►
Description
The Committee reviewed Ordinance 22.101.19, 23.101.19; 24.101.19, 28.101.19, 29.101.19 and 48.122.19 (MC).
A
B
C
B
B
C
B
I
talked
to
Trey
I
said.
Maybe
perhaps
what
we
can
do
is
put
together
a
letter
asking
our
elected
officials
to
draft
a
bill
to
allow
us
to
do
this,
but
then
I
also
said
that
I
can
put
in
legislation
to
basically
direct
him
to
continue
to
do
that,
despite
New
York
state
law.
So
that
kind
of
covers
him
and
also
puts
it
out
there
that
we
should
be
actually
following
this
law,
but
we
are
giving
him
the
authority
not
to
there
is
no
I
said
well.
What
is
the
repercussions
for
this?
D
B
People
are
telling
him
to
not
that
he
doesn't
need
to
worry
about
it,
that
there's
no
repercussions
for
it,
but
it's
not
they're,
not
saying.
If
that's,
okay,
it's
a
I
recommended
that
to
provide
him
coverage
until
we're
able
to
correct
it
by
statute.
Otherwise,
they'd
have
to
change
what
they're
charging
combat.
B
It's
not
anything
that
we
need
to
act
on
currently
I
just
wanted
to
give
you
guys
the
heads
up
on
that,
so
we'll
be
seeing
something
along
those
lines
as
we
move
forward
so
on
our
bonds.
I
just
wanted
to
note
that
we
no
longer
have
to
look
at
the
roadway
striping,
because
the
budget
Department
has
said
that
the
150
is
fine.
G
C
B
E
E
A
B
D
Just
want
to
be
clear:
I
raised
an
issue
with
the
way
the
bonding
ordinance
was
amended,
so
we
passed
it
out
of
committee
with
amendments
that
were
expressed
in
the
chart
that
then
got
expressed
as
we
are
authorizing
bonding
for
$225,000,
which
is
not
what
we
intended.
We
intended
to
authorize
the
whole
amount
of
$225,000,
but
bonding
for
only
a
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars.
So
I'd
like
you
to
take
a
look
at
the
at
the
ordinance.
I
think
that
we
need
to
make
an
amendment
before
we
pass
it
mm-hmm.
D
G
G
C
B
B
E
D
Have
two
hundred
and
sixty
seven
thousand
dollars
in
performing
that
last
report
that
we
got
from
unit
was
not
utilized
now
that
was
intended
for
other
projects,
but
we
often
have
some
money
left
over,
which
is
one
of
the
reasons
why
I
think.
We
should
always
think
that
we
can
be
a
little
comfortable
in
taking
money
away
from
some
of
these
bonding
authorizations
because
they
tend
to
overestimate
number
one
and
number
two.
You
can
usually
find
the
money
elsewhere
in
the
budget,
especially
considering
the
last
couple
years.
We've
had
surpluses,
no.
B
E
E
D
E
G
G
D
B
B
B
F
F
So
but
the
the
ones
that
were
ordered
are
on-site,
interrupted
at
their
episode.
So
for
the
reason,
the
reason
that
it
took
so
still
lines
because
they
we
used
to
bonded
in
june/july.
It's
around
that
time
and
the
certain
vendors
under
state
contract
wouldn't
be
able
to
issue
or
issue
a
purchase
order
for
them
until
the
following
year,
because
they
have
a
closed
off
date
for
new
models.
F
So
because
of
the
timing
of
a
bond
police
was
forced
to
wait
until
the
next
spring
in
order
to
get
on
with
the
next
model
of
vehicles
to
order
off
the
state
contract.
And
now,
since
we're
bonding
in
March
this
year,
they
will
be
able
to
get
the
peels
out
in
time
and
receive
the
vehicles
in
2020.
If
they.
D
C
F
I
see
what
you
are
saying,
though
I
I
would
still
stick
with
you
know.
Ideally,
we
would
like
to
change
the
schedule
to
receiving
them
in
2020,
but
I
understand
where
you're
coming
from
in
in
the
past,
because
we
had
to
wait,
we
we
would
technically
receive
them.
If
we
had
bond
in
June,
there
would
be
a
number
of
vehicles
that
we
wouldn't
receive
until
2021,
so
by
the
schedule
of
date
that
they
have
been
receiving
them
in
the
past.
D
Which
I
could
do
in
2021
and
and
then
you
would
be
able
to
do
that
on
a
cash
basis?
I
mean
I.
You
know,
I'm
I'm,
sorry
I
feel,
like
I
have
raised
a
significant
issue
that
I
think
was
deserving
of
some
sort
of
written
response
with
regard
to
this
whole
issue
of
the
4.5
million
dollars
and
you
know
being
available
for
us
to
move
things
to
the
cash
side,
and
so
we're
kicking
the
can
on
this
issue
that
we
have
been
advocating
for
for
several
years.
D
The
OSC
raises,
with
other
municipalities
when
they
are
bonding
for
police
vehicles
of
such
as
Troy
I've.
Looked
at
other
capital
budgets,
I'm,
not
seeing
a
lot.
I've
looked
at
the
there's,
a
national
finance
officers,
government
finance
officers
organization
that
the
office
of
State
Controller
refers
to,
and
basically
it
says,
yeah
you
can.
This
is
aware
you
should
be
exerting
a
lot
of
caution.
D
You
can
purchase
vehicles
on
a
essentially
a
payment
plan,
but
you
need
to
be
watching
out,
and
especially
you
shouldn't
generally
be
doing
that
when
you
are
up
against
your
debt
service
limits,
and
so
that's
the
position
that
we
are
in.
This
actually
puts
us
over
our
debt
service
limits
for
2021
and
that's
well
part
of
the
reason
why
I
was
trying
to
be
do
some
creative
problem-solving,
but
instead
of
maybe
you
know,
keeping
on
the
same
schedule,
what
we're
doing
is
we're
looking
to
do
another
set
of
purchases
early
this
year
and
I.
D
F
That's
that's
my
goal
for
what
I
go
over
to
meet
with
with
police,
to
discuss
and
build
them
a
vehicle
replacement
schedule
faster,
the
same
models
of
Fire
Department
said
it
would
be
a
schedule
and-
and
we
would
we
would
have
a
lot
more
insight
as
to
when
vehicles
are
being
placed.
Now,
if
you,
if
you
were
to
break
it
down
and
do
it
in
a
similar
model
to
what
they
have
been
doing
in
the
past,
then
it
would
be
no
I
and
I
think
I'm
to
talk
to
your
point.
F
It
wouldn't
be
anything
different
than
what's
happened
traditionally
in
terms
of
whether
they've
received
with
vehicles
historically
but
from
I
guess
from
from
the
way
that
we're
looking
in
the
Budget
Office's
is.
We
would
like
to
try
and
write
the
ship
and
have
it
be
where
they
they
bond
for
it
this
year,
we're
finding
in
March
they
will
be
able
to
receive
them
at
the
end
of
the
year,
but
I
mean
again
I
got
in
this
in
this
pieces.
F
This
is
your
decision,
but
to
to
Judy's
point
that
if
you
were
to
wrap
it
into
2021
I
mean
the
the
vehicles
that
are
receive
at
2021
might
come
a
little
later,
but
not
I,
wouldn't
say
significantly
later,
because
it
would
because
they
would,
they
still
wouldn't
have
bonded
for
it.
Yet
so
that
would
be.
The
one
thing
is
the
it's
depending
on
when
they
would
come
in.
2021
would
be
the
effect
that
it
would
have
on
the
operating
budget
when,
in
an
ideal
world
we'd
like
for
them
to
have
the
parts
in
the
body.
F
D
The
this
body
we're
looking
at
now
is
1.2
million
dollars
and
because
we
found
over
the
course
of
three
years,
this
is
a
four
hundred
thousand
dollar
payment
every
year
for
the
next
three
years
that
adds
to
our
overage
I
mean
that
it's
it's
not
like
it's.
You
know
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
over
the
debt
service
limits,
but
it
makes
it
four
hundred
thousand
dollars.
We
are
eliminating
any
flexibility
that
we
have
and
when
you
talk
about
writing
this,
this
is
the
opportunity
to
write
the
ship
where
we
have
these.
D
To
partially
help
us
address
this
now
and
in
the
future,
for
it
you
so
to
the
extent
the
more
this
debt
service
limit
issue
is
something
that
the
more
we
move
to
the
operating
side
now,
the
better
off
we
are
in
the
future,
because
it
sets
of
a
sets
of
precedent
for
that
and
on
something
like
this,
because
we
are
paying
next
year,
we're
gonna
pay,
be
paying
$400,000
more
in
debt
service.
We
could
be
taking
that
off
of
that
moving
it
to
the
operating
side.
So
I
am
not
convinced.
E
Honestly
I
came
to
this
to
fund
balance
or
to
bond
as
much
as
I
care
that
I
want
to
make
sure
we
just
get
this
done,
and
you
know
that's
my
base
to
say
and
my
concern
is.
You
know
we
have
a
lot
of
issues
and
our
police
department
something
out
these
problems,
not
believe
they
have
support
from
this
city
hall.
E
So
when
people
on
the
ground
feel
like
that,
you
know,
I
have
fun
I'm,
not
that
you
show
me
give
these
officers
all
the
resources
that
they
need.
So
I
don't
care
if
it's
fun
balance
I,
don't
care.
If
you
do
it
to
Bondi
and
I
understand,
we've
been
trying
to
get
this
out
of
bonding
for
the
last
for
years
and
I
played
I.
E
B
D
E
B
I
Alfredo
I
agree
with
you.
I
think
that
this
is
it's
when
you.
This
is
something
that
directly
impacts
the
rank
and
file
and
I'm
not
comfortable
making
an
example
of
this.
That
impacts
our
rank
and
file
police
officers
and
directly
impacts
they
D
for
our
citizens.
So
I
personally
would
like
to
see
this
bond
to
go
through
our
committee,
so.
D
The
issue
is
not
whether
these
are
purchased.
The
question
is:
how
are
they
purchased
and
I
firmly
believe
that
if
we
did
not
pass
this
bond
and
the
administration
is
going
to
figure
out
a
way
to
address
this
situation,
to
keep
them
reasonably
on
schedule
with
the
purchase
and
and-
and
we
can
be
done
here
now
and
for
the
future,
with
this
whole
issue
of
you
put
it
in
the
operating
budget
from.
C
F
Is
on
the
cash
budget,
it's
got
to
come
from
somewhere.
Then
it's
gonna
come
either
from
the
fund
balance
or
we
have
to
make
a
decision.
That's
going
to
talk
about
your
five
million
dollars
or
we're
gonna
have
to
raise
taxes
and
many
times
unless,
unless
there's
a
plan
that
we
can
work
on
in
terms
of
it
before
or
during
the
budgeting
process,
that
says:
hey!
Look.
We
are
not
going
to
approve
this
in
2021.
F
G
D
G
D
E
C
E
C
E
Then
times
that
by
20,
because
you've
got
three
years,
I'll
see
you
looking
about
hundred
one
hundred
and
ten
two
hundred
fifteen
thousand
roughly
a
year
with
interest.
They
will
so
will
pay
for
this.
If
here
so
I
dunno
one-time
revenue
increase
and
a
one-time
fun
bounce
hit,
you
would
actually
get
caught
up
pretty
quickly.
Maybe.
D
Can
we
also
go
back
to
the
fact
that
I
have
pointed
out
that
next
year,
our
debt
service
payments,
because
we're
paying
off
a
significant
portion
of
the
landfill,
the
debt
service,
dropped
by
four
point?
Five
million
dollars
so
and
in
some
of
that
will
be
needed
for
raises,
but
Mike
it's
set
here
and
when
I
go
apart
to
three
million
dollars,
so
that
will
need
to
be
used
for
raises
in
2021.
He
was
kind
of
like
not
a
bad
gas
I
think
is
kind
of
what
his
reaction
was.
So
that
leaves
one
point.
D
Five
million
dollars
that
is,
can
be
spent
in
a
lot
of
different
ways,
but
one
of
the
ways
is
is
doing
this,
so
it's
not
a
matter
of
taking
it
out
of
the
fund
balance.
It's
a
matter
of
you
know
the
the
cycling
and
the
timing
of
this
being
accelerated
this
year
to
put
make
the
purchases
and
put
in
the
purchase
orders
earlier
than
normal
versus,
potentially
putting
it
off
into
20:21.
They
may
need
some
sort
of
assurance
in
advance
to
be
able
to
be
assured
that
in
2021
were
authorizing
these
you
know
particular
purchases.
D
So
they
can
put
in
their
purchase
orders,
but
you
know
and
make
that
commitment
for
the
2021
budget.
I,
don't
know
what
mechanism
that
is,
but
I
think
that
you
know
I
think
that
you
don't
to
say
that
it
has
to
come
out
of
the
fund
balance
or
that
we're
not
doing
the
purchases.
You
know
we're,
not
keeping
them
on
their
same
schedule
is
just
not
accurate.
D
D
D
You
got
to
keep
in
mind
that
you're
going
to
reduce
next
year
the
debt
service
payment
by
over
$400,000
and
then
the
following
year.
It
will
be
reduced
by
$800,000
and
then
the
following
year.
It
you
know
by
the
1.3
million
when
you
in
the
interest
I'm
just
I'm
just
I'm
just
looking
at
at
the
future.
We
are
leaving
people
and
and
and
the.
D
The
the
last
one
is
already
included
in
my
calculations,
for
what
I
did
up
as
a
debt
service
chart.
That
included
the
expectation
that
we're
going
to
borrow
about
five
million
dollars.
That
has
been
previously
authorized,
but
it
included
the
elimination
of
1
million
dollars
for
this
particular
move.
Also
and
we're
not
even
doing
1
million
dollars
and
that
had
us
within
like
a
hundred
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
of
our
debt
policy
limit
by
my
calculations
for
2021.
D
E
B
G
F
The
customer
right
well,
the
one
thing
I
can
say-
is
it's
moving
over
to
central
budget.
That
is
the
something
that
that
I
will
be
working
on
going
forward
and
it's
something
that
talking
to
Mike
in
the
mayor's.
Obviously,
that
I
would
I
want
to
start
a
lot
earlier.
Our
capital
planning
process
I
want
to
loop
in
council
leadership,
and
it's
something
that
I
that
I
can
tell
you.
This
is
again.
We
would
like
to
try
to
move
this
over
to
that
budget.
It's
just
for
me
up
here.
F
I
would
like
to
see
a
plan
done
heading
into
next
year's
budget,
the
stuff
that
Judy
that
Judy's
talking
about
things
that
are,
above
above
my
paygrade,
to
talk
about,
but
again
going
going
forward.
That
I
mean
the
solutions
that
I
tell
you
is
that
that's
a
nice
you
wanna
work
towards
that
budget
office.
Definitely
we
want
homeless
is
over.
F
F
E
B
B
B
D
D
D
And
so
I
there
were
two
items
in
the
listing,
so
yeah,
it's
15
years,
very
powerful
usefulness
and
if
you
look
at
the
chart
and
guys
provided
virtually
everything
in
the
way
of
equipment
you
have
down
for
like
eight
to
ten
years
and
we're
not
supposed
to
borrow
you
know
it's
you
know
it's
like
buying
a
car,
you
don't
borrow
it,
buy
it
and
borrow
on
fifteen
years.
If
you
expect
it
to
die
within
ten
years,
because
then
you
keep
on
paying
for
something
that
you
know
unforeseen
the
benefit.
That's
just
that's.
F
I'm
just
saying
it
from
from
there's
a
there's,
a
section
that
says:
there's
supposed
to
be
some
sort
of
weighted
average
and
all
the
equipment
bonds
that
DJ's
have
passed,
hit.
Heaven
they're,
not
all
fifteen
years
than
if
they're,
not
all
ten
years,
there's
a
there's
a
of
tens,
these
12s
15
that
are
that
are
all
merged
together.
So
I'm
again,
this
is
2018
bond.
But
I
am
aware
that
there
were
some
equipment
items
at
fifteen-year,
useful
life,
some
equipment
that
10-year
useful
life.
F
They
were
all
uniform
in
their
their
their
useful
life,
their
people
use
of
every
single
item
who
that
could
post
the
the
ask
for
that
year.
So
I
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
what
what
to
say
about
that.
That's
not
like
everything
was
was
15
years
in
it
has
it
hasn't
been
that
way,
looking
at
IMD
just
provided,
but.
G
G
F
Dgs
provides
it
to
there's
a
there's,
a
column
that
talks
about
New,
York,
State's
controller's
office
recommended
useful
life,
and
then
it
goes
on
to
say
the
waistband
that
dgs
takes
out
of
it,
which
is
the
the
common.
The
common
jumped
by
guesses
comptroller's
office,
says
it's
at
eight
years
from
full
life
and
dgs
is
saying:
most
of
them
are
a
tenure
useful
life.
The
majority
aren't
aren't
15
years.
This.
C
F
Big
enough
that
some
items
there's
there's
a
few
items
out
of
15
there's
a
lot
that
are
10,
there's
I,
don't
think,
there's
any.
That
dgs
is
listed
as
as
a
meteor
PPO
that
the
state
says
a
lot
of
money,
but
there's
some.
There
are
12,
it's
not
entirely
15
and
it's
not
entirely
ten
or
eight,
and
this
is
this-
is
agata
2018
bond.
It
was
the
same
in
nineteen,
so.
D
D
D
D
D
D
The
problem
with
that
is
we,
as
the
Finance
Board,
are
being
asked
to
authorize
these
purchases
with
a
PPU
of
15
years
when
when,
in
reality,
some
of
these
may
even
have
like
you
know,
useful
life
is
something
closer
to
five
years,
depending
upon
how
much
they're
used
and
that
kind
of
thing,
and
generally
the
the
Common
Council,
has
taken
a
position.
Joe
Eigo
has
sat
hearing.
C
D
D
In
terms
of
what
I
was
looking
at
in
terms
of
a
recommendation
that
I
thought
I
could
feel
comfortable
with
knowing
some
of
the
pets
dialogue
of
the
Common
Council
on
this
I
also
note
that
you're
reducing
it
to
a
half-million
dollars
and
the
total
that
actually
was
identified
for
this
is
four
hundred
and
sixty-five
thousand
dollars.
So
even
you
know
so
we
have
thirty
five
thousand
dollars
that
isn't
even
necessarily
need,
except
for
her
I
know.
You
guys
like
to
have
that
cushion
alright,
so
so.
F
D
B
F
G
F
F
D
D
D
D
So
I
move
to
amend
or
pass
forty
eight
point,
one
two
two
point:
one:
nine
MC
out
of
committee
with
a
positive
recommendation
with
the
maximum
estimated
cost
being
amended
to
1
million
and
fifty
thousand
dollars
both
for
the
maximum
estimated
cost
and
maximum
amount
of
bonds
and
then
also
in
Section.
Two,
the
plan
of
financing
objects.
F
E
D
B
A
D
A
B
D
So
my
chart
that
I
provide
everybody
with
has
the
reimbursement?
Has
the
full
debt
service
in
there
for
everything
for
three
years,
and
then
it
backs
out
everything
that
is
subject
wasn't
yeah,
but
it
doesn't.
It
does
not
include
my
calculations,
do
not
include
the
skyway
or
were
any
of
these
projects
that
we
had
here
and
it
had
an
extra
$250,000
in
production
from
the
equipment.