►
From YouTube: House Floor Session-Day 27, February 16, 2023-PM
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
C
Thank
you,
Mr
Speaker,
I
move
third
reading,
amendment
number
one
to
Senate
file,
88
and
now
withdraw
it
at
the
appropriate
time.
Ladies
and
gentlemen,
I
just
want
to
bring
back
the
conversation
of
what
we're
really
doing
here.
It's
it's
a
drastic
change
and
it's
a
change.
That's
going
to
affect
a
lot
of
people
in
the
state.
You
know,
I've
got
a
lot
of
constituents
who
are
Sportsman
guides
Outfitters.
All
of
the
above
that
that
this
will
directly
affect
it,
changes
the
course
of
what
we've
had
for
decades
in
this.
C
That's
what
it
that's
what
it
amounts
to.
You
know
selfishly
I,
like
the
idea
I'm
way
under
the
necessary
points
to
draw
the
tag,
but
we
gotta
think
outside
ourselves
sometimes
and
do
what's
best
for
the
people,
for
our
constituents
and
for
Wyoming
and
understanding
that
this
system
is
gonna,
come
to
a
complete
halt
and
we're
going
to
tell
people
sorry,
you're,
you're,
no
longer
going
to
get
that
dream,
hunt,
you're,
gonna,
go
back
to
Ground,
Zero
and
and
your
time
and
effort
and
money
is
going
to
be
put
to
waste.
C
C
We
we've
got
to
be
able
to
do
what's
best
for
the
majority
of
our
constituents
and
and
because
of
that
I
stand
in
opposition
to
this
bill
and
I
hope
we
can
put
this
aside
and
and
come
up
with
something
better
because
I'm
ready
to
to
have
those
conversations
so
I
urge
you
no
vote
on
this
Bill.
Thank
you.
A
D
The
current
system
we
have
is
unsustainable,
long
term.
This
system
protects
those
folks
who
have
all
the
points
for
four
years
and
that
they
they
will
have
that
dream
of
drawing
and
then
beyond
that
other
people
who
have
multi
who
have
many
points.
Those
points
will
be
cubed
in
this
case
with
the
amendment
that
are
that
the
good
representative
from
Sheridan
brought.
D
D
Is
there
a
greater
chance
that
somebody
who
has
their
points
cubed
will
have
a
greater
chance
of
winning
that
and
drawing
in
that
Lottery?
Absolutely.
This
is
not
perfect
in
any
way
shape
or
form,
but
it
does
address
what
is
currently
a
failing
system
so
I'm
on
against
the
amendment
Amendment
and
for
the
Bill.
Thank
you.
E
A
It
will
not
allow
in
the
long
run
it
will
not
allow
anybody
young
to
be
able
to
have,
and
by
Young
I
mean
40
years
of
age,
I'm
60
right.
So
it's
it's
not
sustainable
long-term
in
in
providing
any
kind
of
opportunity
for
hunters,
and
so
if
this
is
not,
if
this
amended
version
of
88
is
not
the
path,
then
what
is
the
path?
And
that's
that's
the
question
I
have,
and
you
know,
I
have
some
ideas
on
how
I'd
have
done
it.
A
F
G
Thank
you,
Mr
Speaker
I,
unlike
you,
already
know
how
I'm
going
to
vote,
but
to
me
we're
just
kicking
the
count.
Can
down
the
road
further.
There's
too
many
instances
where
the
bonus
Point
does
not
work
any
better
than
the
preference
point.
So
we
just
need
to
try
to
figure
out
some
way
to
take
care
of
these
people
that
have
spent
all
this
money
and
time
trying
to
get
a
license
and
then
go
back
to
take
your
chances
each
year.
So
vote
no.
H
Thank
you,
Mr
Speaker,
you
know
we're
just
piling
one
bad
Bill
on
a
bad
system.
This
bonus
points
are
aren't
going
to
work.
The
best
thing
we
can
do
is
maybe,
in
four
years
quit
quit
giving
out
any
more
preference
points
and
in
four
years,
get
rid
of
that
bill
and
just
go
back
to
a
random
draw
where
everybody
is
on
the
same
footage
and
I
think
that's
the
only
way
this
is
going
to
work
in
the
long
run,
because
these
these
bonus
points
we're
just
kicking
the
can
down
the
road.
Thank
you.
I
Thank
you,
Mr
Speaker.
So,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
we
talk
about
these
points
and
one
important
issue
is:
is
there
are
people
out
there?
There
are
a
lot
of
people
who
have
20
or
more
points.
That
alone
says
the
system
doesn't
work
as
it
is.
Currently,
you
know
I
remember
when
they
started
this
system
and
yes
I've
been
putting
in
since
they
started
it
they
at
the
time
the
idea
was
in
five
to
ten
years.
I
You
were
almost
guaranteed
of
a
license
and
at
the
animal
numbers
in
those
days
you
probably
were
but
over
time
over
the
last
and
let's
you
get
a
point
a
year.
If
you
apply
and
you
don't
draw
a
license,
you
get
a
point.
If
you
don't
want
to
even
do
that,
you
can
buy
a
point
over
the
years,
so
20
some
people
have
25
points
25
years.
I
We
need
to
come
up
with
a
better
idea
of
giving
people
the
opportunity
to
hunt
these
animals
and
it's
an
opportunity.
There's
no
guarantee
I,
wouldn't
want
to
guarantee.
What
fun
is
that
you
know
you
hunt.
You
hunt
sheep.
You
can
spend
literally
weeks
in
the
mountains
and
not
see
one.
Then
again,
you
can
see
one
getting
out
of
your
truck
and
that's
the
opportunity.
I
I
You
got
a
number
of
people,
as
the
good
speaker
had
said,
who
spent
I
believe
it
was
18
months.
Looking
at
this
issue,
we
had
citizens,
we
had
Hunters
Outfitters
ranchers
other
people
and
that
go
look
at
the
the
the
diverse
background
of
the
people
on
this
committee.
Some
were
Hunters
on
the
task
force.
Rather
some
were
Hunters.
Some
were
not.
They
spent
a
lot
of
time.
They
looked
at
other
states.
You
know
the
states
with
south
of
us
has
a
trophy
elk
area,
you're
stuck
putting
in
that
area
for
at
least
I.
I
J
J
You
know
I
mentioned
before
I
had
an
opportunity
years
ago,
when
I
put
in
for
a
Moose
tag
and
I
got
it.
That's
a
good
memory
had
a
good
hunt,
even
though
I
missed,
but
in
those
days
we
didn't.
We
didn't
have
this
bonus
system
where
you
kind
of
Stack
your
way
in
or
you
buy
your
points
and
stack
your
way
in
and
hope
some
year,
you'll
get
lucky
I,
don't
think.
That's
the
right
way
to
go.
J
K
C
C
It
might
look
good,
but
eventually
it's
going
to
break
and
that's
not
the
road
we
want
to
go
down
and
I
appreciate
the
work
of
the
task
force.
I
I'm,
not
saying
that
they
didn't
put
in
hard
work,
but
all
of
us
have
put
in
lots
of
work
on
bills
to
find
out
that
that's
not
the
direction
we
wanted
to
go
and
so
I'm
willing
to
put
in
the
work
and
and
I'll
I
know.
C
C
A
A
A
A
M
Thank
you,
Mr
Speaker,
I
move
third
reading,
amendment
number
one
to
Senate
file
91
and
ask
for
your
favorable
consideration
members.
This
is
an
applicability
Clause.
Essentially
it's
just
clarifying
that
we
are
not
changing
existing
law
as
it
currently
stands
in
Wyoming,
so
that
someone
couldn't
run
into
court
and
say:
oh,
you
passed
a
law.
You
must
have
intended
to
change
the
law,
we're
making
it
very
clear
that
we're
not
we're
just
confirming
what
the
law
already
is
based
based
on
a
court
case.
A
Anybody
else
for
their
first
time,
question
being
called
all
those
in
favor
third
reading,
amendment
number
one
to
Senate
file,
91
signified
by
saying
aye
all
those
opposed.
Third
reading
amendment
number
one
to
Senate
file
91
has
been
adopted,
foreign
91,
having
been
read
three
separate
times.
The
question
is:
shall
the
bill
pass
Chief
clerk?
Please
call
the
roll.
L
A
N
A
A
Okay,
so
that
bill
144
was
was
was
referred
to
committee
yesterday
and
I'm
going
to
rule
that
this
motion
is
out
of
order,
because
a
reasonable
time
has
not
been
allowed
for
that
committee
to
hear
that
bill.
So
if
you
want
to
overrule
my
ruling,
then
you'd
have
to
bring
a
motion
to
overrule
the
ruling
of
the
chair
that
a
reasonable
time
has
not
occurred
for
that
bill
to
have
been
heard
in
that
committee.
A
So
it's
standard
motion
Chief,
you
got
any
knowledge,
Chairman's
walnuts
or
it's
debatable
right
appeal
of
the
appeal
of
the
chair
is
debatable
as
far
as
I
know
so,
yep
all
right
so
representative
bear
explain
and
you
have
to
stick
to
the
motion
and
that,
which
is
why
that
rule
should
apply
when
I
say
it.
Shouldn't
apply
right
now,.
O
Thank
you,
Mr
chairman.
We
have
many
many
bills
right
now
and
this
particular
committee
that
I'm
moving
it
to
does
not
have
very
many
bills,
so
I
think
in
a
reasonable
amount
of
time.
This
would
be
heard
and
I
believe
having
it
heard
this
week
will
help
it.
The
bill,
advance
and
I
think
that
this
is
something
that
the
the
state
is
very
interested
in
us
setting
a
policy.
So
therefore
I
believe
it's
important
that
we
advance
it.
A
Mr
chairman,
thank
you
on
and
against
the
motion.
First
and
foremost
the
the
committee
I
send
it
to
has
the
most
senior
membership
in
this
body.
They
can
meet
three
times
a
day
five
days
a
week.
They
can
hear
any
bill
in
any
amount
of
time.
One
day
is
not
a
reasonable
amount
of
time
to
have
heard
any
bill.
In
fact,
it
could
hardly
have
been
noticed
for
today
and
so
be
based
on
that
I.
P
E
P
R
C
Thank
you.
As
far
as
the
point
of
order
didn't
come.
Thank
you.
Mr
chairman
I,
as
a
freshman,
feel
that
we
rush
a
lot
of
things
that
were
go,
go,
go
that
that
we
have
to
get
through
stuff,
and
so
one
day,
I
feel
just
with
the
precedent
we've
set.
This
session
is
in
a
reasonable
amount
of
time
to
have
had
a
bill
come
before
committee,
see
it
I
I
mean
have
something
done
with
it.
So
I
support
the
motion
to
overrule.
S
You
Mr
chairman
on
and
against
the
motion
to
overrule
the
ruling
of
the
chair.
I
certainly
support
this
bill
and
it
deals
an
important
topic
that
needs
to
be
discussed
and
I
certainly
think
it's
one
thing
if
it
had
been
sitting
in
a
committee
for
weeks
or
even
four
or
five
days,
but
it
just
got
referred,
we
need
to
let
the
process
work,
so
I
think
that
this
is
premature.
Overrushed
and
I
encourage
a
Novo.
Thank
you.
T
T
T
U
First
time,
thank
you
Mr
chairman,
so
you
know
I,
guess,
I
guess
this
is
really
a
question
of
do
our
rules
actually
matter
or
do
we
as
the
body
not
care?
What's
in
the
rules,
because
I
I
really
don't
understand
how
we
can
say
that
one
day
elapsed
is
a
reasonable
amount
of
time
when
not
even
all
of
our
committees
meet
every
day.
All
none
of
our
committees,
except
for
the
committee
that
it
got
referred
to.
U
That's
the
only
one
that
meets
every
day
so
to
argue
that
one
day
is
a
reasonable
amount
of
time
seems
baffling
to
me
is
I
guess
the
word
that
I
would
use
so
so
I
would
urge
you
to
vote
no
on
overruling
the
speaker's
ruling,
because
I
think
our
rules
that
we
set-
and
we
all
agree
to
at
the
beginning
of
the
year,
actually
matter
and
I-
think
overruling
the
speaker
in
this
decision
is
a
little
bit
of
folly.
Thank
you,
Mr,
chairman,
okay,.
V
You
Mr
chairman,
just
to
point
to
go
along
with
the
past
couple
speakers.
Yes,
we're
following
rules.
This
is
Rule
5.6.
Yes,
it
is
procedure
and
the
thing
is
is
doing
it
today,
since
we
found
out
a
committee
is
available,
they
could
meet
on
it
tomorrow.
So
it's
just
it's
just
to
help
things
along.
We
all
know
we
have
tons
of
bills
to
listen
to
if
they're
going
to
be
heard,
so
we're
just
trying
to
help
that
along
nobody
knew
that
there
was
going
to
be
this
availability.
V
So
it's
just
one
of
those
things.
So
it's
it's
not
going
against
anybody
in
particular
or
for
any
specific
reason.
It's
just
to
get
a
bill
heard
in
it
and
taken
from
one
committee
that
is
very,
very
burdened
with
bills
and
budget
which
we're
hoping
to
get
to
here
shortly
and
to
assigning
it
to
another
committee
where
the
chairman
is
more
than
willing.
Thank
you.
E
Okay,
any
other
Members
First,
Time,
okay,
we're
going
to
move
the
second
time
any
members.
Second
time
that
spoke
first
now
what
this
motion
it
wasn't
expressed
by
the
move
or
this,
but
this
is
house
rule
8-4
an
appeal:
that's
what
the
motion
is
an
appeal
and
I'll
just
read
it.
A
vote
of
the
majority
of
the
members
present
shall
be
sufficient
to
sustain
an
appeal
from
a
decision
of
the
presiding
officer.
It's
rule
8-4
members
present.
E
O
Thank
you,
Mr
chairman
I,
just
think.
It's
been
said
that
this
committee,
that
it
has
the
bill,
now
meets
three
times
a
day,
or
at
least
it
can
so
the
one
day
is
a
little
bit
different
when
you
have
a
committee
that
can
meet
that.
Often,
but
again,
that
committee
is
loaded,
so
I
would
just
urge
your
I
vote
and
I
call
for
the
question.
E
E
Clerk
informs
me
since
we're
going
to
first
go.
The
first
protocol,
be
a
Voice
vote
and
then
we'll
probably
have
a
division,
we'll
go
to
standing
division
on
it.
Okay,
so
again
all
those
in
favor
then
of
the
appeal,
please
say:
aye
all
those
opposed.
Please
say:
no,
okay!
The
peel
has
failed
division
being
called
all
those
in
favor
that
PL.
Please
stand.
E
A
I
think
it'd
be
fair
to
say
that
it
would
be
second
kind
of
second
reading
questioning,
so
you
could
only
go
up
twice,
but
certainly
people
will
be
allowed
to
ask
questions
through
the
process.
So
are
you
guys
going
to
do
it
by
sections
Mr
chairman?
Thank
you.
So
probably
what
I'll
do
is
I'll
just
do
two
by
section
and
allow
people
to
come
up
on
each
section.
That's
talked
about.
If
you
want
got
questions
and
we'll
run
it
that
way,.
X
Thank
you,
Mr
chair,
Mr,
Speaker
privilege
of
the
floor.
If
I
may
please
so
as
we
get
ready
to
go
through
the
conference
committee
report,
I
just
want
to,
we
want
to
make
sure
that
you
have
the
documents
you
should
have.
The
conference
committee
summary
report,
that's
on
the
the
legal
page
and
we'll
be
referring
to
that.
When
we
go
through
and
explain
it
we'll
be
doing
it
Page
by
page,
but
that'll
be
the
one
we
work
off
off
from.
You
should
also
have
a
copy
of
the
joint
conference
report.
X
Now
you
may
have
a
couple
of
them.
One
is
signed
and
one
isn't
signed.
The
this
shows
the
adoption
of
all
the
house
appropriate
amendments,
all
of
the
senator
amendments
and
then
in
the
back.
It
will
show
you
the
amended
section
300s.
So
as
you
get
in
it
as
we
get
in
and
talk
about
how
some
of
those
funds
went
into
the
the
reserve
accounts
and
in
the
Wyoming's
tomorrow,
those
footnotes
will
be
in
this.
This
document
there's
also
a
document
that
it
says
summary
of
fun
movements
and
savings.
X
X
Deliberation
might
be
the
right
word
that
we've
had
since
I've,
been
in
the
legislature.
The
number
of
days
in
getting
the
budget
bill
out
with
a
couple
of
weeks
left
in
the
session.
Just
has
not
happened,
the
nut,
the
amount
of
time
that
the
public
are
colleagues
and
the
public
have
had
to
review
the
budget
bill
before
we
started
debating
it
is
a
lot,
is
the
most
we've
ever
had
10
days
to
review
the
budget
bill
before
we
ever
started.
Talking
about
it.
X
There
is
there's
some
interesting
things
in
the
in
the
bill.
We
in
this
supplemental
budget
we
sent,
we
spent
383
million
dollars
of
General
funds,
which
leaves
which
is
just
a
little
bit
less
than
what
we
have
outstanding
so
in
in
other
personal
or
committee
bills.
So
we
and
and
that's
unusual.
Normally,
your
budget
has
far
more
spending
in
it
than
the
other
bills
that
are
coming
in
that
will
be
debating,
but
there's
still
bills
out.
There
I
think
there's
still
bills
out
there
that
contain
175
million
dollars
worth
of
Appropriations.
X
That
will
debate,
and
so
there's
it's
just
about
split.
Here's
a
it's
interesting
that
for
every
dollar
we
spent,
so
we
spent
383
million
in
the
budget
Bill
we
saved
three
dollars
and
fifty
cents.
Every
dollar
spent
we
saved
three
dollars
and
fifty
cents.
We
put
into
savings
in
the
supplemental
budget,
1.4
billion
with
a
B
dollars
more
into
savings
than
we
ever
put
in
on
our
budget
Bill.
Even
during
the
boom
times.
X
We
we
set
up
the
reserve
accounts,
we
funded
the.
If
you
would
look
at
the
top
of
the
comparative
portion
in
section
one.
It
shows
where
we
ended
up
in
in
with
a
115
million
in
the
in
the
in
the
bra
is
showing
the
lsra
at
1.4
the
school
Foundation
program
at
232
million,
we're
generally
happy
to
come
out
of
here
and
leaving
a
million
in
there
where
it
we're
at
Double.
Of
that,
then
we
we've
got
the
school
Foundation
Reserve
account
with
63
million
water
one.
X
We
you'll
recall
we
added
some
money.
There,
we've
got
27
million
there.
The
reserve
account
for
the
pmtf
has
507
million
the
common
School
permanent
land
fund.
Reserve
account
has
569..
The
pmtf
now
has
nine
million
9
billion
with
a
B
593
million
600
000
and
the
common
School
permanent
land
fund
will
now
have
at
will
now
have
4
billion,
with
a
B
957
million
six
hundred
thousand
in
our
Appropriations.
We
were
really
close
to
the
Senate.
We've
done
a
couple
of
things
that
they
didn't.
X
We
put
that
160
million
of
the
governors
into
savings
and
they
spin
it.
But
as
we
worked
out,
we
we
really
came
out
pretty
close
on
those
Appropriations
for
spending
at
356
million,
and
then
the
total
was
at
899,
with
all
your
with
all
of
the
funds
out
of
the
lsra
and
school
Capital.
Construction,
remember
that
was
in
there
as
well.
X
Then
you,
if
you
come
down
to
the
transfer
to
savings,
you'll
recall
that
we
put
a
half
million
dollars
into
the
state,
fair,
the
cultural
trust
fund.
We
were
we
added
nine
million.
That
leaves
us
at
27.
So
that's
just
3
million
shy
of
having
that
fully
funded
the
wildlife
trust
fund.
We
added
another
10
with
another,
almost
million
dollars
that
they
can
use
for
matching
funds
to
get
to
the
exact
amount
that
they
need.
The
we
have
the
Wyoming's
tomorrow
endowment
fund.
X
X
X
A
So
how
I'm
going
to
do
this
just
to
repeat
I'll
I'll,
let
this
the
probes
go
through
each
whatever
section
chairman
Nicholas
goes
through
and
then
we
can
ask
questions.
So
if
they're
in
your
mind,
right
then
and
then
we'll
go
to
the
next
person
and
then
ask
questions
and
and
just
kind
of
roll
through
it
like
that.
So
chairman
Nicholas.
W
Thank
you,
Mr
Speaker
I
would
move
joint
conference
committee
number
one
to
House
Bill
one
and
ask
for
your
approval
and
we'll
we
will
walk
through
and
explain
this
to
you.
So
we're
asking
you
to
approve
1.4
billion
dollars
in
savings,
because
that's
that's
what
this
bill
does
and
it's.
So
if
everyone
goes
there
to
their
summary
sheet,
I'm
going
to
do
the
first
page,
so
it's
the
larger
one.
W
So
number
one
was
has
to
do
with
a
position
in
the
governor's
office
that
we
for
the
education
Commission
of
of
States.
We
simply
move
that
back,
took
it
out
of
the
governor's
up
from
the
Department
of
Education
and
put
it
back
into
the
governor's
office.
So
you
may
recall
what
our
discussions
on
that
then
going
down
to
three
and
four:
this
has
to
do
with
the
thyroid
Thompson
Building
and
412
thousand
dollars
for
General
services
for
the
operations
of
the
thyrotosa
building.
W
You
may
recall
we
had
had
not
funded
that
recently
recently
constructed
building,
but
we
hadn't
put
the
the
ongoing
operational
costs
until
today
and
in
this
budget.
So
then,
if
you
go
down
to
the
next
line,
which
is
five
and
six,
this
has
to
do
with
350
000,
so
that
we
can
open
this
Capitol
Building,
particularly
during
the
summer
on
on
on
the
weekends.
W
W
So
then
down
to
nine
and
ten.
This
is
8.6
million
dollars
for
the
while
link.
That's
that's
for
the
ongoing
operational
costs
of
wildlink;
that's
that's
just
what
it
costs
and
so
we're
funding
that.
Then.
If
you
go
down
to
11
and
12,
this
is
twenty
thousand
dollars
having
to
do
with
an
all-inclusive
care
for
the
elderly
study
program.
W
Then,
if
you
go
down
to
13
and
14
.,
this
is
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
to
the
DFS
for
one-to-one
matching
for
clients
with
high
Behavioral
Health
needs
and
I
think
you
can
call
when
we
talked
about
that
going
down
to
15
and
16
..
This
increases
the
amount
of
funds
in
the
rgp
programs.
That's
the
mineral
royalty
grant
program
that
the
our
five
electeds
have
authority
of
and
Grant
to
our
local
community.
W
So
then,
if
you
go
down
to
17
and
18
300
000
School
of
energy
resources
for
analysis,
A
feasibility
study
for
graphite,
high
grade
graphite
with
coal
or
other
sources,
then
19
and
20.
This
is
22.
This
is
the
ECA,
basically
funding
our
educational
requirements,
22
million
and
down
the
last
one
is
2122.
W
Y
Y
So
we
deleted
the
house
version
of
this
amendment
and
we
deleted
and
further
amended
the
Senate
version
and
you'll
see
there.
If
you
go
all
the
way
over
to
the
right
page
under
description
that
we
eliminated
the
correction
to
the
line
that
discussed
that
prior
appropriation
for
funding
for
the
airport
tower,
so
a
delete
and
further
amend
on
line
24.
Y
Excuse
me,
so
these
are
to
the
state's
Treasurer's
Office,
allowing
an
increase
in
funds
special
Revenue,
so
not
General
funds
to
be
used
for
increased
compensation
for
the
chief
technology
officer
in
that
office
line.
26
is
to
a
I,
and
this
is
a
decrease
in
the
funding
for
a
building
security
guard
there
in
the
Casper
building
line.
27
is
a
delete
and
further
amend
to
a
and
I,
and
this
coincides
with
line
28
which
was
adopted,
and
so
this
was
the
survey
of
state
employees.
Y
So,
on
the
house
side,
we
wanted
to
understand
the
visibility
of
providing
child
care
for
state
employees,
and
so
we
added
that
to
the
study
of
survey,
the
survey
of
employees
who
might
be
interested
in
moving
to
Riverton
to
work.
So
now
it
is
one
study
with
multiple
questions
for
the
same
amount
of
money
line.
29
is
a
deleting
the
sentence
position
on
funding
for
the
marketing
for
the
State
Fair
line.
30
is
an
adopted
of
The
house's
position.
Y
This
is
an
increase
to
the
Department
of
Revenue
for
a
position
to
administer
the
property
tax
refund
program
so
that
when
our
constituents
are
seeking
refunds,
there's
a
person
to
help
them
with
that
and
line
31
is
a
delete
and
further
amend.
So
this
is
to
ensure
that
we're
not
stacking
funds
for
the
property
relief
program
in
multiple
bills.
Y
Z
Y
Mr
Speaker,
thank
you
for
the
question.
So
so
again,
this
is
embedded
in
those
technical
Corrections
on
line
23
and
24..
If
you
go
to
the
line
24
all
the
way
to
the
bottom,
far
right,
you'll
see
that
we
are
deleting
a
technical
correction
that
the
set
the
other
body
made
to
maintain
The
house's
position
so
that
the
funding
that
was
priorly
appropriated
stays
in
the
in
the
budget
bill
for
that
airport
tower
to
be
constructed.
A
X
Thank
you,
Mr
chairman
we're
on
page
three
on
items
32
we
delete
and
further
amend
house
second
reading
amendment
number
seven
where-
and
this
is
the
cultural
trust
fund,
where
we
reduced
the
house
position
of
six
billion
by
a
half
to
three
million,
that's
and
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
that
brings
the
total
to
that
Corpus
up
to
27
million
dollars
on
item
33.
We
deleted
Senate
second
reading
amendment
number
21,
where
they
took
out
a
requested
position
in
the
department
of
construction.
X
We
put
that
back
in
after
reminding
them
of
the
conversation
we
had
with
that
agency.
This
is
helping
with
the
procurement
and
accounting
analysts
that
they
have
in
the
need
in
that,
and
so
they
adopted
our
position
and
we
removed
that
item
number
34.
We
deleted
house
third
reading
amendment
number
four.
This
was
some
language
that
we
put
in
there
that
was
relevant
to
some
other
bills
where
they,
where
General
funds
were
used
for
border
control,
where
we
have
for
the
past
several
years
used
water
One
funds.
X
So
we
put
some
language
in
there
talking
about
which
document
governed.
We
we
in
working
with
the
the
Senate
and
looking
at
the
two
bills
that
are
out
there
we're
going
to
resolve
that
issue
in
in
the
in
the
two
water
bills,
and
so
that's
all
deleted
item
35.
We
delete
and
further
amend
house
third
reading
amendment
number
four,
where
we
there
is
a
request
for
a
position
in
the
state
Engineer's
Office,
that
same
position
exists
in
House,
Bill
22.
X
The
consensus
between
both
bodies
is
the
position
as
needed,
but
doesn't
need
to
be
duplicated
so,
depending
on
what
house
bill
222
does
will
depend
on
whether
this
position
comes
out
of
of
this
action.
We're
out
of
the
house
bill
222.
in
item
36,
we
adopt
Senate
second
reading
amendment
number
22
on
the
wildlife
trust
fund.
X
That
was
some
language
added
in
at
the
request
of
the
agency
to
in
to
make
sure
that
this
you'll
recall
that
we
put
that
money
in
there,
because
the
this
agency
is
more
Nimble
in
handling
handling
this
type
of
natural
resource
issues,
and
so
we,
the
action
in
the
in
the
footnote,
was
to
make
sure
that
it's
not
subject
to
the
standard
application
process.
It
would
that
would
come
into
effect.
Item
number
37.
X
We
deleted
how
second
reading
amendment
number
12,
which
was
the
page
program
item
38.
We
delete
and
further
amend
house
third
reading
amendment
number
four
department
of
health
health
care
financing.
Was
we
directed
the
department
to
do
a
rebasing
study
for
the
comprehensive
waiver
and
in
community-based
Services?
We
had
an
appropriation
appropriation
in
there
for
the
the
committee.
We
reduce
that
amount
from
a
hundred
thousand
to
fifty
thousand
in
items
39
and
40.
We
further.
X
We
delete
and
further
amend
Senate
second
reading
amendment
number
27
and
adopt
house
reading
third
reading
amendment
number
27,
and
this
is
dealing
with
the
wait
list
where
we
reduced
they.
The
senate
had
eliminated
any
of
that
funding
and
we
brought
that
back
by
by
50
percent,
that
three
million
seven
hundred
and
seventy
five
thousand
dollars
and
it
can
be
used
for
comprehensive
and
support
waivers
and
with
and
that'll
be
biennialized
moving
forward.
X
In
item
number
41,
we
adopt
how
second
reading
amendment
number
43,
where
the
house
put
in
500
000
General
funds,
matched
by
federal
funds
for
the
preventive
and
diversion
Services
efforts
in
the
Department
of
Family
Services
in
item
42.
There
was
two
actions
here
in
the
Senate
we
delete
both
of
them
because
they
they
actually
just
nullified.
Each
other
sent
a
second
reading.
Amendment
number
31
and
Senate
third
reading
amendment
number
number
nine
and
find
the
item
44.
X
We
adopt
house
third
reading
amendment
number,
six
State,
Lance
and
Investments,
where
we
increase
the
compensation.
We
recall
this
was
I,
think
a
request
from
the
executive
branch
to
in
the
agency
for
a
different
position
that
we
than
what
we
had
authorized
increases
the
that
authorized
position
for
a
specialist
to
policy
and
for
policy
and
planning.
So
Mr
chairman
I'm,
happy
to
take
any
questions
on
those
actions.
AA
You
Mr
chairman
Mr
Speaker.
Excuse
me:
we
are
on
page
four
item
number
45
house.
Third,
reading
amendment
number
28.
This
was
a
delete
and
further
amend,
and
this
is
in
relation
to
the
physician's
assistant
school
over
at
the
good
University,
and
we
reduced
that
number
from
10
million
dollars
for
this
standing
up
of
that
program
to
7.5
million
dollars.
Moving
on
to
item
number
46
Senate.
AA
AA
Amendment
number
16:
this
was
at
the
University
and
the
school
of
energy
resources.
175
thousand
dollars
for
an
economist
positions
to
study,
graphite
uses
item
50
was
deleted.
Senate
third
reading
amendment
number
12
in
the
Department
of
Corrections
for
250
000
of
the
opioid
settlement
to
be
used
for
as
Therapeutics
to
treat
persons
on
Parade,
probation
and
parole
item
51
was
deleted
and
in
that
that
is
Senate
second
reading
Amendment
36,
which
means
that
a
hundred
and
forty
one
thousand
dollars
for
a
program
manager
position
will
be
included
in
this
year's
budget
item.
AA
52
and
53
are
good
friends
down
the
hall
really
took
care
of
this
on
their
own,
so
Senate.
Second
reading
amendment
number
37
and
Senate
third
reading
Amendment
30
13
were
both
deleted
in
the
conference
committee
action
and
that
was
written
regards
to
the
business
ready
communities
adding
30
million
dollars
to
their
account.
They
first
delete
removed
it
and
then
they
added
it
right
back,
so
they
corrected
their
own
action.
The
conference
committee
still
had
to
act
on
it
and
so
deleted.
Both
of
those
actions.
AA
Item
54
was
a
delete
and
further
amend.
This
is
Senate.
Second
reading
amendment
number
38
to
the
Business
Council
and
their
Community
facilities
program,
and
this
is
going
to
be
further
amended
into
item
81
on
the
back
page.
But
in
this
amendment
the
total
amount
was
was
amended
to
be
5.5
million
dollars
and
I'll.
Explain
the
remainder
in
item
81.
AA
AA
Item
57
was
a
delete
and
further
amend
and
it's
really
items
57,
58
and
59
are
all
connected.
So
items
57
and
58
were
delete
and
further
amend,
and
that
is
how
second
reading
amendment
number
23
and
house
third
reading
amendment
number
10,
and
this
is
the
230
or
280
thousand
dollars
and
one
FTE
for
the
purposes
of
managing
charter
schools
and
then
the
language
saying
that
that
money
is
only
available
in
the
event
that
the
money
is
is
or
the
bill
about.
AB
Stith
Mr
speaker,
thank
you.
So,
on
page
five
of
this
large
sheet,
starting
at
item
60,
as
you
may
recall,
the
house
I
had
put
in
a
hundred
nine
thousand
dollars
to
add
an
additional
law
enforcement
position
in
the
gaming
commission.
This
the
Senate,
did
not
have
that.
We
acquiesce
to
their
position
for
that
item
61.
This
is
Wyoming's.
Tomorrow
we
had
had
40
million
dollars
in
the
budget
and
that
the
other
side
had
zero.
We
split
the
difference
in
this
conference
report
puts
20
million
dollars
into
Wyoming's
tomorrow.
AB
On
the
other
side
during
conference,
that
was,
that
was
cut
in
half
to
1.25
million
dollars.
You'll
see
it'll
show
up
as
a
section
300
and
it
it's
it
is,
has
all
the
same
structure
as
Wyoming's
tomorrow's
scholarship.
But
it's
not
called
that
because
until
the
wyomix
tomorrow
scholarship
gets
to
50
million,
we
can't
spend
a
dollar
so
now
the
next
several
items.
AB
AB
I
find
this
this
one
is
really
stunning,
because
what
it
does
is
at
the
bottom,
and
if
you
look
to
the
bottom
of
item
64
here
on
Page
Six,
when
all
the
dust
settles,
the
recommendation
is
to
put
367
million
594
000
into
the
common
School
permanent
land
fund,
so
the
school
Permanent
Fund
and
then
the
same
amount
150
there
on
the
left
of
General
funds
and
217
of
other
funds,
so
another
367
500,
367
million
594
000.
again
the
same
amount
goes
into
the
Wyoming,
the
permanent
Wyoming
mineral
trust
fund.
AB
So
collectively
that
is
735
million
dollars
that
goes
into
the
permanent
fonts.
That's
a
stunning!
It's
a
stunning
amount
item
65
again.
Some
of
these
is
more
of
a
a
technical
one.
Back
on
64..
You
may
wonder
why
on
64
it
takes
so
many
line
items
to
get
that
done,
and
the
bottom
line
reason
that
you
have
to
have
all
of
these
different
transfers
to
these
different
accounts
is,
for
example,
two-thirds
of
your
property
tax
that
you
pay
goes
to
pay
for
schools.
AB
Well,
we're
not
allowed
to
just
take
property
tax
spent
for
schools
and
put
it
into
permanent
savings.
We're
not
allowed
to
do
that,
so
the
work
around
essentially
is
to
take
a
combination
of
federal
mineral
royalties
and
other
funds
destined
for
the
construction
account
and
put
that
into
the
common
school
permit
land
fund.
So
that's
why
line
64
looks
so
complicated,
but
the
bottom
line
is
735
million
dollars
going
into
permanent
savings
at
the
bottom,
a
lines
paid
item
66.
you
remember.
AB
We
had
this
funny
160
million
dollars
that
we
expect
to
get
sort
of
revert
paid
back
by
the
federal
government
and
the
on
the
other
side.
They'd
put
it
all
in
the
governor's
office
for
special
projects,
Federal
Energy
matching
projects
for
say
a
hydrogen
Hub
or
carbon
sequestration.
What
the
conference
committee
has
done
is
said.
AB
AB
here
we
have
a
lot
of
money
again
going
into
savings,
but
this
time
it's
going
into
the
reserve
accounts.
So
the
very
top
line
item
there.
You
see
274
million
dollars
that
is
going
into
the
wine
permanent,
winding
mineral
trust
fund,
Reserve
account
so
I
think
it
was
the
sound
like
a
general
Reserves
and
then
the
other
number
359
million
dollars.
That's
going
into
the
common
school
permit.
Land
fund
Reserve
account,
and
you
may
recall
why
are
these
numbers,
what
they
are
the
whole
design
is.
AB
AB
The
rest
of
the
page
on
page
seven
well,
I
forgot
to
mention
on
item
67.
We
also
have
smaller
amounts.
4.6
million,
that's
going
into
the
I
believe
that
one
is
the
Hathaway
yeah,
the
Hathaway
account
and
1.4
million
going
into
the
higher
excellence
and
higher
education
account
and
again
the
reason.
The
reserve
accounts
and
the
reason
those
numbers
are
what
they
are
is
it
gets
you
to
the
five
times
the
the
spending
policy
amount.
AB
Okay,
after
that,
the
remaining
items
on
this
page,
seven
through
line
73.,
68,
69,
70,
71,
72
and
73.
Those
are
all
just
conforming
changes
to
make
sure
that
all
these
savings
work
together.
So
again
between
these
two
pages,
as
the
good
Vice
chairman
of
Appropriations
mentioned
earlier,
when
all
the
dust
settles,
you've
got
1.4
billion
dollars
going
into
savings,
of
which
a
little
more
than
half
is
into
the
permanent
funds.
AC
AA
Okay,
thank
you,
Mr
Speaker.
We
are
on
item
74.,
I'm,
not
sure
what
page
it
is
on
the
smaller
printed
sheets.
On
my
large
one
is
we're
on
page
seven
of
your
sheets
item
74..
This
is
a
delete
and
further
amend
and
it
is
connected
to
item
75,
which
is
also
a
delete
and
further
to
amends
to
an
item
74.,
it's
Senate
second
reading,
Amendment,
15
and
75,
it's
house
second
reading
Amendment
25,
and
this
is
regarding
School
Capital
Construction,
and
so
the
combined
total.
AA
So
once
you
find
out,
if
you
have
a
condition
or
a
capacity
issue
in
your
District,
then
you
the
next
step,
is
really
to
do
a
most
cost,
effective
remedy
study
and
that's
where
the
state
will
use
some
of
this
dot.
This
money,
along
with
the
district,
to
go
out
and
do
those
studies
to
figure
out
what
is
the
best
solution
for
the
issue
that
that
has
been
identified.
Fight
now.
Moving
on
to
item
76,
which
was
adopted,
it's
Senate
second
reading
in
number
16..
AA
Item
77
was
deleted,
which
was
sent
at
second
reading
number
47,
and
this
again
is
in
the
the
section
300s
and
the
senate
had
removed
the
language
spending
5
million
out
of
the
75
million
for
matching
funds,
and
so
we
deleted
that
and
we'll
go
ahead
and
spend
that
5
million
moving
on
to
item
78,
it
was
adopted
house
third
reading
number
37,
and
this
is
in
the
community
colleges.
It's
a
section
300
and
it's
3.5
million
for
the
community
colleges.
AA
Item
79
was
deleted.
That's
how
second
reading
amendment
number
52
that
this
is
for
the
unmet
housing
needs,
so
that
was
reduced
in
this
amendment.
Then
we
move
on
to
Amendment
or
item
number
80.
excuse
me,
which
was
deleted
and
further
amended,
and
this
is
house
third
reading
amendment
number
17.
The
house
position
was
at
10
million
dollars
and
this
reduces
that
amount
to
five
million
dollars.
AA
Moving
on
to
item
81,
this
is
delete
and
further
amend.
This
is
the
one
I
mentioned
earlier
that
is
tied
to
item
54,
and
so
the
total
amount
here
will
be
5.5
million
dollars,
with
the
first
2.6
695
million,
going
to
business,
to
the
Business
Council
for
municipalities
to
preserve
formal
facilities
that
have
already
received
grant
funding,
and
the
remaining
2.7
is
using
the
current
statutory
structure
for
general
purposes
of
a
community
facility
item
82
was
deleted.
AA
This
is
Senate
third
reading
amendment
number
19,
and
this
is
in
regards
to
Senate
file,
136
and
Senate
file.
136.
It
reduces
the
assessment
rate
from
nine
and
a
half
to
eight
and
a
half.
This
funding
would
have
been
used
to
make
communities
whole
if
that
were
to
go
into
effect.
Your
local
College
districts,
conservation,
districts,
Etc
and
the
committed
committee's
feeling
was
when
that
bill
hits
the
floor.
AA
We
would
take
care
of
the
Appropriations
in
that
bill
at
that
time,
as
opposed
to
trying
to
do
what
I
would
describe
as
a
blanket
coverage
in
the
budget
Bill
and
so
we'll
address
that
when
that
bill
comes
through
the
through
the
body
and
then
item
number
33
was
adopted,
and
this
is
house
third
reading
number
45
most
likely
this
will
not
be
used.
This
is
a
transfer
in
case
we
need
more
funding
and
so
the
way
I
would
describe.
AA
This
is
if,
as
that
had
the
good
co-chairman
of
the
committee
described
there's
more
spending
in
individual
bills
than
there
is
in
the
actual
budget
bill.
So
if
every
single
one
of
those
outstanding
House
and
Senate
house
bills,
Senate
files
that
are
still
in
the
process
were
to
pass
and
fully
funded,
then
this
number
item
number
83
would
maybe
be
used.
AA
But
even
if
just
half
of
those
bills
or
half
of
the
amount
in
those
bills
were
reduced
or
does
not
pass,
then
this
would
not
be
needed
at
all,
and
so
it's
really
just
completely
a
safety
mechanism
on
our
behalf,
and
so
that
was
adopted.
But
most
likely
will
not
be
used
so
with
that
any
questions,
foreign.
D
It
says
under
item
three
that
half
a
million
dollars
was
the
house
and
half
a
million
dollars
was
the
Senate
and
that
the
joint
conference
committee
was
half
a
million
dollars
in
yet
in
on
page
two
line:
29
it
takes
that
funding
out
or
and
I
waited
till
the
end
to
see
if
it
somehow
solved
itself,
because
sometimes
my
hair
gets
on
fire
about
something
and
then
I
find
out
three
pages
later
that
it's
all
fixed
up.
But
I
didn't
find
that
this
was
all
fixed
up.
X
So,
thank
you,
Mr,
chairman
and
just
to
clarify,
Madam
chairman
is
the
the
half
million
dollars
that
was
going
to
come
for
advertising
for
the
State
Fair
of
the
tourism.
Account
can
be
done,
but
we
deleted
the
requirement
of
it
in
this
budget
bill.
So
they
still
have
the
ability
to
do
it.
We
don't
we
don't
dictate
that
they
do
it,
and
that
was
a
position
yeah
yeah
it
was.
It
was
a
senate
position.
X
One
of
the
buildings
named
after
a
great
Eastern
Shoshone
chief
for
474
thousand,
just
really
pleased
with
the
way
that
director
is
taking
the
state
fair
and
in
those
facilities
there.
So
we
approve
that
and
then
approved
another
half
million
dollars
to
further.
Do
some
of
the
stuff
that
they
are
doing
up
there
and
then
we
also
approved
an
additional
half
million
dollars
that
they
didn't
request
to
be
used
for
matching
funds
to
grow.
The
trust
fund.
AC
A
AC
Thank
you,
speaker
yeah.
We
just
kind
of
Claire
and
need
a
little
more
clarity
to
that
now.
Does
that
mean
if
they
wanted
that
500
000
in
tourism
as
something
came
up,
they
would
go
ahead
and
be
able
to
get
that
or
it's
totally
gone,
what's
I
guess
not
quite
sure
on
what
that
really
meant.
Thank
you.
AA
Thank
you,
Mr
Speaker.
We
have
to
tag
team
this
because
we
are
on
second
reading
speaking
rules,
so
we
can't
speak
a
second
time
until
everyone
spoke
for
the
first
time,
so
I'll
Aid
my
good
friend
from
the
committee.
So
if
you're
looking
at
the
sum
this
summary
sheet-
and
you
see
the
in
the
about
a
third
of
the
way
down-
it
shows
the
state
fair
that
500
000
on
that
page
is
the
matching
funds
that
is
not
the
advertising
funds,
and
so
the
Senate
and
the
house
both
had
matching
funds
in
there.
AA
So
it
is
at
that
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
again
that's
the
matching
funds
component,
not
the
advertising
funds.
The
advertising
funds
were
only
approved
on
the
other
end
of
the
building.
They
were
not
approved
on
this
end
of
the
building,
which
meant
we
would
go
one
way
the
other
way
or
meet
somewhere
in
the
middle
The
Joint
conference
committee
chose
to
eliminate
all
of
those
funds
for
the
advertising
piece,
so
those
are
are
off
the
table
and
will
not
be
funded
in
this
budget.
AA
The
advertising
piece
now
that
is
not
to
say
that
the
state
fair,
could
not
go
work
with
the
Department
of
Tourism
to
work
on
something
because
Department
of
Tourism
does
have
money
in
their
budget
to
do
advertising
that
just
is
not
dictated
through
this
budget
that
they
are
required
to
do.
Any
of
that.
AA
So
I
hope
that
clears
up
some
of
the
confusion
that
that's
taking
place
there,
where
there's
two
different
pots
of
500
000
again,
what's
shown
here
on
this
sheet,
is
regarding
the
matching
funds
that
builds
the
trust
or
not,
really,
the
trust
account,
but
the
the
the
permanent
account
for
the
state
fair.
That
was
not
affected
in
the
conference
committee,
because
that
was
already
appropriated
by
both
ends
of
the
building.
The
advertising
funds,
again
are
the
ones
I
believe
are
in
question.
Advertising
through
the
Department
of
Tourism
was
eliminated
in
The
Joint
conference
committee.
AD
AD
I
know
that
tomorrow's
program
was
was
cut
in
half
for
that
funding.
But
then
we
have
This
1.2,
5
million
and
as
I
understand
it
it's
handled
somewhat
outside
the
tomorrow's
program
and
then
it
says,
is
allowed
expenditures
on
Scholarships
in
fiscal
year
2024,
including
a
Prohibition
on
reversion
or
transferred
to
the
Wyoming
tomorrow's
endowment
Corpus.
Does
that
mean
this?
This
entire
1.25
is
slated
to
be
used
without
going
back
into
the
corpus.
AB
Mr
Speaker
that
is
correct,
that
this
1.1,
this
1.25
million
dollars,
is
in
the
will
be
in
the
expenditure
account
and
is
slated
to
be
used
for
funding
actual
scholarships
to
get
the
program
up
and
going
right
away
and
is
not
scheduled
to
be
reverted.
But
the
good
Vice
chairman
of
Recreations
may
have
a
further
clarification.
X
So
this
is,
as
we
visited
with
our
colleagues,
we
wanted
to
have
until
we
get
up
there.
We
wanted
to
be
able
to
use
some
money
for
those
scholarships
for
the
community
colleges.
So
it's
in
what?
If
you'll?
Look
there?
It's
it's!
It's
not
the
Wyoming's!
Tomorrow,
it's
a
higher.
It's
a
it's
just
a
little
different
account
that
allows
them
to
use
it
for
the
same
purposes,
but
it's
not
coming
out
of
that
income
account,
but
it
can
be
used
for
the
same
purpose.
A
A
AE
L
A
AE
body.
This
is
the
state
lands,
use
and
land
qualification
requirements,
the
Senate
added.
If
you
you
look
at
your
concurrence
report,
the
Senate
added
on
page
three
line,
eight
for
the
production
of
agricultural
Commodities
and
I,
would
ask
for
an
eye
vote
on
this.
It
doesn't
substantially
change
the
bill,
probably
helps
it.
A
L
A
A
E
Thank
you,
Mr
Speaker
I'd,
move
message:
341
concurrence
request
on
House,
Bill
65,
that's
a
988,
Suicide,
Prevention,
Hotline
members
are
our
cohorts
down
at
the
other
end
of
the
hall
on
the
west
end
of
the
Capitol
made
a
couple.
Little
changes,
I
think
the
one
was
simple:
it
corrected
a
statute
reference
error.
The
other
was
to
encourage
the
Department
of
Health
to
raise
money
for
this
effort
and
then
the
third
one
is
actually
a
sunset
of
the
program
and
that's
July
1st
2028..
E
So
we
don't
want
to
sacrifice
the
good
for
the
perfect
doesn't
need
a
sunset,
but
I
don't
think
it's
worth
fighting
about
right
now.
I
think
this
we're
probably
95
percent
there
I
think.
Probably
the
68th
or
69th
legislature
push
it
over
and
finish
it.
But
I
appreciate
everybody's
work
on
this
really
important
program
and
I
think
we're
starting
to
see
the
Stats
come
in
from
just
one
year
of
work
and
on
this
program
and
really
encouraged
so
I
think
we're
going
to
learn
more
as
the
years
go
on.
E
A
AF
L
L
A
A
AF
A
AH
B
File
32
sponsored
by
Judiciary,
prohibiting
drones
over
penal
institutions,
an
act
relating
to
crimes
and
offenses
Mr
Speaker.
Your
committee
number
one
Judiciary
to
whom
was
referred:
Senate
file,
32
engrossed
prohibiting
drones
over
penal
institutions,
respect
for
reports
sent
back
to
the
house
with
the
recommendation
of
due
pass
with
the
following
amendments:
eyes:
Representatives
chestick,
craigo,
Haroldson,
Jennings,
nemic,
Oakley,
provenza,
Rodriguez,
Williams,
wash
it
chairman
representative
Washington
is
Chairman.
AI
Z
AI
AI
These
institutions,
a
couple
things
that
they're
concerned
about,
obviously,
is
drugs
or
weapons,
or
any
of
that
type
of
information,
or
just
them
using
these
these
devices
to
to
spy
into
these
institutions.
So
with
that,
I
will
talk
about
the
amendment
and
and
we'll
move
through
the
Amendments
one
of
the
things
we
we
were
concerned
about
is
in
in
this
bill.
It
talked
about
that
you
we,
you
were
not
allowed
to
spy
upon
or
anything
of
that
nature
inside
of
an
institution
which
we
agree
with.
AI
You
were
spying
in
so
we're
putting
this
amendment
in,
and
the
amendment
is
Page
Three
line,
19
after
intentionally
insert
trespassing
over
or
in
a
penal
institution
or
on
the
grounds
of
a
penal
institution
with
an
unmanned
aircraft
system,
and
so
this
is
just
saying
that,
if
you're
on
your
property,
you
can
fly
your
drone
on
your
property.
If
you're
on
an
adjacent
property,
you
can
fly
that
drone
on
that
adjacent
property.
You
just
can't
fly
it
over
property
owned
by
the
state
and
or
the
actual
facility
of
the
institution.
AI
AH
AI
AF
Mr
chairman,
thank
you,
questions
the
good
bringer
of
the
bill
it
does.
It
does
articulate
more
specifically
it's
over
the
grounds.
Has
there
ever
been
consideration.
This
is
a
friendly
suggestion
or
Amendment.
Potentially
there's
a
certain
space.
A
no-fly
zone,
maybe
500
feet.
Half
mile
one
mile
from
the
penitentiary.
AF
AJ
Thank
you
Mr
chairman,
so
that
was
a
discussion.
We
talked
a
lot
about
it
during
the
interim
There
Are
Rules
around
airspace
that
essentially
it
lies
under
the
rule
of
the
United
States
government.
So
States
can't
dictate
what
we
do
in
in
Flight
space
because
of
the
f,
if
yeah,
the
so
the
the
body
that
oversees
airplanes
and
stuff
that
flies
not
not
that
one,
but
essentially
there
were.
There,
were
concerns
about
violating
that
issue.
AI
Thank
you,
Mr
chairman
one,
other
real,
quick
thing
on
that
the
federal
establishments
this
is
this
is
the
the
verbiage
that
they
use
for
those
as
far
as
that's
how
they're
handling
those
and
so
on
the
federal
level.
That
organization
we
just
talked
about
or
that
agency
we
just
talked
about.
They
did
oversee
Federal
institutions,
but
they
did
not
speak
into
State
institutions
and
so
we're
just
covering
the
state
institutions
and
seeing
no
one
else
at
the
mic.
Without
a
call
for
the
question.
B
Senate
file
61
sponsored
by
management,
Council
legislator
per
diem,
an
act
relating
to
per
diem
rates.
Mr
Speaker,
your
committee
number
two
Appropriations
to
whom's
referred
Senate
file,
61
and
gross
legislator
per
diem,
respectful
report
saying
back
to
the
house
with
the
recommendation
at
a
due
pass.
B
Originally,
this
bill
was
to
house
subcommittee
Revenue
three
to
whom
was
referred:
Senate
file
61
in
grossed
to
legislator,
per
diem
respective
reports.
Saying
back
to
the
house
with
the
recommendation
to
do
pass,
Representatives
eyes,
Representatives,
Byron,
Harshman,
Northrop,
Oakley,
store
zwanitzer
knows
Representatives
bear
lock
strzok.
It
was
then
re-referred
to
committee
number
two
Appropriations
to
whom
was
re,
respectful
reports
back
same
back
to
the
house,
with
the
recommendation
of
the
due
pass
eyes:
Representatives
Henderson,
Larson,
Nicholas,
Sherwood,
Stith,
Walter,
zwanitzer,
representative
Nicholas,
chairman.
A
Mr
chairman,
thank
you,
ladies
and
gentlemen.
I
bring
you
Senate
file
61
and
ask
for
your
favorable
consideration,
so
this
comes
out
of
management
Council
during
the
interim,
when
we
looked
at
several
ways
of
of
trying
to
bring
up
basically
bring
the
legislative,
we
looked
at
legislative
salaries.
We
looked
at
per
diem.
We
looked
at
our
our
quarterly
our
our
quarterly
extra
money
for
constituents
allowance.
A
So
we
looked
at
a
lot
of
different
things
to
decide
if
we
should
bring
anything
forward
that
because
there
hasn't
been
anything
brought
forward
in
a
long
time
and-
and
so
this
is
one
of
those
and
so
legislative
per
diem.
So
if
you
go
into
the
bill
just
to
start
right
into
it,
we
go
into
28,
5101,
subsection,
B
and,
and
it's
and
the
changes
are
the
per
diem
amount
to
be
received.
A
A
few.
A
few
ideas
about
this.
This
bill
requires
the
state
auditor
to
annual
auditor
annually
to
set
the
per
diem
rate
for
legislators
and
all
boards
and
commissions
statutorily
tied
to
legislator
per
diem
to
the
federal
general
service
administration's
per
diem
rate
for
locations
in
Wyoming.
This
is
very
similar
to
the
manner
in
which
mileage
reimbursement
is
determined
for
legislators.
Under
28.5
101
D
legislative
per
diem
was
last
increased
in
2008
from
85
dollars
a
day
to
109
a
day.
A
It
will
provide
location
rates
in
Wyoming,
which
means
currently
higher
per
diem
for
meetings
held
in
Teton
subletter
Park
counties.
There
are
52
boards
and
commissions
with
their
per
diem,
statutorily
tied
to
legislative
per
diem
amounts.
The
vast
majority
of
the
members
of
those
boards
and
commissions
serve
without
any
other
compensation,
and
we
last
had
a
bill
on
this
and
2019
to
to
increase
per
diem.
It
passed
both
bodies
and
failed
to
get
by
the
chief
executive
due
to
an
amendment
that
came
on
that
was
around
that
was
based
around
this
area
around
the
capitol.
A
You
know
and
I
just
want
to
say,
I
guess
the
final
thing
before
I
get
into
my
heartfelt
pitch.
I,
guess
is
this:
act
is
effective.
July,
1st,
2023
and
I
just
wanted
to
wanted
to
say,
I
think
we
we
all
recognize
that
that
our
per
diem
has
increased
substantially
out
there.
If
you
look
at
hotel
rates,
if
you
look
at
meals
caught
what
meals
cost
I
think
it's
time
we
raise
this
I
think
this
is
a
a
good
route
to
go
and
it
really
ties
it
to
the
federal
rate.
AH
AH
AE
Mr
chairman
I,
move
that
when
the
committee
of
the
whole
Rises
to
report
it
do
so
with
a
recommendation
that
Senate
file
102
do
pass.
There
is
a
standing
committee.
Amendment
I
will
move
standing
committed
committee,
amendment
number
one
to
Senate
file,
102
and
I'll
turn
over
the
explanation
to
our
good
speaker
from
the
headwaters
of
the
Green
River.
A
Chairman,
thank
you
and,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
I
bring
you
Senate
file
102
and
ask
for
your
favorable
consideration
and
Mr
chairman
with
with
your
acceptance.
I
will
I
will
discuss
the
bill
and
I
will
bring
in
the
amendment
as
I
go
and
then
the
first
thing
we
can
do
after
I
do
that
explanation
is
take
up
that
Amendment.
If
that
works.
For
you,
Mr
chairman.
AH
A
Thank
you
so,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
I've
I've
always
wanted
to
do
a
food
Freedom
bill
on
the
floor,
and
so
what
I?
What
I
call
this
I
call
this
breakfast
Freedom
right,
because
if
you
look
in
the
bill,
what
we're
really
doing
is
we're
doing
milk
and
egg
freedom,
and
so
what
what
this
bill
does
and
the
gist
of
this
bill
is
that
there
are
areas
of
the
state
that
want
to
sell
milk
and
they
want
to
sell
milk
in
a
venue.
A
That's
not
in
a
not
in
a
grocery
store,
but
it's
in
kind
of
a
farmer's
market
or
or
an
an
area
for
that
is
similar
to
that.
And
so,
and
so
there
was
some
difficulty
getting
that
language
done
with
the
Department
of
Agriculture,
and
so
it
was
decided.
The
best
way
to
do
is
really
is
to
come
in
here
and
try
to
try
to
fix
this
problem
statutorily.
And
so,
if
you
look
on
page
one,
we
go
on
to
page
two
and
we
go
into
definitions,
and
so
in
definitions,
1149
102.
A
This
is
in
the
food
Freedom
Act
we
go
into
subsection,
12
designated
agent
means
and
then
I'm
going
to
work
in
the
amendment
here
and
so
I'm
going
to
just
bring
in
the
language
of
the
amendment.
So
the
designated
agent
means
a
person
or
Consignment
Model
Market
or
food
Freedom
store
designated
by
the
producer
to
facilitate
the
produce,
the
pro
the
product
to
facilitate
producer
to
Consumer
transactions,
including
transport,
storage
and
delivery
of
food
or
drink
products.
A
A
A
So
we
I'm
going
to
give
you
the
new
language,
as
it
would
read
from
the
amendment
a
producer
May
utilize,
a
designated
agent
to
facilitate
a
transaction
just
facilitated
transaction,
the
seller
of
eggs,
dairy
or
dairy
products
or
homemade
food.
So
this
is
where
dairy
products
are
brought
in
produced
consisting
of
non-potentially
hazardous
food.
A
And
then,
if
you
go
onto
the
bottom
of
page
three,
you
see
the
Safeguard
new
language,
homemade
or
uninspected.
Food
shall
not
be
served
or
utilized
as
a
as
an
ingredient
median
in
a
commercial
food
establishment
onto
page
four
and
then
you'll
just
see
the
rest
of
page
four
is
conforming
conforming
amendments,
conforming
language
and
then
on
to
page
five
towards
the
bottom
of
the
page,
the
new
language,
the
department.
This
is
the
Crux
of
the
biscuit.
A
The
Department
of
Agriculture
shall
not
promulgate
any
standard
for
food
or
health
inspection
that
is
applicable
to
this
act
that
is
more
stringent
than
a
standard
established
by
the
United
States
Department
of
Agriculture.
So
the
idea
here
is
to
write,
get
back
right
to
what
the
only
the
feds
require
and
no
more
than
the
feds
require,
and
and
hopefully
we
can
get
that
that
milk
sold
in
that
in
that
good
County
number
10..
C
You
Mr
chairman,
just
real
quick
I,
just
want
to
say
this
is
a
great
Bill.
We
worked
in
the
committee.
We
heard
testimony
from
local
producers
who
really
want
to
take
advantage
of
this.
It
gets
state
of
Wyoming
closer
to
you
know
where
we
want
to
be
in
food,
Freedom
and
so
I
just
encourage
and
I
vote
on
this
bill.
Thanks.
A
AH
Thank
you
Mr
speakers.
The
motion
having
been
made
question
being
called
an
understanding
committee.
Amendment
number
one
to
house
bill,
send
file
102.
those
in
favor
of
the
standing
committee,
Amendment,
say:
aye
opposed
no
standing
committee
amendment
is
adopted.
We
are
back
on
the
bill
question
being
called
all
those
in
favor
of
chairman
eklund's
motion
that
when
the
committee
of
the
whole
rise
to
report
it
does
so
with
the
recommendation
that
Senate
file
102
do
pass
all
those
in
favor
say
aye.
AH
B
Senate
file
65
sponsored
by
Senator
Baldwin
compensation
of
local
registrars,
repeal
an
act
relating
to
Vital
Records
Mr
Speaker.
Your
committee
number
10
labor
Health
and
Social
Services
to
homes
referred
Senate
file,
65
compensation
of
local
registrars
repeal
respect
the
report
same
back
to
the
house
with
the
recommendation
that
a
due
pass
eyes:
Representatives
Chadwick
plauston,
hornock,
o'hern,
Penn,
Trujillo,
Ward,
Yin
sawant,
sir
representative
zwana,
sir
chairman.
AK
AH
Question
being
called
on
the
bill,
all
those
in
favor
that
when
the
committee
of
the
whole
rise
to
report,
it
does
so
with
the
recommendation
that
Senate
file
65
do
pass
those
in
favor
say
aye:
does
it
pose?
No
the
eyes
have
it
Senate
file
65
is
best
committed
to
hold
the
next
bill,
for
our
consideration
is
Senate
file.
66.
The
reading
clerk
will
read
the
bill.
Senate.
W
AA
AA
By
going
to
the
fiscal
note,
and
so
the
first
thing
it
does,
is
it
the
school
lands,
mineral
royalties
account
and
the
school
major
maintenance,
sub-account
both
are
removed
and
both
of
those
counts
move
into
the
school
Foundation
program
account
Additionally.
The
school
Capital
Construction
account
moves
into
the
school
Foundation
program
account
and
then
in
the
bill
prior
to
the
amendment,
the
0.45
percent
of
cipa
that
goes
to
school,
Capital
Construction
would
then
that
that
flow
would
be
removed.
AA
So
I'll
move
to
the
amendment
and
what
we
do
in
the
amendment
is
we
keep
that
0.45
percent
of
sipa
flowing
to
the
school
Foundation
program
account
and
that's
just
to
make
sure
there's
a
good,
steady
flow
of
funding
into
the
school
system,
the
K-12
school
system,
so
the
0.45
stays
in
place,
but
all
of
the
accounts
are
Consolidated
into
the
school
Foundation
program
account
and
that's
what
Senate
file
66
does.
If
there's
any
questions,
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
them.
AH
AH
Question
being
called
on
the
bill
foreign,
you
all,
those
in
favor
of
chairman
Nicholas's
motion
that
when
the
committee
of
the
whole
rise
to
report
it
does
so
with
their
recommendation
that
Senate
file
66
due
pass.
All
those
in
favor
say
aye
those
opposed
no,
the
eyes
have
it.
Senate
file
66
has
passed
the
committee
for
the
whole.
The
next
bill
for
our
consideration
is
Senate
file.
AI
Harrelson,
thank
you
Mr
chairman,
so
before
us
today
we
have
kind
of
an
interesting
fun
Bill,
if
you,
if
you
want
to
call
it
that
178
mountain
lion,
Pursuit
season,
was
born
out
of
a
out
of
kind
of
a
necessity,
I
guess
even
a
loophole.
If
we
want
to
call
it
that
in
how
our
mountain
lion,
hunting
seasons
work
so
currently
how
it
works
is
majority
of
all
mountain
lion.
Hunting
in
the
state
of
Wyoming
is
done
with
the
use
of
dogs.
AI
They
we,
we
run
dogs,
we
catch
a
fresh
track
and
we
run
mountain
lion
and
the
mountain
lion
is
treed
and
then
harvested
or
released
pending
gender
quota.
All
of
those
those
factors
well,
the
issue
we
have
are
these
these,
these
individuals
that
that
have
these
dogs
need
to
do
a
large
amount
of
training
with
these
dogs
to
get
them
ready
to
pursue
mountain
lion,
and
so
a
lot
of
the
times.
They're
outfitting,
this
they're
they're
doing
hunts
they're
they're
going
into
these
areas.
AI
Well,
the
problem
is,
is
the
only
way
you
can
pursue.
Mountain
lion
is
with
a
current
license
in
an
open
area.
So
obviously,
when
a
certain
number
of
mountain
lions
are
harvested
in
a
area,
we
shut
the
area
down
and
we
make
it
where
you
can't.
You
no
longer
can
hunt
in
that
area.
Well,
what
we're
struggling
with
and
what
the
what
the
hunters
are
struggling
with
is
the
fact
that
they
get
new
dogs
and
how
do
you
train
those
new
dogs
on
how
to
actually
do
the
pursuit
and
Hunt?
AI
So
this
here
this
bill
would
just
open
up
the
opportunity
for
individuals
that
own
Pursuit
dogs,
these
mountain
lion,
hunting
dogs
to
actually
get
a
opportunity
to
go
out
just
for
training
purposes.
They're,
not
hunting,
they're,
not
going
to
harvest
they're,
just
going
to
train
their
dogs
in
the
field
running
running
the
dogs
for
mountain
lion.
So
this
opens
up
that
training
opportunity
for
for
our
mountain
lion,
Pursuit
season,
so
it's
different
than
the
actual
harvest
season.
It's
a
Pursuit
season.
AI
AI
On
standing
committee,
one
okay,
I'm,
sorry
at
this
point,
I
do
move
standing
committee,
amendment
number
one
to
how
a
senate
file
178
and
ask
for
your
no
vote.
The
standing
committee
of
the
whole
Amendment
will
address
this
and
take
care
of
this,
and
that
is
the
good
Representatives
Amendment.
That's
coming
up
next.
So
at
this
point
in
time,
I
would
ask
call
for
the
question
on
standing
committee.
Amendment
number
one.
AH
D
D
AH
AI
Thank
you
very
much
so
again,
just
really
really
simple:
we're
creating
a
Pursuit
season,
an
opportunity
for
these
individuals
to
to
go
out,
train
their
dogs
to
get
in
the
field,
and-
and
this
wouldn't
wouldn't
get
in
the
way
of
that.
The
other
thing
that
this
actually
is,
these
individuals
are
holding
open
areas,
so
they
can
continue
to
do
this
and
they're
not
harvesting
the
the
numbers
they
normally
would.
AI
AI
AL
AH
T
Brown,
thank
you
Mr
chairman
I,
I,
guess
my
my
biggest
question
is
when
I
look
at
this
I
I
guess
right
now
we
don't
have
a
Pursuit
season,
but
when
we're
looking
at
this,
we're
we're
now
going
to
create
a
Pursuit
only
season.
So
my
question
is:
do
we
have
where
we
have
the
pursuit
season?
They
can't
go,
kill
and
I.
I
noticed
that
we
used
our
our
lovely
words
on
page
two
line:
23
knowingly
kills
a
mountain
lion.
T
T
But
is
this
going
to
line
up
right
up
against
the
hunting
season
of
of
the
of
the
pursuit
season,
so
the
hunter
will
be
able
to
find
out
where
this
Line's,
potentially
at
the
day
before
and
now,
he's
going
to
come
in
and
the
very
next
day
be
able
to
find
out
exactly
where
that
cat
was
at,
and
you
know
the
to
the
other
question
that
was
brought
forward.
I
I
think
the
the
discussion
on
whether
or
not
we're
going
to
have
ten
thousand
dollars
or
30
days
in
the
dog
pound.
T
AI
Thank
you,
Mr
chairman,
so,
to
start
out
what
would
happen
if
the
dogs
were
to
get
to
the
cat
and
and
kill
the
cat?
A
couple
things
you
need
to
realize
I
in
my
lifetime
and
and
my
experience
with
this
I've,
never
seen
that
happen
in
any
way,
shape
or
form.
The
reality
is
your
cat
might
get
your
dogs,
but
your
dog's
very
seldom
ever
get
your
cat,
and
so
what
the
idea
is
the
cats?
Are
they
go
up
a
tree?
That's
pretty
much
where
it's
at.
AI
If
you
guys
and
I
don't
know
if
it's
sent,
but
I
did
email,
a
video,
maybe
you've
already
watched
it
that
I
sent
to
you
guys.
That's
that's
us
training
dogs,
so
this
is
the
concept.
Obviously,
in
that
case
we
were
carrying
a
tag
with
no
intention
to
fill
that
tank
and
this
would
open
it
up.
The
second
question
is:
what
what
about
the
are?
AI
AI
The
other
thing
you
need
to
understand
is
this:
I,
don't
know
if
any
of
you
guys
have
stray
cats
in
your
neighborhood,
but
the
cat
that
was
out
on
the
back
porch
might
be
on
the
neighbor's
back
porch
in
30
seconds
and
just
multiply
it
times
10
and
you
found
what
these
cats
can
do.
So
it's
not,
you
might
know
where
it
was
yesterday,
but
it
won't
be
there
today.
That's
just
the
reality
of
how
these
these
cats
work
so
I
think
that
answered
the
two
questions
that
came
forward
and
I'll
answer
more.
AA
Walters,
thank
you.
Mr
chairman
I
really
have
some
concern
with
this
bill
to
just
train
your
dogs.
There's
lots
of
other
predatory
species
that
are
out
there
that
can
be
used.
I
know
you
can
use
the
ones
that
have
the
the
glasses
that
look
like
they're
wearing
glasses
and
stripes
down
their
backs
and
big
bushy
tails,
and
you
know
you
can
use
a
lot
of
different
species.
I,
don't
believe
a
lot
of
people
use
their
their
waterfowl
dogs,
they
don't
go
out
and
shoot
waterfowl
just
to
help
train
them.
AA
They
wait
until
the
season
and
in
between
the
seasons.
They
use
some
sort
of
a
dummy
type
item
to
the
point
of
the
dog's,
not
getting
the
cat
I.
Think
if
these
seasons
are
when
those
cats
are
having
their
offspring,
a
dog
taking
down
a
kitten
would
have
no
trouble
without
it
doing
much
damage
to
the
to
the
dog.
But
my
biggest
concern
is
that
you're,
you
would
never
be
potentially
never
let
these
cats
have
any
reprieve.
AA
You
would
hunt
them,
then
you
would
have
Pursuit
seasons
and
those
Pursuit
Seasons
could
overlap
with
the
other
wildlife
and
and
that
are
having
their
offspring
in
the
spring
and
early
summer
of
the
year.
So
now
you're
putting
more
pressure
on
that
habitat
by
running
these
hounds.
Through
these,
these
various
habitat
areas,
just
for
the
training
purposes,
I
think
as
I
said,
I
think
there's
other
species
that
can
be
used
for
the
training.
AA
If
that's
what
we're
looking
for
to
train
these
hounds
and
by
just
having
a
Pursuit
season
to
train
your
dogs
out,
just
don't
see
that
it's
necessary
so
I'd,
be
on
and
against
the
bill.
I
do
appreciate
the
idea,
but
I
think
there's
many
other
mechanisms
to
train
the
dogs
and
and
leave
our
Wildlife.
Let
them
have
a
little
bit
of
reprieve
throughout
the
year
representative.
AH
AL
Thank
you
Mr
chair,
so
my
I
guess
my
next
concern
would
be
okay.
We
it's
it's
not
happening,
they're
not
getting
to
the
cat,
but
is
it
causing
undue
stress
in
a
time
where
they
need
to
be
relaxed
and
be
able
to
carry
babies?
That's
that's
my
question
and
you
know
we
have
problems
with
Hunters
going
out
and
shooting
at
Wildlife
to
and
stuff
like
that.
We
have
those
problems,
but
I
mean
I'd
argue.
This
is
just
the
same
as
that.
So.
AM
AM
Yes,
we
train
the
dogs,
but
we
also
tend
to
train
the
cats
and
we
keep
them
wary
and
I
believe
we're
doing
them
a
favor
by
harassing
them
a
little
bit
and
we're.
Certainly,
if,
if
you
develop
it
instill
a
little
bit
of
fear
of
humans
in
these
animals,
it
keeps
them
out
of
our
backyards
and
out
of
our
children's
playgrounds.
I
think
it's
a
great
idea.
AI
Thank
you,
Mr
chairman,
so
I
think,
let's,
let's
bring
this
back
into
a
concept
and
a
focus
for
a
second
here,
a
full-grown
male
cat
will
harvest
or
will
kill
a
deer
a
week
in
a
time
when
our
mule
deer
population
is
is
on
a
decline
in
a
time
where,
where
we're
we're
seeing
these
struggles
predominant
source
of
food
for
these
animals
are
our
deer
and
elk,
and
and
so
not
that
saying
they
don't
do.
Don't,
hunt
other
species,
but
that's
predominant.
So
you
have
to
understand
that
52
deer
a
year
per
cat.
AI
AI
So
when,
when
we
talk
about
when
we
talk
about
running
these
animals,
it's
not
like
we're
stressing
a
a
winter
range
unit
of
of
deer
or
elk,
where
man,
if
we
run
them
during
that
time,
they
they
may
not
make
it
through
the
winter
cats
are
prevalent.
They
they're,
not
that's,
not
the
issue,
I
I,
don't
think
I,
don't
think
I've
ever
heard
of
or
seen
of
a
mountain
lion
starving
itself
to
death
or
something
of
that
nature
and
to
the
prior
comment.
T
Chairman
Brown,
thank
you,
Mr
Speaker,
so
I,
I,
think
and
I
appreciate.
The
the
good
explanation
on
this
and
I
was
I
was
referred
back
to
the
standing
committee
Amendment
and
then
to
the
committee
of
the
whole
Amendment,
which
is
actually
the
one
that
we
were
told
we
really
wanted,
and
so,
when
I
went
and
looked
at,
the
committee
of
the
whole
Amendment
and
I
actually
placed
it
into
the
bill.
T
I
I'm
actually
more
concerned
than
I
was
to
begin
with,
and
it's
because
the
bill
now
reads
to
consider
establishing
and
regulating,
and
let
me
put
that
into
context
here.
It
says
that
the
commission
is
directed
and
the
commission
is
directed
and
empowered
to
consider,
establishing
and
regulating
I'm,
not
sure
what
consideration
and
whether
we
need
to
put
consideration
into
the
Green
books.
We
either
tell
the
commission
to
do
something
or
we
tell
them
not
to
do
it,
and
so
now
we're
giving
this
consideration
now.
T
T
This
is
actually
training
the
cats
to
be
more
prolific
at
getting
away
and
they're
they're
getting
smarter
with
this.
If
we,
if
we
put
them
into
this
opportunity,
so
I'm
not
sure
that
I
I
think
that
this
is
actually
the
way
that
we
want
to
go
with
this
to
me,
I
I,
just
I'm,
really
frustrated
with
the
idea
that
we
want
to
consider
establishing
something.
Now,
it's
not
really
where
I
want
to
go
with.
K
S
S
They
take
a
lot
of
testimony
and
do
a
lot
of
consultation
with
their
biologists,
so
if
they
feel
that
there
is
a
concern
in
a
certain
area,
that's
when
they
can
take
into
consideration
and
limit
that
season
to
ensure
that
they
are
not
going
to
be
exposed
or
that
those
herds
will
be
exposed
to
to
these.
To
this
practice,
the
reality
is
all
predators
need
to
be
managed.
S
Mountain
lions
are
a
big
part
of
what
is
putting
pressure
of
what
a
predation
pressure
on
our
mule
deer
hurts.
The
reality
is
these
houndsmen
across
the
state
need
to
keep
these
dogs
these
dogs
trained
up,
and
so
that's
one
of
the
big
considerations
that
we
heard
in
committee
that
came
forward
and
testified,
and
that's
why
we're
asking
if
this
to
be
here
in
the
first
place,
we
already
have
this
concept
of
fish
catch
and
release.
S
This
is
conceptually
the
the
exact
same
thing
again,
I
think
you
know
to
the
gentleman
from
the
capital
city.
The
process
for
setting
these
by
the
commission
is
a
pretty
lengthy
and
involved
process.
It's
not
expedited.
There's
a
lot
of
these
factors
that
already
take
into
consideration
and
it's
a
process
that
they've
done
a
lot
with
other
species
as
well,
so
I
hope
that
provides
a
little
bit
of
explanation.
Please
support
the
bill.
AN
Mr
chairman,
yes,
back
to
the
good,
bring
or
good
representative
there,
these
areas
will
probably
be
considered,
but
not
all
areas
will
be
used.
So
the
other
part
of
of
this
is
that
these
are
hunters
and
and
Sportsmen
they're
not
going
to
sabotage
their
own
Cash
Cow.
These
lions
are
what
they
hunt
and
get
money
for.
So
do
you
think
they're
going
to
go
out
there
and
run
them
to
the
point
that
this
becomes
an
issue
I
highly
doubt
it
so
I'll
and
for
the
bill.
Y
Thank
you
Mr
chairman,
so
anybody
who
knows
me
knows
that
I
love
a
dog
that
has
a
job
but
I
do
have
a
question
about
the
physical
impact
of
this
bill.
So
there
is
no
fiscal
note,
but
we
do
have
the
creation
of
a
special
license,
so
I'm
curious
about
how
that
might
be
set
up
or
if
our
agency
suggested
what
the
fiscal
impact
of
that
might
be
and
then,
on
the
back
end
wondering
what
the
impact
to
our
our
enforcers
time
and
resources
might
be.
Thank
you.
AH
Thank
you
Mr
chairman,
so
I
him
on
and
in
favor
of
this
bill.
I
live
in
a
unique
situation
where
actually,
just
a
couple
of
weeks
ago
after
the
snow,
there
were
some
cat
tracks
wandering
right
through
my
front
yard,
right
up
the
the
the
stairs
beside
my
house,
that
happens
at
my
house
quite
a
bit
so
I'm
in
a
unique
situation
and
the
guy
that
lives
over
the
hill
for
me
loves
to
mount
to
to
hunt
mountain
lions,
and
so
he
talked
to
me
about
this
bill.
AH
He
raises
dogs
specifically
for
this,
and
he
said
you
know-
and
this
past
year
in
here
in
this
County
the
the
number
of
it's
it's
not
like
deer
hunting
season.
Like
was
said
before
so
with
mountain
lions,
you
have
to
call
the
game
and
fish
and
say:
hey:
have
enough
Lions
been
killed,
so
so
sorry,
the
the
department,
so
there's
a
certain
block
of
time.
AH
It's
about
two
months,
long
that
that
you
can
hunt
these
mountain
lion,
lions
in
the
state
and
depending
on
the
area,
depending
on
how
many
lions
get
killed
during
the
season,
because
you
you
have
to
report
the
lion
kill,
so
the
the
commission
knows
exactly
how
many
lines
are
being
killed
all
the
time.
So
the
commission
limits
the
number
of
lines
that
can
be
killed
in
a
certain
area
this
past
year.
AH
Our
two-month
season
was
over
in
15
days
because
they
said
up
enough
lines
have
been
killed
it's
over
so
now
for
the
guy
that
lives
over
the
hill.
From
me
who
raises
dogs
specifically
for
this
every
year
he
said
you
know
two
weeks
feeding
my
dogs
all
year.
Long
for
two
weeks
of
a
season
is
not
very
long,
so
he
wants
the
opportunity
to
take
his
dogs
out
and
to
have
them
chase
Lions
during
this
time
period.
To
to
you
know,
it's
like
exercising
your
dog,
it's
training
your
dog.
AH
Now
when
it
comes
to
lions,
typically
they
are
always
treed
and
so
a
lion
climbs
up
a
tree.
You
call
off
the
dogs,
you
take
them
home.
So
that's!
What's
going
to
happen
and
the
the
Lion's
not
going
to
be
not
going
to
be
harmed
except
get
them
a
little
exercise,
but
I
would
much
prefer
to
have
the
dogs
running
around
and
the
Lions
around
my
house
frankly.
So
anyway,
I
think
this
is
a
good
bill.
AH
C
Representative
Banks,
thank
you,
Mr
chairman
I,
just
want
to
let
the
body
know
that
this
isn't
a
new
idea.
It's
implemented
now
in
a
couple
of
States
and
it's
very
popular
and
very
successful.
So
it's
not
going
to
be
an
experiment.
It's
it's
been
implemented
and
it's
been
very
popular
and
so
I
think
that
we
can
enjoy
the
benefits
of
it
here,
as
they
do
in
other
states.
So
urja
I
vote
on
this
bill.
AG
AG
AG
There's
just
tracks
like
a
spider
web,
going
every
direction
and
so
there's
a
couple
different
points.
You
want
to
remember,
as
we
think
through
this
we've
learned
that,
as
we
run
those
Lions,
especially
the
females,
they
learn
how
to
manage
dogs
so
the
more
you
run
them
the
more
crafty
and
creative
they
get,
and
they
learned
what
we
call
tap
a
tree
and
that's
if
they,
if
that
cat
gets
so
closer,
those
dogs
get
so
close.
They'll
leave
scent
in
a
tree
and
they'll
jump
and
tap
it
and
keep
going
now.
AG
They
don't
tap
it
far
enough
that
the
dogs
can't
find
it.
That's
their
job,
make
a
wide
Loop
pick
up
the
trail
and
go
on
if
they
can't
get
it,
but
we
have
Rimrock
and
they'll
crawl
down
into
a
crevasse
in
the
Rim
Rock
and
they'll
figure
it
out.
We
finally
pulled
the
dogs
off
the
castle.
Go
she
learns
the
next
lesson
she
does
it
again,
and
so
my
only
concern
in
this
legislation
is
that,
from
my
standpoint,
I
need
as
many
cats
controlled
as
possible
because
they
absolutely
impact
my
livelihood.
AG
They
eat
the
deer
that
we
let
Hunters
come
in.
We've
we've
lost
Cults
to
them
horses
Lambs,
but
a
mountain
lion
will
walk
through
a
whole
flock
of
newborn
Lambs
to
eat
a
fool
on
a
mare
we've
seen
it
happen
on
more
than
one
occasion,
and
so
lions
are
a
major
issue
and
I'm
trying
to
look
as
I've
listened
to
all
this
discussion.
AG
We
need
to
monitor
them
and
we
need
to
manage
them
because
we
have
got
an
A
plentiful
abundance
of
them.
So
it's
kind
of
a
catch-22:
I,
don't
know
where
I'm
at
on
this
right
now
we
need
to
control
them,
but
I
almost
am
concerned
that
over
chasing
could
potentially
make
it
even
more
difficult
for
us
to
control
them
when
The
Season's
on
and
we
need
to
control
these
animals.
So,
just
something
to
consider.
AJ
Thank
you,
Mr
chairman
the
consideration
about
whitetail
deer
I'm,
wondering
if
in
committee
there
was
any
conversation
about
about
that,
because
white-tailed
deer
to
my
best,
my
understanding,
are
an
invasive
species,
and
so
I
don't
know
that
it's
necessarily
a
bad
thing
that
we've
got
cats
running
around
eating
them
and
then
do
we
are
there?
Is
there
any
scientific
evidence
of
this
in
terms
of
what
the
outcomes
are
other
states
doing
this?
AJ
AG
AH
Are
you
ready
for
the
question
question
being
called
all
those
in
favor
of
chairman
newsom's
motion
that
when
the
committee
of
the
whole
rise
to
report
it
does
so
with
the
recommendation
that
Senate
file
178
due
pass,
although
some
favor
say
aye,
those
opposed
no,
the
eyes
have
it
Senate
file.
178
has.
AH
B
Senate
file
95
sponsored
by
Senator
Ellis
moon
landing
day;
an
act
relating
to
Legal
time
and
holidays
Mr
Speaker.
Your
committee
number
nine
minerals,
business
and
economic
development
to
whom's
referred
Senate
file;
95
engrossed
moon
landing
day,
respectful
report
saying
back
to
the
house
with
the
recommendation
that
a
due
pass
with
the
following
amendments:
eyes:
Representatives
Banks,
Burkhart,
Conrad,
heiner,
Knapp,
Larson,
Lawley,
Carver,
Western,
representative
Burkhart,
chairman.
I
You
Mr
chairman
I,
move
that
when
the
committee
of
the
whole
rise
to
report,
it
do
so
with
a
recommendation
that
Senate
filed
95
due
pass.
I
also
move
adoption
with
a
standing
committee
Amendment
and
turn
both
the
explanation
of
the
bill
and
the
amendment
over
to
the
good
representative
and
co-sponsor
on
the
bill
from
District
32..
AO
You
Mr
chair,
so
when
our
good
senator
from
the
capital
city
brought
this
to
me,
I
thought
I'm,
not
sure
on
this
and
she
said,
give
me
some
Grace
and
she
said.
What's
the
greatest
thing,
this
country's
achieved
in
the
last
50
years,
and
she
said
we
put
a
man
on
the
moon
when
we
didn't
really
have
computers
and
brought
them
back
and
I
agreed
with
her,
and
she
said
you
know:
you're
you're,
a
town
in
Gillette
has
a
company
that
supplies
equipment
for
NASA.
AO
They
made
the
crawler
for
the
space
shuttle
they
still
make
supplies.
What
she
didn't
know
is
that
my
mother-in-law's
family,
who
homesteaded
in
Crook
County
my
wife,
had
two
uncles
who
worked
on
the
Apollo
project,
and
you
know
they.
They
talked
about
like
the
courage
of
the
astronauts,
the
Heartbreak
when
things
failed
and
what
it
was
like
to
have
a
whole
nation
and
a
whole
world
watch
you.
AO
It's
gained
national
attention,
so
the
second
man
on
the
moon,
Buzz
Aldrin,
has
got
a
hold
of
us
and
he's
in
favor
of
this.
Oh
sorry,
oh
he
is
in
the
bill.
There's
another
astronaut
who's,
not
in
the
bill,
but
he
was
the
10th
Man
on
the
Moon.
He's
got
a
hold
of
us
and
he's
in
favor
of
this
we've
had
sculptures
and
organizers
fundraisers,
who
want
to
come
to
Wyoming
and
commemorate
this
so
on
July
20th.
AO
We're
asking
that
the
state
recognized
moon
landing
day
is
a
great
achievement
of
this
country
on
the
Amendments.
It's
a
Community,
Committee
Amendment
and
the
chairman
has
asked
me
to
remove
it
and
I
agree.
So
I'm
going
to
move
standing
committee,
amendment
number
one
to
Senate
file
95
and
ask
you
to
vote
no
on
the
amendment.
If
we're
going
to
pass
the
bill,
we
need
to
say
the
state
shall
observe
this.
Not
May,
observe
this.
So
can
we
move
a
question
on
standing
committee.
AH
AL
AH
U
Thank
you,
Mr
chairman
understanding,
committee
Amendment.
You
know,
I
think
that
one
of
the
I
mean
I
I,
didn't
watch
testimony,
so
I
was
actually
going
to
ask
questions,
given
that
the
the
good
bringer
said
to
vote
no,
but
all
of
our
all
of
our
holidays
have
the
shall
be
appropriately
considered.
None
of
them
say
may
be
appropriately
considered.
So
this
is
just
keeps
it
consistent
with
the
rest
of
our
holidays
and
statute.
AG
AD
Knapp
Mr
chairman,
thank
you
on
the
amendment.
We
need
to
do
one
or
the
other,
because
in
sub
a
it
says
shall
be
a
per
appropriately
or
appropriately
observed
by
the
state
and
local
government,
but
in
sub
B
it
says
the
governor
May
issue
a
proclamation,
so
they
either
need
to
be
both
shall
or
both
me
Chairman's.
AK
Monitor
thanks,
Mr
Speaker
I
just
say
may
is
a
better
choice
if
it
falls
on
a
weekend
and
there
are
some
instances
in
a
statute
with
the
same
language
that
many
of
them
actually
say
like
the
second
Friday
of
the
month.
So
they
do
fall
in
the
government
working
week
where
this
one
having
a
specific
Dayton
statute
might
not
so
I
think
we
should
go
to
the
main
language.
E
Chairman
Harshman,
thank
you,
I'm
against
the
amendment.
I
think
the
shell
is
appropriate.
I
think
you
know
this
little
Bill
comes
across
and
it
but
I
think
these
things.
What
we
say
is
important.
I
remember
as
a
student
teacher
when
the
Challenger
exploded,
1986
and
I
remember
as
a
little
kid
going
out
back
in
1968,
looking
up
the
sky,
see
if
we
could
see
these
guys.
But
when
you
ask
kids
today,
maybe
some
of
you
in
this
room.
E
E
We're
the
only
people
putting
men
on
the
moon
and
and
I.
Think
just
you
know
it's
not
just
kids!
You
ask
Americans
in
general,
it's
kind
of
a
thing
we've
almost
unless
you
live
through,
it
have
kind
of
Forgotten,
and
you
know
after
the
space
shuttle
was,
was
put
away.
We've
gone
we're
flying
on
Russian.
E
AH
AH
AL
Z
Thank
you,
Mr
chairman,
just
something
to
consider.
We
were
running
three
days
right
in
a
row
here
we
had
the
Independence
Day
greatest
day
in
our
nation's
history.
We
have
statehood,
Day,
July
10th,
and
then
we
have
this
day,
one
two
three
right
on
top
of
each
other
and
I
just
worry
that
we
start
putting
too
many
holidays
special
days
right
on
top
of
each
other.
Do
we
overshadow
one
of
them?
Do
we
fail
to
give
proper
regard
to
the
others?
My
only
concern.
AO
Thank
you,
I'll
just
wrap
this
up,
and
you
know
nobody
gets
a
day
off
with
this.
It's
just
recognizing
this
great
achievement
of
our
country
and
those
men
and
women,
and
you
know
when
the
senator
brought
it
to
me,
I
told
her.
She
had
to
include
the
importance
of
stem,
so
the
science
technology
engineering,
math
I
mean,
if
you
think
what
those
men
and
women
did
back
then
to
make
this
feat
happen.
It's
really
incredible.
So
again,
I
just
ask
for
your
support
and
I
will.
AO
A
B
Message:
342.
Mr,
Speaker,
Senate
file,
9
Medicaid
coverage
licensed
pharmacists.
The
Senate
failed
to
concur
on
house
amendments
to
the
bill
listed
above
by
the
vote
indicated
I-6
knows
24
excused
one
message:
343
Mr
Speaker,
the
Senate
appointed
Senate
conferees
to
meet
with
a
light
committee
number
one
from
the
house
on
amendments
to
Senate
file.
Nine,
the
Senate
conferees
are
Senator
Baldwin,
chairman
Senator
Barlow
senator
biteman
message:
344
Mr
Speaker,
the
Senate.
B
The
house
bill
listed
above
passed
on
third
reading
in
an
amended
form
as
follows
by
the
vote
indicated
eyes.
30
excused
one.
The
Senate
respectfully
asked
the
house
to
concur
by
adopting
the
listed
amendments
message:
346
Mr
Speaker,
the
bill
listed
below
passed
the
Senate
on
third
reading
by
the
vote
indicated:
House
Bill,
106
eminent
domain,
wind
energy,
collector
systems,
eyes,
18,
nose,
12
excused
one
message:
347.
Mr
Speaker
the
bill
listed
below
passed
the
Senate
on
third
reading
by
the
vote
indicated
House
Bill,
142
notice
of
annexation
highs,
30
excused
one
message:
348.
B
Mr
Speaker
the
bill
listed
below
passed
the
Senate
on
third
reading
by
the
vote
indicated
House
Bill,
239
vehicle
idling,
decriminalization
eyes,
30
excused
one
message:
350.
Mr,
Speaker,
House,
Bill,
7,
underage
marriage
amendments
the
house
bill
listed
above
passed
on
third
reading
in
an
amended
form
as
follows
by
the
vote
indicated
eyes.
23
knows
7
excused
one.
B
The
Senate
respectfully
asked
the
house
to
concur
by
adopting
the
listed
amendments
message:
351
Mr
Speaker
the
bill
listed
below
failed
to
pass
the
Senate
third
reading
by
the
vote
indicated
House
Bill,
213
energy
production,
inventory
exemption
eyes.
11
knows
19
excused
one
message:
352.
Mr,
Speaker,
House,
Bill,
41,
lightweight
trailers,
permanent
registration,
the
Senate
adopted
The
Joint
conference
committee
number.
One
report
on
the
bill
listed
above
by
the
vote
indicated
eyes.
28
knows
one
excused
two
sincerely
Ellen
Thompson
Senate
Chief
Clerk.
B
T
A
B
an
act
relating
to
digital
assets
prohibiting
the
con,
the
compelled
production
of
a
private
key
that
relates
to
a
digital
asset,
digital
Identity
or
other
interest
or
right,
except
as
specified,
providing
the
definition
repealing
the
definition
and
providing
for
an
effective
date
being
enacted
by
the
legislature
of
the
state
of
Wyoming.
I.
A
Q
A
B
Act
house
enrolled
act,
29
be
an
original
House
Bill
15..
An
act
relating
to
counties
clarifying
that
Boards
of
County
Commissioners
do
do
not
have
authority
to
dissolve
archaeological
geological
and
historical
museums
under
their
General
authority
to
dissolve
County
related
boards
and
commissions
and
providing
for
an
effective
date
being
enacted
by
the
legislature
of
the
state
of
Wyoming.
A
A
A
The
next
enrolled
act
for
our
consideration
is
house
enrolled,
act,
number
32,
being
Original
House,
Bill
142.,
oh
I
went
and
got
a
little
ahead
of
the
schedule
there
I
didn't.
Let
you
read
it
in
next
one
for
our
consideration
is
house
enrolled
act,
number
32.
The
reading
clerk
will
read
the
enrolled
act,
Allison.
A
A
B
Roald
act,
34
being
Original
House,
Bill
41.;
an
act
relating
to
Motor
Vehicles,
providing
for
the
permanent
registration
of
specified
trailers,
providing
a
fee
exemption
for
permanently
registered
trailers,
specifying
requirements
upon
transfer
of
ownership
and
providing
for
an
effective
date
being
enacted
by
the
legislature
of
the
state
of
Wyoming.
I'm.
A
A
B
Act:
Senate
enrolled
act,
27
be
an
original
Senate
file,
11.
an
act
relating
to
public
health
and
safety,
amending
eligibility
requirements
and
the
reimbursement
system
for
the
Wyoming,
colorectal
cancer,
early
detection
and
prevention
program
and
providing
for
an
effective
date
being
enacted
by
the
legislature
of
the
state
of
Wyoming
I.
A
A
A
B
Enroll
DAC
30
being
original
Senate
file,
68
an
act
relating
to
prescriptive
easements,
establishing
prescriptive
easements
for
water
conveyances,
providing
requirements
for
the
width
and
the
use
of
prescriptive
easements
as
specified
requiring
the
state
Engineer's
Office
to
post
an
informational
document
on
its
website,
providing
notice
to
purchasers
specifying
applicability
and
providing
for
an
effective
date
being
enacted
by
the
legislature
of
the
state
of
Wyoming.
I.
A
A
B
And
roll
act,
32
being
original
Senate
file,
139
an
act
relating
to
crimes
and
offenses.
Expanding
the
offense
of
unlawful
use
of
a
credit
card
to
include
a
charge
card
and
a
debit
card,
providing
definitions,
providing
penalties
and
providing
for
an
effective
date
being
enacted
by
the
legislature
of
the
state
of
Wyoming
I'm.
A
B
A
B
Enrolled
act,
35
being
original
Senate
file,
40.
an
act
relating
to
campaign
practices
specifying
that
Federal
political
action
committees
are
not
required
to
file
contribution
and
expenditure
reports.
If
the
contributions
and
the
expenditures
of
the
committee
are
exclusively
related
to
Federal
candidates
or
issues
and
providing
for
an
effective
date
being
enacted
by
the
legislature
of
the
state
of
Wyoming,
I.
A
AG
I
W
Z
Thank
you,
Mr
Speaker,
here
committee
number,
one
Judiciary
we'll
meet
tomorrow
morning:
Friday
February
17th
at
7
30
in
the
morning
in
the
historic
Supreme
Court
Chambers,
to
hear
a
presentation
on
first
responder
suicide
and
then
at
8
30.
We
will
convene
for
our
regular
meeting
in
our
regular
room
to
reconsider
sitter
Senate
file
56
and
then
consider
Senator
file.
120.
AP
AP
AP
X
E
Harshman,
thank
you.
Mr
Speaker,
your
committee
number
three
Revenue
will
meet
Tuesday
morning,
8
A.M
East
room;
three:
that's
February,
21st
Senate
file,
151
Wyoming,
prescription,
drug
transparency,
Act.
We
think
we're
going
to
have
a
pretty
full
house
for
that
one.
So
as
time
allows,
we
will
then
hear
Senate
file,
101
Wyoming
legal
tender
act.
Thank
you.
Mr
Speaker,
chairman
Olson,.