►
Description
Armagh City, Banbridge and Craigavon Borough Council Planning & Regulatory Services Meeting on Wednesday 6th September at 3:00pm
A
For
those
of
you
who
are
basically
in
the
council
chamber,
can
I
please
remind
you
that
when
speaking
into
your
microphone,
you
need
to
be
able
to
see
your
shelves
on
the
screen.
So
the
live.
Feed
can
pick
up
your
comments
if
you
speak
before
your
image
is
projected.
Those
listening
on
the
live,
feed
or
via
Zoom
will
not
hear
anything
that
you
say.
This
is
obviously
particularly
important
in
the
case
of
a
vote
being
required.
Audio
recording
is
being
used
to
assist
in
preparing
the
formal
minutes.
A
So,
first
of
all,
I'd
like
to
with
a
welcome
to
Carlene
Leonard,
the
interim
strategic
director
for
the
community
and
growth
who's
observing
today,
you're
very
much
welcome
David,
baptism
Affair
for
the
planning
committee.
Apologies.
A
A
D
Yeah.
Thank
you,
sir
good
afternoon,
members
members.
The
report
before
you
relates
to
a
planning
guidance
note
for
temporary
structures
and
changes
of
use,
and
some
of
you
may
recall,
the
guidance
was
introduced
by
the
council
in
July
2020,
not
long
after
the
start
of
the
pandemic,
I'm
assumed
at
supporting
local
businesses
to
meet
operational
challenges
and
restrictions
such
as
social
distancing
requirements,
the
guidance
alloyed
businesses
to
make
certain
changes
without
the
need
for
planning
permission
and
was
initially
introduced
for
a
six-month
period.
D
But
its
use
was
extended
a
number
of
times
with
the
approval
of
members.
It'll
remain
in
effect
until
the
end
of
this
month,
but
having
regard
to
changes
in
the
effects
of
the
pandemic
and
the
fact
that
restrictions
have
been
significantly
relaxed,
officers
are
recommending
the
withdrawal
of
the
guidance
from
the
end
of
the
month.
Businesses
will,
of
course,
be
notified
of
the
matter,
aren't
given
the
option
of
either
removing
the
development
or
seeking
planning
permission
and
happy
to
take
any
questions
or
queries
church.
Thank
you.
E
Thank
you
chair
and
thank
you
Damien,
just
sort
of
a
quick
query.
Do
you
know
how
many
structures,
roughly
this,
might
impact
on
the
bar,
because
I
know
there
was
a
surge
of
surge
of
outside
Satan
areas
and
things
put
in
during
Cove
and
so
on?
To
just
you
know,
what
kind
of
numbers
will
maybe
be
talking
about
here?
That
might
be
impacted.
E
D
Yeah,
thank
you
Charlotte,
yes,
counselor.
The
optic
was
around
11
businesses
and
and
mainly
involved
developments
such
as
awnings
and
beer
gardens,
and
so
on
so
a
spread
across
the
bar.
Actually,
it
was
across
all
parts
of
the
borough,
but
the
total
was
11..
D
So
hopefully
that
answers
your
query.
Council
are
we.
C
D
Yeah,
thank
you
chair
and
thanks
Alderman
Wilson
yeah.
It
would
depend
Alderman
Wilson
on
the
the
type
of
the
development,
and
so
it
might
vary,
but
these
are.
These
are
relatively
small
developments.
If
you
like
and
they're,
you
know
sort
of
little
as
I
mentioned
earlier.
They're
all
links
and
beer
gardens
of
the
fees
wouldn't
be
considerable,
relatively
small,
and
but
it
would
vary
depending
on
the
nature
of
the
of
the
development
itself.
A
A
A
G
Thank
you
chair.
It's
called
for
evidence
for
input
into
the
air
pollution
in
the
race
into
the
natural
environment,
so
the
Department
of
Agriculture
environment
and
ruin
Affairs,
which
zadira
has
launched
a
call
for
evidence
on
impacts
in
our
pollution
of
the
national
environment
dear
and
his
role
as
an
appropriate
nature
conservation
body
in
Northern.
Ireland
has
a
duty
to
provide
advice
to
plan
authorities
and
other
corporate
authorities,
and
the
potential
impacts
of
air
pollution
include
pneumonia
from
plans
and
projects
on
designated
States
and
protected
habitat.
G
The
current
operational
protocol
used
by
Dira
was
developed
in
2012,
and
a
supplementary
note
was
issued
in
2018
since
2012.
The
body
of
scientific
evidence
on
the
impacts
of
air
pollution
on
designated
sites
and
protected
habitat
has
greatly
increased
and
nucleus
law
has
also
emerged.
This
call
for
evidence
presents
available
scientific
evidence
taken
into
account
of
legal
requirements
and
drawn
upon
expertise
upon
special
subject.
G
Areas,
however,
dear
recognize
that
they
may
not
have
access
to
all
evidence
of
relevance
in
the
development
of
this
future
operational
protocol
and
therefore
the
council
is
invited
to
submit
any
additional
evidence
they
that
they
would
have
that.
Could
contribute
to
the
delivery
of
a
scientifically
robust
evidence-informed
operational
protocol
and,
as
it
should
say,
due
to
the
DTM
report,
I
propose
to
take
members
through
each
section
and
ask
for
any
comment
at
every
stage,
rather
than
through
the
entirety
of
the
report,
and
ask
for
comments.
G
So
the
first
stem
section
of
the
report,
they're
asking
for
any
comment
on,
is
relation
to
the
zone
of
influence.
Basically,
the
zone
of
influence
is
a
screening
distance
required
for
a
Pacific
distance
Beyond,
which
unlikely
that
any
emission
Source
would
have
any
harmful
impacts.
The
current
zone
of
influence
for
European
sites,
ramsars
and
ssis
Northern
Ireland,
is
7.5
kilometers
and
the
current
zone
of
influenced
running
priority,
habitat
I,
would
say.
G
The
Disney
States
is
two
kilometers
Northern
Ireland
dear,
do
not
propose
to
extend
that
distance,
reduce
it
or
extend
it,
and
we
are
saying
we
don't
have
any
evidence
to
suggest
that
it
should
be
extended
or
reduced,
and
our
members
content
that
that's
yeah
they're
moving
on
then
the
next
one
is
thresholds.
Basically,
what
Dara
considered
to
be
thresholds,
so
thresholds
are
used
by
US
plan
bios
plans
to
assess
environmental
impacts
of
air
projects.
So
what
there's
different
ways
you
have
to
consider?
It
first
is
further:
consideration
is
required.
G
There
is
potential
for
significant
facts
or
the
fact
is
acceptable
for
deer's
future
operational
protocol
for
the
assessment,
where
quality
impacts
of
designated
sites,
the
figure
of
naught
0.1
percent
of
the
critical
errorless
proposed
as
a
de
minimis
threshold.
Anything
under
that
is
to
Minimus,
and
there
are
ruled
out
for
further
assessment.
G
There
are
two
main
thresholds
detailed
within
the
report
to
determine
if
the
impact
is
considered
de
minimis,
basically,
the
decision-making
threshold
which
allows
the
decision
maker
I.E
the
likes
of
deer
and
shared
environmental
service
to
determine
if
the
impacts
is
acceptable
or
the
state
relevant
threshold.
This
will
allow
specific
conditions
to
be
looked
debt
IE
agent
to
give
information
that
should
be
taken
into
account
in
relation
to
their
projects.
G
Victor
is
asking:
is
there
any
other
evidence
or
other
thresholds
that
ought
to
be
taken
into
consideration
at
this
stage,
and
the
council's
draft
response
would
be
that
we
don't
have
any
additional
evidence
that
this
provided
this
time,
our
members
content
yeah,
the
second
one
basically
is
Under
The
Hub,
attack,
regulations
and
assessment
needs
to
take
account
of
the
facts
from
plans
or
projects
either
alone
or
in
combination
with
other
plans
and
projects.
Only
when
a
proposal
is
considered
to
be
acceptable
alone
does
a
need
for
further
assessment.
I.E
and
combination
effects
arise.
There.
G
I
have
listed
a
number
of
plans
and
projects
that
should
be
taken
into
account,
and
this
is
array
from
case
law
and
judgment
over
the
years
the
council
has
looked
at
these
and
they'd
would
respond
that
we
don't
have
any
additional
comments
or
any
additional
evidence
suggests
that
other
plans
and
projects
ought
to
be
taken
into
consideration
all
in
that
listed
within
the
report.
G
Members
content
yeah.
So
in
relation
to
deer's
future
operational
protocol,
they
provided
two
options
for
assessment
of
new
projects:
hey.
How
should
they
be
looking
at
new
form
and
practices
going
forward?
So
they
give
new
projects
option
one.
This
allows
for
set
relevant
thresholds
to
be
applied
and
allowed
for
detail
assessment
to
be
submitted
foreign
consideration
of
the
likelihood
that
posel
could
undermine
the
conservation
of
our
objectives.
G
The
proposal
will
issue
a
risk
category,
a
high,
medium
or
low
a
new
project
option
two
does
not
provide
for
a
state
relevant
threshold
or
detailed
assessment
to
this
minute.
It's
a
more
generic
approach,
and
basically
it
says
a
decision
maker
makes
the
final
decision
and
that's
it.
The
council's
draft
response
would
be
that
we
prefer
new
projects
option.
One
a
assess
allows
for
a
more
of
a
case
by
Keys
assessment
of
individual
planning
applications
and
plans
and
projects.
G
Furthermore,
I
provide
for
detailed
assessments
to
be
made,
and
if
there
is
a
strategic
approach
for
the
site
that
identifies
that
there
is
room
for
development
AE,
that
this
project
can
go
ahead,
because
there
are
proposed
mitigation
measures,
for
example,
that
may
be
allocated
at
low
risk
and
therefore
could
be
approved.
The
currency
would
also
comment,
however,
that
the
new
project
option
one
has
more
steps
to
it
and
they
would
be
concerned
that
this
would
slow
response
times
to
the
plan
Authority
and
that
should
be
taken
into
consideration
as
well.
G
Are
you
content
that
we
go
for
the
new
projects
option
one
but
basically
allows
when
we
are
looking
to
plan
applications
rather
than
abroad?
Bridge
Approach
that
you
take
advantage
by
key
SPSS
members
acceptable
yeah.
They
have
give
us
supplementary
questions
and
recent
priority
habitat,
basically
the
two
kilometers.
We
would
agree
with
that,
but
we
said
that
that
maybe
should
review
to
not
as
long
as
2012
for
the
near
future.
G
They
also
has
a
paper
in
relation
to
expansion,
A
variation
or
replacement
of
existing
operation
activities,
and
that
is
also
has
to
be
considered
in
relation
to
a
plans
and
projects.
They
have
also
given
two
options:
option
one
will
be
influenced
by
factors,
including
the
distance
in
red
of
pollution
contribution
from
next
state.
A
option.
1A
is
a
flat
rate
option
whereby
all
replacement
activities
are
required
to
reduce
pneumonia
by
30
option.
1B
is
a
distance
from
site
option
whereby
the
minimum
reduction
emissions
required
is
determined
by
the
distance
to
the
site.
G
So
we
are
saying
that
they
should
go
for
option
one
one
B.
Basically,
if,
if
you're
the
closer,
if
the
closer
you
are,
that
does
near
the
states,
potentially
the
greater
impact
you're
going
to
have,
but
if
you're
further
aware
that
your
your
format
practice
may
not
have
a
detrimental
impact.
So
it's
unfair
if
you're
a
further
away
that
you
should
plan
30
threshold
when
it
could
be
up
to
ten
percent,
is
all
you
need.
So
we
would.
We
prefer
to
be
a
case
by
Keys
basis.
Basis
also
depends
on
the
formal
practice.
G
There
are
more
intensive
form
and
practices
out
there
like
poultry
and
pigs
that
maybe
require
more
mitigation
form
than
farmers
who
may
be
doing
the
legs
of
beef
and
a
sheep
that
maybe
did
not
need
to
have
such
stringent
and
onerous
assessments
on
them.
So
that's
why
we're
going
for
option
one
option,
one
a
as
members
content
and
then
the
last
part
of
it
simply
is
a
case
study
that
they've
looked
at
and
basically
what
those
key
studies
highlights
that
there
are
going
to
be
potential,
Financial
constraints
and
Farmers.
G
There
have
to
give
their
Financial
resource
to
these
Farmers
that
they
can
carry
out
these
activities
in
an
environmentally
way
and
they've
also
looked
at
the
cost
of
restoration
of
habitat
methods,
and
we
would
agree
that,
yes,
there
are
a
habitats
within
our
bird
that
has
have
impacts,
but
they
can
be
looked
at
and
they
can
be
restored
with
financial
assistance,
and
we
will
be
Keen
that
the
the
that
those
particular
projects
are
given
the
financial
assistance
from
those
particular
departments
Yeah.
So
basically,
we've
gone
back
and
there's
a
draft
in
your
appendix
3.
G
In
light
of
those
comments,
I
know
there's
a
lot
of
detail
there,
but
if
you
want
me
to
take
you
through
any
of
the
members
I'm
happy
to
do
so,
so
we
would
be
directing
you
to
recommend
that
you
approve
the
draft
response
to
Dira
and
respect
to
the
call
of
evidence
on
the
on
the
impacts
of
our
pollution
on
the
national
environment.
A
Thank
you
very
much,
Anita
members.
Does
anyone
have
any
questions
or
comments
that
would
like
to
add?
No
okay,
I
think
that
is
decision
items
we're
going
to
get
proposal
for
Apple's
pay
cancel
their
hobby.
The
second
second.
A
D
Thank
you
sure
members.
This
report
relates
to
the
statistical
bulletin
produced
by
the
department
for
infrastructure
for
the
2022-23
business
year,
provides
an
overview
of
planning
activity
across
all
planning
authorities
and
gives
information
on
processing
times
on
performance
members
that
don't
propose
to
go
through
the
report.
Verbal
item,
but
I
think
it
would
be
helpful
just
to
pick
out.
Maybe
just
have
a
few
headline
points,
so
what
I
can't
tell
you
is
out
of
11
consoles.
We
were
the
the
second
fastest
last
year.
A
C
Foreign,
do
you
mean
in
terms
of
the
at
system?
How
is
it
performing
now
just
out
of
interest
to
say
you
know
how
to
run
a
complaints,
they
seem
to
have
tailed
off
and
my
radar
anyway,
so
I'm,
assuming
that
perhaps
means
it's
performing
a
lot
better
than
it
was.
If
you
could
just
let
us
know
we're
not
from.
D
Thanks
sure,
thanks,
Alderman
Wilson
yeah
look
I'm
pleased
to
report
that
it
is
a
stabilized,
its
performance,
much
better.
That
was
certainly
in
the
you
know
the
early
months,
but
you
know
having
said
that,
it's
still
I
suppose
very
much
in
its
infant
stage.
There
are
still
a
number
of
issues
associated
with
it
that
that
are
being
resolved.
There
are
Technical
Solutions
been
applied
on
a
regular
basis.
D
It
was
a
fortnightly
basis
to
begin
with,
not
quite
as
often
as
that
now,
but
there's
also
an
action
plan
that
is
being
monitored
and
managed
by
it's.
A
group
known
as
the
intelligent
Clan
function,
they're
responsible
for
the
day-to-day
management
of
the
new
system
they
set
under
Belfast
City
Council,
so
they're
they're
ensuring
that
issues
are
are
being
resolved
or
been
tracked
an
or
been
resolved.
D
But
you
know
what
is
probably
going
to
take
a
little
bit
longer
before
we
see
it
completely
settle
down,
but
it's
certainly
a
vastly
improved
on
what
what
it
was
in
the
the
early
months,
but.
E
Thank
you
chair
and
thank
you
Damien
for
the
report.
It's
just
on
the
comparison
and
the
roughly
18
to
20
decrease
compared
to
the
previous
year,
which
is
quite
concerning
perhaps
maybe
a
strike.
Some
worries
about
the
local
economy
for
not
receiving
as
many
applications
as
normal
and
your
time
in
ABC.
Have
you
seen
a
decrease
that
large
I
mean?
That's,
that's
quite
considerable.
You
know
effect
of
the
business
so
to
speak
being
down
it's.
E
It's
certainly
certainly
quite
worrying
and
is
there
any
anecdotal
evidence,
in
particular
types
or
categories
of
applications
that
we're
seeing
hair
decreases
in
terms
of
what
or
just
any
other
comments
or
not
in
general,.
D
Yeah
thanks
chair
thanks,
counselor
yeah,
the
application
numbers
were
probably
at
a
consistent
level.
Sort
of
you
know
the
the
10
years
prior
to
covet
and
then
strange
enough
during
for
the
first
two
years
of
covid
numbers
started
to
rise
and
they
went
up
in
the
first
year
of
covert
slightly
higher
than
what
they
were
pretty
cool
with
and
then
the
next
year
they
went
even
higher,
but
yeah
the
year
that
followed
then
2020-23.
D
We
didn't
see
this
common.
To
be
perfectly
honest.
In
the
first
six
months
of
22-23
numbers
were
probably
you
know
what
what
we'd
have
expected
to
see,
but
they
dipped
in
the
the
second
half
of
the
year.
No,
initially,
we
thought
that's
possibly
related
to
the
new
it
system,
but
they've
got
downward
trend
has
continued
into
the
current
year,
so
we're
actually
the
numbers
this
year
are
dining
where
we
would
have
been
pre-covered,
so
we're
just
keeping
a
very
close
watch
in
that
to
see.
D
Is
it
a
blip
or
is
it
a
sign
of
the
economy
generally
and
cost
of
living
crisis?
People
are
maybe
putting
projects
on
the
long
finger,
so
we
are
just
keeping
an
eye
on
it
because
it
does
have
implications,
obviously,
for
income
for
the
council
and
that's
something
we
are
concerned
about
so
I'll.
Obviously
keep
members
of
theater
as
the
business
year
progresses
thanks
chair.
If
there's
anything,
I
missed
they're
kind
of
very
happy
to
pick
it
up.
A
Thank
you
very
much
Damian
for
that
on
Google
equation
numbers,
any
other
questions,
move
on
to
3.4,
update
and
planning
case
loads
and
again
I'm
gonna
bring
in
Damian
Mulligan
head
of
planning
to
present.
D
Yeah
thanks
chair
and
members
you'll
note
from
this
report
that
the
number
of
decisions
issued
during
the
month
of
August
stood
out
around
66
and
that's
a
relatively
low
members
as
you'll
know,
and
it's
it's
mainly
attributable
to
on
a
number
of
things,
but
the
short
reporting
period
was
only
a
three
week
short
reporting
period
last
last
period.
Also
a
holiday
season
has
influenced
that
number
as
well,
and
the
number
of
applications
we
received
during
August
was
78
so
slightly
more
in
than
out,
which
means
the
live.
D
Care
slowed
currently
stands
at
a
thousand
and
29..
Now
that's
still
down
where
we
were
at
the
beginning
of
the
business
year.
We
were
3007
at
the
beginning
of
the
business
year,
so
we're
down
40
and
that's
we're
going
the
right
direction
and
we
had
a
couple
of
call-ins
during
the
month
of
August,
which
brings
the
total
year
to
date
to
14
members
I'm
happy
to
take
any
queries.
Sure.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
A
H
Thank
you
chairman,
good
afternoon,
members
Adam
4.1.
This
is
a
request
for
the
naming
of
a
Housing
Development
or,
with
this
part,
consisting
of
four
number
Apartments
off
Lake
Street
in
Lurgan.
The
Appling
is
preferred
name
and
the
master
of
appendage
one.
The
applicant's
preferred
name
for
development
of
the
apartment
block
is
the
old
buyer,
and
the
applicant's
main
reason
for
the
preferred
name
is
that
this
is
the
site
of
the
former
bar
on
Maxwell's
Farm,
which
was
The
Farmhouse,
located
at
number
73
Lake
Street.
H
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Tom
members,
any
questions
or
queries.
No
okay
can
I
get
a
proposal
for
the
report
proposed
by
Kessler
hockey
on
second
by
catcher
Duffy,
real
great
great.
Thank
you
very
much
members
I'll
move
on
to
4.2
street
name
and
report
for
Pittsford
Park,
which
is
on
the
tolligali
road,
craigavon
and
again
over
to
Mr
Tom
labry.
Please.
H
Thank
you
chair.
Yes,
this
is
a
request
for
the
naming
of
a
large
Housing
Development,
consisting
of
118
dwellings
of
the
Tully
Gallery
Road
and
Craig
Adam
and
details
of
maps
are
on
appendix
2..
The
applicant's
preferred
name
for
the
development
is
Buford
Park
and
their
main
reason
for
the
preferred
name
as
in
order
to
independix
one
is
that
historically,
this
area
was
named
rathmore
due
to
the
proximity
of
a
ring.
Fort
officers
would
agree
that
there
is
historical
evidence
to
support
the
suffix
Fort
which
meets
the
criteria
of
the
council's
policy.
H
However,
officers
believe
that
the
rationale
given
for
the
prefix
View
at
French,
for
beautiful
for
all
three
suggestions
and
the
application
can
suggestion
that
it
can
be
used
to
describe
an
area
of
natural
beauty,
is
somewhat
big
and
tenuous.
H
H
There
is
also
website
marketing,
which
has
also
been
produced,
indicating
Beaufort
Park,
as
the
name
of
the
development
is
shown
on
the
screenshot
that
attached
to
Panda
Explorer
foreign
ERS
would
welcome
investment
into
the
area.
We
have
reminded
the
applicant
that
displaying
our
advertising
Street
teams
prior
to
the
council
approval
is
an
offense
on
the
legislation
and
they
have
done
so
entirely
at
their
own
risk.
So,
ultimately,
as
ultimately,
it's
the
function
on
the
decision
of
members
to
officially
name
all
developments.
H
E
Like
HR,
as
you
know,
I
love
name
and
housing
developments.
E
E
E
The
obvious
options
would
seem
that
it
should
be
named
some
Fashion
After,
Tully
gallery
or
rathmore
low
sights,
and
it's
just
inappropriate
that
the
developer
has
acted
both
in
terms
of
all
the
advertising
without
common
I'm,
getting
proper
authorization
and
things
like
that,
as
is
common
practice
like
the
the
other.
E
One
was
saying
before
there
so
I'd
be
minded
that
right
to
the
applicant
and
courage
and
Tully,
Galley
or
rothmore
are
some
more
more
concrete
street
names
that
have
linked
to
that
local
area
rather
than
proceeding
with
Buford,
which
is
seems
to
be
a
vacation
here
and
a
lot
Beyond
real,
be
interesting
hearing
what
others
feel
about
this
one
see
what
the
situation
is.
J
I
think
they're
clutchnic
straws
to
bring
in
that
name
and
for
them
to
go
ahead
and
put
the
the
pop
out
the
public
publicize
everything
there.
Oh
thanks
totally
well
sorry
because
it's
opening
a
gate
then
for
other
people,
other
developers
to
do
that,
so
I
wouldn't
be
for
that
name
whatsoever.
I
think
the
need
to
go
back.
That's
going
to
love!
We
said
I'm,
bringing
the
wrathmore
the
telegali,
something
like
that.
That
is
to
the
area
suitable
to
the
area.
K
Thank
you
chair.
It's
just
when
you
mentioned
there
that
it's
an
offense.
What
is
the
the
consequence
of
of
premium
and
development
just
because
not
not
too
sure
of
the
the
consequences
of
it.
Thank
you.
H
Thank
you,
chair
under
the
legislation,
is
actually
in
the
fans
under
schedule,
two
which
Bianca
Advantage
was
the
fee
of
schedule.
Two
years
these
days,
I
think
it's
2009.
If
we
decided
to
go
down
that
route
and
pursue
that
it.
B
H
Never
comes
out
in
the
past
there
having
a
number
of
other
incidents
similar
to
this,
and
the
developers
have
taken
down
the
signage
and
or
covered
it
up
until
such
times
as
members
have
have
decided
what
the
name
is.
A
E
Thank
you,
chairs,
pose
and
and
keeping
us
at
Calamity
and
the
local
links
as
part
of
our
street
name
and
hard,
and
so
on.
I'll
be
proposing
that
we
respond
to
the
the
applicant
decline
in
the
proposed
names
instead,
encourage
straight
name,
contain
them
all,
are
appropriate
local
connection
to
come
back
to
committee
and
and
as
soon
as
possible.
So
it
can
get
this
amount
of
resolved.
Someone
like
the
sacker.
A
Thank
you,
members
all
agreed
in
that
process.
Yeah
tell
me
Happy
enough.
Go
back
to
the
applicant
and
yeah.
We
come
back
with
a
sort
of
more
localized
meme.
Thank
you
very
much.
Okay,
thank
you.
Members
and
move
on
to
4.3
update
and
building
control
and
property
certificate
applications
again
going
to
bring
in
Tom
lovely
head
of
building
control
to
present.
H
Thank
you
chair.
This
is
to
keep
members
informed
of
some
of
the
work
that
have
been
undertaken
by
the
department
during
the
first
five
months
of
this
financial
year.
As
noted
in
authentic
six,
and
in
total,
we
received
488
billion
regulation
applications
with
a
notional
construction
investment
value
in
the
area
of
just
over
100
million.
In
August
alone,
it
was
just
under
18
million.
H
We
have
carried
out
over
6
000
satisfactions
and
undertaken
780
plan
assessments
and
I
shoot
all
the
relevant
statutory
notices.
The
department
has
also
continue
to
deliver
the
council's
probably
certificate
function
for
the
companion
of
properties
across
Council.
In
the
last
five
months,
we've
received
and
administered
1
346
new
applications
and
issued
1
625
certificates
to
solicitors
and
agents
relating
to
property
sales.
H
The
department
has
also
been
dealing
with
a
high
number
of
dangerous
structures:
incidents
since
the
first
of
April.
Those
were
in
severity
from
Loosely,
it's
falling
off
roofs
to
the
extreme
of
partial
building,
collapses,
which
you
may
have
heard
about
resulting
in
road
closures
and
for
public
safety
reasons
and
total.
There
have
been
17
incidents
since
the
first
of
April
and
prior
to
this
there
are
still
four
ongoing
live
cases
just
for
members
information
but
I'm
happy
to
take
any
questions.
Members
may
have.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Tom
members,
any
creation,
questions
yeah.
Thank
you
very
much
and
thank
you
very
much.
Tom
move
on
to
agenda
item
six
correspondence.
There
is
nil
agenda
item
seven
aob.
There
is
nil,
so
K
members
we're
going
to
breakfast
and
write
four
clock.
Okay,
I'll,
say
CT.
Please
turn
off
the
feed.
L
A
Thank
you
can
move
on
to
agenda
out
of
Fame
Faith
applications
for
planning
permission
to
be
considered
by
the
committee
as
per
schedule
of
planning
applications
good
afternoon.
Everyone
welcome
to
the
planning
section
of
the
hybrid
meeting
of
the
plane.
Regular
toy
Services
committee
can
I
ask
everyone
to
please
mute
their
microphones
at
all
times
unless
invaded
to
speak
by
myself.
For
those
of
you
who
are
physically
in
the
chamber.
A
Can
I
please
remind
you
that
when
speaking
into
your
microphone,
you
need
to
see
yourself
on
the
screen,
so
the
lay
feed
can
pick
up
your
comments
if
you
speak
before
the
images
before
your
image
is
projected
those
lessons
on
the
life
fit
or
they
assume
will
not
hear
anything
that
you
say
this
is
obviously
particularly
important
in
the
case
of
a
vote
being
required.
Audio
recording
is
being
used
to
assist
in
preparing
the
formal
minutes.
Therefore,
anyone
participate
in
the
meeting
consensus
being
recorded
on
being
live
streamed
on
YouTube.
A
Also
during
the
course
of
the
meeting,
the
questions
may
be
asked
of
counselors,
who
are
members
of
the
planning
record
for
a
service
Committee
of
planning
officers.
Applicants
for
planning
permission
objectives
or
those
speaking
on
their
behalf
and
doing
so
counselors
and
diverters
ascertain
their
information,
which
they
feel
is
necessary
to
enable
them
to
determine
the
application.
However,
members
of
the
public
should
note
that
counselors
will
not
reach
the
conclusion
as
to
whether
an
application
should
be
approved
refused
or
deferred
until
the
debate
on
application
has
concluded,
memories
you'll
be
aware.
A
There's
a
number
of
appendixes
have
been
removed.
Appendix
4,
that's
TLA
officers
tend
additional
information.
Appendix
7
objectives
haven't
received
Institute
handling
notice,
appendix
12,
additional
information
for
the
officers
to
consider-
and
just
there
are
now
appendix
one.
The
one
of
the
the
applicant
hasn't
received.
You
timely
notice,
so
we're
going
to
move
straight
into
your
appendix
2
application.
Number
L
is
here
we're
at
2021
one
five,
four
three.
C
A
G
Thank
you,
chair
yeah.
We
are
20
21,
15
43
here
for
the
demolition
of
existing
dwelling
and
garage
in
a
reaction
of
four
number
one
bedroom
apartments
and
Associated
site
works.
The
allocation
was
recommend
refusion
and
called
into
the
plan
and
regular
service
committee
by
the
former
ultimate
Spears,
an
office
of
taken
that
members
have
read
the
report,
including
addendum
and
Phil,
and
this
is
synopsis
only
Mercedes,
located
inside
the
certain
limit
of
Arma
outside
the
central
area
and
is
located
on
land.
That
is
not
zoned.
G
Officers
are
of
the
opinion
that
in
principal
Apartments
can
be
acceptable
not
withstanding,
as
the
proposal
needs
to
be
considered
and
assessed
against
all
other
material
considerations.
These
are
assassin
deal
with
within
a
report.
The
officers
reported
went
through
all
their
Criterion
in
pps7
and
found
their
proposal
Fields
Criterion
hitch.
The
separation
distance
from
the
apartments
to
the
common
boundary
to
the
rear
is
approximately
at
0.3
meters.
G
Guidance
dates
where
such
development
of
what's
the
private
garden
areas
of
existing
properties,
a
minimum
distance
of
around
15
meters
should
be
provided
between
the
rear
of
the
apartments
in
the
common
boundary.
The
Proposal
falls
short
of
this
guidance
as
such
Services
assess
this
proposal
would
cause
overlooking
into
the
adjacent
properties.
As
regards
to
parking,
as
highlighted
within
the
report,
there
are
four
number
of
in-cartlets
parking
spaces
to
serve
these
apartments.
There
is
a
requirement
for
Fife
1.25
per
apartment
to
serve
their
post
Apartments.
G
However,
as
the
site
enjoys
a
high
level
high
level
of
pedestrian
accessibility
to
local
services
and
the
public
transport
Network,
and
also
located
400
meters
from
the
city
center,
the
reduced
level
of
parking
is
acceptable
in
this
incident
officer
satisfied
that
post-development
will
not
give
raise
any
detrimental
or
adverse
impact
upon
the
tree
in
each
works
or
cause
any
impact
in
relation
flood
risk.
The
third
party
objections
have
been
fully
considered,
an
officer
of
the
pen
that
poses
contrary
to
the
spps,
pps7
and
creating
places
and
for
those
who
are
raised
and
said
it's
recommended.
G
You
can
see
the
application
Central
area,
there's
a
Southeastern
pharmace
Center
next
slide.
Please
and
that's
the
aerial
view
of
the
post
side
outlined
in
red
and
you
can
see
it
there's
just
off
the
new
road
going
into
your
ma
next
slide.
Please
understand
view
of
the
post
side
to
just
give
you
an
understand
of
the
context
and
the
density
around
the
state
down
from
Folly
Lane
and
across
the
road
from
detached
to
Ellens
along
the
new
Erie
Road.
G
G
There's
four
in
Curtis
parking,
the
vegetation
career
is
being
retained
and
the
hard
surfaces,
an
area
there's
a
small
heads
going
along
the
front,
so
we're
off
the
opinion
that
hard
surface
and
Etc
won't
cause
no
except
well
impact
is
the
proximity
of
the
rear
boundary
of
this
apartment
to
the
adjacent
property
to
the
rear.
G
Next
slide,
please
that's
the
elevation
and
floor
plan,
so
there's
a
11
dining
area
in
the
front
to
overlook
the
golf
course
that
goes
beyond
the
dwellings
near
Farsi
the
road
and
then
to
the
rear.
Is
your
bedroom
entire
facilities,
a
section
through
the
state?
That's
actually
number
five
following
which
is,
and
that
just
shows
the
level
difference,
but
the
the
dwelling
height
test
or
mean
98.3
meters
high
next
slide,
please!
So
that's
a
photo
of
a
straight
view
of
the
state
you're
coming
down
the
state's
just
behind
that
vegetation.
G
They're
in
the
right
hand,
side
next
slide
please
and
coming
up.
That's
it
just
in
relation
to
the
adjacent
property
at
number,
62,
newey,
Road
next
slide,
please,
and
that's
just
the
dwellings
in
the
opposite,
sale
Road!
That's
just
to
give
you
an
understand,
there's
an
Eclectic
mix
of
architecture,
Styles
and
finishes
in
the
immediate
area.
Next
slide,
please
That's
A,
View
From,
the
current
dwelling
towards
not
really
crucial,
just
stand
next
in
the
Upper
Floor
bedroom
at
the
minute.
G
So,
looking
out
to
that
side,
the
elevation
property
and
number
62
who
I
believe
has
speaking
right
here
tonight.
Next
slide,
please,
and
that's
just
the
rear
wall
of
the
boundary
shrimp
stamp.
Not
that's
the
impact
we
are
saying
not
probably
number
five
following
is
George
still
the
rear
Barrel
will
be
at
0.3
meters
in
that
wall.
Next
slide,
please
and
then
on
beyond
that
there
you
will
see.
A
Paper,
glasses
members,
you
have
an
addendum
report
in
your
minutes,
so
if
you
have
Sean
Barton
to
make
representation
objection,
we
have
Mr
David
McMaster
to
make
representation
as
the
agent
and
we
have
written
representation
objection
to
application
from
Mr
Michael
and
Brenda
Carlisle
going
to
bring
in
Sean
Barnaby
representation.
First
John,
you
have
three
minutes
and,
as
you
can
see
in
your
screen,
you
have
the
the
timer
on.
Obviously
at
three
minutes:
I'll
cut
you
off
and
move
on
to
the
next
okay.
So
in
your
own
time,
Sean
can.
M
Okay,
I'll
go
through
this
very
quickly
as
you
can.
I
live
next
door
to
the
proposed
development
and
I'm
glad
to
be
offered
the
opportunity
to
reiter.
At
some
of
the
points,
I
raised
the
bilateral
of
objection
and
to
look
for
some
relief
that
the
report
recommended
a
refusal
in
the
report.
I
note
that
policy
pps7
have
given
has
been
given
substantial
weight
and
against
criteria
he
just
was
concluded.
The
proposal
will
have
unacceptable
adverse
impact
and
it
refers
to
the
create
and
places
policy
document.
M
Paragraph
7.17
great
care
will
be
needed
in
designs
where
residential
schemes
cause
significant
loss
of
amenity
to
adjoining
dwellings.
The
objections
I
raised
were
that
are
relevant
to
this
criteria
were
that
the
development
would
overshadow
our
small
backyard,
which
has
been
an
inaccurate
plotted
on
the
site
layered
plan.
M
I
should
clarify
that
the
extent
to
which
the
overshadowing
will
impact
our
garden
cannot
be
accurately
ascertained
by
examining
the
plans
submitted
with
the
application
because
they
aren't
accurate.
The
impact
is
much
greater
because
our
our
garden
extends
closer
to
the
proposed
development
than
the
map
indicates.
The
plan
inaccurately
shows
our
house
extending
as
far
as
the
Garden
Wall,
but
this
isn't
in
fact
the
case.
The
report
states
that
no
supporting
evidence
was
submitted
to
a
substantiate
this
claim,
but
I
suppose
haven't
enjoyed
the
garden
for
36
years.
M
I
hope
my
statement
alone
will
be
sufficient
substantiation,
but
if
clarification
had
been
needed,
a
site
visit
could
have
taken
place.
This
didn't
happen.
Can
I
now
some
evidence
to
say
that
my
a
don't
actually
see
the
camera,
but
I
have
two
plans
here
that
indicate
an
aerial
view
of
my
garden
and
the
plans
that
were
substantiated
and
they're
sure
clearly
that
my
garden
extends
actually
right
up
to
the
boundary
wall,
which
is
four
meters
to
the
property.
M
I
would
also
like
to
challenge
the
related
point
of
page
12
of
the
report,
which
states
that
the
impact
of
the
overshadowing
is
acceptable
because
the
proposed
development
is
of
a
similar
height
and
scales
as
the
building
that
it's
replacing.
However,
the
site
of
the
new
development
is
not
on
the
same
footprint
is
the
present
house,
but
will
be
built
in
its
back.
Garden
it'll
create
an
overshadow
of
our
garden
that
doesn't
currently
exist.
M
A
Thank
you
very
much
Sean.
Fortunately,
we
can
accept
the
your
evidence.
The
the
photographs
are
number
one.
We
can't
see
them
on
the
screen
and
it's
part
of
our
planet
policy
that
we
don't
accept
plans
at
this
stage.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
your
your
information.
I'm
going
to
move
on
to
Mr
David
McMaster.
Make
representation,
as
the
agent
in
support
of
the
application
will
be
coming
up
on
the
screen
here
so
when,
in
your
own
time,
you're
you're
good
to
go.
Thank
you.
I
I
It
basically
hinges
on
paragraph
7.17
and
it
makes
reference
to
such
development
the
field
they
actually
address.
The
first
part
of
this
which
states
that
it
is
where
apartment
developments
where
living
rooms
are
balconies
on
upper
floors
can
cause
a
significant
loss
of
immunity
to
adjoining
dwellings,
particularly
while
they
are
close
to
boundaries,
and
this
applies
to
Greenfield
sites
and
lower
down
City
Sites.
I
I
In
addition
to
that,
I
think
we
can
agree,
it's
not
a
Greenfield
site,
so
that
paragraph
does
not
apply
if
it's
Greenfield
or
lower
density.
And
if
we
look
at
the
density
in
the
immediate
area,
including
our
site,
we
are
actually
talking
of
the
equivalent
of
40
to
45
units
per
acre.
I
So
if
that
slow
density,
I
will
probably
do
that,
but
we
do
not
believe
it's
no
density
and
therefore
this
does
not
apply
when
we
look
at
it
in
terms
of
other
planning
within
the
area
which
was
approved,
albeit
a
long
time
ago.
But
when
creating
places
was
there
there's
an
application
with
Apartments
190
meters
down
the
road
where
no
part
of
the
building
is
more
than
four
meters
from
the
boundary.
I
It
should
also
be
noted
that
for
permitted
development
rights,
whereas
dwelling
if
I,
was
to
build
an
extension
to
the
existing
property
to
story
hay
with
a
total
glass
cable
on
it.
As
long
as
I
am
more
than
seven
meters
from
the
boundary
I
do
not
even
need
planning
approval,
we
would
also
query
whether
it's
private
immunity
space
foreign
actually
has
two
pairs
of
semis
with
a
common
Alleyway.
I
We
see
another
for
its
access
to
Gardens,
so
we
would
even
question
if
this
is
private,
but
irrespective
of
that,
we
believe
a
solution
is
quite
simply
to
condition
that
opaque
glass
can
be
put
in
these
windows.
If
overlooking,
is
the
only
issue
in
terms
of
the
application?
There's
also
planning
game
you're,
getting
much
needed
accommodation
of
this
type
and
there's
a
reduction
in
drainage
problems,
because
we're
proposing
sustainable
drainage.
Thank
you.
Mr,
chair.
A
Thank
you
very
much
David,
so
give
it
two
seconds.
C
Yeah
facts:
I,
just
suppose:
that's
that's
an
interesting
one!
I'm
just
looking
at
you
know
the
aerial
photos
and
actually
went
on
the
Google
Street
skateboard
as
soon
as
where
they
are
Elvis
are,
are
gay
and
Trump
will
just
sort
of
Spawn
it
around
slightly,
and
there
does
seem
to
be
a
very
wide
variety
of
and
layouts
in
this
area.
Quite
an
intensive
sort
of
density
as
well
and
I'm,
just
wondering
in
terms
of
you
know,
are
the
agent
here
has
spoken
of
permitted
development
rates,
which
I
assume
is
what
he
can.
C
What
the
applicant
could
build
without
a
plan
or
application.
So
one
of
a
couple
of
points
to
make
on
that,
and
it
is
whether
that's
correct
or
not
to
start
with.
If
you
know
what
the
architect
has
stated
is
true,
and
if
it
is
true,
then
what
would
be
the
ultimate
stretching
of
that
and
I
know
how
to
deal
with
the
application
this
before?
If
we
want
to
talk
about
that
as
well,
but
just
firstly
and
then
I'll
come
back,
is
it?
Is
it
traded
under
primitive
development?
He
could
develop
an
extension.
C
G
G
Windows
of
apartments
in
the
the
bedrooms
you
could
extend
for
the
touch
property,
I
think
it's
four
meters
to
pan
four
meters
out
from
the
from
the
rear
boundary,
and
we
have
taken
that
into
consideration
as
relation
to
the
impact
on
the
adjacent
property
at
number
62
regards
to
the
windows
and
that
basically
the
existing
house,
there
is
a
single
story,
elevation
projecting
beyond
the
rear
elevation.
He
could
build
that
up
at
the
minute
and
he
is
out
with
two
meters
from
the
neighboring
property.
G
So
we
did
look
at
that
yard's
impact
on
the
joining
property.
But
as
far
as
we're
concerned,
we
can
look
at
this
apartment
scheme
must
be
for
us
and
guidance
would
say.
Good
practice
indicates
15
meters
to
Common
boundary
for
a
single
dwelling.
You
know
it'll
be
10
meters,
so
even
a
plan,
not
flexibility
of
a
single
dwelling
it
is
still
below
and
what
we
would
consider
acceptable
for
regards
to
overlooking.
C
Yeah
and
it's
just
I
suppose,
looking
at
that
photo
7
towards
the
rear
of
nearly
Road
dwells
I
mean
there
looks
to
be
Windows.
You
know
in
position
there
that
aren't
opaque
Island
that
looked
down
into
this
Garden,
so
you
know
looking
at
it
and
I'm
only
looking
at
it
through
these
photos,
I
guess
difficult
to
see
all
the
issues
here.
Just
in
the
photos,
you
know
I'm
fine,
not
a
struggle
just
to
to
get
the
Burns
in
terms
of
all
that.
C
But
you
know,
surely
this
proposal
is
creating
an
even
bigger
you
know,
there's
quite
a
narrow.
Looking
at
what
land
footage
is.
Quite
it
looks
quite
narrow
in
terms
of
the
alleyway
or
it's
not
really
an
Alleyway
the
wall
that
separately
exists
these
two.
So
this
proposal
to
me
looks
like
it's:
creating
a
much
bigger
gap
which
is
pushing
this
property
away
from
it
from
a
neighbor
and
property.
It
doesn't
look
to
me
that
it's
pushing
it
much
further
back.
C
In
my
estimation,
just
looking
at
and
it's
hard
to
see
with
all
those
written
details
are
on
that
plan.
You
can't
read
them,
which
is
a
bit
annoying
too,
but
you
know
it
does
look
like
to
me.
If
you
were
replaced
in
that
house,
you
would
want
to
push
it
away,
but
further
back.
You
know,
in
my
mind,
you
wouldn't
want
it.
I
was
near
the
road
if
you
had
the
opportunity
right,
we're
not
going
to
stay
in
real,
clear,
which
is
completely
reasonable.
C
Undoable
I,
assume
on
the
replacement
dwelling
policy
you'd
want
to
push
it
further
back.
You
may
also
want
to
keep
it
a
two-story,
and
wait
also
want
to
do
one
of
these
real.
You
know
modern
type
designs
where
angles
all
over
the
place,
and
you
know
more
facilities
and
features
out
to
the
rear,
so
also
bring
it
into
the
fact
proof.
Quite
a
number
of
hmos
and
built
up
areas
which
are
catering
for
a
lot
of
people
in
a
relatively
small
space
as
well.
C
To
me,
Apartments
seem
to
be
more
generous
in
terms
of
a
house
in
multiple
Arkansas
occupancy
versus
an
apartment
suggests.
To
me,
an
apartment
for
four
is
something
slightly
more
specious
or
organized
in
a
more
spacious
way.
I'm
thinking
well
that
to
me
seems
more
appropriate
and
not
location
versus
an
htmo.
If
you
know
what
I
mean
so
using
the
existing
property,
so
I'm,
just
struggling
to
see
in
terms
of
I,
mean
looking
back
to
photo
fave
Oliver.
A
Wilson
trying
to
stick
to
this.
C
C
Throw
it
yeah
it's
based
upon.
Looking
at
the
photos,
the
photos
aren't
tremendously
helpful
in
terms
of
what
I'm
looking
at
I
mean
404.
What's
the
sloped
roof
part
about.
Is
that
the
is
that
an
extension
at
the
back
of
of
the
house
and
that
obviously
drops
off
straight
is
that
a
single
story
then
come
on
out
the
back
of
what
is
a
two-story
Sinead
is
out
with
that,
but
that
doesn't
look.
C
Tech
stand
as
far
past
the
the
house
beside
it
also
I'm
just
curious
to
just
find
a
layered,
quite
straight
I,
just
I,
don't
think
the
photos
are
helping.
My
understanding
of
the
of
the
layout
of
this
hole
situation
and
I'm,
assuming
then
I,
know
I'm
going
on
here,
but
in
the
sections
there,
if
you
could
bring
that
slate
up,
the
house
to
the
right
is
that
the
is
that
the
fall
alien
property
and
then
the
one
that
I
left
is
what's
proposed,
because
again,
it's
very
hard
to
read
the
information.
G
Yeah
you've
touched
on
a
few
things:
Ultraman
Wilson
will
try
to
address
them
all.
Firstly,
for
the
four
is
US
time
in
an
existing
bedroom
upstairs.
Basically,
we
couldn't
get
into
the
Jason,
probably
number
six
on
that
day,
so
the
application
allowed
us
to
go
up
and
actually
we
then
see
the
garden
of
the
Jason
Property.
From
that
probably
perspectives,
that's
number
62
and
that's
his
extension
out
the
back.
G
There
is
a
sort
of
a
single
story
projection
on
the
on
the
on
the
dwelling
at
the
present
time,
which
is
that
that's
a
roof
of
it
so
you're,
starting
on
the
in
the
bedroom.
That's
the
single
story,
projection
from
the
accepting
dwelling
and
beyond
that
they
are
not
way
out.
Building
is
to
the
rear
of
number
62
and
that
wall
there
is
around
the
entire
site
that
is
2.2
meters
to
the
that
elevation
under
this
proposal,
it'll
be
4.7,
they
are
pushing
it
further
away,
but
the
creating
places
does
provide
guidance.
G
Thus
not
guidance
does
like
look
as
if
it's
going
to
have
an
impact.
So
if
you're
any
residential
scheme
we're
bringing
forward
the
planet,
but
you
were
quite
strict
and
straightened
and
stringent
on
our
on
the
parameters
we
apply
so
for
single
dwellings,
it's
10
meters,
the
common
boundary
for
departments,
you're
talking
about
15
meters.
Now
that
means
we
are
standing
at
the
back
rear
elevation
of
the
fencer
wall
and
your
look
into
that
rear
properly.
It
should
be
at
least
10
meters
for
a
house
which
you
will
all
agree.
G
C
So,
just
on
you
know,
looking
at
the
at
the
our
ala
imagery,
the
house,
next
door
has
a
an
extension.
Protrude
and
I
am
quite
an
arrow
one,
where
quite
a
tall
patch
on
it
is
up
permissible,
because
it's
a
single
story
is
that
the
case
or
is
it
also
two-story?
You
know
with
a
bit
projecting
out
the
back,
but
you
know
on
the
height
of
that
versus
the
site
that
we're
talking
about
at
the
minute,
it's
just
hard
to
read
it.
C
How
impactful
that
existing
extension
is
on
the
site,
we're
talking
about
at
the
minute
without
being
in
the
garden
and
seeing
it
you
know.
From
that
perspective,
you
know
to
work
out
in
my
mind:
how
bringing
that
backwards
is.
You
know
which
I
assume
would
probably
be
in
line
with
one
two,
three,
four,
five:
six,
maybe
seven
similar
projections
heading
backwards
towards
a
boundary
or
it
looks
like
a
drive
or
an
ollie
where
it
must
be
to
access
the
back
of
those
other.
K
G
C
Yeah,
sorry,
but
it
to
me
it
looks
further
away
if
you
know
what
I
mean
versus
The
Heist
directly
beside
it.
You
know,
in
my
main,
that's
where
the
you
know.
If
there's
impact
it's
to
the
house
closest,
surely
because
well,
alien
looks
to
be
quite
a
High
Ridge
hate
and
you
know,
there's
probably
overlooking
potential
in
the
ex
I
know
their
existing
houses.
We
can't
really
we're
not
interested
in
them
as
per
se,
but
we're
talking
Gardens
as
a
garden
amenity
space,
then
that
we're
overlooking
into
that's
the
issue.
A
Thank
you
very
much
any
other
questions.
Members,
yeah
I
think
it
was
the
objective
mentioned
it,
but
some
of
those
inaccurate,
inaccurately
plotted
and
G-
and
you
know
if
you
think
that
there
is
the
application,
was
in
that
quickly
plotted.
G
We
can
clearly
see
where
that
rear
extension
is
so
just
at
the
back
there.
That's
where
the
rear
extension
is.
Then
there
is
a
garden
area
and
then
there's
a
light
building.
A
A
C
C
You
know
throughout
the
last
term
as
well
and
similarly
congested
areas
in
terms
of
housing,
density,
I,
think
it'd
be
someone
I'd
be
I,
know
we
don't
often
do
that
and
we've
sort
of
got
away,
but
from
from
doing
that,
but
I
just
think
this
one
is
one
I
would
personally
benefit
from
actually
seeing
on
the
ground.
It's
just
for
a
viewer.
E
Thank
you
chair
and
thank
you
and
the
presenters
there
for
their
input.
I,
don't
know
what
a
site
visit
would
achieve.
The
distance
is
clearly
outlined
by
Sinead
there
under
those
authors.
Great
deal
reports
seems
to
be
fairly
strong
case
for
the
refusal
given
given
those
impacts
of
overlooking,
and
so
on,
that
have
been
outlined
by
Sinead
I'll,
be
content
to
make
a
decision
here
today
and
the
decision,
and
at
least
in
my
view,
will
be
in
line
with
the
officer's
recommendation.
E
I,
don't
I,
don't
think
these
distances
are
going
to
change
when
we,
when
we
see
it
and
on
site,
I,
think
we'll
ever
hang
here.
We
need,
and
maybe
anyway.
N
Thank
you
chair
just
I'd
like
to
say,
I
can
Council
library's
proposal,
I
trust,
Chinese
ability
to
measure
the
length
of
the
garden,
so
I
don't
need
to
go
and
see
it
for
myself
and
I
also
think
if
we're,
if
the
minimum
is
10
for
or
15
for
residential
property
and
we're
already
going
for
eight
four
four,
but
for
four
separate
apartments
and
you're
minimizing
that
space.
To
that
extent,
I
think
the
case
is
quite
strong,
then
for
refusal.
Thank
you.
A
E
Thank
you
chair.
So,
along
with
the
long
lines
of
what
I've
previously
said,
my
comments
are
I'll,
be
proposing
that
we
accept
the
officer's
recommendations,
review
in
this
case
due
to
amenity
impact
and
and
the
distances
outlined
by
Sinead
earlier
in
this
meeting,
so
people
opposingly
accept
the
refusal.
Thank
you.
E
C
B
A
K
B
P
B
A
J
L
F
A
The
members
we
have
seven
for
the
proposal
by
Alderman
Wilson
that
we
go
for
shade
visit
and
we
have
sex
against
one
of
students
who
members
we're
going
for
a
safe
visit
yeah.
Thank
you
very
much
members.
We
move
on
to
appendix
3
potential
Lavery
has
declared
an
interest
in
it.
Do
you
want
to
come
in
go
ahead.
E
Thank
you
chair.
Yes,
it's
declare
an
interest
to
understand
my
employer
as
making
representation.
The
committee
today,
although
I,
had
no
involvement
in
it.
It's
just
in
the
interest
of
what
you
know
devoid
any
accusations
about
us
and
things
like
that.
I'll
not
be
not
be
taken
apart.
Thanks,
yeah.
B
A
G
The
application
involves
fourteen
thousand
cubic
meter
of
inert
material
that
is
made
up
of
ten
thousand
cubic
meters
of
fill
and
then
250
ml
of
topsoil
plate.
The
infill
material
consists
of
inert
material
acquired
from
dredging
of
man
made
drains
Albion
port,
a
clay,
soil
stones
and
Rubble
policy.
Wm4
of
PPS
11
is
entitled.
Land,
Improvement
and
states
of
the
proposal
of
inert
waste
by
deposition
on
land
will
only
be
permitted,
whereas
damage
deal
the
result
and
land
Improvement
and
certain
criteria
are
all
met.
G
The
fundamental
premises,
therefore,
of
wm4
is
that
land
Improvement
will
result
states
that
this
person
of
energy
on
agriculture
or
other
land
can
result
in
Improvement
of
non-quality,
for
example,
where
steep
gradients
are
reduced
and
the
land
is
recreated.
With
the
adequate
surface
layer
of
topsoil
due
to
the
proximity
of
the
flood
plain,
the
field
as
a
whole
cannot
be
filled.
In
addition,
there
has
to
be
a
five
meter,
wide
maintenance,
strips
of
Watercourse
that
exist
through
the
center
of
the
site.
G
In
addition,
the
levels
proposed
are
now
a
1.5
meter
lower
than
the
permanent
levels
approved
directly
adjacent
to
the
state.
These
difference
in
levels
within
the
field
in
relation
to
the
land
that
Jason
could
not
an
officer's
judgment,
be
described
as
land
Improvement,
because
the
different
ingredients
would
hinder
the
efficient
use
of
the
field
as
a
whole.
The
applicant
has
not
provided
a
suitable,
an
analysis,
A
rationale
to
demonstrate
the
proposal
resulting
land,
Improvement
and
accordingly,
officers
are
of
the
opinion,
is
not
made
the
fundamental
requirements
of
wm4.
G
The
policy
goes
on
the
state
that,
if
it
does
not
meet
with
the
overall
objective
of
this
policy
test,
then
is
viewed
as
a
waste
disposal,
rather
than
an
improvement
and
wamp
3
a
place.
Authors
are
considered
their
proposal
against
wmp3
and
does
not
meet
those
policy
tests
either.
The
side
lays
right
in
the
periphery
of
the
one
in
100
Year
floodplain.
G
The
applicant
was
required
to
carry
out
a
flood
risk
assessment
to
verify
the
more
accurate
extent
of
this
floodplain
DFA
Rivers
have
reviewed
the
flood
risk
assessment
and
topographical
service
and
carried
out
their
own
survey
on
the
site
and
accepts
that
it
is
an
accurate
presentation
of
the
current
ground
levels.
Fallen
revisions
to
the
scheme,
no
inference
proposed
within
the
flood
plan
and
therefore
it
meets
the
requirements
of
fld1
regarding
noise
and
impact
in
residential
immunity
officer
of
the
opinion,
the
subjects
are
appropriate
controls
and
condition.
G
The
Proposal
will
not
give
rise
to
any
significant
adverse
impact.
In
this
regard,
The
Proposal
seeks
to
use
the
existing
access
onto
Mahi
Road
under
sufficient
space
to
allow
for
parking
and
turning
off
the
highway.
All
the
objections
have
been
fully
considered
and
have
regard
to
the
above
and
fall
in
the
plan
on
balance
and
exercise
or
of
the
pen
that
post-development
fields
to
comply
with
the
spps
and
all
other
relevant
policies
and
such
as
recommended
the
application
to
be
refused.
G
This
location
on
the
south
in
the
general
area
straight
to
the
north
of
gamber
area
and
to
the
south
of
lochner
next
slide.
Please
so
our
scenario,
view
of
the
post
site
with
the
original
outlined
a
site
in
red
next
slide.
Please-
and
there
is
segregation
plan
there
in
real-
is
the
area
that
was
subject
to
this
proposal.
G
Next
slide.
Please
follow
in
a
review
of
the
flood
risk
assessment.
The
state
location
plan
was
reduced
lately
to
ensure
that
no
air
development
was
proposed
within
the
flood
plan.
Next
slide,
please!
So
that's
a
state
layout
plan
showing
the
levels
across
the
state
accepting
and
proposed,
and
the
Aryan
red
is
the
only
area
in
which
he's
proposing
to
infill
next
slide.
Please,
and
so
that
gear
is
at
the
area
too.
Adjacently
to
the
Northeast
has
been
granted
infill
and
then
the
Aryan
orange
is
what
he's
looking
to
do
now.
G
The
areas
in
purple
have
to
be
kept
free
from
any
infill
and
then
the
areas
in
blue.
We
would
call
the
floodplain.
G
So
that
just
now
review
of
there
has
been
flood
records
has
saved
their
area
outlined
and
raid
is.
This
site
is
right
on
the
edge
of
the
flood
plain
you
can
see
it
there
next
slide,
please
so
that's
an
overview
of
our
location
plan
on
it
and
there
is
in
blue
where
historical
flood
events
is
actually
occurred
as
well.
G
Next
slide,
please,
and
so
that's
a
view
from
the
myanmari
road
into
the
site,
the
present
time
so
agriculture
land
next
slide,
please
and
Phil
has
been
brought
into
for
the
first
part
of
the
site
and
they're
sitting
there
at
the
present
time
and
next
slide.
Please,
and
that's
just
on
a
few
on
off
the
Murray
Road
into
the
land
to
the
rear.
Next
slide,
please.
This
is
often
a
small
Road.
G
Looking
back,
the
land
is
quite
flat
and
policy
would
say:
I
normally
requiring
film
with
a
steep
gradients
where
you'd
maybe
need
then
fill
it
up
to
make
it
flat.
We
are
saying:
This,
Land
is
quite
flat,
so
therefore
there's
no
real
need
for
land
Improvement.
In
addition,
you
can't
just
go
across
the
entire
Fields
it'll
be
up
and
down
in
jigs.
We
are
saying
actually
it
would
not
cause
land
Improvement
to
make
it
more
difficult
for
farm
machinery
rather
than
help
it
next
slide.
G
Please,
and
that's
just
back
a
furthermore
Road
in
like
a
black,
the
land,
the
Topography
of
this
area,
yeah,
obviously
due
to
the
extent
of
Philadelphia,
is
really
quite
flat
and
we're
saying
that
Dawson
does
not
conducive.
There
are
four
for
Atlanta
to
be
infilled
under
the
policy
that
we
have
to
apply.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
We
members
we
have
one
tennis
in
the
MLA
to
make
representation
and
objection,
counselor,
Paul
toffee
to
make
representation
and
objection
little
corner
to
make
representation
as
the
agent
and
you
have
written
representation
and
objection
to
the
application
which
are
near
minutes
so
going
to
bring
in
one
Tennessee
to
make
representation.
When
you
have
paid
minutes,
the
clocks
on
your
screen
there
so
after
five
months
will
cut
me
off
and
moving
on.
Okay.
So
over
to
you.
S
Thank
you,
chair
and
you'll,
be
relieved
to
know.
I,
don't
pretend
to
speak
for
the
full
five
minutes
presenting
today
at
both
as
an
objector
and
on
behalf
of
a
number
of
concern
concerned.
Constituents
who
have
been
in
touch
object
into
the
proposed
landfill
extension
and
also
speaking
in
support
of
the
officer's
recommendation
for
refusal
of
the
application,
in
addition
to
the
concerns
which
have
been
well
rehearsed
already
in
terms
of
the
land,
Improvement
issues
and
wm4.
S
More
to
the
application
area,
I
still
believe
lies
below
the
13.67
meter,
OD
level
and
land
Reasoner
info
within
this
boundary
is
therefore
likely
to
result
in
component
of
plotting
issues,
displacement
of
flood
water
and
cause
further
damage
to
surrounding
properties.
This
is
a
concern
which
I
believe
is
actually
echoed
in
DFI
Rivers
plan
on
advisory
unit
in
their
consultation
responses
and
which
should
be
a
material
consideration
for
this
committee.
S
The
assessment
itself
recognizes
potential
impact
of
climate
change,
which
should
be
considered
over
the
lifetime
of
the
development,
and
this
will
have
a
significant
impact
in
future,
but
also
the
revised
top
graphical
data
contained
in
the
supplementary
flood
and
Flood
information
indicates
that
the
13.67
meter
contour
line
is
further
south
and,
as
such,
the
northern
part
of
the
application
nice
outside
the
flood
zone.
S
The
importance
of
reliable
survey
data
at
a
site
such
as
this
is
a
fundamental
importance
in
such
close
proximity
to
Loch
Nair.
In
order
to
enable
informed,
unreasoned,
plowing
decisions.
However,
there
has
been
a
degree
of
variation
in
the
topographic
survey
data
which
has
been
provided
by
the
applicant,
which
is
further
calls
for
concern.
S
Dfi
Rivers
Planet
advisory
unit
also
raised
a
concern
in
relation
to
PPS
15
policy.
Flv2,
protection
of
flood
defense
and
drainage
infrastructure,
as
undesignated
water
courses,
Traverse
the
site
and
section
6.32
of
that
policy
states
that
it
should
therefore
be
protected
from
impediments
for
land
reason.
As
a
result,
this
committee's
decision
I
believe,
should
ultimately
prioritize.
Safeguarding
the
immunity
of
existing
households
from
flood
risk.
S
I
do
not
believe
having
reviewed
the
evidence
that
the
applicant
has
demonstrated
sufficiently
how
they
will
prevent
any
increase
in
director
and
direct
flood
risk
over
the
lifetime
of
the
proposed
development
and
therefore
I.
Don't
believe
that
this
application
meets
planning
guidelines
and
would
implore
the
committee
to
accept
the
recommendation
of
officers
and
reject
the
application
accordingly.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
consideration.
A
O
Thank
you
chair
and
thank
you
to
the
committee
for
letting
us
speak
here
today.
I
believe
is
as
a
local
councilor
from
2011
local
knowledge
matters
on
speaking
to
local
people
on
the
CSU
and
being
out
there
in
2016
and
many
other
years,
I
have
seen
firsthand
the
flooding
that
takes
place
in
this
area.
It
was
totally
underwater
due
to
flooding
homes
and
businesses
in
the
area
needed
sandbags
to
hold
back
with
flood
water,
and
a
lot
were
flooded.
Any
water
displacement
will
cause
more
flooding.
O
If,
if
this
infill
is
allowed
to
go
ahead,
it
will
have
a
desert,
devastating
consequences
to
local
residents,
wildlife
and
environment
lab
Wings
curlies
were
regular.
Birds
stated
in
the
area
prior
to
this
first
infill
of
this
area.
The
drainage
sounds
along.
The
anishmore
road
were
filled
in
by
Mr
Smith
or
his
employees
asked
excavated.
Soil
from
contaminated
sites
will
be
done
there,
which
makes
all
the
waste
contaminated.
O
There
have
been
totally
irresponsible
in
their
duty
of
curator
like
lately
beside
the
site,
and
this
just
proves
it
as
their
hazardous
waste
team
were
not
consulted
on
this
application.
There
will
be
a
runoff
into
the
drainage
system
on
the
luck
which
is
under
pressure
at
the
manageria
algae
landfill
sites
caused
greenhouse
gases.
We
all
know
greenhouse
gases
are
one
of
the
biggest
contributors
to
Global.
Warm
landfill
can
also
cause
odors,
which
cause
nausea
and
headaches.
O
A
T
Right
thanks
once
again
I'm
the
committee
for
this
opportunity
to
speak
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
I
made
as
a
agent
of
the
application
just
going
back
over
and
reflecting
on
what
what
we've
heard
so
far.
Obviously,
there's
been
over
the
site,
as
defined
in
the
in
the
additional
information
that
the
planners
have
presented
there.
It's
a
small
portion
of
irregular
rectangular
land
on
the
Mahi
Road.
It
lies
alongside
what
has
already
been
approved
under
phase
one
under
planning
reference
and
approved
in
22nd
of
the
November
17th.
T
During
that
process,
the
planning
application
was
deemed
and
scrutinized
under
the
regional
development
strategy,
the
strategy
planning
policy
statement,
Craig
Avenue
plan
policy
statement,
3,
11,
15
and
also
PPS
21..
During
that
process,
the
consultations
went
out.
All
consultations
has
been
returned
with
no
objections
from
Nia
DFI
Rivers
road
service.
So,
like
the
objections-
and
there
was
six
have
been
registered
on
the
portal,
the
six
where
Mr
Folker
with
just
a
letter
of
no
content,
it
was
a
Mr
Liberty,
councilor
temasem.
T
At
the
time
yourself,
Mr
salt
on
the
Mr
Mrs
Fox
Mr
salt
is
deceased.
Unfortunately,
during
this
time
of
the
application,
the
property
of
Mr
forger
has
been
sold
and
moved
to
someone
else
again.
Other
other
refusal
points
that
was
been
made
by
the
other
objectors
in
our
opinion,
have
been
answered
and
has
been
given
a
clear
bill
of
health
by
the
representations
of
the
local
authorities.
T
So
the
objections,
in
our
opinion,
are
carrying
a
weight
on,
in
our
opinion,
are
involved
due
to
the
the
responses
from
those.
So,
in
conclusion,
I
would
say
that
this
application
on
the
grains
that's
been
refused
under
two
points
of
Waste
Management
policy:
the
same
policy
applied
to
the
previous
application
under
phase
one
which
was
granted
permission.
If
that
was
the
case
way,
has
this
now
been
done?
T
The
Consultants
have
been
given
the
application
and
no
objections
respond
to
all
a
precedent
has
been
created
in
the
granting
of
the
first
approval
and
the
same
film
material,
the
same
levels.
Everything
is
the
same.
The
OD
level
separate
area
is
to
be
met.
The
field
which
the
levels
have
been
reached
will
be
returned
to
Alyssa's
green
pasture
to
compared
with
what
they
currently
are.
The
ecology
will
be
improved
on
their
photos
and
planning
committee
to
reconsider
this
refusal
decision
based
on
this
fact
on
the
application
requires
to
be
treated
fairly.
A
Yeah
many
thanks.
Many
thanks
needed
just
to
clarify.
It
was
I
think
it
was
counselor
Duffy.
You
were
talking
about
not
myself,
but
then,
in
terms
of
the
latter.
Sorry.
T
I'm
out
maybe
I'm
wrong,
and
that
situation
must
be
sure.
I'm
not
I
was
just
going
by
what
what
the
objections
had
said
and
yes,
I
had
taken
that
that
was
the
Paul
Duffy
was
concert
of
it.
A
A
R
I
was
just
wondering:
I
was
just
again
going
to
be
a
bit
of
background
information
on
on
this
particular
issue.
If
the
first
planner
information
was
obviously
approved
and
now
the
second
plan
of
mission
is
an
extension
of
what
was
previously
granted
nothing's
changing
from
the
first
part
of
permission.
B
G
Yeah
I
am
thank
you
counselor,
there's
slightly
different
material
considerations
now,
first
one
as
submitted
in
this
particular
flood
risk
assessment
and
then
on
the
information
support
with
this
file
as
well,
and
that
application
of
previously
filled
as
a
means
to
prevent
subsidence
to
the
b196
Mahi
road.
So
the
road
was
slightly
subside
in
there
and
provide
good
access
Inlet.
So,
as
you
can
see,
we
laid
so
many
thought
to
be
land
Improvement
to
cfkr
that
road.
G
It
then
was
allowed
certain
and
felt
to
Larry
and
agricultural
type
Machinery
off
the
public
road
before
they
actually
can
for
the
get
so
just
allow
that
and
filter.
Then
they're
not
going
to
write
down
again.
So
we
did
allow
a
bit
of
info
at
the
top,
but
there
was
definitely
different
material,
accelerations
land
subsidence
of
that
road
and
then
to
learn
access
into
the
field.
R
Yeah
go
ahead,
yeah!
No
thanks,
sir
clarify
is
up
happy,
but
the
other
thing
too
I
was
just
wondering
about
was
on
the
report
here
that
I've
been
glancing
through
here,
just
as
you
can
go
on
straight
up
that
talks
about
the
statutory
and
consultation
I
was
just
wondering
that,
obviously
they
have
came
back
with
with
new
issues
and
I
was
just
wondering
why,
as
you
guys
encountered
the
planning
committee,
why
are
you
why
you're
objecting
against
what
they
don't
have
an
issue
with
I'm?
R
G
Yet
know
your
your
absolutely
right
take
counselor
the
start
of
your
consultations,
provide
guidance
and
advice
to
us
in
certain
areas
that
they
have
the
competent
areas
up
to
roads.
For
example,
if
no
objections
we're
not
raised
in
any
reason
for
refusal,
environmental
impacts
as
long
as
you're,
not
you're,
going
to
keep
your
five
meter
buffer
from
those
water
courses
and
we're
strictly
controlling
our
type
of
whisk
and
in
you
know
so,
there's
a
race
code.
There
Rivers
have
no
objection,
we're
not
refusing
that's,
not
flooding
water
management
units
have
no
issues.
G
We're
not
considering
this
a
contamination
of
the
environment,
we're
saying
it's
not
allowed
and
Improvement
we're
seeing
land
improvements,
should
look
at
the
entirety
of
the
fields
and
actually
result
in
Improvement,
but
this
year,
if
approved,
would
actually
result
in
alternative
levels
and
the
area
as
it
is
quite
flat.
So
therefore
we're
saying
this
policy
is
not
you
know
it
doesn't
fit
in
here,
because
it
won't
result
actually
in
land
Improvement,
because
you're
going
to
have
variance
and
levels
and
actually
the
land
is
quite
level
at
the
present
time.
G
Paul,
as
you
say,
with
a
steep
gradients,
you
can't
really
use
it
and
for
agricultural
purposes,
so
you
can
maybe
infill
to
make
it
flat.
This
is
not
the
key
is
here
so
we're
saying
it
doesn't
meet
with
the
fundamental
premises
of
awm4
and,
as
you
say,
then
the
surgery
consultation
we
haven't
based
any
review.
We
have
met
against
their
advice
on
anything
here,
because
we
have
now
refusal
reasons
against
the
advice
that
they
have.
They
suggested.
G
T
Mr
chair,
if
it
was
possible,
could
I
have
quite
a
few
minutes
when
someone
everybody
has
spoken
as
possible.
A
J
Sorry,
the
gentleman
actually
had
said
that
the
visible
several
residents
had
sadly
passed
away
or
moved
on.
Can
anybody
confirm
or
counselor
is
going
to
say
who
died
and
sort
of
he
can?
Can
anybody
confirm
if
their
marriage,
if
there's
even
family
members
or
whatever
lives
there,
they
would
have
the
same
opinions
as
the
last
ones.
O
Yes,
thank
you,
chair
a
family,
they
have
sold
the
business,
but
they
still
live
there.
So
we're
running
at
the
salt
family
wounded
pass
away,
but
there
is
family
members
still
living
there.
The
Fox
Family
aren't
a
marsh
already
and
also
lived
down
in
a
small
Lane.
So
today,
so
there
is
plenty
of
residents.
All
the
residents
of
their
initial
communion
are
still
in
that
area.
A
C
Yeah
thanks!
That's
just
if
we
could
go
to
photo
four
just
again
trying
to
get
my
Burns
on
this
one,
because
I'm
I
don't
think
I've
ever.
C
Life
yeah
is,
that
is
that
photo
looking
towards
the
mockery
road?
Is
it
where
those
big
tall
sort
of
fur
trees
are?
Is
that
the
roadway
there's
like
some
type
of
machinery
and
then
there's
a
lot
of
fancy
on
his
other
Road
to
the
top
of
the
image?
Is
the
root
at
the
top
of
the
image?
Basically,
is
that
accurate.
G
Which
is
currently
taking
place
so
where
those
trees
are
there's
a
road
in
between
those
trees
and
behind
those
trees
is
in
a
smaller
house
which
would
be
the
Leicester
building
and
there's
a
wall
there
and
then
there's
the
Mahi
Road
and
then
there's
these
seats.
That's
just
looking
up
from
then
there's
more,
which
stands
off
the
myanmari
road.
C
I
suppose
that
I'm
taking
it
maybe
there's
one
for
Neil
that
feel
looks
very
I.
Don't
know:
if
has
that
been
someone
gray,
isn't
on
that
or
something
it
just
looks
really
wet,
and
then
the
durian
there
looks
to
be
water
permanently.
Well,
not
permanent,
I,
don't
know
if
it's
permanent,
but
in
photo
fade.
It's
certainly.
The
durian
looks
quite
full
in
that
regard.
I'm
just
wondering
from
a
veteran
perspective,
then,
is
it
the
case
that
inert
material
is
then
allowed
across
that
to
reuse
the
level
if
there's
250,
Mill,
I,
think
of
soil?
C
Is
that
the
key
it's
going
to
be
put
on
the
top
of
it?
That
I
read,
then,
is
that
an
obvious
batterman
to
move
away
from
what
is
looks
like
a
bit
of
a
quagmar
and
restore
the
potential
degree
is,
is
that
is
that
what
this
is
about?
I
mean
is
that.
G
On
3
000
over
33
300
tons
of
infield
to
come
in
here
and
then
on
top
of
that
would
be
the
250
ml
of
top
side.
So
there
is
substantial
amount
we
have
to.
The
agency
will
take
over
two
years
to
infill.
C
And
all
that
material
is
up
in
Earth,
then.
Is
that
something
the
environment
agencies
content
with?
If
it
meets
the
list,
that's
provided
there
is
that
acceptable,
then,
and
you're
that
there's
an
acceptability
of
so
the
material
really
isn't
the
issue,
it's
the
betterment
or
what
you
would
perceive
as
a
long-term
Battlement
of
it
is
that
am
I
getting
a
rate
I'm
not
regard.
G
Yeah
they
didn't
fill
all
the
land.
The
failure
tokenberg
will
be
inert
fills
that
would
be
typical
of
of
landfill.
It's
not
any
hazardous
waste
or
anything
proposing,
and
if
members
remain
to
approve,
we
would
have
to
condition
the
table
film.
All
that
comes
into
this
particular
site.
Yes,
thank
you.
C
So,
and
just
in
terms
of
you
know,
sort
of
projecting
ahead,
then
with
the
plan
would
our
plan
on
Authority
here
have
a
place
with
a
rule
and
stipulate
what
would
go
in
who
you
would
ultimately
monitor
what
goes
in?
If
you
know
what
I
mean,
would
that
be
planner,
or
is
that
an
aea-
or
you
know
just
teasing
that
out
further
at
that
State.
G
Any
fill
brought
in
requires
worst
license
from
Nia
as
well,
and
they
would
see
it
and
they
will
be
fundamental.
There
will
be
enforcement
if
she's
needed
here,
if
just
due
to
the
close
proximity
of
the
floodplain
Etc,
any
sort
of
spell
HBO
on
that
real
Lane
would
have
reservations
for
there
for
externally
and
Phil
Etc.
So
there
will
be
a
dual
approach
here
would
have
to
be
needed,
but
it
wouldn't
be.
G
C
I
suppose
it's
just
gone
on
to
just
going
back
to
that.
404
I
mean
I'm,
not
aware
I'm,
just
looking
at
the
photo,
but
is
there
is
the
easily
able
to
give
a
bit
of
clarity
as
to
you
know
the
condition
of
that
ground.
It
looks
bad
to
me.
Have
animals
been
on
that
or
something
it
just
looks
like
there's
a
lot
of
hoof
prints
or
something
in
that
corner,
and
is
that
the
key
is
that
like
looks
like
a
summertime
situation
there,
judging
by
the
foliage
in
the
trees?
C
T
Sure,
just
to
clarify
that
that
grind,
even
in
the
summertime
as
counselor
Wilson
has
stated,
there
is
wet
it's
it's
per
the
silence
referred
to
by
actually
there
on
the
on
the
spoil.
That's
been
been
there
and
has
been
there
from
the
accept
due
to
the
fact
that
the
applicant
has
been
forced
to
abandon
Works
due
to
ongoing
issues
with
enforcement
on
objectors.
T
So
we
can't
achieve
or
can't
get
that
particular
material
spread
on
that,
but,
more
importantly,
that
with
the
water
courses
that
can
be
identified
there,
those
will
still
be
there.
The
five
meter
buffer
is
each
side
of
that
those
watercourses
will
actually
be
unretained.
T
The
applicant
also
has
all
appropriate
licenses
from
Nia
and
the
other
agencies
for
to
bring
to
the
site
under
that
list
of
approval
so
everything's
there.
Everything
can
be
policed
by
that
and
also
has
been
carried
out
on
the
ground
by
the
representatives.
T
But
what
I
wanted
to
touch
on
Mr
chair
was
today:
I
had
emailed
a
supportive
document
to
Shania
for
additional
information,
which
it
probably
isn't
privy
to,
because
it
was
a
transition
between
probably
a
time
in
in
Banbridge,
born
to
this
meeting
and
at
a
substantial
work
on
a
substantial
information
which
I
feel
is
critical
to
this
application,
and
on
late
and
later
of
that,
I
would
ask
if
she
can
make
access
to
that
on
an
email
if
that
can
be
considered
and
possibly
may
change
a
lot
of
what
has
been
discussed
on
whatever
by
our
Consultants
on
this
process.
A
A
I'm
going
to
enjoy
adjourned
for
about
five
minutes
so
and
she
need
can
get
the
share.
Emails.
I
will
come
back
in
a
bit
favor.
A
They
feed
yeah.
Thank
you
very
much
members.
We
are
going
to
defer
to
the
evidence
of
coming
to
your
officers
and
to
give
them
time
to
review
it
and
to
be
able
to
make
sure
that
we
get
set
of
that
as
well.
We're
going
to
defer,
as
soon
as
possible,
to
be
brought
back
to
the
next.
The
next
legally
meetings
of
planning.
Okay,
so
we're
gonna
defer
that
I
move
on
to
the
next
item
on
our
agenda.
M
A
G
G
The
state
is
currently
outside
the
certain
limit
and
as
such
as
then,
the
rural
area,
the
definition
of
a
HMO
was
defined
in
the
Housing.
Act
is
a
building
apart
thereof,
occupied
by
three
or
more
persons
as
their
only
our
main
residents
are
those
living
it
to
form
more
than
two
households,
paragraph
6.73.
G
If
the
spps
sets
out
the
Strategic
policy
for
residential
development
in
the
country
state
to
be
taken
into
account
in
the
termination
of
plan
and
obligations
at
paragraph
6.74,
it
states
that
other
types
of
development
in
the
countryside,
apart
from
those
sellouts,
should
be
considered
as
part
of
the
development
plan
process.
In
line
with
the
other
policies
sets
out
within
the
spps
policy.
Cty
one
of
PPS
21
less
oriented
types
of
development
which
in
principle
are
considered
to
be
acceptable
in
the
countryside
and
which
will
contribute
to
the
EM
sustainable
development.
G
Furthermore
with
regards
to
parking
officer,
content
or
sufficient
parking
within
the
cartilage
of
the
property
and
the
access
arrangements
are
acceptable
and
considering
all
other
material
considerations,
there's
no
concerns
regarding
flooding.
The
application
is
not
foreign
part
of
any
state,
that's
nationally
or
internationally
designated
for
its
nature
conservation
importance.
There's
no
viable
environmental
Pathways
from
the
proposal
to
any
feature
of
European
State
and
will
not
impact
any
historical
or
natural
environment.
G
There
have
been
no
objections
to
this
proposal
have
regard
to
all
of
the
above
and
fall
in
the
plan
and
balancing
exercise
officer
of
the
pen,
the
post
development
as
contact
to
cty,
one
of
PPS
21
and
the
correspondent
paragraphs
of
the
spps
and
as
such
status
recommend.
This
application
is
refused.
G
Specification
of
the
side
so
as
to
the
west
of
portadown
and
north
of
the
Rich
Hill
next
slide.
Please
it's
a
scenario
view
of
the
state.
There
is
in
the
current
access
laneway
up
to
the
house,
which
is
proposed
to
be
used
non-altered
as
part
of
this
clan
application.
Next
slide,
please
that's
a
state
location
plan
with
the
site
outlined
in
red
next
slide.
Please!
So
that's
a
state
layer
plan
really!
Nothing
is
going
to
change
fundamentally
on
the
outside
of
this
particular
property
and
there's
adequate
turning
for
parking
of
cars
and
vehicles
Etc.
G
So
it's
all
acceptable
next
slide,
please!
So,
though,
as
the
existing
plans
of
the
house
and
two-story
pitched
roof
red
brick
house
next
slide,
please
under
post
plan
outside
will
remain
the
same
simply
the
downstairs
and
master
living
room.
It's
going
to
be
changed
into
our
bedroom
next
slide,
please!
G
G
A
Yeah,
thank
you
very
much,
I'm
going
to
bring
in
Philip
Marshall
of
Henry
Marshall
Brian
Architects
to
make
representation
as
the
agent
and
support
of
the
application.
Philip
you're
very
welcome
to
the
plan
committee
here
this
afternoon.
You
have
three
minutes
and
it
depends
on
your
on
the
screen
there.
So
it's
over
to
yourself
in
your
own
time,.
F
U
Thank
you,
chair,
I,
just
like
to
make
a
few
points
in
support
of
this
application.
If
I
may,
as
you
probably
know,
Gail
fresh
or
local
family
business
which
were
established
back
in
1965
and
since
that
time,
which
is
over
50
years,
they
have
grown
to
employ
over
170
full-time
staff,
display
all
major
retailer
Outlets
across
Ireland,
fresh
fruit
and
vegetables.
U
U
U
A
B
C
Yeah
thanks
for
Michelle
or
the
or
the
agent
or
are
these
seasonal
workers
largely
and
obviously
you
know
from
the
EU
they're
coming
over,
obviously
under
the
required
permits
to
work
I'm
just
wondering
in
terms
of
current
Arrangements,
obviously
that's
more
for
for
the
agent
in
this
regard.
What's
the
current
situation
like
for
workers
making
that
commute
on
the
costs
associated
with
it
and
versus
obviously
well
I'm,
assuming
a
good,
far
greater
degree
of
convenience
and
living
beside
the
site?
C
So
it's
just
to
get
a
gauge
of
the
the
inconvenience
I
suppose
of
you
know
where
are
they
living
at
the
moment?
And
what's
that
commute
looked
like
for
them?
Thank.
U
If
you
want
to
come
in
yeah
workers
are
a
major
problem
for
Gill
fresh
with
a
high
turnover
of
Staff,
because
the
commute
is
a
real
problem,
gilfresh
actually
of
all
vehicles
of
their
own,
that
they
use
to
Ferry
workers
from
local
towns
and
villages.
But
it's
not
really
sustainable.
U
You
know
the
course
involved
are
prohibited
really
and
and
to
have
local
the
workers
living
locally,
basically
walk
across
the
yard
into
the
factory
I
mean
if
they
need
to
be
on
call
early
morning
evenings.
It
would
be
much
better
to
have
them
close
at
hand.
C
And
I
suppose,
then,
on
the
basis
of
that,
are
there
like
key
workers?
You
know
Eastern
European
workers
that
are
critical
to
the
operation
of
the
factory.
That
therefore
there's
a
benefit
to
them.
Living
on
site
on
upper
I
suppose
are
they?
Would
they
you
those
types
of
positions?
Be
then
automatically?
You
know
if
that
was
to
be
the
case
as
a
as
an
HTML.
Would
there
then
sort
of
automatically
be
the
staff
that
would
be
housed
in
that
property
to
further?
You
know,
you
know
benefit
from
that
efficiency.
U
Yeah
yeah
I
think
that's
correct,
yeah
efficiency
and
have
key
staff
living
close
to
the
factory
for
on
call
for,
for
all
sorts
of
reasons,
for
for
obviously
the
factory
Works
long
long
hours
and
have
key
staff
available
for
certain
problems.
You
know
Machinery
breakdowns
whatever
you
know,
it's
definitely
is
key
to
have
key
staff
close
to
the
factory
at
all
times.
F
U
Resorted
to
to
Temporary
accommodation
in
the
hope
of
getting
this,
this
application
through
because
it's
been
in
the
in
the
system
for
quite
some
time.
C
Yeah,
it's
an
air
chairman
I
want
to
know
come
back
to
the
previous
term.
I,
don't
know
how
many
of
them,
without
one,
usually
the
generators.
Quite
a
lot
of
objection,
you
know
I,
remember
one
was
maybe
over
100
objections
and
put
it
down,
and
there
were
all
the
the
issues
raise
the
news
instances.
Some
of
them
are
very
genuine
from
people
because,
as
a
committee,
we've
all
was
taken
objections
and
giving
them
their
appropriate
Whip,
and
some
of
them
were
very
heartfelt
in
terms
I.
C
Am
you
know
the
nature
of
your
chair
moves
lend
itself
to
your.
You
know
with
employment
on
the
seasonal
holiday,
it
land
itself
equate
through
put
of
individuals.
You
know,
and
at
sort
of
it
was
negative
in
terms
of
trying
to
build
and
sort
of
booster,
the
Sansa
community
in
an
area,
and
once
we
exceed
that
you
know
you're
into
the
doesn't
materially
change
that
Community
aspect
of
an
area.
You
know
over
a
period
of
time,
I
feel
with
this
one
where
it's
it's
I
think
the
agent
had
mentioned
it.
C
You
know
it
doesn't
appear
to
be
a
chance
to
monetize
in
any
way.
It's
more
from
an
economical
aspect
and
efficiencies
aspect,
I'm,
sort
of
an
convenience
aspect
and
efficiency
for
the
for
the
firm
room
I'm.
Not
so
the
fact
is
beside
the
factory
I,
don't
think
it
would
be
somewhere.
C
Ordinarily,
someone
would
automatically
want
to
go
and
live
unless
that
a
you
know
it
was
for
that,
and
you
know
that
was
for
enablement.
You
know
in
terms
of
being
close
to
the
factory
and
avoiding
not
commute
and
I
suppose
workers
in
this
instant
they're
here
you
know
they
make
that
journey
across
for
and
they're
quite
you
know
their
their
hard
graft,
especially.
We
know
that
I
mean
that's
the
the
prevailing.
C
You
know
they've
made
that
Journey
from
from
their
home
place
to
live
here
and
work
on
you
know
to
find
the
wages
are
not
lucrative
and
a
lot
of
them
enjoy
living
here.
A
lot
of
them
have
spoke
to
cross
and
my
own
DEA
I've
chosen
to
live
here.
I
speak
to
Manila
regularly
and
they've
made
at
their
home.
So
you
know
it
is
a
common.
C
It's
a
common
thing
and
I
suppose
I
can
see
economically
that
there's
an
argument
there
for
for
this
one
in
that
regard,
I
can
see
why
kill
fresh
where
you
know
it
has
been
an
issue
rate
across
the
UK
and
getting
seasonal
workers
and
getting
them
to
remain
and
I
can
see
why
you
know
living
right
there.
It's
a
fairly
substantial
dwell
on,
but
it
looks
of
I
can
see
the
attraction
of
that
in
terms
of
here's,
where
you'll
be
living
you'll
be
playing
a
key
part
in
The
Firm.
C
E
B
O
Yes,
thank
you.
Chair
is
sort
of
tender
gray.
You
know
I've
seen
Manny's
a
farmer
who
had
Caravans
and
stuff
lay
up
there
and
substandard.
You
know
places
where
they
were
to
put
up
a
foreign,
National,
seasonal
workers
and
I.
Don't
really
think
you
know
these
houses
here,
10
most
super
just
strictly
for
times
cities
thing
and
if
they're
needed
in
the
countryside,
no
I
don't
see.
Why
not.
F
Thank
you,
chair
and
command
the
CM
Grinders
cancer.
Definitely
you
know
a
lot
of
the
debates
for
any
of
him,
whose
was
objections.
There's
no
objections
here.
It's
obvious
air
from
the
view
of
the
house,
it's
quite
literally
in
the
back
of
Beyond,
there's
no
existing
properties
and
you
get
to
see
in
the
boxes
of
gilfresh
up
in
the
back
of
it.
So
it
really
is
a
house
on
site.
F
A
Q
Yes,
thank
you
very
much
sure
and
yes
again,
I
think
when
and
maybe
on
what
previous
comments
have
said.
I
think
it's
important
to
note
that
you
know
it's
it's
well
and
good.
Q
You
know
advising
that
there's
you're
in
close
proximity
to
lock
all
Kilmore,
Rich,
Hill
and
portadown,
but
I
think
you
have
to
take
into
consideration,
and
you
know
public
transport
or
or
potential
lack
of
you
know
these
people
are
maybe
working
on
searchable,
R's
things
like
that
and
again
I
think
there's
potential
road
safety
issues
and
and
going
to
you
know
a
more
rural
location
like
that.
So
I
think
that's
just
something
I'd
like
to
add
to
the
debate.
L
Thank
you
chair,
just
because
he's
probably
tackle
what
our
last
contributors
had
said.
L
The
the
agent
that's
expressed
his
opinion,
our
views
that
the
company
was
had
three
or
four
vehicles
to
transport
people
back
and
forward
this.
This
wouldn't
only
sort
of
with
the
help
of
the
environment
there's
not
as
much
driving
about
and
vehicles,
fire
and
staff
back
and
forward,
and
it's
a
local
business
and
I'm
sure
they
support
local
Growers
and
I
think
we
should
be
encouraging
local
businesses
take
us
to
to
help
our
agricultural
industry
and
I
just
think
it
would
be.
L
A
A
Ladies
and
gentlemen,
this
point
I'm
going
to
move
all
those
members
of
the
public
and
counselors
who
are
attending
the
planning
on
regulatory
Services
committee
via
Zoom
to
zoom
within
room
those
using
the
talent
service
will
be
placed
on
hold,
and
anyone
in
attendance
in
the
chamber
will
be
asked
to
leave
the
room
to
enable
accommodate
10
legal
advice
from
a
legal
advisor.
Any
member
of
the
committee
who's
spoken
as
a
supporter
objector
to
the
application
on
the
consideration
will
be
asked
to
leave
the
room.
A
The
advice
provided
will
be
it
only
to
legal
matters.
A
new
discussion
of
the
merge
of
the
planning
application
now
before
us
will
take
place
until
the
public
element
of
the
meeting
resumes
and
we
move
back
into
the
meeting
or
taken
off
hold
any
legal
advice
providers
confidential
loan
members
of
the
committee
Who
Remain,
or
replace
to
preserve
that
confidentiality.
An
official
will
readmit
or
lose
required
now
to
leave
the
room
and
those
who
assume
will
be
readmitted
to
the
meeting
once
a
provision
of
legal
advice
has
concluded.
Thank
you.
A
Yeah,
thank
you
very
much,
members
of
the
public
and
members
of
council.
So
members
we
were
in
the
bed
and
going
back
up
and
the
bed
officially
further
comments
or
questions.
I
would
like
to
be
asked
moving
on
to
decision.
Okay,
Alderman
Wilson,
please.
C
Yeah,
thank
you
I
suppose,
moving
on
from,
he
was
discussion
of
hard
and
legals
and
and
the
interest
of
just
you
know
due
process
and
keeping
ourselves.
You
know
fully
up
to
speed
and
all
the
attribute
to
this
case.
I
A
Yeah,
thank
you
very
much.
Mr
Marshall.
U
A
B
A
A
P
P
The
site
is
located
in
lands
which
are
not
zoned
for
any
particular
type
of
development
within
the
within
the
development
of
warringstone,
as
defined
in
the
craigavon
area
plan.
The
plan
States
the
policy
said
one
applies
to
both
Sunland
and
wetland
in
the
urban
area
and
consideration
of
set
one
to
set
out
in
detail
in
the
report.
P
The
applicator
surveys,
the
site,
is
an
agricultural
use
and
a
submitted
as
farm
maps,
which
show
the
extent
of
his
foreign
business
dear,
have
confirmed
that
the
applicants
claimed
basic
form
payments
for
the
lands
in
2023
and
previous
years
as
the
site
is
an
agricultural
use.
Officers
are
satisfy
that
it
is
not
considered
open
space.
P
The
principal
of
residential
development
in
the
state
is
therefore
considered
to
be
acceptable.
This
is
an
outline
application.
Details
relating
to
design
and
layout
have
only
been
submitted
for
indicative
purposes
if
members
are
made
to
approve
the
application,
matters
of
design,
scale
proportion
and
massing
and
appearance
of
buildings.
Landscaped
and
hard
surface
areas
will
be
considered
a
reserved
matter
stage.
Officers
in
consultation
with
DFA
roads
are
satisfied
that
an
acceptable
means
of
access
can
be
achieved
and
sufficient
space
within
the
cartilage
can
be
provided
for
parking
and
turning
natural
environment,
division
of
advice.
P
The
vegetation
has
grown
up
being
removed
from
the
site
and
have
recommended
that
conditions
be
attached
to
ensure
the
protection
of
remaining
vegetation
and
the
enhancement
of
this
vegetation.
A
number
of
objections
to
the
proposal
have
been
received
and
the
issues
raised
have
been
considered
in
detail
are
set
out
in
the
report
on
balance
officers.
Consider
The
Proposal
complies
with
the
spps
and
all
other
relevant
planner
policies
and
are
recommend
that
the
application
be
approved
and
I'll
just
take
you
through
the
slides.
P
This
is
the
indicative
side
concept
that
was
submitted
by
the
agent
and
supported
the
obligation
to
demonstrate
the
two
dwellings
and
access
could
be
accommodated
on
the
site,
and
this
is
an
aerial
photograph
of
the
site
and
its
surroundings,
and
the
application
side
is
just
to
the
southeast
of
the
cricket
ground,
zero.
You
can
see
the
cricket
grounds.
Is
that
circular
a
lot
of
them
out
in
the
middle
of
the
photograph.
P
A
E
Sorry
such
a
question,
because
it
reminds
you
did
we
have
a
similar
application
a
couple
of
months
ago.
Maybe
it
was
an
adjacent
site,
I
think
it
was
maybe
one
dwelling
facing
Into,
The,
Lawns
and
then
I
take
at
least
two.
E
You
know
we're
first
known
to
the
main
road
there,
let's
put
up
new,
dwell
and
taken
into
consideration
as
part
of
these,
these
two,
you
know
with
the
the
additional
you
know,
impact
Wally
came
from
that
one
dwell
and
so
on
in
terms
of
a
clear
limit
of
impact
of
all
three
Roland,
just
two
on
their
own
and
one
on
their
own.
If
you
know
what
I
mean
thanks.
P
Thank
you
chair.
Yes,
we
were
aware.
Obviously
there
was
another
application
which
was
presented
to
the
committee
a
couple
of
months
ago
for
a
single
dwelling
further
to
the
south
of
these,
these
two
sites
and
yes,
and
considering
the
application
that
we
have
in
front
of
us.
We
were
aware
of
the
other
application,
which
is
an
outline
application,
and
the
impact
of
that,
along
with
the
two,
was
taken
into
consider
in
a
consideration
and
assessing
the
application.
A
A
L
A
A
A
V
Thanks
chair,
firstly,
there
are
two
tables
in
the
report
that
need
to
be
corrected:
a
for
condition.
Seven
within
that
condition
condition
number
seven
is
referenced,
which
it
should
have
read
condition
six
so
condition.
Seven
should
read
the
parking
services
and
circulation
areas.
Details
in
the
and
above
condition,
number
six
shall
be
open
for
Eastern.
All
hours
of
business
I
mean
likewise
in
conditions.
13
conditions
14
is
referenced.
Whenever
condition,
12
should
have
been
referenced
so
condition.
13
should
read
the
reviews
to
removals
from
the
site.
V
She'll
only
take
place
within
permitted,
RS,
detailed
and
condition
12
above
and
are
loading
and
unloading
shall
take
place
within
the
cartilage
of
the
site.
Only
the
application
seeks
full
plan
information
for
the
part,
tunes
of
use
of
a
section
of
an
existent
Factory,
from
ancillary
storage
to
production,
the
reaction
of
an
extension
to
an
existing
Factory
reaction
of
attached
anxiety,
Warehouse
retention
of
an
facility
Warehouse
building
their
attention
often
extends
into
the
site,
fade
external
storage,
space
and
HTTP
parking
and
all
Associated
plant
parking
and
site
works.
The
applications
before
you
this
evening.
V
As
it's
a
major
plan,
application
officers
have
taken
up.
Members
have
read
the
report
in
full
and
such
this
as
a
and
the
addendum
and
such
as
assistant
options.
Only
the
application
status
located
in
a
settlement
development
limits
of
Lurgan
the
sales
located
in
lands
home
for
industry
l-i2,
is
depicted
in
the
map.
5
of
the
creek
Avenue
plan.
2010
membership
face
that
officers
consider
that
the
development
can
place
with
the
swelling
of
the
land
and
meets
the
keysight
requirements
for
the
Sunland.
V
V
policy
paired
one
pps4
operates
a
presumption
in
favor
of
development
such
that
development
proposal
incorporate
in
the
class
B3
General
industrial
use
would
be
permitted
in
an
area
specifically
allocated
for
such
purposes
and
a
development
plan.
The
proposed
storage
areas
are
ancillary
to
the
primary
class
3
B
from
class
B3
functionals
for
the
overall
site,
considerably
to
be
compatible
with
the
dominant
industrial
employment
use
and
would
not
result
in
reduction.
V
In
the
industrial
Employment
Resource
officers,
therefore
off
the
opinion
that
the
proposed
class,
B3
and
B4
uses
are
acceptable
in
principle
and
the
policy
pad
one
is
satisfied.
The
storage
is
here
to
be
retained
than
the
proposed
storage
shed
and
extensions
of
the
factory
would
all
be
subordinate
and
scaled
to
the
existing
Factory
The
Works
represent
an
approximate
increase
in
flow
area
by
32
percent.
V
The
design,
scale,
Mason
and
choice
of
external
materials
are
in
keeping
with
other
buildings
within
the
site
and
wider
Industrial
Area,
such
as
filament,
is
considered
to
be
sympathetic
to
the
shrine
buildings
in
the
half
panty
Valley
Industrial
estate
officers
also
raised
no
concerns
over
the
pro
storage
yards
to
the
east.
The
post
Landscaping
instruments
are
deemed
appropriate
for
the
development
and
retention
of
agitation
along
the
northernmost
National.
Most
boundaries
of
the
site
have
been
conditioned.
V
As
such,
the
proposal
is
considered
to
comply
with
annexe
of
the
spps
and
policy
paid
one
of
pps4
and
creates
no
conflict
with
the
relevant
criteria
of
policy
pad
9
of
pps4,
a
transport
assessment
form
and
say
car
parking
survey
have
been
submitted
in
support
of
the
application.
The
process
seeks
to
provide
access
onto
the
internal
roadway
within
the
half
penny.
Valley
Industrial
estate,
the
development,
would
result
in
an
increase
approximately
11
to
the
total
number
of
trips
associated
with
the
site.
V
Officers
and
consultation
with
EFI
roads
are
content
that
the
development
will
have
minimal
vehicle
generation
compared
with
the
existing
conditions
and
the
existing
infrastructure
can
accommodate
the
additional
traffic
movement
anticipated.
Officers,
therefore,
is
no
concerns
regarding
policy
and
P2
of
pps3
post
car
park
includes
97
in
cartilage
car
parking
spaces
fee
for
use
based
based
off
at
the
site
and
their
teenage
TV
SPS,
which
Falls
below
the
requirements
of
parking
standards,
Park
and
standard
states
that,
for
some
units,
parking
will
be
assessed.
V
The
surveys
undertake
ensure
that
their
spare
capacity
for
parking
and
Peak
periods
officers
in
consultation
with
DFI
roads
are
therefore
content
with
the
proposed
development,
of
course,
with
the
spps
and
policies
amp2
and
amp
7
of
pps3
Criterion,
GH,
9th
policy
pair
9
pps4
and
the
parking
standards
genus
assessment
is
being
submitted.
The
storm
drainage
proposes
for
The
Cider
to
tenure
to
any
additional
flow,
using
a
hydrobrack
and
oversized
pipework.
V
An
applicant
proposes
discharge
stormwater
to
public
storms
here
at
an
attenuated
rate,
which
would
limit
the
discharge
for
itself
Greenfield
conditions
overall
in
a
flooding
and
drainage
context.
Officers
consider
there
to
be
no
conflict
with
spps,
the
Positive
presence
of
pps15
phase
and
criteria,
D
and
F
of
policy
pad
9
of
pps4.
V
The
impact
of
the
development
of
features
of
natural
and
built
Heritage
is
being
considered.
Officers
in
consultation
with
common
authorities
have
not
identified
any
concerns
regarding
the
impact
on
natural
alert
built
heritage.
Members
should
face
the
two
levels
of
objection
of
being
received
regarding
this
plan
application
from
one
objector.
The
primary
concerns
were
around
the
existed.
Embarkment
of
lorries
within
the
wider
industrial
estate
members
will
know
the
creation
of
18
new
HCC
parking
spaces
within
the
site.
The
professional
fights
has
been
conditioned
as
per
the
addendum
report.
V
V
So
the
next
slide,
then
just
shows
that
you
can
see
in
red
is
a
storage
Warehouse,
that's
proposed,
and
then
blue,
then,
is
therefore
the
existing
Factory,
where
which
is
to
be
changed
in
use
from
a
storage
to
production
and
then
an
orange
above
that
we
have
the
extension
to
the
factory
Just
Between,
the
red
and
blue.
There
is
storage
Warehouse,
which
is
to
be
retained
in
green,
sorry,
yeah
in
green.
Then
we
have
the
car
park
which
has
been
extended
in
purple.
V
We
have
the
HTTP
parking
spaces
which
1800p
Fighters
and
then
yellow
additional
storage.
Space
is
the
next
slide,
then
just
shows
the
floor
plans
just
off
pair
four,
and
then
they
proposed
a
storage
Warehouse.
It
was
followed
by
elevations,
then
of
the
a
warehouse
on
the
next
slide.
The
next
slide,
then
it
just
shows
the
floor
plans
of
the
extension
and
again
allocations
of
the
extension
hey.
V
Okay,
so
then,
this
is
a
photograph
of
the
of
the
factory.
It's
just
a
show,
a
context.
The
next
slide,
then
it
just
shows
this
is
on
the
right
hand,
side
is
the
access
road
to
access
the
Factory,
and
then
the
next
slide
down
is
Facing
East.
Just
again,
you
can
just
see
that
what
department
and
The
Wider
industrial
estate,
the
next
slide
a
shows,
the
area
where
the
proposed
storage
warehouses
to
be
our
actors?
V
Okay.
So
this
is
path
four,
which
will
have
the
proposed
change
of
use
and
the
extension
will
project
from
from
that
building
and
then
in
the
rear.
You
can
see
the
storage
building,
which
is
to
be
retained.
The
next
side,
then,
just
shows
the
front
allocation
of
that
storage
building,
followed
by
the
rear
allocation
on
the
on
the
next
slide.
V
This
is
the
site's
the
site
access
at
present,
and
then
this
is
an
Eastern
section
of
the
site
which
is
currently
used
for
storage
and
where
storage
is
is
proposed
within
the
application.
Next
slide,
then
just
shows
a
again
another
section
of
the
site.
Some
of
the
storage
which
is
been
undertaken
on
that
section
of
the
site.
V
A
Thank
you
very
much,
Kel
members.
Just
to
make
your
work.
We
have
Mr
Brandon
stargy
of
hotel
and
stocky
planning
consultant
and
Jonathan
McCune
read
his
plastic
who's,
the
applicant
and
attendance
on
here
to
clarify
your
answer,
questions
that
you
may
have:
okay,
so
I'm
gonna
open
the
the
floor
for
any
questions
of
the
applicant
agent
or
supporters.
O
L
A
V
This
plan
application
seeks
full-cloud
information
for
direction
of
a
general
industrial
Factory
class
B3
the
solar
panels
on
the
roof
and
Associated
Plastics
recycling
Hull.
The
filament
includes
Associated
silos,
Transformers
compressor
and
nie
high
voltage
in
Tech
and
consumer
I,
definitely
including
the
professional
of
external
storage
areas,
parking
lighting
and
direction
of
a
perimeter
fence
applications
before
you
receive
them.
V
As
it's
a
major
plan
application
officers
of
tech
members
have
read
their
important
flow
and,
as
such,
this
as
a
synopsis,
only
the
application
sites
located
within
the
development
limits
of
the
organ
the
sales
secure
non-zone
for
industry
l-i2,
has
depicted
map
5
of
the
craigavon
area
plan.
2010
membership
advice
that
officers
consider
that
the
development
complies
with
the
zoning
of
the
land
and
meets
the
key
state
requirements
for
the
Sunland.
The
development
is
considered
to
be
played
with
the
requirements
of
the
area
plan.
V
The
Proposal
will
fall
under
class
B3
Channel
industrial
of
the
plan
and
use
classes
order.
Northern
Ireland
2015.
policy
paid
one
of
pps4
operates
a
presumption
in
favor
of
development
such
that
development,
Society
development
proposal
and
corporate
in
the
class
B3
General
industrial
use
will
be
permitted
in
an
area
specifically
allocated
for
such
purposes
in
a
development
plan.
V
Officers
therefore
are
of
the
opinion
that
the
post
class
B3
use
is
acceptable
in
principle
in
that
policy
pad
want
to
satisfy
two
buildings
are
proposed
within
this
application:
the
same
scale
mass
and
the
choice
of
external
materials,
on
keeping
with
other
buildings
within
the
wider
industrial
estate.
As
such
that
the
filament
is
considered
to
appear
sympathetic
to
the
surrounding
buildings.
In
the
half
penny
Valley
Industrial
estate,
the
proposed
landscape
and
arrangements
are
deemed
appropriate
for
this
development,
and
the
retention
of
vegetation
along
the
northernmost
boundary
of
the
site
has
been
conditioned.
V
Officers
are
therefore
of
the
opinion
that
the
post
buildings
and
Associated
yard
areas
will
not
have
a
non-acceptable
facial
impact
and
will
satisfactory
visually
integrated
into
the
immediate
area
after
surgery
has
no
concerns
over
the
design
and
layout
in
relation
to
the
spps
living
places
or
a
policy.
There's
two
of
a
plan
strategy
for
Rural
Northern
Ireland.
V
The
nearest
dwells
decided
to
kill
along
baling
the
money
Lane
approximately
140
meters,
West
or
Southwest
of
the
site,
the
housing
development
of
Hillcrest,
approximately
330
meters,
southeast
of
the
site
and
the
housing
development
of
Carriage
Manor,
approximately
340
meters,
south
of
the
site.
An
acoustic
report
has
been
provided
and
was
considered
by
the
Environmental
Health
Department,
as
detailed
in
the
report.
Officers
would
raise
no
concern
in
racing
to
noise
or
immunity,
subject
to
the
suggested
conditions.
V
As
such,
the
proposal
is
considered
to
comply
with
annexe
if
the
spps
the
policy
paired
one
pps4
and
creates
no
conflict
with
the
relevant
criteria
of
policy.
Pair
9
of
pps4
transport
assessment
forms
being
submitted
and
supportive
application.
The
process
seeks
to
Fed
access
onto
the
internal
roadway
within
the
half
penny
for
the
industrial
estate.
The
access
to
the
filament
is
considered
to
comply
with
policy
amp2
of
pps3.
V
The
safe
specific
needs
of
the
proposal
means
that
low
levels
of
traffic
is
likely
regenerated
by
the
proposed
development,
which
will
have
a
negligible
impact
on
the
shrine
Road
Network.
The
parking
profession
on
the
site
falls
short
of
orders
required
in
the
parking
standards
document.
However,
Parkinson
understates
that,
for
some
units,
parking
will
be
assessed.
Individual
merits
have
in
regard
to
the
numbers
or
number
of
workers,
operating
patterns,
location
and
proximity
to
public
transport.
V
Listen
to
this
proposal,
the
factory
will
operate
using
two
operation
shifts
which,
if
times
being
8
A.M
to
4
pm
and
10
pm
to
8,
am
the
task
confirms
that
there
will
be
five
staff
on
site
per
shift
and
up
to
six
customer
visitor
chip
spread
over
working
day.
The
12
car
Parks
cases
are
therefore
considered
to
accommodate
the
say.
Specific
needs
of
the
proposal.
There'll
be
four
surface
vehicles
on
the
site
per
day.
Inadequate
profession
has
been
made
for
SCP
parking
with
with
war
hdv
parking
spaces
proposed.
V
The
parking
profession
is
therefore
considered
to
meet
Park
and
demand
at
pick
times
and
as
such
is
considered.
Acceptable
officers
in
consultation
with
DFI
roads
are
therefore
contented
to
propose
to
falmen
the
courts
with
spps
policies,
amp2
and
MP7
of
pps3,
Criterion
g
h
and
I
of
policy,
pet,
nine
pps4
and
the
parking
standards.
A
change
assessment
is
being
submitted
and
a
10
year,
energy
assessment.
V
The
company
authority
of
matters
for
this
water
research
infrastructure
were
consulted
and
know
that
they
could
not
support
the
proposal
as
their
capacity
issues
with
the
serial
Network
officers
have
been
a
phase
that
this
matters
likely
to
be
able
to
be
resolved.
But
in
order
to
proceed
to
a
determination
of
this
application,
officers
recommend
the
condition
be
attached
to
any
approval
requiring
resolution
of
this
prior
to
the
commencement
of
development
which
is
in
keeping
with
the
previous
PSE
decision.
V
The
impact
of
the
developmental
features
of
natural
and
build
Heritage
has
been
considered
and
officers
and
cons
in
consultation
with
the
competent
authorities
not
identified
any
concerns
regarding
impact
natural
build
Heritage,
subject
to
conditions.
19
solar
panels
were
proposed
on
the
southwestern
allocation
of
the
general
industrial
Factory
and
officers
raised
no
concerns
regarding
this
aspect
of
the
proposal
and
the
policy
professions
of
PPS
18.
V
members
should
face
that
no
objections
have
been
received
regarding
as
plan
application,
so
overall
officers
considered
the
proposal
to
comply
with
the
local
development
plan,
the
policy
requirements
of
the
spps
and
all
other
relevant
plan
policies,
and
all
that
basis
approval
is
recommended
for
the
reasons
outlined
in
the
report
and
subject
to
the
conditions
suggested
in
the
report
and
I'll.
Just
take
you
through
the
presentation
now.
V
Industrial
estate,
a
the
next
identical
scenario,
overview,
which
you'll
note,
is
immediately
adjacent
to
the
previous
Factory
that
was
considered,
and
it's
currently
on
developed
land
again.
The
next
day
then
shows
that
this
they
say
this
is
sorry,
that's
the
it's
pardon
me,
the
site,
location
plan,
I
outlined
in
red
and
then
the
next
slide
then
shows
it
up
the
sales
of
careless
Man
song
for
industry
within
the
Craig
Island
area
plan.
V
Next
slide
then
shows
the
state
layout
plan
and
Then,
followed
by
the
floor
plans,
and
then
we
have
the
proposed
allocations,
and
then
we
have
the
side
allocation,
so
you
can
see
in
the
context
of
other
buildings
within
the
industrial
estate.
This
is
in
keeping
with
the
scale
massing
of
those,
so
the
site
is
fairly
well
overgrown.
As
you
can
see
in
the
photographs,
you
can
just
see
in
the
rear
there,
the
radius
a
factory.
V
The
next
slide,
then,
is
just
a
few
of
the
sites
facing
in
north
northwest
towards
the
railway
lines.
Next
slide,
then,
first
and
South
East
towards
the
plazaar,
a
factory
next
slide
answers
across
the
site.
Frontage,
where
you
see
radius,
is
Factory
to
the
left
and
plus
wire
to
the
right,
and
it
was
not
a
photograph
just
across
the
frontage
where
the
access
will
come
into
the
site
and
then
finally,
we
have
a
just
a
photograph
of
the
access
road
being
used
to
serve
the
development.
Thank
you.
A
Many
thanks,
Kell
members
just
make
you
aware
we
have
an
attendance,
Mr,
Debbie
green
who's,
a
director
at
reduction,
Plastics
he's
here
to
answer
any
questions
or
clarify
any
of
your
questions.
A
O
E
Thank
you
chair
and
thank
you.
Kerry
for
the
presentation
that
was
fairly
comprehensive
presentation
seems
to
be
a
strong
application
for
continued
business
growth
and
and
the
Virgin
area
and
half
pennies
industrial
estate
and
it's
positive
to
say,
they're,
going
to
Laden
and
look
like
so
you
know
leisurenewable
companies,
and
so
it
seems
to
be
a
very
positive
application,
make
neural
requirements.
So
they
can.
You
know,
inclined
to
accept
the
recommendation
to
the
proof.
A
B
A
You
very
much
members
will
agreed
great.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much.
David
cheers
yeah
moving
back
to
appendix
name
application
number,
ls08
2022.
Oh
sorry,
2020,
zero.
Three,
six,
zero
f
answer:
approval
I'm,
going
to
bring
in
bushin
Hummel
pencil,
applying
officer
to
report
present
the
report
and
PowerPoint
presentation.
Counselor
mayor
who
died,
has
made
a
declaration
on
this
Adam,
so
we're
gonna
bring
in
cancer
diet.
A
P
P
The
application
site
was
once
occupied
by
The
Tavern
bar
and
is
located
at
the
air
packs
of
Bridge
Street
and
Carrick
blacker.
Road.
The
state
is
located
with
the
Korean
urban
area
just
outside
in
the
craigavon
area
plan
policy
here
to
U2
States
the
planet.
Permission
for
residential
development
will
be
granted
for
the
infilling
conversion,
Redevelopment
or
use
of
vacant
to
direct
or
underutilized
Lander
buildings
subject
to
a
number
of
criteria
on
balance,
officers
should
satisfied.
The
Proposal
meets
the
policy
test
of
Hotel.
Ut
are
sat
out
in
detail
in
the
report.
P
Officers
are
also
of
the
opinion
that
the
proposal
to
develop
the
site
for
residential
purposes
does
not
conflict
with
the
Craig
Avenue
area
plan,
the
Craig,
Aventine
Center
boundaries
and
Retail
designations
plan
or
the
spps.
Such
the
proposal
is
acceptable
in
principle,
security.
One
of
pps7
requires
new
residential
development
to
demonstrate
that
the
proposal
will
create
a
quality
and
sustainable
environment,
while
security
won't
identifies
nine
criteria
which
proposals
for
residential
development
is
expected
to
comply
with,
and
these
have
been
considered
in
detail
in
the
report
and
are
set
out
officers
over
the
opinion.
P
The
proposed
development
is
acceptable,
such
that
it
complies
with
the
spps
Paul
security,
one
of
pps7
it's
addendum
and
the
supplementary
planning
guidance
as
detailed
in
creating
places
the
application
site
lies
in
close
proximity
reported
on
Presbyterian
Church,
which
is
a
great
battery
list
of
building
and
officers
in
consultation
with
HED,
are
satisfied
that
the
proposed
development
complies
with
the
requirements
of
policy
bh11
of
pps6,
subject
to
the
inclusion
of
a
condition
no
car
park.
Spaces
have
been
made
available
for
the
proposed
apartment
development.
P
However,
it
has
been
confirmed
by
way
of
a
park
and
Survey,
but
on-street
park
and
car
parks
are
available.
Nearby
officers
have
given
way
to
the
location
of
the
development
on
the
edge
of
the
town
center
and
the
availability
of
one
street
Parkin
and,
in
this
instance,
are
satisfied
to
relax
the
requirements
of
the
parking
standards
I'll
set
it
above
and
I
water
have
recommended
this
application
be
refused.
They
have
advised
that
Whaler
is
available.
Capacity
at
the
wastewater
treatment
works.
P
There's
a
public
funds
here
within
20
meters
of
the
post-development
boundary,
which
cannot
adequately
service
these
proposals
as
a
receiving
further
distribution
at
reputation
capacity.
However,
officers
note
that
in
a
recent
appeal,
the
plan
appeals
commission
were
advised.
The
developer
may
have
to
undertake
a
Wastewater
impact
assessment
in
order
to
determine
what
works
would
be
required
to
enable
the
development
to
connect
the
Wastewater
infrastructure.
P
They
consider
that
the
imposition
of
a
negative
planning
condition
was
reasonable
and
necessary,
which
would
prohibit
commencement
of
any
development
on
the
submission
of
a
Wastewater
impact
assessment
to
confirm
that
either
sewage
connection
could
be
made
or
an
alternative
provision
for
disposal
of
sewage.
Accordingly,
in
line
with
the
approach
of
the
PSC
officers,
consider
the
imposition
of
a
negative
condition
is
necessary
and
would
address
the
concerns
raised
by
ni
water
on
balance.
Officers
consider
the
proposal
mates
the
policy
test
set
out
in
the
spps
and
all
other
relevant
planning
policies
subject
to
the
conditions.
P
And
the
red
or
the
I
read
I
wrote
notes
where
the
application
side
is
that's
just
at
the
junction
there
of
Bridge
Street
and
Carrick
blacker,
Road
and
put
it
down,
and
that's
just
an
aerial
view
of
the
site.
Just
to
give
you
an
idea
of
the
context,
that's
where
the
old
Tavern
bar
used
to
be
that
the
bar
was
demolished
a
number
of
years
ago.
So
it's
just
it's
it's
Stone,
Dairy
and
I,
and
that's
the
site
location
plan
with
the
application
site
and
light
and
red-
and
this
is
the
proposed
layout.
P
So
you
can
see
the
two
blocks
to
the
north
and
to
the
South
joined
by
glass.
Atrium,
and
these
are
the
proposed
elevations.
The
above
elevation
is
the
elevation
that
you
would
see
from
Bridge
Street,
so
you
can
see
it's
a
three-story
block
of
Apartments
proposed
and
with
a
single
story
and
a
join
a
bit
with
the
Terrace
On
Top
and
the
bottom
elevation
is
the
elevation.
You
would
see
as
you're
coming
out
of
the
Town
Center
towards
the
junction
of
character,
Road
and
Bridge
Street
and
the
top
elevation.
P
There
is
the
elevation
project
on
two
carat
blacker,
Road
and
then
at
the
bottom
is
just
a
section
through
the
proposed
Apartments,
and
these
have
your
proposed
ground
and
first
floor
plan.
So
you
can
say
yes
with
a
block
Apartments
to
the
north
and
to
the
South
fronting
onto
Bridge,
Street
on
front
and
onto
caricbaker
Road
and
that's
the
second
floor
plans
of
the
apartments.
P
So
these
are
some
photographs
of
the
site,
as
you
can
see,
and
the
arrow
shows
in
the
direction
that
the
photograph
was
taken.
So
that's
just
looking
into
the
site
from
just
at
the
edge
of
character
Road
there
and
that's
just
another
view
further
back
as
you
would
come
out
of
the
Town
Center
towards
up
driving
up
character,
Road-
and
this
is
another
view
just
more
looking
up
the
Bridge
Street
direction.
Again,
you
can
see
that
site
and
you
can
see
that
they
have
the
rear
applications
in
the
rear
of
the
application
side.
P
P
I,
don't
know
if
you
can
see
it
very
clearly,
but
that's
a
photograph
of
what
the
Old
Tavern
bar
looked
like
when
it
was
there
as
I
say
it's
10
demolished
a
number
of
years
ago
and
again
they
are
just
contextual
elevations
of
the
street
provided
by
the
agent
just
to
give
you
an
idea
of
how
the
development
would
look
from
Carrick
black
abroad
and
Bridge
Street.
A
O
Yes,
thank
you
chair.
No,
it's
a
very,
very
busy
part
of
the
town.
You
know
just
let
me
know
of
sort
of
like
a
traffic
report
and
you
know
the
mitigate
any
disruption,
the
new
road
closures,
none
of
that
sort
of
thing
during
the
construction
of
if
it
gets,
grew.
P
Thank
you,
chair,
no,
there's
nothing
being
submitted
as
part
of
the
application
and
for
whether
or
not
there'll
be
real
closures
or
anything
during
the
course
of
the
the
development
there's.
No
access
proposed
as
part
of
this,
because
there's
no
parking
in
cartilage
parking,
rather
than
proposed
as
part
of
the
development,
so
all
of
the
park
and
other
proposes
on
straight
but
and
so
they've.
Given
us,
Parkin
surveys
and
DFI
routes
are
happy
with
the
the
information
that's
been
submitted.
But
no,
we
haven't
got
anything
in
terms
of
what
happens
during
construction.
A
A
Second
pay
cancer
hockey.
Thank
you
very
much
members.
We
all
agreed,
oh
great,
thank
you.
Mifon
to
appendix
11.,
hey
leader,
a
Play
application
number
la
zero,
eight,
twenty
twenty
three
two
one,
five,
two
F:
that's
an
approval
for
the
education
Authority,
going
to
bring
in
Russian
Hamill,
Princeton
planning
officer
to
present
report
and
PowerPoint
presentation.
Rushing.
B
P
Application
seeks
full
planner
permission
for
the
replacement
of
an
existing
modular
building
with
a
new
single
story:
modular,
educational
building
and
security.
Fencing
and
Associated
site
works
at
listenali
special
Steel
in
Arma.
The
application
seeks
to
replace
an
existing
classroom
that
is
not
fit
for
purpose.
It
has
been
rented
and
does
not
provide
the
level
and
type
of
accommodation
that
is
required
by
the
school.
P
The
Proposal
is
located
within
the
settlement
limit
of
Arma
and
it
was
within
the
grounds
of
the
existing
School
complex.
The
design
and
setting
of
the
classroom
respects
the
current
buildings
of
the
school
and
there'll
be
no
increase
in
people
numbers
and,
as
such,
there's
no
requirement
for
additional
care.
Parking
officers
are
therefore
content.
The
Proposal
is
acceptable
in
principle,
however,
the
site
is
located
within
a
reservoir
flood
inundation
area.
P
This
proposal
seeks
to
replace
an
existing
modular
classroom.
A
flood
evacuation
and
management
plan
has
been
provided
by
the
applicant
and
officers.
Consider
that
the
material
considerations
outweigh
the
fact
that
proposals
counter
to
fld5
and
therefore
recommend
that
members
growth
plan
permission
subject
to
the
condition
set
out
in
the
report
and
again
I'll.
Just
take
you
through
the
slides.
P
P
This
just
gives
you
an
idea
of
what
the
existing
modular
Building
looks
like.
Obviously,
the
argument
has
been
made
that
is
not
fit
for
purpose
and
what
they're
proposing
to
replace
it
with
is
slightly
bigger,
they're,
proposing
to
take
away
all
the
the
close
board
effects
in
there
and
replace
it
with
2.4
meter,
height,
halogen,
pencils
and
again,
that's
another
view
of
the
site,
just
from
Logan
from
the
frontage
from
the
car
park
and
again
more
photographs
just
of
the
modular
building
to
be
replaced
and
I.
P
Don't
know
if
you
can
see
it
in
photographs
there,
but
it
is
parts
of
it
are
surrounded
by
security,
fencing
as
well
temporary
security
fans,
and
so
that's
all
to
be
replaced
with
proper
palette
and
pencil
and
just
another
photograph
of
the
site
from
the
camera
Park
and
another
photograph
of
where
the
mobile
is.
It's
been
replaced,
and
these
are
the
proposed
elevations
of
the
mobile
and
that
it
will
be
replaced
with
members
may
recall
we
have
had
a
couple
of
applications
here
before
for
mobile
modular
units.
P
This
is
very
similar
to
the
modular
units
that
are
there
and
it's
just
a
floor
plan
of
the
modular
unit
and
that's
a
bit
of
detail
of
the
proposed
fencing
and
then
that's
just
the
area
shown
in
the
area.
Blue
is
a
footprint
of
the
new
building
and
it
sits
perpendicular
to
the
one
that's
already
on
the
site
that
it
will
replace
and
that's
the
end
of
the
presentation.
Thank
you.
Members.
C
No
I
was
in
my
mind
about
deliberating
on
something
quite
similar
to
this,
going
back,
so
you've
confirmed
that
and
supposedly
not
be
assisting
in
Lane
with
that
I.
Remember
the
the
water-
and
you
know
this
lovely
and
being
on
this
year
that
stage
and
content
enough
with
the
mitigations
around
that.
O
Yes,
Frankie
chair
on
I
do
remember
new
stuff
from
lisinelli
school
common
planning
before
and
was
pointed
out
at
the
time
that
was
new
hockey
pitch
and
all
this
corn
planting
into
the
same
area,
no
objections
from
anybody
down
about
any
of
that
there
so
I,
don't
see
what
promise
and
what's
I,
think
it's
four
or
five
minutes
away
the
Dom
they're
talking
about.
So
it's
not
exactly
on
this
doorstep.
A
Any
other
questions
or
comments,
nope,
okay,
neither
so
members
can
I
get
a
decision.
Can
I
get
a
proposal
proposed
by
Alderman
Wilson
on
second
Bay
canister
can
meetry
all
agreed
great.
Thank
you
very
much
members,
okay,
I'll,
say
CP
to
please
stop
the
live,
feed,
remember
CF,
home,
and
thank
you
very
much.
All
the
officers
and
everybody
he
took
came.
They.