►
From YouTube: Arcata City Council Meeting - 12/21/2022
Description
City of Arcata Live Stream
A
Good
evening
and
thank
you
for
viewing
the
December
21st
meeting
of
the
Arcata
city
council
city
council
meeting
is
being
held
as
a
hybrid
meeting,
with
both
in-person
attendance
and
teleconference
access
via
Zoom.
Our
first
item
tonight
is
a
land
acknowledgment.
The
city
of
Arcata
acknowledges
that
the
lands
we
are
located
on
are
the
unseated
ancestral
lands
of
the
wiat
tribe.
A
The
land
that
Arcata
rests
on
is
known
in
the
wiat
language
as
Houdini,
meaning
over
in
the
woods
or
among
the
Redwoods
past
actions
by
local
state
and
federal
governments
removed
the
WEA
and
other
indigenous
peoples
from
the
land
and
threaten
to
destroy
their
cultural
practices.
The
city
of
Arcata
acknowledges
the
weak
Community
their
Elders,
both
past
and
present,
as
well
as
future
Generations.
This
acknowledgment
seeks
to
Aid
in
dismantling
the
Legacy
narratives
of
subtler
colonialism.
If
you
would
like
to
join.
If
you
would
like
to
please
join
me
for
the
flag
salute.
A
A
If
you
wish
to
make
a
comment
during
the
meeting,
either
at
the
two
open
public
comment
periods
or
for
an
individual
agenda
item,
there
are
three
ways
to
do.
So,
if
you
are
here
in
person,
please
line
up
behind
the
podium
when
the
item
you
would
like
to
speak
is
accepting
public
comment.
If
you
are
logged
onto
Zoom,
click
raise
your
hand
when
it
is
time
for
public
comment
on
the
item.
A
You
wish
to
speak
on
if
you're
on
the
phone
press
star
9
on
your
phone,
to
raise
your
hand
when
it
is
your
turn,
you
will
be
prompted
to
dial
star
six
on
your
phone
to
unmute
for
each
item.
We
will
be
taking
in-person
public
comment
first
and
then
moving
to
online
comments.
We
will
not
be
going
back
and
forth.
So
if
you're
waiting
or
wanting
to
comment
on
an
item,
please
line
up
at
the
podium
or
raise
your
electronic
hand
as
soon
as
public
comment
is
requested.
A
C
The
projects
He
reviewed
for
both
the
applicant
and
the
community
and
whereas
John
had
a
deep
working
knowledge
of
the
general
plan
and
zoning
ordinances,
often
catchy
nuances
in
the
code
that
others
had
missed
and
whereas
John
spoke
softly.
But
his
words
were
always
important
to
hear
and
whereas
John
demonstrated
a
commitment
to
Public
Service,
giving
back
to
the
community
in
ways
we
could
only
hope
to
emulate
and
whereas
his
dedication
and
service
to
all
of
us
is
appreciated
and
will
be
missed.
Now.
C
D
This
is
a
certificate
of
appreciation
for
Mike
Clinton
for
his
40
years
of
service
to
the
city
of
Arcata,
whereas
the
city
of
Arcata
hired
Mike
Clinton
as
a
seasonal
maintenance
worker
in
1982
Mike
was
promoted
to
full-time
water,
Wastewater
maintenance
worker
in
1989,
and
continued
to
advance
the
certification
and
role
within
the
city
as
water,
Wastewater
mechanic,
plant
operator,
crew,
leader
and
eventually
Waterway
sweater
superintendent
in
2011..
Mike
was
further
promoted
to
environmental
service,
deputy
director
for
streets
and
Utilities
in
2017,
and
whereas
Mike's
extensive,
extensive
knowledge
of
the
city's
infrastructure.
D
Mike
has
provided
a
Keen
Eye
for
review
of
designs
to
ensure
successful
construction
and
integration
with
current
treatment
facility
operations
and
whereas,
through
his
dedicated
work,
ethic
study,
leadership
and
evident
respect
and
appreciation
for
his
staff.
Mike
cultivated
Excellence
within
the
Environmental
Services
Department.
Just
don't
ask
him
to
speak
in
public
and
whereas
Mike
has
long
served,
the
best
interests
of
the
city,
its
residents
and
visitors,
infrastructure,
Arcata
wastewater
treatment
facility
and
our
Cato
Marsh
and
Wildlife
Sanctuary
with
dedication,
resourcefulness
and
positive
positivity.
D
The
results
of
his
service
will
ensure
high
quality
of
life
in
Arcata
for
many
generations
to
come
now,
therefore,
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
Arcata
hereby
expresses
appreciation
to
Mike
Clinton
for
serving
the
people
of
Arcata
for
40
years.
We
wish
him
all
the
best
and
commemorate
his
retirement
on
December
27
2022
dated
December
21
2022
with
Sarah
Schaefer
mayor.
A
A
Okay,
so
next
on
our
agenda
will
be
early
oral
Communications,
the
city
council
values.
Your
comments
in
this
15-minute
time
period
allows
people
to
address
the
Council
on
matters
that
are
not
on
the
agenda.
Please
know
that,
pursuant
to
the
brown
act,
the
council
cannot
discuss
or
take
action
on
items
that
are
not
listed
on
the
posted
agenda
at
the
end
of
all
oral
Communications,
the
council
May
respond
to
statements
supported
requests
that
require
Council
action
will
be
set
for
future
agendas
or
referred
to
staff.
Speakers
may
be
limited
to
two
minutes.
A
F
I
could
see.
After
reading
the
ER
that
Humboldt
was
Cal,
Poly
Humboldt
was
throwing
arcade
of
fire
district
taxpayers
and
the
health
and
safety
of
students
under
the
bus.
This
issue
runs
parallel
to
the
Gateway
process.
With
a
joint
session
and
the
majority
of
the
Planning
Commission
and
the
city
council
members
on
August
23rd
2022
voted
for
a
seven-story
building
Heights
at
this
meeting.
My
public
comment
was
what
are
you
doing?
F
F
Firefighters,
arrived
at
the
scene
within
12
minutes
of
the
first
emergency
call
witnesses,
told
local
news
outlets
that
several
occupants
had
jumped
out
of
the
windows
to
escape.
Several
people
who
were
injured
are
still
between
life
and
death.
According
to
the
fire
up
Arcata
fire
department,
there
has
been
a
number
of
dorm
fires
in
the
past
that
call
Cal
Poly
Humboldt
thanks.
Okay,.
G
Okay,
foreign
good
evening,
Fred
wise
first
I,
want
to
congratulate
and
extend
my
appreciation
to
arcata's
new
mayor
vice
mayor
and
our
newest
member
of
the
city
council,
former
planning
commissioner
Kimberly
White.
Thank
you.
I
also
want
to
speak
about
the
arcade
of
fire
district.
They
gave
Eric
loudensberger
spoke
before
the
Planning
Commission
on
August
4th.
G
G
He
gave
a
presentation
to
the
Arcade
Fire
District
Board
of
Directors.
It's
I
have
a
video
of
it
on
arcata1.com.
You
can
go
to
arcade1.com
council
and
it
goes
right
to
it.
Essentially,
he
said
and
I
shouldn't
be.
Paraphrasing
you'll
he's
going
to
be
giving
a
presentation.
It's
scheduled
for
January
10th
that
video
will
be
on
the
website.
Also
my
website,
but
I
am
going.
To
paraphrase,
it
is
impossible
for
the
arcade
of
fire
district
to
provide
adequate
fire
protection
for
a
building
taller
than
four
stories.
G
It's
not
going
to
happen
with
taxes.
Property
tax
increase
could
possibly
happen
with
funds
from
the
University.
Is
that
really
accurate?
Okay?
I'm?
Sorry,
so
we'll
we'll
see
on
January
10th
I
will
say
that
from
the
fire
districts
has
been
trying
to
reach
people
since
February.
The
delay
on
last
week
from
Eric's
point
of
view,
was
the
third
time
that
he
was
going
to
present
this
to
the
Planning
Commission.
Thank
you.
H
Good
evening
Arcata
City
Council
Members,
hopefully
the
climate
Action
Council
for
2023-
is
my
preview
desire
to
ask
of
you
to
really
make
that
first
and
foremost,
I
just
came
from
the
D
Street
Neighborhood
Center,
where
the
Arcata
Playhouse
is
hosting
some
people,
some
of
them
unhoused
for
a
nice
meal
at
this
time
of
year,
and
there's
going
to
be
some
art
projects
and
some
proposals
for
future
activities
through
Playhouse
Arts.
So
this
is
a
redirected,
redistributed
funds.
H
I
just
wanted
you
to
know
that
it
was
a
very
full
room
and
active
and
I
even
met
a
person
there
who
lives
in
the
Grove
which
I
wanted
to
say
was
I,
went
out
and
visited
it
a
couple
weeks
ago,
because
I
have
a
friend
who
lives
there
and
it
was
quite
impressive.
So
that's
a
great
step,
I
still
am
very,
very
concerned
and
I
want
to
remind
the
council
and
staff
and
folks
about
the
transparency
component.
H
It
wasn't
even
in
the
police
report,
so
I'm
very
concerned
about
that,
and
if
you
can
explain
that
to
me,
I'd
appreciate
it
because
Santa
Barbara,
where
I
used
to
live
just
issued
a
report
from
the
police
and
there
were
38
deaths
that
they
had
to
investigate,
and
some
of
them
were
unhoused
people.
So
I
will
be
speaking
later
on
at
the
meeting.
Thank
you
thank.
I
Yeah
hi
there.
This
is
your
ride.
Driscoll
just
calling
in
again
I
I,
really
kind
of
shocked
about
the.
When
I've
read
about
the
fire
department
not
being
able
to
support
protection
at
the
at
the
craftsmans
mall.
If
that
were
they
ever
get
built,
that
just
seems
extremely
negligent.
So
I
agree
with
some
of
the
earlier
caller
or
earlier
speakers
about
that.
But
I
also
was
a
little
bit
confused.
I
I
I,
just
I'm,
really
shocked,
I'm,
not
sure
what
else
you
need
in
order
to
take
some
real
strong
actions.
I
mean
someone,
my
neighbor
and
and
Michelle
for
one
of
your
neighbors
got
severely
hurt
and
right
at
because
of
that.
That
parking
lot
has
not
been
designed.
Properly
has
never
been
designed
actually
as
a
parking
lot
and
I
I
traversed
past
that
daily,
sometimes
two
or
three
times,
and
it
is
always
a
mess
and
I
just
do
not
see
why
this
is
not
being
taken
more
seriously.
I
I'm
really
shocked
at
that,
and
you
know
I'm
also.
You
know
my
heart
goes
out
to
Nancy,
who
passed
away
at
your
doorstep.
I
think
that
there's
some
priorities
that
really
need
to
be
examined
here
is
the
health
and
safety
of
our
community.
That's
at
stake,
and
time
is
of
the
essence,
so
please
do
not
delay
in
in
taking
serious
action
on
addressing
these
issues.
Thank
you
very
much.
J
At
that
time,
transportation
Safety
Committee
made
the
recommendation
for
the
designation
of
the
L
Street
linear
Park,
and
to
abandon
the
k,
l
cutlet
on
August
2nd.
The
petition
has
been
circulating
to
support
the
recommendation
at
present,
there's
roughly
670
people
who
have
signed
the
petition
about
90
on
outline
and
the
balance
on
a
paper
petition.
J
We
have
spoke
to
numerous
signers
that
support
the
linear,
Park
and
the
preservation
of
the
Open
Spaces
and
L
Street
rails
with
Trails
corridor.
They
also
support
the
alternative.
Some
type
of
alternative
to
k,
l
caplet
just
basically
not
seeing
that
going
through
as
far
as
a
through
Road
I
hope
to
keep
this
discussion
about
L
Street,
Lanier
Park
fresh
into
council's
mind.
Any
council
members,
our
community
members
who
would
like
more
information,
can
go
to
the
L
Street.
K
It
just
makes
my
heart
sink,
that
you
know
we're
supposed
to
be
a
city
that
cares
and
I
I,
don't
really
see
that
with
this
city
and
with
the
leadership
of
the
city,
and
it
shouldn't
be
left
up
to
the
non-profit
organizations
to
offer
a
space
during
extreme
weather,
we
have
to
stand.
You
know
we
have
to
step
up
and
really
offer
that
to
our
citizens.
The
State
Community
Center
would
be
a
great
location.
I
know
it's
being
advertised
to
rent
out
for
events.
K
I,
don't
see
why
the
hesitation
for
an
emergency,
shelter
and
then
also
the
crabs
ball
field
I
think
is
a
great
location
as
well
I,
just
I.
Just
you
know,
it's
also
been
quoted
that
Nancy,
you
know
refused
shelter
when
she
was
offered
shelter,
but
it's
kind
of
ignoring
the
fact
that
there
was
no
shelter
to
offer
her
and
her
and
her
dog,
so
anyways
I
I,
just
really
think
that
we
need
to
get
a
emergency
shelter
up
tonight
tomorrow.
K
A
Well,
that
will
bring
us
to
the
end
of
our
early
oral
Communications.
Our
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
consent
calendar
all
matters
on
the
consent.
Calendar
are
considered
to
be
routine
by
the
city
council
and
are
enacted
in
one
motion.
There
is
no
separate
discussion
of
any
of
these
items.
If
discussion
is
required,
the
item
can
be
removed
from
the
consent,
calendar
and
considered
separately.
At
the
end
of
the
reading
of
the
consent,
calendar
council,
members
or
members
of
the
public
can
request
that
an
item
be
removed
for
separate
discussion.
A
A
Only
item
F
adopt
ordinance
number
1561,
an
ordinance
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
Arcata,
amending
the
Arcata
Municipal
Code
pertaining
to
the
California
building
code
and
companion
codes.
Title
eight
building
regulations,
chapter
one
building
codes
articles,
one
through
nine,
eleven
thirteen
and
fourteen
wave
reading
of
the
text
and
consensus
read
by
title.
Only
item
G
declare
a
continuation
of
the
local
emergency
related
to
the
coronavirus
pandemic
item.
A
Twenty
percent
for
a
total
of
139
941.60
to
allow
for
any
unforeseen
contingencies
and
additional
work
as
necessary
and
authorize
the
city
manager
to
execute
all
applicable
documents.
Item
J,
adopt
resolution
number
223-27,
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
Arcata,
amending
the
class
and
pay
resolution,
compensation
and
benefits
for
hourly
rated
part-time,
temporary
and
seasonal
Personnel
to
reflect
the
January
1st
2023
change
in
state
minimum
wage
and
new
position
of
professional
expert
item
k.
D
A
A
I
M
B
L
A
A
H
But
I
just
had
the
opportunity
today
sitting
and
reflecting
on
this
winter
solstice
to
read
some
of
the
packet
that
you
guys
get
all
the
time.
But
it's
not
always
easy
for
me
to
read
it
online
and
it's
not
easy
to
read
it
over
in
the
hard
copy
there,
because
it's
attached
to
the
wall
and
I
can't
sit
and
look
at
it.
H
But
the
minutes
of
the
December
7th
meeting
that
didn't
really
occur
very
for
very
long
if
it
occurred
because
it
wasn't
a
quorum
I'm
trying
to
understand
how
the
items
that
are
on
there
were
dealt
with
in
terms
of
being
no
vote.
How
does
that
happen
when
you
have
minutes
of
a
meeting
that
didn't
really
take
place?
A
E
The
council,
even
in
in
a
non-corum
situation,
the
council
can
move
agenda
items
forward,
and
so
they
made
a
motion
they
by
consensus.
In
essence,
the
couple
that
were
here
to
move
the
majority
of
that
agenda
forward
to
this
meeting,
with
the
exception
of
two
items,
which
were
the
Westwood
Gardens
appeal
and
the
discussion
of
the
fees
around
that
appeal,
which
was
moved
to
the
January
4th
meeting.
So
they
can
do
that
much
without
a
quorum.
In
that
meeting.
H
D
H
So,
thank
you
again.
My
name
is
Joanna
Gary
and
I'm,
a
resident
of
Arcata
and
a
curious
person.
In
addition
to
that,
and
when
I
see
all
the
listings
on
the
agenda
packet
of
the
disbursements,
which
I
mean
is
what
the
city
spent
on
certain
things.
It's
itemized
very.
You
know
vaguely
and
linearly
in
a
way
that
you
know,
there's
a
lot
of
U.S
banks,
so
I'm,
just
assuming
that's
a
business
card
usage
that
all
gets
listed
and
such
but
I'm
glad
you
changed
the
name
of
it
from
warrants
to
disbursement.
A
L
L
L
A
Yeah
Emily,
if
you
want
to
go
ahead
and
take
that
quick
question,
because
I
know
we
did
kind
of
cover
that
extensively
I
mean
Emily.
Emily
benvey
gave
us
a
lovely
presentation
just
about
basically
how
we
don't
know
how
we're
going
to
do
that
yet,
but
to
get
into
compliance.
This
is
the
step
we
have
to
First
Take.
L
P
Your
the
introduction
of
this
ordinance
came
two
meetings
ago
and
deputy
director
Emily
benvey
gave
a
you,
know,
thorough
presentation
of
the
intent
of
the
ordinance
and
then
what
our
next
steps
are.
As
we
know
that
compliance
with
the
state's
1383
Organics
recycling
recycling
of
food
waste
is
very
complicated
and
Emily
has
been
a
leader
working
with
other
leaders
in
the
region
to
figure
out
how
we're
going
to
implement
all
that
is
required
of
us
from
the
state.
So
there's
many
moving
pieces.
P
P
This
ordinance
does
outline
that
we
would
intend
to
have
a
three
container
system
to
answer
council
member
stillman's
question.
We
currently
have
a
green
waste
pilot.
It
is
yet
to
be
determined
how
would
roll
out
for
a
three
container
system,
but
that
is
quite
a
bit
down
the
road.
Our
next
step
will
we're
starting
negotiations
with
our
franchise
holler
Recology,
to
figure
out
how
it
will
work
on
the
ground
and
what
services
Recology
would
provide
versus
the
City
versus
the
county
and
all
of
our
partners.
P
We
anticipate
having
bringing
a
draft
franchise
agreement
for
the
council's
consideration
in
late
spring
and
with
that
would
also
be
a
rate
analysis
and
a
hearing
and
process
for
determination
of
rates
for
solid
waste
collection,
and
so
we
anticipate
that
would
all
be
coming
in
the
spring
and
summer
of
this
next
year.
So
I
hope
that
answers
some
timeline
questions
and
the
reason
that
we're
bringing
this
adoption
of
the
ordinance
to
your
council's
agenda
tonight.
L
Well,
thank
you
very
much
for
that
and
I
do
know
some
people
like
myself,
we
have
a
we
have.
We
have
people
that
are
picking
up
our
compost
on
a
regular
basis,
but
I
know
they
can't
meet
the
requirements
that
you're
going
to
be
needed
in
the
future,
so
I'm
glad
to
hear
that
we
have
time
to
figure
this
out.
Thank
you
very
much.
Emily.
A
H
Yeah
thanks,
my
name
is
Joanna
McGarry
and
I
had
the
opportunity
to
attend
a
Eureka
city
council
meeting
a
few
weeks
ago,
because
I
sometimes
like
to
see
how
different
municipalities
operate,
and
they
do
things
a
little
bit
differently,
one
of
the
things
that
they
did
and
it
was
outside
the
chambers
there
is.
They
had
a
little
booklet,
that
kind
of
explained
what
they're
doing
in
terms
of
their
organic
waste.
It
was
kind
of
a
cult,
not
a
coloring
book,
a
comic
book.
H
It
was
you
know
something
very
simple
and
had
a
lot
of
illustration
and
and
such
and
I
thought
I
had
it
in
my
go
bag,
but
I
don't,
but
I
was
sort
of
impressed
that
they
had
something
for
the
people
to
understand
a
little
more.
Basically,
what
this
ordinance
was
about,
because
it
is
a
regional
concept
that
everybody's
discussing
and
I
know
that
you
have
a
deadline
to
present
something
to
the
state
to
show
that
you're
in
good
faith.
Trying
to
do
something.
I
think
this
particular
ordinance
is
so
so
convoluted
and
disappointing.
H
F
Good
evening,
Gregory
Daggett,
sometime
back
on
public
television
I,
saw
a
pretty
extensive
report
on
recycling
in
America
I
think
they
actually
got
a
Peabody
Award
for
this,
and
so
the
question
I
have
is
that
in
this
reporting
well,
first
with
recycling's,
very
difficult
for
some
people
to
get
it
right
and
they
follow
the
waste
stream
to
the
plant.
But
the
most
disturbing
part
about
it
is
that
we
were
all
relying
on
China
to
take
all
this
Recycling
and
they
made
a
big
decision
that
they
weren't
going
to
do
that
anymore.
F
So,
in
this
report,
basically
warehousing
all
of
this
Recycling
and
very
little
of
it,
some
cardboard
was
being
recycled,
some
metal
cans,
but
all
of
it
was
pretty
much
going
to
the
dump.
So
my
question
for
the
city
is
with
this:
with
this
as
a
guide,
what
is
happening
to
our
recycling?
Is
it
being?
Is
it
really
being
recycling
or
is
it
ending
up
at
the
dump
and
I
would
give
an
example
of
cardboard.
We
see
cardboard
like
a
pizza
box.
F
They
they
had
this
in
the
PBS,
where
it
was
in
a
bale
of
maybe
a
ton
of
cardboard
that
was
going
to
be
recycled.
The
buyer
came
along
and
saw
a
little
bit
of
grease
on
that
one
ton
Bale
and
rejected
it
and
then
went
to
the
dumps.
So
my
understanding
of
reading
through
this
quickly
is
that
greasy
cardboard
is
now
going
into
your
Organics.
So
there's
going
to
be
a
huge,
let's
say:
education
for
people
and
right
now,
I
see
a
huge
problem
just
with
a
regular
recycling.
F
That's
going
on
that
people
aren't
doing
it
very
correctly,
there's
some
that
are
very
good,
but
a
lot
of
them.
It's
terrible!
It's
and
I
think
PBS
basically
got
back
and
documented
that
how
they
were
conveyors
and
trying
to
grab
all
the
stuff
that
wasn't
supposed
to
be
there.
So
it's
it's
very
complicated,
so
I
appreciate
if
we
could
get
an
answer,
we're
just
starting
with
our
own
recycling
program,
whether
it's
really
working
or
whether
it's
going
to
the
dump
and
I,
don't
know.
I
I
support
the
idea
of
of.
N
F
Mean
Organics
makes
a
huge
difference
on
on
our
our
dumps
and
that's
terrible,
but
at
the
other
side
of
this
I'm,
just
really
a
skeptic
on
how
it's
going
to
work
from
the
standpoint
of
getting
people
to
comply
with
it,
especially
like
apartment
buildings,
where
they
have
this
bin
and
you're
supposed
to
clean
it
out,
and
what
I
see
from
right
now
is
even
when
they
pick
up.
Recycling
paper
goes
flying
from
all
these
bends
and
nobody
cleans
it
up.
F
I'm
talking
about
these
smaller
units
and
there's
one
across
the
street
from
where
I'm
at
and
nobody
takes
responsibility
for
any
of
this.
It
just
goes
all
all
over
the
street
and
the
watches
basically
down
the
storm
drains
out
to
our
wetlands
and
rivers.
So
I
see
problems
right
now
and
so
I
hope
you
can
figure
it
out.
Thanks.
K
Yes,
I've
talked
to
you
before
about
my
love
of
compost,
and
so
anyways
I
was
I.
Don't
you
know
I
just
kind
of
want
to
remind
and
and
hope
that
there
is
space
that
people
could
still
compost
on
their
own
property
and
not
have
to
ship
their
waste
out.
You
know
outside
of
our
County
in
this.
In
you
know
the
name
of
environmentalism
so
because
I
don't
think,
there's
any
better
Environmental.
K
D
All
right,
I
moved
to
adopt
ordinance
number
1560
in
ordinance
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
Arcata,
amending
Solid
Waste
Management
provisions
of
the
Arcata
municipal
code
to
incorporate
mandatory
organic
waste
disposal
reduction
requirements,
way
of
reading
of
text
and
consent
to
read
by
title.
Only.
L
N
A
Q
P
I
might
not
make
it
one
minute,
but
we'll
try,
so
the
Arcata,
Annie
and
Mary
Trail
connectivity
project
is
a
priority
project
of
the
council
for
this
fiscal
year.
It's
a
component
of
a
Regional
Trail
priority,
that's
been
around
for
over
20
years,
the
city
had
a
planning
Grant
and
through
that
process
in
2019,
the
council
selected
a
preferred
alternative
along
the
railroad
Corridor.
P
Since
that
time
the
city
has
received
an
active
Transportation
Grant
wrote
that
we
wrote
that
proposal
and
received
that
and
that
combined
with
other
funding,
is
funding
the
current
effort
we're
in
the
first
phase.
It's
the
project,
approval
and
environmental
documentation,
phase
that
has
been
going
on
this
last
year,
working
with
our
project
Partners,
the
county,
Humboldt
Bay,
Municipal,
Water,
District,
Caltrans,
great
Redwood,
Trail
agency
and
our
Consultants.
P
We
did
a
series
of
technical
studies
and
composed
a
initial
study,
SQL
document
and
into
a
mitigated
negative
declaration
secret
document
and
really
out
outlined
that
the
project
has
some
potential
environmental
impacts,
but
with
mitigation
and
avoidance,
we
do
not
think
that
there
will
be
any
significant
impacts.
The
trail
is
3.5
miles,
connecting
the
arcade
Escape
Park
up
to
connecting
to
the
Valley
West
neighborhood
over
the
giantullio
overpass
and
then
to
the
Mad
River.
P
So
there
are
some
smaller
Wetland
impacts,
biological
resource
impacts,
potentially
that
we
will
mitigate
in
a
mitigation
and
monitoring
program
and
that
this
document
secret
document
was
circulated.
For
the
past
most
of
November
into
December.
We
had
several
Outreach
opportunities
for
people
to
give
input.
P
We
received
no
formal
comments,
but
the
comments
that
we
did
receive
in
the
document
are
addressed
as
far
as
how
we
will
address
them
or
if
they
are
already
addressed
in
the
plan
and
it's
an
opportunity
to
adopt
this
secret
document
in
order
for
us
to
in
order
for
the
city
to
be
on
the
California
Transportation
Commission
agenda
in
January.
To
then
start
our
next
phase
so
to
get
our
allocation
of
design
and
right-of-way
funding.
I
There
would
be
no
real
reason
for
ncra
to
have
purchased
something
that
had
been
abandoned
now,
I
have
provided
those
documents.
I
got
those
documents
from
an
stb
attorney:
I
provided
those
two
netra
in
the
city,
the
county,
everyone
else
that
was
involved
in
that
so
I'm
I,
I'm,
really
surprised.
I
haven't
seen
any
indication
that
that
has
been
resolved.
I
You
know
in
the
stb
ruling
was
that
you
know
the
ncra
really
did
not
have
ownership
of
that.
So
I
think
that
that
needs
to
be
resolved
some
way
or
another.
Now,
if
there's,
what
the
intent
is
is
to
purchase
those
easements
from
the
adjacent
landowners.
Okay,
that's
one
thing:
maybe
that
is
in
the
works.
I
Maybe
Emily
can
discuss
that
at
some
point,
but
anyway,
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
issues
that,
from
what
my
perspective
haven't
been
resolved
at
all,
yet
and
and
there's
it's
pretty
well
documented
that
the
Annie
Mary
part
of
that
which
is
from
coreplex
West
End
West
Green.
Rather
all
the
way
out
to
Blue
Lake
was
not
under
the
ownership
of
the
ncra
so
anyway,
that's
that
my
interpretation
of
it
and
I
think
that
needs
to
be
resolved.
A
A
H
Okay,
I
just
think
with
all
that's
happened
in
the
past
the
recent
past
talking
about
destroying
records
of
the
city.
It
should
just
be
spoken
out
loud
as
to
why
this
is
happening
and
what
specifically
is
being
destroyed
just
so
people
I
pulled
it
out
so
that
we
could
have
an
explanation,
not
just
a
line
item
on
the
consent
calendar.
So
if
somebody
can
explain
to
me
what
this
is
all
about
and
what
is
being
destroyed
and
what
are
the
dates
and
all
that
kind
of
stuff,
if
that's
possible,.
A
H
D
Still
going
to
be
a
record,
I
think
it's
probably
in
here
what
is
being
destroyed
and
I
just
took
a
board
clerk
training
class.
So
I'll
try
to
speak
to
the
fact
that
there
is
a
calendar
of
Records
destructions
and
every
three
years
or
five
years
or
seven
years
things
are
allowed
to
be
destroyed.
They
have
to
be
signed
off
by
our
City
attorney.
E
H
Okay,
I
I.
Thank
you
for
that.
I
didn't
get
a
chance
to
get
that
far
in
the
agenda
packet,
but
I
know
it's
been
sort
of
a
question
in
the
past
and
I'm,
not
so
much
doing
it
for
myself,
as
just
for
the
Greater
Community
to
understand.
Sometimes
those
of
us
who
aren't
sitting
at
these
tables
and
up
on
the
dice
need
to
kind
of
understand
and
planar
terms,
sometimes
what's
going
on.
So
that's
the
only
reason
I
brought
it
up.
H
D
E
I
Yeah
I
yeah
I,
was
kind
of
shocked.
I
was
trying
to
get
some
records
from
just
a
couple
of
years
ago
and
found
out
that
they
were
not
available.
It
was
like
wow
that
doesn't
really
lend
a
much
transparency.
Often
you
need
to
know
what
the
Genesis
of
a
certain
you
know.
Process
is
and
I'm,
not
even
sure
where
the
what
the
Genesis
of
this
resolution
is
and
how
it's
determined.
I
You
know
what
records
should
should
just
disappear,
because
anyone
putting
in
a
public
records
request
should
be
able
to
have
access
to
information,
and
if
all
you
get
in
response
is
well
those
those
records
have
been
deleted
because
they're
over
two
years
old,
that
that's
really
kind
of
disturbing
to
me,
I
I,
mean
I.
Think
it's.
It's
really
extremely
important
to
know
how
things
got
developed
and
why
are
we
at
where
we're
at?
If
we're
trying
to
deal
with
an
issue
so
I
I've
got.
You
know
strong
sentiments
about
this,
but.
N
I
Know
you're
probably
just
gonna
pass
it
because
that's
what
you
do
and
but
it's
it's
really
disturbing
to
me,
as
a
citizen
who's
trying
to
participate
and
trying
to
be
educated
about
the
process
of
things
to
not
be
able
to
really
understand
what
that
process,
how
the
process
got
developed
and
the
explanation
that
was
provided
just
before
I
got
on
the
line
here
was,
did
not
provide
any
Clarity
at
all.
It
was
a
matter
of
fact:
it
seemed
more
convoluted
and
more
confusing.
I
D
All
right,
I
moved
to
adopt
resolution
number
2223-26
authorizing
the
destruction
of
certain
City
Records
maintained
by
the
city
relating
to
the
Departments
of
city
manager,
contracts
and
special
projects.
Personnel
city
clerk,
environmental
services
and
finance
is
permitted
under
section
34090
of
the
California
government
code
and
the
Secretary
of
State's
local
government
records
program.
L
A
We
have
an
emotion
in
a
second
all
in
favor,
aye,
aye,
okay,
and
with
that
that
brings
us
to
the
end
of
our
consent
calendar
and
we
will
move
on
to
new
business
so
item
a
under
new
business
is
to
introduce
ordinance
number
1562
amending
the
arcade
and
Municipal
Code
title
X
chapter
3
regulations
for
the
use
of
the
Arcata
margin,
Wildlife
Sanctuary,
to
update
overnight
time
restrictions.
So
can
we
have
a
staff
report
from
Environmental
Services
director
Emily
sinkhorn?
Please.
P
So
as
we
all
in
Arcata
recognize
that
the
marsh
is
an
extremely
wonderful
place
for
bird
watching
habitat
walking
strolling
rolling,
and
it
is
one
of
the
key
places
that
residents
and
visitors
really
gravitate
to
kind
of
all
alike
and
there's
also
challenges
in
maintenance
of
such
a
multi-use
space
for
recreation,
for
Habitat,
for
enhancement
of
our
Wastewater
coming
from
our
treatment
plant.
So
there's
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
factors
involved
and
over
the
last,
especially
the
last
year
or
two.
P
Crew
has
implemented
a
Paving
project
on
the
northern
part
of
South
eye,
adding
fog
lines,
which
are
more
of
a
visual
thing
for
drivers
to
slow
down
and
to
also
look
for
other
users
on
the
roadway.
We
also
enhanced
a
gravel
shoulder
for
more
of
a
separated
walking
area
for
for
pedestrians
to
really
lead
from
Samoa
Boulevard
or
close
to
Samoa
Boulevard
down
to
the
trails
in
the
marsh.
P
How
could
we
look
at
you
know,
updates
to
those
times
to
ensure
continued
Coastal
access,
especially
for
people
coming
on
motorized
vehicles.
You
know
all
all
modes,
but
to
make
it
to
be
something
where
it's
consistent
with
other
Parks,
so
that
the
existing
gate
that
we
have
on
South
I
Street
could
be
a
more
feasibly
used
in
the
operations
of
our
police
department
and
speaking
to
that
gate.
We
have
gates
at
other
City
parks
and
Facilities.
The
Community
Center
Redwood
Park
and
these
facilities
are,
you
know,
are
open
or
closed
between
sunset
and
sunrise.
P
And
so
what
is
being
proposed
in
the
ordinance
today
is
a
change
to
the
marsh
being
closed
from
one
hour
after
sunset
to
Sunrise.
That
one
hour
after
Sunset
is
consistent
with
Humboldt
Bay
Wildlife
Refuge
other
public
access
areas
around
the
bay,
and
it
also
enables
I
mean
the
marsh-
is
one
of
the
best
places
to
watch
the
sunset.
So
it
still
enables
that
you
know
great
type
of
use
of
coastal
access
use.
P
P
You
know
5
30
in
the
morning
before
Before
Sunrise
and
it
could
be,
for
you
know,
research
to
happen
at
the
marsh
or,
for
you
know,
other
burning
uses,
and
so
in
the
what
is
in
your
packet
in
the
suggested
amended
language
is
the
change
you
know
in
these
times,
and
it
didn't.
We
included
that
times
could
have
an
exception
if
there
were
special
events
happening
at
the
interpretive
Center.
P
The
interpretive
Center
is
a
place
for
meetings
and
or
other
other
activities,
and
so
we
thought
it
might
be
helpful
to
have
some
exceptions,
for
you
know
compatible
uses
to
get.
You
know
permission
to
access
the
marsh
from
South
eye
at
an
earlier
time
than
Sunrise.
So
what
was
included
in
a
blue
folder
item
to
the
council
and
what
is
up
on
the
screen
here
in
the
chambers
is
a
suggested
on.
The
bottom
is
a
suggested
update
from
what
is
in
your
packet
for
Section
10605.
A
C
So
I
know
you
mentioned
the
interpretive
Center
on
G
Street
will
also
be
locked
and,
as
folks
know,
who
spent
any
time
down.
There's
a
lot
of
RVs
and
campers
down
there.
So
if
they're
not
moved
out
before
they'll
be
locked
in
and
they'll
get
out
in
the
morning,
but
I
guess
more
of
my
question.
Is
it
says
that
they're
not
going
to
be
prohibited
to
be
parking
there,
but
yet
seems
like
we
have
a
lot
of
folks
that
are
going
to
be
down
there
because
they
don't
have
anywhere
else
to
go.
P
The
gate
these
potential
times
for
changing
of
overnight
use
would
enable
the
Arcata
Police
Department
before
that
one
hour
or
at
that
one
hour
after
Sunset
to
drive
through
the
South
I
Street
area
and
remind
people
that
we're
closing
the
gate
here
pretty
soon.
Here's
the
times
that
are
posted
and
then
to
do
that
type
of
run
through
before
closing
the
gate
that
would
not
be
occurring
at
the
South
G
Street.
That
could
be
a
future
conversation
and
the
kind
of
citations
for
parking
of
over
a
certain
period
of
time.
P
C
O
I
I
was
just
wondering
by
changing
the
hours.
One
of
the
concerns
was,
if
you
know,
if
staff
at
APD
would
actually
have
you
know
time
in
their
schedules,
to
be
able
to
do
that.
I
know
it
kind
of
depends
on
what's
going
on,
but
do
do
they
think
that
they'll
be
able
to
participate
in
this
and
make
it
more
of
a
standard
procedure.
P
Yeah
so
Environmental
Services
have
met,
you
know
several
times
with
staff
from
APD
and
they
are
supportive
of
the
time
change
being
in
line
with
other
city
parks,
and
that
would
make
it
much
more
feasible
to
be
part
of
their
patrols.
Much
like
the
kind
of
operations
of
our
other
gates
at
City
facilities.
You
know
that
is
on
the
list
of
the
you
know
what
can
happen
during
the
patrol
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
come
up,
but
in
particular,
when
there
are
either
you
know
times
of
we're.
P
D
P
Yes
correct,
so
the
recommendation
is
to
introduce
the
ordinance
as
revised
during
the
council
discussion.
If
we
choose
to.
If
the
council
would
choose
to
go
with
the
language
on
the
bottom
of
that
screen
and
then
also
to
adopt
the
secret
exemption
that
we
are
recommending
and
as
detailed
in
the
staff
report.
A
So
I
have
a
question
just
about
I
like
this.
This
language
to
add
the
you
know,
caveat
for
special
events
and
permits
and
stuff,
but
I
mean.
Is
there
an
existing
process
for
that
already
or
would
this
add,
you
know
an
extra
job
to
environmental
services
and
then
just
kind
of
how?
How
would
that
work?
I
know
like
if
you
rent
out
Redwood
Park,
you
come
and
you
get
the
key
to
the
bathrooms.
A
You
know,
would
it
be
a
similar,
like
you
check
out
a
key
and
you
can
open
the
gate
yourself
or
would
somebody
half
you
know?
Would
we
have
to
have
an
officer
come
open
the
gate,
because
that
seems
like
you
know
a
little
too
much
staff
work
on
our
end.
For
that,
so
just
I
don't
know:
do
we
have
a
process
for
that
figured
out.
P
Yeah,
no
thanks
for
that
question
for
the
we
have
a
process
in
place
for
renting
the
interpretive
Center
or
hosting
events
there,
it's
more
more
likely,
and
so
that
is
already
a
process
in
place.
Environmental
Services
does
review
and
Grant
nature
area
entry
permits,
which
is
you
know
our
existing
process
for
considering
often
their
their
research
related
permits,
also
access
to
cultural
areas,
so
that
is
one
existing
process
and
environmental
services
feels
the
the
details
of
working
out
how
to
if
the
gate
is
closed.
A
L
In
fact,
I
actually
did
one
survey
for
them
and
I
think
that
this
is
a
good
way
to
go,
and
when
you
want
to
do
specific
things,
you
can
always
check
out
a
cave
APB,
and
that
might
be
a
way
for
us
to
make
it
work,
because
we
have
to
think
ahead
and
if
you
know
you're
going
to
be
doing
something
you
want
to
think
not
at
the
last
minute.
But
I
would
support
this.
E
O
And
I,
just
I
just
had
one
I'm
clarifying
thing
director
of
C
corn
I
know
that
you
know
we
originally
had
it
in
our
packet
and
then
you
said
that
you
got
a
helpful
phone
call
today
and
you
know
made
some
changes
and
I
just
wanna
I'm,
assuming
that
that,
because
you're
presenting
us
with
the
changes,
this
is
a
recommendation.
That's
my
assumption.
So
I
just
want
to
be
really
clear
that
you
know
that
you
are
recommending
this
and
not
the
other,
for
your
professional
opinion.
Yeah.
P
Thank
you,
I
would
say
that
you
know.
We've
had
had
conversations
with
a
number
of
community
members
and
organizations
about
this
process
over
the
last
a
number
of
months,
and
you
know
especially
about
understanding
of
you,
know
the
time
to
open
you
know
being
sunrise,
and
so
that
was
really
in
all
of
our
conversations.
You
know.
Support
for
that
and
I
think
you
know.
P
Just
the
additional
input
today
was
helpful
to
to
note
that
there
are
probably
some
very
compatible
exceptions
to
accessing
the
marsh
Before,
Sunrise
and,
and
especially,
we
have
many
existing
again
nature
area
entry
permits
for
for
research,
so
they
could
be
studying
birds
or
bats
and
new
to
drive
in
some
equipment.
You
know
before
that
time.
So
there's
this
really
fits
that,
in
addition
to
you
know,
heading
out
from
the
boat
launch
at
high
tide,
so
I
think
there's
many
uses.
A
H
Ahead,
Joanne
hi,
my
name
is
Joanne
McGarry
I
live
close
to
the
marsh
and
I
try
to
go.
There
often
I
actually
have
to
say
that
I
definitely
try
and
go
there
during
daylight
hours
because
as
it
gets
dark
and
if
I'm
by
myself
I
do
not
feel
safe,
but
I
also
want
to
speak
to
the
exceptional
uses
or
the
the
different
events
that
might
happen
and
I've
been
participating
in
the
past
with
the
lantern
ceremony,
that's
out
at
klopp
Lake
and
when
I
first
started
working
with
that
group.
H
For
that
event,
it
does
happen
after
Sunset,
because
you
want
the
lanterns
to
shine
on
the
on
the
lake
and
people
use
the
canoes,
which
is
also
an
exception
on
that
water.
But
one
of
the
things
I
really
tried
to
Institute
and
as
we
look
at
ordinances
like
this
in
the
future,
the
connection
between
an
ordinance
like
this
to
preserve
a
wildlife
habitat
or
a
recreational
space
in
our
community.
H
Looking
at
why
we
need
to
not
have
it
open
to
people
overnight
and
what
are
some
alternatives
for
people
who
utilize
it
overnight
and
also
for
the
different
activities,
even
in
terms
of
the
impact
of
cars
driving
through
that
Marsh.
So,
as
we
start
to
look
at
at
what
we're
creating
ordinances
about
I'd
like
us
to
extend
it
to
some
of
the
other
issues
that
are
impacting
our
habitat,
the
Montreal
biodiversity
cop
conference,
15
just
took
place
and
they
agreed
to
a
30
30
thing
about
preserving
habitat
and
I
know
this.
H
This
may
seem
a
little
tiny
spec
of
a
wildlife
habitat
and
the
whole
scheme
of
the
global
issue,
but
we
have
to
start
in
our
own
backyard,
so
to
speak,
and
so
looking
at
overnight.
Use
closing
things
off
for
safety
of
the
the
habitat
and
for
the
users
is
really
good,
but
also
the
the
kind
of
use
that
occurs
24
hours
a
day
or
in
the
daylight
hours
of
that
place.
H
Just
really
start
thinking,
because
when
we
talk
about
the
climate
action
plan,
transportation
is
a
big
issue
in
terms
of
greenhouse
gases
and
there's
a
hell
of
a
lot
of
people
driving
up
and
down
I
Street
to
get
to
Club
Lake
in
their
individual
cars.
It
is
a
danger
to
some
of
the
habitat
and
crossing
the
roads.
There's
a
lot
of
speeding
that
goes
on
so
I.
Just
look
at
this
ordinance
as
the
beginning
of
many
other.
H
E
R
The
adverse
impacts
of
camping,
as
well
as
speeding
and
unregulated
parties
need
to
be
addressed
to
maintain
the
benefits
of
ecotourism
at
the
marsh
and
Wildlife
Sanctuary.
Create
locked
gates
are
needed
both
at
the
G
Street
access
and
I
Street
G
Street
currently
has
a
recreational
vehicle
behind
a
pickup
truck
overflowing
with
debris
for
the
past
three
days
on
the
change
of
time
from
Fort
a.m.
To
Sunrise
there
needs
to
be
additional
clarification
and
I.
R
Think
I
would
thank
Emily,
Saint
corn
for
her
comments
about
recreational
voting,
but
there's
not
too
much
feedback
that
the
new
facility
and
the
historic
facility
both
are
affected
by
tidal
regime,
and
it
would
be
unfortunate
to
have
a
brand
new
facility
and
not
be
able
to
access
it
depending
on
the
elevations.
Do.
R
But
again,
I
think
both
Emily
sinkhorn
and
the
City
attorney
for
their
thoughtful
approach
to
a
way
to
address
this,
but
because
of
the
public
and
Coastal
access
issues,
I
I
think
we
probably
should
have
a
more
detailed
conversation
about
how
this
special
event
approach
might
work,
but
again,
I
appreciate
the
city,
staff
manager
and
Council
in
their
interest
to
improve
and
maintain
the
high
quality
recreational
facilities
that
you
have
at
the
Arcata
Motors.
Thank
you.
A
O
I'll
make
a
motion
to
introduce
ordinance
number
1562,
as
amended
in
tonight's
meeting,
amending
the
arcade
Municipal
Code
title
10
chapter
3
regulations
for
use
of
the
Arcata
Marsh
and
Wildlife
Sanctuary
to
update
overnight
time
restrictions,
wave
reading
of
the
text
and
consent
to
read
by
title
only
and
to
adopt
a
sequa
exemption
pursuant
to
California
code
of
regulations,
title
14
sections,
15,
307
and
15308
I'll.
Second,
okay,.
L
A
Okay
motion
passes
unanimously.
Thank
you,
okay,
and
that
will
take
us
now
to
Item
B
in
new
business,
to
authorize
an
amendment
to
the
Strategic
infill
Redevelopment
program,
contract
with
plan
West
partners
and
a
budget
adjustment
totaling.
A
hundred
and
eighteen
thousand
dollars
for
additional
form-based
code
scope
of
services.
L
L
S
The
city
council
really
tasked
the
Planning
Commission
to
identify
the
resources
that
it
would
need
to
be
able
to
make
a
solid
recommendation
to
the
city
council
on
these
planning
amendments,
the
form-based
code,
the
Gateway
area
plan
and
the
general
plan
amendments
they've
been
working
since
that
time
on
a
very
regular
basis
going
through.
You
know
identifying
the
concerns
that
they
have
and
the
potential
solution
set
and
using
that
solution
set
as
a
recommendation.
S
So
this
is
the
first
of
maybe
a
couple
of
different
recommendations
that
comes
from
the
Planning
Commission
to
the
city
council
to
either
you
know
you
know
men,
scope
or
or
identify
new
scope
to
you
know
to
get
this
work
done.
You
know
note
that
to
date
all
of
this
work
has
been
really
bootstrapped.
We've
been
only
spending
what
we
could
capture
through.
S
You
know
either
entitlements
that
had
contributions
towards
this
work,
or
so
those
would
be
planning
permits
that
had
a
condition
of
approval
to
to
contribute
to
this
effort
or
through
Grant
funded
sources
and
to
date
it's
really
only
been
Grant
funded
sources
that
have
contributed
because
the
the
entitled
projects
never
move
forward
to
the
stage
where
they
made
those
payments.
So
if
you
can
look
on
packet,
page
2
296,
this
is
attachment
B
and
in
B
we
try
to
put
together
for
you
what
the
existing
scope
of
work
is.
S
You'll
notice
on
that
packet
page
under
exhibit
B
at
the
top
there's
a
table
and
at
the
very
bottom
of
that
table
bullet
item
four
Gateway
area
plan.
Form-Based
code
had
16
830
dollars
attributed
to
it,
and
so
we
were.
We
were
working
with
sort
of
a
budget
model.
If
you
will
of
a
form-based
code
in
I
believe
it
was
September.
We
started
looking
at
trying
to
increase
the
scope
of
work
and
and
build
in
more
features
to
it,
and
we
presented
an
October.
S
What
you'll
see
in
attachment
C
to
the
Planning
Commission,
a
revised
scope
of
work,
that
revised
scope
of
work
was
approximately
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
estimated.
We
didn't
have
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
at
that
time,
and
so
we,
you
know,
thanked
Ben
Noble,
our
consultant
who's
working
on
the
form-based
code
and
said
you
know
we
we
just
don't
have
the
money
to
do
this.
It's
it's
nice
to
have,
but
not
need
to
have
from
that
scope
of
work.
We
broke
off
a
couple
of
things
where
we
did
have
some
flexibility.
S
The
council
originally
approved
a
not
to
exceed
limit
for
the
all
of
the
planning
work
that
was
in
excess
of
what
we
actually
contracted
for.
So
we
had
a
little
bit
of
wiggle
room
and
we
entered
into
an
amendment
and
that's
attachment
B2,
so
attachment
B1
and
B2
really
reflect
the
existing
scope
of
work
that
the
city
is
working
on
for
the
form-based
code
and
you'll
see
that
in
packet
page
300,
we
have
effectively
added.
You
know
thirty
thousand
seven
twenty,
so
now
we're
you
know
we're
up
to
about
40.
S
You
know
support
from
our
consultant,
so
that's
where
the
revised
scope
of
work
that
you'll
see
in
attachment
a
came
from.
We
asked
Ben
to
pull
together,
something
that
would
address
some
of
the
things
that
we
were
Hearing
in
the
community.
You
know
the
desire
to
have
a
real,
a
better
understanding
of
what
the
the
max
build
out
form
might
look
like,
and
so
you'll
see
that,
as
you
know,
a
masking
diagram
on
bullet
number,
five
on
package,
page
282,
there's
also
this
testing
opportunity
sites.
S
Item
number
four
and
he's
given
examples
of
these
in
in
your
package
as
well,
to
show
you
what
you'd
be
looking
at
and
so
with
these
opportunity
sites
we'd
be
able
to
build
out
a
little
bit
more
graphical
representation,
not
necessarily
that
that's
exactly
what
will
be
approved
there,
but
what
could
be
approved
under
the
existing
conditions
to
really
give
a
visual
for
the
council,
the
Planning
Commission
and
the
community?
You
know
what
these
new
codes
might
look
like
in
our
our
community.
S
In
addition,
there's
a
lot
more
engagement
that
will
be
led
by
our
consultant.
That's
really
directed
at
trying
to,
as
we've
been
trying
from
the
start,
to
get
a
community
design,
something
that
the
you
know
that
folks
have
really
had
the
opportunity
to
participate
in
weighing
in
on
these
standards
that
we
would
use
to
judge
future
projects.
E
It
is,
you
certainly
have
those
funds
in
reserve.
You
are
exceeding
this
fiscal
year.
Your
stated
goal
for
Reserve.
You
know
some
of
us
believe
we
can
never
have
enough
in
reserve,
but
the
truth
is
part
of
the
responsibility
is
also
to
get
that
money
out
to
where
the
need
is.
So
you
will
still
continue
to
exceed
your
reserve
limit
for
this
fiscal
year.
We
are
just
in
the
process
of
closing
out
and
starting
audit
testing
on
last
fiscal
year,
so
I'm
also
confident
that
you
will
be
adding
money
into
your
reserve
from
that
too.
D
Us,
okay,
all
right
so
I'm
reading
this,
and
it
seems
like
so
I
know
that
at
the
study
session
that
we
totally
told
the
Planning
Commission
that
you
know
whatever
they
want,
we
would
do
our
best
to
provide
to
them
so
I'm
happy
to
do
that.
I
also
know
that
the
community
really
felt
like
there
was
not
a
lot
of
Outreach,
so
I'm
very
happy
to
see
some.
D
If
we're
not
really
capturing
the
part
of
the
community,
that
we
hope
to
capture
and
kind
of,
you
know,
spend
more
money
on
the
code
itself.
If,
if
we're
not
capturing
as
much
Outreach
as
we
want,
I
mean
I
think
that
the
idea
behind
this
is
you
know,
to
really
get
input
and
to
show
people
what
things
are
going
to
look
like
and
to
you
know,
really
give
people
a
rich
opportunity
to
dig
into
a
foreign
based
codes.
Look
like,
and
it's
really
interesting
I
mean
it
really
is.
D
But
I
would
like
to
see
kind
of
like
a
midpoint
where
we
can
sort
of
assess.
You
know
how
much
of
the
community
we're
reaching
do.
We
need
to
Pivot
and
like
find
different
ways
to
reach
people
and,
if
we're
not
reaching
the
the
people
that
we
want
to,
can
we
kind
of
pull
some
money
out
of
the
Outreach
and
put
it
into
the
actual
codes
itself?
Does
that
make
sense.
S
Yeah
that
that
does
make
a
lot
of
sense
and
I
think
we
can
absolutely
build
that
into
the
process
where
we're
checking
in
to
make
sure
that
you
know
we're
accomplishing
the
goals
for
the
Outreach.
I
also
want
to
point
out
that
if
you
look
on
packet,
page
283,
which
breaks
down
the
the
total
budget,
you
know
there's
forty
nine
thousand
dollars.
You
know
for
Noble
forty
six
thousand
dollars
for
ufs
ufs
is
assigned
purely
to
doing
the
graphics
work.
S
Providing
the
you
know
that
there
are
an
architectural
firm.
They
provide
the
the
background
documents
that
we'll
need
to
either
do
the
engagement
and
or
refine
those
into
the
code,
and
that
you
know
approximately.
You
know
fifteen
thousand
dollars
of
the
forty
nine
thousand.
That's
going
to
Ben.
Noble
is
really
around
adding
to
the
code,
so
the
46
000
and
then
the
15
000.
You
know
approximately
sixty
thousand
dollars
is
going
towards
the
code
itself
and
then
that's
being
added
to
the
approximate.
S
You
know
forty
six
thousand,
that
we
have
currently
budgeted,
which
is
almost
all
primarily
going
to
the
code
staff,
is
really
intending
to
carry
the
the
engagement
for
the
majority
of
that
Ben
had
a
couple
of
times
when
he
was
pegged
to
come
to
various
commission
meetings,
and
you
know
and
be
there
to
answer
questions,
but
really
he
was
focused
on
on
writing
that
code.
So
we
really
do
have
that.
You
know
this
is
a
large
increase
in
the
budget
for
outreach,
but
we
really
do
have
a
large.
S
D
It
does
and
again
I'm
really
happy
that
we're
you
know,
reading
the
room
and
making
you
know
the
effort
to
do
all
this
Outreach
and
give
people
what
they
want
to
hear.
Another
concern
I
have
is
we're
so
far
behind
in
this
process.
You
know
I
feel
like
we
do
a
lot
of
talking
about
it
and
with
all
this
added
Outreach
I
just
want
to
know
like
how
much
farther
we're
pushing
this
down
the
road
I
would
like
I,
don't
know
if
there's
like
a
caveat
that
could
come
with
this,
but
I
would
like.
D
You
know
some
kind
of
time
that
you
think
would
be.
You
know
reasonable
to
say
all
right.
We've
done
all
this
Outreach
we've
done
all
this
four
base
code.
This
is
when
we're
going
to
start
to
make
some
decisions
and
was
wondering
if
you
know
like
July,
is
something
that's
reasonable
for
that,
which
seems
also
really
far,
but.
S
S
You
know,
I
think
this
is
a
you
know.
To
some
extent
it's
a
you
know,
matter
of
going
slow
to
go
fast,
making
sure
that
we're
you
know
bringing
folks
along
a
lot
of
people.
You
know
felt
like
that
they
hadn't
been
involved
in
the
process
and
so
I
think
that
you
know
we've.
We've
definitely
got
a
steady
core
of
people
who
are
engaged
and
interested
and
participating
at
this
point,
we're
also
bringing
you
know.
S
New
people
in
you
know
through
through
the
ongoing
engagement
that
we've
done
and
I
think
you
know,
staff
can
really
commit
to
that
timeline
based
on
what
we
have,
but
you
know.
Ultimately,
it's
a
council
decision.
It's
a
Planning
Commission
decision
as
to
you
know
whether
we're
we're
you
know
coming
in
on
those
timelines.
D
Sure,
so
how
are
we
going
to
Market
this
Outreach?
How
are
we
gonna?
Let
Arcada
know
that
hey,
you
know
we're.
Don't
we're
dedicating
100
000
to
making
sure
that
everybody
is
getting
their
questions
answered
like
how
are
how
are
we
gonna?
You
know,
except
for
the
10
people
that
are
watching
tonight.
Are
we
gonna
say
you
know,
hey
we're
doing
all
this
please
come
participate.
I
mean
I'd
like
to
kind
of
know
how
that's
going
to
work,
to
make
sure
that
we
do
get.
You
know
a
big
representation.
S
Yeah,
you
know,
I
I,
think
that
we
have
evidence
that
there
are
10
people
watching
tonight,
but
but
I
know
that
the
audience
is
much
much
larger,
but
you
know
we
do
have
you
know
several
arrows
in
our
quiver
of
you
know
marketing
and
Outreach
and
engagement,
and
many
of
them
have
been.
You
know,
successful,
I.
S
Think
to
be
honest
at
this
point,
A
lot
of
people
are,
you
know,
they've
got
engagement,
burnout,
you
know
by
by
this
time
you
know
they've
they've
been
involved
and
very
active
and
engaged,
and
many
of
those
people
who
are
very
passionate
about
this.
We're
not
hearing
from
again
but
I
think
that
these
meetings
are
really
going
to
bring
people
out
again
they're
going
to
feel
like
meaningful.
Next
steps,
where
you
know
critical
input
is
going
to
be
garnered.
We
were
also
you
know.
S
Working
with
you
know
our
our
I.T
Department
and
our
our
Communications
Department
to
you
know
to
get
messaging
out
and
and
we're
looking
at
additional
ways
to
you
know
make
sure
that
our
our
results
on
you
know
search
engines.
Are
you
know
high
enough?
So
I
think
we
have.
You
know
a
pretty
good
strategy
for
you
know
for
for
outreach
and
engagement
at
this
point
and
also
also
always
open
to
Improvement
and
suggestions.
So
if
you
have
ideas,
let
us
know
no.
A
Yeah
I'll
just
add
to
that
I
think
that
this
will
be,
like
you
said,
David
just
kind
of
a
different
type
of
meeting
that
would
reinvigorate
people
and
just
looking
at
the
scope
of
work.
There's
a
lot
more
deliverables.
You
know
with
it
than
the
Outreach
that
we've
had
before
we're.
Looking
at.
You
know
enhanced
graphics
for
the
code,
we're
looking
at
a
series
of
three
meanings
on
specific,
dedicated
subjects
that
people
are
interested
in.
A
You
know
Zoom
sessions
with
Ben
Noble
about
form-based
code
and
just
continuing
that
education
and
I
think
this
will
do
that
to
see.
You
know
how
a
form-based
code
can
work
in
that
part
of
Arcata,
and
then
you
know
it's
in
people.
Those
Minds
to
see
how
it
can
work
larger
throughout
the
county
and
other
you
know,
opportunity
spots
all
over
the
county
to
have
that
kind
of
building
code
and
so
yeah.
We
said
we'd
get
the
Planning
Commission
the
tools
that
they
need.
I
know,
yeah,
we've
been
feeling
the
you
know.
A
We've
already
pushed
this
off
one
meeting.
We
were
supposed
to
see
this
like
a
month
ago
and
didn't
have
a
quorum
on
on
Gateway,
stuff
and
weren't
able
to
do
it,
and
so
you
know
really
making
that
push
to
you
know
be
able
to
start
doing
something
and
have
it.
You
know
happen
in
a
timely
fashion,
and
you
know
I
think
the
Planning
Commission
you
know
knows
that's
expected
of
them
somewhat
too.
However,
you
know
we
are
going
to
be
bringing
in
one
and
two.
A
But
you
know
that
some
some
people
will
have
to
play
catch-up
but
like
this
is
the
best
way
to
play
catch-up
like
this
is
not
only
robust
engagement
for
the
community,
but
also
for
new
planning
Commissioners.
You
know
getting
involved
in
the
process
and
and
learning
about
the
the
plans.
So
that's
just
my
my
two
cents
on
it
and
so
I.
Don't
really
have
any
questions,
I
guess
but
Kimberly
do
you
have
any
council
member
white?
Do
you
have
any
questions
that
you'd
like
to
ask
on
this
specific.
C
C
I
think
that
well
I
don't
feel
like
we
have
burnout
per
se.
Just
think
we
need
to
engage
more
people
and
I'm,
so
I'm
excited
about
that
to
bring
in
new
voices
not
the
same,
although
I
do
want
to
hear
from
those
who
have
been
loyal
and
and
keep
coming,
but
I
think
it's
time
for
us
to
start
extending
our
Outreach
to
those
that
we
haven't
heard
from
because
as
much
as
we
say,
everybody
knows
about
it.
Everybody
doesn't
know
about
it.
C
S
Yeah
there
excuse
me,
there
are
four
total
workshops
involved
in
the
existing
scope
of
work.
That
was
part
of
attachment
B2,
and
so
these
would
be
three
additional
and
I
would
draw
your
attention
to
attachment
C,
which
starts
on
packet,
page
302,
which
was
the
proposal
that
the
Planning
Commission
saw
in
October,
and
this
was
the
scope
of
work,
the
approximate
hundred
thousand
dollar
scope
of
work.
That
included.
You
know
what
I
was
referring
to
at
that
time.
Is
you
know
the
the
Platinum
model
or
that
sort
of
thing?
S
You
know
to
the
Planning
Commission
as
a
whole
as
the
kinds
of
things
that
would
come
out
of
this
new
scope,
so
I'd
be
interested
in
and
hope
that
I
could
address
any
comments
or
questions
that
you
have
about
how
this
proposed
contract
amendment
is
maybe
different
from
what
the
Planning
Commission
you
know
had
authorized,
because
that
it
was
certainly
our
intent
to
bring
forward
a
reflection
of
the
the
recommendation
of
the
Planning
Commission.
So.
C
S
Yeah
I
think
we're
intending
to
have
some
yeah
surveys.
Survey
work
associated
with
you
know
the
engagement
we
haven't
quite
resolved
on
how
we
can
what
we've
been
trying
to
do
with
all
of
these
engagements
is
to
try
and
make
them
sort
of
ongoing
or
enduring
engagements
to
provide
some
tools
that
community
members,
if
they
missed
the
the
the
in-person
or
the
live
engagement,
can
go
and
watch
it
on
YouTube
and
then
you
know,
take
survey
questioners
afterwards.
S
B
C
S
D
Yeah
I
will
say
I
like
surveys,
but
I
also
like
surveys
after
education,
so
I'm
glad
that
there's
you
know
they're
tied
together.
Just
like
you
know,
blind
surveys
without
you
know
having
some
presentations
and
some
concrete
plans
before
that.
I
have
one
more
question,
and
that
is
all
right.
So
the
Planning
Commission
asks
for
this.
This
is
the
18
000
chunk
of
our
reserves.
Do
you
anticipate
other
things
that
they
might
ask
for
that?
Will
prolong
this
and
require
more
money
out
of
our
Reserves.
S
Yeah,
the
the
planning
commit
commission
went
through
an
exercise
where
they
identified
and
the
community
as
well
identified
concerns.
Planning
Commission
went
through
those
concerns
and
identified
potential
solutions
to
those
concerns.
Looked
at
the
resources
that
were
available
at
the
time
or
that
will
be
developed
through
the
eir
process
and
established
a
set
of
you
know
asks
for
for
each
of
those
different
concern
areas.
So
that's
a
lot
of
the
work
that
they
were
doing
over
the
last
couple
of
months.
S
This
was
the
first
item
that
came
out
of
that
work
and
it
was
agreed
to
by
you
know,
by
consensus
on
the
first
day
that
we
did
this
this
this
you
know
sort
of
Mind
mapping,
work
of
identifying
concerns
and
solutions.
There
have
been
several
you
know,
other
solutions
that
have
been
identified.
Some
of
them
are,
you
know
pretty
simple.
The
Planning
Commission
has
asked,
for
instance,
the
the
fire
department,
the
chief
of
police,
to
come
and
speak
to
them.
S
They've
asked
for
Cal
Poly,
and
so
we've
made
those
requests
out
we're
getting
those
scheduled
so
that
the
Planning
Commission
can
hear
directly
from
those
other
agencies,
or
you
know,
service
providers.
Those
won't
cost
any
additional.
You
know
funds.
There
may
be
other
items
that
come
forward
that
are,
you
know,
asks
for
either
you
know
new
studies
or
you
know
something
that
will
require
additional.
S
You
know
Staffing
additional
capacity
and
all
of
those
would
come
with
a
request
to
the
council,
to
you
know
either
add
scope
to
our
existing
contract
with
with
the
planning
team
and
or
go
out.
For
you
know,
a
new
contract
with
you
know
go
out
for
bids
for
a
new
contract.
To
do
that
work.
We
simply
don't
have
any
more
staff
capacity
to
to
do
additional
beyond
what
we're
already
programmed
with
this
work
and
the
work
that
we're
currently
doing
to
bring
the
the
general
plan
forward.
S
And
then
to
the
timing,
I
mean
I,
certainly
think
that
you
know
more
review
more
conversations
with
you
know
other
entities.
All
of
these
things
are,
you
know
they
are
going
to
take
more
time.
If
the
city
council
wants
to
see
a
recommendation
on
the
Gateway
plan,
you
know
in
July,
you
know
by
July
whatever,
then
you
know
we
would
need
to.
You
know,
wrap
that
work
up,
there's
still
a
time
frame,
that's
associated
with
the
approval,
as
if
we're
going
through
the
environmental
review
process
and
that
time
frame
can
be.
S
You
know,
used
concurrently
to
do
any
additional.
You
know
work
and
research,
but
if
we
wait
to
make
recommendations,
if
we
wait
until
you
know,
we've
done
you
know
every
you
know,
study
or
you
know
you
know,
identified
every
concern
and
resolved
it.
That
will
result
in
in
slipping
past.
That
July
time
frame.
D
S
Got
a
contract
I
mean
this
is
basically
this
is
the
contract
here
I'm
I'm
going
to
take
this,
get
a
signature
page
on
it
and
have
Karen
sign
it
right
after
the
meeting
no
I'm
joking,
we
will
start
this
work
immediately.
We've
got
the
first
of
these
I
think
scheduled
for
late
January,
early
February
and
they're
going
to
happen
in
Rapid
succession.
S
There's
some
work
that
we're
doing
with
the
commission
actually
as
studies
our
special
meetings,
where
the
commission
will
be
involved
in
that
that
process
and
then
we've
got
some
that
are
more
public
facing.
So
quite
a
number
of
meetings
to
try
and
squeeze
into
between
January,
1
and
mid-may-ish
is
where
we're
looking.
C
S
No,
we
don't
have
a
timeline
in
here,
we've
been
again
responsive
to
the
desire
to
get
this
work
completed,
efficiently
and
and
quickly.
Internally,
at
the
staff
level,
we've
been
working
out
a
timeline
to
see
you
know
what
would
this
look
like
we
anticipated.
If
we
came
to
you
and
said
we
want
118
000
to
do
additional
form-based
code
that
you
would
say
to
us.
How
long
is
that
going
to
take?
We
want
to
know
so
we
we
really
mapped
it
out.
We
worked
with
our
consultant
to
see
you
know.
Are
these
realistic
time
frames?
S
We've
talked
in
general
with
the
the
Planning
Commission
that
if
this
is
authorized,
that
they
would
need
to
schedule
in
you
know
some
weekend
work
and
that
sort
of
thing,
and
so
everybody's
kind
of
primed
to
do
that.
I
can.
Certainly,
if
you
know,
if
you
authorize
this
I
can
certainly
you
know,
one
of
our
follow-up
steps
will
be
to
release
that
timeline,
so
people
can
start
seeing.
This
is
when
to
anticipate
these
meetings.
I.
A
G
Good
evening,
I'm
Fred
wise
I
have
a
lot
here,
so
I'm
going
to
go
quickly.
I
ask
if
you
have
questions
of
me
to
contact
me
another
time.
First,
I
want
to
make
sure
that
everyone
knows
I'm
very
much
in
favor
of
more
funding.
I've
spoken
about
this
to
the
council
and
to
the
Planning,
Commission
and
David
about
this,
but
I
ask
that
the
council
postpone
the
vote
on
this
for
another
two
weeks
for
precisely
the
reasons
that
some
people
have
already
brought
up.
G
Councilmember
Matthews
I
commend
you
what
you
said
was
very
well
said
exactly.
It
is
unclear
from
this
how
much
money
is
being
spent
on
meetings
and
public
engagement
and
how
much
is
spent
in
the
actual
code,
particularly
in
earlier
draft
Pages
302-306.
It
has
fifty
five
thousand
dollars
spent
for
graphics
for
the
presentations,
that's
not
for
the
code
and
then
David
said
that
that's
the
Platinum
version
right
using
that.
But
what
are
we
getting
and
where?
Where
is
the
balance?
It's
not
clear
at
all
I
consider
it
to
be
very
sloppy.
G
Councilmember
white.
You
are
present
at
the
meeting
where
this
took
place.
I
propose
that
no
one
knew
what
they
were
voting
on.
There
was
a
motion
and
I'm
not
to
put
you
on
the
spot,
but
you
actually
said
is
this
for
one
meeting
or
two
meetings,
commissioner
Dan
tackney
also
did
not
know
what
this
was
for.
G
The
Ben
Noble
spoke.
He
spoke
about
one
or
two
meetings,
it
was.
It
was
very
unclear.
Okay,
there
are
17
pages
of
listings
of
previous
iterations
and
costs.
A
lot
of
information
is
repeated
again.
It's
not
clear.
The
urban
field
studies
in
one
place
is
55.
000
one
place
is
forty.
Six
thousand,
it's
just
not
clear
what
what
what's
going
on
here,
I
think
in
an
hour
or
two
David
could
make
a
spreadsheet.
That
shows
what
is
going
on
what
what
parts
are
for
meetings.
G
Think
the
Planning
Commission
has
got
18
months
of
work
on
their
plate.
Now
we're
talking
about
two
years
of
work
to
get
this
done.
I
wish
that
were
not
the
case.
I
think
it
can
be
changed,
it
can
be
improved,
but
that's
the
way
it
looks
to
me
now
and
again.
I
welcome
your
questions.
Two
things
real
quickly.
The
original
plan
had
six
hundred
thousand
dollars.
This
is
seven
hundred
thousand
dollars
I'd
like
to
know
when
that
was
increased
thanks
very
much.
F
I
might
only
have
a
master's
degree
in
caught
design
at
the
University
of
California
Santa
Barbara,
but
this
has
been
a
really
dysfunctional
process
and
I'll
give
you
an
example.
The
first
thing
is
what
we're
seeing
right
now
on
today's
paper
from
the
fire
department.
They're
they're
really
upset
about
what's
going
on,
and
it
has
all
everything
to
do
with
building
Heights.
F
So
I
would
have
recommended
like
a
year
ago
that
that
would
have
been
in
the
very
first
thing
that
the
question
that
would
have
been
asked
would
gone
to
those
folks
and
asked
what
the
parameters
of
this
project
were,
because
you
burned
up
a
lot
of
time,
arguing
about
what
the
heights
of
the
buildings
are
and
didn't
get
down
to
the
fundamentals
in
the
beginning
and
get
that
answered.
So
I
got
a
prediction
for
you.
This
is
going
to
be
a
big
mess.
F
From
that
standpoint,
it's
going
to
go
all
the
way
to
Sacramento
they've,
already
gone
to
their
representatives
and
it's
going
to
Sacramento,
so
big
failure
right
off
the
bat
in
that
area.
The
second
air,
the
area
that
were
there's
been
a
total
failure,
is
the
coastal
commission.
30
percent
of
this
project
is
in
the
coastal
zone.
You
would
have
thought
you'd,
just
walk
down
the
street
to
your
local
Coastal
office
and
got
the
parameters
of
what
was
going
to
happen
there.
F
The
other
issue
in
the
coastal
commission,
you're,
going
to
get
nailed
is
on
sea
level
rise
that
you
have
so
much
data
and
I've
supplied.
You
guys
I
figured
I
figured
by
now
that
you
would
like
connect
the
dots
but
you're
going
to
get
nailed
in
that
area.
You
call
any
expert
up
between
the
coastal
commission
and
they're
going
to
testify
that
this
is
crazy,
that
you're
going
to
be
building
there
so
right
off
those
two
issues
right
there
should
have
been
answered
right
away
here.
We
are
a
year
later
and
we're
we
have
nothing.
H
My
name
is
Joanna
Gary
I
live
in
the
Gateway
District,
currently,
for
a
long
time
now,
I've
been
blocked
from
seeing
anything
that
the
community
has
posted
on
social
media.
So
I've
resorted
to
just
talking
to
people,
but
I
have
a
degree
in
environmental
planning
and
management
from
UC
Davis
from
a
long
time
ago,
and
never
really
applied
it
in
my
career.
H
But
I
have
long
felt
that
how
if
somebody
was
to
write
a
story
in
the
history
of
this
Gateway
plan,
it
would
be
in
a
very
interesting
story
of
how
it's
all
proceeding
and
how
it
began
and
how
it
stopped
and
how
it
how
it
will
end
I,
don't
know,
but
I
hope.
This
is
a
really
important
lesson
for
the
city
about
how
we
do
things.
H
Do
you
know
what's
going
on
and
I
want
you
to
get
involved,
because
what
decisions
are
made
now
are
really
going
to
impact
them
and
I
just
don't
know
how
this
is
going
to
proceed
so
I'm
going
to
let
some
of
the
others
who
speak
up,
but
the
story
will
be
written
and
I,
don't
think
it'll
be
pretty
about
this
whole
process.
That's
all
I
can
say
it's
really
kind
of
sad.
J
Hello
again
to
Planning
Commission
I'm,
sorry
about
that.
If
you
do
have
a
planning,
commissioner,
but
hello
again
to
the
council
and
then
also
to
the
staff,
a
couple
things
related
to
this
I
believe
the
original
discussion
for
funds
from
the
council
was
actually
for
additional
funds
to
Supply
to
experts,
possibly
outside
the
staff,
for
transparency
and
and
stuff
that
might
be
outside
their
scope
of
what
they
could
answer.
J
In
the
end,
when
the
what
the
Planning
Commission
found
of
concerns
staff
ended
up
assigned
himself
to
all
those
functions,
and
so
that
I
think
kind
of
went
on
the
back
burner
and
you
know,
then
that's
all
water
under
the
bridge,
but
I
did
also
think
that
it
might
be
worth
at
least
getting
some
accounting
on
the
funds.
But
I
do
also
want
to
support
Meredith's
comment
about.
You
know,
moving
forward
with
actual
the
the
form-based
codes
and
and
more
importantly,
I
think.
J
The
education
should
come
there,
because
a
lot
of
people
haven't
gotten
up
to
speed
on
this,
but
moving
forward.
I
believe
that
they
should
be
malleable,
and
so
at
some
point
they
can
come
back
to
planning,
because
I
think
planning
is
working
best,
what
they
can
with
what
they
have
and
have
been
supplied,
limited
information
and
doing
their
best
to
surmise
what
needs
to
do
to
move
forward
and,
in
addition,.
J
T
Hi
good
evening,
City
Council
doesn't
a
form-based
code.
Assume
buildings
over
four
stories
will
be
in
our
zoning
code.
I
believe
it's
premature
to
spend
this
money
before
Arcata
fire
district
has
a
chance
to
present
their
concerns
to
the
Planning,
Commission
and
I.
Don't
recall
the
Planning
Commission
has
having
given
a
definitive
recommendation
on
Building
height,
yet
I
suggest
the
city
council
wait
on
a
vote
on
this
item
until
after
that
occurs.
Thank
you.
E
K
Yes,
I
actually
Sherry
I
just
want
to
say
Sherry,
said
most
of
what
I
wanted
to
say
very
eloquently:
I,
don't
think
that
we
should
be
continuing
on
with
the
far
the
you
know,
with
form-based
codes
or
developing
form-based
codes
until
we
figure
out
with
the
fire
district,
sit
down
with
them
and
figure
out
what
the
costs
are
going
to
be
to
the
city
to
to
build
anything
over
four
stories.
They're
recommending
40
feet
as
the
height
maximum
for
what
they
can
their.
K
K
I
believe
Fred
said
that
it
is
on
his
Arcata
one
website.
It
was
very
informative
of
exactly
what
their
concerns
were
due
to
mainly
Staffing,
but
also
equipment
and
funding,
but
Staffing
is
huge
on
that,
and
it
also
is
their
concerns
with
Cal
Poly
of
seven
story
buildings.
So
I
don't
think
this
discussion
of
feeding
more
money
into
form-based
codes,
I
mean
I
I,
welcome,
more
Community
engagement,
definitely,
of
course,
but
I,
don't
think.
K
The
discussion
of
feeding
more
money
into
the
into
form-based
codes
is
really
should
be
there
until
we
actually
sit
down
with
the
fire
district
and
really
come
up
with
those
true
numbers
to
address
those
concerns,
because
you
know
it
is
a
safety
hazard
and
to
all
involved
are,
are
you
know,
firefighters
and
also
the
community
and
I'm,
not
sure
where
the
liability
Falls?
But
it's
a
big
concern
so
anyhow,
that's
my
take
on
it.
K
D
S
Sure
so
the
Planning
Commission
has
gone
through
this
exercise
to
identify
the
concerns
based
on
first
establishing
that
their
recommendation,
their
current
working
recommendation
is
that
they
drop
each
district
by
one
story,
and
so
it
would
be
instead
of
eight
seven
six,
five
four
we're
talking
now.
You
know
seven,
six,
eight,
seven,
six,
five!
It's
now
seven,
six,
five,
four,
and
so
you
know
the
the
purpose
for
doing
that
is
that
you
know
your
concerns
are
dramatically
different.
S
If
the
Planning
Commission
as
a
body
said,
look
we're
going
to
make
make
a
recommendation
that
you
know
five
stories
be
the
max
in
any
District.
That
raises
a
different
set
of
concerns
than
if
you're
talking
about
you
know
seven
or
eight
story
buildings,
and
so
with
that
in
mind,
with
that
current
mindset
that
their
recommendation
is,
you
know
seven
six,
five,
four
they've
developed
this
set
of
recommendations
and
they
would
be
you
know,
proceeding
with
the
form-based
code
engagement
based
on
those
building
elevations.
S
Certainly
you
want
to
have
an
understanding
of
you
know
what
the
Upper
Floor
step
backs
would
be.
You
know
for
larger
buildings
and
have
you
know
you
know
Graphics
to
Define
what
those
would
look
like
if
ultimately,
the
city
council
or
the
Planning
Commission,
you
know
I
mean
it's?
Ultimately,
it's
a
city
council's
decision.
So
if
the
city
council
says
look
we're
not
interested
in
seven
story,
buildings,
even
we
want
to,
you,
know,
drop
those
down
a
little
bit.
S
There
would
certainly
be
some
work
that
we
need
to
do
to
revise
the
form-based
code,
but
you
know
the
vast
majority
of
the
work
that
we
would
do
in
these
form-based
code.
Workshops
really
apply
to
any
size
building.
It's
you
know
about
the
way
that
the
facades
look
The.
You
know
architectural
detail,
the
you
know,
you
know.
S
If
we're
going
to
have
a
seven
story
building-
and
you
know
the
current
plan
kind
of
accommodates-
step
backs
setbacks
on
the
ground
floor,
so
you
would
set
the
building
back
from
the
frontage
and
then
step
backs
on
the
upper
floors
to
try
and
you
know
mitigate
you
know.
The
massing
concerns
the
shading
concerns
and
those
kinds
of
things,
those
codes
that
we
would
establish
this
process
of.
S
You
know
Garner
from
from
that
if
we
had
absolute
Clarity
at
this
time,
what
you
know
the
building
heights
were
going
to
be.
If
the
city
council,
for
instance,
said
Hey,
look,
these
are
the
building
Heights
that
we
want
you
to
set.
You
know
to
start
planning
around
then
you
know
that
would
simplify
that
issue.
Certainly
right
now
we're
operating
in
an
environment
where
there's
ambiguity,
and
we
have
to
move
forward
to
resolve
that
ambiguity.
S
Saying
that
there's
ambiguity
in
this
area
or
that
area,
and
we
should
move
forward
without
doing
this
you're
going
to
always
find
an
area
of
ambiguity,
and
so
we've
been
attempting
to
do.
The
planning
commission's
work
has
been
attempting
to.
You
know,
work
on
small
pieces
where
they
can
find
the
ability
to
to
move
forward
and
make
recommendations
once
they
got
through
that
work
that
I
described
earlier.
They
started
working
on
ranking
the
the
community
benefits
and
so
now
they're
they're
working
through
that
process
and
they've
got
one
more
meeting.
S
S
S
S
I
think
the
information
that
you're
going
to
hear
from
the
fire
department.
You
know
the
the
community
is
telling
you
what
they've
you
know
said
in
their
meetings.
We've
heard
it
in
you
know
the
meetings
that
we've
had
with
them
offline
and
I,
fully
anticipate
that
they're
going
to
you
know
bring
those
same
concerns.
S
S
S
D
All
right
well
I'm,
going
to
move
to
approves
of
an
118
000
contract
Amendment
for
additional
form-based
code
scope
of
services.
I
would
also
like
to
add
a
midpoint
review.
Maybe
either
April
or
May
and
I
would
find
that
action
to
amend
the
existing
contract
is
not
a
principal
pursuant
to
the
California
Environmental
Quality
Act.
So.
A
A
C
C
Offline
and
I've
had
an
opportunity
also
to
follow
that,
but
I
don't
know
that
the
community
has
and
so
for.
Transparency
I
feel
like
that,
should
happen,
and
then
we
would
be
able
to
better
allocate
the
monies
and
what
direction
that
would
be,
because
it's
going
to
make
a
difference
in
whether
we're
doing
four
or
eight
or
somewhere
in
between
that
was
an
emotion,
though.
A
Yeah
but
but
as
I
mean
I
feel
like
we
get
a
lot
of
feedback,
oh
you're,
putting
the
cart
before
the
horse,
but
like
we
haven't
even
built
the
cart
yet
like
the
there's,
no
cart
to
put
before
the
horse,
because
we
haven't,
you
know,
delivered
anything
really
yet
and
so
I
think.
If
we're
looking
at
deliverables
of
what
you
know,
the
public
wants
to
see
in
simultaneous.
You
know
motion
forward
with
these
questions
that
are
being
asked,
there's
always
a
new
question
and
you
know
sometimes
people
don't
like
the
answer.
A
Sometimes
people
are
satisfied
with
the
answer
that
they
get
to
the
question,
or
maybe
they
find
out
more
information
and
and
move
on
to
a
different
question.
You
know
there's
always
going
to
be.
You
know
these
questions,
but
I
I
think
moving.
You
know
forward
in
the
process
is
going
to
be
the
most
beneficial
to
the
city
and
and
to
you
know,
answering
these
people's
questions.
C
C
S
It'll
be
January
13th,
you
know
again,
it's
you
know.
Maybe
I'll
talk
to
the
fire
department
about
coming
before
the
city
council,
because
this
is
a
decision
that
you
know
if
you're,
if
you're
going
to
say
that
you
know
we're
going
to
allow
the
fire
department
to
you
know
to
to
lead
this
process
that
you
know
prioritize
that
you
probably
should
hear
from
them
or
at
least
tune
into
the
the
the
13th.
S
D
A
A
A
Setting
up
meetings
and
things
like
that
going
on
because
I
kind
of
get
the
the
bead
that
like
I,
see
in
the
news.
All
of
this
you
know
really
Sensational
lies
negative
stuff,
but
then
people
that
I
talk
to
offline
is
like.
Oh,
no
we're
not
that
you
know
the
concerns
are
different
and
so
I
want
to
have
it
happen,
and
you
know
in
a
room
where
we
can
all
hear
it.
I
think
that
would
be
beneficial
yeah,
but
I
also
think
that
doesn't
prevent
us
moving
forward
with
this
scope
of
work.
S
You
know
the
way
that
I
took
the
midpoint
review
earlier
was:
are
we
getting
the
traction
out
of
the
engagement
piece
that
we
feel
like
we
need
to,
or
should
we
shift
some
of
that
into
work
product
and
so
I
think
that'll
be
our?
You
know
our
primary
goal,
but
we
can
also
take
a
look
at
you
know
and
have
the
Consultants
explain
how
a
transition
from
a
recommendation
from
you
know
seven
stories
to
a
lower
number
or
you
know,
or
revising
those
numbers
upwards,
how
those
could
be
applied?
S
You
know
across
the
district,
I
guess
the
the
simplest
way
to
think
about
it
is
that
you
know
if
we're
designing
into
the
form-based
code,
for
one
District
that
has
seven
one
District
that
has
six
one
District
that
has
five
and
one
District.
That
has
four.
If
you
decide
to
eliminate
seven
story,
buildings
you've
already
got
six
built
into
it,
and
so
it's
kind
of
it's
nested
that
way
and
you
would
be
able
to
you
know,
apply
those
standards.
You
know
in
in
the
new
newly
downsized
districts,
I
guess.
A
I
mean
it
doesn't
necessarily
again
just
because
we
in
a
code
say
that
maybe
someday
we
want
to
build
seven-story
buildings
doesn't
mean
that
overnight
or
even
within
five
years
or
ten
years
that
we're
gonna
see
eight
seven-story
buildings
in
the
barrel
District.
That's
you
know
that.
That's
not
what
that
means.
Yeah.
S
And
I
think
just
you
know,
take
that
one
step
further.
The
form-based
code
would
likely
not
you
know,
ultimately
resolve
and
or
result
in
allowing
eight
five
eight
story
buildings.
You
know
there
are
even
within
the
districts.
You
know
where
you
know
six
stories
might
be
allowed.
There
are
only
a
few
Parcels
within
those
districts
that
are
actually
large
enough
to
accommodate
a
six-story
building
and
still
have
all
the
design
specifications.
The
setbacks
and
whatnot
that
that
are
undoubtedly
I
mean
I.
S
You
know,
I
don't
have
the
code,
so
I
can't
tell
you
what
they
are,
but
these
are
the
concepts
that
we've
been
talking
about,
and
so
it
once
those
are
applied
once
those
frames
are
applied,
you're
going
to
drastically
reduce
the
number
of
parcels
where
that
size
building
can
be
built
anyway
and
we'll
be
able
to
communicate
that
a
little
bit
more
effectively
through
this.
You
know
this
engagement
to
share
with
the
community.
S
You
know
what
the
potential
outcomes
might
look
like
that
massing
study.
For
example,
there
is
a
YouTube
that
we
produced
already
that
looks
at
the
form-based
code,
where
I
I
kind
of
show
this
graphically.
Where,
if
you
reduce
the
size
of
you
know
these
Upper
Floor
setbacks,
I'm
looking
at
you
know
specific
Parcels
in
a
particular
area
around
the
Old
Saint
Vinnies.
It
quickly
eliminates
the
majority
of
the
properties
there
from
the
potential
to
build
those
buildings
on
those
sites.
S
So
essentially,
even
though
in
that
District
I
believe
it's
five
stories
are
allowed,
none
of
those
Parcels
in
that
entire
area
would
would
accommodate
a
five-story
building,
so
I
think
the
form-based
code
work
that
we'll
do
is
going
to
you
know
quickly,
filter
down
to
you
know,
there's
there's
much
less
mass
and
density
than
you
know
than
people
are
concerned
about
when
they
first
think
about.
Oh,
my
gosh
eight-story
buildings
or
five
story
or
seven
or
whatever,
the
the
building
height
is.
A
A
A
A
N
A
A
A
A
Yeah
okay
looks
like
we're
back
online
here.
Item
12
on
our
agenda
tonight
is
oral
and
written
Communications.
The
city
appreciates
public
input.
This
time
is
provided
for
people
to
address
the
council
or
submit
written
Communications
on
matters
that
are
not
on
the
agenda.
Please
know
that,
pursuant
to
the
brown
acts,
the
council
cannot
discuss
or
take
actions
on
items
that
are
not
listed
on
the
posted
agenda.
A
At
the
end
of
all
oral
and
written
Communications,
the
council
May
respond
to
statements
supported
requests
that
require
a
council
action
will
be
set
by
the
council
for
a
future
agenda
or
referred
to
staff
speakers
addressing
the
council
may
be
limited
to
three
minutes
with
a
maximum
of
five
minutes.
We're
doing
three
minutes
and
the
limit
on
the
length
of
oral
Communications
may
be
imposed,
but
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
people
here
tonight.
So
if
you
are
in
person
and
want
to
give
comment,
please
line
up
at
the
podium.
We'll
do
in-person
comment.
A
H
H
So
I
guess
you
know.
I
I
sometimes
speak
in
very
kind
of
broad
step,
back
thing
that
I
am
inspired
by
people
like
Julia,
butterfly
Hill,
who
just
celebrated
this
month,
25
years
of
when
she
climbed
up
into
the
redwood
tree
Luna
and
lived
there
for
over
two
years,
and
there's
people
like
that
and
like
the
astronauts
up
in
space
who
really
do
have
perspectives
about
the
overview
and
looking
at
the
big
picture,
not
that
we
have
to
operate
in
big
ways.
H
I
don't
want
another
person
to
die
on
the
streets
and
especially
in
front
of
City
Hall
I,
don't
want
to
see
a
businessman
stabbed
again
and
I
want
people
who
have
issues
that
result
in
their
sleeping
where
people
don't
want
them
to
sleep,
to
have
a
place
where
they
can
be,
and
I
just
want
us
to
take
some
action
and
make
some
sacrifices.
We
don't
need
to
have
parties
all
the
time
we
need
to
do.
Some
serious
work
and
then
we
can
celebrate
so
I
hope.
H
The
2023
year
will
be
one
of
working
hard
to
get
things
done,
and
then
we
can
celebrate
what
we've
accomplished
and
if
it's
operating
in
emergency
mode
quickly
and
urgently,
let's
do
it
and
let's
get
the
community,
do
it
together?
Don't
just
have
them
rely
on
you
guys
or
just
little
old
me
there's
a
lot
of
people
out
there
who
want
to
get
involved
and
will
get
involved.
If
you
ask
them
and
there's
things
that
we
can
do
so,
I
guess
I'm
just
sort
of
leaving
it
at
that
and
I
just
hope.
G
G
Okay:
first
there's
a
good
article,
excellent
article
member
of
reunion
came
out
today
by
Jack
Durham
about
the
Cal
Poly
situation
with
the
fire
district.
There's
a
link
on
arcader1.com
Council,
the
if
you
want
to
come,
is
January
10th,
I'm
sure
you
can
come
and
sit
back,
not
saying
anything
to
watch
the
presentation
there
I
have
a
handout.
At
the
end,
the
David
you
mentioned
not
too
many
tall
story,
buildings
or
St
Vinnie's
Parcels
can
be
purchased
and
combined.
G
That's
what
developers
do
they
make
them
larger?
You
remember
in
June,
I
said
that
David
Lloyd
is
gaslighting.
The
city
council
turns
out
the
gaslighting
has
become
the
word
of
the
year,
so
I
was
in
advance
on
that
a
little
bit
next
time.
This
is
very
serious
stuff
I'm
going
to
use
the
quote.
You
never
go
so
far
as
when
you
don't
know
where
you're
going.
You
heard
me
say
this
before
I
find
the
lack
of
management
impossible
to
get
any
kind
of
results.
There
is
no
sense
of
dependency
or
critical
path.
G
Thinking
we've
talked
about
the
fire
district
weighing
in
on
the
building
height.
That's
that's
early.
The
the
fire
district
has
been
in
touch
with
our
state
senator
and
assemblyman.
They
were
quote
dumbfounded
that
this
had
not
been
addressed
earlier
previously.
This
is
dealing
with
the
Cal
Poly
situation.
Same
thing
applies
here
in
when
I
started
getting
involved
in
this,
studying
it
full-time,
really
February
March
April.
G
G
It's
it's.
It
originally
had
a
one
year
process.
If
you
remember
that's,
what's
here
we're
supposed
to
be
done
by
December,
it's
not
going
to
be
done.
David
is
skilled
in
many
ways,
but
not
in
management
of
a
large
project.
In
my
opinion,
and
the
results
are
here,
I
have
a
list
of
items,
I
can
say,
I
think
you
know
most
of
them
the
updated
Gateway
plan.
It
was
October
1st
we're
supposed
to
see
a
table
of
things.
It
only
contains
things
that
quote
unquote
comport
to
the
plan.
G
Nothing
else
we're
supposed
to
table
of
things.
The
L
street
is
continually
on
the
table.
The
transportation
Safety
Committee
has
made
their
decision
voted
three
times
on
that,
but
we
kind
of
refused
to
listen
to
them.
The.
What
else
can
I
say?
You
know
this
is
how
I
feel
I
think
in
essence,
this
year,
in
the
next
few
months,
you're
going
to
be
discussing
removing
David
lawyer
from
management
of
this
plan.
So
we
can
continue.
F
I
mean
you
can
see
what's
happening
tonight,
you're
you're
approving
quite
a
bit
of
money
for
the
Gateway.
So
one
of
my
environmentally
impact
questions
for
the
Gateway
was
that
you
weren't
in
compliance-
and
this
is
spelled
out
from
plan
West-
has
to
do
testing
it
and
I
actually
spelled
out
you're
not
going
to
do
this
little
two-hour
test
where
you're
gonna
go
around
town
and
then
and
then
tell
us.
F
You
know,
I
I
specified
what
the
information
to
you
guys
that
there's
government
system
for
doing
a
long-term
test
to
see
what
the
seasonal
changes
are
and
all
these
busy
inner
intersections.
That
are
going
to
be
part
of
the
Gateway
project
too.
So
it's
a
perfect
time
to
find
out
all
those
answers.
Unfortunately,
when
I
go
to
plan,
West
or
I've
talked
to
anybody
in
this
city,
they
just
don't
seem
to
know
what's
happening
with
that.
It
should
have
been
started
about
a
year
ago.
Has
I'm
not
aware
that
it's
even
been
started.
F
So
for
a
year
now,
you
haven't
been
compliance
with
the
the
noise
element
and
there's
specific
standards
in
the
city
code.
There's
standards
in
the
county,
there's
there's
count,
there's
standards
for
the
state,
so
you
don't
get
a
pass
just
because
you
want
to
pick
and
choose
what
laws
that
you
want
to
enforce
in
the
city.
So
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
what
to
say
about
this
anymore.
It's
just
I
want
to
see
some
action.
F
I
mean
this
is
part
of
what
I
wrote
to
you
on
SB
1000,
social
justice
and
environmental
planning.
You
know,
I
have
a
pretty
good
idea
that,
unfortunately,
people
are
going
to
use
public
track
Transportation,
so
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
traffic
going
on
these
busy
streets
and
we
need
to
have
an
answer
of
what
what's
going
on
right
now
and
also
the
calculations
of
how
that's
going
to
influence
the
standards
of
living
of
people
that
are
living
in
Northtown,
the
Midtown
and
in
the
Gateway
area.
F
This
was
sort
of
why
we
got
that
Berkeley
versus
Berkeley
case
where
the
neighbors
went
after
the
university
in
this
case
for
their
project,
and
it
was
a
lot
of
it-
was
about
the
noise
in
also
the
city
also
sued
the
university,
in
that
case
too,
because
of
some
of
these
things
that
are
coming
up
with
the
fire
and
the
six
and
a
half
billion
dollars
that
you're
going
to
have
to
come
up
in
extra
money
for
to
actually
go
over
four
stories.
So
please
work
it
out.
M
M
M
I
I
tried
to
speak
with
you
folks
on
risk
management
before
and
this.
This
is
a
very
major
topic
out
there.
As
some
of
you
are
aware,
the
city
did
a
and
not
a
judgment,
but
a
plea
deal
for
3.9
million
dollars
on
a
settlement.
I
wish
you
folks
to
really
ask
your
staff.
What
does
this
have
to
do
with
our
future
costs
in
the
city,
since
this
is
kind
of
what
I
do
and
I
work
with
insurance
company?
M
So
as
far
as
my
math
goes,
probably
during
the
last
20
or
30
years,
you
have
exceeded
the
total
that
you
spent
on
litigation
in
one
year.
This
deeply
concerns
the
public
but
more
more
important.
That
deeply
concerns
the
public
and
you
I've.
Some
of
you
have
had
communication
with
me.
Some
of
you
haven't
you
all
should
get
involved
in
this.
M
Is
it
the
problem
that
cost
a
3.9
million
dollar
judgment
which
I
think
I
think
in
the
prior
prior
year
was
1.6
million
dollars
worth
of
legal
expenses,
and
I
can
be
corrected
on
that?
But
when
you're,
when
you're
looking
at
something
that's
ramping
up
to
that
cost,
you
have
a
serious
problem
in-house,
so
I
highly
recommend
that
you
folks
start
paying
attention
to
risk
management,
litigations
where
money
happens.
This
is
what
happens
in
the
in
all
the
forms
I
deal
with
and
I
I
think
you
need
to
ask
your
staff.
M
I
want
to
minimize
your
cost
in
the
future,
and
the
biggest
thing
is,
if
you
had
a
judgment
like
that,
why
hasn't
the
problem
been
fixed
that
caused
the
problem
and
I'm
happy
to
work
with
Karen
Diemer
and
your
staff
to
make
sure
that
this
does
not
end
up
being
a
39
million
dollar
judgment,
because
the
next
judge
will
say
you
didn't
fix
the
problem
that
cost
us
3.9
million
dollar
settlement.
It
wasn't
a
judgment.
It
was
a
settlement.
M
T
Q
Hi
good
evening,
mayor
vice
mayor
council
members
and
a
member
of
the
public
and
the
staff
here.
The
first
question
is
why
I'm
here
on
the
older
World
project,
because
I
promised
not
promise
I
said
in
February,
when
we
did
our
environmental
document
approval
and
the
30
design
that
when
we
received
our
60
design,
I'll
be
back
to
give
an
update
on
the
project.
So
we
received
our
60
design,
late,
November
and
the
plans
are
on
the
website.
So
I'm
here.
Just
to
give
you
a
bit
update
on
the
project.
Q
I'll,
just
briefly
go
over
the
project
background,
just
for
like
some
of
the
new
content
members,
so
they
know
how
we
end
up
here
and
then
I'll
go
over
the
current
status
of
the
project.
Next
steps
and
at
the
end,
if
you
have
any
questions,
I'll
answer
those
questions
so
project
overview,
this
Old,
Market,
I
wrote
project
has
been
a
priority
project
for
more
than
a
decade.
I
would
say
in
2010,
City
attended
attempted
to
do
a
project
in
that
area.
Q
However,
project
was
not
liked
by
the
neighbors
because
we
did
not
consult
with
them
before
starting
the
project,
so
probably
we're
not
able
to
complete
the
project
in
2010
and
we
lost
the
funding.
So
in
2015
we
restarted
the
project.
But
this
time
we
started
with
aggressive
public
engagement.
The
public
engagement
lasted
for
at
least
for
eight
to
nine
months.
In
that
public
engagement
process,
we
had
multiple
public
meetings,
pop-up
and
demonstration
walk,
Audits
and
based
on
the
public
engagements.
Q
Q
The
project
limits
project
starts,
it's
not
very
clear
to
see
here,
but
here
this
is
our
buttermilk
and
all
our
root
roundabout.
Just
here
so
project
begins
just
approximately
600
feet.
South
of
that
roundabout.
The
project
length
is
approximately
a
mile.
It
includes
Paving
and
biosoils
drainage
improvements
on
walkway.
Currently
there
is
no
sidewalk,
and
so
some
portion
of
the
Old
Arcata
Road,
but
after
the
project
is
completed,
there
will
be
a
continued
sidewalk,
at
least
on
the
one
side.
Throughout
the
project.
Q
For
most
part,
the
cross-section
will
look
like
this.
There
will
be
two
travel
Lanes
bike,
Lanes
on
either
side
and
a
walkway,
continuous
walkway,
at
least
on
the
one
side.
So
for
now
it
will
be
on
the
west
side
of
the
old
arcade
Road
and
there
will
be
a
walkway
and
between
the
walkway
and
the
bike
lane
and
some
location.
There
will
be
a
three
to
five
foot,
bio
swail
and
just
for
drainage,
Improvement,
as
as
well
as
buffer
between
the
traffic
and
the
pedestrians.
Q
So,
on
the
current
status,
as
I
said
in
early
February,
we
did
a
presentation
here
at
the
council
and
our
environmental
document
got
approved
and
after
that,
right,
after
that,
we
went
to
CTC
California
Transportation
Commission
and
received
the
applied
and
received
for
funding
for
the
design.
For
the
next
phase
of
the
project.
Q
So
before
I
go
to
that
one,
when
I
presented
this
project
at
the
30
level
and
during
the
meeting
there
were
some
recommendations
provided
by
the
council
and
the
members
of
the
public
and
that
were
not
Incorporated
in
the
30
design.
So
I'll
just
go
over
those
elements,
and
now
they
are
Incorporated
in
our
60
design.
So
main
element
was
parking
parking.
As
you
know,
some
of
the
council
members
Now
parking
was
big
concerned.
It
was
brought
to
our
attention
throughout
the
project.
Q
The
way
we
have
addressed
the
parking
is,
we
are
not
adding
additional
parking
and
along
the
project,
but
we
are
improving
the
existing
parking,
especially
on
the
North
portion
of
the
Jacobi
Creek
School.
Currently,
there's
no
dedicated
parking,
but
as
a
part
of
the
project.
We
are
improving
parking
and
there
will
be
additional
parking,
at
least
on
that
area
of
the
project.
Q
Next
one
was
we
received
a
lot
of
comments
on
the
size
of
the
roundabout.
When
we
had
our
30
design
drawings,
we
had
a
roundabout
that
was
inscribed
Circle
diameter.
We
call
it
it
was
113
feet
and
when
we
presented
that
project
we
will
we
told
the
public
and
the
councils
that
we
will
go
back
to
the
drying
board
and
see
how
we
can
make
it
smaller
So.
Q
Currently,
the
roundabout
that
we
have
proposed
on
the
60
design
is
a
kind
of
weird
to
say
it's
108
to
110
feet
the
reason
I'm
saying
that
it's
not
perfect
Circle,
it's
an
oval
weird
trying
to
have
less
impact
on
neighbor
schools,
so
we're
just
making
it
oval.
So
the
diameter
is
a
little
bit
smaller
on
one
side,
the
one
and
one
side.
It's
longer,
so
it's
I'm
saying
approximately
108
210.
That's
a
diameter
inscribed
Circle
diameter
of
the
current
roundabout.
That's
proposed.
Q
Now,
in
addition
to
that,
we
said
we
will
be
doing
a
drainage
Improvement,
so
we
are
not
doing
but
we'll
be
showing
on
the
60
design
So.
Currently,
our
60
design
shows
all
the
drainage
improvements
along
the
project
alignment,
alignment
that
includes
a
bio
cell
and
a
new
strong
drain
pipe
along
the
project
alignment,
and
also
at
the
intersection
of
the
old
old
arcade
Road
and
the
Jacobi
Creek
I,
wrote
and
last
but
not
the
least,
was
people
have
requested
rapid
flashing
Crossing
at
certain
locations.
Q
So
we
have
shown
that
on
the
60
design,
especially
at
the
all
intersection
of
old
arcade,
Road
and
Anderson
Lane,
there
is
a
crosswalk
and
there
will
be
pedestrian
actuated
light
Crossing
there.
In
addition
to
that,
there
will
be
similar
Crossing
light
at
Highland,
which
is
in
front
of
the
school,
and
all
the
three
legs
of
the
roundabout
will
have
a
similar
pedestrian
push
button.
Flashlights.
Q
So
with
that,
you
know
we
got
our
60
design
drawings
with
that
we
also
received
the
cost
estimate.
As
you
know,
lately
the
cross
has
been
going
up
so
initially
the
cost
estimate
for
the
project
was
approximately
four
million
dollars.
So
at
now,
at
60
design
level
we
have
updated
that
to
based
on
the
design
is
five
million
dollars.
Q
If
that's
not
feasible,
there
is
certain
section
and
certain
improvements
we
could
eliminate
and
that
may
include
certain
improvements
along
the
project
alignment.
We
have
not
decided
what
that
would
be,
but
we
are
looking
into
that
option,
so
we
will
remain
within
the
original
project
cost
of
approximately
four
million
dollars.
Q
So
our
next
steps
are.
We
are
planning
to
complete
the
design
by
early
2023
right
now.
We
are
at
60
level,
so
end
of
January.
We
will
be
receiving
our
90
design
and
right
after
that,
we
will
be
taking
those
drawings
and
funding
packet
to
CTC
again
in
the
march,
to
get
the
construction
allocation
funding.
So
once
we
get
the
construction
funding
and
the
design
is
100
done,
we
will
be
hopefully
starting
the
construction
late
summer
of
2023..
Q
So
that
is
my
quick
update
on
the
project.
If
you
have
any
specific
questions,
let
me
please
ask
there:
you
know
on
our
project
project
specific
website.
There
are
six
different
design
and
all
the
documents
related
to
the
project.
So
people
can
view
that
provide
comments
if
they
have
any
feedback
on
that-
and
this
is
our
updated
round.
But
it's
not
changed
significantly,
but
this
has
been
updated
since
February
and
the
the
on
one
new
thing
that
you
will
notice
and
we
are
still
trying
to
work
through.
Q
It-
is
the
access
on
the
Old
Arcata
Road
here
this
axis
for
the
school.
Originally
that
access
was
not
there,
but
we
are
trying
to
automatically
accumulate
that
access
in
case
school
has
to
get
out
at
least
one
way,
and
it
may
not
be
feasible
to
do
two-way,
but
definitely
people
could
enter
through
Jacoby
Creek
and
they
can
exit
here.
D
Q
Yeah
definitely
I
don't
want
to
be
very,
very
optimistic
and
say
that,
yes,
we
will
be
starting
the
construction
as
I
said
in
late
summer,
and
there
is
still
one
hiccup
that
we
are
working
through
Caltrans
to
get
our
federal
site
in
membran,
which
is
NEPA,
and
they
have
promised
that
they'll.
We
will
have
that
by
January.
So
if
that
happened,
then
we'll
be
moving
forward
in
right
direction.
So.
O
E
A
H
And
not
circles
wish
the
bike
lane
could
actually
be
on
the
other
side
of
the
BIOS
whale
I.
Don't
know
if
that's
a
consideration
at
all
or
it's
too
late
or
if
there's
problems
with
doing
that,
but
having
bikes
next
to
cars
is
always
tricky
and
it's
better
to
have
them
next
to
pedestrians.
Perhaps
so,
but
I
love
the
oval.
F
F
You
guys
are
still
sort
of
like
quite
a
few
years
behind
with
just
a
white
line,
that's
kind
of
like
a
really
wimpy
way
of
identifying
the
bike
lane
so
I,
don't
know
whether
the
issue
is
just
the
cost
of
the
paint,
but
they're,
not
the
only
city
I
mean
I,
just
came
from
Miami
for
Mark
basil
and
in
Miami
too.
It's
the
same
thing
that
bicycle
lanes
are
pretty
distinguished.
Sometimes
they
in
Santa
Monica's
case.
They
also
have
physical
barriers
to
keep
cars
away
from
the
from
the
bike
lane.
F
M
Hello,
netra
Ken
sawatski
here
and,
of
course
the
rest
of
you
also
I,
appreciate
the
fact
that
you
redesigned
your
project
when
I
pointed
out
that
there
was
no
Crossing
at
the
I
guess,
you'd
say
the
southern
side
of
this,
where
people
could
cross
safely.
I
appreciate
the
fact
that
you
actually
realized
that
people
go
the
shortest
distance
between
two
things
and
Incorporated
out.
Unfortunately,
a
comment
was
made
that
there's
major
support
for
this.
Yes,
there
is
for
some
people,
but
again
risk
management
is
something
I
deal
with.
M
This
is
supposedly
supposed
to
solve
a
problem
that
didn't
exist
and
I
could
be
corrected
if
wrong,
but
I.
My
understanding
is:
there's
only
one
accident
in
the
distant
past
regarding
the
current
situation
there
without
the
roundabout
and
that
had
to
do
with
some
I
think
drunk
driver
blowing
through
the
stop
sign,
I'm
sure
there'll
be
a
whole
bunch
of
people.
M
Commenting
in
favor
of
this
I
I
always
have
a
problem
when
staff
doesn't
reach
out
to
certain
groups,
such
as
Bayside
carers,
who
have
had
a
lot
of
input
and
I
just
spoke
with
one
of
their
members
here,
and
they
did
not
have
a
clue
that
this
was
on
your
gender
for
tonight.
So
they
could
come
in.
So
I
do
see
major
flaws
unless
here
I
totally
support
the
rest
of
the
support
of
the
project.
M
My
family
members
do
have
property
down
on
on
Jacoby
crew
and
I'm,
not
speaking
for
the
rest
of
them,
but
to
spend
the
amount
of
money
we're
spending
for
this
particular
roundabout
portion
of
your
project.
To
me,
there's
all
kinds
of
better
places
and
I
do
understand.
Your
staff
gets
whatever
10
to
manage.
M
The
project
now
is
50
more
than
what
it
was
before
without
the
roundabout,
but
that
that
should
not
be
a
driving
concern,
and
my
concern
is
the
wish
of
the
local
people
a
lot
of
it's
expressed
by
a
group
that
lives
right
there
and
has
input,
especially
the
school.
That's
there
and
and
if
those
people
were
not
notified,
that
this
was
on
your
agenda
for
tonight,
I
have
serious
problems
with
that,
so
that
you
can't
get
input
from
people.
M
So
I
recommend
that
if
there's
any
action
to
be
taken
that
these
people
be
notified-
and
you
table
this
for
a
future
thing,
I
think
this
is
just
a
report.
I
guess
you're
going
to
accept
the
report,
which
is
always
great
but
I-
think
you
should
should
also
listen
to
the
constituents,
not
only
a
few
that
are
within
your
jurisdiction,
but
the
people
that
are
within
the
county
and
again
risk
management.
This
is
a
lawyer's
dream,
you're
in
litigation
on
this
already
and
I.
M
N
U
Please,
hello,
yeah,
okay,
Mark,
Delaney,
I
live
on
the
corner
of
Old
Chicago
Road
and
a
big,
oh
Jacoby,
Road
and
Old
Bay
old,
locator,
Road
and
Jacoby
Road.
That's
the
intersection!
That's
under
discussion
for
the
roundabout.
The
rest
of
the
project
is
in
Arcata.
This
roundabout
is
not
in
Arcata
it's
in
the
humble
it's
in
Humboldt
County,
it's
outside
of
Arcata.
U
U
There's
a
traffic
jam
there,
but
there's
a
problem
here:
Arcata
has
not
involved
the
people
that
live
outside
of
Arcata
jurisdiction
in
the
decision-making
process,
and
we
don't
want
this.
We
don't
want
to
round
about
the
general
plan.
The
California
Constitution
requires
that
consistency
with
the
general
plan
be
adhered
to.
You
guys
are
not
adhering
to
the
three
General
plans
that
say
this
is
the
main
Rural
and
unchanged.
This
is
a
historic
district.
U
I
live
in
a
in
a
California
and
National
registered
Landmark,
the
Jacobi
Creek,
the
old
Jacoby
Creek
School,
the
temperance
Halls
across
the
street
and
the
grains
across
the
street,
and
this
roundabout
will
move
the
highway
closer
to
the
school,
which
is
against
the
law.
You
can't
impact
children
by
moving
that
Highway
closer
to
them.
The
noise
impact
alone,
plus
the
visual
impact
to
this
community
is
not
desirable.
We
don't
want
that.
The
rest
of
the
project
is
an
Arcata
Arcata
should
work
on
the
stuff.
That's
in
our
case
the
stuff.
U
We
have
not
been
part
of
this
process
and
to
the
in
2016
the
part
of
the
community
that
was
involved
voted
against
this
this
project,
the
roundabout
was,
was
a
idea
of
omni
Consultants
to
add
intersection
where
actually
we
wanted
to
have
the
road
improve,
but
just
maintain
the
existing
road
that
four
million
dollars
to
put
a
roundabout
in
that
goes.
Nowhere
for
nobody
is
not.
A
Okay,
so
that's
the
last
of
the
public
comments
on
that.
We
will
move
on
to
our
next
staff
report
again
this.
This
segment
is
for
staff
reports.
Only
these
are
not
agenda
items
that
we
are
taking
action
on.
These
are
just
reports
of
information,
so
we
will
move
next
to
an
update
from
Environmental
Services
director
Emily
sinkhorn
on
the
Arcata
Annie
and
Mary
Trail
connectivity
project
great.
P
So
I'll
try
to
be
quick
because
I
touched
on
some
in
the
previous
agenda
item,
but
just
for
some
background
for
the
Andy
and
Mary
Trail.
It
has
been
a
Regional
Trail
priority
for
over
two
decades
and
especially
connecting
Arcata
to
Blue
Lake
along
the
previous
rail
line,
and
it
is
currently
a
priority
project
on
the
council's
fiscal
year.
P
Priority
projects
and
it's
really
especially
directly
tied
to
connecting
the
Valley
West
neighborhood,
with
much
more
of
a
safe
walking
biking,
connectivity
to
downtown
Arcata
and
Cal
Poly
Humboldt,
and
connecting
downtown
Arcata
and
of
Arcata
neighborhoods
to
the
Aldergrove
industrial
park
and
then
to
the
Mad
River
at
the
park.
One
of
the
Humboldt
Bay
Municipal
Water
District's
Pump
Station
Park.
P
So
it
would
connect
to
Valley
West
over
the
giantulli
overpass
and
then
dead
end
at
city
limits,
so
in
the
Aldergrove
industrial
park
and
from
Community
input
during
the
planning
stages,
people
really
asked
for
a
family
friendly
destination
and
having
a
non-motorized
access
to
the
river
was
really
seen
as
what
could
be
this
great
destination.
On
the
overall
Regional
goal,
to
eventually
connect
Arcata
to
Blue,
Lake
Caltrans
is
a
key
partner
and
especially
as
the
city
it
through.
P
This
project
is
proposing
improvements
at
Four
Points
that
overlap
with
their
right-of-way
and
most
notably,
the
Gen
totally
overpass
over
299.
Some
improvements
on
the
Sunset
Avenue
overpass
over
101,
a
bit
of
air
space
where
the
highway
goes
over.
The
city's
West
End
Road
near
the
Arcata
Ridge
Trail
Northern
entrance,
as
well
as
under
the
St
Louis
Road
overpass,
we'll
take
a
look
at
some
photos
of
those,
so
there
they
are
a
key
partner.
P
The
great
Redwood
Trail
agency
is
the
agency
that
is
used
is
now
managing
the
rail
Corridor
along
the
North
Coast,
the
former
North
Coast,
railroad,
Authority
and
so
their
key
key
partner,
as
they
are
currently
embarking
on
a
master
plan
for
the
great
Redwood
Trail.
We
have
a
consultant
team
led
by
ghd
with
shn
and
dzc
Archeology,
and
then
a
lot
of
community
members
and
organizations,
in
particular
Friends
of
the
Andy
and
Mary
trail
that
have
been
advocating
for
the
trail
for
20
years.
P
So
here's
the
project
area
and
the
yellow
line
is
the
trail
alignment.
So
especially,
you
know.
The
the
southern
boundary
is
at
the
sunset
overpass
near
the
skate
park
in
Larson,
Park
and
heading
up
north
to
the
giantulli
overpass
and
then
East
to
park
one
and
so
beyond
the
Alder
Grove
industrial
park.
We
are
in
the
unincorporated
County
and
that's
why
the
county
has
been
a
key
partner
in
all
of
this
planning
and
environmental
document
and
preliminary
design.
P
And
so
this
is
giving
the
bigger
picture
of
like
this
is
just
not
a
3.5
acre
Trail,
but
it
will
really
enable
with
the
completion
of
the
County's
Humboldt
Bay
Trail
South
from
the
south
end
of
the
city's
Bay
Trail.
It
will
really
provide
continuous
walking,
biking,
rolling
path
from
Eureka
through
the
northern
city
limits
of
Arcata
and
into
heading
towards
Blue
Lake.
So
there's
a
lot
of
colors
on
this
map,
the
component
in
Blue
Lake.
So
the
light
blue
section
of
Trail
through
the
city
of
Blue
Lake
is
complete.
P
So
I've
spoken
to
some
of
this
already,
but
we
had
a
planning
study
in
2018
2019.
A
lot
of
public
Outreach
informed
the
council's
decision.
At
that
time
we
received
an
ATP
Grant.
We
have
now
are
completing
our
environmental
phase
and
then
heading
into
design
and
right-of-way.
This
next
year
and
we're
aiming
to
begin
Construction
in
summer
of
2024.
That
is
the
goal.
P
So
here's
just
some
photos
that
hopefully
come
out
a
little
bit
of
north
to
south,
with
the
trail
Corridor
looks
like
this
is
along
the
unincorporated
section
of
West
End
Road,
and
there
is
a
bench
that
is
has
been
there
for
the
rail
and
since
1951
like
long
time
that
this
you
know
rail
Corridor
has
been
here.
The
ties
and
metal
rails
have
all
been
pulled
from
this
segment.
It
is
really
woodsy
feeling
you're
below
the
road,
so
there's
even
more
separation,
and
then
you
get
great
views
of
the
river.
P
The
giantole
lane
overpass
is
the
a
key
component
of
this
project
and
we're
proposing
a
sidewalk
and
improve
bike
lanes
over
the
overpass
for
Valley
West
community
members
to
access
the
trail
over
the
highway.
These
are
just
what
it
currently
looks
like
to
Traverse
that
overpass
and
then
south
of
there.
The
trail
is
much
more
in
a
industrial
Zone
and
there's
lots
of
there's
two
different
Rail
lines
that
go
through
there.
P
P
Here's
just
some
photos
of
where
the
rail
quarter
goes
under
the
St
Louis
Road
overpass,
parallel
to
101,
and
it
is
an
open
area
that,
through
the
community,
engagement
was
seen
as
an
option
for
a
parklet
to
have
more
Recreation
opportunities
in
this
zone
right
along
the
trail,
and
then
the
trail
would
connect
to
the
existing
Humboldt
Bay
Trail
Foster
Avenue
Trail
right
at
the
skate
park.
This
is
just
a
photo
of
one
of
our
Outreach
events
with
a
demonstration
Paving
of
where
the
trail
will
be
continuing
North.
P
So
here
are
some
conceptual
renderings
from
some
of
the
photos
kind
of
that
you
have
seen
and
what
the
trail
could
look
and
feel
like
and
again
in
the
design
phase.
This
next
year,
we'll
be
engaging
with
more
community
members
and
adjacent
Property
Owners
about
exact
design
parameters
for
the
for
the
trail.
P
I
P
So
the
council
has
adopted
our
SQL
document.
We
are
going
to
the
CTC
for
funding
in
January,
headed
to
design
looking
forward
to
working
with
more
community
members
to
refine
the
30
designs
and
I.
Think
that
is
it.
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
share
about
the
project
look
forward
to
more
in
the
next
year.
A
C
Of
course,
I'm
super
excited
because
it's
a
great
way
to
connect
Valley
West
to
Maine
arcaden
3.5
miles
I
did,
and
you
probably
said
it,
but
I
maybe
missed
it.
Will
there
be
a
sidewalk
so
like
when
you're
in
front
of
The
Mill
Yard,
and
it
goes
all
the
way
toward
the
Arcata
Ridge
Trail,
where
the
Lewis
Avenue
Bridges,
because
trucks
are
barreling
through
there's,
barely
any
shoulder.
P
A
G
Thanks
for
your
hard
work
on
this,
it's
nice
to
see
a
long-term
project
like
this
eventually
come
to
fruition
and
and
I
know
it
takes
takes
time.
I
have
a
question
which
is
not
specific
to
this
project,
but
something
that
you
know
about
it's
it's
for
all
projects,
really
it
has
to
do
with
the
proliferation
of
electric
bicycles.
We
have
electric
bicycles
now
that
are
essentially
our
motorcycles.
They
don't
require
pedaling.
G
Will
they
be
a,
but
we
use
the
phrase
non-motorized.
It's
I
mean
the
phrase
non-motorizes
on
the
Sciences
everywhere
how's
this
going
to
get
resolved.
I'm,
not
looking
for
an
answer
immediately,
but
at
some
point
you
know
all
I
really
like
to
say
is
this
is
going
to
have
to
get
resolved?
That's
that's
it
thanks.
F
You
mentioned
that
bridge
that
was
part
of
the
project.
I
would
like
to
point
out:
The
High
Line
in
New,
York
I,
don't
know
very
many
people
are
familiar
with
that
elevated
railroad
track
that
originally
they
wanted
to
tear
it
down,
but
now
has
turned
into
the
most
successful
project
in
New,
York,
so
popular
that
they
spend
a
couple
billion
dollar
project
on
the
Hudson,
with
all
the
infill
projects
there.
F
So
just
was
wondering
whether
there's
much
thought
going
into
you
know
railroad
structures
and
incorporating
that
into
the
project,
because
in
New
York's
case
it
could
have
easily
been
torn
down
and
instead
they
kept
it
and
draws
like
millions
of
people
a
year,
tourists
that
want
to
walk
on
an
elevated
or
above
the
city.
So
you
know
that's
I
would
highly
recommend.
We
have
a
lot
of
railroads
and
potential
other
projects
that
someone
like
evaluates
that
and
and
Corp
is
incorporates
that
from
the
creative
side.
I
I
You
know
they're
they're,
quiet
and
sooner
or
later,
there's
going
to
be
some
wrecks
that
there
haven't
been
already
here
locally
I
recall,
bringing
this
up
with
Forest
management
committee
and
I
was
really
berated
for
even
just
having
the
idea
of
keeping
electric
bikes
off
of
dirt
trails
or
natural
surface
trails,
so
anyways
that
that
is
something
that
needs
to
take
some
serious
consideration.
But,
aside
from
that,
I
mean
I.
N
I
I
I
wasn't
able
to
get
the
first
part
of
Emily's
presentation,
but
I
brought
up
earlier
about
the
that
West
End
Road
section
of
rail
that
was
part
of
the
Annie
Mary
that
had
been
abandoned
before
ncra
came
into
existence
and
I.
Don't
know
that
that's
been
resolved
in
a
family
addressed
that
in
her
earlier
part
of
this
presentation.
I
E
M
Hello
can't
Swati
and
I
always
like
people
to
be
educated
or
under
the
facts,
and
of
course
you
can
ask
Emily
these
to
see
whether
these
facts,
but
number
one
is
according
to
this
determination
that
I'm
aware
of
from
the
surface
Transportation
board,
the
Annie
and
Mary
Rio
Road
was
abandoned
and
it
can't
be
rail
banked.
It's
not.
It
can't
be
part
of
a
trail
system.
M
So
the
trail,
unless
it's
put
beside
Caltrans
or
some
other
thing
or
willing
landowners
such
as
myself
and
my
neighbors,
who
probably
own
I,
don't
know
7
8
or
a
mile
worth
of
potential.
What
used
to
be
the
railroad
to
our
property
wished
agreed
wish
to
go
for
this.
The
trail
in
itself
is
is
very,
very
difficult
to
be
feasible.
M
Emily
can
educate,
you
I
think
they
tried
to
go
ahead
and
even
get
Caltrans
to
allow
the
trail
to
be
moved
alongside
of
the
the
highway
there
and
I,
don't
think
they
will
warmly
received
regarding
that
so
I
caution.
Everybody
who's
involved
with
this
quote:
unquote:
Annie
and
Mary
Trail
to
to
understand
exactly
where
you're
at
and
even
the
sections
that
were
referred
to
there.
M
A
D
D
E
Yeah
sure
I
mean,
unlike
some
of
our
Southern
neighbors
arcade
Affair.
You
know
much
better,
just
being
farther
north
from
the
epicenter
of
the
earthquake,
but
it
certainly
did
Shake
in
this
region
and
our
water,
and
we
did
have
approximately
12
staff
that
responded
in
between
the
hours
of
you
know:
2
30
and
6
o'clock.
For
some
of
that
initial
response
focused
primarily
first
on
water
sewer
infrastructure.
E
Obviously,
power
went
out
instantaneously
throughout
the
entire
County,
so
we
start
moving
generators
to
power
up
certain
pump
stations
and
certain
water
tanks
in
in
our
region.
Our
staff
really
did
an
excellent
job.
They
know
our
system
well,
things
ran
very
smoothly
and
Arcata.
In
terms
of
that
response,
you
read
Mike
Clinton's
retirement.
Today
you
know
we
put
the
whole
thing
on
him.
E
Our
building
official
also
responded
in
very
early
and
just
started
to
look
at
the
downtown
businesses
around
the
plaza
and
then
heading
out
to
some
of
the
higher
population
areas,
the
hotels
and
some
of
the
taller
older
structures,
but
fortunately
in
Arcata
between
what
we
were
able
to
do
initially
and
then
once
daylight
hit
to
start
going
through
the
other
facilities
coordinating
with
Cal
Poly
coordinating
with
the
schools.
We
have
not
had
to
redtake
any
buildings
here
in
Arcata,
so
we
did
sustain
some
damage
to
one
of
our
water
tanks.
E
So
we're
going
to
look
at
assessing
that
the
county
has
declared
a
local
emergency
so
we'll
be
filing
all
of
our
damage
assessments
as
well.
We
did
put
out
some
social
media
posts
today,
encouraging
residents
or
businesses
who
had
damage
to
to
log
that
onto
the
County's
website.
So
we
can
get
a
full
picture
of
the
damage
of
the
earthquake.
E
Most
of
the
damage
that
we
know
has
been
window
damage,
besides
just
breakage
of
things,
interior
to
either
residences
or
businesses,
and
it
appears
that
most
of
the
window
breaks
were
things
that
fell
from
the
inside
of
businesses.
That
display
cases
or
so
forth
that
fell
into
the
windows
and
therefore
kind
of
breaking
the
window
out.
I
did
see
a
really
nice
post
from
Main
Street
this
morning,
one
of
our
community
ambassadors
as
well
fire
phoenix
reported
in
very
early
and
was
helping
with
downtown
businesses.
E
Cleanup
class
had
had
issues
right
on
on
the
Plaza,
so
that
was
great
and
and
gave
me
lots
of
ideas
of
how
we
could
potentially
use
the
ambassador
program
in
emergencies
that
we
hadn't
before
so.
But
it's
definitely
a
reminder
to
all
of
us
to
have
our
you
know
extra
things
to
charge
available,
to
have
our
gobigs
ready
and
to
practice
our
drills
at
our
own
residences
and
businesses.
So.
D
Thank
you
so
much
and
I.
You
know
to
just
piggyback
off
of
that.
A
lot
of
our
businesses
were
hit.
You
know,
and
very
important
shopping
day,
really
close
to
the
holidays,
so
they've
lost
probably
a
day
of
business.
I,
just
like
to
remind
everyone
to
please
in
these
last
couple
days,
shop,
local
shop,
the
stores
in
Arcata
and
have
a
happy
holidays.
Thank
you.
A
C
Might
be
a
little
overzealous,
but
I
got
to
attend
my
first
committee
as
a
liaison
for
the
homeless
and
housing
working
group,
and
they
did
some
updates
on
the
two
home
key
projects.
I
actually
had
an
opportunity
to
go
with
Mike
Wilson
on
Friday
and
Kevin
Hoover,
and
do
the
grand
tour
and
watch
people
get
moved
in
and
it
was
very
emotional
watching
people
left
this
last
Friday,
but
the
Freddy
before
Friday
and
Saturday
and
Sunday.
They
filled
up
55
units
so
about
60
people.
C
C
People
I
think
for
a
total
of
135
between
the
two
homecake
projects,
depending
on
not
people
units
excuse
me
because
some
will
be
double
occupancy
and
some
might
even
have
families.
They
also
gave
an
update
on
the
safe
parking
program
and
a
lot
of
those
because
they
were
able
to
be
moved
into
the
Grove,
which
is
the
formerly
the
Days
Inn,
now
has
opened
up
some
opportunities
and
so
they'll
be
able
to
move
down
that
waiting
list
and
get
people
in
currently
they're
serving
19
Vehicles.
D
C
O
I'm
sorry,
mine
just
going
to
be
a
little
more
personal
because
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
update.
So
everyone's
on
the
same
page
but
I
know
both
of
you
guys
got
left
in
a
Lurch
at
our
first
meeting
and
it
was
my
every
intention
to
be
at
that
first
December
meeting,
my
father
was
involved
in
a
life-threatening
accident
that
he
was
airlifted
out
to
the
Bay
Area.
Just
you
know
days
prior
to
that
meeting.
O
But
that
is
no
reflection
on
on
the
new.
You
know,
Kimberly,
on
on
your
new
arrival
and
Meredith
your
re-election.
So,
congratulations
to
you.
Both
I
am
functional
today
and
I'm
here,
so
that's
great
and
hoping
to
be
better
but
and
my
dad
is
doing
much
better.
Things
are
good.
That's
all!
That's
all
going
really
well,
but
I've
just
been
a
little
bit
off
my
game
and
wanted
to
kind
of
clarify,
so
people
understood
what
was
going
on.
So
thanks
for
your
patience.
A
L
U
L
I
know
you
can't,
you
know,
I
just
thought:
I
was
thinking
about
non-motorized
vehicles
and
I
know
that
we're
getting
a
lot
of
those
motorized
scooters.
All
around
town
I
saw
them
before
I
left
and
so
I
just
wanted.
To
add
that
you
know
it
was
something
Fred
brought
up
and
I'm
just
thinking,
that's
something
else
to
think
about
the
scooters
and
where
and
how
they
can
be
used,
and
anyway,
they're
quite
comfortably
used
in
many
many
places,
and
so
I
wanted
to
bring
that
up.
L
And
the
other
thing
is
that
I
did
have
an
HTA
meeting
this
last
week
and
it
all
seems
to
be
going
along
well
there
and
they're
talking
about
going
out
for
a
grant
in
order
to
do
some
more
study,
work
and
they're
thinking
in
McKinleyville
about
having
something
that
would
be
like
an
Uber,
a
smaller
vehicle
that
would
have
nine
passengers
to
12,
where
they
could
go
to
outline
Parts
in
McKinleyville
and
bring
them
into
the
bus
system
and
so
I.
Just
that's
an
interesting
concept.
L
It
won't
be
door
to
door,
but
it
would
be
a
sight
to
a
bus
station
or
a
bus.
Stop
so
I
thought
that
would
that
was
interesting.
I
just
want
to
report
on
that
and
merry
holidays
to
you
all
I'll
see
you
soon.
We
miss
you
all
the
safe
travels.
Thank
you.
I'll
see
you
I'll
be
back
home
tomorrow
night,
so.