►
Description
Armagh City, Banbridge and Craigavon Borough Council Planning & Regulatory Services Meeting on Wednesday 5th July at 3:00pm
A
Borrow
with
me
please,
because
I
am
still
on
the
boat
at
the
minute.
I
just
got
off
this
morning,
I'm
Still
rocking
to
leave
it
so,
okay,
okay,
can
I
ask
ICT
to
start
the
live
feed
good
afternoon
members
or
good
afternoon.
Everyone
welcome
to
the
regulatory
section
of
the
hybrid
planning
on
regulatory
service
command
made.
Can
I
ask
everyone
to
please
meet
the
microphones
at
all
times
unless
invite
it
speak.
A
Pay
myself
for
those
of
you
who
are
physically
in
the
council
chamber,
can
I
remind
you
that
when
speaking
into
your
microphone,
you
need
to
wait
until
you
see
your
sales
on
the
screen,
so
delay
feed
can
pick
up
your
comments
if
you
speak
before
your
image
is
projected
those
listening
on
the
live,
feed
or
if
I
assume
may
not
or
will
not
hear
what
you
say.
This
is
obviously
particularly
important
in
the
case
of
a
vote
being
required.
Audio
recording
is
being
used
assistant
preparing
formal
minutes.
A
A
A
D
D
The
last
thing
is
being
considered
under
Section
AV
part.
One
of
the
plowing
Act
DFC
has
assessed
the
merits
of
listing
the
chaos
against
their
published
criteria
and
in
this
case
the
significant
criteria
include
style
proportion,
ornamentation
plan
form,
quality
and
survival
of
interior
age,
authenticity,
authorship,
social,
cultural
and
economic
importance,
Rarity
and
local
interest.
They
have
noted
also
that
their
alterations
direct
detracting
from
the
the
building,
so
in
their
survey
they
have
an
appendix
one.
D
They
have
described
the
chaos
as
a
ks6
model
or
cast
iron
construction
built
to
suggest
Gilbert,
Scott's,
standardized
design
of
1935.
and
the
advice
that,
despite
the
loss
of
the
original
graze
panels
and
the
replacement
was
perspex.
This
is
still
an
important
example
of
an
iconic
piece
of
straight
Furniture,
which
is
now
increasingly
rare,
and
it's
it's
within
the
visual
range
of
the
best
of
vernacular
Public,
House
and
greatly
hours
to
the
distinctiveness
of
the
settlement
of
the
tarahan.
D
The
council's
viewers
have
been
sold
regarding
the
the
proposed
listing
and
the
draft
response
that's
attached
to
the
pansex
T,
which
includes
the
planning
status,
the
constraints
and
Advising
the
whites.
The
council
has
no
objections
to
the
proposed
nesting.
It
would
be
supportive
of
the
property
owner
if
they
were
to
raise
any
concerns.
So
it's
recommended
that
members
would
approve
that
draft
response.
A
C
Yeah,
it's
just
it's
just
a
point
of
note.
I've
experienced
recently
in
another
case
where
a
resident
was
one
similar
phone
box
of
similar
age
moved
because
it
was
providing
an
obstacle
for
access
to
his
property.
With
him
there
was
a
farm
accessed
off.
You
know
a
small,
very
small
development,
but
up
you
know
the
tractors
and
trailers
and
stuff
had
to
make
a
quite
sharp
turn,
and
the
phone
box
was
just
on
the
opposite,
the
the
turn
off,
and
ideally
he
was
wanting
to
move
and
he
made
inquiries
to
that
effect.
C
But
then,
in
the
whole
intervening
period
the
phone
box
was
listed
and
not
really
complicated
things
because
BT
wouldn't
even
provide
a
price
to
the
channel
man
for
the
costs
of
just
moving
at
a
few
yards
because
it
was
listed.
So
you
know
I'm
not
quite
sure,
as
the
processor
d-listen,
something
even
temporarily
to
get
it
moved,
but
it
just
sounds
like
a
complete
nightmare.
If
you
had
to
do
it
so
I'm
just
wondering
in
this
circumstance
I'm
looking
at
the
Footers,
there
is
a
property
quite
close,
so
I'm
just
wondering
you
know.
C
I
know
there
are
some
consultation
takes
place,
but
I
don't
know
what
we
can
do
about
this,
but
in
terms
of
just
the
views
of
that
Resident,
given
the
fact
that
this
is
going
to
be
in
place
forever
and
a
day-
and
you
know-
is
that
something
there
should
be
me
and
more
aware
about.
You
know
again
ass
down
to
this
list
issue
where
residential
views
aren't
really
taken
on
board
or
given
much
weight.
C
A
D
No,
no
Char
the
process
is
a
statutory
obligation
to
consult
with
the
owner
and
the
district
kind.
So
so,
and
in
this
case,
I
had
gone
back
to
the
second
clarification
of
who
the
owner
was,
and
I
said
that
they
had,
they
told
me
they
had
consultant
with
BT
who
they
understood
to
be
the
owner,
that
that's
the
only
consultation
that
there
is
there's
there's
no
public
consultation
on
it
as
such.
A
A
E
A
F
D
Had
me
at
the
point
before
without
other
chaos
about
you
know
the
turning
and
when
it
was
getting
in
the
way
after
the
farmer,
you
know
I'm
I'm,
not
sure
again,
it
would
be.
It
would
be
a
case
between
who
the
landowner
was
and
who
the
owner
of
the
kiosk
was
whether
there
would
be
the
wedding
to
John
take
a
move
off,
but
the
word
need
to
apply
for
a
vegetable
and
consent
to
do
any
alterations
to
it.
A
No
problem
honey
thanks
care
members:
can
they
get
a
second
we'll?
Have
a
proposal
pay
commissary
can
I
get
a
secondary
to
the
draft
response?
Second
pay
concert
only.
Thank
you
very
much.
All
agreed
a
great.
Thank
you
very
much.
Members
move
on
to
3.2
notice
of
opinion
from
Department
of
infrastructure
on
a
regionally
significant
planning
application
and
I'm
going
to
bring
engineer,
McAvoy
accounting
manager,
two
percent,
this
Adam.
F
G
G
H
Thank
you
chair.
That's
the
notice
opinion
from
the
Department
for
infrastructure
and
raising
a
significant
planning
application.
It's
a
section
54
application,
which
has
been
similar
to
sick
non-compliance
with
two
specific
conditions
attached
to
Lochte
extraction,
permission,
initially
request
and
removal
of
condition
relating
to
the
Restriction
operation
during
the
hours
of
Darkness
during
winter
months,
which
is
condition
seven
and
a
variation
to
condition.
H
12
provide
a
level
of
flexibility
to
the
operating
companies
when
seeking
to
replace
the
sound
barges,
conditions
serve
and
excludes
operation
in
the
hours
of
darken
Darkness
during
the
winter
months
to
avoid
disturbance
of
the
site
selection
features,
notably
while
file
additional
survey.
Work
has
been
completed
by
the
project,
ecologists
and
further
Shadow
habitat
regulations.
Assessment
has
been
reduced
to
company
the
application.
The
national
environment
deviation
stated
in
regards
to
condition
seven.
H
The
caution
is
required,
as
it
cannot
be
conclusively
determined
through
the
service
that
displacement
from
forage
and
areas,
particularly
during
Ferry,
cold
weather,
can
be
ruled
out.
They
have
recommended,
therefore,
that
a
12
hour
undisturbed
forestine
period
for
boards
from
November
to
February,
is
conditioned
with
barge
operations
confined
to
the
period
of
all.
Six
hundred
dollars
to
1800
hours
during
that
period
and
such
a
condition
that
reflects
the
comment
of
this
expert
constantly
would
be
attached
to
the
decision
notice
rather
than
its
removal.
That
is
reflected
in
condition
number
six
on
your
tax
correspondence.
H
The
application
is
also
potent
to
develop
land
without
compliance
with
condition
12,
which,
if
approved,
would
result
in
a
change
to
the
size
of
the
barges
currently
permitted
to
be
operated.
Dfi
are
content.
There
may
not
be
any
visual
disturbance
on
sensitive
receptors
through
the
non-compliant
of
this
condition
in
its
present
form
and
then
closing
of
an
amended
wording.
H
Authors
would
face
a
dear
and
National
environment,
division,
Water,
Management
unit
and
Inland
Fisheries
shared
environmental
services
and
our
own
Environmental
Health
Department,
as
well
as
the
other
kinds
of
environmental
Department,
have
all
been
consulted
and
offer
no
objections
to
the
opposal
subject
to
the
conditions
and
the
section
76
legal
agreement
officers.
There
are
four
Mega
Man
that
we
respond
to
the
department
confirming
that
the
council
do
not
wish
to
request
an
opportunity
to
appear
before
and
be
heard
by
the
plan.
I
A
Okay,
members
can
I
get
a
proposal
proposed
by
Alderman.
Wilson
can
I
get
a
secondary
second
by
cancer.
Duffy
wall
agreed
a
great
thank
you
very
much
members
I'm
going
to
move
on
to
Adam
for
information
which
is
3.3
with
an
update
on
planning
case
loads
I'm,
going
to
bring
in
head
of
planning
Damian
Mulligan
Damien
over
to
you.
J
Thanks
chair
good
afternoon
members
members,
the
report
before
you
is
in
relation
to
an
update
on
on
planning
case
loads
and
what
I
can
inform
you
is
that
the
number
of
decisions
that
were
issued
by
the
department
during
the
month
of
June
was
187
number
of
applications
received
over
the
same
period
135
and
the
life
care.
So
at
the
moment
is
1036,
which
is
52
down
on
last
month,
which
is
very
good
news
members.
It
means
her.
J
Ksload
has
been
driven
down
and
clearly
going
in
the
right
direction
and
number
of
call-ins
over
that
period
was
three
which
brings
it
to
nine
for
a
year
to
date
and
members
just
to
mentioned,
we
were
supposed
to
bring
a
report
enforcement
quarterly
report
to
you
this
month,
but,
unfortunately,
the
statistics
have
not
been
able.
We
haven't
been
able
to
run
those
because
of
a
an
issue
with
the
the
it
system,
but
they
will
come
before
you
at
the
next
meeting.
J
A
F
F
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Ken
members,
you've
all
seen
the
report
we
all
agreed
can
I
get
a
proposal
on
the
secondary
proposed
by
cancer
Duffy
second
by
Oliver
Wilson
Oliver
babe.
Thank
you
very
much
members
I'm.
Moving
on
to
4.2,
which
is
Adam
for
information,
an
update
in
building
control
and
property
certificate
applications,
workload,
building,
control
manager,
canvas7
is
going
to
present.
This
report
bring
it
back
in
Kevin.
F
No
again,
thank
you.
Joe
members,
for
up
just
makes
purpose
of
report,
provides
information
reading
to
the
workload
of
building
Control
Department.
It
details
out
the
list
of
the
core
responsibilities
and
then
in
appendix
to
you
have
this
statistical
information
in
relation
to
the
applications
received
and
processed
and
this
purposes.
A
A
G
Thank
you,
chair,
I.
Suppose,
as
you
just
said,
you
probably
recall
the
application
when
it
came
to
committee
I
think
was
in
January,
2022
and
I
went
through
a
significant
amount
of
debate
in
this
chamber.
Another
chamber
this
committee
decided
to
refuse
our
application
unanimously.
I
think
it
was
counter
Nicholson
at
the
time
myself
metaphors
on
Saturday,
but
we're
all
in
agreement.
Given
that
we
had
concerns
about
the
impact
it
would
have
on
the
Gosford
Castle
Gosford
Forest
Park,
because
members
will
know
very
heavily
protected,
environmentally
and
things
like
that.
G
G
We
did
consider
everything
that
was
in
that
report
and
ultimately
we
decided
that
there
was
no
betterment
sort
of
argument,
and
my
concern
is
that
you
know
it's
almost
overriding,
and
you
know
Democratic
that
here
in
this
chamber
and
as
an
example,
is
at
the
end
of
the
road
they'll
plan.
The
page
commission
number
final
say
because
again
I'm
not
from
that
area,
but
I
remember
at
the
time
there
was.
G
You
know
judicial
review
option.
What
you
know
is
the
last
resort,
but
I
decided
value.
Discipline
and
I
just
wanted
the
three
as
a
committee,
because
normally
our
decisions
don't
get
overturned,
they're
normally
fairly
solid,
and
we
do
consider
them
fully
in
this
chamber.
But
I
just
find
this
one
to
be
very
disappointing.
Thank
you.
Chair
anyone
have
any
information
on
that.
I
J
Thanks
chair
thanks
counselor,
because
they're
having
totally
empathized
with
with
the
comments
you
you've
made
yeah
that
that
application.
When
it
came
before
members,
obviously
the
officers
were
recommended
approval
for
it,
and
members
had
a
very
interrogated
they're,
also
recommendation
and-
and,
as
you
said,
significant
number
of
members
of
not
all
the
committee
agreed
that
the
application
should
be
refused
and
officers
defended.
Data
refusal
very
robustly
before
the
planning
appears
commission.
Look
the
planning,
appease
commission.
J
They
will
look
very
clearly
at
the
planning
merits
of
the
case
and
the
fact
that
the
planning
committee
has
overturned
an
officer
recommendation
and
has
reached
a
decision
on
that
pieces
doesn't
necessarily
come
into
play
and
it's
more
about
the
planning
merits
of
the
case,
and
they
are
an
independent
body
who
will
Who
will
focus
on
those
particular
issues.
Now,
in
this
case,
what
they
did
was
look
at,
firstly,
and
the
fact
that
there
was
a
fallback
position
and
that
fallback
position
was
represented
by
an
accident
planning.
J
Permission
was
granted
by
Doe
quite
a
few
years
ago,
which
allowed
for
change
of
use
of
the
castle
and
also
for
23
garages
on
the
application
side
of
the
appealing
site.
That
really
did
swear.
If
you
read,
the
report
seemed
to
sweat
significantly
for
the
Pac
and
because
what
they
were
saying
was
you
could
have
23
garages
on
that
site
and
if
you
compare
that
to
the
erection
of
11
dwellings
instead
well,
you
have
to
then
look
and
and
make
a
sort
of
balance
assessment
and
what
they
decided
was.
J
The
11
dwellings
represented
betterment
over
the
full
back
position
and
they
based
out
on
the
fact
that,
and
there
was
a
reduced
amount
of
build
development
on
the
site
and
there
was
a
restoration
of
the
garden
walls.
There
was
a
new
historical
linkage.
It
was
restored
number
of
factors
that
sort
of
influenced
their
decision,
but
very
much
based
on
what
they,
what
could
have
been
built
on
the
site
under
the
extant
permission
against
what
this
application
represented
and
that's
essentially
what
what
their
their
case
was.
J
So
in
terms
of
what
the
options
are
and
I
you're.
Quite
right
that
you
know,
if
there
is
going
to
be
a
challenge
to
this,
it
would
have
to
be
through
the
high
court.
It
would
have
to
be
through
a
judicial
review,
there's
no
third
party
right
of
appeal,
and
so
unfortunately,
for
for
anyone
who
did
want
to
challenge
the
PAC
decision,
it
would
be
a
case
of
legal
challenge
to
the
high
court.
A
C
Yeah
that
was
thanks,
I
suppose
it
is
quite
a
unique
situation
in
terms
of
this
committee.
If
the
odd
situation
where
the
officers
had
delivered
a
verdict
which
we
overturned
and
then
it
was
found
to
be
correct,
so
suppose,
a
in
that
way,
it's
it's
strange
that
you
know
it's
went
to
that
stage
and
and
we're
back
where
we
started
again,
which,
to
the
you
know,
annoyance
of
many.
C
In
that
regard,
not
least
the
users
of
the
park
and
those
you
know,
11
close
by
without
all
being
said,
I'm
just
wondering
in
terms
of
the
you
know
the
verdict
of
the
planet
of
Peter's
commission.
Is
it
then
a
reversion
back
to
the
original
approval
as
it
stands,
and
all
that
that
entails
or
I
read
some
other
PSE
report
on
a
dead
catchment
in
terms
of
that
fall
back
position,
but
you
know
the
Walled
Garden
and
not
as
as
contained
within
that
submission.
I.
C
Just
wondering
is
all
that
still
in
is
that
a
is
what
will
be
developed,
what
we
were
presented
within
in
many
ways:
if
there
is
no
other
recourse
or
you
know
those
opposed
to
it,
don't
take
any
further
action,
just
won't
trying
to
sort
of
future
up.
You
know,
what's
what
is
the
outcome
of
this?
What
involvement
will
planning
have
and
insurance
in
the
event
that
no
further
action
is
taken?
You
know
legally
say,
for
instance,
against
this
application.
Sort
of
my
interest
is
that
you
know
this
and
committee
on
our
own
plan
service.
C
J
Thanks
Char
thanks
Alderman
Wilson
yeah
it
folks
from
here.
What
the
applicant
will
not
be
able
to
do
is
to
go
and
implement
the
scheme
that
came
before
a
committee
but
subject
to
the
conditions
that
were
imposed
by
the
plan
on
appearance
commission,
so
they
actually
impose
12
conditions
and,
amongst
those
conditions
that
included,
for
example,
removal
permitted
development
rights.
So
they
can't
do
anything
beyond
what
they've
got
planning
permission
for.
So
any
further
work
that
they
would
want
to
do
would
have
to
come
before.
J
The
council
and
they've
also
required
that
there's
no
external
lighting
and
that's
for
biodiversity
reasons,
and
then
there's
there's
other
conditions
on
there,
for
example,
how
the
Landscaping
will
be
managed
and
so
on.
So
the
Fairly
stringent
conditions
and
details
of
those
who
have
to
come
be
submitted
to
the
council
for
approval
and
some
cases
and
there's
conditions
around
retention
of
trees
as
well,
and
so
on.
J
So
yeah
like
I,
think
the
conditions
will
ensure
that
the
you
know
the
scheme
that
has
been
approved.
You
can't
you
can't
there's
no
room
for
another
on
that,
you
know,
and
so
so
what?
What
has
it'll
be
implemented
as
seen
if
you
like,
but
yeah
12
conditions
to
be
complied
with
along
the
lines
of
what
I've
mentioned.
C
Yeah,
just
just
briefly,
and
thanks
and
I
suppose
going
you
know
into
the
future
again
a
little
bit
I'm
just
wondering
what
kind
soul
as
a
what
plan
on
committee,
I
suppose
sort
of
recording
their
unanimous
objection
to
this
at
that
meeting
issued
something
further.
You
know,
such
as
the
discharge
of
a
condition
or
something
completely
new,
or
some
revised
aspect
of
that
come
before
this
committee.
How
do
we
stand
in
Legally
as
having
had
a
predisposed
opinion
looking
forward
against
the
development
in
its
entirety?
C
You
know
how
do
we
sit
there
and
as
as
members
of
the
committee,
when
we
go
to
make
a
decision?
If
you
know
what
I
mean,
because
we've
had
a
quite
a
unanimous
verdict
against
it,
which
has
been
overturned?
Do
we
look
at
it
freshly
without
those?
Are
you
know
from
The
public's
perceptive
perception?
Is
it
oh?
Those
are
those
people
are
against
that.
You
know
how.
How
do
we
get
that
level
of
you
know
Assurance
built
back
into
this
I.
Just
don't
recall
a
similar
situation,
development.
C
J
I
suppose
like
it
goes
back
to
the
point
that
members
will
be
well
aware
of
about
being
open-minded
and
look
while
you've
taken
the
decision
previously
on
on
that
application.
If
the
details
do
come
before
you,
it
is
about
approaching
with
an
open
mind
and
that
you
know
the
details
will
be
about
making
sure
why
why
you
did
have
issues
regarding
the
development
itself,
it
will
be
about
making
sure
that
you
take
a
decision
that
ensures
that
the
details
will
make
that
scheme.
J
You
know
as
best
as
it
can
be
so,
for
example,
about
the
management
of
the
Landscaping,
making
sure
that
the
Landscaping
the
management
scheme,
for
that
is
acceptable.
It
will
work.
It
will
ensure
that
the
landscape
and
its
maintained
in
perpetuity,
for
example,
there
will
be
other
conditions
that
will
come
before
you.
J
It's
about
just
approaching
those
conditions
with
an
open
mind,
irrespective
of
the
possession
that
you
took
on
their
original
application,
and
you
know,
look
if
you,
if
you
want
there
could
be
a
similar
Point,
could
have
been
made
about
officers
trying
to
defend
the
appeal
when
the
recommendation
from
officer
was
to
Grant
approval.
But
when
that
position,
when
we're
placed
in
that
position,
we
represent
the
council,
not
ourselves,
and
so
we
would
defend
the
council's
decision
robustly,
irrespective
of
our
own
individual
opinion
or
professional
opinion,
might
be
we're
prepared
to
work
to
the
council.
J
G
Thank
you
chair
and
thank
you
Damien
for
those
contributions.
It's
certainly
very
informative.
One
I
think
it
is
just
to
some
pointing
I
know.
When
do
we
give
the
initial
approval
I
think
it
was
even
discuss
the
committee
that
was
very
much
they
were
looking
to
secure.
You
know
the
refurbishment
of
the
castle
and
the
apartments
and
stuff
and
I
think
they
had
to
show
a
bit
of
flexible
labor
regards
to
the
garages
to
sort
of
get
that
across
the
line
in
order
to
you
know
protect
that
Historic
Site.
G
If
the
flexibility
was
asked
for
additional
Housing
Development,
maybe
doe
wouldn't
have
been
this
as
open
to
flexibility,
but
will
never
know,
and
this
is
where
we
are
so
it
certainly
kept
kept
in
my
mind
when
all
future
things
come
and
come
to
this
committee,
that
would
just
need
to
be
very
careful,
but
I
think
it
just
is
disappointing
the
way
this
one,
this
one
turned
out.
Thank
you
chair.
A
A
Need
to
start
the
lay
feed.
Thank
you.
Okay
change
it
in
five
applications
for
planning
permission
to
be
considered
by
the
committee
as
per
the
schedule
of
planning
applications
good
afternoon.
Everyone
and
welcome
to
the
talent
section
of
the
hybrid
meeting
of
the
plan
regulatory
service
committee
can
I
ask
everyone
to
please
mute
their
microphones
at
all
times
unless
invaded
to
speak
by
myself.
A
For
those
of
you
who
are
physically
in
the
castle
chamber.
Canal,
please
remind
you
when
speaking
into
your
microphone,
you
need
to
wait
and
see
yourself
on
the
screen
so
that
delay
feed
can
pick
up
your
comments.
If
you
speak
before
your
image
is
projected.
Those
listening
on
the
live,
feed
or
via
Zoom
will
not
hear
anything
that
you
say.
This
is
obviously
particularly
important
in
the
case
of
a
vote
being
required,
audio
recordings
are
being
used
to
system
preparing
the
funnel
minutes.
A
Therefore,
anyone
participating
in
the
meeting
concerns
to
have
been
recorded
and
being
live
streamed
on
YouTube.
Also
during
the
course
of
this
meeting,
questions
may
be
asked
by
counselors,
who
are
members
of
planning
regulatory
service.
Committee
of
planning
officers,
applicants
for
planning
permission
objectors
or
those
picking
on
their
behalf
in
doing
so,
counselors
Endeavor
to
ascertain
information
which
they
feel
is
necessary
to
enable
them
to
determine
the
application.
A
L
There
you
go
thank
you
chair.
Firstly,
I
would
like
to
point
out
there's
a
typo.
The
report
refers
to
laoa
2021
0130
in
a
few
places,
the
plan
and
reference
was
actually
loit,
2021
0130,
so
the
suffix
is
actually
o
for
outline
planning.
Permission
was
granted
for
a
dwelling
and
garage
at
this
site
under
laoa,
2021
or
130
subject
to
conditions.
This
application
is
to
remove
planning,
condition,
number
nine,
which
requires
improved
and
maintained
visibility,
space
at
the
junction
with
Ardmore
Road
prior
to
development
commencing.
L
The
proposal
has
been
made
under
Section
54,
which
is
a
specific
application
to
remove
or
vary
a
planning
condition
within
an
extant
planning
permission
or
with
Dynamic
stand
approval.
The
recommendation
is
to
refuse
and
the
reason
for
refusal
is
set
out
in
the
planning
report.
Dfi
roads
have
been
consulted
and
have
recommended
this
application
should
be
refused
policy,
amp2
of
plan
and
policy
statement.
3,
which
is
access,
movement
and
parking,
is
the
main
planning
policy
and
provides
the
criteria
for
assessing
and
proposed
access
to
a
public
Road.
L
The
current
road
standard
is
less
than
2.4
meters
by
10..
The
visibility
standard
required
is
2.4
by
70.
policy.
Mp2
requires
a
plan,
and
permission
will
only
be
granted
for
a
development
proposal
involving
a
direct
access
or
intensification
of
the
use
of
an
existing
access
onto
a
public
road
where
such
an
access
will
not
Prejudice.
Road
Safety
are
significantly
inconvenience.
This
the
sorry,
the
flow
of
traffic
and
the
proposal
does
not
conflict
with
policy
MP3
access
to
protected
routes.
L
The
applicant
is
provided
a
full
plan
of
the
works
proposed
at
outline
stage,
including
the
removal
of
fences
Hedges
and
a
new
road
curve
to
comply
with
the
required
standards.
The
applicant
did
complete
the
relevant
forms
on
a
serve
notice
on
the
owners
of
the
lands
in
question.
At
that
time,
the
policy
confirms
that
conditions
can
be
used
to
ensure
the
access
will
be
upgraded
prior
to
the
development
commencing
if
it
is
substandard.
Thus,
a
planning
condition
was
applied.
L
Officers
in
consultation
with
DFI
roads
are
of
the
opinion
that
the
removal
of
this
condition
is
not
acceptable
on
the
grounds
of
The
Works.
Consider
are
necessary,
are
considered
necessary
to
provide
a
proper,
safe
and
convenient
means
of
access
to
the
development
and
to
be
carried
out.
Officers
are
of
the
opinion
that
the
removal
of
this
condition
is
unacceptable,
as
the
proposal
were
Prejudice.
The
overall
aim
of
the
condition
and
as
such,
will
not
Accord
with
the
spps
and
pps3
I'll
just
go
through
the
part-time
presentation.
L
So
you
can
see
the
location
of
the
site,
it's
just
it's
within
the
settlement
of
Daria
next
slide.
Please-
and
this
is
a
site
location
plan,
next
slide,
please
and
just
for
information.
That's
the
settlement
limit
to
forward
area
within
the
Craig
Avenue
plan
next
slide.
Please-
and
this
is
an
aerial
context,
then
of
the
proposed
site
next
slide,
please
just
the
detail
of
the
access
road
with
the
Access
Lane
with
the
Ardmore
Road
next
slide,
please
that's
just
an
aerial
view,
looking
towards
the
site
and
the
access
next
slide,
please.
L
This
is
the
view,
then,
from
the
site
looking
towards
the
side
and
the
access
next
slide.
Please.
This
is
the
view
from
the
north.
Looking
South
towards
the
access
next
slide
place,
just
a
close-up,
then
of
the
access
up
to
the
site.
Next
slide,
please
again
a
close-up
of
the
access,
the
laneway
that
goes
up
to
the
site
next
slide,
please!
L
L
L
A
M
Afternoon
and
thanks
for
the
opportunity
to
speak,
the
issue
is
whether
the
proposed
wildling
would
result
in
intensification
of
traffic
on
the
existing
Lane
and
I
also
consider
that
compliance
with
the
conditioning
question
would
actually
undermine
the
privacy
and
residential
military
of
number
23
Ardmore
Road,
the
applicant
is
Paul
Scott
and
Paul
has
lived
all
his
life
at
17
Bay
Ardmore
Road,
which
is
one
of
the
sex
houses
already
on
the
land.
He
lives
with
his
parents
and
his
wife
and
son.
M
The
plan
is
that
he,
along
with
his
wife
and
child,
would
move
into
17b
and
out
of
the
existing
or
excuse
me
would
move
out
of
the
existing
house
at
17b
and
enter
the
proposed
dwelling,
and
his
parents
will
stay
on
at
17
babe.
This
means
that
there'll
be
no
increase
in
the
Resident
population
on
the
land
and
no
change
in
the
overall
volume
of
traffic.
M
The
application
was
committed
by
a
report
carried
out
by
SW
chartered
Engineers,
which
included
account
of
the
traffic
entering
and
leaving
the
land
over
a
three-day
period.
The
dwellings
on
the
land
typically
generate
2.33
vehicle
arrivals
per
house
per
day
and
2.38
departures
per
house
per
day,
which
is
a
very
low
number.
It
will
be
unreasonable
to
say
that
there'll
be
additional
traps
as
a
result
of
the
dwelling,
because
that
would
mean
that
the
applicant
and
his
family
were
being
double
counted,
as
there
will
be
no
intensification
in
the
use
of
existing
access.
M
M
I
would
ask
you
to
consider
the
facts
specific
to
this
case.
The
applicant
already
lives
on
the
lien
and
he
will
continue
to
use
the
access
to
Ardmore
Road,
except
from
a
different
dwelling.
Therefore,
there's
no
intensification
of
the
use
of
the
access
and
accordingly,
no
justification
for
improving
the
sight
lines.
Therefore,
the
condition
may
be
removed
and
the
residential
amenity
of
one
of
the
houses
on
Ardmore
Road
will
be
protected.
M
A
E
A
N
Okay,
DFI
roads.
We
understand
the
argument,
the
the
applicant,
the
agent
picks,
but
we
don't
accept
that
on
the
basis
that
it's
an
extra
house,
it's
an
extra
household,
that's
being
created,
families,
expand
and
change
over
time,
people
come
and
go
and
they
have
outgrown
the
existing
house
they're
in
and
need
to
expand
into
another
one,
and
therefore
that
is
the
intensification
in
numbers
of
people
that
are
coming
on
the
therefore
the
level
of
traffic
that's
coming
in
and
out
of
the
development.
N
Now
the
trip
generation
that
they've
coded
being
quite
low
trip,
Generations
typically
change,
but
we
we
talk
about
the
average
generation
of
properties
and
we're
just
kind
of
get
out
as
one
additional
property
creating
another
additional
level
of
traffic.
Over
and
above
what's
already
there
intensification
is
deemed
to
occur
as
defined
in
common
control
of
version
of
15.
There's
been
over
five
percent.
There
are
six
houses
on
the
lane.
E
Has
to
keep
my
head
around
you
know
just
because
you're
a
new
house,
you
are
11
million,
it's
going
to
be
no
more
traffic
in
and
out
bar
the
ones
that
you
know
what
the
time
in
the
building
of
the
new
house,
which
would
be
an
increase
for
a
short
period,
but
I
just
can't
see
whether
come
to
that
conclusion.
Sure
that's
just
what
I
have
to
really
see
on
foreign.
N
Yes,
that's
the
way
we
would
see
it.
An
additional
household
is
being
created.
It's
an
additional
building.
That's
there
to
accommodate
a
brand
new
household
they've
outgrown
the
existing
household
children
grew
up,
go
out
to
work,
start
driving
cars
start
their
own
family
have
their
own
children,
and
the
cycle
continues.
N
As
we
talked
about
the
chances
that
the
house
will
not
be
sold,
I
don't
think,
there's
any
reasonable
condition
that
planning
service
can
allow
a
planning
approval
to
say
the
house
cannot
be
sold,
there's
nothing
to
stop
it
being
sold
at
any
time.
As
far
as
I'm
aware
so,
basically,
it's
a
new
house,
a
new
building,
a
new
household
being
created
which
will
generate
a
brand
new
set
of
traffic.
L
Thank
you,
chair
I,
just
wanted
to
add
that
the
issues
raised
there
and
were
are
in
the
planning
report.
Those
issues
were
considered
in
terms
of
the
the
number
of
trips
and
the
fact
that
the
the
applicant
lives
along
the
lane.
That
means
all
of
those
issues
were
raised
and
have
been
considered
as
part
of
the
planning
assessment
haven't
been
out
to
the
site
myself.
L
C
This
is
obviously
you
know.
The
word
substander
has
been
new
to
many
other
houses
utilize.
This
am
substandard,
as
husband
quoted
an
access
point
and
if
it's
considered
substandard,
why
is
it
only
considered
substandard
nigh?
At
this
point,
F
other
people
have
used
it
and
I've
received
plan
permission
down
through
the
years.
Why
is
it
only
an
issue
now.
N
I'm
not
aware
of
the
history
of
there
being
any
other
recent
applications
on
the
lane.
Those
houses
have
been
there.
For
a
long
time,
we
haven't
had
the
opportunity
to
make
comment
on
the
suitability
of
the
access,
so
the
intensification
hasn't
been
raised
as
an
issue
not
to
know
the
comment
was
that
there
are
no
recorded
accidents.
The
PS
and
I
have
no
accident
history
on
the
site.
You
know,
of
course,
the
fact
that
there
hasn't
been
a
recorded
accident,
which
is
a
an
accident
involving
personal
injury.
A
C
Yes,
for
a
point-
and
a
number
of
you
know:
Road
access
and
exits
that
or
entries
and
exits
that
are
considerable
issues
from
a
safety
perspective.
But
the
information
about
the
lack
of
psna
reports
is
something
that
DFA
then
used
to
say
and
we're
not
prioritizing
any
Improvement
works
at
this
Junction
at
this
time,
but
it
seems
to
be
the
reverse,
and
this
instance,
but
just
don't
get
further
Clarity
in
terms
of
both
sides
of
that,
and
you
know
where
the
visibility
display
requirements
are
at
least.
C
Is
that
not
then
on
the
ownership
of
the
individual
concern?
Is
that
why
it
hasn't
been
referred
to
in
the
engineered
report
or
the
engineered
response
and
to
you
know
which,
which
brought
forward
the
removal
of
that
conditioning?
Is
it
the
case
that
you
know
to
improve
that
splay?
You
would
be
accessed
and
alarms
that
aren't
in
control
of
the
applicant?
Is
that
the
case.
N
Yes,
I
just
like
to
clarify
further
that
during
the
previous
outline
application,
we
had
discussions
with
the
agent
to
see
what
improvements
we
could
make
and
we
came
to
an
agreement
that
he
could.
He
give
us
information
that
he
could
get
control
of
the
land
to
the
north,
to
remove
the
Hedge
and
fence
to
improve
the
visibility
in
that
direction.
Now
improving
the
visibility
in
that
direction,
that
has
to
be
recognized
that
that
doesn't
make
the
access
fully
compliant
with
our
standards.
N
The
visibility
to
the
left
hand,
side
coming
out
of
the
access
is
also
pure.
The
width
of
the
limb
is
poor,
so,
but
on
balance
we
felt
through
the
negotiation
giving
that
Improvement
to
the
visibility
Square
to
the
north
was
giving
us
an
overall
betterment
and
all
the
angles
to
get
to
a
situation
where
we
could
approve
it.
N
Whilst
it's
not
going
to
meet
the
full
standard,
as
described
in
decam
15,
it
was
seen
as
being
sufficient
betterment
to
allow
us
to
recommend
approval
for
it,
but
that
did
involve
land
I'd,
say
the
applicant's
control
originally.
But
the
agent
had
notified
us
that
his
clamp
could
get
control
of
that
land.
K
I
K
In
for
the
visibility
they
say,
they
could
have
mandated
that
application
probably
would
have
been
turned
around
pipe
blank
to
Modern
water
stage.
It's
just
the
fact
that
they're
brought
in
where
they
could
amend
the
visibility
on
that
left
more
for
the
planners
to
approve,
whereas
if
I
had
to
come
in
the
application,
wouldn't
have
been
approved
at
all.
If
he
had
more
than
demanded
display
or.
A
G
Thank
you
chair.
Thank
you
for
the
presenter,
sir,
it's
one
of
the
lesson
two
of
great
interest
and
read
the
papers
and
certainly,
but
they
have
a
lot
of
Sympathy
for
the
applicant
in
terms
of
their
living
there
already
there's,
there's
houses
there
on
that
laneway,
but
ultimately,
for
me,
this
comes
down
to
safety,
and
it's
been
pointed
out
of,
like
a
legislation
has
changed,
legislation
have
changed
throughout
safety.
G
Characteristics
are
improved
to
prevent
the
chance
of
further
accidents
on
ultimately
helping
the
police
improve
people's.
You
know
health
and
well-being,
as
I
said.
Ultimately,
this
does
come
down
to
safety
and
with
a
recommendation
here
for
a
refusal
from
DFA.
Obviously,
the
original
application
was
approved,
provided
they
could
sort
ID
access,
and
you
know
it's
like
giving
them
the
benefit
loadout.
G
Unfortunately,
we
haven't
been
able
to
get
the
accessory
for
whatever
reason
all
our
landowners
and
things
like
that
But.
Ultimately,
it
comes
down
to
safety
and
if,
if
the
state
lines
are
on
aren't
making
standards,
I
think
that's
very
much
in
my
mind,
I
think
might
be.
The
refusal
here
is
the
best
way
to
go,
but
I
know
it's
a
disappointed
one.
Thank
you.
C
Yeah,
it
is
a
difficult
one,
because
you
know
it's
from
the
safety
perspective.
You
know
I
suppose
the
committee's
responsibilities.
In
that
regard,
it
does
pose
a
very
awkward
question.
When
you're,
you
know
disposing
of
a
condition,
that's
designed
to
create
a
safe
environment,
but
then
I
get
the
other
point
where
there's
already
use
of
Love.
C
You
know
the
authorities
aren't
concerned
with
it
or
well
they're,
not
not
concerned,
but
they're
legally.
You
know
they're
constrained
on
what
you
know
they
can
do
about
it
really,
but
I'm
wondering.
Is
there
an
option?
You
know
generally
for
a
lot
of
some
more
time,
for
you
know
the
applicant
to
pursue
those
issues
around
the
and
visibility
suppliers
and
how
you
could
achieve
them.
You
know
I,
know
ultimately
going
to
have
to
make
a
decision
or
we're
just
wondering.
Is
that
how's?
That
being
done,
you
know
in
the
planners.
C
L
Foreign
permission
still
extend,
you
know
it's
still.
It's
still
available.
It's
it's
up
to
the
applicant
to
be
able
to
adhere
to
the
condition
So
within
the
time
scale
of
the
permission
you
know
if
they
are
able
to
secure
that
that
that's
up
to
them,
so
we
this
wouldn't
be
taken
away
from
that.
Any
decision
today
wouldn't
be
taken
away
from
the
fact
that
there
is
a
permission
there
on
conditions
which,
if
they
adhere
to
those
that
that
Reserve
matters
could
be
submitted.
C
K
You
chair,
Alderman,
Wilson,
just
sort
of
covered
it
again.
There
I
was
just
wondering:
has
the
the
applicant
standard
pipe
blank
that
they
can't
give
access
to
this
declarative
availability
visibility
displays,
or
is
this
just
a
shot
in
the
dark
thinking
they
can
get
away
without
additional
costs,
clear
and
visible
display.
L
That's
possibly
a
question
you
might
want
to
ask
the
agent
but
I
mean
as
it
stands.
We
just
have
to
consider
the
application
as
presented,
whether
they
have
that
possibility
or
not
that's
up
to
them
and
negotiations,
but
we
wouldn't
be
fully
aware
of
that,
but
they've
made
this
application
so
that
they
wouldn't
have
to
be
able
to
provide
those,
but
the
outline
permission
is
not
affected
the
principle
of
development
on
the
site
if
they're
able
to
adhere
to
those
conditions
still
there.
A
M
The
applicant
hasn't
made
any
approaches
to
the
third
party
about
the
visible
displays,
and
you
know
it's
not
a
question
about
it.
It
just
certainly
doesn't
want
to
do
it,
but
what
he
doesn't
want
to
do
is
have
to
disturb
a
third
party
acquire
their
land
undermine
that
person's
privacy
undermine
a
residential
minute
type
for
the
sake
of
access
improvements
that
aren't
actually
required
and
I
go
back
to
the
point
of
you
know:
is
there
intensification
in
the
use
of
the
access
and
there
isn't
when
you
have
the
person?
M
That's
that's
looking
to
live
in
the
house.
They
drive
up
and
down
that
lane.
At
the
moment,
they're
they're
part
of
the
the
vehicle
count
on
that
lane
and
they'll
still
be
part
of
that
vehicle
kind
on
that
land.
Whenever
their
house
is
built,
so
I
think
you
know
it
is
very
reluctant
to
approach
the
third
party
to
acquire
their
land
and
particularly
I.
Don't
know
if
Nicholas
time
to
put
up
all
the
photographs
on
the
screen
of
the
person's
house
who's
affected
by
the
sight
lines.
M
M
K
A
A
Alderman
Wilson
secondary
Alderman
Wilson.
Thank
you
very
much.
We
all
agreed.
Thank
you
very
much
members
we'll
look
great.
We
move
on
to
index
three,
so
appendix
2
has
been
withdrawn
from
the
schedule.
Two
to
your
Crest
from
officers
report
that
has
came
to
late
in
the
address
of
procedural
furnace.
Sedum
has
been
withdrawn.
K
A
O
Thank
you
chair.
This
application
is
for
the
replacement
of
an
existing
turbine
approved
under
application,
o2006-1147
bar
F,
to
propose
50
meter,
tar
and
54
meter
rotor
diameter,
including
a
section
of
Earthen
cable
on
lands,
165
meters,
southeast
of
20
second
hand,
Road
Arma.
The
application
is
being
presented
to
committee
tonight,
as
the
proposal
is
generated.
More
than
four
objections
from
four
separate
postal
addresses.
O
Members
will
be
aware
that
an
addendum
report
was
circulated
earlier
today,
following
the
receipt
of
additional
representation
on
this
matter
and
also,
at
this
stage
like
to
add
a
line
to
propose
condition.
Number
two
which
reads
the
protocol
should
also
include
measures
to
address
any
breach
of
the
condition
and
the
time
frame
for
the
implementation
of
such
measures.
O
The
potential
impacts
arising
from
noise,
Shadow
flicker
ice
throw
and
reflected
light
have
been
considered
in
detail
in
the
report
in
terms
of
noise,
given
that
the
predicted
noise
levels
fall
within
the
limit
set
using
Etsy
officers
in
consultation
with
the
Environmental
Health
Department
are
satisfied.
The
Proposal
will
not
have
an
unacceptable
impact
in
the
residential
immunity
of
nearby
properties.
Subject
to
the
recommended
conditions
in
terms
of
shadowflicker
officers
just
satisfied,
the
effects
of
potential
Shadow
flicker
can
be
mitigated
against
by
conditions
requiring
the
use
of
shutoff
software
outside
opening.
O
O
For
that
reason,
in
assessing
the
visual
impacts
of
this
proposal,
officers
considered
the
impacts
against
the
impacts
of
the
two
approved
turbines
of
the
site
I'll
set
out
in
the
report.
The
screening
and
backdrop
provided
by
existing
vegetation
and
the
separation
distances
from
critical
viewpoints
officers
are
satisfied
that
the
pose
wind
energy
development
does
not
result
in
an
unacceptable
adverse
impact
in
a
vision,
mean
d
and
Landscape
character
of
the
area.
O
O
Officers
consider
that
The
Proposal
complies
with
a
strategic
plan
and
policy
statement
for
Northern
Ireland
and
all
other
relevant
plan
policies,
including
PPS
18,
and
are
recommend
that
the
application
be
approved
subject
to
the
condition
set
up
in
the
report
and
I'll.
Just
take
you
through
the
slides.
O
O
This
is
the
site,
location
maps,
middle
of
the
application,
and
the
red
line
is
where
the
turbines
to
be
located,
and
this
is
an
aerial
photograph
of
the
site
within
the
wider
area
and
just
a
closer
area
of
photograph
of
the
site.
And
you
can
see
the
existing
compound
and
turbine
to
the
south
of
those
farm
buildings.
O
This
is
a
photograph
from
the
Gosford
Road
looking
towards
the
south
east.
It's
probably
difficult
to
see
in
that
slide,
but
the
turbine
is
there
behind
mature
trees
that
the
sort
of
in
the
middle
of
the
road-
and
this
is
another
photograph
taken
from
further
down
the
gospel
Road
looking
towards
the
east.
O
O
O
O
And
that's
just
shown
the
base
of
the
existing
turbine
on
the
ground,
and
these
are
the
substations
that
currently
exist
on
site
and
they
will
remain
they're
not
being
removed.
Foreign
montages
that
have
been
supplied
by
the
agent
in
support
of
the
application
and,
as
we've
already
said
and
said
in
the
report,
there
is
approval
here
for
two
turbines.
One
has
been
erected.
O
O
And
again,
this
is
a
photograph
of
the
junction
with
retirement
Road,
showing
you.
The
impact
of
the
two
turbines
is
approved
in
comparison.
The
one
that's
proposed
on
the
bottom,
and
this
is
a
photograph
again
from
the
second
Road
and
the
top
is
the
two
turbines
as
approved,
and
the
bottom
is
the
turbine.
That's
under
consideration.
O
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Pusheen.
We
have
Mr
George
Clark
to
make
representation
an
objection
to
the
application.
We
also
have
Mr
Connor
Floyd
make
representation
as
the
agent
members
Mr
Clark
is
in
the
jacket,
am
I
right,
yeah
and
just
to
make
this
both
away
and
show
you
some
both
been
informed.
You
have
three
minutes
and
once
I
once
you
start,
the
ticket
will
start
and
once
it
has
three
months,
they'll
have
to
cut
this
off.
Okay,
so
we're
going
to
bring
in
Mr
Clark.
First
of
all,
to
make
representation.
A
P
Thank
you,
Mr
chairman.
The
three
minutes
is
not
enough
time
for
me
to
deal
with
the
detail
of
this
application.
There
are
many.
Many
issues
that
need
to
be
covered.
I
will
just
have
to
focus
on
a
couple
of
the
most
pertinent
points.
The
the
first
point
is
that
the
separation
distance
set
out
in
policy
has
not
been
adhered
to.
In
this
case.
In
this
case,
there
are
five
properties
within
the
the
minimum
separation
distance
of
500
meters.
P
In
this
case,
however,
the
applicant
depends
on
the
claimed
financial
interest
in
relation
to
specifically
property
at
20a,
sigakon,
Road
and
financial
interest,
if
indeed,
there
is
financial
interest
allows
higher
noise
levels
to
apply
at
that
property.
So
thus
two
questions
come
from
that
point.
Firstly,
is
financial
involvement
applicable
as
a
grounds
to
a
lower,
a
second,
a
higher
level
of
noise
about
property?
If
you
involve
the
rationale
of
the
case
officer
in
this
case,
it's
not
because
ETSU
specifically
states
that
the
financial
interest-
this
is
what
it
says.
It
says.
P
Higher
noise
levels
are
permissible
where
the
Occupy
of
the
property
has
some
financial
interest
in
the
Wind
Farm,
not
in
the
wind
turbine
second
Point.
Finally,
there
is
no
evidence
whatsoever
that
the
occupier
of
20a,
segatron
road,
or
indeed
the
other
property,
has
any
financial
interest.
The
case
Officer
says
in
this
case
that
there
is
evidence
there
is
no
evidence
and
I've
spoken
to
the
case
officer
today,
and
she
has
confirmed
to
me
in
my.
There
is
simply
no
evidence
all
that
there
is,
and
it
has
not
been
on
the
planning
portal.
A
Q
Good
evening
numbers
not
to
get
back
on
all
the
points
made
by
Mr
Clark,
the
application
has
been
made
in
terms
of
covered
all
the
main
items
that
are
covered
in
ppsa,
a
team
near
me,
noi
shadowflicker,
butts
geology
and
those
visual
assessments
done
as
well.
We
also
have
the
fallback
position,
as
rightly
pointed
out
on
the
fact
that
there
was
two
turbanes
already
approved.
Q
There
was
one
operational
in
terms
of
the
noise
element
and
it's
widely
accepted
that
had
to
aren't
Associated
Institute
of
Acoustics
documentation
is
acceptable
for
wind
turbines
and
wind
farms.
Obviously
with
wind
farms,
the
numbers
can
vary.
Single
wind
turbines
are
single
in
nature
and
you
need
some
stick
to
measure
them
with,
so
it's
applicable
across
Northern
Ireland
and
in
fact,
across
the
UK
and
Ireland.
Q
The
in
relation
to
the
query
on
Mr
Paul
Hill
Paul
is
the
son
of
the
applicant
Morris
Hill
and
lives
as
you've.
Seen
on
the
farm
buildings
there
and
financial
linkage
can
very,
it
can
mean
you
can
be
a
director.
It
means
you
could
be
a
shareholder,
but
it
also
means
you
could
potentially
have
get
your
electricity
paid
or
receive
a
payment
from
that
building
or
from
that
application.
So
there's
a
variety
of
reasons
there
and
I
think
from
a
economic
or
confidentiality
element.
Q
There's
no
need
to
necessarily
State
what
Financial
linkage
amounts
to
as
long
as
you
confirm
that
you
are
financially
linked
and
I
think
in
this
instance.
Here
it's
very
it's
very
obvious
that,
given
the
the
familial
link
to
the
applicant
being
a
son
that
there
is
a
linkage
there
and
the
fact
that
he
lives
in
proximity
to
the
existing
turbine
as
well,
would
back
that
up
so
I
suppose.
Just
from
a
general
point
of
view,
the
application
was
assessed
on
its
own
grounds
and
what
we're?
Q
What
we
have
here
is
an
applique
or
an
existent
Harbor
in
which,
in
reality
is
has
very
little
conditions
associated
with
it.
What
we're
going
to
get
here
is
a
turbine,
that's
going
to
be
have
noise
conditions,
Shadow
flicker
conditions
and
there's
going
to
be
protection
for
all
the
local
people
or
any
objectors
or
anyone
there
that
if
there
is
an
issue,
the
council
have
some
recourse
potentially
against
it,
and
you
know
as
well.
Q
What
we're
saying
here
is
it's
an
improvement,
and
the
other
point
I
would
like
to
make
is
this
applic
disturbing
is
a
brand
new
machine.
It's
going
to
increase
efficiency
of
this
site,
utilizing
existing
infrastructure,
so
we're
not
removing
any
of
the
existing
elements
on
the
site
and
I
suppose
where
we
are,
generally
speaking
in
terms
of
renewable
energy.
Q
A
C
Yeah,
thank
you,
chair,
I,
suppose
you
know
with
this
particularly
we've
had
one
of
these
applications.
There
seems
to
be
a
doe
decision.
Originally.
Is
that
the
case
and
then
let's
create?
Unless
you
know
Specter
of
a
like
stump
approval,
then
we
have
an
e-application
which
this
Council
and
this
news
way
of
working.
C
You
know,
although
it's
not
that
new
now,
but
in
terms
of
post
our
pre-rpa,
you
know
the
landscape
is
quite
different
in
that
regard
in
terms
of
the
responsibilities
and
what
this
Council
does
in
terms
of
dealing
with
his
own
plan
and
applications,
and
you
know,
we've
had
a
few.
You
know
decisions
in
the
past
which
have
been
similar
in
terms
of
doe
decisions
and
then
Council
seeking
to
put
you
know,
applications
through
their
pieces.
So
to
speak,
and
you
know
this
is
another
one
of
these.
C
Where
an
extent
approval
exists
for
two
turbines,
so
is
it
the
view
really
Russian
directly
to
you
that
you
know
what
is
proposed
is
a
banner
month
because
we've
had
you
know,
we've
had
the
whole
Gosford
thing
last
time
where
you
know
the
the
PAC
considered.
You
know
the
houses
are
betterment
over
the
garage
blocks.
So
is
this
something
similar
where
you
know,
as
opposed
to
two
turbines
we
have
before
us
a
single
turbine,
albeit
you
know
a
bit
bigger,
is
it?
C
Is
that
the
overriding
factor
on
all
this,
where
ABC
council
plan
and
Department
of
State
of
the
this
is
an
opportunity
for
betterment
on
I?
Suppose,
as
our
you
know,
the
agent
has
said
here,
there's
a
lot
more
controls
and
conditions
placed
on
this,
so
is
that
the
Uber
riding
reasons
really
I'm
just
trying
to
get
to
in
this
regard.
A
O
You're
quite
right:
yes,
there
is
an
extant
approval
on
this
site
and
one
turbine
has
been
erected.
A
second
turbine
could
be
erected
and
I.
Suppose
that's
the
Baseline
for
us,
considering
from
the
visual
impact
here
in
terms
of
the
the
proposed
turbine,
but
I
mean
we've
looked
at
the
application
on
its
own
merits,
we've
rigorously
assessed
it.
We've
asked
for
a
number
of
reports,
as
the
agent
has
pointed
out
in
terms
including
the
noise
report.
O
O
Obviously,
in
terms
of
the
visual
assessment,
you'll
have
seen
the
photo
montages.
We
have
to
take
into
account
the
fallback
position
that
there
is
potentially
there
could
potentially
be
two
turbines
here.
Is
you
know,
and
in
terms
of
the
visual
impact?
Is
it
unacceptably
adversely?
You
know
that
it
would
require
us
to
justification
to
recuse
it,
and
you
know
wherever
view
that
the
complacer
ppsc
team
and
in
its
own
right
and
that's
the
reason,
we're
recommending
approval.
G
O
Yes,
councilor
Lavery
and
the
original
approval
has
been
implemented
by
the
erection
of
one
turbine,
so
he
could
go
ahead
and
build
the
second
turbine
now,
even
if
we
were
to
approve
this,
this
application
for
the
replacement
of
the
existing
turbine
technically,
he
could
still
go
in
and
build
the
second
turbine,
which
is
why
we're
recommending
the
legal
agreement
to
protect
against
that
happening.
Obviously,
you've
seen
in
the
report
would,
if
members
reminded
to
approve
this,
would
be.
You
know,
suggesting
that
a
legal
agreement
would
be
put
in
place
that
he
couldn't
direct.
G
Legal
agreement
and
then
say,
for
example,
a
developer
were
to
create
the
second
turbine
from
the
original
site.
Would
then
kind
of
still
have
recourse
to
require
a
lot
of
removal
or
the
development
to
stop
just
just
to
clarify,
because
we
don't,
you
know,
obviously
we're
discussing
here
and
noise
levels
and
things
for
one
turbine
say,
for
example,
you
know
both
end
up
getting
best,
obviously
that
that
may
change
the
noise
situation
for
the
resin.
So
I
just
want
to
really
understand
what
we're
looking
on
here.
R
O
C
C
What
controls
are
on
the
current
turbine,
if
any,
as
opposed
to
what's
being
proposed
with
this
new
one?
So
because
I
know
there
are
objections
and
and
players
at
the
momentum,
I'm
just
Keen.
This
to
you
know,
get
the
difference
here
between
what
exists
versus
what
could
potentially
exist
versus
what
this
game
is
before
the
committee
today.
O
Thank
you
chair
and,
as
I've
already
said,
there's
an
existing
turbine
there.
The
second
turbine
could
be
built
in
looking
back
at
that
2007.
It
was
a
2006
application.
It
was
a
2007
approval,
there's
only
two
planning
conditions
in
that
approval.
There's
no
conditions
in
relation
to
noise.
There's
no
conditions
in
relation
to
Shadow
flicker.
C
O
G
Thank
you
chair.
It
is
an
interesting
one.
That's
part
of
the
decision.
We're
Fair
stayed
out
how
you
refuse,
in
which
case
you
could
end
up
with
double
the
turbines
of
less
possibility
for
enforcement,
less
noise
Criterion
so
on,
or
we
approve
this
application,
which
ultimately
averts
the
previous
course
of
action
and
provides
greater
reassurance
for
enforcement,
particularly
in
terms
of
being
without
legal
agreement,
which
was
discussed.
G
I
guess
it
may
not
may
not
be
welcomed
by
the
objectives,
maybe
if
they
don't
want
any
turbines
there.
But
that's
this
is
the
decision
we're
facing
which,
which
one
of
these
two
do
we
choose
and,
to
be
honest,
I've
been
tempted
to
go
with
the
approval
to
provide
those
certainties
around
enforcement
and
prevention
of
any
any
second
turbine
on
the
site
which,
which
would
you
know
double
the
impact
I,
think
that's
the
choice
where
Fierce
was
here,
chair
and
it'll
be
tempted
to
go
with
their
approval
on
this
case.
C
Yeah,
you
know
what
happened
to
that
again,
where
I'm
in
tune
with
councilor
Lowry
on
various
issues
in
this.
Certainly
one
of
them
were,
you
know,
I
think
we
have
the
there's
an
obvious
opportunity
here
for
for
betterment
and
I'm.
Looking
back
at
those,
you
know
very
recent
Pac
decisions
and
yeah
I
would
be
of
exactly
the
same
views
as
counselor
library
in
this
were
that
element
of
control
or
feel
is,
is
a
very
important
issue
versus
you
know
a
doubling
and
an
amplification
of
the
current
issues.
A
I
S
A
A
O
Thank
you
chair.
This
application
is
a
full
application
for
the
reaction
of
a
dwelling
on
garage
with
Associated
site
works,
on
lands
adjacent
to
and
south
of
10
and
21
Rothman
Street
Bluff
Brooklyn.
The
application
is
being
presented
to
committee.
As
the
strategy
consultee
has
recommended
that
the
application
be
refused.
O
O
The
plan
recognizes
that
the
settlement
limit
of
block
Brookland
is
designed
to
provide
for
additional
development
opportunities
which
utilize
current
capacity
within
the
settlement
limit.
In
order
to
maintain
a
compact
Urban
form
and
protect
the
setting
of
The
Village,
the
spps
and
policy
OS
one
of
PPS.
It's
state
that
the
development
that
would
result
in
the
loss
of
existing
open
space,
irrespective
of
its
physical
condition
or
appearance,
will
not
be
permitted.
The
site
takes
in
a
large
portion
of
the
cartilage
of
number
10
on
an
area
of
scrub
land.
O
O
The
assessment
and
consideration
of
the
planning
merits
of
the
proposed
development
informed
by
pps7
quality
residential
environments
and
a
particular
policy
qd1,
the
addendum
pps7,
safeguarding
character
of
established
residential
areas
and
also
supplementary
planning
guidance
I'll
set
out
in
detail
on
the
report.
The
proposal
has
been
fully
considered
against
the
provisions
of
these
policies.
Officers
consider
the
proposal
Accords
with
the
spps
Paul
security,
one
of
pps7,
and
complies
with
the
supplementary
planning
guidance.
O
O
Officers
in
consultation
with
DFA
roads
are
satisfied
that
an
acceptable
means
of
access
can
be
achieved,
a
sufficient
space
when
the
cartilage
can
be
provided
for
and
I
water
have
advised
that,
while
there
is
available
capacity
at
the
wastewater
treatment
works,
there
is
a
public
file
Sir
with
20
within
20
meters
of
the
proposed
development
boundary
which
cannot
adequately
service.
These
proposals,
as
the
receiving
file
storage
network
has
reached
capacity.
O
They
wanted
to
state
that
the
public
system
cannot
presently
serve
this
development
without
significant
risk
of
environmental
harm
and
public
disability,
including
pollution,
flooding
and
detrimental
impact
on
existing
properties.
However,
officers
note
that
an
appeal
reference,
2021
a0231,
the
planning
appeals
commission,
considered
that
the
imposition
of
a
negative
planning
condition
was
reasonable
and
necessary,
which
would
prohibit
commencement
of
any
development
until
a
submission
of
Wastewater
impact
assessment
to
confirm
that
either
a
surge
connection
could
be
made
or
an
alternative
provision
for
disposal
of
surge.
O
In
this
case,
confirmation
has
been
provided
from
the
agent
that
he
is
satisfied
in
engineering
solution
for
disposal
of
Wastewater
can
be
found
accordingly,
in
line
with
the
approach
of
the
PAC
are
standard
above
officers.
Consider
that
the
imposition
of
a
negative
planning
condition
is
necessary
and
would
address
the
concerns
raised
by
ni
water.
That
condition
would
prohibit
commencement
of
any
development
until
a
Wastewater
impact
assessment
confirms
that
a
sewage
connection
can
be
made
or
that
alternative
provision
for
Soviets
disposal
of
sage
is
made
own
balance.
O
O
O
O
O
O
And
this
is
a
view
from
the
rear
site
boundary
looking
north
towards
into
the
site
effectively
and
again
a
view
of
from
the
northeastern
side
boundary
across
the
site
and
a
view
across
the
state
from
the
Northwestern
boundary
of
the
application
site.
And
that
concludes
the
presentation.
Thank
you.
Members.
A
G
Thank
you
chair
and
thank
you.
Roshin
obviously
discussed
this
matter
before
about
application
should
come
from
a
statutory
refusal
and
so
on
how
they're
dealt
with
what
assurances
do
we
have
that
say.
For
example,
we
do
Google
assist
approval,
even
inspired
with
file
surge
water
uncertainty,
but
you
know
solution
can
be
found
or
will
be
found,
because
the
last
thing
we
want
to
do
is
approve
a
property
and
then
the
developer
to
go
ahead
and
install
some
kind
of
substandard
solution.
G
But.
Ultimately,
the
the
barrel
was
probably
may
not
be
aware
of
and
could
cause
significant
impact
on
the
residential
immunity
yeah.
You
know
if
things
don't
don't
meet
standards,
I,
suppose
what
Assurance?
Don't
we
have
that
you
know
nothing
will
occur
before
very
you
know,
appropriate
standard
solution
is
given
fully
for
the
water
for
the
water
issues
before
we
were
to
take
any
decision
on
this
thanks.
O
Thank
you.
Councilman
officers
are
recommending
a
condition
which
would
be
a
negative
condition
so
that
no
development
could
commence
on
this
site
until
a
Wastewater
impact
assessment
is
submitted
for
consideration
now
and
I.
What
are
they
provided?
Wastewater
impact
assessment
service
and
they
will
provide
a
site-specific
development
solution
and
Engineers
report
detail
and
potential
developer,
funded
solutions
to
overcome
Wastewater
capacity
constraints
and
to
facilitate
new
development
in
the
area.
So
basically
they
will
provide
that
engineer's
report
to
tell
the
developer.
B
C
You
basically
looking
at
the
the
site
and
its
size.
Is
it
not
the
case
that
the
applicant
could
have
a
normal?
You
know:
nie
approved
consent,
the
discharge
under
a
standalone.
You
know
type
septic
tank
system
than
anybody
else
that
isn't
within
distance
over
the
public
sewage
system.
We're
coming
at
home,
I
have
done
that
and
it's
fully
approved
and
you
get
it
emptied
once
a
year
for
free,
Northern,
Ireland
water.
Is
that
not
an
option?
In
this
instance
I
mean
for
a
standalone
dwelling
that
has
adequate
space
around
it.
A
O
Thank
you
chair.
The
purpose
of
the
condition
is
that
he
would
investigate
you,
know
all
possibilities
in
terms
of
how
this
could
be
dealt
with.
Obviously,
what
you're
talking
about
would
require
consent
to
discharge
from
niea.
There
may
be
difficulties
with
that.
You
know
we
don't
know,
but
the
condition
would
would
protect
against
any
development
commencement
until
something
had
been
investigated
and
agreed
that
there
is
a
solution
to
dealing
with
the
with
the
sage
problem.
E
E
O
You're
quite
right,
there
is
potential
for
noise
impact
from
the
the
traffic
on
the
A1,
but
we
have
consulted
with
environmental
health.
We
have
recommended
that,
subject
to
the
imposition
of
conditions
that
the
noise
issue
would
not
result
in
the
loss
of
immunity,
so
you'll
see
there's
conditions
there
that
are
recommended
in
terms
of
ventilation
in
terms
of
double
Gleason,
that's
proposed
in
terms
of
conditions
number
seven,
and
yet,
as
dealing
with
those
issues
in
terms
of
noise.
G
Making
sure,
certainly
it's
an
interesting
application,
because
I
think
it
highlights
the
I
guess
the
growing
age
of
our
anti-water.
You
know
Network
infrastructure,
I
think
we
want
to
be
faced
with
a
lot
more
of
these
type
of
situations.
So
I
think
it's
important
that
the
community
keeps
an
eye
on
it,
particularly
with
regards
to
larger
applications,
which
may
be
more
local
isolations
will
be
difficult
to
implement
and
costly.
Ultimately,
we
need
investment
from
the
Northern
Ireland
assembly
for
right
across
Northern
land
for
improvement,
the
capacity
nowhere
growing
area
and
ABC
Council.
C
A
T
Let's
plan
on
application,
6
full
plan
permission
for
the
reaction
of
residential
development
and
pricing
of
66
two-story
dwellings,
24
of
which
will
be
detached,
42,
semi-detached
internal
roads,
Associated
parking,
Landscaping
public,
open
space,
drainage
facility
works
and
the
profession
of
right
hand.
Turning
in
onto
onto
Silverwood
Road
into
the
development
Advanced
100
meters,
east
of
25
and
27
Silverwood
Road
in
Lurgan.
The
application
is
before
you
this
evening.
As
its
major
plan,
application
officers
have
taken
it
members
of
Red's
report
in
full
and
as
such,
this
is
a
synopsis.
T
Only
the
application
site
is
located
within
the
department
limits
of
the
governor
urban
area
on
phase
one
zone,
housing
land
leh-1,
with
the
proposed
access
provided
through
land
zone
for
Light,
Industry
and
warehousing
la6,
as
defined
by
the
craigavon
area
plan
2010..
The
site
is
currently
used
as
agriculture
lands,
but
it's
in
close
proximity
to
other
dwellings,
along
Silverwood,
Road,
Silverwood
industrial
estate
to
the
southwest
and
the
railway
line,
which
is
further
south
east
of
the
site
post
of
almond,
is
considered
to
comply
with
the
keysight
requirements
of
zoning
elliot1
and
officers.
T
3
has
no
conflict
between
the
proposed
development
and
the
craigavon
area
plan
or
the
spps.
Therefore,
the
the
proposal
to
develop
a
site
for
residential
purposes
is
considered
acceptable
in
principle.
Regarding
the
proposed
to
sign,
layouts
and
amenity
officer,
3
has
no
concerns.
The
proposed
densely
is
considered
to
be
acceptable
for
this
area.
T
A
concept
plan
for
the
entire
sewing
has
been
provided
for
information
purposes,
but
the
proposed
layout
is
deemed
acceptable
in
the
context
of
the
creating
Place
document
with
sufficient
open
space
provision
layout
has
been
designed
today
for
Heckler
and
pedestrian
access
to
potential
future
faces
after
development.
The
site
also
Fades
into
exists
and
cycle
networks
and
food
pass
by
the
cycle
in
along
the
access
road
to
the
Housing
Development.
T
The
layout
is
considered
to
respect
the
excessive
natural
features
of
the
site,
with
substantial
enhancement
of
these
features
and
platinum
proposed
members
are
advised
that
the
development
is
considered
to
create
no
conflict
with
the
policy
professions
of
pps7,
the
addendum
to
pps7
pps12
for
creating
places
open
space
provision
and
landscape
and
arrangements
are
deemed
appropriate.
The
further
it
Landscaping
requirements,
conditions
as
necessary.
T
A
transport
assessment
form
has
been
submitted
and
considered,
as
has
a
transport
assessment
which
is
considered
the
entire
lh1
zoning,
which
is
based
on
approximately
516
dwellings,
facilitate
this
development.
The
ghost
Island's
right-hand
tunnelian
is
Dean
necessary
and
is
proposed
for
this
application.
Additional
Works
will
be
required
for
future
phases.
T
A
total
of
136
in
cartilage
parking
spaces
and
42
long
streets,
visitor
parking
spaces
have
been
provided
and
officers
raise
no
concerns
with
the
parking
Arrangements
in
the
context
of
the
park
and
standards
document.
The
FI
roads
raise
neural
issues
with
access
arrangements
and
parking
professions.
T
Officers
therefore
satisfied
that
no
conflict
success
between
the
policy
professions
of
pts-3
Janus
assessment,
accompanied
this
plan
application
officers
in
consultation
with
vfa
rivers
are
content
that
the
Master's
proposed
will
effectively
mitigate
the
flow
address
to
the
post
development
and
from
the
development
elsewhere
such
that
The
Proposal
complies
with
policy
fld3
of
PPS
15.
Revised
members
will,
however,
note
that
the
condition
has
been
included
requiring
final
GNH
assessment
to
be
provided.
A
flood
risk
assessment
has
also
been
provided
and
officer.
Tree
has
no
concerns
regarding
policy
fld1
of
PPS,
15
or
phase.
T
So
overall
officers
are
subject
to
inclusion
of
the
formats
and
condition
it
raised.
No
concerns
regarding
the
policy
professions
of
PPS
15
rephased,
the
impact
of
the
development
on
natural
heritage
and
the
environment
has
been
considered
in
the
report.
The
site
is
hydrologically
linked
to
the
loch,
nay
and
luck
big
special
protection
area
which
are
of
international
and
National
importance
and
protected
by
the
habitats,
regulations
and
environment
Northern
Ireland
order
2002
following
consultation
with
theater
and
shared
Environmental
Services
officers
are
content
that
the
development
can
proceed
without
any
adverse
effects.
T
On
the
Integrity
of
these
sites,
an
ecological
statement
has
been
considered
and
the
national
environment
division
of
the
areas
no
concerns.
So
overall
officer
tree
has
no
concerns
regarding
the
policy
professions
of
pps2
officers
also
raise
no
concerns
regarding
contamination,
consultation
with
the
regulation
unit
of
Dara
and
the
Environmental
Health
Department
concerning
contamination,
preliminary
risk
assessment,
environmental
health
have
also
considered
a
noise
impact
assessment
and
other
air
quality
impact.
Assessment
and
officers
have
played
necessary
conditions
to
overcome
any
concerns
and
protect
residential
immunity
and
I.
T
T
Just
shows
the
location
of
the
site
in
the
general
area,
so
it's
just
off
the
Silverwood
Road
to
the
west
or
Northwest
of
Bergen
Town.
Center
next
slide
then
shows
an
aerial
overview
of
the
sites,
so
we
can
see
it's
currently
agricultural
lands
with
Silverwood
industrial
estate
to
the
southwest
and
then
other
heisen
developments
in
the
nearby
facility.
T
Next
slide
then
shows
the
site
location
plan
and
the
next
slide
shows
the
area
plan.
So
the
access
to
the
development
goes
through
like
a
landstone
for
like
industry
and
warehousing,
but
the
proposed
housing
is
on
phase
one
I
hope
housing
land,
the
next
slide,
then
it
just
shows
the
so
I
think
yeah.
It
just
shows
that
they
actually
there.
You
can
see
the
access
thing
to
the
the
main
development
and
the
next
slide
then
just
shows
a
a
zoomed
in
version
of
the
layout
the
next
site.
T
Then
this
is
the
overall
concept,
so
you
can
see
the
access
coming
from
the
Silverwood
road
and
it
is
just
a
concept
for
how
the
entire
Sony
may
be
built
out.
A
next
slide,
then,
is
the
proposed
Landscaping
plan.
So
we
have
existing
boundaries
which
are
being
enhanced
and
then
new
boundaries
and
quite
substantial
planting
a
proposed
along
them.
T
Next
slide
then
show
some
of
the
Post
House
types.
So
this
is
one
of
our
detached
house
types
followed
by
another,
a
detached
house
type
on
the
following
slide
and
then
some
of
the
semi-detached
on
the
following
slide
terms
of
landscaping,
a
there's,
no
routine
structures
proposed
within
this
development.
But
these
are
the
proposed
Landscaping
treatments.
The
next
slide
then
shows
some
of
the
sections
through
the
site
and
an
end
which
is
followed
by
the
apsd
drawing
and
on
the
next
slide.
Then
you
can
see
the
access
which
has
the
right
hand
they're
turning
them.
T
T
A
the
next
slide
down
is
just
a
photograph
of
the
site
to
be
developed.
So
that's
a
photograph
of
the
site,
Facing,
East
and
Then,
followed
by
a
photograph
facing
Northeast
and
finally,
then
a
photograph
facing
north,
and
you
can
see
there
the
rising
land
to
the
the
left
of
the
photograph
which
is
outside
of
the
application
side.
Thank
you.
A
G
Thank
you
chair
and
thank
you
Kerry
for
that
very
informative
presentation.
I
want
to
share
that
to
know
so
many
Lurgan
members
will
be
aware
of.
Is
that
that
area
North
Logan
has
a
very
high
demand
for
social
housing.
I
note
that
the
status
for
private
dwellings
and
so
on.
Can
you
confirm
if
any
of
those
are
expected
to
be
social,
housing
or
planners,
give
any
consideration
that
a
portion
of
that
you
know
this
application
are
the
overall.
G
T
Yeah
we
have
give
a
consideration
a
to
to
a
social
housing
profession,
so
in
this
instance,
no
social
housing
is
proposed
on
the
side
of
this
fully
private
housing.
So,
ultimately,
when
the
plan
application
was
submitted
back
in
2019,
the
social
housing
need
in
North
Logan
was
for
80.
80
units
is
identified
in
the
2018.
Housing
needs
assessment.
T
So
during
the
journalist
periods,
a
114
social
housing
units,
North
Oregon,
have
either
been
completed
or
programmed
for
Works,
which
is
an
access
of
the
Eddie
units
that
was
required
at
that
time.
So
we
did
conclude
in
that
basis
that
there
was
no
social
housing
requirement
for
the
site
on
that
basis.
But
in
addition
to
that,
as
you've,
seen
from
the
presentation
and
from
the
from
the
report
it
is,
there
is
challenges,
obviously
in
trying
to
develop
this
site
as
a
large
site
having
a
good
Street
Industrial
land.
T
T
There's
a
the
access
rule
to
the
development
is
6.7
meter,
distributor
class
access
rule,
so
that's
to
lay
Future
boss
access
through
through
that
development
from
Silverwood
Road
Lincoln
on
to
a
the
killing
the
end,
which
obviously
would
have
other
costs
associated
with
it
and
again,
there's
cycle
cyclists
wears
along
that
300
meter
stretch
as
well,
so
there
have
been
have
been
caused.
So,
yes,
we
have
considered
the
social
elements,
and
but
we
have
completed
this
in
a
sense
that
there
is
no
requirement
to
provide
us
in
on
that
basis.
G
A
U
U
The
the
applicant
at
this
stage
is
not
proposing
to
develop
other
parts
of
the
zoning
how
those
lands
are
outside
of
his
control.
So
we
cannot
obviously
speculate
what
may
or
may
not
come
forward
in
terms
of
social
housing.
Development
on
the
remainder
of
the
zoning
I'd
react
reiterate
what
was
said
there
by
the
planning
officer
in
that.
In
order
to
open
up
this
part
of
the
zoning,
it
was
a
requirement
that
the
access
onto
Silverwood
Road
was
provided.
U
This
has
been
done
at
the
applicant
Zone
expense
expense
and
that
will
ultimately
benefit
future
developers
on
this
part
of
the
zoning
and,
as
was
mentioned
there
as
well,
there's
been
the
the
the
design
of
that
access
is
to
accommodate
buses
and
as
to
accommodate
a
cycle
Lane.
So
there's
a
lot
of
public
benefit
coming
out
by
the
developer,
opening
up
this
section
of
the
zoning,
but
in
terms
of
what
may
come
after
that,
that's
something
beyond
our
control
and
that
we
can't
speculate
on
at
this
moment
in
time.
J
Thanks
chair,
it
looks
just
to
go
back
to
the
concert
average
Point
sure
because
of
it
is
a
very
good
point
and
you
are
right.
The
number
of
affordable
units
now
associate
units
not
identified
by
the
housing
executive,
North
Logan,
there's
over
two
home,
that's
around
248
and
and
I
was
telling
what
was
said
by
the
agent.
Other
applications
do
come
forward
for
for
that
array
of
land
by
other
developers.
J
G
Like
HR,
don't
expect
to
be
much
of
the
device
of
the
bed
in
this
one
I
think
we're
all
agreed
that
you
know.
Obviously,
we've
got
their
previous
Sidelines
done
then,
and
this
is
obviously
the
first
phase
of
it
and
I
think
it's
good
say
the
continued
residential
growth
and
Lurgan
I
think
one
that
she
rather
did
have
it.
You
know,
as
the
social
housing
need
in
North
Lurgan,
albeit
new
area
units.
Now
is
what
traveled
I
don't
know
what
it
was
in
2019
and
thank
God.
G
She
was
accelerated
growth
for
social
housing
aid
in
North,
Lurgan
and
ultimately
needs
to
come
under
plan
with
mines
in
a
more
greater
and
greater
emphasis
and
future
applications
in
future
development
sites,
because,
ultimately,
we
need
to
provide
social
housing
aid
for
for
an
inclusive
Society.
But
that's
maybe
one
for
another
day.
Unless
application
of
baking
time
was
the
recommendation
to
approve
I,
don't
know
if
any
other
members
have
any
thoughts,
but
let's
move
another
and
again
nice
to
say
the
Mansion
of
cycle,
awareness
and
lack
of
travel
and
so
on.
G
Through
these
developments,
and
given
that
such
a
such
a
big
development,
it's
good
that
there'd
be
walking
opportunities
for
people
where
I'll
have
to
go
on
a
circular
route
round
to
get
from
one
side
of
it
to
the
other.
I
have
one
road
to
the
other,
that'll
be
able
to
walk
through
and
access.
You
know
access
roads
onto
Lock,
Road
and
Killingly
and
Silverwood
Road,
and
things
like
that.
So
that
seems
to
be
a
well-solid
application
in
terms
of
The
Wider
The
Wider
scuba
too.
A
A
Thank
you
very
much
members,
and
thank
you
very
much
chance
for
your
time
and
soon
and
we
want
to
appendix
six
I'm
going
to
make
a
decoration
of
interest
that
they
have
when
it
was
and
made
famous
lordmer
I
met
with
the
applicant
of
the
owners
and
the
applicant
regardless
much
needed
I've
created
in
Guildford,
so
I'm
going
to
hand
over
to
my
David
Alderman,
Kennedy
and
step
out
of
the
room.
Thank
you
very
much.
H
Thank
you
chair.
This
application
takes
full
plan
information
for
the
conversion
of
an
extension
to
the
vehicle,
Guilford
Mill
complex
from
Aveda
mixed
use;
development
consisting
of
a
garden
center
restaurant
Residence,
Apartments,
a
rooftop
garden,
children's
activity
area
and
Associated
services
and
storage
car
parking
access,
Landscaping
works.
Authors
have
taken,
the
members
have
read
the
report
and
fallen,
so
this
will
be
a
synopsis
only
the
States
located
in
the
development
level
of
Guilford
outside
the
Town
Center,
primarily
on
land
zone,
for
Max
use
development
and
partly
within
an
area
of
accessing
open
space.
H
H
Quantitative
risk
assessment,
the
construction
math
estate
and
latent
part
plan
about
mitigation
plan,
and
these
reports
have
all
been
appraised,
not
only
by
officers
but
the
relevant
common
authorities
who
have
offered
no
objection.
The
overall
proposal
has
damaged
it,
there's
no
sequentially
for
preferable.
States,
the
retail
impact
assessments
demonstrated
both
the
qualitative
and
quantitative
robust
need
for
this
proposal
within
Guilford
The
Proposal
cannot
be
found
to
have
significant
versus
impact
in
any
time
Center
than
the
catchment.
H
The
Redevelopment
of
the
state
for
a
mixed
use
of
residential
and
Commercial
development
is
complementary
to
the
objectives
of
the
RDS
and
may
bring
substantial
regenerate
benefits
not
only
to
Gilford
but
to
services
and
jobs.
The
Wider
armor
bound
brazing
for
governor
officers
consider
the
current
scheme.
It
brings
substantial
Community
benefits
that
out
where
the
loss
of
the
open
space
officers
are
consider.
The
post
area
of
car
park
and
within
the
area
of
accessing
open
space
is
acceptable
weighing
up
the
material
plan
and
history
and
specific
circumstances
of
this
case.
H
The
river
Corridor
and
Associated
plant
that
will
not
be
compromised
with
their
post-development
officers.
Consider
that
that
the
introduction
of
a
high
quality
landscape
scheme
around
the
Miller
complex
will
enhance
the
river
Corridor
compared
to
the
existing
condition
of
the
state,
which
has
come
become
relatively
overgrown
and
unmalished
over
recent
years.
Guilford
Mill
is
one
of
the
largest
surviving
Flags
been
in
males
in
Ireland
and
therefore
is
of
national
importance.
H
Historic
balance
are
supportive
of
the
principle
of
entertain
solutions
to
these
historic
structures,
historic
buildings
of
recommended,
no
objection
subject
to
the
condition
to
test
the
development
of
the
historic
Miller.
Complex
will
also
bring
substantial
regeneration,
benefits
to
Guilford
and
represent
not
one
of
the
largest
and
transport
of
projects
within
gufford
and
The
Wider
Borough.
The
development
also
brings
substantial
benefits
to
the
conservation
of
one
of
the
most
prominental
animals
in
Northern
Ireland.
H
H
So
that's
just
an
overview
of
the
site
at
the
present
time,
so
it's
next
to
the
river
there.
So
it's
the
access
and
Guilford
Mill
complex
next
slide.
Please
that
just
gives
you
an
understand.
The
red
line
is
the
application
site,
so
you
can
stay
a
straddles,
a
number
of
different
designations
within
the
plan
which
all
had
to
be
accounted
for.
Yeah
the
northern
green
area
is
the
area
of
open
space.
H
The
blue
area
is
the
next
use
development,
the
hash
blue
areas,
theory
of
Timescape
character,
the
house
green
areas,
the
area
of
a
local
landscape
policy
area
and
the
light
blue
areas,
their
extensive
character
next
slide.
Please
so
that
just
shows
the
site
location
plan
again
outline
red,
but
the
access
to
the
the
meanderburn
road
there
and
then
the
river
and
the
Millers
will
also
be
incorporated
and
retains
part
of
the
scheme.
H
Next
slide,
please
so
that
just
shows
the
other
side
layout,
so
the
the
buildings
and
quests
in
order
to
the
west
of
the
site,
so
the
two
to
the
west
of
the
main
building
and
then
the
engine
room,
building
to
the
back
and
accessing
out
buildings
are
all
as
part
of
this
proposal.
Next
slide,
please
so
the
ground
floor
plan
is
the
area
in
which
the
Garden
Center
will
be
proposed.
So
come
on
into
the
rear.
Your
car
parking
will
be
level
access
into
the
garden
center
area
and
then
to
the
bottom.
H
There
also
will
be
an
extension
to
the
front
of
the
me
and
Guilford
Mill
and
which
is
for
the
additional
retail
egg
yarn
Center
floor
space
next
slide.
Please
that's
the
fourth
floor
plans.
The
first
floor
plan
will
host
the
restaurant
and
children's
activity
area
as
well
as
the
garden
The,
Edge
side,
Garden
area
and
Stayton
area.
So
you
can
the
extension
to
the
frontal
Lodge
for
level
access
to
the
front
of
the
building
to
come
off.
H
As
you
know,
there's
an
existing
fit
path
around
the
river,
so
you
can
come
from
that
footpath
and
get
access
to
the
front
of
their
restaurant
up
those
steps
to
the
open
courtyard
area
into
the
restaurant
or
sit
outside
next
slide,
please.
So
the
these
were
addressed.
The
plans
are
for
apartments,
so
the
second
third,
fourth
and
fifth
are
for
am
apartments
and
next
slide
and
the
next
slide.
H
H
Next
slide,
please
so
I'll
just
shows
an
aerial
view
of
the
site
in
1958.
So
you
will
probably
go
from
the
report
that
we're
considered
of
national
importance
and
that's
one
of
the
criteria
where
you
allow
the
development
than
the
floodplain
and
that's
the
pawn
to
the
front.
You
can
see
from
that
building
that
there
was
always
an
extension
to
the
front
of
their
spelling,
so
by
a
line
that
new
extension
is
actually
bring
it
back
in
Lane.
What
previously
was
always
there
and
next
slide?
Please.
H
So
that's
the
view
of
the
melanoma
closed
in
1986
and
you
can
also
see
the
front
of
the
building
where
there
was
an
extension
and
nuts
that
this
development
sort
of
bringing
that
back
into
use
and
the
other
two
at
the
bottom
is
that
as
it
is
today,
that's
the
rear
elevation
and
you
can
see
it
is
getting
into
such
use
that
it's
it's
been
being
downgraded,
so
this,
hopefully,
will
bring
it
back
to
use
next
slide.
Please
and
that's
just
a
few
of
the
main
front
buildings.
H
H
So
that's
probably
a
duplicate
part,
and
that's
just
to
the
back
so
that
building
to
the
right
hand
say
there
is
the
engine
room
building.
So
it's
part
of
this
proposal
that's
coming
in
and
it's
going
to
be
the
main
entrance
to
the
garden
center
and
then
there's
going
to
be
a
flat
roof
link,
given
it
to
their
main
Guildford
Mill
building,
and
then
it's
also
going
to
be
a
left
shaft
to
the
rear
of
that,
but
not
precluding
a
protruding
above
the
the
height
of
it.
You
won't
see
it
from
the
front
next
slide.
H
H
You
see
such
like
open
plan
with
these
strands
up
the
middle,
so
we're
trying
to
retain
that
for
part
of
the
the
apartments,
as
you
can
see,
they're
going
to
be
set
back
from
the
openings
to
the
front,
but
they'll
be
left
open
as
a
sort
of
a
for
certain
night
area
with
this,
a
glass
balconies
over
them.
So
there's
going
to
be
notes.
It's
going
to
set
back
so
there's
no
Windows
Etc
in
those
portion
of
the
of
the
site.
Next
slide,
please!
H
The
back,
then,
will
be
your
Apartments
next
slide,
please
and
that's
to
the
rear.
So
that's
the
left,
shaft
building
that
accommodate
the
stairs
and
and
the
the
left
and
obviously
that
type
of
material
won't
take
away
from
the
Integrity
of
the
Leicester
building
and
then
to
the
right
hand,
say
that's
the
engine
room,
it's
going
to
be
the
me
and
entrance
into
the
garden
center
next
slide.
Please,
and
then
that's
just
not
impression.
Just
given
the
back
of
it
here
where
the
QR
Park
and
it's
going
to
be,
and
then
the
the
buildings.
H
K
V
You
thank
you.
Okay.
Thank
you.
Well,
thank
you.
Mr
chairman
I'm,
here
representing
the
applicant,
and
we
fully
endorse
the
officer's
recommendation
to
committee
to
approve
the
application,
and
indeed
the
next
application
before
committee,
which
is
the
associated
listed
building
consent.
Application.
V
The
Bell
complex,
has
led
vacant
for
many
years,
and
this
project
will
see
the
me
and
no
building
brought
back
into
use
and
opened
up
again
to
the
public
and
the
data
lacked
as
a
catalyst
for
the
Regeneration
of
The
Wider,
complex
that'll,
bring
great
benefits,
we
think
to
Guilford
damage
residents.
It's
for
these
reasons,
members
Mr
chairman,
that
we
would
urge
members
to
endorse
the
officer's
recommendation
to
committee
to
approve
the
application
and
indeed
the
associated
list
of
building
consent.
V
Application
I
have
on
the
call
with
me
as
well:
Richard,
Lawton,
who's
off
the
call
group,
the
applicants
for
the
application
and
Rob
Jennings
of
RMI
architects,
who
are
The
Architects
for
the
project,
both
of
whom
can
assist
me
with
any
questions
that
members
may
have.
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr
chairman.
G
Like
HR,
and
thank
you
for
that
presentation,
I
think
I'm
going
to
just
have
to
declare
an
interest
I
remember
being
on
the
new
as
a
working
group
meeting
back
in
2019
I
think
this
may
have
been
discussed
in
brief
detail.
I
think
that
was
before
any
plan
on
application,
I
think
so
important
to
declare
a
lot
of
they'll
go
under
the
application
with
an
open
mind,
and
things
like
that
so
happy
to
take
part
and
ask
questions
but
I
think
it's
important
to
declare
a
lot.
Well,
maybe
that'll
always
ask
questions.
G
S
K
H
But
we
would
put
a
five-year
time.
Constraints
would
have
five
years
to
commence
the
development,
but
maybe
Alderman
Wilson
or
Council
Wilson's,
maybe
looking
to
know
when
the
the
developer
or
the
applicants
may
be
looking
to
start
so
I
think
they're
on
the
call
for
clarification.
Maybe
Richard
Luton,
maybe
would
be
best
placed
chair
to
answer
that.
W
It's
obviously
been
been
in
plan
in
a
few
years
and
there's
been
a
few
changes
since
in
the
environment
since
the
application
went
in,
but
we
can't
really
put
any
thanks
go
on
the
completion
of
the
scheme
and
we
wouldn't
want
to
commit
that
at
this
stage.
But
there
is,
there
has
already
been
a
fairly
significant
investment
in
there,
they're
saving
the
buildings
and
regarding
roofs
and
and
the
the
kind
of
invasive
species
and
stuff
around
the
state.
W
E
Yes,
thank
you,
chair
and
I'm
surprised,
Alderman,
Wilson
didn't
come
and
say
about
so
much
of
the
building
being
listed,
and
would
it
have
much
of
an
impact
on
the
works
on
the
time
scale
of
the
works
on
the
cost
that
actually
gone
ahead?
One
of
the
one
red
phone
bucks,
one
where
they
can
pick
one
up.
K
H
Thanks,
yes,
apologies
Council
Larry
there
were
separate
access,
drones
I
should
have
had
them
up
just
to
demonstrate,
but
just
as
supposed
to
clarify
yes,
there
will
be
a
rate
turning
lean
in
and
there
will
also
be
a
pedestrian
Center
provision.
You'll
probably
know
that
access
way
at
the
moment,
they're
actually
a
telegraph
Pole
right
in
the
center
of
it.
So
that's
going
to
be
removed
and
then
there's
going
to
be
a
pedestrian
Parts
within
your
cross
and
from
the
public.
Footpath
you've
got
a
central
reservation
and
then
takes
you
on
through.
H
You've
got
to
be
two
lane
traffic
in
and
out,
and
it's
wide
enough
then
to
to
get
a
right
turning
in
there
as
well,
and
so
that
will
all
be
up
the
standard
as
the
present
time.
So
yes,
I
apologies,
I
should
have
had
the
separate
access
drawn
up
just
to
clarify
that
for
you
yeah,
but
yes
returning
and
a
footpath
link
in
and
two-way
traffic
at
night.
R
Yeah
this
one's
for
the
the
planning
officer
there
I
see
there
when
it
comes
to
traffic
access
parking,
that
the
officers
have
considered
the
access
and
pocket
management
of
the
excellent
permission
which
proposed
670
parking
spaces
and
that
could
have
resulted
in
the
loss
of
significant
portion
of
public
open
space
and
the
football
pitch
and
kind
of
still
operated
player.
Park
game.
Can
you
expand
a
little
bit
further?
I
H
If
there
is
an
extent
permission
in
this
site,
but
she
allowed
for
a
lot
vast,
more
car
park
in
which
way
and
will
extend
North
into
you,
probably
see
from
thing
there's
a
green
area
which
is
open,
space
and
Woodland,
so
that
we're
saying
this
is
a
betterment.
So
while
there
was
a
desire
for
between
280
car
parking
spaces,
that's
preferred
to
on
the
body.
S
Thank
you
sure.
I
am
looking
at
just
thanks,
Neil
for
the
presentation
and
looking
through
the
Artisan
pricings.
That
definitely
is
an
exciting
development
on
the
definitely
would
be
very
beneficial
to
the
greater
Guilford
area.
There
has
been
a
few
fall
stones
with
Guilford
Mill,
and
hopefully,
if
this
is
approved
to
innate
that
this
would
be
great
for
the
area
and
for
investment
on
jobs
and
everything.
So
it
definitely
is
looking
at
artists
Impressions
on
on
we're
seeing
tonight
definitely
exciting
development
for
the
area
have
approved.
Thank
you.
G
Thank
you,
chair
so
think
advantage
to
be
at
stage
so
just
give
me
views
I
think
on
paper.
This
is
probably
one
of
the
best
ever
applications
that
have
come
to
this
committee.
You've
got
it
all.
You've
got
protection
of
historic
buildings,
new
business
opportunities,
support
and
active
travel,
bring
an
area
which
has
been
subject
to
our
election,
not
just
for
years
but
for
decades
and
the
significant
positive
public
use
so
I
think
it's
it's
a
very
positive
application.
Obviously
the
developer
said
you
know,
uncertainty
on
timelines
and
things
like
that.
G
K
K
E
K
K
S
K
H
Yeah
thank
you,
chair
and,
because
of
all
applications
now
you're
being
approved.
This
application
must
take
the
list
of
building
consent
to
facility,
at
that
a
conversion
of
an
extension
to
the
vehicle,
Guilford,
Mill
and,
and
so
the
Leicester
building
side.
Application
can
go
forward
and,
according
to
section
90
one
of
the
planet,
Knack
officers
and
consider-
and
this
application
have
given
special
regard
to
you
and
considerable
wit,
desirability
of
preserving
the
building.
H
It's
set
in
any
features
of
spatial,
architectural
or
historic
and
restaurant
possesses,
and
policy
B
hit
sovereignty
and
abuse
of
Leicester
buildings
states
that
the
key
is
favorable
for
these
buildings
is
his
reuse
to
be
preserved,
enhanced,
okay,
this
Mill
closed
in
1986.
As
you
know,
when,
since
then
the
application
has
changed
hands.
On
several
occasions
the
state
was
acquired
by
the
applicant,
the
card
group
in
2016
and
Still
Remains
vacant
as
PPS
60.
It's
the
key
to
survival
and
upkeep
of
Leicester
building
is
to
keep
them
in
active
use.
H
This
proposal
16
to
use
the
building
and
therefore,
if
they
offers
repellent
opinion,
would
secure
the
upkeep
and
survival
of
this
building
in
accordance
to
policy.
Be
here
to
it,
and
officers
are
content
that
the
central
character
of
the
building
of
Saturn
or
attained,
and
the
speeches
of
special
interest
remain
attacked
on
the
bird
The.
Works
proposed,
make
use
of
traditional
sympathetic
building
materials
and
techniques
and
techniques
which
match
or
keep
are
in
keeping
of
those
found
in
the
building
and
the
architecture,
details
master
and
keep
with
the
building.
H
So,
in
light
of
all
the
above
officer,
consider
the
proposal
age
of
section
81
of
the
planet
act
on
all
crimes
that
observes
architectural
and
historic
interest
of
these
buildings.
Thus,
raising
officers
are
also
satisfied.
The
Proposal
complies
with
the
spps
and
policy
P
hits
of
pps6
and
therefore
we
would
recommend
the
consensus
ground
in
this
application.
Also,
I
haven't
done
any
further,
am
presentation
chair
because
it's
a
CM
again,
and
so
it's
up
to
you.
V
Thank
you
chair
again,
as
Shanette
has
said,
I
don't
really
have
anything
further
to
add.
Following
the
last
application,
that's
being
presented
and
discussed
by
members,
this
is
really
only
listed
building
consent
to
go
alongside
the
full
application.
So
we're
happy
enough
to
take
any
questions
again
that
members
may
have
Mr
chairman.
Thank
you.
K
C
Yeah
thanks
chair
I,
suppose
it's
not
a
question
per
se.
I,
don't
know
any
fairly
rigorous
in
their.
You
know
implementation
of
these
types
of
projects
in
terms
of
keeping
with
the
consents
and
the
listed
building
status,
and
it
would
just
be
sort
of
a
a
more
public
caller
that
would
be.
You
know
it
would
be
a
good
working
relationship.
You
know
between
naea
and
the
developers
that
you
know
Nia
would
see
the
the
Bannerman
aspect
of
this
and
the
Regeneration
that
it
would
bring
and
not
to
be
overly
onerous.
H
Hear
it
with
us
quite
proactively
to
write
the
same
project,
their
husband
build
engagement
both
with
the
architect,
the
agent
and
ourselves,
and
they
are
very
excited
with
this
project
and
to
be
honest,
they're.
They
have
been
very
quick,
responding
to
us
and
the
less
Leicester
buildings
consent
has
all
the
architectural
details
that
we
require.
So
we
don't
need
to
come
back
into
losses.
You
know
over
35
drones
of
the
smallest
details.
There's
now,
if
you
use
accept
this
consent
will
now
be
approved.
S
A
T
Only
section
54
of
the
planet,
North
9
2011
is
a
part,
allows
for
an
application
to
be
made
for
plan
permission
for
the
Department
of
land
without
complying
with
contestants
subject,
to
which
a
previous
permission
was
granted
and
considering
an
application
made
under
Section
54
members
must
only
consider
the
question
of
the
conditions
subject
to
which
the
plan
information
should
be
granted.
Consequently,
the
scope
of
members
is
in
principle,
more
limited
when
dealing
with
the
Saxon
54
application.
T
Although
members
are
entitled
to
consider
the
circumstances
that
led
to
the
previous
original
Grant
of
plan
information
condition,
five
required
the
profession
of
two
acoustic
barrier,
fences
prior
to
the
occupation
of
the
development,
the
this
application
seeks
to
for
a
condition
Faith
by
reducing
advance
of
the
previously
approved
acoustic
fence
to
the
east
of
the
warehouse
building
with
office
currently
occupied
by
Amazon
by
approximately
105
meters.
It's
proposed
that
this
accident
offensive
needed
the
adjacent
to
the
warehouse
building
and
staffed
car
park.
South
of
that
building
is
not
erected.
T
T
This
has
been
used
to
justify
the
removal
of
the
requirement
of
the
section
of
acoustic
barrier
along
the
side
of
the
warehouse
officers
have
consulted
with
the
Environmental
Health
Department,
if
not
raised
any
objections
to
the
proposed
variation
of
contention.
The
fire
Mental
Health
Department
also
face
that
they
have
not
received
any
noise
complaints
regarding
these
premises.
T
Residential
immunity
will
be
maintained
despite
the
reduced
stance
of
the
acoustic
barrier
fence
based
on
the
information
provided
and
the
consultation
response
from
environmental
health
officers
therefore,
are
off
the
opinion
that
this
variation
is
acceptable,
as
the
proposal
will
not
Prejudice
the
overall
aim
of
the
conversion
membership.
Faced
that
no
letters
of
objection
have
been
submitted
regardless
plan
application,
so
overall
officers
consider
the
proposal
to
meet
the
policy
requirements
of
the
spps
and
all
the
other
relevant
planning
policies.
T
T
T
A
next
slide
then
shows
the
site
location
plan
and,
in
terms
of
the
area
plan,
the
part
of
James
or
sorry
James
Park
sorry
is
zoned
an
industrial
land
and
partially
white
land.
So
the
section
of
the
site
we
are
concerned
with
in
terms
of
expenses
within
the
white
land,
a
the
site
that
I
plan
is
on
the
next
slide.
T
So
that's
the
section
of
the
fence
that
the
applicant
seeks
to
routine,
which
has
been
erected
and
then
an
orange
alongside
of
the
warehouse
and
the
car
park
to
the
south
of
that
is
where
the
fence
has
not
been
built
and
they're
proposing
to
remove
that
section
of
phantom
in
the
next
slide,
then
just
shows
the
acoustic
fence
detail
so
the
first
photograph,
then
you
can
see
the
Warehouse
currently
occupied
by
Amazon
and
the
acoustic
fence
they're
straight
in
that
area
of
yards
to
the
left
hand
side.
Next,
they
photograph
land.
T
Again,
you
can
see
the
continuation
of
That
acoustic
fence,
which
is
then
continued
into
a
photograph.
Three,
the
fourth
photograph
land
is
taken
from
the
a
car
staff
car
park
a
to
the
South
off
the
off
the
warehouse.
So
originally
this
was
to
be
acoustic
fence,
but
has
been
interacted
as
policy
advancing
and
a
there's.
Obviously,
the
area
where
we're
proposing
to
remove
the
acoustic
barrier
fence.
Thank.
R
A
A
B
Thank
you.
Chair
can
I
begin
by
amending
the
wording
of
condition.
Five
in
the
report
to
read
the
Upper
Floor
of
the
property
shall
only
be
used
for
storage
purposes
in
conjunction
with
and
which
are
ancillary
to
the
beauty.
Salon
hereby
approved
on
the
ground
floor
and
shall
not.
We
celebrity
operate
as
an
independent
business.
Thank
you.
B
B
Members
are
advised
to
post
AFI
routes
under
environmental
health
were
consulted
in
relation
to
the
proposal
and
both
raise
no
objections.
Subject:
conditions
which
are
set
out
in
the
report
The
Proposal,
does
not
include
any
alterations
to
the
external
appearance
of
the
property
and
therefore
there's
no
adverse
impact
on
the
appearance
of
the
terrorists.
Orth
Street
Scene
no
objections
were
received
in
relation
to
the
proposal
and
officers
recommend
that
permission
be
granted
subject
to
the
conditions
set
out
in
the
report
and
the
section
76
legal
agreement
and
I'll
just
take
you
through
this
PowerPoint.
Please.
B
Next
slide,
please
this
area
photograph
with
the
site
within
the
wider
area.
So,
if
you're
familiar
with
our
model,
your
your
head
and
you've
got
Home
Bargains
there
to
your
right
and
you're
heading
up
the
more
you
wrote
next
slide,
please
so
that
shows
the
particular
site
in
question
and
the
area
to
the
left
of
the
site.
There's
a
bit
of
hearthstone.
You
can
see,
and
that's
also
part
of
the
site
and
that's
where
the
parkings
to
be
provided
next
slide
please.
B
B
That
garage
was
part
of
the
previous
application
that
we
required
the
section
76
for
and
as
part
of
that
proposal,
that
garage
was
to
be
replaced
by
a
standalone
beauty
salon
just
to
the
rear
of
that
property
and
you'll
see
in
later
slides
than
the
layout
that
who's
as
part
of
that
scheme.
Next
slide
please.
So
this
is
shown
the
rear
of
those
properties,
that's
an
Alleyway
that
leads
down
the
back
of
all
four
properties
and
the
next
one
please,
and
this
is
taken
from
the
rear
Garden.
B
These
properties
have
a
small
yard
area
than
an
alley
and
then
a
garden
beyond
that,
and
this
is
taken
from
the
The
Garden
of
number
two
looking
back
towards
the
Terrace
next
slide,
please.
So
these
are
existing
and
proposed
elevations.
There
are
new
changes
to
be
made
externally
and
the
next
one
is
the
floor
plans.
So
this
shows
that
the
ground
floor
is
to
be
changed
into
the
beauty
salon
upstairs.
B
Originally,
there
was
to
be
a
treatment
room,
but
with
concerns
over
potential
noise
impact
that
was
removed,
the
two
areas
of
dice
lines
show
what
is
considered
to
be
buffer
areas.
So
they're
they're,
really
the
stairwells,
and
it
means
then
that
the
properties
on
either
side
are
protected
by
number
two's
stairwell
and
then
the
adjacent
one
on
the
other
side
and
they'll
act
as
a
buffer
for
any
potential
noise
on
the
next
slide.
Please
so
this
is
the
proposed
car
parking
plan.
You'll
see
the
dash
line
on
this.
B
One
is
where
the
existing
garages
are
and
they
need
to
be
removed
to
provide
the
parking.
The
park
in
here
will
provide
a
parking
for
all
of
the
properties
along
the
some
alicky's
tariffs,
and
then
the
next
should
be
one
more
slide.
Yeah
there
we
go.
There
was
a
slide
to
show
you
the
other
one,
just
to
show
you
that
there
was,
if
maybe
got,
the
earlier
version
of
it
well,
but
it
basically
just
showed
that
you
couldn't
really
operate
the
two
to
have
a
sufficient
car
parking.
A
Thank
you
very
much
proposed
by
councilor
Wilson's,
second,
by
cancer
Duffy.
We
all
agreed
great.
Thank
you
very
much
members.
We
move
on
to
pandex
10
application
number.
Earliest
year
we
had
2023
1763f,
that's
an
application
pay
or
mass
city
pound
base
in
Craig,
Edinburgh
Council
I'm,
going
to
bring
in
I
got
a
Queenie,
see
me
senior
planning
officer
to
present
report
on
PowerPoint
presentation.
L
Thank
you
chair.
This
proposal
has
been
submitted
by
our
Banbridge
and
craigavon
Council
for
a
replacementbols.net,
which
is
120
meters,
long
and
25
meters
high,
and
it's
in
lock
all
Country,
Park
and
golf
course,
which
is
owned
by
the
council.
The
recommendation
is
to
approve
and
there's
no
objections
to
the
proposal.
The
main
policy
consideration
is
os3
of
pps8,
open,
Spaceport
and
outdoor
recreation
officers
are
content
with
the
design,
the
visual
character
and
amenity,
including
residential
amenity,
there's
no
traffic
or
parking
requirement
for
this
form
of
development.
L
L
Start
presentation,
so
this
is
the
site,
then
just
site
of
local
next
slide
place
and
you
can
see
the
side
it's
immediately
next
to
local
Football
Club
next
slide.
Please
and
that's
a
location
plan
next
slide,
please
just
showing
you
the
area,
it's
just
immediately
in
front
of
that
band
of
trees.
Next
slide,
please
that's!
The
elevation
proposed
next
slide.
Please
and
it's
just
you
can
see
the
golf
you
can
see
the
floodlights
for
the
the
football
club.
Sorry
just
immediately
behind
so
it'll
be
right
in
front
of
that
vegetation.
E
A
R
L
A
They're
proposed
by
cancer
Dolphins
second
day,
counselor
Armstrong
are,
we
all
agreed
all
the
great
members.
Thank
you
very
much
I'd
like
to
thank
you
all
for
your
patience
this
evening
and
we've
been
a
long
long
till
night
then
very
successful
day,
and
thank
you
very
much
and
CF
home
members
and
Casual
officers
and
can
I
ask
ICT
to
please
stop
the
feed.