►
From YouTube: ASD School Board Work Session 05/03/22
Description
00:00:11 Call to Order, Roll Call
00:00:58 Board Requests For Information (RFI) are items or questions for which Board members have asked fo...
00:12:35 BP5040 Student Nutrition and Physical Activity
00:29:42 2022-23 School Board Meeting Calendar
00:47:27 Adjournment
A
B
A
A
C
Yes,
madam
president,
I
think
this
might
have
gotten
resolved.
I
had
a
conversation
with
mr
anderson
and
to
the
best
of
my
knowledge
after
our
conversation
sounds
like
we,
we
do
not
have
one
and
mr
anderson
doesn't
oppose
the
finance
committee
implementing
a
plan,
and
so
I've
had
initial
conversations
with
finance
chair
lessons
as
to
us
examining
what
that
might
look
like.
So
I
don't
know
that
I
need
further
information
from
the
administration
unless
it
sees
value
and
submitting
more
information
through
the
rfi
process.
Thank
you.
C
D
Nope,
we
can
actually
share
kind
of
the
the
basis
of
the
different
types
of
business
process,
reviews
and
audits
that
we've
done
thus
far
over
the
last
six
years,
which
would
serve
as
a
basis
to
understand
what
new
information
or
or
redoing
for
the
new
superintendent
to
work
with
the
board
in
that
finance
meeting.
But
a
background
of
those
we
can
share
in
the
board
connect
and
provide
links
to
them.
A
E
A
G
A
F
What
did
you
have
pending
well
mine
that
it's
been
around
for
months
and
months
that
I'm
grateful
that
it's
partially
addressed
in
the
the
the
goals
report?
That's
going
to
be
presented
tonight,
but
my
question
was
over
the
past
five
school
years,
how
many
of
our
instructors
have
gotten
unsatisfactory
evaluations,
and
it's
partially
addressed
in
the
report?
That's
coming
up
tonight
as
how
many
teachers
are
were
asked
not
to
reapply
or,
however,
you
put
it
in
that
you
know,
but
it
was
for
the
I
think,
a
three-year
period,
but
it's
different.
H
F
D
Thank
you,
that's
good
information
and
we
had
done
a
study
about
four
years
ago,
which
was
a
different
data
pool
which
is
pretty
significant.
So
we
can
keep
this
on
the
rfi
and
move
it
up
because
it
was
additional
work
that
was
outside
the
guardrail.
So
we
just
wanted
to
know
if
the
board's
guardrail
would
answer
that
it
would
be
in
addition
to
those
that
are
listed
because
they
didn't
leave,
because
you
know
they
left
because
there
was
marks
you
know
made
on
our
unsatisfied
unsatisfactory
marks.
D
F
A
D
D
A
A
H
H
I
D
Through
the
president
to
member
holloman,
no,
they
are
not,
and
the
difference
is
we
added
building
subs
to
be
that
person
that
could
they
might
go
on
a
day
and
sub
for
a
teacher's
aid?
They
might
go
for
a
day
when
they
show
up.
They
could
be
anything
from
the
office
to
a
teacher
and
so
they're
not
engaged
in
the
preparatory
work
that
our
teachers
are
engaged
in
to
plan
for
a
lesson.
D
Carry
out
a
lesson
assess
a
lesson
so
those
long-term
higher
salaried
or
for
certificated
teachers
that
are
subs
that
actually
do
that
full
circle
of
work,
that
a
teacher
does
the
benefit
for
the
building.
Subs
are
that
they
can
have
a
job
every
day
and
just
show
up
and
not
have
you
know
they
can
enter
when
they
enter
and
leave
when
they
leave
and
not
have
that
additional
planning
time
and
responsibility.
So
that's
how
we
divided
it
and
again.
A
B
A
E
D
E
D
A
A
D
J
This
discussion,
there
was
initial
meetings
and
I
think
I
from
melanie
sutton
our
coordinator
of
health
and
physical
education,
who
is
probably
the
world's
greatest
note
taker.
She
has
given
me
her
entire
one
inch
stick
folder
on
this
group,
and
so
I
was
going
through
looking
at
the
history
and
I
thought
I'd
just
share.
It
started
in
february
7th
of
2019
to
review
the
current
policy.
That's
already
in
existence.
J
There
were
at
least
10
different
meetings
held
over
that
time,
and
in
the
middle
of
that
you
may
remember,
we
took
a
little
pause
when
we
got
a
grant
that
came
from
harvard
from
the
t.h
chang
school
of
public
health,
and
we
did
a
wellness
study
in
the
middle
of
the
discussion.
So
we
kind
of
stopped
on
the
the
coordination
of
that
board
ad
hoc
committee,
and
we
did
the
wellness
policy,
and
so
there
was
a
group
meeting
clear
up
to
there
and
coming
up
with
draft
documents.
J
So
that's
the
history
of
why,
and
so
what
I
would
like
to
propose
for
your
discussion
tonight
is
just
a
potential
process.
I
have
talked
to
president
bellamy
and
also
a
member
lessons
who
was
on
the
original
committee
and
has
an
interest
in
this
topic,
and
I
think
you
know
my
proposal
and
maybe
theirs
too.
J
The
details
are
where
administrators
go
to
with
the
bullet
points
to
tell
them.
This
is
what
you're
supposed
to
do,
and
here
are
the
things
that
you
need
to
make
sure
you
have
in
place,
and
so
we
had
presented
sort
of
a
draft
of
that
and
then
we
stopped,
and
so
what
I
would
propose
is
that,
starting
in
august,
we
would
put
together
a
ward
ad
hoc
committee
and,
as
a
discussion
starter,
I
would
recommend
at
minimum
that
we
have
two
school
board
members.
J
Perhaps
three
from
elementary
one
of
those
being
director
and
tim
andrew
was
here
this
evening.
He
was
one
of
the
folks.
That's
been
working
behind
the
scenes
to
look
at
how
elementary
principals
are
interacting
with
this
policy
and
get
two
principles.
If
there
was
one
thing
that
was
a
probably
a
little
not
represented
as
well
as
could
have
been
in
the
summer
time,
the
last
time
this
came
up
is
at
that
time.
J
Member
senior
director
glenn
nielsen
was
the
only
elementary
representative
in
those
meetings
and
he
was
in
between
jobs,
and
so
we
didn't
get
full
elementary
principal
representation
as
to
how
this
policy
affects
them.
So
we
would
probably
make
a
more
concerted
effort
to
have
some
elementary
principles
on
that
group.
A
secondary
director
and
I'd
recommend
that
be
marty.
Lang
marty's,
the
one
that
worked
with
student
nutrition
worked
on
the
smart
snacks
waiver,
the
federal
rules
that
go
along
with
the
whole
student
nutrition
aspect
of
board
policy,
50
40..
J
Perhaps
someone
from
mental
health
or
health
services.
One
of
those
I
would
recommend.
We
have
two
people
from
the
health
field
itself.
Perhaps
a
teacher
and
perhaps
melanie
sutton
herself
who's
been
probably
the
most
knowledgeable
about
this
and
then
under
other.
I
would
recommend
at
least
someone
from
student
nutrition
who
knows
the
federal
rules
on
that,
because
there
is
a
whole
segment
of
student
attrition
to
this
policy
and
then
others
as
the
board
would
would
dictate.
I
think,
as
to
representation
that
you
would
like.
J
We
can
come
back
to
the
committee.
Make
some
tweaks
prepare
a
second
draft
based
on
feedback
and
then
really
the
board's
policy
writing
process
just
kicks
in
it
goes
to
governance,
then
the
three-member
governance
committee
would
wordsmith
it
to
death
and
create
you
know
what
they
actually
want
to
propose
to
the
full
board
for
its
actual
policy
and
that's
pretty
much
it.
J
The
big
part
that
really
we
need
to
do
heavily
is
whatever
this
board
passes
really
needs
to
be
communicated
very
thoroughly
to
our
principles,
because
one
of
the
things
that's
happened
over
the
years
is,
as
administrators
have
come
and
gone
and
things
have
turned
over.
You
know
the
actual
compliance
to
the
current
policy
is
is
weak
at
best
and
it's
actually
written
in
such
a
long
form.
That's
hard
for
principals
with
a
you
know,
long
narrative
for
them
to
sort
out.
J
E
Sure,
well,
first
of
all,
thank
you,
dr
stock,
for
your
continued
attention
and
collaboration,
and
thank
you,
miss
sutton
for
your
continued
everything
in
this
process.
Both
of
you
have
been
instrumental
for
a
number
of
years,
and
I
appreciate
that.
I
think
one
question
that
I
have.
I
really
like
the
plan
to
move
forward:
there's
an
architecture
and
there's
a
narrative
and
a
path
forward.
It
reminds
me
of
the
process
that
the
board
went
through
this
summer.
You
know
keep
delete,
modify.
E
I
think
it's
important
to
bring
this
current
board
up
to
speed
and
that
the
end
product
really
is
thoughtful
and
places
students
needs
academically
emotionally
behaviorally
physically
at
the
center
of
that
product,
and
so
I
am
hopeful
for
whatever
comes
of
it.
A
couple
of
logistical
questions
that
I
have
one
is:
if
there's
a
creation
of
an
ad
hoc
committee,
is
that
something
that
needs
to
be
voted
on
and
two?
E
Is
there
any
ongoing
collaboration
with
dr
cohen
and
the
grant
that
she
has
received
that
I
guess
we
would
need
to
be
aware
of
that
would
interfere
with
a
trajectory
that
out.
You
know
that
is
outlined
here.
Right,
you
know
sort
of
beginning
work
in
august,
continuing
through
the
fall
coming
up
with
something
that
could
then
be
communicated
in
a
timely
manner
for
for
putting
for
implementing
in
fall
of
23..
J
Thank
you
to
remember
member
lessons
through
the
president.
There
is
a
current
interview
process
that
is
underway
through
the
grant
where
they
are
doing
focused
interviews
verbally
by
just
calling
individual
principals
who've
been
part
of
the
wellness
pilot
and
just
trying
to
understand
what
parts
of
the
policy
are
they
still
implementing
voluntarily
as
a
result
of
that
process.
So
we
will
have
data
come
august
that
I
think
the
committee
can
look
at
and
with
regards
to,
we
could
also
review
the
original
research
that
was
done
on
it
and
also
review.
J
E
A
C
My
I
guess
I
I
think
I
find
value,
especially
when
it
comes
to
stakeholder
input
from
the
community
and
from
staff
will
be
implementing
the
policy,
and
so
I
think
that's
that's
the
big
draw
here
for
me
member
lessons,
and
I
did
do
some
initial
work
and
governance
over
the
past
year
to
get
the
ball
rolling
on
it.
So
I
would
be
willing
to
to
serve
on
the
ad
hoc
committee.
You
know
if
there's
others
who
want
to
participate.
C
E
Yes,
I
just
had
one
at
least
one
other
thought
there
is
the
state
of
alaska.
As
far
as
what
we
want
to
consider
you
know
in
this
process,
the
state
of
alaska
does
have
a
very
helpful
checklist
for
what
should
be
included
in
a
wellness
policy,
and
so
I
think
there
are
a
number
of
guiding
documents
that
we
can.
A
G
E
E
A
A
J
Yes,
she
participated
the
the
last
time.
As
I
recall
the
difference
here
is
there
were
a
lot
of
other
health
providers.
Besides
her
there
there
were
there
were
I
started
saying
podiatrists,
I
think
pediatricians
might
be
a
better
word.
There
were
a
number
of
other
doctors
and
folks
that
were
there
experts,
but
I
think
with
lauren
his
representation
and
melanie
and
her
team,
I
think
we'd
have
it
covered.
Okay,.
A
All
right,
so
I'm
just
trying
to
establish
a
timeline
for
the
ad
hoc
committee,
because
I
don't
want
it
to
go
out,
go
on
forever,
and
so,
when
do
you
think
it's
reasonable
that
we
would
have
a
draft
in
the
fall
establishing
the
fall,
the
next
step?
So
if
we
had
a
draft
by
9-1
that
that
would
give
the
committee
I.
A
A
A
A
A
B
Attention
of
joint
meeting
dates
or
have
not
been
confirmed
by
the
assembly.
Thank
you.
The
tentative
dates
have
not
been
confirmed
by
this
assembly
because
they
have
not
set
their
calendar
for
2023
yet,
and
so
we
went
through
the
the
july
through
december.
Dates
have
been
set
by
the
municipality,
and
so
those
ones
are
solid.
They're.
B
A
A
K
D
K
Okay
and
then,
as
far
as
the
school
board
meeting
calendar,
I
know
we're
still
conflicting
we're
doing
at
the
same
time
as
the
assembly,
which
I
know
has
been
one
of
the
criticisms
some
people
have.
That
makes
it
difficult
for
people
to
participate
as
an
issue
as
consideration
in
regards
to
you
know,
I
know
that
sometimes
we
get
disruptive
meetings
we
get
other
kite,
but
I
don't
really
want
to
shut
people
down
either
from
from
being
able
to
voice
whatever
they
want
to
voice
and
that's
a
little
bit
of
an
issue.
A
Part
of
part
of
that
is
to
lessen
the
impact
on
staff
when
they
are
repairing
the
reports
and
getting
ready
for
getting
ready
for
our
meeting.
They
work
all
weekend
for
a
monday
meeting
to
be
ready
for
us
on
on
monday,
so
it
personally
I
can
speak.
I
I'm
not
available
on
mondays,
but
if
the
board
wants
to
move
change
to
meetings,
we
didn't
do
wednesdays,
because
that's
church
night
prayer
meeting
nights,
we
didn't
want
to
impact
that.
B
One
of
the
main
reasons
was
the
the
work
on
staff
and
we
did.
We
do
work
to
try
and
offset
the
meetings
with
the
assembly
offsetting
every
meeting,
trying
to
predict
what
they'll
be
doing
for
2023.
We
did
land
quite
a
few
on
mondays,
so
I
did
move
the
major
ones
that
were
for
bond
and
budget
so
that
those
different
conflicts.
A
Does
the
assembly
meet
the
second
and
the
fourth
they're
not
consistent,
see
that
we
went
to
the
first
and
third
tuesday
because
they
were
on
the
second
and
fourth?
They
have
since
changed.
Well
they're,
not
consistent,
because
sometimes
they
don't
have
the
same
pattern
like
we
do
or
consistency
as
we
do.
A
D
Madam
president,
I
recall,
through
the
discussion
a
couple
of
years
ago
due
to
the
pandemic
and
the
ability
of
phone
in,
although
some
people
like
to
come
in
person
both
at
the
assembly
and
here
allowing
for
that
that
kind
of
release
just
very
similar
policies
on
the
board
that
you
could
be
home
and
still
do
a
board
meeting.
I
think
that
that
also
was
part
of
the
board's
discussion
that
the
ability
to
testify
was
still
provided,
and
that
was
key
via
telephone
was
one
of
the
things
at
both
meetings.
B
A
D
And,
madam
president,
the
very
first
year
that
it
changed,
I
think
president
agusti
was
here
and
at
that
time
the
assembly
did
have
a
pattern
and
we
adjusted
to
their
pattern.
And
then
the
next
year
was
when
we
found
some
trouble
and
when
we
asked
them,
they
just
said
they.
They
often
change
them
and
they
they
just.
D
They
have
different
dates
and
and
for
in
different
reasons,
because
of
their
other
meetings
that
they
have
so
initially
the
first
year
worked
beautifully
and
then,
as
we
moved
to
the
second
year,
it
was
all
wonky
and
that's
when
we
found
out
they
didn't
have
a
pattern.
What
we
had
seen
it.
They
just
shared
that
that
was
by
coincidence.
K
Yes,
sir,
I
I
appreciate
the
explanation
because
I
have
been
asked
that,
like
in
community
councils
and
what
are
we
going
to
do
in
the
future,
I
said
we'll
look
at
it
so
now
I've
got
an
answer
for
that
and
I
think
anyone
else
on
the
that
gets
into
community
council
is
asking
that
question.
At
least
we
got
some
explanation
that
we're
not
trying
to
avoid
them
appreciate
it.
Thank
you.
D
G
A
A
I
D
D
F
A
A
F
D
It's
just
not
in
all
schools
done
as
part
of
the
announcements,
in
fact,
in
many
schools
to
increase
student
learning
time,
chugach
optional
is
one
of
them
that
they
expect
them
to
be
done
in
the
classrooms,
and
they
only
do
announcements
once
a
week
and
then
the
kids
come
down
and
it's
a
production,
but
generally
announcements
will
take.
You
know
10
minutes
or
so
could
be
longer,
and
they
wanted
to
give
the
instructional
time
back
to
classrooms.
D
So
we
have
supervisors
have
supported
the
pledge
of
allegiance
to
be
done
in
individual
classrooms
rather
than
on
the
announcements
we
could.
That
was
our
last
discussion
of
a
difference
of
opinion
on
what
the
policy
communicated,
but
really,
maybe,
as
we
could
do
a
a
doodle
google.
Whatever
thing
just
to
ask,
I
don't
I
don't
know
you
know,
will
we
just
be
asking
our
administrators
to
share
when
is
it
done?
F
Madam
president,
when
I
said
policy
I
actually
was
referring
to
an
administrative
regulation
because
in
the
administrative
regulation
I
think
it's
clear
that
it's
supposed
to
be
over
the
public
address
system
and
I
kind
of
consider
that
board
policy
too.
It's
it's
there,
it's
in
the
rules
and
when
there's
administrative
regulation
it
implies
that
we
don't
have
to
do
our
own
policy.
D
Sure
and
madam
president,
with
that,
we
can
do
that
survey,
but
also
that's
why
it's
administrative
regulation
to
really
get
feedback
from
schools
who
are
implementing
the
policy,
and
that
was
a
request
from
them,
and
so
certainly
we
could
ask
them
if
the
board
wants
to
make
it
a
policy,
but
it
would
be
appropriate.
We
believe
to
adjust
that
administrative
regulation
to
allow
that
to
happen.
D
If,
because
we
have
we,
we
have
given
permission
for
that
to
happen
for
the
sole
reason
not
to
avoid
saying
the
pledge,
but
for
the
sole
reason
of
recapturing
student
learning
time,
especially
with
the
the
young
children.
So
whatever
the
board's
desire
is
you
can
carry
this
forward
if
this
is
part
of
the
governance,
but
those
were
the
discussions
around
it.
But
please
note
that
there
is
no
intention
in
schools
to
not
say
the
pledge
of
allegiance,
that
that
was
crystal
clear
in
our
direction.
F
H
F
I
was
there
when
the
pledge
was
supposed
to
be
by
the
administrative
regulations
said.
It
was
not,
and
I
personally
observed
and
listened,
and
there
were
classrooms
where
it
was
not
being
said,
because
there
was
no
state
school-wide
participation
in
facilitated
individual
classrooms,
not
saying
that.
A
So
remember
donnelly
I'm
going
to
recommend
that
we
have
this
discussion.
Look
at
the
policy
again
in
governance.
It
seems
perfectly
in
my
grandson's
school.
They
don't
say
it
publicly.
They
say
it
in
their
classroom.
That's
how
he
learned
it.
He
learned
it
with
his
schoolmate
with
his
class
in
his
class,
and
so
whilst
I
think
schools
need
to
have
some
flexibility
on
how
it's
done.
It's
not
a
matter
of
not
doing
that,
so
whether
that's
an
adjustment
to
the
ar
or
whether
it's
an
adjustment
to
our
policy.
A
K
You
I'll
just
say
that
for
administrative
regulations,
I
do
that
under
totally
the
control
of
the
superintendent,
because
that's
coming
from
her,
so
she
has
that
flexibility.
When
it
comes
to
a
policy,
only
the
board
can
alter
the
policy
they
have
to
be
followed,
but
administrative
regulations
allow
and
should
allow
the
administration
to
evaluate
the
appropriateness
at
different
times,
since
they
have
the
ability
to
establish
it
to
to
revise
it,
eliminate
it
under
their
control.
So
I
think
the
administration
we
have
to
recognize
falls
underneath
the
superintendent.
From
my
perspective,
thank
you.