►
From YouTube: OpenActive W3C Community Group Meeting / 2019-01-30
Description
A public hangout for members of the OpenActive W3C Community Group.
https://w3c.openactive.io/meetings/2019-01-30-booking-feedback
A
A
There
is
a
new
draft
of
the
spec
that
Nick
has
published
this
afternoon,
which
will
I,
think
Nick
will
take
us
through
and
I.
Think
no
Nick
has
got
some
questions
that
have
come
up
during
edits
and
revisions
that
he'd
like
to
bring
to
the
group.
So
we'll
look
through
the
latest,
spec
I've
been
looking
at
it
from
the
point
of
view
of
what
we
can
create
some
extra
documentation
around
it.
A
It's
at
the
editors
draft,
URL
I
will
send
an
email
round
to
the
mailing
list
after
the
call
so
that
everyone
who
hasn't
been
able
to
make
it
can
at
least
start
looking
at
the
spec.
The
idea
is
that
we're
pushing
this
out,
even
though
there
is
still
a
bit
of
work
to
be
done
in
a
few
areas,
because
we
want
to
make
sure
that
people
have
plenty
of
chance
to
review
the
detail
over
and
above
what
we've
gone
through
on.
A
B
So
I'm
in
just
in
case
where
he
does
join
in
the
next
kind
of
ten
minutes,
there's
a
bit
I've
actually
already
talked
to
Ray
separately,
about
I,
wanted
to
bring
to
the
group
and
chair
or
we
chest
about
and
then
get
get
into
thought
specifically
on
it,
and
that
is
kids
activity
booking.
So
you
might
seen
ran
the
mailing
list.
There
was
a
an
email
from
Alastair
and
public
health
England
about
about
that.
B
So
quick
chat
with
Ray
revealed
that
it
might
not
be
a
lot
of
work
to
add
that
in,
but
that
might
just
be
with
clarity,
so
I
wanted
to
get
and
a
few
other
systems
input,
but
as
we
have,
we
are
gotta
bodies
from
basically
everybody
today
for
some
reason
in
it
might
just
be
you
that
would
be
providing
that
guidance.
You
are
you
able
to
hear
and
respond.
B
You
just
want
the
full
name
and
surname
really,
and
then
you
just
trust
that
this
is
all
dissolved.
Clarity
perspective.
You
just
trust
that
if
you've
booked
a
kid
in
for
a
you
know
a
thing
that's
between
8
and
12
years,
in
relevance
or
whatever
it
is
as
an
age
bracket.
You
trust
that
the
parent
has
put
their
kid
in
the
right
class.
B
If
that's
useful,
for
the
people
at
reception
to
know
or
for
other
reasons,
to
print
certificates
for
swimming
lessons
or
whatever.
It
is
and
checked
against
book
when
and
book
when
do
have
the
same
thing,
so
they
the
only
slight
differences
with
book
winners,
you
can
add,
are
but
you've
got
main
Booker
and,
you
can
add,
are
but
tree
attendees.
B
Alongside
that,
the
Booker
and
the
with
the
wood
book,
when
you
actually,
they
also
specify
for
each
of
those,
if
they're
a
child
or
not
as
a
boolean
value,
so
is
that
child
is
that
not
which
I
guess
helps
them
differentiate,
which
the
parent
and
the
child
is,
if
they're,
printing
a
certificate
or
whatever
it
is
they're
doing
so,
that's
as
far
as
we
got.
Basically,
the
changes
required
to
four
kids
activities
would
just
be
an
attendee
array
which
is
optional,
with
four
name
surname
and.
B
C
The
first
thing
is
that
you
know:
when
we
make
a
book,
we
have
curve
a
con,
a
condo
and
account
yeah.
They
don't
have
to
have
used
him
and
pass
will
be
a
cement
account
and
I.
Think
we've
all
decided
they
can
be
distinguished
by
an
email
address:
okay,
mmm-hmm!
So
what's
the
chart
Evo
just
going
to
be.
C
Yes,
now
we
can
make,
we
can
put
the
debt
on
the
parents
account
and
have
the
attendance
on
the
child's
account
and
we
can
link
the
child's
account
to
one
or
more
parent
accounts.
Actually,
because
that's
the
way
things
work
these
days,
but
in
general,
yes,
we
can
attend
the
trial
separately
to
the
payment.
I.
B
C
Can
have
yes,
we
can
have
just
for
clarity.
I
shouldn't
say
that
with
Raymond
over
here.
Just
for
clarity,
that's
something
that's
only
particularly
used
in
the
our
sports
programs,
rather
than
class
bookings
and
activities,
but
the
relationship.
What
I
mean
by
that
is
that
you
can
create
that
relationship.
We
can
create
a
relationship,
but
in
terms
of
online
to
be
able
to
select
which
of
your
children.
You
want
to
book
in
that's
the
only
available
for
sports
courses
yeah,
so
that's
a
background
connection
which
isn't
used
in
classes.
B
C
B
It's
okay,
so
we
I
guess
the
potential
issue
there
is
yeah
and
I
did
actually
have
a
quick
chat
with
them.
Gladstone
about
this,
with
some
effusion
about
Gladstone's
implementation
of
it
when
I
spoke
to
them
a
few
days
ago,
as
I
happened
to
be
talking
about
other
things,
and
they
mentioned
that
in
Gladstone,
you
actually
have
a
similar
set
at
where
you
have
the
account
of
the
child.
You
make
the
booking
against
the
account,
but
didn't
seem
to
matter
too
much
to
them
which
way
around
it.
C
We
well
like
I
said
that,
for
what
we're
talking
about
at
the
moment,
you'll
be
booking
a
class
for
the
child,
yeah
yeah,
there's
no
point
in
bringing
in
as
someone
else
pays
for
it
I
think.
In
this
context,
it's
absolutely
really
relevant
when
you
want
to
manage
debt
and
there
won't
be
any
Jess
on
this
case
yeah.
But
me,
the
question
is:
how
are
you
going
to
identify
that
child?
Yes,
so.
C
Have
an
email
address,
which
is
the
primary
key
for
the
kind
of
person
in
this
case
they
won't
have
anything.
You
know
if
you
one
less,
he
very
precocious,
you
don't
have
a
Google
account
yeah.
B
B
On
your
signed,
IDs,
so
okay,
that
makes
sense
so
actually
the
one
account.
So
the
simple
case
is
that
you
you
submit
the
child
is
the
account
so
for
that
to
work.
Then,
if
we
have
the
attendee,
so
China
mash
them
all
together.
If
we
have
the
attendee
provided
and
we
use
that
to
create
the
account
rather
than
the
customer
customer
object
as
it
were,
then
your
customer
object
could
still
contain
the
person
who's
paying
so
consistency.
The
customer
object
can
be
the
parent,
and
in
sounds
like
in
legend
the
Gladstone's
case.
B
C
There's
quite
a
lot
of
latency
on
this
car.
Like
she
said
it's
about
four
seconds.
I
can
see
here
you
talk
and
then
your
mouth
lose
about
four
seconds
later.
It's
real
the
I'm
saying
here
is
that
the
challenge
is
that,
if
I
want
to
book
myself
in
Ian
it
lay
somewhere,
then
I've
got
to
record
that
if
I
then
want
to
put
my
child
in
I've
got
to
put
down
Jamie
at
whatever
Gmail
and
they
want
to
put
another
child
in
it's
blah
blah
blah
blah
blah.
C
C
Think
the
other
challenge
we've
got
is
deduplication,
because
if
we
just
put
you
don't
beat
a
staffing,
the
child
has
to
have
an
account.
However,
we
have
a
wiki
account,
so
if
I
come
in
and
then
the
wife
comes
in
a
bit
later
and
puts
in
Jamie
dams
yeah,
how
are
we
gonna?
Do
duplicate
that?
Because
there's
no
unique
identifiers
for
that
that
child
I
mean
we
could
return
the
unit.
C
So
you
know
we
could
we
could
set
things
up
so
that
when
I
as
Ian
downs,
log
in
and
say,
I'd
like
to
either
child
and
by
the
ways
it's
Jamie
yeah,
that
creates
that
link
record.
That
creates
account
ignoring
how
we
manage
the
the
identification
of
that
person.
I,
don't
know
how
we
do
that,
but
that
doesn't
matter.
If
then,
madam
came
in
and
she
wanted
to
book
something
for
Jamie,
it
will
be
different
accounts.
C
A
A
B
B
B
That's
fully
detailed
with
the
email
address
and
you
can
key
against
that
find
the
parent
finding
and
then
it
looks
against
Jamie
based
on
the
relationship
there
and
I,
don't
like
to
say
if
it's
gonna
be
difficult
key
of
anything
except
the
name
really,
unless
you
ask
for
date
of
birth,
but
then
you
might
have
two
twins
and
then
you'd
have
to
do
something
to
combine
them.
So
I
suppose
there's
no
there's
a
risk
that
might
just
generate
a
new
account
for
each
unless.
B
A
B
C
I
mean
within
online
services
the
web
applications.
The
emails
are
key,
but
if
people
don't
have
an
online
account,
then
we
don't
have
a
primary
key.
Our
search
is
the
member
number
or
something
like
that,
and
so
the
emails
could
be
random
or
not
there
or
anything.
So
what
we
need
to
do
is
say
it's
a
it's
an
ODI
account
and
therefore
we
will
make
sure
that
the
email
address
is
a
primary
key
effectively.
B
A
B
You
know
I
guess:
I
was
thinking
if
we
still.
If
we
went
with
the
kind
of
book
when
in
clarity's
you
have
a
customer
and
then
you
have
an
attendee
kind
of
attendee
structure,
then
it's
quite
simple
and
then
you
can
infer
that
those
are
children
that
they're
relation
but
I
see
what
you're
saying
that.
A
A
B
Well,
it's
mainly
the
certificate
state
law
and
knowing
the
children
in
the
register
when
they
turn
up
and
things
like
that.
That's
that's
the!
So
it's
a
from
raise
the
conversation
with
Ray.
That's
mainly
why
they
capture
that
information,
but,
like
I,
said
it's
literally,
first
name
surname,
there's
nothing
else,
certainly
not
dated
there.
B
This
is
the
question:
if
it's
something
that's
simple,
I
suppose
you
saw
in
Alice's
email.
Obviously
the
scale
of
the
opportunity
there
is
large
but
and
I
know
that
the
second
iteration
of
this
API
might
happen
for
a
while.
So
this
is
kind
of
saying
whether
you
change
for
lives
can
use
this
is
and
I
suppose.
If
we
given
it
some
discussion,
it's
it's
hard
or
maybe
there's
a
very
small
amount
of
work.
B
C
C
C
Of
attendees
wouldn't
work
because
you'd
need
to
say
booking
one
child,
one
booking
customer
one
child
one
booking
two
customer
one
child
to
booking
three
customer
one
child
three,
so
I
can
ski
off
there.
The
other
thing
is,
as
I
was
saying.
To
begin
with,
is
that
if
we've
got
an
age
range
specified
for
the
activity,
then
we
would
need
to
check
the
date
of
birth.
C
If
we
can
report
the
Aged
rain
back
and
if
that
attendee
didn't
have
a
date
of
birth
or
the
date
of
birth
was
out
of
scope,
then
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
put
them
in
so
I
mean
I'd
need
to
look
into
that
quite
a
bit
more
because
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
under
the
hood
stuff.
I
need
to
think
about.
There.
B
C
C
B
You
so
that's
really
good,
so
will
them
sounds
like
there's
a
couple
of
things
here.
So
obviously
there's
the
clarity
in
the
book
when
root,
which
is
the
booking
itself,
has
an
attendee
list
to
your
point
on.
You
know
it's
they're
not
assigned
by
you
know
you
might
have
you
might
book
to
two
spots
in
a
class
in
one
line
item
and
the
next
time
item
might
be
one
spot
in
the
class,
but
because
it's
at
the
booking
level
at
the
order
level,
the
attendees,
it
doesn't
say,
who's
in
which
and
donations
not
captured
anyway.
B
So
but
that
simple
case,
obviously
that's.
This
is
a
straightforward
route
here,
but
where
you
need
to
associate
those
things
that
becomes
even
more
complicated
because
for
every
at
the
moment,
the
structure
we
have
in
the
API.
Here
you
have
a
number
of
bookings,
so
you
can
book
seven
zimba
places
and
you
would
have
to
then
have
an
array
of
seven
in
that
order.
Item
that
matched
seven
attendees
for
the
seven
places
and
then,
if
it's
the
same
attendee
after
duplicate
information,
which
is
all
very
complicated.
B
A
So,
just
what
we
do
on
it
might
be
worth
capturing
them.
Absolutely
it
get
up
somewhere
some
some
of
the
things
that
are
possible
without
changes
to
the
spec.
So,
for
example,
it
feels
to
me
like
booking
free
places
where
you
don't
necessarily,
you
know,
even
need
to
be
paying
or
need
to
know
details
of
attendees
that
that
is
still
possible.
So
we
could
just
start
to
scope
out
which
things
might
not
be
available,
mm-hmm
bookings,
rather
than
it
being
a
black
and
white.
This
is
not
supported.
C
The
other
thing
I'd
like
to
say
is:
it
would
be
useful
to
get
some
use
cases
for
this.
The
email
from
Alistair
is
a
vision
statement
and
really
the
the
meat
of
it
is
book
children's
activities.
But
what
does
that
mean?
What
activities
you
know?
What
are
the
genuine
constricting
you
just
put
in
it
may
be
enough
to
just
say,
have
some
way
of
marking
the
activities
of
children's
activity
or
it
outside
the
current
age
restrictions
yeah
and
not
book
it
not
build
it
in
as
it
as
a
as
an
age,
restricted
activity.
C
B
C
B
Absolutely
okay
sounds
good,
something
I,
imagine
them
so
so,
and
Steven
Winfield
at
gol.
So
if
there's
anything
that
he
can
help
with
the
booking
stuff,
then
no-
and
this
sounds
like
a
great
thing-
that
we
can
put
gol
what
kids
activities
do
you
have
that
you
would
like
change
for
life
to
book
the
same
question
for
four
other
operators
and
other
other
providers
and
their
book
whens
got
some
already
that
they
CD
to
to
reference
but
yeah
you
right
so
sounds
like
that's
a
good
question,
I.
B
Think
there's
another
question
here
about
holding
up
the
spec
for
this
and
I
can
see.
There's
there's.
Basically,
this
is
a
simple
answer
that
we
might
not
want
to
invest
in
weeks
and
weeks.
I
was
kind
of
hoping.
It
would
just
be
a
simple
array
that
we
could
add
and
crack
on,
but
it's
that
might
be
unlikely,
but
it
may
be
if
we
get
some
use
cases
in
the
next
week
and
if
there's
something
that
looks
like
it's
obvious,
we
conclude
it
in
the
inspect
button,
abhi
really
complicated
and
then
maybe.
B
So
we've
got
okay.
This
is
a
slightly
easy
question.
Cuz
we
covered
a
lot
of
it
last
time.
So
if
you
scroll
down
the
document
on
the
left
to
booking
cancellations,
nine
point
nine
point
three
yeah
so
well.
First
of
all,
if
we
go
to
nine
point,
two
I
will
show
you
the
changes
we
made
based
on
the
last
conversation
remember
last
week
there
was
strong
pushback
from
everybody
about
the
idea
of
doing
anything
with
amending
orders.
I
think
that
was
just
generally
a
very
bad
and
complicated
idea
for
this
version.
B
So
what
this
is
talking
about
as
a
process
to
talk
you
through
is,
is
just
to
cancel.
What
you
do.
Is
you
post
a
order
quote
with
the
order
status
that
cancels,
so
you
can't
do
any
amendments,
it's
full
cancellation
and
then
it
will
come
back
with
an
amount
that
is
the
the
new
value
of
the
transaction
and
there's
a
question
about
translation
fees
which
I
have
in
there
in
a
sec,
and
then
then
we
would
issue
the
refund,
maybe
not
a
full
refund.
B
If
there
was
a
cancellation
fee
again
question
to
ask
and
then
you
would
submit
the
order
to
confirm
that
that
is
is
done
after
the
refund
and
then
that's
it
and
then
the
the
its
that
is
now
records
complete.
You
can't
make
any
further
amendments,
it's
effectively
a
full
full
cancellation,
but
must
been
processed.
B
My
question
is,
and
it's
it
seems,
comment
that
there
are
cancellation
fees
for
things,
that
arms
that
you
want
to
cancel
as
a
user
and
you
may
be
penalized
or
either
because
the
rules
say
that
it's
a
certain
number
of
hours
before
whatever
the
booking
system
has
as
a
constraint
around
cancellation
from
all
members
all
forum,
if
you
can
even
cancel
at
all-
and
so
is
it
gonna,
be
because
you
can.
We
can
include
that
in
here
and
just
have
the
final
value
being.
A
Sorry,
just
to
just
back
up
a
little
bit,
so
what
the
requirement
we're
running
with
is
that
you
can
a
customer
can
cancel
an
order.
Mm-Hmm
we've
got
elsewhere
that,
though
there
may
be
limits
on
about
how
close
to
an
event
that
they
can
do
cancellation.
So
there
might
be
some
constraints
on
that
and
then
separately.
You've
noted
that
there
may
be
some
cancellation
fee,
so
you
might
not
get
a
full
refund
okay,
but
the
whole
order
is
cancelled.
A
You
know
completely
canceled
or
not,
and
all
the
status
of
cancels
would
then
represent
that
so
that
the
mechanism
you're
describing
here
is
submitting
another
order,
quote,
etc.
I
thought
we
were
retaining
the
original
bit
of
the
API
that
there
would
be
all
the
URLs
in
which
case
I
was
expecting
to
see
a
post
or
a
delete,
or
something
to
that
Oddie
specific
order
URL
rather
than
trying
to
reuse
the
existing
mechanism.
A
B
The
order
chrome
is,
is
a
it's
a
post,
it's
just
to
the
quote
and
the
reason
there's
a
quote.
Is
you
get
the
quote
first
and
then,
depending
on
that
amount,
you'll
need
to
refund
accordingly,
and
then
you
complete
it.
So
it's
the
same
two-phase
as
exists.
The
reason
it's
not
a
delete
in
terms
of
rest
is
that
you're
not
deleting
to
the
last
call's
point
on
voiding
things:
we're
not
actually
deleting
the
quote
not
deleting
order.
We
are
canceling
the
order
which
doesn't
invalidate
it.
It
just
works
in
two
different
states.
Okay,.
A
A
Makes
sense
so
Maine
tonight
back
there
but
semantics
against
look
like
kind
of
semantics.
It
was
like
there
what's
being
changed.
Is
what
again,
why
wouldn't
use
a
patch,
for
example,
or
host
back
the
current
state
of
the
resource,
rather
than
an
order
quote
because
an
order
quote
as
I
understood
it
was
a
structure
that
was
being
passed
around
that
two-phase
commit
and
the
end
result
was
an
order
which
I
was
expected
to
see
I'd
be
submitting
an
auto
revised
order
with
the
status
of
canceled
to
not
an
order
quote
so.
B
The
redo
submit
a
revised
honor
that
step
for
submitting
a
revised
order
with
the
sense
of
cancelled
and
sorry
it
wasn't
clear.
Why
do
you
need
two
phases
for
this
piece,
because
if
you
generate
a
cancellation
fee
or
any
anything
that,
if
there's
any
issue
with
it,
basically
at
all,
so
it's
not
cancelable,
because
it's
too
close
is
the
cancellation
fee.
There's
number
of
things
that
could
be
the
case
that
all
the
quote
will
bottom
out,
so
the
order
quote
might
fail
or
it
might
return.
B
A
A
C
In
general,
in
general,
we
wouldn't
charge
a
cancellation
fee
if
it's
counsel
in
time.
So
what
would
what
we
there's?
This
two
source
of
cancellation
is
fee.
Yeah
one
is
that
we
generally
fund
so
there's
a
cancellation
cutoff
this
let's
say
a
day
before
the
event.
If
they
cancel
before
that,
then
they
get
a
full
credit
full
refund.
If
they
cancel
after
that,
then
they
will
get
a
no
relief,
no
refund
or
a
partial
refund.
C
In
the
cases
where
and
I
know,
it's
not
germane
to
the
immediate
requirement
in
the
cases
where
they
had
a
discount
against
that
class,
I
defer
they'll
have
to
pay
the
full
price
or
the
residual,
so
they've
got
40%
off.
Then
they
gotta
pay
the
40%
that
gets
ill
to
them,
but
bear
in
mind
that's
an
extra
charge
or,
alternatively,
they'll
be
charged
a
fee
for
counseling
yeah.
B
No,
it's
more,
it
was
more
of
a
40-pound
football
pitch,
got
canceled
or
something
with
you.
Would
you
retain
ten
pounds
as
a
consolation?
I
guess
was
the
question,
but
yes.
D
B
C
A
little
bit
confused
about
the
I've
just
really
briefly,
and
you
issue
an
order,
quotes
with
status
of
canceled,
which
should
probably
be
cancellation
request
because
counsel
sounds
like
is
canceled
yeah.
If
there
was
such
a
thing,
then
returns
a
the
transaction
raised
got
any
payment,
so
that
was
effectively
saying.
C
There's
these
five
items
that
you
booked
in
this
order
and
you
could
have
to
pay
five
pounds
for
that
one
or
will
refund
five
pounds
of
that,
will
nothing
for
that
one,
ten
pounds
for
that,
one
yeah
and
then
after
once
you've
shown
that
the
customer
and
taking
the
money.
You
then
kind
of
push
that
back
in
with
the
same
transaction
already
saying
it.
C
C
C
We
would
actually
like
people
spilt
at
Council
when
they
don't
get
moneybags
to
release,
make
space
for
someone
else
to
buy
things
from
it
and
there's
also
the
semantics
of
I've
got
an
order
which
has
got
classes
across
two
weeks.
There
was
ten
classes,
I've
actually
attended
five
of
them.
This
is
midweek
or
Saturday.
I
want
to
cancel
next
weeks,
but
the
semantics
is
here
is
saying:
I
want
to
cancel
the
held
order
and
I
just
think.
C
A
A
So
there's
actually
a
couple
of
states
that
I
think
and
all
that
coming
through
to
you
know,
being
canceled
and
refunded,
but
I
think
it
would
be
clearer
to
do
that
with
as
a
more
kind
of
restful
interaction
rather
than
using
order
code.
So
I,
think
of
dating
and
order
and
having
an
explicit
set
of
refund,
totals
rather
than
changing.
The
existing
totals
might
be
clearer
because.
B
Yeah
I
haven't
explained
it
very
well
because
the
step
four
does
do
that
it
does.
That
is
the
confirmation,
so
the
currently
no
state
change
happens
to
the
booking
system
at
all,
until
until
four
all
you're
doing
is
just
checking
if
it's
all
possible
and
if
it's
all
possible,
you'll
issue
the
refund
and
then
confirm
it
in
step.
B
Four
I
suppose,
there's
two
there's
two
different,
there's
two
different
things
to
pick
up
here:
there's
the:
how
do
we
do
it
in
a
restful
way-
and
you
know,
is
that
post
lots
of
different
approaches
there
and
then
there's?
What
is
one
of
the
steps
in
the
process?
So
is
it
check
and
submit?
Is
it
change
the
state
twice?
Is
it
you
know?
So
the
idea
here
was
minimal.
State
changes,
so
absolutely
nothing
changes
until
the
point
where
it's
cancelled
and
refunded
in
one
go
and
that's
either
all
donor.
B
A
C
B
A
C
Okay,
I
think
we
so
need
a
two
step
process,
because
only
the
provided
like
ourselves
can
know
if
it
can
be
cancelled.
Who
knows?
What's
happened
since
then,
so
we
might
have
cancer,
we
might
have
canceled
the
class
and
so
the
the
broken
vents
the
cellar.
But
then,
if
things
don't
go
perfectly
well,
the
purchaser
may
decide
to
cancel
that
order,
but
the
catalytic
Lance
also.
We
need
to
have
that
stage
of
checking
and
absolutely
definitely
if
the
customer
decides
they
want
to
actually
cancel.
C
We
need
to
know
what
will
be
or
has
been
refunded,
so
we
can
well
for
reporting
purposes
and
also
so
that
we
can
make
sure
we
get
the
right
amount
of
commission
from
the
or
payment
from
the
the
seller.
So
I
think
the
two
stage
is
essential:
I,
don't
really
care
about
the
the
the
restful
semantics?
That's
that's
that's
not
usually
imported.
It
is
imported
car
seats.
Don't
get
me
wrong.
B
C
Don't
think
we
wouldn't
do
it
that
way,
we
would
see
is
a
request
for
cancellation
information.
Can
I
cancel
these
things?
What
am
I
going
to
get
back
from
it,
I'm
gonna,
do
it
yeah,
we
wouldn't
actually
cancel
them
and
then
charge
you.
If
that
we
could
do
that,
he
just
where
the
system
looks
but
I
think
the
basic
I,
like
the
idea
of
I'd
like
to
cancel
this
order,
what's
going
to
happen
and
then
okay
go
and
do
it.
B
Okay,
yeah,
the
question
left
is
so
yes,
as
it
sounds,
we're
all
agreed
on
the
two-phase
commit
approach.
You
preview
then
do
a
question
about
whether
the
do
bit
is
is
further
broken
down
into
do
the
council
do
the
refund
or
as
you're
saying
imagined
it
would
just
be
just
do
all
together
or
not
I,
don't
know.
C
A
B
B
C
B
B
C
B
Ask
our
translation
fees
next,
but
I
mean
maybe
it's
worth
it's
just
moving
to
that
quickly.
If,
as
we're
talking
about
it
next
seven
minutes.
So
if
you
go
to
five
point,
nine
point:
five
point:
one:
there
that's
the
reason
we
did.
We
did
briefly
touch
on
this
last
call,
but
I
imagine
it
might
be
naeun
just
after
you
popped
off,
I
think
so,
yeah,
sir
that's
okay
and
we
will
happen
again
in
seven
minutes
so
trying
to
it
this
time
in
so
basically
this
this
is
just
a
feed
of.
B
So
we
come
on
to
talk
about
the
feed
is
an
approach
where
they
can
just
be
processed
later
on,
so
the
broker
would
be
checking
this
feed
and
if
there's
any
cancellation
requests
that
come
in
sorry,
any
any
refund
requests
that
come
in
they
process
those
refunds
and
then
notify
back
to
say.
Yes,
I
processed
this
one,
this
one,
this
one
just.
C
For
clarity,
there's
a
disconnect
we
in
the
first
paragraph
in
the
second
paragraph.
So
how
do
you
find
the
order
items?
I
mean
I,
know
how
you
find
the
authorizers,
but
you've
got
a
class.
That's
one
of
the
elements
in
the
order
would
are
you
retaining
the
I
suppose
you
would
be
in
the
the
broker
retaining
the
actual
identifier
for
that
class,
so
you
can
look
it
up
and
then
from
that
work
of
what
the
order
was
and
then
been
doing
the
next
bit
so
I
think
there's
a
there's,
a
it's.
C
A
B
I
suppose
the
good
thing
about
this
being
in
our
PD
feed,
incidentally,
is
if
the
broker
wants
to
synchronize
state
using
it.
They
could
just
go
back
to
the
beginning
of
the
feed
and
get
all
the
bookings.
All
that
all
the
orders
be
happy
made
on
behalf
of
that
broker
and
in
order
to
make
sure
that
they
so
eventually
this
is
providing
them
that
window
into
fully
synchronizing
the
information
and
instead
of
what.
C
B
So
the
idea
here
is
this
is
a
separate
feed.
That's
a
private
feed!
That's
authenticated!
Okay,
that
wasn't
clear!
Sorry!
Yes,
that
was
that's
a
key
point
and
definitely
skipped
over.
So
the
this
all
the
sections
in
the
context
of
yes,
sorry
that
feed
and
the
idea
is
that
any
so
so
the
idea
with
this
feed
is
anytime,
anything
happens.
Any
bookings
are
made
or
or
canceled
that
there's
a
the
order
is
posted
to
the
feed
as
an
update
in
the
normal
way.
I
will
see
this.
B
This
is
going
to
have
much
lower
frequency
of
polling
compared
to
the
other
feeds
that
we've
got
a
bunch.
You've
got
that,
thank
you
yeah
so,
and
the
reason
for
that
is
that
if
we
use
the
web-based
approach,
we
would
have
to
do
it
have
a
fallback
anyway,
so
that
people
can
retrieve
the
state
and
so
rather
than
implementing
two
approaches.
B
We
come
to
just
why
we
implement
just
the
one
and
then
therefore
obvious
the
simplest
route
job
with
us,
as
though,
of
course,
it
is
asynchronous
so
you're
getting
that
you're
pulling
for
that
information,
you're
processing
it
and
you're
posting
back
that
you've
completed
it
so
to
Lee's
previous
point.
There
is
the
potential
that
you
could
cancel
a
bunch
of
stuff
and
the
provider
side
because
of
some
it's
well.
The
instructors
ill
cancel
the
class
classes
cancelled,
15
attendees
with
all
those
orders
need
to
then
be
refunded.