►
From YouTube: OpenActive W3C Community Group Meeting / 2018-03-14
Description
A public hangout for members of the OpenActive W3C Community Group.
Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-openactive/2018Mar/0002.html
For more information visit: https://www.openactive.io/w3c-community-group.html
A
C
C
That,
yes,
I'm,
going
often
I
work
at
Gladstone
as
one
of
the
product
owners
and
I'm
kind
of
looking
at
our
next
generation
of
consumer
product
and
where
the
overlaps
were
the
kind
of
a
fanatic
of
objectives.
And
things
like
that
so
kind
of
taken
over
from
where
Tom
v9o
has
been
involved
previously
and
Pete
Walker
so
kind
of
carrying
on
from
from
where
they've
left
off
really.
A
Get
started
on
today's
agenda
so
so
for
guys
benefit.
We
have
these
calls
every
couple
of
weeks.
We
use
it
as
a
chance
to
kind
of
regular
check-in
with
the
standards
group
about
the
technical
work,
we're
doing
on
the
project
and
also
gives
us
time
to
discuss
some
of
the
kind
of
technical
questions
and
issues
that
have
come
up
in
the
interview
period.
A
B
A
A
Okay,
so
what's
to
kind
of
just
briefly
check
in
on
the
those
updated
draft
documents
other
than
Nick
I,
don't
think
anyone's
find
feedback
on
the
the
page
inspect
yet.
But
there
has
been
some
discussion
around
the
facilities
proposal
that
I
wants
to
touch
on
I'm
keen
to
move
that
forward
and
then,
if
we
have
time,
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
briefly
check
in
around
data
validation
is
something
that
we
need
to
start
spending
more
time.
A
Thinking
about
so
I
just
want
to
have
a
kind
of
brief
discussion
around
that
and
ask
for
some
kind
of
input
and
suggestions
from
people
again.
If
there's
anything
that
anyone
wants
to
raise
on
the
call,
then
let
me
know
there'll
be
some
time
at
the
end,
so
in
terms
of
the
the
booking
work
I'm,
trying
to
kind
of
include
a
regular
check-in
on
this
every
couple
of
weeks,
because
there's
quite
a
lot
of
activity
that
that's
happening
at
the
moment.
A
So
there
are
we've
been
working
with
a
group
of
people
who
have
been
coding
early
implementations
of
a
booking
specification,
so
I'll
circulate
these
slides.
Afterwards,
you
can
follow
the
links,
but
they
say
version
0.3
of
booking
spec.
A
few
people
have
been
successfully
implementing.
We've
been
doing
that
because
there
were
some
specific
projects.
They
were
looking
at
booking
that
were
running
in
this
kind
of
first
call
of
the
year.
A
Nick,
probably
give
a
bit
more
color
to
where
we
are
with
some
of
the
implementations
in
a
minute,
but
our
plan
now
is
to
based
on
what
we've
learned
on
that
early
work
is
to
start
creating
a
well
fully
fledged
more
detailed
specification.
So
I
think
it's
been
say
that
the
the
initial
document
is
a
kind
of
working
document,
so
it
focuses
very
much
on
what's
been
required
to
get
those
early
implementations
up
and
running,
but
there's
a
bit
more
kind
of
background
information
and
certainly
more
detail
that
has
go
in
in
a
few
places.
A
A
So,
like
the
other,
specs
they're
meant
to
be
reference
documentation,
but
we're
well
aware
that
developers
will
need
some
additional
support
to
help
them
actually
build
implementations.
So
the
we
will
be
creating
some
tutorial
of
the
guidance
and
feels
also
going
to
be
working
on
put
together
some
swagger
API
specs.
That
will
give
another
way
to
navigate
through
some
of
the
specification
content
so
that
that's
where
we
are
at
the
moment.
D
We
haven't
found
any
any
problems
with
the
spec
and
if
we
have
major
problems
with
respect,
but
the
ones
we
have
we've
noticed
down
on
the
document
stuff,
like
account,
ID,
doesn't
need
to
be
passed
through,
for
example,
and
just
other
changes,
but
other
than
that.
No,
it's
fine,
it's
implemented,
I,
think
good
Jim
have
implemented
it
and
so
I
think
so.
Yeah
we're
definitely
not
the
only
ones
which
is
good
and
at
least
the
good
Jim
one
looks
fine
as
well
so
yeah
all
good.
A
D
Things
where
some
fields
are
optional,
for
example,
which
one
was
it
I
think
remaining
attendee
capacity
is
optional
for
those
that
have
an
unlimited
slot
like
good
gym,
whereas
something
like
that's
not
abundantly
clear
at
first,
and
that's
just
one
example.
And
of
course,
if
you
know
the
modeling's
back
inside
out,
then
that
it
doesn't
need
to
be
said,
but.
D
A
D
B
And
so
the
others
that
are
implementing
I
believe
team
up
is
it's
what
you
died
due
to
some
resourcing
issues
on
in
that
little
mini
project?
That's
going
on
and
also
the
that
makes
wet
work
that
Nick's
doing
I
believe
is
on
the
way
we
haven't
seen
anything
yet,
but
he's
joined
the
w3c
slack
and
he's
kind
of
slacking
back
and
forth.
So
I
think
that's
happening.
I
know
the
legend
stuff
is
is
cracking
on.
A
A
Shout
if
there
is
so
I
recently
circulated
a
update
to
the
opportunity
days
model.
That's
included
a
couple
of
new
sections
to
discuss
how
we
can
include
availability
of
facilities,
in
indeed
feeds
just
describe
those.
After
a
number
of
discussions
on
these
calls,
we
ended
up
opting
for
a
kind
of
product
based
view
where
the
feed
would
be
including
data
on
the
availability
of
a
specific
facility,
a
sports
hall
or
a
pitch
or
table
tent
table
tennis
table,
and
you
know
what
they
were:
the
costs
and
what
the
event
what
the
slots
are
for.
A
A
He
had
also
a
used
specifically
around,
for
example,
hotel
bookings
and,
referring
to
you,
know
things
like
towels
they're
kind
of
like
features
of
of
a
hotel
or
with
a
similar
facility,
so
that
the
first
thing
I
kind
of
wanted
to
just
check
in
on
was
that
kind
of
discussion
really
about
naming,
and
so
both
Nick
and
Jamie
had
got
feedback
on
this.
So
just
wanted.
Whether
you
wanted
to
raise
some
of
the
points
that
you
made
on
in
the
github
issue
here
on
the
court.
E
Yeah
I
think
we,
as
I
mentioned,
to
get
hub
issue
I
think
we
would
prefer
it
to
be
facilities.
I
mean
that's.
What
we
use
internally
and
I
feel
that's
more
appropriate
even
for
a
table
tennis
table,
but
ultimately
it's
probably
just
semantics,
so
I'm
not
overly
concerned.
If
we
end
up
with
a
different
mode.
A
C
A
E
E
Think
that
would
be
fine
I
mean
when
you're,
making
a
booking
for
a
table.
Tennis
table
and
I
use
the
GL
example
and
again
I
wish
you
know
they
lessard
you
a
what
kind
of
table
and
exactly
the
same
format
as
they
list
a
football
pitch
for
a
tennis
court.
So
you
know,
even
though
it
is
a
movable
object.
I
would
say
that
facility
still
can
relate
to
a
table
tennis
table.
E
B
Yeah
and
I
think
I
think
that
the
semantic
distinction
between
equipment
might
be
interesting
as
well
here,
because
I
think
that,
potentially,
when
we're
talking
about
this,
this
use
thing
that
is
different
to
talking
about
the
table
tennis
table
as
a
piece
of
equipment,
because
it
sounds
like
because,
especially
with
the
word
use
here,
talking
about
that
specific
table
be
being
made
available,
which
means
wheeled
out
by
the
staff
put
in
the
position.
The
backs
are
kind
of
brought
out
as
well.
B
A
lot
of
stuff
is
then
made
available
for
use
for
that
particular
time,
and
then
it's
taken
back
again.
So
I
guess
it's
where,
as
a
bit
of
equipment
is
it's
kind
of
more
cos?
Oh
I!
Guess
it.
What's
the
difference
between
the
table
tennis
table
and
the
badminton
net
and
badminton
net
requires
a
space
to
be
put
up
in
so
does
a
table
tennis
table
both
of
them
are
bits
of
equipment.
Neither
of
them
can
be
used
without
bass
or
without
someone
wheeling
them
out
and
setting
them
up.
B
So
I
wonder
whether
it's
just
you
know
the
same
with
a
fiber
side
goal.
You
know
you
have
to
put
the
goal
out,
but
you
don't
have
a
fiber
side
pitch
that
you
book,
which
is
the
use
of
the
facility,
and
so
in
most
cases,
although
there
are
equipment
involved
in
in
each
of
these
and
in
the
table
tennis
example,
the
bats
are
as
well
equipment
as
well
as
the
table,
so
there's
not
just
the
table.
So
we
generally
there's
the
thing
about.
You
know
the
equipment's
useful
to
reference
and
yeah
there's
a
goals.
B
E
I
I
would
say
as
well
in
the
kind
of
context
of
booking
sites
like
ours.
You
know
if
you're
gonna
across
cell
or
you
know
add
on
extras.
For
example,
I
use
the
case
of
a
bowling
machine
which
indoor
cricket
Nets
will
hire
out
on
an
additional
cost.
So
to
that
point,
Nick
III
might
distinguish
between
something
that
it's
there
is
a
you
know,
fundamental
property
of
playing
again
badminton
or
metal
or
table
tennis,
and
that
that
can
be
included
as
an
additional
purchase.
E
C
What's
gonna
say:
Jamie's
made
the
same
point:
I
was
thinking
off
that
you
do
have
these
potentially
floating
things
say
ball
machines
for
tennis,
coaching
and
things
like
that,
where
you
might
have
I've
got
six
tennis
courts
available,
but
only
two
ball
machines
available
and
which
aren't?
Yes,
you
could
book
tennis
quite
happily
six
times,
but
you
can
only
book
it
with
a
ball
machine
twice
having
that
kind
of
floating
thing.
Just
to
consider
that
scenario,
yeah
and
I
thought
this
was
just
a
lookup
of
the
word
immunity
and
kind
of
synonyms.
C
The
name
resource
is
no
one
that
could
be
thrown
in
there,
which
was
they
also
it's
a
resource
for
that
safe
physical
room,
an
area,
a
table
tennis
table
a
a
ball
machine,
whatever
it
may
be,
it
is
a
resource
that
can
be
booked
out
and
a
given
activity
may
require
two
is
all
three
resources
or
whatever
it
may
be.
One
of
those
resources
may
be
a
compulsory
thing.
C
A
C
We
kind
of
it's
something
we
have
our
architectures
a
bit
odd,
because
we
have
products
of
a
fundamental
thing
to
actually
book
out,
which
is
all
strange
but
they're
identified
as
resource
products.
So
it
is
kind
of
a
term
used
in
the
gladstone
world,
as
apical
thing
is
essentially
a
a
resource
so
yeah
it
is
a
term
used
within
Gladstone
world
I
wouldn't
go
down
that
route.
C
Simply
for
that
reason,
but
it
did
seem
to
me
I
say:
I
just
did
a
google
search
on
immunity
and
synonyms
and
and
that's
one
that
jumped
out
or
something
that
would
kind
of
make
senses.
Some
might
be
quite
widely
understood
and
yeah
relevant
to
a
variety
of
different
things.
That
would
be
considered
a
resource.
A
In
the
paging
feeds
in
the
data
that
people
are
pushing
through
that
mechanism,
so
to
give
the
example,
you've
got
a
sports
hall
that
will
have
multiple
configurations.
It
can
only
be
used
in
one
or
a
small
number
of
those
configurations
at
any
one
time,
so
as
soon
as
a
booking
is
made
for
a
particular
slot.
That
means
that
the
schedules
associated
with
those
other
configurations
will
all
need
to
be
updated
or
invalidated
because
they
no
longer
available
for
halftime.
A
So
in
some
cases
that
will
mean
that
we're
providing
is
a
publishing
data
about
these.
These
facilities
that
have
multiple
configurations,
then
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
churn
in
their
feeds
every
time.
A
sauces
book
tag
I'm,
not
sure
yeah.
The
best
way
to
address
that
it
would
be
useful
to
get
a
sense
of
how
prevalent
that
issues
going
to
be.
You
know,
in
terms
of
you
know
how
many
providers
are
going
to
be
using
these
kind
of
config
multiple
configured
facilities.
A
If
we
think
that
is
the
most
rapidly
changing
piece
of
data
and
that
might
cause
problems
in
harvesting,
then
not
including
that
or
not
including
it
all
directing
people
to
another
mechanism
to
check
availability.
Is
he
anywhere
but
I
just
wanted
to
throw
it
open
to
see
what
other
people
thought
I
think.
E
A
It's
I
don't
get
necessarily
impacts
the
data
model.
It
would
might
impact
the
amount
of
data
that
is
going
to
impact
the
amount
of
Records.
Essentially,
that
will
be
updated
yeah
in
the
feed,
which
means
everybody
who's
consuming.
That
feed
will
need
to
be.
You
know,
continually
pulling
down
new
updates
yeah
so
for
some
feeds,
where
somebody's
only
just
providing
Gator
on
you
know,
pitches
that
only
booked
as
a
whole
pitch.
A
E
A
E
A
E
So
I
think
what
Ray
was
saying
was
that
if
five
side
page
gets
worse,
then
the
knock-on
effect
is
the
11
aside
pitch
needs
to
refresh
its
availability
in
order
to
account
that
fiber
side
booking
and
the
same
owner,
sports
or
badminton
courts
and
volleyball
basketball,
etc.
So
it's
just
whether
you
do
that
as
a
kind
of
heartbeat
mechanism
kind
of
sends
through
the
updated
availability
or
whether
you
refresh
the
entire
set
of
availability
on
a
kind
of
to
minute
basis
or
five-minute
basis.
E
B
B
B
We
would
consider
it
to
be,
which
is
a
full-blown
all
the
information
7:30
on
a
Tuesday
yoga
class,
and
then
they
have
what
they
call
a
compact
representation
for
a
schedule
which
is
optimized
just
for
the
idea
that
you've
got
a
pattern
of
recurrence
and
then
there's
things
that
are
excluded
from
that
pattern
as
they
get
booked
so
kind
of
inverted
version
of
the
same,
and
so
that
would
be
that's
useful
for
kind
of
hairdressers.
Appointments
is
what
they
used.
B
Obviously,
that's
the
same
as
it
is
a
football
pitch
and
so
probably
worth
throwing
out
in
as
a
they'll
identify
the
two
use.
Cases
and
they've
obviously
got
this
notion
of
a
kind
of
reverse
view,
and
then
the
other
thing
is
that
book
when,
when
they
did,
their
implementation
had
the
same
issue
with
their
occurring
schedules,
which
was
their
occurrence
rules
were
kind
of
in
one
place,
and
then
they
had
to
give
updates
about
the
actual
events
that
were
generated
inside
those
recurrence
rules
and
what
they
did
is
they
actually
provided
two
feeds.
B
One
feat
was
of
the
recurrence
rules
and
the
other
feed
was
of
the
of
the
availability,
and
so
there's
only
the
availability
updates
and
combining
those
two
things
together,
the
Google
view
in
the
and
the
kind
of
book.
When
is
done,
you
could
easily
see
one
feed
containing
the
timetabling
stuff
and
then
the
other
feed
is
just
when
there's
a
booking
made
that
those
ping
through
is
exclusions.
B
B
Yeah,
yes,
so
they
they
publish
a
schedule
which
would
say
they
should
reschedule
with
food
with
two
properties,
frequency
of
slot
and
slot
length.
So
you
know
16
minute
a
slot.
Every
60
minutes
of
length.
50
minutes
implies
a
10-minute
space
that
allows
you
to
create
slots
and
then,
within
that
that
sets
you
your
framework
up
and
then
on.
B
The
separate
feed
you've
got
the
exclusions
come
in,
so
as
things
are
booked
within
those
slots,
then
the
exclusions
come
in,
which
means
you're
only
transferring
effectively
you're
only
transferring
data
when
someone
does
something,
because
you're
only
talking
about
exclusions
rather
than
transferring
color
all
the
potential
slots.
Every
time
as
to
you,
okay,
right.
B
Right
but
I
guess
that
the
idea
here
would
be
that
let's
say
that
there
are
10
or
20
configurations,
invalidated
I
mean
if
there
were
10
to
20
ways
you
could
use
a
particular
pitch
or
I
mean
it'll
only
be
invalidated.
If
there
were
say
there
was
one
pitch
which
could
be
using
20
ways.
Obviously
there's
five
pictures,
then
some
of
those
other
things
might
still
be
valid.
So
if
one
pitch
could
only
be
used,
then
yeah
and
you
would
ping
through
20
updates
on
that
feed.
B
But
given
that
the
feed
is
I
mean
you
could
put
thousands
of
requests
through
that
feed
in
the
end
it
wouldn't
it
would
scale
to
that.
So
I
don't
know
if,
if
you're
only
passing
through
just
those
changes,
potentially
that's
not
a
scamming
issue.
I
guess
the
issue
becomes
more
when
every
time
you
up
there,
one
slot
you've
got
a
the
feed,
then
has
all
the
slots
for
that
day
or
that
site
without
whatever
in
the
update.
B
A
A
A
So
the
the
other
option
is
that
that's
them
that's
what
you
would
do
that
you
would
just
before
you
start
displaying
a
you
know
a
calendar
of
slots
or
something
somebody
you
would
make.
That
call
I
mean,
even
if
you
were
harvesting
I,
think
you
probably
want
to
do
that
anyway,
just
to
make
sure
that
you
were
showing
the
user.
The
latest
information.
B
Well
is
a
question
for
Jamie
on
use
cases
on
assuming
at
the
moment
it
well
I
don't
know:
do
you
want
it?
Is
there
a
use
case
for
I
want
to
find
this
at
badminton
court
at
7
p.m.
like
you'll
need
to
know
the
availability
of
all
the
courts.
Norton
answer
that
question,
or
is
that
not
so
much
the
use
case.
B
I've
gotta
figure
out
is
the
use
case
here.
Like
I
found
my
I
found
the
venue
now
I
know
I
want
to
go
there,
I'm
gonna,
look
for
what's
available
and
then
kind
of
just
see
the
timetable,
or
is
there
like
yeah
yeah,
my
searching
for
any
squash
court
at
7
p.m.
just
finally,
or
a
just
find
me
something
free.
E
E
B
I
guess
I'm,
just
thinking
if
you
put
the
put
availability
in
the
feed,
then
it'll
be
really
easy
for
someone
to
relatively
easy
for
someone
to
create
a
search
of
free
space
available
a
particular
time
across
a
number
of
venues.
Whereas
if
you
take
the
availability
out
of
the
feed-
and
you
only
have
it
in
the
kind
of
the
booking
step
almost
then
you
have
to
go
and
navigate
to
the
venue
first
and
then
look
at
the
for
the
availability,
so
almost
restricts
I!
Guess
that's
the
thing!
B
It
restricts
that
use
case
slightly,
because
if
you
wanted
to
have
like
veil
ability
search
across
venues,
you
would
need
to
either
pull
the
heck
out
of
all
of
those
availability
endpoints,
which
I
know
some
systems
do
or
yeah.
Well,
thanks
really
well
I
mean
at
that
point
you're.
Just
circumventing
the
add
the
feed
idea,
you're
just
less
efficient
I
mean
it's.
E
B
Okay,
yeah
I,
don't
work
I
feel
like
that's,
probably
their
distinction.
They
like
it
sounds
like
this
I
mean.
If
we
wanted
to
allow
availability
search,
then
that
would
be
worth
where
the
feed
is
useful
and
if
we'd,
if
we
don't,
then
we
we
don't
allow
that
use
case
to
happen
which
it
sounds
like
Jamie's.
Current
implementation
doesn't
have
I,
don't
know.
If
is
Tom
there.
B
F
F
D
We
definitely
want
such
cross.
Multiple
venues
for
facilities,
so
I
think
our
use
case
is
very
much
I
want
to
book
a
squash
court
within
a
mile
radius
of
where
I
am
at
7:30.
What
options
are
there
and
then?
Ideally,
you
want
all
of
the
squash
courts
from
all
of
the
different
village,
centers
or
squash
club.
D
B
C
Just
yeah
I
think
you
know,
maybe
so,
we've
seen
increasingly
kind
of
being
requested
and
I'll
see
the
nature
of
the
market
is
that
you
are
getting.
You
know
single
providers,
single
operators
buying
out
or
taking
on
contracts
with
multiple
those
centers.
In
a
lot
of
that,
it's
the
potential
then
for
users
to
use
across
different
major
centers
I
know
you
clean
the
the
chiropractor
kind
of
Fitness,
first,
looking
it
kind
of
cluster
gyms
and
how
their
facilities
across
a
number
of
humans
in
their
in
one
area
can
be
used.
C
So
you
know,
then
we
need
to
build
one
swimming
pool
in
one
of
your
gyms
and
then
all
your
members
kind
of
coax
their.
They
want
to
swim
either.
So
you
need
to
put
a
swimming
pool
into
every
one
of
your
of
your
clubs.
So
that
kind
of
thing
does
then
this
kind
of
clustering
of
gyms
and
locations
does
then
this
help
more
to
across
facility
across
their
new
kind
of
search?
C
Well,
then,
we
we
call
them,
and
it
is
that
situation
of
the
kind
of
the
multi
you
sports,
all
type
thing
where
we
have
that
one
kind
of
facility
as
such,
for
our
it
split
up
potentially,
can
have
lots
of
different
things
booked
onto
it,
so
that,
if
you
then
make
looking
for
badminton
that
stops
it
being
available
for
five-a-side
football,
it
stops
being
available
for
table
tennis
and
stops
being
available
for
basketball
and
have
many
other
activities
could
potentially
take
place
in
there,
where
we're
kind
of
trying
to
provide
an
update.
For
that.
C
Are
we
kind
of
thinking
that,
having
made
a
booking
for
badminton
I'm,
then
gonna
have
to
update
data
for
every
single
one
of
those
other
activities
that
could
potentially
be
booked
in
that
same
space?
And
is
there
some
way
of
almost
separating
that
out
to
go?
The
basic
thing
we
need
to
update
on
is
the
fact
that
particular
resource
has
been
used
and
then
all
the
different
things
that
need
that
resource
can
just
look
at
that.
One
update
in
some
way,
if
that
makes
any
sense.
B
Abstraction
that
we're
so
it
seems
like
they're
too
well,
maybe
there's
a
middle
ground
eventually
which,
by
the
way
suggesting
but
either
we
kind
of
the
logic
of
of
like
how
many
badminton
courts
there
are
and
like
how
the
sports
all
can
be
divided
and
like
no
stuff
could
be
exposed
a
bit
so
that
people,
the
consumer
side,
can
calculate
things
like
also
commenting
cause
being
book.
Does
that
mean
I
can
still
play
basketball
depends
so
that
so
there's
that
bit
I,
guess
which
it's
a
question
of.
B
So
if
we
I
think
what
we
just
saw
before
was
well
if
we
put
the
abstraction
at
like
the
maximum
level.
So
we
she
don't
know
if
the
badminton
court
and
the
basketball
court,
or
even
in
the
same
place,
exposing
as
it
set
for
a
badminton
and
bass
cold
product,
and
if
one
disappears,
then
you
don't
worry
about
any
of
the
kind
of
logistics
downstream,
but
yeah
the
benefit.
If
we,
obviously
it
would
be,
it's.
E
E
C
Yeah,
it's
yeah,
it's
difficult,
it's
one
of
those.
It
is
in
some
ways
to
be
looking
at
the
squash
courts
and
things
like
that.
Where
is
you
just
look
it
it's
one
thing
that
you
booked
on
that
area.
It's
it's
not
such
a
nursery
is
those
multi-use
kind
of
areas
that
present
a
much
more
complicated
problem
because
of
its
kind
of
overlap
off.
If
you
do
that,
you
now
can't
do
that
over
there
etc.
B
C
C
Okay,
look:
let's
do
something
that
works
for
the
simple
scenarios
and
then,
if
we
need
to
do
something
say
it
slightly
different
approach
for
the
complicated
multi
use
scenarios,
then
we
deal
with
those
almost
as
a,
but
those
is
out
of
scope
and
going
right
there's
the
kind
of
first
one
we
got
where
it's
you're
booking
into
a
aerobics
class
that
takes
place
at
a
set
time
on
a
set
date.
That's
nice
and
simple.
The
next
level
up
from
that
is
the
squash
court
kind
of
scenario
where
or
you
can
book
on.
C
The
squash
court
is
the
squash
court,
but
you
can
pick
your
time
of
day
when
you've
a
time
when
it
is.
You
want
to
do
that.
That's
your
next
bit
and
then
the
third
bit
is
then
done
was
treated
as
as
differently
as
you've
gone
from
kind
of
aerobics
classes
to
squash
are
two
very
different
use.
Cases
and
pincher
could
be
different
solution
and
when
you
go
to
multi
use,
that's
always
another
step
again
and
could
be
a
completely
different
solution
that
has
to
but
in
place.
C
For
that
you
don't
try
and
blend
the
two,
our
voice,
yeah.
You
get
this
kind
of
mongrel
solution.
That
kind
of
works
for
both
that
doesn't
really
work
well
for
either
one
and
your
voice.
The
compromises
you're
making
to
get
something
that
works
for
both
yeah
better
way
is
just
to
complete
them
as
sweetness.
Two
completely
separate
things.
B
Sorry
could
you
say
that
again,
just
close
to
my
friend
couldn't
quite
cut
okay,
hello,
so
you
know
what
you're
saying
solution.
I
think
just
the
fact
that
this
is
a
complicated
issue
means
that
I
suppose
it
will
be
quicker
to
get
something
out
there
if
we
would
focus
on
single
use
just
first
iteration.
B
C
B
C
We're
not
we're
not
yeah
we're
not
wasting
time
for
such
development,
so
that
weekend
is
one
of
those
have
something
throw
at
the
problem
see
if
it
works
and
yeah.
If
it
doesn't,
then
you
kind
of
go
well,
we
were
half
expecting,
it
will
go
away
and
think
about
it
and
if
it
does
work,
then
okay,
great,
we
didn't
kind
of
spend
time
unnecessarily,
trying
to
solve
a
problem
that,
in
the
end,
didn't
actually
need
to
be
solved.
A
A
Yeah,
he
means
we
don't,
because
this
issue
doesn't
specifically
affect
the
way
that
were
planning
to
structure
the
data,
at
least
for
the
simple
case.
It
means
we
can
just
kind
of
we
can.
We
can
encourage
people
to
start
making
that
data
available,
making
sure
that
then
is
bookable
past
getting
some
I've
put
some
more
thought
into
the
more
complicated
case
or
just
as
they
were
saying,
get
some
implementations
with
it,
so
it
would
be
perhaps
just
acknowledging
we
can
keep
something
in
the
spec
and
keep
an
open
issue,
not
for
them
for
that.
A
A
A
No
okay,
if
you
have
any
other
thoughts,
then
circulate
slides.
There's
a
link
to
the
github
issue.
Where
you
can
you
can
chime
in
and
I'll
put
some
about
some
summary
or
for
what
this
description
is.
What's
the
squish
we've
just
had
onto
that
issue,
as
well,
so
just
to
kind
of
capture
where
we've
got
to
the.
A
Yeah,
it's
been
kind
of
a
discussion,
I
think
the
other
stuff
I
was
going
to
talk
about
we're
not
gonna
have
time
to
cover
their
kind
of
data
quality
data
validation
stuff
again
this
time,
but
that's
fine,
because
we've
focused
on
removing
some
or
dressings
and
potential
blockers.
We've
moved
on
the
other
bits
of
work.
I
did
want
to
just
kind
of
last
government.
It's
just
briefly
like
draw
your
attention
to
the
proposed
updates
to
the
paging
spec.
A
There
were
a
couple
of
revisions
that
I
proposed
to
just
some
metadata
into
the
spec
so
into
the
feets.
Firstly,
it
was
to
identify
which
version
that
so
put
a
version
number
of
the
feeds
back
in
there
or
saw
some
kind
of
indicator
of
which
version
of
the
feed
is
being
implemented.
So
the
clients
can
start
to
use
that
as
a
cue
for
processing
data
differently.
If
we
have
any
future
changes
to
data
structure,
etc.
I.
A
Suggested
that
maybe
we
might
need
to
give
some
indication
of
feed
level
of
the
types
of
objects
and
type
of
data
that
is
included
in
the
data
in
the
so
in
the
body
of
the
feed,
so
whether
it
is
about
whether
it's
a
feed
that
publishing
a
journal
by
events
or
events
coz,
something
we've
been
talking
about
together.
Events
or
their
kind
of
amenities
facility
use.
A
Use
case
and
potentially
I
think
Nick's
just
raised
that
there
might
be
another
variant
type
of
feed,
which
is
just
about
availability,
some
way
of
knowing
what
this
feed
actually
is.
It
contain
it
might
be
useful.
We
do
have
the
kind
of
broad
kind
of
brush
kind
of
kinds
key
in
there
at
the
moment,
but
it's
not
it's
not
very
well
defined.
A
They
set
metadata
those
published
as
part
of
the
of
getting
the
kind
of
dataset
registered
on
them
on
the
dashboard,
but
that's
not
discoverable
from
the
feed,
so
there's
no
kind
of
interlinking
between
those
different
different
bits
of
metadata.
So
we
might
just
want
to
put
that
in
just
to
make
it
easier
people
to
find
find
all
the
metadata
and
all
the
related
data.
That's
been
published
from
a
specific
publisher.
B
A
So,
okay,
okay,
so
I
think
I'm
gonna
wrap
up
we're
spending.
Quite
a
lot
of
these
calls
getting
into
details,
but
I
think
that's,
that's
good!
That's
exactly
what
they're
for
I
think
that
when
we
first
started
out
we're
having
some
quite
high
level
discussions,
but
it's
great
that
we're
getting
into
a
lot
of
the
detail,
because
that's
that
reflects
the
fact
that
we've
made
a
lot
of
progress.
A
I
think
so
I
kind
of
want
to
continue
continue
that
make
sure
that
we've
got
time
and
to
cover
these
kind
of
issues
in
the
weekly
or
fortnightly
catch
ups.
So
I
might
just
need
to
rein
in
how
much
I
think
we
can
cover
in
each
of
these
discussions
for
future
ones,
but
yeah
thanks.
Everybody
for
coming
along
and
chipping
in
and
I'll
do
some
follow-up
on
the
mailing
list
and
also
on
gear
up
to
try
and
capture
what
we
just
got
so
far
so
yep
thanks
for
coming.
Oh,
yes,.