►
From YouTube: House Floor Session - Day 9, February 5, 2021-AM
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
D
C
D
C
D
C
F
C
F
C
H
C
H
H
F
C
F
C
F
C
F
C
D
K
I
F
C
F
D
C
C
D
D
C
L
C
L
B
H
B
B
B
Heavenly
father,
we
just
come
to
you
still
tumultuous
times
all
around
us
calm
times
all
times
we
come
before
you.
We
are
thankful.
I
am
thankful
for
this
66th
wyoming
legislature,
my
colleagues,
our
staff,
the
citizens
of
wyoming
who
entrusted
us
to
come
and
represent
them.
I'm
thankful
for
this
time
that
we've
been
able
to
do
work
on
behalf
of
those
folks
and
do
that
work
honoring
you
in
our
words
and
our
deeds
and
our
actions.
B
B
B
B
So
we're
going
to
take
up
some
concurrences,
we'll
sign
some
bills,
take
some
messages
from
the
senate
and
then
we'll
probably
stand
at
ease
for
a
bit
and
then
we'll
do
a
little
more
and
then
there's
a
transition.
So
we'll
go
probably
for
probably
have
an
hour
an
hour
and
a
half
of
things
to
do
this
morning,
maybe
a
little
bit
of
wait
time
as
we
stand
at
ease,
we'll
come
back
in
at
two
o'clock,
and
we
should
finish
our
business
today
within
a
little
a
pretty
short
amount
of
time
after
two.
B
So
that's
kind
of
that's
kind
of
the
way,
the
chief
clerk
and
I
and
and
our
lso
staff
kind
of
see
the
day
working
out.
I
want
to
thank
chairman
greer
for
the
meeting
he
had
this
morning
sounded
like
it
went.
A
lot
of
good
information
was
shared
there.
Chairman
paxton
has
informational
meeting
at
noon
for
education
committee,
so
folks
are
welcome
to
participate
in
that.
So
at
this
time,
chief
clerk
messages
from
the
senate
or
actually
chief
clerk,
sorry
journal
committee
report.
C
Message:
145,
mr
speaker,
house
joint
resolution,
one
traumatic
brain
injury
and
post-traumatic
stress
treatments.
The
house
bill
listed
above
passed
on
third
reading
in
an
amended
form
as
follows
by
the
vote
indicated
eyes.
18
knows
12.
The
senate
respectfully
asked
the
house
to
concur
by
adopting
the
listed
amendments
sincerely
ellen
thompson,
senate
chief
clerk.
B
M
M
So
what
our
good
friends
did
down
the
hall
twofold
first
you'll
see
an
amendment
they
brought
on
second
reading
that
just
clarifies
the
intent
that
y
dot
doesn't
necessarily
own
all
of
these
towers.
In
some
cases
they
just
operate
them
under
certain
agreements.
Public
and
private-
so
certainly
not
controversial
and
made
sense
to
the
statute.
The
second
piece
is
originally
anticipated
in
this
bill.
They
were
going
to
create
a
separate
maintenance
account
for
the
telecommunications
system.
M
Our
good
colleagues
down
the
hall
believed
that
they
didn't
need
a
whole
new
account,
but
they
found
an
existing
account,
their
isf
their
internal
service
fund,
and
they
brought
an
amendment
to
merely
have
a
separate
accounting
as
part
of
that
fund
to
keep
track
of
the
funding
instead
of
creating
yet
another
fund
in
state
government,
and
I
think
we
can
all
agree,
we
don't
need
any
more
coffee
cans
than
we
have
to
have.
So
if
there
are
no
questions,
I
would
ask
for
your.
I
vote.
B
A
Thank
you,
mr
speaker,
so
my
question
is
on
getting
rid
of
the
account.
I
mean
it,
so
it's
it's
separately,
I
mean.
Does
the
appropriations
folks
do
they
think
that's
sufficient?
I
mean
I
I
kind
of
like
the
separate
accounts.
You
know
it's
coffee
cans.
Some
of
them
need
to
go.
Sipa
needs
to
go
because
it's
not
going
to
something
that
that,
but
this
another
coffee
can
for
this
I
think
is
okay,
I
mean
so
I'm
I'm
not
thrilled
about
that
amendment.
So
thank
you.
L
G
G
G
N
First
time,
thank
you,
mr
speaker
and
chairman,
I'm
going
to
support
the
concurrence
just
want
to
one
real,
quick
question.
Just
in
the
separate
accounting
and
the
internal
service
fund,
though
it's
still,
it
still
only
can
be
used
really
for
this
purpose,
even
though,
and
so
it's
accounted
separately,
that's
not
a
hard
function,
I
think
to
occur,
but
I
do
want
to
also
comment
on
this
coffee
can
issue
folks,
I
think
that's
a
little
bit
of
a
red
herring
out
there
and
that's
the
new
buzzword.
N
I
think
that's
a
little
bit
of
this
lookie
here
squirrel
in
the
bushes
stock,
and
I
just
think
many
coffee
cans
at
times
are
very
good
and
they're
all
savings
accounts,
and
I
think
so
I
don't,
I
think,
that's
kind
of
a
false
thing
out
there
and
I
think
all
this
stuff
needs
to
be
evaluated
on
its
own
merit.
We've
done
a
lot
of
good
with
coffee
cans
in
the
past
and
in
the
present.
So
that's
my
two
cents
for
thank
you,
mr
speaker,.
M
Thank
you,
mr
speaker,
and
I
guess
I
won't
get
in
the
coffee
cans,
but
to
answer
the
good
question
from
appropriations
twofold.
These
are
any
it's
not
only
towers,
but
it's
any
communication
infrastructure
and
I
think
if
he
looks
at
the
beginning
of
that
sentence,
it
has
to
be
state
funded
or
state
controlled.
M
So
in
some
cases,
as
long
as
we
are
leasing
it
and
we
operate
it
under
some
type
of
contract,
we
may
not
own
it,
but
we
have
control
over
it
and
an
infrastructure
in
the
interim
committee
was
larger
than
just
when
you
think
of
towers,
there's
a
lot
of
other
networks
out
there
etc.
So
I
don't
think
it
hurts
the
bill
and
I
think
it
clarifies
that
we
don't
have
to
officially
have
the
state
government
own
it
as
long
as
we
are
in
basically
control
of
it
through
a
lease
or
contract.
B
Thank
you,
chairman
and
well,
I
do
see
representative
clausen
has
his
hand
up.
We
were
on
second
time
representative
claussen,
didn't
inquire
for
the
first
time
so
be
out
of
order.
So
members
we
are
voting
on
the
motion
to
concur
with
senate
amendments
to
house
bill.
15.
a
majority
of
elected
members
is
required.
Chief
clerk,
please
call
the
roll.
C
F
D
C
O
O
G
A
P
C
P
D
O
C
L
O
D
C
Q
C
D
C
I
C
R
Thank
you,
mr
speaker.
I
moved
concurrence
on
house
joint
resolution
number
one
and
ask
for
your
favorable
consideration.
Please
vote.
Yes,
what
are
our
good
friends
down
the
hall
as
we
like
to
say,
although
I
don't
know
where
anyone
is
right
now
physically
did
with
with
house
joint
resolution
was
to
go
in
and
correct
grammar
some
spelling,
and
I
think
there
were
four
changes
in
total.
They
don't
change
the
bill
in
any
way
other
than
it
reads.
Probably
the
way
it
should,
for
example,
they
changed.
B
Thank
you
chairman.
Anyone
for
the
first
time,
anyone
for
their
first
time
on
message,
145
house
joint
resolution,
one
first
time.
First
time,
second
time
before
the
chairman,
we
are
voting
on
a
motion
to
concur
with
senate
amendments
to
house
joint
resolution.
One
a
majority
of
the
elected
members
is
required.
Chief
clerk,
please
call
the
roll.
G
D
C
D
O
D
S
H
O
C
D
B
C
K
B
H
Representative,
washington,
mr
speaker,
go
ahead.
Please
represent
washington.
What's
your
point?
Thank
you,
mr
speaker,
on
two
consecutive
votes
now
we've
had
a
member
vote
without
being
visibly
streaming,
which
is
in
violation
of
our
rules
for
the
virtual
session,
and
I
think
we
need
to
make
sure
all
of
our
members
are
within
the
bar.
When
we
vote.
B
B
B
I
did
call
out
to
a
couple
members
and
sent
an
email
and
got
responses
back
to
them,
so
we'll
ensure
that
from
now
on,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
if
you're
voting,
if
you're
going
to
vote
that
you
initiate
your
video
before
you
initiate
your
mic
because
a
lot
of
times,
they
will
key
at
the
same
time
and
the
video
flashes
and
then
it
flashes
off.
So
I
I
do
understand
that,
and
I
observed
that
yesterday
at
somebody's
urge
encouragement
and
I
reached
out
to
a
couple
of
those
folks.
So
thank
you
very
much.
B
M
M
First,
as
you'll
see
in
the
bottom
part
of
your
concurrence,
really,
the
the
first
three
lines
are
just
grammar:
you'll
see
they
changed
adults
to
adult
in
the
signage,
which
makes
sense
they
added
a
hyphen
and
on-site
you'll
see
me
do
several
grammar
things
on
bills
during
the
session,
but
I
just
thought
it
was
a
bit
early
this
year
for
our
good
friends
down
the
hall,
a
certain
senator
likes
to
grammar
check.
Just
like
I
do
so.
M
M
So,
even
if
you're
calling
at
midnight,
they
have
to
either
refuse
or
give
it
to
you
before.
2
am
apparently
this
is
in
case
law
from
60
years
ago,
and
so
we're
not
actually
making
a
policy
shift
with
this
amendment.
They
just
found
an
instance
of
case
law
and
went
ahead
and
added
that
into
the
statute.
M
This
is
the
ongoing
contract,
carry
debate
that
you'll
remember
from
a
couple
days
ago.
A
certain
special
interest
group
really
wants
some
sideboards
in
this
area,
so
they
thought
putting
at
least
the
case.
Law
in
the
statute
was
an
acceptable
protection
for
them,
so
it
doesn't
change
the
current
public
policy
of
the
state.
I
personally
think
it's
a
little
odd,
but
it's
the
policy
continuation
of
what
we
have
now
within
statute.
In
case
again,
I'd
ask
for
your
favorable.
B
T
U
Looking
at
page
11
line
19,
it
appears
that
this
same
day,
delivery
requirement
would
apply
to
wyoming
manu
persons
holding
manufacturer
licenses
with
a
satellite
location,
and
so
does
this
inadvertently
have
the
effect
of
treating
out-of-state
wineries,
out-of-state
manufacturers
of
distilled
spirits
more
favorably
than
our
own
domestic
producers,
because
it
looks
like
if
you're
a
wine
manufacturer,
but
you
also
happen
to
have
a
satellite
location.
Someplace,
it
seems
like
this
proposed
change,
would
would
not
allow
you
to
ship
unless
it
were
same
day,
literally
red
and
the
same
for.
U
If
you
imagine,
if
you
had
a
distillery
that
produced
a
whiskey
in
wyoming,
it
seems
like
if
we
require
same-day
shipping,
that
their
competitors
from
kentucky
will
be
able
to
deliver
from
out
of
state,
but
they
won't
be
able
to
deliver
in
states.
So
do
we
inadvertently
by
adopting
this
discriminate
unfairly
against
our
own
producers?
Thank
you.
B
K
Thanks
kevin
so
back
to
the
delivery
issue,
and
I
I'm
not
I'm
not
trying
to
kill
the
bill,
I
mean.
I
think
it
was
a
cleanup
bill,
but
just
to
be
be
clear
here.
This
sort
of
insertion
of
some
sort
of
case
law
so
backing
up
again
because
it's
on
two
pages
here,
we've
we've
got
these
and
I
I
really
am
not
knowledgeable
about
what
who
these
whole
holders
are
and
stuff,
but
they
may
deliver
or
contract
have
delivered.
So
let's
say
the
winery
you
know
gets
an
order
now.
K
What
was
described
by
the
presenter
of
the
concurrence
was
that
it
had
to
be
basically
shipped
the
same
time.
You
got
the
order
or
within
the
same
hours
as
when
you
got
the
order.
This
is
really
doesn't
say
that
I
mean
I'm
visualizing
if,
if
a
place
got
an
order,
say
at
6
p.m
and
the
peop
and
they
could
send
it
out
the
door
tomorrow
at
9
00
a.m,
which
certainly
things
could
have
you
know
if
it's
a
box
of
12
bottles
or
something
like
that.
K
But
what
we're
really
saying
is
that,
the
next
morning,
when
the
winery
gives
the
box
of
12
bottles
to
the
delivery
people,
the
delivery
person
has
to
be
extremely
prompt
and
get
to
the
recipient.
That
day,
I
mean
we're
trying
to
bring
in
some
sort
of
caseload.
I
don't
know
what
it
is,
but
so,
whose
fault
is
that,
if
the
delivery
person
has
a
giant
route
that
goes
all
around
the
states
in
a
circle
and
doesn't
get
there
for
a
day
and
a
half?
O
O
The
delivery
portion,
so
just
the
liquor
store,
can
deliver
and
we
we
took
up
this
issue
in
in
committee
and
it
it's
gray.
So
so
it
was
done
with
the
case
or
in
ag's
opinion
from
50
years
ago
is
why
it
was
inserted
in
and
it's
strange.
So
when
you
think
of
delivery,
it
is
just
delivery
from
the
liquor
store,
which
is,
which
is
very
strange.
I
know,
but
liquor
law
is
very
strange.
I
Thank
you,
mr
speaker,
yeah
on
on
that
same
topic,
and
I
don't
I'm
not
even
necessarily
trying
to
go
against.
You
know
suggesting
that
we
vote
this
down,
but
you
know
the
the
good
true
woman
of
labor
health
brought
up
the
you
know
the
the
scenario
of
a
statewide
route
and
obviously
we're
wyoming,
and
you
know
we
can
have
bad
weather
to
to
further
implement
delivery
time.
I
But
I
was
even
considering
on
a
more
local
level,
even
in
town,
and
I
I
don't
I'm
kind
of
going
out
on
a
limb
here,
because
I
can't
imagine
that
there's
going
to
be
very
many
cases
where
you,
you
know
somebody's
going
to
just
on
a
whim
call
at
the
last
minute.
But
what
I'm
you
know
pondering
here
is
that
there's
a
certain
piece
of
delivery
company
out
there
that
once
had
a
we
deliver
in
30
minutes
or
it's
free
policy,
and
they
were
very
serious
about
that.
I
I
You
know
whipping
up
a
probably
a
worst
case
scenario,
but
it
does
seem
like
an
odd
thing
to
have,
and
you
know
again,
I
think
we
should
keep
this
bill
alive
and
afloat
and
probably
vote
eye
on
this
concurrence,
but
I
do
think
that
the
issue
as
a
whole
is
something
that
needs
to
be
discussed
and
looked
at
further,
possibly
in
other
legislation
or
you
know
in
the
interim,
so
anyway,
lodi.
Thank
you.
L
Thank
you,
mr
speaker.
I
guess
I
share
the
same
concerns
when,
when
I
read
that
I
I'm
not
somebody
that
that
knows
a
lot
about
our
liquor
laws,
but
I
I
just
think
this
doesn't
make
sense.
It's
too
restrictive.
I
don't
know
what
the
penalties
are
if
something
happens
that
that
some
unfortunate
soul
gets
stuck
in
a
snow
storm
or
they
have
car
problems
that
prevent
them
from
getting
that
delivery
completed.
L
L
I
I
do
think
we
should
vote
no,
and
we
should
go
to
conference
committee,
and
we
should
have
some
discussion
on
that
because
I
I
just
don't
think
it
makes
sense
to
to
create
law
that
that
we
can't
explain
to
our
constituents
and-
and
this
one
to
me
doesn't
make
sense.
I
think
it's
unreasonable
too
restrictive.
Thank
you.
B
E
E
So
are
we
talking
24-hour
schedule?
Are
we
talking
midnight?
So
if
I
call
it
11
59
and
order
something
do
they
have
to
tell
me
nope
you're
gonna
have
to
call
back
at
1201
because
that's
a
new
day,
and
so
I
just
think
it's
not
very
clear.
As
I
said
here
and
read
it.
It's
like.
I
said
it's
just
confusing
me
more
and
more,
and
it
actually
applies.
I
mean
to
more
than
the
way
it's
actually
written
into
the
bill.
It
applies
to
more,
I
think,
than
just
retail
liquor
licenses.
E
B
K
Thank
you,
mr
speaker.
This
is
really
just
a
follow-up
to
my
first
question
and
and
the
fact
that
I
don't
remember
just
shows
how
you
know.
We
all
have
our
areas
that
we
spend
a
lot
of
time.
Thinking
on
and
the
rest
of
us
as
soon
as
the
bill
deletes
goes
away
from
our
screen.
We
totally
forget
everything
that
we
thought
about,
but
I
know
we.
I
do
remember
that
we
had
a
lengthy
discussion
about
common
carriers.
K
T
Thank
you,
mr
speaker.
I
I
as
well
encourage
a
no
vote
on
concurrence.
We
need
to
go
back
and
fix
this
there's.
This
has
too
many
implications,
and
you
know
the
way
you
read
it.
It
actually
applies
to
shipments,
not
just
your
local
store
or
your
local
restaurant,
or
something
like
that.
It
has
too
many
implications.
We
need
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
fencing
anybody
out
by
by
voting
to
concur.
So
I
urge
the
body
to
say
no.
B
M
So,
first,
if
you
read
12.5201,
which
is
the
licensed
building
under
license
permits,
these
are
the
licenses
that
are
given
by
your
local
licensing
authorities,
your
cities
or
your
counties
right.
So
we
are
just
talking
about
your
brick
and
mortar
buildings.
Here,
you'll
see
that
on
page
12
line
three
of
the
bill
and
then
for
these
other,
what
we
call
distributors
right,
you're,
where
you're
shipping
from
a
distillery,
a
winery,
that's
covered
in
page
13
line,
eight
right,
that's
from
romanette
five.
M
Those
are
separate,
so
this
does
just
apply
to
brick
and
mortar
buildings
and
establishments.
Your
package,
liquor
stores
the
good
representative
from
johnson
county.
I
I
thought
I
entered
this
but
you're
it's
whatever
your
local
licensing.
Authority's
hours
are,
and
so
all,
but
one
place
in
the
state,
they're
6
a.m,
to
2
p.m
or
2
a.m.
I'm
sorry
6
a.m
to
2
a.m.
M
So
if
you
called
it
1am-
and
they
said
we
just
don't-
have
anybody
on
staff
or
we
don't
believe
any
one
of
these
new
trendy
transportation
companies
can
you
can
do
an
order
and
get
them
to
you
by
two
a.m?
They're
required
to
say
no,
we
can't
sell.
I
had
a
member
ask
me:
can
I
just
say:
hey
deliver
me
a
six-pack
every
night
all
week,
no
under
this,
you
would
have
to
call
each
day
or
through
your
mobile
app
as
this
anticipates,
etc.
M
Trendy
business
practices.
It
is
a
daily
thing
to
answer
the
representative
from
teton
counties
from
area
to
areas
so
you're.
Two
things
your
local
license
is
seeing
authority
can
permit
an
area
or
areas
depending
on
that
jurisdiction
and
what
their,
what
you've
petitioned
for
applied
for,
and
what
they've
granted.
Also
when
we
say
areas
that
would
include,
if
you
have
a
satellite
location
in
addition
to
your
your
main
site
location.
So
I
hope
I
answered
that
alcohol
just
is
a
tricky
area
of
law,
and
so
this
isn't
meant
to
confuse
anyone.
M
M
I
wasn't
here
asking
for
concurrence
yesterday
because
I
had
all
these
same
questions
and
same
thoughts
and
it
didn't
make
sense
and
I've
kept
talking
to
senators
and
associations
and
groups
and-
and
they
all
seem
to
be
telling
me
they
all
seem
to
say
the
same
thing-
that
this
only
applies
to
your
brick
and
mortar
stores.
The
division
that
sells
alcohol
or
distributes
alcohol
in
our
state
confirm
that
the
association
confirmed
that.
M
So
I
think
it's
in
12.5201
this
whole
section
of
licensed
building
in
article
two
just
emphasizes
that.
So,
if
I'm
sorry,
I
didn't
bring
more
information
and
distribute
and
the
people
who
brought
this
amendment.
I
did
ask
at
least
our
colleagues
down
the
hall
to
get
a
piece
of
information
which
is
coming
in
now
at
10
42,
but
I
do
think
it
makes
sense.
It
fits
and
it
just
limits
it
to
what's
currently
in
in
case
law,
not
statute.
M
B
L
B
B
C
D
F
D
C
D
J
C
J
J
C
E
F
A
C
F
F
C
F
I
C
B
M
This
has
to
do
with
service
of
process,
and
so
you'll
read
that,
basically,
when
the
entity
files
itself,
it
agrees
to
consent
of
service
by
electronic
means.
So
the
problem
we
come
into-
let's
say
15
times
a
year
somewhere
between
5
and
10,
is
where
you
try
to
serve
an
entity
process
and
for
some
reason
you
can't
the
registered
agent
is
no
longer
there.
The
registered
agent's
license
has
been
revoked
or
the
registered
agent,
for
some
reason
is
refusing
that
service
of
process.
M
Currently
what
happens
if
they
can't
get
a
hold
of
the
registered
agent
or
the
registered
agent
for
some
reason,
refuses
the
secretary
of
state's
office
under
the
current
law
takes
or
accepts
that
process.
We
call
it
being
perfected
right
and
so
the
secretary
of
state
perfects
that
process
of
being
served.
M
So
that's
the
legal
requirement,
then
the
question
is
well.
How
do
you
notify
the
entity,
and
so
what
the
amendment
allows
is
to
notify
the
entity
through
that
electronic
means
right,
so
they
can't
get
a
hold
of
the
registered
agent
for
whatever
reason
they've
already
been
served
process,
the
secretary
of
state's
office
has
it.
B
E
And
there
are
occasions
when,
if
we
cannot
track
down
the
registered
agent,
that
and
and
I
think
that's
what
they're
trying
to
talk
about.
If
we
can't
track
down
the
registered
agent
or
he's
unable
to
be
served,
he
or
she
that
we
can
serve
the
summons
by
electronic
means
and
then
another
issue
which
really
isn't
contained
in
this,
which
I
also
think
we
may
deal
with
in
the
future,
and
I
just
wanted
to
mention
it
is,
and
I
apologize
to
the
body.
I
really
miss
this.
E
The
first
time
through
when
we
were
looking
at
this
statue
really
is
just
the
the
due
process,
issues
with
actually
sending
a
summons
in
a
complaint
by
email
rather
than
by
some
other
means.
I
just
I
see
a
lot
of
issues
that
could
arise
there
and
hopefully
we
can
deal
with
those
in
the
future.
But
this
is
a
good
bill.
It
allows
our
secretary
of
state
to
save
a
lot
of
money
and
I
don't.
E
B
M
No
thank
you,
mr
speaker.
I
do
believe
the
representative
is
correct.
It's
just
continuous
improvement
in
our
statutes
to
update
and
make
sure
everything
dovetails
together
and
especially
when
it
comes
to
the
secretary
of
state's
office
and
all
of
the
corporates
and
businesses
they
oversee
it's
complicated
and
it's
evolving,
and
so
I
I
do
think
the
good
representative
pointed
out
issues
that
we
need
to
fix
in
the
future.
M
B
D
C
E
S
D
F
I
D
E
N
C
O
C
C
B
H
K
I
B
B
B
C
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
Thank
you
very
much,
chief
clerk,
so
members,
I
think,
there's
50
plus
bills
out
there
in
committee.
Some
committees
have
a
full
load,
some
have
a
less
of
a
load,
and
some
of
that
is
just
flat
out
the
topics
that
are
on
the
bills.
You'll,
probably
note
that
there
are
some
bills
that
I'm
not
sending
out
during
this
interim.
They
will
be
introduced
as
soon
as
we
come
back
and
and
reconvene
and
those
are
ones
that
generally
have
to
do
with
health
orders
and
energy.
B
The
broader
energy
topics
so
they're
not
being
pushed
down.
I
just
felt
like
we
try
to
gather
them
all
up
and
part
of
the
reason
is,
I
know
several
of
you
have
come
to
me
and
said:
I've
got
several
more
bills
coming
on
these
topics,
so
I'm
trying
to
group
them
up
so
that
we
can
maybe
kind
of
deal
with
these
issues
in
as
a
topical
matter
not
bill
by
bill.
I
B
H
I
B
B
B
S
S
B
So
thank
you
for
the
question
representative
sweeney,
and
so
we
are
working
with
our
lso
staff
and
and
our
senate
colleagues.
I
am
working
with
them
to
try
to
balance
the
committee
time
availability
because
we
obviously
know
we
have
committees
that
have
a
lot.
Some
have
a
higher
workload
than
others,
so
we're
looking
at
the
options
of
maybe
giving
more
committee
time
for
those
committees
that
may
request
it
or
want
it
and
and
then
less
for
those
that
don't
need
it.
B
So
we
are,
we
are
looking
at
modifying
the
what
we
did
the
last
time
somewhat
to
actually
bear
influence
on
what
is
actually
before
the
committees.
So
there
will
be.
There
may
be
some
adjustments
and
we'll
work
with
the
committee
chairman
and
they'll
certainly
get
that
to
you
as
they
decide
what
bills
they
want
to
take
up.
So
we
are,
we
are
working
toward
that.
As
you
will
know,
we
already
have
bills
on
general
file.
We
get
bills
out
of
this
next,
these
next
committee
meetings
and
the
pipeline
will
be
primed.
B
We
will
likely
have
general
file
on
the
first
day
we
reconvene,
which
is
not
something
that
normally
happens,
and
we
will
keep
the
pipeline
going.
Also
make
a
note
that
in
our
next
next
convening
the
budget
will
be
done
the
second
week.
So
we're
going
to
try
to
get
some
things
done
the
first
week
and
then.
J
J
C
It
to
us
probably
sounded
better
message.
157,
mr
speaker,
the
senate
did
concur
on
house
amendments
to
the
bill
listed
below
by
the
vote
indicated
senate
file
18
universal
occupational
licensure
eyes.
29
knows
one
sincerely
ellen
thompson
senate
chief
clerk
message
158,
mr
speaker,
the
senate
did
concur
on
house
amendments
to
the
bill
listed
below
by
the
vote,
indicated:
senate
file,
26
animal
abuse,
statutes,
reorganization
and
update
eyes,
30,
sincerely
ellen
thompson
senate
chief
clerk
message.
B
B
So
members,
there
will
not
be
any
conference
committees
because
all
bills
have
been
concurred
with
so
now.
What
we're
waiting
on
is
the
yeah
there's
a
sigh
of
relief
in
the
chief
clerk
from
the
chief
clerk.
So
now
we're
waiting
on
is
the
finalization
of
the
bills
and
then
the
creation
of
the
signer
cheating.
C
B
Very
good,
we
will
stand
at
ease
for
five
minutes
and
members
for
signing.
There
are
no
more
votes
on
anything
that
we've
done.
So
my
colleagues
that
want
to
hit
the
road
or
on
the
road
want
to
continue.
There
are
no
more
votes
that
you
will
be
obligated
to
participate.
We
do
need
a
quorum.
We
do
need
a
quorum
to
continue
our
business,
so
I
would
appreciate
that
we
have
a
quorum
available,
but
to
my
colleagues
you're
welcome
to
go
on
now.
I
see
I
have
some
questions.
We'll
start
with
chairman
burkhardt.
R
K
Chairman
wilson,
thank
you,
mr
speaker,
just
thinking
ahead,
and
I
know
the
email
came
out
from
the
director
of
lso
and
and
the
leadership
as
far
as
the
march
session,
but
oftentimes
as
people
look
forward
to
having
some
sort
of
formal
signing
with
the
governor,
and
I'm
wondering
it
has
there
been
any
discussion
with
his
office
looking
ahead
or
is
that
just
not
knowable
as
far
as
formal
signings
for
any
bills?
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you
very
much
chairman
wilson,
so
members
chairman
wilson
brings
up
something
that
is
very
important
to
to
members
as
they
bring
forth
constituent
concerns
and
issues
and
pass
a
bill.
The
governor
has
always
been
very
gracious
about
offering
a
signing
ceremony
for
the
sponsor
and
for
maybe
the
interests
that
that
were
came
forth
with
the
issue.
There
has
been
discussions.
I
don't
know
that,
there's
a
final
understanding
or
a
final
process
in
place.
B
Q
B
P
B
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
so
it
should
be
on
your
go
to
the
legislative
website
and
you
can
go
to
the
committee
meetings
and
you
should
be
able
to
go
to
education
and
it
says
details
and
there's
two
things.
One
it
says
testify
and
one
that
says
watch
so
you
can
go
to
the
broadcast
column
and
it
says
watch
so
if
you
want
to,
if
you're
in,
if
you're
part
of
the
committee,
I
would
say
you
go
to
testify.
B
S
Thank
you,
mr
speaker,
privilege
of
the
floor.
Please
proceed
so
I
I
really
appreciated
what
the
good
chairman
of
minerals
and
the
committee
put
together
for
us
this
morning.
It
was
invaluable
and
I
I
believe
that
at
the
end
the
slides
will
become
available
and
I'm
not
correct.
Perhaps
I
I
might
not
be,
but
I
believe
the
youtube
recording
should
be
available
for
those
that
want
to
go
back
and
take
a
look
at
that.
But
I'm
I'm
not
100.
S
B
B
B
So
members,
because
those
were
senate
files,
you
will
note
that
they
are
complete
as
far
as
legislative
action.
The
president
has
signed
him
whether
the
clerk,
the
senate
clerk,
has
signed
them
as
the
originating
body.
The
president
has
signed
him
and
now,
as
speaker
of
the
house,
I've
signed
him
on
behalf
of
the
house
of
representatives,
so
these
will
now
go
to
the
executive
branch
for
their
consideration.