►
From YouTube: OpenActive W3C Community Group Meeting / 2023-04-26
Description
A public hangout for members of the OpenActive W3C Community Group.
For more information visit: https://www.openactive.io/w3c-community-group.html
A
Welcome
to
the
w3c
again
so
the
show
today
on
the
agenda.
We've
got
three
things
that
we
want
to
talk
about.
We
want
to
talk
about
the
new
data
quality
Explorer,
how
it's
going
to
present
on
that.
This
is
an
extension
to
the
spreadsheet
that
we
showed
you
a
couple
of
meetings
ago.
A
Chris
wants
to
update
you
on
the
work
he's
been
doing
with
the
activity
list
and
then
we're
going
to
kind
of
discussion
about
prioritizing
future
Focus
for
this
group
and
then
a
bit
of
time
for
aob
at
the
end.
So
I
think,
with
that
I'll
hand
over
to
Howard
to
talk
about
data
quality,
Explorer,
Howard,
excellent.
B
Yeah,
so
we've
been
through
this
process
over
the
last
six
months-
probably
probably
even
a
little
bit
more.
We
had
office
of
national
statistics
in
to
talk
about
some
of
the
approaches
they
recommend
in
terms
of
improving
data
quality,
and
we
followed
that
process
or
a
version
of
that
process,
which
is
to
focus
on
the
use
cases.
B
You
know
focus
on
the
purpose
that
the
data
was
collected
and
work
out.
What
would
look
good
in
that
sense
and
then
to
device
some
metrics
report
on
those
regularly
and
hopefully
Drive
some
improvements,
so
we're
getting
to
that
reporting
on
those
regularly
stage
now,
so
we've
got
a
new
tool
that
we're
we're
about
to
test
I.
B
Think
with
we
probably
over
the
next
couple
of
weeks,
we'll
be
looking
for
some
volunteers
to
to
run
through
the
tool
with
Chris
after
I've
run
through
the
tool
with
Chris
and
equipped
him
for
the
job,
and
he
can,
you
know,
talk
through
some
of
the
the
data
quality
issues
and
you
can
look
at
the
data
in
real
time
and
it's
quite
it's
quite
intuitive.
That
way.
Hopefully,
that's
the
idea
so
Focus,
initially
on
the
Discovery
and
booking
use
cases.
B
This
is
present
them
in
a
new
way
and
hopefully
a
way
that
allows
you
to
explore
the
data
and
identify
areas
that
can
be
improved,
so
we're
going
to
be
looking
for
feedback
and
the
proposal
is
to
replace
the
existing
visualize,
the
tool
which
is
visualizer.openactive.io
so
next
slide.
Please
Andrew.
B
And
there's
an
example
of
the
the
open
active
data
visualizer,
which
is
a
tool
we
inherited
from
open
referral,
is
as
a
means
of
quick
and
dirty
means
of
visualizing
the
data
and
exploring
the
data
that's
available
via
a
data
feed.
So
we've
we've
taken
that
kind
of
skeleton
and
and
added
some
of
the
measures
that
we've
been
looking
at.
B
So
here's
a
an
example
for
one
of
the
one
of
the
Leisure
centers
Castle
point,
and
it
just
shows
the
metrics
that
we've
been
talking
about
so
so
basically,
whereas
it's
the
does.
The
record
have
a
name,
a
valid
name,
a
valid
description
and
an
activity
which
matches
to
the
activity
list.
B
So
that's
that
first
measure
there
that
hundred
percent
doesn't
it
does
the
record
have
either
a
postcode
or
geospatial
coordinates,
so
it
can
be
displayed
in
activity
finder
and
used
for
geospatial
search.
Does
this
have
a
valid
start
date?
I
start
in
date
in
the
future,
for
you
know,
for
an
activity
that
can
be
booked,
and
then
this
measure
of
we've
got
a
proxy
measure
of
whether
there's
a
link
that
takes
you
right
through
to
the
session
to
book
onto
the
session
or
the
other
slot
or
wherever
it
might
be.
B
B
And
yeah,
so
we've
got
some
totals
so
some
counts.
What
the
data
does
it
looks
if
there
are
two
related
feeds.
Let's
say:
you've
got
a
session
series
and
a
scheduled
session
feed.
Then
it
looks
at
it
looks
at
both
of
those
and
tries
to
bring
that
information
together,
as
as
you
would
do
in
an
activity
finder,
and
so
it
summarizes
that
that
data
there.
So
the
data
quality
measures
are
based
on
that
combined
data
feed
where
it's
possible
to
combine
them.
B
Did
you
want
to
jump
on?
There's
a
there's.
Another
couple
of
examples,
I
think
so
that's
one
of
the
bigger
feeds
with
every
Everyone
Active
feeds
and
again
that
the
URL
is
the
one
where
you
know
that
provides
that
seamless
link
from
an
activity
Finder
right
through
the
booking.
That's
still
one
of
the
ones
that
we
kind
of
need
to
work
on
as
an
initiative.
C
That's
just
a
quick
update
on
that
form.
We're
working
at
the
moment.
We've
just
deployed
the
H6
into
the
development
environment.
Evaluating
Nick
I'll
provide
you
with
an
update
a
little
later
today
tomorrow
and
if
that
was
all
fits
to
Bill
Nick
we'll
be
looking
to
aim
to
put
that
into
their
live
environment.
Probably
next
week.
B
Superb,
that's
I
mean
that's
that's
spot
on.
Is
it
roll
on
and
Rusty?
This
I
think.
Is
there
another
one?
No
blank
page.
That
was
where
I
was
going
to
do
a
little
quick
demo,
so
I
think
I
can
do
that
for
us
now,
I'm
gonna
try
and
share
the
screen.
If
that's
okay,
that's.
B
B
Okay,
so
I
think
you
can
see
that
now,
like
the
the
visualizer
there's
a
drop
down,
we
just
got
a
list
of
beats
and
it's
almost
complete
I've
taken
out
a
couple
at
the
moment.
While
we
just
work
on
some
of
the
presentation,
the
numbers
weren't
coming
through
right,
so
there's
no
course
instances
in
there
at
the
moment,
but
things
like
session
series
schedule
sessions
and
then,
on
the
other
side,
the
facility
use
and
Slots
those
come
through
quite
quickly.
B
So
this
is
what
oops,
oh
that's
a
little
Quirk,
where
the
chart
appears
twice,
ignore
that
that'll
be
fixed
so
that
that's
read.
You
know
three
pages
and
six
pages
from
the
other
feed
the
the
results
are
cash.
So
it's
quite
quick,
particularly
if
you
go
back
to
it.
So
let
me
find
one
that
I
haven't
ruined
and
see
how
long
that
takes.
B
Live
data:
oh
there
we
go.
That
was
not
too
bad,
so
that
was
a
just
an
example.
It
you
know
it's
quite
a
quick
process
and
then
yeah.
The
message
is
right
there.
So
17.2
percent,
with
an
act
with
a
matching
activity.
Id
100,
have
got
name
100
book
description.
B
It's
a
little
small
and
I'll
be
working
on
how
to
make
the
text
larger,
but
we've
got
a
summary
of
the
top
five
activity
types
there
and,
of
course
we
still
bring
in
some
of
the
capabilities
from
the
visualizer
tools.
So
you
can
look
at
the
raw
Json
data
for
for
a
record.
B
You
know
and
drill
into
any
kind
of
issues
you
might
find
there
and
you
can
send
that
Json
also
to
the
validator
which
has
opened
in
another
screen.
So
you
can't
see
it,
which
is
not
very
helpful,
but
you
know
that's
a
one.
One
click
takes
it
through,
takes
up
Jason
and
puts
it
to
the
validator.
It
gives
you
a
more
exact
links
and
hints
on
how
to
to
get
the
data
compliant
and
improve
the
quality
so
I'll
stop
there.
B
I
think
that
was
all
I
wanted
to
to
show
you,
but
it
you
know
it
feels
like
we're.
We
we're
getting
to
a
place
where
those
measures
we've
been
talking
about.
You
know
there's
a
tool
there
that
could
make
them
quite
useful
and
handy
and
hopefully
help
to
to
raise
the
data
quality
in
the
initiative.
From
this
perspective
of
you
know,
right
through
to
those
activity,
finders
and
people
trying
to
find
a
book,
an
activity
I'll
stop
there.
A
Excellent
thanks
Howard,
that's
really
useful
I!
Just
wonder
if
anyone
has
any
questions
or
observations
on
that.
D
B
It's
doing
I
I,
that
was
my
I,
should
have
said
So
the
plan
is,
we've
got
a
prototype
up
and
running
now
and
I'd
like
to
just
test
that
with
a
couple
of
of
keen
volunteers-
and
you
know
so,
if
you
want
to
take
a
look,
I'll
I'll
provide
the
details
with
Chris
and
Chris
can
kind
of
share
those
with
people
who
are
interested.
So
can
we
take
you
as
a
first
volunteer,
Stephen
yeah.
D
That's
fine
that
works
out
well
for
us,
because,
but
some
of
you
will
know
that
we
only
made
half
of
our
centers
open
data
enabled
last
year,
then
we
took
a
pause,
but
we
just
restarted
doing
the
rest
of
it
and
it'll
be
a
trickle
feed
over
the
next
couple
of
weeks
or
so
as
we
get
the
rest
of
State
enabled.
So
this
will
be
a
good
tool
for
us
to
check
the
quality
of
the
data
of
those
we're
actually
enabling
that's.
B
Brilliant
yeah,
so
it's
just
a
prototype
at
the
moment,
just
while
we
iron
out
any
any
books.
So
any
feedback
from
your
from
your
explanations
will
be
will
be
useful
thing.
I
will
say
with
the
bigger
feeds
like
like
that
is
that
initial
load
does
take
just
take
a
it
might
take
five
eight
minutes,
something
like
that,
while
it
while
it
brings
all
the
data
in
so
for
those
bigger
feeds,
it's
not
quite
as
instant.
C
B
B
B
If
you
go
back
a
couple
of
slides
Andrew
just
to
show
the
visualizer
again
it
you
know
we're
basically
just
adding
functionality.
This
visualizer
does
have
those
filters
and
the
intention
is
to
return
to
restore
some
of
that
focusing
functionality.
So
you
can,
you
can
hone
in
on
particular
locations
was
the
thing
that
our
organizations
was
the
one
that
you
know.
Cites
was
the
one
that
Debbie
mentioned
in
the
past
I'll
be
looking
to
to
add
that
back
in.
B
E
Well,
what
I
would
say
is
I,
don't
think
this
represents
all
users
of
the
visualizer
I
know
EMD,
for
example,
to
use
those
filters,
or
at
least
did
I'm
not
sure
the
current
folks
they
do,
and
so
it
might
be
worth
thinking
about.
Maybe
before
replacing
it
just
putting
your
filters
back
again
as
a
last
second,
last
step,
it
sounds
like
it's:
it's
improved
upon.
What
was
there
and
that's
the
case?
I'm
sure
there'll
be
no
issue
with
with
replacing
what
was
there.
That's
the
same,
but
better.
B
All
these
filters
are
working
right
now
either.
So
that's
you
know
so
we'll
be
looking
to
to
fix
those
make
them
more
relevant
to
the
feeds
and
the
challenges
that
data
Publishers
like
like
Debbie
mentioned.
It's
the
site
kind
of
level,
quality
that
we're
really
interested
in
and
so
we'll
try
and
we'll
try
and
bring
that
functionality
back
over
the
next
month.
A
I
think
the
the
only
other
thing
I
would
add
is
that
we
are
aware
that
exposing
data
quality
can
be
a
little
bit
controversial,
so
we
are
trying
to
kind
of
manage
the
release
of
this
I
I
think
you
know
where
we've
got
engaged
people
who
are
part
of
the
community
who
are
Community
Schools,
regularly,
that's
fairly
easy
to
do.
I
I
think
we
we
will
do
some
wider
comms,
though,
because
not
everyone
is
as
engaged
as
you
guys.
A
So
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we're
telling
everyone
about
this
and
what
it
means
and
what
it
shows
and
explaining
our
logic
and
Chris
as
Howard
has
said,
we'll
be
providing
support
to
Publishers
as
well
to
help
them
understand
what
relates
means
and
help
them
to
understand
how
to
improve
so
yeah.
Okay.
If
there
aren't
any
more
questions
on
that
I
propose,
we
move
on
to
talk
about
still
grab
the
activity
list.
Chris.
F
Thank
you,
Andrew
hi,
everyone
hope
you're
all
well
and
there's
been
a.
B
F
While
since
I've
been
on
one
of
these
calls
just
due
to
illness
and
annual
leave
so
good
to
see
everyone
again,
so
it's
been
a
I
think
a
while.
F
Since
we
spoke
about
the
activity
list,
I
thought
I'd
just
go
through
a
recap
just
first
of
all,
so
obviously
we
had
a
process
in
place
for
a
long
time
of
whether
there
was
a
committee,
but
there
was
also
you
know
a
long
drawn
out
process
for
anyone
who
wanted
to
add
a
submission
or
suggest
adding
as
a
gymnast
submission
to
the
activity
list.
F
You
know
case
of
one's
a
suggestion
was
made.
It
was
too
many
steps.
You
know
to
actually
get
the
activity
added
and
the
committee
wasn't
convenient
on
a
regular
basis,
as
it
should
have
been.
That
then
created
a
huge
backlog.
Excuse
me
of
activities,
so
I
took
a
sort
of
a
deep
dive
analysis
of
the
whole
process
of
the
activity
list,
looking
at
the
quality
of
it,
looking
at
the
whole
process
and
then
came
up
with
some
ideas
of
a
best
way
forward
and
then
sitting
down
with
colleagues.
F
The
decision
was
made
to
you
know.
Have
this
exceptions
process
in
place
where
it
should
only
then
take?
You
know
a
matter
of
minutes
to
decide
whether
an
activity
was
worth
adding
to
a
list
or
if
it
needed
to.
You
know,
come
along
to
this
committee,
rather
than
potentially
waiting
two
to
three
months
before
something
could
actually
be
approved,
and
then
you
know
another
month
or
two
before
it
actually
gets
added
to
to
the
list
so,
but
then
to
sort
of
help
with
that
process
as
well.
F
I've
updated
the
web
form
from
the
website
where
the
submissions
were
made
just
to
get
as
much
information
as
possible,
because
the
previous
web
form
I
think
only
asked
four
questions.
Nothing
was
mandatory.
You
could
literally
just
type
in
whatever
you
wanted,
and
you
know
as
if
I
needed
any
further
information
or
if
anyone
needed
further
information,
you
wouldn't
be
able
to
really
get
it.
If
nobody
put
their
contact
details
on
there
or
the
company
that
they're
submitting
from
so
we've.
You
know
so.
We've
got
this
new
exceptions
process
in
place.
F
Now
we've
got
a
new
web
form.
The
website
has
been
updated
as
well
to
include
this
new
web
form
and
so
everything's
now
you
know
obviously
flowing
as
better
as
can
be
so
moving
on
to
that
now
we're
talking
about
the
backlog.
As
I
said,
there
was
a
backlog
of
activities
which
has
now
been
cleared,
so
everything's
now
cleared
and
I've
added
48
new
activities
to
the
list.
F
Now
one
of
the
things
about
this
activity
list
was
about
inclusivity
was
making
sure
that
we're,
including
both
physically
active
but
also
activities
that
will
help
with
health
and
well-being
and
mental
well-being.
F
So
in
keeping
with
those
themes,
you
know
across
those
48
new
activities
added
we've
got
things
like
chair
yoga,
canoe,
slalom,
paranet,
ball
activity,
holiday
camps,
camping
acting
singing
crash
and,
as
you
know,
there's
many
many
more
and
now
the
number
of
activities
on
the
list
now
currently
stands
at
741..
F
Are
on
there
now
on
the
next
slide,
don't
go
to
yet
just
yet
Andrew,
but
on
the
next
slide
for
when
everyone
wants
to
you
know,
look
at
it
is
the
list
of
the
48
that
I've
added
to
the
list,
so
you
can
see
in
a
bit
more
detail
what
ones
have
actually
gone
on
there
and
then
just
some
next
steps.
So,
as
I
said,
the
backlog
is
now
cleared.
F
The
new
web
forms
up
nothing's
been
submitted
so
far
on
the
new
web
form
just
yet
so
waiting
for
you
know
new
submissions
to
come
through
on
that.
So
what
I'm
currently
working
on
now
is
re.
You
know
improving
the
data
quality
issues,
but
making
sure
that
what
these
issues
are
that
they're
not
going
to
have
an
impact
on
the
Integrity
of
the
list.
So
you
know,
for
example,
I'm
not
going
to
be
going
about
renaming
potential
activities
or
deleting
anything.
Then
it's
going
to
like
start
breaking
systems.
F
It's
not
a
case
of
that,
but
what
I'm,
starting
with
is
looking
at
the
ones
that
don't
have
a
definition,
so
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we,
you
know
supposedly
if
we
want
to
look
at
it
from
a
data
quality.
Dimensions
perspective
I'm.
Looking
at
the
completeness
is
everything
they're
needed
so
I'm.
F
Looking
at
that
definition
now
so
when
I
started
that
there
were
399
activities
that
didn't
have
a
definition
and
I've
been
working,
you
know
sort
of
flat
out
I'm,
just
trying
to
add
the
definition,
but
also
a
good
definition,
not
just
a
couple
of
words
that
you
think
oh
that'll
do,
but
that's
now,
I've
got
that
down
to
189
now.
F
So
a
good
couple
of
hundred
I've
managed
to
sort
of
add
a
definition
to
hopefully
by
the
next
call
in
a
couple
of
weeks.
F
I'll
have
cleared
all
them
so
there'll,
be
you
know
nothing
or
no
activities
rather
so
that
would
be
missing
the
definition,
but
then,
once
that
task
is
then
completed,
then
I'll
sort
of
want
to
look
a
bit
more
into
the
other
data
quality
Dimensions
to
see
what
potential
issues
there
are
I'll
say
around
validity
or
consistency
for
accuracy
for
argument's
sake
and
then
I'll
put
a
fontins
packed
together
and
then
report
back
to
the
group
once
I've
got
something
and
then
decide
then
on
what
the
next
steps
should
be.
F
Barely
you
know,
obviously
going
back
to
that
previous
point
of
being
careful
that
the
Integrity
of
the
list
isn't
compromised
in
in
any
way
at
all
and
then
just
linking
back
to
what
Howard
mentioned
about
the
framework
there.
You
know
that
one
of
the
fields
that
we're
measuring
is
around
the
activity
list.
Id
matches,
so
that's
going
to
be
something
I'll
be
working
on
as
well
as
making
sure
those
figures
start
getting
improved
as
well.
F
So
so
that's
just
a
brief
run
through
of
what's
been
happening
since
the
last
call
of
the
activity
list.
And
if
you
have
any
questions,
please
let
me
know
thank.
A
C
Sorry
Chris
it's
Andy
from
Gladstone,
just
a
quick
thing
on
the
last
call.
We
talked
about
communication
of
any
changes
being
applied
so
that
likes
of
ourselves.
We
potentially
they
can
let
our
clients
know
and
feed
it
down.
So
that
they're
aware
there's
changes
being
applied,
so
they
can
go
to
their
data
management
example
and
modify
as
they
needed
to
because
he'll
be
picked
up
straight
away.
C
B
So
let
me
clarify
Chris
we
so
yeah
we
did
talk
about
Debbie
highlighted
the
importance
of
you
know
knowing
about
changes
to
the
list
in
case
it
has
knocked
on
effects
in
the
you
know,
in
their
systems
they
can,
they
would
be
able
to
take
advantage
of
new
activities
or
whatever,
and
my
thinking
was
to
communicate
in
the
any
changes
here
at
this
group
would
be
sufficient
Andy.
So
maybe
my
I
got
the
wrong
end
of
the
stick
there.
B
If
there's
a
preferred
route,
please
let
us
know,
but
the
next
slide
kind
of
contains
the
additions
and
those
would
be
held.
You
know
they're
kind
of
we
save
these
slides
at
the
end
of
every
session,
but
if
there's
a
better,
a
better
way
to
communicate
that,
then
then,
please,
let
me
know
I.
C
Mean
it's
a
work
in
progress.
Howard
to
be
fair,
I
mean
the
thing
with
it
is
that
if
this
hasn't
been
applied
yet
then
this
is
a
perfect
forum,
but
if
this
has
been
applied
and
we
weren't
made
aware
yeah
we're
home
we're
conscious
the
hopes
with
Integrity,
the
data
is
not
going
to
upset
anything
in
the
data
season.
The
data
Integrity-
it's
probably
just
don't-
know
it's
Christmas
and
getting
the
timelines
along.
A
Yeah,
so
hopefully
the
changes,
don't
don't
break
anything.
There
is
a
point,
isn't
it
about
knowing
when
things
are
being
added
to
the
list?
So
if
you
have
a
copy
of
the
list,
rather
than
using
the
the
the
reference
data
you
can,
you
can
update
your
your
local
copy,
I.
A
Think
in
terms
of
the
comments
around
this
I'm
really
Keen,
that
we
write
something
for
the
connective
blog
about
how
we've
tackled
the
activity
list
and
how
we've
improved
the
process
and
how
we're
making
it
better
and
actually
to
promote
the
list
a
bit
more
and
talk
about
what
it
is,
because
I
think
it
essentially
has
value.
Beyond,
open,
active,
I,
think
in
terms
of
changes.
A
G
I
feel
like
something
that
might
help
people
is
if
changes
are
scheduled.
So
once
we
know
what
changes
are
going
to
be,
then
we
can
schedule
those
changes
for
a
time
in
the
future,
just
so
that
people
have
time
to
prepare
in
case
it
can
cause
any
issues.
F
So
changes
alongside
what
like
additions,
just
as
simple
as
that
to
begin
with
I
mean
because
that's
all
I'm
looking
to
do
at
the
moment
is
just
you
know
the
the
additions
which
is,
you
know,
apologies
I,
said
I've
already
done.
These
have
already
been
added
but
they're
on
there
now.
But
you
know
with
the
definitions
that
I'm
working
at
the
moment,
I
mean
should.
Would
everyone
like
a
list
of
like
okay
here?
F
Are
the
next
lump
of
activities
that
I'm
going
to
add
a
definition
to
be
prepared
or
I,
don't
know
so,
as
I
said,
it's
just
I'm
not
working
on
any
sort
of
amended
names
or
deleting
because
you
know
I've
come
across
quite
a
few
duplicates
but
I'm
not
going
to
think
about
removing
anything,
because
that's
that
I
know
could
obviously
interrupts.
You
know
someone's
system
or
you
know
cause.
F
You
know
the
Integrity
to
the
list
because
someone
may
be
using
that
tag
instead
of
using
another
one
for
I
mean
for
argument's
sake,
I've
seen
on
their
crossfits
on
their
twice
one
with
an
upper
KC
one
one
with
a
lowercase
C
I
don't
want
to
take
one
off
because
someone
may
be
using
the
lower
case
someone's
using
the
uppercase.
That's
just
as
an
example
I'm
not
doing
that.
It's
just
the
additions
but,
like
I,
said
more
than
happy
to
you
know,
communicate
like
Andrew
said
via
slack
or
to
this
group.
F
C
I
think
that's
a
good
move
going
forward.
So
there's
an
awareness
of
what's
been
approached
and
what's
been
looked
at
this
amount
of
time
equally
as
well.
What
it
may
also
do
is
part,
maybe
a
discussion
with
the
guys.
Oh
that's
funny.
What
about
have
we
thought
about
this
one?
So
then,
we'll
then
also
then
promote
the
the
exceptions
process
as
well
yeah.
It
just
brings
it
to
the
force
like
the
Mind.
Rather
being
you
know,
retrospective.
F
B
B
So
if
we
try
and
give
I,
don't
know
if
we
say
two
weeks
notice
slack
before
before
the
changes
go,
live
we
just
build
that
into
our
process
and
we'll
give
that
a
go
and
see
see
how
we
go.
F
Okay,
I
mean
sorry
I'm,
just
gonna
quickly,
so
I
can
tie
it
in
like
say
with
this
group.
I
can
say
you
know
on
a
Wednesday
afternoon
after
this
call,
I
could
say
right.
Here's
the
the
list
of
activities
they're
going
to
have
a
definition
added
by
the
time
we
get
to
the
next
call.
If
there's
any,
you
know
anything
when
he
wants
to
raise
and
they
can
raise
you
but
there's
nothing.
Then
I
had
off
to
that.
Potentially.
E
It's
all
right,
so
the
two
two
things
I
had
the
thoughts
were
yeah
having
us,
maybe
even
a
separate
slack
Channel
or
you
know,
putting
on
wqc
notifications
like
Channel
might
be
good.
A
separate
one
is
good
in
some
ways,
because
you
can
then
discuss
it
in
that
space
But.
There
might
be
an
advantage
to
having
that.
Clearly,
you
know
separate
Channel.
That's
that's
negatively
the
same
thing
everyone's
aware
of
it.
It
could
be
in
that
channel,
like
the
other
main
ones,
which
everyone's
added
to
sounds
like
great
ideas
to
me.
E
The
other
thing
that
crossed
my
mind
is
we
currently
don't
really
have
a
release
process
around
the
list
which
we
do
on
other
projects
and
if
you
use
a
release
process
on
GitHub,
you
do
get
for
free.
If
you
like
a
little
release
note,
it
comes
with
exactly
what's
changed
and
you
can
update
that
release,
note,
etc,
etc,
and
the
advantage
of
that
over
putting
it
anywhere
else
is
that
we've
then
got
a
change.
Log
and
I
think
this
is
something
I
mentioned
previously.
E
E
Now
it's
become
clear
to
me
just
through
listening
to
this
I
think
probably
GitHub
is
and
releases
the
right
place
to
put
that
change
log
in,
for
a
few
reasons,
one
it's
where
we
put
other
change
logs,
so
it's
probably
easier
to
maintain
because
it's
easy
to
for
crystallogen
edit
the
things
as
they
go.
You
know
don't
need
to
have
access
to
code
or
anything
to
do
that
and
and
three
the
other
attempts
we've
had
to
do.
This
in
the
past
have
been
involved.
E
For
example,
there's
a
change
log
on
the
current
activity
list,
editor,
which
is
an
HTML
page,
that
someone
needs
to
go
into
and
edit
and
commit
an
update,
and
it's
the
same
repo
so
and
that's
in
the
editory
posts
really
feel
like
the
right
place
to
put
that
so
probably
cleaner
to
keep
it
either
separate
and
my
suggestion
there
would
be
that
whenever
the
editor,
someone
updates
the
editor
and
presses
the
button,
it
currently
automatically
updates
the
list,
but
maybe
instead
of
doing
that,
it
should
just
create
a
pull
request
and
can
be.
E
Everyone
can
see
that's
happening
and
then,
when
that
gets
merged,
a
release
is
created
and
that
release
has
got
the
exact.
What's
happened,
history
there
so
you're,
basically
using
all
the
correct
processes
and
then,
if
anyone,
if
there's
a
problem
which
is
really
what
this
is
about,
right
something's
gone
wrong,
someone
can
it's
easy
to
go
back
and
go
right.
Where
did
that
happen?
Why
didn't
that
happen?
You
know
what
was
the?
E
What
was
the
point
where
it
broke,
which
I
think,
if
we're
doing
it
a
bit
more
ad
hoc
and
also
if
it's
disconnected
between
blogs
and
other
places,
and
then
none
of
them
are
really
connected
to
the
exact
connect
to
create
the
issue,
it
might
be
more
difficult
to
figure
out.
What's
what.
B
Okay,
okay,
well,
I'll,
just
take
an
action
in
to
to
explore
that
that
link
in
terms
of
the
GitHub
and
the
change
log
and
Chris
we've
got
some
refinements
to
the
process.
There
I
think
the
only
thing
I'm.
The
only
thing
about
my
mind
is
that
we
we
will
move
into
a
fast
track
process
and
I
want
to
undermine
that
by
creating.
You
know
excessive
avenues
for
discussion,
but
let's
say:
let's
you
know:
let's,
let's
give
it
a
go.
A
E
Agree
with
that,
Howard
I
think
I
think
there's
probably
something
about
making
sure
that
the
there's
not
in
that
expected
we're
not
waiting
for
Community
to
necessarily
comment
on
everything.
It's
there
in
case
people
are
interested
in
following
it
because
I
totally
agree.
We
don't
want
to
be
in
another
situation
where
we
create
bureaucracy.
For
the
sake
of
it,
it's
more
about
transparency
than
bureaucracy.
B
A
Thanks
Nick
thanks
Howard
and
thanks
Chris
for
taking
us
through
the
activity
list.
There's
some
interesting
things
on
that
that
list
of
additions
out
there
I'm,
not
sure
what
better
than
Chris
is
so
I'm
going
to
go
and
look
up
the
definition
for
that
afterwards
and
see
what
that
actually
is.
A
A
So
what
I
wanted
to
do,
for
the
remainder
of
the
meeting
being
a
bit
of
time
for
a
b
of
course,
is
to
talk
about
the
future
a
bit
and
the
the
future
of
of
open,
active,
the
specifications
of
the
tech
stack
and
and
how
we
kind
of
prioritize
things
that
we
want
this
group
to
focus
on
moving
forwards.
A
A
So
we
have
a
few
documents
that
kind
of
seem
to
describe
what
this
group
is
for
the
most
recent
one
is
a
governance
and
processes
document
from
2018,
and
that
describes
our
goal
as
being
development
of
openly
licensed
standards,
technical
recommendations
and
best
practices
being
a
location
for
people
to
collaborate
with
one
another
and
to
work
on
a
few
areas
of
standardization.
So
so
the
first
one
being
around
opportunities,
the
second
one
about
booking
apis
and
the
third
one
about
kind
of
standardizing
data
to
improve
interoperability.
A
We've
also
got
a
charter
which
I
think
is
a
requirement
of
being
part
of
the
w3c.
The
charter
broadly
expresses
the
same
things
but
uses
slightly
different
language
to
the
governance
and
process
and
document,
but
broadly
has
the
same
focuses
and
then
on
the
open,
active
W3
webpage,
there's
also
a
kind
of
set
of
objectives
for
the
group,
so
so
one
is
about
publishing
and
enabling
systems
and
websites
to
make
activity
data
easily
found
there's
a
bit
about
activities.
A
So
this
is
about
labeling
and
there's
a
bit
about
kind
of
content
types,
nothing
out
of
all
of
the
descriptions.
I
looked
at
this
one
was
the
kind
of
the
Vegas
one
probably
needs
a
bit
of
an
update,
but
I
think
what
I've
taken
from
those
and
what
I've
been
kind
of
been
thinking
about
a
little
bit
is
about
what
this
group
needs
to
be
thinking
about
and
I.
Think
in
terms
of
thinking
about
what
we're
doing
in
the
future.
A
I
can
kind
of
see
two
key
areas
of
focus,
so
the
first
one
is
a
kind
of
continuous
Improvement
space.
So
actually,
this
is
about
resolving
issues
and
solving
problems
as
they
arise,
making
sure
that
the
infrastructure
keeps
working
making
sure
where
there
are
problems
or
issues.
We
we
quickly
find
ways
to
fix
those
and
keep
the
thing
working.
A
I
think
the
second
area
of
continuous
Improvement
is
around
technical
use
cases.
So
actually
we
have
ideas,
don't
we
about
how
we
want
this
thing
to
be
and
how
we
want
it
to
work
and
how
we
wanted
to
develop
and-
and
actually
this
this
group
has
an
important
role
in
in
discussing
those
ideas,
testing
those
ideas
and
prioritizing
those
ideas
and.
A
Had
some
discussion
last
time
around
the
mapping
of
facilities
to
activities
I
can't
see
that
as
a
really
good
tactical
discussion
and
a
potentially
potentially
technical
use
case.
Well,
that's
just
quite
reactive.
It's
all
quite
responsive,
it's
all
quite
immediate
and
I.
Think
one
of
the
other.
The
other
thing
that
this
group
needs
to
do
is
have
a
much
longer
term
Focus,
so
actually
starting
to
think
about
how
the
open
active
infrastructure
will
develop
over
the
long
term
over
the
two
three
five
years
sort
of
time
scale.
A
So
we
understand-
and
we
can
have
some
certainty
about
what
we
want:
the
data
architecture
and
the
data
specifications,
the
technical
architectures
that
look
like
in
three
to
five
years
time
so
that,
as
we
invest
our
time
and
effort
in
in
open
active,
we
are
all
investing
in
the
same
direction
and
I
think
that's
really
important.
So
we've
got
quite
a
limited
resource,
so
I
think
in
terms
of
thinking
about
what
we
want
to
talk
about
in
the
future.
A
Before
I
got
here,
this
group
came
up
with
a
list
of
future
topics
for
discussion,
and
this
is
the
list
that
I
was
given
by
Howard.
Who's
disappeared,
I,
don't
know
if
he's
feeling
guilty
or
something
I'm,
not
sure.
B
A
We've
got
quite
a
few
topics:
there's
something
around
accessibility
and
providing
accessibility.
Information
in
the
feeds
there's
something
about
how
we
manage
the
activity
list
of
facility
lists,
there's
a
whole
stack
of
GitHub
issues.
The
example
that
was
given
was
high
frequency
hour
clock
sessions.
I
think
we've
got
a
bit
of
an
issue
with
GitHub
I
think
we've
got
a
bit
of
a
backlog,
I
think
there's
quite
a
lot
of
stuff
in
there
that
we
need
to
deal
with.
We
need
to
think
about.
A
This
is
the
kind
of
interaction
between
open,
active
and
open
referral.
That's
becoming
a
hotter
topic
by
the
minute.
A
I'll
come
back
to
that.
Maybe
if
we've
got
time
at
the
end,
we've
got
the
root
specification.
I
think
uptake
has
actually
been
reasonably
low.
Is
that
something
we
want
to
prioritize
or
not?
We've
talked
about
court
clubs
and
courses,
we've
talked
about
processes
and
then
the
last
area
was
kind
of
safeguarding.
So
actually,
how
do
you
exchange
data
to
understand
whether
a
provider
has
got
the
relevant
safeguarding
Provisions
qualifications,
Etc
and
I
suspect?
A
So
what
I
thought
it
would
be
useful
to
do
was
try
and
map
some
of
these
things
by
the
category
they
fall
into,
whether
they're
kind
of
continuous
Improvement
or
whether
they're
long-term
strategic
things
and
about
how
around
how
urgent
they
are
as
well
so
before
I
will
put
this
link
into
the
meeting,
but
before
I
do.
Let
me
try
and
show
you
how
I'm
visualizing
that
at
the
moment,
so
hopefully
you
can
still
see
my
screen.
A
Basically,
what
I've
done
is
I've
created
a
really
simple
board
on
the
one
side,
I've
kind
of
got
the
Tactical
stuff
the
issues
and
the
problems
and
the
temporal
use
cases
and
on
the
other
side,
I've
got
more
strategic
stuff.
The
data
architecture,
specifications,
technical
architecture
and
what
I've
tried
to
do
is
take
those
things
off
that
previous
slide
and
put
them
onto
the
jamboard
and
put
them
where
I
think
they
fit.
So
the
top
of
the
board
is
stuff.
That's
urgent!
A
What
I'm
proposing
that
we
do
is
I'll
share
the
link
to
this
jamboard
with
everyone
through
the
chat
and
then
I
think
what
we
can
do
is
have
a
quick
discussion
about
the
things
that
are
already
on
the
board
and
maybe
to
spend
two
minutes
on
each
one
and
work
out
whether
I've
put
it
in
the
right
place
or
whether
item
is
understood,
I'm
really
happy
to
be
wrong.
I,
don't
care
that
much
about
being
wrong
I'd
rather
get
it
right
and
get
your
Insight
and
then
add
anything.
That's
missing
to
the
board.
A
In
parallel
to
this,
the
steering
committee
are
increasingly
starting
to
think
about
the
kind
of
strategic
direction
for
open
active
and
what
I've
been
asked
that
they're,
having
a
discussion
tomorrow
at
their
student
committee
meeting
about
the
kind
of
strategic
objectives,
you're
open
access
and
what
I
would
like
to
do
is
bring
this
strategic
review
of
the
tech
and
data
infrastructure.
Together
with
the
Strategic
view,
the
steering
committee
is
talking
about
what
the
issues
should
be
and
seeing
if
they
align
and
if
they
don't
line
working
out.
A
E
A
If
it's
an
issue
that
needs
a
resolving
in
the
short
term,
because
it's
affecting
the
operations
of
the
infrastructure,
it's
an
issue
or
a
problem.
If
it's
something
that
we
would
like
to
do
or
that
we
think
is
desirable
to
do
for
the
future,
it's
probably
in
the
Strategic
box.
A
So
I
think
the
boards
in
the
chat
it's
a
public
board,
so
you
should
all
be
able
to
get
into
it.
I,
don't
think
it's
important
to
people
sign
in
for
these.
A
So
the
first
couple
of
things
I'm
going
to
start
with
issues
and
problems
columns.
So
the
first
couple
of
things,
I
guess
the
first
question
is:
are
all
those
things
things
that
people
think
are
things
things
that
need
resolve
around
a
couple
of
generic
like
the
GitHub
and
the
the
kind
of
processing
guidance,
but
I've
managed
the
activity
listing
the
facilities
listed
in
there
because
we're
kind
of
working
on
those
at
the
moment.
So
I
presume
at
some
point,
because
we're
working
under
someone's
decided
their
their
urgent
things
that
we
need
to
deal
with.
A
So
let's
put
those
at
the
top
I
think
the
GitHub
issues.
We
need
to
kind
of
explode
that
out
a
bit.
So
if
there
are
any,
if
there's
any
favorite
GitHub
issues,
we
could
probably
add
those
and
then,
in
terms
of
high
frequency
ad
hoc
sessions,
I
wasn't
entirely
sure
what
that
was.
A
A
A
Think
yeah
tell
me
to
update
things.
I
I
think
it's
easier
to
see
in
the
share
than
it
about
going
into
it
than
through
the
screen
share
so
yeah.
Just
if
you
want
to
make
changes,
tell
me,
but
let's,
let's.
B
Management
activity
list,
I
think
I
feel
like
we're
close
to.
You
know
that
that's
we've
been
working
on
that
for
the
first
few
months
of
this
year,
we've
got
a
new
process,
we've
got.
We
think
it's
working
so
I'd
that,
certainly
if
there
isn't
a
done
column,
it
goes
down
to
to
not
urgent.
Although
promotion
of
the
activity
list
beyond
the
open
activity
initiative
or
as
using
it
as
a
tool
to
draw
other
organizations
and
initiatives,
make
them
aware
of
open
active
is
more
of
a
strategic
thing.
A
B
So
I
think
what
drove
working
on
the
activity
list
was
that
it
has
potential
for
standardization
across
the
sector
and
that's
a
strategic
data
architecture
kind
of
challenge
what
you
know
while
we
were
there
with
the
first,
we
looked
at
the
facilities
types
list
and
we
realized
that
that
could
probably
benefit
from
a
similar
process.
It
changes
less
I
think,
but
you
know
so
so
that's
that
is
probably
still
media
emergency.
You
know
we
get
by
with
the
spreadsheet
that
we've
got.
B
Yeah
do
do
we
want
to
well
on
high
frequency
ad
hoc
sessions,
so
if
I
just
did
one
line
summary
Andrew
I
would
say
that
the
particularly
with
kovid
the
way
that
you
could
book
a
gym
session
changed.
You
could
just
turn
up
to
a
gym,
but
then
there
were
limits
on
the
number
of
people
and
you
needed
a
time
slot
so
that
the
shape
of
the
data,
the
shape
of
the
opportunity
data
changed
over
that
time
and
different
Publishers
have
managed
that
in
different
ways.
B
So
it's
kind
of
created
a
challenge
for
the
activity
finder
people
to
take
that
changing
shape
of
the
data
where
it's
changing
different
shapes
and
to
kind
of
present
that,
in
a
way
that
makes
a
decent
user
experience.
That's
the
challenge
in,
in
my
words,.
B
A
E
This
is
I'm,
no,
no
I'm,
sorry
right
yeah,
it
makes
sense
and
the
view
the
question
from
Andrew
is:
do
we
have
a
view
on
the
importance
of
resolving
this
yeah?
There's
a
question
so
I
I
think
I.
Think,
probably
because
we've
only
got
11
minutes
to
do
this.
Maybe
the
higher
level
response
to
that
is.
E
Every
GitHub
issue
has
got
different
stakeholders
that
need
it
to
a
different
extent
and
some
of
those
become
urgent
to
your
point
on
reactive
bubble.
Up,
at
which
point
we
like
need
to
move
on
this,
the
ones
that
are
currently
not
being
discussed
as
no
one's
emailed.
You
yesterday
about
them,
probably
not
urgent
right
now.
So
we
could.
We
could
say
that
many
of
these
things
have
kind
of
settled
back
into
the
state
of
design,
there's
something
that
works
for
now.
People
have
kind
of
found
a
work
around.
E
It's
not
urgent
and
therefore
we
need
to
solve
it,
but
not
immediately,
and
so
I'd
say,
there's
a
huge
number
of
issues.
Where
that's
the
case
and
at
any
given
moment,
they
could
become
urgent
again
because
someone's
trying
to
implement
or
use
or
something
at
which
point
we
need
to
then
schedule
a
call.
E
So
my
suggestion
would
be
given
the
expertise
that
we've
got
present
currently
in
this
phase
around
the
different
aspects
of
the
issues
raised.
It's
probably
worth
investing
time.
In
that
longer,
you
know
pulling
all
the
context
into
those
issues
making
sure
we
have
the
robust
discussions
where
needed.
E
My
concern
would
be
if
we
leave
that
backlog
just
sitting
there
for
another
two
three
years,
that
there
were
everyone
who
had
left
the
building.
Who
has
any
idea
what
that
stuff
was
and
will
be
left
with
forever
a
reactive
situation,
because
it
will
only
be
when
the
reactive
stuff
comes
in,
but
people
then
will
gather
and
deal
with
and
so
I
think
we've
got
a
unique
opportunity
really
until
the
end
of
the
phase
to
solve
this.
E
It
kind
of
backlog
issue
really
put
things
in
good
places
and
park
things
with
all
the
input
that
we
need
and
I
would
suggest,
that's
quite
important.
So
that's
a.
E
Yeah,
my
suggestion
would
be
as
a
first
step,
and
this
is
this-
is
part
of
the
knowledge
transfer
work
for
Andrew
we're
in
discussion
about
at
the
moment,
the
the
person
that's
raised,
the
issue
which
many
times
as
myself,
on
the
basis
of
those
that
have
spoken
to
me
about
it,
I
think
that
probably
accounts
for
90
I've
got
context
of
those
issues,
spends
the
time
triaging
and
elaborating
the
issue
on
the
basis
of
the
knowledge
that
is
already
available
so
rather
than
spending
I,
don't
think
we'd
actually
get
through
them
all
on
this
in
this
format,
in
this
forum,
because
there's
just
too
many
of
them
that
that
information
is
is
put
in
there
and
then
we
can
actually
stack
rank
them.
E
Maybe
somewhere
like
this,
you
can
imagine
putting
them
together
and
people
saying
I've
got
an
emergency
around
this,
but
also
as
part
of
that
knowledge
transfer
actually
flagging
those
ones
with
what
the
dependencies
are.
You
know
what
is
it?
Who?
Which
organizations?
Does
this
particular
one
relate
to
when's
it
likely
to
become
urgent,
etc,
etc.
G
A
That's
interesting,
thank
you,
so
yeah
and
then
and
then
I
think.
The
kind
of
last
block
in
this
box
were
about
things
like
improving
processes,
improving
guidance
and
I
I
kind
of
left
them
in
here,
because
they're
kind
of
things
that
kind
of
are
quite
short-term,
but
without
knowing
what
guidance
and
what
processes
that
they
felt
quite
vague
and
I.
Think
I
was
I.
Think
what
occurred
to
me
was.
A
We
need
more
insights
about
about
what
processing
guidance
we're
going
to
kind
of
kind
of
look
at
first
in
terms
of
so
moving
across
the
table
in
terms
of
the
technical
use
cases.
A
The
the
obvious
one
at
the
moment
is
around
the
interaction
between
open,
active
and
open
referral,
and
there
are
a
number
of
people
who
are
interested
in
this
within
open,
active
and
within
open
referral
and
I
I.
Think,
there's
probably
a
piece
of
work
to
do
as
a
priority
to
look
at
the
relationship
between
the
two
and
how
data
from
open
active
becomes
like
a
referral
compliance
and
is
made
accessible
through
that
open
referral,
infrastructure.
C
Oh
yeah,
I'm,
sorry,
Andrew
I
might
be
a
little
bit
lost
it's
a
new
term.
But
what
what?
What
is
the
definition
of
open
referral.
A
Open
referral
is
very
similar
to
open
active.
It
is
a
schema.org
based
scarce
Jason,
LD
framework
for
sharing
data
and
open
referrals
focus
on
data
about
Community
Services.
A
So
there
is
a
legal
requirement
on
local
authorities
to
provide
a
directory
of
community
services
in
a
couple
of
categories.
One
is
child
care
and
I
think
the
other
one
is
around
safeguarding
services
or
or
social
work.
Services
I
can't
quite
remember
what
the
definition
is.
An
open
referral
basically
provides
a
data
stand
of
showing
that
information.
They
have
a
lot
of
the
same
challenges
that
we
have
open.
A
Referral
in
many
ways
is
a
simpler
standard
than
open
active,
so
it's
about
taking
an
app
get
taking
an
abstract
of
the
data
out
of
Road
throughout
the
stream
and
putting
it
in
an
open
referral
standard
and
the
benefit
of
doing
that
is
that
anyone
who's
built
a
social
prescribing
system
that
uses
open
referral
will
then
be
able
to
get
access
to
the
data.
That's
in
the
open
active
feeds.
A
So
there
are
some
discussions
going
on
at
the
moment
between
ODI
and
open
referral.
We
know
that
there
are
people
in
various
organizations
who
are
interested
in
making
this
work,
and
Tim
and
I
are
going
to
work
with
them
to
kind
of
create
a
technical
use
case
around
this
and
potentially
attract
some
funding
as
well.
To
look
into
this
in
a
bit
more
detail.
A
Yeah,
no
we're
aware
of
the
backing
exists
already
I.
Think
it's
a
question
of
how
to
operationalize
it
I
think
there
are
a
couple
of
options.
One
option
is
that
you
have
a
sort
of
central
transformation
service
which
takes
back
to
the
data
and
transforms
it
to
to
open
referral.
I
guess
the
other
alternative
is
that
you
you
do
it
at
source.
So
you
provide
a
pattern.
That's
a
data
publisher
can
use.
So
essentially
you
could
I
I.
A
Guess
it
might
I
guess
you
could
end
it
with
a
data
set
data
set
site
with
a
an
open,
active
Tab
and
open
bookings,
Tab
and
an
open
referral
tab.
So
we
just
need
to
work
out
what
the
best
way
of
doing
that
is.
A
Absolutely
it's
not
a
discussion
for
four
minutes
left,
but
yeah
I,
I,
I'll
I'll
keep
people
posted
on
that
as
it
develops.
So
this
is
a
good
example,
though
of
technical
use
case
right
there,
and
there
must
be
many
other
technical
use
cases
that
we've
got
and
then
moving
on
to
the
more
strategic
stuff,
I
I
think
we've
talked
a
bit
about
clubs
in
the
past.
That
feels
like
a
fairly
urgent
thing
that
we
want
to
deal
with.
We
want.
A
We
want
to
have
an
approach
to
dealing
with
information
about
clubs,
safeguarding
accessibility
that
safeguarding
particularly
keeps
cropping
up
in
conversation
and
pairing
with
people
across
the
network.
This
idea
of
how
do
I
trust
your
provider
over
my
own
internal
provider
is
a
really
interesting
question:
the
link
to
active
places
and
how
we
deal
with
that.
A
couple
of
people
have
mentioned
that
in
the
last
couple
of
meetings
and
I
think
there's
some
stuff,
that's
less
urgent,
I
think
I
get
I,
get
a
sense.
A
That
Roots
is
less
urgent,
that
the
specification
exists,
but
I
don't
get
a
great
sense
that
there's
an
attitude
a
great
sense
of
an
appetite
to
to
kind
of
really
push
the
root.
Specification
and
courses
have
cropped
up
a
couple
of
times,
I'm
guessing.
That
is
a
learn
to
swim
course
or
a
football
training
course
or
a
tennis
coaching
course.
That
sort
of
course,
so
those
are
the
things
I
kind
of
got
in
the
Strategic
box.
A
I
guess
my
question
would
be:
is
there
anything
that
isn't
on
this
list?
That
should
be
immediate
thoughts
on
that.
G
I
mean
I'd
say
in
the
the
spec
box
we've
got
add-ons,
which
has
an
open
issue
on
a
moment.
E
The
the
issue
with
the
specifications
and
finalizing
those
we've
basically
got
a
the
current
specs
that
are
in
use
are
a
blend
of
outstanding
issues
that
have
been
resolved
to
a
satisfactory
status
and
kind
of
python
documentation
and
respect
themselves
across
I
think
all
specifications.
So
we
do
have
a
situation
where
the
current
current
status.
E
And
that's
just
because
we
haven't
had
the
resources
to
actually
update
the
specs
and
so
I
think
that
would
be
a
good
thing
to
do.
I
mean
again
an
objective
of
last
phase.
I
think
always
maybe
even
the
case
before
we
haven't
met,
but
certainly
something
that
could
have
done
this
first
yeah
is
updating
those
I.
E
In
the
every
everything's,
it's
not
on
fire
right
now,
because
everyone
just
ignores
the
spec
and
uses
the
documentation,
and
so
we
have
a
workaround
I've
had
many
things
that
you're
not
hearing
daily
about
we've
got
ways
around
these
these
issues,
but
yeah,
there's,
there's
I,
guess
there's
if
we
were
doing
open
active
properly
in
the
first
commas,
things
would
be
like
a
certain
way,
but
there's
things
that
we're
just
kind
of
figuring
out
without
that,
okay.
B
I'll
jump
in
we
haven't
got
long
left.
I.
Think
I'll
put
a
comment
in
the
chat
places
in
that
access.
Accessibility
could
be
linked
as
a
technical
use
case
and
it
kind
of
might
prove
or
disprove
whether
it's
it
is
a
strategic
route.
We
want
to
go
and.
D
B
Is
like
bringing
in
real
time
with
perhaps
bringing
the
accessibility
information
from
active
places
where
it
exists
when
you've
got
a
in
an
incoming
open,
active
location.
B
The
other
thing
I
would
mention
when
we
talk
about
safeguarding
we're
talking
about
individuals
and
kind
of
providers,
activity
providers
trainers
whatever
it
might
be,
so
this
is
kind
of
that
identity.
We
talked
about
this
morning
with
Australia
digital
identity,
where
we
move
into
talking
about
information
about
individual
providers.
B
So
you
know-
and
this
has
come
up
with
other
conversations-
what
level
of
training
have
they
got
you
know?
Do
they
have
what
first
aid
provision
all
those
kind
of
things
kind
of
questions
that
come
up
yeah.
A
Okay,
cool
well
we're
losing
people
so
I'm
going
to
suggest
we
stop
there
and
I
will
post
the
link
to
an
editable
version
of
this
into
the
slack
and
ask
for
people's
thoughts
and
comments
offline,
but
I've
enjoyed
that
meeting
excluded
the
data
quality
stuff
progressing
and
it's
it's
good
to
see
the
the
activity
list.
Improving
and
I
think
there
are
some
interesting
ideas
about
what
we
do
next,
so
thank
you.
I
will
see
you
all
soon.