►
From YouTube: Board of Equalization Hearing May 16th, 2023
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
A
A
E
Thank
you,
I
appreciate
your
time.
My
name
is
Rania
Elias
and
I'm.
Here
with
you
to
discuss
my
property
at
the
eclipse
of
unit
453.
I
bought
the
property
in
December
of
2021
for
550
000.
and
a
month
later,
I
learned
that
the
HOA
dose
would
increase
almost
18
percent
and
had
I
known
that
they
would
increase
so
drastically.
I
would
not
have
paid
that
much
and
when
I
appealed
it
last
year,
they
said
we'll
we'll
look
at
values
in
2022
and
make
the
adjustment
next
year.
E
Well
in
November
of
2022,
there
is
a
unit
like
mine,
958
square
feet,
two
bedroom
two
bath
one
floor
below
mine,
so
it
sold
for
515,
000.
and
so
I'm,
requesting
an
adjustment
to
525
000,
because
I'm
one
floor
above
them
and
I
think
that
that
would
be.
F
E
Adjustment
for
the
higher
floor
and
the
comps
that
were
used
and
my
assessment
were
from
July
and
so
not
as
recent,
and
also
not
the
same
floor
plan.
One
thing
to
note
about
my
floor
plan:
that's
different
than
the
other
two
bedrooms,
one
is
the
kitchen
is
much
smaller
and
two
the
laundry
room,
the
laundry
closet
is
in
the
bedroom,
which
makes
it
actually
kind
of
difficult
to
use
as
a
bedroom
and
the
other
two
bedroom
units
that
were
used
in
my
comp
and
have
it
in
the
hallway.
E
While
there
is
a
a
view,
a
nice
view,
it's
also
the
side
where
the
train
tracks
are
so
I
do
get
a
lot
of
noise
from
the
terrain.
Even
when
the.
E
Closed
the
other
units
used
in
the
comps
are
either
the
facing
a
road
with
no
train
or
the
interior
Courtyard,
which
is
pretty
quiet.
E
For
these
reasons,
I
feel
like
the
appropriate
value
of
my
property,
is
525
000,
especially
in
light
of
the
unit
that
just
sold
in
November
I
appreciate
your
time.
Look
forward
to
answering
any
questions.
G
H
G
The
building
was
built
in
2006,
although
no
interior
inspections
were
conducted,
voters
from
the
Appellate
were
submitted
and
since
it
did
sell
recently,
the
MLS
listing
was
analyzed
as
well,
but
it
showed
the
unit
to
be
in
its
original
condition,
well
maintained
with
panoramic
panoramic
views
of
the
Potomac.
The
appellant
is
concerned
that
her
2023
assessment
remains
unchanged.
Last
year,
like
she
had
stated
the
HOA
fees
increasing
with
interest
rates,
she
states
her
opinion
in
a
fair
market
value
to
be
525
000.
G
G
Produced
at
12
900
bringing
the
total
2023
assessment
from
562
900
to
550
000.,
if
you
guys
can
just
turn
to
page
three
and
I'll
reference.
The
comparables.
H
G
000
and
has
an
assessment
cell
ratio
of
1.02
a
little
bit
about
this.
Is
it's
a
one
bedroom
one
bathroom
124
square
foot
unit,
and
it
is
on
the
eighth
floor.
The
unit
is
very
close
to
its
original
condition.
G
G
This
is
also
a.
This
is
going
to
be
a
two
bedroom,
two
bathroom
a
little
bit
bigger
1123
square
feet
with
Westport
use
it's
on
the
sixth
floor.
It
does
have
a
new
HVAC
in
the
kitchen.
Has
an
assessment
comp
was
used
to
show
uniform
and
Equitable
assessments.
G
I
G
1900
s,
looking
at
the
2023
analysis,
it
showed
that
our
assessment
is
sale.
Ratio
for
two
veggie
bath
units
were
in
line
and
tightly
improved
around
a
median
ratio,
a
six
percent
increase
to
one
bedroom
units,
but
for
700
square
feet
and
an
11
increase
to
two
bedrooms
over
1200
square
feet
was
important
too.
The
subject
was
the
only
958
square
foot
two
bed,
two
bath.
H
G
That
sold
and
it
had
a
higher
ratio
than
the
other
two
bedroom
sales.
After
a
further
review
of
the
sales
in
the
2023
analysis,
the
subjects
floor,
plan
base
value
was
discovered
to
be
out
of
Equalization
and
a
correction
was
made.
The
change
was
made
to
the
other
900.
The
change
was
made
to
other
958
square
foot
unit
bedrooms,
and
this
will
be
reflected
in
their
2024
assessment.
G
When
valuing
condominium
units
and
mass
appraisal,
we
rely
heavily
on
sales
derived
from
our
analysis
period.
The
two
comparable
sales
referenced
by
the
appellant
were
outside
of
our
analysis
period
and
will
be
considered
in
our
2024
analysis.
Given
that
the
2023
assessed
value
for
the
subject
was
562
900.,
the
reduction
has
already
been
applied,
based
on
the
model
being
unequalized
I
recommend
the
subject's
2023
assessment
to
be
confirmed
that
the
new
reduced
value
of
550
000..
Thank
you.
B
The
the
unit,
sorry
452.,
what
does
that
face?
Do
you
know
is
it
face?
Is
comp
really
does
it
face
into
Courtyard
or
to
the
outer
area
with
the
tracks
too,
and
are
you
giving
a
difference
in
those
views
at
all
yeah.
G
A
Oh
did
I
jump
in
on
that
on
that
buddy
do
I
understand
that
comp
3,
because
it
is
958
square
feet
that
will
be
adjusted
in
2024..
Yes,
sir,
okay,
so
to
me-
and
this
may
be
for
comments,
but
just
so
that
you
know
I,
don't
think
assessments
should
be
in
the
three
cups
I
think.
If
you've
got
to
go
Fannie
May,
let
you
go
out
of
the
building,
get
another
condo
someplace
else
to
do
it,
but
to
compare
it
against
a
comp
that
we
already
knew
is
wrong
and
you're
going
to
fix
it.
A
C
A
question
on
the
the
noise
factor
and
there's
a
whole
bunch
of
very
nice
condos
along
that
strip.
The
Facing
East
on
the
east
side
of
Richmond
Highway.
Are
there
noise
I
forget
the
word
discounts,
because
the
railroad,
yeah
and
maybe
planes
taking
off.
G
Definitely
I
think
that's
something
that.
H
C
I
H
I
Your
windows
do
they
have
any
soundproofing
like
double
pane
or
anything
of
that
nature.
E
The
windows
are
provided
by
the
HOA
able
to
change
out
the
windows,
so
even
I
mean
I
even
hear
the
trains
in
the
middle
of
when
the
windows
are
closed,
and
you
know
it
sounds
like
there's
no
adjustment
made
for
the
noise,
but
it
seems
like
there
should
be
because
there's
nothing
I
can
do
about.
G
H
G
E
Yeah
and
so
I
understand
that
the
the
more
recent
comes
because
they
said,
they'll
evaluate
him
next
year,
I,
don't
understand
why
they
can't
be
evaluated
now
and
the
concept
the
chick
that
was
sold
for
620
000
Unit
621
West.
That
was
assessed
at
561
500,
which
equates
to
500
a
square
foot.
If
I
apply
that
500
a
square
foot
to
my
union,
my
unit
that
would
result
in
a
value
of
479
000.
I
Yeah,
you
know
I
I
do
land
use
out
in
Fairfax
and
they
have
what
they
call
Highway
corridors
and,
if
you're
in
a
highway
Corridor,
the
zoning
requires
you
to
put
in
soundproof
windows
and
I
I.
Think
the
the
question
for
me
is:
should
we
deduct
25,
Grand
or
not,
and
I
I
think
that
the
property
owner
hasn't
carried
their
burden
up
through?
I
Like
you
know,
it's
easy
to
measure
noise
inside
a
unit
and
if
I
had
seen
that
or
seen
some
readings
or
something
but
I
I
mean
I,
haven't
heard
anyone
else
say:
oh
I
faced
that
way
and
the
noise
is
unbearable.
Therefore
it
should
be
lowered
in
value.
So
that's
my
thinking.
I
wanted
to
share
that
see
what
anyone
else
thinks.
J
Considering
that
the
building
was
built
in
2007,
don't
you
think
that
they
already
have
I?
Don't.
I
I
A
F
B
So
what
do
you
think
about
applying
looking
at
this
square
footage
of
a
living
space?
One
comp,
one
I-
guess
it's
two-fourths
higher,
but
her
last
small
argument
was
concerning
applying
that
square
footage
price
to
her
unit
which
brought
it
down
substantially.
B
A
H
I
K
K
B
C
C
I
can't
imagine,
that's
really
worth
you
know
for
561,
probably
during
the
assessment
period,
by
the
way,
a
word
of
caution
twice,
the
appellant
appears
to
not
quite
understand
the
assessment
period
and
the
rationale
behind
it.
We
do
we
accept
it.
It
makes
sense,
but
I
would
urge
the
department
to
always
make
sure
that
people
understand
what
the
assessment
period
is
and
why
it's
that
time
frame
you
know
appellance
is
no
reason.
C
C
J
I'm,
okay
with
a
reduced
number
because
well
we
don't
necessarily
make
adjustments
based
on
square
footage
value
and
about
who
we've
ever
done.
J
Listen,
not
not
in
this
area
and
other
states
of
Marines
that
they
do
specifically
the
vice
president
youth
environment.
But
none
of
this
market,
so
I'm,
okay,
with
the
reduced
decision.
K
C
G
C
H
I
Yeah,
you
know
on
condos
on
assessments
of
condos.
They
could
be
making
up
or
not
not
increasing
enough
the
past
three
years.
She
just
oh
sure
to
me
an
assessment
going
up.
Doesn't
really
it
indicate
to
me
a
change
in
value.
It
could
be
making
up
for
not
high
enough
in
the
past
years
or
they
couldn't
lower
it
because
they
over
collected
money.
You
just
you
just
don't
know.
Yeah.
K
Yeah
commission
and
confirmed
abbreviation
assessment.
H
A
Five
two
one,
the
County's
reduced
value
of
550
000,
has
been
confirmed.
Thank.
F
A
H
A
Another
story
of
something:
that's
a
super
County
over
that
okay
to
have
Mr
Jansen.
F
A
C
A
L
Thank
you,
I
apologize
for
the
earlier
technical
disability,
so
my
name
is
Miles
Jansen,
my
wife
and
I
are
the
owners
of
4458
36th
Street
South,
that
is
in
the
fairlington
neighborhood,
specifically
the
fairlington
harbor.
The
board
is
probably
aware
of.
Burlington
is
a
community
that
was
built
in
the
1940s.
They
were
later
transformed
into
condos
in
the
1970s,
but
essentially
there
are
specific
models
throughout
the
throughout
the
neighborhood.
L
The
model
that
I
live
in
declaring
is
a
Clarendon
model,
their
standard
size,
square
footage,
standard,
size,
bathrooms
and
bedrooms.
So
it's
essentially
a
thousand
square
feet.
Two
bedrooms,
two
bathrooms,
and
currently
the
board
of
the
Department
of
real
estate
assessment
assesses
all
that
every
every
condo
with
the
same
model
at
564
800..
L
The
reason
why
I
submitted
this
appeal
is
there
is
a
difference
right.
It's
from
the
outside.
All
of
the
the
the
the
units
look
the
same
and
on
paper
they
look
the
same
and
I
think
for
a
long
time.
The
department
assessed
them
the
same,
and
that
made
sense.
L
However,
recently
many
homeowners
throughout
the
neighborhood
had
done
significant
Renovations,
for
example,
and
the
way
I
kind
of
Define
significant
Renovations
was
knocking
either
out
all
or
part
of
the
kitchen
wall,
kind
of
creating
an
open
Concept
in
the
home
and
in
my
appeal,
I
did
submit
pictures
regarding
some
of
those
units
during
the
the
rating
or
the
period
in
time
there
were
11
units
sold.
Essentially,
they
were
the
same
as
my
model.
L
Eight
of
those
have
had
kind
of
renovated
kitchens,
as
I
just
you
know,
defined
either
knocking
out
all
or
part
of
the
wall,
whereas
three
of
them
only
had
three
of
them
have
the
wall
intact.
The
original
wall
intact.
L
When
you
look
at
the
average
sales
price
for
homes
that
have
kind
of
added
renovated
kitchen
that
comes
out
to
629
thousand
dollars
compared
to
the
three
homes
that
have
had
a
impact
wall,
the
average
sales
price
for
that
is
589
000..
So
there
is
a
forty
thousand
dollar
difference
for
what
our
essentially
at
least
on
paper.
The
same
units
now
I
know
the
the
department
when
it
was
looking
at.
My
appeal
cited
the
fact.
L
The
the
three
comparables
one
two
and
three
are
all
units
with
the
wall
intact
and
then
the
fourth
one
was
what
a
modified
unit
I
I
would
note
that
the
seven
modified
units
that
they
left
out
had
very
significant
sales
price
sales
prices,
for
example,
one
sold
for
seven
hundred
and
three
thousand
or
excuse
me
sorry.
One
sold
for
655,
000
I,
know
they're
sold
for
595,
610
665.,
another
one
for
665,
60,
58
and
then
605..
So
so.
L
The
justifying
their
decision
I'm
a
little
bit
concerned
that
the
department
ticked,
the
least.
L
Sales
price
for
a
modified
unit,
which
kind
of
distorts
what
is
the
sales
prices
essentially,
this
is
this
is
an
equity
argument
if,
if
homes
are
essentially
the
same
on
paper,
but
there
is
a
difference,
I
think
that
the
department
should
take
a
a
should
consider
that
when,
when
assessing
real
estate
prices,
I
know
in
speaking
with
the
assessor,
she
indicated
that
the
department
does
have
trouble,
assessing
fairlington
home
prices,
I
think
for
a
variety
of
reasons,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day
you
know
I
shouldn't
be
shouldn't,
be
kind
of
dinged
or
punished
on
that.
L
Essentially
it
comes
down
to
either
I'm,
paying
too
much
or
homeowners
who
have
had
modified
kitchens
are
paying
too
little,
and
so
I
think
that
this
is
an
issue
that's
worth
raising,
and
that
would
be
my
argument.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
thank
you
all
right
for
the
county,
Miss
telleria.
D
Good
morning,
everyone,
my
name,
is
taffy
and
I'll,
be
speaking
on
behalf
of
the
county.
Today
the
subject
is
4458
36th
Street
South,
which
is
a
two
bedroom.
Two
bathroom
one
thousand
square
foot
model
at
fairlington
Harbor
the
appellant
filed
for
both
a
departmental
review
and
a
Boe
stating
that
he
believes
there
is
marketable
difference
between
Clarendon
units
that
have
an
open
concept,
kitchen
versus
the
ones
that
remain
intact
with
their
original
model,
meaning
there
is
a
wall.
Now,
during
the
2023
analysis,
there
were
a
total
of
11
Clarendon
model
sales.
D
The
majority
of
these
units
appeared
updated
and
8
out
of
the
11
sales
had
altered
kitchen
floor
plans
where
they
knocked
down
the
wall.
Creating
this
open
floor
plan,
some
of
the
Clarendon
sales
included,
3420
South
Utah
Street,
which
sold
in
December
of
2021
for
565
thousand
dollars.
This
unit
had
an
older
renovation
and
included
a
backyard
patio.
It
had
an
assessment
to
sales
ratio
of
98
44
14
34th,
Street
South
sold
in
February
of
2022
for
615
000..
D
This
unit
was
also
renovated
and
had
an
assessment
to
sales
ratio
of
90
and
44
48
36th
Street
South
sold
in
April
of
2022
for
588
000..
This
unit
was
renovated
with
an
assessment
to
sales
ratio
of
94.
The
three
comps
that
I
have
just
listed
all
remain
with
their
original
floor
plans
and
are
all
assessed
at
564
800.
D
D
This
comparable
was
chosen
because
the
level
of
renovation
was
very
similar
to
the
other
three
comparables
listed.
All
Clarendon
units
received
two
percent
increase
to
their
model-based
values.
All
assessment
to
sales
ratios
appear
to
be
tightly
clustered.
Regardless
of
the
changes
that
had
been
made
to
the
floor
plans.
There
was
no
quantifiable
difference
between
the
units
with
open
concept,
kitchens
versus
the
ones
with
original
floor
plans.
Now
the
majority
of
units
in
farlington
are
town
home
style
Condominiums.
D
These
units
are
always
changing,
whether
they
be
finishing
attic
spaces
or
their
basements,
and
as
of
right
now
we
are
making
adjustments
to
the
units
that
have
been
adding
bedrooms
or
additional
bathrooms
to
their
models.
The
11
sales
that
have
occurred
during
our
analysis
period
show
that,
after
the
small
increase,
the
majority
of
units
are
still
under
assess.
Regardless
of
these
modifications,
as
presented
with
the
comparables,
the
subject
appears
to
be
equalized
amongst
other
Clarendon
units.
Therefore,
I
kindly
asked
the
board
to
confirm
the
2023
assessment
at
564
800..
Thank
you.
Okay,.
A
I
C
A
good
question
for
the
appellant
we
just
heard
the
department
Representatives
say
that
there
was
no
demonstrable
difference
between
Clarendon.
H
C
That
had
some
upgrades,
the
Wall
taken
down
versus
not
I
mean
it's.
You
know
it's
not
one
for
one
but
they're
in
a
cluster,
whereas
I
thought-
and
this
is
why
I'm
asking
you-
the
question,
I
thought
that
you
had
said:
no.
There
was
about
a
forty
thousand
dollar
increase
for
those
Clarendon
units
that
had
the
Wall
taken
down,
and
maybe
some
other
stuff
as
well.
So
on
one
hand,
I
hear
now
it's
all
about
the
saying
the
other
hand,
it's
no
it's
you
know.
Eight
nine
percent
difference
did
I,
hear
you
right.
L
L
So
so
I
looked
at
the
11
units
that
were
sold
in
the
in
the
rating
period.
I
then
went
online
and
found
pictures
did
to
make
a
determination
of
whether
you
know
those
eight
units
or
those
three
units
had
a
intact
wall
or
not
for
the
eight
that
I
I
found
I.
You
know,
basically,
it's
a
crude
method
but
I
added
up
the
sales
price,
the
total
sales
price
and
divided
paid
right
versus
and
then
for
the
other.
Three
I
took
the
the
average
sales
price
by
adding
it
up
and
dividing
by
three.
L
So
that's
how
I
got
the
Forty
thousand
dollar
difference
and
and
I
think
that
that,
when
you
look
at
the
sales
prices
of
the
homes
with
a
modified
wall,
they
are,
they
are
significantly
higher
and
you
can
see
that,
and
certainly
there
is,
you
know
the
comparable
for
is.
L
But
that's
that's.
How
I
got
essentially
the
my
my
analogy.
A
To
follow
up
on
there,
Mr
Jensen
in
your
analysis,
did
you
look
at
the
assessments
of
those
eight
properties.
H
L
The
assessments,
every
every
11
units,
all
total
11
years,
regardless
of
the
kitchen,
is
modified
or
not
or
assessed
at
the
same
rate
of
564
800.,
which
was
concerning
to
me
because
you
have
a
home
which
is,
for
you
know
in
one
case,
over
seven
hundred
thousand
dollars
being
accessible
rate.
That
I
am
my
home
is
worth
a
lot
less.
A
Okay,
all
right
the
question
for
the
county.
Just
so
then,
just
in
to
follow
up
on
that
point,
I've
come
two
that
sold
for
615
significantly
more
than
what
the
owner
paid
for
their
property.
The
rationale
that
it's
all
assessed
equally.
Can
you
give
me
a
little.
D
So
when
a
second
Condominiums,
we
use
Mass
appraisal,
we
are
basically
grouping
the
majority
of
condos
based
on
their
models.
So
when
doing
Mass
appraisal,
you
know
we
look
at
the
MLS,
we
make
sure
their
open
market
transactions.
We
look
at
the
assessment
to
sales
ratio
and
we
look
for
Trends
right.
So
during
the
analysis
period
are
we
seeing
if
there
is
a
market
for
the
Clarendon
models
versus
the
smaller
Studios
and
then
we'll
make
changes
accordingly
right?
D
So
if
all
of
the
Clarendon
models
had
ratios
assessments
of
sales
ratios
that
were
a
lot
lower
than
will
do
an
increase.
In
this
case
it
was
the
two
percent,
and
that
is
why
they
all
moved
accordingly,
so
that
they
can
all
remain
equalized
as
well.
The
issue
with
the
open
floor
plan
versus
not
is
we
can't
quantify
how
much
value
is
in
that
wall
or
how
much
value
is
in
the
renovation
itself.
D
So
the
two
percent
Works
off
the
model
value
we
have
a
specific
value
that
is
not
listed
on
your
comparable
sheet
for
each
model.
It
wasn't
based
off
that
total
assessment.
C
K
D
For
the
subject,
yes
yeah,
so
when
we
look
at
these
sales,
we
look
at
that.
If
they're
publicly
listed
on
the
MLS
in
the
for
the
subject,
it
was
not
listed
when
we
reviewed
it
last
year.
K
G
K
I'm
just
kind
of
curious:
why
the
why
the
price
was
so
low.
L
A
Okay,
Miss
teleria.
If
you
take
a
minute
to
wrap
up
this.
D
Yeah,
of
course,
I'd
just
like
to
remind
the
board
that
when
we,
we
actually
had
a
lot
of
sales
this
year
that
we
were
able
to
look
at,
we
do
Mass
appraisal,
as
I
stated
so
meaning
everyone
goes
up
the
same
amount,
regardless
of
the
level
of
renovation.
At
this
time
we
are
not
making
additional
adjustments
for
if
you
are
more
upgraded
than
another,
we
are
conducting
an
original
condition
study
if
you
remain
intact
with
an
original
condition,
but
that
does
not
appear
to
be
the
case.
D
Therefore,
the
appellant,
the
pelons
home
subject,
is
equalized.
Thank
you.
L
Yes,
thank
you,
so
I
am
asking
for
a
slight
decrease
of
an
assessed
value
of
540,
000
I.
Think,
as
the
the
board
has
heard,
it
seems
that
everyone
is
kind
of
being
lumped
in
together.
I
think
that
Equity
dictates
that
that
people
should
be
considered
individually,
and
so
for
those
reasons,
I
am
asking
for
the
slight
decrease
in
evaluation.
Thank
you.
B
What
I
was
thinking
and
looking
at
the
difference
between
the
comp2
and
this
one
was
the
fact
you
got
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
sale
price
difference.
That's
a
substantial
number!
You
found
no
realtor
fees
in
there.
A
B
I,
I
and
I
understand
I'm,
sorry,
but
all
the
renovated
ones
are
running
so
much
higher
I.
Just
if
people
in
Selling
Houses
not
like
you
guys,
but
on
the
other
side,
but
people
walk
in
they.
Don't
they
look
at
the
appearance.
If
it
looks
good
they're,
not
comparing,
you
might
have
three
houses
reasonable,
so
put
twenty
thousand
dollars
in
and
paint
it
up
better
and
do
some
things,
but
it'll
sell
better.
B
But
if
you've
got
three
houses
in
front
of
you,
you're
gonna
take
the
one
at
that
price
and
you
don't
want
to
do
the
work.
People
don't
want
to
it's.
They're
gonna,
go
they're
gonna,
buy
a
house
they're
willing
to
spend
a
little
more
in
this
market
for
something
that's
already
been
done
and
I
think
that's
a
big
difference.
A
C
Would
suggest
that
Mark
said
the
case
that
the
renovated
unit
should
be
higher,
assessed
versus
unreaded
renovated,
lower
assessed
but
I'm,
a
big
believer
in
Mass
assessment
or
her
Believers,
the
right
word,
but
I
honor
it.
You
know
and
we
can't
60
000
properties.
We
can't
do
that.
We
can
make
some
reasonable
adjustments,
but
the
case
the
department
made
well.
Maybe
it's
not
just
the
wall,
it's
the
floor
of
the
ceiling.
It's
the
stove,
it's
the
downstairs
bathroom.
C
We
really
don't
know
I
wish
they
had
more
people
and
could
make
some
finer
determinations
and
I'm
not
sure
that
it's
reasonable
I
agree
with
you.
B
A
J
A
J
Policy
decision
I've
seen
most
of
the
pictures
of
the
almost
11
units
that
were
sold
I
mean.
The
four
point
is
the
same.
Everything
is
pretty
much
the
same,
but
I
read
the
package.
My
reaction
was
the
same
lost
common
that
they
felony
either
he's
paying
too
little
or
the
rest
of
the
people
are
just.
J
I
think
the
renovated
units
are
just
under
assessed
right
now
compared
to
you
know,
because
they're
just
basing
it
on
the
model
and
if
we
were
to
look
at
individual
homes
as
townhouses,
it's
a
town
halls,
but
you
know
they're
kind
of
mediums.
The
icing
the
renovated
units
are
just
playing,
but
under.
B
B
B
K
I
K
K
Right
I'll
make
some
motion
to
reduce
the
assessment
to
549
800.
A
A
Just
thank
you,
sir.
The
remaining
four
cases
the
balance
are
not
here,
but
they
still
want
a
hearing
held.
We
will
move
to
number
one
on
the
agenda,
which
is
one:
seven:
zero,
zero,
eight
zero,
two
five
Seventeen
hundred
Clarendon
Boulevard,
and
so
you
could
start
with
your
eight
minutes
and
tell
us
about
this.
One.
D
The
subject
is
unit
131
at
The
Gaslight
Square
condominium.
It
is
a
two-bedroom
Loft
with
two
and
a
half
bathrooms
and
1600
square
feet.
It
includes
two
full
parking
spaces
and
is
on
the
first
floor
with
a
private
patio.
The
unit
was
not
inspected
and
the
unit
did
sell
recently
in
December
of
2022..
D
So
the
recent
listing
shows
what
the
unit
to
appear
to
be
an
original
2013
condition,
with
minor
updates
to
lighting
the
appellant
applied,
both
for
departmental
review
and
a
Boe
citing
his
concerns,
which
are
that
his
2023
assessment
is
not
equal
to
the
unit's
recent
sales
price.
The
appellant
recently
bought
the
property
for
one
million
two
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars
in
December
of
2022.
The
unit
was
on
the
market
for
approximately
68
days.
There
were
a
total
of
seven
sales
at
Gaslight
Square
condominium
during
our
2023
analysis
period.
D
Five
of
those
sales
were
two
bedroom
units.
Three
were
flat
models
and
the
other
two
were
Penthouse
style
models.
Some
of
the
sales
included
unit
235,
which
is
a
two
bed
two
bath
flat,
13
37
square
feet
which
sold
on
May
of
2022
for
one
million.
Twenty
five
thousand
the
unit
is
an
original
condition
and
has
a
direct
elevator
unit
135.
Also
a
two
bedroom:
two
bathroom
flat
13
37
square
feet
sold
in
November
of
2021
for
1
million,
twenty
thousand,
also
in
original
condition,
unit
138
sold
in
December
of
2021.
D
This
one
sold
for
1
million
four
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
in
original
condition.
It
is
two
bedrooms:
three
bathrooms
1882
square
feet
and
a
penthouse
unit
and
unit
158
sold
in
October
of
2021
for
1
million
489
000
a
two
bed:
three
bath
1882
square
foot,
Penthouse
unit,
all
unit.
All
units
appear
to
be
in
the
same
condition:
Gaslight
Square
condominium
was
built
in
2013
and
only
has
80
units
renovation
hasn't
been
a
big
factor
in
this
neighborhood.
D
The
median
ratio
for
the
neighborhood
was
94
in
all
two
bedrooms
received
a
five
percent
increase
to
their
model
base
rates.
The
fine
median
ratio
after
the
change
was
97
percent.
During
our
analysis,
the
subject
sale
was
still
in
active
listing,
but
sold
after
we
concluded
our
analysis.
It
was
noted
that
the
subject's,
late
sale
would
possibly
indicate
a
shift
in
the
market,
but
would
still
be
soon
to
make
any
adjustments
until
we
see
more
sales,
the
subjects
they
will
be
used
for
the
2024
assessment.
D
I
H
I
D
So
we
have
several
types
of
parking.
We
have
compact
spaces
in
the
garage
valued
at
thirty
thousand,
but
the
tandem
spaces
are
only
valued
at
fifteen
thousand
full
spaces
in
the
garage.
Also
thirty
thousand
handicap
as
well,
but
all
tandem
are
just
valued
less,
so
you
can
have
more
spaces,
but
still
be
thirty
thousand.
You
could
have
two
tandem
with
the
thirty
thousand
dollar
value
or
you
could
just
have
either
one
compact
or
one
full
at
thirty
thousand,
and
then
storage
units
also
account
for
five
thousand
dollars
in
value.
C
I
have
a
question
we
want
to
make
sure
this
is
right,
first
of
all,
comps
three
and
four,
or
both
penthouse
yeah,
yeah,
okay
and
and
comps
one
and
two
are
one
one
floor,
not
with
a
loft
like
the
appellants,
correct,
correct,
good,
we'll
make
sure
you
got
it
right.
Okay,
just
quick
question:
how
does
a
unit
label
138
become
a
penthouse
I
mean
these?
Are
these
four
levels
these
buildings.
D
C
D
Yeah,
it
is
a
four-story
I
thought
that
was
weird
as
well.
I
think
just
the
unit
numbers
were
all
over
the
place.
Okay,.
C
Good,
just
just
stuck
out
that's
my
that's
my
last
question.
Thank
you.
D
I
think
yeah,
so
I
just
want
to
remind
the
board
that
for
this
unit
it
did
sell
out
of
our
analysis
period.
We
do
recognize
that
that
sales
price
does
stand
out
compared
to
everything
else,
but
the
sales
that
we
had
during
our
analysis
period
do
show
that
an
increase
was
warranted
for
two
bedroom
models.
Thank
you.
H
J
C
My
my
thought
is,
you
don't
have
an
enormous
amount
of
data,
but
it's
it's
with
much
larger
units
on
two
levels
higher
from
the
street,
and
is
it
somewhat
busy
street
that
the
the
the
assessment
between
the
subject
and
the
two
best
to
me,
the
best
comparables
three
and
four,
isn't
nearly
large
enough?
Is
it
high
enough
a
difference?
It's
a
hundred
and
I
mean
80
75
000
difference
in
assessment.
It
seems
that
the
appellants
place
forgetting
about
the
sale
price.
You
know
a
little
bit
after
the
assessment
period,
just
relative
to
those
other
two.
H
K
It's
a
totally
different
world
from
the
data
valuation.
I
I
mean
I
I,
put
more
weight
on
the
data
valuation
in
a
rapidly
changing
Market,
which
we're
in
so
I'd
rather
see
a
comp
in
December
of
22..
Then
in
December
of
21.
J
H
K
I
A
K
H
B
H
K
H
J
A
B
A
But
we
will
move
to
case
four
on
the
agenda:
zero,
seven,
zero
one,
one:
zero,
seven,
eight
at
20591,
footstep
November
it
was.
It
would
start
with
your
eight
minutes
and
tell
us
about
this
part.
G
Awesome,
thank
you
so,
good
morning
again,
everybody
subject
is
2059
North
Woodstock
Street
Unit
106
at
the
Beverly
farms,
two
bedroom,
one
bathroom
821.
G
G
The
Appellate
believes
the
subject
to
success
it
more
than
spare
market
value
in
his
review
application.
He
indicates
that
he's
been
trying
to
sell
this
property
and
two
others
at
this
location.
For
the
past
year,
at
a
price
of
230
000.
without
receiving
one
offer.
There
are
16
units
in
this
building
which,
for
the
2023
analysis,
there
were
not
any
sales.
However,
for
the
2022
analysis,
there
were
two
sales
that
were
comparable
to
the
subject.
G
If
you
all
would
just
turn
to
page
three
of
the
packet
unit,
201,
which
is
rpc-07011070
that
sold
September
9th
of
2020
for
297
000,
with
the
current
assessment
to
sale,
ratio
of
Point
B44
a
little
bit
about
this
unit.
Is
it's
very
similar
to
the
subject
in
size.
It's
a
two
bedroom
one
bathroom
803
square
foot
unit,
so
it
is
slightly
smaller
by
18
square
feet.
The
condo
is
well
maintained.
The
kitchen
has
been
updated
with
stainless
steel
appliances,
countertops
and
cabinets
at
some
point
in
its
life.
G
The
bathroom
tile
is
outdated,
comparable
to
unit
205,
which
is
rpc07011079.
G
About
this
comparable
is
it's
very
similar
to
the
subject
as
well:
two
bedroom,
one
bathroom
854
square
feet.
The
kitchen
has
been
fully
updated
with
granite
countertops.
L
G
Has
also
been
updated
as
well,
since
we
lack
comparable
sales
in
this
neighborhood.
An
assessment
comp
was
used
to
share
uniform
and
Equitable
assessments
throughout
the
building
unit.
306
did
not
sell
and
it
is
a
similar
model
as
a
subject
having.
H
G
H
G
In
this
neighborhood
for
our
2022
analysis,
the
assessment-
the
sale
ratio
was
only
0.843
for
2023
analysis
to
keep
up
with
current
market
trends.
A
three
percent
positive
adjustment
was
warranted
due
to
limited
sales.
Data
points
in
the
form
of
sales
are
weighed
heavily.
There
are
only
16
units
in
this
neighborhood
and.
H
G
Sales
in
the
2022
analysis
showed
us
that
we
were
under
assessed
for
this
kind
of
neighborhood
2023
didn't
have
any
sales
and
we
Trend
into
neighborhoods,
similar
to
other
condos
in
the
geographic
area.
Even
with
this
change
for
2023,
our
assessments
are
still
lower
than
the
last
time.
These
units
sold
both
units
that
sold
in
2022
had
some
degree
of
renovation.
H
G
Weren't
any
sales
that
were
in
original
condition,
therefore,
it's
difficult
to
quantify
a
difference
among
renovated
units
first
edition
units
having
two
proper
goals
that
sold
in
2022
that
had
undergoing
some
level
of
renovation
and
the
data
showed
that
the
Assessments
in
this
neighborhood
were
much
lower
than
what
they
were
selling
for
in
the
previous
year.
After
a
review
of
the
analysis,
the
subject
appears
to
be
equalizing
similar
size.
D
H
C
C
It's
just
it's
a
small
neighborhood
they're,
very
similar
units,
some
of
that
Conjuring,
the
question
you
said
there
were
two
sales,
though,
in
the
assessment
period
there
were
one
bedrooms.
They.
C
C
G
16
units
in
this
neighborhood,
you
know
in
the
2012
analysis,
showed
us
that
we're
under
assess
for
this
kind
of
neighborhood
2023
did
not
have
any.
H
J
J
A
lot
of
them
was
listed,
but
it
was
in
2015
that
wasn't
just
a
totally
different
property,
but
I
mean
for
the
price
that
he
was
asking
230.
Nothing
would
sell
them
so
I'm.
Okay
with
this
and
all
the
other
units.
K
C
K
K
B
A
And,
what's
the
other
difference,
there's
no
sales
here,
okay,
my
argument
would
were
ultimate
campus.
Two
cops
outside
of
the
period
my
feeling
would
be
go
to
another
building
and
get
me
another
sale,
because
there
are
sales.
But
that
being
said,
I
think
for
that
square
footage
to
have
a
250
000
assessed
value.
It's
not
going
to
be
much
lower
than.
B
J
Still
has
nothing
to
do
with
you
yeah
most
of
them
are
rentals.
I
mean
he's
kind
of
this
here.
This
is
the
80s
he
lives
in
Florida,
but
the
rental
rates
that
he
charging
to
him,
which
is
he's
doing
free
cash
flow
because
yeah,
it's
not
necessarily
for
affordable
housing,
but
is
only
because
it's
much
easier.
B
H
H
C
A
G
So
it's
the
phone,
the
subject's
2061
North
Woodstock
Street,
Unit
301.
This
is
at
the
Beverly
arms
same
condominium.
This
is
a
two
bedroom.
One
bathroom
is
803
square
feet.
This
subject
was
obviously
inspected.
He
did
reference
yellow
photos
as
well.
G
Were
no
interior
photos
of
this
unit,
I
only
saw
an
outside
picture,
but
it
was
indicated
by
the
appellant
that
it
was
in
its
original
condition.
Of
course,
the
building
was
built
in
1959,
as
I
had
stated
before
that
in
his
review
application,
he
indicated
that
he
had
been
trying
to
sell
this
property
for
two
and
two
others
at
238
000
and
without
receiving
one
offer,
as
I
had
referenced.
There
are
16
units
in
the
building.
For
the
2023
analysis,
there
were
no
sales.
G
Is
outdated,
comparable
two
sold
on
62.1
for
287
300.,
very
similar
to
the
subject
two
bedroom
one
bathroom
854
square
feet
unit
is
slightly
larger.
Kitchen's,
been
fully
updated
with
granite,
countertops
and
newer
cabinets
and
tile
backlash.
The
bathroom
has
been
updated.
H
G
F
G
Analysis
showed
us
that
we
were
under
assessed
with
the
county.
Neighborhood
2023
didn't
see
any
sales
and
we
tried
to
the
neighborhoods
similar
to
under
other
condos
in
the
area.
Even
with
the
change
for
the
2020
.,
our
assessments
are
still
low,
so
I'm
sorry
still
lower
than
the
last
time
these
units
sold
yeah.
So,
after
a
review
of
the
analysis,
this
subject
appears
to
be
equalized
with
similar
size.
H
C
G
That's
what
I
mean
yeah,
so
we've
got
floor.
Adjustments
and
you
know
the
subject,
or
this
result.
G
It
doesn't
accept
this
adjustment.
I
would
think.
Looking
at
the
the
copper
bowl
and
Susie
got
floored
something
on
floor
two
and
they
don't
have
any
sort
of
floor
adjustment
and
there's
one
that
was
an
assessment
comp
that
was
on
floor
three
and
it
doesn't
have
any
sort.
B
I
You
know
this,
this
gentleman's
argument
may
be
correct,
but
I
mean
to
me
as
a
serious
Department.
B
A
A
A
K
A
F
K
A
All
right,
okay,
then
we
will
stand
the
turn
at
1007
repeat
tomorrow,
at
9am.