►
From YouTube: Unimatrix Governance Board call 2021-06-07
A
Okay-
let's
let's
get
going,
then
we
it's
been
quite
a
while,
since
we
we
had
the
the
most
recent
euromatrix
governance
call,
and
I
think
one
of
the
things
we
discussed
at
that
point
was
to
how
to
technically
proceed.
I
think
we
come
in.
We
ended
up
in
a
little
bit
of
a
limbo
to
align
ourselves
with
with
it,
with
the
technical
board
etc,
and
coming
up
to
this.
A
A
It
suggested
that
we
do
some
improvement
on
the
website
or
actually
make
it
into
a
website
more
than
just
the
placeholder.
It
is
now
one
question
that
we
need
to
sort
of
agree
upon
or
discuss
is
how
there
is
hugo
palo
hugo
is
to
discuss
how
how
this
should
be
done,
because
we
have
up
to
now
all
the
work
that
was
put
into
that
website
was
done
by
access
and
actually
donated
to
the
project,
and
that
also
means
that
we
don't
have
any
funds
collected
from
the
members.
A
A
B
A
C
We
in
reality
I
mean
just
like
anwarf:
has
the
communications
committee
consider
having
that?
So
it's
you
know
website.
You
know
you
may
eventually
have
press
releases
coming
up.
You
know
a
little
bit
of
communication,
sort
of
and
stuff
like
that.
So
would
this
be
a
time
to
maybe
consider
you
know
getting
into
a
structure
like
that
point.
One
point
two.
C
C
C
C
So
I'm
just
thinking.
You
know
ahead
of
time
that
you
know
in
terms
of
messaging,
creating
that
getting
it
out
right
now
and
as
we
discussed
the
last
time
you
know,
most
of
the
changes
required
is
really
more
or
less
a
technical
nature.
C
Technical
nature
so
documentation
and
samples
and
and
whatnot
so
right
now
it's
a
very
hands-on
task.
I'm
just
you
know
thinking
a
little
bit
ahead.
You
know
when
we
we
really
want
to
blast
out
that
that
we,
when
we
have
a
good
message
and
and
wanna
you
know,
if
you
look
at
the
ossa,
which
I
think
you
compare
in
in
the
sense
that
it's
a
relatively
new
foundation,
you
know
they
have
all
these
streamlined.
C
You
know,
as
does
on
with
so
I'm
not
so
much
worried
about
the
test
right
at
hand,
that's
more
of
a
practical
nature,
but
maybe
we
need
to
think
ahead.
B
B
B
Yeah
so
for
the
next
year,
because
we
needed
some
participants
for
that
group,
so
they
were
mainly
in
suggestion.
A
C
C
Well,
member
had
you
know
not
necessary
to
put
a
title
on,
but
I'm
I'm
throwing
myself
into
the
game
of
you
know
working
on
the
website.
C
A
Yeah
on
that
topic,
we
have
received
a
a
note
from
linux
foundation
that
we
need
to
add
copyright,
linux
foundation
at
the
bottom
of
the
patches
which
we
didn't
from
the
beginning,
which
also
indicates
that
they
didn't
look
that
close
when
they
received
it.
I
guess
so
that's
what
that's
that's
they
want
to
do
that
to
maintain
their
the
copyright
to
it
as
they
own
the
project.
C
So,
in
that
sense
we
I'll
set
up
a
meeting.
Well,
we
need
to
agree
on
what
you
know
what
to
sort
of
develop
with
right,
and
I
know
from
the
last
meeting
you
had
some
pretty
good
ideas
on
you
know
on
and
it
was
discussed
what
to
what
to
expand
with,
but
just
to
figure
out
a
process
for
this
and-
and
you
know,
do
we
need
to
have
an
approval
process,
no
from
the
from
the
gb
and
stuff
like
that,
so
yeah.
B
D
B
B
B
A
B
B
C
B
A
F
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
So
I
guess
if
we
go
for
that
time
for
for
that,
so
we
need
to
have
an
agreement
of
all
companies
in
the
communist
portal
that
we
need
a
change
of.
A
D
I
mean
we
have
done
a
few
examples
so
far.
That's
on
the
gitlab!
That's,
but
it's
just
examples.
So
if
this
is
some
kind
of
models
that
are
supposed
to
be,
you
know,
production
ready
or
that
is
like
a
baseline
or
develop
and
develop.
Those
kind
of
you
know
models
similar
to.
D
Basically
what
panorama
is
trying
to
do.
I
think
that's,
I
would
say
it's
a
change
of
scope
because
providing
production
quality
models
for
for
different
hardwares.
It's
a
it's
a
huge
effort.
I
mean
amazon
spent
loads
and
loads
of
money
on
that.
D
D
D
And
that
would
be
a
major
change
of
scope.
I
would
say
I
don't
know
what
what
you
other
guys
think
or
what
from
from
ipro's
side.
What
is
your
intention
of
that.
E
E
F
Is
very
important
for
uni
matrix
because
of
the
contents
are
created
by
them
and
therefore
so
and
then
we
attract
such
a
company
so
maybe,
for
example,
our
free
pre-trained
model
in
the
sample
program
and
and
so
on,
are
needed
for
the
application
vendors.
F
D
But
the
thing
these
models
are
optimized
and
pruned,
and
so
on
for
specific
hardware.
So
in
unimatrix,
if
we
support
multiple
different
hardwares,
I
mean
from
the
present
companies.
We
already
have
maybe
three
four
different
hardwares.
D
So
then
these
models
need
to
to
be
optimized
and
pruned,
and
so
on
for
all
these,
and
and
that's
you
know,
that's
a
huge
huge
effort,
I
would
say-
and
that's
I
mean
amazon-
is
investing
a
ton
of
money
on
this
and
I
think
if
we
want
to
to
do
the
same
thing,
we
need
to
have
a
huge
budget
and
it's
I
I
think
it's
in
my
point
of
view
out
of
scope
right
now
with
what
this
kind
of
setup
we
have.
D
So
for
me,
I
think
for
providing
these
examples
and
and
so
on,
for
maybe
a
few
different
hardwares
is
within
scope.
Otherwise
I
would
say
it's
a
big
change
in.
G
H
G
Yep,
maybe
we
should
get
clear
like
what
is
the
goal
during
metrics
as
a
body
is
trying
to
achieve
via
this,
maybe
reiterate
the
goal
if
necessary,
and
then
we
can
make
come
to
a
conclusion
on
this
appropriately.
F
Also,
I
think
so
maybe
the
goal
of
unimatrix
is
to
show
the
ai
application
among
the.
F
Camera
vendors
in
the
integrators
in
con
in
the
so
such
if
we
will
create
such
a
var
in
unimatrix,
so
the
application
vendors
is
very
important
or
low.
F
And
therefore
so,
even
though
we
create
the
unimatrix
framework
only
for
the
hardware,
so
maybe
ai
application,
vendors
and
integrators.
G
You
could
take
open
source
model
as
this
exists
and
optimize
it
for
a
couple
of
hardware
and
showcase.
G
D
G
Well,
so,
just
to
be
clear,
we
are
talking
about
only
models
running
on
the
client
side
right.
The
hardware
there's
no
service
component
here,
so
where
is
aws
coming
into
picture
just
using
the
models
that
they
have
yeah?
In
that
case
shouldn't
we
just
use
models
from
the
open
source
community
like
given
how
unimatrix
is
set
up
versus
yeah.
I
would
prefer.
D
I
would
go,
but
the
thing
is
if
you
want
this
like,
but
it
seems
like
I
pronounced,
is
more
looking
at
the
same
way
that
panorama
is
is
laid
out
that
the
developers
doesn't
have
to
do
a
lot
with
the
training
themselves.
So
they
basically
only
do
the
application
on
tour,
and
that's
not
really
what
we
thought
from
the
beginning
of
of
this
product
that
it's
up
to
the
to
the
ai
developers
to
to
do
the
training
and
so
on,
with
their
models.
B
Didn't
we
discuss
with
this
with
hick
extensively
in
the
beginning,
just
exploring
if
this
was
possible
or
not,
or
he
concluded
that
it
was
very
difficult
at
that
time
to
do
that.
D
A
If
we
all
agree,
this
is
a
very
very
I
should
say,
resource
consuming
activity,
because
we
have
to
guarantee
workability
portability
and
a
lot
of
things
which
we
might
see
as
a
challenge.
That
would
defer
this
to
to
decide
on
a
today
to
stage
and
see
what
the
yield
will
be
from
the
the
other
recruitment
activities.
We
can
get
going.
B
A
I
Okay,
hi
guys,
I
I
have
one
question
inside
of
the
uni
mattress:
do
we
have
any
long-term
planning
to
do
our
own
like
a
app
management
or
license
mechanism
thing
for
ai
developers,
especially
for
individual
or
small
size,
ai
companies
they
for
the
fact
that
they
don't
have
their
own
mechanism
to
manage
their
app
manage
their
license?
So
it's
it's
a
little
bit
like
a
scene.
So
do
we
have
any
long-term
planning
on
on
that
direction
or
it's
out
of
top
picking
inside
the
metrics.
D
B
And
actually,
the
next
tv
call,
we
would
like
to
discuss
a
proposal
or
we'd
like
to
discuss
ansible
that
could
suit
our
needs
in
uni
matrix
and
that's
next
monday.
The
same
time
as
today.
B
So
after
some
research
from
axis,
we
concluded
internally
that
ansible
would
be
a
good
fit
for
the
requirements
that
we
have
doesn't
take
too
much
system
resources.
So
it's
lightweight.
We
had
quite
some
good
features
that
would
suit
us,
but
we'll
have
some
one
expert
from
texas
that
is
available
for
that
discussion.
Next
monday.
C
Because
I
I
I
completely
agree
on
on
and
I
was
actually
just
having
the
same
thoughts.
You
know
we
are
very
much
discussing,
obviously
the
technical
platform
and
and
that's
great,
but
we
are
up
against.
You,
know
ossa
in
all
honesty,
we're
trying
to
achieve
the
same
so
we're
fighting
for
you
know
the
resources
of
the
smaller
developing
companies.
That
has
a
great
you
know,
ai
technology,
but
don't
have
the
reach.
C
B
A
B
Yes,
yes,
frederick,
you,
you
would
put
this
on
the
agenda
now.
You
know
back
from
vacation,
stop
creating
the
agenda
for
that.
F
H
A
For
the
remaining
points
I
would
like
to,
as
I
said
earlier,
if
we
agree
that
we
we
get
this
discussed
in
the
technical
board,
because
I
think
there
is,
there
is
a
lot
of
technical
underlying
arguments
on
the
consensus
of
building
the
component,
the
reference
implementation,
the
possibility
for
the
the
member
companies
to
produce
products
with
this,
the
one
that
could
be
something
we
discuss
here
there
is
this,
the
one
for.
F
F
A
Okay,
so
so,
if
I
understand
you're
right,
the
question
was
that
with
the
member
companies
should
do
some
sort
of
disclosure
on
when
they
believe
they
have
products
ready
for
deployment
with
unimatrix.
F
Should
be
introduced
in
comma
and
therefore
so
such
a
schedule
and
plan
should
be
shared
each
other.
H
I
I
If
I
currently,
we
can,
we
cannot
give
give
you
a
confirmed
schedule
on
product
development,
but
we
will
try
out
from
our
site
on
this
internal
development
and
by
the
way,
when
I
ask
that,
are
we
gonna
do
any
official
like
like
a
compatibility
process
to
say
this
hardware
from
hakville
or
from
panasonic
it
is.
It
is
fully
fully
approved
or
fully
compatible
with
the
with
videometrics
or
something
like
that.
So
are
we
gonna
do
that
or
it's
just
claimed
by
each
individual.
F
So,
of
course,
so
we
are
still
under
investigating
and
therefore
so
we
don't
have
a
concrete
schedule,
but
so
we
do
proceed.
The
investigation
about
the
matrix.
A
Well,
I
don't
know
I
mean
if,
if
we
compare
with
with
the
work
we're
doing
on
with,
we
really
don't
discuss
when
we
have
products
or
when
products
will
be
be
available
on
the
market.
With
the
usb
tv
profiles,
we
do
meet
in
the
hackathons,
sometimes
to
test
out
prototypes
and
stuff
like
this,
but
we
don't
keep
any
any
sort
of
official
list
if
this
is
happening
between
other
companies,
I
don't
know
it's
not
an
official
activity,
at
least
so
maybe
this
is
more
or
something
to
to
bring
up
your
hackathons.
F
Oh
so
I
I
don't
know
the
obvious
own
beef
background
and
so
and
if
so,
we
don't,
if
we
don't
treat
the
schedule
about
the
introduction
for
the
each
company
if
it's
work.
Well,
it's
no
problem.
I
think
so.
However,
so
there
are
two
so.
F
In
the
future,
so
concern
is
so
how
many
companies
will
introduce
the,
for
example,
ronald
to
the
camera.
So
we
don't
understand
so
we
can
expand
the
minimatrix.
F
In
each
company,
or
not
so
actually
so
april
is
investigating
to
introduce
larot
on
the
eyebrows,
ai
camera
and,
of
course,
axis
has
already
introduced
a
lot
of
e
axis
ai
camera,
and
but
so
how
about
other
companies?
F
So
so,
maybe
so,
if
so
many
camera
vendors
will
not
introduce
the
route
widely.
So
the
effect
to
introduce
matrix
is
very
small.
It's
our.
A
A
B
B
A
We
run
into
some
some
activity
issues
when
we
had
the
the
last
meeting
before.
A
And
we
just
need
to
to
sort
of
be
a
little
bit
more
active
to
contribute
to
agenda
and
bring
questions
up,
but
maybe
now
yes,
when
you
have
a
new
task,
you
will
be
eager
to
meet
us
more
often.
C
Yeah,
I'd
happily
cancel
my
summer
vacation
just
to
meet
up,
although
I
didn't
well,
it's
partly
cancelled
anyways
yeah,
I'm
fine,
whatever,
whatever
we.
C
D
Yeah,
but
now,
if
there's
a
lot
of
you
know
balls
in
the
air,
I
feel
about
what
to
include
in
orchestration
and
and
so
on.
So
I
think
that
probably
we
can
have
at
least
start
monthly
and
then
see
if
we
need
more
increase.
B
Focused
meetings
like
we
have
had
for
largo,
for
example,
depending
if
you,
if
you're
working
on
orchestration,
for
example,
maybe
we
need
meetings
bringing
that
work
like
working
group.
D
B
Hey
we
should
discuss
vitamin
tb
if
we
need
to
form
working
groups.
If,
for
example,
we
have
both
people
working
on
large
and
on
ansible
that
first
people
working
with
issues
could
be
having
different
working
groups,
for
example,
depending
on
who
is
involved.
C
So
that
so
that
does
sound
like
a
good
topic
for
next
week's
tb
meeting.
D
A
A
The
other
point
for
tv
also
just
is
to
do
development
model
for
converters,
id
etc
for
a
applications,
and
I
also
took
down
that
the
the
need
for
hackathons
frequency
is
really
in
the
need
in
the
hands
of
of
the
members
board.
The
members
meeting
to
say
when
it's
time
to
to
get
together.
D
About
that
that
one
about
the
tool,
developments,
it's
something
we
haven't
really
discussed
much
either
it's
it's
a
little
bit
out
of
scope,
I
would
say,
but
I
can
see
the
need
for
it.
I
mean
to
compete
with
the
oss,
for
example,
to
need
they
have
like
android
studio,
which
is
a
slick
environment,
and
we
we
could.
D
We
should
provide
similar
thing
for
a
good
developer
experience.
So
so
my
I
want
to
to
focus
on
visual
studio
code,
which
is
an
open,
open
source,
and
you
can
do
extensions
and
so
on.
So
we
can
do
you
know
uni
matrix
extensions
for
for
building
in
applications
and
so
on.
B
A
And
we
have
a
few
a
few
decisions
taken
here
about
the
communications
board,
we'll
repeat
to
the
decision
on
the
meeting
frequency.
A
Of
course,
yes,
sorry,
I
forgot
that
sorry,
good
thing
you
brought
it,
you
brought
it
up.
You
I
proposed
a
questionnaire
to
be
distributed,
so
we
can,
after
the
meetings
called,
we
can
send
it
to
all
the
the
governor's
board
members
and
then
we
can
take
a
decision
to
send
it
out.
Also
to
the
members
list.
A
E
F
A
F
A
Yes,
it
works
good
yeah.
So
if
we
can
take
a
look
and
look
at
that
and
then.