►
From YouTube: March 10, 2020 AF City Council Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
I
expect
he'll
be
here
before
the
common
consent
agenda.
Councilmember
Taylor
will
not
be
in
attendance
this
evening,
and
he
has.
Let
me
know
that,
so
we
will
follow
the
agenda
as
outlined.
If
you'd
like
a
copy,
there's
one
in
the
middle
of
the
room
on
the
table,
we'll
begin
with
the
Pledge
of
Allegiance,
it
will
be
followed
by
an
invocation
by
councilmember
Stacey
Carol,
after
which
I
will
conduct
the
roll
call.
We
all
please
stand.
C
Our
dear
Heavenly
Father
we're
grateful
this
day
to
be
come
before
thee
as
members
of
our
city
and
members
as
the
City
Council.
We're
grateful
for
the
opportunity
that
we
have
to
govern
ourselves
and
to
be
guided
by
the
police
bless
us
with
a
spirit
of
cooperation
and
understanding
and
help
us
to
be
guided
in
our
decisions
and
the
name
of
Jesus
Christ,
amen,
amen,.
A
A
D
You
mayor
I
just
had
just
a
couple
things
number
one:
we've
had
an
overwhelming
response
to
our
recreation
program
for
the
soccer
and
we
had
over
a
thousand
youth
in
our
city
sign
up
for
that
program.
It's
a
very
popular
program
and
we're
excited
to
have
that
season
coming
on,
basketball
ended
and
it
was
a
great
season.
Our
recreation
program
really
does
a
tremendous
job
involving
our
youth
in
sports
in
the
city,
and
we
just
appreciate
all
of
our
employees
and
staff
that
take
care
of
our
youth
and
get
them
engaged
in
the
city.
D
D
There's
there's
a
lot
of
seminars
that
the
state
is
putting
on
in
the
health
department.
There
is
a
1-800
number
for
the
Utah
coronavirus
information
hotline.
That's
one,
eight
hundred
four,
five,
six,
seven,
seven
zero
seven,
and
if
you
feel
you
need
more
information
about
the
corona
virus,
you
can
call
that,
but
the
biggest
I
think
the
biggest
takeaway
from
a
lot
of
the
seminars
and
a
lot
of
the
information
we're
getting
is
that
corona
virus
is
is
is
not
as
scary
as
some
people
are
making
it
out
to
be.
D
There's
no
reason
to
go
and
and
stockpile
massive
amounts
of
toilet
paper
or
bottled
water.
But
we
need
to
be
prepared
to
you
know
to
take
care
of
ourselves.
We
may
you
know
if
it
got
to
a
point,
we
would
have
to
maybe
stagger
people's
work
shifts
or
have
people
work
from
home
or
provide
essential
services.
D
Only
these
are
the
types
of
things
we're
talking
about,
just
so
that
our
city
knows
that
we're
we're
we're
looking
at
these
things,
we've
posted
on
social
media
several
times
about
the
about
this,
and
so
I
hope
our
residents
are
getting
the
information
that
they
need
to
be
aware
of
what
they
need
to
do
for
themselves.
So
just
wanted
to
report
on
that
that
that's
definitely
something
we're
looking
into
so
that's
all
I
have
thank.
E
E
F
C
The
first
one
was
that
today,
the
Lone
Peak
Business
Alliance,
which
is
part
of
the
American
Court
Chamber
of
Commerce,
had
the
state
of
the
city
luncheon
for
Alpine,
Highland
and
Cedar
Hills
and
the
mayor's,
or
in
one
case
council
member
reported
on
their
city,
and
it
was
really
interesting
to
hear
what
surrounding
cities
are
taking
as
priorities
and
things
that
are
happening
in
their
cities
and
how
they
fit
into
things
that
we're
doing
so.
I
enjoyed
that
and
they
commented
how
much
they
appreciated
our
chamber
and
how
putting
into
the
Lone
Peak
business.
C
Alliances
is
husband,
a
new
thing
for
them
and
they
really
like
it
I.
Also,
we
had
a
lunch
last
week
with
just
our
normal
learning.
Lunch
with
it
was
called
the
Tri
chamber
lunch,
so
it
was
with
Lehigh
Eagle
Mountain,
American,
Fork,
I'm,
Pleasant,
Grove
and
Lyndon.
So
maybe
we
need
to
change
the
name
to
the
watch,
but
they
had
jeanette
bennett,
who
it
do.
I
get
that
name
right:
Kevin,
yeah,
Jeanette,.
C
At
the
she
was
the
editor
and
founder
of
betta
Valley
magazine,
and
she
told
us
a
little
bit
about
her
experiences.
She
had
some
great
stories
really
good
lots
of
people
attended.
It
was
good
to
hear
from
other
chamber
members
and
other
chambers
and
for
us
to
get
the
their
network.
That
way.
I
also
wanted
to
thank
the
mayor
for
supporting
dr.
Scoresby
and
dr.
pew
for
coming.
I
was
able
to
attend
that,
and
they
had
it
was
a
community
event.
C
They
talked
about
some
things
with
screen
time,
as
well
as
emotional
self
reliance
on
how
to
help
your
family
when
it
was
a
free
event
that
anybody
could
go
to,
and
they
gave
some
great
information
for
helping
our
families.
I
thought
it
was
a
great
thing
to
promote
in
our
community
I,
really
like
that,
and
then
lastly,
I
wanted
to
thank
the
city
staff
for
taking
the
time
for
the
budget.
Retreat.
C
G
G
As
far
as
the
only
report
that
I
have
as
far
as
council
assignments
is
concerned,
is
that
Pleasant
Grove
is
now
officially
part
of
dispatch
that
took
place
on
Sunday
they're
just
contracted
right
now,
so
they
don't
have
a
board
seat
as
they
finalize
the
inner
local
logo,
each
city
and
agency
to
be
adopted
to
bring
them
as
a
full-fledged
member
of
the
inner
local.
So
that
will
come
probably
in
the
next.
It
depends
on
when
the
lawyers
get
everything
figured
out,
but
I'm
guessing
the
next
two
months
somewhere
on
there.
G
So
as
soon
as
I
find
out
metal,
let
you
know,
and
if
we
can
get
that
on
a
agenda
item
for
action,
but
come
with
any
questions
on
it.
Let
me
know,
but
as
part
of
that,
we
did
get
an
update
in
our
last
meeting
about
a
lot.
That's
going
on
legislatively
with
dispatch
I'm
sure
the
Chiefs
could
acknowledge
it
as
they're
discussing
in
the
operations
side
of
things,
there's
a
big
big
push
for
consolidation
across
the
city.
G
Utah
there's
an
issue
with
not
people
calling
911
and
getting
the
right
dispatch
center
and
having
the
dispatch
center
be
fully
staffed.
I,
don't
think
the
dispatch,
centers
and
I,
then
on
the
board
has
been
fully
staffed.
It's
just
like
police
trying
to
find
enough
people
to
be
able
to
serve
on
that.
So
with
Pleasant
Grove
coming
over,
we
were
able
to
get
close
to
being
fully
staffed,
but
still
not
quite
there
yet
they're
looking
at
wage
increases,
I
think
Springville
went
up
$3
an
hour,
and
so
that's
right
and
in
Spanish
works
backyard.
G
So
it's
not
that
more
difficult
of
a
commute
and
Wasatch
has
recently
really
raised
what
they're
paying
dispatchers.
So
as
we're
going
through
our
budget
right
now,
we're
trying
to
see
how
do
we
stay
competitive,
and
so
there
may
be
some
rate
increases,
but
I'll
bring
that
forth.
As
as
we
look
at
that,
but
those
are
kind
of
two
things
is
keeping
an
eye
on
what
legislatively
is
going
on
on
the
hill
and
then
second
of
all,
seeing
what
we
need
to
do
on
the
budget,
so
I
think
so
thanks
man
thank.
A
You
okay!
As
far
as
the
mayor's
report,
I
too
appreciated
the
retreat.
If
I
could
just
paint
the
picture
of
this
retreat
because
I've
seen
it
embellished
on
social
media,
not
this
year
or
last
year,
but
some
might
think
of
a
retreat
that
were
maybe
spending
time
at
the
grand
California
eating
all
kinds
of
crazy
foods
and
stuff.
But
so
it
is
held
at
Fox,
Hollow
golf
course,
because
we
have
ownership
in
that
and
it's
free.
A
The
self-reliance,
emotional
self-reliance
class
I
felt
like
it
was
very
beneficial
I
felt
like
for
me,
I
thought.
If
I
could
write
wine
back
this
clock,
a
little
bit
I
might
been
a
little
more
careful
in
the
way
that
I
handed
my
kids,
the
world
in
a
cell
phone
and
I
have
good
kids.
Don't
get
me
wrong.
I
feel
like
they're,
they're,
good
kids,
but
giving
them
the
finger
tips
there
at
their
fingertips.
Access
to
the
world
is
something
shouldn't
be
taken
like
take
unlikely
and
I
felt
like
that.
A
There
was
good
information
and
it
was.
There
was
some
good
resources
to
follow
that
back
up.
If
people
that
were
there
wanted
to
take
advantage
of
it,
it
was
recorded
and
it
will
have
some
highlights
and
that
will
that
will
be
presented
and
it
will
be
shared
in
its
entirety
throughout
all
the
cities.
If
people
would
like
to
to
review
it
and
be
there
and
participate
in
it,
so
I
felt
like
it
was
very,
very
beneficial.
A
I
had
the
opportunity,
this
last
week
last
week
to
spend
almost
nine
hours
in
CDBG
grant
process
and
be
a
part
of
that
board
and
allocate
and
listen
to
many
presentations
of
things
that
are
very
necessary
within
our
communities
that
affect
domestic
violence.
Kids,
on
the
move,
just
to
name
a
few,
and
there
was
just
not
enough
money
for
everything
but
I
felt
like
we
must
the
board
we
came
through
and
me
we
allocated
resources
that
will
help
everybody
within
the
good
within
Utah
County.
A
For
the
first
time
we
came
together
as
the
County
Provo
and
Orem,
and
we
combined
resources.
What
we
found
is
that
many
of
the
agencies
were
coming
to
Orem
with
one
application,
the
problem
with
on
one
application
into
the
county.
So
we
pulled
those
monies
and
formed
a
new
committee
and
I
felt
like
everybody
at
the
end.
A
Lastly,
today
and
I
missed
the
the
Chamber
event,
because
I
was
scheduled
to
be
go
out
and
participate
on
the
mils
on
wills
and
I
visited
about
probably
about
ten
people
within
our
community
that
need
that
service
and
I
think
I
could
have
spent
hours.
I
wish
I
had
more
time
to
be
able
to
sit
down
and
talk.
I
learned
a
lot
of
people
that
have
been
here
for
50
60
70
years
they've
grown
here.
A
A
C
A
Have
a
motion
by
councilmember
Carol
and
a
second
by
councilmember
Christian
s'en
any
discussion
on
the
motion,
seeing
none
I'll
call
for
a
vote
council
member
Christian,
s'en,
hi,
council
member
Shelton
I
counts,
member
Barnes,
hi,
council,
member
Carol
and
council.
My
potaters
absence.
Okay,
we'll
now
move
on
to
the
action
items.
Item
number
one
is
ratification
of
City
payments
from
the
date
of
February
February,
18,
20,
22,
March,
3rd
2020
and
approval
of
purchase
requests
over
$25,000.
A
C
A
I'm
number
two
is
reviewing
action
on
an
alcohol
license
for
bandera
brisket
located
at
496,
North
990
west,
the
applicant
here,
yeah
you're,
okay
right
there.
If
we
have
any
questions
for
them,
we
can.
Maybe
we
just
want
to
toss
brisket
for
a
while,
that's
pretty
good
topic.
So
there
any
questions
or
concerns
from
the
council
just.
A
A
This
has
been
through
the
Planning
Commission
there's
any
questions.
I'd
have
Adam
come
forward
and
address
them
if
we
want
to
go
into
depth
about
them
for
the
audience
sake
that
the
council
does
receive
their
packet
about
Thursday
of
each
month
and
they
have
three
or
four
hundred
pages
to
have
a
good
long
weekend
over.
So
so
any
questions
good.
G
Question
I
had
is
I,
know,
council
know,
Carol
brought
this
to
me
originally,
and
my
biggest
concern
is
right
now,
I,
don't
think
the
market
will
support
what
we're
going
to
require
down
there,
we're
seeing
in
the
market
right
now
huge
pulls
backs
in
the
retail
sector,
and
so
I
think
we
just
take
a
look
at
that
and
understand
where
that's
going
to
put
us
I
think
that
area
is
very
unique.
I
know
when
we
first
looked
at
the
metals
crossing.
G
G
My
biggest
worry
we've
done
this
over
here
in
the
East
End
development.
Is
that
what
we're
calling
it
now
yeah
and
if
you
go
over
there,
even
with
all
the
housing
and
it's
a
building
built
down
there,
those
are
still
mainly
vacant,
took
a
client
down
there
to
look
at
one
that
was
being
sold
and
the
returned
market.
Wise
just
isn't
there
to
support
it,
so
I
don't
know
I
think
we
said
take
that
in
consideration.
G
If
we
enact
that,
how
long
is
it
going
to
take
to
fill
through
those
retail
issues,
I
think
some
of
the
biggest
issues
on
the
retail
side
isn't
your
day-to-day
I'm
gonna
call
them
coffee
shops
that
could
be
supported,
but
it's
the
other
type
of
retail
that
typically
draws
people
and
has
had
a
huge
disruption
with
the
Amazon
effect.
We
talked
a
little
bit
about
this
at
the
retreat
as
well.
G
So
that's
my
biggest
worry
is
that
we
can
legislate
it,
but
I
don't
know
if
the
market
will
bear
that
and
what
issues
that
will
be
down
the
road.
There's
always
that
argument
where
we
can
wait
for
the
market
to
bear
that.
But
how
does
that
look
with
what
we're
trying
to
do
down
there?
I
know
we
talked
a
little
bit
council
trail
about
maybe
doing
this
as
a
convertible
space,
and
that's
something
I
could
more
readily
support
where
you
know
down
the
road.
C
So
I
thought
about
this
a
little
bit
and
here
here's
a
couple
of
my
thoughts
that,
since
we
talked
and
one
is
that
it's
it
doesn't
have
to
be
retail
its
its
commercial,
but
as
far
as
I
can
understand
its
commercial
in
any
form
right.
So
it
can
be
restaurants
or
retail
or
offices,
and
those
a
little
bit
broader
market
because
we're
bringing
him
different
things.
C
The
other
thought
that
I
had
and
I
think
I
talked
to
Barbara.
She
mentioned
this
to
me
a
little
bit
that
we
developers
have
to
be
have
to
work
with
the
market
as
it
is
right
now
and
that's
by
nature.
They
just
have
to
be
they
work
with
the
market,
but
as
a
city,
we
have
to
take
into
consideration
our
long-term
needs
and
I
really
think.
If
we
need
something
to
make
a
community
great,
then
we
need
to
legislate
it
and
that's
kind
of
how
I
I.
G
Know
that
we
use
the
word
retail,
but
in
the
real
estate
market,
that's
pretty
much
anything
that's
in
a
strip
mall,
so
you
know
you
have
your
insurance
salesmen
that
may
have
a
Allstate
Insurance
or
something
like
that.
So
it's
not
necessarily
always
selling
goods.
The
hard
thing
is
driving
something.
That's
going
to
be
that
stopping
point
like
I
said:
maybe
a
coffee
shop
or
a
cafe
or
something
like
that
would
work,
but
when
you're
looking
at
all
that
frontage,
there
aren't
200
to
make
all
of
that
work.
G
G
And
you're
going
to
have
all
those
economic
retail
centers,
which
is
way
too
close
that
you
wouldn't
see
in
my
mind
that
coming
in
I
totally
agree
that
you
know
as
a
government,
we
get
a
chance
to
do
it
I'm
just
not
sure
what
benefit
that
adds
to
the
community
verses
and
allowing
it
to
be
residential
now
getting
that
development
taken
care
of,
and
then
if
the
market
does
bear
it,
that
it
could
flip
back
to
those
commercial
type
activities.
I.
E
G
Think
that
if
they
build
it
to
the
spec
of
a
commercial,
you
could
be
able
to
do
that.
If
you
look
at
the
ones
over
there
in
the
eastern
part,
there
is
one
bakery
that's
going
in,
but
yes,
they
are
going
in
and
the
rent
of
per
square
footage.
Is
this
a
lot
lower
than
the
residential
per
square
footage?
And
again
that's
just
what
the
markets,
bearing
I,
think
that
if
the
market
ever
came
back
to
support
that,
then
they
would
convert.
G
J
G
A
Think
if
I
could
draw
like
it's
hard
for
me
to
drive
a
comparison
between
Easton
Park
and
this
for
the
simple
fact
that
currently
we
have
a
lot
of
traffic
just
for
frontrunner
and
I
could
easily
see
you
know:
I'm
just
gonna
throw
out
names
a
pharmacy,
it
could
be
a
clinic,
you
know,
maybe
it's
any
sort,
it
could
be,
it
could
be
a
doughnut
shop
or
it
could
be
something
that
is
more
suitable
to
to
service
that
general
area
of
people
as
they're
walking
through
or
their
living
by.
They
come
over.
A
G
K
G
If
they
can't
build
that
housing
above
it
because
they've
got
the
requirement,
they
can't
fill
the
vacancy
I,
don't
see
people
walking
across
the
street
from
the
front
runner
expecially
built
a
four
lane
with
a
20
foot
trail
in
the
middle
or
a
meeting
of
20
feet
to
go
over
to
do
that.
I
think
that's
going
to
be
coming
from
the
natural
development.
G
That's
already
going
to
be
taking
place
there,
so
I
in
my
mind,
that's
the
only
thing
I
look
at
is:
if
we
do
do
this,
I
think
it's
definitely
gonna
slow
down
the
development
of
that.
If
that's
something
we're
okay
with
I
think
it
may
be
wise
to
talk
with
the
developer
and
see
what
their
thoughts
on
I.
Don't
think
that
they
have
the
final
say
on
anything
but
perhaps
completely
off
or
maybe
there
is
a
way
of
doing
that
as
a
convertible
space,
or
maybe
we
do
a
different
percentage
versus
a
hundred
percent.
G
A
I
It
could
be
on
a
second
floor,
yeah,
it's
just
the
equivalent
amount
and
that
you've
touched
on
it.
The
reason
we're
looking
at
this
now
is
some
of
the
in
the
initial
discussions
that
we've
had
with
potential
projects
in
the
area.
This
is
our
highest
density
area.
This
is
where
we
would
like
to
see
that
mixed-use
element
with
that
higher
density
and
and
yes,
what
we're
getting
a
lot
of
the
feedback
that
we're
getting
is
well,
we
don't
want
to
do
any
commercial.
We
don't
want
to
do
any
office.
I
We
just
want
to
do
strictly
residential.
The
worry
that
we
have
and
that
the
Planning
Commission
could
see
is
that
if
we
lose
the
opportunity-
and
it
goes
all
residential
you've
lost
a
huge
component
of
what
we're
trying
to
create
in
that
area.
When
you're,
looking
at
how
many
thousands
of
people
were
looking
to
house
in
that
area,
not
just
along
200
South,
but
the
entire
Tod,
it's
not
just
the
traffic
on
200
South
that
will
drive
use
of
this
area.
I
It's
the
entire
surrounding
area
as
well,
so
the
Planning
Commission,
with
the
exception
of
one
who
voted
against
it,
could
see
that
wisdom,
and
could
they
felt
that
it
was
wise
to
enact
something
like
this,
even
if
it
takes
a
little
longer
in
the
long
run,
because
what
are
we
trying
to
create?
Are
we
trying
to
just
let
something
go
in
now
with
what
the
market
will
bear?
Are
we
wanting
to
look
ahead
a
little
bit
and
that's
really
where
they
landed
so.
G
G
A
G
C
G
That's
what
the
major
tenant
right,
so
you
think
of
like
a
target
or
a
small
grocery
store.
It's
the
anchor
tenant
that
will
be
there.
That
will
drive
that
I
think
we
have
very
unique
issues
with
this
property
because
all
your
anchors
are
just
across
the
street.
Think
of
all
the
retail
that's
happening
less
than
a
half
a
mile
away
and
that's
the
issue.
Usually
they
don't
want
to
see
a
bigger
distance
between
anchor
tenants
to
be
able
to
have
that
so
I
mean
we
can
adopt
it.
My
biggest
worry
is
we're
gonna.
G
B
B
F
I
G
F
F
I
Any
build
so
here's
the
the
pink
area,
that's
the
mixed-use
core,
if
the
building
fronts
200
South.
What
the
proposal
is
before
you
is
that
basically,
a
100%
of
the
ground,
floor
area
or
equivalent
of
the
ground
floor
area
be
a
use
other
than
residential.
Whether
that's
office
of
commercial
and
I
used
the
terms
that
are
called
out
in
the
Tod
or
and
that's
do
I
didn't
create
new
ones.
I
Any
other
street
that
at
fronts,
whether
that's
900,
West,
11th,
west
or
a
local
street
in
between
we've
dropped
that
requirement
down
to
25%,
because
we
figure
the
majority
of
the
traffic
in
the
the
the
activity.
If
you
will
will
be
along
200
south,
and
so
that's
really
where
we
tried
to
bulk
that
up
and
that's
what
the
ordinance
proposes.
I
F
F
F
Zoning
I,
understand
and
and
can
get
with
that,
but
sometimes
when
you
get
to
too
much
detail
in
the
government
telling
people
what
they
can
or
cannot
do
with
their
personal
property
sometimes
gives
me
a
problem.
That's
just
my
problem.
That's
philosophically,
but
I
also
understand
that
this
is
that
development
brought
within
the
Tod.
This
isn't
just
a
little
thing.
F
This
is
a
big
thing
and
the
whole
part
of
it
fits
together
and
that's
why
we've
got
the
housing
high-density,
where
we
do
and
then
the
lesser
density
as
we
go
out
and
and
all
the
other
components
of
that
the
walking
trails
and
and
where
the
bike
paths
are,
and
all
of
that
and
I
understand.
All
of
that
and
still
tried
to
put
all
of
that
together.
F
Has
there
been
any
serious
discussion
about
this
being
a
problem
with
any
of
the
developers
that
have
come
in
yet?
Do
we
have
any
developers
that
are
serious
down
there
and
do
we
have
any
developers
that
have
already
had
plans
approved
I
guess
is
the
way
to
put
it
for
this
area?
Has
anything
been
submitted?
All
of
those
questions,
kind
of
just
run
together.
In
my
mind,
sorry.
I
I
C
G
That's
the
hard
thing
you're
going
to
be
fighting
is
supporting
those
restaurants
and
that
I'm
gonna
call
it
retail
still
it's
the
even
the
State
Farm
agents
and
all
those
different
offices
that
go
into
a
retail
center
that
are
going
to
be
hard
to
support
without
that
that
Class
A
office
space
being
built.
So
will
it
perhaps
5
10
15
years
I
think
we
just
have
to
take
a
look
at
that.
G
I
can
see
that
being
the
same
issues
we
face
right
now
when
we
convert
residential
to
commercial,
that
buffer
of
some
nature
being
to
put
in
there
so
I
think
we
got
to
be
sensitive
to
protect
those
that
are
in
the
residential
side
that
do
make
those
investments,
knowing
that
now
it's
residential
and
then
having
something
come
in
and
change
down
the
road
that
changes
it
to
commercial.
You.
J
C
I,
like
the
idea
of
having
letting
the
developers
have
a
little
bit
of
flexibility,
maybe
they
even
have
an
idea
of
what
they
want.
They
used
to
be
and
I
think
that
was
kind
of
the
intent
of
having
the
language
like
that
and
I.
Maybe
I'm
misunderstanding,
but
I
thought.
The
intent
of
a
mixed-use
area
is
that
we
are
mixing
residential
and
commercial
and
people
are
expecting
that
we
are
being
mixed,
and
that
is
a
problem.
I.
G
C
G
But
if
they're
in
the
same
building,
that's
the
that's
the
concern
right
so
anyway,
just
a
thought:
that's
there
I
mean
what's
going
to
stop
someone
from
all
of
a
sudden
turning
their
apartment
into
a
dog
grooming
business
and
now,
all
of
a
sudden,
you
thought
your
neighbor
was
residential.
You
bought
it
as
residential
and
now
all
of
a
sudden,
you've
got
dogs
and
cats
coming
in
all
the.
B
B
G
Before
you
were,
anticipating
that
whole
floor,
being
residential
I
could
see
where
we
want
to
regulate,
to
a
certain
extent
where
commercials,
commercial,
residential,
residential,
still
mixed-use
right
in
the
same
building.
But
that's
how
I've
seen
it
be
successful
in
other
projects
that
are
out
there,
I.
C
I
Just
I
mean
I
think
we're
getting
into
hypotheticals.
That
may
not
happen,
but
all
that
all
that
we're
doing
here
is
we're
trying
to
allow
flexibility
by
saying
100%
ground
floor
area,
equivalent
of
that,
whether
it's
all
the
ground
floor,
whether
it's
half
of
two
floors,
whether
it's
stepping
up
to
a
third
it
gives
the
development
community
that
flexibility
to
design
how
they
see
fit,
but
it
is
also
trying
to
place
those
commercial
uses
in
the
course.
I
So
we
do
have
that
element
of
mixed
use
and
in
their
site
plans
when
we
review
those
we
will
see.
Oh,
this
is
clearly
residential.
This
is
clearly
commercial.
So
if
someone
comes
in
five
years
down
the
road
and
says
I
want
to
turn
my
residential
apartment
into
a
commercial
use,
we
can
go
back
and
say:
well,
that's
not
how
it
was
approved.
These
areas
were
approved
for
the
commercial
uses.
G
G
I
Commercial
standards
are
different
than
residential,
so
if
it's
within
the
same
building
they're
going
to
have
to
construct
those
commercial
areas
to
a
commercial
standard
as
opposed
to
a
residential
standard,
just
like
Easton
Park,
those
those
bottom
levels
are
constructed
to
a
different
standard
than
the
residential.
They
had
to
follow
a
commercial
code
just
as
this
well.
F
I
F
F
I
G
I
G
I
Again,
part
of
the
reason
we
gave
such
high
densities
in
this
area
is,
we
were
trying
to
spur
that
element
of
mix
juice
yeah.
You
can
have
nearly
unlimited
density
here
and
in
that
the
hope
was
okay,
yeah
I
can
I
can
get
super
high
density
here.
So
I
can
this.
This
makes
sense
to
throw
in
some
mixed
use
elements,
but
we're
not
seeing
that
so.
A
A
A
A
B
A
Going
there's
a
perfect
places
for
them
to
go,
and
as
far
as
walking
across
the
road
one
of
the
intended
intended
reasons
to
making
that
a
little
bit
wider
is
to
create
a
safe
pedestrian
walkway.
So
they
have
a
landing
in
the
middle,
so
they
can
come
and
walk.
I.
Think
the
the
width
of
the
the
medium
is
there
for
safety,
so
people
will
actually
use
it.
It's
not
so,
and
we're
gonna
have
what
landing
places
and
input
and
things
that
they
can
maybe
even
sit
and
relax,
and
so
I
I
feel
good
about
it.
C
Just
gonna
yeah
I
am
gonna,
make
a
motion,
but
I
also
wanted
to
point
out
that
we're
not
the
only
ones
doing
mixed-use
that's
kind
of
the
trend
of
where
it's
going.
They
want
the
residential
to
be
closer
to
the
commercial
because
they
feel
like
they
can
capture
it
more.
So
this
isn't
like
a
new
thing
that
is
crazy
and
that
nobody
else
is
doing.
That
is
definitely
a
trend
for
development
right
now.
So.
G
B
I
C
F
I
The
LT
means
you,
so
that's
not
that
block
a
lot
type.
So
what
we
did
is
we
took
every
lot
type
that's
allowed
within
that
core,
and
we
tried
right
now.
You
have
some
maximum
Heights.
What
we,
what
we
wanted
to
do
was
also
give
it
a
minimum
that
way
you
can
we're
trying
to
get
that
bulk
within
that
core.
What
we
didn't
want
to
see
happen
was
something
right
next
to
the
train
station.
I
Let's
say
it's
one
or
two
stories
the
way
the
code
is
written
now,
even
though
that's
we
would
hope
that
wouldn't
happen,
it
could
potentially
happen,
and
so
again
that
would
be
another
opportunity
that
would
be
potentially
lost
for
bulking
up
that
area
around
the
Train
station.
With
that
either
mixed,
you
know
with
the
mixed
juice
in
the
density,
so
we
proposed
minimum
heights.
I
mean
the
maximum
heights
were
already
there,
but
we
just
proposed
minimums
as
well.
F
I
F
F
I
F
F
I
G
F
I
vote
undecided,
I
honestly,
don't
know
I
thought
of
this
off
and
on
all
day,
and
since
we
had
prior
discussions,
but
I
do
understand
and
appreciate
what
Adam
has
said:
I'm
gonna
vote
no,
just
because
I'd
like
to
study
it
a
little
bit
more,
not
that
I'm
opposed
to
it,
but
I
think
this
idea
of
maybe
looking
at
some
other
codes
or
whatever.
Okay
council.
A
A
G
Your
patience,
mr.
Jensen
and
and
I
think
the
thing
that
cleared
it
up
most
from
me
was
the
email
that
you
had
sent
with
the
exhibit
that's
kind
of
nice
to
see
that's
what
I
was
looking
for
is
making
sure
that
we
had
that
that
plan
in
place
I'd
love
to
see
that
actually
become
part
of
these
minutes,
because
I
think
there
was
a
lot
of
discussion
about
that.
So,
if
we
could
add
that
exhibit
into
these
minutes,
I
think
that
would
be
great
and
then
I
would
just
hope
and
advocate
with
staff.
G
Is
we
have
those
streets?
It
looks
like
we're
lining
up
with
Pleasant
Grove
that
that
will
actually
come
to
fruition
because
can
be
very
critical
for
the
success
of
that
area
down
there.
So,
thanks
again
for
your
patience,
I
appreciate
that
so
with
that
mayor-
and
this
is
the
questions
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
and
adopt
the
ordinance
approving
the
zone
map
amendment
from
the
ra.one
residual
agricultural
zone
to
the
po1
professional
office,
only
located
at
12:54,
YZ,
300
north
and
make
this
zone
change
conditioned
and
appreciate
so
I'm.
A
E
B
I
F
The
the
main
concern
I
had
is
in
the
minutes
from
the
Planning
Commission,
and
that
is
that
the
traffic
down
there
is
just
a
mess
and
I'm
just
hoping
this
extension.
If
I
understood
it
right
of
an
island,
that's
gonna
go
a
little
further
north
because
those
people
that
are
coming
out
of
the
northern
end
of
that
up
by
IFA,
but
not
that
far
the
other
entrance
there
they're
cutting
across
to
three
lanes
of
traffic
and
just
trying
to
get
in
an
accident.
It
looks
like
it
scares
me
to
death
to
go
down
there.
F
I
always
go
a
different
route,
so
I
don't
have
that
problem,
but
it's
just
amazing
on
a
Saturday
afternoon,
that
is
a
very
busy
street
and
it
concerns
me
to
add
more
retail
there.
Even
though
that's
what
it's
designed
to
do
so
I'm
glad
you've
got
some
plans
in
place
to
to
regulate
that
traffic.
A
little
bit
yeah.
I
F
I
K
L
F
F
G
G
F
L
F
L
B
C
Don't
know
to
me
this
light
traffic
light
is
too
close
to
the
other
two
lights.
It's
between.
No,
your
plays
are
sitting
there.
Thinking
Stacey
is
not
a
traffic
engineer
and
I'm,
not
a
traffic
there,
but
they're
so
close
that
it's
gonna
seems
like
it
was
gonna
snarl
traffic,
especially
having
accesses
in
and
out
so
I
have
two
comments.
Basically
one
is:
is
there
any
chance?
We
could
just
not
have
a
direct
access
onto
the
road
and
have
them
access
to
the
current
access.
B
L
Know
councilman
Kerala
I'll
frankly
admit
to
you
if
this
was
all
completely
brand-new
undeveloped
and
we
got
our
way
to
plan
how
this
would
go
and
where
the
signals
would
go,
it
would
look
different
it
would.
Those
signals
are
closer,
admittedly,
you're
right,
they're
closer
than
I
would
prefer,
but
not
having
a
signal
is
even
worse.
You
know
the
the
developments
coming
Costco's
there
I
have
phase
there
it'll
function,
it
will
function
and
I'm,
confident
it'll
function
appropriately.
L
B
C
C
B
C
C
C
B
K
K
L
C
C
L
I
guess
maybe
just
to
answer
your
question
first
or
concern
the
manual
of
uniform
traffic
control
devices.
These
access
management
manuals
all
give
very
clear
specifications
on
speed
limits.
How
far
for
different
types
of
rows,
roads,
wet
accesses
can
be
what
kind
they
can
be.
This
meets
all
the
codes.
All
the
standards
I
do
like
less
access
in
some
places,
but
at
the
posted
speed
for
this
kind
of
road,
it
does
meet
all
the
standards.
B
G
J
G
L
G
This
situation,
presentation
with
Ryan
Hale
that
was
hired
unloved,
an
ethics
study
on
this
core
back,
probably
10
years
ago,
the
Board
of
adjustments
and
the
Planning
Commission
I,
don't
know
if
you
remember
this
John
or
not,
was
there
as
well
and
they
basically
said
how
are
we
gonna
deal
with
the
traffic
on
State,
Street
and
900
West
coming
in
and
he
came
back
and
said:
that's
just
always
going
to
be
an
F.
They
looked
at
moving
the
roundabouts.
G
B
G
G
L
Roundabout,
that's
there
Ryan
and
Hales,
and
I
actually
spoke
couple
months
ago
back
when
we
were
preparing
the
CIP
and
I.
Don't
want
to
diverge
too
far
off
the
topic
here,
but
that
roundabout
doing
some,
the
striping
that
we
did
has
dramatically
helped,
but
it's
in
the
ICA,
the
CIP
that
I'd
like
to
move
it
some
day.
Now,
that's
not
going
to
be
cheap,
but
that
roundabout,
if
it
was
further
away
from
the
State
Street
intersection,
would
function
just
fine,
it
would
function
very
well.
L
L
J
Jury
for
even
associates
representing
the
developer
tonight.
So
mr.
mayor
members,
council,
it's
been
a
great
discussion
up
to
this
point.
I
appreciate
that.
So
when
we
looked
at
this,
you
know
one
of
the
things
that
we
did
look
at
was
the
access
from
900
west
and
how
that
helped
out
the
Deveaux,
and
we
want
people
to
be
able
to
come
in
continue
under
way
with
the
median
in
there
yeah
that
that
does
help
out
with
the
traffic
flow
that
reduces
our
points
of
conflicts
as
we
navigate
this
intersection.
J
So
yes,
it
it's
close
to
the
one
that's
to
the
south.
It's
also
fairly
close
to
the
light
to
the
north
of
us,
but
actually
that
median
will
help
us
out
tremendously
for
those
that
want
to
leave
this
development
to
move
to
the
south.
We
do
have
access
through
IFA,
which
gives
them
direct
access
to
that
traffic
signals
so
they're
not
coming
into
the
park
you're,
not
flipping
u-turn
or
trying
to
do
one
I'm
900
West
at
the
light
itself.
C
J
C
F
L
J
F
G
G
F
If
we
beat
that
to
death,
I'd
be
willing
to
go
ahead
and
make
the
motion
that
I
moved
to
approve
the
final
plat
of
IFA
subdivision
number
two
located
is
that
the
right
one
of
money-
okay,
located
at
504,
North
900
West
in
the
GC
two
planned
commercial
zone
to
end
to
authorize
the
mayor
and
city
council
to
sign
the
plat
and
accept
the
dedications
with
instructions
to
the
city
recorder
to
withhold,
recording
of
the
plat
subject
to
all
conditions
identified
in
public
records
associated
with
the
March
tip.
2020.
F
G
F
E
A
Member
Shelton
I
counts,
member
Barnes,
aye,
council,
member
Carol
and
council
member
titters,
absolutely
okay
item
5b
the
reviewing
action
on
an
ordinance
approving
a
commercial
site
plan
for
Bank
of
America
and
Apollo
burger
located
at
504
North
900
West
in
the
G
c2
planned
commercial
zone.
I
think
this
one
I
think
we
pretty
well
talked
it
not
the
death,
but
we've
had
to
get
discussion
about
it
so
I'm.
Unless
there's
further
questions,
I'd
entertain
a
motion.
A
Okay,
I
have
a
motion
by
councilmember
Shelton.
Second,
second,
by
counsel
many
council
member
christian
singh,
and
you
discuss
you
on
the
motion
seeing
that
I'll
call
for
a
vote:
council
member
christian
singh,
hi
council,
member
Shelton,
aye,
council,
member
Barnes,
aye,
council,
member
Carol
and
council
member
okay
item
number
six
review:
an
action
on
a
resolution
approving
the
2020
sanity,
sanitary
sewer,
master
plan
and
impact
fee
facilities,
plan
element
of
the
general
plan,
Scott
I'm
gonna.
Have
you
come
up
and
just
kind
of
prepare
us?
L
About
the
council,
what
did
this
item
and
the
next
several
we've
got
before?
You
are
really
all
about
updating
the
master
plans
and,
as
you
know,
we've
embarked
on
this
to
really
do
a
thorough,
in-depth
review
of
these
master
plans
and
there's
several
that
we
have
before
you
the
sewer,
the
pressurized
irrigation
the
water
and
the
roads
tonight
to
review.
L
These
are
big
documents
I
realize,
but
that
doesn't
mean
that
every
page
of
it
changed
and
so
of
course
we
have
the
document
before
the
full
document
in
the
packet
for
you
and
we
I
know:
I
sent
an
email
to
David
that
I
understand.
He
forwarded
it
to
you
that
hopefully,
was
a
little
bit
of
a
cheat
sheet.
If
you
will
to
be
able
to
take
you
to
the
places
where
the
bigger
changes
are
made,
that
doesn't
mean
that's
all
of
the
changes.
They
were
word
here,
they're
at
everything
and
I.
L
Don't
want
you
to
think
that
was
all
the
changes,
but
that
was
the
highlight
and
of
the
summary
of
the
substantive
changes
that
are
there
with
just
just
generally.
The
water,
P,
I
and
sewer
master
plans
did
not
change
a
lot,
a
few
sizes
here
and
there
maybe
a
couple
locations,
but
for
the
most
part
we
we
pretty
much
had
that
that
set
and
there
weren't
a
lot
of
changes
with
the
roads.
L
A
L
A
A
L
I
were
to
summarize
really
the
main
change,
or
one
of
the
larger
changes
that
we
have
on.
The
sewer
master
plan
was
just
really
a
couple
of
things
about
sizes
of
the
lines.
As
we
see
areas
where
there's
a
little
bit
higher
densities,
we
felt
that
we
needed
to
have
a
little
bit
of
an
up
size
and
some
of
them
one
of
the
things
that
you
will
find
in
all
of
them
in
the
I
FFP.
L
The
is
the
timing
of
some
of
these
projects
back
when
some
of
these
prior
plans
were
developed,
American
Fork
was
growing
but
not
like.
It
is
now
not
like
as
fast
as
it
is
now,
and
so
one
of
the
things
that
we
looked
at
closely
with
this,
as
with
the
others,
was
to
make
sure
that
we
asked
the
question
and
looked
very
closely
at
what
we
were
seeing
with
projected
growth
over
the
next
five
years.
L
L
It's
a
little
bit.
You
know,
what's
going
to
happen
with
the
economy,
where
there's
there's
a
lot
of
ifs
that
could
happen,
and
all
we
can
do
is
make
our
best
assumption
and
plan.
Based
on
what
we're
seeing
and
seeing
in
the
the
trends.
Could
we
be
wrong
sure?
Could
we
could
be
wrong
both
ways
it
could
be.
L
A
L
L
The
peak
monthly
flow
is
is
is
basically
if,
over
the
the
course
of
a
month,
okay,
the
the
the
the
longer
the
the
timeframe.
Essentially,
it's
really
looking
at
it
at
a
at
a
day.
Okay,
what's
the
highest
amount
of
flow,
the
highest
flowed
day
that
you
have
that
month
and
and
I'm
sorry,
peak
monthly
flow
is
during
the
the
course
of
a
year,
I'm
sorry
I'm,
getting
mixed
up
over
the
course
of
a
year.
What
month
of
the
year?
Is
it
the
highest
for
the
month?
L
And
you
know
it
can
just
be
depending
on
when
people
are
taking
more
baths
or
doing
their
laundry
more
it's
typically
in
the
summer,
some
communities
when
I
was
in
the
past,
it
seemed
like
it
was
believe
it
or
not
around
the
holidays,
when
a
lot
of
people
came
in
to
visit
where
that
month
tended
to
be
the
highest,
but
the
peak
daily
flow
is
meaning
what's
the
highest
day,
so
you
know
where's,
the
peak
monthly
is
averaged
over
a
whole
month.
This
is
a
more
of
an
instantaneous
time
in
a
certain
day.
L
What's
the
peak
day,
quite
often
like
I,
one
of
the
cases
I've
seen
is
it's
Thanksgiving
Day.
It's
tends
to
sometimes
be
the
highest
peak
peak
day,
half
Super
Bowl.
Sometimes
it
could
be
quite
often
it
could
be
when
everyone's
draining
their
turkeys
out
of
the
sink
that
they've
been
falling,
because
that
can
sometimes
be
the
highest
day.
So
that's
that's.
Why
that
peak
day,
I.
B
L
E
L
E
E
L
Because
I
mean
you
you
may
have
over
the
let's
say
it
is
we're
looking
at
November.
What's
the
take
all
the
30
days
of
November,
even
if
you
have
one
big
day,
your
monthly
average
may
not
be
skewed
by
one
crazy
day,
but
that
one
day
will
be
significantly
higher
than
the
average
for
that
month,
no
matter
what
month
it
is.
C
L
L
G
L
Does
so
yes,
some
of
the
the
sewage
from
Cedar
Hills
in
those
other
cities
does
flow
through
American
Fork
lines,
and-
and
that
is
one
reason
why,
on
some
of
those
lines,
we
do
get
T
SSD
to
help
clean
them
and
they
do
work
in
helping
clean
them
and
get
Rodham
from
time
to
time,
Dumaine
and
son
of.
But
there
are
lines
for.
D
A
an
AF
City
mean
American
Fork
does
share.
Is
it's
our
main
that
Cedar
Hills
comes
through,
so
we
have
to
city
in
our
system
for
Cedar
Hills
we've
initiated
that
Cedar
Hills
was
paid
along
the
way
to
send
their
flows
through
our
city,
and
we
charge
a
conveyance
charge
for
that.
But
so
we
have
to
make
sure
our
pipes
are
big
enough
to
handle
the
Cedar
Hills
flow.
Where
Highland
comes
through
with
the
ice
Eagle
Mountain
come
through,
those
are
TSS
D
mains.
We.
B
G
C
G
D
B
F
A
L
Just
just
mention
one
thing
on
this
one,
and
this
is
probably
of
all
the
plans,
the
one
that
probably
changed
the
least,
but
one
thing
I
guess
to
bring
to
your
attention-
is
that
we
have
included
in
the
project
list
for
the
master
plan
and
plans
to
eventually
be
able
to
build
a
facility
that
will
intercept,
treated
wastewater,
recycled
water
from
the
T
SSD
plant
and
to
be
able
to
put
that
to
use
in
the
pressurized
irrigation
system.
It's
down
the
road
there's
quite
a
few
questions
that
have
to
be
answered.
L
Water
rights,
a
lot
of
different
things,
and
so
it
is
down
the
road.
But
it's
something
that
we're
looking
on
and
want
to
have
on
our
horizon
as
something
to
look
at
as
a
a
great
resource
to
to
use
someday.
That's
probably
the
biggest
one
out
there,
I
guess
changes
again.
There's
a
few
projects
moved
up.
This
moved
back,
though
this
line
size
changes,
those
are
relatively
minimal.
I.
F
L
G
L
Do
you
mean
current
wells
or
because
well
current,
all
of
our
current
wells,
all
five
of
them
are
tied
to
the
cullinary
system
and
are
used
in
the
cullinary
system.
All
of
them
are,
but
they
can
then
discharge
from
the
coronary
system
into
the
the
the
pressurized
irrigation
system,
but
they're
all
culinary
they're
all
permitted
and
allowed
to
be
used
for
that
right
now
and
are
tied
to
that
I.
G
L
G
G
G
G
L
K
E
E
There's
a
table
there,
the
different
densities,
the
percentage
of
the
lot
irrigated
for
the
high
density,
low
density,
medium
and
very
low.
It
seems
like
the
percentage
of
the
lot
irrigated
you
know,
increases
depending
on
the
density,
but
the
typical
irrigated
acres
decreases
that
doesn't
compute
to
me.
E
K
L
Not
a
hundred
percent
sure
and
I'm
pretty
sure
this
is
not
one
of
the
parts
that
changed
from
before
so
you
know
I
know.
Obviously
you
should
get
really
really
small
Lots
you
you
can
have
I
mean
it
will
increase
like
the
the
percent
of
that
lot.
That
might
be
are
gated.
It
could
be,
but
but
higher
higher
density.
L
Can
you
know
you're
gonna
have
more
common
areas?
I,
you
know,
I,
don't
know
I,
don't
want
to
I,
don't
want
to
fumble
here
and
say
something
I
shouldn't
you
know.
I
may
have
to
look
into
it.
It
I'll
frankly
admit
to
you
Councilwoman
that
I
read
the
changes.
I
focused
on
a
lot
of
things
that
were
changing
that
really,
as
we
did
this
review
and
I'm
pretty
sure
this
was
not
one
of
the
things
that
changed
so
I
hate
to
speculate.
I
know
that
we
did
have
Horrocks
engineering
when
they
did
this
study.
L
E
B
F
Threw
me
for
a
loop,
but
high
density
to
me
would
be.
There
are
more
people
on
an
acre
and
less
grass
on
the
acre
and
we're
talking
about
irrigation
water,
so
there's
less
grass,
so
the
high
density
would
have
a
smaller
percentage
of
the
land,
that's
irrigated,
so
the
high
density
to
me,
or
maybe
I'm,
just
the
opposite
look
yeah.
The
high
density
would
have
a
smaller
percentage,
so
that's
52
and
then
you
go
from
high,
come
down
to
medium
and
then
go
back
up
to
low
and
then
come
down
to
very
low.
F
A
D
K
D
Housing
unit
right
so
if
we
had
a
low
density,
meaning
a
single-family
lot,
there's
one
unit
on
it,
they
have
their
own
yard,
so
the
percent
of
land
irrigated
is
higher,
but
the
typical
irrigated
acres
could
be
lower
because
the
lot
is
smaller
than
a
lot
for
a
high-density
project.
The
lock
actually
gets
bigger
because
they're
putting
more
units
on.
E
D
E
E
D
E
E
G
K
L
G
B
G
G
K
G
Yeah,
so
2.7
million
would
be
available
for
potential
impact
feed
because
of
the
that
does
say
that
benefit
there,
which
I
think
would
skew
the
numbers,
if
we
already
put
in
the
ordinance
to
allow
for
those
meters
we
put
in
how
we
charging
for
that
cost
and
then,
as
we
mean
to
look
at
that
and
then
as
we
go
down,
I
just
want
to
make
some
looking
at
this
at
the
subtotal
at
the
very
bottom.
Then
Deline.
If
you're,
okay
going
there.
G
So
that
we've
got
36
million,
is
the
cost
31
million
available
for
impact
fees,
but
yet
most
I
don't
know
I
guess
I
just
need
some
help
on
that
calculation.
It's
not
good
at
night.
I
know
we're
working
that
next
step
to
go
into
it,
but
I
think
we
need
to
relook
at
that
metering
line
and
they
knew
that
did
just
at
the
very
top.
It
says.
B
G
G
E
G
G
K
L
G
K
L
G
G
For
but
with
the
cost,
that's
the
city's,
not
the
impact
fees,
we'll
collect
those
we'll
charge
for
those.
But
if
we're
already
a
million
dollars
shy
each
year,
how
are
we
going
to
pay
for
these
improvements
that
are
pretty
significant
and
that's
probably
a
bigger
discussion,
but
I
just
wanted
to
bring
that
up
as
we're
talking
about
costs.
G
K
G
D
G
D
G
D
G
Okay,
I
guess
what
I'm
saying
that's
part
of
the
bone.
Collins
I
think
we
need
to
get
back
in
here
and
figure
that
out,
because
it's
great
to
come
back
and
say
here's
the
liability
on
the
new
people
coming
in,
but
we've
got
to
take
care
of
our
responsibilities
at
the
same
point
in
time.
Okay,
thank
you.
Okay,.
A
G
B
B
G
D
A
L
Mr.
mayor
members
of
the
council,
I
probably
don't
have
a
whole
lot
more
I
guess
to
say
on
on
this
one
again:
there's
some
changes,
certainly
on
the
project
timing
and
which
projects
needed
to
be
built.
There
were
some
changes
in
terms
of
some
line
sizes
as
we're
seeing
some
densities
increase
and
beyond
that
of
any
questions
you
may
have
I'll
do
my
best
to
answer
more
apologize
for
any
more
typos.
You
may
find.
F
G
On
the
motion,
the
only
question
I
had
on
this
one,
so
I'm
trying
to
scroll
through
it
and
the
Internet's
trying
to
catch
up
with
me
here
a
little
bit
the
36
inch
water
line
that
we
have
coming
down.
Does
that
have
it
broken
out
here,
I
tried
looking
and
trying
to
understand
how
much
of
that,
because
what
we're
told
is
without
that
we
can't
do
any
new
growth,
but
with
it
right
now
we're
okay,
so
I
know
we'll
have
some
benefit
from
it,
but
I
guess
it
kind
of
goes
back
to
that
same
thing.
G
L
Councilman,
if
you
were
to
really
look
at
you
know
what
is
it
about
water
lines,
the
that
allows
the
growth
it's
really
the
area
so
depending
on
the
diameter
and
the
area
is
as
a
square
of
the
function
of
the
diameter.
So
essentially,
if
you
double
a
diameter
of
pipe,
you
quadruple
the
capacity,
the
area
which
you're
quadrupling
the
amount
of
water
that
can
flow
through
it.
L
So
with
a
good
chunk
of
that
line
that
we're
talking
about
it's
a
12
inch
now
it's
a
36
that
we're
going
to
so
triple
the
size,
you're
nine
times
the
area
and
nine
times
the
capacity.
So
for
a
lot
of
those
in
a
you
know,
the
some
segments
are
not
the
same
but
I'm
just
speaking
in
general.
If
for
a
segment
like
that,
then
I
think
it's
very
easy
to
say
that
1/9
of
that
that
pipe
cost
is
for
existing
customers
and
8/9
of
it
are
for
the
new
growth
in.
G
B
G
C
D
G
D
D
G
B
G
L
D
K
G
D
G
I
just
want
to
make
sure
if
we're
getting
challenged
on
it,
we
can
come
back
and
say
yes,
this
is
what
we're
accounting
for
that
is
in
this
line.
Item
fits
kind
of
very
vague
and
buting
for
someone
we
can
tie
that
back
and
say
this
is
where
we
came
over
that
cost.
This
is
covered
in
the
36
line,
and
this
is
how
much
benefit
is
to
existing
versus
new,
because
that's
a
huge
project
I
think
that's
like
30
million
dollars,
it's
a
big
project,
so
it's
finding
sure
we're.
D
A
F
L
F
F
F
A
G
The
only
thing
I
would
ask
there's
a
motion
on
the
floor.
We
can
just
add
the
clarifying
language
and
there
about
the
transmission,
and
were
you
looking
at
that
36
inch
water
line,
cost
and
benefit
analysis
as
we
go
to
the
next
stage.
Is
all
I
would
ask
if
that's
okay
to
add
into
the
motion
in
a
second.
G
E
A
L
Mr.
mayor
members
of
the
council,
this
is
the
plan
of
all
of
them
that
we
probably
spent
the
most
time
on
and
made
the
most
changes
on.
Let
me
just
maybe
summarize
a
couple
of
them
for
you
and
Savannah
jog
of
memory.
I
know
we
discussed
quite
a
few
of
these
with
you
in
a
work
session,
the
concept
a
month
and
a
half
two
months
ago,
I'm
trying
to
remember
what
it
was
exactly
with
you.
L
But
a
lot
of
the
focus
we
looked
at
was
many
of
the
intersections,
because
the
really,
when
you
look
at
roadway
capacity,
a
lot
of
what
limits
the
amount
of
cars
that
can
physically
move
through
a
certain
space
is
what's
happening
at
the
intersections
lanes
matter.
They
absolutely
do
and
we
don't
want
to
imply
that
they
don't.
But
what
is
happening
at
the
intersection
matters,
a
lot,
whether
it's
a
two-way
stop
a
four-way
stop,
which
is
a
temporary
measure
that
we're
only
supposed
to
use
temporarily
or
a
roundabout
or
a
signal
whatever.
It
may
be.
L
What
happens
at
those
intersections,
depending
on
the
traffic
flow
and
the
time
of
day
and
all
the
other
things
really
matters?
So
we
put
a
lot
more
effort
into
looking
at
those
intersection
treatments
and
making
a
decision
as
to
what
it
should
be.
So
quite
often,
you
would
see
in
the
old
plan
to
major
master
plan.
Roads
come
together,
a
collector
and
a
minor
collector,
let's
just
say,
for
instance,
and
you'd
see
them
intersect
and
there
was
nothing
listed.
What
are
we
going
to
do
there?
Is
that
a
signal?
Is
it
a
roundabout?
L
L
Sometimes
the
costs
are
comparable
between
a
roundabout
and
a
signal
in
terms
of
the
initial
capital
cost
at
least
they're,
not
identical,
but
they're
comparable.
So
that
was
a
lot
of
the
big
change,
the
other
really
substantive
change.
That
I
know
we
discussed
in
work
session,
but
if
I
could
jog
your
memory
was
introducing
this
concept
that
you
know
for
lack
of
a
better
word.
L
Currently
it's
farmland
or
a
County
Road
or
whatever,
and
they
thought
that
I
wanted
to
throw
out
is,
if
you
really
strictly
interpret
at
the
old
way
that
the
plan
is.
Is
that
we're
saying
those
cross-sections?
Even
there
should
be
identical,
they
should
look
exactly
the
same.
In
other
words,
we
should
go
back
and
retrofit
change.
The
curb
line
buy
some
property
all
along
seven
hundred
to
match
the
existing.
L
That
was
a
very
big
change
and
there's
a
lot
of
reasons
why
I
was
kind
of
pushing
for
this
I
could
get
into
probably
a
bunch
of
different
hypothetical
examples
for
you,
but
it's
a
change
that
we
felt
was
pretty
good
and
I'm
glad
we
got
to
discuss
it
with
you
at
the
work
session.
If
you've
got
any
questions
or
concerns
about
that
or
or
anything
else,
I'm
any
of
the
intersection
treatments
I'll
be
happy
to
answer
those
now.
L
F
L
L
That's
why
it's
that's
right.
That's
that's!
Why
that's
that's
exactly!
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
This
is.
This
is
showing
that
the
over
the
course
of
the
the
planning
for
this
document
that
connection
will
be
poked
through
and
you
can
see
it
kind
of
in
the
middle
of
the
of
the
screen
and
I
know.
That's
your
favorite
project,
but.
C
F
K
E
K
E
L
E
G
And
Barbara
talking,
there
is
increased
traffic
in
these
areas
because
of
the
development
has
taken
place
in
these
areas
and
so
those
costs
that
the
part
of
this
is
what's
that
equitable
balance
to
be
able
to
have
if
we
could
jump
to
page
264
of
the
packet
and
and
I
didn't
see
the
300
north
traffic
light
on
there
anywhere
in
the
next
five-year
plan.
Is
I
I
look
through
there,
but
maybe
I
missed
a
mess
going
pretty
quick,
but
are.
G
K
K
G
G
Was
looking
on
the
ones
for
200,
south,
okay,
I'm?
Sorry,
it's
on
page
265,
the
next
one
down
as
we
take
a
look,
it's
one,
two,
three
four
fifth
one
down:
it's
talking
about
and
I
just
wanna
make
sure
I'm
understanding
this
right
widen
to
five
lanes
going
from
the
West
city
limits
to
300
West.
So
we're
talking
that
whole
200,
South
Corridor
we've
been
talking
about
right,
we're
saying
it's:
gonna
cost
the
city
11
point
1
million
and
that
there's
zero
availability
for
impact
fees.
K
B
G
To
take
because
that's
a
huge
chunk,
that's
11
million,
and
if
you
look
at
the
one
just
above
it
you're
talking
the
Pioneer
Crossing,
which
is
20
million,
and
we're
only
allocating
284,000
to
impact
the
eligibility
on
a
20
million
dollar
project
and
I.
Think
this
is
the
one.
Well,
maybe
I've
got
it
wrong.
B
L
Would
be
in
in
if
I
could
check.
Let
me
tell
you
what
I
think.
The
reason
why
that
is
is
because
the
that's,
the
total,
the
project
total
cost.
That
is
correct.
But
if
I
remember
correctly-
and
maybe
we
can
verify
this
in
a
minute
but
on
our
five-year
plan
we
had
looked
at
doing
the
design
in
year-
5,
but
not
building
it
until
later.
So
if
you
were
to
look
at
just
the
design
costs,
some
of
those
should
be
impact
fee
eligible.
But
that's
why
the
smaller
number?
G
C
K
G
We're
putting
in
a
new
signal
at
eleven
twenty,
north
and
150
west
and
there's
zero
benefit
to
new
impact
fees.
I,
don't
know
if
that
makes
sense
either
so,
as
I
went
through.
Sometimes
you
have
identical
costs
like
a
new
roundabout
and
things
of
that
nature,
and
some
of
these
are
major
intersections
that
are
having
that
increase
because
of
the
growth,
so
I'm,
not
sure
how
that
column,
American
for
cost
and
the
impact
the
eligibility
is
done.
G
K
G
G
And
then
we
come
down
to
well
there's
this
one
down
here
on
page
266,
and
this
is
the
one
that
kind
of
their
mind.
I'll
I'll
wait
for
the
explanation
to
come
back.
Okay
at
the
very
bottom.
The
footnote
at
the
very
bottom
of
page
268
also
is
a
little
concerning
to
me.
You
have
it
tally
the
subtotals
of
everything
and
it
has
33
million
I'm,
hoping
that's
American.
Forks
costs
not
what's
be
eligible.
B
G
K
G
In
five
years,
we're
gonna
spend
271
million
dollars
great,
but
the
problem
I
have
is
the
next
one
down.
There
is
footnote,
1
says:
cost
represent
existing
2017
construction
right
away.
Engineering
costs
I
thought
the
whole
purpose
of
going
through
this
was
to
update
the
cost,
because
I
believe
we've
seen
some
increases
in
right
away,
cost
and
construction
costs.
So
this
would
be
reflective
currently,
otherwise,
I
don't
feel
like
it
does
it's
the
benefit
of
going
through
this
analysis,
I.
A
G
L
L
G
J
A
F
L
Mr.
mayor,
this
is
and
council,
this
is
a
UDOT
project
that
they're
doing
some
work
along
that
section
of
Main
Street,
and
they
gave
us
some
good
heads-up
so
that
we
could
get
in
to
do
a
little
bit
of
water
line,
replacement
a
couple
of
hydrants
and
some
work
that
we
felt
needed
to
be
done
to
the
water
system
before
they
did
the
work.
So
this
is
one
that
we
asked
for
your
approval
to
award
this
contract.