
collector,
Road,
speed,
limit
reductions
as
part
of
vision,
zero,
speed
management
strategy,
members
aye
circular
I
had
the
clerk
circulate,
the
motions
that
were
in
our
hands
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting
and
councillor
Bradford's
has
been
revised
a
couple.
B
A
G
G
I
actually
have
two
motions:
the
first
one
lists
14
different
streets
in
were
13,
where
we
would
like
to
see
it
moved
from
40
kilometres
and
have
the
speed
speed
reduced
to
30
kilometres
and
then
the
second
motion,
if
the
clerk's
can
put
that
on
the
screen,
is
to
have
the
transportation
service
staff,
as
well
as
the
director
of
project
and
design
and
management
through
transportation
services.
Report
back
to
this
community
council
on
recommendations
to
reduce
the
speed
on
Bay
Street,
Jarvis,
Street
and
Jarvis
Street
self,
from
a
230
km/h
I'm.
G
Just
gonna
note
that
we've
had
some
very
high-profile
collisions
over
the
past
year.
Some
of
it
is
resulted
in
tragic
deaths
on
Jarvis
Street
alone.
Over
the
past
five
years
we
had
had
three
fatalities,
including
pedestrians,
killed
in
2016
2017
and,
most
recently,
you
would
have
heard
on
the
news
just
over
the
weekend,
15
people
who
were
injury
injured
seriously
by
just
trying
to
make
their
way
across
Jarvis
Street
on
Bay
Street
we've
had
one
fatality,
a
pedestrian
who
was
struck
in
2017
and
who
all
toys
have
come
to
those
serious
injuries.
G
And
then
we
ten
individuals
who
were
seriously
injured
and-
and
this
does
not
include
those
individuals
who
were
perhaps
in
collision
but
but
walked
away
and
decided
not
to
report.
Overall,
we
have
seen
a
number
of
community
members,
as
well
as
business
stakeholders
who
altered
to
the
fact
that
the
speeds
on
Jarvis
and
Bay
Street
are
too
fast.
G
C
A
K
B
A
B
C
B
A
And
I
would
just
add
that
this
is
actually
the
forum
where
a
number
of
statutory
meetings
take
place.
That's
the
only
legal
place
that
members
of
the
community
can
be
engaged
in
certain
decisions
and
I'm
deeply
concerned
about
adding
any
kind
of
barriers
to
access
to
that
decision
making
process.
So
thank
you
for
councillor
Fletcher
for
bringing
this
I'll
be
supporting
it
and
wholeheartedly.