►
From YouTube: June 25, 2019 AF City Council Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
C
Not
this
time,
you
want
to
express
gratitude
for
the
ability
that
we
have
to
govern
ourselves
and
then
the
freedoms
that
we
enjoy,
we're
so
grateful
for
those
who
give
their
legs
and
service
to
help
those
in
our
city.
Please
bless
us
tonight
that
our
minds
will
be
open
and
you'll
have
the
ability
to
make
good
decisions
say
these
things
in
the
name
of
Jesus
Christ,
amen,.
A
E
A
A
Didn't
catch
this
on
the
news
on
May
15,
2000,
19,
firefighters,
chat,
Jenson,
chase
Perry
and
Coulter
Christian,
who
maintained
a
friendship
inside
and
outside
the
fire
station,
decided
to
spend
some
time
off
duty
of
diamond
Fort
Canyon.
That's
in
Spanish
Fork
boy
off.
They
witnessed
someone
attempted
to
cross
the
fast-moving
Creek
only
to
be
swept
off
his
horse.
A
Chad,
chase
and
coulter
had
neither
supplies,
North
corner
equipment
for
such
a
rescue,
but
they
did
have
training
and
AF
fire
fire
mantra
that
they
lived
all
that
they
live
all
that
they
all
live
by,
which
is
always
ready
at
high
risk
to
their
own
lives.
They
embarked
on
a
dangerous
water
rescue
that
even
brought
some
of
them
into
the
Creek,
but
by
working
together
they
were
able
to
get
the
man
to
safety.
A
We
as
a
community
are
truly
lucky
to
have
a
police
and
fire
department
filled
with
brave
men
and
women
like
these
three
firefighters,
always
wet,
ready
and
always
willing
to
serve
in
an
interview.
Colter
humbly
said
they
were
just
in
the
right
place
at
the
right
time.
I
would
say,
because
of
their
willingness
to
always
act
that,
regardless
of
where
these
men
are
at,
they
make
it
the
right
place
and
the
right
time.
F
I
asked
for
a
better
atmosphere
inside
the
four
walls
of
a
fire
station,
as
well
as
outside,
to
have
the
friends
and
companionship
of
guys
like
Colter
and
Chase,
and
the
rest
of
the
department
that
stand
always
ready
when
a
task
is
given
to
us.
So
we
thank
you
for
this
award
and
the
recognition
we
appreciate
it.
Thank
you.
G
H
I
J
A
A
K
K
Herald
of
June
19th
2019,
quoting
from
that
article,
it
says
it
would
be
a
utility
because
we
feel
this
services
needed
in
every
home,
it's
equivalent
to
water,
sewer
or
being
able
to
get
on
the
street.
I
disagree
with
that
statement
with
96%
of
the
communities
currently
with
access
to
Internet
and
20
internet
providers
vying
for
our
business
in
this
city.
I,
don't
think
it's
a
utility,
in
fact,
they
think
having
the
city
in
competition
with
private
industry
makes
it
not
a
utility.
K
People
in
the
city,
depending
on
their
location
and
I,
admit
not.
Everybody
has
equal
access
through
the
city,
but
there
is
speeds
from
three
to
a
thousand
megabits
per
second
I.
Think
city
utilities
are
things
like
water
sewer,
fire
protection,
I'm
thankful.
Those
people
are
here
with
us:
police
courts,
roads.
K
Those
things
that
private
industry
will
not
be
able
to
provide
for
us
quoting
again
from
the
article
payment
for
the
structure
would
come
as
a
utility
fee
from
residents,
but
bunker
said
initial
estimates
show
it
would
actually
be
less
than
what
most
residents
currently
pay
and
then
gives
an
estimate
of
between
sixty
and
seventy
dollars.
I
currently
get
my
internet
at
forty
dollars.
It
is
sufficiently
fast
for
me
to
stream
movies
without
buffering.
K
My
grandson
can
get
his
homework
done
in
a
timely
fashion
and
it's
provided
by
private
industry
by
adding
an
amount
to
repay
that
twenty
five
million
dollar
bond.
We
are
asking
the
poorest
of
the
poor
in
our
city
to
pay
for
the
wants,
maybe
needs
of
businesses
and
other
residents.
I
think
this
is
better
done
by
private
industry.
My
opposition
is
having
the
city
in
competition
with
private
business.
K
A
A
M
M
J
Met
last
week
with
the
Historic
Preservation
Committee,
there
is
not
a
lot
going
on
right
now.
In
the
city,
there
was
one
home,
that's
a
potential
that
was
discussed
with
the
owner
and
some
of
the
requirements
that
need
to
be
presented
so
that
they
can
understand
what
was
going
on
and
basically
that's
it.
Okay.
Thank
you.
Thank.
C
You
few
things
to
report
tonight:
one
is
that
our
economic
development
team
met
together
and
we
were
able
to
identify
some
people
that
we
could
put
together
to
create
a
task
force
for
Main
Street.
So
I
wanted
to
let
the
council,
members
and
citizens
know
that
that's
going
on
and
we're
making
moving
forward.
I
believe
the
mayor
is
going
to
ask
them
to
be
on
it
or
send
a
letter
to
them,
and
that
will
be
going
out
so
be
aware
of
that.
C
Secondly,
a
little
bit
of
update
on
still
days
the
magazine
is
being
going
to
the
printer
tomorrow
with
the
intent
of
being
in
mailboxes
on
July
1st,
so
that
will
give
them
some
time
to
look
over
the
magazine
and
participate
in
things
that
they
want
to
participate
in
I
just
asked
the
chamber
how
many
they
were
printing
and
they
said.
34,000
magazines
are
going
to
be
going
out
and
changed
34,000
and
change,
and
they
will
be
going
to
AF
all
of
a
f'd
Island
Alpine
Cedar
Hills,
Pleasant
Grove
and
some
of
East
Lehigh.
C
So
it
goes
to
more
even
than
just
American
Fork
and
providing
them
with
those
that
magazine
that
you
might
have
seen
this
on
Facebook.
But
the
Carnival
tickets
have
gone
on
sell
for
a
dollar
if
you
applied
them
ahead
of
time,
they're
a
dollar
and
you
can
purchase
them
online
or
there's
a
bunch
of
places
throughout
the
city
that
they
have
listed
and
those
will
be
in
the
magazine.
C
I
think,
if
not
they
were
are
all
online
and
I
can
tell
you
those
the
summer
concert
series
has
been
happening
and
if
you
will
remember,
we
gave
some
money
to
the
Harrington
group
for
the
summer
concert
series
and
they
will
be
doing
some
enhancements
to
the
customer
concert
series
yet
to
be
determined
but
watch
for
those
it
should
be
better
marketing.
Maybe
some
cooler
sound,
maybe
some
more
people
that
can
come
to
be
in
the
groups.
That
kind
of
thing,
so
there
should
be
some
enhancements
to
the
summer
concert
series.
C
The
last
thing
I
wanted
to
talk
about
was
that
I
took
the
opportunity
last
weekend
to
run
the
AF
Canyon
run
against
cancer.
I
believe
that's
what
it's
called
and
it
comes
down:
American
Fork
Canyon
and
goes
through
cedar
hills
and
into
American
Fork
and
ends
at
our
die
and
as
I
was
running.
It
I
was
thinking,
of
course,
about
the
wonderful
cause
that
they
have.
N
We
have
little
events
like
we
have
tonight
to
celebrate
those
three
men
who
you
know,
thought
more
of
someone
else
in
themselves,
but
it's
well
warranted
what
a
difference
we
have
seen
in
the
past
few
years
in
in
our
public
safety
and
how
much
we
appreciate
to
appreciate
them.
So
that
was
the
only
thing
I
had
in
there.
A
Me
away
from
the
Senior
Center
just
now,
I
was
able
to
have
dinner
with
12
of
the
the
Miss
American
Fork
contestants
and
I
came
away.
Thinking,
I'm,
glad
I'm,
not
a
judge
and
had
to
judge,
will
have
to
judge
those
beautiful
girls
and
their
talents,
their
their
their
platforms
and
all
everything
that
they
were
speaking
about.
A
He
said
we
just
wanted
to.
Thank
you
for
your
help
and
continued
support.
Know
this
email
went
out
to
several
members
of
our
staff.
He
was
not
addressing
me
specifically
as
the
mayor,
but
he
wanted
to
thank
you
for
your
help
and
continued
continued
support
for
our
event
this
past
weekend,
it
was
a
huge
success
and
we
recognized
that
we
could
not
do
this.
Without
your
partnership,
we
had
the
largest
ever
AF
Canyon
run
with
nearly
5,000
registered
runners
and
thousands
more
family,
friends
and
spectators.
We
hosted
participants
from
37
states
in
seven
foreign
countries.
A
We
are
grateful
for
your
patience
and
for
working
with
us
through
the
construction
and
parking
logistics.
Your
team
has
been
very
helpful,
responsive
and
great
to
work
with.
Thanks
again,
we
are
looking
forward
to
our
ten-year
anniversary
event
in
2020
and
it
will
be
even
bigger
and
better,
and
that
was
from
Craig
Nelson
and
a
few
other
members
of
the
IHC
staff
and
so
kudos
to
our
staff
and.
A
For
American
Fork
to
bring
so
many
people
in
for
that,
and
then,
if
I
could
just
again
I'm
on
the
public
safety
thing,
it
seems
like
it's
been
a
little
while,
but
it
really
was
just
last
week.
Wasn't
it
chief
when
we
had
the
convention,
but
our
fire
department
hosted
the
111th
fire
state
fire
convention.
It
was
held
at
various
venues,
some
in
Lehigh
at
Thanksgiving
point
they
had.
We
brought
him
to
our
die
for
a
BBQ
and
lightning
and
then
rain,
but
I
could
just
see
the
leadership.
A
We
have
a
great
fire
department
and
they
had
a
lot
of
fun
and
there
was
no
question
in
my
mind
and
I
am
might
be
a
little
biased
to
this,
but
I
feel
like
our
crew,
just
reflected
the
finest
of
all
firefighters
and
so
I'm
glad
I
know.
The
chief
is
glad
that
events
over
and
they
look
forward
to
it
in
another
decade
or
so,
but
they
did
a
wonderful
job.
That
is.
The
mayor's
report
will
now
move
on
to
the
common
consent
agenda
consisting
of
seven
items
as
presented.
G
J
H
J
E
A
C
M
J
J
J
A
Item
number.
Three
is
a
reviewing
action
on
a
resolution
adopting
the
American
Fork
city
budget
for
fiscal
year,
ending
June
30th
2024.
Those
present
its
might
be
well
to
note
that
this
has
been
six
to
eight
months
in
the
in
the
making
of
several
meetings.
Well,
several
countless
meetings,
but
we're
here.
This
is
for
our
budget.
For
this
coming
cooperating,
hear
any
discussion
from
the
council.
M
O
G
E
A
E
E
B
There
are
two
items
before
you
tonight:
this
is
the
first
one,
so
it's
a
request
to
amend
the
underlying
land
use
map
and
then
the
following
item
is
the
zone
map,
and
so
typically
the
zoning
and
the
land
use
go
together.
This
one,
for
whatever
reason,
was
not
already
designated
that
the
business
has
been
there
a
number
of
years
or
the
building
has.
B
It
depends
on
what's
already
there
in
this
case,
because
it's
already
commercial,
it
made
sense
to
flip
it
in
some
instances,
it's
residential,
but
it's
looking
to
move
more
towards
a
commercial.
So
we
see
that
in
kind
of
the
fringes
of
the
downtown
area
when
those
change
from
residential
to
commercial
uses,
that's
probably
what
you're
thinking
of.
J
N
Able
to
see
anything
in
the
notes
from
the
Planning,
Commission
and
I
see
that
mr.
and
mrs.
Phelps
are
sitting
next
to
mr.
mole
or
peacefully
so
I
assume
that
everything
is
all
good
from
your
from
your
take
on
that.
So
with
that
mayor,
I
would
move
to
adopt
resolution
approving
a
land-use
map
amendment
located
in
the
area
of
705
east
50,
South
from
the
residential
high
density
to
the
design,
industrial
designation.
N
P
B
B
M
J
N
J
E
B
Know
Thank
You,
mayor
and
council
just
as
a
little
bit
of
background,
so
what
this
amendment
proposes
is
to
allow
cul-de-sacs
or
other
dead-end
type
of
streets
within
a
block
type
five
in
the
Tod
zone,
so
the
current
Tod
zone,
as
it
is
written
you
can
see
on
the
screen.
It
allows
cul-de-sacs
or
other
closed
end
dead,
end
type
streets
in
blocks,
1,
2,
3,
&
4.
B
It
specifically
leaves
out
blocks
types
5
and
above
because
in
those
block
types,
that's
where
basically,
the
core
of
the
Tod
area
is,
and
so
you
want
to
promote
the
maximum
connectivity
within
those
areas
and
so
they're
allowed
in
all
of
the
lower
block
types.
But
you
get
up
into
that
core
area
and
that's
where
they've
been
left
out
again,
that's
to
promote
that
connectivity
between
uses
and
just
because
you
are
close
to
the
station.
We
wanted
it
to
be
very
walkable.
B
So
with
again
with
the
recent
adoption
of
the
code
that
was
left
out,
this
was
before
Planning
Commission
a
couple
weeks
ago.
They
ultimately
recommended
against
it.
They
did
have
some
back
and
forth
discussion
as
you
can
see
in
the
notes
or
the
men,
but
ultimately
they
came
out
with
a
recommendation
against
it
again.
N
So
Adam
I
after
reading
that
and
recognizing
that
the
Reynolds
development
was
in
prior
to
the
Tod
correct.
It
seemed
like
from
my
interpretation
of
the
Planning
Commission
minutes
that
John
is
very
strong,
because
you
know
the
ordinance
says
and
that's
why
we're
denying
it.
But
I
was
mrs..
Anderson
I
think
one
other
talked
about
the
need
to
look
at
a
potential
exception
because
of
the
proximity
to
the
Reynolds
property,
and
that
was
one
of
the
reasons
to
to
maybe
look
in
the
future.
I
don't
know
whether
it
was
specific
to
this
one.
B
B
G
N
B
N
So
it
wasn't,
it
didn't
have
anything
to
do
with
man
being
contiguous
with
horrendous
property
and
being
but
not
being
able
to
have
any
flow.
It
was
just
the
fact
that
that
came
in
at
a
different
time,
and
this
came
in
under
the
new
Tod
ordinance
that
we
put
in
and
so
we're
hearing
to,
that
it
didn't
have
anything
to
do
with
any
relation
between
the
two
properties.
B
B
We
are
looking
to
a
connecting
road
along
the
southern
portion
of
his
property.
But
again
the
northern
two-thirds
are
developed
out.
So
there's
no
opportunity
to
punch
a
road
through,
but
the
Planning
Commission
also
felt
you
know
yeah.
They
did
discuss
it,
but
if
it
were
compelling
enough
I
believe
then
probably
the
code
may
have
been
recommended
for
approval
guys
so
appreciate.
M
D
G
A
R
D
R
Of
the
council,
my
name
is
Duane
Rasmussen.
My
address
is
67
40
South
13th
east
in
Salt,
Lake
City,
Utah
I'm,
with
a
company
called
Castle
wood
development.
We
have
this
property
under
contract
from
a
company
called
a
Fe
Utah,
who
owns
a
number
of
acres
out
there.
We
went
into
this
with
our
eyes
wide
open.
In
fact,
we're
encouraged
by
the
staff
to
wait
until
this
new
ordinance
was
in
place
and
we
did
and
everything
that
Adams
has
said
about
connectivity.
R
We
support
and
we
think
that
our
site
plan
is
going
to
show
you
how
we
reach
that
goal.
All
we
really
ask
the
Planning
Commission
to
do
was
add
block
5
in
the
case
of
a
natural
or
man-made
boundary
that
limit
the
connectivity
of
the
street
and
when
we
addressed
that
and
what
I'm
going
to
show
you
a
site
plan
here
in
a
minute,
we
ran
into
a
dead
end
of
rad
rails
property
and
there
was
no
way
to
deal
with
that
other
than
what
we
proposed.
R
The
staff
staff
said,
look,
cul-de-sacs,
aren't
allowed,
and
so
we
have
to
not
hold
a
hearing
on
this
until
you've
addressed
that
issue.
So
we
subsequently
made
the
application
of
the
Planning
Commission
asking
them
to
consider
recommending
that
to
you,
I
think
it's
been
a
little
mischaracterized
how
that
went
that
evening,
because
they
didn't
feel
like
they
felt
like
we
were
asking
for
an
exception
or
not
asking
for
an
exception.
R
We're
asking
that
the
code
be
amended
to
allow
these
exceptions
when
man-made
or
geographical
barriers
occur,
and
so
they
felt
obligated
to
deny
the
request
and
basically
put
it
in
your
lap.
I
think
you
read
the
Chairman's
comments.
He
said,
that's
what
you
get
paid
the
big
bucks
for
us.
That's.
Why
I'm
here
and
I
appreciate
your
listening
to
me
and
abiding
me
with
some
time.
I
have
some
handouts.
I
did
share
with
you
to
sort
of
demonstrate
what
I'm
talking
about,
if
you
don't
mind
and
I'll
also
share
one
of
the
staff.
R
When
we
submit
our
application,
you
complied
with
all
of
the
blocks
and
lot
requirements
of
the
new
Tod
plan
in
all
of
those
issues
we
submitted
with
that
application,
this
site
plan
and
other
things
that
are
part
of
this
package
that
I'm
going
to
show
you.
The
staff,
told
us
to
remove
that
plan
and
because
it
wasn't
appropriate
at
the
framework
application
process.
Okay,
we
agree
with
that.
So
we
took
it
out,
but
we
still
face
this
cul-de-sac
issue.
R
Having
had
many
conversations
with
the
staff
about
it,
you
can
see
where
we
have
the
cul-de-sac
on
the
project
which
is
275
south
and
it
can
connect
to
the
north
when
that
property
develops.
But
it
cannot
go
south
because
South,
it
runs
directly
into
Brad
Reynolds's
property.
So,
rather
than
putting
a
dead-end
street
Ian,
we
put
the
cul-de-sac
in
and
put
on
our
amenity
Center
green
space,
open
space
clubhouse
at
the
end
of
that
cul-de-sac.
R
That
cul-de-sac
complies
completely
with
public
safety
requirements
for
fire
trucks,
police
vehicles
and
the
like,
and
then
from
that
it
really
is
more
of
a
roundabout
than
a
cul-de-sac.
If
you,
if
you
get
my
drift,
and
so
you
can
go
off
of
that
either
direction,
either
east
or
west
and
connect
to
200,
south
or
350
south,
creating
that
connectivity
before
we
move
on
from
this
drawing
I
would
point
out
that
along
the
very
west
end
of
the
property
is
a
path,
a
pedestrian
path.
Adam
talked
about
wanting
pedestrian
connections
to
the
park-and-ride
lot.
R
We've
accommodated
that
all
the
way
from
350
South
completely
through
our
project,
a
two
hundred
South,
where
they
can
cross
at
pedestrian
crossing.
So
we
think
we've
created
that
connectivity
and
we
ran
into
this
problem,
and
so
that's
why
we're
here,
if
I,
could
get
you
to
turn
to
the
next
drawing
I
wanted
you
to
understand
the
density
that
we
are
proposing
on
this
project
and
what
it
looks
like
you.
A
R
Appreciate
that
merit
I
think
it's
pertinent
to
the
subject.
You
want
me
to
move
on
I
will
this
is
a
five-story
building
to
create
the
density
which
Adam
talked
about
wanting
in
this
block,
and
we
can.
We
are
at
with
this
site
plan
33
units
per
acre
and
Brad
Reynolds
is
at
15.
We
are
more
than
double
that
and
we've
created
the
connectivity
I
think
it's
important
to
understand
that
I
wanted
you
to
see
what
we
were.
What
what
we
are
trying
to
create
here
then.
Lastly,
Councilwoman
Christensen
referred
to
the
curved
Road.
R
If
you
look
at
the
very
last
exhibit
in
the
in
the
packet,
if
we
were
to
bring
275
South
in
and
turn
it
to
the
to
the
south
to
meet
375
South
Street,
we've
created
a
street
within
our
project.
I,
don't
know
that
we've
increased
connectivity
anymore
than
we
would
have
if
we
had
if
we
were
allowed
to
put
the
cul-de-sac
in
and
we
have
reduced
density.
R
We've
lost
almost
50
units
by
putting
that
Street
in
there,
and
so
it
seems
to
me,
like
we've,
accomplished
the
goals
that
you
set
out
in
the
Tod
to
accomplish
them.
We
fully
support
those
goals
and
we
think
we've
done
our
best
to
reach
that
and
we
have
run
into
a
man-made
natural
or
Geographic
boundary
that
doesn't
allow
275
South
to
go
anywhere.
I
point
out
one
additional
item,
and
that
is
when
you
get
down
to
where
350
West
Street
connects
to
375
South.
R
R
That's
the
reason
for
the
request.
I
think
the
Planning
Commission
was
sympathetic
but
unwilling
to
deal
with
an
exception
and
we're
not
asking
for
an
exception.
We're
asking
for
an
amendment
of
the
code
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
may
have
I
hope.
I've
explained
it
without
getting
too
deep
into
the
weeds,
as
the
mayor
has
suggested,
but
I
thought
it
was
important
for
you
to
see
what
we're
trying
to
create
there.
N
So
for
my
untrained,
I'm
air
man,
you
know
I'm
just
going
on
Landry
and
I.
The
scenario
with
the
cul-de-sac
looks
like
a
better
situation
to
me.
I
understand
the
block
type
I
understand
away
with
the
exercise
of
doing
the
Tod
completely
down
with
all
of
that,
but
the
other,
the
other
part
I
struggle
with,
because
now
we've
got
that
full
role
in
there
and
I'm
thinking.
Okay,
what's
the
best
development
and
what
is
the
best
thing
for
American
Fork,
City
I'm,
all
about
following
the
ordinance
and
following
the
code
in
this
particular
case.
N
Think
because
of
the
extenuating
circumstances,
in
my
view,
option
a
on
the
first
page
of
the
handout
that
was
given
to
us
provides
a
better
solution.
We
still
have
the
connectivity
that
we
talked
about
than
the
latter
option
and
so
I'm
not
saying
I'm
right,
I'm
saying
tell
me
why
it's
not
and
if
the
answer
is
because
our
code
says
so,
then
that's
the
wrong
answer
for
me.
So
we
can
skip
the
discussion
because
I
because
I
get
it
not
because
I'm
right,
but
because
I
get
it
I.
C
C
N
B
L
About
actually
is
a
through
Street
this.
This
is
a
dead-end.
It
comes
into
a
personal
in
dead
ends,
the
right-of-way
ends.
It
would
need
to
be
public
I.
Think
one
of
the
presumptions
is
that
these
are
the
only
two
ways
the
parcel
can
be
developed,
which,
quite
frankly,
I
think
is
not
correct.
I
think
there
are
other
ways
to
develop
the
parcel
and
still
comply
with
the
code.
M
P
B
M
M
B
M
A
B
Think
when
you
look
at
potential
code
changes,
you
have
to
look
beyond.
What's
just
in
front
of
you
and
Stacey
pointed
out.
Someone
right
next
to
the
train
station
could
come
in
and
put
in
a
call
to
sac
and
have
some
argument.
While
the
train
stations
there
I
have
to
use
a
cul-de-sac
and
then
I
think
I
just
feel
like
if
you
have
to
look
ahead
beyond
what's
right
here
and
as
David
stated
what's
here
is
one
plan,
but
it's
not
necessarily
the
only
plan
that
can
be
workable.
B
J
J
That
said,
I
think
it's
a
slippery
slope,
the
camel's
nose
in
the
tent-
and
it's
always
tough
to
be
the
first
camel
sticking
his
nose
in
the
tent
and
I.
Think.
That's
the
challenge
that
I'm.
Having
is
somehow
we're
supposed
to
treat
all
our
children
alike,
but
we
never
do,
but
if
we
do
it
for
one,
then
the
others
all
line
up,
and
so
just
in
my
mind,
that's
that
the
lamb
I'm
having
just
tried
to
figure
out
what
should
be
the
answer
to
this.
N
Well
and
I:
it's
my
ignorance
that
brought
this
discussion
on
and
if
there's
another
way
to
be
able
to
develop
this,
where
we
don't
have
to
you
know,
entertain
this
or
the
other
option.
That's
probably
what
we
should
do,
because
I'm
not
in
favor
of
changing
our
code,
unless
it's
just
one
of
those
things
that
we're
standing
by
code
to
stand
by
code
and
there's
no
other
way,
and
so,
if
there
is
another
way
to
design
an
engineer,
this
then
I
think
you
probably
ought
to
give
that
a
give
that
a
whirl.
R
Public
input
is
over,
but
if
there
is
and
the
staffers
have
something
in
their
pocket
that
they
could
show
me,
I
am
more
than
willing
to
listen.
I've
had
architects,
two
of
them
and
engineers
look
at
this
in
trying
to
figure
out
how
we
can
accomplish
that
connectivity,
giving
the
narrowness
of
the
site
from
east
to
west,
and
that
has
been
a
problem.
And
so
these
are
the
solutions
that
I
came
up
with.
There
hasn't
been
anything
proffered
by
the
staff,
not
that
they're
responsible
for
planning.
R
D
R
R
J
R
Q
R
H
R
Before
you
take
action,
could
I
just
make
one
suggestion,
given
the
dilemma
that
you
appear
to
be
in,
and
some
of
you
are
wrestling
with
that.
Perhaps
you
table
this
tonight
and
give
us
a
chance
to
go
work
with
the
staff
and
see
if
there's
an
alternative
plan,
if
not
I'll
come
back
here
and
ask
you
to
vote
on
this.
A
J
Q
Q
M
M
J
N
D
N
R
N
And
so
I
guess
my
question
would
be
to
staff,
might
be
I,
don't
want
to
put
anyone
on
the
spot,
but
why
wouldn't
we
do
that
help
mr.
Rasmussen,
if
we're
sure
there's
another
way
to
do
it?
No
one
has
to
engineer
but
you're,
just
like
we
would
on
any
other
project
we're
talking
about
potential
opportunities.
Why
would
we
not
do
that?
Rather
than
just
bolt
this
down
and
say
there,
you
go
I.
L
Think
the
staff
is
more
than
willing
to
sit
down
with
anyone
and
discuss
the
merits
of
a
project.
You
know,
I,
think
some
of
the
options
are
are
to
do
a
different
product
even
on
the
site.
That
is
one
of
the
things
that
that
the
developer
is
free
to
do
and
I.
Think
staff
is
very
careful
not
to
direct
people
on
the.
R
Open
to
different
products,
let's
put
all
the
cards
on
the
table.
If
this
city
wants
a
project
so
dense
that
today
it
requires
a
parking
structure
I'm
out.
If
that's
what
they're,
if
that's
what's
in
everybody's
back
pocket,
because
it
will
not,
the
market
will
not
support
a
parking
structure
there
today
and
so
I've
made
it
as
dense
as
I,
possibly
can
still
surface
park
it
and
take
advantage
of
the
Tod,
so
I'm
happy
to
sit
down
and
have
that
conversation?
R
If
that's
where
they're
headed
I'll
come
back
and
tell
you
I'm
out
and
that's
the
reason,
I'm
out,
I
think
it's
an
open
process.
I
think
the
staffs
been
cooperative
to
this
point
other
than
to
say
nobody
said
we
want
a
different
product.
They've
said
that
that
they
said
that
the
Planning
Commission
there
are
different
ways
to
do
this.
If
the
different
ways
involve
a
parking
structure,
then
I
think
it's
a
long
time
before
them
property
down.
A
N
We
are,
we
are.
We
have
some
serious
requirements
here.
I
would
love
to
see
us
be
able
to
do
that.
I
want
to
add
burden
to
you
know,
but
if
there
is
a
way,
let's
talk
about
it
and
if
not,
let's
break
back
for
a
vote.
I
think
that's
cooperative
and
that
will
give
us
the
best
result,
what
we
want
and
what
they
need
at
the
same
time,
I
think
that
can
be
cheap,
so
I
appreciate
councilman
Shelby's
motion
on
that.
So
that's
that's.
How
I
feel.
A
P
A
A
P
N
A
M
A
A
M
P
A
E
N
E
N
A
M
G
P
A
I
Sure,
thanks
mayor,
so
the
manual
is
just
a
guiding
document
to
help
staff
be
safe
and
successful
in
their
jobs.
It
keeps
the
employee
say
if
it
keeps
the
city
safe,
we
try
and
update
it
frequently
so
that
stays
relevant
while
it
seems
like
a
big
mess
this
year,
I
feel
like
I,
can
probably
group
it
into
a
couple
general
categories
of
changes
we
tried
to
streamline
in.
I
In
all
the
other
policy
versions,
we
offer
120
hours
of
holiday
pay,
but
we
have
found
that
it's
been
a
little
bit
unclear
for
the
couple
employees
that
work
a
5/8
schedule
and
how
exactly
that's
going
to
be
managed,
and
so
we
try
to
define
that
better
and
we
we
did
this
through
the
use
of
what
we
call
personal
personal
leave
and
it
kind
of
will
provide
the
difference
in
120
hours
versus
in
96
hours
or
essentially
10-hour
days
or
state
hour
days.
That's
one
change.
I
We
we
made
we
added
the
payment
in
lieu
of
medical
coverage.
We
feel
that
there's
a
cost
to
this,
but
it's
less
of
a
cost
than
actually
paying
out
medical
coverage
for
an
employee
and
his
or
her
family.
The
next
one
is,
we
had
add
one
sentence
in
the
use
of
personnel
for
City
equipment
for
personal
uses.
I
And
so
we
tried
to
open
it
up
a
little
bit
so
that
unintentional,
use
or
incidental
use
will
be
permitted
just
so
that
no
one
gets
in
trouble
for
something
that
they
didn't
mean
or
intentionally
do
and
probably
the
bulk
of
the
rest,
maybe
not
all
of
it.
But
most
of
it
are
changes
that
were
recommended
by
our
legal.
An
HR
attorney
looked
through
the
whole
thing
and
they
deleted
rewrote
added
sections,
particularly
in
chapters
9
and
10.
Just
to
make
things
more
clear.
We
felt
like,
if
you
adopted
all
those
changes
in
Reddit.
I
It
wouldn't
be
substantially
different
than
what
was
already
there.
It's
just
better
worded
it's
more
clear
and
maybe
protects
us
better
than
the
language
protects
us
better
than
the
way
we
wrote
it
previously.
So
those
are
most
of
the
changes.
You
guys
have
any
questions
regarding
any
of
them
happy
to
help
fill
them
I.
J
E
I
We
in
a
couple
places
we
change
that
no,
the
Affordable
Health
Care,
the
the
29
30
hours
or
more
still
is
mandated
for
allowing
for
benefits,
but
we
are
trying
to
be
clear
and
state
that
when
you
are
benefited
full-time
person,
the
city
expects
40
hours,
not
30
hours
of
work,
so
we're
trying
to
make
it
clear
what
our
standard
weekly
work
time
schedule
is
for
a
benefited
full
time
person.
So.
J
I
For
if,
for
whatever
reason,
someone
goes
above
the
29
that,
where
their
part-time
and
now
they're
working
more
than
29
hours,
then
we
would
say:
okay,
well,
you're
benefited
and
we'd
like
you
to
work
40
hours.
If
we're
gonna,
do
that
we're
it's
getting
the
best
bang
for
our
buck,
for
you
know
having
to
cover.
I
Well,
if
it's
a
full-time
position
authorized
full-time
position
and
they
don't
want
to
work
the
40
hours
we'd,
look
at
the
circumstance
to
see
if
there's
outstanding
circumstances
for
this
particular
issue.
Otherwise,
it'd
be
you
know
they
may
be
looking
for
a
job
elsewhere.
If
that's
what
they're
so.
I
I
No,
that's
operationally
that's
how
we're
we're
working.
We
just
wanted
to
make
it
clear
so
that
there's
no
one
who
says
well
I
want
to
work
full-time
on
benefits,
but
I'd
like
to
just
do
30
hours,
and
so
we
want
to
avoid
that.
Let
make
it
clear
the
expectations.
Forty
hours,
if
you're
a
full-time
benefit
employee,
does
that
make
sense.
Okay,.
A
J
C
Three
B
then
says
part-time
employees
are
those
employees
who
are
regularly
scheduled
to
work
less
than
30
hours,
which
is
what
you
just
said.
So
there's
you
got
full-time
as
forty
hours
and
part-time
as
those
who
work
less
than
30
hours.
So
you're
saying
there
just
isn't
anybody?
That's
gonna
work
between
30
and
40.
I
N
L
G
B
L
J
J
I
E
J
J
J
I
In
this
situation,
we
kind
of
made
it
an
all-or-nothing
thing,
whether
they're,
a
single
individual
or
what
there
were
on
the
family,
the
whole
family
under
our
plan
and
any
combination
wants
to
move
its
kind
of
either
opt
out
of
all
of
it
or
you
use
it.
However,
you
wanted
use
in
whatever
whether
it's
just
you
and
the
rest
of
the
family
is
on
a
different
plan,
or
you
want
to
have
yourself
and
and
the
family
on
the
plan.
We
kind
of
just
did
an
all
or
nothing,
nothing.
Okay,.