►
From YouTube: July 9, 2019 AF City Council Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
C
C
We
have
had
this
agenda
posted
on
state
website
in
various
places
throughout
this
the
city,
and
we
will
follow
the
agenda
as
outlined.
We
will
begin
with
the
Pledge
of
Allegiance,
after
which
we'll
have
an
invocation
by
councilmember
Christiansen
and
then
I
will
conduct
the
roll
call.
If
everybody
would.
C
C
Shelton
here
councilmember
Christensen
here.
Thank
you
now
move
on
to
the
public
comment
period
time.
If
anybody
would
like
to
address
the
mayor,
the
City
Council,
our
senior
staff,
we
invite
you
to
come
forward.
If
you
please
state
your
name
and
try
well
limited
as
much
as
you
can.
There's
not
a
big
crowd
here
tonight.
So
I,
don't
think
we'll
have
to
worry
about
timing.
So
this
would
be
a
great
time.
F
Nik
Sorenson,
hello,
everybody
we're
very
excited
to
be
on
the
agenda.
So
thank
you
for
accommodating
that
thing.
Scott
for
getting
us
onto
that
agenda
as
well.
I
just
had
some
questions,
I,
don't
know
the
right
forum
for
them,
mayor,
frost
but
related
to
what
was
drafted
and
how
it
applies
to
our
PUD
in
the
turning
over
the
infrastructure.
F
Some
questions
around
some
of
the
specifics
of
how
it
was
drafted
and
how
it
would
potentially
exclude
us
or
not
exclude
us
so
I,
don't
know
if
there's
a
opportunity
to
discuss
that
in
this
meeting
or
another
meeting
just
wanted
to
confirm
that
that
would
work
for
our
PUD
and
had
some
questions
about
that.
So.
D
C
A
C
G
H
F
G
Thanks
for
participating
and
volunteering
to
help
with
some
of
these
events,
and
we
invite
the
community
as
well
there's
still
opportunity
for
our
community
members
to
come
and
participate
and
help
with
some
of
the
events,
and
maybe
councilmember
Carol
will
touch
on
that
as
well
too.
So
that's
all
I
have
okay.
Thank.
E
H
Man
just
really
excited
about
the
fourth
of
July
had
a
neighborhood
knocked
on
my
door.
We
were
talking
a
little
bit
on
the
4th
and
she
mentioned
how
great
it
is
to
live
in
a
community
where
it's
just
celebrated
and
really
felt
patriotic
and
in
hometown
and
a
lot
of
stuff.
We
talked
about
about
the
nude
boards
really
came
out
in
that
conversation.
H
So
how
true
that
is,
as
far
as
still
days
goes,
the
only
portion
that
you
know
one
of
my
committees
have
is
the
garden
tour
so
put
a
little
plug
in
there
for
the
Beautification
Committee
I.
Believe
all
the
addresses
are
in
the
on
the
website
and
in
the
magazine
as
well.
I've
always
gone
and
found
great
insights
into
that
one
year.
There
was
a
guy
that
was
really
making
a
salad
ate
because
he
was
cooking,
some
kind
of
a
meat
on
a
grill
or
something
like
that.
H
A
Had
one
thing
originally,
and
that
was
just
that
I
was
able
to
attend
the
concerts
in
the
park
last
night
and
I
was
there
last
the
week
before
it
was
amazing.
How
often
it
can
rain
in
July
in
Utah
on
Monday
evening,
and
it
really
threatened
again
last
night,
but
we
were
able
to
do
it.
They
had
three
lovely
young,
ladies,
that
did
a
wonderful
job
last
night,
the
group
the
week
before
did
a
wonderful
job.
A
I
A
That
one
should
be
really
good.
This
coming
Monday
they're,
just
good
performances,
all
the
time.
They've
they've
done
a
good
job,
putting
that
together,
Barbara
Mintz
and
the
Americana
I'll
just
say
that
I
did
go
up
there
and
I
thought
it
was
very
well
done.
There
were
a
lot
of
people
there
that
were
participating.
There
were
some
good
vendors
and
different
things,
and
she.
A
It
is
still
growing,
but
I
think
they
learned
their
lesson.
You
don't
compete
with
the
Lehigh
roundup
parade
I
think
was
afraid
that
night
or
something
and
it
it
just
doesn't
work
so
I'm
glad
to
hear
they're
looking
at
a
different
night,
but
again
just
it's
just
something
that
is
one
of
the
many
things
that
are
happening
in
this
city
that
are
so
good.
So.
J
Have
been
able
to
even
if
it's
not
your
relaxing,
to
sit
in
a
cool
Park,
it's
gotta
be
our
cool.
It's
Park
in
the
city
as
far
as
I
mean
cool
as
in
temperature,
but
it
is
also
very
awesome,
but
it's
just
really
relaxing
you
can
go
and
there's
no
pressure.
You
can
sit
wherever
you
want
and
you
can
see
it's
like.
It's
just
really
nice.
J
Just
talk
about
a
couple
of
different
events,
so
we
start
Friday
and
go
all
the
way
through
next
Saturday.
So
it's
a
really
long
event:
Miss
America
Fork
pageant
is
this
Friday
and
that
is
new
to
have
it.
During
the
still
days
of
events,
they
are
very
excited
to
be
happening
this
week.
Another
a
couple
of
new
things
is
the
barbecue
cook-off
is
happening.
J
This
Saturday,
it's
going
to
be
in
the
same
Park
as
the
car
show,
only
separated
it's
going
to
be
in
the
baseball
diamonds,
and
that's
a
new
event
for
this
year
should
be
very
exciting.
I
think
we
have
a
number
of
people
who
have
signed
up
to
compete
and
you
can
go
and
watch
them
and
the
judges
are
judging
that
afternoon
at
3
o'clock.
J
Let's
see
on
one
of
our
new
events
is
next:
Tuesday
is
a
kid's
splash
night
from
4
to
8
p.m.
and
that's
going
to
be
at
the
fitness
center
Pony
Express
baseball
field.
That
one
is
for
kids,
but
kids
of
any
age
can
come
and
play
and
they
have
a
dunk
tank
they're,
looking
for
notable
people
that
can
be
dunked
in
the
dunk
tape,
so
they
may
ask
you
you,
don't
have
to
say
yes,
but
they
may
ask
you
if
you
know
of
somebody
who
might
people
might
think
is
a
fun
in
there.
J
They
would
probably
like
that.
Pickleball
tournament
is
a
huge
hit.
I
think
it's
full
is
Derek
still
here.
I
think
it
might
be
full
that
is
happening
Wednesday.
What
else
is
really
interesting?
The
the
youth
dance
has
been
moved
to
art
day
park
this
year,
and
that
is
a
great
venue
for
it,
because
they're
already
gonna
have
sound
and
a
stage
and
and
a
screen
that'll
be
really
good.
J
The
parade,
of
course,
is
Saturday
July
20th,
so
not
this
Saturday,
but
the
next
one
and
it
should
be
fantastic,
and
we
always
need
lots
of
help
for
that.
One
I,
just
looking
at
the
website
here
that
he
put
up
I
forgot
to
mention
so
the
chalk
festival
is
happening.
It
didn't
make
into
the
magazine,
but
it
is
going
to
be
happening
as
an
event
and
it
will
be
in
the
parking
lot
across
the
street
as
well
as
the
Harrington
Center
parking
lot.
J
That
should
be
really
cool
if
they
can
get
off
the
ground.
That's
new
this
year,
as
well
as
far
as
help
I
would
love
any
help
that
people
have
anybody
asks
you
the
morning
of
the
parade
there
would
be.
We
would
love
to
have
a
few
more
people,
helping
they
we're
a
little
bit
short
and
I.
Don't,
but
people
want
to
go
sleep
in
and
go
watch
the
parade.
I
understand
that,
but
there's
anybody
who
wants
to
help.
J
We
would
love
that
I
cannot
think
of
anything
else,
that
I'm
kind
of
desperate
for
I
think
that's
the
only
one,
the
bounce
houses
so
on
Saturday
during
the
fair
we
have
bounce
houses
for
kids
and
they
can
come
and
it's
free
it's
so
it's
so
great.
It's
one
of
the
only
cities
I've
ever
been
to
that
has
a
fair,
that's
free
like
that,
but
we
need
some
people
to
monitor
the
bounce
houses
to
make
sure
that
the
kids
are
safe.
So
that
is
also
where
we
need
people
and
that's
Saturday
afternoon
from
Forte.
J
B
A
couple
of
things
mayor,
Fox
Hollow,
is
probably
in
the
best
condition
that
I've
seen
it
in
years.
I
mentioned
that
before
still
they
scramble
golf
tournament.
Is
this
Wednesday?
Excuse
me
this
Monday
Monday,
the
15th
I'm,
not
sure
if
there
are
I've
just
inquired
of
a
couple
of
guys
there
if
there
were
still
spots
available
in
that,
but
the
course
is
playing
playing
awesome,
then
looking
really
good
right
now,
so
that
that
is
just
one
of
the
great
events.
We've
had
every.
D
B
Days
and
just
a
plug
for
still
days,
it's
it's
man,
it's
hometown,
it's
community,
and
there
are
so
many
good
things
going
on.
Like
Stacey
talked
about
what
you
know,
the
fair
and
just
activities
that
people
can
come
and
participate
in
that
aren't
going
to
require.
You
know
financial
output
on
all
things
or
to
get
in
that,
and
it's
it's
it's
really.
It
just
feels
right.
It's
it's
a
good
good
thing
to
be
involved
in
so
just
a
plug
for
still
days
and
hope
to
see
a
lot
of
you
there.
That's
all!
Okay,.
I
C
Preface
to
this
big
week
just
want
to
thank
councilmember
Carol
too,
and
the
committee
there's
a
lot
of
worry.
There's
a
lot
of
blood,
sweat
and
tears.
Hopefully
not
tears
of
joy,
but
pulling
off
a
party
for
thousands.
Tens
of
thousands
of
people
for
a
week
takes
a
lot
of
fundraising
and
a
lot
of
coordination
amongst
individuals
and
with
our
fire
and
ambulance,
and
then
city
staff,
and
so
thank
you
before
it
happens
and
because
it
it's
it's
quite
an
effort
so
and
I'll
be
there.
I'm
gonna
try
to
get
everything.
C
I
can
to
just
watch
everybody
smile
wave.
If
we
could
get
a
dollar
for
every
smile
from
still
days,
we
could
fix
our
roads,
I!
Think,
okay,
that's!
The
mayor's
report
will
now
move
on
to
the
common
consent
agenda,
but
note
that
item
number
three:
the
approval
of
the
June
25th
minutes
are
not
in
the
packet
they're
not
prepared,
and
so
we
would
I
need
a
strike
item
number
three.
There's
any
questions
concerning
the
common
consent.
If
not
I'll
entertain
a
motion,
there.
C
E
C
D
E
E
C
K
Mr.
mayor
members
of
the
council,
this
is
a
draft
policy
procedure
for
your
consideration
and
discussion.
As
you
remember,
when
we
had
the
work
session
a
couple
of
weeks
ago,
we
had
talked
about
that
from
time
to
time,
different
homeowners,
associations
or
others
who
have
private
streets
approached
the
city
with
the
request
that
they
be
allowed
to
dedicate
those
those
streets
and
other
infrastructure
to
the
city
for
the
city's
ownership,
operation
and
maintenance,
and
so
we
had
talked
about
a
couple
of
key
principles
and
things
that
you
wanted
to
see
in
terms
of
a
procedure.
K
I
wrote
it
as
a
as
a
procedure.
No
policy
wasn't
quite
sure
how
to
fit
this
into
ordinance,
which
is
I'm,
hoping
one
of
the
things
that
we
can
discuss.
Probably
a
little
bit
a
little
bit
tonight.
I
know
Councilman
Shelton.
You
had
that
question
and
and
I
think
that
probably
should
be
part
of
the
discussion
as
to
exactly
where
how
how
this
should
go
in.
So
this
is
a
draft
of
some
key
principles
based
on
what
believe
we
had
heard
it
rather
than
just
read
through
it
yeah
I
figured.
We
can
discuss
that.
K
Probably
quite
a
bit
as
you
have
questions,
but,
generally
speaking,
the
principle
is,
is
that
the
applicant
will
submit
a
request
to
the
city.
To
start
this
process
will
make
sure
that
they'll
be
required
to
have
a
clear
description
of
what
they're
asking
the
city
to
take
over
and
that
they
have
the
the
applicant
truly
has
the
authority
to
do
so,
whether
it's
the
an
action
of
an
HOA
board
or
some
other
entity,
whoever
it
is
that
is
asking
it.
K
We
try
to
make
this
generally
a
little
bit
more
generic
so
that
it
wasn't
geared
strictly
towards
HOAs.
For
instance,
there
may
be
a
commercial
subdivision
where
there
is
no
HOA,
but
the
businesses
on
the
streets
want
to
do
the
same
thing.
So
that's
way
it's
a
little
more
generic,
then
the
in
short
the
process
would
be.
We
would
do
an
investigation.
We
would
look
at
the
condition
of
the
infrastructure
based
on
a
lot
of
the
different
criteria.
K
I
have
here
listed
the
things
that
we
would
look
for
and
then
I
would
be
required
as
a
city
engineer,
to
prepare
a
report
summarizing
my
findings.
That
I
would
then
bring
to
you,
along
with
a
recommendation,
the
HOA
or
the
I
should
say.
The
applicant
would
then
be
required
to
bring
everything
up
to
the
current
city
standard,
the
standard
as
it
as
it
sit
at
the
time
of
application.
K
K
Looking
at
this
process,
and
and
in
the
discussion
we
had
with
the
council
and
in
the
work
session
a
couple
of
weeks
ago,
I
got
a
general
sense
of
feel
that
we,
the
council,
was
supportive
of
eddington
estates
and
what
they
wanted
to
do,
and
one
of
the
things
that
at
least
I
should
say
the
only
one
that
I'm
aware
of
where
I
know
they
don't
meet.
Current
city
standard
is
the
street
with
street
the
width
of
the
pavement
and
right
now,
the
public
street
standard
is
34
feet
of
asphalt.
K
They
have
32
feet
of
asphalt,
and
so
it
it
I
wanted
to.
In
discussion
with
David,
we
talked
about
well.
What
do
we
do
here,
because
we
got
a
general
sense
from
the
council
of
support
for
eddington
estates
and
it
kind
of
leaves
two
basic
options,
which
is
don't
make
them
comply
with
city
standard
and
write
this
such
that
it
wouldn't
or
look
at
changing
the
city
standard.
K
So
following
david's
direction,
that
I
know
he'd
spoken,
at
least
with
a
couple
of
you:
we're
running
that
process
to
change
the
city
standard
from
34
feet
of
asphalt
to
32
feet
of
asphalt.
That
process
needs
to
go
through
the
Planning
Commission,
and
so
that
is
on
the
agenda
for
their
meeting
next
week,
along
with
the
rest
of
the
things
that
we
talked
about
in
the
work
session,
which
would
obliterate
the
private
street
standards.
K
So,
if
recommended
by
the
Planning
Commission,
then
adopted
by
the
City
Council
at
your
next
regular
session,
there
would
be
no
such
thing
than
as
a
private
street
standard
anymore.
All
new
subdivisions
that
would
come
in
would
need
to
comply
with
the
the
current
or
I
should
say
the
new
public
street
standard,
which
would
be
32
feet
of
asphalt
within
a
60,
two-foot,
right-of-way
and
again
I'm
talking
lope.
These
are
local
roads,
so
the
current
standard
is
64
and
34.
K
K
K
H
Course
I
wanted
to
bring
that
out
and
with
that
I,
just
real
quick
sure
on
that
topic.
If
the
water
lines
are
owned
by
the
city,
but
the
road
is
privately
owned,
water
leak
we
go
in,
we've
got
to
cut
into
the
road
correct,
we
do
a
patch,
they
come
back
and
say,
and
that
was
a
shoddy
piece
of
work.
You
know
what
I
mean
sure.
G
H
K
The
condition
that
I
would
suggest
would
be
on
that
that,
if,
if
somebody
is
wanting
to
dedicate
just
the
water,
make
sure
that
that's
a
city-owned
water
line
but
still
keep
that
one
of
a
couple
of
requirements,
I
would
would
ask
for
and
there's
three
that
that
I
have
I
have
not
read
this
here,
and
that
is
maybe
something
we
should
I
should
add.
But
my
three
recommendations
would
be
number.
One
is
the
same
thing.
Those
water
lines
need
to
comply
with
current
city
standard
number
two.
K
They
need
to
have
all
obstructions
if
there
are
any
removed
and
that's
because
I
know
of
a
couple
places
where
that
is
the
case.
That's
why
I'm
into
that,
and
then
three
perhaps
is
the
most
important.
Is
that
there'd
be
a
dedicated
utility
easement,
giving
us
enough
room
to
work
within
the
street,
the
private
street
or
private
driveway,
whatever
it
may
be,
to
maintain
that
infrastructure?
And
what
that
does?
Is
that
means
legally?
We
actually
don't
even
have
to
replace
it.
Now
we're
not
typically
gonna
and
correct
me
I,
don't
mean
a
sate
legal
stuff.
K
That's
what
I've
been
told
prior,
not
by
this
attorney
but
by
many
attorneys
other,
is
that
when
you
have
an
easement,
you
have
the
right
to
get
in
there
and
do
what
you
need
to
do
and
you
are
not
legally
obligated
to
restore
it
back
the
way
it
was
in
fact.
In
this
case
you
can't
because
when
you
cut
the
road,
as
you
said,
it
doesn't,
and
maybe
I
should
quit
trying
to
speak
on
the
law.
But
that's
been
my
understanding
on
the
FIR
Tim
on
that,
but
we
would.
K
B
D
B
So
where
you
say
we
have
that
easement
we
don't
even
have
to
repair.
Well,
certainly
we're
going
to
repair
it,
but
if
it's
substandard
by
that
PUD,
then
why
wouldn't
we
say
we
will
come
in
and
make
those
repairs
on
that
waterline.
But
the
surface
is
yours,
and
so
you
would
have
that
responsibility
with
that
and.
H
H
We
have
sewer,
I'm,
sorry,
storm
drain
issues
to
go
right
to
the
middle
of
people's
backyards
and
we're
still
trying
to
figure
it
out
as
that
public
or
private,
or
how
that
works,
and
so
I
was
kind
of
under
the
impression
we
wanted
more
clear-cut,
it's
either
all
or
not,
because
you
get
into
these
hairy
opportunities.
I
can
see
where
you're
coming
from
for
fire
protection,
strict.
H
I,
don't
if
there's
another
way
around
that
that
you
know
we
kind
of
do
that
on
the
storm
drain
with
PU
DS,
that
if
we
feel
that
that
storm
drain
is
deficient,
then
the
city
has
the
right
to
go
in
and
make
the
repair
due
to
Public
Safety
because
of
potential
flooding
issues
and
then
the
develop
the
homeownership
has
to
pay
or
reimburse
the
city
back.
For
that
repair
wondering
if
that
might
be
something
where
we
can
say
hey.
H
You
still
have
private
water
lines,
but
if
we
know
there's
a
deficiency
that
exists,
we
can
go
test
the
hydrant,
it's
not
giving
water.
We
give
you
60
days
to
make
that
repair
or
we're
coming
in
and
doing
that
for
public
safety
and
then
handing
you
the
bill
to
the
HOA
seems
to
me
to
be
more
clear
than
maybe
this
easements
and
things
of
that
nature.
I,
don't
know
my.
K
Concern
I'm
really
concerned
about
private
lines
and
private
fire
hydrants
and
requiring
an
HOA
or
there's
a
lot
of
churches
in
the
area
that
have
hydrants
around
them.
Schools,
etc.
They're,
just
mostly
not
in
the
business
of
understanding,
how
to
maintain
a
hydrant
or
and
to
make
sure
it's
in
good
working
condition.
So.
K
Probably
and
the
lines
leading
to
it
and
that's
where
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
gray
area
and
that's
I,
think
what
I'm
part
of
what
I'm
getting
at
is.
Is
that
in
a
way
I'm
presenting
to
you
what
I
think
should
be
the
ideal
is,
is
that
and
in
my
opinion,
for
what
it's
worth
I,
don't
like
the
concept
of
having
any
such
animal
as
a
private
fire,
hydrant
I,
don't
think
that
word
should
ever
exist.
I
think
that
should
be
a
city-owned
hydrant
with
a
city-owned.
You
know
we
maintain
it
and
that
way.
K
We're
sure
that
that
fire
hydrant
is
safe.
It's
operable
if
it
gets
rough,
it
gets
damaged.
We
replace
it
that
way.
The
fire
department
can
know
without
ever
any
doubt
that
that
fire
hydrant
is
good
and
I.
I'm
also
concerned,
then
about
I
know
how
to
us
to
call
but
hopscotch
infrastructure,
where
something
is
private
than
public
and
in
private
and
in
public.
So
we're
going
from
a
public
system
through
a
private
water
line
to
a
public
hydrant
that
concerns
me
as
well.
I
think
it
should
be
generally
speaking
with
water.
K
Everything
should
be
public
public
public
all
up
and
tie
it
till
the
time
it
hits
a
water
major
somewhere
and
that
water
meters,
that
line
of
demarcation,
where
everything
downstream
is
private,
not
ours,
at
all.
Everything,
upstream
of
that
that
way,
it's
clear
we're
selling
you
water
at
this
point
well,
going
up
to
a
hydrant.
You
never
hit
a
meter
ever
so
this
is
again
my
opinion.
K
J
K
There
are
a
few
so
really
I'm,
focusing
on
the
water
and
mostly
I'm
thinking
focusing
on
the
water
simply
because
of
the
firefighting
aspect
of
it.
So
if
there's
just
a
focus
on
the
water
there,
there
are
a
few
but
very
few
places
in
the
city
where
those
fire
hydrants
are
clearly
private,
because
it's
going
through
a
meter
somewhere.
K
There
are,
of
course,
many
more
places
where
it's
very
clear:
it's
public,
because
it's
a
public
street
everything,
but
there
are
a
lot
of
places
where
it
never
hits
a
meter
and
it's
going
through
a
private
street
and
there's
no
easement,
there's
nothing
in
place.
So
at
that
point
whose
line
is
it
and
that's
where
I
think
it's
a
little
gray
and
that
kind
of
makes
me
the
engineering
me
a
little
nervous
and
that
I
don't
know?
Is
that
my
our
line
to
maintain
or
not?
K
Is
that
our
hydrant
to
maintain
or
not?
My
suggestion
is
I
think
it
should
be,
but
I
think
some
things
need
to
change
to
make
it
clear.
An
official
dedication
to
the
city
of
those
water
lines
and
hydrants
with
the
conditions
I
mentioned,
is
what
I
think
is
a
good
idea,
but
again,
this
is
not
my
call.
It's
just
my
suggestion.
E
L
D
L
L
D
L
And
I
agree
with
Scott
the
one
exception,
the
roads
and
all
that
you
know
if
they
don't
meet
the
specs,
but
the
water,
the
city
should
own.
Like
Scott
said
the
meter
downstream
is
theirs.
Everything
else
is
the
city's,
because
we
absolutely
know
they
work
they
function
and
if
they
don't,
we
can
fix
them.
H
I'm
just
trying
to
think
here
and
maybe
I'm
going
too
far
off
the
topic
here,
so
you
guys
sometimes
that
happens.
Pull
me
back,
but
I
see
two
possible
solutions.
One
is
what
Scott
is
presented
and
saying:
hey
we've
got
this
easement
that
goes
over.
The
other
is
something
we're
already
doing
with
the
storm
drain,
and
that
is,
if
we
see
a
deficiency,
you
get
a
fix-it
ticket
for
60
days.
You
don't
fix
it.
H
We're
gonna
come
in
and
fix
it
on
our
own
I,
like
the
latter,
because
you're
testing,
all
the
five
hydrants
anyway
right
and
I,
think
you
said
of
a
year
ago,
one
in
a
year
and
you're
testing,
all
those
hydrants.
So
we
have
a
deficiency.
We
passed
that
buck
right
onto
that
HOA
and
they've
got
60
days
to
idiot.
They
don't
then.
H
Can
get
involved
and
take
care
of
it,
but
that
gets
us
out
of
this
whole
easement
conversation
and
repair
and
I
kind
of
like
that,
to
a
certain
extent,
because
I
think
there's
more
issues
that
exist
from
a
I
put
this
the
right
way
procedure
beside
takes
more
time
for
you
to
go
ahead
and
J
to
go
out
and
fix
that
and
to
worry
about
the
HOA.
Do
the
repair
get
all
these
easements
in
place
on
all
these
private
ones?
That
already
exist
right
so.
D
K
Maybe
add
a
couple
pieces
of
information,
just
so
you're
aware
to
is,
is
I've
already
directed
my
staff
for
all
new
subdivisions
coming
in
wherein
they
have
requested
private
streets,
thou
shalt
make
them
dedicate
a
utility
easement,
and
it's
written
clearly
on
the
plant
and
everywhere
who
owns
that
line
where
those
easements
are
so
just
once.
You
know
that
new
ones
going
forward
we're
already
doing
that
right
now,
it's
of
course
the
question
of
these
old
ones.
K
B
Pd
and
Stacey
just
raised
the
question
that
I
had
earlier
is:
if
we
changed
this
and
the
road
standard
now
becomes
32
feet,
I
mean
that's
one,
less
reason:
even
half
peds
are
we
required
by
law
to
have
a
PN
PUD
option?
Why
couldn't
we
just?
Why?
Couldn't
we
just
stop
pee-yew
T's
and
those
that
exist,
then
they
they
have
to
subscribe
to
this
thing,
but
I
have
a
point
with
that
after
Tim
answers.
This
question.
M
So
I'm
not
aware
of
any
statute
that
says
we
have
to
the
statues,
allow
them
and
all
cities
do
so.
We
would
be
doing
something.
Creative
I
would
want
some
time
to
study
it,
and
then
we
would
have
to
have
a
work
session
or
two
and
look
at
whether
we
would
like
to
proceed
in
that
direction.
If
that's
the
council's
intent.
H
N
B
D
B
Of
the
complete
request,
the
seat
engineer
will
conduct
an
administrative
review
of
the
infrastructure.
I
would
like
to
have
that
be
a
checklist
so
that
that
whoever
that
city
engineer
is
or
city
administrator
city
engineer,
so
that
it's
not
based
on
preference.
It's
not
they
don't
the
the
PUD.
The
petitioner
does
not
feel
like
they've
got
to
get
a
special
favor
or
they're
getting
treated
poorly
I
would
love
for
it
to
be
as
black
and
white
as
possibly
make
it.
So
there
is
no
ambiguity.
B
Okay,
you
meet
this
or
you
don't
and
then,
if
you
don't,
we
have
something
like
we
have
with
the
Board
of
adjustments
where
this
is
an
extenuating
circumstance
and
you
need
to
be
able
to
come
in
and
and
go
through
a
procedure
like
that.
It
seems
to
me
like
we
would
be
best
served
with
something
like
that.
These
guys
are
prepared
to
come
in
and
they're
prepared
to
come
in
right
now
and
could.
B
B
D
B
D
H
Would
agree
with
that
I
kind
of
like
we
use
with
a
conditional
use
permit
you
got
to
check
off
on.
It
was
up
in
South,
Salt
Lake,
helping
a
friend
try
to
get
a
conditional
use
permit
done
and
man
it
was
full
of
ambiguity.
It
was
all
about
staffs
opinion
and
the
problem
we
had
is
the
initial
person
that
reviewed
it
on
staff
gave
their
approval
but
went
to
their
supervisor.
H
It
was
a
different
flavor
of
ice
cream
that
they
preferred
and
now
they're
going
back
and
redoing
engineering,
because
someone
else
didn't
didn't
like
it
and
so
I
was
like
man.
Is
this
really
a
conditional
use
permit?
Because
for
me,
that
usually
was
just
it's
administrative?
You
meet
this
requirement.
This
requirement
this
requirement
so
I'd
agree
with
that,
and
one
thing
I
thought
about
on
that
too.
That
I
had
experience
in
South
Salt
Lake
in
a
few
other
cities
is
to
have
a
time
frame
count.
D
H
D
H
There's
a
way
to
say:
hey
upon
a
complete
packet
being
filed
within
90
days,
it's
presented
to
the
council
or
something
of
a
time
frame.
So
it
gives
someone
an
understanding
that
hey,
if
they're,
trying
to
get
things
done,
they
could
do
it
and
hopefully,
within
90
days,
that
gives
staff
time
to
be
able
to
review
it,
find
the
time
on
a
council
agenda
to
be
able
to
have
it.
So
there's
only
things
I
would
add
to
a
Clark
Convention.
So.
K
B
K
B
L
J
So
that
actually
got
segues
into
what
I
was
gonna
say,
and
it
says
that
the
that
must
mean
all
of
the
city
standards,
but
the
city
standards
at
different
times
have
been
different.
Things
I
think
it
might
reduce
ambiguity
if
we
actually
just
put
a
number
instead
of
saying
study
standards,
because
it
might
change
in
the
future
as
well,
and
maybe
it's
better
for
us
to
just
specify
current.
K
Of
the
challenges
is
right
now
have
been
going
through
a
lot
of
the
city
codes
and
re
looking
at
things
and
so
like
even
the
one
that
I've
just
was
talking
about,
where
I'm
eliminating
the
private
street
standard
I
had
to
go
to
I.
Think
six
different
places
to
do
that,
because
things
just
spread
and
I
can't
look
you
in
the
eye
and
say
I
didn't
miss
one
somewhere,
sometimes
I
love
to
refer
to
one
thing
in
state
standards
in
one
place
and
then
refer
to
it
everywhere
else.
K
G
B
It
easier
on
the
applicant-
and
you
know
some
of
us
remember
how
bad
it
was
before
where
developers
would
come
in
wait.
A
second
I
just
went
in
and
I
just
got
beat
up
on
this,
and
now
it's
changed
that
that
era
is
over
thankfully,
and
I.
Just
I
just
want
to
make
it
super
clean
for
you
super
clean
for
the
applicant
and
and
go
I
just
you
know
what
no
one
should
be
on
the
hook
for
a
city
ordinance.
It
ought
to
be
a
city
ordinance,
I'm
I'm
here
as
an
employee
serving
you
the.
B
H
J
K
When
Eddington
estates
came
in
a
DA
was
the
standard
in
four
public
streets,
so
if
they
were
doing,
if
they
had
come
in
at
there
when
they
came
in
at
the
time,
if
they
had
requested
public
streets,
they
would
have
had
to
have
put
in
those
ramps.
One
of
the
things
about
the
private
streets
was,
it
was
a
loophole
to
get
around
a
lot
of
things,
including
a
DA.
K
H
K
Yes,
yes,
and
no,
yes,
the
second
part
of
what
you
said
that,
yes,
when
we
do
major
roadwork
and
that's
a
little
bit
ambiguous,
I'm,
sorry
from
the
federal
government
that
and
through
the
state
that,
when
you're,
using
state,
and/or
federal
money
to
do
major
road
projects,
you
do
have
to
make
that
road
ad
a
compliant.
But
it's
it's.
It's
not
true
to
say
that
we
don't
ever
have
to
fix
the
ones
that
are
out
there
that
we're
not
doing
a
major
road.
We
will
eventually
have
to
do
so.
K
The
FHWA,
which
gives
a
lot
of
grant
money,
controls
a
lot
of
the
regulations
and
regulates
a
lot
of
the
State
Department's
of
Transportation
has,
in
recent
years,
really
mostly
in
the
last
five
years,
been
requiring
State
Department's
of
Transportation
to
require
cities
who
ever
use
federal
money
ever
in
their
life
to
develop,
what's
called
an
ad
a
transition
plan.
Now
the
good
thing
is
this
is
where
ambiguity
is,
helps
us
a
little
bit.
Is
they
didn't
say
when
they
didn't
say
what
the
plan
had
to
say,
but
you
had
to
have
a
plan.
K
So
back
in
my
previous
city,
we
developed
a
plan
and
you
you
know
you
want
to
talk
about
being
a
weasel.
I
can
be
a
weasel
and
some
of
the
weasel
words
that
I
put
there
in
terms
of
will
work
on
this
and
look
on
that.
And
if
you
looked
at
said
a
it
sounded
like
a
great
plan
and
it
didn't
have
a
lot
of
commitments.
We
have
an
ad
a
transition
plan
here.
It
probably
needs
to
be
tightened
up.
H
K
H
K
D
H
K
H
D
H
H
H
K
I
H
Not
gonna
do
that
until
we
go
in
and
do
a
major
road
repair
on
that
road,
which
makes
economic
sense
of
when
to
do
that
right,
because
you're
already
tearing
up
the
road
to
a
certain
extent,
so
keep
tearing
up
that
concrete
at
the
same
time,
that
makes
more
sense
to
me
than
going
into
a
nice
new
development,
making
these
ugly
saw
cuts
and
going
back
and
retrofitting
something
to
me
that
deteriorates
the
quality
of
the
the
product.
That's
already
there
just
to
conform
with
the
federal.
H
I
you
know
ata,
is
there
I
want
to
respect
it
and
it's
there
for
a
good
reason?
But
if
you
ever
got
that
problem
throughout
the
city-
and
this
has
a
15
year-
RSL
life
on
it-
maybe
your
10
is
when
we're
doing
that
major
repair.
So
we've
got
about
ourselves
10
more
years
of
not
having
to
make
and
I'm
guessing.
They
have
to
turn
to
the
roadway
as
well
to
make
those
ATA
ramps
compliant
because
you've
got
a
hard
fall
of
3
inches
or
whatever
it
is
I.
H
K
Shelton
I'm
in
and
I
hope
you
don't
mind
me
just
pushing
back
a
little
bit,
but
the
only
thing
that
I
would
be
concerned
about
and
is
most
of
the
sidewalks
that
are
in
town
that
are
not
a
DA
compliant
or
at
least
a
huge
proportion
of
them
were
built
before
a
DA
ever
existed.
And
while
we
know
that
we
at
some
point
have
to
upgrade
those
as
I
said,
the
the
FHWA
and
so
forth
has
given
us
a
very
loosey-goosey
grace
period.
K
If
you
will
and
and
that's
the
good
part
this
these
sidewalks
were
clearly
built
after
a
da,
we,
the
city,
allowed
them
to
be
built.
That
way.
The
way
it
got
in
was
it
was
big
care
to
declared
a
private
street,
and
now,
if
we
take
it
in
I,
I'm,
not
I'm
worried,
that's
a
different
situation
than
a
sidewalk
that
was
built
40
years
ago.
K
D
H
G
H
I,
take
a
look
at
that
and
say
it
doesn't
make
economic
benefit
to
us
as
a
city
just
to
comply
with
a
federal,
I'd
love
to
use
your
Wiesel
eNOS.
As
you
mentioned
it
to
say,
hey
they
came
under
the
private.
Now
we
accepted
it.
It's
now
part
of
our
plan
to
go
back
when
there's
a
maze,
Road
issue.
But
if
you
look
percentage-wise,
we
fixed
X
amount
throughout
the
city
over
X
number
of
years
to
comply
with
your
federal
regulations
and.
E
C
Guessing
there's
nobody
in
the
area:
that's
that's
handicapped!
In
a
wheelchair,
because
that
wouldn't
fly
in
my
street,
not
in
a
minute,
because
we've
got
people
wheelchairs
and
they
and
they
couldn't.
They
would
have
to
literally
enter
the
road
and
come
on
to
some
kind
of
an
approach
in
a
dangerous
way.
Well,.
H
In
in
our
neighborhood
that
at
one
time
was
five
kids
in
wheelchairs
in
our
neighborhood,
you
look
at
Val,
Vista
Park.
We
got
the
ad
a
ramp,
but
it
goes
nowhere.
It
goes
to
grass
never
tried
moving
a
wheelchair
and
the
playground
equipment
is
clear
on
the
other
side
of
the
park
altogether.
So
it
was
great
that
we
complied
with
the
federal
law,
but
in
the
application
of
allowing
the
use
of
the
park,
there's
no
sidewalk,
which
is
ironic,
because
we
require
the
other
side
to
all
have
sidewalk,
but
we
didn't
follow
our
own.
D
H
B
Let's
remember
when
we
were
closing
off
that
road
on
Fleming
and
everyone
know:
Harry's
granddaughter
lived
there
and
they
didn't
have
sidewalks
and
she
was
paralyzed
and
in
a
wheelchair,
I
mean
we
have
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
things
like
this.
That
are
critical
and-
and
you
know
everyone's
concerned
with
economy
and
making
these
things
and
roads
are
such
a
big
issue,
but
I
I
feel
like
honestly.
It
does
make
sense
what
what
councilman
Sheldon
is
saying.
It
does
make
sense
to
do
it
right
and
then,
as
that
construction
comes
in,
we
can.
B
We
can
go
in
and
do
that.
I
really
honestly
do
I
know
that
doesn't
probably
hold
water
with
the
government
or
the
FHWA
I,
don't
know,
but
it's
almost
a
chance
we
have.
We
have
to
take
because
we're
talking
about
all
of
these
other
things
and
waterways
not
being
private
anymore
and
having
a
set.
So
we
can
provide
public
safety
to
everyone.
That's
in
our
city,
that's
that's!
B
Even
more
critical
and
and
so
I
think
we
need
a
I
think
we
need
to
give
birth
to
this
thing
and
kind
of
get
going,
and
these
guys
need
to
be
able
to
know
how
to
act
by
the
end
of
July
if
they
have
that
road
resurface
whatever
they
do.
You
know
those
kind
of
things
that
I
think
I
think
we're
close
enough,
particularly
for
changing
this
standard.
I,
don't
know
when
that
goes
before
planning
your
mission.
B
So
you
know
it
seems
to
me
like:
if
we
can,
we
can
make
these
adjustments
that
we
talked
about
I,
don't
think
we
can
address
the
AEA
issue
specifically
for
this
in
this,
can
we
other
than
when
those
changes
are
made?
You
know
I,
don't
know,
I,
don't
know
what
the
proper
language
for
thats
going
to
be,
but
I
don't
think
that
should
hold
this
so.
H
So
there's
two
dots
I
agree
moving
forward.
The
other
thought
I
had
is
I,
went
back
and
reviewed
those
minutes.
We
kept
talking
about
adopting
an
ordinance,
not
a
policy
procedure
and
sent
an
email
out
and
the
eight
years
I've
been
on
the
council.
I've
never
seen
a
policy
procedure
adopted
outside
of
an
employee
manual.
I,
don't
know
if
we
have
a
policy
procedure.
D
H
Public
Works
doesn't
even
exist,
we're
just
going
to
be
page
one
of
the
policy
procedure
manual.
What
the
reason
why
I,
like
the
ordinance
side
of
things,
is
it's
built
right
into
code
and
it's
online
at
muni
code.
Anyone
goes
in
and
and
I'm
mature
Nick
can
attest.
He's
probably
read
that
thing
on
PU
DS
and
read
other
cities
and
things
of
that
nature
and
I
think
it's
more
transparent
to
people
versus
buried
in
a
policy
procedure
manual
somewhere
and
it
may
hold
a
little
more
weight
to
I
guess,
maybe
not
wait.
D
H
I
would
make
it
contingent
on
that
coming
back
through
an
ordinance
that
makes
those
changes
at
the
road
wits
and
everything
going
before
the
Planning
Commission,
but
by
adopting
this
tonight,
hopefully
that
doesn't
hold
up
them
from
starting
an
application
and
putting
it
in
with
the
city
and
moving
forward
on
that
to
try
to
be
more
efficient
with
time
because
they
can't
get
approval
anyway
until
that
ordinance
comes
back
through
on
the
roads
right.
That's.
H
H
H
Just
saying
core
samples
will
be
required
and
we
can
put
as
determined
by
the
city
engineer
you,
okay
with
that
Clark.
Yes,
the
other
item
that
I
would
love
to
have
in
there
is
as
we
go
in
and
we
talk
about
the
application
process.
I'd
love
to
put
some
kind
of
a
time
period
on
that
90
days,
something
whatever
that
would
be
I'd
suggest
90
days
so
90
days
after
application
sitting
engineer
will
make
a
report
or
be
before
City
Council
and
then,
after
a
complete,
a
complete
packet
being
being
submitted.
H
H
J
H
H
Never
done
right,
okay,
so
I'll
make
a
motion.
You
guys
help
me
if
I
forget
some
of
this
stuff
to
adopt
the
policy
procedure
with
a
condition
that
will
be
put
in
an
ordinance
format
and
brought
back
before
the
council
with
the
following
changes
that
we
add
the
city
engineer
where
it
says
city
engineer
or
his
designee
we
come
back
and
put
instead
of
may
require
core
samples.
B
H
C
H
M
What
I
think
I
would
prefer,
rather
than
saying
except
a
DA,
is
to
allow
the
council
to
have
some
discretion
to
impose
the
88
requirements
where
it
makes
sense,
so
that
I
can
understand
why
you
might
defer
in
some
instances
a
DA
compliance,
but
there.
If
you
exempt
everybody,
then
you
could
never
say
to
a
future
applicant.
Oh,
we
need
you
to
be
a
DA
compliant
and
they
say
so.
You
can't.
H
H
Here's
my
policy
procedure.
This
really
doesn't
have
any
effect.
In
my
mind:
it's
not
a
city
code.
It's
not
a
resolution.
It's
just
just
saying:
hey
here's,
some
thoughts
that
we
have,
but
it
really
isn't
legally
binding.
My
hope
by
adopting
it
tonight,
is
giving
direction
to
staff
on
some
clarification
and
hopefully
allowing
them
to
start
that
process
of
the
application
with
city
staff.
So
when
it
comes
back
from
Planning
Commission,
we
got
a
complete
packet,
we
can
approve
it
and
they
can
move
forward.
E
F
F
F
K
So
at
least
two
I
wanted
you
to
see
what
the
thought
was
as
Dave
and
I
worked
on.
This
is,
if
you
look
at
the
the
one
above
we're
saying.
First
of
all,
things
must
comply
with
city
standard.
So
let's,
let's
talk
about
a
pipe.
For
instance,
let's
say
you
know
an
8
inch
pipe
does
comply,
but
a
4
inch
pipe
doesn't
so
we
thought.
Well,
that's
good.
You
want
to
make
sure
it's
in
well
what,
if
that
8
inch
pipe
when
it
was
put
in
complies,
but
now
has
since
sprung.
K
Eight
leaks
in
the
last
year
then
something's
wrong
with
it
sure
it
complies
with
the
standard,
but
it's
in
a
terrible
condition.
So
I
understand
where
you're
saying
you
don't
want
it
to
be
as
determined
by
the
city
engineer,
but
there's
got
to
be.
Have
the
ability,
as
a
city
is
use
the
staff
based
on
my
recommendation
to
say
it
may
have
complied
with
standard?
It
may
have
had
the
right
width
of
Road
or
the
right
size
of
pipe,
but
it's
falling
apart.
We
don't
want
it.
H
H
K
Is
so
if
you
look
a
little
bit
further
down
I,
we
have
some
of
that
in
there.
So,
if
you
look
at
like
number,
five
drainage
systems
must
be
inspected
by
the
city.
Engineer
sure
ensure
that
they've
been
properly
maintained
and
are
fully
functional
operational,
so
we'll
actually
physically
look
in
those
drains
as
best
we
can
and
and
view
them
six.
The
culinary
water
must
be
inspected
and
tested
to
ensure
they've
been
maintained.
K
So
what
we
had
in
mind
at
that
point
is
literally
having
Jay
and
his
crew
go
turn
the
valves
make
sure
the
valves
turn
open.
The
hydrants
make
sure
things
flow.
You
know
look
at
leak
records
all
those
things
that
to
make
a
judgement
yep
all
the
pipe
valves
turn
all
the
hydrants
work.
It's
acceptable
condition
the
next
one
would
be
the
the
last
ones.
The
sanitary
sewer
saying
you
got
to
go
video.
It
run
a
camera
up.
The
sanitary
sewer
see
what
we
see
are
we
seeing
inflow
outflow.
K
B
H
J
B
B
H
F
D
H
K
And
that's
where
it
kind
of
comes
back
to
what
I
was
saying
earlier
is,
is
where
I
think
it's
a
little
bit
gray.
This
action
of
accepting
them
would
clear
that
up
which
I
think
would
be
really
helpful,
because
I
think
they
should
be
and
I've
mentioned
in
the
work
session.
I
think
they
should
be
public
sewers
in
their
subdivision,
but
I
don't
know.
Is
it
because
it's
not
in
City
property,
it's
on
private
property
and
we
don't
have
an
easement
to
get
onto
that
private
property
to
do
anything
in
there.
B
K
C
H
Vent
equipment,
in
my
mind,
if
there's
a
question
of
it,
I
would
rather
have
us
err
on
the
side
that
it's
public,
so
we
don't
have
to
go
back
and
start
going
through.
Can
you
can
imagine
the
headache
going
through
and
working
with
all
these
HOAs
to
determine
where
it's
at
I'd
rather
have
kind
of
this
policy?
And
if
it's
not
clear-cut,
let's
say
it's
public?
H
H
H
K
H
F
H
H
H
K
F
K
The
core
samples
you're
not
have
nothing
to
do
with
RSL.
Really
all
we're
looking
for
in
the
core
sample
is
to
make
sure
that
the
contractor
didn't
cheat
on
thickness,
so
the
there
yeah,
no
that
never
have
never
seen
that
happen,
but
so,
if
the
core
samples
were
good,
then
they're
good
now,
so
there
would
not
be
any
need
that
I
could
see
for
ever
doing
another
core
sample
Council,
it's
up
to
you.
If
you
think
I
should
go
and
take
a
look
at.
H
K
It's
probably
not
changed,
much
I
mean
I'm
gonna
need
to
go
out
there
and
want
to
go
out
there
anyways,
because
you
know,
we've
got
to
look
at
some
of
the
rest
of
these
things.
We
Jay
hasn't
turned
the
hydrants.
He
hasn't
turned
the
valves.
We've
done
any
of
that,
and
we
would
need
to
do
all
that
and
put
this
in
a
innocence
in
it
in
a
report
while
we're
out
there
so.
H
F
This
has
already
been
answered,
so
I
don't
want
to
beat
a
dead
horse,
but
in
the
work
session
I
can't
remember
someone
on
the
council
mentioned.
It
would
be
nice
if
there's
a
list
of
requirements,
we
submitted
our
packet
or
whatever,
and
if
we
met
it
it
was
done.
It
didn't
have
to
come
back
for
review
again.
D
M
F
F
C
I
C
E
C
Member
Shelton
by
councilmember
Barnes
hi
council
member
Carol,
councilmember
Taylor.
Okay.
Thank
you
very
much
appreciate
your
patience.
I'm
number
four.
As
a
review
and
action
on
a
resolution
declaring
the
city's
intent
to
use
tax-exempt
financing
for
the
purchase
of
one
brush
truck
and
one
ambulance,
any
questions
for
staff
we
have.
The
chief
we
have
Kyle
here
did.
I
Excuse
me,
so
what
this
ordinance
or
resolution
is
asking
for
is
per
iris
regulations
in
order
to
reimburse
ourselves
with
a
capital
lease
for
these
purchases.
We
need
to
to
pass
a
resolution
stating
we're
going
to
do
so.
We
have
already
gone
out
to
bid
for
the
actual
brush
truck
and
the
ambulance
and
those
are
under
construction
right
now.
However,
we
have
not
done
nothing
with
the
capital
lease
talking
with
a
few
financing
agencies.
They
said
if
you
can
bundle
those
two
together,
it'll
be
a
higher
capital
lease
and
we'll
get
a
better
rate.