►
From YouTube: Community Meeting (July 11th 2023)
Description
D
A
A
A
A
B
A
A
So
we
are
actually
we've
reached
the
first
evaluation
period
for
a
good
sum
of
code.
And
yes,
so,
if
you
are
currently,
you
know
participating
accessing
API
for
Google
sum
of
code.
Yes,
you
should
be.
You
should
be
expecting
your
first
evaluation
I
think,
probably
next
week,
because
I
think
the
application
for
evaluation
upon
yesterday
June
10th.
A
Yes,
so
you
should
be
expecting
your
review
latest
next
week.
I
I,
don't
know,
maybe
that
depends
on
when
Google
send
it,
but
I
know
latest
next
week.
So
that
is
the
update.
I
have
concerning
Google
sum
of
code,
and
the
next
thing
I
want
to
like
share
update
on
is
the
SNK
mentorship
program?
Hey
Maya,
yes,
so,
like
you've,
all
seen
in
this
slack
Channel
mentorship
program,
okay
by
mentorship
program,
candidates,
selected
candidates
have
been
announced
right
and
we
had
a
total
of
like
10
selected
candidates,
which
is
really
interesting.
A
A
Please
do
not
get
discouraged,
so
it
was
a
really
difficult
decisions
for
the
mentors
to
like
make,
because
honestly,
most
of
the
proposals
are
received
were
outstanding,
like
they
were
all
last
standing
proposals,
so
it
was
a
really
really
tight
decisions
and
I
believe
the
mentors
made
the
right
decisions
for
whoever
they
selected
as
a
candidate.
So
please
do
not
take
this
too
hard.
A
Do
not
let
this
discourage
you
do
not
let
this
stop
you
from
contributing
to
using
kpi
and
do
not
let
this
you
know,
stop
you
from
applying
for
the
next,
which
is
next
year
or
for
any
of
using
kpi
metro
station
program
that
you
that
will
have
next
year.
So
it
was
a.
It
was
a
very,
very
tight
decision
and,
as
a
matter
of
fact,
we
received
over
90
plus
proposals
from
potential
contributors.
A
You
can
see
how
how
about
that
is
right,
so
you
can
also
like
put
it
into
perspective,
to
see
how
hard
it
would
be
for
these
mentors
like
select
this
candidate.
So
you
didn't,
you
didn't
get
rejected
because
you
were
not
good
enough.
I
think
you
got.
The
rejection
was
based
on
who
the
C
was
the
best
candidate
for
the
project.
A
A
Yeah,
so
we
received
the
comments
here
on
from
Kumar
that
joined
live
wow,
it's
saying,
better
participation
than
past
programs.
Yes,
exactly
we
received
18
like
which
is
really
interesting,
right
and
I.
Think
the
trajectory
is
actually
something
I
find
really
am
using,
because,
unlike
last
year
last
year,
we
didn't
receive
like
enough,
like
we
received
like
quite
number
of
proposals
from
potential
contributors
or
potential
mentees,
but
I
think
this
year.
A
I
think
if
we
didn't
double
the
number,
maybe
we
definitely
like
tripled
the
number
which
is
really
interesting
and
also
last
year
we
had
I
think
19
projects,
ideas
that
was
proposed,
and
this
year
we
have
29
project
ideas
that
were
like
proposed.
That
was
like
10
project
ideas,
different,
which
is
interesting.
You
can
say,
like
the
numbers,
just
keep
increasing
and
I'm
like
there's
some
something
I
also
like
really
wish
is
and
I
can
see.
A
It
would
eventually
happen
is
the
way
things
are
going
we
might
have
to
like,
you
know,
have
more
slots
than
we
already
have
and
like
more
slow
than
we
did
last
year
in
our
next
course.
Hopefully
we
get
enough
fund
to,
like
you
know,
keep
increasing
this
slot
to
get
small
contributions
into
the
program.
A
So
we
have
a
question
on
YouTube:
when
does
the
application
day
start
next
year?
So
I
can't
really
say
this
specific
date.
It
might
be
earlier
next
year.
It
might
be
it's
during
the
summer
time
next
year,
but
this
would
definitely
be
communicated
on
the
slack
on
slack
and
also
in
GitHub
discussions.
C
A
So
we
clearly
stated
in
the
rules
as
if
you
are
already
participating
in
a
paid
OSS
program.
You
should
refrain
from
applying
to
the
same
Department
mentorship
program,
but
unfortunately,
someone
actually
went
ahead
and
applied
which
actually
caused
some
some
issues
that
you
know.
You
know
that
I
think
someone
I
can
reached
out
to
me.
That's
rules
are
meant
to
be
broken,
which
I
finally
I
was
just
laughing
I'm
like
no.
We
we
didn't
put
these
rules
out
there,
just
for
them
to
be
broken,
so
just
be.
A
I
actually
are
like
trying
to
like
clear
this
or
usually
here
so
I'm,
going
to
start
by
stating
this
particular
candidates
that
applied
to
the
to
the
mentorship
program,
despite
participating
in
other
open
source
paid,
internship
or
mentorship,
actually
preached
out
to
the
mentor
before
applying
right.
So
he
reached
out
to
the
mentor
before
applying
and
said
to
the
mentor
specifically
that
he
already
is
participating
in,
because
some
of
code
right
and
the
mentor
said
fine.
That
is
fine
by
me
right.
A
So,
since
he
is
fine
by
the
mentor,
the
mentor
told
him
to
go
ahead
and
submit
his
application
right
and
the
only
reason
I
feel
or
the
only
reason,
I
felt
he
got
selected
for
the
project
was.
It
was
the
only
candidate
that
submits
a
proposal
to
the
project
like
overall
for
the
project.
It
was
the
only
candidate
that
submits
a
proposal
for
the
project
which,
according
to
what
I
believe,
is.
If,
if
we
received
more
proposals
for
the
project,
then
I
believed
it
won't,
it
won't
be
selected
right.
A
C
Yes,
like
we,
as
mentioned
that
we
laid
the
rules,
it's
not
like,
we
made
the
rules
to
be
broken,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day,
it's
the
mentor's
decision
to
pick
the
candidate
and
make
the
rules
according
to
the
project.
So
in
as
much
as
you
say,
Sni
these
are
the
rules.
This
is
what
we
want.
At
the
end
of
the
day,
the
mentor
is
the
one
who
overrues,
because
at
the
end
of
the
day,
it's
their
time
is
their
project.
They
are
the
ones
mentoring,
so
we
don't
have.
C
A
Yeah,
so
you
exactly
what
Tully
said
right,
we
actually
have
the
rules,
but
we
really
don't
have
this
final
say,
because
the
major
is
the
one
at
the
end
of
the
day,
that
will
you
know
that
would
be
responsible
right,
because
if
the
candidates
turned
out
to
like
drop
out
of
the
program
or
wasn't
giving
he
or
his
or
her
full
attention
to
the
projects,
I
think
the
the
candidate.
The
mentor
is
to
be
blamed
right
yeah.
A
So
that
is
just
to
like
clear
things
out
concerning
the
issue
and
so,
like
the
person
actually
said
he
he
wanted
this
thing
not
to
be
in
public,
but
I
think
Artisan
kpi
with
those
things
we
are
very
transparent
with
everything
that
is
happening
with
the
community,
and
that
is
why
we
choose-
or
we
chose
to
address
this
issue
publicly
and
the
next
thing
I
want
to
discuss.
I
want
us
to
like
have
a
discussion
on
on
about
this
particular
issue.
A
A
Instead
of
sharing
the
comments
here,
but
since
you
already
shared
I'm
going
to
like
read
it
out
for
you,
but
it's
okay
to
share,
if
you
don't,
if
you're,
not
comfortable,
you
know
talking
so
Kumar
shared
life.
Dutch
should
should
strive
for
fair
treatment
for
everyone.
Okay,
but
if
the
maintenance
is
approving
this,
then
we
should
respect
that
exactly
what
happened
right
so
initially
I
think
Tulia
can
testify.
We
are
actually
planning
to.
A
You
know
kick
these
particular
candidates
out
of
the
program,
but
since
it
is
also
fair
to
look
at
it
that
he
actually,
the
mentor
can
also
testify
that
he
told
him
to
apply
despite
knowing
that
he
is
already
participating
in
a
paid
internship.
So
we
also
have
to
respect
the
mental
decision,
which
is
why
we
have
to
like
go
ahead
with
these
mental
decisions.
A
A
Yep,
so
we
are
also
part
of
the
Google
Assistant
of
dogs
and
also,
if
you
have
any,
if
you
find
any
mentorship
program
out
there,
that
you
think
would
be
an
interest
of
us
definitely
reach
out
to
us
who
definitely
loves
to
apply.
You
know,
look
for
ways
to
bring
more
contributors
into
the
project,
so
the
next
thing
I
want
to
discuss
is
actually
this
particular
rules
right.
A
So
I.
Actually
someone
reached
out
to
me
also
and
told
me:
yes,
so
here
I
have
this
rules
that
says
if
you
are
participating
in
other
paid
open
source
mentorship
program,
you
should
refrain
from
applying
for
the
mentorship
program
and,
like
you
said,
but
there
are
folks
in
the
community
that
had
already
participated
in
this
mentorship
program
and
they
already
have
a
full-time
internship
which
accomplished
somewhere
right.
That's
how
did
how
does
that
like
differentiate
them
right
and
I'm?
A
Like
honestly,
I
don't
really
have
like
the
full
answer
to
that
question,
because
initially,
when
my
whole
opinion
or
my
own
answer
to
that
question
was
when
we
said
paid
open
source
projects,
we
are
only
referring
to
this
open
source
project
because
based
on
experience
right
ahead
of
candidates
like
apply,
don't
let
me
like
say
a
lot
of
candidates.
A
lot
of
syncopic
contributors
apply
for
for
programs
like
Google
sum
of
code
Google
system
of
docs
and
at
the
end
of
the
day
they
get
rejected
right
and
I
feel
they
think
about.
A
Mentorship
program
should
be
able
to
like
give
them
one
last
dance
right.
So
if
they
get
rejected
from
participating,
Google
summer
of
code
or
participating
in
Google
system
of
docs,
then
I
think
they
should.
This
Escape
by
a
message
program
should
still
give
them
one.
Last
chance
you
know
to
contribute
to
a
Sync
API
while
getting
paid
right.
So
imagine
we
have
two
candidates
right.
A
So
a
particular
candidate
already
got
accepted
for
good
sum
of
code
and
the
other
candidates
got
rejected
with
some
of
code
right
and
these
two
candidates
also
applied
for
a
single
pen
mentorship
program.
So,
honestly,
who
do
you
think
you
are
going
to
accept
right
just
to
make
it
fair?
You
will
definitely
choose
this
particular
candidate
that
got
rejected
for
some
of
code
to
participate
in
the
Essential
by
mentorship
program,
so
instead
of
giving
this
other
candidates
that
got
accepted
in
Google,
some
of
course
also
like
participates
in
the
thinking
about
mentorship
program.
A
That
doesn't
really
look
fair
to
me,
and
that
is
why
I
feel
we
have
one
of
the
reasons
why
we
have
this
particular
rule.
So
we
didn't
actually
say:
okay,
if
you
are,
if
you
are
entering
somewhere
in
a
particular
company,
so
the
rule
isn't
just
about
you
know:
internet
somewhere,
the
rule
was
specifically
stated
for
other
open
source
paid
mentorship
program.
So
now
I
was
thinking.
Maybe
we
have
to
update
the
rules
or
something
today,
because
this
this
rule
is
causing
a
lot
of
confusion
in
the
community.
C
Basically,
what
the
whole
vision
is
is
that
we
are
trying
to
like
bring
more
people
into
Open
Source
by
giving
them
mentorship
opportunities
like
in
contributing
to
open
source.
So
when
we
say
that
if
you
are
currently
participating
in
a
paid
open
source
project,
you
shouldn't
apply
it
async,
API
mentorship
program,
so,
for
instance,
right
truly
is
probably
got
accepted,
a
postman,
for
instance,
as
a
Google
sum
of
code
minty
right,
then
I
come
and
apply
for
the
async
API
mentorship
program.
These
these
mentorship
programs
are
in
the
same
category
right.
C
So
it
doesn't
look
fair
for
me
to
participate
in
Google
sum
of
code
in
the
async
API
mentorship.
That
and
also
there
are
rules
like
import
programs
that
you
shouldn't
be
participating
in
two
open
source
project
project
programs.
At
the
same
time,
one
day
is
time,
commitment
and
also
it
is
not
fair
right.
Then,
if
there
is
somebody
who
is
intending
outside
of
the
open
source
industry-
and
they
are
interested
like
in
open
source
pay
program,
then
I
think
it
is
a
different
case,
but.
A
C
Like
yeah,
but
also
the
mentors
when
they
interview
or
they
put
proposal,
are
they
there
are
certain
rules
that
they
specify,
for
instance,
I've
seen
like
for
Google
some
of
dogs
I've
seen
that
if
you
are
currently
doing
other
internships,
you
are
not
eligible
because
of
time
called
meat
pins.
So
those
are
other
things
that
you
need
to
be
transparent:
okay,
I'm,
currently
working.
Unless,
if
you
are
transparent,
like
the
other
intent,
then
it's
up
to
the
mentor
like
we
said
we
can
make
the
rules.
C
But
if
the
mentor
is
okay
with
it,
then
there's
nothing
that
we
can
do
it's
up
to
the
mentor.
At
the
end
of
the
day,
they
do
make
the
final
decision
so
I
think
that
is
what
I
can
say
and
also,
if
somebody
puts
out
a
group
proposals
and
has
the
time
then
definitely
if
I'm,
a
mentor
I'd
rather
take
someone
who
has
a
good
proposal
than
you
know.
You
get
what
I'm
trying
to
say,
yeah.
A
A
B
C
A
Okay,
okay,
Kumar
already
shared
what
is
thanks.
He
said
it
comes
down
to
time,
commitment,
I,
think
in
internship
plus
mentorship
cases,
yeah
time
commencement
just
like
what's
totally
said
yeah
so
I
think
it's
it
makes
sense.
So
we
just
have
to
like
agree
to
the
fact
that
the
mentors
still
have
the
final
decision,
so
the
rules
is
just
like
a
base
to
the
mentorship
program.
A
So
it's
just
like
saying
if
you
know
you're
participating
in
order
paid
open
source
programs
refrain
for
applying,
so
that
you
can
give
other
folks
that
are
not
participating
in
any
of
this
program,
a
chance
to
also
be
involved
in
paid
openness,
mentorships
or
internships.
So
this
rule
isn't
really
about
the
internship.
A
Maybe
you
have
a
full-time
internship
with
some
company.
It's
not
really
about
that.
This
rule
is
specifically
for
open
source,
not
really
anything
about
full-time
internships
and
insurance.
That
candidate
has
it's
just
about
open
source
internship,
open
source,
mentorships,
so
so
commercial.
We
should
have
a
discussion
regarding
this
with
the
maintainers.
A
The
the
last
thing
I
have
on
my
agenda
is
actually
about
the
Singapore
conference
right.
So,
firstly,
I've
been
getting
a
lot
of
questions
about
interested
candidate
like
interested
contributors
willing
to
was
got
willing
to
attend
this
conference,
but
they'll
leave
far
away
from
the
conversations
and
I've
been
hacked
truly
so
I
said,
I
would
pass
this
question
to
you.
A
A
So
let's
say
I'm
interested
in
the
conference
right
and
I'm,
based
in
Lagos,
Nigeria
and
I'm,
trying
to
attend
one
of
these
conferences,
like
let's
say
the
one
happening
at
IBM
like
in
London,
so
do
I
just
fly
to
London
and
you'll,
say
and
just
come
to
IBM
or
they
would
be
an
application.
I
have
to
feel
to
indicate
that
I'm,
interested
or
I
want
to
visit
London
conference.
C
A
B
And
stuff,
but
but
the
point
is
we
will
need
to
have
names
of
who's
coming
before
the
day.
People
won't
just
be
able
to
sort
of
turn
up
at
the
door
just
because,
like
with
any
big
company,
you
know
we've
got
security.
There's
going
to
be,
you
know,
there's
going
to
be
a
pass
ready
for
everyone
who
attends
and-
and
we
won't
be
able
to
do
that,
it
just
has
people
appear
so
so
yeah
I
I,
think
the
plan
was
to
use
sessionize.
B
C
C
A
C
Okay,
so
from
the
last
time
we
discussed
this,
we
only
currently
we
like
sponsoring
tickets
to
speakers.
So
if
you're
speaking,
then
they
your
ticket
is
covered.
It's
a
speaker
then
okay
support.
Yes,
then,
for
support,
which
means
you
have
to
be
either
a
TSA
member
or
in
a
Sync
API
Ambassador.
Those
are
the
people
who
come
like
at
the
priority.
C
A
D
C
C
D
A
C
A
A
C
Okay,
so
in
terms
of
flight
tickets,
that's
where
I
say:
if
you
are
a
speaker
and
you
like
to
speak
and
you
need
like
financial
assistance,
then
on
the
additional,
where
there
is
the
speakers
from
where
you
would
submit
all
your
details,
there's
an
additional
form
there.
You
can
just
specify
okay
I
will
need
assistance
in
traveling.
Then
after
the
call
for
speakers,
and
then
we
will
let
you
know
and
discuss
further
how
we
can
help.
Is
the
initiative
yeah.
C
A
C
C
C
If
we
have
something
some
tools
or
tricks,
or
maybe
we
have
design
methods
of
doing
different
things,
you're
welcome
to
submit
a
talk.
We
really
really
encourage
even
first
time
speakers
to
really
submit
their
talks
as
well
and
cover
speakers
of
clause
on
the
28th
of
July
so
make
sure
to
start
Drafting,
and
if
you
need
any
help
in
drafting
a
proposal,
please
do
reach
out
to
me
on
slack
I'll,
be
happy
to
help.
A
C
A
C
A
A
C
C
A
A
A
C
We
only
received
a
few
votes.
A
few
nominations,
so
please,
please,
everybody,
let's
jump
in
this
is
very
important,
especially
is
is
for
our
community
health,
it's
for
us
in
KPS,
Community
Health.
So
we
need
everybody
to
participate
and
vote
and
nominate
people,
you
think,
will
be
the
best
fit
to
handle
the
court
of
conduct.
So
please
make
sure
you
drop
anybody
that
you
think
will
be
the
best
way
to
be
part
of
our
first
court
of
conduct
committee.
Please
just
drop
a
nomination
who
really
really
appreciate
it.
D
A
Okay
share
the
link
on
YouTube
feel
free
to
participate
to
nominate
Fox.
Whatever
you
find
interesting
to
be
part
of
this
team,
I'll
be
free
to
dominate
and
also
votes.
Your
votes
are
highly
necessary,
so
I
think
that
should
be
everything
yeah
today
and
I.
Don't
I
think
Maya
has
something
for
us.
I
think
that
was
one
of
the
reasons
she
joined
life
but
I,
don't
think
she's.
There.
C
A
Yeah
definitely
I
also
saw
the
search
the
influence
in
design
of
genetic
community,
and
yes,
we
don't.
We
don't
need
design
help
and
honestly
I
wasn't
I
was
quite
sad
when
I
found
out,
like
just
one
designer,
submitted
a
proposal
for
the
mentorship
program
and
yeah,
so
I'm
really
glad
tennis
are
changing
and
yeah
I
really
hope
Maya.
You
have
a
way
for
us
to
like
keep
these
designers
engaged
and
not
leave,
because,
honestly,
they
are
the
hardest
folks
to
like
retain
in
open
source
projects.
C
D
A
Oh
two
questions,
so
let
me
address.
Let
me
answer
Kumar.
First,
oh,
yes,
what
is
the
next
contribution
meeting?
No,
no,
not
community,
meeting
okay
contribution
meeting
so
what's
Kumar
is
actually
asking.
Is
I
love
all
staying
these
meetings,
where
I
am
bored
new
contributors
to
contribute
to
smkpi?
So
what
we
basically
do
at
this
meeting
is
we
pick
up
an
issue?
We
fix
it
together
and
we
try
to
like
get
it
made
as
soon
as
possible.
So
this
way
we
can
encourage
contributors.
That's
it's
in
Quebec!
A
Community
is
welcoming
and
help
them
reduce.
You
know
this
stress
level
of
being
a
first-time
open
source
contributor,
so
the
next
contribution
meeting
will
be
happening
on
Thursday
13
UTC
just
like
last
week,
so
the
spoiler
alerts.
These
meetings
are
not
recorded
because,
initially,
when
I
started
doing
it
I
always
want
to
record
it.
But
what
I
noticed
is
when
I
tell
folks
that
this
meeting
is
going
to
be
recorded.
A
A
Oh
yes,
we
are
also
the
plan
was
we
are
we
we
are
supposed
to
start
last
week,
but
we've
decided
to
like
move
it
for
this
switch,
because
we
we
we
had
a
new
contributor,
but
that
has
project
management,
skill,
so
she's
a
new
contributor
and
she
I
think
this
is
our
first
time
contributing
to
open
source
project.
But
she
is
a
project
manager
and
she's
looking
for
ways
where
she
can
use
a
skill
to
help
open
source,
how
to
help
contribute
to
open
source
projects
and
yeah.
A
So
we've
decided
to
collaborate
with
her,
so
you
know
so
I
didn't
bother
just
today
earlier
today,
so
she
would
be
responsible
in
you
know.
Creating
these
issues
creating
an
epic
road
map,
I
think
she's,
currently
reviewing
Maya's
design,
so
she's
responsible,
so
I'll
be
working
alongside
her
to
make
this
implementation
part
interesting,
so
that
other
countries
details
that
are
struggling
or
looking
for
issues
will
be
able
to,
like
you
know,
contribute
to
this
project
and
also
a
way
for
her
to
also
contribute
to
the
projects.
D
A
A
So
we
have
a
question
from
vision
of
YouTube.
Is
it's
thinking
about
mentorship
program
paid?
Yes,
the
Instagram
attention
program
is
paid,
so
they
get
a
total
sum
of
one
thousand
five
hundred
dollars,
just
like
in
Google
server
of
code
to
participate
in
the
SQL
mentorship
program,
and
this
payment
is
made
twice
so
the
first
payment
I
think,
which
is
half
of
it,
would
be
paid
immediately.
You
pass
the
first
evaluation
period.
The
second
payments
will
be
paid
after
you
pass
the
second
evaluation
period.