►
From YouTube: ASD Finance Meeting 9-14-22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Are
you
ready,
I
think
so,
yeah,
okay,
great
good
good
noon,
everyone!
It
is
Wednesday
the
14th
of
September
we're
gathered
for
our
finance
meeting
and
today
in
the
boardroom
we
have
members
Higgins,
Holloman,
Jacobs,
number
lessons
myself,
it's
my
understanding
that
what
president
Bellamy
will
be
coming
after
she
finishes
up
with
the
local
community
council
and
then
hopefully
we
will
receive
other
members
online
and
I'm
just
going
to
go.
A
We
have
some
guests
from
the
administration
and
our
allies,
our
teammates,
so
we
could
go
around
the
room
and
introduce
ourselves
for
the
record
real,
quick.
E
A
And
in
the
back
we
have
Captain.
Oh.
G
A
Teacher
great
okay:
we
have
three
items
on
our
agenda
today.
The
first
item
is
our
P
card
audit.
So
I
will
let
our
Auditors
take
over.
Thank
you,
Meredith
and
Mike.
Thank.
D
You
as
we
introduced
ourselves
previously,
my
name
is
Mike
Chadwick.
This
is
Meredith.
She
is
newer
to
ASD
I
think
this
is
her
first
meeting
with
with
you
all
so
this
is
our
our
P
card
audit
that
we
were
asked
to
conduct.
We've
done
this
in
the
past.
I
think
this
may
be
second,
third
or
second
I,
don't
know
at.
I
D
Just
want
to
emphasize
on
page
two
of
this
report.
We
have
the
overall
evaluation.
We
have
our
first
sentence.
Overall,
most
employees
comply
with
District
policies
and
procedures
regarding
the
use
of
P
cards.
This
is
not
a
sentence
that
we
typically
put
in
an
audit
report.
In
other
words,
we
don't
typically
start
off
with
something
good.
D
Given
the
nature
and
size
of
ASD
ASD
is
a
is
a
big
organization
with
a
lot
of
activities
occurring,
most
employees
are
doing
what
they
need
to
do
with
Peak
Hearts.
However,
we
did
find
some
areas
for
improvement.
D
For
example,
we
found
that
some
gift
cards
I
did
not
have
a
conditional
approval
prior
to
the
purchase
being
moved.
Some
of
the
gift
card
purchases
may
have
been
denied
if
conditional
approval
had
been
sought
in
advance.
D
Finding
two
and
I
need
to
back
up
in
each
one
of
these
findings
and
recommendations.
Management
was
very
responsive
to
the
findings
and
and
recommendations,
and
not
only
were
they
responsive.
They
got
the
response.
Back
to
us
in
time,
which
sometimes
is
unusual
not
for
ASD
but
further
organizations,
finding
two
we
had
some
transactions
split
to
circumvent
the
dollar
limits.
The
P
cart
holders
have
a
dollar
threshold
that
they
can
make
purchases
say
up
to
twenty
five
hundred
dollars.
E
I
E
Have
already
through
on
the
radar,
but
that's
something
that
we
have
to
add
to
the
training,
so
people
are
aware
that
those
things
can
happen
or
you
thought
you
ordered
one
thing
from
Amazon
and
the
quantity
was
wrong
and
it
process
so
yeah.
We
definitely
kind
of
caught
me
by
surprise
I
as
soon
as
they
brought
it
up
as
soon
as
she
found
it.
We
could
see
how
it
could
happen,
but
we
had
not
addressed
that.
In
previous
terms.
That's.
D
A
good
point
you
know,
for
example,
one
of
the
purchases
that
we
found
was
one
high
school
had
forty
four
hundred
dollars
they
purchased
for
flag
uniforms.
They
split
it
into
two
purchases.
E
To
be
clear,
what
they
should
have
done
is
a
PR,
that's
what
you're
supposed
to
do
or
get
your
credit
card
limit
increased
and
they
can
ask
for
that.
But
not
asking
and
not
not
trying
to
find
the
fix
and
put
the
right
thing
in
place
is,
is
what
Meredith
was
looking
for.
Thank.
D
You
finding
three
at
the
bottom
of
page
four,
we
had
a
personal
purchases
using
the
P
card,
we're
not
always
reimbursed,
and
we
identified
23
of
96
personal
transactions.
They
didn't
total
a
whole
lot,
but
they
hadn't
been
reimbursed.
However,
during
the
course
of
the
audit,
most
of
those
personal
key
card
transactions
were
reimbursed
and
I.
Don't
think
for
a
lot
of
these
that
it
was
an
intentional.
It
was
perhaps
they
got
mixed
up.
For
example,
they
may
have
been
on
Amazon
and
they
bought
something
and
they
used
the
wrong
credit
card.
E
Activate
the
other
thing
we
did
late
last
year
and-
and
it
wasn't
in
effect
for
this
whole
audit
period
was
change
the
P
card.
We
did
a
contest
where
Student
Art
was
used
and
we
changed
all
the
P
cards,
because,
frankly,
four
or
five
years
ago
my
Alaska
Airlines
card
looked
exactly
like
at
five
in
the
morning.
E
E
D
And
I
think
that
was
a
real
creative
solution,
because
when
you
pull
that
card
out,
you
think
that
can't
be
my
car
that
colorful
artwork
that
might
have
stick
it
in,
so
it
helped
finding
for
this
was
we
found
a
few
prohibited
transactions
around
the
contract
and
transportation?
D
In
our
previous
slide,
we
actually
found
quite
a
few
more
so
this
is
a
big
Improvement
regarding
prohibited
transactions,
not
very
many,
you
think
of
the
number
of
transactions
that
we
have,
that
the
ASD
has
and
the
dollar
value.
This
is
very
few
prohibited
transactions
finding
five.
D
This
is
donations
that
were
made
using
Peak
cards
to
agencies,
not
included
on
the
district's
charitable,
giving
campaign
list
or
not
approved
by
an
appropriate
instructional
division
senior
director.
We
found
five
of
those,
not
large
dollar
value,
but
nonetheless
they're
supposed
to
be
on
that
approved
list.
E
A
lot
of
the
challenges
for
this
is
students
like
when
the
Ukrainian
Invasion
occurred,
students
go
out
and
do
a
fundraiser
with
the
specific
intent
of
donating
it
to
this
organization
and
and
frankly,
not
every
sponsor
understood
what
about
the
charitable
giving
list
and
we've
we
haven't,
updated
it
in
the
last
year.
E
We
are
going
to
put
some
effort
into
that
and
making
sure
that
we
we
fix
the
list
and
make
it
better,
but
all
they
really
had
to
do
was
send
an
email
and
Elementary
or
secondary
directors
would
have
looked
at
the
the
organization
and
if
it
was
valid
they
would
have
said.
Yes,
it.
D
Yeah
are
fighting
six
at
the
top
of
page
a
we
have
that
we
have
two
record
purchases,
we're
not
always
approved
within
seven
business
days,
and
we
found
it
took
an
average
of
eight
days
now,
that's
an
average
eight
days
versus
seven
days,
but
on
average
there
were
some
that
are
higher.
D
E
This
this
continues
to
be
a
struggle.
You
know
the
second,
they
swipe
the
card
we've
already
paid,
but
to
get
everything
winked
up
and
matched
and
to
be
able
to
account
for
everything
they
need
to
approve
it,
and
so.
E
Work
with
it
really
is
District
level
leadership
at
director
level
and
and
at
schools
to
make
sure
that
that
we
look
at
the
process
to
see
if
there's
a
way,
we
can
streamline
that
to
make
it
cleaner
and
and
we'll
have
something
by
this
spring
to
start
floating
by
the
principles.
The.
E
Gotten
better
is
we
we
do
talk
to
principals
before
we
Implement
changes
that
didn't
happen
as
much
when
I
first
got
here,
I
think
we're
a
much
stronger
team
on
making
sure
that
for
one
they
understand
it
better.
If
you
get
their
input
and
and
talk
it
through
with
them,
but
they.
D
This
is
there's
an
improvement
here.
It's
important,
it
helps
keeps
the
district's
financial
reporting
up
to
date
and
current
97.
This
is
dealing
with
Amazon,
Prime,
memberships
and
well.
The
intent
may
be
good
to
get
a
Prime
Membership.
We
found
that
there
were
a
lot
of
memberships
bought,
are
purchased
and
sometimes
these
memberships
were
purchased
at
the
same
school.
When
you
could
have
just
said,
hey
one
person
has
a
membership
and
we
all
use
the
membership
instead
of
two
or
three
people
having
memberships
all
at
the
same
school.
D
So
we
found
quite
a
few
of
these
and
you
know
there's
ways
that
that
can
be
centralized
and
have
just
one
membership
purchased
for
the
entire
school
or
for
just
down
here
at
the
administration
building,
instead
of
having
three
or
four
because
like
at
home,
if
you're
at
home
your
significant
other
purchases
of
membership,
you
said
I
just
purchased
one.
Last
week
now
we
have
two
kind
of
the
same
type
of
thing.
J
E
E
E
These
things
up
as
they're
finding
them,
and
so
we've
been
working
that
and
when
you
do,
the
Amazon
business
account
those
schools
who
have
started
making
that
transition.
It
accounts
for
that.
So
you
have
multiple
different
people
using
it
right.
We
don't
share
passwords,
so
you
wouldn't
share
that
and
it
allows
us
into
the
same
business
account
then,
but
you
only
have
to
pay
for
one
account
right.
E
It
just
allows
like
one
of
ours
is
for
a
hundred
people
and
it
allows
up
to
100
people
to
go
off
of
this
business
account,
but
we
only
have
to
pay
for
the
one
business
account,
but
you're
not
going
to
share
peacock
numbers
with
other
people.
So
of
course
that's
not
that's
not
the
way
it's
set
up
thanks.
D
That's
the
findings
and
and
the
recommendations
that
we
have
in
the
report,
like
I,
said
they
were
very
responsive.
Like
Jim
said
we
talked
with
with
them
months
ahead
of
time.
They
already
know
what
we're
finding
and
are
working
on
addressing
these
things.
At
the
back
of
the
report,
we
have
several
attachments
that
that
just
gives
some
some
statistics
that
people
have
been
interested
in
the
past
like
where
do
these?
Who
makes
these
purchases?
D
What
vendors
are
we
using
these
types
of
things,
and
so
we
just
kind
of
summarize
those
in
the
back
people
just
found
interesting
before
to
come
through,
and
that's
our
report
right
now,
just
to
give
you
an
update,
we're
working
on
the
audit
of
the
Food
Warehouse
and
we've
done
some
of
our
preliminary
work
now
doing
what
we
call
our
field
work,
where
we're
digging
a
little
bit
deeper
into
the
areas
that
we
thought
were
the
most
interesting
or
or
could
have
effects
that
are
important.
A
H
D
J
I
was
going
to
say,
having
been
a
victim
of
the
previous
process
and
I
should
say,
with
a
miracle
by
him
was
people
that
pulled
up
their
motives
and
12
hours
later.
Katie
was
on
the
phone
to
me
and
it
all
got
wrapped
up
really
quickly,
but
yeah.
J
You
got
to
be
careful
what
you
do
in
Missouri
for
the
people,
but
this
has
made
it
so
that
a
lot
of
employees
don't
carry
a
burden
of
either
having
to
buy
something
and
wait
a
month
or
to
go
through
a
paperwork
process,
that's
costly
with
them.
In
the
district
and
everything
the
first
time
this
audit
came
out.
There
was
kind
of
a
reaction
from
a
lot
of
people.
I
want
to
go.
Look
at
all
these
problems.
It's
like!
J
The
the
other
interesting
thing
would
be
the
number
of
purchases,
just
the
gross
number
of
purchases
to
get
made,
but
people
hit-
and
maybe
it's
in
there,
but
people
forget
how
how
much
this
organization
buys
and
how
frequently
people
have
to
buy
it
and
and
far
less
of
a
concept
of
teachers
Pockets.
Now,
just
because
there's
a
process
where
you
can
do
something
in
a
reasonable
amount
of
time
without
just
deciding
implementing
myself
so
really
support
it.
J
D
I
make
two
comments
regarding
the
number
of
transactions
from
March
1st
2021
to
the
end
of
February
2022.
There
were
46
547
transactions
12
before
process
of
10.6
million
dollars.
D
And
then
to
another
one
of
your
points.
I
think
it's
important
to
do
this
on
it
because
or
to
periodically
do
this
audit
because
it
sends
up,
it
sends
a
message
that
someone
is
looking
and
someone
that
that
these
are
it's
important,
I
think
if
we
just
done
the
first
audit
years
ago
and
then
said
that
was
it
we're
never
going
to
look
at
this
again.
I
think
you
probably
would
have
some
more
significant
issues.
I
B
Just
quick
comment:
I
I
worked
in
purchasing
25
years
ago
a
long
time
ago,
and
that
was
back
when
every
school
was
relying
on
purchasing
to
get
every
penny
every
pencil
whatever.
So
the
P
card
process
me
hearing
about
that
was
like.
Oh,
my
God,
that's
wonderful!
The
schools
have
accessibility
to
what
they
need
when
they
need
it.
So
I
appreciate
this
process
very
good.
A
Go
to
the
second
item
on
today's
agenda:
fy24
budget
updates,
okay,.
E
So
The
One
update
I
have
is
you
know:
we've
been
briefing
the
board
now,
every
two
weeks
and
we'll
brief
you
again
on
Tuesday.
We've
also
been
briefing
the
principles
at
the
in
July
and
and
and
at
the
general
leadership
meeting
today
at
the
at
the
conclusion
of
the
finance
meeting,
we've
been
doing
small
group
breakouts.
E
So
in
the
past,
when
budget
deficits
were
pretty
small,
we
would
always
invite
principal
leadership
in
and
some
other
groups,
but
when
you're
looking
at
68
million
plus
dollars,
we
knew
that
we
needed
to
when
we
talked
transparency,
it's
not
just
the
school
board,
it's
to
the
staff,
it's
to
the
principles
it's
to
the
community,
it's
everybody
so
we've
been
bringing
the
principles
in
and
we
briefed
them
once
this
morning
with
everything
we
brief
last
Tuesday
and
then
we
and
having
45-minute
sessions
with
small
groups
as
they
come
in
and
you'll
see
around
the
room.
E
There's
eight
different
posterior
board
things
set
up
and
we
talked
to
them
for
about
20
30
minutes
if
they're
they're
in
feedback
and
comments
and
and
then
on
the
on
the
sticky
notes,
they
put
all
kinds
of
things
from
programs,
they
think
should
be
reduced
or
increased
because
as
we
go
through
this
and
we're
not
there
yet
in
the
budget
discussions
but
you're
gonna
start
seeing
in
in
just
a
matter
of
a
few
meetings.
E
Student
outcome
data
attached
to
those
programs,
because,
at
the
end
of
the
day
you
prioritize
on
the
mission
and
the
mission
is
educating
students
and
sometimes
you
may
actually
invest
more
money
in
a
program.
That's
working
while
reducing
programs
that
you
can't
validate
that
that
they
are
working
and
have
that
in
with
direct
feedback
and
input
from
principals
on
what
they
value
most
on
top
of
the
community
surveys,
because
it
it's
different.
E
You
know
when
we,
when
we
brief
the
principles
when
you're
briefing
people
you're
talking
to
people
you're,
not
talking
with
people
right
and
so
today's
effort
and
it's
pretty
much
all
day
other
than
the
one
hour
kickoff
for
the
briefing
piece
is
talking
to
the
staff,
the
directors,
the
principals,
the
aps,
who
are
in
the
building
and
and
having
those
conversations
about
what
they
value
the
most
and
frankly,
there's
quite
a
few
things
up
on
the
board
that
we
were
not
on
my
list
of
things
to
look
at
because
they
lived
that
world
they're
in
that
Community.
E
So
it's
been
today's
been
pretty
productive.
It'll
take
several
days
for
Katie
Grant
to
take
all
of
those
things
and
put
it
into
groups
and
categories
of
of
comments,
thoughts
and
ideas,
but.
E
Important
to
involve
principals
necessarily
because
they're
going
to
help
us
with
the
solutions
and
they're
going
to
help
us
plan
the
implementation
and,
frankly,
without
their
support,
you
can't
Implement
good
ideas
from
the
Ed
center
right
they're.
The
leaders
in
our
schools
and
I
think
you'll
find.
If
you
talk
to
the
principals
that
I
I
haven't
gotten
any
negative
feedback
today,
they
they
appreciate
being
brought
in
early.
E
They
appreciate
us
listening
and
and
the
dialogue
from
today
and
and
you'll
see,
there's
thousands
of
sticky
notes
on
the
eight
different
categories
and
you
know
I.
E
E
In
fact,
transparent
sometimes
means
more
complicated
and
more
emotional,
but
the
community
has
a
right
and
a
need
to
know
that
you
know
when
I
look
at
programs,
we
won't
name
up
any
specific
program.
We
know
that
88
of
all
of
our
our
money
goes
towards
people.
So
when
you
talk
about
a
program,
it's
not
lost
on
Dr
Bryant
or
the
staff
that
that
program
is
people
with
lives,
houses
and
mortgages
and
families.
E
E
But
at
the
end
of
the
day,
it
isn't
the
district
that
failed
to
change
the
BSA
in
fiscal
year
18.
It
was
the
legislators
priorities
for
the
past
six
years,
and
and
so
we
will
have
a
balanced
budget
in
in
February,
and
the
board
will
vote
on
whatever
that
balanced
budget
is
with
maybe
a
few
amendments
thrown
in
full
space.
But
we
also
at
this
table
because
we're
bringing
in
principles
this
early.
We
know
that
the
second
the
board
votes
on
the
budget
we're
also
now
refining.
E
So
we
can
limit
any
disruption.
As
much
as
possible,
so
you
you
will,
as
you
walk
around
to
the
schools,
please
ask
the
principals
what
they
thought
of
this
and
get
their
feedback,
because
we
want
to
do
what's
right
by
them
and
their
kids
and
their
staff.
A
I
think
that's
a
wonderful
update.
Remember.
J
Holland
I
was
gonna,
say:
I
really
appreciated
the
format
at
the
work
session,
where
a
program
is
listed
in
the
marginal
cost
of
that
program
allowance
for
the
fact
is
we
don't
have
students
in
that
program.
We
still
have
them
in
a
classroom.
Still
have
a
teacher
I
think
at
times
in
the
past
have
been
presented
like
the
program
costs
this
much
and
it's
all
the
salaries
and
it's
all
the
resources,
I
I'll
even
go
so
far
as
to
say,
because
that
program
had
been
tech
for
elimination.
J
So
it
wasn't
a
true
cost
necessarily
but
I
feel
like
we're
getting
an
accurate
picture.
It's
still
going
to
be
terrible
choices
when
it
comes
down
to
it,
but
but
I
think
the
information
has
been
very
fairly
presented.
Well,.
E
E
C
E
Model
remain
because
if
the
Middle
School
model
goes
away,
which
has
been
done
a
couple
times
in
the
past
and
that
brought
back,
there's
cost
savings
for
that
and
all
of
those
things
Compound
on
each
other,
where
the
one
number
is
a
standalone
really
isn't
accurate
unless
all
these
other
things
happen
as
well,
so
hopefully
to
our
finance
meetings.
As
we
really
talk
about
some
of
these
things
over
the
next
few
months
and
at
work
sessions
at.
F
A
You're
you're
foreign
foreshadowing
that
we're
going
to
receive
student
outcome
data
linked
to
the
costs
in
our
future
meetings,
because
I
think
that
there's
an
opportunity
to
show
how
funding
directly
impacts
student
learning
and
I
was
just
reading
about
how
Tennessee
has
really
leveraged
their
Esser
funds
to
make
some
transformative
gains
and
I
feel
like
there
is
an
opportunity
for
ASD
to
lead
the
way
in
the
state
of
Alaska,
and
so
okay,
if
you
want
transformative
student
outcomes,
this
is
the
funding.
That's
required
to
do
to
do
just
that.
Well,.
E
There
are
a
lot
of
legislators,
who've
been
very
vocal
in
the
past
many
years
that
they
don't
want
to
increase
until
they
see
things
happening.
But
as
we
worked
behind
the
scenes
on
the
Alaska
REITs
act
to
get
the
ADM
funding
for
pre-k
spent
a
lot
of
time
talking
to
legislators
about
how
it
it
ended
up
saving
money
by
having
Pre-K,
because
now
they
may
not
need
an
IEP
when
they
come
into
kindergarten
and
and
all
of
those
discussions
behind
the
scenes
helped
build
consensus.
E
That
Pre-K
was
important
so
as
we
can
tie
assessment
outcome,
data
to
the
cost
of
programs,
there's
always
very
likely
potentials
to
work
with
legislators,
about
specific
funding
for
specific
things,
and
sometimes
it's
easier
to
get
that
than
it
is
Broad
across
the
board
funding
increases,
although
frankly
we
want
both.
We.
G
I
E
Although
we
had
one-time
funding
to
include
federal
and
state,
but
so
I
think
tying,
this
assessment
data
to
the
cost
is
going
to
help
us
give
the
legislature
other
options
besides
one-time
funding
or
BSA,
but
look
at
it
programmatically
for
things
that
work,
so
it
it's.
It's
worth
the
effort.
It's
worth
the
effort
for
us
and
it's
worth
it
to
help
the
legislature
help
us.
G
Yeah
I
wanted
to
give
Express
appreciation
for
superintendent,
Bryant,
Mr
Anderson
and
your
team,
the
intentional
and
thoughtful
information-based
conversations
from
starting
earlier
whenever
I
think
particular
community
and
having
this
you
know,
the
most
transparent
budget
process
ever
is
doing
a
lot
to
inform
the
public
understandings.
G
It's
going
to
be
a
conversation
that
should
be
happening
now.
Board
legislators
arrives
in
general
and
so.
E
E
If,
if
anything,
he
picked
up
quickly,
he
did
understand
having
gone
through
it
large
deficits
and
what
it
takes
to
to
build
consensus
as
you
come
up
with
the
plan,
so
that
I
mean
so
that
you
had
to
go
through
that.
But.
H
Remember,
I
appreciate
the
discussion
and
I
like
the
discussion
with
staff,
and
particularly
you
know.
Principals
as
well
have
been
formulating.
This
I
think.
The
way
I
want
to
make
sure
is
on
the
table
is:
what's
not
just
discussion.
The
value
of
the
program
I
got
right
now,
but
what's
missing,
I
mean
we've
got
the
curriculum
issues.
We've
got
other
issues.
What
are
we
going
to
do
in
order
to
improve
academic
outcomes,
and
that
may
mean
putting
programs
and
putting
programs
that
aren't
out
there
right
now
priorities
either?
H
What
we've
got
existing
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
that
focus
on
improving
academic
health
problems
is
up
top
on
the
list,
and
that
means
what
else
is
it?
Are
we
missing?
Even
if
we've
got
a
big
drop
in
funding
and
we're
looking
at
trying
to
maintain
what
we've
got?
There
are
other
options
there
to
try
to
improve
outcomes,
because
our
academic
scores
are
not
there.
H
Review
and
changes,
but
we've
got
to
look
at
doing
things
differently,
not
just
what
we're
doing
right
now,
how
quick
is
doing.
But
what
are
we
not
doing
that?
We
need
to
do
the
changes,
because
I
really
think
that's
a
big
nightmare.
We
got
right
now
where
we've
got
clubs
coming
down,
but
we
still
got
a
little
bit
of
changes,
not
just
status
quo.
I'm.
E
Glad
you
brought
that
up.
If
you
look
at
those
post
reports,
we
specifically
asked
principles
to
tell
us
what
we
don't
currently
even
ask.
That
is
absolutely
something
we
need
to
look
at,
adding
in
order
to
get
to
the
direction
and
and
try
to
steer
our
discussion
away
from
everything
costs.
This
much
to
I
mean
it
all
starts
because
of
the
deficit,
but
the
decisions
aren't
just
because
of
the
deficit.
E
They
are
students,
that's
our
mission
and
we
did
ask
them
to
add
new
things
that
they
think
and
you'll
see
the
categories,
whether
it
was
that
you
know,
District
supports
and,
and
all
the
way
down
to
within
the
school,
so
and
and
as
I
walked.
Around
I
saw
things
that
that
people
feel
very
personal
about
adding
to
their
school,
and
you
know:
we've
got
months
of
conversations
with
principals
as
as
we
try
to
figure
out.
E
That
it's
not
all
about
everything
has
to
be
cut
or
reduced,
but
some
things
will
have
more
money
associated
with
them.
We
try
to
get
into
a
discussion
12
years
ago
and
said:
okay,
bad
earthquake
hits
will
start
you
can
scratch
all
the
old
school.
What
would
we
do
different
to
achieve
the
goals
that
we're
trying
to
achieve
and
I
guess?
That's
what
I'm
focused
on
saying
assume.
H
E
E
Think,
where
you're
going
to
see
the
the
list
of
new
ideas,
more
prominently
is
potentially
on
the.
If
we
get
State
funding
additional
State
funding
later
in
the
legislative
session,
do
you
really
just
rehire
a
program
you
reimagine
transformed,
reduced
or
laminated?
Do
you
just
do
that,
like
we've
done
with
health
teachers
or
these
other
higher
priority
things
that
the
schools
have
helped
us
develop?
E
Are
those
really
the
priority
and
that
reduction
elimination,
transformation
that
doesn't
change
because
I
know
unless
barring
a
BSA,
significant
BSA
increase
if
they
give
us
one-time
funding
and
that's
what
we
get
we're
the
same
boat
12
months
from
now
having
the
same
discussion,
so
some
of
the
things
that
we
do
to
get
efficiencies
or
increase
capacity,
some
of
them?
We
don't
want
to
relook
again,
if
there's
something
that's
more
important
and
we
and
we
do
get
the
one-time
money
or
a
BSA
increase.
E
C
But
yeah,
yes,
thank
you.
We
are
I,
do
think.
I
agree
with
member
Jacobs
that
the
community
is
really
in
they're
paying
attention
we've
given
them
the
survey
and
they
want
to
know
what
else
they
can
do,
and
so,
while
the
legislation
you
know
while
and
we
are
working
on
our
legislative
priorities,
but
in
the
interim
you
know
other
than
provide
comment
and
give
input,
did
we
talk
at
some
point
about
doing
something
so
that
we
can
you
know
so?
C
The
public
could
could
do
something
like
talk
to
a
legislator,
even
though
they're
not
in
session
or
do
we
just
want
to
wait
until
we
do
our
legislative
priorities
and
give
them
that.
E
I
think
it
never
hurts.
As
we
go
to
town
halls
and
talk
to
family
members,
I
mean
the
administ
District
administration
is
a
political
organization.
We
are,
we
are
a
political
by
definition.
I
have
no
signs
in
my
yard,
despite.
E
Of
people
in
Eagle
River,
who
want
to
plant
them
there
and
see
if
they
grow
but
November
8th,
is
the
election.
People
are
going
to
town
halls
and
talking
about
their
priorities
and
they're
receiving
input
and
feedback
from
community
members.
Several
days
a
week,
our
cell
phones
are
blown
up
with
texts
to
go
to
the
next
fundraising
thing.
If,
if
people
want
legislators
to
know
what
their
priorities
are,
then
they
have
to
talk
to
those
people
running
for
office
and
and
when
they
make
decisions.
E
You
know
you
look
on
Muldoon
Avenue,
coming
off
the
Glenn,
Highway
I
see
it
every
single
morning
and
one
of
the
signs,
the
the
only
word
rather
than
the
individual's
name
is
PFD.
So
when
legislators
believe
that's
the
community's
priority,
then
they
go
into
session
just
like
they
have
the
last
six
years
in
the
PFD
is
the
community's
priorities.
So
that's
the
way:
they're
gonna,
that's
the
way,
they're
gonna
prioritize.
If
the
community
talks
to
them
about
the
importance
of
Education
funding,
then
they'll
be
able
to
help
prioritize.
E
In
their
own
mind,
what
the
community
feels
is
important
and
I
think
the
District
administration,
the
school
board.
A
lot
of
organizations
have
lobbied
Without
End
at
the
legislature
for
several
years,
but
you
know,
frankly,
we
have
used
fund
balance,
State,
one-time
funding,
Federal
relief
dollars.
The
community
did
not,
you
know,
probably
fill
required
to
engage
on
is
education
funding
a
priority,
but
you
know
this
year.
The
biggest
thing
on
the
front
page
was
the
largest
PFD
ever
yeah,
and
and
yet
we're
in
a
68
million
dollar
deficit
for
next
year.
E
So
I,
don't
think
anybody's
at
fault
on
the
legislature.
I
think
they
believe
they're
voting
in
accordance
with
the
priorities
of
their
communities
and
and
if
people
talk
that's
how
legislators
find
out,
but
from
a
District
administration.
That's
that's
something.
School
boards
can
do
it's
it's
not
something.
I
should
be
doing
no.
G
Yeah
it's
a
man
of
president's
Point
I
had
the
privilege
of
speaking
to
a
group
of
protect
Educators.
As
best
we
can
actually
I
think
the
times
why,
with
the
twin,
they
heard
that
all
legislative
seats
in
Alaska
don't
want
were
going
to
be
on
the
ballot,
including
the
entire
Anchorage
delegation.
You
know
being
nonpartisan
in
our
in
our
roles.
G
I
I
kept
to
saying
that
ask
the
candidates
who
knock
on
your
door
and
asked
how
they
feel
about
the
base
student
allocation
and
ask
those
questions
and
utilize
that
to
the
voting
group
and
that
got
a
lot
of
energy
I
saw
folks.
Looking
pointed
out,
the
website,
which
is
online
through
the
naked
page
that
folks
can
find
out
what
district
they're
in
folks
are
going
to
Kenneth's
websites
so
providing
context
to
the
unique
opportunity
anchor
driven
instead
of
Alaska's
have
right
now.
C
C
I
think
people
are
gonna,
find
the
you
know
that
they
will
need
information,
but
they'll
find
it
throughout
discussions
and
hearing
from
us
and
so
because
I
don't
want
to
I,
don't
want
to
it's
just
when
I've
gotten
a
couple
of
emails
where
people
say
so
what
is
this
BSA
and
who
do
I?
Who
do
I
talk
to
about
that?
C
You
know
and
and
so
I
send
them
some
information,
so
I'm,
just
thinking
and
I,
don't
necessarily
meet
me
for
the
staff
to
do
this,
but
maybe
the
Board
needs
to
have
some
kind
of
campaign.
I
and
I.
Don't
know
what
that
looks
like,
but
maybe
we
can
talk
about
that.
E
E
E
G
So,
let's
just
let's
add
it
to
the
agenda.
H
You
know
we
talked
about
more
frankly,
we
need
more,
but
one
legislatures
will
tell
you
is
that
what
to
adequate?
And
we
did
a
study
back
12
years
ago
on
WhatsApp
and
look
at
it
from
the
standpoint-
that's
objective
that
was
used
in
the
lower
48.
If
I
could
tell
each
other.
H
So
that
we
can
get
the
results,
that's
that's
what
they
want
to
get
together
with
so
I
think
when
we
talk
to
the
legislators
will
tell
us
what's
adequate,
you
know
if
I
double
it
would
that
be
adequate
and
they
asked
a
small
school
district
and
said
well,
I,
don't
know
they
said
well,
then
I
don't
know
either,
but
we
do
have
information
out
there
that
shows
that
all
classroom,
Sciences
or
module
and
the
world
48
in
which
you
got
building
something
states
where
maximum
start
the
classroom
sizes
a
little
more
larger
than
that
acceptance
where
they
start
15
1K
through
three
is
a
mortgage
and
we're
not
in
that
category,
so
I,
just
all
the
options
that
are
out
there,
defining
giving
more
information
out
there
in
regards
to
why
when
they
grow
under
funded
other
than
just
that,
we
were,
we
got
the
same
audience
since
2017.
A
It's
more
than
that,
but
I
think
and
I
will
just
say:
I
appreciate
that
definition
of
that
what
is
adequate?
We
did
receive
information
and
word
connect
about
the
state
of
more
than
700
k-3
classes,
and
we
have
class
sizes
that
if
we
use
that
I
guess
on
definition
are
significantly
higher
than
adequate.
But
it's
how
we've
pieced
it
together
and
we
know
that
the
cost
of
that
are
above
150.
E
A
E
Not
it's
not
there's
other
stuff
and
we're
working
on.
You
know
helping
teachers
be
the
best
that
they
can
possibly
be,
and,
and
sometimes
when
you
look
at
studies,
you
get
caught
on
the
one
thing
that
sticks
out,
that
costs
the
very
most
and
it
might
not
be
the
most
important.
A
Okay,
well,
let's
I'd
like
to
move
to
item
three
in
today's
agenda,
which
is
a
review
of
memorandum,
zero,
two
four
and
just
to
recap:
the
administration
presented
this
the
original
memo
at
the
September
6th
meeting
and
it
detailed
incoming
funds,
courtesy
of
the
legislature
for
one-time
operational
funding,
will
bond
at
reimbursement
and
it
also
opened
up
a
few
options
for
how
we
might
allocate
those
phones
and
there
were
a
couple
of
cost
neutral
items
as
well.
A
That
were
a
part
of
the
original
memo
and
then
the
administration
really
did
a
wonderful
job
of
breaking
down
proposed
projects,
Capital
priorities
potentially
for
2023,
as
well
as
2024
I,
think
that
was
a
response
to
board
interest
and
understanding.
The
District's
needs
at
this
point
in
time.
A
My
intent
today
is
to
have
a
robust
conversation
in
this
committee
among
the
board
members
that
we
are
have
gathered
here
and
administrators
and
asked
the
finance
committee
to
ultimately
recommend
passage
of
a
substitute
memo.
Remember,
Jacobs
and
I
spent
a
good
deal
of
time,
drafting
a
substitute
so
to
recommend
passage
of
that
substitute
memo,
as
drafted
or
as
amended
here
today
and
I
did
want
to
clarify
that
I
want.
A
This
will
be
amended
to
clarify
the
sr123
sort
of
official
names
within
the
memo
to
make
sure
we
are
noting
things
correctly.
A
I
wanted
to
begin
by
bringing
up
the
sort
of
the
pertinent
facts
that
member
Jacobs
and
I
spelled
out
in
this
substitute
that
these
funds
from
the
legislature
are
coming
as
we
confront
a
historic
fiscal
cliff.
The
district's
purchasing
power
is
approximately
80
million
dollars
less
than
what
we
could
afford
in
2017.
In.
A
We
are
dealing
with
an
unchanged
District
cost
Factor,
that's
a
part
of
the
foundation
formula.
It's
nearly
two
decades
old
we've
had
flat
funding
for
the
BSA
and
for
transportation.
For
a
number
of
years,
we've
had
nearly
a
decade
of
enrollment
to
cleanse.
A
We
have
these.
We
have
received
doses
of
federal
funds,
which
we
are
leaning
on
heavily
this
year
to
manage
our
operations.
We
have
a
significant
amount
of
deferred
maintenance.
Both
major
and
minor
I
think
that
the
board
and
the
community
are
really
focused
and
paying
attention
to
the
question
of
student
safety.
A
We're
grappling
with
gubernatorial
vetoes
of
school
bond
debt
reimbursement
over
a
number
of
years,
and
we
have
an
opportunity
to
try
to
accelerate
student
learning
and
make
safe,
secure,
reliable,
healthy
spaces
for
our
students
to
learn
for
our
staff
to
work
in
for
a
community
to
invest
in.
So
what
I'd
like
to
do
for
a
process
is
begin
with
the
recommendations,
starting
with
the
cost
neutral
transfers
that
the
administration
originally
recommended
and
have
board
consensus
or
a
full
discussion
about
each
of
those
points
and
we'll
see
what
needs
amending
and
what?
A
What
the
commit.
The
finance
committee
will
ultimately
recommend
any
comments.
Questions
at
this
point.
G
Administration
and
appreciate
all
their
time
and
energy
working
with
us
and
communicating
as
we
I
think
our
latest
revision
was
number
six
or
seven,
as
we
continue
to
gather
information
of
facts.
What
I
would
ask
the
committee
as
it
considers
today
is
this
board
has
been
a
very
intentional,
given
the
increased
turnout,
we
often
seek
to
abortions,
which,
as
a
historically
and
so.
A
What
keeps
us
functioning
is
as
the
level
of
achievements.
Thank
you
for
your
time
consideration
and
that,
for
the
record,
I
wanted
to
remember.
John
Lee
is
online
on
the
phone,
so
we
will
be
paying
attention
to
anything
that
he
might
ask
or
say,
and
also
that
members
Bellamy
and
Wilson
joined
us
moments
after
we
begin
our
meeting.
A
Okay,
so
I'd
like
to
begin
with
the
recommendation
that
the
board
would
approve
the
cost
neutral
items
for
Native
education,
budget
and
special
education
budget
revisions.
Is
there
any
dissent
on
those
items?
Those.
A
C
Scene,
my
only
question
would
be:
are
the
amounts.
E
Are
they're
accurate
I?
We
do
this
every
fall
where
we
budget
for
positions
that
we
end
up
having
to
contract
out
or
modify,
because
we
can't
find
those
people
and
that's
why
we
try
to
make
them
cost
neutral
because
it's
already
been
budgeted
for
okay.
So
it's
really
not
looking
for
new
money.
It's
we
can't
find
this.
So
let's
take
that
budgeted
Authority
in
and
do
this.
A
Great
okay
and
the
second
or
I
guess
now.
This
is
the
third
bullet
point,
so
this
is
really
now
speaking
to
option
three
in
the
administration's
original
memo,
which
sort
of
said
well.
What
does
the
board
want
to
do?
And
paraphrasing
here
we've
spoken
about
how
the
district's
fiscal
cliff
will
be
about
68
million
dollars
if
we
save
68
or
excuse
me,
16
million
dollars
in
one-time
funding,
so
I'd
like
to
get
for
any
any
more
discussion
about
saving
16
million
dollars
in
one-time
operational
funding.
Is
there
any
disagreement
to
that
proposal?
A
Now
there
was
the
one
item
that
we
added
to
the
substitute
memo
that
was
not
a
part
of
the
original
memo
was
the
information
about
nine
and
a
half
million
dollars
in
major
maintenance,
and
here
we
say
we
suggested
nine
and
a
half
million
dollars
in
major
maintenance
to
capital
projects
needing
immediate
mitigation
it.
This
may
be
starting.
A
E
I
E
Every
dollar,
now
we
we
do
when
we
get
to
Bonded
reimbursement.
We
we
are
con,
aware
that
just
the
timing
of
being
able
to
get
next
Summer's
projects
in
those
are
things
that
that
we
would
certainly
encourage
a
quick
decision
on,
but
on
the
nine
and
a
half
you
can
do
it
like
this
or
we
can
still
hold
off
just
like
we
could
on
some
of
the
bond
every
investment
money
and
wait
until
Rob
and
his
team
have
had
a
chance
to
come
back.
E
We've
got
multiple
roofs
out
there
leaking
that
either
way
we
have
to
come
back
to
the
board.
So,
even
if
you've
put
this
in,
like
we
think
the
design
for
Ursa
Major
we're
going
to
get
a
15
sometime
in
October,
we
need
65
to
be
able
to
get
cost
analysis
for
repair
versus
rebuild.
We're
pretty
sure
that
this
would
be
a
great
choice
for
being
able
to
get
the
design
money
to
get
the
65
design.
E
So
so
the
board
can
make
a
long-term
decision
but
I,
but
even
if
you
put
it
in
here
the
way
it's
written,
we
still
have
to
come
back
to
you
and
ask
for
approvals
so
I
I
guess
my
only
comment
would
be.
We
don't
have
to
make
all
decisions
now
and-
and
some
can
wait
and
on
the
major
maintenance.
I
would
put
it
like
part
of
the
fondant
reimbursement
that
those
decisions,
don't
necessarily
it's
I
mean.
Frankly,
it's
not
even
a
decision.
It's
we
still
have
to
come
back
either
way.
F
Sorry,
no
you're
correct
what
we
need
to
do,
though
much
like
we
did.
We
need
to
spend
some
money
together,
we're
going
to
have
an
overview
of
the
direction
in
October.
This
is
called
a
15
percent.
Okay,
we're
gonna
need
to
spend
some
money
to
create
a
design
and
that
that
money
will
be
somewhere
between
I
would
say,
roughly
one
and
a
half
to
three
million
dollars
to
spend.
C
E
Just
we,
we
know
that
we
have
four
or
five
roofs
that
are
leaking
really
bad,
but
we
also
have
record
rainfall
and
anytime.
You
have
two
straight
months
of
rain.
You
have
more
leaks
than
you
normally
would
until
we
get
an
analysis
on
those
as
to
whether
they're
damaging
internal
structures
and
now
make
it
a
priority
because
of
that
I,
don't
I
I
think
within.
E
So
we're
going
to
have
a
better
list
for
the
board
on
what
we
think
we
should
use
that
what
we
would
recommend
that
nine
and
a
half
be
used
for
and
frankly
even
then
we
may
only
have
a
recommendation
for
half
of
it
and
and
knowing
that
bad
things
happen,
sometimes
that
the
other
half
would
be
at
a
later
point
when
we
had
fully
fleshed
out
staffed
recommendations,
I
think
sometimes
in
in
the
past.
E
The
administration
did
try
to
to
come
up
with
the
complete
solution,
and
some
of
it
maybe
was
premature
and
didn't
have
to
be
decided
yet
and
so
I'm
because
of
everything
else.
This
year,
I'm
I'm,
certainly
cautious
of
not
over
deciding
too
early
only
to
find
out
that
the
real
priority
we'll
know
about
next
month.
G
So
yeah
I
think
the
Our
intention
of
collectively
we're
discussing
These
funds
originally
in
the
administration
proposaling
was
listed
at
all.
It
was
to
find
middle
ground
that
acknowledge
the
receipts,
as
well
as
the
general
plan,
while
giving
the
Administration
has
breached
flexibility.
Just
what
I
want
to
talk
to,
we
recognized
more
than
ever
for
whether
it
be
budget
issues
or
two
months
of
rank.
The
flexibility
is
important
and
so
I
think
that
was
the
thought
behind
it.
Knowing
that
we'll
still
fall
in
a
process,
but
we
are
acknowledging.
So
that's.
E
D
H
Higgins,
yes,
but
this
is
all
for
one
big
discussion
is
that
what
are
we
going
to
do
for
I
mean
I'll
I'll,
be
very
maintenance
system
compared
to
what
it
was.
We've
come
down
some
with
my
debt,
but
I'll
show
you.
The
maintenance
is
massive
at
this
point.
We've
got
like
two
points,
something
billion
dollars
of
property
and
we
can
expect
somewhere
around
50
million
plus
to
maintain
things
if
we
were
running
like
a
regular
business,
we're
not
going
to
be
special
along
with
it.
If
we've
got
like.
I
H
We
just
have
to
fix
them,
because
otherwise
we
always
got
more
internal
damages
and
that
doesn't
make
good
businesses
called
practical
standpoint.
So
I
I
just
think
within
a
limited
time,
which
I
appreciate
the
fact
that
we're
looking
Global
but
I
think
the
crisis
is
what
we
need
to
know
got
to
put
money
in
for
some
schools
because
of
boots,
because
this,
let's
dedicate
that
portion
right
away.
Let's
go
ahead
and
do
that
because
it's
stupid
to
delay
that
and
then
Health
mildew
and
further
cooperates.
G
A
Haven't
gotten
to
it
yet
yeah.
So
for
the
same
of
time,
what
I'd
like
to
ask
finance
committee
support
is
to
amend
this
particular
item
to
say
nine
and
a
half
million
major
maintenance
to
capital
projects
which
shall
be
presented
to
the
full
board
for
prior
approval
and
I
think
that
that
gets
to
the
intent
of
both
technology
and
directing
These
funds
towards
projects
on
an
as
needed
basis.
A
Flexibility,
but
knowing
that
we
will
direct
those
funds
in
that
manner.
The
next
two
items-
the
7.3
million
dollars
in
secure
vestibules
and
security
improvements
and
38.4
million
dollars
in
Urgent
Capital
Improvements
both
reflect
the
priorities
the
administration
laid
out
in
attachment
a
so
I,
remember,
Jacobs
and
I
didn't
have
any
changes
to
that.
These
are
both
I
think
what
we
would
call
shovel
ready.
You
have
you
have
and
they
are
doable
within
the
2023
season.
Is
that
correct?
They.
F
A
Great,
oh,
and
so
there
are
more
details
available
in
attachment
a
about
each
of
these
projects.
This
is
just
a
condensed
version
of
those
okay,
so
I
guess
I
would
like
to
say.
E
If
we
can
get
disapproved
at
say
first
board
meeting
in
October,
we
have
time
to
get
the
art
piece
on
the
street
in
the
month
of
October
and
get
ahead
of
the
competitive
cycle
for
available
construction
this
summer.
Okay,
if
it
delays
past
October,
then
then
it's
like
how
we
saw
ourselves
with
Aquarian
and
and
there's
less
people
bidding
because
they've
already
got
their
projects
for
this
summer.
Okay,
that's.
E
A
Okay,
so
if
members
of
the
finance
committee
would
consider
recommending
those
items
that
would
be
I,
see,
heads
nodding
I'll
take
that
as
a
yes,
we
will
move
down
to
the
11.8
million
dollars
to
repay
asd's
Debt
Service
fund
balance,
which
was
was
used
to
make
payments
in
each
of
the
years
says.
School
bond
reimbursements
were
reduced.
E
Item
one
we've
had
the
conversation,
one-on-one
I,
don't
think
it's
been
talked
about
in
public
that
we
we
have
talked
in
public,
about
how
flexible
the
state
funded
reimbursement
money
was
Kelly
and
I
have
have
not
talked
in
depth,
but
just
a
little
bit
about
the
reality
that
state
bonded
reimbursement
money
could
also
be
used.
E
If,
if
it
wasn't
committed
early,
there
could
be
other
options
as
we
look
at
finally
closing
our
budget
out,
because
it's
so
flexible.
So
when
you're
looking
at
a
68
million
dollar
deficit,
if
you
make
decisions
on
all
of
this
very
early
on,
then
you
have
no
flexibility
when
it
comes
to
January
and
February.
E
So
if
some
decisions
don't
have
to
be
made
right
now
there,
there
is
some
logic
in
holding
on
those
decisions
in
case
what
ends
up
really
being
a
priority
to
the
board
in
December
through
February,
really
is
some
of
the
incredibly
difficult
choices
the
board
has
to
make
that
they
would
prefer
to
use
these
kind
of
funds
for
so
I.
A
A
This
particular
I
guess
we're
on
this
bullet
point.
What
is
your
interest
in
even
the
concept
of
reducing
tax
burden
in.
A
H
We've
got
product
funding
since
2017
and
we've
got
removed,
we're
paying
for
maintenance
on
a
regular
basis
out
of
our
budget
anyway,
which
we
don't
have
funds,
but
we're
spending
a
whole
lot
of
money
with
maintenance.
That's
not
Capital
Investments
in
maintaining
what
we've
got
and
we're
not
maintaining
everything.
The
way
we
need
to
maintain.
H
It
is
such
a
missed
message
to
say
we're
going
to
turn
some
of
this,
but
then
in
April
we're
going
to
ask
for
more
money
and
we're
telling
everybody
we
don't
have
enough
money
to
better
maintain
Facebook
800
million
dollars
into
early
maintenance.
I,
don't
I'm
not
worried
about
the
I'm,
not
worried
about
okay
or
focused
on
trying
to
look
good
I'm
looking
at
trying
to
run
the
place
but
I
guess
that's
the
issue
and
giving
some
money
back
looks
quick.
H
Okay,
it
really
does
we'll
go
ahead
and
cut
some
back,
but
then
we're
going
to
be
asking
for
April
for
you
to
give
us
even
more
I.
Just
there
was
so
many
needs
here
in
the
district
from
the
roots
to
you
name
it
for
safety
reasons,
for
security
reasons,
for
all
the
kind
of
factors
that
we're
getting
messages
to
say.
H
That's
how
we
put
it
I,
don't
I
I,
think
the
needs
in
this
District
are
too
great
to
send
a
message
out
that
we
have
funds
that
we
can
give
back
when
we're
telling
them.
We
don't
have
the
funds
for
all
the
routes
and
for
everything
else.
We
need
to
do.
I
just
have
concerns
that
that's
a
that's
a
mixed
message
and
it's
also
from
a
management
perspective
to
me
not
achieving
what
we
need
to
do.
H
We
have
to
put
safety
in
the
operations
of
the
of
the
district
to
be
well
managed
as
much
as
we
can
and
that
we've
got
serious
means
and
I
don't
want
to
see
those
needs
not
met
a
week.
A
symbolic
and
I
think
it
is
symbolic:
11
million
to
go
back
to
the
tax
phase
implies
that
this
is
how
much
we
need
with
this.
How
much
we
don't
need
it's
not
valid,
we
do
have
a
need,
and
that
need
is
greater
than
what
we're
getting
back
from
the
state
right
now.
I
H
There
are
800
million
dollars,
is
real
and
affiliate
maintenance
I
believe
that
I've
been
there
or
do
it
moved
to
some
of
the
projects?
It's
it's
significant
and
it's
going
to
maintain
schools
available.
We
need
more,
not
not
less
and
I.
Just
don't
want
to
send
that
message.
A
I
A
Okay,
so
that's
you're,
speaking
more
broadly
about
the
remaining
funds.
After
the
16
million
the
nine
and
a
half
in
major
maintenance,
the
seven
million
insecure
vestibules
and
the
38
in
Capital
Improvements
of
those
remaining
funds,
you
would
suggest
holding
some
funds
back
as
a
possible
emergency
fund
and
allocating
some
portion
of
the
remainder
towards
taxpayer
relief.
G
The
11th
point:
they
really
I,
don't
see
it
as
a
recognition
that
the
district
has
extra
money
to
allocate.
This
is
intended
to
repay
money
that
was
previously
borrowed
for
other
purposes.
I
think
that
we're
going
to
need
a
few
things
going
forward
to
solve
the
outgoing
fiscal
challenges
our
district
faces.
Number
one
is
cooperation
in
general.
Number
thing
is:
another
thing:
is
cooperation
from
taxpayers
here
locally,
it
is
transfer
will
be
just
responsible.
G
We've
also
be
transparently
accountable,
I
think
we
all
agree
with
on
student
safety
and
our
facility.
Throughout
the
day,
you
mentioned
the
800
million
dollar
backlog.
The
minimum
preferences
is
supplying
the
higher
number
eight,
so
we
can't
we
cannot
solve
this
challenge
with
just
the
folks
here
at
the
state,
eventually
not
acknowledging
that
these
funds,
we
have
a
seriously
considered
refunding
our
debt
service
to
be
able
to
use
out
one
of
the
stakeholders
from
the
conversation
that.
A
A
I
want
to
acknowledge
that
it's
going
to
be
difficult
to
say
yes
or
no
on
any
of
these
in
and
of
themselves,
so
maybe
we
can
surf
Oklahoma.
Is
that
your
hand?
Oh.
F
A
That
we
also
discuss
the
two
other
bullet
points
here.
Three
million
towards
excuse
me
towards
the
major
maintenance
item
to
address
minor
maintenance
needs
and
25.8
million
to
fund
one
of
two
options.
So
I
think
that
all
all
of
these
discussion
points
maybe
need
to
happen
simultaneously,
but
remember:
Holiness,
yeah,.
J
And
just
speaking
broadly,
you
know
if
there
was
a
way
to
actually
return
the
money
to
the
people
that
paid
it,
but
think
about
that.
But
of
course
it
doesn't
go
back
exactly
to
the
people
that
take
it
through
some
overlap,
but
it
Aries
and
and
if
we
start
doing
the
right
thing,
we
run
out
of
money
before
we
finish
doing
the
right
things.
J
I
would
see
an
opportunity
for
the
board
to
go
ahead
and
direct
this
money,
not
right
away,
but
earlier
than
waiting
for
a
bond,
an
uncertain,
Bond
and
proceed
through
the
year
without
some
of
the
chaos
that
comes
from
not
knowing
if
the
Bond's
going
to
pass
but
continue
our
original
plan
of
not
having
a
2023
bot
package
on
the
ballot
and
I
know
it's
a
tough
thing.
If
you
go
to
the
public
with
a
bond
package,
they're
not
really
voting
on
whether
or
not
those
are
good
ideas
or
not
they're.
J
J
J
That
I
think
lets
projects
do
their
job
in
a
better
way
and
take
some
of
the
guesswork
from
the
CFO
about
what
the
future
is
going
to
be
and
that
that's
the
most
logical
way
to
proceed
with
this
and
I'd
love
to
give
money
back
to
the
taxpayers.
So
I'd
get
a
little
bit
of
it
myself,
but
I
don't
think
it's
going
to
be
enough,
that
it
really
matters
to
people,
I,
think
it'd,
be
symbolic
and
then
really
there's
member
Higgins
pointed
out.
J
Yeah
so
I
think
we
should
proceed
with
that
in
mind
of
the
best
and
wisest
use
of
the
resources
you've
got
over
the
reasonable
period
of
time.
We're
allocating
them.
A
Can
I
ask
them
before
you
leave
I'd
like
to
have
a
sense
of
your
support
for
one
of
the
two
options
for
the
25.8
million
dollars
at
number?
Jacobs
and
I
have
outlined
option.
One
is
allocation
towards
the
Demolition
and
reconstruction
of
in
The
View
Elementary
School,
pending
approval
of
the
design
by
the
Urban
Design
commission
and
option
two
is
allocation
to
the
ASD
capital
projects
fund
to
be
further
allocated
following
passage
of
the
fy24
budget.
H
Number
of
reasons
it
is
we
we
have.
We
have
some
decline
in
students,
but
we
don't
have
enough
schools
that
have
built
safely.
We've
got
a
lot
of
kids
in
in
charter
schools,
so
let's
say
we.
There
was
a
lot
of
these
books
to
a
clients
of
educational
services
that
something
has
to
be
done
within
will
be
positively.
That's
moved
from
a
construction
standpoint
to
try
to
maintain
it
and
the
cost
Associated
long
term.
Does
it
potential?
H
Well
so,
from
my
standpoint,
doing
something
with
that
school
and
what
the
whole
plan
doing
it
as
cost
effectively
as
we
can
absolutely
but
doing
it
makes
sense
the
justifications
been
there
and
it's
just
a
matter.
How
much
can
we
fund
I?
Don't
want
to
make
sure
we
funded
enough
so
that
we
go
forward?
We
don't
have
to
leave
out
the
windows
and
the
doors,
but
I
would
like
to
make
sure
that
we
get
it
cost
effectively.
You
can
performance.
H
A
A
C
Forgot
what
I
was
going
to
say?
Well,
no
I
just
wanted
to
just
make
a
comment
that
that,
however,
spending
this
money
in
the
long
range
in
the
long
term,
we
are
wise
and
we
are
purposeful.
We
will
give
the
taxpayers
released
because
they
won't.
We
won't
have
to
ask
for
as
much
money
in
the
future.
So
that's
how
I
look
at
this
I.
C
Don't
look
at
it
as
a
sending
taxpayers
a
check
but
but
making
sure
that
we
we
use
these
one-time
funds
wisely
so
that
we
don't
have
to
come
back
to
them
for
some
things
in
the
future
that
that
would
to
me
that's
that's
how
I
look
at
it.
You
know
thinking
about
these
funds.
A
A
Of
that
finance
committee
to
speak,
your.
B
One
of
those
two
options-
I
am
obviously
I-
have
been
an
advocate
for
interview
as
well.
My
dilemma
comes
in
as
far
as
language
is
is
by
the
allocation
of
ASD
capital
projects
fund.
That
language
has
more
flexibility
and
I've
learned
this,
because
I
was
at
e
River
Elementary
the
day
before
the
earthquake
in
which
they
said
we're
not
on
the
bond.
B
We
were
not
deemed
to
be
needing
to
be
rebuilt
at
this
point
or
at
this
point
repaired
or
whatever
their
language
was
at
the
time
and
then
the
next
day
the
earthquake
happened
and
Eagle
River
needed
direct
attention.
Right
I
mean
it
was,
is
so
I
I've
learned
firsthand
that
PIN
pigeonholding
money
for
one
project
when
we
don't
know
what's
going
to
happen
in
a
week
or
a
month,
and
they
need
absolutely
need
to
access
those
funds
for
a
more
emergent
purpose.
B
C
F
Construction
of
the
plan
as
it
exists
currently.
A
F
A
A
martial
condition
it
religious
things-
okay,
all
right
so,
but
the
ballpark
is
36
million
dollars
if
we
start
next
summer,
if
we,
this
is
a
question
for
the
administration,
knowing
that
you
would
like
to
send
out
rfps
in
October
for
various
projects,
I
assume
that
you
would
write
for
next
year.
If
the
board
allocated
this
25
million
dollars
or
more
to
the
capital
projects
fund
to
be
reallocated
to
the
budget
following
passage
in
February.
E
Foreign
two
things:
there's
not
enough
money
here
to
cover
Inlet
View
anyways,
there's
enough
money
to
cover
the
demo
for
Inlet
View,
but
not
enough
money
to
do
the
contract
for
the
rebuild,
so
it
it
could
be
looked
at
in
two
different
ways.
But
if
you
demo
it-
and
we
do
that
contract,
not
knowing
if
the
Bond's
going
to
pass,
then
you've
pretty
much
decided
was
the
first
school
you're
going
to
vote
on
to
close
right,
I
mean
it's
it.
E
It
will
certainly
put
you
in
an
awkward
position
to
to
approve
the
demo
before
you
have
the
bond
pass
to
actually
rebuild,
but
I
mean
you
certainly
can
do
that.
There's
would
be
nothing
stopping
the
board.
It
would
be.
That
would
be
the
first
school
that
would
close
and
maybe
get
rebuilt
when
the
bond
passed,
but
there's
not
enough
flexibility
in
to
to
guarantee
that
right,
yeah.
The.
F
We
couldn't
contract
I
mean
the
lessons
within
the
contract
without
the
funding.
C
A
But
we
could
get
there
if
we
moved
the
11.8
million
to
the
25.8
million.
The
money
is
available
to
us
to
allocate
it
as
we
desire
to
be
stewards
of
the
taxpayers,
money
and
I.
Think
that
is
like
a
core
question
here.
Right
is
Inlet
View,
a
school
that
we
want
to
see
available
for
anchorage's,
long-term
future
or
is
Inlet
View,
ultimately
not
a
school,
not
a
location
that
we
see
as
a
part
of
anchorage's,
long-term
future.
Remember
Jacobs,
I.
Think
from
my
perspective
on
that
question
supports
already
prioritize.
A
Over
two
years
in
the
cfp
to
including
on
last
this
year's
month,
I
think
it's
a
matter
of
how
the
board
wants
to
pursue
interview
as
part
of
its
larger
budget
conversation
and
capital
Improvement
conversation
right
now,
we're
about
to
engage
in.
G
Significance
significantly
challenging
conversations
with
families
of
particular
schools
here,
as
early
as
next
month,
talk
about
school
closures,
program,
redesigns
families,
we're
already
seeing
some
emails,
but
it's
just
a
drift
compared
to
what
we're
about
to
speaking
to
member
Wilson's
point
about
flexibility.
Do
we
want
to
have
and
and
Mr
Anderson's
Point
too,
about
flexibility
part
of
this
conversation
later,
because
we
want
to
take
care
of
the
urgent
things
now
and
finish.
G
The
conversation
at
work
point
I
think
that's
ultimately
reasonable
to
put
a
finer
point,
I
guess
on
some
of
the
conversation
that
happens
a
few
minutes
ago,
Mr
Anderson
or
Dr
Brian
from
Team.
If
the
board
allocated
supported
in
a
few
minutes.
G
Of
the
remainder
to
a
bond
proposition
for
next
spring
and
that
pass
what
would
the
time
frame
look
like,
because
we
had
a
similar
time
frame
this
past
year,
when
we
didn't
have
that
the
measure
on
the
bond
for
the
full
project
I
believe
the
intent
was
to
begin
the
projects
these
early
stages?
G
F
That
was
adequate
to
fund
the
school
and
its
current
design.
Then
you
would
be
looking
at
Construction
Inception
of
2024
summer.
A
A
So
so,
and
just
to
to
restate
what
you
just
said
so
a
bond
a
potential
bond
in
the
spring
of
2023
would
allow
adequate
funding
to
begin
an
Inlet
View
project
in
2024.
A
F
A
By
the
same
token,
if
we
put
off,
if
we,
if
we
directed
ballpark,
37.6
million
dollars
towards
Inlet
View
and
whatever
else
to
be
determined
following
passage
of
the
fy24
budget
is
and
with
the
intent
that
Inlet
View
took
up
the
majority
of
that,
those
funds.
F
F
G
A
E
They'll
prioritize,
like
everyone
else,
on
what
they
can
make
the
most
revenue
on.
Well,
that's
that's.
The
answer.
There's
always
risk
that
other
stuff
that
what
happens
when
competition
is
reduced.
Is
you
end
up
with
one
bidder?
So
now
all
of
our
estimates
for
other
stuff
or
even
in
the
view
it
depends
on
which
ones
last
we'll
have
fewer
bidders
and
that
will
cost
more
than
what
we
estimated
at
the
cost.
When
Capital
plans
and
and
Rob
say
this
is
what
we
think
the
community
can
improve
in
one
summer.
I
E
Because
we
didn't
think
the
other
schools
were
important,
it's
we
thought
that
Collective
group
was
about
the
maximum
amount
that
realistically
the
community
could
build
this
summer.
So
when
you
had
a
really
huge
project
on
top
of
it,
we
don't
know,
what's
going
to
happen
and
I
mean
I,
remember:
aquarium
doubled
in
price
right.
We
don't
know.
A
J
A
E
That
that
are
part
of
I
don't
know
how
much
those
communities
down
south
that
do
have
lots
of
money
coming
to
them.
They're
going
to
be
the
whole.
The
whole
construction
industry,
like
the
tourist
industry,
is
looking
for
workers
they're
going
to
be
offering
people
money
to
come
where
the
jobs
are,
and
so
we
will
potentially
be
competing
for
those
same
people
right.
J
Two-Thirds
of
it
and
then
say,
yeah
we're
going
to
ask
you
for
a
bond
for
the
rest.
We
need
to
either
do
it
or
not.
Do
it
and
I
do
see
advantages
of
doing
it
early
also
just
backing
up
and
looking
at
it.
E
Turned
into
summer
grants,
but
they
had
the
advantage
of
having
a
bunch
of
separate
buildings,
so
construction
could
be
kind
of
isolated
and
I
can't
remember
how
long
it's
been
getting
far
to
pass
the
Clark
failed.
They
took
a
Hiatus
and
didn't
bring
it
up
for
a
couple
years
and
then,
when
they
bonded
again,
they
had
spent
those
two
years
not
working
just
with
the
community
around
Clark
but
Anchorage
at
large
yeah.
So
if,
if
you.
J
At
the
point
where
we
have
the
opportunity
to
make
it
happen
and
and
there's
value
in
doing
that
and
going
forward
with
a
lot
of
certainly
and
getting
back
to
the
bond
package,
that
eventually
comes
not
having
one
huge
item
on
it
that
that
may
be.
This
may
be
difficult
to
convince
everybody
across
the
municipality
to
vote.
For
so
I
think
we
need
to
configure
our
allocation
so
that
we
can
start
and
ideally
start
sooner
rather.
B
B
E
Schools
learning
schools,
those
cocktails
on
the
4th
of
October
is
the
first
board
meeting.
Shannon
Bingham
will
be
at
the
table
with
us.
We've
already
started
working
with
them,
providing
them
information,
and
you
should
expect
an
initial
analysis
with
with
maybe
not
recommended
closures,
but
most
likely
candidates
for
closure
repurpose
on
the
18th
of
October.
If,
if
we're
just
not
there
yet,
because
we
need
principal
input,
we
need
some
other
stuff
to
make
sure.
E
Then
it
would
push
it
naturally
to
the
following
board
meeting
but
you'll
meet
Shannon
for
the
first
time
on
the
fourth
and
and
as
quickly
as
we
can
pull
together
the
products.
If
we
can
do
it
that
quick,
then
you
would
expect
to
see
names
either
at
the
at
the
second
board,
meeting
in
October
or
or
hopefully
no
later
than
the
first
in
November.
E
Right,
frankly,
we
don't
even
we
don't
think
we're
even
going
to
know
the
number
of
schools
on
the
4th
of
October,
not
because
we
don't
want
to
share.
We
don't
think
we're
going
to
have
it
sort
of
being
ongoing.
So
we
think
in
October
will
be
a
discussion
of
the
metrics
that
we're
using
the
data
that
we're
analyzing
all
these
different
things
from
major
maintenance.
E
Recent
that's
been
put
into
a
building
major
maintenance
future
for
long-term
cause,
minor
maintenance
utilities
and,
and
then
the
the
student
demographics
there's
a
plus
the
analysis
on
the
gaining
schools
and
what
the
impact
we're
not
going
to
have
that
by
the
4th
of
October.
A
Unfortunately,
we've
just
lost
one
of
our
finance
committee
members,
but
I
would
like
the
finance
committee
to
feel
comfortable,
bringing
a
recommendation
to
the
board
and
perhaps
we'll
rehash
some
of
these
discussions,
both
as
a
non-action
item
and
again
as
an
action
item
I'm
going
to
propose
that
you
guys
have
had
many
many
insightful
comments
and
I
believe
that
everybody
here
wants
to
be
best
by
our
students
and
our
community
I'm,
going
to
propose
that
we
combine
these
two
items
and
direct
it
in
support.
A
For
the
sake
of
conversation
in
our
upcoming
board
meeting
towards
the
allegation
and
in
support
of
an
allocation
towards
Demolition
and
reconstruction
of
Inlet
View.
Pending
approval
by
the
of
the
current
design
by
the
Urban,
Design,
Commission
and
I
will
send
a
revised
memo
to
the
finance
committee
members
to
formally
request
their
approval
right
after
this
meeting.
I'll
redraft
something
and
we'll
send
it
to
Amanda
to
move
it
as
a
substitute
memo
for
board
discussion
on.
A
C
A
It
would
it
would
remove
The
Debt
Service
fund
balance
question
what.
A
A
There
will
be
a
remainder
given
Rob's
estimate
and
I
guess.
I.
F
Because
please
understand
as
a
reminder
that
the
invitation
to
bid
process
from
start
to
finish
is
about
a
five
month
process
and
and
and
to
Jim's
earlier
point,
it's
very
difficult
to
predict
the
responses
with
it
back
in
the
family
so
for
I.
Think
we're
talking
about
basically
rounding
money
being
categorize
as
rounding
at
this
point.
So
I
wouldn't
advise
that
we
would
count
on
any
balance.
So.
E
It's
either
everything
on
attachment,
B,
which
was
security,
vestibules
and
other
prioritized
things,
and
it
also
removes
any
flexibility
if
the
board
were
to
want
to
wait
and
see
how
the
budget
development
occurs
over
the
next
two
and
a
half
months,
if
it
would
remove
any
chance
of
using
any
of
those
funds
to
prevent
the
loss
of
something
something
on
the
February
budget,
because
it
is
flexible
funding
and
could
ultimately
be
used
for
that
purpose.
So
it
what
it
really
does
is
takes
away
flexibility.
E
If
the
board
thought
that
they
may
have
very
difficult
decisions
to
make
three
months
from
now,
but
it
puts
it
on
the
timeline
to
be
able
to
get
Inlet
View.
If
that's
the
board's
primary
priority.
C
So
and
I
guess
so
for
me,
it
seems
to
me
that
whether
we
do
make
that
decision
on
10-4
or
not
if
we
create
I'm
all
for
creating
that
part
of
money,
I
just
need
it
to
be
more
flexible,
which,
because
we,
the
plot,
if
she
creating
this,
combining
The,
Debt
Service
with
the
but
but
give
to
build
a
new
school
or
yeah
to
build
a
new
school
is
going
to
eliminate
a
whole
lot
of
other
needs.
C
I
mean
it
is
so
I'm
trying
to
figure
out,
and
there
will
be
no
flexibility,
because
the
money
is
there
you're
putting
it
there
for
Inlet
views
when
we
close
schools,
when
we,
if
we
combine
six
seven
eight,
whatever
we
decide
to
do
with
the
2020
for
budget
I,
I,
don't
know
what
that
is,
but
I
need
that
information
before
I
can
decide
on
how
to
spend
this.
The
leftover
money.
C
And
it
may
be
that
we
could
afford
that
we
can
do
in
with
you,
but
it
may
be
that
we
can't
so
I,
don't
know,
I,
don't
know
what
the
impact,
because
we're
looking
at.
It's
just
odd
to
me
that
we're
we're
spending
where
and
which
we
should.
We
should
spend
the
money,
but
we
are
also
looking
at
a
deficit
and
so
and
there's
no
there's
nothing.
That
says
we
can't
save
some
of
this
money
for
the
deficit,
but
I
understand
that
our
Capital
needs
are
great.
C
B
I'm
I'm
in
support
of
the
language.
The
second
bullet
point:
the
allocation
of
the
ASD
Capital
project
funds,
which
I
stated
priorities
because
we're
in
Alaska
we
don't
know,
what's
going
to
happen
tomorrow,
so
just
to
have
that
flexibility.
Just
in
case.
C
So
if
we
can
create
pull
back
some
money,
but
it
has
to
be
money
that
we
can,
you
know
I
mean
I,
Ursa
Major
may
come
in
at
10
million
dollars.
Then
we
have,
then
we
we've
already
obligated
ourselves
to
to
just
one
project.
So
so
I,
don't
it's
a
struggle
but
I
I.
Just
can't
I
just
can't
see
pigeonholding
money
for
a
single
purpose.
When
we
have
so
many
so
many
question
marks
as
to
how
we're
going
to
even
build
a
2024
budget.
G
I
I
want
to
address
that.
You
know
so
go
back
to
something
that
you
move
in,
which
is
the
next
two
three
months.
In
particular
sorry,
the
next
few
months
in
particular
for
those
on
the
phone
are
going
to
be
extremely
challenging
and
Mr
Anderson
has
stressed
multiple
times,
Administration
stressful.
Sometimes
we
don't
need
to
have
this
entire
conversation
right
now.
H
G
Be
yes,
I
think
if
we're
looking
for
how
to
modify
this
based
on
it
sounds
like
I'm
hearing
a
number
of
lessons
or
other
number
Higgins
Express
desire
to
further
prioritize
MW
and,
of
course,
I
think
again
we're
coming
from
the
standpoint
that
this
board
has
already
taken
significant
steps
to
prioritize
some
of
you.
But
what
I
think
I'm
hearing
is
that
there's
a
desire
to
do
that
and
remove
making
the
bonded
service
whole?
G
My
suggestion
is
to
have
that
conversation
at
a
later
date
and
perhaps
remove
that
line
item
move
that
into
the
second
bullet
points
under
the
25,
but
it's
currently
25
million
or
so
and
then
maybe
a
little
before
we're
passing
around.
It
looks
like
that,
but
before
we
make
such
a
significant
change
to
what's
presented,
although
two
of
the
three
members
can
make
a
vote,
my
suggestion
as
we
do
in
a
form
of.
A
Okay,
maybe
I.
Let's,
let's
follow
that
suggestion
to
take
a
stockhold
among
the
six
remaining
members.
Remember,
Donnelly
I
know
that
you're
still
on
the
phone,
how
nope
nope,
yes,
okay,
excellent,
may
I
ask
how
many
of
you
would
support.
C
C
G
We're
already
assuming
the
boards
agreed
to
strip
Out,
The,
Debt
Service,
okay,
make
make
that
fun
poll
which
I
don't
agree
with
removing
those
funds
to
be
clear.
Then.
A
B
C
C
A
So
my
informal
tally
suggests
that
there
is
a
split
among
board
members
in
support
of
an
Inlet
View
allocation
which
would
allow
an
earlier
project
build
and
those
who
would
be
focused
on
reallocating
funds
following
passage
of
the
fy24
budget.
A
I
think
for
the
sake
of
not
knowing
member
Donnelly's
perspective
and
knowing
that
member
Higgins
is
not
here
right
now,
I
think
it's
reasonable
to
send
a
recommend
and
I
would
ask
for
your
support
and
sending
a
recommendation
from
the
finance
committee
in
support
of
the
capital
projects
fund
option.
Okay,
great,
remember:
Donnie!
Are
you
online?
A
A
A
Yeah,
thank
you
for
reaching
out
to
me
because
I
was
having
to
try
both
by
phone
app
by
Zoom
to
connect
yeah
I,
agree
with,
because
you
just
laid
it
out
that
we
should
be
looking
forward
with
it,
as
it
appears
in
The
Proposal.
That's
before
us
to
have
it
go
into
the
capital
projects,
because
I
agree
with
President
Bellamy
that
I'm
concerned,
because
we
used
all
the
money
at
once.
A
We
may
be
desperately
in
need
of
money
in
a
few
months
for
some
higher
priorities:
yeah.
Okay,
thank
you!
So
much
and
I'm
glad
we
were
able
to
connect.
Okay,
I
will
redraft.
It
is
20
minutes.
After
the
end
of
this
meeting,
I'm
going
to
redraft
a
memo,
get
the
finance
committee
members
approval
and
send
it
to
them.
As
a
recommendation
from
the
finance
committee,
we
didn't
really
directly
discuss
the
backlog
of
minor
maintenance,
but
Rob.
Are
you
supportive
of
this?
A
In
order
to
remain
flexible,
I
think
that
was
a
key
concern
among
the
number
of
board
members
and
I.
Don't
know
that
there
was
overwhelming
support
for
allocating
it
towards
taxpayer
relief
when
we
can
think
about
taxpayer
relief.
A
Of
our
resources
through,
possibly
not
offering
a
bond
in
2023,
so
this
just
makes
one
larger,
more
flexible
pool
of
money
that
we
would
then
address
following
passage:
FY
24
budget.
Yes,.
C
But
we
will
have
discussions
at
our
next.
All
our
works.