►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
D
For
these
I
actually
don't
count
you
in
in
in
person
meetings,
you
can
go
ahead
and
start
I'm
paying
attention
to
what
you're
doing.
Okay.
C
Okay,
I'm
gonna
move
my
script
good
evening.
Everyone
welcome
to
the
October
3rd
meeting
of
the
Arlington
County
Planning
Commission
I
am
commission,
chair,
Vice,
chair
davanti
Patel
I
would
like
to
share
a
few
logistical
points
for
those
members
or
Commissioners
for
participating
remotely
tonight.
C
Tonight's
meeting
is
available
as
a
broadcast
with
closed
captioning
on
Comcast,
Xfinity
channels,
25
and
1085,
Verizon,
FiOS
channels,
39
and
40,
and
the
County
website
audio
of
tonight's
meeting
is
available
via
telephone
if
Commissioners
and
presenters
or
speakers
lose
internet
connectivity
during
tonight's
meeting,
please
reconnect
with
us
by
phone
I
understand
that
you
can
use
the
number
provided
in
the
team's.
Invite
and
registered
speakers
have
received
Miss
Johnson's
telephone
number
in
their
speaker,
registration,
confirmation
for
other
presenters
and
speakers
joining
us
through
Microsoft
teams.
C
Please
keep
your
phones
and
devices
muted
until
you
are
called
upon.
Please
turn
off
sound
to
any
other
devices
around
you
to
minimize
interference.
Please
keep
your
cameras
off
until
the
clerk
calls
upon
you
to
speak
when
called
upon
to
speak.
You
must
unmute
Yourself
by
clicking
on
the
microphone
icon
that
is
located
on
your
meeting
command
bar.
The
moderator
does
not
have
the
ability
to
unmute
you
once
you
have
spoken.
Please
turn
your
cameras
off.
If
you
are
dialing
in
by
phone,
please
press
star
6
to
unmute
public
speakers.
C
You
will
be
called
upon
by
the
clerk
at
an
assigned
time.
Pre-Registration
to
speak
at
tonight's
meeting
was
required.
We
are
not
able
to
accommodate
additional
speakers.
Public
comment
will
take
place
within
the
same
time
frames
as
we
would
provide
at
an
in-person
meeting.
Speakers
will
have
three
minutes
to
comment
as
individuals
and
five
minutes
to
speak.
If
representing
an
organization,
a
speaking
timer
will
be
displayed
on
screen
by
the
clerk.
If
you
are
dialing
in
by
phone
and
unable
to
see
the
screen,
we
will
provide
an
audible
warning
when
30
seconds
are
remaining.
C
You
will
be
muted
when
your
time
has
concluded.
The
meeting
chat
is
active
for
present,
presenters
or
Commissioners,
who
need
technical
assistance.
Only
please
do
not
use
the
meeting
chat
for
discussion,
public
comment,
questions
about
agenda
items
or
requests
for
more
information.
All
public
comment
must
be
shared
verbally
for
the
record
during
the
assigned
public
testimony
period.
C
C
A
A
E
F
F
All
right,
good
evening,
everybody
good
more
good
evening,
Commissioners
today,
I'm
here
to
talk
about
the
toolbox
that
we've
developed
DS
has
developed
through
vision,
zero
and
it's
a
multimodal
engineering
toolbox.
F
Is
that
better
perfect?
Thank
you,
okay,
great
so
again,
I'm
here
to
present
about
the
multimodal
safety
engineering
toolbox,
developed
in
Des
as
part
of
our
vision,
zero
initiative.
The
agenda
that
I'm
going
to
go
through
today
is
listed
on
the
screen
right
here.
Basically,
I'm
going
to
talk
about
the
toolbox
objectives,
talk
about
our
public
engagement
that
we
conducted
how
we
conduct
how
we
engage,
provide
Incorporated
the
feedback
that
we
had
through
engagement,
the
timeline
for
the
toolbox.
C
We
can't
actually
see
anything
I'm.
Sorry,
thank
you.
D
F
Okay,
we're
in
business
now
so
I
and
I'll
I'll
save
some
time
within
for
questions
and
answers.
F
So
basically,
the
engineering
toolbox
is
something
that
was
identified
through
our
vision,
zero
action
plan
as
one
of
those
items
that
we
would
create
the
objectives
of
the
toolbox
are
to
inform
stakeholders
about
ways
that
we
can
improve
safety
on
the
streets,
how
we
can
communicate
those
tools
to
an
audience
in
an
easy
to
understand
format,
how
we
can
use
these
tools
to
facilitate
amongst
staff
and
our
different
contractors
that
are
working
through
US
developers,
Etc
and
then
create
a
shared
understanding
and
expectations
around
safety
treatments.
F
F
F
So
we
conducted
public
engagement.
You
can
see
in
three
different
forms
right
here.
We
did
an
online
form
earlier
this
year,
that
was
up
for
a
month
and
we
collected
22
responses
through
that
we
had
a
virtual
meeting
on
February
1st,
where
we
had
17
participants
in
a
very
Lively
discussion,
and
then
we
had
finally
emails
to
staff.
There
was
three
of
those,
so
we
took
all
that
information
and
Consolidated
it
to
understand
what
people
thought
about
the
first
draft
toolbox
that
we
created-
and
here
are
some
of
the
categories
of
feedback
that
we
got.
F
The
first
is
the
content
and
usefulness
of
the
document
of
the
draft
document,
so
the
toolbox
scored
a
7
out
of
10
on
ease
of
understanding.
There
were
mixed
responses
about
the
level
of
detail
for
each
tool.
Some
wanted
more
detail
and
others
wanted
less.
But
one
suggestion
was
adding
key
information
in
the
list
of
tools
so
that
they
can
compare.
F
They
can
compare
them
more
easily
side
by
side,
and
that
is
one
of
the
big
things
that
we
did
from
the
the
feedback
and
that's
what
I'll
talk
about
in
more
detail
later
when
I
conclude
the
presentation,
the
respondents
also
said
that
they
really
cared
and
were
more
concerned
about
the
safety
benefits
and
the
potential
crash
reduction
for
each
of
the
tools,
and
you
can
see
the
the
bars
on
the
the
right
side
of
the
screen
just
show
what
types
of
information
were
most
interest
to
people
that
provided
feedback.
F
So
the
second
item
we
collected
feedback
on
were
was
the
format
of
the
toolkit
and
the
visuals.
Most
people
did
find
that
the
format
was
clear
about.
50
percent
of
the
respondents
thought
that
they
were
effective
and
about
50
thought
that
videos
and
animations
would
be
more
effective
again.
That's
something
that
we
could
look
at
in
the
future,
but
right
now
this
is
a
static
tool
box.
F
So
the
final
area
where
we
asked
for
feedback
was
feature
use
and
promotion
and
in
general,
the
public
thought
that
the
toolbox
would
be
a
good
tool
to
advocate
for
safety
measures.
The
public
also
provided
feedback
on
how
that
should
be
promoted,
and
it
was
pretty
evenly
split
between
the
County
website,
County
emails
and
social
media,
and
then
this
category
of
27.
You
can
see
in
blue
right
here
which
we
called
other
responses,
we're
attending
Community
meetings,
pop-ups
and
using
all
the
methods
listed
above.
F
Oops
sorry
skipped
that
so
in
essence,
this
is
what
we
did
to
incorporate
the
feedback.
We
adjusted
the
tools,
what
we
say
disaggregated
them,
so
that
the
purpose
of
each
of
the
tools
were
clear.
For
example,
we
had
some
tools
that
were
pretty
Broad
in
scope.
Some
of
them
were
like
markings
and
signs
and
people
wanted
to
know
more
specifically,
what
types
of
signs
and
markings
were
there,
so
we
disaggregated
that
into
several
categories.
So
it
was
clear.
F
F
We
identified
plans
to
evaluate
the
efficacy
of
some
of
the
tools
over
time,
those
that
are
kind
of
more
in
the
pilot
phase.
So
that's
conducting
before
and
after
studies
which
we'll
do
on
some
of
those
tools,
we
rearrange
the
section
so
that
the
toolbox
made
sense.
F
We
created
this
easily
digestible
executive
summary,
which
I'll
show
you
in
more
detail
and
then
the
last
few
things
is
reviewed,
the
language
so
that
it
was
easier
to
understand,
check
for
Quality
and
created
a
glossary
so
that
the
definitions
were
clear.
When
people
read
the
toolbox
so
now
we're
going
to
get
into
the
meat
of
what
changes
we
made
through
the
toolbox,
so
you
can
see
the
column
on
the
left
shows
the
the
kind
of
broad
categories
of
where
the
tools
fit.
F
The
middle
column
shows
the
tools
that,
as
they
were
originally
in
the
the
draft
document
and
then
on
the
right.
You
can
see
the
tools
that
we
added
or
changed,
so
you
can
see
that
there's
two
areas
in
Crossings
and
signals
that
have
been
crossed
out
because
we,
what
I
say
is
disaggregated,
though
so
that
they're
intent
and
the
function
of
those
tools
was
clear.
So
signal
timing
and
phasing
became
leading
pedestrian
interval,
phasing
modifications
to
signals,
red
light,
cameras
and
traffic
signals
and
then
signage
and
pavement
markings
became
crossing
signs
and
markings.
F
You
know
for
crossing
pedestrians
and
bicyclists
and
then
travel
Lane
signs
and
markings
for
directing
vehicles
and
and
bicyclists
along
the
roadway.
So
again
the
intent
is
to
have
tools
that
were
easier
to
understand
by
name
for
Transit
facilities.
It
stayed
pretty
much
the
same,
but
we
added
a
bus,
Q
jump
signals
which
are
basically
a
means
that
Transit
can
bypass
traffic
and
intersections
and
that's
a
tool
we
added
in
these
last
three
categories:
bicycle
and
pedestrian
facilities.
F
Excuse
me,
buffered
bike
lanes
and
conventional
bike
lanes
and
conventional
bike
lanes
are
the
five
to
six
feet
wide
bike,
Lanes
that
don't
have
a
buffer
or
separation
from
traffic,
and
then
we
added
curb
ramps
and
green
markings.
Green
markings
are
usually
used
for
bicycle
Lanes
for
Speed
and
traffic
management.
F
In
may
we
had
our
big
Vision
zero,
the
first
year
annual
meeting,
and
we
described
some
of
the
things
that
we
were
working,
which
were
the
additional
tools
that
I
described,
went
through
very
briefly,
and
a
draft
executive
summary
through
June
we
refined
that
executive
summary.
We
revised
the
toolbox
and
then
sent
it
around
different
departments
for
internal
review
in
the
summer
involved.
We
continue
to
fall
that
we
continued
those
revisions
and
then
we
published
the
toolbox
approximately
a
month
ago
and
right
now,
you're.
F
F
We
will
continue
to
accept
and
collect
Community
feedback
and
we'll
make
updates
to
the
toolbox
as
necessary.
This
is
a
living
document
where
it's
intended
to
be
updated,
as
we
see
tools
that
can
help
us
with
reaching
our
goals
through
vision,
zero.
F
F
Second,
is
we
do
an
analysis
of
that
location
and
then
third,
of
course,
as
we
select
a
tool
and
then
the
fourth
is
implementation,
so
the
graphic
shows
that
process
in
a
little
bit
more
detail
that
first
step
identif
location
identification
can
be
seen
in
basically
the
far
left
side
of
the
graphic
where
we
can
identify
that
through
a
data
analysis
through
a
capital
project
or
a
development
project,
a
site
plan
through
planning
studies
and
then
through
Community
feedback
and
requests.
F
F
The
third
step
is
select
the
appropriate
tools
based
off
of
the
data
and
our
understanding
of
the
issue
and
then,
finally,
that
fourth
step
moving
across
to
the
right
is
implementation,
and
that
could
be
something
very
short-term.
Like
signage
and
marking
projects.
It
could
be
by
updating
our
policy
and
regulations.
It
could
be
by
piloting
a
project
that
we're
not
really
sure
how
effective
it
will
be.
F
So
we'll
do
something:
that's
low
cost
and
inexpensive
and
collect
data
to
see
if
it's
having
the
effect
that
we
would
like,
then
we
can
do
a
quick
build
project
which
is
a
project
of
a
short
timeline,
something
that
we
can
Implement
typically
within
a
year
and
of
course,
then
there's
a
capital
project.
It
can
become
a
capital
project
which
has
a
longer
lead
time
and
that
whole
process
kind
of
is
an
iterative
process
where
we
can
collect
and
analyze
data
to
see
how
effective
it
is.
F
So
a
summary
of
the
tools.
Basically,
we
have
40
tools
now
in
the
toolbox.
I
did
talk
about
the
categories
that
those
five
categories
that
they're
divided
into,
but
each
of
the
the
toolbox
basically
has
a
more
detailed
summary
of
the
of
each
of
the
tools
than
I'm
going
to
go
through
today,
but
I
will
take
a
high
level
look
at
each
of
the
tools
by
showing
you
the
executive
summary
and
in
that
you'll
see
that
there's
a
few
icons.
F
F
So
now
I'll
take
you
through
very
briefly
all
the
tools
that
we
have
in
this
first
iteration
of
the
toolbox,
so
there's
two
pages
for
Crossings
and
signals,
but,
as
you
can
see,
this
is
basically
how
do
people
get
across
the
street.
So
if
you're
looking
at
the
upper
left,
hand
corner
crossing
signs
and
markings,
these
are
things
that
could
be
done
to
enhance
that
bicyclists
pedestrians.
Other
users
are
crossing
the
street,
it's
short
timeline
and
also
low
cost.
Typically,
we
also
have
traveling
signs
and
markings.
F
These
are
things
that
help
guide
motorists,
bicyclists
people
that
are
using
the
roadway,
those
the
timeline
varies
could
be
short
to
to
medium
and
the
cost
is
still
pretty
low,
overall
parking
restrictions
and
crossings
and
daylighting.
F
These
are
things
that
help
we
we
can
employ
intersections
to
help
provide
expectancy
for
pedestrians
or
cyclists
when
they're
crossing
a
street,
so
that
motorists
and
pedestrian
cyclists
can
see
each
other
that
there's
not
something
obstructing
that
ability
for
them
to
make
visual
contact,
and
you
can
see
this
has
a
actual
expected
crash
reduction,
because
this
is
just
one
specific
tool
about
a
30
reduction
for
pedestrian
vehicle
crashes,
which
is
great,
and
you
can
see
the
timeline
and
cost
varies,
but
again,
they're
they're,
typically
not
higher
cost,
Hardin,
sunlight
center
lines
and
turn
wedges
also
is
something
that
we
look
to
deploy
and
we've
done
some
already
in
the
county.
F
But
these
are
things
that
help
slow
down
turning
Vehicles
when
going
over
a
Crossing,
it
could
be
right
or
left
turning
vehicles,
but
again
these
are
still
pretty
short-term
and
low
cost
and
going
across
the
bottom
of
the
screen,
you
see
Ray's
Refuge
Islands.
These
are
things
that
basically
enable
pedestrians
to
cross
a
street
in
two
separate,
distinct
movements,
so
they're
only
Crossing
one
direction
of
travel
and
a
time
a
pretty
good
crash
reduction
of
69
percent
protected
intersections.
F
This
is
one
of
the
newer
things
that
we
added,
but
again
we
have
this
manual
that
guides
when
we
deploy
stop
signs
and
that's
the
manual
of
uniform
of
trap,
the
manual
of
uniform
traffic
control
devices,
the
mutcd,
and
when
we
apply
the
stop
sign
using
that
methodology,
then
we
see
that
there's
a
22
percent
of
crack
reduction
in
crashes
and
finally,
on
this
rectangular
rapid
flashing
beacons.
These
are
those
beacons.
F
You
see
that
you
can
push
and
provides
a
yellow
flash
we've
deployed
over
the
the
past
few
years,
numerous
of
these
near
in
the
ballpark
of
30
of
these
over
the
the
past
three
or
four
years,
but
those
have
about
a
47
percent
reduction
in
crashes
for
pedestrians
between
pedestrians
and
vehicles.
F
Okay,
continuing
with
Crossings
and
signals
a
pedestrian,
hybrid
Beacon,
you
can
see
that
is
a
one
of
those
beacons
again.
When
you
push
it,
it
provides
that
yellow
flash
then
a
red
signal
that
gets
motorist
to
to
stop
for
pedestrians,
and
that
has
about
a
55
percent
crash
reduction.
That
is,
you
can
see
one
of
the
more
expensive
items.
F
Traffic
signals,
I
think
that
they're
self-explanatory,
but
when
that
is
applied
according
to
the
mutcd
I
mean
we
see
about
a
30
reduction
in
all
crashes
and
again,
this
is
one
of
the
most
expensive
items
that
we
see
in
the
toolkit
traffic
signal
back
plates.
Those
are
rather
inexpensive,
but
these
are
something
that
can
provide
about
a
15
reduction
in
crashes.
F
Phasing
modifications
is
basically,
we
can
phase
a
signal
to
reduce
conflicts
between
different
movements
often
and
that
will
provide
a
41
to
48
percent
reduction.
When
we're
excuse
me
when
we're
talking
about
left,
turn
crashes,
if
we
provide
protected
left
turn,
phasing
mean
left
turns,
go
without
any
other
conflicting
movement.
That
in
itself
provides
a
41
to
48
crotch
reduction,
Mr.
F
Thank
you
there's
other
tools.
You
can
see
here
that
provide
benefits
that
you
can
see
on
the
the
slide
right
here.
I'll
quickly,
note
a
few
things
about
pedestrian
and
bicycle
facilities.
We
did
disaggregate
those
so
that
you
can
see
going
from
the
left
side
to
the
right
side.
You
see
an
increased
performance
from
safety
up
to
74
reduction
in
crashes
between
bicyclists
and
vehicles
for
a
separated
facility.
F
Continuation
of
that
I
will
just
kind
of
briefly
glance
through
some
of
those
speed
and
traffic
management.
We
have
a
lot
of
things
we're
doing
in
this
area
and
we
see
a
lot
of
opportunity.
F
One
of
the
things
that
I
did
mention
is
a
chicanes
and
traffic
circles.
We
do
see
speed
reductions
through
that
and
then
finally,
these
other
Road
designs.
These
are
things
too,
that
we
do
see
varying
benefits,
modifications,
the
corners
up
to
almost
50
percent
reduction
and
then
for
roadway
reconfigurations.
We
see
some
great
benefits
too
so
again.
In
conclusion,
I
I
see
that
you
know
we've
gotten
a
lot
of
feedback
on
how
we
could
use
this
Outreach
I
kind
of
mentioned
that
very
briefly.
F
But
this
is
a
tool
that
we
can
all
use
to
through
site
development
process
through
different
communication
with
the
public
to
help
improve
and
to
engage
the
community
on
these
tools
and
how
these
tools
can
be
deployed
to
help
improve
safety
and
reach
our
goals
through
vision,
zero.
F
C
H
Thanks,
commissioner,
Patel
I
have
two
questions:
the
the
term.
Yes,.
F
Not
I
will
briefly
describe
it.
Chicane
is
basically
where
and
I'll
go
back
to
the
graphic
here.
If
you
can
see
that
the
chicane
is
basically
where
you
put
things
in
the
roadway
to
cause
motorists
to
not
follow
a
straight
path,
because
in
a
straight
path,
people
tend
to
drive
faster.
F
So
if
you
can
deflect
that
meaning,
you
know
divert
them
from
that
straight
path,
then
they
will
typically
drive
slower,
and
you
can
see
that
there's
about
a
three
to
nine
percent
speed
reduction
for
a
chicane,
a
Vu
Nerf
is
a
basically
a
street
that
has
no
control.
F
They
would
be
used
on
a
slower
roadway,
with
kind
of
more
of
a
a
mix
where
you
see
like
bicyclists
pedestrians,
but
the
whole
intent
of
a
voonorf.
Is
you
really
don't
provide
any
control
and
it
really
everybody
just
kind
of
works
together?
You
know
they
learn
how
to
to
handle
the
street
by
mixing
in
a
polite
in
the
effective
way,
but
it's
not
in
streets
that
are
very
high
volume.
F
H
All
the
pictures
I
saw
had
it
looked
very
similar
to
that
you
can
so
I
sorry
I
spent
a
year
trying
to
learn
the
word
boo
Nerf,
so
I
really
appreciate
it.
Trying
to
do
it
I
want
to
make
sure
that
the
only
other
thing
I
will
say
the
number
one
question
I
get
revolving
around
this
entire
concept
is
as
follows,
and
I
have
just
the
question.
Does
this
help
answer
that
question?
H
Why
can
I
Stephen
not
get
a
speed
bump
put
on
my
street
and
I
have
to
explain
to
somebody
that's
pretty
much
over
stats
cold
body?
Will
they
install
a
new
speed,
hump
anywhere
in
Arlington?
Their
next
response
to
me
is,
then,
why
is
it
Stephen
that,
when
they
removed
them
and
repave
the
streets,
they
put
them
back
in
and
I
can't
answer
that
question?
H
Does
this
help
explain
that
to
people
and
have
we
done
a
good
job,
communicating
to
our
community
that
particularity,
because
to
most
people
the
simplest
way
to
make
things
slow
down
and
be
safer
is
to
make
it
really
obnoxious
to
drive
fast,
pretty
much
make
it
painful
for
people,
and
so
the
number
one
question
I
get
from
parents
and
people
I
know.
Is
that
exact
question
and
I?
Don't
think
that
document
really
answers
that
question.
F
And
that
that's
a
a
good
question,
commissioner
Hughes.
That
is
a
long
answer
to
that,
but
the
toolkit
is
intended
to
help
people
understand
what
is
feasible
and
appropriate
for
different
roadways.
So
a
speed
hump
isn't
appropriate
for
every
roadway
type.
It's
also
to
help
staff
to
work
with
the
public,
to
figure
out
how
we
deploy
some
of
these
tools
that
we
may
not
have
deployed
very
much
in
the
past.
So
there's
things
that
you
know
we
need
to
work
collectively
on
to
try
to
figure
out.
F
You
know,
what's
the
best
best
path
forward,
speed
humps
may
be
one
of
these
things
that
fit
into
that
category.
So
really
the
the
intent
of
the
toolkit
is
to
start
conversations
internally
and
externally
to
figure
out
how
we
can
use
these
tools
in
an
appropriate
manner
that
helps
people
address.
Safety
needs
on
the
roadway.
H
My
only
encouragement
for
staff
I
know
it's
a
living
document
is
consider
whether
you
can
answer
that
question,
because
that
is
the
number
one
question
I
get
revolving
around
anything
about
traffic
management
and,
as
I
said,
I've
learned
how
to
say,
Vue
Nerf
in
my
time
and
trust
me
I
did
not
know
how
to
say
it
before
and
so.
I'm
very
well
aware
of
some
of
the
many
intricacies
of
traffic
engineering.
I've
read
several
mini
papers
on
the
subject
now,
but
that's
the
question
we
always
get
to
the
heart
of
and
because
they
exist
everywhere.
H
People
experience
the
speed
humps
as
they
go
down
different
parts
of
Arlington,
and
so
they
ask
the
question:
why
can't
we
get
them
and
I
can't
really
give
them
a
good
answer?
That's
that's
the
fundamental
point
and
so
to
the
extent
that
we
can
have
a
document
that
answers
that
question
I'd
appreciate
it
because
I
would
love
to
tell
them
read
page
43
of
the
vision,
zero
plan
and
they'd
be
like
oh
okay.
I'll
go
do
that
soon.
That
would
be
really
helpful.
H
I'm
sorry
I
just
wanted
to
plug
that
one,
because
it
is
the
number
one
question
anytime.
We
talk
about
traffic
engineering
with
a
common
person.
That
is
the
first
question.
I
get.
Why
do
they
get
it
and
I
can't
I
can't
answer
it?
It's
not!
It's
not
easy
to
answer
and
I've
sat
through
plenty
of
people
trying
to
explain
it
to
me.
You
know
well.
I
As
a
pedestrian
I
appreciate
all
of
this
as
a
former
civic
association
president
who
had
to
contend
with
Washington
Boulevard
speed,
bumps
not
going
to
be
there
bodies,
maybe
but
speed
bumps.
No,
there
wasn't
much
of
a
process.
Four
or
five
years
ago,
when
I
started
going
to
the
open
door,
Mondays
talk
to
every
board
member
got
all
their
suggestions,
went
to
pack,
went
to
everything
and
finally
got
the
RF
FB
at
North
Nelson,
so
that
people
could
cross
to
the
universal
Park
and
it
has
been
very
well
used.
I
I
still
see,
drivers
go
right
through
it,
which
is
kind
of
scary.
So
I
have
a
question:
can
you
pull
up
the
slide
issue
ID
and
Tool
selection?
Is
it
possible
to
pull
that
back
up?
Sure
I
just
want
to
get
a
you
know,
because
my
process
through
that
was
including
getting
the
money
in
the
CIP
was
well
over
four
years.
So
I
just
want
to
understand.
I
So
if
you
have
you've
identified,
analyzed
a
location
and
then
you
go
to
your
next
screen,
which
is
your
time
frame
or
your
timeline?
So
are
you
saying
that
it
would
be
half
a
year
or
a
year
or
something
in
certain
cases,
including
the
analysis
and
then
what
happens?
I'm
assuming
staff
provides
the
analysis
how
many
staff
do
you
have
for
some
of
these
things?
I
guess.
I
My
question
is:
how
realistic
are
the
timelines,
and
you
know
for
somebody
who
sat
in
the
trenches
with
people
who
were
very
concerned
about
Crossing
safely
and
there
had
been
people
hit
on
Washington
Boulevard,
something
faster
than
four
years.
Obviously,
which
I
see
is
a
potential
here.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
you
there's
enough
staff
that
can
do
this,
and
and
when
we're
communicating
this
back
to
the
public,
you
know
we're
we're
in
very
Urban
environments.
I
F
Yeah.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
the
question,
commissioner
beglin.
The
toolkit
shows
you
know
in
a
very
broad
sense.
What
timeline
is
typically
required
for
some
of
these
tools,
so
the
things
that
are
easier
are
like
signing
and
markings
can
be
done.
You
know
within
a
single
season,
meaning
a
year
or
less.
Some
of
the
other
things
would
require
a
more
in-depth
analysis.
The
rfbs
that
you
mentioned.
F
You
know
that
varies
it's
one
of
these
things
that
could
be
done
in
short
term
potentially,
but
you
know
very
often
longer
a
little
bit
longer
term,
not
a
long-term
project
because
of
you
know
some
of
the
underground
requirements,
but
we
have
selected
these
tools
because
it
does
provide
that
wide
variety.
There
are
things
that
we
could
do
in
the
in
the
short
term
that
help
provide
some
benefit
for
people
to
you
know
that
serve
whatever
need
we're
trying
to
serve.
F
F
You
know
more
substantive
change
so
again
we're
trying
to
select
things
in
doing
things
that
you
know
have
that
short
term
all
the
way
to
long
term,
we
do
have
staff
that
are
working
on
those
short-term
things
that
are
part
of
our
typical
programs,
like
our
maintenance
program,
some
of
our
short-term
safety
analyzes.
So
we
do
have
the
staff
that
can
do
those
things
and
really
the
whole
purpose
of
vision.
F
Zero
is
for
these
tools
to
fit
within
the
existing
framework
so
that
it's
easy
for
them
to
be
part
of
everything
we
do,
because
if
we
have
to
do
something
separate-
and
it
has
to
be
its
separate
thing
and
that's
the
only
way
it's
going
to
you
know
survive,
then
you
know
it's
dependent
on
it's.
You
know
the
critical
path
is
different
than
if
everybody's
doing
it.
I
Well,
I
appreciate
the
process,
a
more
well-defined
process
than
has
been
there
as
we
encountered
it
in
the
past,
and
is
it
your
anticipation
then
or
or
the
goal
that
if
we
ran
into
something
like
we
did
in
my
neighborhood,
you
know
five
years
ago
or
however
long
it
was
that
the
anticipation
would
be.
It
could
be
addressed
faster
now
with
the
process
than
it
had
been
in
the
past.
F
F
It
really
depends
upon
the
extent
of
the
issue.
You
know
the
vision.
Zero
program
in
itself
is
really
trying
to
Target
the
areas
where
we
see
the
most
risk
right.
So
that's
essentially
in
a
nutshell,
how
we're
prioritizing
where,
where
the
risk
is
greatest
great.
E
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
Mr
neighbors,
for
your
presentation
and
your
work
on
this,
a
couple
questions
and
then
a
couple
pieces
of
feedback
for
you,
so
I'm
wondering
if
staff
has
considered
making
this
robust
document
more
Dynamic
Interactive.
E
F
There
has
been
discussion,
we
we
don't
have
a
a
plan
for
that.
You
know.
One
of
the
things
that
we
do
do
is
in
the
annual
meeting,
as
we
show
where
these
tools
are
are
being
deployed
to
kind
of
give
a
better
sense
of
where
they
are.
How
extensive
are
they,
so
we
are
kind
of
providing
that
element
in
terms
of
you
know,
I
think
what
you
were
saying
is
like
it
was
something
a
little
bit
more
dynamic
in
terms
of
information.
F
There
are
links
within
the
document
to
other
jurisdictions,
agencies,
sometimes
Federal,
Highway
Administration,
sometimes
Virginia
Department
of
Transportation,
which
have
videos
that
show
like
how
do
you
navigate
around
about,
or
things
like
that,
so
we
are
kind
of
pigging
back
off
of
that
other
existing
material,
but
that
is
something
that
we
can
look
at
for
the
future
in
terms
of,
if
there's
gaps
in
that
knowledge,
you
know
how
do
we
fill
in
those
gaps.
E
Yeah
I
think
it's
good
that
you're
having
those
discussions
and
you
have
the
other
links
in
there
like
I,
said
it's
very
robust.
E
You
have
a
lot
of
good
links
and
good
materials,
but
I
think,
as
your
people
are
thinking
about
different
criteria
or
different
solutions,
they
may
want
to
know
that
some
things
like
something
that
they
could
actually,
commissioner
badly
something
we
could
do
in
a
shorter
time
frame,
has
a
bigger
impact,
maybe
medium
to
low
cost,
and
you
might
be
able
to
filter
out
things
that
don't
meet
that
criteria
more
quickly
than
having
to
go
through
all
the
different
iterations.
E
You
could
have
technology
do
that,
for
you,
so
we'd
hope
that
some
hope
I
would
suggest
that
something
to
consider
to
help
staff
work
smart,
not
hard
on
some
of
these
issues.
What
is
the
timeline
for
updating,
maintaining
this
on?
What
kind
of
cycle
will
this
go
into?
You
know:
iteration
2.0,.
F
That
that's
a
good
question,
I
I
think
as
needed.
You
know
if
we
see
another
tool
that
we
want
to
Pilot
and
test
and
see
how
effective
it
is,
and
we
find
it
is.
Then
it's
something
that
we
can
add
to
the
toolbox.
I,
don't
think
that
there
would
be
any
defined
timeline,
I
think
as
soon
as
something's
available
or
we
find
something-
that's
useful.
You
know
we'll
add
it.
So
it's
intended
to
be
a
dynamic
or
a
living
document.
In
terms
of
that
aspect,
that's.
E
Good
and
I
think
as
you're
doing
that
in
and
updating
it
I
think
it
would
be
good,
as
this
will
be
used
in
site
plans
and
other
things,
for
you
know
the
sprc
and
other
commissions
to
be
made
aware:
Transportation
Commission,
that
there
are
kind
of
additional
tools
on
the
in
the
actual
toolbox
toolbox.
E
A
couple
just
comments
for
feedback.
One
I
do
like
your
executive
summary
I
do
like
that
element,
I
think
the
visuals
could
use
just
a
little
bit.
They
could
be
a
little
bit
better.
Some
of
the
graphics
I
know
were
taken
from
the
other
part
of
the
document,
but
they're
the
resolution
in
them
is
a
little
fuzzy,
and
so
it's
a
little
tough
to
to
see
I
would
suspect.
Lots
of
people
might
be
using
that
executive.
Somebody
to
make
comparisons
and
that's
the
first
place
they
land.
E
So
you
know
that
could
maybe
be
a
little
better.
The
the
cost
graphic
that
you
have
there.
If
people
aren't
paying
a
ton
of
attention
because
they're
they
all
appear
there
and
some
of
them
are
shaded
in
you,
maybe
kind
of
you.
May
some
people
may
not
pick
up
on
that,
so
something
to
think
about
I
did
note
that
also
I
guess
another
thing
on
the
executive
summary.
E
It
looks
like
some
of
those
titles
for
each
of
the
the
tools
it's
in
blue
text,
which
conveys
to
people
that
it
might
be
a
link,
but
it
doesn't
actually
link
anywhere
right.
E
So
maybe
that
could
be
I
do
I
know
you
link
elsewhere
down
to
the
full
text,
but
the
executive
summary
might
be
another
opportunity
to
do
that
and
then
finally,
and
looking
at
the
resources
you're
citing
your
parenthetical
citations
and
the
references
at
the
end,
a
number
of
those
references
are
a
decade
old,
if
not
20,
years
old
and
I'm
wondering
Mr
Neighbors.
E
If
you
could
speak
to
are
these
sort
of
foundational
documents
and
that's
why
they're
included
I
do
wonder
about
the
ones
that
are
from
like
2020,
2002
or
2003,
whether
that's
really
still
the
latest
and
greatest
research
on
what
we
have
here
on
Net
Zero,
so
I
don't
know
if
you
can
speak
to
that
briefly.
I
know
I'm
kind
of
catching
you
off
guard
with
that
one,
but.
F
So
yeah
we,
the
the
references
you
know
some
of
them
are
older,
because
they've
been
established
through
the
industry
for
a
long
time,
so
we
we
still
use
those.
There
is
a
few
locations
where
we,
you
know,
can
collect
and
mine.
What's
the
the
latest
data
you
know,
some
of
it
does
come
from.
You
know:
Virginia
Department
of
Transportation.
F
There
is
a
national
Clearinghouse
for
this
type
of
information
that
we
can
scour
to
find
what's
latest
and
greatest
in
general,
you
know
some
of
those
ones
that
are
older
and
have
been
verified
more.
You
know
we're
not
seeing
as
much
interest
from
different
communities
in
researching
them.
The
ones
that
we
are
seeing
more
interest
in
are
the
ones
that
are
kind
of
more
tactical
in
nature,
and
those
are
those
kind
of
quick,
build
type
things
you
know
like
the
the
turn
hardening.
Those
are
the
things
that
we
see
are.
F
People
are
more
focused
on
that
research
because,
again,
through
vision,
zero,
we
we
understand
and
a
lot
of
other
Vision
zero
cities
understand
as
well
that
if
we're
not
implementing
quickly
enough,
then
we're
always
going
to
be.
You
know
chasing
this
goal
and
we
won't
be
able
to
to
make
a
serious
Headway.
So
a
lot
of
the
more
recent
research
is
on
some
of
those
kind
of
more.
F
You
know,
shorter
term
implementations
and
some
of
the
other
things
are
are
more
foundational.
If
that
answers
your.
E
B
Tonight,
it's
just
commissioner,
we're
thank
you
for
the
presentation,
two
questions.
The
first
is
well
I'm,
just
gonna
ask
them
one
at
a
time,
and
you
know
you
can
answer
I'll
just
give
me
just
letting
you
know.
I've
got
a
second
question
so,
but
the
first
question
is:
is
what
is
going
to
be
done
to
integrate
the
toolkit
with
the
impending
update
to
the
master
Transportation
plan
and
I'll?
Let
you
speak
to
that
and
then
I've
got
another
question.
F
So
that's
something
that
you
know
we'll
make
sure
is
incorporated
so
that
you
know
if
there
is
pertinent
information
that
kind
of
helps
provide
more
definitive
guidance
in
terms
of
how
these
tools
can
be
deployed.
Then
we'll
make
sure
that's
Incorporated
I
know
we
mentioned
speed
humps.
You
know
it's
one
of
those
things
that
we're
looking
to
get
more
definitive
guidance.
So
you
know
we'll
definitely
see
areas
where
that
specific
guidance
is
needed
and
make
sure
that
is,
you
know,
moved
forward
through
that
process.
B
So,
for
what
it's
worth
and
I'll
maybe
defer
to
commissioner
and
tell
me
to
refine
this
point
and
or
to
speak
for
the
Transportation
Commission,
but
I
I.
Actually
on
the
occasions
when,
in
this
body,
I've
had
to
go
to
the
MTP
to
inform
my
own
thinking
or
questions.
B
I
was
dissatisfied
with
the
extent
to
which
I
was
able
to
quantify
the
targets
or
the
goals
that
are
in
the
MTP,
when
looking
at
a
street
plan
right
and
saying
whether
or
not
I
thought
that
this
particular
Street
plan
or
a
particular
garage
or
whatever
cross-section
comported,
was
in
substantial
Accord.
B
B
You
know
for
the
purpose
of
of
liking
it
when
we
are
asked
to
to
to
review
public
use
site
plans.
You
know,
there's
always
the
question
lingering
in
the
air
about
the
extent
to
which
it's
insubstantial
Accord
with
the
comprehensive
plan.
So
you
know
make
of
that
comment
what
you
will
my
my
thank
you
for
your
feedback
on
it.
My
my
second
question
is:
if
you
could
go
to
actually
on
your
on
your
deck,
I
think
it's
slide.
B
There
is
some
language
in
the
full
report
about
modification
about
shortening
Crossing
distances
that
gets
directly
to
the
turning
radius,
which
I
think
is
one
of
the
operative
issues
here
that
for
benefit
of
my
fellow
Commissioners,
that
the
turning
radius
is
an
issue
that
the
the
the
the
smaller
the
turning
radius,
the
slower
the
vehicle
has
to
has
to
drive.
It
has
to
travel
in
order
to
make
the
turn
without
going
over
the
curb
and
a
nice
wide
turning
radius,
not
unlike
a
nice
wide
turn
on
a
freeway
encourages
faster
speeds.
B
So
I'm,
really
appreciative
of
the
language,
at
least
in
the
report
about
turning
radius
is
my
concern.
Is
that's
a
really
wide
turning
radius
that
we're
seeing
on
on
this
slide
that
in
fact
it
you
know
without
without
getting
out
some
some
graphic
software?
It
actually
looks
to
me
wider
than
the
corresponding
radius
or
then
the
radius
and
the
corresponding
illustrative
example
or
illustrative
illustration
in
in
the
full,
broader
report
and
I
I.
B
Just
really
really
hope
that
that
that
it
staff's
intent
and
as
we
see
this
continue
to
move
towards
operative
language
that
we
that
we
are
leaning
into
the
narrowest
possible.
Turning
radiuses,
that
that
are
that
engineering
permits
for
the
purpose
of
the
limiting
factor
that
you
articulated,
which
is
trucks.
But
you
know,
trucks
can
drive
slowly
too,
and
I
would
rather
err
on
the
side
of
a
turning
radius
that
protects
pedestrians
and
makes
life
inconvenient
for
truck
drivers
than
the
alternative.
B
So
again,
that's
a
comet
I'm
happy
to
hear
any
thoughts
or
responses.
I
guess
I
lied
when
I
said
I
had
a
second
question,
but
thank
you
again
for
coming
in
tonight.
F
Okay,
thank
you,
commissioner.
I
will
say
you
know,
basically
that
you
know
the
intent
of
what
we
do
on
the
streets
is
to
provide
accommodations
for
all
and
very
often
because
a
lot
of
our
streets
were
designed
a
while
ago.
We
do
see
that
there
are
opportunities
for
reducing
that
turn
radius.
F
K
Yes,
first
of
all,
I
do
want
to
align
myself
with
chair
Weir's
comments
there
and
I'd
like
to
go
a
little
further
in
that.
This
is
a
toolkit
of
course,
but
a
number
of
the
especially
the
design
elements
in
here
are
ones
that
really
should
be
applying
to
every
street
and
every
intersection.
K
We
have
I'm,
hoping
that
this
means
that
when
time
comes
that,
not
even
in
response
to
a
community's
request
or
a
particular
site
plan
that
when
time
comes
to
redesign
a
particular
street
because
of
routine
maintenance,
it
needs
to
get
dug
up
and
rebuilt
that
all
of
these
Design
Elements
will
then
be
included.
As
a
matter
of
course,
whenever
a
street
is
being
redesigned
and
rebuilt
is,
is
that
correct,
I.
K
Great
I
have
a
question,
a
comment
actually,
which
will
end
up
going
back
to
chair
Weir
I
noticed
that
one
of
the
most
effective
tools
that
we
have
in
this
toolkit
as
far
as
I
can
I'm
concerned
is
the
speed
cameras
I've,
seen
how
they've
been
used
in
the
district
and
I'm
very
impressed
about
how
they
really
do
influence
traffic
Behavior.
K
The
tunnel
under
Washington
circle
on
K
Street
has
a
speed,
camera
25
mile
a
speed
limit
and
the
traffic
goes
at
25
miles
an
hour
virtually
every
vehicle
going
through.
There
is
at
that
speed
limit,
295,
Kenilworth,
Avenue,
Anacostia
freeway
has
speed
cameras
for
50
mile
an
hour,
speed
limit
and
for
the
most
part
at
this
point
not
three
years
ago,
but
now
after
experience,
traffic
really
keeps
to
that
speed
limit
pretty
well,
if
not
below
it
or
on
off
and
below
it,
and
not
just
because
of
heavy
traffic.
K
It's
really
surprising
to
me
how
effective
that
is,
and
that's
great
we're
hobbled
in
our
use
of
it.
As
you
mentioned,
we
can
only
use
it
if
I'm
correct
in
construction
zones
and
school
zones.
Correct
I
would
ask
that,
when
we're
looking
for
our
list
of
things
for
going
for
legislative
changes
which
you've
raised
I
saw
that
earlier,
we
add
to
that
lifting
the
limits
on
the
use
of
speed
cameras,
that
it
should
be
able
to
be
used
by
any
jurisdiction
where
they
deem
it
appropriate.
K
So
that's
good
and
finally,
one
more
comment,
which
is
it
following
up
on
commissioner
schroll,
a
design
element
in
in
the
actual
document
itself.
This
is
this
is
almost
silly,
but
the
cover
picture
you
have
is
so
out
of
date
now
that
none
of
that
block
was
scraped.
There's
nothing
that
left
anymore
on
that
block.
It's
now
a
large
apartment,
mixed-use
apartment
going
up
above
it
it's
already
like
10
stories
up
it's
going
to
go
to
over
20.
K
And
on
top
of
that,
the
street
in
front
of
it
will
be
mainly,
as
you
probably
already
know,
major
reconfiguration.
As
part
of
that
site
plan,
we
were
able
to
get
a
major
modifications
of
where
Washington
I'm,
sorry,
where
Clarendon
and
Wilson
boulevards
come
together,
so
that
picture
probably
should
be
updated,
especially
going
forward.
So
thank
you.
I
Yeah
one
quick
question:
I
guess,
on
the
flip
side
of
that
I
as
a
pedestrian
walking
around
if
I
go
to
walk
Arlington-
and
you
know
we
pride
ourselves
on
getting
all
the
information
out
about
walking
around
the
walkability
here.
Will
they
be
incorporated,
links
to
Vision
zero
places?
I
can
scan
with
a
QR
code?
I
Is
yes,
I'm
walking
around
and
I
notice
that
this
seems
kind
of
strange
or
I
have
questions
about
this
intersection
just
seems
if
we're
going
to
go
through
all
this
that
we
should
have
something
also
tying
to
the
people
that
are
actually
on
on
foot
or
looking
how
they
go
on
foot.
To
tie
back
to
this,
just
just
a
thought,
just
a
comment
so.
F
Okay,
yeah,
that's
that's
a
a
good
thought.
I
know
that
we've
discussed
this
in
terms
of
you
know
various
types
of
projects.
Can
you
know
having
that
type
of
communication
tool?
I
think
that's
something
I
do
have
to
check
back
with
to
see.
You
know
what
our
capacity
for
doing
that
type
of
thing
is,
but
we
we've
heard
this
feedback
before
so.
C
F
C
Madam
clerk
maybe
call
the
next
matter,
oh
actually
before
we
call
the
next
matter.
I
just
wanted
everybody
to
know
that,
from
time
to
time,
the
Planning
Commission
does
allow
the
vice
chair
to
host
a
meeting,
and
so
that
is
what
we
are
doing
here
tonight
in
case.
Anybody
is
confused
as
to
why
Mr
Weir
is
sitting
next
to
me
and
not
doing
his
dutiful
responsibility.
B
Meeting
for
those
who
don't
know,
I
anticipate
that
I
will
be
asking
commissioner
Patel
to
chair
the
November
5
meeting,
for
let's
call
it
medical
reasons,
and
commissioner
Patel
wisely
asks
I
think
to
to
chair
tonight's
meeting
as
a
as
a
prep.
In
anticipation
of
that
to.
A
G
G
If
some
of
you
are
rehearing
this,
but
I
wanted
to
put
this
on
the
record
for
the
Planning
Commission.
So
our
commercial
Market
resiliency
strategy
is
really
to
provide
a
new,
quicker
process
for
the
establishment
of
commercial
uses
that
are
not
clearly
defined
in
the
Arlington
County
zoning
ordinance.
Today,
this
strategy
introduced
a
new
process
for
considering
new
zone
for
considering
zoning
strategies
for
New
Uses
for
proposed
new
or
amended
uses
that
are
determined
by
staff
to
have
a
scale
or
type
of
activity
has
a
limited
impact
on
surrounding
area.
G
A
quicker
and
more
efficient
process
was
presented
that
allowed
for
an
initial
period
of
Staff
analysis,
a
very
broadly
scoped
request
to
advertise
a
streamlined
engagement
process
and
continued
analysis,
a
descriptive
summary
of
the
proposed
action
which
is
included
in
the
legally
required
advertisement
and
then
the
Planning
Commission,
and
the
board
consideration
of
the
zoning
ordinance
Amendment.
The
goal
of
this
different
approach
for
newer,
amended
uses
is
to
have
them
ready
for
a
board
consideration
a
bit
more
quickly
than
other
typical
zoning
studies.
G
G
There
we
go
so
again,
the
micro
fulfillment
center
and
how
we've
looked
at
it
is
we've
categorized
them
as
retail
sales
and
Define
them
as
any
establishment
for
the
receipt
transfer,
short-term
storage
and
dispatching
of
retail
and
other
similar
Goods,
and
the
idea
is
where
should
they
be?
So
what
you
see
in
front
of
you
is
that
we've
proposed
the
following
districts
for
consistency
across
other
retail
sales
districts.
G
So
we
took
what
we
see
in
our
commercial
and
mixed-use
Zoning
districts
looked
at
all
of
the
other
different
types
of
retail
sales
uses
and
really
applied
that
to
these
commercial
districts
listed
out
here,
the
industrial
districts,
as
well
as
our
form-based
code
district.
So
you
can
again
following
sort
of
our
retail
sales.
G
It
does
reflect
the
industry,
best
practices
and
staff
discussion
with
a
microfulfillment
center
operators,
commercial
space
needs,
and
we
believe
this
is
a
appropriate
threshold
for
these
uses
and
will
accommodate
the
various
models
of
microfulfillment
centers
for
the
location
of
the
use
and
its
relationship
to
activate
Street
frontages.
We
wanted
to
ensure
that
spaces
that
might
have
direct
pedestrian
access
to
the
street
would
be
required
to
have
walk-in
customer
sales
areas.
The
transparency
and
fenestration
requirements
per
site
plans
would
not
be
changed
with
this
proposed
amendment.
G
G
So,
finally,
the
engagement
strategy,
the
county
manager,
had
the
opportunity
to
present
again
to
the
County
Board
during
his
manager's
report
in
September
20th
about
the
commercial
Market
resiliency
and
recognize
that
it
does,
and
he
has
initiated
a
streamlined
approach
to
engagement
for
this
quick
and
Nimble
use
change.
So
the
idea
is
the
promo
promoting
resiliency
through
Innovation
and
risk
appropriate
processes
and
regulations
for
new
or
expanded
uses.
G
So
what
we've
done
is
a
level
of
Engagement
of
communicate
through
Public
Notices
agendas
and
reports,
a
redundant
Advance,
the
Planning
Commission,
and
also
the
County
Board
actions
and
then
consult
we've
developed
an
online
form
for
feedback
or
questions
on
these
proposed
changes
and
stood
up
this
new
commercial
Market
resiliency
website,
which
lists
all
these
up
these
uses,
and
with
this
we
have
an
opportunity
to
explore
alternative
engagement
strategies
with
the
zoning
committee
and
Planning
Commission
processes,
and
it
was
suggested
even
or
thought
of
a
consent
agenda
working
with
you
and
the
idea
around.
G
All
of
this
is
to
really
limit
the
multiple
in-person
or
virtual
presentations
sort
of
long
term.
You've
been
saying
or
other
County
boards
been
seeing
a
variety
of
different
amendments
that
come
forward
so
again,
given
the
limited
impact
that
this
proposed
use
as
a
micro
fulfillment
center
that
as
it's
located
in
our
commercial
mixed-use
districts,
it
was
our
assessment
that
relatively
few
microfulfillment
centers
would
be
established
in
Arlington
in
the
coming
years.
G
The
targeted
use
standards
that
are
proposed
and
stop
and
therefore
we're
using
the
tools
primarily
from
the
communicate
and
gone
through
with
the
Outreach.
Again,
we've
briefed
the
Planning
Commission
in
EDC
and
upon
the
approval
of
the
request
advertised
in
advance
of
the
September
zoko,
we
published
an
overview
on
the
zoning
studies
website.
G
So
all
of
this
is
to
say
sort
of
what
we
are
recommending.
It's
a
lot
of
language
and
a
lot
of
words
here.
I
believe
you
have
copies
of
the
staff
report
from
recommending
adoption
of
the
attached
ordinance
to
Amanda
reenactory,
codify
the
zoning
ordinance,
a
variety
of
Articles,
and
really
to
allow
microfulfillment
centers
through
the
provision
of
use
standards
and
many
of
our
commercial
and
mixed
use.
Zoning
districts.
Thank
you
and
that
concludes
my
presentation.
Thank.
A
We
do
have
two
speakers
give
me
just
I'm:
gonna
pull
their
names
up.
Actually
Mr
Musso
is
here
to
speak.
You
can
go
ahead
and
call
Mr
myself.
L
Sorry
about
that
should
I
start
from
the
beginning.
Oh
sorry,
well,
I,
guess,
just
on
behalf
of
the
chamber.
We
want
to
express
our
support
for
the
this
amendment.
L
We
think
these
amendments
are
part
of
a
much
larger
and
broader
need
to
modernize
the
zoning
audience,
that's
obviously
being
reflected
in
the
commercial
Market
resiliency
initiative,
and
we
greatly
support
on
the
future
phases
of
that
initiative
as
they
kind
of
go
forward
into
the
end
of
this
year
and
the
next.
So
we
strongly
encourage
the
commission
to
adopt
this
change
and
the
additional
changes
to
come,
and
hopefully
things
like
microfulfillment
centers
can
be
a
part
of
the
greater
Arlington
economy
going
forward.
A
C
C
Okay,
well,
the
matter
is
before
the
commission.
This
matter
did
come
before
zoko
and
commissioner
Starley
ran
a
wonderful
meeting
in
which
there
were
several
of
the
items
were
brought
before
the
meeting
on
that
night.
Commissioner
sarley
did
you
I
I
did
Mark
down
a
couple
of
the
buckets
that
we
had
that
night
that
we
were
we
met,
which
were
issues
around
the
dimensions,
issues
around
the
definition
of
commercial
versus
non-commercial
vehicles
and
then,
as
well
as
the
enforcement
of
limitations
on
alternative
trans
Transportation
uses.
M
One
concern
that
did
come
up
during
the
meeting
was
the
possibility
of
reaching
out
to
the
neighborhoods
a
little
bit
more.
We
feel
that
the
process
was
a
little
bit
opaque
on
that
front.
Ms
Mish
hunger
did,
however,
answer
all
the
other
questions
and
comments
that
you
highlighted.
C
Are
there
any
questions
or
comments
by
the
Commissioners
commissioner
tell.
K
Me
you
have
some
clarifying
questions,
I
think
that
that's
what
they
probably
are
first
off,
would
this
contemplate?
Well.
First
of
all,
this
is
a
great
idea,
I'm
very
happy,
we're
doing
this
and
I'm
very
happy
that
it's
being
done
so
quickly
and
I
hope.
This
is
only
the
first
of
many
of
these
that
we
see
coming
forward
for
modifying
our
zoning
ordinance
to
bring
it
up
to
date
for
uses
that
we
didn't
contemplate
when
the
zoning
ordinance
was
being
written
so
that
come
and
decide.
K
G
K
G
K
K
Okay,
so
if
you
have
a
fairly
so
there
has
to
be
clear
at
least
10
000
square
feet
on
the
site
anyway,
in
order
for
you
know
to
reach
that
limit.
But
if
it
was
a
20
000
square
foot,
you
could
only
have
one.
You
can't
have
two.
You
couldn't
have
one
ups
and
one
B
Amazon
on
that
same
site
if
it
was
20,
000
square
feet
available.
K
K
G
K
Again,
clarifying
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I'm,
not
complaining,
I
just
wanted
to
know,
and
finally,
the
bicycle
definition
that
contemplates
electric
bikes
as
being
bicycles.
K
G
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair
Ms,
hunger.
Thanks
for
your
work
on
this
and
for
coming
to
zoko
and
then
presenting
this
evening
as
I
raised
during
zoko
and
I'll,
raise
again
I'm
wondering
about
staff's
Outreach
to
Civic
associations
or
the
Civic
Federation
on
this
matter.
Since
you
mentioned
during
our
zoko
presentation
and
in
the
stop
report,
staff's
extensive
Outreach
to
the
business
Community
neop,
the
chamber.
G
One
of
the
examples
was
microfulfillment,
so
it
really
wasn't
an
Outreach
about
microfulfillment
per
se.
It
was
about
the
commercial
Market
resiliency.
Those
presentations
were
identical
to
the
presentations
that
were
provided
during
the
managers
reports
that
were
done
with
the
County
Board
and
and
broadcast
that
way.
So
so,
in
that
way,
we
feel,
as
we
have
done,
the
the
Outreach
that
has
been
consistent
with
many
other
zoning
text.
Amendments.
Okay,.
E
G
Sure
I
think
it
might
be
a
little
bit
more
clear,
so
sort
of
the
streamlined
approach
is,
is
broadcasting
it
on
our
our
web
pages,
ensuring
that
it
is
advertised
appropriately
going
before
with
the
county
board
for
RTA
I
think
that's
sort
of
more
the
streamlined
approach
as
we
get
to
more
of
the
nuanced
approach
and
the
more
and
that
type
of
Engagement
it's
what
you
would
see
with
a
much
more
robust
engagement
and
interaction,
and
it
that
that
nuanced
approach
would
go
sort
of
our
typical
process
of
that
it
would
go
to
zoko.
E
That's
helpful,
so
I
don't
necessarily
have
any
qualms
about
this
zoning
Amendment
and
some
of
the
other
ones
that
I
think
are
going
to
come
before
us.
It's
more
that
I,
don't
know
that
staff
nor
the
commission
knows
if
there
is
an
opposition
to
something
if
you
haven't
done
enough
Outreach.
So
if
you're
not
doing
Outreach
to
Civic
associations,
how
does
a
civic
association
that
engages
regularly
with
a
planning
process
the
ones
along
the
various
corridors?
How
do
they
know
that
a
new
use
is,
you
know,
going
to
be
allowed
and
permitted?
E
And
so
and
again
it's
not
anything
about
this
one
Amendment.
But
you
know
it
it's
hard
for
me
to
say
that
something
should
go
on
the
consent
agenda
when
you
haven't
necessarily
gotten
the
broad
consent
to
people
that
this
is
a
good
idea
and
so
how
we
do
what
we,
how
we
do,
what
we
do
matters
and
so
I
get
that
you
want
to
move
quickly
and
I
support
that,
but
and
I
also
want
staff
to
be
engaging
with.
E
H
I'm
gonna
piggyback
first
of
all,
commissioner
Troll's
comment
to
to
Just
note:
I
mean
we
didn't
even
hear
this
at
the
form-based
code:
advisory
working
group
staff,
it's
a
staff
driven
process,
so
that's
perfectly
within
status
prerogative,
I!
That's
where
I'm
going
to
leave
that
comment.
H
Just
I
think
commissioner
Schultz
already
done
a
good
job
of
explaining
that
on
the
bicycle
language
inside
the
zoning
text,
I,
don't
think
we're
strong
enough
on
it
to
clarify
that
the
questions
that
commissioner
lantemi
laid
out
of
the
various
e-cargo
bikes
trikes
other
methods
of
urban
Mobility
that
are
very
common
throughout
Europe,
that
we
could
do
a
better
job
of
of
exemplifying.
H
What
we
expect
to
see
for
this
10
use
and
finally,
I
get
the
the
urgency
in
this
I
mean
I
understand
we
have
a
very
high
vacancy
rate
across
the
County
right
now,
but
I
will
not
support,
but
I
will
not
oppose
this
I'm
going
to
put
it
that
way,
I'm
going
to
abstain,
but
I
want
to
say
why
and
commissioner
Antonio
began
to
sort
of
go
down.
The
rabbit
hole
of
examples
are
possibilities
and
the
the
first
sight
that
comes
to
mind
is
Bolero.
H
Bolero
was
a
vacant
retail
space
for
a
very
long
time.
The
reason
it
was
vacant
is
because
it
extended
way
back
into
that
building.
In
the
Buchanan
on
23rd
Street
and
the
insistence
on
an
active
retail
Frontage,
there
created
a
brand
new
experience
that
makes
23rd
Street
what
23rd
Street
is
in
Crystal,
City
and
jbg,
and
the
others
who've
owned.
H
A.M,
where
they
will
unload
all
these
things
and
do
their
deliveries
throughout
the
day
weeks
and
nights
and
I,
don't
think,
we've
done.
I
think
I
think
the
situation
where
we're
going
to
have
a
situation
where
we
will
probably
have
good
clients
like
most
zoning
things,
who
are
really
great
neighborhoods,
neighbors
and
partners.
Who'll
do
good
buildings
and
we're
going
to
have
one
or
two
who
take
advantage
of
the
situation,
create
problems
throughout
the
community
and
it's
for
those
reasons
that
I'm
not
going
to
oppose
it.
H
But
I,
don't
think
we've
done
the
right
due
diligence
necessary
to
understand
the
very
many
possibilities
that
this
particular
change
in
the
zoning
ordinance
can
be
used
to
make
what
was
otherwise
an
active,
enjoyable
retail
skate
that
may
have
been
open
till
two
am
in
the
morning
a
very
different
experience
for
the
Neighbors.
So
with
that
I
live
by
my
time,
chair,
Patel,
and
appreciates
staff's
changes
from
our
zoko
meeting
as
well.
Thank
you.
N
Good
evening
and
Paul,
obviously,
I
was
not
here
at
the
beginning
of
the
presentation.
So
if
the
questions
that
I
have
have
already
been
addressed,
I
beg
leeway
and
just
you
know,
let
me
know
that
how
many
square
feet
is
typically
a
full-size
procurement
Center.
Is
there
an
average
size
for
that,
like.
N
Okay,
thank
you,
commissioner.
Okay
for
a
scaling
purpose,
I
was
trying
to
get
a
sense
of
that.
Thank
you
in
in
terms
of
sort
of
some
of
the
other
localities.
They
know
we
modeled
some
of
the
definitions,
we're
looking
at
off
of
Fairfax
and
I
think
some
other
of
our
neighbors.
How
many?
If
you
know
how
many
micro
procurement
centers
does
Fairfax
have
or
any
of
our
other
localities
that
we
kind
of
looked
at.
G
N
I'd
be
curious,
certainly
with
micro
procurement,
centers
or
my
sense
is
that
it's
location
location
in
terms
of
how
quickly
we
can
get
something
out,
but
I
do
think
that
you
know
given
some
of
our
nearby
neighbors
and
what
other
localities
have
in
terms
of
micro
procurement,
centers
I'd
be
curious
and
kind
of
what
that
spread
is
and
what
we're
sort
of
offering
you're
going
to
have
available.
You
know
by
Arlington
making
these
changes
as
well.
N
N
You
know
good
tenants
and
then
less
good
tenants
and
in
terms
of
sort
of
what
that
looks
like
when
you
have
something
that
you
know
when
you're
talking
about
a
functionality,
that's
going
to
have
a
lot
of
loading
and
unloading
and
that
how
we
establish
you
know
what
hours
that
can
take
place
at
and
what
we
look
at
I
think
we
do
want
to
be
looking
at
some
constraints
or
some
you
know,
enforcement
on
on
those
activities,
because
I
think
that's
what's
going
to
ultimately
what
I
I
think
this
is
a
good
idea.
N
I
am
going
to
support
it,
but
I
think
in
order
for
this
to
be
a
success
and
not
something
that
is
simply
fodder
for
unhappy
neighbors
and
you
know
Bad
Neighbor
relations
I
think
we
need
to
be
cognizant
of
that
and
have
some
parameters
in
place
so
that
the
best
intentions
don't
end
up
with
angry
phone
calls
at
four
in
the
morning.
G
Thank
you
that
that's
appreciated.
We
do
have
our
noise
ordinance
in
place
with
respect
to
noise
and
I
I
do
believe
many
of
our
site
plans
have,
or
some
I'm
going
to
turn
to
Anthony
real
quick,
have
have
conditions
with
respect
to
hours
of
loading
operations
as
well.
Okay,
thank
you.
J
Thank
you,
madam
Vice
chair.
No,
although
I
do
align
myself
with
commissioner
schroll
and
commissioner
hughes's
comments
about
making
sure
that
when
we
propose
a
new
change
to
a
use,
we
try
to
provide
some
Outreach
to
the
community
thanks.
C
M
Yeah,
it
was
the
narrative
version
all
right.
We
recommend
to
adopt
the
attached
ordinance
to
amend
the
the
men
reenact.
E
E
M
Planning
Commission
recommends
to
the
County
Board
that
they
adopt
the
attached
ordinance
to
amend
reenact,
so
men
reenact
and
recodify
our
Arlington
County
zoning
ordinance,
article
7,
8,
11,
12
and
18,
along
with
sections
3
of
appendix
a
and
part
9
of
appendix
B,
to
allow
micro,
fulfillment
centers
through
the
provision
of
use
standards
in
the
ra
4.8,
R,
Dash
c
r.
A
dash
h-32.
H
M
H
A
C
Okay,
I've
seen
you
I,
see
you,
commissioner
Steinberger.
Thank
you.
Okay,
any
further
discussion,
wonderful
shareware
aye,
commissioner
Schulte,
commissioner
Hughes.
H
J
C
Commissioner
Lynn
tell
me
aye
Mr
Steinberger
aye
Mr,
Bagley
aye,
commissioner
Starley
aye,
commissioner
Patel
aye
one
two,
three,
four,
five,
six,
seven,
eight.
We
have
eight
eyes.
The
motion
carries
okay.
We
are
done
with
this
matter.
Thank
you,
so
much
Miss
hunger
for
sticking
in
with
us
on
this
matter.
Thank
you
all.
So
much
thank
you.
Have
a
great
night,
Mr
fussarelli
you're
here
to
give
us
some
updates
on
bylaws,
yes,
foreign.
O
All
right
good
evening,
thank
you
again
for
the
record
Anthony
fusarelli
planning
director
with
Community
planning,
Housing
and
Development
this
evening.
I
am
happy
to
be
here
tonight
really
for
a
brief
follow-up
on
our
conversation
that
we
had
last
month
regarding
the
commission's
recent
transition
to
hybrid
meetings,
beginning
back
in
September
1st.
O
To
start
with,
make
sure
my
slide
deck
is
there
we
go.
Thank
you,
Ms
Johnson,
to
start
with
just
a
few
brief
reminders
on
key
elements
of
the
2022
electronic
meetings.
Bill
effective
as
of
September
one
first,
while
the
Planning
Commission
is
not
one
of
the
several
com
is
one
of
the
several
commissions
that
is
not
eligible
for
volley.
Virtual
meetings.
O
Additionally,
remote
participation
for
medical
reasons,
either
for
self
or
for
family
members.
That
requires
the
care
it
can
be
approved
without
any
specific
numerical
limit.
O
For
a
member
to
participate
electronically,
there
are
several
fundamental
requirements
that
must
be
met.
First,
there
must
be
an
in-person
quorum
and
for
the
full
Planning
Commission
as
exemplify
this
evening.
That
Quorum
is
a
simple
majority
and
then,
when
we
are
talking
about
committees
or
subgroups,
the
Quorum
that
was
incorporated
into
the
revised
bylaws
as
of
last
month
is
the
the
number
of
three
three
members
would
constitute
a
quorum.
O
A
second,
the
chair
of
the
public
body,
must
approve
all
requests
for
individual
members
to
participate
remotely
before
the
meeting,
and
then
this
is
also
really
important
and
I.
Think
worth
emphasizing
is
that
in
our
meeting
minutes
it
must
reflect
with
specificity
the
nature
of
the
personal
matter
for
which
the
member
is
participating
remotely.
So
our
conversations,
our
understanding
to
date
with
our
county
attorney's
office,
is
it's
not
simply
sufficient
to
say
so
and
so
is
participating
remotely
for
personal
matters.
O
There
needs
to
be
some
additional
detail
or
level
of
specificity.
It
doesn't
need
to
go
into
great
detail,
but
there
needs
to
be
more
specificity
than
just
saying
a
personal
matter,
and
for
that
we
appreciate
everyone's
cooperation
going
forward
and
and
over
the
past
few
weeks
already
so
last
month,
the
commission
approved
revisions
to
its
bylaws
that
allowed
for
the
creation
of
subgroups
for
certain
committee
meetings,
especially
for
site
plan,
review
committee
or
sprc.
O
We
also
anticipate
there
will
be
some
lrpc
or
long-range
planning
committee
meetings
where
subgroups
will
be
warranted
and
created
under
the
construct
within
the
bylaws.
Each
subgroup
is
a
distinct
public
body
established
by
the
commission,
with
a
formally
adopted
roster
specific
to
each
subgroup.
Members
May
participate
electronically,
as
I
said
earlier,
for
up
to
two
or
25
percent
of
the
meetings
per
year.
Essentially,
whichever
is
greater
but
again,
all
of
the
other
requirements
need
to
be
met
in
order
for
a
commission
member
to
participate
electronically.
O
So
I
know
I
think
when,
since
we
started
this
transition
in
early
September,
there
have
been
a
number
of
I
think
conversations
and
questions
between
staff
and
members
of
the
commission
preparing
for
upcoming
meetings
at
the
site
plan
review
committee
with
long-range
planning
committee
and
I
know,
there
have
been
a
number
of
questions
and
I
just
wanted
to
share
some
additional
information
and
perspective
this
evening.
That,
hopefully
helps
address
those
questions
and
happy
to
you
know.
O
Take
any
remaining
questions
that
that
you
Commissioners
may
have
a
few
points
to
consider
when
it
comes
to
the
establishment
of
subgroups.
Really.
Is
that
for
a
subgroup
to
be
created,
we
see
the
committee
of
the
Planning
Commission
really
being
the
convener
of
that
particular
process
to
review
a
specific
item.
O
We
also
anticipate
that
you
know
subgroups
and
rosters
would
be
appropriate
to
create
when
there
are
other
stakeholder
groups
or
representatives
of
advisory
boards
and
commissions
that
you
will.
That
would
specifically
be
invited
to
participate
at
the
table
and
also
an
expectation
for
multiple
meetings.
O
You
know
a
process
to
review
is
specific
study
that,
where
it's
not
just
a
a
single
meeting
but
where
there's
anticipated
to
be
several
meetings
as
part
of
a
larger
review
process
and
I,
know
I
think
I
believe
on
the
site
plan
review
committee,
I
think
there's
a
pretty
solid
level
of
clarity
and
understanding
that
we've
been
working
through
I
think
most
recently
were
some
additional
questions
remain,
is
on
the
long-range
planning
committee
Arena
and
to
provide
a
little
bit
more
clarity
here.
O
O
Another
question
that
I
think
has
come
up
and
I
believe.
Actually
the
information
I'm
going
to
share
this
evening
is
a
bit
of
an
update
compared
to
the
information
that
was
shared
back
in
September
through
further
discussions
with
our
County
Attorney's
Office
I.
Think
the
guidance
and
recommendation
that
wanted
that
we've
received
and
wanted
to
sort
of
extend
to
the
commission
is
really
thinking
about
each
of
the
planning
commission's
public
bodies,
if
you
would,
as
an
as
a
distinct
public
body
and
then
accounting
for
the
limits
of
electronic
participation
individually
within
each
public
body.
O
We
would
assume
that
that
would
also
be
up
to
25
per
year.
There's
a
working
exception
there
that
there
would
be
at
least
eight
meetings.
Otherwise,
if
there
were
fewer
than
eight
zoko
meetings,
for
example,
two
would
be
a
greater
number
than
25.
O
So
those
are
you
know
some
details
that
we
will
continue
to
work
through,
but
for
this
illustrative
purpose
this
evening,
just
making
that
assumption
here
and
then
the
important
point
on
the
subgroups
perspective
is
that
each
subgroup
is
really
its
own
entity
and
so
that
if
there
is
a
subgroup
created
for
site
plan
A,
then
there
would
be
each
each
commissioner
could
participate
up
to
two
meetings
per
year
for
that
subgroup.
O
This
is
a
really
just
hypothetical
example,
but
if
we
were
to
look
at
a
a
potential
year
of
meetings,
this
chart
here
really
details
out
Planning,
Commission,
meeting
monthly
hearings
and
the
25
result
of
that.
The
non-sub
group
zoko
and
lrpc
meetings
we've
assumed
here
that
all
sprcs
would
have
a
subgroup
and
that
the
lrpcs
several
lrpcs
would
have
a
subgroup.
O
So
you
could
basically
see
where
the
limit
of
two
meetings
comes
into
play
versus
the
25
percent
and
then,
if
we
were
subtotal
this
all
out
or
total
it
all
out
at
the
bottom,
you
could
see
in
this
hypothetical
you
know
roughly
or
more
than
a
third
of
meetings
could
be
participated
in
electronically,
so
long
as
all
the
proper
requirements
are
met,
and
the
last
slide
here
just
wanted
to
briefly
cover
a
few
of
the
follow-up
questions
from
the
September
meeting.
I.
Think
one
question
was
for
a
joint
meeting.
O
If
there's
a
joint
lrpc
in
zoko
meeting
with
that
Quorum
stay
at
three,
would
it
go
to
six
at
the
the
response
back
from
conversations
with
our
County
attorney?
Is
you
know
if
the
committee
makeup
is
the
same?
The
Quorum
would
remain
at
three.
So
hopefully
that
helps
address
that
question.
O
We
also
learned
that,
unfortunately,
the
Virginia
code
does
not
make
allowances
for
quorums
to
be
temporarily
adjusted
when
Commissioners
might
be
on
FMLA,
and
so
there
really
isn't
any
accommodations
that
the
the
code
currently
allows
for
that.
Based
on
feedback
we've
received
from
the
attorney's
office
and
I.
Think
we've
spoken
to
some
degree
about
the
establishment
and
updating
of
subgroup
rosters.
If
there's
any
further
questions
on
that,
we
would
be
happy
to
try
to
address
them.
O
So
that
is
my
last
slide
and
thank
you
for
your
time
happy
to
take
any
questions
that
might
remain.
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair
Mr,
fusarelli
I
want
to
thank
you
for
walking
through
those
slides
and
providing
the
greater
clarification,
not
a
number
of
questions,
because
a
number
of
those
were
my
questions
that
came
up
this
past
week
and
with
commissioner
and
tell
me
about
an
upcoming
lrpc
meeting.
So
I
do
want
to
thank
you
and
staff
for
providing
that.
That's
great,
and
you
know
I
I,
do
think
that
this
is
is
very
helpful.
E
The
one
question
I
do
have
I
guess:
I
have
one
question
for
you
perhaps
too,
which
is
who's,
making
the
decision
about
whether
an
lrpc
falls
into
a
subgroup
or
not,
and
is
that
something
that
Steph
is
sort
of
determining?
Or
are
you
envisioning
that
that
would
be
a
conversation
with
the
lrpc
chair
in
advance
of
that
decision?
E
I
I
say
that,
because
in
the
lead
up
to
this
meeting,
commissioner
Lynn
tell
me
and
I
had
discussion
with
staff
and
initially
thought
we
should
have
a
subgroup
and
I.
Think
staff
rightly
pointed
out
that
we
were
we
were
Incorrect
and
that
we
didn't
need
one.
But
if
we
did
there
wasn't
time
in
the
calendar
to
have
done
that
for
this
meeting
and
the
lrpc
would
have
had
to
get
pushed
off
a
month,
so
I'm
wondering
or
everybody
has
to
meet
in
person
and
nobody
can
participate.
E
O
Thank
you,
commissioner
schroll
for
for
the
question
and
glad
you
know
glad
to
be
here
tonight
and
hopefully
address
some
of
the
questions
that
have
come
up
idea.
I,
think
the
ideal
situation,
as
is
often
the
case,
is
that
decision
to
really
be
a
jointly
made
decision
between
staff
and
the
commissioner
chairing
that
effort.
I
think
we
would
be
looking
towards
reaching
agreement
and
general
consensus
on
the
approach
and
I
think
we
have.
You
know
good,
a
good
experience
and
Foundation
of
getting
there.
O
We
from
our
perspective,
it's
it.
Certainly
the
committee
or
subgroup
of
the
commission,
and
so
we
are.
We
are
here
to
support
the
work
of
the
commission,
but
I
think
to
the
extent
that
we
could
be
aligned
in
sort
of
the
conclusions
of
how
to
approach
it.
I
think
that
would
be
ideal.
The
one
other
thing
I
would
just
reinforce
and
it
didn't
I,
don't
think
it
would
specifically
was
touched
on
in
my
prepared
remarks.
O
But
you
know
there
also
is,
as
as
many
of
you
know,
who
particularly
have
been
working
with
staff
in
establishing
rosters
for
sprc
there's
a
fair
amount
of
time
of
Staff
time
required,
and
commissioner
time
required
to
kind
of
go
through
and
arrive
at
those
rosters.
And
so,
if
it
is
again
just
one
meeting
we
are
looking
at
or
you
know
one
meeting
it
with
the
potential
for
several
down
the
road.
O
E
Yeah
that's
helpful
and
then
you
mentioned
Mr
fusarelli
that
you
know
if
people
are
participating
virtually
you
know
that
needs
to
be
captured
in
the
meeting
minutes.
E
I'm
wondering
you
know
how
that's
going
to
be
facilitated.
If
you
know
the
chair
is
approving
those
requests,
is
it
as
simple
as
ccing
the
staff
member
or
members
who
are
managing
that
and
that
is
sufficient
to
ensure
that
it's
captured
in
the
meeting
minutes
or
are
you
recommending
a
different
approach.
O
And
thank
you
for
that
follow-up
question.
Just
to
clarify,
are
you
talking?
Are
you
asking
specifically
about
other
members
of
the
commission
who
might
be
participating
electronically
or
members
of
the
public
as
well?
Not.
E
Necessarily
members
of
the
public,
but
if
it's
the
members
of
this
body
or
if
it's
a
member
of
a
subgroup
who's
requesting
particularly
to
participate
virtually
my
understanding
is,
it
has
to
be
captured
in
the
meeting
minutes
and
I'm
wondering,
what's
your
preferred
approach
to
facilitate
that,
is
it
you
know
as
simple
as
ccing,
you
know:
I
I'm
I'm,
leading
an
upcoming
site
plan
with
with
Miss
Badgers,
do
I
just
CC
Miss
badger
on
all
those
Communications.
O
I
think
that's
a
great
question,
I
think
as
on
as
an
interim
solution,
I
think
that
would
be
an
efficient
way
to
manage
that
I
would
also
suggest.
Let
us
go
back
and
look
at
take
another
look
at
some
of
the
guidance
document.
O
We
guidance
documents
we
have
from
some
of
our
support
and
the
communications
and
engagement
group
in
the
manager's
office,
because
we
want
to
be
sure
we're
not
missing
anything
in
terms
of
in
the
meeting
itself
to
what
level
of
detail
you
know,
the
chair
needs
to
acknowledge
that
a
commissioner
or
a
subgroup
member
might
be
participating
electronically
and
whether
or
not
there
needs
to
be
a
certain
level
of
detail
in
terms
of
their
participation,
so
we'll
regroup
on
that.
O
But
I
think
for
the
time
being,
absolutely
you
know
good
practice
to
copy
staff
on
approved,
requests
for
and
actually
requests
that
aren't
approved,
because
those
also
I
believe
need
to
be
captured
in
the
minutes
as
well.
That's.
E
C
H
B
O
Absolutely
please
give
me
one
one
moment:
foreign.
B
I
just
want
to
make
sure
everyone
that
this
isn't
lost
on
anyone
that
this
nightmare
of
a
table
to
have
to
wrap
your
mind
around
is
why
we
are
here.
It
is
why
we've
been
having
this
conversation,
why
we
have
asked
y'all
to
wrap
your
brains
around
bylaws
Arcana,
and
it
is
why
Mr
fusirelli
and
his
team
have
put
in
just
an
ungodly
amount
of
time
into
figuring
out
these
questions
and
I
I
will
speak
for
myself,
but
I.
B
Think
I'll
speak
for
everyone
to
say
again
how
much
we
appreciate
the
work
that
you've
all
put
in
so
far.
I
think
that
there
are
a
few
areas
where
we're
not
necessarily
pleased,
as
you
predicted,
with
the
guidance
we've
gotten
from
the
county
attorney
and
that
you
know,
perhaps
that
will
be
reflected
in
Emotion
when
we
get
to
the
legislative
priorities.
You
know,
but
but
thank
you
again
absolutely.
K
Oh
first
I
want
to
thank
commissioner
stroll
for
raising
the
questions
I
otherwise
would
have
raised.
So
thank
you
there,
but
if
you
get
the
slide
deck
back
up
again,
I
just
told
you
don't
take
it
down.
Quite
yet,
I
did
have
a
quorum
question
from
one
of
the
beginning,
slides.
K
O
O
For
the
subgroups
I
believe
the
bylaws
that
were
the
revised
bylaws
that
were
adopted
in
September,
it
would
be
three
members
total
planning,
Commissioners
or
non-planning
Commissioners.
However,
one
of
those
one
of
those
three
members
who
are
physically
present
to
constitute
that
Quorum
must
be
a
commissioner,
a
planning
commissioner.
K
So
presumably
the
chair
would
be
there
anyway,
but
so
the
member
of
the
lion
Park
civic
association,
who's
at
the
table
would
count
in
the
Quorum
and
the
representative
from
the
parks
and
rec
commission
who's.
There
would
count
as
the
Quorum
as
long
as
they
were
on
the
approved
roster
exactly
perfect.
Thank
you.
That's
the
clarification
I
needed
yeah.
Thank
you.
N
O
N
O
It
is
a
commission
that
has
more
flexibility,
because,
in
contrast
to
the
Planning
Commission,
which
is
one
of
the
few
commissions
that
can't
have
any
100
virtual
meetings,
the
public
Facilities
Review
Committee
can
in
fact
have
a
certain
number
of
all
virtual
meetings.
Okay,.
O
N
Done
with
career
center
now
and
that's
going
to
continue
as
it
has
been,
yes,
I
think
that'll
kind
of
run
that,
but,
as
we
have
other
actions
coming
up,
I'm
sure
I
will
have
questions
just
so
we
get
this
right
and
everyone's
in
a
good
headspace.
But
that
addresses
my
immediate
question.
So
thank
you.
Thank.
C
H
Just
want
to
remind
my
my
colleagues
that
when
we
get
in
the
elevator,
we're
only
allowed
to
talk
about
the
weather
and
we
can
never
take
off
our
hats
as
being
a
commissioner,
and
so
even
if
we
wanted
to
sit
in
a
meeting
publicly,
if
one
of
us
shows
up
to
a
meeting,
the
two
of
us
are
at
as
a
member
of
the
public,
we
create
a
very
uncomfortable
conundrum,
so
trust
your
colleagues
listen
after
the
fact,
but
try
to
avoid
attending
if
two
people
are
already
there.
That's
my
only
comment.
C
O
You
and
I
know
I
know
we
are
actively
still
working
on
some
other
solutions
to
provide
additional
support,
to
make
your
roles
and
responsibilities
as
to
to
not
create
any
additional.
You
know
excessive
work
beyond
what
we
can
help
limit
by
way
of
tracking
attendance
and
leveraging
the
information
from
the
meeting
summaries
for
individual
purposes
for
your
own
tracking.
We
will
follow
up
on
the
information
for
how
best
to
relay
approvals
and
non-approvals
for
requests
so
we'll
we
will
definitely
be
in
touch.
Thank.
A
C
An
awesome,
Madam
clerk
I
also
just
went
ahead
and
called
Mr
fusarelli
and
I
didn't
even
check
with
you.
So
I
apologize
spoke
out
of
turn.
May
may.
We
I
know
we're
just
gonna
move
them
right
along
may
we
move
on
to
number
three,
the
PC
reports
and
other
business
sure
yeah,
that's
fine.
We
go
ahead
and.
C
You,
okay,
so
has
everybody,
has
received
the
September
7th
2022
meeting
minutes.
I
am
going
to
ask
for
unanimous
consent
for
approval
of
those
minutes.
Any
it's!
Okay.
If
you
were
not
here
what
chair
Weir
has
taught
us.
Is
we
just
don't
say
anything,
I
know,
okay,
so
seeing
no
objection,
those
meeting
minutes
are
approved.
C
Wonderful
couple,
other
things
we
have
I'm
going
to
seek
unanimous
consent
to
approve
the
actually.
Let
me
let
me
start
here,
commissioner
Peterson
had
sent
over
a
sprc
report
for
everybody
and
in
that
contained
a
notice
that
we
need
to
approve
two
news:
subgroups
for
the
svrc
rosters,
for
Boston
Macy's
and
Bingham
Center
Silver
Diner
sites,
as
well
as
approve
the
two
amended
subgroup,
sprc
rosters
for
Joyce
Motors
and
the
Boston
Holiday
Inn.
Yes,.
B
K
C
Okay,
perfect.
Thank
you!
Wonderful.
We
ready
great,
thank
you.
So
we
have
the
Bingham
Center
Silver
Diner
site
on
our
computer
monitors
here.
So
I
am
going
to
see
unanimous
consent
to
approve
the
new
subgroup,
sprc
roster
for
the
Bingham
Center
Silver
Diner
site,
any
objection,
okay,
seeing
them
so
moved
and
then
do
we
have
the
Boston
Macy's,
so
I
seek
unanimous
consent
to
approve
the
new
subgroup,
sbrc
roster
for
Boston
Macy's,
any
objection,
wonderful,
so
moved
and
then
I'm
going
to
seek
a
motion
for
from
commissioner
schro
on
the
amended
subgroup.
E
All
right,
thank
you,
madam
chair,
so
I
would
move
to
ask
unanimous
consent
to
amend
the
previously
approved
roster
for
the
Joyce
Motors
site
plan
to
include
updated
members
from
the
climate
change,
energy
and
environment,
commission,
disability,
advisory,
commission
and
pedestrian
advisory
commission.
As
shown
on
the
screen
in.
C
Oh
I'm,
sorry,
you
asked
for
you
okay,
any
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Any
objection,
okay,
wonderful,
seeing,
no
objection,
okay
and
then
the
last
one
commissioner
Shaw.
If
you
wouldn't
mind
helping.
E
C
B
So
this
is
the
long-threatened
discussion
on
recommendations
to
the
county
board
for
inclusion
in
the
County's
legislative
priorities,
a
couple
of
things
just
high
level
right.
This
is
there's
a
lot
of
filter.
B
The
language
itself
isn't
I
think
so
as
important
as
the
as
the
the
gist
of
the
ideas
that
we're
trying
to
Signal
our
that
we
care
about
to
the
county,
remembering
that
this
has
got
to
go
through
a
lot
of
filters,
not
the
last
of
which
is
the
legislative
affairs
people
which
actually
are
the
ones
that
would
do
anything
with
them
and-
and
you
know,
that's
a
whole
different
set
of
factors
to
consider
and
and
with
that
being
said,
you
know
these
are
on
screen,
but
I'll
I'll
I'll,
just
the
the
one
that
I
I
want
to
note
and
I.
B
Think
I
might
do
it
as
a
separate
motion
just
so
that
we
don't
get
too
confused.
I.
Think
I
want
to
do
something
separate
to
encourage
authority
to
have
members
of
commissions
take
leaves
of
absences
for
worthy
purposes.
I
I've
got
to
give
myself
a
minute
to
think
that
through
on
the
one
hand,
you
know
the
reason
that
that
it's
not
a
thing
that's
done
is
because
people
don't
take
leaves
of
absences
from
Boards
of
directors.
That's
not
how
it
works.
On
the
other
hand,
we
don't
have
a
fiduciary
obligation.
B
We
are
not
the
County
Board.
We
are
not
members
of
a
board
of
directors.
We
have
an
obligation
to
the
board,
but
we're
in
a
very
different
category
than
the
kind
of
parliamentary
body,
deliberative
body
that
someone
might
say.
Why
are
you
asking
if
a
member
of
the
board
can
take
a
leave
of
absence?
That's
a
stupid
question.
Go
away,
I
think
that
that
commissions
are
different.
B
They
are
of
a
different
character
and
and
the
the
kinds
of
things
things
that
that
the
actual
elected
boards
want
from
commissions,
are
of
a
different
nature,
and
so
I
don't
mind
asking
the
County
Board
to
give
some
thought
to
charging
the
legislative
affairs
staff
with
giving
some
thought
to
that.
I
know
exactly
where
it's
going
to
probably
go,
but
I
don't
mind
asking
them
to
think
about
it.
So.
B
Quorum
well,
that's
the
point
right
is
that
that
a
leave
of
absence
welcomes
someone
back
to
the
body
by
by
operation
of
the
rules
themselves,
but
during
their
their
leave
right.
The
denominator
goes
down
by
one.
So
that's,
but
but
yes,
that's,
that's
a
good
point
and
I'll
go
up
that
that's
the
other
reason.
I
wanted
to
take
these
separately
so
that
we
can
have
a
conversation
about
what
people
have
already
sent
to
me
and
I've
tried
to
distill
and
the
only
other
thing
that
I'll
make
the
point
that
I'll
make.
B
Then
thank
you,
commissioner,
and
tell
me
the
only
other
point
that
I'll
make
is
that
this
is
not
my
like.
The
language
reflects
my
way
of
drafting
it,
but
these
are
ideas
that
have
come
from
a
number
of
you
on
on
the
commission.
You
know,
commissioner,
might
tell
me
you
might
recognize
one
or
two
of
yours
here
I
know,
commissioner
Peterson
has
a
lot
of
these
I've
got
some
of
these
commissioner
gearen
has
been
the
source
of
some
of
these,
and
I
said.
B
That
was
the
last
thing,
but
it's
actually
not
the
last
thing.
There's
one
change
here:
number
six
is
different
than
what
I
circulated
earlier
today
that
number
six
earlier
today,
I
had
said
that
that
it
should
be
the
language
that
I
said,
included
was
a
little
different.
B
This
just
says
that
this
just
is
basically
an
endorsement
of
of
a
letter
that
the
the
forestry
and
National
Resource
Commission
sent
earlier
about
very
broadly
deliberately
so,
tools
for
preventing
canopy
loss,
I
I
realized
that
I
left
one
more
out
here.
So
I'm
gonna
have
two
separate
motions,
we'll
deal
with.
B
C
H
H
That's
the
problem
with
a
lot
of
these
and
it's
kind
of
the
Arlington
approach
problem
I'm
going
to
describe
it.
That
way
is
it.
We
have
to
remember
that
Arlington.
If
we're
not
appropriate
and
deferential
to
our
place
in
the
Commonwealth,
we
create
ourselves
problems
that
we
don't
otherwise
need
to,
and
by
that
I'll
give
this
a
very
specific
example.
The
prohibition
on
the
school
board's
ability
to
have
negotiations
with
a
school
school
teacher
Union
was
the
direct
result
of
40
years
ago's
decisions
or
30
years
ago.
H
Decisions
that
the
state
legislature
then
chose
to
not
only
remove
the
privilege
but
forbid
the
privilege,
and
so
a
lot
of
these
things.
I
I
generally
agree
with,
but
it's
the
approach
and
I
think
we
need
to
convey
not
only
our
hope
that
these
things
could
change,
but
maybe
ways
we
could
try
to
do
so
in
a
way
that
respects
the
other
parts
of
our
community
that
have
different
priorities
and
decisions
and
I
can
use
many
examples.
H
The
example
we
just
talked
about
was
the
excuse
of
of
a
fiduciary
obligation
to
the
community
for
our
planning
responsibility.
We
do
it's
embodied
in
state
code,
we're
one
of
the
few
commissions
that
are
stuck
having
to
be
in
person.
H
For
those
reasons,
and
in
most
of
the
Commonwealth,
the
size
of
the
Planning
Commission
is
the
exact
same
number
of
the
County
board
members,
so
I,
just
I
I
am
so
deferential
to
making
sure
that
the
request
we
have
is
something
that
we
can
achieve,
because
if
we
narrow
our
approach
to
achievable
goals,
we
can
find
Partners
in
the
state.
But
if
we
just
ask
for
everything,
we
wish
that
the
world
had
we're
going
to
end
up
with
nothing
more
than
them,
taking
away
privileges
that
we
wish.
H
We
still
had
and
that's
the
reaction
that
can
be
generated
across
the
state
because
I
remember
a
tour
of
Barcroft
with
a
civic
association
president
who
was
a
friend
of
mine,
and
we
showed
me
a
dilapidated
building
and
I
said
it's
not
nearly
the
most
dilapidated
building
I've
seen
in
the
Commonwealth,
and
his
point
was,
but
it's
terrible
see
when
I
go.
H
B
You,
commissioner,
Hughes
I,
have
two
two
responses.
The
first
is:
please
understand
that
my
comment
about
the
official
obligation
was
ex
was
highly
contextualized
within
the
context
of
the
relationship
of
a
member
of
a
board
of
directors
to
a
corporation
within
a
court.
You
know
within
the
body
of
corporate
law,
not
within
not
to
say
anything
about
our
relationship
to
the
community
in
general.
B
A
second
I
think
more
substantively.
Please
keep
in
mind
that
you
know
we
we're
having
this
conversation
in
part,
because,
because
we,
like
all
of
the
commissions,
have
been
asked
by
the
board
to
make
any
recommendations
based
on
our
bailiwick,
our
conversations
and
our
experiences
over
the
last
year
to
flag
issues
for
for
their
deliberation
in
the
as
to
the
legislative
affairs
package
right.
Our
our
job
here
is
only
to
speak
to
the
issues
that
we
have
encountered
and
our
thoughts
about
possible
solutions
to
those
issues.
B
These
broader
conversations
that
and
and
concerns
as
we're
talking
about,
are
well
placed,
but
I
think
that
they
are
more
well
placed
with
the
County
Board
than
they
are
with
us.
Our
charge
is
to
surface
the
issues
that
we
have
come
across.
I,
don't
I,
don't
I
your
your
philosophical
concerns
are
well
received.
That's
I
just
wanted
to
point
that
out.
Okay.
C
C
B
B
If
anyone,
if
anyone
has
one
or
two
that
they
are
concerned
about,
you
know,
a
motion
to
to
break
one
or
two
of
them
out
would
be
in
order.
I
mean
that's
a
that's
a
normal
part
of
the
deliberation,
so
I
think
we
start
with
the
motion
on
the
whole
package.
B
N
I
had
a
clarification.
Question
got
my
hand
up
fast
enough,
I
think
so.
With
regards
to
item
five
public
bodies
procluded
by
Statue,
from
conducting
virtual
meetings
allowing
a
virtual
meeting.
If
so
long
as
no
votes
are
already
taken
at
that
meeting,
a
can
you
CL
I
mean
usually
we're
in
the
context
like
for
Planning
Commission,
like
we're
voting
on
something
whether
we're
approving
minutes
or
anything
like.
Is
there
ever
a
meeting
in
which
we're
not
voting
at
on.
B
Something
meetings
of
the
sprc,
the
lrpc
and
the
zoning
committee
are
Committees
of
the
whole
and
and
it's
those
non-sub
group
meetings,
where
that's
just
the
one-off
of
the
lrpc
of
the
zoning
committee.
If
we
were
to
have
a
meeting
of
the
sprc
for
the
purpose
of
giving
feedback
on
a
specific
thing
like
like,
we
did
when
it
came
to
default
site
plan
conditions
right.
These
would
be
meetings
of
the
Planning
Commission
meetings
of
the
Planning
Commission
meeting.
B
N
C
To
do
it,
I,
don't
think
so
is
okay
sure.
So,
commissioner
Weir
has
moved
this
bucket
of
recommendations,
and
is
there
a
second
on
it?
You
did.
I
Okay,
maybe
I've
been
off
on
Mars
somewhere,
it's
a
possibility,
but
I
didn't
get
these
until
5
17
this
afternoon
and
I
didn't
get
out
of
my
office
until
after
six.
So
this
is
kind
of
you
know
before
this,
and
just
now
so
I'm
having
a
hard
time
number
two,
particularly
as
I
think
about
the
3901
Fairfax,
where
there
was
money
that
was
supposed
to
be
given
back
because
the
black
box
theater
or
something
I,
don't
want
that
going
out
of
the
neighborhood.
We've
fought
really
hard
for
that.
I
There
were
a
lot
of
bad
feelings
about
that.
So
if
this
has
any
sort
of
effect
on
that,
I
can't
support
it,
but
again
getting
it
at
5
17
this
afternoon,
I
I,
don't
feel
necessarily
schooled
up
enough
on
it
to
comment,
but
number
two
sticks
out
to
me
and
for
that
reason,
if
we
vote
on
it
as
a
you
know,
a
total
thing
I'll
have
to
abstain.
So
thank
you.
Thank.
C
You,
commissioner,
Garen
had
her
hand
up
and
I
think
we
couldn't
see
it,
because
we
have
our
screens
like
this.
So
I'd
like
to
go
to
commissioner
Garen.
Oh.
J
B
Thank
you,
commissioner
gear
and
I'm
silent,
because
I'm
trying
to
remember
what
it
was
that
I
thought
that
I
had
in
mind.
As
I
wrote.
This.
B
C
O
That
is,
that
is
correct.
I
can
confirm
that
the
what
what
transpired
and
what
played
out
at
3901
Fairfax
does
not
have
any
direct
relationship
to
what
is
the
subject
of
item
two
here.
C
So
I'm
just
going
to
try
to
help
kind
of
move
this
conversation
a
little
bit.
Can
we
is
there
a
way
does
do
people
feel
comfortable?
What's
the
appetite
for
kind
of
lumping
a
few
of
these
together,
that
are
substance
like
they're
in
the
same
area
like
trees
and
then
other
things
that
are
like
meetings
to
be
able
to
kind
of
move
this
along
and
see
what
we
feel
comfortable
as
a
Planning
Commission
to
recommend
and
where
we
have
some
abstention
or
no
votes.
N
H
N
Specific
action
like
an
actual
legislative
action,
number
eight
is
sort
of
like
a
sense
of
like
Commission
I
feel
like
like
a
recommendation.
Well,
commissioner,
Hughes
stated
before
in
terms
of
where
we
could
end
up
losing
things
that
we
already
have
number
eight
really
sets
us
up
for
that
and
I'm.
Just
not
really
sure
where
that
gets
us
I
would
I
could
support
this
list.
If
we
took
eight
out.
B
Remember
the
origin
of
that
one
particular
bullet
and
so
I
I.
My
apologies
to
whichever
of
our
colleagues,
had
suggested
that
language,
but
I
I
was
not
able
to
bring
that
to
a
more
discreet.
B
I
would
also
see
unanimous
consent
regarding
number
six
to
change
the
language
to
endorse
the
forestry
and
natural
resources
commission's
recommendations
dated
August
one
concerning
canopy
coverage
and
authorities
sufficient
to
stem
the
loss
of
our
invaluable
tree.
Canopy
I
think
that's.
The
language
I
was
trying
to
use
any.
C
E
H
I
M
C
C
B
Three
more
actually
and
I
want
to
take
these
in
order
of
of
I,
think
least,
to
most
controversial.
The
first
would
be
to
add
I
I,
moved
to
add
to
this
list:
Grant
author
Grant
local
governments
authorities
to
remove
limits
to
to
Grant
authorities,
Grant
local
governments
authorities
to
reduce
limits
on
the
use
of
speed
cameras.
B
H
B
H
A
position
of
the
lower
speed
should
be
the
priority
in
an
urban
area.
Fundamental,
that's
what
you
two
are
trying
to
get
to
as
the
enforcement
mechanism
of
it,
but
the
first
step
is
kind
of
why
no
one
speeds
down
seven
and
Falls
Church,
because
everybody
knows
you
will
get
a
ticket
pretty
quickly.
If
you
do
so,
that's
why
nobody
goes
more
than
25
downfalls,
Church
route,
7.,
so
many
places
in
Arlington.
C
Okay,
so
I'm
just
gonna,
say
this
because
I
feel
I
feel
like
this
is
nostalgic
for
where
we
were
once
when
commissioner
Steinberger
said
is
kind
of
happening
a
little
bit
too
much
in
the
dark
for
me,
and
so
I
am
going
to
abstain
from
this
motion,
because
I
don't
feel
that
we
have
enough
information
on
it.
C
Number
one
number
two
I
remember
the
issues
of
speed
cameras
coming
up
in
in
the
context
of
police
practices
group-
and
there
was
a
lot
of
conversation
around
Equity
concerns
and
other
issues
that
come
up
in
that
space,
so
politely
I
will
abstain.
Maybe
a
force
to
take
further
action.
I
would
probably
oppose
it
just
because
again,
I
don't
have
enough
information
to
be
intelligently
deciding
on
this
issue.
K
No,
the
only
reason
I
was
Raising
it,
because
I
felt
that
speed
cameras
are
inherently
more
Equitable
than
having
police
enforcement
in
the
sense
that
anybody
going
by
it
doesn't
matter
who's
doing
it.
It's
the
car
that
goes
it's
the
vehicle,
it's
not
who's,
driving
it
that
gets
gets
caught
by
it
and
there
is
not
the
discretion
that
the
police
would
otherwise
have
to
either
choose
to
to
stop
someone
or
to
let
them
go
once
they
did
the
speed.
Camera
takes
the
picture
and
it's
the
license
plate.
That's
that's!
That's
done.
It
also
gives
information.
K
C
K
C
I
I,
don't
disagree
with
you,
commissioner
told
me.
I
am
obviously
not
gonna
I'm,
not
the
I'm,
not
a
person
on
this
commission
that
likes
to
do
a
lot
of
back
and
forth,
but
having
experience
in
that
space
in
District
of
Columbia
there's
a
it's.
It's
ripe
with
a
lot
of
issues
so
anyways.
Let's
go
ahead
and
vote
on
this.
Commissioner
hi
commissioner
schroll
hi,
commissioner
Hughes.
J
M
C
B
The
next
one
is
to
I
I
move
to
include
among
the
legislative
package
recommendation
that
the
Commonwealth
authorized.
Members
of
County
appointed
advisory
commissions,
including
planning
commissions,
to
take
medical
leaves
of
absence
such
as
parental
leave
or
other
longer
term,
leave
consistent
with
FMLA.
That
allows
for
the
automatic
Return
of
the
commissioner
to
the
body
and
allows
that,
commissioner,
to
not
be
counted
for
the
purpose
of
determining
a
quorum
and.
C
J
C
B
The
last
one
is
to
this
one:
I'm
gonna
I,
don't
necessarily
know
that
everyone's
gonna
agree
with
this
and
I
agree
with
and
I
acknowledge.
Preliminarily
you're
preemptively
acknowledge,
commissioner
bagley's
concerns
about
the
the
late
nature
of
the
distribution.
That's
on
me,
but
I'm
still
going
to
suggest
it
and,
if
I'm
out
voted
I'm
outvoted,
but
that
the
Commonwealth
adopt
changes
to
the
building
code
to
re-permit
and
I
can
say
more
about
that.
In
a
moment.
The
use
of
single
stairways
for
smaller
floor
plate,
multi-family
apartment
buildings
up
to
six
stories.
B
C
E
I
have
a
clarifying
questions.
Madam
chair,
which
is,
is
that
not
in
the
base
motion
as
number
seven.
C
Okay,
we're
gonna
move
on
committee
report.
We've
got
we've
taken
care
of
commissioner
site
plan
review
committee
have.
B
K
K
There
will
be
an
lrpc
on
the
17th
for
missing
middle
and
I'm.
So
looking
forward
to
that,
oh,
my
goodness,
the
19th
there'll
be
a
joint
lrpc
for
both
the
Chesapeake
Bay
plan
and
the
forestry
and
natural
resources
plan
updates
to
the
comprehensive
plan.
Both
of
those
items
will
be
considered
at
that
one
meeting
and
then
on
the
25th
there'll
be
an
lrpc
for
plan,
Langston
Boulevard.
That
will
be
an
update,
and
commissioner
schroll
has
graciously
consented
to
to
lead
that
effort
in
November.
K
We
have
a
couple
coming
up
that
are
only
tentative,
so
you
don't
necessarily
have
to
put
it
on
your
calendar
quite
yet,
but
be
aware
that
these
are
coming
up.
2500,
Wilson
Boulevard,
a
special
Club
study
tier
one
special
glove
study.
That's
the
property
next
door
to
the
courthouse
West
that
we've
already
considered
that
will
have
to
have
a
subgroup
and
then
the
lrp
there'll
be
an
lrpc
on
the
22nd
or
the
29th
and
that'll
be
the
Sunrise
Assisted
Living.
K
You
may
remember
there
already:
we've
had
one
meeting
on
that
and
again,
commissioner
schroll
is
chairing
that
there
will
also
have
to
be
a
subgroup
that
we'll
have
to
adopt
from
that
and
in
December
we're
looking
to
have
the
lrpc
for
the
sanitary
sewer
master
plan.
K
We,
you
know
that's
again,
tentative,
but
that's
one
that
was
the
incentive
since
over
a
year
ago.
So
maybe
we'll
actually
have
it
this
time,
try
not
to
be
too
snarky
I'm.
Sorry,
anyway,
that's
what's
coming
up
for
the
lrpcs.
K
Thank
you
all
and
I
do
look
forward
to
seeing
people
at
these
meetings.
Thank
you.
M
So
perhaps
the
chair
and
the
vice
chair
have
more
pertinent
information
than
I.
Do
we
had
a
couple
meetings
scheduled
for
October
but
I
think
they're
off
the
docket
and
I'm
sort
of
waiting
to
hear
what's
going
to
happen
and
when
it's
going
to
happen
in
November
regarding
the
missing
middle
zoko,
me
too,
so
that's
my
report,
fantastic.
N
That's
me
yes,
career
center
is
proceeding,
commissioner
Peterson
stepped
in
very
ably
for
me,
while
I
was
on
maternity
leave,
so
I've
been
coordinating
with
her
on
the
meetings
that
she
chaired
for
when
we
have
Planning
Commission
for
lrpc,
while
I
wasn't
available,
we
have
a
letter
that
we're
reviewing
now
that
will
go
to
the
school
board
ahead
of
our
presentation
to
them.
N
I
will
be
presenting
the
school
board
on
October
13th,
which
point
the
school
board
will
make
some
decisions
on
how
they're
going
to
be
moving
forward,
and
then
there
may
be
some
additional
career
center
meetings
after
that.
But
at
this
point
that's
sort
of
what's
Happening
career
center-wise
for
pfrc
and.
H
Foreign
for
FPC,
we
don't
have
anything
urgent
on
the
current
docket,
but
there
is
the
Bank
of
America
site
project
that
will
our
Bank
of
America
property,
which
you've
already
heard
is
any
minute
for
and
the
implications
with
the
I
forget
the
building's
name
at
this
point.
But
the
Macy's
Boston
site
plan
is
connected
to
a
form-based
code
project,
possibly.
C
C
B
Once
upon
a
time,
we
would
have
had
gift
baskets
we're
trying
to
get
back
there
and
food,
but
to
Stephen
and
Sarah.
Congratulations.