►
From YouTube: Jan 31, 2017 Town Council Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
D
B
Councilman
padula
yeah
councilman,
letrati,
yeah,
councilman,
messiah,
yeah
council.
Vice
president
d'amico
yeah
council
president,
here
arctic
village
development
agency
committee,
jacqueline
sawada,
william
patnode,.
B
B
Just
to
give
a
brief
little
bit
before
we
can,
I
want
to
move
them
closer
now.
We
do
that
at
the
next
meeting
next
council.
D
Not
this
meeting
all
right
just
to
give
you
a
brief
history
lesson
for
the
council
members
who
were
not
on
the
council
so
about
six.
Eight
months
ago
the
attic
village
redevelopment
agency
came
to
us
with
a
proposed
ordinance.
Majority
was
drafted
by
nick
cambio
who's.
Actually,
in
the
audience
right
now,
it
was
brought
back
to
the
council.
Council
was
working
on
it
with
marcarullo
and
the
town
manager
going
back
and
forth.
D
It
took
some
time
to
where
the
council
got
it
where
they
wanted,
wanted
it
to
be
roughly,
and
then
election
time
came
as
you
can
see.
Three
of
you
are
new
and
three
have
accidents.
So
at
that
time
I
think
mr
cambio
had
meetings
with
each
council
member
individually
just
to
show
him
the
ordinance
I'll,
give
him
a
copy
of
his
ordinance
and
give
you
that
brief
history
lesson
of
what
he
was
looking
to
do
so
the
article
just
to
give
you
a
heads
up.
D
D
We
have
no
say
once
this
ordinance
is
passed.
They
can
do
what
they
want
to
do.
They
can
hire
a
developer
whatever
it
may
be.
So
just
to
give
you
a
heads
up,
there's
when
you're
reading
this
there's
some
important
parts
that
I'd
like
to
point
out
and
mark
and
nick.
Thank
you.
I
know
the
two
of
you
went
back
and
forth
for
hours
on
in
the
one
thing
that
I
wanted.
I
know
the
ordinance
itself.
D
There
was
some
wording
in
nick's
ordinance
that
I
personally
like
to
see
change.
Before
I
came
back
to
the
council,
I
told
them
to
work
together
and
bring
back
a
well-drafted
ordinance,
so
we're
not
changing
every
little
sentence
and
whatever
it
may
be,
and
I
think
maki
put
about
two
or
three
weeks
into
this
afterwards,
if
not
longer
and
many
visits
from
nick
and
there's
a
couple
of
key
things
that
I
know
I'd
like
to
see.
D
Basically,
on
the
last
page,
it's
actually
letter
d,
in
addition
to
payment
specified
in
2a
designated
developer
and,
as
it
says,
designated
developer
of
properties
receiving
tax
exempt.
So
the
stabilization
shall
donate
an
additional
one
and
a
half
percent
of
the
gross
sale
price
of
such
properties,
distributed
as
followed
westward
senior
center
half
a
percent
westwood
fire
department,
a
half
a
percent
westworld
police
department,
half
a
percent.
D
Then
it
says
in
the
back
any
lump
sum
payment
made
to
the
town
of
west
work
as
a
result
and
conditions
prescribed
in
paragraphs.
A
through
sea
shall
be
deposited
in
a
restricted
account
to
be
utilized
exclusively
for
projects
within
the
development
district
or
to
mitigate
impacts,
resulting
in
our
redevelopment
district
within
one
mile
of
the
district.
D
I
I
think,
one
of
the
reasons
why
I
asked
for
that
to
be
in
there
and
if
you
look
at
some
of
when
you
start
reading
this
proposed
ordinance
there's
times
with
the
towns,
I
get
lump
sum
payments
and
in
2006
I
I'll
use
a
little
history
lesson:
2005,
the
town
council.
Nobody
on
this
council
was
here
sold
the
cell
tower
up
there
on
the
hill.
I
remember
coming
up
to
the
microphone
because
I
was
with
I'm
with
the
communications
company
and
said
you're
crazy
for
selling
that,
at
this
point,
didn't
listen.
D
They
sold
it
for
1.1
million
dollars.
We
as
a
council
came
in
in
2006
and
we
had
some
shortfalls.
What
do
we
do
at
the
1.1?
We
plugged
it
into
the
budget,
so
the
1.1
in
2006
was
spent
like
that.
So
one
of
the
reasons
why
I
say
should
have
a
designated
area
is
a
designated
account
is
because
of
the
fact
that
if
we
start
getting
lump
sums
and
we
stop
plugging
it
into
the
budget,
then
no
matter
who's
up.
Here,
it's
going
to
fail.
D
So
also
one
of
the
other
reasons
is
you
get
a
lump
sum
and
I'll
use
a
property,
we'll
say
we're
getting
three
thousand
dollars
a
year
for
over
20
years
at
60
000.!
Well,
if
you've
got
a
lump
sum
of
60
000
up
front,
that
money
needs
to
be
continued
generating
every
year,
so
it's
gonna
come
out
of
that
fund
to
generate
per
year.
You
don't
wanna,
take
the
whole
60
000
out
in
year,
one
when
it
should
have
been
3
000
per
year
over
20
years.
D
So
that
was
one
of
the
reasons
why
I
wanted
to
see
a
designated
farm.
Other
key
points
mark
you
want
to
go
over
some
of
these
real
quick.
G
D
And
one
thing
that-
and
I
want
to
make
this
clear
too-
and
I
had
a
little
brief
conversation
with
stan
today.
One
thing
that
myself
mark
nick
and
a
few
others
agree
upon
is
when
you're
doing
a
development,
especially
of
a
large
size,
that
you
want
to
have
a
massive
developer
and
that's
only
because
you
say
master
or
massive
massive
master.
Okay,
so
that
way
there
jay
you
don't
come
in
with
a
blue
vinyl-sided
building.
I
come
in
with
a
white
vinyl
side.
D
You
come
in
with
earth
tone,
stones
or,
and
then
you
come
in
with
brick
and
I'll
use,
and
I
and
I
use
ferrucci's
as
an
example,
but
the
town
designated
for
cheese
to
a
certain
style
of
building
that
he
didn't
want
to
put
up
that
style
of
building
and
it
don't
even
fit
there
now,
because
if
you
look
at
cvs,
it's
all
brick
beautiful.
D
You
look
at
centerville
bank,
all
brick
and
water.
In
the
front.
The
john
j
clark
buildings,
all
brick,
then
you
got
a
cinder
block.
Building
sit
man
well
dave.
Let
me
interject.
G
I
don't
think
you
need
to
have
a
massive
developer.
For
that
reason.
We're
actually
trying
to
put
together
standards
that
we'd
like
to
see
in
any
project
within
the
zone
has
to
come
to
us
with
final
approval
and
a
ways
that
we
can
kind
of
impose
our
standards.
We
would
put
our
standards
on
those
buildings,
so
I
don't
know
if
we
really
have
to
master
develop
just
for
that,
but
that's
just
so
you
know:
we've
been
planning
we're
trying
to
get
a
budget
we're
trying
to.
G
You
know
now
trying
to
get
some
college
to
do
these
standards
for
free,
but
I
mean
come
to
the
point
where
we
need
to
have
money
in
the
budget
to
put
those
standards
in
place,
because
if
we
do
have
multiple
developers
coming,
we
want
to
have
those
standards.
So
we
can
say
we
want
to
see.
You
know
stone.
Brick
has
to
be
this:
the
style
of
lighting,
possibly
or
you
know,
village
style.
Just
for
instance,
cvs
went
up
that
project
was
approved
10
years
ago,
roughly
before
this
commission
was
established.
G
So
what
happened
was
they
came
and
we're
going
to
build
a
comment?
We
actually
tried
to
force
them
or
asked
to
request
them.
We
wrote
to
cvs
because
the
boy
had
liked
the
meeting
of
the
developer
to
try
and
go
to
a
more
village
style,
building,
wood,
shingles
or
some
sort
of
not
big
box
style
such
as
the
one
up
in
boston
on
44
there
on
the
corner.
They
didn't
come
here
so
had
this
commission
been
in
effect
at
that
time.
G
H
Would
like
to
make
comment
on
cbs
then,
through
the
work
from
fred
and
some
they
did
the
building
a
little
bit.
Really
yes,
but
you
know
they
got
the
taste.
No,
they
hit
the
windows
on
the
side
of
the
sidewalk.
That
was
not
part
of
the
building
matter.
Of
fact,
I
was
in
there
when
they
opened
up
on
sunday
and
the
store
manager
is
so
happy
to
have
all
that
lighting,
and
I
said
you
can
you
can
thank
the
redevelopment
commission
for
that,
because
they
really
worked
with
them
to
get
just
those
windows.
H
Those
miners
a
little
bit
of
an
impact
on
that-
and
I
agree
with
jim-
has
just
said
we
need
to.
We
need
to
give
unless
we
actually
put
it
in
our
budget
to
do
that
to
get
everything
already,
but
we
should
know,
I
mean
we've
got
anybody
who
comes
in
here.
We
should
be
able
to
say
you
need
to
do
this.
You
can't
do
that
because
we've
got
things
going
on
right
now,
even
at
the
audit
playhouse,
that
we
need
to
sit
down
with
them
because
they
want
to
do
a
lot
of
things.
E
Mr
council,
president,
council
members,
just
briefly
to
review
the
proposed
ordinance
as
it's
presented
this
evening.
This
is
a
somewhat
different
type
of
a
proposal
than
exists.
I
think
anywhere
at
least
in
the
state
of
rhode
island
I'm
aware
of-
and
I
think
mr
cambio
would
agree
with
that,
and
that
he
made
a
proposal
to
the
redevelopment
agency
about
a
year
and
a
half
ago
with
regard
to
what
he
calls
a
pilot
program
and
what
he
means
by
pilot
is
a
payment
in
lieu
of
taxes.
E
E
Take
a
piece
of
property
as
it
exists
today
you
would
determine
the
the
basic
tax
revenue
that
you're
getting
from
that
property
today
and
any
increase
in
value
that
the
develop
would
bring
into
the
town
upon
sale
of
the
property.
The
town
would
get
more
or
less
a
real
estate
commission
of
six
and
a
half
percent.
E
E
Very
unusual
in
that
most
communities
that
have
these
types
of
not
these
types
but
have
tax
stabilization
agreements
usually
do
a
phase
in
of
an
overall
tax
where
any
developer
doing
an
improvement
to
a
property
would
start
at
maybe
a
five
percent
value
and
and
increase
that
up
to
a
hundred
percent
over
a
number
of
years.
The
town
of
westworld
currently
has
a
program
like
that.
That's
it's
a
six-year
plan.
E
I
think
it's
ten
percent
a
year
of
a
phase
in
for
improvements
to
certain
properties
in
certain
areas,
so
this
is
kind
of
a
different
animal.
E
That's
been
developed
by
mr
cambio
and
as
part
of
the
discussion
and
at
the
direction
of
the
council
president,
mr
cambo
came
in
and
spoke
with
me
and,
and
we
went
back
and
forth
on
multiple
occasions,
and
you
know
in
our
discussion
as
as
you
talk
about
scenarios,
I
imagined
a
scenario
where
a
property
could
actually
perhaps
return
less
than
the
value
you
know
over
the
20-year
term,
based
on
increased
property
values,
increased
tax
rates
etc.
E
So,
based
on
that
conversation,
we
came
to
an
understanding
that
it
would
be
the
payment
to
the
town
would
be
the
greater
of,
and
so
that
there,
the
way
that
this
is
designed
today
is
that
any
increase
in
value
or
any
value
that
the
town
will
be
paid
would
be
at
least
125
percent
of
the
existing
value
of
the
existing
revenue
that
the
town
would
get
or
the
6
or
seven
and
a
half
percent
with
the
other.
The
other
factors
calculated
and
whichever
is
greater
again.
E
What
I
believe
mr
cambio
is
looking
for,
and
you
know
he
can
certainly
come
up
and
speak
for
himself-
is
the
adoption
of
this
tax
stabilization
agreement
for
arctic
so
that
he
can
come
in
as
a
developer
start
to
acquire,
improve
market
properties,
sell
those
properties
and
start
to
make
payments
to
the
town
over
time
under
the
agreement,
some
of
the
discussion
that
we
had
back
and
forth
and
we
talk
about
a
designated
developer
and
councilman
gosselin,
mentioned
this
issue
before,
is
that
the
thought
behind
this
from
the
developer
and
and
and
others
is
that
coordinated
development
from
a
designated
developer?
E
In
speaking
with
members
of
the
redevelopment
agency
there
there
are
different.
There
are
different
trains
of
thought
there.
Some
believe
we
should
have
a
a
designated
developer
for
the
whole
district.
Some
think
that
we
should
have
enter
any
developer
who's
coming
in
and
design
our
own
design
standards.
So
that's
that's
kind
of
part
of
our
conversation
that
we're
having
today,
but
for
the
benefit
of
the
council.
Tonight
the
ordinance
is
basically
a
payment
one-time
payment
to
the
town
based
on
sale
of
properties
within
the
district.
E
That
payment
is
to
go
into
a
restricted
account,
as
this
is
structured
so
that
it
doesn't
get
used
as
a
one-time
payment
to
plug
the
budget.
I
think
that,
and
that,
in
a
nutshell,
is,
gives
you
a
brief
overview
of
what
the
ordinance
is
here,
as
it's
presented
this
evening.
D
And
one
of
the
other
concerns
and
how
fred
brought
it
up
to
me-
and
I
think
it's
still
a
kind
of
a
concern
is
the
revenue
stream.
I
know
we
brought
this
up
the
last
time
with
the
previous
council
that
I
think
it
was
one
of
my
big
quirks
was,
if
we're
not
having
revenue
for
20
years.
D
Let's
just
say
at
the
time
we
were
talking
about
a
possible
bulldozer's.
Action
like
taking
whole
blocks
at
a
time
and
starting
fresh.
I
wanted
to
know
where
that
revenue
was
coming
from
at
the
time.
So
no,
if
the
developer
bought
like
I'll
use,
crawford
street,
there's
three
empty
lots
there
in
the
hong
kong,
that's
right,
the
old
jj,
newberry
building
and
the
old
holmes
jewelers
built
so
developer
comes
in
and
buys
all
those
properties
I'm
starting
flies
right.
Boom,
collapses.
Them
down
starts
fresh.
D
D
Well
this
as
of
right
now,
until
the
project
is
complete,
we
still
be
paying
taxes
on
that
property
until
the
project
is
complete
according
to
this
ordinance,
but
the
other
concern
is
in
20
years,
who's
going
to
maintain
that
money
and
how
is
it
going
to
maintain,
which
would
be
the
designated
account,
but
that
would
be
definitely
a
finance
burden
per
se,
because
you
have
to
keep
track
of
what's
what
and
what's
going
on
in
there
at
all
times
so
and
like
mark
said,
there's
easier
ways
out
there.
D
You
know
20-year
tax
freeze
or
a
10-year
tax
freeze,
but
then
you
also
look
at
what
you
can
have
is
like
we
did
with
royal
mills
or
whoever
else
they
come
in
they're,
paying
40
of
their
taxes
and
they
pay
10
each
year
up
to
six
or
10
years.
I
think
royal
mills
was
a
10-year
deal,
not
a
sixth
year,
but
what
did
we
just
do
with
six
year
old?
Was
it
with
rt
noons.
I
Yeah
we
did
one
with
news:
we
did
one
with
camp
bow
wow.
We
did
one
with.
I
D
Some
of
the
questions
that
I
know
from
from
the
board,
which
was
a
little
different
to
me,
was
this-
was
brought.
This
was
somewhat
brought
back
to
us
six
eight
months
ago
from
the
board
to
take
action
on
it,
but
some
feel
that
we
might
not
even
need
this
audience
in
place.
Just
you
know.
If
so,
it's.
H
B
E
Your
question
is
yes,
and
no
at
the
at
the
beginning
of
this
process,
it
was
determined
both
by
the
agency
and
the
town
council
at
the
time
that
enabling
legislation
was
necessary
through
the
state,
to
allow
the
town
council
to
create
a
tax
stabilization
ordinance
for
arctic
in
any
community
in
the
state.
The
state.
Basically,
the
local
community
is
a
creature
of
the
state.
The
state
creates
a
local
community.
The
state
gives
the
local
community
the
power
and
west
warwick
did
not
have
at
that
time.
E
The
authority
to
create
a
tax
stabilization
ordinance
for
arctic.
So
as
part
of
that
negotiated
process
between
the
local
community
in
the
legislature,
the
20
years
became
a
creature
of
that.
I
think
it
did
start
at
25
years
at
one
point
and
then
as
part
of
that
negotiation,
there
was
a
discussion
anywhere
between
five
years
and
25
years.
So
I
think
the
20-year
20-year
number
was
arrived
at
as
part
of
that
negotiation.
E
E
So
that
was
a
negotiated
proposal
and
yes,
it
is
somewhat
arbitrary
in
that
someone
decided
yeah
20
years
is
what
wes
warwick
should
get
that
was
done
at
the
legislature.
So
that's
where
the
20
years
came
from
so
that
20
years.
So
this
isn't
a
number
that
that's
not
a
number
that
we
arrive
at.
That's
a
number
that's
been
dictated
to
us
through
enabling
legislation
from
the
state.
G
If
my
memory
starts
listening,
I
think
it
seems
like
the
towns
that
were
more
that
needed.
More
help
got
more,
so
I
think
central
falls
was
25.
What
was
the
other
one?
One
socket
one
socket.
A
D
I
don't
know
what,
but
one
of
the
things
that
was
brought
up
with
this
audience
is
the
what
types
of
businesses
will
come
in
and
obviously
it'd
be
businesses
with
high
tangible
taxes,
whether
it's
vehicle,
whether
it's
x-ray
machines,
whether
it's
mri
machines
or
anything
like
that,
so
obviously,
medical
fields
and
anybody
who
has
high
tangible
taxes,
would
want
to
move
into
these
areas
because,
let's
face
it,
if
I
can
save
50
60
000
a
year
of
operation,
I'll
probably
move
to
that
area
again,
that's
one
of
the
aspects
of
it
and-
and
I
look
at
it
as
if
you
get
certain
businesses
that
come
in-
and
I
know
I
talked
to
stan
about
this-
you
start
bringing
in
the
medical
facilities,
thunder
mist
and
other
medical
facilities
throughout
that'll
bring
other
businesses
such
as
starbucks,
small
restaurants.
D
Anything
like
that.
That's
that
was
my
look
outlook
at
it.
You
know,
but
you
know
that's
why
I
wanted
it
before
the
council
and
let
the
council
discuss
it
with
with
the
board
and
see
which
way
we
want
to
go.
I'm
not
I
get
mixed
feelings
from
fred,
I'm
not
sure
not
mix
exactly
where
he
well.
D
I
I
can
give
you
in
a
nutshell,
I
mean,
I
think
we
need
an
ordinance
to
give
tools
to
the
redevelopment
authority
to
incentivize
development
and
arctic.
Absolutely
what
I'm
not
for-
and
I
mentioned
this
the
last
time
this
came
before
the
council
is
any
kind
of
exclusive
deal
for
a
single
developer.
I
think
that's
really
bad
business.
I
I've
seen
examples
throughout
the
state
where
that
has
failed
miserably
where
developers
have
then
taken
control
over
a
whole
area
and
even
when
they're
not
doing
anything,
any
other
developer
that
wants
to
come
in
has
to
go
through
them
and
it
becomes
an
a
deterrent
to
development,
and
I
don't
want
to
see
that
and
that
wasn't
the
intent
of
the
proposal.
Initially.
I
D
And
I
think
I
brought
that
up
the
last
time
that
based
and
I
used
a
scenario
of
cvs
versus
friendly
cat.
You
know
if
I
want
to
put
a
cab
stand
back
up
in
the
corner
of
autocare
and
putting
a
20
by
20
building
with
a
barber
shop
on
the
side
and
the
cab
stand.
On
the
other
side,
I
put
up
a
250
000
building,
I'm
getting
the
same
same
tax
incentive
as
cvs
just
put
a
two
million
dollar
builder
over
there.
So
the
question.
I
I've
never
seen
anything
like
the
the
proposal
to
provide
us
a
percentage
of
the
sale
and
it's
it
becomes
something
from
a
budget
standpoint,
it's
very
difficult
and
we
we
are
not
going
to
know
what
we're
going
to
have
to
work
with
until
and
if
the
building
sells.
I
That's
not
a
good
position
to
be
in,
as
you
know,
town
has
to
budget
from
year
to
year
year
and
then
into
the
future.
I
think
it
just
it
makes
it
very
difficult.
So
I'd
much
prefer
a
standard
tax
agreement,
and
I,
when
I
was
planning
director
in
smithfield,
we
did
the
tax
agreement
for
fidelity's
500
000
square
foot
office
edition.
I
We
did
the
tax
deal
for
alexion
biopharmaceuticals.
Those
are
major
deals
and
I've
never
seen
any
kind
of
proposal
like
this.
I
think
it
needs
to
be
more
standardized
and
I
think
it
needs
to
be
less
prescriptive,
where
we
give
the
power
to
the
redevelopment
authority
to
negotiate
those
things
based
upon
what
a
developer
brings
to
them
and
open
it
up
to
any
developer.
Because
that's
the
idea,
because
you
want
variety-
you
want
someone
to
have
the
ability
to
come
in
and
feel
like
all
right.
I
This
is
the
suite
that
I
can
work
within,
and
I
know
that
if
I
have
a
good
project
that
they're
going
to
work
with
me
to
come
up
with
something
that
can
work
to
make
that
project
work.
That's
that's
my
take
on
this.
I
mean
it's.
Obviously
the
council
in
the
redevelopment
authority
can
can
speak
to
to
their
preference,
but
just
having
been
through
this
numerous
times.
I
just
I'm
not
comfortable
with
this
deal,
but
that's
my
position.
I
I
don't
vote,
but
it's
something
that
I
think
that
ultimately,
what
is
best
for
this
town
for
this
downtown,
I
mean
we
have
project
good.
We
had
the
cvs
project
in
stan
mentioned
the
theater.
I
mean
that's
going
to
be
a
1.2
1.4
million
dollar
project.
I
A
Me
put
my
two
cents
in
I've
probably
been
involved
with
this
more
than
anyone
on
this
counter
from
the
planning
board.
I've
been
hearing
the
same
thing
over
and
over
and
over
again
we're
going
to
redevelop
attic
well
guys
nobody's
breaking
the
door
down
to
coming
to
west
walwick.
Let's
face
it,
we
have
an
rfp,
no
contractors
came
into
town
that
were
involved
in
it
that
wanted
to
get
involved
in
it.
There's
no
builders
that
wanted
to
get
involved
in
it
yeah,
mr
cambio,
here
like
them,
dislike
them
different,
indifferent.
A
Whatever
you
want
to
do,
he
came
with
a
plan
16
years
ago.
Attic
would
be
booming
my
opinion
as
a
businessman
right
now.
We
have
nothing,
we're
not
making
any
money
on
attic.
You
got
the
homes
building.
If
that
was
one
of
our
buildings
up
here,
we'd
get
chastised
getting
it
down.
Nobody
about
that
building
the
broken
glass
somebody's
going
to
get
killed
over
there
and
you
know
whose
fault
it
is
and
I'll
testify
on
their
behalf.
The
town
dropped
the
ball
on
that
building.
A
That's
I've
been
bitching
about
that
for
three
years,
four
years
now
the
planning
board
when
they
first
came
up
with
for
it.
Someone
on
the
council
didn't
like
cambio.
So
you
know
what
over
my
dead
body
was
said
right
to
our
faces.
He'll
never
be
developed
the
developer
of
arctic.
Well,
he
didn't
develop
arctic
arctic's.
A
ghost
town
artists
gonna
continue
to
be
a
ghost
town,
because
the
people
are
gonna
say
they
put
in
their
time
they're
trying
to
do
what
they
have
to
do
and
we're
not
giving
them.
A
A
So
you
know
what
I
think,
it's
time
to
pull
the
trigger
or
don't
waste
their
time,
don't
waste.
My
time,
I
don't
want
to
hear
attic
anymore
after
this.
I
don't
want
to
hear
it
because
no
one's
coming
in
here
no
one's
going
to
come
in
here,
they're
moving
out,
we
lost
west
valley,
we
lost
the
villa.
Now
you
lost
the
bank,
there's
three
or
four
other
businesses
moving
out.
They
can't
afford
to
do
business
in
this
town,
whether
you
want
to
hear
it
or
not.
A
I
have
a
104
year
old
business,
I'm
ready
to
lock
the
doors
I
can't
afford
it.
There's
42
businesses
down
my
salvage
yard,
they're,
ready
to
pack
up
my
two
cents,
I'm
just
sick
about
hearing
redevelop
an
arctic
and
we
don't
want
to
give
anybody
a
chance.
Does
it
have
its
cons?
Of
course
it
does.
Does
it
have
its
good
points?
Of
course
it
does,
and
there
are
15
people
over
here
trying
to
get
in
to
build
no.
G
G
Advertised
it
in
this,
in
the
state
portal
we
advertised
in
developers,
mark
can
name
them
he's
real
estate
journal.
B
G
It
that
was
it
so
here's
the
thing.
What
we're
gonna
say
is
whether
you
do
the
specific
yeah.
G
G
So
I
I
think
basically
tonight
we
need
to
come
up
with
something,
whether
not
tonight,
but
if
you
don't
act
on
this
and
you
have
to
tweak
it
or
we
have
to
sit
down
again
and
come
up
with
something,
but
we
need
tools
right
now
we
have
about
you
know
mr
cambio's
heavily
he's
met
with
us
about
three
or
four
times.
G
He
has
shown
a
lot
of
interest,
but
we
have
a
couple
other
developers
that
we
may
want
to
talk
to
at
some
point.
We
want
a
tool,
we
want
a
tool
to
go
to
them
and
say
they're
gonna
say
to
us.
So
what
do
you
have?
We're
gonna
be
like?
Well,
we
have
no,
we
want.
We
want
to
say
we
have
this.
We
want
to
have
something
in
our
hand,
like
you
said
about
the
tangibles
to
come
in.
We
need
something.
G
B
I
add
something
sure
you
know.
I
agree
with
everything
angelo's
saying
as
far
as
like
the
frustration
and
we
need
to
do
something.
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
am
concerned
about
an
exclusive
developer.
That
does
concern
me
to
some
degree,
but
the
other
part
of
it
is
nothing's
happening
so
well.
G
Agree
the
board's
not
asking
for
that
tonight
the
board's
not
asking
for
that
we're
here
to
advocate.
We
need
something.
We
need
a
tool,
whether
this
be
it.
We
can
sit
down
again.
We
can
have
another,
you
know
come
up
with
something
else,
tweak
it
a
little
bit.
Mr
campbell
is
the
one
that
came
forward
with
this
he's.
The
only
one
he's
here
tonight
he's
developed
before.
I
See
you
later
guys
I'd
just
like
to
make
a
comment
quickly
about
the
fact
that
nothing's
been
done
here
for
one?
I
disagree
with
that
cvs
that
development
they've
just
invested
millions
of
dollars
into
that
project
and
they're
looking
at
the
rest
of
that
site
and
in
fact,
they're
looking
across
the
river
that
developer
at
other
possible
areas
that
they
can
develop
as
part
of
that
to
expand
that
whole
process.
I
Centerville
bank
just
invested
tens
of
millions
of
dollars
into
their
block
and
really
improved.
The
way
main
street
is
looking
right
now
with
that
project,
as
as
they
complete
that
and
they're
investing
in
downtown
to
the
point
where
they're
creating
a
whole
new
commercial
and
residential
loan
office
with
more
employees.
That
will
be
here
on
a
daily
basis,
and
now
you
have
arctic
theater
that
just
got
a
300
000
loan
from
the
rhode
island
arts
council
to
redo
the
masters
building.
That's
that's
a
starting
point,
but
they're
gonna,
that's
a
that's!
I
Gonna,
be
a
1.2
1.4
million
dollar
project.
Nothing
happened
before
quite
frankly,
and
I
told
the
council
when
I
was
planner,
because
this
arctic
med
zone
project
was
rolled
out
poorly.
It
wasn't
done
what
didn't
follow
state
law
it
didn't.
It
wasn't
done
in
the
way
that
it
should
have
done
with
respect
to
public
outreach
and
all
the
things
that
had
needed
to
be
done.
We
did
that
now
we
did
an
arctic
redevelopment
strategy.
We
spent
two
years
brought
in
a
boston
consultant.
They
did
the
strategy.
I
We
got
the
approved
redevelopment
area
which
did
not
exist
by
the
way
we
have
a
redevelopment
authority
which
is
sanctioned
by
the
state
that
did
not
exist
before
all
these
tools
are
now
in
place,
and
now
we
are
seeing
action.
The
cvs
wasn't
building
they
weren't
even
going
to
talk
to
us.
They
bought
that
property
and
they
told
me
in
a
meeting
to
block
walgreens.
I
That
was
the
sole
intent,
but
they,
after
working
with
us
and
having
the
redevelopment
authority
in
place,
they
decided
to
come
forward
now
and
move
forward
two
years
ahead
of
schedule
that
building
wasn't
supposed
to
start
till
2018
and
all
the
work
that
centerville
did.
If,
if
arctic
was
a
ghost
town,
centerville
would
not
have
invested
all
the
money
they
just
invested.
They've.
I
Centerville
could
have
done
the
same
thing,
but
they
didn't
they're
very
committed
to
this
town
and
this
downtown
by
the
way,
because
they
gave
the
arctic
playhouse
175
thousand
dollar
grant
of
their
own.
All
I'm
saying
is
that
things
are
moving
now
and
what
I
don't
want
to
do
is
create
a
hindrance
by
putting
something
that
is
going
to
cause
blocks
to
developers
that
want
to
come
in
here,
because
we
are
getting
the
questions
from
developers.
We
are
speaking
with
developers
long
since
that
rfp
went
out.
I
We
probably
need
to
do
that
again,
but
I
just
don't
want
again.
My
issues
with
this
are
the
exclusive
the
exclusivity
and
the
overly
prescriptive
nature
of
it.
I
don't
think
we
should
tell
anybody
what
they
need
to
get.
I
think
we
should
give
them
a
range
in
different
areas.
Give
them
the
tools
to
do
their
job,
sit
down
and
negotiate
with
developers.
If
mr
cambio
wants
to
develop
10
projects
in
town,
that's
awesome,
we
can
go
from
that
range.
That's
here,
negotiate
project
to
project
with
him
and
get
it
done.
I
I
have
no
issue
with
mr
cabio
does
great
developments
his
projects
are
extremely
well
built.
I
have
no
issue
with
that
at
all.
What
I
have
an
issue
with
is
the
way
this
is
done
and
it's
going
to
prevent
other
developers
from
coming
in
and
we're
just
now
getting
to
the
point
where
everything's
in
place
now,
and
it
does
take
years
to
do
it
right,
but
we've
done
it
right.
D
Thing
one
thing
I
want
to
make
clear
and
mock
was
at
the
table
along
with
nick
cambio.
I
want
to
make
it
clear
that
I
want
I
I
don't
care
about
the
developer.
D
D
D
Very
well
written
before
we
went
any
further.
I
didn't
want
the
because
the
initial
ordinance
I
could
tell
you
that
there
would
have
been
a
ton
of
changes,
because
that
was
exclusive
from
the
sounds
of
it.
The
board-
and
I
did
make
that
very
clear
to
nick
in
our
meeting
with
mark
that,
just
because
it
says
designated
developer
or
developers
they
get
to
choose,
not
the
council
they're
the
board
that
decides
who
develops
and
who
who
doesn't?
D
G
D
I
It
depends
on
the
terms
of
the
deal,
but
what
they
did
in
for
the
for
the
train
station
downtown
in
in
warwick
for
the
whole
train
station
development.
They
hired
a
master
developer
and
then
they
kind
of
sat
on
it
for
years
and
when
people
did
finally
come
forward
and
wanted
to
build
things
because
of
the
agreement
that
was
in
place.
Everybody
had
to
go
through
that
developer
and
and
it
stopped
them
from
getting
anything
done.
But.
J
J
About
the
contract,
with
silence
that
ends
up
in
court,
you're
invite
you're
violating
the
contract
clause
of
the
constitution,
so
that
would
be
like
appointing
mark
carullo
as
an
independent,
non-municipal
non-state
entity,
and
he
gets
to
approve
everything.
Now
you
guys
go
in
and
say
we
want
to
put
up
adele's
lemonade.
J
If
you've
got
an
option
for
that
developer
or
the
contractor
that
says
you
can
put
up
red
brick,
you
can
put
up
stone,
you
can
put
up.
I
don't
know
anything
but
vinyl
siding,
usually
you're
going
to
be
successful.
On
that
guy
says.
I
want
to
put
a
final
sighting:
it's
cheaper,
you
guys,
say
you're
a
master
developer
or
your
designated
developer,
no
he's
going
to
follow
the
rules
that
have
been
set
forth,
that
is
outlined
by
the
ordinance
and
the
enabling
legislation.
G
B
G
We
got
you
know
the
theaters
here
we
lost
the
bank,
cbs
moved
from
one
to
the
other.
We
still
have
an
empty
building,
so
our
problem
really
is
proximity
to
the
highway
and
we
have
a
developer
in
town,
guys
developing
properties
right
now
throughout
the
state
it's
got
a
building
up
and
a
road
another
lot
somewhere
else,
another
town
that
it
butts
us,
I
said,
would
you
come
talk
to
us
nope?
Why
not
too
far
from
the
highway
too
far
from
the
highway?
G
J
So,
just
to
reminisce
a
little
bit
nick,
remember
the
meeting
at
the
west
rock
high
school
auditorium,
probably
10
15
years
ago,
about
finding
the
big
boxes.
Yes
work
and
you
stood
up
and
said
see
all
those
properties
I
have
on
route
2.
I
can't
fill
those.
How
do
you
think
you're
going
to
because
it
was
too
far
away
so
we're
still
stuck
in
that
same
cycle,
because
I
think
we
all
recognize
the
fact
that
anytime,
you
compete
or
try
to
bring
somebody
here.
Someone's
gonna
try
to
steal
them
and
put
them
there
right.
D
Well,
I
I
will
tell
you
when
I'll
and
nick
I'm
sorry
I'll,
let
you
speak
in
a
second,
you
know
nick,
and
I
both
have.
We
both
have
this
agreeance,
that
the
retail
market
is
no
longer
the
retail
market.
People
are
shopping
online.
On
amazon.
You
don't
have
to
leave
your
house
anymore.
To
go
grocery
shopping.
Pea
pod
will
drop
it
off
at
your
house,
so
those
big
box
stores
is
not
what
I
want
to
see
here,
because
it's
going
to
be
virtually
important.
I
mean
you're
not
going
to
get
a
macy's.
D
G
That
every
day
stuff
that
you
can
build
around,
you
know
the
theater.
That's
going
in.
You
know
if
you
take
a
look
at
take
a
look
at
downtown,
westerly
and
downtown
east
greenwich
right,
they're,
vibrant
there's
all
small
businesses,
they're
local
people
shop
there
they're
going
to
shop
at
that
place.
People
are
going.
G
D
Now
you
look
at
the
transformation
phoenix
did.
They
were
all
little
mom
and
pop
stores,
candy
stores,
whatever
it
may
be.
Now
every
single
one
is
either
secondhand
antique
whatever
you
want
to
call,
I
want
to
say,
yard,
sale
items,
it's
it's.
Basically
what
this
thoughts
consignments
look.
G
Texas,
village
right
the
little
pet
shop,
they
got.
That's
what
you're
probably
going
to
need.
You
know
that's
what
we
need
to
attract.
We
need
to
direct
some
some
commercial
with
some
residential
mixed
above
and
that's
what
we're
going
to
need.
We
want
people
here
as
well,
so
I
think
that
you
know
commercial
with
residential
above
is
great
because
we
have
the
people
to
supply
the
retail
with
after
hours.
I
mean
central
bank's
all
going
great.
But,
let's
be
honest,
everybody
goes
home
at
four
o'clock.
Well,.
G
B
Cream
cone,
you
can
get
the
dinner,
you
can
go
to
a
show,
because
why
else
would
you
drive
there
right.
G
D
But
if
everybody
remembers
the
50s
and
40s
and
60s
when
it
was
booming,
there
was
a
lot
of
bars,
nightlife
and
alley
life
and
whatever
else
was
going
on
around
here-
and
I
could
tell
you-
my
grandmother
gave
me
a
lot
of
history-
lessons
when
when
she
was
alive
about
arctic,
so
you
know-
and
that's
in
you
know
like
malonsi's-
I
I
I
love
it.
It's
a
great
place
to
eat,
he's
hidden
in
the
back.
If
he
was
on
main
street.
D
I
think
it'd
be
much
better
for
him
and
for
us,
but
you
know,
the
theater,
like
you
said,
is
coming
in
once
you
get
out
of
the
theater
at
nine
o'clock
at
night,
ferrucci's
just
closed
at
eight
or
seven
for
the
bonus
bone
heads,
but
they.
D
D
D
So
I
don't
know
on
here
it
says
designated
developer
now
you
know,
I
don't
know
if
you
should
say
designated
developers,
you're,
not
comfortable
with
the
lump
sum
type
of
agreement.
Nick
did
you
want
to
speak.
K
Nice
sure,
whoever
somewhere
along
the
line,
we've
got
off
track
here.
The
there's
more
things
involved
with
a
developer
designated
developer
developer.
I
deal
with
a
lot
of
developers.
Okay
and
no
one's
coming
to
us
see.
I
totally
disagree
with
france.
Cbs
was
here
they
upgraded
themselves.
The
playoffs
was
a
great
thing,
a
great
thing.
It
can
attract
who's
it
going
to
attract.
K
K
That's
the
key
and
john
hit
on
it.
The
first
of
all,
I
want
to
congratulate
the
three
newcomers
to
the
council
because
they
they
believe
in
themselves.
K
They
a
lot
of
people,
thought
they
wouldn't
go
anywhere
and
they're
here,
the
actual
majority
on
the
council.
Having
said
that,
congratulations,
the
your
designated
developer
can
reach
out.
I
mean
you,
look
at
all.
The
big
stars
are
downsizing
okay,
walmart
home
depot,
so
you
need
somebody
who
can
reach
out
and
pick
up
the
phone
and
you
don't
talk
to
the
outfit.
You
talk
to
a
designated
man
who
handles
different
national
verbs
and
that's
the
guy.
You
want
the
employer
now
you're
worried
about.
K
K
I
I
really
can't
ask
you
the,
but
regardless
of
that
the
however,
legally,
you
have
to
have
someone
in
charge
of
putting
everything
together
coming
up
as
a
master
plan
and
so
forth.
That's
the
guy!
You
want.
K
What
does
he
do?
He
gets.
Let's
use
names
k-mart
with
a
walmart,
don't
want
he
gets
them
interested.
He
brings
them
in.
They
want
to
put
up
something
that
we
would
like.
But
let's
say
they
come
up
with
something
we
don't
like.
The
agency
is
in
charge.
The
developer
isn't
in
charge.
F
K
D
I'll
use
an
example
I
have.
I
have
two
stores
that
are
looking
to
come
into
my
ward,
I'm
not
going
to
share
their
names
right
now,
but
I
have
two
stores
within
a
thousand
feet
of
pop
that
basically
are
coming
into
westwood.
When
people
say.
That's
that's
why,
when
somebody
says
nobody's
coming
to
westworld
develop
there
are
people
coming
it's
just
not
as
fast
as
some
people
want
it
to
be.
Yes,
we'll
find
out
budget
time
how
much
growth
we
got
so
we
can
take
average
taxes,
we'll
we'll
we'll
be
fine
with
that
angel.
D
That's
budget
time,
but
I'm
saying
like
two
on
main
street
two
stores
within
a
thousand
feet
apart
and
I
think
they're
coming
before
zoning
and
planning
within
the
next
month.
I
mean
they're,
very
aggressive
right
now,
and
you
know
but
they're
not
here
in
the
audit
district
but
they're
right
outside
of
on
it.
Timing
is
a
key.
I
mean
you.
K
D
D
Rachel,
can
you
call
grandma,
please
she's,
calling
me
check
check
her
grandma.
Nobody
has
really
tried
to
market
that
area
as
much
as
we
are
trying
to
do.
Avik
right
now,
and
I
agree
with
fred
that
there's
a
lot
of
potential
here
in
anik,
but
maybe
we're
overlooking
a
lot
of
other
potential
areas
in
town
also.
K
D
B
D
J
D
K
Protected
council
protected
the
town's
protected
and
he's
protected.
It's
a
two-way
street.
I
mean
we,
I've
been
working
on
an
article
a
long
time,
but
we
always
get
into
a
snag.
Instead
of
pulling
the
trigger
I'd
like
to
read
you
something
real,
quick,
there's
three
pages
but
it'll
be
very
quick,
and
this
is
what
I
come
up
with.
K
K
We
have
the
tools
and
either
we
are
afraid
to
use
them,
or
we
don't
know
how
opportunity
keeps
passing
us
by.
I
place
the
responsibility
of
the
three
new
councilmen.
They
appeared
to
have
some
vision
the
year
they
ran,
that's
big.
They
had
a
foresight
to
run
to
be
elected
honestly,
one
of
their
goals.
K
We
must
react
and
get
something
going.
These
notes
I
write
to
myself.
By
the
way
we
have
a
successful
developer
willing
to
move
on
eyes.
I
hope
personal
animosities
aren't
involved
in
business.
You
rely
on
other
people's
strengths
and
I
miss
this
opportunity
and
I
always
try
to
work
off
people's
strengths.
K
K
I
have
never
worked
for
cambio
and
I'm
not
sure
if
we
would
get
along
anyway,
the
two
office
buildings
and
he
owns
two
hard
drives
the
shannon's
building
the
owners.
Your
tenants,
you
own
the
car
dealership
you've,
got
a
large
warehouse
in
the
rear
equipment
building
the
only
old
post
office,
I've
just
gotten
into
the
town
a
long
time.
K
K
K
I
was
in
charge
of
that
committee
to
build
a
gazebo.
That's
where
we
didn't
have
enough
money
to
build
a
gazebo.
Just
a
structure.
I
didn't
know
the
guy.
I
want
to
see
him.
I
said
you're
in
town,
I'd
like
you
to
help
us
out
with
the
gazebo.
I
wanted
to
put
up
one
wall
in
the
front
and
all
that
he
came
down.
He
looked
dead,
he
said
I'll,
do
it,
but
you're
gonna
promise
me
one
thing,
and
I
said
what
was
that
he
said
you
don't
bother
me.
K
K
I
think
that's
a
good
person
in
town,
the
attic
village,
revitalization
legislation,
his
attorneys.
K
The
agency
did
everything
right
by
the
way,
getting
the
legislation
and
so
forth
and
by
the
way
the
legislation
was
passed
last
night,
12
minutes
after
midnight.
I
want
to
thank
adam
satchel
he's
the
one
that
passed
it,
but
adam
sanchez
was
the
one
that
got
it
going
because
we
couldn't
get
it
going
through
the
house.
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Hit
some
areas
that
I'll
be
honestly,
I
never.
I
haven't
thought
about.
K
C
The
two
is
the
tax
stabilization
agreement
for
20
years
is:
what's
going
to
attract
businesses
to
overcome
the
needs
of
getting
in
here
right
now,
they're
going
to
get
the
benefit
of
no
taxes
for
20
years,
no
tangible
taxes
for
20
years;
no
effort
for
need
for
20
years
and
no
motor
vehicle
excise
tax
for
20
years.
Not
me
the
tenant.
C
C
The
first
thing
I'm
going
to
do
is
solicit
with
the
tools,
the
tool
being
the
tax
stabilization
agreement
right
tenants
who
am
I
going
to
solicit
office,
retail
service
businesses
and
residential
to
bring
in
a
higher
demographic
right?
So
that's
the
tool
that's
going
to
attract
people.
I,
on
the
other
hand,
have
agreed
to
pay
the
taxes
on
the
property
from
the
day
I
buy
it
to
the
day
I
get
a
co
and
either
sell
it
or
lease
it.
C
C
C
C
Just
as
an
example,
you
got
the
artic
mill
right
around
the
corner
that
town
that
property's
paying
the
town
fifty
thousand
a
year.
Twenty
years,
the
town
gets
a
million
dollars
my
goal.
If
I
were
to
be
able
to
purchase
it,
then
come
in
and
get
a
building
prevent
and
get
it
approved
and
make
sure
the
zoning
and
everything's
correct
build
condominium
development.
C
Would
the
town
rather
get
45
million
over
three
to
five
years
or
a
million
over
20.?
I
think
that's
a
simple
answer
right,
but
this
isn't
going
to
happen
overnight.
This
could
take
years
and
years
and
years
first,
I
have
to
buy
the
property
if
someone
don't
want
to
sell
it.
The
last
thing
I
want-
and
I
don't
want
to
get
involved
in
the
time
taking
it
by
a
minute,
don't
make.
I
don't
want
that
right.
C
A
designated
developer
with
a
staff
possessing
the
skills
and
experience
in
real
estate
development,
including,
but
not
limited
to
tenant,
x
and
land,
uses,
destroy
preservation
around
the
department
of
environmental
management
and
wetlands
guidelines,
signage
control
and
traffic
patterns
and
float
is
necessary
to
harm
redevelopment
right.
Let's
see
what
you
started,
I
want
to
be
a
designated
developer
right
and
once
I
get
designated,
I
gotta
go
and
buy
the
problem.
C
C
First
you're
going
to
buy
it
right,
then
I
got
to
go
and
what
I
plan
to
do
if
the
town
is
available
is
to
designate
the
post
office
under
the
tax
stabilization
and
maybe
have
the
time
agreed.
Let
me
buy
one
other
property,
okay
and
then
go
test
tomorrow.
The
market
dictates
demand.
C
What
I'm
going
to
use
for
two
is
the
tax
stabilization
in
20
years.
It's
without
that
tool.
You
know
what
I'm
going
to
attract
ghosts
right,
no
tax
treaties,
no
10
right.
I've
done
this.
I
know
my
way
around
right,
for
example,
on
route
2
right.
The
development
I
built
walmart
because
of
amazon
closed
a
bunch
of
walmarts
and
they
closed
four
seams
and
one
of
them
that
they
closed
was
the
one
I
root,
two
cn
spent
12
million
dollars
and
then
a
year
later
they
closed
it
down
now.
C
Luckily,
I
know
what
I'm
doing
right.
So
the
gentleman
that
I
sold
the
building
to
I
got
a
new
tenant.
The
tenant
is
at
home
yeah.
If
you
go
by
there
right
now,
they're
rebuilding
the
building
right,
that's
one
of
the
few
developments.
That's
got
100
occupancy
zero
vacancy
100
percent
occupancy
right.
C
I
think
and
speak
for
myself
right,
you're
saying
that
my
developments
are
well
designed
right
and
I
take
very,
very
close
thought
into
techniques
who
the
tenants
are
right.
So
if
the
council
audit
gives
me
the
tool
to
work
with,
then
I'm
going
to
go
out
to
the
brokerage
community,
I.e
atlantic
retail
province,
they
represent
over
a
hundred
major
national
tenants,
dominant
properties.
They
represent
national
tenants.
I
have
good
relationship
with
the
whole
brochure
community
in
the
northeast
and
in
the
country
right.
C
So
once
I
get
the
stack
stabilization
in
place
on
the
post
office
and
maybe
another
piece
of
property,
I'm
going
to
go
out
soliciting
the
tenant
community,
then
we'll
know
what
the
demand
is.
Once
we
know
what
the
demand
is,
then
we
want
to
go
to
the
agency
and
say:
look
we
want
to
develop
a
nice
good.
I
like
a
village
type.
Look,
hopefully
they
will
too
don't
like
cinder
blocks.
I
like
cobblestones,
I
don't
like
vinyl
society.
I
like
natural
wood
right
and
hopefully
so
will
the
top
right.
C
C
So
after
numerous
reiterations
of
this
ordinance
with
mr
cruz,
I'm
okay
with
it,
if
you
like
it,
pass
it.
I'm
okay
and
I
like
the
last
paragraph-
I
I
think
it
was
a
genius
part
of
your
move
to
ask
him.
C
C
C
B
I
I
B
D
F
Before
you
go,
I
just
want
to
ask
the
problem
I
would
have
with
having
a
designated
developer
is
once
once
you
put
the
first
nail
to
the
wood.
Correct
me.
If
I'm
wrong,
that's
when
the
med
zone,
like
the
clock,
starts
running
correct.
F
H
I
H
I
D
D
D
I
I
Take
out
the
specificity,
give
it
a
range
so
that
mr
cambio
can
accomplish
everything
he's
asking
for
here
and
then
sit
down
with
the
redevelopment
agency
and
negotiate
a
contract.
That's
when
you
get
specific
in
the
contract
and
you
come
in.
You
say:
I've
got
the
rights
on
this
property.
I've
got
the
rights
on
that
property.
This
is
what
I
want
and
they
negotiate
that
with
you.
They
sign
that
contract
and
you're
off
and
running,
and
if,
in
the
meantime
you
go,
this
is
going
to
go.
I
I'm
going
to
go,
get
those
two
properties
too,
and
you
come
back
to
them
and
you
work
out
a
similar
agreement
based
upon,
but
the
ordinance
needs
to
be
general
enough
so
that,
if
he
comes
in
the
next
time
wants
to
tweak
it
some
they
have
that
flexibility
without
coming
back
and
if
somebody
else
comes
in
across
town
and
says,
look
I
just
want
to
tear
down
the
homes
building
and
put
something
up.
I
want
something
in
this
range.
I
don't
want
everything
he's
got
so.
I
B
D
I
want
west
warwick
to
flourish,
but
if
it's
not
gonna,
if
this
is
something
that
we
pass
and
it
doesn't
work
and
it's
a
failure
after
that
we'll
know
we'll
know
you
know
and
let's
face
it,
the
post
office
has
been
vacant
for
what
15
years
now
10
15
years,
a
little.
D
It's
probably
due
to
be
developed,
and
you
know
I've
been
in
other
properties
of
yours
on
quaker
lane
that
I
see
what
your
vision
is
there
and
I
think
it's
going
to
work
very
well
over
there
and
you
know,
and
if
that's
the
vision
you
have
over
here,
that's
the
vision
but
I'd
like
to
see
see
it
working
before
we
say:
okay,
we're
going
to
designate
one
person
for
every
project
and
we
only
and
we
have
two
failed
projects.
Why.
D
I
Believe
an
ordinance
should
be
a
development
agreement,
which
is
what
this
is
moving
towards.
A
development
agreement
should
be
a
development
agreement.
An
ordinance
should
give
the
authority
the
powers
they
need
to
create
the
development
agreement
that
mr
cambio
is
asking
for.
So
that
gives
generalized
ranges
and
tools
that
they
can
utilize
to
make
the
agreement
that
he
needs
to
make
happen
and
or
less
if,
if
the
development's
smaller.
J
Well,
let
me
do
you
want
to
be
in
havoc
centric
to
the
developer
or
retrocentric
to
the
property,
because
if
a
property
comes
in
that
you
don't
want
to
develop,
let's
say
if
another
developer
came
in
and
said
he
wants
to
develop,
but
under
the
guidelines
set
forth
by
you
guys
with
your.
I
Plan
development
would
that
developer
be
prohibited
from
doing
it.
That's
what
I'm
asking.
I
don't
think
you
should
that's
what
I
mean.
That's
what
you're
saying
so,
instead
of
being
designated
developer,
he
does
everything
he'd
be
able
to
do
it
by
properties
by
project
right.
So
it's
either
it's
extra
centered
to
the
property
not
to
the
developer,
but
if
you
make
the
ordinance
general
enough
as
many
projects
as
he
wants
to
bring
forward,
he
can
bring
forward.
They've
got
the
tools
to
negotiate.
It
could
be
the
same
deal
every
time.
Anyone
else.
B
B
F
B
A
C
If
I
may,
what
you
would
want,
or
should
want,
is
to
have
the
developer
paid
for
and
be
responsible
for
sewer
improvement,
water
improvement
and
traffic
tool.
What
you
don't
want
right
is
for
me
to
get
tax
stabilization
agreement
eight
times
six
and
a
half
percent
or
seven
and
a
half
percent,
and
then
the
town
surgery
on
it
spends
it
for
infrastructure
right
tom
wants
to
make
money
right.
That's
that's,
first
and
foremost,
foremost,
is
to
rebuild
a
town
and
not
lose
money
in
the
process,
but
make
money
right.
C
So
that's
why
you
need
someone
right
that
can
say.
Look
we're
going
to
turn
this
here
into
residential
this
area,
to
retail,
that
area
into
office
and
we're
going
to
need.
You
know
this
much
additional
sewer
floor,
this
much
additional
water
body,
more
we're
going
to
have
to
take
care
of
this
much
more
drainage,
imperviously,
every
impervious
area,
all
that
stuff
right.
C
If
you
have
10
different
guys
doing
it,
you're
going
to
have
a
mess
right,
my
goal
is
to
have
the
town
run,
the
show,
but
not
have
the
town
cross
court
not
have
the
time
to
spend
money
have
to
develop
me
or
someone
else,
but
there's
a
whole
lot
of
people
that
right
aren't
going
to
want
to
take
the
time.
The
effort
and
the.
I
I
believe
there's
there
has
to
be
an
ordinance.
What
type
of
an
ordinance
that
gives
like
I
was
stating
before
gives
them
a
range
of
tools
up
to
the
extent
that
mr
cambio
is
asking
for,
so
that
they
can
have
the
authority
to
do
that,
but
also
so
they
could
go
less
because
right
now
this
says
developer
comes
in,
and
this
is
what
they're
going
to
get.
That's,
not
a
good
position
to
put
them
in,
because
now
they've
got
to
give
it
to
every
developer,
or
in
this
case,
to
every
project.
I
If
they
pick
one
developer,
every
project
is
going
to
get
the
same
deal.
It
should
be
something
that
they
get
to
negotiate
based
upon
the
investment
that's
being
made
upon
the
value,
that's
being
created
to
say,
yeah,
we're
going
to
go
to
the
max
on
this
one,
because
this
is
an
important
deal
and
I'm
fine
with
for
the
first
one
or
two
to
show
that
this
works.
I
But
there's
got
to
be
a
point
where
they've
got
to
have
the
ability
to
look
at
what's
happening
and
and
make
adjustments
along
the
way,
whereas
the
way
this
is
set
up,
it's
one
size
fits
all
or
one
size
fits
one
in
this
case,
and
I
just
think
you
need
more
flexibility.
That's
why
we
created
a
redevelopment
authority
so
that
they
we
had
somebody
that's
able
to
vet
these
projects
as
they
come
in,
and
these
are
open
meetings
and
anybody
can
come.
I
You
know
and
and
state
their
case
and
and
talk
about
the
projects.
So
I
mean
so
that's
my
point
I
just
wanted.
I
would
like
to
see,
I
think
it
makes
more
I'd,
be
interested
in
hearing
from
the
authority
as
well
more
on
that
and
what
they're
really
looking
for,
because
what
we
had
discussed
early
on
is
not
what
this
is.
C
C
F
F
C
C
I
own
the
post
office
and
no,
I
I
do
not
own
anything
else
within
the
zone,
I'll
go
out
and
find
a
piece
right
that
you're
happy
with
right.
I'll
have
the
town
say?
Yes,
we
like
the
piece
that
you're
looking
at
or
no
we
don't
right
now,
post
office
is
absolutely
one
right.
All
I'm
saying
is
give
me
two
right,
one
for
sure
and
one
that
you
will
approve
player.
C
J
D
I
D
J
Draft
an
ordinance,
a
law
for
one
person.
Well,
that's
why
I'm
asking
it
has
to
be
an
agreement.
That's
a
development
agreement,
development
agreement,
I've
been
saying
mr
cambio
already
owns
the
property
and
it's
the
property
that
he's
going
to
obtain
it's
his
it's
already
his
property.
So,
instead
of
coming
to
the
town
saying,
I
want
a
tax
stabilization
agreement
where
I'm
not
going
to
pay
taxes
or
100
percent
of
taxes
for
the
first
year,
two
years,
three
years
he's
offered
up
something
different,
so
you
can't
make
it
an
ordinance.
C
A
H
We
actually
there's
two
points.
There's
two
things
there's
two
phases.
The
first
thing
is
what
jim
asked
us
asked
initially
is
we
want
an
ordinance
to
give
us
a
tool
to
talk
to
developers,
in
addition
to
all
the
other
things
that
we
have
in
a
little
box,
we
we
actually
offered
to
mr
cambio
several
times.
Do
you
want
this
plan?
If
you
want
to
make
it
specific
to
the
post
office,
bring
it
to
us
and
we'll
bring
it
to
the
council?
H
We
already
had
that
on
the
table
with
him
we
didn't
have
to
you
didn't
have
to
do
all
of
this.
It
was
already
on
the
table.
We
already
offered
it
to
him.
You
want
to
do
specifically
one
or
two
things.
We
will
want
to
take
that
to
you
and
say
yes,
see
what
you
can
do
with
it.
The
thing
that
we're
asking
for
here
tonight
is
what
jim
said
earlier,
which
is
separate
to
this
is
we
need
an
ordinance
and
the
one
that
we
gave
up
to
you.
H
I
don't
know
two
months
ago
or
three
months
ago,
before
the
election
that
that
gave
us
the
flexibility
that
fred
was
talking
about.
It
gave
us
a
range
from
10
to
20
years.
We
had
our.
We
freeze
the
appraisal
on
the
on
the
property
once
the
development
started.
It
was
a
little
bit.
It's
quite
a
bit
different
than
this.
This
is
very
different,
but
we
did
give
him
an
opportunity.
D
D
J
Can
I
make
a
suggestion
about
the
ordnance
part
of
it
the
second
meeting
in
february?
I
would
give
everyone
enough
time.
Joe
shakati
is
still
your
attorney.
All
right
sit
down
with
him
fred
me.
Anybody
else
work
that
stuff
out
present
it
to
the
council.
Let
the
council,
if
they're,
satisfied,
pass
it
in
addition
to
that
there
would
be
a
separate
agreement
either
through
the
attic
redevelopment
or
the
town
for
mr
cambio
for
properties
that
he
already
owns
and
enjoy.
J
J
D
D
B
I
B
B
D
D
So,
basically
we're
going
to
congratulations
too.
By
the
way
the
tool
has
pretty
much
already
drawn
up
that
right,
we're
just
going
to
tweak
it
up
a
little
bit.
We
can
work
on
that.
D
J
D
I
I
think,
I
think
what
a
lot
of
people
were
concerned
with
was
a
new
console
came
on
and
it
went
dormant
and
nobody
was
talking
about
it.
So
it
was
brought
back
to
light
by
mr
cambio,
mr
boyer
and
some
individuals
on
the
board.
So
that's
that's
one
of
the
things
and
that's
why
it's
here
before
us
tonight.