►
From YouTube: ASD Governance Committee Meeting 11/17/22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
D
I
think
we're
ready
ready
to
begin.
You
began
already
didn't
you.
D
C
F
D
D
Moving
to
the
agenda
first
item
is
I'm.
Sorry,
we
do
have
president
Bellamy
and
member
Donnelly
online
at
attendance.
Also,
first
item
up
for
discussion
is
Pledge
of
Allegiance
survey
and
changes
in
board
policy.
Six
one
one:
five:
does
anyone
wish
this?
Well,
that's
mine.
Excellent!
No.
H
First
of
all,
thank
you
for
having
this
on
the
agenda
today.
I
have
before
the
members
of
draft
proposal
the
first
page.
Well,
the
first
section
is
the
existing
bp6115.
H
H
H
If
available,
that
is
actually
consistent
with
the
existing
AR,
but
it
is
not
in
our
board
policy
and
then
second
is
a
proposal
that
has
been
previously
considered
by
the
board
in
a
slightly
different
form
that
once
a
month,
schools
would
play
the
national
anthem
and
the
state
flag
song
over
their
loudspeakers,
but
and
then
something
we
haven't
had
before
before
the
board.
H
For
any
consideration
is
the
final
sentence
that
appears
there
and
that
individual
schools
May
petition
the
school
board
for
any
exceptions
to
this
policy,
because
I
have
heard
members
mention,
there
might
be
certain
schools
that
either
well.
They
didn't
have
the
announcement
system.
That's
you
know
they
would
obviously
be
Exempted
from
it
and
might
have
some
reason
for
not
having
these
ceremonies
on
a
daily
or
a
monthly
basis,
and
they
could
simply
write
a
letter
to
the
school
board
and
the
school
board
could
exempt
them
if
it
was
appropriate.
H
Just
a
basic
thing
here,
I
drafted
this
in
legislative
bill
format,
in
that
anything
that's
being
deleted,
is
capitalized
and
included
by
brackets.
Anything
that's
being
added
is
underlined
and
in
bold
and
that's
standard
legislative,
Bill,
writing
process.
D
Also
like
to
note
the
member
Executives
Is,
With,
Us
online
and
remember,
Wilson,
has
shifted
from
being
in
person
to
online
as
well
any
discussion
from
anyone.
Oh.
B
So
I
thank
you,
member
Donnie,
for
bringing
this
forward.
I
know
at
a
previous
board
meeting
I
shared
that
I
would
be
supportive
of
something
to
come
before
the
board.
With
respect
to
this
area
of
Interest,
I
would
suggest
considering
a
couple
of
edits
really
out
of
the
understanding
that
I
feel.
Like
there's
a
report
we
hear
people
say
we
don't
want
to
teach
what
to
think
as
much
as
how
to
think
and
I
support.
B
I
want
to
I
want
this
to
support
activities
that
instill
Pride
the
activities
I'll
just
say
this.
The
school
board
shall
encourage
that
the
school
board
encourages
activities.
That
excuse
me.
The
comments
that
I
have
written
here,
I
have
to
translate
the
school
board,
encourages
activities
and
access
to
resources
that
instill
pride
in
our
country
and
understanding
of
its
complex
histories,
so
I
I
guess
I
have
a
few
edits
that
I
would
propose
and
I'm
not
quite
sure
what
the
best
way
to
to
bring
them
forward
would
be.
Okay,.
D
I
I
I
I
mean
I
I,
just
think
I
think
we
are
going
to
I.
Think
we're
overreaching
with
with
with
with
with
this
we're,
really
overreaching
with
these
edits
and
I.
Don't
know
what
member
lessons
amendments
are,
but
yeah
I
would
find
it
very
difficult
to
support.
I
You
know
if
we
were
if
we
were
adjusting
our
policy,
because
it
did
not
work
the
policy
Works.
What
is
not
working
is
what
some
members
the
way
it's
not
working.
I
If
the
ARs
are
spelling
out
how
the
policy
is
supposed
to
be
carried
out,
and-
and
in
this
case
it
is
a
little
confusing-
then
just
ask
the
administration
to
adjust
the
pop,
the
the
AR
I.
Don't
think
our
policy
needs
any
adjusting.
D
Anyone
else
wish
to
speak
if
not
I'll
put
myself
in
the
speaking
order
and
originally
I
come
prepared
to
think
in
terms
of
the
Pledge
of
whether
or
not
we
adjust
her
a
policy
on
that.
D
I
am
one
of
those
people
spending
a
lot
of
years
in
the
classrooms
waiting
for
the
announcements
to
end
so
that
we
could
begin
what
we
had
planned
for
the
day
I
before
addressing
some
things
like
the
the
national
anthem
and
the
flag.
Song
really
would
like
to
hear
from
building
principles,
one
on
what
they're
doing
now
and
and
I
do
think
in
most
of
our
buildings.
There's
a
concerted
effort
to
use
the
anthem
and
color
guards
in
ways
that
make
it
very
meaningful
to
their
student
body.
D
Other
principals
may
not
think
about
it
as
much.
There's
there's
almost
a
hundred
of
them
and
they
vary
a
lot,
but
also
just
the
impact
of
something
like
this
on
their
on
their
day
each
month
and
whether
or
not
they
see
it
as
enhancing
respect
or
if
there
are
possible
conflicts.
D
If
you
have
an
assembly
that
day,
does
it
all
get
repeated,
I
I
really,
don't
know
what
principles
will
say
when
we
ask
them,
but
before
we
make
changes
in
the
school
day,
I
would
really
like
to
hear
back
from
them
in
some
fashion
and
I'm,
not
sure
what
the
best
way
to
pull
them
on
it.
Certainly
talking
to
apa
and
making
them
aware.
D
Perhaps
they
could
develop
feedback
internally
and
funnel
it
to
us
or
contacting
them
directly
and,
and
part
of
this
just
goes
to
my
feeling
that
the
Board
needs
to
stay
out
of
the
school
day
as
much
as
we
can
in
terms
of
mandating
really
specific
things
happen
at
specific
times,
so
I
I
do
have
a
problem
with
that
part
of
it.
The
and
I
also
say
I.
I
do
think
the
stipulations
on
the
pledge
ideally
should
stay
in
the
administrative
regulations
and
I.
D
Don't
know
if
the
Administration
has
thoughts
on
changing
those
but
to
some
degree
I'd
like
to
see
them,
so
they
are
more
workable
and
workable
for
everyone
and
then
we'd
be
in
a
position
to
decide
if
we
wanted
to
make
stronger
policy
than
that
for
some
reason.
E
And
I
I
can
chime
in
really
the
the
purpose
of
bringing
this
to
governance
was
because
you
know
it
sounds
like
this
conversation's
been
happening
for
a
while
and
I
want
to
give
the
board
an
opportunity
to
share
their
perspective
on
what's
working,
what's
not
working,
whether
it's
with
the
policy
and
or
the
regulations.
So
we
can
figure
out
the
best
path
forward,
but
I
definitely
welcome
individuals.
E
Who've
been
in
the
district
longer
than
I
have
to
maybe
share
some
of
the
reasons
why
it
sounds
like
the
regulations
not
working,
because
that's
the
perspective
I've
gathered
from
The
Limited
interactions
I've
had
with
board
members
about
this,
but
are
there
particular
limitations
to
our
regulation
that
have
led
us
to
this
point
already?
The
other
perspective.
G
And
I
can't
speak
for
municipal
administrative
experience.
K-12
I
mean
in
high
schools
when
I'm
on
campus
regularly.
First
thing
is
a
warning:
it
is
routine
practice
for
them
to
ask
students
to
stand
or
stop
in
the
halls
for
deployment.
Olympians
I
think
most
schools
that
is
part
of
their
daily
practice.
G
Some
schools
may
just
do
that
at
the
beginning
of
each
week,
I'd
have
to
go
and
clarify
that,
and
it's
so
I
guess
I'm
I'm
a
little
unclear
on
what
the
problem
we're
trying
to
solve,
because
I
I
see
often
that
that
is
being
done
in
practice
as
it's
outlined
in
the
administrative
regulation
and
then
I
think
the
experience
of
most
of
the
folks
on
the
administrative
side.
G
Here
when
we're
at
assembly
when
we're
at
sporting
events,
they
are
starting
with
the
national
land
that
they
are
starting
with
the
presentation
of
the
colors
and
so
in
practice
at
least
the
high
school,
where
my
experience
is
rounded
I
see
that
our
schools
are
largely
following
administrative
regulations.
We.
D
E
What
are
they
doing
and
for
that
reason,
I
I
would
welcome
some
sort
of
I
made,
perhaps
a
survey
where
we
pull
principles
on
what
is
your
approach
to
ensuring
that
we're
adhering
to
policy
and
for
those
that
are
not
or
for
those
who
we
know
are
not
adhering
to
the
policy?
E
What
are
the
barriers,
whether
it's
infrastructure,
or
whether
it's
some
other
thing
administration's
willing
to
to
go
that
route?
I
hadn't
realized
the
length
of
time
just
if
we've
been
discuss,
but.
D
I
I
agree
with
Marty
Lang,
I
I.
Think
the
vast
majority
of
schools
you're
going
to
find
it
happens.
A
lot
I
mean
I've,
been
in
other
situations
before
I
became
an
educator,
I
didn't
have
a
national
anthem
or
color
guard
presentation
or
the
pledge
very
often.
But
if
you
work
in
a
school,
it's
just
part
of
the
fabric.
It's
there.
It's
a
lot.
It's
their
assemblies.
It's
it's
much
more
prevalent
than
it
is
in
the
Normal
public
sphere
by
quite
a
bit
but
they're.
D
The
perception
is,
there
may
be
a
handful
of
schools
that
aren't
and
I'm
not
too
concerned
if
they're
doing
something
else
that
fits
within
the
culture
of
their
school,
but
we
don't
know
for
sure
that
they
are,
and
so
I
think
that
that's
the
concern
is
what
what
are
they
doing
so
I
wouldn't
want
to
survey
to
not
simply
be
multiple
choice,
but
if,
if
a
school
is
not
doing
these
things
on
a
regular
basis,
what
what
are
they
doing
and
what
would
fit
in
to
their
culture
and
their
particular
circumstances.
D
I
I
It's
not
an
item
that
interests
the
entire
board,
but
I
would
support
a
survey
if
it
would
help
us
gain
more
insight,
and
if
we
accept
the
result
of
the
survey,
I
would
support
a
survey.
But
remember
our
schools
are
configured
in
different
ways
in
my
grandson's
classroom.
It's
not
said
over
the
intercom
every
day,
but
it
is
said
in
the
in
in
the
classroom.
That's
how
he
learned
it
so
and-
and
it
may
be,
that
some
schools
that
have
teams
are
small
or
smaller,
smaller
learning
communities.
I
It
will
look
different
in
those
in
the
in
those
schools,
so
you
know
I
think
again.
Our
policy
is
fine.
If
we
need
to
look
at
the
ARs
and
have
the
administration
look
at
the
ARs
I,
just
I,
just
don't
know,
I
mean
we're
not
and
I
and
I
don't
know
anyway
enough
I
see
Carl
has
his
hand
up.
D
Yeah
Mr
Ace,
that's
speaking,
and
member
Jacobs.
A
D
J
Yeah,
thank
you
the
last
time,
or
maybe
it
was
last
year.
We
spoke
about
this
and
I
think
what
came
up
was
that
the
AR
that's
in
place
now
is
potentially
restrictive
and
that
it
mentions
morning
announcements
and
kind
of
infers
that
there's
a
PA
system
involved
and
what
I
recall
hearing
was
that
that
that
schools
were
largely,
if
not
unanimously,
meeting
the
intent
and
that
the
pledge
was
recited
daily,
but
that
not
all
schools,
utilize
the
PA
system
or
utilize.
The
traditional
morning,
announcement
system
I'll,
give
an
example.
J
I
know:
afccs
has
like
a
morning
check-in
where
everyone
gathers
to
the
center
of
the
building
and
there's
an
in-person
Gathering,
and
so
you
know
they
wouldn't
use
the
PA
system
for
a
variety
of
reasons,
and
so,
when
I
mentioned
at
the
time
and
which
I
think
I
still
stand
by
is
as
long
as
the
intent
the
board
policy
is
met,
I
would
encourage
Administration
to
review
the
AR
and
remove
some
of
the
restrictions.
J
You
want
something
that
is
Meaningful
when
we're
talking
about
celebrating
what
makes
our
country
great,
placing
restrictions
on
it
and
making
it
Concrete
in
a
manner
which
is
different
than
how
each
campus
may
choose
to
integrate
things
of
meaning
each
day
to
me
hurts
and
then
goes
against
the
intent
of
the
value
of
why
we
would
want
to
have
the
pledge
in
our
buildings
and
why
it's
so
important,
and
so
that
was
kind
of
my
stance
on
it
then
and
I
think
it
still
is
the
case.
J
I
think
a
survey
is
fine,
but
I
think
what
we
found
over
and
over
again
is
that
schools
are
following
the
policy,
but
maybe
just
not
in
the
very
prescriptive
manner
that
is
in
outlined
in
the
AR
and
so
I
think
that
flexibility
is
ultimately
what
we're
going
to
find
the
schools
need.
Thank
you.
J
J
H
I
think
member
Jacobs
I
think
you're,
referring
to
the
very
bottom
of
page
one.
The
second
line
from
the
bottom,
where
the
language
is
added
and
not
disrupt
the
ceremony,
is
that
what
you're
referring
to.
J
Correct
yeah
but
I
guess
to
add
some
additional
context.
I
think
that's
already
inferred,
but
it
makes
me
think
by
adding
an
additional
language.
It
sounds
as
if
you've
been
made
aware
of
incidents
where
there
are
people
disrupting
the
ceremony.
It's
somehow
remaining
completely
silent,
I'm,
just
curious
for
yeah
more
info
on
that.
H
Well,
it's
been
a
few
years
since
I've
had
any
feedback
on
that,
but
it
was
when
I
first
started
working
on
this
about
five
years
ago.
That
I
did
get
feedback
about
that.
That
there
was
there
was
a
movement
by
some
people
to
disrupt
the
saying
as
a
pledge
of
allegiance.
H
I
do
think
that
you
know
the
intent
in
the
existing
policy.
Respectful
silence,
you
know,
should
cover
that.
But
I
do
think
that
there
was
I
had
I
was
getting
reports
from
some
from
some
people
that
people
were
doing
other
things
rather
than
just
standing
there.
They
were
intentionally
trying
to
disrupt
the
pledge.
J
Mr
chair
can
I
follow
up.
Yes,
thank
you
Dave.
Could
you
get
into
specifics
for
me,
I
guess,
I'm
I'm
really
struggling
to
imagine
how
someone
can
be
both
respectfully
silenced
and
also
be
disrupting
something
at
the
same
time,
and
my
teenagers
are
really
creative,
but
maybe
I
should
be
asking
them
instead,
so
can
you
fill
me
in.
H
You
you
could,
you
know
I
I
could
I
could
I
could
Envision
many
ways
which
an
individual
could
disrupt
disrupt
such
a
ceremony
while
being
silent
and
I
I
don't
want
to
get
into
describing
you
know
all
the
possibilities
but
I
think
there's
a
lot.
J
Okay,
I'll
just
wrap
up
by
saying
I
think
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
Dave,
the
word
respectful
silence
is
included
in
the
current
language
and
so
absence
and
pretty
specific
examples.
I
I
think
that's
a
pretty
clear
example
of
adding
language
to
fix
a
problem
that
we
can't
articulate
to
me.
Silence
and
respectful
silence
are
two
different
things.
J
If
it
was
just
silence,
I
could
see
you
know,
maybe
us
going
down
a
rabbit
hole,
but
if,
if
nothing's
been
occurring
recently
and
if
we
can't
generate
even
a
hypothetical
example
of
what
it
might
look
like,
I'm
all
for
the
policies
being
generally
speaking
as
short
and
concise
and
effective
as
possible,
and
that
particular
language
I
think
is
perfect,
as
is
because
it
mandates
that
you
know
respectful
silence,
I
think
speaks
for
itself
and
so
I'll
leave
it
there
and
I
I
still
stand
by
my
other
comments
that
I
think
that
the
problem
was
in
the
AR
which
doesn't
give
School
flexibility
ability
to
embrace
kind
of
you
know
the
pledge,
the
Alaska
flag,
song
and
other
ways
that
we
can
celebrate.
D
As
a
former
Middle
School
teacher
I'll
say
that
I've
had
the
opportunity
to
explain
respectful
to
students
and
it's
a
it's
a
teachable
moment,
so
it
works
out
both
academically
and
in
terms
of
patriotism
as
well.
Anyone
else
have
comments
on
this
I'll.
E
Administration
commits
to
conducting
a
survey
to
understand
the
practices
at
our
schools,
and
then
it
sounds
like
from
there.
A
follow-up
would
be
do
we
need
to
amend
the
AR
to
accommodate
what's
happening
or
do
we
need
to
accommodate
what's
happening
to
meet
the
current
AR
and
it
sounds
like
some
board.
Members
are
open
to
the
possibility
of
amending
the
AR
to
add
flexibility,
but
I
definitely
welcome
opinions.
If
the
intent
of
this
conversation
is
to
change
what's
happening
to
meet
the
AR,
which
direction
is
the
will
of
the
fourth
I.
D
I
do
think
it's
our
intent
that
every
school
promote
patriotism,
at
least
to
this
degree,
in
some
specific
way
that
they
can
describe
and
and
at
that
point
I
think
board.
Members
would
want
to
look
at
what
some
of
the
more
unusual
schools
may
be
doing
to
see
that
it
meets
our
our
threshold
of
what
we
think
is
sufficient.
D
D
So,
given
that
does
anyone
else,
my
conclusion
is
that
the
committee
would
not
take
action
on
this
today.
We'll
wait
for
the
administration
to
do
what
Dr
Bryant
just
outlined
and
then
revisit
this
when
when
it
comes
back,
is
everyone?
Okay
with
that.
D
B
Okay,
super
welcome
to
the
Alaska
reads:
Act
of
Wellness
policies:
that's
that
was
supposed
to
be
a
joke.
It
is
a
comprehensive
policy
and
I
appreciate.
Margo's
laughing
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
update
the
board
on
the
work
of
the
wellness
advisory
committee
over
really
a
robust
and
a
protracted
period
of
time.
So
I
appreciate
all
of
the
staff
time
we
have
had.
We've
had
about
five
community
members
who
have
participated
in
this
process
as
well
as
aea
and
representative
from
the
state
board.
B
Members,
Wilson
and
Bellamy
have
participated.
Remember
Jacobs,
it's
been
quite
a
journey,
so
let
me
share
my
screen
and
I'm
not
well
before
you
in
a
printout
and
then
post
it
online
is
the
committee's
draft
rewrite
of
War
policy
50
40..
B
What
I'm
going
to
share,
however,
are
the
I
don't
think
I've
saved.
The
document
is
a
comparison
of
current
board
policy
with
the
prospective
board
policy
so
that
we
can
see
the
potential
edits
all
right
go
ahead.
B
Thank
you,
I
am
looking
for,
did.
G
B
Okay,
well
I'm
gonna,
just
put
this
up
and
I'll
walk
us
through
so
the
charge
of
the
committee.
Just
with
a
quick
recap:
we
envisioned
working
on
a
leaner
board
policy
and
some
of
the
initial
steps
we
took
involved
reviewing
work
that
the
prior
Wellness
ad
hoc
committee
put
together
in
2019.
B
We
then
reviewed
that
with
the
state
of
Alaska's
School
wellness
policy,
annual
report
checklist,
there
are
components
of
this
which
are
federally
required
and
other
components
which
are
required
for
other
grants.
So
we
wanted
it
to
be
as
compliant
as
possible,
so
it
turns
out.
For
example,
you
have
to
have
language
that
says
that
water
will
be
available,
even
though
that
seems
silly.
It's
the
purpose
you
needed
to
have
that
language.
B
B
Physical
education,
physical
activity,
communication
with
families
and
monitoring
compliance
and
evaluation,
we
cross-referenced
all
of
our
changes
with
a
tool.
That's
been
developed
to
help
districts
nationally,
follow
the
well-sat
3.0
assessment
tool
and
we
scored
ourselves
on
the
different
components
and
in
the
end
we
ended
up
with
a
policy
that
is
more
robust
and
comprehensive
than
the
state
of
Alaska's
gold
standard
wellness
policy.
So
I
think
that
that
speaks
really
well
and
I.
B
Think
you
know
it
was
an
interesting
process
because
in
the
end,
I
think
we
really
tried
to
reflect
Anchorage
values
when
we
support
ourselves,
for
example,
on
marketing,
we
gave
ourselves
a
bunch
of
zeros,
because
we
understood
that
our
school
business
Partnerships
are
really
quite
important
and
maybe
maintaining
those
Partnerships
mattered
more
in
the
end
for
ASD
than
Banning
Tasty
Freeze
from
helping
out
in
hate
elementary
school
every
so
often
so
key
components
of
our.
Let
me
see
actually
I'm
going
to
go
to
the
wellness
survey
really
quickly.
B
I
have
to
reshare
hold
on
new
share
if
we
go
to
the
Google
form
survey.
So
we
ran
this
through
our
our
tool.
We
got
our
information.
We
pushed
this
out
to
the
community.
We
got
3
200
responses,
which
I
think
is
pretty
impressive
and
let
me
share
this
survey,
but
this
is
just
the
raw
Google
form
we
had
about.
74
of
our
responses
were
parents
and
Guardians
people
could
say
I'm
both
a
parent
and,
for
example,
staff.
So
percentages
add
up
to
more
than
100.
B
Elementary
staff
gave
us
a
a
number
of
our
response.
Respondents
students
responded
secondary.
We
had
principals
who
responded
as
well,
Elementary
and
secondary,
and
then
people
like
to
Define
themselves
as
the
fellow
human
beings
so
on
and
so
forth.
B
We
introduced
in
our
survey
each
change,
so
I'm
actually
going
to
go
to
the
question
because
it
details
the
suggested
change.
The
first
change
in
the
initial
section
was
that
we
added
language
encouraging
the
district
to
provide
opportunities
and
supportive
employee
wellness
and
encourage
the
staff
to
model
healthy
eating
and
physical,
the
activity
behaviors.
It
turns
out.
We
got
a
bunch
of
pushback
on
the
second
component
of
this,
so
we
deleted
the
second
half
of
that.
So
we
used
our
feedback
to
modify
the
document
that
you
see
before
you.
B
The
second
question
that
people
were
asked
was
with
respect
to
establishing
an
ongoing
Wellness,
Advisory,
Group
and
I
think
this
is
one
of
those
components
so
that
people
don't
really
like
extra
paperwork,
but
it's
part
of
the
requirement
and
actually
I'm.
Looking
at
the
responses.
I
have
this
all
tallied
up
in
a
different
document,
but
we
looked
at
this
was
the
purpose
we
looked
at
sorry,
the
planning
we
looked
at
people's
responses
for
each
of
these
questions,
so
where
we
saw
this
push
back
here,
we
edited
the
document.
B
That's
before
you,
maybe
I'll
just
get
right
to
the
chase
major
changes
in
the
proposed
document.
Let
me
re-share
this.
B
Major
changes
in
the
proposed
document
do
entail.
B
We
with
the
nutrition
section
we
made
a
distinguished
we.
We
made
a
distinction
between
foods
that
are
sold
in
the
district
and
foods
that
are
made
available,
because
those
are
two
very
different
bodies
of
how
food
shows
up
in
ASD,
and
we
asked
there's
something
called
smart
snacks
in
school,
which
is
a
federal
thing
and
we
ask
the
administration
to
prepare
a
number
of
ARs.
And
maybe
at
this
point
is
there
one
other
areas
that
deals
with
nutrition
or
is
that
the
fundraising
AR.
B
Okay,
okay,
so
for
example,
so
in
this
section
within
the
nutrition
section,
you
know,
in
addition
to
food
sold
on
campus
to
the
extent
practicable
foods
and
beverages
made
available
to
students
during
the
school
day
and
will
be
offered
with
promotion.
Consideration.
Promoting
student
health
ARS
will
be
developed
and
maintained
that
include
suggestions
for
non-food
rewards,
I'm.
Looking
for
fundraising,
I'll
have
to
find
that.
B
The
draft
AR
okay
application.
B
Another
major
change
would
be
to
inscribe
into
policy
that
elementary
schools
shall
provide
a
minimum.
Thank
you
of
20
minutes
of
eating
time
after
being
served
for
lunch,
10
minutes
for
breakfast.
Currently
we
have
an
AR
that
brings
lunch
and
recess
together
into
a
45-minute
block.
This
moves
that
into
policy.
B
B
B
The
physical
education
section
has
a
number
of
new
components
that
were
not
a
part
of
a
asd's
current
policy,
which
was
brought
to
the
board
by
the
Alaska
Association
of
school
boards,
and
I
think
that
the
aasb
had
had
created
a
policy
that
was,
that
would
be
usable
in
very
different
districts.
And
so
we
inserted
some
things
that
would
be
specific
to
ASD
to
restrict
best
or
better
practices
with
physical
education.
B
I
mean
there's
just
there's
so
much
within
this
document.
Physical
activity
reflects
a
change.
We
have
state
statute
that
requires
us
to
have
that
requires
ASD
and
all
districts
to
provide
90
of
the
cdc's
time
physical
activity
during
the
school
day,
previous
language
in
the
policy
said
54
minutes,
which
is
90,
but
we
changed
it
back
to
90
to
really
reflect
the
language.
If
the
CDC
changes
the
amount
of
time
it
recommends
for
physical
activity
each
day,
then
we
can
change
with
it.
B
So
it's
a
little
bit
more
Nimble
than
the
fixed
54
minutes.
We
changed
a
section
here
from
a
minimum
of
20
minutes,
a
day
of
recess
to
30
minutes
a
day
of
recess
and
there's
that
reference
to
State,
Statute
I
think
that
there
are
some
ARs
with
respect
to
there's
an
inclement
weather
recess,
AR.
Now,
communication
with
families,
we
changed
from
communication,
with
parents
to
families
to
be
more
inclusive
and.
B
There's
those
references
to
the
smart
snacks
again
and
really
and
with
the
monitoring,
compliance
and
evaluation
section,
the
federal
government
requires
ASD
to
submit
a
triennial
review
of
our
practices.
B
This
document
reflects
that,
and
it
also
reflects
the
creation
of
kind
of
an
ongoing
feedback
loop
within
ASB,
and
so
the
idea
is,
let's
make
sure
that
the
district
is
complying
with
the
intent
of
this
policy,
but
also,
let's
check
in
on
an
annual
basis
on
what
is
what
does
that
look
like,
and
so
it
this
annual
checkup
would
probably
require
a
couple
of
would
require
an
ongoing
committee
comprised
of
different
stakeholders
and
Survey
of
survey
of
our
staple
there's
the
principles
but
also
other
people
in
our
school
buildings,
and
then
that
would
generate
ideally
a
report
for
the
board
and
for
this,
whatever
this
ongoing
Wellness
committee
might
be
to
really
understand
what
minor
practices
understand.
B
What
supports
we
need
to
improve
our
student
wellness
and
learning
as
we
move
forward
and
I.
Think
one
of
the
other
additions
we
made
right
at
the
end
of
our
meeting
was
that
this
is
the
Y.
We
added
a
section
here
that
the
board
recognizes
that
physical
and
mental
Wellness
contributes
the
students
Readiness
to
learn,
improve
behavioral
outcomes,
increase
the
tenants
and
overall
academic
success,
and
that's
the.
Why
that's
why
this
matters?
B
So
we
have
healthy
students
who
are
ready
to
learn.
So
I
was
going
to
let
you
speak
party
about
some
of
the
AR,
but.
C
C
G
C
G
Echo
what
member
lesson
said?
It
was
a
good
process
if
we
spent
20
plus
hours,
probably
a
committee
with
a
lot
of
different
representative
opinions,
and
we
did
start
out
with
the
intent
to
sort
of
narrow
this
down
to
a
less
obese
policy
and
then
realize
that
the
federal
guidance
really
compels
us
to
have
always
act.
Because
yeah
yeah.
E
G
F
F
G
Oh
AR,
that
really
gives
especially
our
classroom
practitioners
suggestions
around
how
to
do
non-food
rewards,
rather
than
providing
sugars
to
access
incentives
for
kids.
So
we'll
get
some
specific
language
capturing
for
that,
but
in
terms
of
the
three
that
we
do
have
at
least
in
draft
form,
the
first
one
is
specific.
G
The
fundraising
this
really
is
targeted
more
at
our
secondary
schools,
where
a
lot
of
fundraising
equities
happen
through
booster
clubs
for
sports
and
activities,
for
you
know
all
manner
of
things,
and
so
this
really
captures
what
is
required
under
federal
law.
So
it
defines
what
the
school
day
is
under
federal
law.
What
can
and
can't
be
sold
during
the
school
day
where
it.
F
G
J
J
G
Of
the
yams
and
things
like
that,
so
we're
basically
going
to
now
that
we've
got
this
drafted.
G
If,
when
this
policy
is
approved,
we
will
roll
this
out
to
principles
to
make
sure
that
they
understand-
and
these
really
have
been-
has
been
the
law
of
the
land
for
some
time.
But
we
haven't
done
a
concerned
ever
to
educate
our
principles
on
that,
so
this
AR
would
be
kind
of
the
first
step
in
helping
them
see
what.
J
G
Is
just
acknowledging
that,
especially
our
secondary
students
spend
a
lot
of
time
in
sports
and
activities
outside
the
school
day,
so
they
get
a
lot
of
their
physical
activity
through
ASB
Sports,
your
participation
and
Community
programs,
and
so
we
have
traditionally
provided
a
number
of
opportunities
for
them
to
acknowledge
that
activity.
A
G
Captures
what
has
been
historically
in
practice
and
acknowledges
it
in
AR
and
then
the
third
AR
is
directly
out
of
the
elementary
administrative
manual
and
discounts
of
the
language
and
guidance
that
we
have
and
building
under
in
terms
of
inclement,
weather
and
recess.
When
we
would
cancel
the
assessment,
what
temperature
conditions
right.
G
A
H
Can
I
ask
a
question?
Yes,.
H
Darling
yeah,
first
of
all,
on
page
two,
the
second
to
the
bottom
paragraph
where
it
refers
to
no
less
than
30
minutes
total
for
lunch
and
instructed
physical
activity.
Is
that
to
be
read
that
it's
30
minutes
for
lunch
in
30
minutes
for
unstructured
physical
activity
or
that
the
combination
of
the
two
should
be
no
less
than
30
minutes.
F
D
H
The
version
I'm
looking
at
on
page
two
of
the
second
of
the
bottom
paragraph
is
I,
took
it
off
the
agenda
and
it
says
no
less
than
30
minutes
total
for
lunch
and
unstructured
physical
activity
and
I
just
I.
Don't
there's
two
ways
to
read
that
grammatically.
You
know
if
it's
30
minutes
for
lunch,
30
minutes
from
unstructured
or
whether
the
two
are
combined
in
30
minutes.
E
E
G
H
And
then
I
had
a
question
about
the
smart
snacks
in
school
waiver
policy.
Is
that?
Does
that
only
apply
during
the
school
day
that
they
would
require
a
waiver
for
the
fundraising
exemption.
H
G
Or
even
cotton
candy
being
had
in
the
students
on
their
way
out
the
door.
You
have
to
honor
that
half
hour
after
student
release
any
afternoon
evening,
activities
where
you
have
concession
stands
open
or
you're,
bringing
people
in
for
a
potluck
or
you're,
providing
you
know
cookies
at
an
academic
Awards.
All
of
that
is
allowable
under
federal
law,
and
we
we
try
never
to
be
more
restrictive
than
is
already
required
under
federal
law.
B
D
Given
that
this
is
a
draft,
but
what
were
you
hoping
for
for
an
outcome
today?
Well.
B
It's
a
pretty
final
draft,
I
mean
we've
we've
put
in
I'm.
B
B
C
B
H
B
Yeah
but
students
shall
have
obviously
an
adequate
amount
of
eat
and
do
whatever
they
need
to
need.
I
think
that's
a
reflection
of
current
practice.
More.
H
H
B
C
A
If,
like
in
elementary,
that
could
could
look
like
a
20-minute
seated
time
and
then
the
five
minute
passing
and
then
the
30-minute
recess
for
a
total
of
55
minutes
where
we
were
noting
that
secondary
would
not
have
that
requirement.
B
A
Person
and
noting
also
that
the
secondary
high
school
student
may
be
eating
their
lunch,
walking
the
trails
and
therefore
doesn't
need
us
that
lunch
said
recess.
But
what
has
access
to
multiple
spaces
to
obtain
that,
at
the
same
time
where
our
Littles
are
they.
H
H
From
the
questions
I
previously
asked,
I
am
I'm.
Looking
at
page
three,
the
first
paragraph
schools
will
limit
food
and
beverage
marketing
on
campus
to
the
promotion
of
foods
and
beverages
that
meet
the
national
school
lunch
act.
Etc
that
paragraph
from
my
prior
inquiry
seems
to
only
apply
during
the
school
day,
but
it
doesn't
specify
that.
B
H
H
B
Yeah
no
I
see
your
I
see
your
point.
I
think
that
that
is
a
perfectly
reasonable
edit
to
me.
A
Yes,
the
first
comment:
member
Donnelly
was
about
the
sold
during
the
school
day
the
real
advised
to
have
sold
during
the
school.
A
Than
sold
in
the
federal
regulations,
so
I
think
that
this
one
and
other
members
that
can
be
confronting
Iran
was
specific
to
the
marketing.
A
And
so
we
will
yeah.
You
need
to
look
at
that
if
the
marketing
and
soul
under
federal
regulations
in
times
of
days
that
can
be
done.
H
A
Marketing
would
be
like
the
Federal
Regulation
gave
an
example
of
labeling
the
field
like
Taco
Bell,.
C
A
A
giant
huge
Taco
Bell
sign
in
the
middle
of
my
field,
and
that
is
a
giant
marketing
of
non-minded,
smart
snap
and.
F
E
D
A
C
A
Banners
outside
our
fields
and
things
like
that
within
our
schools.
We
would
just
limit
that.
It's
not
blanketing
our
schools
with
promotions
for
energy
drinks,
because
that's
what
they
sponsored
for
this
worksheet
or
this
stomach,
or
menus
or
specials
or
things.
B
F
D
I
conceivably
would
hesitate
to
put
Tasty
Freeze
on
the
school
business
partner
list,
especially
with
the
logo,
and
hopefully
no
one
would
ever
name
a
field.
Taco
Bell,
but.
B
I
D
F
J
J
G
B
D
F
A
Work
with
our
secondary
elementary
and
our
operational
facility
to
make
sure
that
our
principals
can
understand
what
that.
What
that
looks
like
limiting.
According
to
this
policy.
I
I
I
wanted
to
move
that
it
moves
out
of
committee
to
the
consent
agenda
and
that
we
can
continue
our
Pro
to
continue
our
process
of
reviewing
and
potential
possible.
Edit
clarifications.
C
I
Not
action,
so
we
can
have
time
to
look
at
it
again.
All
board
members
can
look
at
it.
I
meant
non-action,
I
would.
B
D
B
So
I'm
going
to
read
part
of
our
this
assessment
tool,
and
this
one
had
is
a
federal
requirement
that
we
restrict
marketing
on
campus
during
the
school
day
to
only
those
foods
and
beverages
that
meet
some
are
connect:
smart
snacks
standards,
School
marketing
includes
feed
and
beverage
advertising
and
other
marketing,
like
brands,
logos,
trademarks,
Etc
on
any
property
or
facility
owned
released
by
The,
District
or
school,
and
used
at
any
time
for
school,
related
activities.
B
D
G
D
Yes,
member
Donnelly,
were
you
finished?
Yes,
okay,
the
member
Jacobs.
J
Thank
you,
Mr,
chair,
I'm,
just
going
to
suggest
this.
This
committee
I
mean
I,
think
the
vast
majority
of
the
board
is
in
consensus
as
someone
who
helps
get
us
to
this
point.
I
think
that
you
know
I'm
in
agreement
that
this
policy
reflects
a
lot
of
positive
work.
But
if
we're
not
going
to
add
it
to
non-action
until
late,
December
or
January,
perhaps
we
can
revisit
the
policy
and
governance
one
more
time
with
the
added
context
of
the
ARs,
see
the
whole
picture
and
then
just
move
it
forward
from
there.
J
I
think
the
intent
is
for
this
new
policy
to
take
effect
next
school
year
and
if
that's
the
case,
I
don't
see
that
that
couple
weeks,
if
it's
even
a
delay
in
theory,
because
we're
already
talking
about
moving
into
January
by
the
time
it
gets
finally
approved-
and
this
is
the
committee
structures
a
good
place
to
review
and
have
this
informal
discussion
outside
of
the
kind
of
firmer
context
of
Robert's
Rules
of
our
business
meetings.
Thank
you.
D
And
I'm
going
to
say
I
can
remember
Jacob's.
My
concern
is
that
a
year
from
now,
all
the
policy
needs
to
be
able
to
stand
on
it.
Some
people
won't
see
the
tool
you're
using
they
won't
have
access
to
the
discussion
and
and
I
do
understand.
It's
hard
to
write
is
not
a
simple
job,
but
I
I
would
like
for
at
least
that
much
to
be
more
clear
and
and
I
would
like
to
read
more
as
well.
We
do
have
a
motion
from
president
Bellamy.
B
B
I
D
Well,
in
that
case,
it's
got
a
second
I
would
move,
but
we
table
it
until
our
December
meeting,
with
some
specific
rewrites
on
this
and
and
other
suggestions
which
I
may
or
may
not
get
a
second
for
it
either.
I'll.
B
D
So
we
will
look
at
it
again
and
I.
Think
if
you
do
rewrite
I
said
I
generally
support
everything
in
here:
okay,
but
in
areas
like
that
there
we
just
need
Clarity
and
there
might
be
some
other
cyanogenic.
It's.
D
C
D
B
D
Serious
ways,
and
so
I
think
time
for
administration,
particularly
in
elementary
I,
would
like
to
hear
back
the
if
it's
workable
with
everything
in
there.
Any
other
comments
on
this
member
Higgins.
D
Under
new
business,
yeah,
okay,
you
would
be
second
on
the
agenda.
Therefore,
yeah
real
quickly
I
have
a
proposal
for
a
change
in
board
policy.
D
6115
ceremonies
and
observances,
it
would
add
a
sentence
of
whether
veterans
say
is
a
holiday
or
regular
school
day
would
be
recommended
by
the
calendar
committee,
which
is
existing
policy,
but
if
it
was
scheduled
as
an
in-service
day,
employees
may
choose
to
use
a
personal
day
without
penalty
if
they
so
choose,
and
that
actually
is
contrary
to
some
contract
language
that
we
have
so
I
just
wanted
to
introduce
this
so
that
people
can
read
it
and
give
feedback
at
the
next
meeting,
not
expecting
reaction
or
discussion
of
it
today.
F
Is
the
idea
of
an
audience
committee
I'd
like
to
bring
in
former
school
board
members
former
CFO
to
talk
about
how
that
has
worked,
the
impact
it
has
had
on
the
district
and
the
importance
that
has
been
placed
on
it?
I
know.
In
the
recent
years
the
Boyd
made
a
decision
to
discontinue
the
audience
committee.
I
know
that's
something
under
the
department
of
the
President
to
establish
committee,
but
I'd
like
to
go
ahead
and
bring
that
forward
and
I.
Don't
know
the
process
of
bringing
other
people
in
people
had.
J
F
Information,
but
we
have
formal
board
members
who
are
very
strong
all
this
issue
on
bringing
in
former
CFO
and
talk
about
the
impact
and
the
the
this
overview
because
I'm
the
only
board
member
here
that's
been
on
the
board
when
they
had
the
audience
committee.
The
audit
committee
doesn't
conduct
the
audit.
The
audit
committee
won't
with
things
like,
don't
do
a
finalization
of
it.
F
It's
the
administration
working
with
the
auditor,
there's
a
goal
above
that
to
make
sure
that
that
all
the
issues
that
covered
within
that
item
in
regards
to
the
review
of
it-
and
there
was
some
there-
have
been
some
tremendous
benefits
to
that
process,
and
so
it
plays
a
role
with
at
the
top
that
we're
we're
the
ones
that
they
are
reporting
to.
If
there's
an
issue
or
concern
in
regards
to
the
audit
that
we
would
be
including
and
not
excluded,
so.
F
Issue
and
it's
one
that
I
go
ahead
and
present
and
I'll
work,
Paul
and
I
had
talked
about
it
before,
but
it
just
never
has
gone
forward
in
boy
and
I
mean
well.
It's
just
setting
up
a
time
to
to
bring
the
idea
and
I
I.
Don't
know
the
processes
for
going
to
get
other
people
in
to
talk
about
it.
But
we've
got
formal
board
members
and
former
CFO
who's
going
to
come
in
to
explain
the
importance
of
this
issue.
D
What
we
could
do
and
I
would
work
with
you
and
member
Jacobs
is
draft
the
changes
to
board
policy
to
create
the
committee.
Okay,
and
once
it's
on
the
floor,
then
any
of
those
people
would
be
able
to
speak
to
it
in
the
committee
and
if
we
voted
out,
we
go
to
to.
I
B
Just
wanted
to
clarify
that
current
board
policy
language
in
5040
does
say:
schools
will
limit
food
and
beverage
marketing
on
campus
to
to
the
promotion
of
foods
and
beverages
that
meet
national
school
at
National,
School
Lunch
act,
nutritional
guidelines,
it's
a
requirement
that
we
say
those
words.
So
this
is
not
a
change
that
that
the
committee
implemented.
D
D
J
Yeah
my
Mr
chair
was
myself.
I
just
wanted
to
to
share
I
was
contacted
by
a
member
of
the
FCC
or
the
Federation
of
community
councils,
and
they
indicated
that
at
their
most
recent
meeting,
a
couple
of
councils
mentioned
that
they
weren't
seeing
regular
representation
by
school
board
members
at
their
meetings,
and
so
I
know
that
last
year
we
passed
a
more
policy
which
test
the
president,
actually
with
monitoring
and
collecting
data
from
board
members
as
to
their
attendance
and
also
limits
board
member
participation
the
following
year.
J
If
they
fail
to
meet
a
50
threshold,
and
so
I
didn't
want
to
pass
on
that
feedback.
That
happened
at
the
FCC
meeting
and
hoping
folks
are
getting
to
those
meetings,
especially
right
now.
I
Will
I
will
be
reaching
out
to
a
couple
of
board
members
based
on
my
report,
or
at
least
the
information
that
I
got
from
the
Federation
of
the
delegates
at
the
Federation
of
community
councils
but
they're
they're?
I
There
are
a
few
board
members
that
are
not
showing
up
I'm
going
to
reach
out
directly
to
them,
and
Amanda
and
I
will
come
up
with
a
of
some
kind
of
process
to
for
boards
for
board
members
to
for
me
to
check
for
board
members
to
log
in
whether
or
not
they're
they
can
go
or
not
go.
Some
of
you
are
reaching
out
and
asking
for
you
know
coverage,
but
please
just
we.
I
We
just
got
to
figure
out
how
to
make
sure
every
Council
gets
a
report
and
when,
when
it's
possible
now
the
ones
that
are
on
our
meeting
nights
I,
we
would
have
to
give
them
a
written
report
right.
But
if
it's
not
on
our
meeting
night,
please
contact
the
president
and
let
them
know
that
you're
not
going
to
be
there
and
give
them
the
information
that
you
want
them
to
share.
But
we
can't
have
board
members.
We
got
to
hold
ourselves
accountable
to
those
to
what
we
said.
We
were
going
to
do
so.
I
I'll
get
back
to
everyone
with
more
information
on
that.
Thank
you,
member
who
was
at
Jacobs.