►
From YouTube: OpenActive W3C Community Group Meeting / 2017-02-22
Description
A public hangout for members of the OpenActive W3C Community Group.
Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-openactive/2017Feb/0003.html
For more information visit: https://www.openactive.io/w3c-community-group.html
A
Right,
yes,
I
was
just
saying
I'm,
going
to
some
slides
now,
just
to
help
kind
of
walk
through
the
discussion.
Let
me
just
do
that.
I
just
wanted
to
quickly
recap
ways
that
you
can
all
contribute
to
the
specification
work
outside
of
these
calls,
and
then
there
were
a
particular
some
areas
of
discussion
that
I
wanted
to
try
and
cover
today
I'm
a
couple
of
key
areas
of
the
specification
that
I
think
I've
had
some
feedback
on.
A
We
had
a
bit
of
discussion
around
last
time,
but
I
just
want
to
try
and
get
a
sense
of
with
we're
going
in
the
right
direction
and
if
everyone's
happy
with
the
way
the
specification
is
handling
activities
and
some
aspects
of
events
and
then,
if
we've
got
time
at
the
end,
any
other
business
in
case
anybody
wants
to
raise
any
other
issues
or
questions.
So
on
that
basis,
I'm
going
to
jump
straight
into
it.
Please
stop
stop
me
and
ask
questions
as
we
go
so
feel
free
to
chip
in
at
any
point.
A
So
we
last
spoke
a
few
weeks
ago,
based
on
some
of
the
discussion
that
we
had
that
meeting
I
published
a
revised
version
of
the
draft
specification
that
was
on
the
tenth
of
februari.
Hopefully,
you've
all
seen
that
there
are
a
few
areas.
I
changed
the
the
kind
of
key
things
that
had
quieras
that
had
work
other
things
I
want
to
discuss
today,
so
made
some
revisions
to
try
and
clarify
the
model.
A
What
we
wanted
to
do
around
activities
and
activity
lists
and
the
specification
also
included
some
extra
notes
around
and
events
reoccurring,
events
and
one
thing:
I
changed,
but
I'm
not
still
not
sure
whether
this
is
right
thing
to
do
is
I
renamed.
What
we
were
previously
called
in
program
to
format-
and
we
can
come
back
to
that
later
on,
because
I'm
not
sure
whether
I
think
it's
something
where
we
need
to
get
the
terminology
right.
A
But
yeah
I
want
to
kind
of
put
two
likely
to
you
as
a
group
in
terms
of
progress
and
plans
for
the
specification,
so
I'm
going
to
be
taking
the
feedback
that
you
give
me
this
afternoon
and
add
that
to
feedback
that
I've
had
on
the
mailing
list
so
far
I'm.
So
thanks
to
those
of
you
that
chipped
in
and
to
create
a
more
complete
specification,
so
it'll
include
data
model,
diagram,
expanding
out
number
of
the
areas
of
documentation
so
covering
organizers,
clubs.
A
Obviously
we
have
the
mailing
list
and
it's
great
to
see
some
of
the
comments
on
there
already
but
feel
free
to
comment
on
any
part
of
the
specification.
It
I'm
really
keen
to
get
feedback
from
people
who
are
both
going
to
be
publishing
and
using
the
opportunity
Gator
to
see
whether
the
specification
covers
your
use
cases.
A
So
does
it
address
how
you're
storing
data
at
the
moment
does
it
address
how
you
would
like
to
consume
and
use
data,
as
well
as
getting
comments
on
the
specification,
and
it
would
really
be
really
helpful
to
get
some
example.
Data,
so
in
the
word
that
I've
been
doing
so
far,
I've
been
looking
at
the
data
that
people
have
already
published
openly
using
the
the
real-time
page
in
specification.
A
A
few
people
have
shared
activity
lists
as
well,
so
I've
seen
the
sport
sweet
mega
list,
adding
lustrum,
Sport,
England
and
I've
dug
out
the
list
from
open
sessions.
But
if,
if
there
are
other
lists
that
you
have
in
your
system
that
you're
happy
to
share,
then
that
would
be
great
as
well,
because
I
think
that's
useful
for
two
reasons.
A
Firstly,
it
will
help
validate
the
model
because
we
can
see
clearly
how
you're
managing
this
data,
but
over
time
it
will
also
let
us
start
to
work
on
identifying
where
there
might
be
overlaps
on
the
between
those
lists
and
start
to
converge,
perhaps
on
a
more
standardized
list
in
the
future.
So
yeah.
So
please
do
use
a
mailing
list
for
those
of
you
that
are
happy
working
in
github.
A
There
is
a
github
repository
that
hosts
the
specification
and
I'm
using
the
issue
tracker
there
to
to
cut
back
together
discussion
points
for
the
group
tasks
so
things
that
work.
That
needs
to
be
done
on
the
specification,
so
that
provides
another
place
to
add
comments
on
individual
areas
of
discussion
or
you
can
feel
free
to
not
only
raise
new
issues.
But
if
you
think
that
the
specification
needs
some
wording,
changes
that
I'm
happy
to
take
all
requests
and
suggested
changes
in
that
way,
rather
than
just
sending
emails
around.
A
So
after
I've
published
the
revised
spec
later
this
week,
I'll
be
put
in
a
request
out
on
the
main
list
to
ask
those
of
you
that
are
holding
data
moment
to
try
out
publishing
some
data
to
the
spec
just
because
I
think
the
best
way
to
validate
it
is
to
actually
put
some
real-world
data
into
the
model.
Well,
I
can
use
I
can
pull
together
sample
data
from
the
data
sources
that
I've
got
access
to
the
more
examples
we
get.
A
A
No
way:
okay,
okay
right,
then,
in
that
case,
let's
move
on
to
the
as
a
specification
discussion.
So
the
first
bit
I
want
to
look
at
is
around
at
activities
and
activity
lists.
It
is
a
very
like
I
think
we've
discussed
the
most
and
my
personal
feeling
is
that
there's
actually
a
lot
of
overlap,
an
agreement
in
place,
but
I
think
them
just
need
to
step
through
it,
just
to
make
sure
that
everyone
is
happy
that
the
model
is
flexible
enough
to
cover
a
variety
of
use
cases.
A
So
I've
got
a
few
diagrams
on
them
on
the
next
few
slides
that
will
hopefully
illustrate
I'm
that
the
flexible
is
in
the
model
and
and
a
kind
of
supplement,
the
kind
of
wording.
That's
in
the
specification,
because
I
some
of
the
feedback,
if
I
don't
think
just
might
be,
that
the
wording
isn't
quite
right
and
described
in
the
model
rather
than
the
model
isn't
correct.
But
this
is
one
of
things
I
want
to
test
out
with
you
all
this
afternoon,
so
so
briefly
so
activities
there
then
named
physical
activities.
A
In
some
cases
there
may
be
synonyms
that
you
have
in
system,
but
it's
it's
the
kind
of
dick.
You
know
dictionary
defined
things
like
cricket,
walking,
cycling,
we're
going
to
be
associating
activities
with
events,
because
then
people
can
find
events
that
involve
the
activities
they
are
interested
in
and
then
they'll.
A
Also
this
I
dissolved
this
idea
of
activity
lists,
so
activity
lists
are
a
way
to
organize
activities
into
simple
lists
or
all
the
more
complex
groupings,
so
as
I've
seen
just
now,
I've
seen,
for
example,
the
the
mega
list,
the
open
sessions
list
and
the
modeling
that
I'm
going
to
step
through
now
is
kind
of
based
on
what
is
seen
in
that
sample
data
and
some
of
the
comments
that
we've
had
so
far,
so
so
stepping
through
it
and
again
I'm
chipping
at
any
point.
If
something
is
not
clear
or
if
you've
got
feedback.
A
So
I'm
thinking
about
the
fact
that
this
is
we're
going
to
have
a
very
broad
set
of
data
publishers
and
who
might
have
very
different
kind
of
technical
platforms
and
that
manage-
their
data.
So
the
simplest
case
is
that
physical
activities
are
just
tags
and
categories
associated
with
an
event.
So
here
we've
got
a
table
cricket
event
that
has
been
tagged
up
as
cricket
and
table
cricket
I.
A
A
It's
just
a
tag,
so
list
of
tags
associated
with
an
event,
but
we
know
that
these
tags
are
about
the
activities
rather
than
some
other
way
of
describing
the
event
and
so
building
on
that,
rather
than
having
a
say,
a
free
text
set
of
tags
that
somebody
hosting
a
you
can
just
type
in
when
they
set
up
the
event,
we
might
have
am
a
controlled
vocabulary.
So
a
an
activity
list
that
identifies
all
of
the
types
of
activities
that
can
be
added
to
an
event.
A
So,
for
example,
open
sessions
has
an
activity
of
a
list,
and
it
may
be
that
when
you're
setting
up
an
event,
you
have
to
choose
from
the
existing
activity
list.
So
the
extension
is
all
we're
saying
is
that,
rather
than
just
tags,
we're
also
capturing
the
fact
that
that
these
activities,
cricket
and
taggable
cricket
have
been
defined
in
an
activity
list
in
a
particular
system.
A
Okay
building.
On
top
of
that,
what
I've
seen
in
some
of
the
discussion
so
far
is
that
some
of
you
are
I've
got
more
structure
within
the
activity
lists
so
and
the
way
that
seems
to
be
panning
out
is
just
a
kind
of
broader
and
narrower
relationships
between
physical
activities.
So
here
we
sit
come,
but
this
is
an
example
from
the
sport
sweet
mega
list.
I'm
table
cricket
is
classified
within
cricket
as
a
broader
activity.
A
A
So
it
doesn't
add
any
complexity
to
the
data
publishing
side
for
people
just
want
to
publish
simple
opportunity
data
by
events,
but
given
the
knowledge
of
that
structure,
it
may
be
that
when
you're
publishing
data
you
just
want
to
publish,
associate
an
event
with
the
most
specific
activity,
but
somebody
who
was
using
the
full
activity
list
within
their
system
code,
for
example,
use
this
broader
relationship
to
offer.
Somebody
search
results.
You
know.
A
So
it
covers
the
range
of
use
cases,
so
simple
tagging
flat
lists
with
controlled
vocabularies
as
well
as
more
complex
hierarchies
and
groupings.
The
the
model
is
based
on
a
w3c
standard
called
stark
skull,
skulls,
which
is
short
for
a
simple
knowledge
organization
system.
It's
basically
just
a
way
to
publish
exactly
these
kinds
of
category
lists
and
taxonomy,
so
it's
been
standardized
in
use
for
quite
a
while,
and
it
has
all
of
this
kind
of
relationships
and
flexibilities
in
there
and
all
of
the
example
to
that
I've
seen
so
far.
A
B
A
You
know
it
can
you
know
the
discussion
can
happen
within
this
forum,
but
the
what
I
haven't
got
a
good
sense
yet
about
whether
those
general
buy-in
that
we
need
to
have
a
single
list
or
whether
just
the
fact
that
we
might
be
able
to
share
all
the
different
lists
and
identify
mappings
and
overlaps
between
them
would
be,
would
get
everybody
kind
of
a
useful
step
forward.
You
know
so,
quite
quite
often
you
know
you
just
you
just
see
when
people
are
publishing
these
kind
of
taxonomy.
Is
that
just
identifying
the
links?
B
Think
so,
I'm
still
wondering
because
opening
sessions
I'm
working
on
our
conceptions
and
the
list
we
didn't
start
with
it,
particularly
well.
One
I
felt
was
particularly
good
and
what
we've
had
is
is
where
users
have
wanted
to
add
something
that
the
list
hasn't
addressed.
Then
we
let
them
do
that
and
then
we
approve
it
or
say
you
can't
have
that
because
it's
not
something
users
with
search
for.
So
we
could
basically
do
with
a
better
list
and.
B
A
So
I
mean
so
from
your
point
of
view.
If
the
say
the
safe
sports
week
we're
publishing
their
list
as
open
data,
would
you
have
started
from
that,
rather
than
taking
stuff
from
Wikipedia
and
elsewhere
sit.
So
my
experiences
this
there's
a
kind
of
there's
different
paths
that
we
can
take.
It
might
be
that
there
are
already
a
good
some
strong
candidates
for
a
kind
of
list
for
the
sector
and
shaming
them
can
help
identify
which
one
you
want
to
select.
A
A
Ever
and
so
it
kind
of
just
happens
through
kind
of
network
effects.
I'd
like
I,
don't
have
a
good
sense
yet
about
where
what
the
right
steps
forward
are.
What,
at
the
point,
when
people
agree
that
okay
good
there
should
be
an
open
active
activity
list,
then
there
ought
to
be
some
governance
put
around
it
to
cover
this
one
of
the
things
that
you
were
saying
like.
How
do
we
agree
when
new
terms
get
added
to
the
list?
D
I,
wasn't
it
I'm
spoiling
me
I
mean
I
would
agree
that
it's
probably
a
bit
the
two-pronged
approach
that
you
are
in
terms
of
your
mixing
and
matching
the
list
start
off
with
so
people
feel
comfortable
over
time.
I
mean
certainly
from
our
point
of
view.
We
want
to
get
towards
a
single
list.
That
is,
you
know,
and
what
you're
trying
to
do
for
this
group
is
hoping
to
get
ownership
of
the
whole
list
of
people.
Words
were
over
time
and
I.
D
Think
that
began
is
the
problem
of
the
publication
or
where
we
are
the
list
at
the
moment,
because
we
have
got
some
lungs
from
GL
l's.
All
the
operators
on
the
call
you
know,
they're
the
ones
who
keep
you
know
from
when
you
surface
this
data
up
and
bend
from
I'm
input.
We
have
this
when
he's
talked
to
operators.
We
look
at
this
data.
This
comes
back.
You
know
that
their
sports
list
is
programs
includes
program
these
all
this
other
stuff.
E
A
E
I'm
not
sure
if
it's
helpful
I,
I
I'm
just
because
I,
obviously
cuz
I,
know
everybody
here,
but
I
know
that
other
people
might
not
to
categorize,
because
I
know
we've
got.
We've
got
Brenton's
to
you,
hear
from
feckle
and
they're.
Both
gonna
be
taking
this
data
and
putting
in
front
of
users
to
help
people
make
bookings,
as
is
Jamie
from
my
local
pitch
who's
here
as
well,
and
and
then
from
get
active
and
so
there's
a
kind
of
few
people
here
are
really
focused
on
engaging
an
audience
and
then
on
the
other
side.
E
Chris
is
representing
kind
of
more
the
back
end
and
where
you
would
have
this
data
kind
of
initially
categorized,
so
they
can
be
presented
to
the
audience
and
passed
to
the
others
and
and
and
duncan
and
andy,
are
kind
of
in
the
in
the
kind
of
in
the
background
in
terms
of
standardizing
but
but
not
for
either
particular
reason.
So
I
I
wonder
what
is
it
worth
is
kind
of
talking
about
whether
this
works
for
both
sides
around?
C
Thanks
that,
from
my
position,
it
does
certainly
make
sense,
have
one
single
list
I'm,
just
one
thought
I
had
based
on
that
presentation.
Lee
was
a
pink
tights
for
each
sports
and
activity
and
I
suppose
one
thoughts
about
they
are
natural
rushes.
You
have
specific
formats
that
can
be
phased
out
specific.
So
far
you
can
change
so
as
long
as
there
is
some
sort
of
relationship,
that's
fairly
standardized
between
formats
and
sports
and-
and
I
think
was
tossing
the
tag
you
were
describing.
A
C
So
we
do
sport
format
and
surface,
so
sport
is
football.
Format
is
eleven
side
of
50
side
70
side,
and
then
this
is
a
tratar
3g
after
tap
in
the
cinema
cricket,
we
have
cricket
in
size
nets
and
goes
come
on
and
on,
but
what
you
want
is
football
and
then
the
cricket
nets
being
possible.
Three
alligator
two
couples,
because
obviously
that
doesn't
work.
A
C
A
C
A
So
this
this
also
touches
on
I,
think
some
comments
that
Nick
made
around
disciplines
and
some
other
kind
of
cata
beaut
ways
to
kind
of
categorize
events.
So
one
approach
to
this
is
that
I
think
you
you
can
just
expand
the
activity
list,
so
you
end
up
with
more
hierarchy
more
collection.
Another
approach
is
that
you
just
have
you
associated
more
tags
with
the
event,
so,
whereas
in
the
diagrams
I
was
showing
that
there
were
set
of
activity
tags,
there
may
be
tags
that
describe
the
surface,
for
example.
A
C
H
C
Relevant
for
us,
ok,
but
I,
didn't
noticed
in
the
active
places
that
doesn't
necessarily
use
those
that
useful
data,
for
example,
flex,
is
an
extremely
useful.
The
data,
though
the
active
places,
the
kolache
list,
floodlights,
which
can
be
a
problem,
and
that
would
be
very
useful
for
any
future
list.
Okay,.
A
D
There
are
solely
for
bugs,
yet
they
are,
they
will
be
pacific
to
a
facility
because
you
normally
you
would
have-
I
mean
if
they
cross
pictures,
for
example,
you
might
have
grasped
you
might
have
footlights
on
just
one
individual
picture.
You
might
be
on
the
whole
lot.
It's
unlikely
I
mean
with
a
3g
pitch
you'll.
Have
them
on.
It
will
be
attached
to
a
3g
pitch,
probably
that
we
flood
like
athletic.
It's
for
lights,
certain
other
things
that,
but
they
tend
to
be
very
facility
pacific
rather
than
place
specific.
Are
the
venue.
D
A
A
C
I
Sandy
from
active
Devon
just
to
add
to
that
discussion,
thinking
of
outdoor
activities,
things
like
mountain
biking
and
orienteering
and
others
that
would
be
a
very
it's
not
a
surface
basis,
same
principle
where
there
would
be
grading
of
the
roots
or
courses
or
trails,
which
would
be
very
significant
in
terms
of
people's
the
appropriate
us
for
people.
Yes,.
F
Yeah
I
mean
I
literally
on
this
group
since
yesterday
afternoon,
so
I've,
not
a
mine
tarnish
or
what
the
larger
scope
and
objects
is
going
to
end
up
being.
But
the
idea
of,
like
a
standard
set
of
category
activation,
dissociating
on
two
things
which
broadly
similar
event
subcategories
of
you
know,
surfaces,
say
no
grass
or
clay
or
difficult
terrain
or
where
it's
going
to
be
kind
of
covers.
The
majority
of
other
combinations
we'd
be
looking
at
whenever
we
use
or
configurations
like
a
book
of
activity.
F
It's
a
combination
of
an
activity,
our
location
and
potentially
staff.
Member
I.
Don't
know
if
there's
any
kind
of
scope
to
think
about
compasses,
a
staff
being
a
searchable
things.
If
there's
another
particular
quality
of
instructor.
Looking
at
they're
gonna
have
like
a
qualification
to
teacher
thing.
That
might
be
something
worth
it
considering
as
well.
Identify
that's
kind
of
a
bit
beyond
the
scope
were
looking
at
other
one.
Now.
A
I
think
I
think
that
isn't
is
in
scope.
I'm,
at
least
to
the
extent
of
the
model
will
have
that
I
can
show
you
the
diagram.
Hopefully
you
can
see
that
so
we've
been
we've
been
discussing
the
kind
of
top
right
piece
just
now,
but
the
events
in
the
opportunity
dater
can
have
the
associate
with
organizers,
which
could
be
both
person
organization.
A
So
this
is
where
we
can
recognize
clubs
or
particular
hosts
for
an
event,
and
then
it
can
also
be
associated
with
a
contributor
which
I
think
more
generally
would
be
other
staff
involved
in
hosting
or
running
the
event,
so
that
give
a
I
think
I
wanted
to
cover
capture.
Some
of
that,
and
you
know
if
there
are
qualifications
and
that
will
be
further
attributes
associated
with
the
personal
or
the
organization.
H
A
The
is
the
diagram
that
they
don't
have
to
show
before
that.
It's
the
so
in
the
center
we've
got
the
event
and
then
there's
this
activity
arrow
over
to
the
young
Galactic.
So
that's
the
tag
you
know
so
either
the
activity
is
going
to
be
a
simple
name
or
the
might.
It
might
have
additional
information
associated
with
it,
so
it
might
be
related
to
two
other
names
or
we
might
even
add.
You
know,
descriptions
and
images
and
things
to
the
activities
as
well.
So.
H
H
F
Lady
abroad,
an
arrow
at
aussie
to
find
things
are
categorizing
similar
methodologies,
so
cricket
is
like
in
net,
which
is
like
table
cricket.
Is
there
any
idea
around
people
who
enjoy
cricket
also
enjoyed
these
other
activities,
which
may
not
be
in
the
same
category
but
may
have
the
same
kind
of
kind
of
psychological
interest
kind
of
to
them.
Yeah.
A
So
I'm
so
scars
also
has
so
some
of
the
naming
I've
taken
from
Scotts
here,
and
one
of
the
things
we
can
discuss
in
future
is
whether
we
want
to
just
kind
of
use
that
naming
because,
if
the
lines
as
with
a
standard
or
whether
we
want
to
change
the
names
but
as
well
as
broad
and
narrow
relationships,
there
is
a
more
general
kind
of
related
relationship
so
that
you
can
just
link
together
two
different
activities.
You
know
so
based.
A
A
So
I
think
this
is
fairly
straightforward.
So
look
within
the
model
we're
going
to
be
using
event
to
cover
as
a
the
broad
term
to
describe
both
individual
occurrences,
so
a
gym
class
that
is
happening
tonight
as
well
as
I
events
that
happen
to
a
show
jewel.
So
the
gym
class
that
happens
every
Wednesday
and
the
really
just
the
difference
would
be
whether
an
individual
event
has
a
specific
date
and
time
or
whether
it's
associated
with
a
schedule
in
the
in
the
next
revision
of
specification.
A
I'll
have
more
detail
on
on
the
scheduling,
but
it
will
be
using
the
structure
that
come
those
described
for
I
calendar
so
that
so
that
standard
order
defines
a
way
to
capture
what
we
call
/
currents
rules.
So
when
you,
you
know,
when
you
set
up
another
recurring
event
in
your
calendar
and
there's
already
kind
of
weld
understood
models
for
doing
that,
so
rather
than
Reese
anodizing
that
something
that
we
can
just
incorporate
into
what
we're
doing.
A
So
the
model
update
so
that
the
specification
at
the
moment
refers
to
sessions,
but
really
that
is
just
as
a
way
for
us
to
have
just
have
another
term
to
refer
to
an
individual
that
single
occurrences.
It's
not
going
to
be
a
feature
of
the
model.
It's
just
sometimes,
when
we're
talking
it
useful
to
agree
that
we're
talking
about
an
individual
currents,
a
session
rather
than
no
recurring
event.
I
Hi,
it's
a
handy
for
amount
of
Devon
I
did
send
an
email
round
very
much
a
do.
I,
don't
know
if
anybody
saw
it,
but
one
of
we're
doing
a
huge
amount
of
work
around
getting
people
acted
outdoors
and
what
struck
me
reading
the
spec
for
this
meeting
me
was
the
way
that
a
lot
of
the
activities
that
we
are
involved
in
in
that
work
is
not
really
covered
as
an
event
as
such
you're.
I
A
couple
of
concrete
examples
would
be
something
like
a
mountain
bike
trailer
to
forest
park
where
actually
you're
wanting
to
it's
your
you're,
offering
the
opportunity
it's
structured,
it's
controlled,
but
it's
not
necessary
and
it
has
a
opening
hours
effectively.
But
it's
not
it's
an
organized
bookable
event
and
such
at
a
certain
time-
and
there
are
lots
of
examples-
are
probably
the
majority
of
the
examples
in
the
getting
active
outdoors
environment
and
they're
connecting
to
nature
kind
of
world
are
in
in
that
kind
of
vein.
I
But
you
are
not
needing
them
to
necessarily
book
it,
but
we
do
then
want
to
find
ways
of
monitoring
that
that
those
people
are
using
it
and
there's
other
ways
of
doing
that.
I
just
put
that
here,
because
obviously
now's
the
time
if
we
were
going
to
make
that
change,
to
make
it
rather
than
later,
yeah.
A
Okay,
that's
useful
so
that
I
did
see
the
email,
and
my
first
thought
was
I
was
wondering
whether
this
is
an
aspect
of
div.
So
you
mentioned
a
park,
for
example.
So
is
the
fact
that
there
is
a
walking
trail
of
the
putt,
something
that
we
want
to
describe
about
the
park
rather
than
most
as
an
independent
opportunity.
I
I'm
thinking
the
sort
of
best
examples
would
be
things
like
permanent
orienteering
courses,
whether
there
would
be
also
be
opportunities
where
there
were
temporary
ones.
We
have
in
Devon,
obviously
lots
and
lots
of
trails
and
cars
and
circular
walks
from
the
southwest
coach
of
the
national
parks.
Any
number
of
organizations
that
you
could
be
promoting
as
opportunities
and
where
it
is
structured.
There
is
a
map,
there's
a
Stefan
at
starting
point,
there's
ways
you
can
actually
engage
with
people
around,
though
their
use
of
those
things,
but
your
it
isn't
a
defined
event.
D
So
yet
Nicki
I
mean
we've
I
mean
now:
we've
got
some
of
the
British
Cycling
gates
that
we
have
we
started
to
have
some
of
the
mountain
is
going
on
at
the
moment
on
the
mountain
bike
trails
for
winter,
which
were
British,
Cycling
type
ones,
well
we're
putting
those
those
go
on
the
facilities,
so
I
mean
there
is
a
question
under
the
facilities.
Should
there
be
natural
track
facilities
and
what
they
define
s,
because
then
you
get
in
tues
what
Andy
saying
gomen
annoying
tyrion
courses?
They
could
be
crags
or
mountains.
D
They
can
be
done
this
enough,
of
course,
but
then
we'd
have
to
be
very
much
close,
that
definition
down
to
say
they're,
not
including
in
your
standard
kind
of
routes,
on
your
kind
of
normal.
You
know
side,
streets
and
footpaths,
but
then
there
is
a
bit
I
misses
about.
What
could
you
do
about
those
manage?
All
those
you
know,
there's
a
lot
of
user-generated
content
or
where
people
put
up
from
us
travel
routes
and
things
like
that.
So
where
does
that
fit?
D
Just
throwing
out
there
because
it
is
out
there,
you
know
that
they
all
that
stuff
is
there,
so
you
take
ordnance
survey
on
their
website
at
the
moment,
people
are
publishing
reach
and
if
at
audience,
so
they
have
people
who
are
kind
of
registered
people
who
publish
their
angry
to
my
open
data
site,
which
they
kind
of
which
they
know
are
correct.
We
to
changing
routes
and
there's
lots
of
information
about
it.
So
it's
a
question:
where
does
that
fit
in
the
future?
And
it's
not?
D
E
So
that
that
yeah,
that
is
really
interesting
and
certainly
something
that
there's
a
few
different
scenarios
where
I
think
orienteering
have
something
similar
where
there
is
orienteering
courses
that
you
can
just
go
and
find,
and
you
just
literally
turn
up
and
there's
a
print.
You
can
print
a
map
out
and
then
go
and
do
the
course
you
don't
need
to
actually
do
it
with
anyone.
So
there's
there's
a
few
of
those
where
there's
a
it's
on
it
is
very
I
could
see
absolutely
agree
with
you.
E
So
a
club
is
at
a
facility
and
a
club
runs
events,
and
you
might,
you
might
want
to
know
about
a
club
or
know
about
the
facility
the
club
is
in
and
it
depends
on
the
sport
as
to
whether
the
club,
don't
as
a
club,
run
on
a
petite
in
a
particular
facility
or
in
on
or
in
does
it
does
it
use
a
particular
trail.
I,
don't
know,
maybe
that's
too.
E
Maybe
those
two
things
aren't
that
connected,
but
yeah
but
they're.
So
maybe
there's
baby,
this
facility's
clubs
and
events
or
three
things
potentially
and
and
the
question
is
a
facility
the
same
as
a
course
or
an
outdoor
trail.
The
running
that
there's
the
running
guys
do
this
as
well,
there's
running
trails
that
you
can
get
off
the
National
Trust
website
and
they're
just
a
trail
I.
G
Found
similarly,
I
can
probably
dig
it
out
and
point
you
in
the
right
direction,
and
but
when
I
was
doing
some
of
the
initial
research,
there
was
definitely
a
lot
of
a
lot
about
walks
and
that
kind
of
thing,
but
it
also
tied
into
the
tagging.
The
attributes
as
well
and
I,
think
that
some
of
that
it
could
be
interesting
because
it's
essentially
quite
seasonal
as
well,
so
coastal
walks
in
particular.
A
I
Went
looking
at
in
reading
it
this
morning,
Lee
I
felt
it
from
where
we're
working
with
a
lot
of
different
partners
on
the
outdoor
safer,
just
because
of
Devin
being
what
it
is
and
the
only
in
terms
of
the
events
in
making
those
discoverable
as
an
activity.
If
I'm
looking
for
a
coast
walk
or
a
mountain,
my
cruise
or
whatever,
it
might
be.
I
The
only
thing
that
really
caught
me
in
the
specification
that
you
have
at
the
moment.
We,
the
description,
was
the
way
that
it
talks
of
an
event
quite
reasonably
is
having
an
agreed
time
and
date,
whereas
the
difference
for
an
excursion
as
an
opportunity
is
simply
that
its
place.
It's
a
way.
You
can
take
barking
that
activity
and
but
it's
not
constrained
by
time
and
date,
and
it's
it.
But
having
said
that,
why
I
thought
the
it
fitted
there
nicely
was
that
they
may
well
be
constraints
around.
I
G
Actually
wonders
worldly,
so
I
just
jump
in
and
something
just
triggered
in
my
mind
there
and
am
in
terms
of
your
use
of
the
word
session
as
well
could
be
quite
interesting
because-
and
forgive
me
if
this
is
covered,
but
something
like
swimming,
for
instance,
is
quite
open
and
you
do
have
different
opening
hours
generally
for
the
facility.
But
then,
within
that
you
might
have
different
restrictions
for
a
particular
session
and
in
terms
of
it
might
be
adults
only
or
might
be
a
swimming
club,
or
something
like
that.
G
So
there
might
be
this
need
to
potentially
break
it
down
a
little
bit
more
as
well.
In
that
kind
of
instance,
so
you've
got
your
overall
times.
You
know
days
of
the
year.
It
is
a
plan,
apart
from
Christmas
Day,
Boxing
Day,
that
kind
of
stuff
and
but
then
you've
got
the
more
granular
start
and
finish
points
as
well.
G
Possibly
I
think
this
comes
back
to
your
original
point
about
and
once
we
have
the
model,
it
would
be
really
good
to
start
filling
in
the
real
data
so
that
we
can
actually
go
okay,
so
is
that
an
event?
Is
that
something
you
know
blow
that
or
is
it
above
it
do
we
need
to
actually
split
these
houses?
Professor
yeah.
A
A
F
Just
a
quick
question:
you
probably
cover
this
previously.
Are
we
considering
a
scenario
where,
as
the
API
driving
this
this
activity,
this
master
activity
list,
we
talked
about
as
being
like
a
manual
process
where
you're
uploading,
your
schedules
and
I've
been
just
being
displayed
to
the
customer
sounds
oh.
A
Yes,
so
that
the
suspect
that
we're
kind
of
discussing
now
is
really
just
going
to
get
the
model
for
the
domain
agreed
and
a
way
to
kind
of
express
that,
in
a
structured
sir
and
I'm
times
put
together
a
separate
spec,
there's
says
how
to
go
about
publishing
that
and
some
of
the
Graham
work
that
that
we
did
at
the
ODI
in
this
space
was
identifying
the
kind
of
different,
different
ways
that
that
data
might
be
made
available.
Some
people
are
using
a
desert.
A
Spectre
Nick
worked
on
called
the
real-time
paging
spec,
which
provides
an
API
to
harvest
events
or
another
opportunity
to
opportunity
dater
so
that
you
can
publish
it
and
then
other
people
can
adjust
that
into
their
system,
but
other
others.
It
might
be
easier
for
other
data
publishers
to
just
publish
regular
data
downloads,
which
might
be
day
to
downloads
of
the
activity
list
or
it
might
be
for
opportunities
or
their
facilities.
A
F
Only
only
worries
me:
this
is
a
operator
point
of
view
because
we
all
watching
to
say
our
timetables
in
terms
of
workout
classes
and
swimming
and
other
activities
on
a
fairly
regular
basis.
I
wouldn't
want
her
to
be
constant,
giving
massives
or
upload
faster
update
timetable
still
couldn't
change
every
single
week,
and
because
we
give
our
individual
dishes
sensors
the
opportunity
to
supply
their
own
timetables,
they
may
change
something
fast.
F
A
Don't
yet,
but
I
think
I
preference
would
be
that
you
would
be
publishing
this
through
an
API
that
other
people
come
and
access,
rather
than
it
being
kind
of
bulk
book
downloads.
But
we
just
want
to
make
sure
that
everyone
can
contribute
in
the
matter
what
kind
of
technical
platform
or
super
hug
okay,
and
so,
unless
there
are
the
comments
on
the
kind
of
events,
I
did
the
last
kind
of
question,
but
I
wanted
to
kind
of
put
to
you.
A
A
It
didn't
want
to
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
there
was
some
clarity
around
what
we
meant
by
you
know
the
term
program,
and
if
there
was
some
confusion
there,
then
I
was
just
going
to
suggest
format.
You
know
as
a
as
in
the
format
of
the
event,
there's
an
alternate,
but
I
had
some
feedback
after
the
revisions
to
say
that
that
maybe
program
would
have
been
better
after
all,
so
I
just
wanted
to
ask
you
all,
which,
which
term
do
you
think
is
better,
is
is
program?
A
Does
it
will
have
a
well-understood
industry
definition
already
and
is
it?
Is
it
the
one
that's
in
spec
or
do
you
think
we
should
be
using
a
slightly
different
turn
to
avoid
any
confusion,
anyone
jump
in
Nick
Nick
from
sport,
england,
this
you
had,
I
think,
had
some
colored
song
and
I
single
you
out
I'm
to
do
prefer
program
versus
format.
God.
D
What
comics
were
now?
I
think,
I
think
the
funny
thing
about
format
is
often
it
is
it
when
you
get
into
the
sports,
make
connotations
to
about
certain
elements
of
how
different
disciplines
or
within
a
sport
once
the
program
isn't
real.
A
wider
kind
of
definition
that
you
can
probably
apply
both
in
times
of
in
terms
of
what
an
operator
would
apply,
plus
a
governing
body,
would
apply.
I.
Think
that's
what
one
of
the
things
got
kind
of
lazy
about
to.
A
Okay,
I
mean
one
of
the
reasons
for
breaking
it
out
separately
to
activities
was
I
think
it
was
partly
cuisine.
What
you
are
I
like
to
think
that
that
it
trying
to
a
deal
with
all
the
kind
of
branded,
not
just
the
branded
sways
running
events,
but
also
the
kind
of
variety
of
ways
that
individual
organizers
might
choose
to
describe
their
particular
event.
So
many
in
buried
that
that
trying
to
incorporate
them
within
activity
list
would
just
make
managing
that
kind
of
list
am
major
overhead.
A
So
if
we
kind
of
recognized
that
there
were
two
different
types
of
things
here,
then
we
can
just
use
program
as
a
more
free
form
tag
and
try
to
maintain
a
kind
of
activity
list
that
was
a
bit
more
a
bit
more
controlled.
That
makes
sense
and
meaning
chatting
this
over
with
a
few
people.
There's
lots
of
cases
where
I
I
think
I
think
samba
was
the
example
of
something
that
has
gone
from
being
a
kind
of
format
to
being
a
kind
of
fairly
recognized
activity.
D
So
I
was
oh
yeah.
I
was
just
thinking
about
that,
because
I
was
thinking
when
you
start
to
looking
for
some
of
people
there.
Maybe
the
program
there
may
be
a
number
of
different
activities
that
go
underneath
it
could
be
almost
across
different
sports
or
something
that
selfing
I
was
going
to
I'll.
Just
go
hide
in
there.
D
I
E
I
mean
and
the
ayah
suspect
that
the
Pete
there's
other
evil
and
is
called
not
because
there's
not
many
people
would
have
a
strong
opinion
either
way.
I
mean
it
potentially
you've
got
Jade
from
the
MDP
in
here
or
or
Kim
again.
I
think
they
would
because
I
think
programs
is
a
lot
more
prevalent
in
some
types
of
sports.
Although
I
mean
Chris
might
be
running
some
less
Mel
stuffs
as
a
view
of
that
yeah.
A
F
A
That
that
was
the
death.
That
was
where
I
thought.
There
was
two
slightly
different
views,
because
what
you
were
describing
there
is
a
kind
of
schedule.
The
actual
program
series
of
events
is
one
way
of
defining
a
program,
but
then
there's
an
there's,
the
something
like
learn
to
row,
which
is
a
way
to
actually
structure
an
individual
event
and
there's
no
connection
between
those
events.
People
also
refer
to
that
as
a
program,
and
it
felt
like
there's
a
need
to
distinguish
between
those
two
different
things.
E
A
E
H
A
E
It's
right
near,
and
we
within
another
way
of
saying
it
is
a
lez
body
pump-
is
a
brand
of
a
certain
type
of
exercise
which
you
might
classify
as
an
activity
of
aerobics
or
something.
So
you
could
have
the
activities
aerobics,
but
the
brand
is
there's
Mel's
body
pump
or
with
the
rowing
example.
The
activities
rowing,
but
the
program
would
learn
to
row
is
a
type
of
rowing
way.
It's
a
six
week
course,
and
you
learn.
You
start
the
beginning
and
you
get
in
learn
to
row
or
a
netball
where
I
get
back
back
into.
E
Netball
is
a
program
where
you
could
just
drop
in
and
you
run
and
eat
anyone
can
drop
in
and
kind
of
play
or
bam
or
back
to
bound
Paddington's.
The
same
notion
fomenting
you
drop
in.
So
it's
not
necessarily
a
there's,
no
more
obsessions
running
way.
It
could
be
from
the
point
of
the
provider.
It
could
be
because
you
might
be
running
us.
Ten.
Ten
sessions
of
nostradamus.
E
From
the
consumers
perspective,
the
fact
10
weeks
of
no
strings
badminton
running
doesn't
affect
them
because
it
just
a
drop
into
any
one
of
those
yeah
just
join
in.
So
it's
coming
from
the
purely
from
the
consumers
perspective.
We
don't
necessarily
need
to
talk
about
it
as
a
stream
of
events,
because
they
only
might
care
about
one
look
but
I,
sometimes
its
course
for.
H
Some
Thai
sometimes
wonder,
then,
maybe
maybe
you
have
a
term-
that's
a
little
bit
different
like
brand,
because
we're
not
talking
about
consumer
facing
bit
language
here.
Are
we
we're
talking
about
back-end
language
factors,
database,
language,
right?
Yes,
yes,
terminology
and
the
problem.
Austin
is
that
if
you
use
terminology
like
program,
we
all
agree
that
somebody
else
uses
that
maybe
narrative
consumer-facing
stuff
to
mean
something
different
and
it
gets
confusing.
Was
he
picker
something
almost
a
completely
different
term
like
brand?
F
So
just
for
me,
the
idea
of
brands
is
quite
interesting,
as
you
think
about
so
I'm
like
spinning.
Spinning
is
a
branded
term,
so
some
of
our
locations
have
spinning
some
house
in
in
somehow
spins
web
studio.
Cycling
some
have
liz
mozar
p.m.
I
know.
A
big
part
of
this
is
to
kind
of
bring
them
all
together
into
one
category,
but
this
will
like
a
brand
perspective,
doing
these
videos
cigarette
down
where
we
have
a
less
nas
branded
indoor
cycling
thing,
a
spinning
branded
one
and
I.
Could
generic
home
very
kind
of
thing?
F
A
A
So,
knowing
you
know,
if
you
just
move
Jim,
knowing
that
you're
going
to
do
les
mills
bodypump
no
matter
where
you
are
seems
like
a
useful
thing
as
a
vent
provider,
I
would
imagine
if
you
want
your
brand
once
you
think,
but
how
you
know,
knowing
the
different
expect
to
consumer
is
only
to
know
the
difference
between
you
know,
spinning
and
spinning
and
RPM
and
stuff,
but
that's
where
we
could.
It
could
be
extra
information
attached
to
them.
I.
D
Was
askin
south,
hey,
Chris,
confirm
from
I
mean
having
looked
through
doing
a
project
with
Birmingham,
which
has
had
some
of
you
all
dated
from
surco,
which
I
know
that
some
of
it
has
come
from
been
passed
on.
It
was
historical
data,
the
amount
of
different
names
that
are
given
the
things,
as
you
say,
spinning
when
he
let
loose
some
in
a
sports
center,
then
renamed
it
all
time.
D
Oh,
is
it
because
I
awful
yeah
so
I
think
being
able
to
take
it
out,
because
then
you
kind
of
giving
them
the
power
by
putting
it
in
a
kind
of
what
are
we
going
to
call
it
for
an
end
and
format
you
can
I
can
call
it
whatever
it
is
whatever
they
could
call
it.
Although
what
I
can
you
name
whether
they
might
call
it?
But
at
least
then
it's
still
going
back
to
the
basic
activity.
Yeah
am
sorry.
F
I
think
from
the
way
to
go
in
the
system,
there's
a
defined
things
in
this
is
RPM,
but
then
they
have
nibbled
you
to
name
their
session.
It
is
turnkey
over
a
free
test
field,
so
the
good
ones
called
rpm.
So
my
colleague
big
Dave's,
RPM
and
just
makes
me
very
unhappy
yeah.
If
we
can
tell
you
that
the
back
end
factors
that
make
it
an
RPM
pass
into
this
this
in
the
system,
you
can
have
a
bypass
that
the
local
naming
yes,
okay,.
A
Yeah
yeah
I
mean
it
dudes,
the
app
the
physical
activity
stuff
we
talked
about
earlier
is
that
kind
of
OPM
indoor,
cycling,
piece
and
yeah.
I
mean
I
agree
that
that
just
being
able
to
name
the
events
as
a
way
to
kind
of
incorporate
some
of
that
branding
stuff
but
I
think
what
what
would
just
proposed
so
far.
The
model
is
that
those
are
just
an
extra
extra
property.
The
allow
that
to
be
incorporated.
Oh.
E
Think
a
previous
point
raised
was
the
maintenance
of
that
is
also
a
bigger
overhead,
because
people
are
caught
constantly
trying
to
differentiate
themselves
with
new
brands,
etc,
and
so
I
don't
know.
Is
it
I
guess
what
we're
not
saying
is
I
presume
what
we're
not
saying
is
we're
going
to
try
and
create
the
mother
list
of
all
branded
activities.
It
is
more
about
saying:
what
are
we
going
to
call
that
thing
just
so
that
we
know
when
someone's
got
free
text
field
and
they're
writing
in
the
field?
E
They're
writing
in
a
program
that
the
text,
the
free
text
field
is
called
Brando,
it's
called
program,
or
it's
called
whatever
and
there's
another
field
which
is
a
drop
down,
which
is
activity
which
is
using
our
standardized
list
of
activities
and
that's
actually
very
well.
We've
consolidated
that
so
there's
only
150
of
them,
but
we
know
that
that
covers
until
someone
Christ
anyone.
But
we
want
to
maintain
that
as
well,
but
not
on
the
same
level
of
any
other.
Yes
exactly
yeah,
yes,
yeah.
B
I
just
want
to
say
that
in
some
cases
it
strikes
me
that
it
might
so
a
product
like
I
come.
Are
you
hitting
this?
Might
act
like
a
synonym,
so
in
the
case
of
someone
looking
for
bikram
yoga,
they
might
not
know
they're
looking
for
that
when
they
might
type
in
hot
yoga
and
be
looking
for
bikram
or
vice
versa,
and
it
can
work
the
Caymans
or
a
few
different
areas.
Spinning
might
be
another
one,
the
inks
in
practice.
It
might
be
a
synonym
behave
that
way.
E
Know,
yeah
I
don't
have
no
idea
how
we're
gonna
somehow
decide
what
is
in
an
activity,
because
hot
yoga
and
bikram
yoga
a
different
ikram
yoga's
got
26
moves
that
you
do
during
the
course
of
the
session.
Hot
yoga's
got
40
plus
and
it
changes
depending
on
where
you're
doing
it,
and
so
they
are
different.
But
then
you
know,
but
they
are
similar
as
well,
so
I
suppose
at
some
point
we're
gonna
need
to
draw
a
line
and
say,
because
you
could
tell
as
meals
would
say
the
same
about
their
rpm
across.
E
We
have
a
particular
format.
All
the
classes
of
the
same
we've
got
these
that
you
know
these
things
that
mean
that
they're
better
than
the
non
branded
version.
So
I
guess
it's
it's
going
to
be
it's
going
to
be
difficult
to
draw
a
line
in
terms
of
what
consumers
need
to
know
versus,
because
if
you
just
can't
categorize
bikram
yoga
and
hot
yoga
under
one
activity
name,
then
users
could
find
and
link
both
together
and
they
both
come
up.
As
kind
of
have
you
seen
this.
Releasing
that
related
things.
A
A
A
Stuff
is
all
of
the
kind
of
churn
that's
happening
at
the
bottom
of
that
list,
where
people
are
coming
up
with
new
stuff,
and
some
of
it
sticks
around
for
long
enough,
and
they
might
actually
become
little
example
that
might
become
a
well-known,
well
understood
activity.
So
at
that
point
could
be
promoted
into
the
more
standardized
activity
list
and
and
but
at
the
moment
we
just
need
a
way
to
kind
of
capture
those
both
of
those
a
bits
of
information
and
I.
A
C
A
Close
up
for
today
is
there
any
other
questions
that
people
have
or
any
other
issues
that
you
want
to
raise.
Is
there
more
that
we
should
be
doing
to
make
it
easy
to
contribute?
It's
more,
that
we
should
be
doing
to
to
communicate
our
plans
so
just
to
just
give
a
couple
of
minutes,
naija
see
whether
anyone
knows
anything
else
to
add.
A
Yeah
I
think
I
have
an
issue
of
theirs
and
I
think
there's
an
issue
that
that
I've
got
linked
out
from
the
spec
of
other
other
types
of
tagging
or
categorization
that
we
need
to
put
on
events
and
I,
think
disability,
another
kind
of
participation,
criteria
or
suitability
criteria,
I
kind
of
within
that
yeah
I
think,
would
be
useful
to
have
a
standard
set
of
a
cabri.
For
that,
but
I,
don't
know
what
variation
exists
in
systems
at
the
moment.
So
it's
again
it's
like
activity.
A
E
Because
there's
definitely
something
there's
some
bodies
to
bring
into
this
group.
If
we're
going
to
have
that
conversation
as
well,
specifically
around
the
the
there's,
a
there's,
a
I
keep
getting
akram
wrong,
but
there's
definitely
a
fuller
acronym
for
an
organization
it
does
that,
and
there's
also
nick
evans
is
other
nick
happens-
is
a
list
of
disabilities.
E
D
I
mean
there's
some
stuff:
I
can
all
just
talk,
I
love
at
all
to
the
disability
team
here
because,
like
there
are
some
quite
standard
kind
of
terminology,
that's
used
and
it
gets
a
bit
difficult
because
I
think
it
there's
different
things.
You
can
do
between
different
sports
and
activities.
So
I
love
a
chat,
get
something
out
of
them.
Okay,.
E
E
E
J
Hey
yeah
I'm
here
I've
got
some
I've
only
just
started
looking
at
some
of
the
different
sporting
companies
that
we've
actually
got
a
book
of
all
but
I
need
to
sort
of.
I
think
I'll
send
something
to
the
the
mailing
list
about
how
I'm
not
sure
how
that's
going
to
fit
in
to
the
event
stuff.
At
the
moment,
I
need
to
sort
of
dig
into
that
bit
really
and
see
see
what
we've
got.
A
A
Okay,
I
think
I'm
going
to
wrap
us
up
then
I'll.
Just
thank
you
all
for
giving
the
time
up
again
this
afternoon.
It's
really
great
discussion.
I'll,
post
this
I'll
post
a
link
to
this
slide
somewhere
and
again.
Yet,
just
just
to
ask
you
all
just
to
keep
an
eye
on
the
spec.
Keep
the
comments
coming.
I
think
we
can
use
me
start
to
move
forward
really
quickly.
That's
great
boy!
Look
Lee!.