►
From YouTube: 04-12-22 ASD Governance Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
And
now
we're
recording
so
we'll
call
the
meeting
of
the
asd
school
board
governance
meeting
to
order
today
is
april
12th
at
4
32
pm
presidents
in
the
board
room
are
myself
for
board
of
representatives
and
then
present
online
katie.
Can
you
read
the
board
members
one
more
time.
A
Member
donnelly
should
be
joining
us
shortly
and
then
we
have
superintendent,
bishop
and
associate
cabinet
members
of
staff
prison
with
us.
We
have
an
agenda
in
front
of
us
any
questions.
Modifications
changes
to
our
agenda
before
we
adopt
that.
A
Agenda
we
have
our
board
monthly
time
use
report
up.
First,
madam
presidents
indicated
that
we
would
reapproach
this
after.
We
clarified
the
data
as
to
what
we
were
monitoring
based
on
the
fact
that
we're
doing
an
actual
gold
monitor
at
one
meeting
per
month
and
so
katie
has
that
pulled
up
from
members.
A
B
President
bellamy
is
online,
I'm
just
moving
her
over
now
and
she
has
her
hand
up.
Okay,.
A
A
Madam
president,
are
you
able
to
hear
us
and
take
the
floor
if
you
have
comments.
D
D
This
is
just
again,
as
the
chair
said,
it's
just
a
you
know
a
a
measure
of
how
we're
using
our
time,
if
you
recall
last
summer,
our
goal
was
30
percent
of
our
time
toward
goal
monitoring,
and
I
am
happy
happy
happy
happy
to
share
that
in
march,
33
of
our
time
went
toward
the
gold
monitoring,
and
so
I
I
just
wanted
to
keep
this
on
it.
You
know
it
you
know
somewhere
in
our
consciousness,
so
that
as
we
move
forward,
you
know
we.
D
We
are
aware
of
how
we
are
using
our
time
relative
to
monitoring
student
outcomes
and
all
the
other
stuff
that
we
do
and
you'll
notice
that
this
month
looks
a
little
different
than
last
month.
That's
all
so
thank
you
for
allowing
us
to
a
space
to
just
review
this.
Every
month,
mr
chair.
A
A
Parents
item
two
is
ar3311.1
a.
I
believe
this
is
a
presentation
by.
B
E
E
So
the
the
new
definition
of
public
notice
for
asd
solicitations
will
be.
You
know,
advertising
on
the
district's
website.
E
Thank
you,
and
so
we
will
advertise
on
the
district's
website.
That
will
be
our
definition
of
public
notice,
so
what
we've
done,
and
furthermore,
we
will
also
indeed
has
required
us
to
provide
some
reporting
to
them
to
confirm
that
we're
doing
so
and
they're
satisfied
with
our
reporting.
So
what
we've
done
is
we've
we've
altered
this
to
show
that
we
are
advertising.
E
You
know
on
our
website
and
then
we
did
also
change
the
days
from
it
had
listed
10
days
prior
that
we
advertised.
We
now
have
changed
that
to
21
days
to
align
better
with
alaska's
statute,
so
that
that
is
the
change
for
for
that
ar
I'll
pause.
If
there
any
questions
and
then
go
on
to
the
next,
any
questions
from
the
board.
A
Thank
you,
regardless
of
4
30
pm,
any
questions
or
administrations.
G
Okay,
great
I'll
just
go
ahead
yeah.
This
is,
I
appreciate
the
chance
to
look
at
this.
I'm
wondering
how
contractors
will
know
I
mean:
do
they
just
need
to
check
the
district's
webpage
every
day
to
know
when
this
is
going
to
be
missed
or
is
there
a
way
they
could
subscribe
to?
Some
sort
of
this
webpage
has
been
updated.
E
E
They
use
our
website
and
then
also
they're
clearing
houses
called
one
is
called
the
plans
room
and
the
other
bid
clearing
house
communication
organizations
and
what
they
do
is
whenever
we
post
a
bid,
they
post
it
for
contractors,
so
the
contractors
either
get
it
off
our
website
or
from
the
plans
room
and
that's
really
what
they
do.
Currently,
they
do
not
watch
the
newspaper
every
day
for
our
bids
they
are
and
also.
E
That
would,
if
it's
a
design,
we
would
email
it
to
every
consultant
that
provides
design
services
in
the
region
and
then,
if
we,
if
it
were
a
construction
project,
we
would
email
it
the
notice
of
solicitation
to
every
construction
contractor
in
the
region,
so
their
their
systems
in
place.
They're
fully
robust.
This
will
not
change
anything.
G
D
A
And
then
a
question
I
had,
because
that
was
that
was
kind
of
my
point
was
asking:
if
there
was
an
email
list
it
sounds
like
there
is.
Is
there
a
way
for
new
organizations
to
join
that
list
where
it's
posted?
What
does
that
look
like
for
the
organization.
E
A
E
Really
the
plans
room
is
very
common
knowledge.
A
contractor
knows
to
go
to
the
plans
room
for
all
public
agency,
so
they,
as
I
said,
there's
these
clearinghouses
there's
multiple
systems
in
place.
So
if
a
contractor
is
not
aware,
it
would
be
because
they
didn't
want
to
be
aware
any
other
questions
before.
E
All
right
so
we'll
move
on
to
the
next
ar
which
is
a
revision
to
air
3312.14
procurement
organization
and
operational
procedures,
and
this
is
around
providing
monthly
reporting
to
the
board
via
board
memos
of
cumulative
change,
orders
or
amendments
that
exceed
250,
000,
meaning
cumulative
change,
orders
and
amendments
that
exceed,
and
this
is
for
architecture,
engineering,
a
e
design
contracts
and
construction
contracts.
E
E
Yes
and
to
be
clear,
this
was
one
of
the
suggested.
The
recommendations
of
the
municipal
internal
audit,
and
so
this
is
was
our
response
to
that
recommendation.
A
No
questions
that
everything
we
have
for
this
agenda
items
yeah
sure
great.
Thank
you
so
much
moving
on
to
board
vacancies.
This
was
an
item
that
continues
to
be
on
my
radar.
I
have
a
just
a
brief
update
and
then
this
is
something
I'm
going
to
propose
to
continue
to
keep
on
the
committee's
radar
after
the
organization.
A
What
that
might
look
like
remember
lessons
had
a
question
as
to
if
our
30-day
window
that's
outlined
in
bb,
92.3
conflicted
with
municipal
election
time
frames,
I
reached
out
to
a
couple
different
sources:
one
advise
that
we
should
check
with
district
council.
The
other
indicated
that
they
didn't
see
any
overlap.
A
I
did
look
at
juno
juveniles,
bylaws
and
policies
because
they
utilized
the
anchorage
clerk's
office
for
their
municipal
election
well
and
they're.
They
use
the
same
stock,
aasb,
bylaws
and
so
remember
lessons
to
your
question.
So
the
best
of
my
knowledge,
I
don't
see
any
need
for
an
update
at
this
point,
but
something
we
can
certainly
keep
an
eye
on.
A
Absolutely
experiencing
no
other
follow-up
questions
before
follow-up,
we'll
move
on
to
agenda
number
four
for
policy:
4212.8
employment
of
relatives
vice
president
holloman.
We
discussed
this
last
month
and
kind
of
well
at
length
and
so
was
curious.
If
you
had
an
update
perspective
as
to
what
your
preference
is
regarding
this
proposal.
A
A
You
and
maybe
you
could
answer
at
the
same
time,
you're
weighing
in.
Could
you
clarify
if
the
the
current
policy
applies
to
only
high
level
administration
for
the
flies
throughout
the
district.
I
The
there
are
a
couple
components
in
policy
and
or
ar
one
contained
in
policy
would
apply
for
those
employees
hired
who
have
immediate
family
on
the
school
board
and
that
relates
to
his
requirement
state
law
in
terms
of
the
approval
process,
that's
captured
in
board
policy.
Currently,
so
I
don't
think
there's
any
adjustment
necessary
there
in
terms
of
what
state
law
requires
and
then
there's
another
ar
that
talks
about
consensual
relationships
which
we
spoke
about
at
some
length,
not
not
captured
in
in
the
employment
of
relatives
policy.
I
A
A
Might
have
phrased
my
question
poorly,
I
apologize
for
interrupting,
so
I
what
I
think
vice
president
hallman
was
attempting
to
address,
was
concerns
of
members
of
a
household
potentially
having
close
relation
and
organizational
chart
to
other
members
of
their
household.
Vice
president
holland,
please
correct
me
if
I'm
off
base
there,
it
sounds
like
that
our
current
policy
doesn't
directly
speak
to
that,
or
am
I
in
my.
A
H
I
And
remember
jacobs,
as
I
understand
the
adjustment
to
the
the
the
policy
change
that
is
proposed
here
would
be
that
the
recurring
requirement
that
the
decision
be
noted
on
each
subsequent
personnel
report
has
been
struck
and
so
that
there
would
be
a
single
period
of
notice.
That
would
appear
on
the
personnel
report
as
considered
and
approved
by
the
board
consistent
with
its
current
approach
on
a
consent,
agenda,
type
vote,
and
I
think
that's.
I
think
that
makes
sense
to
me
and
is
straightforward
enough
to
implement.
I
I
would
need
to
work
with
talent
management
who
manages
that
report
to
come
up
with
a
way
to
to
note
that
a
hire
has
been
made.
That
falls
within
that
category
in
some
way,
whether
it's
a
separate
section
on
the
personal
report
or
noted
with
an
asterisk
or
whatever
the
case
may
be.
But
but
that's
what
I
understand
the
adjustment
presented
today
is
as
compared
to
what
we
discussed
last
time.
We
we
went
through
this.
A
D
D
I
I
still
struggle
with
why
we
need
the
policy
I
I
still
so
so,
if
remember
holloman,
if
you
could
try
telling
me
one
more
time
why
you
think
we
need
to
have
this
in
addition
to
the
laws
that
we
already
have
in
place,
policies
and
the
law
when
it
comes
to,
because
employment
relatives,
employment
of
relatives
to
me
that
I
I
don't,
I
don't
quite
get
it
and
and
I'm
trying
to.
I
mean
I've-
been
struggling
with
this
since
the
last
time
we
met.
D
Why
would
we
need
to
have
this
policy
when
we
already
do
we
have
to
do
this?
Based
on
state
law?
I
mean
any
anybody
that
is
hired.
That
is
a
member
of
the
bull.
If
I'm,
if
my
son
gets
knocked.
D
H
Is
immediate
member
of
the
household
that
was
a
relative
of
a
school
board
member
applies
and
is
going
to
get
a
job.
D
H
It's
allowed
with
the
permission
of
the
commissioner
of
education.
The
question
is
how
many
people
in
the
district
fall
under
that
classification
as
a
board
member?
I
think
it's
reasonable
that
we
know
that
it
doesn't
necessarily
mean
that
there's
a
problem,
but
I
do
think
not
being
aware
of
it
at
all.
H
H
D
H
H
A
H
Yeah,
if
we
can
stop
it,
that
would
be
wonderful,
but
if
not
I'm
prepared
to
continue.
That
would
be
wonderful,
but
if
not
I'm
prepared
to
continue
yeah
simply
back
to
president
bellamy's
question,
I
don't
know
how
many
say:
children
or
principals
work
in
the
buildings
that
their
parents
supervise.
H
D
That
kind
of
explains
so
you're
talking
about
not
talking
about
all
newly
hired
placements.
H
H
E
A
So,
thank
you.
President
bellamy,
dr
bishop
has
asked
to
weigh
in
and
then
if
we,
but
mr
tiffer
would
like
to
do
so
as
well.
B
Whether
it's
a
mom
and
a
child
or
a
dad
and
a
child
and
also
spouses,
we
don't
have
them
supervise
each
other,
but
they
do
work
in
the
same
building
I
did
have
since
I've
come
though
we've
kind
of
put
a
halt
on
that,
but
I
did
have
when
I
offered
a
principal
a
position.
It
was
contingent
because
his
wife
worked
at
the
building
and
there
weren't
very
many
administrators.
B
So
I
said,
you'll
have
to
move
and
nea
alaska
aea
was
very
upset
with
me,
so
it
did
cause
some
hard
feelings
and
upsetness,
and
my
solution
then,
was
to
rescind
the
job
from
the
administrator
and
then
the
problem
went
away,
but
that
then
person
moved,
but
it
was
a
hardship
on
that
family
because
they
had
young
children
and
the
children
had
daycare
by
them.
So
I
totally
understood
it.
B
A
I
President,
thank
you.
I
I,
I
think,
there's
there's
a
couple
things
that
there's
need
to
there's
a
couple
things
separated
out
for
me
for
me
to
understand,
separated.
I
This
particular
adjustment
to
the
policy
really
changes
anything.
I
think
if
the
intent
of
the
proposed
adjustment,
which
would,
at
this
point
in
my
mind,
include
the
redaction
of
the
formerly
proposed
language,
wouldn't
really
much
change
what
the
board
policy
currently
requires
in
terms
of
when
and
under
what
circumstances,
the
commissioner
and
or
board
need
to
approve.
I
To
the
extent
that
that's
the
interest
in
the
change-
and
it's
limited
to
those-
I
don't
see
really
any
any
problem,
but
if
there's
more
to
it
and
and
there's
interest
in
understanding
more
generally,
under
what
circumstances
more
generally
immediate
family
work
together
in
departments,
programs
within
schools-
and
I
guess
this
is
a
bigger
issue.
What
I
see
captured
here
in
the
language.
H
And
I'll
say
that
I
think
most
of
the
time
this
might
have
to
happen,
the
administration
would
have
a
good
reason
for
doing
it.
The
the
fact
it's
noted
doesn't
necessarily
mean
there's
any
wrongdoing
by
anybody,
but
it
does
mean
that
everybody's
aware
it's
not
something
that
some
people
know
and
other
people
don't.
A
A
That
will
be
the
will
of
the
committee
perfect.
All
right,
we
decided
to
move
this
forward
to
the
full
board
for
replacement
future
agenda.
Anything
else
on
this
item
before
we
move
on.
A
Hearing
seeing
none
next
up
is
number
agenda
number
five,
bp
9271
code
of
conduct.
For
those
who
may
remember,
we
had
a
spirited
discussion
regarding
adding
additional
language
for
community
council
meetings.
That
was
my
proposal.
Katie.
Do
you
have
the
ability
to
pull
that
up
and
to
share
that
from
last.
A
And
so
I
actually
there's
just
one
proposing
one
change,
and
so,
if
you
want
to
bring
up
actually
just
email
it
to
you,
so
it
should
be
at
the
top
of
your
email
address.
Oh,
you
did
okay,
so,
while
katie's
bringing
that
up,
I
can
refresh
the
committee's
memory
that
I'll
just
reread
the
language,
I
guess
and
then
we'll
go
from
there,
I'm.
A
To
be
brief,
I
am
proposing
after
hearing
some
of
the
concerns
voiced
about
conflicting
asd
events
and
appointments,
there
was
a
75
threshold,
I'm
proposing
that
we
change
that
to
50
and
then
avoid
modifying
the
language
further
to
keep
the
language
as
clean
and
straightforward
as
possible.
So
great
we've
got
it
in
front
of
us
now
so
I'll.
Let
folks
read
that
digest
that,
and
please
know
that
we're
replacing
the
75
with
50
times.
A
So
while
folks
are
digesting
I'll
continue
to
just
make
the
case
for
why,
I
think
this
is
a
good
policy
move
right
now
there
isn't
a
requirement
that
a
board
member
attend
any
community
council
meetings.
It's
just
encouraged.
I
think
that
as
someone
who's
attended
to
the
best
of.
G
A
I've
heard
both
that
my
attendance
at
our
means
is
appreciated
and
also
that
it
hasn't
always
been
the
case
and
that
there's
a
desire
for
board
presence
to
relay
current
events
as
that's
how
a
significant
portion
of
our
public
gets.
The
information.
I've
also
heard
the
interest
from
multiple
councils
to
write
a
resolution
in
support
of
this
change.
The
original
change
actually,
but
with.
A
H
A
Fair
in
that
the
limitations
are
only
for
those
who
would
serve
as
an
officer
or
committee
chair,
and
so
my
ask
is
to
have
us
move
this
forward
to
the
full
board
for
consideration.
D
To
weigh
in
oops
mr
chair.
D
Thank
you,
I
think
so.
So
personally,
I'd
like
to
75
personally,
I
heard
themselves
highly
accountable
or
decide
that
this
is
an
important
function
of
the
board.
D
Accountability,
I
think
we
hold
ourselves
more
accountable,
not
less
nice,
more
accountable.
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
comment.
Thank
you.
A
Remember
donnelly.
I
know
you
had
concerns
about
the
original
language.
Would
you
I'm
giving
you
an
opportunity
to
speak
before
we
kind
of
go
through
the
committee
to
you,
know
informally,
strawful
vote
to
move
this
forward
or
not?
Is
there
anything
you'd
like
to
have.
C
I
C
E
A
Thank
you.
Member
donnelly,
appreciate
that
the
what
I
just
want
to
clarify
and
something
I
spoke
to
last
month-
is
that
this,
even
even
if
we
change
the
75,
it's
now
50
to
100,
nothing
in
this
amendment
to
9271
would
change
the
qualifications
or
who
could
serve
on
the
board.
A
This
would
purely
be
a
requirement
to
serve
as
an
officer
or
what
I
would
propose
have
a
higher
level
of
accountability
and
poor
involvement
or
as
a
committed
chair,
which
would
be
the
same
so
that
isn't
the
intent
or
that
isn't
what
is
done
in
actuality
with
this
change.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we're
clear
on
that,
but
I
appreciate
your
comments.
Anything
else
before
we
conduct
our
informal
straw
poll
to
move
this
amendment
on.
A
A
Yes,
I
do
thank
you,
member
donnelly,
your
thoughts.
C
C
A
We'll
move
that
forward
and
spin
the
president
to
consider
placing
it
on
a
future
agenda
item
anything
else
on
this
before
we
move
on.
A
This
is
a
item
and
katie
you
were
able
to
pull
this
up
or
throw
those
online.
This
is
a
item,
remember
higgins,
and
I
had
authored
something
ago
actually
had
worked
together
on.
We
are
now
bringing
it
forward
for
consideration
and
kind
of
at
least
an
initial
discussion,
as
this
will
could
potentially
be
my
last
meeting
chair
in
the
governance
committee.
So
I
wanted
to
get
initial
feedback
thoughts
and
questions
from
the
board
on
on
this
topic.
Member
higgins-
isn't
here
so
I'll
speak
to
as
best
as
I
can.
A
The
the
intent
of
the
financial
advisory
committee
is
to
facilitate
a
citizen-led
advisory,
only
look
at
district
finances
with
the
goal
of
producing
a
product
that
would
be
helpful
to
the
board
administration
in
crafting
its
budget,
providing
additional
perspective
that
might
not
be
captured
at
presence.
A
Dissolved
for
reasons
that
I'm
not
familiar
with
intimately,
I
think
there
are
a
number
of
reasons
why
additional
public
engagement
will
be
beneficial,
especially
given
recent
events,
but
I'm
interested
to
hear
board
perspective
and
feedback
on
the
proposal
as
written.
If
there's
any
questions,
I'd
be
glad
to
answer
them.
A
D
D
D
F
So
real,
quick,
broad
brush
I've
been
going
to
the
municipalities,
budget
advisory
committees
now
for
a
little
over
five
and
a
half
years.
In
that
time,
I've
never
seen
them
actually
be
able
to
pull
together
coaching
cohesive
recommendations
that
assisted
the
mayor
in
changing
the
structural
organization
of
the
municipality
or
significant
budgetary
changes.
F
What
I
have
seen
is
certain
areas
of
interest
where
they
were
able
to
raise
and
get
briefings,
and
then
they
would
generally
sign
a
resolution
that
would
either
support
our
bond
or
not
support
our
bond
and
a
resolution
to
support
our
budget
or
not
support
our
budget,
but
even
within
the
municipalities.
F
Frankly,
I
think
the
intent
is
good,
but
when
you
look
at
three
members
being
appointed
by
the
school
board
members
appointed
by
assembly,
the
labor
organization
representative,
which
goes
against
no
financial
dealings
with
the
district
to
ensure
that
there's
no
conflict
of
interest,
I
I
think
it
would
be
a
reach
frankly,
to
get
nine
people
to
agree
who
aren't
subject
matter.
Experts
in
education.
F
F
F
I
I
frankly,
and,
and
I
don't
mean
this
any
rude
way-
I
I
don't
think
that
that
intent
could
be
met
with
nine
disparate
people
in
six
months,
at
one
hour
a
month
and
and
then
we
go
further.
When
I
look
at
this,
I
think
all
of
us
are
tracking
that
the
fiscal
cliff
in
fy24
is
going
to
be
whatever
number
it's
going
to
be
about
four
weeks
from
now.
F
The
legislators
I'm
talking
to
are
thinking
that
the
session
is
going
to
end
around
may
18th,
so
they
can
switch
focus
to
raising
funds
and
trying
to
get
reelected
and
doing
normal
campaign
things
so
around
the
18th,
we'll
see
what
what
has
been
passed
we'll
be
able
to
relook
what
we
think
the
projected
fiscal
cliff
is
going
to
be
for
fy24
and
we're
going
to
have
to
start
a
very
deliberate
thoughtful,
methodical
review
of
everything
from
school
closures
to
programs
to
all
of
the
things
we
have
talked
about
in
the
past,
but
never
been
able
to
actually
address
because
they
were
unpopular.
F
I
think
three
of
our
board
members,
member
bellamy,
donnelly
and
holliman
have
been
at
board
meetings
where
we
talked
about
closing
a
school
at
the
easiest
place
in
the
district
which
was
on
post
and
the
amount
of
pain
and
anguish
over
several
months
over
one
school,
and
I
don't
think
we're
looking
at
one
school
in
fy
24.
F
B
Smarter
use
of
staff
or
staffing
personnel
to
put
in
classrooms-
I
mean
we've
recommended
that
you
know
so
I
mean
I
don't
and
those
came
from
public
recommendations
off
of
our
surveys.
A
F
Going
forward
where
we're
taking
a
top-down
look
well,
I
I
think
I
think
most
of
the
board
is
pretty
aware
that
when
we
start
talking
about
potential
reductions,
whether
they're
programs
or
schools,
or
whatever
the
more
you
bring
the
public
in
the
more
that
information
will
go
out
in
an
untimely
manner.
We
may
bring
up
a
whole
handful
of
schools
to
start
looking
at
and
now
it
gets
leaked
out
and
knowing
that
many
of
those
on
that
list
are
never
going
to
be
on
the
list
that
we
actually
present
to
the
board.
B
We
had
done
this
just
to
engender
more
public
outreach
at
one
time
where
our
surveys
went
to
groups
of
people,
so
we
literally
sent
them
to
stakeholders
in
acreage
whether
they
were
they
were
non-profits.
They
were
for-profits,
they
were
the
chambers,
they
were
the
chamber,
businesses,
parents,
school
communities,
teacher
groups
like
we
went
and
sent,
and
we
just
said
come
up
with
like
what
would
it
look
like
for
you
to
save
money
like
what
think
of
just
to
think
outside
the
box?
So
it
wasn't
the
regular
survey
with
answers.
D
B
They
would
say
we're
a
group,
and
these
are
some
of
the
ideas,
and
they
I
mean
it
was.
You
know
it
was
everything
under
the
sun.
It
was
every
group
pointing
at
the
other,
like
you
should
get
rid
of
special
education
because
it
costs
too
much
money,
but
they
didn't
have
a
law
around
it.
You
should
get
rid
of
high
school
blah
blah
blah
because
we
don't
get.
B
A
B
So
I
don't
think
we've
been
void
of
like
this
public
access
and
information.
It
is
hard
to
get.
I
mean
we,
you
know
put
on
social
media.
We
did
this
this,
that
you
know
when
we
did
have
public
events.
Those
were
the
least
supported.
Like
you
know,
we
had
them
around.
The
district
and
kids
would
come,
which
was
really
fun
because
they
got
extra
credit.
B
It
was
fun
talking
to
them,
but
when
they
were
here,
politicians,
people
who
were
going
to
run
were
the
biggest
people
who
showed
up
you
know
to
be
in
unless,
of
course,
you
had
something
on
the
docket
that
might
be
removed,
then
you
filled
the
house,
and
so
I
think
the
expertise,
I
don't
think
the
input
was
lacking.
I
think
the
expertise
and
knowledge
of
operational
structures
was
lacking
in
people
great.
G
B
They
were
fun
ideas
I
wish
I
could
have
done
some
of
them
half
of
them
or
not
have
that's
exaggeration,
but
quite
a
few
of
them
were
against
the
law.
So
I
mean
it
was
just
interesting.
It
was
you
had
everything
from
get
rid
of
the
school
board,
get
rid
of
the
superintendent,
get
rid
of
special
education
that
cost
too
much
student.
B
Parents
should
feed
their
kids,
you'll
save
money,
I
mean
it
was.
I
mean
they
were
interesting,
but
even
school
groups
had
some
things
and
we
utilized
some
of
those.
You
know
to
make
some.
B
It
was
our
recommendation
on
the
board,
but
I
mean
so
I
see
the
purpose,
but
I
I
think
we're
trying
to
find
the
next
best
thing
to
make
a
thing,
because
we
see
that
funding
for
schools
is
a
problem
I
mean
you
can
put
in
lots
and
lots
of
stuff
and
we
want
lots
of
information,
but
it's
hard
what
what
what
gets
put
to
you
is
hours
and
hours
and
hours,
and
you
know
this
is
I
I
think
that
the
board
could
the
buck
the
budgets
public.
What
you're
asking
for
is.
B
A
B
Surveys
also
form
the
administration,
and
what
we
would
do
is
here's
what
your
people
said.
This
is
how
we're
meeting
what
your
goals
are
and
the
input
I
mean
that's
kind
of
what
we
do,
but
it
was
fun
that
one
time
I
mean
I
just
want
to
let
you
know
it
was
fun,
reading
all
those
and
having
great
ideas,
and
we
actually
used
some
of
them,
but
we
struggled
because
whoever
was
on
the
other
end
of
having
a
redesign.
F
And
ed
graf
years,
where
this
school
board
had
all
the
departments
go
up
for
two
days
and
talk
to
the
school
board
and
what
came
out
of
it
was
five
percent
cuts
across
the
board,
and
I've
done
large
reductions
in
force
in
the
military,
but
still
and
and
they
they
messed
up
by
doing
five
percent
across
the
board.
When
you
start
doing
reductions,
you
have
to
identify
every
position:
that's
going
to
go
away.
F
What
are
the
key
tasks
that
that
individual
does?
Can
it
be
cross-leveled
or
not,
and
the
more
you
make
the
more
you
give
up
on
cross-leveling
and
you
have
to
accept-
and
these
are
the
things
that
we're
no
longer
going
to
do,
but
what
they
did
instead
was
a
lot
of
budget
amendments
in
february,
a
lot
of
individuals
who
knew
they
just
lost
their
jobs.
F
They
found
another
one
and
left
and
a
few
years
later,
as
we
started
digging
into
the
district
headquarters,
we
found
these
huge
gaps
of
things
that
had
not
been
done
for
several
years
and
no
one
knew
that
they
hadn't
been
done,
because
the
person
who
did
it
left
in
a
hurry
because
they
needed
employment
and
because
they
looked
at
it
as
we
need
to
cut
admin,
and
let's
do
five
percent.
How
many
millions
can
we
get
for
five
percent
or
ten
percent?
F
What
happened?
Really?
It
hurt
the
district
for
several
years
and
and
that's
why
this
is
this
is
complicated.
If
we're
going
to
look
at
restructuring
administration
and
structural
programs
within
the
district,
it's
that
level
of
detail
that
takes
fidelity
and
and
honestly
the
courage
to
tell
the
board
these
are
the
things
that
won't
be
done.
F
A
And
perspective,
just
I'll
just
speak
to
a
couple
points
regarding
intent
and
I
guess
and
maybe
clarification
I
know.
Remember
higgins
and
I
both
spoke
to
identifying
if
as
to
this,
is
realistic.
That's
a
separate
question,
but
we
both
spoke
to
identifying
individuals
who
did.
A
But
it
is
a
fair
point
tonight,
something
we
considered
for
sure.
The
other
other
thing
that
I
think
that
remember
higgins,
not
both
identified
was
years
ago
when
the
state
fiscal's
most
recent
fiscal
troubles,
were
just
starting.
I
think
the
current
governor
walker
at
the
time
put
out
a
publicly
publicly
available
excel
spreadsheet,
with
ways
to
close
the
state
budget
gap
and
encourage
public
involvement,
awareness,
and
it
seems
it
was
years
ago.
A
It
seemed
like
a
lifetime
of
discussion
ago,
but
it
did
begin
to
to
have
that
conversation
as
to
how
one
will
better
understand
the
root
of
the
problem
and
then
two
ways
to
identify
solutions,
and
I
think
there
was
value
in
that
process.
Although
it
took
quite
some
time-
and
the
discussion
are
still
happening
to
this
day,
but
it's
a
much
more
informed
discussion
now
than
it
was
years
ago
when
it
started
happening.
So
that's.
B
People
to
your
point
that
it's
not
such
an
easy
task,
that's
what
we're
telling
you!
I
think
we're
on
the
same
page.
There
saying
it
isn't
as
easy
as
nine
people
solve
a
problem,
enlightening
people
that
we
do
have
a
bigger
issue.
If
you
care
about
alaskan
education,
we
should
actually.
But
here
are
the
levers
I
mean
if
I
like
the
idea,
if
we
built
some
kind
of
a
little
thing,
but
it
wouldn't
let
you
you
can't
do
this.
B
You
can't
eliminate
health
and
human
services
totally
to
make
something
else
go
because
you
would
pull
levers.
I
mean
to
your
point
that
was
a
great
tool
and
I
think
because
it
was
just
a
pfd
thing
and
the
whole
you
know,
but
I
mean
that
was
a
a
fun
tool
to
have
in
an
educated
people,
and
that's
that's
very
different
to
me
than
this.
This.
I
A
H
Yeah
someone
say,
I
think
the
comments
by
mr
anderson
are
pretty
well
thought
out.
I
do
understand
the
general
idea,
and
that
is
to
get
fresh
ideas,
fresh
perspectives
from
members
that
may
not
want
to
actually
run
for
the
school
board
in
order
to
to
give
their
opinions.
H
I
think
we
keep
the
cfo
and
other
folks
really
busy
during
that
time
anyway,
but
there
may
be
value
in
asking
the
public
to
look
at
specific
functions
for
a
bit
and
then
and
then
weigh
in,
but
I
it's
not
something
I
would
feel
comfortable
trying
to
come
up
with
a
solution
for
off
the
cuff
in
a
committee
meeting,
but
but
I
can
see
we're
getting
nine
people
putting
our
whole
budget
in
front
of
them.
H
D
Sure
thank
you
get
out
to
andy's
comments
regarding
the
intent
versus
the
impact
of
this.
I
think
the
intent
is
to
continue
to
be
transparent
in
all
phases
of
our
work.
Continue
to
communicate
with
the
public
continue
to
engage
people
in
a
process.
D
I
I
think
this
process
is
a
little
bit
overreaching
for
me.
I
think
it
is
going
to
require
more
time
more
staff,
time
more
district
resource,
and
I
have
a
you
know.
I
don't
care
who,
however
many
people
you
have
but
having
nine
people,
I'm
not
sure
how
we
came
up
with
the
people
who
are
going
to
be
on
the
committee.
D
I
get
three
by
the
superintendent
three
by
the
board.
Why
do
we
need
a
union
person?
I
guess
I'm
you
know
I
mean
I
would
like
to
see
just
three
parents
there.
If
we
were
gonna,
if
we
were
gonna
have
any
kind
of
discussion
I
mean
they,
they
are
the
ones
that
access
education
for
their
kids
and-
and
my
final
thought
is
to
for
us
to
take
our
time
with
this
and
not
I
mean
it
and
not
rush
it
through,
but
to
think
it
through
and
listen
to
the
comments
from
the
administration.
D
I
know
it's
hard
because
we
we
we
tend
to
want
to
do
what
we
think
is
right,
and
I
I
absolutely
get
that,
but
I
think
the
impact
of
this
is
going
to
be
significant
and
with
the
new
superintendent
coming
in.
D
Perhaps
we
could
wait
and
get
that
person's
view,
as
well
as
what
we've
already
gotten
from
the
staff
so
yeah
I
just
see
this
is
I
I
recall
the
days
of
the
budget
review
committee
and
I
recall
the
the
and
I
know
it
doesn't
have
to
be
that
way,
but
it
was,
it
did
not
do
what
what
the
intent
of
this
is
trying
to
do,
and
I
guess
I
would
leave.
I
would
need
more
time
to
to
try
to
make
it
to
try
to
make
some
changes
to
it.
D
To
do
what
I
think
we
want
to
do.
I
think
we
can
do
this
a
a
different
way,
but
I
don't
want
to
get
into
all
that
now,
but
our
our
finance
committee
will
have
can
have
more
discretion
in
how
we
make
this
a
bit
make
our
budget
available
to
the
public,
the
number
of
and
kinds
of
opportunities
we
give
to
the
public
to
see
the
budget
that
is
developed
by
the
people
that
no
education,
an
education
budget
is
not
like
a
bp
budget.
G
Thank
you
for
the
conversation
and
thank
you
also
to
katie
for
improving
the
echo
it's
so
much
better.
I
really
appreciate
that
yeah.
G
I'm
I'm
struck
sitting
here,
because
I'm
thinking
that,
as
a
board
with
the
superintendent
search
process,
we
have
really
found
some
new
ways
to
incorporate
public
feedback
into
shaping
the
actions
that
the
the
actions
that
we've
taken.
So
I
I'd
be
curious
and
intrigued
and
interested
in
in
finding
new
ways
to
expand
that
public
input
process,
maybe
through
the
existing
finance
committee
through
focus
groups.
G
But
I
really
do
appreciate
mr
anderson's
comments
and
reflections
on
that
that
it
might
be
a
reach
to
have
nine
heads
pointed
in
the
same
direction
in
a
meaningful
way
with
an
hour
a
month
or
so
of
time.
So
I
hear
that,
but
I
do
want
to
think
proactively
about
how
we
can
improve
community
feedback,
and
I
think
there
are
ways.
I
think
this
is
a
good
start,
but
I'd
be
open
in
new
ways
as
well.
A
Okay,
it
is
now
5
34.,
so
just
a
quick
check
for
the
committee.
Do
we
we
haven't
resolved
all
of
our
business.
Vice
president
hallman
member
donnelly.
Would
you
like
to
table
this
for
future
governance
committee
meetings
schedule
another
meeting
or
continue
for
a
few
more
minutes
today.
C
I
really
think
it
might
be
useful,
especially
if
you
could
narrow
down
chunks
of
the
budget
for
a
group
like
this
to
look
at
and,
of
course
it
would
completely
depend
on
who
was
willing
to
serve
on
it
too.
If
you
got
lucky
and
got
a
mark
foster
or
somebody
with
that
kind
of
experience
that
was
really
willing
to
put
some
time
into
it,
it
could
be
very
useful
given
us
some
alternatives,
but
I
I
completely
acknowledge
mr
anderson's
observations
about
the
municipal
budget
committee
and
and
the
you.
C
A
Thank
you,
member
donnelly,
so
I
appreciate
that.
I
think
the
intention
at
least
my
preference
is
hearing
from
the
administration,
is
to
take
this
back
to
review
and
prove
and
update
with
that
said
that
my
question
to
you
as
a
committee
member
was,
we
still
have
agenda
items
outstanding
for
discussion.
Would
you
prefer
we
address
those
today
by
continuing
our
meeting
a
few
more
minutes
schedule
a
separate
meeting
or
move
them
forward
to
the
next
regularly
scheduled
governance
meeting
whenever
that
is.
A
The
remaining
items
we
have
may
not
require
significant
staff
involvement,
so
if
there
are
staff
would
like
to
sign
online
or
leave.
You
know
understood
with
that
said
any
further
discussion
on
the
cfac.
C
Yeah
after
our
discussion
at
the
last
meeting,
I
significantly
edited
this
and
reduced
it
to
about
half
of
the
the
original
proposal,
pretty
much
it's
much
more
straightforward
now
and
if
the
members
have
have
looked
at
it,
you
can
see
that
it's
a
lot
shorter
and
I
keep
trying
to
do
the
slider
bar.
B
B
Want
me
to
scroll
it
dave,
since
it's
your
you're
speaking
to
it.
C
A
D
Yeah
I
I
would
just
like
to
ask
member
donnelly:
why
do
we
need
this
now?
The
issue
happened
in
october.
D
I'm
just
not
sure
why
we
are
holding
on
to
this
resolution
when,
by
all
intents
and
purposes
the
the
the
matter
has
been
acknowledged
as
a
mistake,
it
has
been.
C
Because
the
anchorage
public
has
never
heard
us
take
a
position
on
this
issue,
that's
why
and
we
should
have
taken
a
position
on
this
issue.
In
my
opinion-
and
I
think
late
is
better
than
never-
and
I
I
kind
of
hoped
that
maybe
there
had
been
some
some
action
by
the
association
of
school
boards-
I
mean
the
alaska
association,
but
they
chose
not
to
act
and
that's.
C
Okay,
that's
that's
what
I
anticipated
that
organization
wouldn't
act,
but
I
still
think
it's
appropriate
for
us
as
a
anchorage
school
district,
to
take
a
position
on
what
happened
and
there
are
members
of
the
public
that,
to
this
day
still
contact
me.
At
least
I
have
not
other
members
saying:
why
haven't
we.
D
So
the
aasb
did
take
did
issue
a
response,
a
written
response
from
the
from
the
organization-
and
that
was
probably
back
in.
D
I
don't
know
if
it
was
december
or
january
so
anyway,
my
my
own,
I
I
I
think
I
just
feel
like
this
just
keeps
it
just
keeps
I
I
don't
know
it
just
it.
D
It
keeps
regurgitating
that
which
has
happened,
and
you
know
we
are
a
member
of
the
aasb
who
is
a
member
of
the
in
in
national
school
board
association
and
to
resolve
our
partnership
with
them
or
our
membership
with
them
down
to
this
a
resolution
that,
basically,
I
don't
even
know
what
it
does
other
than
affirm
to
some
people
that
ns
the
association
made
a
mistake.
We
already
know
that
I
just
think
at
some
point.
We
need
to
just
move
on
and
tell
people
that
there
is.
D
There
has
been
an
apology
there
has
been
efforts
have
been
taken
to
correct
and
to
get
people
to
to
not
hold
on
to
that,
which
was
an
obvious
mistake.
A
Remember
donnelly
I
don't
see
the
other
hand
raised,
so
I'm
going
to
ask
a
question.
Remember
donnelly.
I
I'm
curious
if
you
would
support
a
more
narrow
and
I
realize
you've
reduced.
I
think
we
originally
had
three
or
four
pages
and
then
now
we're
at
one
from
back.
A
I'm
wondering
if
you
would
support
a
more
narrow
and
simplified
view
that
focused
on
the
nsba
and
left
out
some
of
the
references
to
the
federal
government
and
really
kept
it
within
scope
of
what
our
day-to-day
course
of
business
is
a
school
board.
So
something
like
under
be
resolved
keeping
number
one
that
references.
D
A
Threats
of
violence
and
then
number
three,
the
actions
of
the
nsba
regarding
their
letter
and
then
leaving
the
rest
out
that
pertained
to
the
federal
government,
the
white
house
and
then
maybe,
including
in
the
resolve
that
just
a
note
of
appreciation
that
the
nsba
apologized.
A
F
C
C
Well,
mr
member
of
jacobs,
that
would
be
better
than
the
board
not
taking
any
position
at
all,
but
I
have
to
say
that
the
role
of
the
white
house
was
incredibly
inappropriate
and
they
concealed
their
efforts
in
this
because
they
were
inappropriate.
C
They
white
house
initiative
reached
out
to
the
the
the
school
board
association
and
asked
them
to
send
a
letter
which
they
could
bootstrap
into
something
for
the
justice
department
to
act
on
and
that's
the
facts
and
they
concealed
that
initially,
and
then
it
wasn't
until
later
on
that
that
was
actually
revealed.
C
A
And
remember,
donald
again,
just
to
clarify
yeah,
I'm
not
my
my
attempt
isn't
to
argue
or
debate
the
facts
as
you
relay
them.
I
just
don't
think
I
think
putting
that
aside
and
focusing
on
the
nsba
is
that's
the
underlying
concern
I
see,
but
that's
also
where
there's
a
tie
to
the
board
as
we're
a
member
of
the
aesb,
which
is
a
member
of
the
nsba,
seems
to
be
the
most
direct
path
to
taking
action.
That's
relevant
to
what
we're
doing
that's.
So
I
appreciate
you
answering
my
question.
A
I
guess
my
hearing
that
my
thought
is
to
maybe
review
the.
What
we
have
at
this
point
make
some
changes
and
sending
a
draft
for
you
to
review
at
a
at
the
time
we
sort
of
choose.
A
H
I
generally
side
with
the
issue:
this
wasn't
an
issue
in
anchorage,
not
that
the
that
excuses,
anyone
for
anything
in
particular,
I
think
there
was
unfortunately,
a
threat
to
public
officials,
not
much
of
a
threat
to
anchorage
school
board
members
a
little
bit
of
a
threat
to
anchorage
assembly
members-
and
I
think
that's
the
environment-
that
this
all
happened
within.
H
To
my
knowledge,
no
one,
no
one
got
oppressed,
which
doesn't
mean
everybody's
excused,
but
at
this
point
in
this
stage
I
don't
see
the
value
in
moving
it
forward.
A
G
Yeah,
just
briefly
sorry,
I
had
to
step
away,
but
then
I
heard
remember
holloman
speaking,
I
guess
I'd
like
to
put
it
on
the
record
that
there
was.
I
had
cause
to
reach
out
to.
G
Multiple
member
bellamy
and
I
both
reached
out
to
federal
law
enforcement
regarding
something
that
was
out
of
the
realm
of
the
ordinary,
and
so
this
I'm
not
quite
sure
how
to
word
this.
G
A
So
the
status
of
this
discussion
at
least
right
now
is
there
isn't
two
votes
from
the
committee
to
move
forward.
So
we
would
put
this
back
in
the
list
of
items
to
amend,
reconsider
in
a
future
governance
meeting
whatever
proposed.
Is
there
anyone
else
who
wishes
to
discuss
this
prior
moving
on.
A
Hearing
seeing
none
again
time
check
it's
5
47.,
we
have
one
item
left,
which
is
a
policy
review.
There
are
six
policies
listed
with
the
committee
prefer
to
continue
working
through
or
address
this
at
a
future
meeting
later
this
month
or
work
through
it
at
a
future
meeting
where
the
governance
committee
reorganizes.
D
Is
there
any
are
any
of
them
pressing
for
right
now.
A
These
were
regularly
yeah
every
the
rolling
three-year
review
I
if,
when
I've,
had
urgents
or
pressing
changes,
I've
brought
them
forward
outside
of
this
process.
So
I
have
nothing,
but
I'm
not
sure
if
remember
donnelly
or
vice
president
hollande
had
anything.
A
Hearing
seeing
none,
we
do
not
have
a
set
date
at
this
point
in
your
organization,
which
occurs
later
this
month,
it's
been
a
pleasure
serving
with
the
committee
and
all
the
board
members
who
attended
all
of
our
meetings
felt
like
quasi
full
board
meetings.
So
thank
you
for
the
excellent
attendance
throughout
the
year
with
that
said,
would
take
a
motion
pleasure.