►
From YouTube: Senate Appropriations Meeting, October 27, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
B
So
we
had
our
good
staff
attorney,
prepare
this
for
us
last
night.
So
our
first
part
of
the
amendment
is
on
page
two.
After
line
19,
we've
inserted
what
insurer
means
and
that's
also
taken
out
of
502,
so
we're
just
putting
in
there
what
an
insurer
means.
So
it
means
a
health
insurance
company
or
health
service
corporation
authorized
in
the
state
to
issue
policies
or
subscriber
contracts
which
reimburse
for
expenses
of
healthcare
services,
and
I
thought
I
might
read
that
because
I
these
amendments
aren't
anywhere
online
for
the
public
who
might
be
watching.
B
B
Page
3
line
15
we
deleted
due
and
page
3
lines
16
through
21.
We
deleted
entirely.
B
B
Then
and
then
the
next
a
couple
are
just
grammatical:
renumbering
changes,
page
six
lines
10
through
17
we
deleted
entirely.
That
was
the
part
about
asking
and
we
didn't
want
to
infringe
on
the
freedom
of
speech
or
cross
that
bridge.
So
we
took
that
out.
B
Oh
we're
approaching
page
eight,
which
was
on
page
seven.
We
just
added
a
definition
in
section
2,
a
conforming
statutory
definition
and
then
on
page
8.
We
had
a
question
about
private
schools,
whether
under
the
public
accommodation
definition
in
federal
statute.
If
they
were
included,
and
yes,
they
are
included
in
that
long
list
of
nurseries
and
all
sorts
of
private
businesses
that
offer
public
accommodation.
So
private
schools
are
included
in
that
definition.
B
And
then
on
page
10
line,
7
we're
just
inserting
another
definition
that
creates
a
new
section.
It
does
not
go
into
the
that
that
doesn't
go.
It
was
the
childhood.
Immunizations
was
the
last
section.
It's
creates
its
own
new
section,
it's
just
a
conforming
definition
with
the
new
insurer
definition
that
we
added
and
then
on
page
10
line
23
we
deleted
ever
because
I
know
that
was
very
important
to
the
good
vice
chairman.
B
C
B
D
D
B
I
think
the
difference,
mr
chairman,
if
I
could
wait
in
a
little
bit,
is
what
he
said
is
those
aren't
vaccines.
I
mean
ivermectin's,
not
a
vaccine,
and
so
that's
a
little
bit
different,
but
something
that's
categorized
as
a
vaccine
marketed
to
diminish
or
decrease
the
symptoms.
So
I
don't
know
that
just
in
their
research,
they
are
finding.
Some
of
them
are
being
marketed
that
way,
which
is
why
they
included
it.
So
that's
it'll
be
up
to
the
body
how
we
want
to
define
that.
B
Okay,
anything
else.
Well,
mr
and
I
think
we
still
have
the
looming
issue
of
on
page
three
increase
the
premiums
for
on
line
one
and
two
increase
the
premium
score.
B
Something
that
we
need
to
address
it's
not
addressed
in
this
amendment,
so
we
haven't
moved
the
bill
or
done
any
of
that.
So
I
guess
it's
up
to
you
how
you
want
to
proceed
with
that,
but
we
still
need
to
find
a
fix
on
that.
I
will
tell
you
that
when
I
spoke
to
corey
last
night
or
eight
insurance
professional
last
night,
excuse
me
he
they
said.
B
Five
percent
is
a
pretty
normal
average
as
far
as
rate
increases
and
it's
a
pretty
standard
increase
for
for
the
marketplace.
So
I
don't.
I
don't
know
if
we
want
to
just
choose
a
number
like
that.
That's
an
industry
standard,
but
I
think
our
good
chairman
might
have
some
ideas
as
well.
So
did
want
to
address
that
while
we
were
here.
F
F
Mr
chairman
go
ahead
so
so
I
think
what
we're
saying
is
we
don't
want
people
redlined
based
on
what
what
they
do
or
do
not
have
for
a
vaccine
policy,
but
we
could
couldn't
we
add
languages
language
there
to
the
extent
that
it
is
permissible.
However,
for
them
to
raise
premiums
based
on
claims
explains.
F
B
A
Yeah,
I'm
really
just
about
to
the
point
where
I
think
that
we're
just
better
off
to
strike
it
because
we
already
have
they
can't
reject
and
I
limit,
cancel
using
effectively.
What
you
said
till
brought
us
this
morning
was
that
if
they
increase
it
more
than
certain
percent
is
considered
in
a
cancellation
yeah.
A
E
E
No
sir,
what's
that
no
sir
they're,
not
these
are
persons
who
were
not
here
last
night.
A
A
So
the
bill's
been
moved.
Is
there
a
second,
I
seconded
all
right,
bill's
been
moved
and
seconded.
Let's
go
ahead,
so
go
back
now
so
page
page,
two
page
one
or
two.
A
Why
don't
we
just
because
we
do
have
let's
go
through
it,
just
let's
go
ahead
and
and
go
ahead
and
just
on
page
two.
So
we
have
this.
The
amendment
go
ahead.
Are
you
I
think
you've
explained
it,
but
go
ahead.
Senator
assignments
on
let's
go
ahead,
and
just
do
it
page
by
page.
B
Okay,
thank
you,
mr
chairman,
so
on
page
two
after
line
19
we're
going
to
insert
the
definition
of
insurer
that
I
read
previously
when
I
took
you
through
the
amendment,
which
is
also
the
same
definition
in
2622
502.
We
didn't
pull
that
that
reference
over.
I
don't
I
don't
know
why,
but
we
just
inserted
insurer.
So
that's
the
change
on
page
two.
A
B
B
A
And
let's
go
to
the
next
one
page
page
three
we've
got
I
just.
I
just
moved
that
we
strike
premiums
for
a
second
any
further
any
discussion.
All
those
in
favor
say
aye
aye.
Those
opposed
no
motion
carries
you
got
that
hey.
You
got
that
real.
So
far,
so
good
karen!
Thank
you.
So
much
go
to
page
3
line.
15
go
ahead,
go
ahead
with
with
the
rest
of
page
3.
If
you
would.
B
A
A
And
so
what
that
would
do
on
the
motion?
Is
it
just
takes
and
says
from
the
middle
of
page
line
14
on
page
three,
an
insurer
providing
group
or
individual
policy
contractor
plan
for
health
insurance
shall
not
require
a
financial
other
penalty
on
participating
health
care
provider?
Who
does
not
attain
certain
immunization
administration
for
cover
19.
B
A
F
F
A
F
A
B
A
B
That's
right
and
then
we're
just
redoing
some
punctuation
there
and
then
on
online,
stick
or
page
six
line.
B
Eight,
I'm
deleting
a
semicolon
and
some
periods
on
page
six
lines,
ten
through
seventeen
we're
deleting
entirely,
and
that
is
the
section
where
it
says,
ask
a
person
or
inquire
into
a
person's
covet,
19
vaccination
status
or
ask
or
inquire
whether
a
person
has
had
a
covet,
19
immunity
passport
in
order
for
the
person
to
access
any
services,
goods,
facilities,
advantages
and
privileges
that
are
public
in
nature
or
that
invite
the
patronage
of
the
public
or
any
licensing,
employment
opportunities,
educational
opportunities
or
health
care.
We
would
be
deleting
that
entirely.
D
A
All
right
any
further
discussion,
those
in
favor
say
aye,
aye
aye.
Those
opposed
no
motion
carries
the.
I
think
that
that
the
the
next
thing
that
I
have
struggled
with
is
just
simply
the
placement
of
this
accommodation,
and
so
it's
it's
put
in
in
title
35.
A
The
other
public
accommodation
statutes
are
republican,
title
six
and,
of
course,
the
the
public
accommodation
statutes
and
title
six
are,
you
know,
which
is
in
crimes
and
and
offenses,
but
simply
provides
that
all
persons
of
good
department
are
entitled
to
the
full
and
equal
enjoyment
of
accommodations
advantages,
facilities,
privileges
and
all
other
places
for
agencies
which
are
public
in
nature
or
what
you
invite
patronage
of
the
public
without
any
distinction,
discrimination
or
restriction
on
account
of
race,
religions,
color
sex,
national
origin,
and
then
it
has
a
penalty.
A
The
same
penalty
that
we've
got
reiterated
here
in
title
35.,
then
the
next
section
simply
provides
no
person
shall
be
denied
the
right
to
life,
liberty,
pursuit
of
happiness
or
the
necessities
of
life
because
of
race,
color,
creed,
sex
or
national
origin,
and
then
you've
got
the
same
penalty
there.
A
So
I
mean
ultimately,
what
we're
doing
we're:
creating
a
new
public
accommodation
statute,
so
we'll
have
we'll
have
a
new
public
accommodation
statute,
that's
only
in
there,
but
I
went
down
and
talked
to
the
majority
floor
leader
of
the
house
about
why
he
wanted
to
bear
and-
and
you
know
what
he
was
like
when
he
didn't
want
it
in
crimes,
but
it
is
a
crime.
I
mean
the
the
statute,
makes
it
a
crime,
and
then
he
was
also
concerned
that
he
didn't
want
to
open
up
the
equal
enjoyment.
A
A
C
A
I
think
I
don't
think
that's
the
problem.
I
think
it's,
I
think
it's
within
the
title.
If
you
look
at
the
enact,
you
look
at
the
paragraph.
The
title
which
is
line
one
on
on
page
one
and
actually
into
the
miscellaneous
offenses
prohibiting
discrimination
based
upon
the
goal
of
19
vaccination
status
is
specified
for
discrimination
based
on
that's
exactly
where
it
is
it's
in
crimes
and
offenses
and
miscellaneous
offenses
in
title
six.
B
Mr
chairman,
that's
where
it
started
out
and
it
was
organized
in
a
more
reader-friendly
manner
when
it
was
there,
because
insurance
didn't
come
in
first
and
you
had
all
your
definitions
and
you
could
look
at
the
definitions
and
it
read
a
lot
better
in
title
six
and
that's
where
it
started
out
in
an
effort
to
work
through
the
mirror
process.
B
We
we
made
some
adjustments
and
that's
the
legislative
process
and
what
we
go
through.
So
you
know
if,
if
we
want
to
move
it,
it
does
look
to
me
like
the
title
lends
itself
to
that,
because
it
was
written.
That
way
in
the
first
place,.
A
All
persons
of
good
deportment
are
entitled
to
full
enjoyment
of
all
accommodations
advantages,
facilities,
privileges
in
all
places
or
agencies
which
are
in
public
in
nature
or
which
invite
the
patronage
of
the
public
without
any
distinction,
discrimination
or
restriction
on
account
of
race,
religion,
color,
sex,
national
or
national
origin,
or
the
culprit
19
vaccination
status.
That's
so
you
strike
everything
in
69101
and
you
add
vaccination
status,
which
makes
it
very
clear
what
you're
doing,
and
it
actually
simplifies
it
significantly.
A
A
I
think
you
agreed
for
title
six
and
then
I
think
actually
what
you
would
do
is
you
would
have
to
take
a
you.
Just
you'd
have
to
define
what
copa
19
status
means.
You'd
have
to
put
that
you'd
have
to
just
add
they'll.
Do
we
haven't
seen
so
you
take
that
and
become
c
in
69101
and
so
you'd
add
that
language
into
69101?
B
So
you'd
get
rid
of
the
whole,
so
even
when
it
was
in
title
six,
all
of
the
everything
starting
on
page
seven
on
was
still
there
to
pull
that
over
into
all
of
those
other
yeah.
A
F
Mr
chairman,
as
long
as
we're
on
that
I
just
and
this
ma
this
may
be
a
floor.
Amendment
too,
I'm
I'm
concerned
that
there
are
situations
where
I
think
it's
legitimate
to
inquire
as
to
vaccination
status,
nursing
home.
If
you
run
a
chemotherapy
infusion
center
hospitals,
I
mean
you
know
where
people
are
sick
or
immune
suppressed.
F
A
F
You're
striking
that
language,
but
then
you're
just
simply
sticking
into
the
the
anti-discrimination
for
public
accommodations
vaccination
status.
I
can
understand
a
skilled
facility,
not
being
able
to
say
well.
You
know
we
want
to
inquire
as
to
your
race
or
your
religion,
but
I
can
they
can't
do
that,
but
I
can
understand
vaccinations
different
deal.
F
I
mean
if
I
well,
you
know
you've
been
through
it.
I
had
a
client
that
was
through
it.
You
know
his
95
year
old
mother
couldn't
go
and
be
by
the
bedside
of
his
95
year
old
father
in
the
nursing
home,
but
it
would
have
been
nice
to
be
able
to
say
mom's
been
vaccinated.
Can
she
go
sit
by
dad
while
he
dies.
F
A
A
Well,
let's,
let's
go
ahead,
let's
go
ahead
and
finish
up
really
quick
and
I
I
think
if
anybody
wants
to
take
that
on
h,
they
can
go
up
and
talk
to
the
attorney
and-
and
there
might
be
time
we
can-
we
can
ask
them
to
lay
it
back
later
and
work
on
the
last
and
you
might
be
able
to
get
me
the
whole
amendment
done
and
time
you
know
and
time
to
have
the
bill
before
the
bill's
heard.
A
B
B
Okay,
so
page
seven
line
16
after
21
4
309,
a
insert
21,
26,
1,
102,
a
xvi
and
then
page
10
after
line
7
insert
26
1
102
definitions,
subsection
a
as
used
in
this
act,
except
as
otherwise
provided
in
26
2901
and
26
22
501
through
26,
22,
503
and
sure
means
any
person
engaged
in
as
an
indebted
or
a
surety
or
contractor
in
the
business
of
entering
into
contracts
of
insurance
or
annuity
of
annuity.
B
B
A
D
If
you
read
his
note,
read
his
comments,
I
would
echo
some
of
those
with
some
of
the
issues
that
I
see
with
this
bill,
but
as
far
as
creating
kind
of
putting
some
business
owners
in
the
crossfire
between
federal
law
and
state
law,
at
the
heart
of
some
of
my
issues,
but
like
I
say,
I
think
this
issue
is
important.
It
needs
to
get
to
the
floor
so
I'll
be
voting
in
the
affirmative
and
I
have
to
leave
now.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you.
If
you
left
the
vote,
I
did
okay.
Thank
you.
Any
of
their
comments
are
ready
for
the
vote
and
I'll
just
echo
the
same
things.
I
don't
think
this
bill's
ready
yet,
but
you
know
I
I
guess
it's
the
saturday
night
live
adage
is
that
you
know
we
go
on
now
because
we're
ready,
because
it's
time-
and
so
I
I'm
going
to
move
this
forward
to
do
the
cut
that
I
have
some
significant
concerns
about
the
bill.