►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Thank
you
well
good
evening.
Everyone
welcome
to
tonight's
public
hearing
before
we
get
started,
I'd
like
to
please
turn
off
your
cell
phones
or
other
electronic
devices
to
avoid
any
disruptions.
A
If
anyone
here
is
planning
to
present
testimony
make
sure
you've
signed
up
in
the
back
or
if
you
haven't
signed
up
online
already
anyway,
it's
it's
wednesday,
the
25th
day
of
may,
and
the
time
is
six
o'clock
time
set
for
this
public
hearing.
All
three
commissioners
are
present.
Madam
clerk,
are
there
any
changes
to
the
agenda.
A
There
are
no
changes
to
the
agenda.
The
first
item
on
the
on
the
agenda
is
lenny
lenny
bus.
I
will
open
the
public
hearing
on
case
number:
two:
zero:
two:
two:
zero:
zero:
four:
zero:
zero
dash
v,
a
c
lenny
bus,
a
variance,
an
accessory
used
to
conduct
to
construct
a
detached,
secondary
dwelling,
etc.
C
C
C
Shown
here
is
the
existing
home
to
be
converted
to
the
secondary
dwelling,
as
well
as
the
elevations
for
the
new
home,
which
is
under
construction.
The
site
plan
depicts
the
location
of
the
existing
and
new
homes,
so
the
existing
home
is
sorry.
I've
got
a
lot
of
things
open
here
over
here
towards
the
corner
of
tarp
and
laundry
way,
and
the
new
home
is
more
in
the
middle
of
the
property.
C
There
we
go
regarding
the
variance
the
applicant
is
requesting
to
exceed
the
maximum
900
square
feet
standard
for
secondary
dwellings,
as
well
as
remove
the
requirement.
The
secondary
dwelling
be
occupied
by
the
property's
owners,
property
owner's
family
or
an
employee
staff
is
staff
is
in
support
of
these
requests
for
the
following
reasons.
C
So
in
the
staff
report
it
details
that
mr
bus
went
through
a
what's
called
a
one-time
division
process
with
staff
over
a
year
ago
and
was
successfully
created.
Two
2.5
acre
parcels
out
of
the
original
five
acre
parcel
and
that
is
what's
allowed
in
the
rsw
district.
It's
2.5
acres
minimum
as
a
condition
of
approval.
C
C
The
fact
that
the
septic
was
not
possible,
as
well
as
the
hardship
associated
with
city
of
boise's
requirements
for
sewer,
mr
bus,
was
required
to
basically
put
the
two
parcels
back
into
one
for
five
acres
and
city
boise
would
then
grant
him
sewer
so
through
our
zoning
code,
the
only
option
to
allow
for
the
construction
of
the
new
home
and
the
conversion
of
the
smaller
home
was
a
secondary
dwelling
and,
as
the
existing
home
didn't
meet
the
requirements
for
secondary
dwellings,
the
variance
was
applied
for
as
well.
C
So
that's
kind
of
an
overview
of
of
how
we
got
to
this
point,
I
will
say
that
we
heard
from
several
agencies
on
this
boise
sewer
was
obviously
a
very
big
one.
The
packet
contains
a
letter
from
the
mayor
of
boise,
basically
saying
that
they're
not
granting
new
extensions
to
properties.
So
that
was
something
that
you
know.
We
required
mr
bus
to
go
to
the
highest
level
to
figure
out
if
he
could
get
sewer
for
the
new
home
and
allow
for
the
two
2.5
acre
parcels
and
ultimately
their
decision
was
no.
C
It
has
to
be
a
five
acre
parcel
and
that's
that's
what
we
landed
on,
but
boise
will
allow
the
homes
to
connect.
Our
building
official
had
no
objections.
Our
engineer
had
no
objections.
Achd
had
no
objections
and
the
project
is
supported
by
the
boise
comprehensive
plan.
As
I
mentioned
in
the
staff
report,
this
area
of
the
county
has
multiple
properties
with
primary
homes
and
secondary
dwellings.
C
It
actually
even
has
some
properties
with
multiple
kind
of
primary
dwellings
in
terms
of
being
larger
than
900
square
feet,
so
it
certainly
is
in
conformance
with
kind
of
the
surrounding
area,
and
as
you
look
at
this
map
back
here,
you'll
see
there
are
several
smaller
lot
properties
as
well
in
the
area.
So
again,
all
that
led
to
staff's
recommendation
of
approval,
and
so
with
that
I'll
stand
for
any
questions.
So.
D
Mr
chair,
so
thanks
leon
for
that
presentation.
So
what's
the
reasoning
behind
allowing
them
to
hook
up
boise
sewer,
you
know
if
it's
still
two
homes,
it's
still
two
homes.
So
what
difference
does
it
make
that's
one
or.
C
Commissioner,
it's
a
it's
a
unique
situation,
one
that
I'm
sure
mr
bus
might
be
able
to
tell
you
what
he
went
through
to
try
to
get
that
done.
They
just
will
not
allow
the
creation
of
new
lots
and
new
extensions
of
that
sewer.
So
if
it's
an
existing
lot,
which
this
property
had
access
to
one
hookup
they'll
allow
that
to
happen.
C
I
think
they
even
went
so
far
as
to
say
that
they
would
allow
both
homes
to
connect
to
the
sewer
connection,
but
they
won't
allow
for
the
division
of
land
and
the
creation
of
new
sewer
extensions.
So
and
it's
a
hard
and
fast
rule,
it's
a
it's
a
moratorium
that
has
been
in
effect
for
a
long
time
and
it's
really
changed
the
way
the
southwest
has
developed.
D
And
then,
secondly,
is
this
in
the
southwest
area,
where
the
wells
are
drying
up.
C
C
It
is,
and
it's
not
in
an
area
of
drilling
concern
or
a
nitrate
priority
area.
It
is
in
a
groundwater
concern
area
which,
as
I
understand,
is
arsenic
and
uranium
levels
or
at
the
level
where
ongoing
monitoring
and
things
like
that
are
required
by
idwr.
I
think
also.
The
existing
well
is
115
feet
deep
right
now,
but
yeah.
It's
not
an
area
where
the
wells
are
a
problem
based
on
speaking
to
zach
kirk,
our
county
engineer.
C
C
Larger
great
question
I
might
defer
to
the
applicant
to
tell
you
how
he
gets
to
his
house
so
that
you
can
figure
out
what
roads
are.
I,
I
only
know
the
local
roadways.
I
apologize.
I'm
not
aware.
D
C
Chairman,
commissioner,
yes,
that's
been
reviewed
by
our
building
department
recently
and
it's
being
inspected
and
it's
yeah
meets
all
the
code.
C
C
C
Chairman,
commissioner,
we
have
contemplated
doing
that.
Obviously,
that's
still
a
draft
code
and
we
have
to
go
through
the
adoption
process,
but
that
is
one
thing
that
we've
looked
at
and
a
lot
of
jurisdictions
in
the
area
have
lifted
that
requirement,
largely
in
response
to
housing,
need
and
things
like
that.
E
A
Okay,
thank
you
is
mr
bus
in
audience.
Do
you
want
to
do
you
want
to
speak
you're
welcome
to
present
your
case
if
you'd
like.
F
A
An
adventure
I
I
can
understand
that,
yes,
I
can
understand.
Yes,
is
there
anyone
else
in
the
audience
that
would
like
to
speak
to
this
before
I
close
the
public
hearing,
if
not
I'll
close
the
public
hearing
on
application.
Number:
two:
zero:
two:
two:
zero:
zero:
four:
zero:
zero
v:
a
lenny
bus.
What
is
the
pleasure
of
the
board.
D
Well,
mr
chair,
according
to
our
staff,
I
think
they
did
a
really
good
job
kind
of
outlining
what
falls
into
into
code
right
now
and
then
the
things
that
we're
going
to
have
to
just
kind
of
make
a
decision
on
they're,
putting
it
back
into
five
acres
correct.
So
that's
in
the
process,
and
that
would
be
part
of
a
condition
of
approval.
Or
do
we
need
to
do.
D
We
don't
need
to
worry
about
that.
Okay,
and
I
think
the
only
thing
that
we
would
need
to
really
discuss
on
the
record
is
just
waiving
the
requirement
that
a
second
secondary
dwelling
be
occupied
by
a
family
member.
So
I
think
for
me
we're
I'm
looking
at
hopefully
changing
that
code,
because
we
have
housing
issues
and
it
looks
like
somebody's
been
living
there
anyway
for
five
years,
so
there's
presidents
that's
been
set
and
it
looks
like
we've
got
boise
city
to
agree
to
hook
up
the
sewer
right
now.
D
My
only
concern
would
be
the
115
foot.
Well,
it's
not
that
deep.
So
I
would
just
state
to
the
applicant
that
if
you've
got
arsenic
or
nitrates,
things
like
that
just
have
it
checked
periodically.
Have
it
checked
at
least
once
a
year.
Typically,
you
can
put
some
reverse
osmosis
things
on
your
tap
water,
you're
drinking
water
and
you're.
Fine,
but
just
keep
an
eye
on
it.
D
Up
pretty
well
I'll
make
that
motion
then
to
approve
application:
two
zero,
two:
two:
zero:
zero;
four;
zero
dash,
ac,
lennybus
and
based
on
findings
and
facts,
conclusions
of
law
and
the
testimony
that
we
heard
here
tonight.
The
discussions
by
the
board.
I
think
that
warrants
an
approval
I'll.
A
E
A
G
All
responding
agencies
did
approve
of
the
application,
including
idaho,
fish
and
game
fire,
achd
and
central
district
health
and
as
conditioned
the
applicant,
will
be
required
to
submit
an
updated
road
users.
Maintenance
agreement
signed
by
everyone
who
currently
takes
access
off
south
broken
wheel
lane
and
that
must
be
completed
before
approval
of
the
final
flat
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
the
preliminary
plot
and
I'll
stand
for
any
questions.
D
Mr
chair
corey,
is
there
someone
that
signed
up
to
testify
tonight
regarding
the
wildlife
and
private
road,
or
do
you
have
more
information
on
that.
A
Okay
with
the
okay.
H
Good
evening,
commissioners
for
the
record,
sean
nicholl
po
box,
1595
eagle
83616
here
tonight,
representing
the
lurch
family
lurch
family
and
their
subdividing
of
their
24
acres
into
two
10,
plus
acre
lots
within
a
new
subdivision.
H
The
staff
has
done
a
great
job
at
laying
out
the
staff
report.
The
conditions
of
approval,
you're
planning
zoning
commission
did
recommend
approval.
We
did
accept
the
conditions
that
were
placed
at
that
time.
I
do
have
one
modification
to
one
of
the
conditions,
based
on
the
comments
that
we
received.
I
actually
received
them
today
from
the
from
the
neighbor
neighboring
property
owner.
It
was
dated,
I
think,
may
18th,
but
we
just
got
it
today.
H
Regarding
the
concerns
over
the
private
road.
I
guess
we
might
maybe
let
them
talk
first
and
then
I
can
come
back
up
and
do
a
rebuttal
and
propose
my
condition
that
would
hopefully
help
the
situation.
H
A
I
I
I
We
have
a
lousy
situation
here.
We
have
never
had
any
maintenance
done
to
this
road
since
it
was
built
it's
hard
to
get
private
road
participants
all
in
agreement.
I
bet
you're
familiar
with
that
now
I
am
adding
three
more
entities
to
this
road
is
just
not
good
and
there's
a
commercial
use
that
I'm
really
concerned
about.
I
There
was
12
to
20
people,
maintaining
a
cell
tower.
It's
now
accessing
our
road
that
access
was
done
unit
just
by
the
one
individual,
no
cooperation
agreement.
Nothing
excuse
me:
I'm
driving
dry
throat,
the
man's
been
adversarial
over
the
years
and
I've
lived
there
longer
than
anyone
and
I
don't
want
side
all
the
all
the
altercations,
but
it
would
not
work
for
all
of
us
to
agree
on
this
private
road.
I
I
I'm
asking
that
it
get
recent
the
plot
get
resubmitted,
with
access
to
the
traditional
use
that
was
done
for
30
years
or
so
until
this
recent
change
from
five
mile
road,
and
that
would
just
leave
us
out
of
it
and
leave
some
headaches
out
of
it
and
they
will
come
I'm.
I'm
assured
of
that.
I
Another
problem
is,
we
have
mailbox
concerns,
a
lady
is
real
kind
and
letting
us
have
our
mailboxes
pretty
close
to
where
we
live,
and
that
would
avoid
an
hour
a
day
going
to
the
cuna
post
office,
picking
up
parcels
and
mail
right
now.
It's
overflowed.
We
had
a
nice
uniform,
conforming
mailbox
platform
and
now
there's
buckets
with
cement
and
posts,
and
it's
adding
on
as
each
structure
gets
built
out
there.
So
I
wouldn't
I
wouldn't
blame
the
private
owner
and
say
hey
enough
of
this.
We
want
this
done.
I
We
want
it
out
of
here
and
that
would
cause
a
real
hardship,
there's
a
whole
lot
of
little
trivial
things,
but
to
sum
it
up,
it
would
be
a
real
problem
to
add
basically
three
entities
using
our
road
and
the
commercial
one.
If
we
all
did
the
same
thing,
it
would
not
be
a
private
road
if
I
opened
up
a
little
commercial
platform
about
the
same
size
as
his
platform.
I
F
D
G
D
G
G
D
D
A
Does
the
easement
state
the
the
cell
tower.
D
A
A
A
Okay,
sean.
If
you'd
like
to
wait
a
minute,
you
have
somebody
else:
okay
and
who
would
that
be.
B
A
Am
okay
if
you'd
like
to
speak
to
this
issue,
could
you
state
your
name
for
the
record
and
you
have
you
have
three
minutes.
K
Okay,
thank
you.
My
name
is
rick
berry.
I
live
in
88,
48
south
broken
wheel
lane
I
I
won't
need
three
minutes.
I
just
want
to
support
everything
that
mr
roberts
said,
and
you
know
I
there
is
this.
You
know
there
is
an
issue
with
this
road
being
maintained.
You
know
and
adding
more
people.
I
don't
think
anybody
out
here
is
in
favor
of
adding
more
residences
to
this
road
and
I
think
that
the
applicant
is
going
to
benefit
tremendously.
B
D
H
So
I
guess
the
bottom
line
is
that
the
the
lurches
do
have
legal
access
for
their
existing
house.
I
believe
the
conditional
use
permit
for
the
for
the
cell
tower.
The
axis
was
from
five
mile
through
an
easement
through
the
property,
I
think
over
the
years
the
maintenance
folks
have
decided
to
use
broken
wheel
as
the
access
to
the
cell
towers,
because
the
cell
tower
is
closer
to
the
private
lane.
H
My
suggestion
for
the
condition
of
approval
we
would
like
to
work
with
the
neighbors.
I
think
it's
the
benefit
to
the
entire
subdivisions
to
get
an
updated
maintenance
agreement.
They'll
be
they
will
be
adding
another
property
owner
to
pay
the
cost
of
improvements
and
maintenance
of
that
private
road.
However,
to
move
this
forward,
if
we
could
change
the
condition
number
five
in
your
in
your
exhibit
a
to
state
it
currently
states,
the
applicants
shall
submit
an
updated
road
users,
maintenance
agreement
for
south
broken
wheel
lane.
H
I
would
like
just
to
add
if
access
is
taken
from
the
lane
for
the
new
lot,
I
did
talk
to
the
to
the
aida
county
highway
district
this
afternoon
and
if
we
do
not
have
legal
access
to
that
private
road,
they
cannot
deny
us
access
off
of
hubbard,
and
so
we
could
request
an
access
off
of
hubbard
for
that
new
south.
A
lot
that
we're
creating.
H
D
Mr
chair,
yes,
so
you
don't
know
if
you
have
legal
access,
the
two
lots
have
legal
legal
easement
at
this
point,
you're
not
sure.
A
Okay,
because
they
already
have
access-
and
I
have
a
user's
agreement
for
the
one.
H
H
Okay,
I
think
that's
the,
I
think,
that's
the
concern
and
then,
regarding
the
cell
tower,
they
do
have
an
easement
from
five
mile
to
access
that
cell
tower
for
maintenance.
We
can
just
have.
A
That
access-
that's
that's
a
that's.
B
A
Issue
for
are
they're
not
using
they're
violating
the
your
privacy
sounds
like
it
yeah
yeah
and
they
should
be
using
the
the
where
they
had
the
original
access.
Okay,
could
you
state
again
once
well?
Do
we
have
that
down
what
what
you'd
like
to
add
in
the
number.
H
A
H
C
Chairman
commissioners,
I
I
think
it
sounds
like
tabling
was
something
you're
interested
in.
I
would
say
this
is
a
preliminary
plat,
so
we
do
have
the
opportunity
between
now
and
the
final
plot
to
address
concerns
related
to
that.
I
think
mr
nickel
has
stated
that
the
new
lot
does
not
have
access
right
now.
So
that's
why
it
would
need
the
updated
maintenance
agreement,
the
existing
home
and
the
existing
lot
that
would
be
created
associated
that
home
would
have
access,
because
that
wouldn't
change
the
number
of
people
using
the
private
drive.
C
So
so
again,
I
think
there
is
legal
access,
there's
just
not
legal
access
for
the
new
lot,
so
it's
either
update
that
maintenance
agreement
or
get
direct
access
to
hubbard
road,
and
I
think
those
are
both
workable
things
that
either
won
the
neighborhood
figures.
It
out
or
achd
grants
access
to
hubbard.
But
I
don't
think
there's
when
there
are
two
ways
forward
here:
okay,
so
yeah.
D
A
E
D
Well,
I
think
I'm
inclined
to
do
that,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
that
the
other
owners
along
that
road
understand
a
couple
of
things
number
one.
If
the
owner
of
the
cell
tower
property
is
allowing
access
off
the
wrong
road,
that's
a
code
enforcement
issue
and
neighbors
can
call
code
enforcement
and
take
that
take
care
of
that.
That's
not
under
our
purview
here
tonight.
So
that's
one
issue
I
want
to
address
and
that
should
be
handled
pretty
easily.
D
I
would
think-
and
so
if
we
did
approve
this
tonight,
I
would
make
a
condition
of
approval
that
the
applicant
either
has
to
get
an
updated
road
users.
Maintenance
agreement,
which
would
be
signed
by
all
of
the
parties,
would
have
to
approve
right.
So
if
he
didn't
get
that,
then
he
would
have
to
look
at
having
access
go
to
achd
and
have
access
off
of
hubbard
road.
A
All
right
is
that
clear,
with
the
staff
do
we
need
to.
You
can
do
that
with
the
with
this
motion.
Okay,.
C
A
You
made
the
motion.
Second
motion's.
Moving
seconded,
okay,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye
all
right
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
I
think
we've
resolved
that.
A
Okay,
I
will
next
open
the
public
hearing
on
application.
Number
two:
zero:
two:
two:
zero:
zero:
two:
nine
seven
s:
p
r,
william
humphreys
preliminary
plat,
we'll
hear
from
staff.
First.
L
L
The
property
is
located
on
south
stuart
road
north
of
east
hubbard
road
and
contains
approximately
19.06
acres.
Lots.
One
and
two,
which
are
the
southern
lots,
will
consist
of
five
acres.
Not
three,
which
is
the
northern
lot,
will
consist
of
9.05
acres.
The
three
lots
will
take
fringe
and
access
from
the
proposed
private
road.
The
proposed
subdivision
complies
with
chapter
8-6
of
a
county
code,
since
the
proposed
lots
comply
with
the
dimensional
standards
for
the
rural
urban
transition
district,
the
roston
canal
and
far
lower
lie
within
the
subject:
property.
L
The
rawson
canal
forms
the
western
and
southern
boundary
of
the
subdivision
and
then
the
four
lateral
cuts
through
the
corn.
The
northeast
corner
of
the
subdivision,
the
boise
project
board
of
control
asserts
a
federal
easement
of
40
feet,
both
directions
from
the
roston
canal
center
line
and
a
federal
easement
of
30
feet
both
directions
from
the
far
lateral
center
line.
The
property
is
in
marine's
area
of
sea
impact.
Therefore,
the
marine
corps
have
planned,
as
adopted
by
ada
county,
is
the
applicable
comprehensive
plan.
L
The
future
land
use
map
designates
the
property
as
low
density
residential,
which
is
intended
for
single-family
homes
at
densities
of
three
dwelling
units
or
less
per
acre.
As
the
three
proposed
lots
will
be
five
acres
in
size
or
larger.
The
application
is
compatible
with
the
adopted
comprehensive
plan.
D
Yes,
mr
chair,
yes,
so
brent,
thanks
for
that
report,
how
far
is
this
from
being
able
to
hook
into
suez
versus
having
to
drill
more
wells?
I
notice
it's
in
the
nitrate
priority
area,
so.
L
D
Are
there
any
conditions,
additional
conditions
on
drilling
the
well
here
in
the
nitrate
priority
area
that
they
need
to
be
aware
of.
L
Yeah,
I
think
in
this
one
thing
that
obviously
the
applicant
should
be
aware
of
is
with
being
in
the
nitrate
priority
area
you
definitely
want
to
have.
They
would
definitely
want
to
have
the
water
you
know
tested,
you
know
for
nitrates
and
then
obviously
there's
ways
to
kind
of
remove
nitrates
from
the
water,
such
as
reverse,
osmosis
and
and
and
other
things
that
can
be
installed
in
the
home
to
kind
of
help.
A
Well,
does
your
husband
want
to
speak?
A
B
F
I
just
wanted
to
be
here,
president
in
case
the
and
my
wife,
obviously
as
well
just
in
case
there
were
any
questions,
but
it's
as
simple
as
we
have
two
acre
two
parcels
right
now
and
hope
to
make
it
three
and
a
private
lane.
So
pretty
simple.
Unless
you
have
any
questions,
that's
all.
I
have
to
say.
A
All
right
are
there
anyone
else,
either
online
or
in
the
audience
that
wish
to
speak
to
this
application.
A
D
That's
mr
chair,
after
hearing
testimony
tonight
and
reading
the
report
and
the
review
by
staff,
I
think
that
they
comply
and
I
like
to
see
this
low
density.
So
I
think
that's
good
in
these
areas,
so
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
make
a
motion
to
approve
project
two
zero:
two:
two:
zero:
zero:
two:
nine
seven
s
spr
based
on
testimony
and
the
documents
that
we
have
before
us.
E
I
agree
with
that
and
I'll
second,
that
motion.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Is
there
any
further
discussion
hearing,
none
all
in
favor
of
the
emotion
say:
aye
aye.
F
A
Okay,
we
will
next
have
for
consideration
application.
I
will
open
the
public
hearing
on
application.
Number
two:
zero:
two:
two:
zero
zero
one:
five,
six
dash
a
tracy
crane.
This
is
an
appeal
from
the
staff's
approval,
converting
an
existing
structure
into
a
secondary
dwelling,
we'll
give
our
staff
five
minutes
to
or
give
our
staff
as
much
time.
You
need
to
make
the
presentation
and
make
it
clear
that
I
guess
the
planning
zoning
commission
did
approve
this,
and
this
is
an
appeal
of
the
planning
zoning
decisions.
Opinion.
G
G
The
timeline
of
the
applications
related
to
this
project
is
july.
2020
a
building
permit
was
submitted
to
build
a
new
single-family
dwelling
in
september
of
2020.
A
temporary
use
application
was
approved
to
allow
the
owners
to
live
in
the
existing
dwelling,
while
building
the
new
one
in
november
of
2021,
a
new
temporary
use
application
was
approved
to
allow
them
to
continue
to
live
in
the
existing
dwelling
during
construction.
G
G
The
approval
of
the
secondary
dwelling
by
the
by
the
director
was
conditioned
so
that
the
space
must
be
converted
to
remove
any
unpermitted
additions,
convert
the
garage
space
back
to
garage
and
have
a
maximum
living
area
of
900
square
feet.
This
conversion
will
require
a
building
permit
and
building
inspections
prior
to
final
approval
and
certificate
of
occupancy.
G
The
size
of
the
existing
dwelling
to
be
converted
again
based
on
assessor
data,
is
2
310
square
feet,
which
is
larger
than
the
1512
square.
Feet
noted
on
the
initial
application.
The
applicant
provided
square
footage
that
does
not
include
an
unpermitted
addition
that
is
required
to
be
removed
and
again
as
conditioned.
The
dwelling
must
be
converted
to
a
maximum
of
900
square
feet
of
living
space
prior
to
final
approval
and
certificate
of
occupancy.
G
The
existing
structure
is
already
incidental
and
subordinate
to
the
new
primary
dwelling
based
on
size.
The
primary
dwelling
is
eight
thousand
three
hundred
and
twenty
two
square
feet
and
again
as
conditioned
the
secondary
dwelling,
must
be
updated,
with
siding
and
color
to
match
that
of
the
primary
dwelling.
G
The
dwelling
is
not
considered
a
non-conforming
use
as
primary
and
secondary
dwellings
are
allowed
uses
in
the
rural
urban
transition
district.
The
dwelling
is
considered
a
non-conforming
structure
as
it
met
the
required
setback
at
the
time
it
was
built.
However,
it
does
not
meet
the
current
setback
due
to
the
ada
county
highway
district
holding
the
right-of-way
of
the
temporary
turnaround.
G
G
Neighbors
have
voice
concerns
over
code
violations
on
the
property
stating
that
the
owner
is
running
their
business
off
the
property
and
that
they
have
had
people
living
in
the
existing
dwelling
prior
to
approval.
Currently,
code
enforcement
has
marked
the
property
is
in
compliance
and
as
conditioned
any
open
code,
enforcement
cases
shall
be
closed
prior
to
construction.
G
The
key
conditions
of
this
application
are
that
the
structure
shall
be
reconfigured
to
include
a
maximum
of
900
square
feet
of
living
space
and
the
garage
will
be
converted
back
to
its
original
use
as
garage.
The
secondary,
detached
dwelling,
siding
and
color
shall
be
updated
to
match
that
of
the
primary
dwelling
prior
to
issuance
of
the
certificate
of
occupancy
any
open
code
enforcement
cases
shall
be
closed
before
construction
shall
take
place.
G
The
secondary
dwelling
shall
not
be
used
as
a
rental
unit
and
either
the
principal
dwelling
or
the
secondary
dwelling
must
be
owner-occupied
at
all
times.
The
secondary
dwelling
must
be
occupied
by
the
owner.
A
member
of
the
owner's
family
or
an
owner's
employee
staff
is
recommending
denial
of
the
appeal
and
upholding
the
director's
decision
and
I'll
stand
for
any
questions.
D
I
think
that
was
very
thorough.
I
don't
have
a
printout
of
what
you
just
went
through
on
those
key
factors,
so
we
may
have
you
pull
that
back
up
later,
so
keep
that
handy
thanks.
G
A
Right:
okay,
no
other
questions.
All
right
is
tracy
crane.
Here,
okay,
you
have
15
minutes
and
you'll
get
a
a
wrap
it
up
light
at
with
one
minute
left:
okay,.
O
A
O
And
corey's
covered
most
of
this,
but
we'll
go
through
it
quickly.
This
is
an
appeal
of
the
director's
approval
for
an
accessory
dwelling
unit
located
at
780
east,
clear
creek.
This
is
a
vicinity
map
showing
you
roughly
where
the
property
is
centrally
located.
In
treasure
valley,
the
clearview
estate
subdivision
was
planted
in
december
8th
of
1972..
O
O
Clearview
state
subdivision
is
highlighted
here
in
yellow
and
it
was
it
includes
a
this
is
a
real
gem
down
in
here.
I've
lived
here
for
30
years.
I
never
went
down
here.
They
have
river
frontage
lots,
they
have
view
lots,
they
have
water
feature
lots
and
by
the
way
the
joneses
house
is
beautiful,
water,
several
water
amenities,
most
of
the
homes
were
built
in
the
70s,
since
2002
10
of
the
older
homes
have
been
demolished
with
new
homes.
O
Built
jones
is
the
first
one
to
try
to
keep
the
old
home
next,
who
are
the
appellants,
so
in
green
I've
outlined
the
appellant
that
we
represent.
I
won't
go
through
all
the
names
here.
You
can
see
them.
That's
one
third
of
the
entire
subdivision
and
the
subject
properties
outlined
in
red
next
subject:
property
just
a
little
bit
about
it.
This
is
an
aerial
photograph
of
the
subject:
property
showing
the
new
home
to
the
south
and
the
existing
home
up
toward
the
front-
and
I
understand
the
non-conforming
use
issue-
is
not
an
issue.
O
Sometimes
you
go
through
the
process,
which
is
called
discovery.
Sometimes
you
find
out
that
what
you
claimed
is
not
right,
and
that
is
is
not
right.
Staff
clarified
that
for
us
subject,
property
is
jones
property.
Approximately
five
acres
recently
constructed
modern
architectural
style,
home
building,
permit
approved
8578
square
feet,
structure
with
589
square
feet
living
area,
the
existing
70s
craftsman,
style,
2310
square
foot
home
includes
a
two-car
garage
converted
and
that
home
was
built
in
75.
O
This
is
the
requested
adu
of
900
square
feet,
and
it
also
includes
a
shop
and
some
other
out
buildings,
and
that's
just
the
county
record,
because
initially
it
didn't
seem
like
staff
was
on
board
with
the
county
size
of
being
2310.,
and
now
they
are
awesome.
Next,
this
is
a
listing.
It
just
shows
the
listing
at
24
64
square
feet.
Again
we
were
trying
to
show
that
was
larger
than
what
the
applicants
had
claimed
at
1500.
You
know
sometimes
real
estate
agents
exaggerate,
so
they're
150
square
feet
too
big.
O
Next,
it's
a
little
view
of
the
inside
of
the
house
for
what
it's
worth.
It's
really
nice
inside
and
a
couple
views
of
exterior
next.
O
So
the
new
jones
home
built
in
2021
is
a
modern,
architectural
style.
Elegant
design
features.
As
I
said,
it's
beautiful.
It's
got
flat
and
low
sloping
roof
lines,
substantial
glazing,
multiple
siding
materials.
You
can
see
the
ada
county
picture
and
the
picture
I
took
from
the
adjacent
property
next.
O
The
original
home,
the
proposed
adu,
plain
70
style,
ranch
home,
adding
siding
and
painting
like
the
new
home,
does
not
meet
the
code
criteria.
It's
our
opinion.
You
got
to
decide.
B
O
Next,
the
january
6
2021,
building
permit
and
zoning
certificate
were
issued,
requiring
removal
of
the
existing
dwelling
prior
to
issuance
of
a
certificate
of
occupancy.
Next,
the
november
12
2021
findings
and
conclusions
for
the
extension
of
the
temporary
use
actually
had
a
requirement
in
there
that
the
applicant
and
or
owner
shall
complete
the
demolition
permit
prior
to
the
certificate
epoch
being
issued
for
the
new
single
family
dwelling.
Now
I
understand
I've
worked
in
government
12
years
and
I
also
still
work
as
a
consultant
with
the
city
of
eagle.
O
O
O
Next
slide
yep
the
director
relied
on
incorrect
facts
within
the
adu.
If
you
look
at
the
findings,
this
is
from
the
findings.
It
states
that
the
structure
is
1512
square
feet
and
now
staff
has
shown
that
it's
actually
2310.
That
was
a
big
issue
for
us
next
next,
so
the
analysis
of
the
non-compliance
with
data
county
code,
next
understanding
that
I
accidentally
referred
to
a
cc83n89
which
actually
applies
to
dry
creek
ranch.
O
If
you
read
that
in
the
letter,
that's
a
mistake
and
staff
pointed
that
out
early
on
appreciate
that
so
number
one,
the
secondary
dwelling
shall
be
clearly
incidental
and
subordinate
to
the
primary
dwelling.
That's
out
of
your
code.
Second,
the
allowable
footprint
for
secondary
dwelling
shall
be
minimum
of
900
square
feet
or
60
of
the
footprint
of
the
primary
dwelling.
Whichever
is
less
next,
a
the
secondary
dwelling
shall
be
architecture.
O
It's
almost
like
we're
ignoring
this
part,
but
going
to
the
second
part,
with
the
condition
the
secondary
dwelling
shall
be
architecturally
compatible
with
the
principally
permitted
dwelling
and
shall
use
building
materials
similar
to
the
home.
So,
there's
a
condition
for
the
building
materials
to
be
similar,
but
there's
no
condition
for
architectural
compatibility
and
again,
that's
probably
subjective
next.
O
Although
staff
included
a
condition
to
use
some
similar
materials
as
the
new
home,
there
is
no
condition
by
staff
requiring
that
the
secondary
dwelling
shall
be
architecturally
compatible
with
the
principal
permitted
dwelling.
Merely
adding
materials
to
a
rectangular
building
does
not
provide
a
modern
design
style
like
the
new
home.
No
building
elevations
were
submitted
with
the
application
for
verification
of
compliance
with
code.
Approving
this
application
will
merely
be
kicking
the
can
down
the
road
which
cuts,
impacted
neighbors
out
of
the
due
process
required.
O
Next,
the
the
ada
county
assessor's
records,
showed
2310.
We've
already
covered.
This
laptop
against
letter
said
15
12.
next,
so
we're
down
to
number
one
and
number
three,
which
are
our
main
issues.
I
already
went
over
number
three
number
one.
The
secondary
dwelling
will
not
clearly
be
incidental
and
subordinate
to
the
primary
dwelling
as
required,
but
instead
will
result
in
a
vastly
incompatible
style
of
two
homes.
O
Next,
so
you
saw
this
plan
that
was
submitted.
It's
a
roughly
sketch,
I
call
them
napkin
plans
and
I've
been
doing
this
for
32
years
and
with
over
30
years
of
experience
as
a
land
use
planner.
I
have
never
seen
such
an
inadequate
plan
accepted
by
government
for
land
use
application.
It
seems
like
if
a
person
is
going
to
have
the
ability
to
have
due
process,
they
should
be
able
to
see
what's
being
constructed
and
that's
the
big
issue
to
break
into
this.
That's
the
big
issue
here
is
they're
not
against
them.
O
Having
a
home,
there
is
a
ccnr
lawsuit.
That's
completely
separate
from
this.
That's
a
private
matter
with
regard
to
code
they're,
not
against
them
having
a
home
they're,
not
against
them
converting
the
home.
We
need
housing
here,
it's
a
right!
There's
a
neighbor
across
the
street
that
has
one
and
you'll
see
that
in
a
minute,
what
they
would
like
is
an
application
that
shows
what
the
footprint
will
actually
be
and
what
the
design
will
look
at.
So
they
can
look
at
it.
O
If
we
were
able
to
see
that
we
would
be
able
to
say,
we've
had
our
right
to
due
process
and
it's
cool
but
kicking
it
down
the
road
to
the
building
department,
who's
mostly
going
to
look
at
structural.
We
feel
it
cuts.
It
cuts
us
out
of
the
process.
I
don't
think
that's
fair.
Next,
oh,
is
that
it
could
you.
F
O
Does
not
include
any
it's
not
to
scale
it's
impossible
to
verify.
It
does
not
include
any
necessary
design,
remodel,
details,
building,
elevations
or
actual
adu
floor
plan
dimensions
to
show
compliance
with
code.
Next,
almost
done
so
just
to
take
a
look.
This
is
the
existing
home
compared
to
the
to
the
home,
and
so
I
mean
I
can
you
imagine
just
putting
siding
on
here.
It
doesn't
seem
like
it
meets
the
intent
of
the
code
to
be
architecturally
compatible.
O
Next
now,
conversely,
right
across
close
to
across
the
street,
you
can
see
the
jones
to
the
red.
This
is
the
stanger
property,
which
is
the
upper
one
where
I
wrote
stenger
they're,
the
only
other
approved
adu
in
this
subdivision,
there's
30
homes
in
here
I
have
one
third
of
the
people
who
are
asking
you
to
you
know
deny
this
but
be
preferable
to
remand
it
back
to
staff
and
say
give
us
an
accurate
floor
plan
done
by
an
architect
or
a
draftsman
and
some
elevations.
So
we
can
look
at
them.
O
That's
all
we'd
like
it
to
stay
nice.
This
is
a
beautiful
subdivision.
I
mean
the
jones
has
built
a
beautiful
house
here.
The
clients
would
just
like
to
be
sure,
it's
frankly
beautiful
kind
of
like
the
house,
like
the
stengers
across
the
street.
If
you
look
at
this,
it
has
materials
that
are
the
same,
but
it
also
has
an
architectural
design
style
that
shows
that
it's
subordinate
to
the
principal
home,
same
slope,
roofs,
low
slope
over
the
porches
same
porches
same
window
materials
same.
O
O
I
am
done
and
at
the
end
I'm
going
to
read
through
these,
but
at
the
end
I
say
we
ask
for
your
denial.
But
again,
if
there's
some
way,
you
know
we
don't
want
to
hurt
these
people
with
the
application
or
cause
more
work
for
staff.
If
there's
some
way,
you
can
remand
this
back
to
staff
and
say
provide
the
floor
plan.
I've
already
said
it
once
I'll
say
it
one
more
time
the
floor
plan
and
elevation,
so
they
can
have
their
due
process.
We'd
really
appreciate
it.
O
D
Well,
I
think
I
just
want
to
make
sure
it
took
a
long
time
to
get
there,
because
you
reiterated
things
that
are
no
longer
a
concern.
So
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
what
you're
concerned
with
at
this
point
is
that
it's
architecturally
compatible
using
the
right
materials
in
design
and
you're.
Just
looking
at
making
sure
that
it's
resubmitted,
with
the
things
that
you
just
put
on
here
and
yes,.
O
Yes,
and
something
that
the
the
neighbors
could
could
see.
F
D
O
E
A
question
all
right
go
ahead.
Yes,
so
I
you
know,
you've
got
a
lot
of
technical
arguments
here
and
I
kind
of
get
where
you're
coming
from,
but
just
looking
at
it,
you
know
from
10
000
foot
view
I'm
looking
at
this
going.
I
what's
the
real
harm
to
the
to
the
neighbors
here,
I'm
having
trouble
seeing
what
the
real
issue
is,
why
they
care
like
what
does
it
really
matter?
What
this
house
looks
like
I
mean,
can
you
can
you
give
me
something
to
sure
I
get
it.
O
I'll
start
by
saying
I'm
a
libertarian
people
should
be
able
to
do
whatever
the
heck
they
want
with
land.
However,
I'm
kind
of
conflicted,
because
I
also
work
for
government,
so
that
puts
me
toward
the
rule
of
law
is
so
important,
and
so
we
believe
the
rule
of
law
would
allow
the
neighbors
to
look
at
the
design
and
assure
that
it's
compatible
like
everything
they've
been
building
new
since
2002.,
that's
it.
They
would
just
like
to
look
at
it
and
see
that
it's
compatible,
and
I
think
your
code
calls
out
for
that.
E
Well
sure
I
mean
it's
and
they
might
have
the
right
to
do
that,
but
you
know
it's
it's
kind
of
hard
for
me
to
see
what
the
damage
is
or
what
the
negative
impact
of
the
neighborhood
is
or
again
how
it's
hurting
anybody.
E
O
It's
a
matter
of
looking
at
your
code
and
feeling
like
feeling
like
believing
like
the
interpretation
of
the
code
is
that
statics
are
important
and
because
of
that
in
the
code,
we
would
like
you
to
follow
the
code.
Personally,
I
think,
like
you,
why
do
governments
even
control
aesthetics,
but
on
the
other
hand,
if
we
don't
like
our
codes,
which
I've
changed
a
lot
of
codes
in
eagle
to
try
to
make
them
better
and
then
new
councils
come
in
and
and
make
them
worse
again?
O
E
O
And
this
is
they'd
like
to
see
you
know
if
they
could
just
look
it's.
You
know
this
marriages
fall
apart
because
of
lack
of
communication,
and
if
there
was
just
some
communication
in
here
like
if
they
initially
showed
something
and
the
neighbors
felt
it
was
architecturally
compatible,
we
would
not
be
here.
We
deal
with
the
ccnr
case
separate.
O
We
just
don't
feel
as
compatible
architecturally
there's
nothing
that
shows
if
it
will
they're
gonna,
probably
get
up
and
say,
it'll
look
great
and
I
I
would
have
to
say
it
probably
will
looking
at
what
they
did
with
their
house.
But
it's
a
dark
cloud
right
now
and
it
seems
like
it
could
have
been
easily
cleared
up
with
design
plans
being
submitted,
that
somebody
could
look
at.
E
So
how
do
you
modify
it
being
an
existing
structure
to
make
it
what
the
neighborhood
wants
to
see?
I
mean
I'm
not
a
builder,
so
what
what
can
be
done.
O
Well,
we
don't
really
know
what
the
neighbor
wants
to
see
until
we
see
a
design
style.
Maybe
when
they
put
architectural
features
on
there,
then
it
looks
compatible.
A
Well,
that
would
be
the
next
question:
isn't
compatibility
rather
subjective,
very
subjective?
That's
what
it
seems
to
me
like
very.
A
It's
very
subjective
compatibility
with
the
neighborhood
and
and
some
of
the
other
issues
that
you
brought
up
the
the
900
square
feet.
The
I
mean
it
doesn't
seem
to
you
as
though,
if
the
garage
is
turned
the
garage
is
converted
to
living
space
which
contributed
to
the
2300
or
whatever
it
is.
If
all
that's
done,
and
it's
back
to
to
a
900
square
foot
home
that
takes
away
a
lot
of
your
issues.
Does
it
not.
O
A
A
A
G
I
would
follow
an
instruction
chairman.
This
presentation
will
be
entered
into
the
record
as
an
additional
exhibit.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Okay.
We
have
a
number
of
people
that
want
to
speak
to
this
to
this
issue.
I
might
remind
you
that
we
will
give
each
person
wants
to
speak
to
three
minutes.
Please
don't
repeat
if
somebody
else
has
already
said
something
that
you're
going
to
talk
about.
Please
don't
repeat,
because
we
have
heard
it
once
if
you'll
limit
to
the
two
to
three
minutes,
cheers.
B
A
Yes
and
then
we'll
give
you
a
rebuttal
after
after
the
testimony.
So
if
the
applicant
wants
to
speak.
P
Good
evening,
commissioners
and
staff
thanks
for
hearing
all
of
this
tonight,
my
name
is
peggy
breski.
I
have
peggy
breski
land
planning
and
consulting
the
respondent.
Pulled
me
in
a
little
bit
late
in
the
game.
They
were
trying
to
scramble
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
answer
to
some
of
the
questions
that
that
were
stated
in
the
appeal
letter
for
those
individuals
who
are
not
in
land
use
or
land
development
or
construction,
or
any
type
of
situation
like
that.
P
A
lot
of
the
code
can
be
confusing
and
can
be
a
little
intimidating
and
so
relative
to
that.
Her
attorney
referred
her
to
myself,
and
so
I
do
I've
been
in
land
development
for
a
long
time
and
I'm
actually
an
expert
witness
for
the
idaho
state
attorney
general's
office
with
the
itd
division.
So
I
do
a
lot
of
analysis
and
report
writing
for
situations
such
as
this.
It
sounds
like
based
on
the
appellant's
presentation
tonight.
It
really
has
been
kind
of
zero
it
in
on
what
the
concerns
are.
P
So
I'm
going
to
try
to
be
as
brief
as
I
can
as
the
representative
for
the
applicant,
the
original
applicant
that
I'm
just
referring
to
tonight
as
the
respondent
responding
to
the
appeal
and
I'll
try
to
speak
slowly,
I
tend
to
get
kind
of
ahead
of
myself,
but
at
the
same
time
I
don't
want
to
lose
time
and
run
out
of
time
and
not
cover
something
that's
important,
I'm
going
to
go
to
where
the
end.
P
P
I
want
to
ask
respectfully
of
commissioners
that
I
am
allowed
to
touch
on
a
few
other
points
that
were
stated
in
their
appeal
letter
and
that
were
responded
to
in
our
response
letter
and
analysis,
because
they
are
very
important,
important
points
and
pertinent
to
the
overall
situation
that
we
have
in
front
of
us
tonight.
P
So,
with
regard
to
the
end
of
the
presentation
and
commissioner's
very
deep,
very
I
mean
honest
questions.
What's
the
actual
impact
to
the
neighborhood?
What's
the
problem,
you
know
the
conditions
of
approval
already
address
the
elevation.
What
it's
to
look
like
you
know,
map
literally
pulled
literally
out
of
code
verbatim,
is
what
is
listed
in
the
director's
decision
and
what
is
listed
in
the
conditions
of
approval
for
the
original
approval
of
the
adu.
P
I
think
that
that
in
in
and
of
itself
solves
the
problem
in
that
the
the
punishment
for
or
the
consequence
for
not
making
it
match,
architecturally
with
finishes
etc,
which,
as
everyone
here
had
agreed
and
discussed.
Briefly,
it
is
a
subjective
situation,
but
the
conditions
of
approval
very
clearly
call
that
out,
obviously,
building
permits
will
be
submitted.
P
Official
formal
building
drawings
will
be
submitted,
including
elevations,
etc,
which
will
show
that
it
will
be
in
compliance.
Appellants
say
that
there
was
a
lack
of
communication
to
neighbors.
They
want
the
footprint
to
be
smaller
for
the
rule
of
law.
The
the
neighbors
due
process
was
not
applied
and
not
allowed.
P
I
would
speak
to
that
to
say
that
due
process
was
followed,
notice
was
sent
to
affected
parties
and
property
owners
which
officially
is
300
square
feet,
or
rather
300
linear
feet
away
from
the
subject.
Property.
There's
only
one
individual,
a
landowner
in
that
subdivision.
That
is
officially
as
by
defined
by
code,
an
affected
person,
the
remaining
eight
or
not,
but
it's
their
subdivision.
They
want
it.
You
know
they're
all
involved
parties.
P
So
I
understand
that
and
I
get
that
a
respondent
has
made
numerous
attempts
over
the
last
two
years
to
open
conversations
and
begin
a
dialogue
with
the
neighbors
with
regard
to
all
of
the
different
process,
all
of
the
different
applications
that
it
take
it
took
to
go
from
purchasing
the
land
to
building
the
new
home
to
converting
the
the
original
dwelling
to
an
accessory
dwelling
unit.
P
None
of
the
neighbors
would
open
or
engage
in
a
dialogue
with
her,
not
not
at
all
so
where
their
argument
of
lack
of
communication
and
their
due
process-
and
they
didn't
get
to
see
anything,
I
think,
is
really
and
it's
a
moot
point
it's
up
for
dispute
again,
it's
subjective.
P
I
know
that,
coming
in
a
little
bit
late
into
this
process,
I
didn't
present
prepare
a
slideshow.
I
didn't
have
time,
but
I
do
know
the
entirety
of
the
background
of
the
process,
and
so
I'd
like
to
speak
a
little
bit
about
that.
If
I
may,
the
staff
report
was
excellent.
The
points
that
were
brought
up
by
commissioners
were
narrowed
down
to
really.
How
is
it
going
to
look?
How
is
it
architecturally
compatible?
P
Why
would
they
approve
something
based
on
a
napkin
sketch,
and
the
reason
for
that
is
because
the
the
appellate
parties
at
the
neighbors
have
made
a
very
made
this
a
very
difficult
process
for
the
respondent
for
the
owners
of
this
property.
From
the
moment
they
purchased
the
property
and
applications
started
being
submitted
to
to
the
agencies
for
approval
for
building
their
home
they've
they've
called
in
more
than
I
did
a
foia
request.
P
I
did
a
public
information
request,
as
these
neighbors
have
called
in
and
made
countless
literally
countless
calls
to
the
code
enforcement
agency
trying
to
file
complaints.
Every
time
they
sent
a
code
enforcement
officer
out
the
code
enforcement
officer
that
went
out
most
of
the
time,
as
I
think,
they're
territorial
actually
sent
an
email
today.
P
He
wanted
to
be
here
to
testify
on
behalf
of
the
respondent,
when
I
did
a
public
information
request,
asking
exactly
how
many
complaints
were
filed
against
this
home
by
whomever
they
said
that
there
were
too
many
to
count
and
that
they
couldn't
provide
that
information
at
this
time
within
the
three-day
period
and
that,
based
on
the
fact
that
they
they
were
too
many
to
count
from
different
sources.
They
had
to
get
back
to
me
and
they
were
opening
an
investigation
into
how
many
complaints
there
were
that
were
filed
and
I'll.
P
P
It's
exhibit
number
two
that
was
attached
to
the
late
exhibit,
which
was
my
report,
and
I
apologize
that
the
report
the
exhibit
was
late
because
I
was
pulled
in
kind
of
at
the
11th
hour
and
had
to
rush
to
put
something
together
for
them,
but
they
do
have
a
permanent
certificate
of
occupancy
and
that's
what
the
idea
application
is
for,
where
it
talks
about
a
final
certificate
of
occupancy,
may
not
be
issued
for
the
adu
until
the
process
is
complete,
which
is
what
we're
in
tonight
page
four
of
the
staff
report
discusses
again
since
we
zero
it
in
on
what
the
issue
is.
P
P
There
actually
has
been
research
into
complaints,
but
there
was
never
a
violation
filed
for
this
address
now
when
the
because
of
the
process
that
had
been
going
on
with
so
many
phone
calls
in
for
code
violations
at
one
point,
the
the
the
respondent
applied
for
a
home
occupancy
permit,
because
the
surrounding
neighbors
called
in
and
said
they're
running,
a
business
they're
running
a
business
out
of
the
home.
This
was
during
covet
out
of
the
60
people
in
our
office.
55
of
us
were
working
from
home.
None
of
us
filed
for
a
home
occupation
permit.
P
They
said
to
her.
You
had
so
many
complaints
against
you.
You
should
probably
do
this
to
protect
yourselves.
You
should
probably
submit
for
that.
So
she
said:
oh
okay,
yeah!
Absolutely
this!
The
respondent
is
probably
the
most
compliant
individual
that
I've
worked
with,
and
I've
worked
with
developers.
I've
worked
in
government,
I
work,
I'm
a
contract
planner
for
three
different
different
cities,
so
I've
seen
both
sides
of
it
and
she
is
probably
the
most
compliant
individual.
P
P
They
were
glad
within
that
date
that
appeal
period,
the
appeal
was
filed,
knowing
the
process
as
it
had
gone
on
for
the
past
several
years,
staff
at
various
departments
at
various
levels
understood
what
she
was
faced
with.
They
told
her
we're
gonna
put
in
conditions
of
approval,
you're
going
to
have
to
bring
that
up,
and
she
said
I
I
will
I
I
plan
on
it.
I
mean
her
taste
is
exceptional.
You
can
see
what
the
house
was
that
they
built
she
has
planned
on
it
from
the
beginning.
P
As
a
matter
of
fact,
staff,
seven
staff
and
the
the
respondent
before
she
purchased
the
property
went
and
did
a
walk
of
the
property.
While
it
was
up
for
sale
and
said
this
is
what
I
want
to
do.
I
want
to
live
in
this
little
one.
While
we
build
our
dream
home
that
we've
been
saving
for
over
two
decades,
for
when
we're
done,
we're
gonna,
renovate
and
remodel
this
little
home.
P
We're
going
to
move
my
dad
and
my
dad
is
a
retired
pastor,
and
we
want
him
to
have
the
dignity
of
aging
in
place
aging
in
place.
Right
now
is
huge.
I'm
currently
working
on
a
new
comprehensive
plan
for
the
city
of
cascade.
They
have
a
grant
for
integrating
independent,
living
and
aging
in
place
for
the
population.
It's
it's
big
in
planning
right
now
and
it's
critical,
especially
in
this
housing
market.
P
So
that
was
her
plan
from
the
beginning
they
lined
out.
This
is
what's
going
to
have
to
happen.
Current
code
said
this
may
not
be
an
allowable
thing,
with
the
adu
being
in
the
front,
so
at
that
same
time
I'm
trying
to
hurry.
At
that
same
time,
respondents
started
having
conversations
with
the
city
of
eagle
to
possibly
annex
her
property
into
the
city
of
eagle,
because
eagle's
code
would
allow
for
a
front
adu
and
a
rear
primary.
P
So
she
was
working
with
both
agencies
in
tandem
to
ensure
that
she
was
in
compliance
with
all
necessary
code,
but
so
that
she
could
have
the
home
with
her
father
in
the
big
in
the
front,
with
her
five
children
as
a
generational,
family,
okay.
So
the
fact
that
she
did
not
submit
formal,
elevations
and
formal
building
plans
were
a
result
of.
I
don't
know
if
I'm
even
going
to
get
this
approved.
P
So
I
can't
spend
the
money
right
now,
but
put
it
in
conditions
of
approval,
I'll,
follow
it
and
she
will,
when
we
discuss
the
fact
that
you
know
they
had
a
lot
of
issues,
the
appellant
had
a
lot
of
issues
with
how
the
director
applied
code
I
went
through,
and
I
reviewed
everything
I've
won
an
award
for
for
writing
a
comprehensive
plan
for
the
city
of
mountain
home.
I've
wanted
more,
I'm
do.
I
know
how
what
it
takes
for
community
planning.
P
Additionally,
I
was
over
over
a
decade
in
residential
building
interior
design
and
project
management.
So
I
know
design
I've
been
on
that
site.
There
are
a
lot
of
conflicting
information
out
there
with
regard
to,
depending
upon
whose
records
you
look
at
you.
Look
at
the
mls,
that's
never
accurate.
They
have
a.
If
you
read
my
report,
you'll
see
that
it
they're
they're
trying
to
sell
something
with
this.
What
is
shown
on
the
county
assessor's
website
is
inaccurate.
It
is
definitely
not
2
300
square
feet
or
24..
P
P
The
respondent
knows
that
the
code
requires
900
square
feet
or
less
of
living
space,
and
it
will
be
adjusted
to
that.
They
will
submit
formal
plans
elevations
footprints
and
show
how
the
structure
will
be
modified
to
do
so.
I've
been
in
it,
I
know
how
it
structurally
it's
a
typical
ranch.
I
know
that
the
trusses
and
where
everything
is
going
to
be
structurally,
they
can
absolutely
remove
square
footage
without
an
issue.
It
is
absolutely
possible
and
feasible
and
they
will
do
that.
P
So
if
that
is
what
they're
pinning
the
appeal
on
it
is
a
non-issue
as
it
is
a
condition
of
approval
and
the
consequence
would
be
for
not
doing
so.
They
won't
get
their
certificate
of
occupancy.
They
won't
get
their
adu
final
approval
after
the
tentative
approval.
I
mean
it's
it's
as
simple,
as
that
respectfully
may.
May
I
take
just
two
more
additional
minutes
beyond
the
15.
P
K
D
Chair,
yes,
so
the
respondents,
the
owners
of
the
property,
the
addition
that's
going
to
be
taken
off
was
that
addition
added
on
illegally.
P
D
B
E
So
you
saw
all
the
bullet
points
that
the
appellate
listed.
Are
you
saying
that
those
are
all
covered
by
the
they.
P
Absolutely
are
and-
and
my
report
came
in
as
the
late
exhibit-
it
literally
puts
their
every
one
of
the
points
that
they
put
up
in
the
left
column
and
it
has
a
response
where
much
of
them
are
inaccurate,
respectfully
and
with
our
responses,
referencing
appropriate
code
and
referencing
definition.
So,
yes,
every
single
one
of
the
points
I
can
say.
P
E
P
Yes,
yes,
absolutely
her,
her
builder,
I'm
assuming
it's
going
to
be
the
builder
that
built
the
other
house,
we'll
be
putting
together
elevations
of
drawings,
formal
drawings,
architectural
drawings,
to
show
exactly
how
the
house
is
going
to
be
changed.
We
can
do
that
on
a
on
a
the
appropriate
level.
For
submittal
I
mean
their
appeal
letter
asks
for
technical
drawings,
buildable
drawings.
P
Well,
it's
too
early
for
that
at
this
point,
but
yes,
they
can
submit
and
will
submit
if
the
appeal
is
approved
or
if
the
appeal
is
denied
and
the
original
adu
approval
is
upheld.
The
applicant
is
ready
original
applicant
respondent
is
ready
to
submit
elevations
floor
plan
drawings
to
show
how
the
home
will
be
renovated
and
what
the
end
result
of
the
home
will
be.
Mr
chair,.
D
P
P
That's
a
great
question
and
I
wasn't
I
was
just
going
right
to
this,
so
I'm
glad
that
you
asked,
commissioner,
because
she
didn't
want
to
expend
the
funds
to
have
that
done.
If
there
was
a
chance
that
her
original
I'm.
E
P
Completely
agree
with
that,
commissioner:
that's
an
excellent
point.
Respondent
has
made
multiple
attempts
at
reaching
out
to
neighbors
one
of
the
neighbors
in
the
appellate
parties,
mary
kay,
it's
immediate
neighbor.
I
don't
know
her
last
name,
denton
mary
kay
denton
is
the
immediate
neighbor.
They
have
had
some
conversation
she
has
made
attempt
respondent
has
made
attempts
overall
to
to
open
a
dialogue,
and
they
have
refused
to
have
a
dialogue
with
her.
P
She
has
tried
to
go
through
the
the
county
go
through
staff
and
the
reason
the
staff
were
fine
with
the
napkin
drawing
was
because
they
knew
of
all
of
the
complaints
and
appeals
and
all
of
the
things
that
the
appellant
parties
had
done
to
interfere,
and
so
they
said.
Okay,
we
know
that
there's
some
discrepancy
in
the
square
footage
we're
going
to
allow
you
to
submit
this,
but
be
warned
you're
going
to
have
to
submit
more
formal
drawings
for
your
building
permit
right
so,
but
she
has
tried
to
do
so.
Thank.
P
D
A
chair-
yes,
if
I
may
yes,
it
looks
like
both
parties
have
agreed
that
it's
come
down
to
is
boil
down
to
appropriate
architectural
compatibility
and
materials
and
needing
to
have
some
some
formal
design
with
elevation
and
floor
plans.
D
A
Okay,
we
will,
I
guess,
we'll
first
hear
from
chair
charity.
Is
it
charity
jones?
That's
the
first
one
signed
up
here,
so
yeah
three
minutes
charity.
Thank
you.
Thank.
N
You
I'm
charity
jones,
I'm
actually
the
property
owner.
Thank
you
guys
so
much
for
your
time,
I'm
so
relieved
to
hear
that
information
after
their
full
report
that
went
through
so
much
we've
spent
so
much
time
on
all
their
other
bullet
points.
N
Architecturally
speaking,
two
things
I
wasn't
being
cheap,
that's
not
why
I
did
not
actually
submit
any
professional
drawings
or
whatnot.
We
actually
had
a
meeting
and
I
had
a
room
full
for
the
pre-application
meeting
or
whatever
that
happened,
and
I
said
what
exactly
do
you
want
from
me
and
they
literally
gave
me
exact
instructions.
You
need
to
get
this
graph
paper.
You
need
to
go
ahead
and
give
us
a
drawing
of
what
the
home
is
going
to
look
like
you
can
do
it.
N
You
can
do
it
with
a
piece
of
you,
know
graph
paper
and
a
pencil
and
and
go
ahead
and
write
it
out
for
us.
So
I
just
followed
instructions.
Frankly
speaking,
if
you
guys
need
anything
further,
I'm
more
than
happy
to
do
so.
However,
architecturally
speaking
the
home,
as
as
stated,
we
did
not
do
the
improvements
that
were
not
permitted,
we
purchased
the
home.
N
That
way-
and
part
of
that
was
that
there
was
like
this
extra
room
in
the
back
that
is
rotted
out
and
falling
over
and
needs
to
be
cut
off.
It's
not
complex
like
the
back
home
is.
It
is
really
really
simple.
It's
important
to
note
one
of
the
things
that
I
did
discuss
because
I
had
heard
all
these
arguments
and
I
understand
these
arguments.
You
cannot
see
the
two
homes
with
your
eyes
in
one
eye
shot
at
all.
N
There
is
absolutely
nowhere
on
the
street
that
you
can
go
and
see
both
the
back
home
and
the
front
home
at
the
same
time.
So
you
know
to
what
you
stated
architecturally
similar
a
is
going
to
be
subjective
to
whoever
you
are
speaking
to,
and
I
did
discuss
that
in
my
meeting
my
pre-application
meeting.
We
discussed
all
these
points
and-
and
we
were
very
thorough
to
make
sure
that
we
discuss
these
points.
They
agreed
that
that's
going
to
be
subjective
further.
N
You
know
we
do
have
ccnr's
in
the
subdivision
and
in
those
ccnr's
it
states
that
there's
supposed
to
be
an
architectural
board.
I
searched
and
searched
and
searched
for
some
sort
of
architectural
board
that
I
could
go
to
that.
I
could
submit
these
plans
to.
There
is
no
such
thing.
N
There
is
no
architectural
board
mary
kay
denton,
who
is
the
direct
neighbor
next
to
me
her
and
I
had
text
thread
back
and
forth,
and
I
asked
her
if
she
would
invite
these
neighbors
the
people
who
are
so
angry
that
have
never
come
and
knocked
on
my
door.
I'm
a
small
town
girl.
I
grew
up
in
emmett,
idaho.
N
You
go
trick-or-treating
and
get
invited
in
for
chili
and
cornbread
and
you
go
and
you
talk
to
these
people
and
you
trust
them
and
you
you
share
sugar
and
all
the
things
that
neighbors
are
supposed
to
do
and
that's
the
community.
I
thought
I
was
moving
into.
Yes,
it
is
aesthetically,
absolutely
beautiful
and
it
is
a
gem
and
I
want
to
keep
it
that
way.
But
but
nobody
would
talk
to
me.
They
are
completely
shut
off
from
me.
So
I
don't.
A
Know
if
I
understand
you
correctly,
you
said
that
there
there
are
in
your
restrictive
covenants,
which
is
your
ccnr.
There
is
supposed
to
be
an
architectural
control
committee,
yep.
N
And
there
is
nobody
that
it's
so
old
and
so
gone.
There's
no
hoa,
there's
no
board!
There's
no
architectural
committee,
there's
no
dues,
there's
nothing
there
to
where
I
could
communicate
and
understand.
Some
of
these
homes
are
gated.
The
only
neighbor
that
I
knew
had
been
there
for
a
very
long
time
who
had
communication
with
all
of
the
other
neighbors.
I
invited
them
over
through
her.
Please
come
over.
Let's
look
at
this.
Let's
talk
about
this.
Tell
me
what
your
concerns
are.
Q
My
name
is
matt
wiscoviak.
I
live
at
10836
west
street
line
court
in
boise.
I
am
here
today
to
my
hello,
hello.
My
name
is
matthew
wiscoviak,
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
my
wife,
hillary,
who
was
unable
to
attend
due
to
some
unforeseen
circumstances,
but
she
wanted
me
to
speak
on
her
behalf,
and
this
is
what
she
requested
that
I
share
hello.
Everybody.
My
name
is
hillary.
I
am
a
licensed
realtor
and
have
been
practicing
real
estate
serving
our
amazing
communities
in
our
incredible
state.
Q
Just
shy
of
20
years,
I
was
asked
to
provide
comparative
market
value
information.
Please
note
that
this
is
not
reflective
of
any
personal
opinion
on
the
matter
of
the
public
hearing
at
hand,
but
to
simply
provide
professional
comparative
market
valuation
on
parts
on
the
parcel
consisting
of
2.6
2.61
acres
with
existing
residents
changing
the
size.
Q
The
valuation
is
considering
only
the
the
one
of
the
two
legal
descriptions
that
are
at
that
address.
In
my
professional
assessment,
the
most
recent
comparable
properties
considering
age
square
footage
lot,
size
features,
location,
et
cetera.
The
residents
in
associated
2.61
acres
has
a
current
market
analysis
of
810
810
000.
To
900
000,
with
the
closest
and
most
recent
comp
coming
in
at
879,
which
was
sold
within
the
last
two
weeks
in
may
detailed
information
on
the
comparables
can
be
provided
if
needed.
So
that
was
what
I
had.
Okay
thank.
A
You
thank
you,
elizabeth
jones,.
M
Elizabeth
jones,
I
don't
really
know
what
to
say
she
just
signed
us
in
other
than
I
know
my
she's,
my
sister-in-law
and
I
know
her
taste
is
spectacular
and
I
can't
imagine
she
wouldn't
make
the
front
house
look
just
as
beautiful
as
the
rear
house
and
any
of
her.
Our
family
would
agree
to
that,
and
it's
just
crazy,
the
stuff
that
they've
had
to
go
through
just
to
even
process
as
far
as
they've
gotten,
okay.
A
Well,
okay,
thank
you
all
right,
I'm
going
to
request
again
if
you
we've
narrowed
it
down
to
the
only
thing
in
contention
is
the
is
the
aesthetics
of
the
property,
all
the
the
applicant
and
the
and
the
and
the
respondent
agree
that
all
the
other
issues
have
been
have
been
have
been
handled.
Is
that
correct
yeah?
It
is
correct
yeah,
so
if
you
could,
if
you
keep
your
comments
just
to
the
exterior
aesthetics
of
the
property,
because
that
seems
to
be
the
only
contention
right
now.
E
A
Question
yeah
like
like
okay,
but
I'm
taking
them
in
the
list
as
they
as
they
appear
on
the
sheet.
Is
it
chris
chrissy
jones
or
cece,
or
oh?
Okay?
Okay,
mickey
hemps.
A
Thank
you.
Sharon,
butler,
okay,
justice
jones.
A
Okay,
sephia
jones,
okay,
noble
jones,
all
right
ledge.
Is
it
legend
jones.
A
Okay,
dustin
jones,
okay,
you're
waving
to
all
right.
Okay,
now
we're
down
to
again
I'm
just
taking
these
in
the
order
bob
borber
bobbler
did
you
want
to
speak?
Okay,
tina,
vorbeck,
okay,
todd,
gill,
okay,
mickey
hems
ham,
singer,
ms
meyer,
oh
yeah,
okay,
sh
and.
A
Sharon
butler
okay,
bud
and
april
dillon.
A
R
Brad
dillon,
oh
brad,
I'm
sorry,
that's:
okay!
Okay,
that's,
okay,
chairman
and
eda
county
commissioners.
My
name
is
brad
dillon.
My
address
is
410
east,
clear
creek,
I'm
just
down
the
street
from
the
joneses
have
never
met
them,
and
I
don't
know
what
all
the
banter
is
back
and
forth,
but
I
haven't
been
associated
with
that.
R
That's
that's
awesome
and
that's
all
I'm
looking
for
with
you
folks
to
hopefully
take
that
position.
A
Okay,
I'd
have
a
question
for
you.
It
appears
as
though
your
your
homeowners
association
has
gone
defunct
and
you
might,
you
might
want
to
resurrect
that
and
have
an
architectural
control
committee,
like
you
already
had.
A
R
E
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Brad
share,
I
have
a
question
so
I
mean
if
you
were
presented
with
a
design
I
mean,
I
guess,
would
you
my
question?
Is
you
know
if
you
say
well,
that's
not
good
enough
and
then
they
got
to
bring
back
another
one.
I
mean.
How
is
how
picky
are
you
going
to
be
like
how
what
what
are
you
looking
for
in
this
design
to
to
satisfy
your.
R
Issue,
I
guess
just
something
that
we
can
actually
see.
We
haven't
been
given
anything
to
be
able
to
make
a
proper
decision,
so
I'm
not
looking
for
them
to
move
mountains
or
anything
like
that.
It's
just
something
to
to
take
a
look
at
something
to
to
to
be
able
to
say,
okay.
Well,
I
guess
it's
going
to
look
similar
to
the
other
one.
B
B
A
S
Larry
sandusky
I'm
at
7602,
north
canyon
drive.
I
am
two
properties
away
from
the
jones,
and
I've
lived
here
for
over
25
years.
No
resident
has
ever
caused
this
amount
of
concern.
By
the
way,
there
is
an
effort
by
ms
veskey
to
make
the
neighborhood
look
like
a
punitive
organization.
S
Just
resent
the
neighborhood
being
characterized
as
so
punitive
in
fact
and
and
the
applicant
is
smoke
white.
That's
not
true,
but
we
are
concerned
because
we
don't
have
an
opportunity
to
review
the
real
architectural
drawings
of
the
of
the
building
and
we
were
robbed
of
that
opportunity
by
by
the
county,
approving
something
that
can
only
be
viewed
as
a
napkin.
Drawing.
A
Okay,
that
is
all
I
have.
Are
there
others
that
I'm
not
aware
of.
A
O
You
get
five
five
minutes
for
rebuttal.
I
won't
need
that.
Thank
you,
commissioner.
Back
members
of
the
board,
I
want
to
say
a
couple
of
things
right
up
front
and
I'll
be
quick.
The
ccnr's
are
not
an
issue
here.
There
was
never
a
homeowners
association,
so
ccnars
are
being
litigated
separately.
That
was
never
a
homeowners
association.
They're
ceasing
ours
with
regulations
does.
O
Correct,
okay,
yeah,
what
what
the
people
have
done
is
gone
door
to
door
now.
One
of
the
things
I
want
to
say
is
really
important.
Actually
two
things
just
for
my
own
personal
there's,
a
bunch
of
I
went
out
to
the
property
with
a
guy
named
tom
moore,
and
I
don't
see
where
these
neighbors
had
been
caustic
tom
moore,
I
think,
has
been
caustic
as
soon
as
I
found
out.
He
was
caustic.
I
cut
off
all
communities.
Mr.
D
O
I
know
it's
just
a
bunch
of
caustic
stuff
that
was
said
so
we're
going
to
set
all
that
stuff
aside,
good,
it's
all
red
herring
stuff,
so
they've
said
that
they
are
going
to
do
plans
jared
sherburn.
Did
their
building
plans
he's
a
great
builder?
What
we're
asking
for
is
that
we
would
just
like
to
see
building
plans.
That's
all
as
brad
dylan
said.
O
A
Okay,
so
that's
your
your
your
wrap
up.
Are
there
foreclosure
here,
but
the
public
hearing
are
there.
There
are
there,
do
we
have
any
questions
or
from
the
staff
or
otherwise.
E
A
Okay,
I
will
then
close
the
public
hearing
on
application.
Two
zero:
two:
two:
zero
zero
one:
five,
six,
a
tracy
crane,
okay,
the
public
hearing,
has
been
closed.
It's
up
to
the
commission
now,
what's
the
pleasure
of
the
board.
D
Okay,
well,
I
think
that
we
heard
a
lot
of
testimony
here
tonight.
Much
of
it
really
not
relevant
at
the
end
of
the
day
to
what
the
both
parties
agreed
is
the
issue,
and
I
think
that
this
is
pretty
easily
remedied.
What
I
would
like
to
see,
mr
chair
is,
I
do
think
that
everyone,
including
our
staff
and
and
our
board
and
neighbors,
need
to
see
a
real
drawing
with
a
real
building
plan,
elevations,
etc.
That
shows
that
they're
abiding
by
the
code,
so
the
materials
in
the
architectural
design
are
compatible.
D
However,
I
don't
feel
that
this
board
needs
to
have
verbal
additional
testimony
on
that.
Drawing
what
I'd
like
to
see
is
the
applicant
submit
the
professional
plan
for
the
design
of
the
house
and
submit
that
to
staff
and
to
the
board
we'll
table
this,
give
it
30
days,
and
I
think
that
we'll
allow
everyone
that
wants
to
within
the
neighborhood
to
go
ahead
and
have
access
to
that
plan.
G
Chairman,
it
would
comply
with
the
code
and
requiring
that
it
be
architecturally
compatible.
D
J
D
A
D
J
So,
mr
chairman,
commissioners,
there
is
a
appears
to
be
an
open
business
meeting
on
june
14th.
A
Right,
we
don't
have
emotions.
So
if
we
table
this
till
june,
14th
give
the
applicant
enough
time
to
to
provide
some
professional
drawings
and
then
provide
the
drawings
to
the
appellants
of
the.
So
they'll
have
a
chance
to
look
at
it
as
well,
and
they
can
only
provide
written
testimony
to
us.
A
Then
we
will
provide
we'll
have
a
final
wrap-up
will
only
take
written
comments
on
the
on
the
design
itself
and
for
june
14th.
Okay,
do
we
have
a
motion.
D
To
june
14th,
during
our
open
business
meeting,
to
allow
the
original
applicant,
the
owner
of
the
property
time
to
have
a
professional,
rendering
formal
building
plans
showing
elevation
architectural
compatibility,
including
materials,
to
be
submitted
to
this
board,
probably
no
later
than
june.
10Th.
D
E
I'll,
second,
that
I
I
think
it's
a
reasonable
compromise.
I
think
this
gives
people
the
opportunity
to
to
take
a
look
at
the
designs
and
I
would
just
encourage
all
the
neighbors
to
be
reasonable
in
their
assessment.
As
we
discussed
there's.
A
lot
of
you
know
open
interpretation
about
what
constitutes
architectural
standards,
but
I
would
love
to
see
this
be
resolved
to
not
go
to
court
because
it
feels
like
this
is
on
the
verge
of
going
to
court
and
I
think
life's
too
short
for
lawsuits.
E
So
I
think
if
everybody
can
work
together,
we
can
come
up
with
a
good
compromise
and
that's
my
second
before
we.
Q
D
So
if
we
have
it
in
on
the
tenth
I'd,
give
him
the
whole
weekend
to
review
yeah
10th,
I
think
the
10th
will
be
fine.
The
tent
should
be
fine.
They'll
have
the
whole
weekend
to
review
it
and
it'll
be
they
can
submit
any
written
comments
to
us
on
monday
and
what's
the
date
what's
the
day
of
the
14th,
what's
the
14th
is
that
a
wednesday.
D
D
To
again
june
14th
to
allow
and
we'll
be
hearing
that
in
open
business
meeting,
and
we
would
like
for
the
original
applicant
to
submit
her
professional
building
plans
and
drawings,
including
elevation
on
june
8th
that'll,
give
neighbors
june
9th
and
10th
as
well
as
that
monday.
If
they
need
it
to
submit
written
testimony
only,
and
we
will
then
take
it
up
and
hear
it
on
the
14th.
A
Second,
that
okay,
you've
heard
the
motion
all
in
favor,
say:
aye
aye,
aye
aye
motion
carries
thanks.
A
Thank
you
and
we'll
be
adjourned.