►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
B
A
D
D
Your
topic
requests
are
to
be
submitted
to
management
council
by
the
close
of
session,
which
would
be
april.
7Th
council
will
be
meeting
on.
D
I
believe
it's
april
14th
16th,
to
consider
that's
correct
friday
april
16th
to
consider
and
approve
their
interim
topics.
The
topic
direction
are
to
be
reasonable,
as
it
relates
to
committee
and
staff
time
to
be
described
with
specificity.
In
order
to
provide
clear
direction,
it
can
include
a
continuation
of
a
priority
from
the
2020
session,
but
should
not
be
redundant
and
it
should
be
unique
and
not
duplicative
of
other
committee
requests
at
the
april.
D
D
If
you
decide
to
identify
a
tentative
schedule,
you
may
wish
to
include
whether
or
not
you
wish
to
identify
a
location
of
the
meeting
or
whether
you
want
to
continue
the
use
of
remote
or
hybrid
meetings,
and
it's
also
encouraged
that
you
schedule
to
the
extent
possible
your
meetings
at
least
six
weeks
apart,
and
we
are
prepared
to
even
tentatively
schedule.
The
december
and
january
meetings
for
budget
hearings
that
you
so
desire.
D
With
that,
mr
chairman,
I
think
you
all
have
a
handout
which
provides
submissions
from
members
of
the
public
interested
parties
and
primarily
individual
legislators.
This
document
is
about
six
pages
long.
I
believe
there
are
10
identified
proposed
interim
topics,
although
I
would
ident
suggest
that
four
of
them
are
really
duplicative,
so
that
would
leave
eight
unique
topics.
A
Okay,
mr
coach,
here,
do
you
just
want
to
walk
through
these
and
then
prioritize.
D
Mr
chairman
item
number
one
on
the
top
of
page
one:
this
was
an
outgrowth
of
the
budget
discussions
back
in
december
of
2020..
There
are
two
components
here:
the
use
of
unfunded
leave
liabilities
or
how
to
pay
for
accumulated
liability
of
sick
leave
and
vacation
leave.
I
think
this
topic
was
specific
to
small
agencies
that
had
a
significant
number
of
retirements.
D
There
was
a
an
additional
topic
related
to
leave,
and
that
was
the
use
of
expenditure
savings.
This
is
a
separate
and
distinct
topic.
The
use
of
vacancy
savings
to
provide
funding
for
other
personnel
enhanced
or
increased
compensation,
or
the
like.
Both
of
these
came
out
of
the
december
budget
discussions.
D
F
Is
that
broad
enough,
I'm
assuming
it
does
when
we
talk
about
benefits,
costs
and
structure
and
explore
coordinating
investment
efforts?
Would
that
also
include
review
of
investment
pay
and
how
that
how
that,
maybe,
you
know
at
least
a
review
of
how
that's
worked
and
how
that's
worked
in
the
last
year
or
so?
I
think
they've
had
a
couple
pretty
good
years,
where
they
may
have
triggered
that
and
just
see
how
it
worked.
D
And
I've
noted
that
we
can
add
that
to
the
to
the
description,
are
you
also
bringing
up
a
good
point
that
report
on
performance
compensation
for
both
the
treasurer's
office
and
the
retirement
center
retirement
system
are
directed
to
the
select
committee
on
on
cap
finance
as.
G
Well,
I'm
just
wondering
if
it
would
be
appropriate
to
include
consideration
of
the
fire
a
fund
in
this
topic.
A
F
H
Mr
coach
here
go
ahead,
so
jac
is
the
home
committee
for
the
retirement
system.
Is
that
correct.
A
D
Next,
mr
chairman
item
number
three
appears
at
the
top
of
page
two.
This
interim
topic
is
related
to
post-secondary
education.
Governance
you'll
recall
that
section
337
of
the
2020
budget
bill
directed
a
study
and
provided
no
funding
for
the
university
of
wyoming
governance
study.
D
Technically,
the
joint
education
committee
was
charged
with
overseeing
that
study.
I
will
mention
that
the
research
division,
I
believe,
has
prepared
five
different
white
papers
related
to
the
uw
current
governance
and
competitors
with
other
states.
Over
the
last
year
there
has
been
no
consultant
hired
to.
H
D
Mr
chairman
item
number
four:
is
the
continued
study
of
ets
or
enterprise
technology
services
at
your
january
and
february
meetings,
you
did
direct
ets
with
a
fairly
extensive
task
list
from
the
barry
dunn
report,
as
well
as
expected
reports
over
the
interim
from
ets.
D
System
item
number
five
appears
at
the
top
of
page
three
and
I
might
suggest
that
if
it
appears
to
staff
that
this
is
identical
to
the
last
item
on
page
six,
so
a
submission
by
representative,
stiff
and
representative
nicholas
these
both
appear
to
relate
to
pre-qualifications
and
specifically
senate
file.
D
Six
from
this
session,
which
was
not
recommended
favorably
from
the
house
appropriations
committee
last
week,.
A
So
our
thoughts
on
that
is,
we
would
form
a
kind
of
a
working
group
committee
composed
of
representative
larson
and
whoever
wants
to
do
it
on
the
senate
side
and
stiff
and
kind
of
rework
it
like.
We
did
the
contracting
bill
from
last
year.
They
just
put
a
lot
of
work
into
it,
and
so
that's
our
thought
on
that.
One.
Okay!
Next.
D
Item
number:
six
in
the
middle
of
page
three
relates
to
the
american
rescue
plan,
act,
funds
and
the
expectation
for
a
potential
special
session
this
summer
and
jac,
potentially
being
tasked
by
management
council
to
take
the
lead
or
at
least
be
involved
in
the
initial
preparation
for
the
legislation
for
that
session.
A
And
so,
coming
from
what
I
understand,
this
will
be
a
job
that
we're
going
to
probably
start
on
in
april
in
order
to
develop
the
mechanism
in
the
framework
for
the
special
session
whenever
that
occurs
late
june
or
mid-july.
J
A
D
Next,
the
next
item
on
the
bottom
of
page
three
is
not
a
suggested
topic.
As
I
understand
it,
it's
a
request
for
funding
only
specifically
that
daily
pay
and
per
diem
for
jac
members
to
attend
the
state
treasurer's
conference.
This
conference
typically
occurs
in
the
last
week
of
august,
potentially
the
first
week
of
september.
D
D
A
D
Next,
at
the
bottom
of
page,
four
item
number
eight
appears
to
be
some
continuation
of
the
community
college
task
force
and
would
look
at
sustainability
of
the
funding
model
for
community
colleges,
including
mechanisms
to
generate
additional
revenue
through
statewide
mill
levy.
A
A
Topics,
and
on
the
last
one
on
sf121,
is
that
my
question
larry.
Is
that
something
that
cap
finn
will
do
or
do
you
want
to
work
in
tandem
with
captain.
A
A
H
Hb
244,
I
believe,
has
it-
has
we've
asked
the
investment
funds
committee
to
look
at
the
treasures
office
operations
and
make
some
recommendations.
Do
you
anticipate
that
we'll
be
receiving
interim
updates
or
just
a
report?
At
the
end.
A
So
on
the
house
yeah,
that's
correct!
Even
the
bill
directs
it
at
cat
finn
and
what's
what's
anticipated,
I
think
we
strengthen
the
language.
A
little
bit
is
that
cap
finn
will
once
again
begin
almost
immediately
meet
with
the
ifc
and
kind
of
and
with
the
treasurer's
office,
to
kind
of
form
the
game
plan.
If
you
will
on
how
we
move
down
that
road,
okay,.
H
So
then,
mr
co-chair,
the
next
question
is
you
would,
I
think,
dawn
had
proposed
as
one
of
the
items
for
us
to
consider
whether
we're
going
to
be
meeting
in
person
or,
and
might
I
suggest
that,
between
the
amount
of
time
we'll
spend
here
during
budget
prep
and
the
special
session,
and
given
that
we're
going
to
have
a
load
for
cap
fin
and
appropriations,
that
virtual
might
be
a
the
preferred
option.
I
know
it
would
be
for
me
with,
with
some
exceptions
we
might
have
a
bit
of
in
person
here
and
there,
but
I'd
my.
A
A
L
Mr
chairman,
good
morning,
members
of
the
committee,
my
name,
is
aaron
taylor
and
the
executive
director
of
the
wyoming
association
of
community
college
trustees
and
no
surprise
that
I
wanted
to
be
here
today
to
talk
to
you.
You
know
we
did
submit
and
expecting.
We
would
probably
see
something
on
your
interim,
I'm
I'm
hearing.
There
might
be
something
suggested
in
the
joint
education
committee,
so
it
would
likely
be
up
to
management
council
to
decide
where
something
might
go.
L
Here's
some
some
thoughts
from
from
my
association,
sustainable
funding
is
our
top
priority.
It
and
I
think
everyone
here
knows
that
it
was.
I
feel,
like
the
senators,
are,
await
long
ways
away.
I
can't
see
all
of
you
through
all
of
this.
So
I'm
sorry,
I'm
looking
weird.
H
If
I
appear
distorted,
it's
considered
a
blessing.
L
L
Obviously
we
didn't
have
an
outcome
that
that
that
gave
us
a
vehicle
to
have
the
conversation
in
front
of
the
full
bodies
this
this
session.
So
I'm
not
sure
whatever
the
want
might
be
in
terms
of
a
select
committee.
There
might
be
some
benefit
to
having
it
be
discussed
in
front
of
a
full
committee
standing
committee.
L
So
that
might
be
something
I'd
ask
folks
to
consider,
and
maybe
that's
a
management
council
decision,
I'm
not
sure,
but
sustainable
funding
is
certainly
still
our
top
priority
and
making
sure
that
those
counties
that
are
receiving
services
from
the
community
colleges
in
some
way
are
are
contributing,
and
so
I
would,
I
would
suggest
that
maybe
it's
not
an
open-ended.
L
L
What
is
governance?
It's
a
mess,
they're
disorganized.
We
need
something
different.
We
need
a
change.
What
does
all
of
that
mean,
and
I
would
challenge
you
all
here
to
really
think
about
heart
about
that,
if
you
put
down
governance
for
the
community
colleges,
what
does
that
mean?
What
are
you
trying
to
get
at?
Because
what
that
does
is
really
open
it
up
for
anything
to
come
in
there
we
have
a
good
system.
L
L
If
you're
looking
for
something
else,
I'd
suggest
it
to
be
very
structured,
narrowly
defined,
so
that
there
is
something
that
people
understand
what
we're
trying
to
get
at,
rather
than
something
being
so
open.
Now,
I'm
not
suggesting
we
don't
want
a
different
governance
structure.
We
have
one
of
the
best
and
rated
number
one
in
the
country
in
terms
of
how
we
operate
as
a
community
college
system.
L
L
I
think
I
would
also
recommend-
and-
and
you
can
take
it
for.
However,
you
want
to
some
of
the
things
that
we
have
talked
about
before
this
committee.
If
you
look
at
what
we
refer
to
fondly
as
house
bill
80,
it's
the
funding
mechanism
and
the
statutes
on
how
the
alec
appropriations
are
given
out
in
our
funding
model.
There
are
some
things
within
that
that
that
I
think
are
worth
looking
at,
and
we've
talked
about
that.
L
I
do
know
dr
caldwell's
with
me
here
today
and
she
can
provide
more
information
if
you
have
questions,
but
I
just
really
ask
you
to
think
be
thoughtful
about
what
this
looks
like
on
the
agenda
for
an
interim
narrowly
defining
what
what
is
it
that
you
want,
so
it's
just
not
a
free-for-all
and
then
ends
up
with
a
result
that
that
wasn't
what
you
sought
out
to
to
get
in
the
first
place,
which
is
what
happened
this
last
year
with
that
select
committee.
L
So
with
that,
mr
chairman,
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
and
again
dr
caldwell's
here,
if
you
have
specific
questions
that
she
can
answer
better
than
myself.
Thank
you.
J
Chairman,
it's
it's
my
recollection.
The
last
time
management
council
met,
I
think,
we've
had
this
discussion.
Management
council
has
has
continued,
that
select
committee
on
community
college
finance
and
it
was
the
intent
that
that
would
continue
to
work
all
the
way
through
this
interim
that
committee
is
currently
constituted.
There
are
some
members
that
have
gone
off
that
will
have
to
be
replaced,
but
that's
my
recollection
from
our
last
management
council
meeting
that
that
committee
is
still
in
place
and
will
continue
to
work
through
the
interim.
J
I'm
just
wondering,
if
maybe
my
recollection
is
wrong,
but
that's
my
understanding.
It
was
to
continue
that
work
for
another
year
on
that
funding,
and
there
was
some
other
language
in
there.
We
may
want
to
look
at
just
the
language
of
that
if
there's
something
because
it
did
include
some
of
the
governance
structure-
and
I
can't
remember
verbatim
the
language
in
here
but
part
of
what
was
funding
part
of
it
was-
was
governance
structure
within
that
charter
of
that,
but
I
think
we're
we're
we're
on
course
to
do
that.
J
L
Mr
chairman,
senator
hicks,
I
think
we'd
really
encourage
that
committee.
If
that's
the
the
preferred
vehicle
to
really
keep
the
focus.
You
know
we
didn't
have
a
vehicle
this
session
to
talk
about
that
on
in
the
bodies.
L
The
closest
conversation
that's
being
had
is
on
senate
file,
83
on
the
gillette
college
district,
and
that's
truly
just
about
gillette
college.
Although
we're
hearing
all
these
other
things
coming
in,
so
we
didn't
have
even
a
vehicle
this
session.
So
if,
if
that's
the
case,
yes,
please
continue
that
work.
C
Mr
chairman,
so
my
question
then,
is:
if,
if
that
that
select
committee
is
going
to
continue
the
work,
who
are
they
do
they
report
back,
to
whom,
mr
chairman
management,
counselor
to
a
committee
management
council?
Basically
I
so
so
I
thought
last
year
that
the
the
intent
of
that
committee
was
to
come
back
with
some
kind
of
recommendation
this
year,
and
it
really
did
seem
like
we
did
just
focus
on
a
new
community
college
district.
C
I
was
really
hoping
personally
that
we
would
approach
the
the
issue
that
comes
before
this
committee
every
year
and
we
go
through
the
budget
and
that's
funded
for
community
colleges,
which
we
know
is
is
wonky,
and
so
you
for
I.
I
really
would
like
to
see
this
committee
more
involved
and
try
to
get
something
moved
down
the
road
in
trying
to
correct
the
funding
formula
to
where
it
falls
more
in
line
nationally
and
and
meets
the
needs
of
this.
I
I
just
think
that
we
got.
G
H
H
Maybe
standing
committee
chairs,
when,
when
their
agencies
are
up
or
even
just
general
members,
that
it's
not
a
real,
well-defined
idea,
but
it
helps
I
think,
when
people
can
see
the
markup,
they
can
see
the
big
books
which
you
can't
do
on
zoom
and
they
can
be
here
in
the
room
on
breaks,
ask
various
members
of
jc
questions
or
staff,
so
they
get
a
little
bit
of
exposure.
H
Initially,
my
concern
was
with
you
know,
people
that
think
they
might
want
to
be
on
appropriations
at
some
point.
Sometimes,
when
you
see
sometimes
when
you
see
the
books-
and
you
see
the
process
that
dampens
the
appetite-
sometimes
it
would
sharpen
it
up.
H
H
For
you
know,
maybe
a
couple
of
days,
maybe
more
just
so
that
folks
can
rotate
through
and
get
a
little
bit
better
exposure
to
it,
and
this
also
helps
us
try
to
develop
a
bench
and
I'll
I'll
defer
to
senator
hicks
to
maybe
flesh
out
his
take
on
the
idea.
J
Yeah,
mr
chairman,
I
think
my
colleague
did
a
good
job
on
that.
I
think
it's
as
we
continue
to
struggle
with
budgets
and
federal
dollars
and
stuff
the
more
people
that
we
understand
the
issues
that
we
as
a
committee
grapple
with,
particularly
the
committee
chairs
that
can
take
that
message
back
to
the
body.
I
think
that
strengthens
the
legislature
as
a
whole.
J
A
F
Mean
to
look
at
markup
unless
you
participated
in
the
budget
discussion
for
the
agency.
Markup
is
like
how
do
they
do
that?
I
mean
I
mean
you
look
at
markup
itself.
It
goes
so
fast
so
unless
you've
been
involved
in
the
prior
discussion,
but
but
you
know,
I
think
the
point
is
you
know
it.
You
know,
may.
F
A
J
Well,
at
that,
at
this
point
in
time,
we're
just
saying
this
would
be
a
recommendation
that
we
would
just
committee
take
to
management
council
to
figure
out
what
it's
going
to
cost,
what
it
would
take
to
do
it
with
the
best
mechanisms
to
facilitate
that
happening.
So
right
now
we're
not
saying:
let's
do
it,
let's
look
at
it.
J
A
Addition
to
that
larry,
we
could
just
say
if
you
choose
to
do
that
for
your
agency,
you
know,
because
agencies
are
only
two
or
three
hours
at
a
time
at
the
most
typically,
except
for
the
department
of
health
yeah,
one
of
the
biggest
we
can
say.
If
you
want
to
participate
just
zoom
in
and
we'll
let
you
you
can
essentially
sit
with
us.
H
I
guess
my
perspective
was
more
the
agency
budget
discussions
more
so
than
the
markup
and
and
yes,
and
we
we
do
see
where
you
know
once
some
that
are
interested
come
in
by
zoom.
H
I
just
there's
a
value
to
being
in
the
room:
there's
a
value
to
seeing
the
books,
there's
a
value
to
being
able
to
talk
to
staff
and
members
on
the
committee
and
to
be
able
to
rotate
through
to
actually
observe
that
process,
which
you
know
they
can
do
that
on
their
own
time.
It
just
helps
to
cover
the
cost
of
the
hotel
and
salary
for
a
day,
so
it'll
likely
be
some
combination,
but
I
would
like
to
be
for
people
to
have
the
option
of
the
in
person
during
those
those
agency
discussions.
B
G
Yeah,
it's
an
intriguing
idea:
I'm
not
dismissing
it.
I
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
the
logistics,
though
just
first
of
all,
a
lot
of
our
committees
have
overlapping
responsibilities
related
to
various
agencies,
and
then,
if
we
want
I'm
just
thinking
committee
chairs,
if
they're
actually
participating
knowing
how
hard-pressed
we
are
to
complete
all
of
the
budgets
in
two
weeks,
what
that's
going
to
do
the
timing,
because
I'm
personally
not
I
don't
want
to
spend
three
weeks
in
december
and
three
weeks.
G
I
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
One
thing
I
had
considered
being
new
to
this
and
coming
in
was
that
to
include
the
chairman
in
the
agency
reviews,
because
I
think
that
would
be
helpful
as
we
go
through
agency
reviews
as
we
go
through
our
individual
agencies.
So
that's
something
I
intend
to
and
representative
schwartz
we're
on
a
lot
of
agencies
together.
So
I
wanted
to
visit
with
you
about
that,
but
I
would
like
to
bring
the
chairman
in
on
the
agency
review
side
of
things.
H
So
mine
is
more
as
kind
of
a
succession
planning,
and
I
so
those
are
that's.
My
highest
priority
is
that
we
just
we'd
have
the
budget
to
be
able
to
rotate
through
people
that
really
think
they
might
want
to
be
on
appropriations,
and
we
know
we've
got
some
slot
a
slaughter
slots
upcoming,
give
them
a
chance.
Take
a
look-see
that'd,
be
the
highest
priority
for
me
personally,.
A
So
if
you
can
work
with
don,
because
I
think
we
all
concur
with
the
general
proposition.
B
A
On
so
number
one
we've
got
the
our
funds
and
funding
because,
like
we
discussed
earlier,
I
mean
the
chances
are
we'll
need
it,
probably
two
or
three
times
on
that
between
now
and
july.
So
that
will.
G
C
H
D
D
You
did
not
provide
for
a
second
year
of
the
berry
done
work,
but
you
did
ask
ets
to
provide
the
committee
I.t
project,
evaluation
criteria,
executive
branch,
cooperation
and
feedback,
any
rules
promulgated
by
ets,
a
list
of
the
2324
traditional
budget
requests,
a
list
of
the
major
I.t
project
requests
for
the
subsequent
biennium,
as
well
as
preliminary
observations
on
the
anticipated
funding
estimates
and,
finally,
a
detailed
overview
of
the
very
done
recommendations
and
their
status
of
implementation.
D
I
believe
you
requested
this
to
be
provided
three
weeks
prior
to
the
first
jac
meeting
or
no
later
than
august.
First.
A
In
my
recollection,
don
is
that,
just
because
of
the
nature
of
number
one
getting
the
report
out,
the
limitations
on
the
report
and
the
fact
that
there
were
still
really
kind
of
in
a
transition,
startup
mode
that
they
weren't
able
to
basically
they're
saying
you
need.
We
need
more
time
in
order
to
know
the
full
ramifications
of
their
reorganization
implementation
of
the
very
done
things
I
think
they
said
they
were
implementing
them.
But
was
they
weren't
at
a
point
that
they
could
really
report
on
the
success
or
just
the
total.
D
Mr
chairman,
I
believe
that
is
fair,
but
in
respect
to
timing,
I
think
there
are
two
things.
One
is
some
time
to
digest
and
implement
the
recommendations.
I
think
you've
accurately
stated
my
understanding
of
that.
The
second
issue
is
based
on
the
recommendations.
I
don't
think
it.
I
think
the
executive
branch,
including
the
governor's
office,
had
some
concern
as
to
the
calendar,
meaning
it
was
a
little
bit
front
loaded,
not
allowing
the
governor
an
opportunity
to
vet
some
of
these
issues
prior
to
moving
them
forward.
A
D
Mr
chairman,
I
think
that
is
correct.
I
think
the
one
actionable
item
is.
I
would
anticipate
the
update
on
the
forthcoming
funding.
Request
might
be
a
opportunity
to
dig
in
a
little
deeper.
C
Mr
chairman,
I
kind
of
see
a
two
things
moving
forward
at
the
same
time
and
and
that
being
how
we
move
forward
with
the
ets
and
the
response.
The
governance
within
that
agency,
and
as
it.
C
Determines
how
we
implement
fund
and
approve
these
I.t
needs,
the
other
part
of
that
is.
We
have
we
have
a
couple
of
these.
It
needs
that
are
moving
forward
while
we
get
bits
in
place
and
particularly
the
risk
system
with
y
dot.
C
Having
a
broader
group
of
people
besides
and
it's
no
offense
to
whiteout
in
their
group,
but
they're
saying
we've
gone
to
this,
we've
gone
to
this
consulting
firm
and
it's
going
to
take
us
five
years
to
put
in
an
80
million
dollar
system.
That's
going
to
require
1.4
million
dollars
a
year
to
maintain.
C
And,
yes,
you
are
correct
jac
that
by
the
time
we
get
it
implemented,
it'll
be
antiquated
just
and
then
we
get
out
working
in
our
other
associations
around
the
state.
And
you
hear
industry
and
people
who
are
deeply
involved
in
I.t,
saying
that's
the
craziest
thing
we've
ever
heard.
Why
does
it
take
five
years?
Why
is
it
costing
80
million
dollars
and
I'd
like
to
have
that
conversation
in
front
of
us
from
both
perspectives?
C
A
little
more
because
I
just
I
I'm
really
struggling
with
with
the
price
tag
on
that
when
there
are
so
many
others
who
would
argue
that
second.
C
F
And
so
I
mean
we,
we've
got
a
we've
got
a
full
list.
I
don't
know
exactly
how
you
want
to
proceed
with
this.
Obviously
we're
not
going
to
get
it
wrapped
up
in
the
next
eight
minutes.
So.
F
F
A
So,
just
real
quickly
with
regards
to
the
let's
go
to
page
one.
Would
it
be
useful
to
have
the
basically
and
I
come
and
spend
a
couple
hours
just
walking
through
that
issue
sometime
in
the
latter
part
of
our
of
the
year,
and
if
we
want
to
just
delay
that.
F
I,
mr
mr
kutcher,
I
think,
there's
a
couple
things
that
are
just
kind
of
incumbent
upon
what
we
do.
I
think
that
the
first
one,
I
don't
think
it's
a
long
thing,
but
I
think
it
affects
it
certainly
affects
some
of
the
budget
markups
that
we
do
and
also
involved
in
that
I
think
it's
always.
We
should
also
you
know
when
we
talked
to
him
about
that.
We
had
to
visit
with
him
a
little
bit
about
statewide
cost
allocation
and
how
that's
working.
A
A
A
H
A
The
that
could
be
a
captain
issue
as
well.
We
could
bring
the
bill
to
get
rid
of
the
bra.
Have
that
be
a
joint
appropriations
committee
bill
if
we
choose
to
that's
a
pretty
simple
thing
to
do,
having
taking
a
couple
hours
to
have
a
breakdown
of
where
we
can
really
make
any
simple
first
step
changes,
I
think,
is
a
useful
thing,
but
we
can
actually
do
that
in
both
committees
can
get
updated
on
it
and
address
them.
Mr.
D
Mr
chairman,
that's
correct:
while
the
concept
is
pretty
straightforward,
a
bill
to
eliminate
the
budget
reserve-
and
it
has
been
presented,
I
think
five
years
ago
will
be
fairly
extensive.
E
Mr
chairman,
go
ahead.
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
I
think
that
topic
could
also
be
reviewed
by
the
revenue
committee
as
they
can
look
at
diversions
and
such
versus
just
raising
revenue,
and
so
not
just
cap
fin,
but
I
think
revenue
could
be
utilized
in
that
regard.
A
So
then,
the
next
on
our
list,
I
think
that
senate
file
121-
that's
that
is
a
cap
finishing.
So
I
think
that's
that's
where
that
will
end
yeah
and.
C
Go
ahead
on
that
public
works
work
group.
Could
I
just
request?
If
and
I
guess
I'm
asking
more
from
the
senate
side,
I
worked
on
those
last
contracting
bills.
We've
done
that's
what
kind
of
like
to
be
in
this.
It's
it's
a
representative
stiff
bill
that
we're
trying
to
work
through
and
representative
simpson
lives
in
that
world.
C
A
Okay,
anything
else.
It's
10
o'clock,
I
think
we've
covered
it
in
general
hours,
we'll
kind
of
finalize.
J
That
update
and
then,
mr
chairman,
when
we
want
to
come
back
and
prioritize
those
for
the
committee,
because
in
high
likelihood
you
know
management
council,
they
may
say
you
just
don't
have
enough
staff
and
time
to
do
that.
So
it
would.
It
wouldn't
hurt
for
us
to
have
our
priorities
scheduled
in
place.