►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
We
received
feedback
from
HUD
that
we
should
be
including
a
note
in
our
Consolidated
plan
that
we're
using
the
uncapped
income
limits
for
qualifying
beneficiaries
for
cdbg
programs,
and
what
that
means
is
you
know,
HUD
has
they
publish
area,
immediate
income
limits
and
it's
based
on
household
size
every
year
and
but
for
the
cdbg
program
there
are
specific
limits
that
are
dictated
and
they're
based
on
the
Section
8
income
limit,
so
they're
a
little
bit
different
than
the
area
meeting
income
published
each
year.
However,
you
are,
there
are
certain
communities.
A
To
use
what
they
call
uncash
limits,
where
they're,
basically
allowing
you
to
go
up
to
the
true
80
of
area.
Median
income
for
the
for
the
region
in
DC
is
one
of
them.
So
in
order
to
take
advantage
of
that,
we've
been
taking
advantage
of
that.
But
in
order,
but
apparently
we
need
to
include
that
in
Arkansas,
independent
that
we
are
so
we're
just
taking
that
and
taking
that
advice
and
adding
it
to
this
action
plan
or
Consolidated
plan.
Amendment
request
to
to
put
all
everything.
C
Okay,
great
thanks
Caitlyn
and
thank
you
for
having
me
tonight
so,
as
Caitlyn
mentioned.
In
order
to
actually
submit
the
plan,
we've
got
received
guidance
from
HUD
that
we
need
to
Amanda
Consolidated
plan
and
that's
where
you
guys
come
in
so
I
just
want
to
touch
on
real
quickly
kind
of
what
the
fair
housing
plan
is.
The
process
that
we
went
through
and
kind
of
what
some
of
the
recommendations
are.
C
So
then
you
have
a
better
understanding
of
what
what
what's
in
the
plan.
So
the
fair
housing
plan
is
a
planning
process,
also
known
as
analysis
of
impediments
to
fair
housing
Choice,
which
is
what
it
used
to
be
called
for.
Local
governments
and
public
housing
agencies
to
really
take
meaningful
action
to
overcome
historic
patterns
of
segregation,
promote
fair
housing,
choice
and
Foster,
inclusive
communities
that
are
free
from
discrimination.
C
So
there's
four
real
major
components
that
are
included
first,
robust
Community
participation
and
comment
process
that
allows
for
Meaningful
dialogue
of
key
stakeholders
looking
at
an
assessment
of
our
past
goals
and
actions
of
how
we've
done
analysis
of
data
and
issues
that
impact
fair
housing
and
then.
Finally,
this
leads
to
the
establishment
of
measurable,
fair
housing
goals
and
priorities,
so
so
fair
housing
and
housing
Equity
matters,
because
fair
housing
Choice
really
connects
you
to
high
performing
schools,
diverse
communities,
job
centers
and
employment
opportunities,
different
Transportation
options
and
safe
and
healthy
neighborhoods.
C
So
the
regional,
fair
housing
project
team
was
responsible
for
creating
the
regional,
fair
housing
plan
and
project
team
members
included
representatives
from
eight
of
the
24
local
governments
that
make
up
the
Metropolitan
Washington
Council
of
governments,
otherwise
known
as
COG.
This
included
Alexandria
Arlington
DC
Fairfax,
Gaithersburg,
Loudoun,
County,
Montgomery,
County
and
Prince
William
County,
a
consultant
team
which
was
responsible
for
much
of
the
plan's
technical
work.
Logistics
data
analysis
and
writing.
This
team
was
led
by
the
lawyers
committee
for
civil
rights
under
law.
C
I
also
included
the
urban
Institute
or
Ochoa
Urban
collaborative
did
a
lot
of
our
Outreach
and
we
had
a
HUD
technical
assistance
partner,
which
was
Enterprise
Community
Partners.
C
We
also
had
a
community
advisory
committee.
This
was
comprised
of
organizations
representing
people
impacted
by
fair
housing
choice
this.
They
really
worked
alongside
the
project
team
to
help
ensure
that
the
final
plan
includes
critical
insights
for
addressing
barriers
and
developing
solutions
to
really
achieve
fair
housing
Choice.
Those
organizations
are
shown
here.
C
So
this
is
the
you
know,
the
first
time
in
25
years
that
local
jurisdictions
have
joined
together
to
create
a
joint
plan
for
Metropolitan
Washington
Caitlin
alluded
to
how
long
it's
taken.
We
kind
of
really
started
thinking
about
this
and
kicked
it
off
back
in
December
2017.
So
it's
been
years
in
the
making,
but
the
planning
effort
really
got
underway
in
January
2021
from
that
there
was
an
extensive
data
collection
and
Analysis,
as
well
as
numerous
numerous
opportunities
for
Community
engagement,
I.
C
C
So
there
are
seven
Regional
goals
and
strategies
that
are
derived
from
that
multi-year
planning
study
that
resulted
from
as
I
just
mentioned,
that
that,
looking
at
that
regional
and
local
data
and
all
those
engagement
opportunities
that
included
focus
groups,
surveys
a
number
of
Civic
meetings,
many
of
which
were
held
right
here
in
Arlington,
mostly
virtual.
Of
course,
the
regional
goals
are
implemented
as
local
goals
and
some
jurisdictions
have
additional
goals
specific
only
to
their
Community
as
you'll
see.
C
Arlington
has
a
number
that
are
specific
just
to
Arlington
and
I'll
highlight
some
of
those
after
each
Regional
goal,
so
we're
looking
at
kind
of
limited
goals
to
be
implemented
effectively,
so
we've
selected
those
that
have
the
greatest
possible
impact
for
moving
fair
housing
choice
in
DC,
the
DC
area.
So
you
know
these
are
just
like
our
con
plan
meant
to
be
kind
of
implemented
over
A
Five-Year
Plan
five-year
period.
C
So
the
first
goal,
which
applies
to
Arlington,
as
well
as
its
neighboring
jurisdiction,
is
increase
the
supply
of
housing
that
is
Affordable
to
families
with
incomes
at
60
percent
of
Airy
mean
income
are
below,
as
particularly
in
areas
that
have
historically
lacked
such
housing.
Some
of
the
strategies
that
we're
all
committed
to
working
on
together
are
listed
here,
such
as
lowering
the
income
targeting
for
our
affordable
housing
and
exploring
using
additional
local
government
financing
and
Regulatory
tools
that
we
are
not
currently
using
all
right.
C
In
addition
to
strategies
shared
previously,
Arlington
County
has
committed
to
take
additional
actions
that
work
towards
a
shared
goal.
First
recommendation
is
to
continue
to
encourage
developers
to
exceed
the
required
number
of
affordable,
accessible
units
in
a
range
of
sizes
and
types
when
new
development
occurs.
Second,
really
looking
at
deepening
our
affordability
of
affordable
housing.
C
This
was
something
that
was
very
evident
in
our
focus
groups
as
well
as
the
data
next
is
to
explore
mechanisms
to
reduce
County
fees
and
related
infrastructure
costs
for
a
100,
affordable
developments,
provide
incentives
or
low
interest
loans
for
homeowners
who
rent
their
accessory
accessory
drawings
to
low
and
moderate
incomes
tenants.
Lastly,
here
we're
undertaking
a
new
homeownership
study,
as
you
are
aware
of
that
would
take
a
step
back
from
our
home
ownership
programs
to
to
Really
develop
clear
goals
for
our
approach
to
home
ownership.
C
Second
goal
is
for
zoning
and
land
use
policies
to
expand
access
to
fair
housing
Choice
by
increasing
the
development,
geographic
distribution
and
supply
of
verbal
housing.
So
the
first
strategy
is
to
increase
inclusionary
zoning
incentives
for
creating
on-site,
affordable
housing
next
adopt
affordable
housing
overlay
zones
to
increase
the
amount
of
land
where
developments
that
meet
our
robust
affordability
criteria
are
allowed
as
of
right
and
incorporate
a
fair
housing.
C
Equity
analysis
into
the
review
of
significant
zoning
proposals
and
specific
plans
for
Arlington
specific,
looking
at
initiating
a
zoning
study
to
examine
alternatives
to
the
current
definition
of
family
in
the
zoning
ordinance.
Something
we've
been
looking
at
for
a
little
while
now
and,
secondly,
really
to
initiate
a
study
to
examine
how
affordability
requirement
could
be
structured
within
the
zoning
ordinance
for
senior
housing
projects
that
are
approved
via
site
plan
goal.
Three
is
Implement
preservation
policies
designed
to
preserve,
affordable
housing
and
prevent
displacement
with
a
goal
of
the
no
net
loss
of
existing,
affordable
rental
units.
C
C
We
are
going
to
periodically
re-evaliate
the
real
estate
tax
relief
program,
explore
reopening
the
housing,
Trace
voucher,
primary
waiting
lists
in
order
to
solicit
new
income
eligible
households
seeking
that
rental,
subsidy,
periodically
review
the
housing
grant
program,
eligibility
and
maximum,
allow
allowable
rents,
and,
lastly,
here
consider
developing
a
program
to
provide
financial
and
Technical
Support
to
low
and
moderate
income.
C
Homeowners
for
things
such
as
small
repairs,
estate
planning
taxes
Aging
in
place,
Gulf
War
has
increased
the
number
of
homeowners
in
the
region
and
reduce
inequities
and
discriminatory
practices
that
limit
home
ownership
opportunities
by
members
of
protagonist
classes.
So
Regional
strategies
include
increasing
homeownership
opportunities
for
those
members
and
support
current
homeowners
with
protected
characteristics,
as
well
as
addressing
issues
of
appraisal,
bias
and
increased
fair
housing,
testing
and
monitoring
for
lenders
and
real
estate
entities
so
goal
five
is
protect
the
housing
rights
of
individuals
and
strengthen
fair
housing.
C
Education
Regional
strategies
include
reducing
barriers
to
accessing
accessing
rental
housing
by
eliminating
application
fees
for
voucher
holders
and
encouraging
landlords
to
follow
Hud's
guidance
on
the
use
of
criminal
backgrounds
and
screening.
Tenants
pilot
a
right
to
council
program
to
ensure
legal
representation
for
tenants
and
landlord
tenant
proceedings
and
expand
and
increase
support
for
fair
housing,
Outreach
education
and
enforcement
specific
to
Arlington.
C
We
want
to
increase
the
frequency
of
fair
housing,
testing,
provide
education
and
Outreach
to
potential
first-time
home
buyers,
I'm
in
the
County's
human
rights
ordinance
to
include
all
protected
classes
and,
lastly,
reduced
language
barrier
has
been
seeking
Housing
Services
goal.
Six
has
increased
Community
integration
and
reduce
housing
barriers
for
persons
with
disabilities.
C
This
includes
prioritizing
home
and
CD
cdbg
funds
for
developments
that
include
those
permanent
Supportive
Housing
units
and
advocate
for
new
multi-family
developments
with
public
funds
to
have
at
least
10
percent
of
total
units
accessible
to
persons
with
Mobility
disabilities
and
at
least
four
percent
accessible
for
persons
with
hearing
or
visual
disabilities
for
Arlington.
We
want
to
share
that
all
accessible
units
and
future
committed,
affordable
housing
developments
provide
the
same
features
as
standard
units
and
to
develop
a
rental
accessibility
modification
program
which
I
hear
you've
already
offended
through
your
CDA
program,
which
is
great.
C
Initial
Arlington
goal
is
to
increase
effectiveness
of
existing
programs
to
further
fair
housing.
This
includes
the
review
of
current
metrics
for
goals
and
Implement
an
equity
analysis
with
metrics
across
program
areas
and
to
develop
a
plan
and
mechanism
for
collecting
reliable
demographic
data
of
residents
of
our
committed,
affordable
housing.
C
So
as
far
as
next
steps,
we
plan
to
take
the
amendment
to
the
consultative
plan,
which
includes
this
Regional
fair
housing
plan
to
the
July
board
meeting
and
from
that
I
think.
The
goal
from
Cox
perspective
is
to
submit
as
a
region
to
HUD
the
full
fair
housing
plan.
D
Well,
do
you
go
to
the
slide
one
describing
Arlington's
priority
responses,
I
believe
is
the
sub
point.
One
of
that
slide.
B
D
There
you
go
I
just
had
a
question
about
your
first
point,
so
you
mentioned
pushing
for
increase
in
supply
of
housing,
affordable
to
low
and
moderate
income
families.
I
know
something
that's
come
up
in
a
lot
of
conversations
here
is
when
we
look
at
incentivizing
money
instead
of
going
to
a
head
right,
building
more
affordable
housing.
D
Is
there
some
way
that
the
county
is
considered
being
able
to
incentivize
that
in
any
way,
I
assume
this
would
be
something
we
have
to
go
to
Richmond
for,
but
given
this
is
a
regional
draft
plan
specifically
for
Arlington
is
or
something
that
can
be
done
locally
in
the
meantime,
because
at
the
moment
there's
a
an
incentive
to
simply
donate
money
to
pay
him
instead
of
actually
creating
more
cath
units.
C
Housing
needs
analysis,
but
also
through
the
public
Outreach
that
we
went
through
for
the
fair
housing
plan,
so
I
think
what
we
had
envisioned
this
was
to
you
know,
provide
incentives
for
the
inclusion
of
extremely
affordable
housing
units
that
are
financed
by
the
county
and
also
looking
at
projects
that
you
know
that
seek
refinancing
through
the
county
that
that
had
already
gotten
their
funding,
but
are
coming
back
in
to
see
if
we
can
adjust
those
affordability
covenants
to
increase
the
the
share
of
units
that
are,
you
know
not
at
60
but
but
lowered.
C
You
know
to
40
percent
or
30
percent.
That's
where
we're
really
seeing
the
need
in
some
of
these
committed,
affordable
units
and
then
I
think,
lastly,
encourage
owners
of
existing,
affordable
units
Explorer,
you
know
collaborative
approaches
to
increasing
the
share
of
units
dedicated
to
those
lower
affordability,
levels
and
I.
Think
to
your
point,
I
think
there
is
a
an
interest
in
having
the
conversation
of
you
know,
units
that
we
get
through
our
site
plan
process
to
to
to
be
on
site.
C
I
think
that's
a
conversation
that
that
we
need
to
have
you
know
whether
or
not
we
get
the
cash
for
those
there's.
There's
some
benefits
to
getting
the
cash.
We
could
potentially
get
more
units
elsewhere,
but
there's
also
benefits
to
potentially
getting
those
units
on
site
such
as
you
know,
expanding
our
geographic
distribution
goal.
B
F
I
have
a
question
about
the
one
about
the
Arlington
specific,
preserving
and
existing
affordable
housing,
something
five
or
four.
Do
you
foresee
any
response
from
particularly
opponents.
B
F
C
I
think
so
I
mean
I.
Think
what
you
know
this.
This
goal,
in
particular
goal
is
three,
is
really
looking
at
what
our
existing
portfolio
of
committed,
affordable
units
and
making
sure
that
we
we
are
able
to
win.
That
affordability
period
expires
that
we're
able
to
kind
of
keep
them
affordable
in
some
way
are
if
they
are
currently
I,
think
what
you're
kind
of
getting
at
is
some
of
the
market
affordable.
Some
of
those
you
know
like
a
bar
cropped.
C
C
The
missing
middle
I
think
is,
is
kind
of
a
little
bit
different
conversation,
and
you
know
we
have
that
recommendation
under
kind
of
Performing,
some
zoning
and
land
use,
which
is
is
has
already
happened,
but
I
think
there's
some
steps
that
need
to
continue
to
happen
there
and
I'm,
not
the
right
person
to
talk
to
that
about,
but
yeah.
F
D
One
more
question:
it
kind
of
goes
towards
I
think
it
was
a
point,
seven
graduate
seven
detailing
what
steps
the
county
could
take
in
order
to
reach
fair
housing
goals
related
to
protective
classes.
So
I
know
that
right
now,
Arlington
doesn't
actually
observe
all
the
pathetic
classes
that
Richmond
laid
down
I
forget
how
many
we
actually
observed,
but
out
of
the
eight
now
that
Richmond
dictated
we've
made
only
observe
at
least
six
or
seven.
D
That's
this
might
be
out
of
your
your
wheelhouse,
so
I
apologize
for
that,
but
and
looking
at
how
the
county
could
potentially
work
with
affordable
housing
Partners
to
ensure
that
units
are
are
compliant
with
any
of
these
various
needs
that
that
support
our
members
of
the
community
have
within
the
county,
first
have
to
recognize
full
breath
of
protective.
C
Classes,
yes,
thank
you
for
that.
That's
a
great
question,
so
we
are
working
with
our
human
rights
office
as
well
as
the
Human
Rights
Commission
to
work
towards
getting
all
of
those
in
I.
Think
we're.
You
know
we're
starting
with
source
of
income
to
try
and
get
that
into
our
local
ordinance,
and
we've
also
started
on
education
to
landlords.
C
About
this
recent
I
mean
it
hasn't
been
two
recent,
but
making
sure
that
landlords
know
that
this
is
is
a
a
law
now
that
they
need
to
follow
and
I,
don't
know
if
Jennifer
has
anything
to
add
to
that.
A
All
right
any
other
questions.
A
Well,
Laura
I
think
the
there
would
need
to
be
an
action
to
recommend
approval
of
the
amendment.
B
F
G
B
D
A
Fy25
Nova
yeah
so
that
I'm
going
to
take
this
one
and
I'm
just
gonna
I'm
gonna,
pull
it
up
on
the
screen,
but
from
my
computer.
So
just
share
with
me
all
right.
A
So
we
are
gearing
up
for
the
release
of
the
2025
notice
of
funding
availability
for
the
Community
Development
Fund,
and
we
typically
like
to
have
sitzac
review
the
nofa
just
to
make
sure
that
we,
you
know
are,
are
putting
out
something
that
everyone
agrees
with
and
is
happy
with
for
the
next
fiscal
year.
A
I
didn't
there
actually
weren't
a
lot
of
changes
this
year
we
made
a
lot
of
changes
in
the
previous
year,
but
I
will
you
know
since
I
think
well,
most
people
in
the
room
have
actually
gone
through
the
process
before,
but
I'm
still
going
to
go
through
just
the
contents
of
the
nofa
and
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
process
and
when
we're
going
to
get
started
and
all
that
good
stuff,
good
stuff.
So.
A
There
we
go.
Oh
that's
even
smaller
there
we
go,
that's
better,
okay,
so
just
the
first
part
of
the
nofa.
It
talks
a
little
bit
about
the
various
funding
sources.
You
know
we
are,
and
you
know
how
the
the
funds
are
administered
again.
They're
administered
for
one.
B
A
For
most
of
the
sources
ahif
Housing
Services
are
awarded
for.
B
A
Years
so
there's
just
a
little
bit
of
interest
there.
We
also
talk
a
lot
a
little
bit
about
the
differences
between
the
amount.
A
That
organizations
can
apply
for
so
Public
Services
organizations
are
eligible
to
apply
for
up
to
fifty
thousand
dollars,
and
public
services
are
really
range
from
anything
that
could
be
job
training,
health,
related
programs.
A
Senior
programs
resident
services,
programs
and
so
again
those
can
those
programs
apply
for
up
to
fifty
thousand
and
then
there
are
other
programs
where
we
are
allowed
to
spend.
A
You
know
how
HUD
caps,
the
the
funding
source,
and
so
those
types
of
programs
are
Housing,
Development,
homeownership,
counseling,
Economic,
Development,
certain
Economic,
Development
programs,
Business
Development
and
those
types
of
programs.
So
those
are
those
are
eligible
to
apply
for
Grants
up
to
100
..
A
B
A
Specific
piece
of
it,
but
these
are
the
funding
priorities
that
were
laid
out
in
the
last
fatality
plan,
and
so
any
application
applicant
that
applies
has
to
respond
to
one
of
these
goals
and
priorities
talk
a
little
bit
about
eligibility
requirements.
There
are
different
eligibility
requirements
for
each
of
the
sources
and
I.
We
wanted
to
be
really
clear
about
what
those
eligibility
requirements
are
so
Community
Development
cooperate
and
Community
Services
block
grant,
have
you
know
pretty
specific
eligibility
requirements
that
are
outlined
here?
A
Temporary
assistance
for
needy
family
have
some
additional
requirements
that
have
to
be
met
and
then
same
with
the
AF
housing.
A
Typically
age
of
Housing
Services,
we
look
for
projects
that
are
housing
related
in
some
way
and
and
or
are
provided
at
a
committed,
affordable,
housing,
property
property.
Sorry
provided.
A
This
is
just
a
quick
look
at
what
types
of
programs
were
funded
through
the
2024
Community
Development
Fund,
so
this
one
this
year
there's
this.
This
actually
is
probably
a
little
bit
more
I'm
actually
going
to
change
this
graph
because
goal
one,
it
seems
a
lot
bigger
than
it
actually
should
be,
and
that's
because
we
provided
our
moderate
income
purchase
assistance
program
with
a
lot
of
funding
last
year.
A
B
A
Three
are:
are
the
bigger
funding
programs
and
or
categories,
and
that's
where
here
I'll
joining
the
funding
goes.
A
These
are
the
federal
income
limits,
so
we
talked
a
little
bit
about
this
when
I
was
talking
about
the
Consolidated
plan
and
so
basically
any
program
that
applies
for
funding,
they
have
to
ensure
that
the
beneficiaries
of
those
programs
fall
Within,
These,
income,
Pages,
and
so
what
I
was
talking
about
before
is
that
we
are
using
the
uncapped
80
of
Ami
limits.
So
if
we
were
to
use
the
cap
limit
these,
this
top
line
here
would
be
much
lower.
It
is
now.
A
A
So
what
we
do.
What
we
like
to
do
for
this
is,
of
course,
do
an
overview
of
the
nofa,
but
then
we
also
like
to
do
specific,
one-off
kind
of
Workshop,
where
we
have
someone
come
talk
about
ways
to
improve
their.
You
know
an
application,
and
this
year
we're
going
to
be
doing
a
telling
your
story
training.
So
it's
really
about
helping
applicants
figure
out
better
ways
to
explain
what
their
program
is,
and
you
know
have
a
better.
The
average
reader
will
have
a
better
understanding.
A
So
the
proposals
this
year
will
be
due
on
September,
8th
and
so
for.
Everyone
in
this
room
benefit
what
that
means
is
usually
we
try
to
get.
The
proposals
turned
around
to
you
guys
within
two
weeks
of
that,
so
you
should
be
able
to
start
reviewing
applications
at
the
end
of
September
this
year,
hopefully
hopefully,
and
then
again
in
October
and
November,
we
meet
every
Wednesday
to
to
meet
with
the
applicants
and
we'll
you
know
the
schedule.
A
And
then,
once
the
those
interviews
have
been
completed,
we
then
do
our
ranking
exercise
where
we
rank
all
the
proposals
based
on
priority,
and
then
we
start
building
up
the
budget
and
that's
included
in
the
county
manager's
proposed
budget
in
February.
There
are
hearings
in
March
both
with
sinsac
to
review
the
action
plan
and
the
budget
recommendation,
and
also
through
the
County
Board.
Does
their
regular
budget.
A
A
This
is
just
some
information
about.
You
know
what
the.
A
Sort
of
what
we're
The,
Proposal
presentations
and
feedback
page
and
then
we
get
into
setting
up
the
zoom
grants,
account
which
is
required
to
be
able
to
submit
an
application,
and
then
we
get
into
finally
the
required
conscious
of
The
Proposal.
A
We
are
asking
pretty
much
the
same
questions
I
think
we
tweaked
a
couple
just
based
on
some
feedback
from
last
year,
but
again
generally
very,
very
similar.
There
will
be
an
overall
program.
Design,
Community
needs
collaboration
with
other
organizations,
long-term
strategy
and
project
sustainability,
goals,
objectives
and
outcomes
and
the
evaluation
plan,
and
then
some
the
aspects,
more
specific
information
about
the
organization's
history
and
experience
and
capacity.
A
B
A
A
And
we
also
provide
information
about
the
proposal.
Evaluation
forms
what
their
application
will
be
graded
against.
That's
basically,
it
I
wanted
to
see
if
you
yeah.
I
G
And
Page
Three
I
have
a
question,
sure
you're
0.1.1
input.
The
goal
increases
supply
of
committed,
affordable
housing
units,
nothing
in
the
proposals,
okay
well
clearly
or
enable
the
supply.
The
supply
is
really
the
builders.
The
contractors.
A
So
traditionally
we
have-
and
it
doesn't
happen
every
year,
because
it
we
don't
get
enough
CBD
or
home
funding
to
do
a
project
every
year.
But
when
we
do
have
sufficient
funding,
people
sometimes
allocate
CDG
or
home
your
home
to
an
affordable
housing
property
and
that's
typically
how
we
meet
that
priority
and
that
goal.
A
Well,
for
example,
we
on
our
tour
this
year
we
visited
the
Cadence
and
that
was
partially
funded
with
CD.
B
A
Actually,
sorry
that
was
partially
funded
with
home
and
actually
but
you
both
sorry
I'm
getting
projects
so
that
was
partially
funded
with
both
cdbg
and
home
funding.
So
it
it's
usually
on
an
as
needed
basis
and
when
we
have
enough
funding
we'll
recommend
that
the
city
home
be.
A
To
a
project
and
in
the
in
the
past,
when
that's
happened,
it
hasn't
been
for
a
few
years,
but
those
projects
will
actually
come
before
said
sac
and
the
developer
will
come
and
talk
about
the
pro
the
project
and
sit
Tech.
B
A
It
wouldn't
necessarily
come
in
through
this
sofa.
It
would,
if,
if
they
were
applying
for
funding,
it
would
probably
multi-family,
which
is
a
completely
separate
process.
F
A
One
of
these
others
sure
and
several
of
our
programs
do
and
I
mean
it's
the
same
for
goal
three.
We
don't
see
a
lot
of
programs
that
come
in
for
funding
that
are
specifically
supporting
homelessness,
but
we
work
with
our
colleagues
in
the
Department
of
Human
Services
to
develop
these
priorities
because
it's
they
obviously
have
a
lot
of
different
programs
and
they
through
that
support.
Those.
F
E
One
question
in
just
looking
at
some
of
the
descriptions
on
page
11.
program,
design.
I
know
we
had
in
most
instances
when
we
ask
questions
of
the
applicants.
A
B
E
E
Between
Arlington
versus
other
and
then
on,
the
I
know
that
on
item
number
dates,
which
is
around
the
project,
sustainability,
that
was
also
open
issue
and
somehow
a
lot
of
the
applicants-
and
maybe
the
workshop
covers
this.
So
it's
not
it's
less
of
an
issue,
but
you
know,
maybe
we
need
to
The.
Prompt
question
needs
to
be
a
little
bit
more
specific
as
to,
if
you
did
not
have
this
funding,
how
would
you
continue
to
support
and
grow
your
program
or
something
to
that
system,
except
because
somehow,
like
project.
B
F
B
F
B
E
And
where
they're
coming
some
of
them,
when
we
peeled
it
back
one
level
game
obvious
that,
because
a
number
of
these
serve
sort
of
region
that
they
were
actually
serving
more
folks
from
outside
I,
think
in
Alexandria.
F
I
Can
I
mention
on
the
long-term
strategy
I
like
the
idea
that
you
mentioned,
but
there's
still
the
question
that
we've
never
answered?
How
will
the
project
eventually
become
self-sufficient,
which
I
think
is
a
great
question,
but
do
we
really
want
or
expect
that
grantees?
If
you
come
in
but
10
20
years?
How
long
has
this
been
around?
Do
we
really
expect
them
to
become
self-sufficient?
I
would
hope
so,
but
do
we
I
mean
do
we
do
we
grade
them
on
that
I.
G
G
H
H
Some
of
them
are
sexier
and
there
is
when
they're,
more
able
to
you
know
bring
in
Foundation
funding
or
they're
able
to
you
know,
create
some
sort
of
you
know
social
impact,
their
own
funding
or,
and
some
of
them
just
aren't
so
the
way
I
interpret.
This
is
sort
of
depending
on
the
project
and-
and
you
know
a
lot
of
times,
they'll
answer-
they
won't
answer
the
question
directly.
They'll
answer.
H
You
know:
well
we're
gonna,
we're
gonna
grow
our
program
and
we're
gonna
bring
in
other
stuff,
but
they're
they're,
not
able
to
be
really
specific,
so
I
feel
like
there's
got
to
be
a
context
as
you're
reviewing
this.
You
know
no
matter
how
we
frame
this
question
like
I.
Think
I,
don't
think
you
can
look
at
every
single
proposal
in
the
same
way,
just
because
they're
different
kinds
of
projects
and
and
we'll
have
different
kinds
of
needs.
So
that's
my
two
cents.
H
Basically,
what
would
you
do
if
you
didn't
get
the
funding
I
know.
We
often
ask
that,
as
as
part
of
this
sort
of
interview,
because
that's
really
the
bottom
line
like
if
an
organization
says
oh
yeah,
we
would
still
go
or
we
would,
you
know,
serve
slightly
fewer
people
or
we
would
find
other
funding.
That's
one
thing,
but
if
they
say
our
whole
organization
would
fold
that's
kind
of
a
different
conversation,
so
maybe
asking
it
in
both
ways
might
be
helpful
for
more
context.
E
A
Is
currently
optional
and
we
could
we
can
make
it
it
used
to
be
required.
A
A
Them
you
know
they're
required.
We
we
have
to
have
them
in
order
for
grant
funding
to
the
organization.
So
the
way
we
kind
of
got
around
that
was
not
requiring
them
at
the
time
of
application,
but
if
they
were
funded
they
would
be
required
to
submit.
A
H
E
As
a
lot
of
budget
questions
was
sort
of
looking
at
it
in
the
context
of
their
overall
budget.
So
did
we
end
up
being
you
know
a
primary
like
you
said
you
know,
sort
of
without
us
they
might
Miss
half
their
budget
or
whatever
and
I.
Think
that
that's
not
that
that's
a
and
all
the
break,
all
but
I
think
it's
useful
to
see.
D
A
E
J
H
B
H
I
mean,
as
Caitlyn
said
it's
the
balance
for
us
is
we
really
are
trying
to
be
supportive
of
small
startup
organizations
as
well,
that
aren't
necessarily
going
to
be
as
sophisticated
or
have
as
many
funding
sources
or
so
it's
again,
it's
a
context.
If
you're
a
brand
new
organization,
this
is
your
first
grant
to
get.
You
started.
I
think
you
need
to
look
at
it
a
little
differently
than
if
you're
a
you
know,
large
sophisticated
organization
with
multiple
funding
streams,
so
I
think
the
whole.
E
Yeah
well,
an
organizational
budget
shouldn't
be
required.
Yes,.
A
J
Yeah
right
thought
maybe
giving
it
more
time
and
also,
but
we
don't
have
to
have
our
scores
due
to
eliminate
them,
which
I
think
we
learned.
Lastly,
by
doing
this
week,
but
no
I
just
wanted
to
ask
that
question.
A
Yeah
no
I
mean
I
think
we
could
definitely
I
mean
I
think
the
way
we've
approached
it
is.
We
require
the
documents
that
are
required
in
order
recipe
in
order
for
us
to
fund
them
as
an
organization
tax
accept
status,
the
articles
of
the
corporation,
the.
A
That
as
a
required
document
last
year,
because
some
folks
have
thought
that
that
was
help
helpful
to
see
you.
B
A
I
and
I
I
think
that
is
another,
but
we
can
definitely
add
organizational
budget
as
required.
I
I,
don't
I,
think
that,
like
you
said,
if
they're
getting
an
audit
done,
which
most
of
them
should
be
getting
an
audit
done,
it's
required.
So.
B
E
F
Well,
and
also
kind
of
outside
of
the
budget
and
correcting,
if
I'm
thinking
about
this
but
like
in
in
terms
of
thinking
about
like
if
this
doesn't
get
funded
by
us,
will
it
will
the
whole
organization
yeah
we're
we're
reviewing
program,
not
an
organization,
and
so
even
if
it
is
a
small
kind
of
startup,
and
this
is
one
of
the
only
things
that
they're
doing
we're
still
looking
at
the
program
and
so
I.
This
is
not
something
I,
don't
think,
ask
in
the
application,
but
kind
of
as
we're
looking
ahead.
D
B
D
J
A
Typically,
we
can't
allocate
our
funding
to
like
any
anything
that
could
be
considered
an
income
payment
so
going.
A
B
A
J
Heavy
and
then,
but
we
can
fund
for
programs
where
they're
staff
member
yes.
J
J
I
thought
yeah,
but
I
think
at
the
end
of
the
day,
I
think
we're
just
like,
ultimately
up
to
you
staff
to
make
the
final
decision.
It's
just
awesome
to
make.
E
And
I
know:
I'm
gonna
probably
fall
on
deaf
ears,
but
I
just
so.
I
was
quite
amazed
that
the
entire
commission
reviews
all
of
the
proposals
proposal
because
I've
never
seen
that
before
so
usually
with
Grant
reviews.
E
They,
you
know
you
like
a
group
of
three
people
review
10
applications,
another
three
people,
another
10
applications,
and
then
you
can
have
group
discussion
around.
Those
can
like
ask
questions
again
before
final
scores,
but
I
like
remarkable
the
entire
Commission
all
of
the
applications,
and
so
I
just
would
throw
out
the
fact
that
that
is
not
the
norm.
D
In
addition,
right,
what
are
the
particular
benefits
and
having
the
setup
you
laid
out
where
a
group
of
three
look
at
ten
and
I
think
three
look
at
10
versus
having
the
entire
commission.
E
Yeah
I
mean
normally
that's
done
just
so
that
you're
not
burdening
people
with
many
many
hours
of
review
and
potentially
people.
You
can't
end
up
reviewing
and
there's
concern
about.
If
you
don't
review
all
of
everybody's
review,
all
of
them.
If
that's
how
it's
set
out,
then
that's
problematic,
and
sometimes
you
may
get
you
know.
E
You're
already,
gonna
have
to
take
off
polarized
things
because
you're
looking
for
a
common,
you
know
you're
looking
for
a
range,
so
it
just
tends
to
make
it
a
little
bit
cleaner
for
the
most
part,
but
it's
huge.
It's
mostly
just
it's
sort
of
Overkill.
F
Is
another
Advantage
is
if
like
Margaret
and
Link
and
I
are
all
reviewing
the
same
set
of
applications?
They
can
all
sit
down
and
have
a
conversation.
You
say,
I
said
this
and
I
thought
this
piece
of
the
proposal
and
I
thought
that
was
really
good
and
you
know
and
Lee
says:
oh
I
didn't
notice
that
good
point
and
we
can
kind
of
make
sure
that
we're
all
sort
of
seeing.
F
E
A
G
A
It's
something
to
consider
I,
I
and
I
I.
Remember
you
saying.
A
Think
we're
not
totally
prepared
to
completely
revamp
the.
A
Yet
but
but
yeah
I
think
it's
a
good
suggestion
and
maybe
something
that
we
probably.
B
A
Need
to
take
a
little
bit
a
little
bit.
We
currently
have
until
the
review
cycle
this
year
to
to
really
think
about
how
the
process
would
work,
because
I
would
also
worry
about
like
how
are
you
normalizing
scores,
and
if
someone
doesn't
actually,
you
know
complete.
A
Do
you
make
sure
that
the
proposals
are
actually
being
reviewed
by
a
consistent
number
of
reviewers.
E
So
yeah
I
have
some
images.
I
mean
it
does
sort
of
require
people
to
be
committed
to.
D
To
you
than
it
does
to
me
than
all
of
your
scores
are
going
to
actually
skew
negatively
because
you
value
an
aid.
Far
more
than
I
am
yeah
and
there's
not
like
you
said,
there's
not
a
standardization
of
that
we're
all
working
on
a
common
understanding
of
what
these
values
mean.
Then
you're
going
to
get
some
scores
which
are
just
floating
right
and
others
are
visible.
E
D
E
B
I
Would
it
be
practical
trying
to
figure
the
middle
ground
here,
because
I
I
tend
to
be
a
much
tougher
scorer
and
that
was
fine
as
long
as
I
was
consistent
and
I
still
think
we
should
all
be
tougher
because
I
don't
think
they
should
all
come
in
in
such
a
narrower
range?
Why
do
we
have
one
to
ten
if
we
never
use
one
to
five,
never
yeah
but
anyway,
but
I
watched
that
one
so
I'll
move
on?
I
Would
it
be
practical
to
to
group
the
review
committees
by
areas
so,
for
example,
I,
don't
know
how
you
decide
exactly
how
much
money
goes
for
each
of
the
areas,
but
when
we
do
our
dots,
we
have
so
many
dots
for
this
area.
So
many
dots
better.
Would
it
be
possible
to
have
the
same
subgroup?
Look
at
all
of
these
relative,
consistent
programs
that
are
consistent.
D
Where
you're,
not
only
thinking
about
I,
think
a
way
to
get
what
you're
saying
of
being
more
critical
is
when
you
have
people
who
are
more
inclined
to
subject
matter,
because
they
know
what
they're
looking
for
right,
I
I
have
a
propensity
towards
housing,
so
I'm
going
to
be
looking
at
housing
more
critically
and
my
scores
are
probably
going
to
be
a
bit
more
rigorous
because
I
know
what
to
look
for,
but
if
I'm
not
acquainted
with,
say
programs
with
aging
I
think
it
is
that
he's
gonna
be
like
okay,
I
know
what
to
look
for
here.
D
I
know
what
deserves
money.
I
know
what
doesn't
deserve
so
I.
Think
to
your
point.
We
have
these
these
areas
of
expertise,
you'll
kind
of
get
that
that
whittling
down
to
looking
for
when
we
started
using
more
floors
and
fives,
because
we're
not
as
as
stretched
out
our
bandwidth
is
actually
have
a
bit
more
discernment
in
the
process.
B
J
I
think
I
think
currently
is
pretty
good
to
be
honest,
I
think
because
you
get
the
people
like
it
includes
everything
it
includes
people.
Everyone
gets
to
review
things
that
they're
passionate
about
that.
They
have
expertise
on
The,
Things,
They,
Don't,
Really
art
as
like
knowledgeable
about.
But
then
you
have
folks
who
know
that
content
area,
but
also
how
many
education
last
year,
like
48
yeah.
So
for
that
48
applicants,
each
of
them
gave
a
15
minute
presentation
that
you
have
to
have
us.
B
J
A
presentation
or
just
have
like
a
like
a
Spiel
after
each
one,
I
think
it
should
be
two
times.
A
A
B
A
Identifying
areas
of
expertise
and
yeah,
we
can
figure
out,
hopefully
a
happy
medium,
maybe
not
this
year,
but
I
just
have.
D
Our
process
is
pretty
because,
just
because
you've
done
something
for
so
many
years,
the
best
way
to
do
it
sure-
and
there
are
benefits,
of
course,
as
Nicholas
said
right
to
having
a
problem
where
people
and
spread
out
the
word,
where
you're
not
doubling
up
and
aware
of
the
the
time
requirements,
but
at
the
same
time,
if
our
job
is
to
critically
evaluate
all
these
applications,
but
not
doing
that
very
well,
then
it's
kind
of
like
we're
doing
the
wrong
thing
fast
right.
It's
like
oh
well,
we've
wasted
time.
D
Regardless
right,
we
could
have
been
more
practical
with
our
resources
and.
A
I
actually
have
a
couple
questions
for
you
all
just
about
process.
Last
year
we
for
the
proposal
presentations.
We
were
all
in
person,
obviously,
because
we
had,
but
the
applicants
were
virtual.
Did
you
guys
like
the
way
that
works?
Should
we
try
it
different?
You
like
that?
Okay
I
think
there
might
have
been
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
the
best
way
to.
A
E
D
E
I
And
my
own
process
is
tons
of
paper
because
I
have
read
stuff,
I
have
notated
and
when
they
come
in
personally
I
feel
like
have
to
look
at
them.
They're
presenting
and
they're
talking
I'd
have
to
look
at
them.
I
can't
be
flipping
back
and
forth
and
double
checking
this.
If
they
say
something,
I
can't
do
that,
so
I
can.
What
I
do
is
as
soon
as
they
leave
the
room.
I'm
done
with
my
scoring
plan,
because.
D
A
Do
we've
started
sending
out
kind
of
like
tips.
H
Yeah,
except
you
all,
have
moved
on.
This
is
a
couple
of
topics
ago,
but
I
wanted
to
I
had
to
throw
in
the
an
idea
for
simplifying
the
process,
because
I
hear
you
there's
a
lot
for
Sid
Sac
to
do.
There's
a
lot
for
staff
to
do
and
we've
gotten
feedback
from
applicants
in
the
past
that
are.
Our
proposal
is
really
out
of
line
from
a
grants
management
perspective
I
mean
essentially,
people
can
get
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
and
there's
a
ton
of
work
that
they
have
to
do
for
that.
H
So
we've
we've
tried
to
sort
of
move
towards
simplifying
the
proposals,
which
is
part
of
why
we
sort
of
made
fewer
of
the
attachments
required,
but
I
mean
another
way.
If
everyone
wanted
to
review
everything,
we
could
look
at
really
simplifying
the
proposal
and
that
would
be
nicer
for
sidsac
and
I.
Think
it'd
definitely
be
nicer
for
applicants.
H
You
know
the
trade-off,
of
course
would
be.
You
wouldn't
necessarily
get
all
the
information
you
needed
or
wanted,
but
maybe
you
could
do
that
as
part
of
the
interview
thing
or
something
like
that
anyway.
Just
wanted
to
throw
that
out.
There
I
don't
want
to
make
it
more
burdensome
for
applicants
because
from
what
we
understand
and
my
experience
in
grant
writing
we
have
it's
a
lot
for
not
that
much
money.
H
E
Yeah
well
and
what
we've
seen
a
lot
more
out
there
just
because
the
whole
world
has
become
much,
you
know
faster
and
give
me
give
me
the
bullets
and
that
sort
of
thing
that's,
you
know
if
there
is
information
that
we
tend
to
process
like
how
many
people
are
you
serving,
you
know
what
three
jurisdictions
are
they
in?
That's
you
know
we.
B
E
Get
them
to
do
it
in
you
know,
bullets
and
then,
if
they
wanted
to
have
a
little
narrative
that
was
around
their
story,
then
let
that
be
narrative
but
try
and
take
its
to
a
more
you
know,
factual
bulletized,
because
that's
kind
of
how
we
may
be
processing
so
anyway.
I
just
threw
that
up
but
I'm
more
than
happy
to
be
part
of
a
little
task
force
to
look
at
that
if
they
want.
If
you.
B
I
F
Yeah,
well
maybe
along
the
lines,
but
like
the
application,
were
they?
What
is
your
slides?
What
are
your
proposal?
What's
the
matter
like
that's,
that's
helpful,
because
then
you
read
through
them
and
it's
open
enough
that
they
can
customize
the
arrow
and
program,
but
maybe
if
we
can
make
some
more
of
the
questions
answerable
like
that,
that
might
help.
A
C
D
A
Just
ask
was
we
switched
up
the
way
we
were
doing
our
subject
matter,
expert
reviews
last
year
where
we
were
basically
asking
multiple
staff
from
different
County
departments
to
review
the
applications
and
then
we've
provided
their
comments
informed
on
the
summary
sheets?
Did
you
guys
we've
changed
it
many
times
in
the
last
five
seem
to
work.
Okay
did
everyone?
Is.
B
A
A
A
Right
right,
I
mean
yes
and
no
yes,
I
mean
I.
Think
a
lot
of
them
do
kind
of
tailor
their
proposals
to
a
specific
funding
source.
But
you
know
some
are
pretty
General
and
could
really
fit
under
any.
F
B
B
A
To
reapply
for
funding,
because
it's
really
just
to
help
get
the
program
off
the
ground.
I
I
mean
I'm
I'm
open
to
hearing
from
other
folks.
But
for
me
personally
I.
It
doesn't
really
make
a
huge.
F
G
A
I
A
New,
well,
we've
not
done
that
before
I'm
not
opposed
to
it.
I
think
we
have
to
kind
of
really
figure
out
what
that
example
would
look
like
without
having
without
giving
away
like
what
organization
it
is,
but
yeah,
that's
an
idea.
I
can
I
can
look
at
there's
a
way.
E
B
E
They
don't
want
just
a
re,
just
a
like
I
just
filled
in
the
blanks
from
my
organization,
yeah
so
I
mean
I
can
see
both
sides
of
it
completely,
but
just
a
reflection
of
a
lot
of
Grant
issuers
don't
give
a
sample
of
a
good
application
for
that.
A
A
Of
talk,
you
know
what
the
idea
is
and
whether
it's
eligible
and
whether
a
program
like
that
has
been
successful
and
and
I
I
got
a
lot
of
those
calls
last
summer
and
you.
B
A
Lot
of
those
programs
did
wind
up
applying
for
funding,
but
I
and
I,
but
yeah
I
think
that's
you
know
if
you
were
ever
talking
to
an
F
potential
applicant,
definitely
recommend
that
they
contact
staff
because
we
it's
a
better
proposal
when
it's.
F
A
I'll
say
that
typically
I
get
the
calls
when
once
they
have
the
nofa
has
been,
but
it
can
I
mean
we
accept
the
quality
around
there's,
nothing,
including
them
from
calling
me
in
February
but
yeah.
It
definitely
usually.
I
will
say
that
it
when
I
get
the
calls
it's.
You
know
the
they've
been
thinking
about
the
program
for
well
and
they're.
They.
H
Thanks
well
you
you
mentioned
one
of
the
things
I
was
going
to,
which
is
we
do
encourage
people
to
reach
out
and
I
think
that
really
does
improve
the
proposal.
We
also
do
a
nofa
workshop
in
July
about
two
weeks
after
the
nofa
comes
out
and
we
walk
through
the
nofa
and
encourage
people
to
ask
questions
there
and
then
I
also
want
to
say
we
heard
from
I
think
two
or
three
of
the
folks
who
did
not
get
funded
last
year.
H
You
know
we
always
offer
that
as
a
debrief
and
and
did
do
that
so
I
think
you
know
that's
helpful.
For
people
too
who
came
in
you
know
what
what
they
could
have
strengthened.
What
you
know
we
we
take
notes
on
on
y'all's
conversations
and
kind
of
Staff
feedback,
and
so
that
helps
people
I
think
if
they
want
to
submit
for
a
second
year
after
they're
not
funded.
So
hopefully
we
provide
enough
assistance
that
they
can,
if
they
take
advantage
of
it,
they
can
put
together
a
good
proposal.
B
E
Record
your
work,
your
nofa
workshops
and
you
could
post
them
from
the
price
you
know
from
prior
year,
with
the
caveat
that
the
nofa
changes
from
year
to
year.
But
that
way,
if
somebody's
like
in
January
thinking
I
may
want
to
think
about
this
funding
source,
they
can
get
a
little
bit
of
an
insight
into
it.
What
does
that
do
we
do
that?
Yeah.
A
A
So,
just
for
as
a
reminder
will
we're
going
to
go
back.
We're
gonna
incorporate
some
of
the
feedback
that
we
received,
it'll
be
released
on
the
5th
of
July
and
then,
when
we
come
back
in
September
I'll
do
a
demo
a
demo
of
our
application
review
software
so
that,
just
as
a
refresher
to
everyone
about
how
you
actually
go
into
the
system
and
review
the
proposals.
And
how
do
you
score
so
just
you
know,
keep
that
in
mind
that.
F
I
guess
area
report
I
think
I
was
gonna,
raise
the
issue
of
whether
or
not
you
tend
to
meet
in
July
and
August.
A
Yes,
we
typically
take
those
months
off
just
because.
F
A
B
E
Or
three
pager
and
I
can
share
with
the
group,
but
it
it
sort
of
takes
kind
of.
It
was
built
off
of
the
County's
equity.
E
B
B
E
E
What
questions
is
the
thing
to
just
help?
Keep
us
whenever
considering
decisions
that
are
relative
to
policy
or
actions
that
we
keep
that
right
now,
so
I'm
happy
to
share
that,
and
then
we
also
did
our
annual
report
for
2022
so
see
what
the
housing
commissions
about
here.
A
Any
other
member
reports-
great
I,
guess
I'll
just
do
a
quick
stack
report,
even
though
we
have
one
minute.
I'll
make
it
very,
very
quick.
There
was
an
application
that
came
in
in
the
last
round
of
funding
for
2024.
You
might
have
seen
it
in
the
zoom
Grant
system,
but
we
didn't
review
it.
It
was
called
the
Reeves
Farmhouse
project.
A
We
are
we're
actually
looking
to
provide
funding
to
that
Project
cdbg
funding
and
we're
working
with
a
big
interdepartmental
group
of
staff
to
figure
out
how
to
do
that
and
if
it
goes
through
and
it's
we
decide
that
it's
that
we
want
to
recommend
the.
B
A
It
will
come
before
the
sitsac,
and
so
the
sort
of
the
project
overview
right
now
is
that
the
county
currently
owns
Reeves
Farmhouse,
it's
a
historic
property
on
the
other
side
of
the
county,
umont
neighborhood
and
the
name
again
slower
Reeves,
Farmhouse
yeah,
and
it
is
it's
the
last
operating
dairy
farm
in
the
county
and
you've
probably
seen
it
if
you've
ever
been
to
Blue
Mountain
Park.
It's
this
big
white
house
that
kind
of
sits
in
the
middle
of
the
park.
A
Vacant
for
20
years
and
the
county
is
looking
to
convey
the
property
to
Habitat
for
community
and
they
want
to
turn
it
into
a
group
home
for
persons
with
disabilities.
So
we
think
it's
a
great
project
and
it's
a
great
use
for
Community
Development
block
grant.
B
A
But
there
are
a
lot
of
federal
requirements
that
have
looked
at
and
so
we're
in
the
process
of
getting
all
that
figured
out.
And
there
are
some
other
site
plan
issues
that
have
to
be
addressed
to
be
able
to
redevelop
the
property.
So
we're
hoping
to
bring
that
before
the
board
in
September.
And
if
we
do
that,
then
you
guys
will.
B
A
B
A
Yeah
right-
and
so
it's
it's
a
it's
a
great
use
for
it
and
it'll
provide
a
resource
in
the
county.
That's
much
needed,
but
again
just
has
a
lot
of
things
that
need
to
be
figured
out
stay
tuned.