►
From YouTube: TPAC 2019 WebRTC meeting @Thursday part 1
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
He
at
home
would
be
Jeff
Gordon.
Is
a
scientist
I'm
chimes?
Okay,
this
is
the
meaning
of
the
web,
read
to
see
working
group
on
Thursday
September,
the
19th,
a
little
information
about
the
meeting
we're
out
here.
So
we
know
where
it
is.
We
will
be
meeting
here
both
in
this
room
called
base
agenda
and
all
the
other
meeting
info
is
up
on
the
wiki.
These
are
links
to
all
of
the
dress.
I
think
we'll
be
getting
to
almost
everything
on
this
one.
A
During
today's
that's
our
meeting,
you
have
the
slides
on
the
working
group
wiki,
and
hopefully
everyone
has
filled
in
their
slides
at
least
enough
for
today.
Please
do
so
quick
tomorrow,
and
then
we
do
need
a
scribe
to
particularly
for
decisions
that
we
made.
So
we
can
track
those.
Do
we
have
a
volunteer
I.
A
D
A
A
A
Get
there
twice
done
and
then
Friday
is
for
more
forward-thinking.
Things
will
have
foreign
language
like
that
scalable
video
coding.
We
have
a
privacy
session
with
ping
from
nine
fifteen
to
ten
that
the
lead
and
I'll
probably
be
a
lot
of
pain
people
here
UN.
So
it's
going
yeah.
So
if
we
have
privacy
things,
we
should
probably.
A
Start
session
ID
use
cases
and
then
recharter
and
then
in
the
afternoon
we
have
a
meeting
with
the
accessibility
platform.
Architectures
group
for
Dell
talk
about
access
for
use
cases
throughout
all
this.
We
have
two
sessions
empty
sessions.
Potentially
you
can
reuse,
so
we
will
try
to
be
very
time
efficient,
so
we
may
cut
things
off,
but
if
something
needs
more
time,
we
can
allocate
it
into
my
the
Friday,
those
about
your
sentence
and
then
he'll
wrap
up
at
4:30.
F
W
kissies
leadership-
very,
he
has
to
mister
finished
with
what
you
say.
One
was
there,
but
I
finished
with
me
and
again:
I
didn't
get
into
PR.
According
to
the
current
rules,
waiting
for
the
rules
have
changed.
It's
not
the
strategy.
I
would
recommend
the
choker
also
says
with
the
who
should
define
an
object-oriented
API
based
the
Novartis
II,
this
crap
requirements,
the
new
use
cases
and
understand
it
seems
that
the
some
of
them
realistic
that
we
will
be
done
with
all
these
items
until
mark
next
year.
F
F
H
F
And
most,
but
not
sitting
man,
this
poop
at
this
moment,
but
the
pressure
of
the
week
also
Novartis.
He
has
decreased
s--
assume
people
are
not
yelling
above
it
anymore,
but
people
who
want
specific
pieces
have
spun
out
postings
in
separate
letters
and
a
bit
from
because
they
were
tired
of
waiting
dresses.
No
because
they
thought
that
better,
my
own
web
transport
event
code
that
are
used
obvious
initiatives
so
going
to
the
to
the
specs.
F
Someone
mentioned
over
breakfast
of
the
bread
counselor
they
become
so
last
year
that
I
have
no
evidence
of
this
years
and
56
open
issues
goes
to
HR
holds
some
of
Achaia
James
means
well
next
sintered
comin
coming
together
is
there
are
vents
that
are
easy
to
fix
and
epic
syllables
and
the
reference
that
really
requires
some
heavy
thinking
and
they
tend
to
stick
around.
So
we
do
need
to
go
through
this
and
say
no.
This
is
dawn,
dawn
dawn
or
stop.
Stop
thinking
about
that.
F
I
I
A
L
M
M
A
F
O
F
F
F
P
F
F
N
F
O
Q
N
F
N
D
F
Anyway,
I
think
how
has
a
session
yeah
I
guess
you're,
not
so
well.
One
interesting
thing
that
came
up
was
that
if
you
want
to
even
read
the
whole
concept
of
great
now,
you
could
take
dragged
out
of
Rebecca
CPC
and
put
it
together
here
so
that
we
have
all
arrived.
This
does
not.
This
therefore
make
more
Sun
Stockman
twice:
I
am
education,
but.
F
F
N
G
F
H
F
I
O
A
T
O
O
O
We
had
the
joy
to
go
through
the
line
by
mine
into
a
nerd-seeking
all
the
lines
in
this
pack
to
try
to
get
coverage
and
to
get
a
feeling
about
how
much
recovery-
and
that
was
the
first
time
he
and
another
shot
at
a
little
over
200,
best
of
all
all
the
media
capture
and
so
on,
and
that
was
like
it's
intense
and
so
into
heaven
on
human.
Finally,
we
begin
to
place
some
kind
of
cooperation
streams
and
we
will
be
fined
a
little
bit.
O
The
process
of
the
spec
to
be
able
to
tag
me
in
the
spec
inning
strike
that
automatically
so
and
then
the
loop
et
was
taken
over
by
another
group
that
mean
something
different
than
ever,
but
the
coverage
backing
that
we
can
see
that
between
his
long
in
2016-
and
we
are
the
roughly
1000
text
text
anywhere
between
seventy
percent
coverage
of
the
specs
that
gathers
confidence
as
look.
We
both
went
to
the
Louvre,
see
that
was
tested
a
since
then
the
WPT
removed
the
this
capacity.
O
M
O
H
O
113
under
259
right,
so
that's
great!
That's
what
we
see.
That
was
the
situation
last
year
in
so
the
WB
GE
was
testing
most
of
the
most
recent
desktop
version
of
the
browsers,
but
unfortunately
the
number
of
tests
that
were
passing
across
all
the
four
browser
was
zero.
So
you
can
look
at
the
bottom.
O
It
is
a
different
view,
which
is
already
text
work
from
the
left
to
the
right
on
only
one
nonzero
browsers
and
all
the
one
only
to
only
Fiero
affirm,
and
you
can
see
the
four
column,
which
is
where
we
should
be
even
to
me,
what's
a
complete
zero.
So
thanks
gotta
work
on
red
right.
It
was
white
that
was
good,
so
big
progress
time
this
year
we
have
more
tests
and
also
better
consensus
that
the
most
liberating
so
we
decided
to
have
last
year,
one
folder
third
speck.
O
M
O
O
B
O
O
The
WPT
in
dashboard
is
improving
with
less
afraid.
This
is
one
who
let
the
well
down.
So
if
you
click
on
about
his
CDs
isn't
eaten
up
all
the
tests
next
slide
and
if
you
roll,
even
one
without
down
that
so,
although
that
vector
so
the
comparison
between
the
WPT
dashboard
and
the
whole
pyramid
kind
in
2018,
was
that
kind
can
run
the
mobile
browser.
O
O
Thanks
like
it
right
now,
I
have
a
link,
it's
bad
for
Cosmo,
it's
at
the
bottom
of
one
of
each
month,
so
you
can
check
later
and
in
terms
of
error
and
logging.
This
is
what
you
get
in
mobile
Ricky
in
the
dashboard.
So
it
is
good
to
have
a
no
no
I,
don't
review.
It
might
be
more
difficult
for
an
engineering
to
act
on
it
exactly
use
that
fifty,
but
because
it's
difficult
most
developer
will
run
the
WBT
themself
manually.
I'm
gonna
show
you
anyway,
our
traits
a
big
field.
O
That's
like
in
our
case,
because
we're
lazy
we've
got
everything
on
there.
On
the
dashboard
till
you
have
a
global
number
66
dot.
71
percent
of
the
test
pass
across
the
browser
configuration
you
have
listed
there
so
again,
my
deadline,
I,
can
not
read
this
creature.
We
could
do
this
right
here.
Mr.
Mac
magnifier
469
Windows
5
of
69
Mac
Firefox,
71
windows,
Firefox
71
Mac
from
77
Rosalie,
will
help
you
for
this
country.
O
O
Safari
on
iOS
and
so
on,
and
we
also
have
categories
there.
So
that's
the
row,
for
example,
to
compare
Firefox
69
between
Mac
and
Windows.
So
you
can
see
the
result
on
slightly
different
other
models
to
compare
5
o'clock.
69
games,
5.71
different,
very
reader.
We've
got
some
category
on
the
site
to
see
which
one
we're
invading
because
of
the
track
problem
or
string
problem
of
media
problems
at
the
mode
to
dispatch
to
the
right
people.
So
your
category.
O
O
Or
annotation
for
the
time
being,
yes,
that's
our
mean
value
into
that
more
so
next
line,
and
then,
if
you
click
on
it,
we
want
to
need
actionable.
So
on
the
top
right
hand,
you
cannot
really
see
that,
for
example,
the
green
part
I
click
on
it.
So
it's
inverted.
So
we
don't
see
the
the
test
that
passed
was
already.
You
only
did
see
the
failure
you
have.
The
configuration
on
the
bottom
left,
okay,
aren't
close
and
really
the
77
and
I
click
on
one
of
the
test.
O
O
Totally
random
I
just
thought
the
first
one
I
run
down
back
time.
So
you
see
the
time
report
under
the
times
along
the
testicular.
So
I
could
write.
For
example,
all
the
configuration
in
the
entire
double
DDT
in
one
hour
in
the
distributed
selenium
grid
here
I
decided
to
run
them,
not
by
name
on
my
diamond
in
my
number
of
mistake
with
my
time
and
then
I,
look
at
the
role
of
the
right,
Sardar
or
two
are
coming.
So
that's
publicly
available.
O
The
evidence
was
tight
code
for
the
luanda
next
slide,
so
something
that
the
WBT
can
undo
is,
of
course,
even
caste,
or
whether
it's
to
be
us
fu,
and
that
was
the
biggest
concern
masters.
The
a
party
see
in
orders
to
eat
the
great
range
at
the
time
in
the
middle
we
field
to
compare
cross
need
to
have
the
same,
to
compare
what
is
comparable
and
then
for
single
cask
illegal.
To
other
section.
O
Sober
now
was
quick
to
point
that
most
people
don't
come
back
and
say:
I
have
an
ethical
problem,
they
say,
I
have
a
dining
table,
I
have
immediate
problem,
I,
have
a
cure,
ankle
problem
and
so
on
and
so
forth,
since
there
is
not
a
complete
set
of
specification
on
the
SFU
site,
but
about
the
see
models,
rules
and
yes,
a
few.
We
worked
a
lot
with
everybody
to
actually
company
tests
that
could
test
different
attitude
against
the
browser.
So
next.
Next,
why
me?
O
So
we
did
that
in
the
context
of
the
IETF,
a
katana,
because
first,
the
critical
mass
was
there
most
of
the
open
source
were
on
the
CSF.
You
developer,
wilderness
of
the
browser
and
remember
their
locations
are
going
to
never
do
that
once
the
104
was
really
successful.
We
provided
an
open
source.
Essentially
that
was
working
in
you
back
setting
with
different
model
for
be
unified
plan
and
all
these
compliance
testing
with
a
lean
and
mean
node.
The
node
to
the
test
will
be
very
full
compliance
instead
testing
feature.
O
O
You
have
people
test
against
their
excess.
She
went
and
surveys
the
dogs
really
good,
that's
one,
because
we
were
about
to
see
oxygen
ever
even
the
moral
wasn't
that
big
I
think
pride
with
the
location
and
everything,
and
we
found
fifty
bucks
during
this
Asian
12
of
them
were
fixed
by
the
end
of
the
to
date,
right
so
the
capacity
to
have
the
browser,
vendors
and
yes,
a
few
vendor
everybody
talking
all
the
Colorado,
River
and
and
the
rifle
to
test
was
a
very
successful.
Next,
we
ended
up
as
a
deliverable
with
a
browser.
O
Support
are
so
or
reason
to
be.
You
have
all
the
different
things
that
could
impact
at
this
stage,
thus
even
cast
including
some
IETF
high
tensions
on
the
whole
appreciated
and
then
vertically
you
have
the
different
access.
You
browser
sorry
for
this
one
and
everything
was
validated
by
each
of
the
browser
vendor.
That
was
there
when
I
say
something
it's
not
working
in
Firefox,
Firefox
agreed
to
say
yes,
it's
supporting
is
not
nobody
moving.
Yes
was
there
and
the
name
of
the
people
who
bit
his
boot
on
the
back
until
they're
responsible
to
that
right.
O
O
Most
of
the
people
were
right
in
the
middle
of
the
transition
between
the
whole
school
system.
Caste
can
be
VP
managing
in
smaller
circle,
and
the
new
schools
even
comes
with
the
transceivers
and
the
receiver.
Api
and
Noah's
be
given
no
SSRC
the
air
ID
and
all
that.
So
there
were
a
lot
of
it
in
all
kind
of
different
combination
existed
at
the
time,
so
you
can
see
that
between
promised
a
woman
consonant
area
at
the
time
we
already
had
a
big
change
between
Westport.
It's
all
you
are
for
the
WC.
O
O
Them,
yes,
if
you
still
support
something
legacy,
you
cannot
new,
whether
it
be
something
or
not,
alright.
So
the
definition
of
compliance.
If
you
use
reports
the
spec
as
it
is
today,
you
can
still
be
back
whether
that's
good
or
bad.
Mister
is
a
it's
question
of
opening
confrontation,
so
the
lead
read
and
the
yes
is
compliant
with
respect,
as
it
was
at
that
time
and
the
arranger
was,
do
you
still
want
to
accommodate
for
things
you
should
so
this
is.
O
Yes,
browser
support
are
right.
Where
do
we
stand
and
I
think
that
was
one?
What
Harold
wanted
to
see
right?
There
is
whether
we
supposed
to
implement
that.
Is
it
actually
usable
right
and
that's
where
the
problem
is.
You
also
need
on
the
SF
inside
the
depending
income
occasion.
So
then
we
go
to
the
next
slide,
which
is
the
SFU.
So
you
have
the
fool
which
is
on
top
on
the
right
corner,
because
I
didn't
want
to
tell
opinion
a
lot
of
people
behave
very
badly
when
you
tell
them
that
they
exactly
he'll.
G
O
It's
a
compliance
report,
so
we
doesn't
mean
you
guys
have
fleas
better.
You
just
mean
it's
complying
to
the
student
labor
spec
and
some
people
will
tell
you
I'm
fine,
with
not
being
I'm
fine
with
the
way
the
spec
I
want
to
be
able
to
operate
with
the
current
browser,
and
today's
so
that's
the
house.
O
Gustavo,
for
example,
was
very,
very
vocal
about
that
is
a
humble
read
the
test,
but
I
want
fun,
while
some
other
people
like
to
experimental
surgery
over
Enzo
in
a
key
visual
suspect
that
one
you'd
be
a
guinea
pig
reading
a
lot
except
a
baby
good
morning.
So
the
color
does
mean
compliance.
Not
is
not
a
quality
assessment
but
I
below
us
to
know
again.
If
you
want
to
test
against
the
latest
spec
which
SFU
should
we
use
right
is
if
they
don't
support
them.
If
I
played
negotiation.
V
O
They
were
not
at
that
time.
At
the
time
we
did
the
test,
it
was
104
so
time
we
try
to
arrange
this
table
every
unhappy
IETF
and
we
try
to
bring
more
people.
So
in
this
slide,
I
will
speak
about
and
Singapore
one
with
that
Bluebird
the
IDS
to
have
all
the
browser,
and
one
more
essentially
to
test
against
to
have
a
complete
snap
off
of
the
supports.
O
So
an
example
of
a
funny,
but
we
found
the
bandwidth
allocation
back,
so
you
have
believed
to
the
test
and
from
the
configuration
to
reproduce
it
was
from
Doug
and
physically.
It
was
expecting
you
to
provide
the
single
cast
layer
from
the
high-resolution
to
the
lowest
resolution,
and
it
was
allocating
the
bending
it
accordingly.
So
if
you
were
providing
the
layers
it'll
record
over
or
the
lower
resolution
first
and
that
I
am
resolution
after,
but
your
lower
resolution
stream
won't
get
most
of
the
benefit
available
for
it.
O
While
the
higher
resolution
will
be
any
constraint
to
the
point
where
it
would
reduce
the
resolution
automatically.
So
I
was
kind
of
funny
here.
Next
month
is
so
we
pass
on
the
street
and
so
on.
So
we
need
a
little
case
study
and
done
with
world
for
everybody
from
there.
So
this
one's
one,
this
one
was
from
thanks
to
Janice,
but
we
ensure
we
can
fund
a
lot
of
corner
cases
that
would
otherwise
be
almost
impossible.
O
Test,
if
you
don't
have
a
test
tool
that
won't
need
to
endow
NSF
fee
different,
absolutely
different,
I'm
sorry
and
that's
the
last
one
right.
So
you
know
in
one
family,
morality
was
a
small
group,
but,
interestingly
enough
we
managed
to
get
more
people
on
you.
People
so
frozen
contact
with
a
life
switch
exception
and
join
us.
O
They
were
finishing
implementation
single
cast,
so
they
managed
to
delete
in
the
widget
the
managed
to
fund
a
few
bugs
and
so
on,
and
they
will
add
the
result
of
the
test
against
their
exception
and
see
you
in
the
status
report
that
allow
them
to
know
when
they
are
going
to
stand
compared
to
the
other.
One
and
kinda
managed
the
browser
to
test
against
Emma
genetically
so
provide
better
support
in
Singapore
in
terms
going
to
join
semester,
Intel
announced
that
they
were
open
sourcing,
their
entire
test
suite
and
MCU.
O
As
a
few
and
everything
this
is
done.
It
is
part
of
the
upper
visual
clouds
pushed
from
Intel
who
goes
beyond
being
able
to
see
which
transfer
utility
leaders
watch
it
in
and
so
on.
The
one
used
to
be
in
terrible
to
see
collaboration
suite
is
not
called
open
about
to
see
ability,
I
think
comics
and
they're
going
to
join
us
in
Singapore
during
IETF,
but
we
have
integrate
some
of
the
tests
into
kites.
O
O
O
O
O
So
that's
it
we're
going
to
try
to
remove
able
to
test
and
increase
the
coverage
together.
The
browser
know
where
it's
working
or
what
the
use
cases
are
out
there
and
we
prepared
a
few
tests
for
the
usual
suspect
or
hangout
me
to
WebEx
that
we're
going
to
share
publicly
and
if
the
browser
vendors
need
the
SFU
safety
test
against
install
we
can.
We
can
help
set
it
up,
but
never
she
needs
open
source
entries.
Let's
make
it
happen.
O
A
A
A
All
the
requirements
for
PR
again
basically
must
show
adequate
if
fermentation
experience
and
then
have
the
wide
review.
If
you
address
the
issues
raised
during
the
CIL
review
period,
identify
stops
into
the
issue
since
the
close
of
that
and
then
need
to
remove
features.
So
just
so,
we
just
talked
about
some
of
the
patient
experience.
I
will
talk
about
that.
Some
more
I
have
one
over
that.
A
A
Okay,
now
in
terms
of
simulcast
I,
think
we
had
a
spec
issues
that
let
me
talk
about
it
in
Teaneck
2018.
There
are
no
issues,
labeled
simulcast
remaining,
so
I
think
from
a
spec
point
of
view.
We
have
done
our
job
and
made
very
good
progress
since
last
year
there
are
a
few
implementation
gaps
and
differences.
A
Here's
what
I
think
we
are
ready
max
remember
using
featured
risk.
That
is
one
of
the
cast
votes.
So
that
is
me
is
yet
we
have
some
differences
and
some
accounts
test.
You
see
that
I
was
talked
about.
I
didn't
want
to
chat
a
little
bit
about
support
for
the
rid
and
big
hair
extensions.
I
guess
we
have
the
ribs
are
in.
O
A
Okay,
so
still
a
little
bit
a
little
bit
of
extra
work
on
the
RTP
site
to
do
in
the
browser
and
then
there's
the
little
SDP
differences
there
and
Harold
hadn't
put
an
interactive,
an
idea
about
the
SDP
portion
of
this
as
well.
Okay.
So
let's
talk
about
the
WBT,
basically
I
think
Alex
covered
admitting
with
about.
Thank
you,
as
Alex
mentioned
during
the
WPT
gesture,
simulcast
had
something
during
kind.
O
O
A
Of
status,
I
think
dr.
Alex
said
much
more
green
than
before,
and
still
a
few
false
negatives
do
dependencies
and
I
think
that
is
definitely
less
than
it
was
now.
I
won't
cover
the
weg
status
except
general.
You
look
at
this.
It's
a
lot
greener
than
it
used
to
be
so.
Let's
talk
about
console
and
status.
Basically,
this
is
the
ability
key.
Just
individual
rosters
compost
just
tried
to
give
you
an
idea
of
how
much
and
implement
it
and
Yanni
hair
has
gone
in
and
history.
A
Each
of
the
risk
come
down
to
a
lot
even
lower
level,
but
they
promised
this
site.
Minutemen
came
by
down
basically
handles
methods
and
objects,
and
then
Yanni
was
taking
it
to
the
next
level,
with
the
actual
attribute
support.
Just
to
give
you
a
sense
of
where
we
are
in
terms
of
Berto
status.
There
are
a
lot
fewer
with
no
limitations
that
mean
dr.
Alec
said
that
that
would
be
kinda
flying
for
this
hero
and
browses
a
lot
less
of
that
today.
The
object
model
support
is
much
better.
A
A
year
ago,
at
carnage
was
the
only
browser
implementing
us
transfer.
No
longer
true.
We
have
an
sctp
transport,
so
just
to
kind
of
give
you
a
general
sense.
Obviously
this
is
an
I
tried,
but
you
can
basically
just
look
at
the
colors,
and
this
is
on
you
see
clear
connection,
and
it
is
almost
all
reading,
with
the
exception
of
before
my
servers,
which
general
talk
about
next
candidate
here,
which
just
got
implemented
and
the
Seb
James,
which
is
currently
and
then
for
the
some
of
the
objects
they
tend
to
be
nice.
A
X
V
A
And
then
this
is
more
the
object
model
and
we
can
see
there
are
a
few
red
items
the
SAT
be
transported
on
Herald
did
in
chrome,
so
we
have
one
implementation
of
this.
We
have
done
last
year,
but
we
and
we
do
have
most
of
the
ice
transport
RTC
ice
transport
is
in
chrome
and
getting
hopefully
will
have
on
that
details.
D
A
But
otherwise
green
and
then
RTC
error,
which
just
came
in
relatively
recently
in
chrome,
oh
you're,
having
to
so
some
progress
there,
so
I
guess
the
overall
impression
I
wanted
to
say
is
this
looks
a
lot
better
than
last
year
and
we
at
least
in
particularly
have
one
implementation
of
the
vast
majority
of
things.
It
enables
other
implementations
to
get
started,
and
you
know
Ivar
will
talk
about
the
problem
areas
where
we
do.
We
saw
these
things
may
never
get
done,
and
that's
ok,
but
overall
I'd,
say
they're.
A
Yeah,
so
I,
basically
I
think
we're
making
progress
there
and
then
the
uneven
would
like
to
talk
about
the
stuff
that
we're
basically
not
making
dollar
song.
We
just
talked
it
out
and
I
say
rip
it
out
those
day.
Okay,
we
just
talked
about
the
simulcast
playground,
stuff,
the
loopback
and
then
I
think
some
of
these
things.
These
are
working
with
decisions
for
simulcast,
I
guess.
The
item
you
just
took
lose
the
loopback
test
and
then
continued
work
on
me
interrupts
on
testing
point
of
view
with
the
SF
humans.
O
Y
A
A
A
So
we
can
we're
approaching
after
you're
at
10
o'clock,
sore
about
to
take
a
break.
So
anyway,
just
to
summarize
yeah
the
South
has
discussion.
We
have
the
future
its
discussion,
my
what
I'm
trying
to
present
you
is
I
think
otherwise
we
seem
to
be
on
track
for
the
spec
and
from
a
confluence,
a
communication
point
of
view.
Are
there
anybody
who.