►
From YouTube: XAFers Community Standup - May 14th 2020 - Blazor
Description
Join us the second Thursday of every month for our community standup covering everything that is going on with XAF, XPO, Blazor and more. There is no agenda, no formality, no dress code required, let's just talk about what we love and share our experiences.
Subscribe for a weekly publication full of XAF interesting, relevant links:
http://xafersweekly.com/
Facebook Group
https://www.facebook.com/groups/xafxpoxamarin
A
A
C
D
C
A
A
A
B
A
A
A
D
A
D
B
D
A
A
B
D
A
A
C
I
guess
I
will
and
I
think
I'm
an
old
can
expand
on
what
I
say:
I
mean.
Basically,
there
are
a
few
reasons.
Why
really
interesting?
At
least
for
me
in
this
sense,
is
that
first,
like
the
scalability,
how
you
do
it
you
can
I
mean
it
can
be
done
vertically,
which
is
something
that
is
really
great,
especially
right.
C
Now
that
you
have
Archer
and
a
lot
of
digital
machine
providers
that
you
can
just
scale
up
like
more
memory,
more
sick,
you,
because
before
that
you
need
to
I,
don't
know
what
was
the
name
of
that
I
think
was
I.
Guess
for
a
for
something
like
that,
so
you
need
to
do
like
a
farm
of
IRAs
to
scale
horizontally,
and
then
you
have
to
have
like
a
load,
balancer
and
so
on.
I
mean
I
think
that
this
analysis
is
valid
in
general.
C
D
D
C
In
my
perspective,
is
that
is
a
sharp
first
approach.
I
will
say
that,
because
basically
I
think
that
when
you
as
a
programmer,
where
I'm
the
time
when
I
use
more
productivity,
if
you
nice
change
language
or
tools,
so
in
that
sense
will
be
the
same
tool,
the
same
language
and
also
this
on
the
studio,
because
in
general
for
a
time,
I
used
to
do
race
in
PHP
and
I
was
using
depth
sense.
Actually
they
give
me
some
licenses
for
free,
because
I
did
some
revenues
for
them
and
I.
C
At
that
moment,
I
managed
to
learn
that
what
I
really
liked
about
dotnet
it
would
only
donate
official
studio
in
general,
because
if
you
write
PHP,
this
will
X
to
you.
You
know
you
feel
like
you're
writing
c-sharp
in
general,
because
if
you
use
their
tool,
I
mean
they
won't
come
there
sense
you
have
to
complete
intelligence
and
so
and
so
and
so
on,
and
it
just
look
like
c-sharp
in
general.
C
So
for
me,
like
refectory
support
and
dental
exams
and
type
safety,
and
for
me
did
the
first
big
point
is
I:
don't
have
to
change
tools,
I,
don't
have
to
have
a
different
tool
set
and
also
everything
is
in
the
same
language,
because
you
don't
use
JavaScript,
which
I
think
that
hate
is
a
strong
word,
but
I
do
hate.
It
I
mean.
B
C
Not
productive
at
all
I
mean
some
people
is
some
people
love
it
I,
don't
like
the
design
pattern.
I,
don't
like
that
everything
is
mutable
somehow
and
there
are
like
hundreds
of
thousands
of
people
inventing
the
same
all
over
again,
and
so
let
my
approach
is
the
best.
My
approaches,
the
best
my
how
to
do
this
so.
D
D
Start
you
didn't
start
developing
in
JavaScript,
Landis
I
did
I
didn't
start
with
it.
I
worked
a
year
and
a
half
working
on
Electra
map
it
was
it
was,
but
it
is
like
that
the
real
pain
point
I
guess
in
all
the
JavaScript
land,
and
that's
really
it
is
a
bit
opinion-
is
when
you
start
to
have
bundle
up
stuff.
Three
of
these
all
the
tumblers
minimizer's
and
then,
and
then
you
being.
D
Too
many
TM
isn't
that
bad
on
some
kind
of
occasional,
I
I
think
NPM
is
a
great
ecosystem,
and
there
is
this
really
really
a
great
resource
of
source
code
out
there
out
there
that
you
can
just
use.
The
thing
is:
if
I
want
to
be
productive
and
get
a
thing
up
and
running
and
deploy
it
and
compile
it
and
then
publish
it
on
Treasure
or
two,
for
example,
with
with
a
client-side
laser,
we'll
do
a
file
deploy
and
transfer
me
everywhere.
D
C
D
D
C
Mean
that
they
did
so
lean
is
one
of
the
reasons.
For
me.
The
other
reasons
will
be
that
in
general,
I
I
know
that
the
easiest
way
to
deploy
something
in
some
webs
but
I
never
been
a
strain
of
like
web
applications
in
general
because
they
require
galaxy
and
I'm.
Not
a
friend
of
that
somehow
mix
I
mean
the
same
is
like
okay,
now
I
feel
like
I
would
do
something
like.
Oh
I
will
do
my
own
control,
but
I,
don't
when
I
miss
something
I
will
do
my
own
changes
and
before
I
was
flying.
C
C
D
C
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
C
Actually
have
it
I,
don't
know.
If
you
remember
this,
there
was
an
article
I
think
that
Dennis
wrote
it
where
he
said
that
they
I
mean
the
manpower
that
they
need
to
recreate
everything
or
on
react
was
like
really
a
lot,
and
in
a
few
days
they
emigrate
enough
to
run
stuff
in
place
or
like
in
a
two
days
or
something
like
that.
C
I
mean
it
was
like
that
he
puts
a
time
he
said
like
it,
took
so
long
to
move
his
stuff
to
react,
and
we
had
to
do
a
lot
of
like
magic
like
stuff
that
sometimes
you
don't
want
to
do
that
are
really
complex,
but
then
he
said
like
then
we
start
moving
it
to
blazing.
It
was
like
somehow
it
will
be
easy
going
that
sense.
Actually
what
I
will
I
mean?
What
I
think
that
is
good
about
it?
C
A
B
C
Of
and
also
like
I
mean
you
have
the
experiment
in
between
right,
which
is
a
markup
language,
so
in
general
that
fulcrum
mature.
It
was
well
as
when
known
you
have
hundreds
of
thousand
of
document
of
information
in
the
interns.
In
that
sense,
I
mean
I.
Think
it's
a
way
to
go
in
general,
actually
I'm
hoping
for
to
move
some
of
our
customers
to
be
a
single
code
base
that
they
will
use
just
blazer
instead
of
Windows
fourth,
and
especially
because
at
the
moment
I.
C
C
So
it
will
be
nice
to
say
that
hey
if
you're
a
Linux
office
and
you've
run
everything
on
limits,
because
inside
there
are
cases
like
that,
where
all
the
each
computer
have
Linux,
then
you
can
go
in
I
mean
and
you
can
really
locally
and
you
can
probably
ask
in
web
so
in
general.
I
think
that
is
great
because
he
will
give
they
don't
made
programmers
and
new
opportunities
that
they
didn't
have
before.
C
C
A
D
Everything
I
I
learned
so
far
about
blazer
comes
from
almost
this
repository.
It's
like
what
is
the
best
practice
or
what
is
what
what
what
options
do
you
have?
What
what
what,
for
example,
there
was
like
blazer
of
my
identity,
stuff
and
stuff
like
this
they're
they're,
really
small
and
and
and
and
and
approachable
and
I,
really,
like
them,
I
said,
learning
material.
It.
D
A
A
D
D
C
A
E
D
C
A
B
A
C
A
E
C
C
C
B
A
B
D
D
D
All
all
that
kind
of
stuff.
Nothing
on
the
market
is
like
that
flexible
and
complete
in
in
that
kind
of
sense,
and
it's
always
impressing
because
I
poured
it
over
my
personal
sore
space
to
fix
AF
my
accept
source,
but
that
is
over
to
blazer.
Of
course,
my
solution
growth
over
the
time-
and
it's
not
that
easy
to
do
that-
file
new
project,
but
basically
most
file
new
project
copy,
a
bunch
of
code
over
into
the
start,
delete
the
other
stuff
and
I
was
running
a
blazer.
D
D
C
A
C
B
C
C
Xp
or
we
thought
that
it
was
a
good
idea,
especially
because
at
that
moment
I
was
working
in
a
so
called
show
hitting
actually
was
in
California,
but
I
was
working
from
inside
below
and
basically
teacher
for
customers.
They
have
a
different
database
engine
and
they
had
at
that
moment,
IBM
db2,
Postgres,
SQL
Server
and
some
of
them
had
Oracle
dad
at
that
time,
so
we
always
have
to,
and
it
was
like
really
in
the
early
time
all
of
dotnet,
where
other
dotnet
didn't
have
the
they
all
the
interfaces.
C
So
every
time
you
have
to
create
a
concrete
data
up
there
and
so
on
so
also
on.
So
your
code
was
somehow
attached
to
one
vendor
of
decoration
unless
you
create
your
own
factory
pattern
and
so
on.
So
on
so
on.
That
is
another
plumbing
code
that
you
have
to
do.
So
when
we
are
those
we
have
customers
in
firebase
our
base
and
Inter
base.
C
So
if
I
it
was
impossible
to
maintain
like
oh,
this
customer
was
once
this
report,
but
is
using
the
data
Raptor
for
Oracle
native,
and
it's
not
at
the
interface,
because
that
came
in
the
net.
I
think
so
we
say:
let's
give
it
a
try
to
appeal
and
actually
even
really
well
as
funny
as
it
is
there.
One
of
the
first
things
that
I
did
in
HBO
was
to
create
a
provider
for
a
basic
8
which
is
not
accredited.
D
C
They
start
the
support
for
pervasive
9
and
all
of
our
customers
were
pervasive
8.
So
if
I
okay
no
say
you
have
an
attached,
try
to
connect
these
two
and
somehow
I
was
kind
of
piecing
and
after
that
I,
don't
a
lot
of
providers
fix
here
and
also
well.
You
know
that
we've
been
developing
non-stop
providers
lately
and
well.
It
was
like
that
it
was
single
code
days,
different
databases
with
Adam.
C
At
that
moment
it
was
something
like
really
breaking
ground
somehow
and
then,
when
sustained
I'm,
not
good
with
the
UI
I
cannot
draw
a
straight
line
in
a
Pacers
I'm,
not
good,
drawing
at
all,
but
I'm
I'm
here,
I'm
good
to
people
I
hope
that
doing
so,
I
thought.
Well,
if
I
do
this,
I
don't
have
to
drag
and
drop
controls
to
the
user
interface.
We
thinking
that
I,
don't
like
at
all
I.
C
Talk
head:
okay,
so
basically,
I,
remember
one
time
that
my
boss,
I,
was
like
tell
me
something
years
old
and
he
told
me
like
Jose
your
screens
really
suck
I,
don't
know
what
you're
thinking
so
so
then
I
studied
in
stuff,
and
everyone
was
thinking
that
it
is
great
how
you
prove
so
I
mean.
How
can
you
do
it
so
fast?
You
look
so
good
and
you
should
see
the
icon.
E
C
That
aside,
okay,
forget
about
everything.
I
will
do
stuff
for
everything,
even
if
it's
an
application
that
only
has
one
window
I
will
use
it.
So
then
I
start
to
try
to.
Actually
there
is
one
guy
from
summer
in
which
is
charged
said
I,
don't
know
what
fist
laughing
that
soul
or
something
like
that,
the
one
who
do
he
talks
about
in
graphics
and
and
the
older
you,
you
I,
draw
in
components
or
summaries,
and
he
said
something
that
is
really
interesting.
C
When
you
just
have
one
tool,
you
always
wonder
how
can
I
do
whatever
I
want
just
using
this
tool
without
moving
to
another
formal
tool,
so
I
start
thinking
about
cutting
back
senseless
in
the
absence
of
all
other
tools
here
that
started
the
only
thing
I
have
on
hand.
How
would
I
do
it,
so
that
was
my
goal
from
how
I
say
how
would
I
do
it?
If
I
only
have
experience
of
the
content,
I
found
them
all
the
ways
possible,
I
so
like
forget,
I
will
go
to
another
cutter.
D
D
C
A
C
A
A
C
A
B
D
E
D
Path
but
but
that's
the
thing
but
about
the
scalability,
is
the
scalability
about
developer
reason:
scalability,
it's
great!
It's
it's
on
scalability
on
you
can
it
can
start
small
iterating
fast
on
some
smaller
stuff.
Of
course
you
have
to
optimize
here
and
there
that
there
is
not
no,
we
are
all
developers
we
need.
We
know
there
is
some
kind
of
optimization.
We
have
to
make
some
from
point
to
point.
B
D
That's
the
reason
why
I'm
so
excited
of
a
blazer,
because
there's
just
two
things:
you
really
need
to
know
to
be
productive
with
blazer
and
and
in
c-sharp.
It's
like
you
have
to
know
a
little
bit
HTML.
You
have
to
know
CSS.
That's
that
there's
nothing
up
against
it.
You
can
use
bootstrap
or
something
like
this.
Of
course,
that
lowers
the
barrier
for
not
so
experienced
front-end
developers.
A
B
A
A
A
B
A
A
A
D
A
E
D
A
B
B
B
B
B
C
B
A
A
B
A
A
B
C
C
C
So
actually,
what
I
was
doing?
I
mean
three
days
before
was
I
was
trying
to
create
an
application,
and
I
did
have
problems
with
my
environment
at
that
time,
but
we
did
you
set
up
or
the
last
version
of
Derek
stress
like
2
or
2
days
ago.
He
just
basically
work
well,
I,
don't
I
didn't
have
to
do
anything.
So
what
I
did
in
this
case
is
just
up.
C
The
insert
application
like
there
is
a
separate
link
and
paste
for
this,
which
does
not
include
like
all
the
modules,
also
on
so
on
so
on,
but
it
does
include
like
the
basic
crude
operations,
and
this
is
what
you
get
out
of
the
box
here.
So
basically
you
get
the
module
that
mostly
modulus.
You
will
get
in
any
other
other
phone,
all
the
three
excites
right
now,
then
you
break
the
SDK,
which
I
really
love,
because
I
mean
I
didn't
mention
that
as
much
and
then
you
get
the
place
remodel,
which
is
the
same.
C
Like
Windows,
module
is
p.net
module.
Actually
I
always
thought
that
they
have
a
from
how
strange
naming
conventions
or
web
because
sometimes
is
a
SP.
In
the
end,
sometime
is
where
fit
in
the
end
of
the
name
of
the
module
and
so
on
so
I
think
they
should
be
just
web
or
a/c,
but
just
one
name.
So
in
this
case
it's
later
again,
this
is
a
point
that
is
a
project
and
also,
let's
see,
let
me
close
this
well,
basically,
it
works
just
as
any
self
application.
C
C
If
people
netcode
a
standard
application
which
I
didn't
like
the
design
pattern
of
asp.net
I
mean
they'd,
be
there
and
so
on.
Maybe
there
are
patterns
that
they
use,
so
you
have
it
in
here.
So
this
will
be
really
nice
in
some
senses
that,
for
example,
we
do
have
a
lot
of
stuff
that
we
have
done
or
XP
or
an
asp.net
course.
So
we
will
be
easy
to
put
in
this
pipeline.
I
was
just
taking
the
pipeline,
I
mean
you
have
the
computer
services
and
so
on
limit
is
just
a
regular
dotnet
for
application.
C
C
C
This
I
cannot
increase,
so
in
general,
I
mean
in
here
you
see
the
services
that
they
are
using.
Actually
so
you
can
include
anything
I
mean
I
have
not
tried,
but
that's
the
logic.
I
think
that
you
can
use
anything
that
you
have
used
before
or
for
asp.net
code
in
general,
so
also
visual,
Ronaldinho's,
actually
I've
been
working.
A
lot
of
working
a
lot
on
on
case,
like
a
small
monologue,
have
to
move
dog
net
developers
to
develop
for
like
a
1/2
in
this
case,
which
is
the
one
that
I'm
using.
C
So
for
me,
this
is
just
great
I
mean
the
complaints
I
had
when
I
was
working
in
the
side
bar,
for
example,
is
like
your
application
depends
on
windows:
that's
either
a
your
web
application
or
your
Windows
application.
They
both
depend
on
Windows,
and
we
don't
like
that
because
we
don't
have
Windows
servers.
So
in
this
case
for
Mesa,
it's
a
new
opportunity
to
try
to
reach
those
customers.
The
customers
are
on
on
the
linux
servers
and
also
then
the
scalability,
which
is
not
related
to
something
general
is
related
to
the
design
of
web
forms.
C
So
this
will
fix
all
of
that
and
also
in
general,
what
I
like
that
in
these
templates.
Actually,
it
means
three
is
MDK,
so
there
isn't
a
modern
approach,
but
I
also
love
this
and
which
the
family
will
do
this
with
the
head,
brace
for
iOS
and
Android
I
mean
you
have
it
in
the
in
the
SharePoint,
but
nothing
in
the
head
projects.
C
Yesterday,
we
were
I
was
doing
a
webinar
for
a
group
in
world
igloo
pees
all
over
the
world,
some
people's
in
Germany,
some
people
in
United
States,
and
we
were
talking
about
such
because
they
will
jump
to
school.
So
one
other
thing
that
I
liked
about
Safa,
ok,
I,
would
say:
Experian
dinner.
Is
that
there
are
almost
no
break
it
changes
a
little
next
year.
There
are
only
like
three
in
the
history
of
XP.
Also,
it's
not
done
much
ok,
so
this
is
the
application.
C
It
makes
your
application
the
stuff
that
I
like
in
here
it
looks
modern
because
he
does
I
mean.
Sometimes
you
see
this
javascript
based
application,
where
the
UI
3
responsive
is
like
jumping
bubbles
and
so
on.
So
on
so
on,
and
some
people
ask
me
like.
Why
is
your
application
doesn't
look
like
that
and
if
I
will
wait
on
webform
in
special
word
like
that,
a
web
part?
Of
course
you
can
do
it,
but
it
would
require
effort.
I
mean
here
is
just
by
default.
C
C
Yeah
nice
I
mean
there
is
one
thing:
I
mean
well,
I,
don't
know
if
everyone
knows
but
Coveney
night
we
work
in
the
same
company.
We
work
basically
the
same
company
and
the
thing
is
that
I'm,
not
a
uie,
related
person,
sometimes
for
people
to
find
a
button
in
this
game
is
really
hard
or
anyone
will
happen.
I
about
know.
B
C
Dui
I
mean
it's
really
something
that
we
so
pinyin
ated
between
persons
so
I'll
grade
you
I
for
one
person
might
not
be
a
good
wife
for
another
person,
and
we
have
a
case
in
a
long
long
time
ago,
when
I
was
like
23
years
old,
and
one
person
told
me
like
forsaking,
you
put
that
little
period
from
all
fish
in
your
application,
because
application
is
kind
of
boring.
So
I
was
thinking
what
the
more
clever
would.
Yes,.
C
D
How
does
you
can
feel
that
that's
well
IIIi
didn't
do
it
so
far,
but
as
my
understanding
is
it's
because
it's
based
on
a
bootstrap
mm-hmm,
it
should
be
compiling
a
source
file
down
with
new
color
schemes
or
at
least
film
scheme.
There.
There's
a
lot
of
customization
out
there
how
to
compile
a
boot
supreme,
but
it's
it's
really
great.
They
didn't
invent
another
design
system
or
something
like
this,
because
there
is
so
much
components
out
there.
D
They
just
play
nice
with
bootstrap
and
there
are
a
lot
of
stuff
that
doesn't
work
well
because
of
spacing
and
stuff
like
this.
So
basically,
as
far
as
my
understanding
is,
it
is
a
bootstrap
theme,
but
I
think
the
things
they
build
in
is
a
really
really
cool,
especially
the
high
color
contrast
themes
and
the
thing
how
you
customize.
This
is
in
your
startups,
yes
or
in
your
application
chasing
up
settings
Jason.
D
D
C
D
D
C
B
C
D
C
B
C
B
B
C
D
A
B
A
A
C
B
D
A
D
The
phone
the
phone
kept
one
mm-hmm
and
the
thing
is
this-
feels
like
ready
for
mobile,
yet
that
it
almost
works
perfectly
on
mobile,
where
the
other,
the
other
other
thing
was
always
like
lagging
around,
and
this
is
not
supported,
and
that
is
not
supported
and
we
now
get
almost
all
on
one
end
and
I
think
it
would
be
this
this.
This
will
work
great
I
guess
there
was
always
this.
This
discrepancy
about
win
forums
and
then
web
for
him.
So
then
is
mobile.
It's
like
the
fifth
clear
on
the
wagon.
D
A
B
A
B
C
D
C
D
D
D
B
D
D
A
A
D
D
F
A
D
E
A
D
So
basically,
I
hope
that
doesn't
blow
up
and
I
will
just
quickly
back
this
thing.
Let's,
let's
check:
if
there
are
errors,
there
aren't
a
huge
errors
right
now,
so
should
be
loading
I'm,
just
making
sure
did
I.
Do
the
update
thing
here,
there's
a
great
great
thing
about
programming
life.
It
is
stopped,
please
not
making
you
nervous
at
all,
oh
and
it's
it's
there
at
least.
So
let's
do
a
quick
refresh.
C
D
C
D
D
Of
it,
it
is
only
some
of
it,
yes,
but
that
the
thing
is
I
was
talking.
We
didn't
record
on
stream
so
far,
but
the
thing
was
like
I
was
trying
to
place
the
support
on
that
stuff
and
there's
like
okay,
III
edit
some
modules
and
stuff
like
this,
but
I
didn't
change
that
much
so
far,
and
it's
only
the
platform
modules,
because
the
other
stuff
is
like
just
working
out
of
the
box.
So.
D
D
There
are
some
specifics:
I
have
to
ensure
that
are
working
with
amis
built
and
specific
versions
of
about
mcore
and,
of
course
laser.
If
we
Stefan
large
enough
yeah
yeah,
for
example,
I
have
to
do
can't
do
something
start
struggling,
but
I
I
didn't
do
anything
except
for
file
new
project
copy
it
over
and
reference
it.
And
basically
that's
the
only
thing:
I,
that's
the
only
module
for
now
and
I
referenced.
D
D
We
we,
of
course
we
can
yeah,
sure
and
I
I
was
a
little
bit
upset,
because
I
I
was
thinking.
I
am
doing
the
right
thing,
because
I
worked
with
face
because
Nick
or
in
the
past.
So
the
other
thing
is
like
you
have
like
this
service
collection.
You
get
passed
to
it,
so
the
the
dependency
injection
container,
you're,
putting
stuff
up
front
and
and
the
whole
the
framework
will
grab
all
the
dependencies
abilities
dependency
tree
for
you
and
the
the
I
wrote
about
dependency.
Injection
I
have
no
idea
I
guess
ten
years
ago,.
A
D
D
D
Yes,
yeah
and
my
thing
is:
it
could
be
resolved
because
I
was
doing
this
stupid
way,
not
the
stupid
way,
but
III
did
propose
a
change
and
then
it
really
really
took
the
time
to
write
me
and
basically
that's
the
thing
I
was
doing
and
then
they
add
xaf
section
was
that
the
thing
I
was
thinking
that
is
in
the
template
and
I
was
thinking.
Okay,
if
I
put
the
application
inside
the
DI
container,
they
would
resolve
it,
but
they
don't
resolve
it.
D
C
Lately
actually
remember
that
we
meet
like
two
times
to
where
you
show
us
a
nyan
and
so
on
so
on
so
on
and
I
was
thinking
that
in
general
I
guess
we
do
that
for
compatibility,
but
the
design
pattern
that
we
use
for
the
application
for
the
publication.
It's
not
that
modern
anymore.
You
can
use
a
lot
of
folders
off
like
dependency
injection,
build
their
patterns,
and
so
on.
That
is,
like
more
I,
mean.
E
C
C
D
Modern
approach
to
not
the
main
problem,
I
have
with
with
like
the
monolithic
approach
that
xaf
had
in
the
past.
It's
like.
Okay.
Now
we
have
to
support
multiple
databases,
there's
one
data
layer
that
connects
to
this,
the
one
data
layer
that
connects
a
bet
we
have
to
to
not
only
data
layers,
there's
a
lot
of
stuff
going
on,
and
if
you,
if
you
say,
add
applications
like
one
two,
three,
okay,
there's
one
base
module,
that's
application,
one!
D
It's
like
security
and
cross-cutting
concerns,
but
you've
like
every
single
module,
is
a
single
module
that,
like
the
ten
leaf
in
the
application
itself,
so
it's
very
hard
to
do
to
a
horizontal
or
vertical
slicing.
If
you
will,
with
the
most
approach
and
and
that
the
the
thing
is
I
am
always
on
the
tip
of
the
toe,
if
you
will
so,
but
this
implementation
is
not
the
source
code,
we
good
got
delivered
so
far,
so
that
that
isn't
something
that
is
my
twenty
one.
D
Three
I
think
they
said
earlier
or
new-built,
but
the
the
main
that
that's
the
only
problem
I
had
was
like.
Okay,
I
I
had
to
write
my
own
extension
default
that
copies
over
some
of
the
logics
that
are
inside
this
kind
of
of
me
fault,
because
it
isn't
comfortable
with
the
way
I
instantiate
it
and
then
and
did
stuff.
But
it
was
the
only
line
of
code.
I
had
trouble
with
and.
C
D
Yes
and
then
I
had
a
working
and
running
application.
It's
not
it's!
Not
it's
not
it's
a
complete,
of
course
mm-hmm,
but
everything
else.
For
example,
if
is
I,
have
a
new
client,
my
layouts,
my
everything
else
is
working
and
I
didn't
have
to
do
anything
if
nothing
changed.
I
have
my
business
object,
I
for
everything
and
everything
sandal
did
so
far
so
I
have
my
calendar
start
on
those
are
new.
You
didn't
see
those
the
last
episode,
cuz
I
didn't
finish
them
so
far,
but,
for
example,
the
layout
builders
are
working
exactly
the
same.
D
B
D
D
Distributed
computing
in
general,
so
it
you
have
always
the
time
where
you
say:
ok,
I
have
to
pick
this
background
task.
I
need
to
perform
once
a
week
or
I
have
to
do
some
kind
of
import.
I
need
to
do
from
this
company
every
hour
or
something
repays
and
put
this
all
my
knowledge.
I
have
an
application
building
with
XF
the
last
10
years
into
one
single
framework.
You
can
first
per
case
soon.
E
D
The
current
said
is,
I
am
finishing
a
lot
of
AP
ice
right
now
and
then
it
would
to
lock
down
and
postpone
a
lot
of
stuff.
I
was
going
to
plan
to
release.
It
was
on
my
time
plan.
It
was
like
just
right
now.
There
should
be
a
debate
of
it
out,
but
because
of
kovat
and
all
the
all
the
stuff
I
need
to
postpone
it
at
least
a
month,
so
stay
tuned
at
least
in
meat
of
June.
There
should
be
a
public
Peter.
D
C
D
D
D
C
C
D
C
Was
willing
to
ask
you
something
manual
aside?
What
are
your
thoughts
on
the
scalability
now
that
it's
time
to
talk
about
something
like
that,
I
mean
we
didn't
really
introduction,
because
that's
we
got
a
lot
of
questions
in
our
office
like
which
type
of
server
do
I
need
to
use
for
yourself
application
that
could
be
the
station
type
of
server.
How.
D
D
There
are
two
things
that
I
I
guess
are
really
really
exciting
and
cool
about
laser
in
general
and
and
the
architecture
that
shows
about
client
states.
There
is
Microsoft's
claims
like
if
you
do
server
side
blazer,
it's
the
thing
that
we
are
talking
about
right
now.
So
if
I
stop
my
application,
the
my
browser
tires
know:
oh,
it
did
tie
it
a
little
deep
in
Windows
yeah.
No,
it
isnt
it
close.
The
browser
window.
D
A
lot
deal
the
thing
is,
plays
a
server-side.
It's
like
everything
all
different
calculations,
about
the
dome
dipping
and
all
the
stuff
happens
on
the
server.
Nothing
happens
on
the
client
or
almost
nothing
happens
to
the
choir,
but
that
comes
at
a
cost.
So
every
client
that
connects
needs
to
have
all
the
3d
thing
and
then
the
whole
dom
tree
or
not
a
whole
dom,
but
the
different
sort
of
component
model
tree
on
the
server.
It
will
talk
about
like
five
to
ten
bags
of
ram
for
a
client
mm-hmm.
D
C
C
D
That's
that
that's
a
minimum
requirement
I
see
four
per
user
if
you
use
service
I
plays,
but
the
neat
thing
about
combining
xaf
with
with
blazer
is
like
you:
don't
have
this
huge
bag
of
obsession
state
you
need
it
for
web
forms,
it's
like
a
small
tree
of
differences
and
and
and
like
only
to
use
it
either.
So
the
memory
footprint
is
a
lot
small
repair
user,
for
example
a
sir
and
you
have
the
application
model
as
a
whole
bunch
as
a
per
process
thing,
and
it's
not
huge
it's.
D
C
Stateless,
basically,
it's
stateless
yeah
I
actually
did
one
I
like
for
me
I'm
looking
forward
from
two
things.
Actually
one
is
that
well
Yuma
I
mean
in
this
case
you
can
use
Linux
servers
yeah
that
will
reduce
the
licensing
cost
for
the
customer,
because
you
know
I
mean
I
I,
don't
know
exactly
how
it
is
because
I
have
not
done
that
lately,
with
as
far
as
I
can
recall
or
remember,
is
that
Windows
license
for
celebrate
depends
on
the
amount
of
RAM,
all
CPU,
that
you
have
yes
yeah.
It
depends
on
I
on
the.
C
C
D
Guess,
on
the
long
run
and
I
say:
okay
in
one
two
years,
I
have
xaf
team
had
said:
okay,
let's
decide
when
PubMed
five
is
stable
about
the
client-side
place
or
stuff
just
right
now
we
are
server-side
only
with
X
there
and
that's
fine.
That's
fine
for
I
guess
over
80
to
90%
of
the
applications.
If
you
don't
need
offline
support,
you
have
unstable
internet
connection,
it
is
like
a
back
office
staff
or
it
is
like
mobile
with
good
connectivity
you're
fine
with
laser
server.
D
A
We
have
another
question
in
the
chat.
That
is
exactly
what
you're
talking
right
now
that
he's
saying
that
I
have
some
concern
about
blazer
self-assess,
a
software-as-a-service
taking
account
they
ticket
that
we
know
for
Danish.
That
he'll
say
that
we
shouldn't
use
1000,
you
say
in
himself.
He
says:
King
may
be
using
multiple
little
private
service,
so
I'm
gonna.
A
D
Just
a
small
excerpt
on
blazer
and
on
the
scalability
of
XF
in
in
general,
it's
like
blazer
for
server-side
is
like
you
have
like
this
memory
footprint.
You
have
per
user.
You
have
like
kinda
sticky
session,
because
the
treaty
algorithm
runs
in
this
on
the
server
side.
If
you
got
the
next
lever
and
go
to
laser
medicine
D,
you
can
host
it
on
Azure
on
a
file
share.
It
doesn't
does
anything
you.
You
can
write
a
note,
GS
server
application
and
write
the
front
end
in
blazer.
It's
the
other
way
around.
It's
it's
horrible.
D
C
D
On
the
class
for
sir
for
blaze
for
xaf,
like
thousands
and
thousands
of
thousands
of
people
are
connecting
to
one
service,
it
depends
on
your
architecture.
It
depends
on
how
is
this
the
same
database?
Are
you
doing
multiple
nodes
to
you,
balancing
security
stuff,
like
that
out-of-the-box
xef
is
not
designed
to
handle
hundreds
of
thousands
of
users,
but
I
have
like
deployed
applications
with
athletes
at
least
thousand
thousand
and
are
500
uses
Oh.
C
D
C
Some
progress
that
we
had
in
third
or
regarding
web
forms
is
that
you
really
need
to
to
fine-tune
your
ideas
somehow,
and
that
is
a
ski
that
is
hard
to
find.
I
mean
I
live
in
my
country
in
the
summer,
where
I
was
born.
If
I,
okay,
they
find
someone
who
did
the
demonstration
for
AES.
So
we
can
have
like
something
really
neat
and
that
was
hard
to
find
and
expensive.
If
you
want
to.
C
If
you
want
to
learn
about
dog
balancing
in
nginx,
there
are
hundreds
of
our
people
everywhere
on
how
to
do
all
type
of
no
balance
in
proxies
and
so
on.
So
in
that
sense,
and
also
there
is
sort
of
people,
I
mean
really
good
in
that
in
demos
already.
So,
if
I
you
do
that,
for
me,
I
will
just
put
my
application
to
run
so
for
me,
it's
like
he
will
open
a
new
market.
C
Somehow,
because
you
have,
you
can
go
to
Linux
everything
content
and
also
you
can
include
all
the
type
of
person
that
you
didn't
into
before,
because
of
course,
that
waveforms
will
not
run
in
Apache
yeah.
You
will
run
in
engine
X
because
if
the
Blazer
thing
so
in
that
sense,
it's
like
it
would
change
somehow
they
layout
on
how
we
work
and
also
I
think
that's
another
change
that
we'll
do
have,
and
this
is
right
off
or
off.
It
is
that
maybe
that
will
become
the
main
flavor
for
us,
not
web
phone
or
Windows
Phones.
C
It
will
be
just
later
yeah
because
we
can
do
a
little
order
of
magmatic
to
say.
Okay,
let's
do
it
with
an
external,
so
one
we
compile
that
we,
so
we
have
all
the
other
foods,
and
now
we
can
include
that
we
can,
with
one
of
everything,
could
be
four.
So
in
that
sense
something
will
change.
Maybe
your
codebase
will
be
more
monolithic
somehow,
because
we
will
aim
to
just
want
that.
Oh
ABC
for
Windows
Eddie,
before
where
I
don't.
C
D
A
good
time,
but
from
from
service
perspective,
at
least,
if
you
say:
okay,
that's
my
back-end
code
that
I
need
to
scale
my
back-end
code,
that
that's
that's
a
thing
you,
you
can't
easily
horizontal
scale
like
just
through
another
instance
of
XF
web
service
in
there
Weaver,
but
with
web
forms.
There's
no
way
to
do
this
web
forms
way,
but
in
it
blaze
away
cause
of
the
way
that
it's
communicated.
You
can
throw
a
red
sash
or
something
like
this
in
the
back
end
and
store.
D
C
D
C
Is
that
become
straight
on
time
and
money?
You
have
because
it's
possible,
but
in
this
the
constrain
is
lower
because
they
require
I
mean
is
easier
in
some
some
senses,
so
I'm
looking
for
actually
for
that
and
to
seem
like
just
in
one
product
form
like
where
for
Windows
I,
don't
care
I
will
do
in
this
case.
Actually.
For
me,
what
is
really
interesting
is
that
I
will
go
to
check
really
check
a
literal
example,
because
for
one
case,
why
why
I
do
web
applications
himself?
C
Is
that
everyone
in
the
family
office
the
family
business,
the
youth
market?
You
know
I
needed
to
do
to
have
a
web
application
for
that
and
before
he
was
not
as
responsive
as
in
Windows
forms,
but
I
think
that
web
software
is
good
enough
actually,
and
now
we
will
be
way
there,
and
especially
if
we
can
provide
something
like
a
electron
to
have
like
a
desktop
application.
It
will
be
even
better
somehow
so.
For
me,
much
much
user
is
a
being.
A
A
D
But,
and
you
can't
compare
UGS,
it's
like
10
kilobytes
of
scripts
compressed
same
to
the
browser
and
then
like
two
animations
and
stuff
like
this.
It's
not
the
same
thing
like
with
XA.
Ever
it's
a
except
it's
a
much
larger
scale
from
from
architecture
perspective,
but
that
doesn't
mean
it's
that
it's
it's
flexible
on
other
balances
because
react,
apps
can
be
snappy,
but
we
just
saw
database
applications,
don't
have
to
be
a
labor
as
well
or
not
fast.
They
are
farce
and
Tanaka,
and
the
next
version
is
too
promising.
D
B
B
C
It
to
be
complete,
we
have
to
wait
for
developer
Express
to
move
all
the
controls,
because
there
is
something
about
the
leading
Windows
that
I
think
is
impossible
to
add
more
features
to
that,
and
then
maybe
you
they
have
it.
So
if
they
manage
to
move
that
tube
later
then
Windows
Phones
would
become
like
a
second
me
I,
don't
know,
but
of
course,.
D
D
We
it
the
way
we
use
applications
today
is
totally
different
than
the
first
time
the
grid
was
introduced.
Do
you
know
what
I
mean
it's?
Ok,
you
have
all
the
stuff
and
we
have
this
grouping
and
with
the
summaries,
and
it's
all
good
and
everything
we
love
about
grits,
but
I
think
the
the
way
we
experience
user.
D
C
Actually,
I
think
that
somehow
is
the
opposite,
because
you
know
that
a
common
request
that
we
have
in
our
office
is
that
if
I
mean
it's
over
functional,
so
they
asked
to
make
it
more
simple,
because
the
grease
can
be
overwhelming.
If
you
see
all
the
options
that
they
have,
so
they
want
to
narrow
down
to
a
few
options
or
a
few
options
where
they
can
do
is
both
because
it's
like,
for
example,
we
we
were
talking
with
you
about
that.
C
That's
very
dangerous
honey,
I
think
what
yeah
yeah
yeah
for
a
for
me
dynamic
for
me
in
in
South,
and
we
just
did
it
because
the
customer
wanted
like
that,
because
they
could
achieve
the
same
using
the
simple
control
of
degrees,
but
they
thought
that
is
too
complex
for
the
end
user.
You
need
something
that
looks
more
primitive
from
house
which.
D
Watch
them
yeah,
that's
always
the
thing
with
user
experience.
Yes,
oh,
oh
always
this
this
balance
between
simplicity
and
functionality
and
and
sometimes
that
in
in
in
most
of
the
cases
of
look
at
the
new
support
center,
it's
it's
much
more
cleaner.
It
has
lot
less
options
and
I
am
more
of
a
power
user
of
the
support.
D
Center
and
I
really
be
some
features,
but
there's
another
talk,
but
but
that's
the
thing
in
with
with
usability
in
general
and
I,
think
the
cleaner
design
is
more
approachable
to
most
of
the
end
users
and
we
can
add
features
for
the
power
users
if
we
need
to
without
having
to
strip
out
everything.
That's.
C
C
C
D
B
D
C
I
never
intended
it
together.
That
is
also
I,
know
the
stuff
that
you're
actually
talking
about.
One
of
the
pain
point
is
that
yes,
they're
more
functionality,
you
have
the
more
support
that
you
need
to
have
and
also
they
expect
somehow
of
documentation
from
your
Bayview
I
mean
you
did
this
export
book
right.
So
you
think
that
you
did
it
for
them
and
if
I
know,
if
these
just
come
with
the
framework-
and
you
have
to
explain
it
so,
if
increase
the
support
and.
C
D
D
B
D
Did
all
the
coding
and
now
you
can
use
it?
So
that's
that
that's
that's
all
is
it's
all
my
memory
about
pop-up
and
all
the
effort.
I
really
really
I,
really
love,
XF,
I
love
the
way.
There
are
pain
points,
of
course,
with
everything
nology.
They
are
pain
points,
but
it's
all
that
the
love
in
our
day
I
put
into
there
and
then
so.
That's
that's
the
thing
with
technology
in
general,
you
can
say:
okay,
use
you
Jess
I,
like
it
it's
it's
really.