►
From YouTube: OpenActive W3C Community Group Meeting / 2018-06-06
Description
A public hangout for members of the OpenActive W3C Community Group.
Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-openactive/2018May/0004.html
For more information visit: https://www.openactive.io/w3c-community-group.html
A
A
We
got
to
a
point
where
I
think
we
were
reasonably
happy
with
the
model
and
then
in
the
process
of
implementing
the
abscess
fusion.
A
number
of
issues
came
up
and
basically
started
to
collect
invitation
feedback
betrayed
some
panic
questions
about
this.
That's
currently
in
the
editors
draft.
So
what
I'd
like
to
try
and
do
stay
in
less
and
one's
got?
Any
other
suggestions
is
to
just
recap
what
we've
got
in
editors
draft
at
the
moment
and
look
at
the
approach
has
been
taking
the
fusion
and
then
work
out
on
how
we
want
to
proceed.
A
A
So
for
those
of
you
who
haven't
seen
it
already,
there's
a
that
our
board
I'm
using
to
keep
track
of
where
things
are
in
the
specification
process.
So
it's
a
big
backlog
of
other
proposals
that
we
need
to
try
and
get
to
which
is
one
keen
to
leave
the
festivities
forward,
and
you
can
see
the
stuff
that
is
currently
in
the
Edit
and
so
one
of
the
so
just
to
kind
of
maybe
frame.
The
discussion
I
think
there's
three
possible
ways
out
of
this
Court.
A
A
A
Another
option
is
we
decide
that
we
will,
though,
we
need
a
little
bit
more
time
to
finish
facilities
model,
but
we
will
go
ahead
and
publish
one
point.
Just
those
are
the
changes,
so
just
the
amenities
age
range.
General
restrictions
just
unblock
that
stuff.
Because
again
there
are
some
publishers
who
would
like
to
use.
A
A
A
And
we
can
come
back
to
I'm
not
going
to
suggest
which
maybe
should
be
going.
We
can
come
back
to
it
towards
the
end
of
the
call
based
on
what
we
feedback
I
get
from
you
all
as
we
go
through
things.
So
any
any
questions
or
comments
on
that.
So
it's
good
yeah,
okay.
So
what
I'm
going
to
briefly
do
then,
is
just
jump
to
the
editors
draft
and
just
a
quick
recap
of
how
we're
planning
to
my
support
for
the
facilities
at
the
moment
and
then
look
at
the
fusion
stuff.
A
A
It's
an
offer
to
take
part
in
an
activity
using
a
particular
location
at
a
particular
at
some
points
in
time.
So
we
can
describe
that
facilities.
You
might
be
able
to
play
table
tennis
or
played
football
at
a
particular
location,
and
we
obviously
describe
what
the
activities
are.
So
where
you'll
be
doing
it,
which
might
be
might
be
quite
high
level
of
you,
can
go
to
a
leisure
center
and
play
tennis
or
it
could
be.
You
could
go
to
a
specific
tennis
court.
A
We
describe
the
offers
to
use
that
facility,
so
that's
basically
the
price
and
then
the
times
at
which
that
facility
is
available
so
which
were
calling
informally
the
moments
odds.
So
what
time
periods
can
you
book
so
we've
entered
we've
different
ways
to
do
this.
That's
what
we
ended
up
kind
of
hitting
on
it
seemed
to
fit
the
models
that
some
of
the
existing
platforms
and
using
which
tends
to
treat
these
products
anyway.
A
We
have
without
kind
of
getting
into
it.
On
this
called.
There
has
been
one
concern
about
this
approach,
specifically
for
multi-use
facilities,
where
there
might
be
different
ways
to
configure
a
sports
hold
for
different
types
of
use.
So
you
might
all
give
money
into
two
or
four
away,
depending
on
what
is
actually
happening
in
there's
a
concern
that
that
might
end
up
with
a
churn
in
the
updates
floor
data
consumers.
A
We
had
the
last
one
last
call
where
we
discuss
facilities.
We
decided
that
the
approach
for
dealing
with
that
would
be
to
kind
of
release
model
and
then
see
in
practice
how
much
of
it
there
actually
was
and
then
make
some
decisions
to
address
that.
There's
a
separate
issue
in
github,
where
which
spells
out
some
of
their
context
for
that
discussion,
and
some
of
the
remedies
might
help
deal
with
adjourn
I.
A
Don't
think
any
of
them
really
evolved,
reworking
the
model
using
different
ways
to
publish
the
context,
and
so,
if
I
jump
through
to
the
section
of
respect
that
to
properties
so
they're
defining
so
in
the
world
would
want.
It
defines
a
new
type
of
facilities
that
will
have
properties
are
listed
in
this
table.
So
there's
some
standard
things
in
there
that
everything
has
a
URL
identifier,
name,
description,
images,
just
kind
of
standard.
A
The
key
thing
is
that
facility
use
is
for
use
of
specific
activity
or
activities,
so
football
or
tennis,
it's
a
specific
location
and,
as
I
was
alluding
to
earlier,
that
could
be
a
edge'
Center
or
it
could
be
individual
facility
like
a
specific
pitch
or
court.
It
then
has
an
array
of
events,
so
those
are
the
individual
slots,
so
you
know
the
half-hour
hour
intervals
at
which
that
court
or
pitch
is
available
for
and
then
an
array
of
offers,
so
which
is
the
pricing
for
the
use
of
facility.
A
A
So
that's
kind
of
like
the
minimum
thing
that
we
need
to
be
able
to
express
in
order
to
be
able
to
say
that
facilities
available,
there's
a
few
variants
on
that.
Obviously
there
could
be
additional
offers
and
then
a
client-
and
you
know
different
offers,
perhaps
based
on
age
ranges
or
member
Norman
I,
think
a
lot
more
events.
A
B
A
There's
a
couple
of
things
to
highlight
in
this
example
here
chosen
to
specify
a
specific
page
other
than
the
legislature
as
a
whole
and
there's
also
in
the
second
slot
here.
There's
this
adventure
level
property
which
allows
us
to
say
actually
there's
two
pitches
available
at
this
time.
So
we
can
do
things
like
indicate
that
there's
multiple
pitches,
though
both
slots
and
and
have
a
more
fine-grained
availability
and
pricing
associated
with
each
of
those
slots
them
so
go
back
to
my
slides.
A
B
Anyway,
well
in
this,
in
for
the
stop
schedule,
the
idea
here
is
that
you
can
generate
the
empty
slots.
So
if
you
let's
say
you're
presenting
a
gridview
a
bit
like
Mullica
pitch
has
and
you've
got
lots
of.
You
know
lots
of
squares
that
you
can
say
I
want
to
book
that
book
that
one
you
could
put
that
grid
view
based
on
the
slot
schedule
on
the
slot
raishin,
and
then
you
could
fill
that
view
out
using
the
slots
themselves.
B
D
E
E
You
could
good
30
minutes
or
you
could
put
the
whole
hour
in
something
is
which
actually
so
having
this
great
view
makes
no
no
real
sense
and
on
the
other
hand,
people
have
also
been
holy,
and
if
you
have
a
long
holiday,
but
you
are
filling
in
you
automatically
just
call
the
data
you
will
be,
you
will
be
doing
information
because
that
they
would
have
any
slots
in
it.
So
that's
why
I
think
that
all
the
information
should
be
in
the
slots
that
in
the
event
section
and
they
haven't
make
any
assumption.
A
B
Guys
I
agree
with
the
fact
that
it
doesn't
try.
They
well
agreed
because
there's
a
problem
that
we
face
as
well
as
how
do
you
sort
of
map
non-uniform
slots
on
the
grid
and
I
think
the
only
way
you
could
actually
feasibly
do
it
is
to
have
sort
of
a
minimum
slot
time,
like
a
minimum
slot
unit
that
then
gets
sort
of
expanded
on
in
specific
slots.
So
you
could
have
a
few
minutes
to
45
minutes
and
60
is
an
example.
You'd
have
like
a
minimum
slot
unit
is
15
minutes,
and
then
you
could.
B
You
could
work
that
into
a
grid.
If
that's
the
way
you
wanted
to
get
if
having
it
on
a
grid
was
like
an
absolute
requirement,
you
could
work
around
it
that
way,
so
that
could
be
potentially
another
property
that
could
then
feed
in
and
help
you
build
a
grid
off,
there's
sort
of
variable
slot
times
so
I
suppose
the
question
is,
in
this
case
I
and
it
will
vary.
The
booking
system
has
a
kind
of
a
slot
length
and
everything
conforms
so
I.
B
Suppose
the
question
is
you:
do
you
guys
want
that
information,
or
should
we
just
not
include
it
and
I
don't
like
gnostic
either
way?
It
was
just
been
that
as
we
had
it,
but
if
you're
not
going
to
use
it
anyway,
because
algorithms
that
you're
using
are
just
gonna,
assume
non-uniform
sauce,
but
actually
it's
kind
of
irrelevant
right,
we
saw
drop
it
yeah
I.
A
B
A
Okay
right,
so
we
touched
on
this
as
well,
but
let's
just
make
it
explicit
in
the
current
draft.
The
events
and
you've
got
the
rain
event,
so
that's
listing
out
all
of
the
slots.
So
it
would
mean
you
know,
I!
Guess
it's
up
to
the
publisher
at
home,
how
many
of
those
they
include,
but
they
you
do
it
each
day,
whether
you
put
out
a
whole
week
with
slots,
and
so
that
array
could
get
quite
large.
A
B
Minutes,
sorry,
to
interrupt
you
there
lis
system
on
this
I
said
there
they're
separate
they're,
separate
things,
so
the
slot
stuff
is
the
same
slot
stuff.
This
slot
schedule
is
again
another
bit
of
additional
information
that
the
booking
system
provides
that
we've
included
here
and
what
that's
used
to
power
on
the
everyone
active
website
is
just
opening
times
of
the
facility
use,
that's
really
all
it's
used
for,
and
so,
if
we
don't
have
the
duration,
as
we've
said,
we
don't
want
to
render
a
grid
view
we're
going
to
so.
B
D
B
A
A
So
as
I
understand
it,
then
so
at
the
moment
we
did
inspecting
using
stuff.
That's
in
schema.org
we
can
do
what
is
described
the
opening
hours
for
the
leisure
center,
because
there's
some
properties
for
that
you
can
specify
opening
hours
each
day.
What
this
is
doing
is
specifying
the
opening
hours
of
the
tennis
courts
at
the
motor
center,
which
is
a
fireman.
So
it's
kind
of
do.
We
have
that
as
a
general
requirement
to
go
to
a
specified
opening
hours
of
individual
facilities
from
lists.
E
E
A
B
I
think
we've
probably
got
the
same
conclusion:
I
was
I,
will
I'll
ping
Ely
there
link
of
the
of
the
actual?
What
everyone
actives
own
website
shows
for
this
information,
but
I
don't
know.
If
that's
at
this
stage,
I
think
we
probably
got
a
good
conclusion
that
it
is
useful
to
have
it.
So
don't
a
labor,
a
labor,
the
point
yeah.
A
A
B
B
A
Yeah
that
okay
I
think
well
the
same
page,
all
right.
The
I'm
gonna
move
forward
because
we're
so
the
the
other
change
was
there
was
there's
actually
a
few
related
things
back,
how
much
granularity
were
provided
by
the
individual
courts
or
pitches?
So,
if
you
remember,
when
I
was
at
the
moment
in
the
spec,
we
are
they
just
kind
of
say
you
can
play
tennis
a
vacation
or
we
can
specify
there
are
these
slots
for
these
individual
courts.
A
B
A
B
So
sometimes
your
courts
are
split
into
multiple
in
that
multi-use
facility.
You
might
have
a
as
five-a-side
court,
that's
also
for
badminton
courts
and
they'd
be
called
caught.
One
caught
two
or
three
got
four
and
then
see
you
would
book
five
aside
as
caught
wonderful
and
then
caught
five
to
eight
wasn't
mean
yeah.
C
You
want
to
be
using
whatever
terminology
they
use,
rather
than
us
climbing
event
in
it,
so
whether
there's
another
have
a
chat
with
GLL
or
because
it
is
confusing,
because
you're
going
to
multi
multi
sites
you
are
talking
about.
That
is
a
sport
tool
which
has
depending
on
how
they
will.
They
will
divide
it
into
four
badminton
courts,
which
will
be
equivalent
of
one
high
pitch
one
full-size,
whatever
so
I,
don't
think
what
Nick's
saying
is
wrong.
You
just
need
to
be
on
the
technology,
because
you
will
confuse
people.
A
C
That
they
can
book
a
you
know,
focus
on
pitch
or
a
court
I
mean
you
do
get
people
I've.
You
know
individual
preferences
over
above
in
schools
and
how
things
are,
but
it
all
depends
on
how
the
system
is
the
only
other
thing
that
you
know
a
user
is
going
to
want
to
know
whether
they
are
their
attributes
around.
My
individual
court
I.
C
A
That
I
think
those
requirements
are
already
covered
by
the
current
left,
because
you
can
only
they
just
say
you
know
you
can
play
table
tennis
or
you
can
play
tennis
at
the
leisure
center
and
you
just
provide
those
slots
and
the
pension
level
or
if
you
need
to
provide
more
granularity,
save
for
pitches.
He
wants
to
describe
that.
You
can
play
on
astroturf
versus
other
surface.
B
I
I
think
this
is
because
the
because
the
way
gladstone
set
up
that
might
not
always
so.
This
is
probably
a
bad
example
here.
Just
one
thing
get
some
sample
data.
There
might
be
more
obvious
that
if
you've
got
a,
if
you
bought
three
pictures,
let's
say
on
the
MLP
side,
sorry
to
keep
referencing
that
and
I
think
that's.
B
My
kind
of
go
to
is
looking
at
for
how
to
lay
information
out
on
the
other
piece
like
there's
a
different
photo
associated
with
each
pitch,
and
so
you,
you
book
the
fiber
side
core
or
your
book.
Whatever
you
know,
the
3G
and
our
facility
use
in
inverted
commas.
Is
it
different,
so
a
facility
use,
maybe
seventy
uses
a
5g
pitch.
Sorry?
Is
that
specific
5g
pitch
or
it's
that
specific
or
that
specific
something
else
and
the
facility
is
what
that
is
that
make
sense?
B
So
so,
if
there's
a
let's
say
that
there's
a
5g
pitch
with
two
half
pitches,
then
this
facility
will
be
those.
But
if
you
don't
have
this
facility
kind
of
data,
then
you
would.
All
you
have
is
the
location
of
the
leisure
center
and
Hamilton
or
football,
so
you
wouldn't
be
able
to
identify
which
photo
to
associate
with
this
particular
slot.
If
that
makes
sense
like
what
what
am
I
actually
booking
a
my
booking,
the
3d
picture
up
and
a
top
left
at
the
center
or
the
you
know,
the
indoor
football
pitch
which.
A
G
A
G
Sorry's
just
gonna
say
agree
with
nectar.
What
we
see
in
reality
is
very
similar
and
that
and
users
would
and
so,
for
example,
taken
an
Oxford.
They
could
be
booked
in
a
facility
and
one
of
the
football
pitches,
and
you
could
be
walking
half
a
mile.
You
know
across
the
whole
length
of
facility
to
be
started
for
a
football
master
clock
and
basically,
if
there's
no
way
of
defending
which
facility
they
have
individually
booked
I,
can
see
in
practical
terms,
I've
caused
a
lot
of
complications.
C
Jamie
think
I
think
you're
right
in
terms
of
what
the
facility
at
facility
I
mean.
Can
we
have
an
extra
places
so
for
each
3G
pitch,
for
example,
is
an
individual
facility
ID
and
that
will
be
associated
as
Nick
says,
with
the
photo
when
you
talk
about
C's
I
think
that's
important,
the
consumer
to
know
which
pitch
when
you
eat
the
full
size
pitch,
but
in
how
they
cut
that
up.
C
They
don't
need
to
know
about
when
they've
cut
that
into
you
know,
taking
a
full
size
3G
and
during
week
it's
available
for
three
seven
sides.
They
don't
need
to
know
the
complexities
about
that.
Seven
aside
is
in
this
part
of
that
page.
They
just
need
to
know
it's
associated
with
that
that
individual
facility,
so
probably
how
MLP
of
cut
up
is,
is
correct.
It's
just
it's
just
how
you
explain
that
you're
playing
on
this
pitch,
how
they
cut
it
up
in
their
back-end
system
that
that's
you
know
that
is
number
one.
A
So
again,
I
think
that
are
going
to
stand
the
requirement
there
and
I
think
but
I
think
we
we
can
accommodate
that
in
the
current
draft
in
the
you
can
you
could
you
could
provide
in
you
could
make
every
single
pitch
a
separate
facility
use
you
in
the
location.
It
would
be
a
description
of
the
individual
pitch
with
name
photo
description
and
all
of
that
kind
of
stuff.
A
A
B
Would
probably
be
on
kind
of
the
same
page,
I
think
the
subtle
difference
here
is
that
location
in
the
way
that
we've
done
it
refusin
is
consistent
with
the
way
that
session
locations
work,
and
so
the
location
is
a
place.
The
place
includes
well
exactly,
that's
not
that
you
just
have
they're
actually
on
the
previous
thing,
yeah,
that's
that's
the
snippet
of
the
location
they
place
a
URL
name
and
address
that
stuff
is,
is
the
same
because
it's
still
look.
It's
still.
B
We
can
group
by
location
on
the
location
field
and
say
that's
where
that's
the
leisure
center
this
is
in,
and
if
we
want
the
extra
level
of
granularity
for
the
facility,
we
can
look
at
the
facility
property
and
say
and
that's
the
astroturf,
because
they
get
their
site
different
levels
of
granularity.
Okay,.
A
I
saw
I
think
we're
mostly
on
the
same
page
here.
I
think
the
only
bit
that
I
may
be
pushing
back
on
a
little
bit
is
that
there's
a
way
to
accommodate
that
already.
This
example
doesn't
show
it
because
it's
this
is
showing
the
bath
sports
and
leisure
center
has
a
gym
inside
it,
but
you
can
specify
either
way
around.
You
can
say
this
pitch
is
within
its
leisure
center.
B
I
mean
we
could
spit
this
out
as
a
separate
proposal.
I
guess
the
thing
with
that
is
that
there
we
talk
about
nested
locations
effectively
where
the
highest
level
location
is
the
top.
The
top
level
is
the
astroturf
pitch,
and
the
second
level
down
is
the
leisure
center
and
I.
Guess
that
the
Ben
of
having
facility
separate
to
location
is
that
you
don't
have
to
worry
about
traversing
that
tree
and
finding
your
leisure
center
in
some
depth
of
that
location.
B
You
should
I
mean
because
you,
because
the
actual,
because,
if
you're
putting
us
on
the
map,
you
just
want
to
know
the
postcode
and
if
the
postcode
is
always
at
location,
dot
address,
stop
postcode,
that's
really
easy.
If
they
look,
if
the
postcode
is
sometimes
at
location,
dot,
address
type
postcode
and
sometimes
at
location,
dot,
location,
dot,
address
type
postcode,
because
it's
insider
because
we've
because
we've
embedded
a
location
inside
an
astroturf
pitch,
then
it
creates
this
kind
of
additional
work
which
some
in
some
use
cases
you
don't
actually
care.
A
B
B
Because
would
they
change
as
well
or
are
we
talking
about
two
different
facility
uses
here
because
I'm
not
still
fully
done
with
the
spec,
but
it
seems
to
me
like,
if
you
end
up
with
nested
facilities
with
different
configurations,
especially
if
it's
multi
use
than
the
offers
would
be
dependent
on
what
the
user
chose
as
well.
So
probably
not
I.
B
A
What
we
was
discussing,
the
variation
is,
do
we
have
like
the
court
within
a
separate,
separate
property
here,
or
is
it
or
is
it
within?
Did
we
say
that
the
court
is
within
this
place
right?
So
you
can
imagine.
Maybe
this
location,
this
location
thing
was
inside
the
facility.
The
offers
would
still
be
specified
at
the
same
level.
It
would
be
about
the
facility
use
of
or
slots,
but.
B
A
B
B
Can
we
assume
that
right,
yeah,
okay,
so
there'll
be
a
facility
use
for
just
caught
one
facilities
for
just
court
to
and
the
since
use
that
covers
both
called
one
hand,
court,
okay
and
make
sense
and
I
suppose
think
this
is
the
thing
if
you
have
to
then
embedding
the
location.
Both
will
then
mean
you
duplicate
the
postcode
in
both
and
then
you
have
to
then
traverse
an
array
as
well,
so
we'd
be
traversing
yeah.
A
B
Only
reason
this
gets
this
is
not
the
reason
we
might
want
to
consider.
Exposing
that
array
and
not
trying
to
you
know
shovel
into
one
string
which
we
could
do
is
that
the
booking
system
actually
uses
that
for
other
things.
So
if
you
were
going
to
try
and
build
a
booking
integration
off
the
back
of
this
those
IDs
those
identifies,
there
are
actually
really
useful
because
you,
you
would
use
those
when
you
make
the
booking
and
doing
other
things
in
the
system.
A
Okay:
okay:
we've
only
got
a
few
minutes
I'm
going
to
move
a
solemn
school.
It
feels
like
we
understand
what
the
requirements
are.
This
is
just
some
discussion
around
how
that's
expressed,
or
maybe
we
could
follow
up
on
the
and
get
her
to
just
just
to
show
some
different
snippets
other
things
that
you
I
think
that
highlighted
was
adjacent
course
whether
there
were
offers
to
have
other
courts.
A
B
Just
a
bit
of
detail
on
this
that
the
one
of
the
challenges
we
had
here
is
because
facility
use
is
bundling
slots
together
that
are
in
the
set.
So
if
you've
got
eight
badminton
courts
in
a
sports
hall,
you're
only
going
to
have
one
facility
use,
which
is
badminton
court
and
the
inventory
level
will
be
eight.
That
makes
sense.
B
If
you
choose
to
publish
it
that
way,
yeah
you
could
do
each
individual
court
or
you
could
do
each
individual
call,
but
if
we're
using
simply
using
the
kind
of
that
sense,
then
then
this
is
this
is
eight
and
there's
two
issues
with
that.
I
mean
it's
great
because
it
does
remove
the
complexity
of
the
Sports
Hall
and
to
Nick's
earlier
point.
I
think
we
kind
of
spoke
about
this
at
length
last
time
and
why
that
was
useful
to
not
worry
about.
You
know.
B
People
just
want
to
book
a
bunch
of
called
the
okay
which
one.
So
that's
that's
quite
good.
The
challenge
that
creates
is
when
you
book
a
thing
you
actually
do
want
to
book,
one
of
them,
because
that
and
that's
how
the
booking
system
kind
of
works.
So,
there's
a
there's
a
point
in
this
process
where
you
want
to
actually
expose
that
there
are
eight,
and
so
maybe,
if
you
just
scroll
down
a
little
bit
there,
where
it
says
feed
slots
to
the
very
bottom,
one
below
that's
right
there
yeah.
B
So
this
is
what
you
end
up
with
this
is
I
decide.
This
is
just
jumping
over
there
for
Jason
inventory.
For
a
second
and
the
inventory
there,
you
can
see
breaks
out
into
two,
so
you
can
see
that
this
is
actually
the
way
it's
done
here.
Look
so
caught
sports
sports,
all
seven
courts,
seven
and
eight
is
one
booking
and
caught
five
and
six
is
another,
and
you
can
book
either
of
those
as
a
separate
things.
B
There's
prices
for
both
now.
Obviously,
we've
rolled
it
up
so
that
you
don't
expose
this
detail
and
it
just
you're
just
booking
a
couple
of
courts
at
the
high
level
and
but
when
you
get
into
actually
making
the
booking
you've
got
to
pick
which
one
of
these
you
booked,
and
so
we
need
to
therefore
expose
these
two
different
IDs
effectively.
These
two
different
IDs
that
coming
through
that
offers
a
but
two
IDs.
You
literally
give
the
booking
system
to
transact
on.
So
you
need
to
pick
one
of
these
two
book.
B
A
E
E
Should
display
as
much
information
as
possible,
so
you
know
exactly
that
page
is
not,
and
then
when
you
are
consuming
the
data,
which
is
what
we
are
doing,
we
we
aggregated
that
say:
okay,
so
we
have
four
tennis
courts
available
and
then
we
are
going
to
again
that
and
display
that
as
only
one
it's
not.
It
has
full
availability
so
for
I.
E
Think
it's
called
inventory
level
in
here,
but
that's
something
that
you
might
decide
to
want
as
an
API
consumer
rather
than
when
you
are
displaying
the
API
from
there
from
the
source
because
yeah
you
might
want
to
book
one
page
or
one
tennis
court
or
you
one
might
want
to
know
what
a
tennis
court
is
actually
available
or
not
anyway.
This
is
what
we've
seen
so
far
from.
A
A
While
I'm
trying
to
find
a
way
forward,
is
it
sound
like
that?
Then
there
is
a
requirement,
but
do
we
need
to?
Is
it
going
to
block
us
from
moving
forward?
Is
this
something
that
we
can
add
as
a
revision,
or
do
we
need
to
have
all
just
this
kind
of
adjacency
more
complex
invent?
We
need
to
be
in
straight
away,
I
guess.
B
The
I
guess
it's
actually
a
problem
to
do
the
opposite,
so
it's
it's
more
complicated
with
fusion
to
roll
it
up
and
summarize
it
and
then
figure
out
how
the
booking
works.
When
you
can't
specify
a
particular
quarter
book,
that's
actually
more
complicated
than
exposing
the
detail
as
an
implementation.
So
if
we
wanted
to
publish
the
spec
that
rolled
this
up,
I
to
make
this
conform
to
the
spec,
we
would
then
publish
would
take
more
effort.
A
A
B
Here's
my
challenge,
I
totally
agree
with
you,
and
this
is
one
of
the
things
that
were
throwing
away
with
this
it's
complicated.
The
challenge
is,
if
you
don't
group
the
eight
squash
courts
in
the
model
when
you
expose
them,
then
it's
quite
difficult
to
then
group
them
after,
because
the
grouping
is
around
the
properties
that
were
not
actually
necessarily
exposing.
We
don't
expose
any
common
IDs
that
you
could
use
to
group,
so
you
wouldn't
have
any
idea
that
those
eight
squash
courts
were
actually
one
exactly
the
same
being
at
eight
instances
of
the
same.
B
So
if
we
don't
group
them,
then
there's
a
problem
for
the
data
consumer
and
then
how
can
you
try
and
figure
out
the
group
then
based
on
names
and
fuzzy
matching
and
that
kind
of
rubbish?
So
maybe
we
want
to
group
them
if
we
want
to
simplify
the
experience
for
the
user
to
let
them
just
look
one
of
eight
squash
courts,
I,
don't
care
which
one
but
then
the
next
challenge
is
when
you
actually
come
to
book
one
as
as
there
and
all
P
guys
are
just
describing.
B
B
You
know
where
my
spec
squash
coiours
across
the
whole
of
London
and
I've
zoomed
into
that
Center
I
actually
want
to
book
two
next
to
each
other
for
me
and
mimei,
and
then
at
that
point
you
need
detail
or
you
know
football
or
whatever
it
is,
and
so
I
guess.
That's
that's.
Why
there's
two
levels
here
there's
like
the
London
view,
where
I
just
want
to
football
football
pitches
next
to
each
other
or
whatever
they
are,
and
then
there's
the
I
get
into
the
detail
and
I
want
to
book
them.
E
B
Maybe
this
concept
of
facility
uses
is
not
quite
we
mean
new,
take
step
back
again
and
say:
actually
we
don't
need
to
roll
things
up,
so
let's
actually
have
all
the
granular
data
in
you
know
sports
halls,
where
you've
got
different
ways
of
cutting
them
for
all
six
squash
courts
or
all
eight
badminton
courts
out
there,
don't
roll
them
up,
have
more
data
presented
and
then
let
the
data
users
kind
of
do
that
rolling
up.
After
guess,
there
seems
like
that.
We
got
a
bit
of
a
fork
in
the
road
here.
E
B
B
No,
it's
a
question
of
whether
the
so
it
sounds
like
this
or
this
this
level
of
detail.
However,
we
present
it
needs
to
be
in
there
because
we
need
their
detail.
The
question
is
at
the
level
above
this,
so
when
you've
got
your
slot
feed
I,
don't
if
you've
seen
it
there's
a
you've,
got
it
open
there
leave.
The
second
tab
is
that
what
the
fusion
lifestyle
slots
are.
B
The
question
is:
is
do
we
want
that
inventory
level
there
to
be?
You
know
eight
and
then
have
the
you
know
and
they're,
not
not
care
about
the
detail
about
the
rest
of
it.
So
we
with
that
is
like
they'll,
be
thousands
of
slots
in
there
changing
really
frequently
as
things
get
booked.
So
we're
synchronize
at
the
moment
had
a
kind
of
facility
use
level
not
on
a
court
by
Court
basis.
B
So
the
question
is:
do
we
want
to
continue
synchronizing
our
facility
use
level
and
then,
when
we
get
to
booking
drill
into
the
cords
and
themselves
later
or
do
we
want
to
synchronize
on
a
core
level
and
lose
this
kind
of
rolling
up
thing?
That's
going
on
where
we
kind
of
aggregate
the
court
one
to
eight
is
one
thing
and
synchronize
on
that.
E
E
Maybe
you
you
want
to
have
two
facility
use,
want
a
football
pitch.
Sorry
11
a
side
football
page,
but
when
you
aggregate
the
data
you
want
to
aggregate
all
the
football
pitches,
so
you
would
have
four
availabilities
or
the
fiber
side
onto
for
you,
the
wrong
side
and
even
though
they
are
two
different
different
facility
uses.
E
A
Okay,
okay,
I'm
in
conscious
to
the
time
that
we
need
me
at
that
time
and
I
work
out
a
way
forward.
Here
we
weren't.
A
Adding
a
subtype
I
mean
a
specific
time
of
event
for
slots
and
variables
slot
length,
and
there
was
a
dive,
an
insufficient
about
house.
It
has
to
deal
with
that
like
if
you
want
to
buy
thirty
minutes,
because
an
extra
thirty
minutes
it
could
be
expressed
and
offer.
But
it's
the
the
thing
that
we
see
to
be
keep
spiraling
around
and
not
really
kind
of
getting
everyone
on
board
with
is
the
level
of
detail
that
were
including
in
feeds,
so
I
think
we
need
to
be
talking.
A
We
need
to
be
having
some
actual
concrete
examples
like
Jason
documents
that
we
can
look
at
comment
on
and
decide
which
is
the
right
level
of
priority
because
filling
in
these
discussions
with
having
quite
a
high
level
back-and-forth,
but
in
practice
until
you
actually
see
the
data
we're
not
really
going
to
decide
what
works
for
people
does
that.
Does
that
sound
reasonable
to
everyone
else?.
D
A
Nick
and
well,
anyone
actually
that
has
some
comments
on
the
level
of
regularity,
actually
update
the
given
issue
with
kind
of
theses.
How
I
think
he
should
work
be
very
clear
about
the
changes
that
are
required
in
order
to
get
us
there,
because
he
sounds
like
I
may
be
misinterpreting,
but
he
sounded
like
some
of
the
inventory
level.
Stuff
could
just
be
dealt
with
by
moving
the
eventual
level
as
of
the
offer
and
putting
it
onto
the
slots,
which
would
be
a
fairly
minor
change.
A
B
Know
I
think
that's
the
thing
that
that's
really
good.
Maybe
we
I
think
that
the
thing
is,
if
we're
all
implementing
against
this
or
thinking
about
it
like
we
implemented
it,
that's
probably
where
we'll
find
the
most
kind
of
sure
opinions,
I
suppose
on
this,
because
I
guess
we're
and
some
of
this
comes
kind
of
obviously
from
an
implementation.
I
wonder
if
you
know
on
the
other
side
of
aged
consumers,
you
guys
are
thinking
about
using
this.
B
That
might
be
a
way
of
I,
don't
know
if
we
have
like
two
two
alternative
Jason
documents:
one's
got
one's
got
the
kind
of
granular
feed
and
one's
got
the
grouped
feed
and
then
we've
kind
of
vote
or
whatever
people
think
is
more
useful
for
them.
I
think
this
is
one
of
those
things
that,
especially
if
we
do
this
and
roll
it
out
to
all
the
different
end
points.
B
We're
probably
gonna
have
deal
with
the
problems
that,
if
we
haven't
thought
it
through
now
across
all
of
those,
so
we'd
be
good
to
make
sure
that
we
have
all
had
a
chance
to
think
about.
You
know
when
we
use
it.
What
the
implications
are
and
all
the
rest
of
it
I
can't
I,
can't
see
a
clear
advantage
of
either
to
be
honest,
I
can
see
the
benefits
of
both.
B
Maybe
people
want
to
group
things
in
different
ways,
so,
actually
maybe
there's
no
way
of
avoiding
it
and
actually
granular
is
the
way
forward.
So
I
can
kind
of
see.
So
it
depends
really
on
on
what
that
roll-up
is,
and
it's
probably
simpler
for
data
providers
to
just
publish
the
granular
stuff
and
not
do
a
group
by
to
be
honest.
So
it's
cheaper
that
way
like
yeah
I
got
I
can't
see
that
yeah.
So
maybe,
if
we
created
JSON
documents
and
then
I
think
about
consuming
them,.