►
From YouTube: Cartographer Community Meeting, Feb 9th, 2022
Description
00:00 Intro
00:32 TL;DR What's new in the project this week?
03:12 Open Mic discussion
08:32 Supply Chains live editor demo (work in progress)
Community meetings happen each Wednesday at 8:00 AM PT/11:00ET
See the agenda here (https://bit.ly/2Z67z08), add any topic you may want to discuss and join us live!
B
B
That
marty
had
pushed
for
and
that's
been
done.
That's
cool
and
some
work
is
kicked
off
for
rfc
9,
if
I'm
tracking,
correctly
yep
rfc
9
for
introducing
those
options
that
we
ratified
this
week
as
well,
and
lots
of
discussions
about
where
we're
going
to
go
from
there
as
well.
That's
with
with
respect
to
snippets
and
multipathing.
A
A
A
A
So
I
will
be
learning
at
least
all
this
year
and
yeah
applying
what
I
learned
here
for
the
project:
okay,
cool,
also
yeah.
This
one
was
in
my
backlog
for
several
weeks.
I
I
used
github
discussions
in
the
past,
mainly
for
archiving
old
meeting
notes,
but
also
to
spark
some
conversation
discussions,
because
it's
kind
of
easier
or
more
visible
than
just
scrolling
up
on
slack.
A
A
A
A
I
would
have
to
check
it
out.
Usually
there
is
a
section
at
the
beginning
called
weekend
review,
like
notes
from
core
kubernetes
and
also
the
cloud
native
ecosystem.
So
it's
usually
a
community
effort
to
populate
this
section.
I
will
also
keep
looking
for
for
relevant
news,
but
if
you
are
aware
of
something
that
needs
to
be.
A
A
A
Yeah
that
that's
part
of
the
challenge,
I'm
hosting
by
myself-
and
no-
I
have-
I
have
never
done
this
before
but
yeah-
that's
the
reason
I've
been
preparing
from
several
weeks
if
someone
from
the
djik
team
joins
will
be
as
a
guest
or
for
support,
but
I
will
be
the
host
and
russian
wishima
will
be
your
fantastic
guest
for
the
episode.
All
of
you
are
welcome
to
join
also
right
because
usually
there
are.
There
are
many
questions
in
the
chat.
The
you
know.
Podcast
live
stream.
A
B
B
I
think
we
can
add
a
lot
to
it,
but
it
will
certainly
error.
If
you
don't
provide
something,
that's
necessary.
You
can
now
see
that
it's
an
error
because
metadata
wasn't
provided,
for
example,
so
as
a
quick
demo
just
making
some
progress
on
a
live,
statically
serveable
editor
for
supply
chains.
The
goal
is
to
support
also
providing
a
workload
and
visualizing.
How
that
workload
affects
the
supply
chain
and
visualizing
the
supply
chain
itself.
E
B
You
know
vs
code
editor
to
plug
in
that
sort
of
stuff,
but
I
will
throw
together
a
sample
lsp
like
a
live
language
server
that
can
do
reference
checking
as
well
and
also
do
suggestions
that
sort
of
thing.
I'm
absolutely
all
for
that,
because
I
think
that's
number
one
where
you
get
lost
when
you're
building
a
supply
chain-
and
I
think
that
will
help
a
lot
along
with
that
visualization
which
I
haven't
shown
before.
D
B
Yeah,
so
I
will
put
a
I
will
put
a
link
in
here
just
where
so
in
the
docs.
Sorry,
I'm
not
sharing.
Let
me
just
quickly
show
what
I'm
doing,
I'm
just
putting
a
link
in
here
yeah.
So
so
you
can
see
my
this
is
my
original
attempt
at
at
some
rfc
design,
but
it
does
include
an
example
of
sorry
not
that
one
this
one.
B
D
D
I
know
we
have
so
the
document
the
example
supply
chains
mentioned
in
our
talks,
but
some
of
the
other
communities,
if
you
like
the
karwal
community,
if
you
see
this,
have
a
sort
of
a
good
set
of
interactive
tutorials,
just
kind
of
helping
a
user
walk
through
creating
like
a
sample
supply
chain.
For
example,
I
mean
they
have
it
for
obviously
for
creating
a
carvel
package,
but
is
that
something
that's
been
thought
about,
or
is
that
something
might
be
helpful
or
useful
for
cryptographer.
F
B
D
Got
it
I'll
just
share
the
the
kerbel
one
in
case,
if
you
haven't
seen
it
or
if
you
find
it
useful,
it's
a
it's
a
partnership.
I
think
they
do
it
through
katakura
and
it's
I
don't
know
how
difficult
it
was
to
create,
but
but
it
makes
it
really
simple.
For
someone
to
kind
of
do
a
walkthrough
of
creating
a
package
like
I
was
able
to
create
a
package.
I
mean
that
for
me
it
was
a
pretty
good
benchmark
for
a
pretty
low
understanding
of
kerbal
tooling
in
general.
A
D
No,
I
was
not
talking
about
like
I
didn't
have
I
don't
have
a
specific
rfc,
but
I
was
just
like
as
a
way
to
understand
sort
of
the
all
of
the
rfcs
that
might
be
in
contention
of
like
introducing
or
like
some
being
approved,
like
just
knowing
sort
of
what
are
some
of
the
big
changes
coming
to
the
cryptographer
project
was
that
was
that
something
that's
typically
done
here.
If
not
that's
fine,
I
was
just
kind
of
curious
as
I
process
so
you'll
do.