►
From YouTube: Beacon Planning Board 6-14-22
Description
June 14, 2022 7:00 PM
Planning Board Agenda
Regular Meeting
1. Continue Public Hearing for SEQRA Environmental Review on applications for Subdivision
and Site Plan Approval, AND open Public Hearing on applications for Subdivision and Site
Plan Approval, "Beacon Views Townhouses" 37 units, Conklin Street, submitted by Beacon
Views, LLC
2. Continue Public Hearing for SEQRA Environmental Review on applications for Site Plan
Approval, Special Use Permit, and Subdivision (lot merger) Approval, Multi-Family Residential
(62 units), 16 West Main Street, submitted by Farrell Building Company
3. Public Hearing on application for Special Use Permit and Site Plan Approval, accessory
apartment, 18 North Walnut Street, submitted by Brian Donnelly and Scott Ramsey
4. Public Hearing on application for Special Use Permit and Site Plan Approval, indoor and
outdoor event space, 4 Hanna Lane, submitted by Jason Hughes
5. Public Hearing on application for Special Use Permit and Site Plan Approval, hotel and event
space, 1113 Wolcott Avenue, submitted by Prophecy Theater, LLC
6. Continue review of application for Subdivision Approval, 2-lot residential, 46 Judson Street,
submitted by 46 Judson LLC
7. Continue review of application for Special Use Permit and Site Plan Approval, Mirbeau Inn and
Spa at Howland Estate, 7 Craig House Lane, submitted by the Mirbeau Companies
8. Review application for Site Plan Approval, small cell wireless facility on an existing light pole
and one antenna, 2 Red Flynn Drive, submitted by Verizon Wireless of the East, LP (dba Verizon Wireless)
9. Review application for Subdivision Approval, 2-lot residential, 67 Grove Street, submitted by Dawn Brill
1. Zoning Board of Appeals - June meeting
2. Consider request for one 90-day extension of Site Plan and Certificate of Appropriateness
Approval, 416-420 Main Street, submitted by 420 Main St. LLC
3. Consider request for one 90-day extension of Amended Site Plan and Preliminary and Final
Subdivision Approval, Ferry Landing, submitted by Ferry Landing at Beacon, Ltd.
4. Consider request for one 90-day extension of Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plat Approval,
52 Dennings Avenue, submitted by Angela Ingham.
1. Certificate of Appropriateness - 145 Main Street; Signage
2. Certificate of Appropriateness - 149 Main Street; Change façade color
B
Okay,
we're
going
to
start
our
workshop
portion
of
the
evening
here
at
five
minutes
after
the
hour
and
we're
going
to
go
until
about
20
minutes
and
then
start
our
regular
meeting,
we're
going
to
make
a
slight
shift
in
our
agenda
and
move
an
application
for
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
up
to
7
20,
where
they're
about
and
then
we'll
move
into
our
regular
agenda.
So
with
that,
I
think
john
you
had
some
information
on
the
dutchess
county.
Housing
needs
assessment
that
you
thought
you'd
share
with
the
group
here.
C
Yes,
when
we
talked
last
time
about
the
sort
of
things
we
should
be
looking
at
in
a
workshop,
this
came
up,
affordable
housing
seems
to
be
the
hottest
topic
around
beacon
and,
and
it
happens
that
the
dutchess
county
updated
their
housing
needs
assessment
just
earlier
this
year,
and
so,
if
you
haven't
seen
the
presentation,
this
is
their
official
presentation.
I
didn't
make
this
up.
I
stole
it
off
the
internet,.
E
C
C
C
If
you
look
at
the
chart,
it's
been
going
up
and
up
and
up
and
all
sudden
in
the
last
10
years
it
plateaued
and
they
expect
that
to
continue
to
slow
down,
and
the
reason
is,
if
you
look
at
the
right
side,
is
that
even
though
the
number
of
households
and
have
been
going
up
and
up
and
up
the
population
per
household
has
been
going
down
and
down
pretty
precipitously
in
beacon,
it's
gone
down:
12
12
13.
In
the
last
20
years,
the
number
of
people
per
household.
C
We
have
a
lot
more
single
family
couples,
households
without
children,
so
we
have
elderly
population.
So
we
have
a
lot
of
houses
that
are
relatively
empty
compared
to
what
they
were
20
30
40
years
ago,
and
so
even
though
we
have
more
and
more
houses
being
built
and
apartments
being
built,
they're
being
populated
by
much
fewer
people.
C
The
other
thing
is
that
we're
seeing
an
aging
of
the
population
that's
another
function
of
how
the
household
size
has
been
going
down,
because
we
have
a
lot
of
elderly
households.
Obviously
without
children
and
a
lot
of
times,
people
are
hanging
on
to
their
houses
longer
than
they
used
to,
and
so
we're
having
a
lot
of
single-family
houses
in
particular
that
have
few
people
in
them
and
mostly
elderly
people.
C
C
C
Yeah,
I
know
that
I
don't
think
their
graphics
were
particularly
good,
but
you
know
they're.
They
were
easy
to
show.
If
you
look
on
the
right,
the
median
age
of
dutchess
county
has
gone
up
and
up
and
up
of
our
42
years-
and
you
know
nationally,
it's
it's
high,
comparatively
speaking
to
other
communities.
F
C
B
C
C
C
The
supply
of
housing
is
still
dominated,
this
is
dutch's
county,
remember,
not
beacon
is
still
dominated
by
single-family
homes,
and
so,
if
you
look
at
the
trends
from
2000
to
2019,
they're,
essentially
static
people
are
still
up
in
this
area
buying
and
building
single-family
homes.
Now
you
do
see
in
terms
of
new
construction,
a
larger
percentage
are
larger
apartment
buildings
than
there
used
to
be,
but
overall,
it's
still
pretty
much.
70
percent
of
the
new
construction
units
are
our
single
family
houses,
again
not
in
beacon,
but
in
county-wide.
C
C
C
And
so,
if
you
look
at
the
right,
you
can
see
in
2000
the
median
affordable
rent
could
pay
the
medium
gross
rent.
You
know
that
somebody
could
pay
for
what's
out
there
on
average
and
that's
been
declining
ever
since
rent's
going
up
incomes,
don't
match
it,
and
so
people's
real
buying
power,
in
terms
of
particularly
the
rental
market,
has
been
declining,
sounds
like
a
problem.
B
C
Reliable,
reliable
yeah,
they
have
a
bigger
margin
for
area
error,
and
so
you
can't
always
rely
on
the
19
estimates
so
and
we
haven't
got
the
full
census.
Numbers
from
2020
to
come
in.
We've
got
certain
basic
categories,
but
not
all
the
detailed
stuff
that
would
allow
you
to
update
this
analysis.
I'm
surprised
they
did
this
analysis
and
didn't
wait
for
the
2020
census,
but.
D
F
H
F
C
So
if
you
look
at
cost
burdens
for
renters
in
particular,
and
that's
based
on
30
of
your
budget
should
be
able
to
go
for
housing
and
if
it's
higher
than
that
30
threshold,
then
therefore
you're
considered
cost
burdened.
It
starts
eating
into
your
food
budget
and
your
transportation
budget
and
other
things.
C
So
if
you
look
at
the
renters
asked,
obviously,
especially
at
the
lowest
income
brackets,
70
80
90
of
people
are
cost
burdened
at
that
income
level
and
it's
getting
worse
from
2000
to
2019
the
numbers.
The
number
of
the
percentage
of
cost
burden
people
with
the
lower
income
brackets
is
going
up
and
up
so
to.
D
C
This
says:
there's
a
serious
problem
here:
there's
a
real
mismatch
between
availability
of
housing,
particularly
for
families
who
are
earning
less
than
75
000
or
fifty.
Certainly,
fifty
thousand
dollars
there's
just
not
anything
out
there
that
you
can
afford
and
so
therefore,
you're
spending
forty
fifty
sixty
percent
of
your
budget
on
housing
and
you
have
to
really
scrimp
to
make
other
parts
of
the
household
budget
work.
C
So
if
those
are
the
findings,
essentially
we're
aging
housing
become
less
and
less
affordable.
What
are
the
recommendations?
So
the
simple
one
that
comes
out
of
this
is
the
greatest
level
of
need
is
renters
own
earning
under
fifty
thousand
dollars
a
year.
These
are
households,
so
they
could
be
two
two
two-person
households
or
single-person
households
who
are
earning
less
than
fifty
thousand
dollars
a
year.
F
C
C
D
C
C
Up
with
this
number
over
that's
over
20
years,
twenty
one
thousand
five,
fifty
five
twenty
one,
twenty
one
hundred
and
fifty
five-
and
that
means
a
hundred
and
eight
per
year-
county
wide,
which
seems
incredibly
small
like
a
spit
in
the
bucket
and
then
they
apply.
Their
second
recommendation
is
to
use
a
fair
share
approach,
which
is
what
they
did
in
the
previous
housing
needs
assessment,
meaning
everybody
all.
The
communities
in
dutchess
county
should
take
a
fair
shot
at
meeting
these
goals,
and
so
I
mean
spreading
it
out
amongst
communities.
C
And
so
these
are
the
numbers
they
came
up
with
in
this
report
for
beacon
it's
five
units
a
year
for
20
years,
which
seems
to
be
absurd
and
I'm
also
of
the
opinion
that
places
that
have
central
locations
with
transit
services
and
walkability
and
jobs
availability
not
like
armenia
and
dover,
but
places
like
poughkeepsie,
beacon
down
in
poughkeepsie
town
down
to
fisher
should
take
a
larger
share
of
the
bird
and
they
do
because
they
prorated
by
population.
But
it
does
seem
ridiculously
small.
C
If
you
say
there's
all
these
thousands
of
people
who
who
are
cost
burdened,
it
doesn't
seem
enough
to
beat
the
demand,
and
so
I
called
up
the
people
who
put
this
thing
together,
not
the
private
consultant,
but
the
county
staff
who
worked
on
it
with
them.
And
I
said:
what's
what's
the
story,
you
know,
and
you
know
they.
They
explained
a
lot
of
things
away
and
it's
primarily
about
fair
share
and
everything
else.
C
But
I
compared
it
to
say
the
2008-9,
which
was
the
previous
version
of
this
housing
needs
survey
and
the
numbers
were
much
higher
in
those
days
and
the
need
was
much
less
in
terms
of
population
and
why
are
they?
You
know
lowballing
it
now,
and
I
think-
and
this
is
what
it
wasn't-
it
wasn't
what
was
said
to
me.
This
is
but
what
I
surmise-
or
at
least
I
guess,
is
the
reasons
why
these
numbers
are
low.
C
First
of
all,
they
want
to
put
out
a
low
number
so
that
they
meet
it,
and
you
know
you
don't
put
out
high
expectations
and
never
meet
it.
That's
what
happened
in
2008,
nine
they
put
out
a
housing
needs
survey,
they
put
a
lot
of
numbers,
it
was
much
higher
in
terms
of
everybody's
target
and
the
recession
came
along
and
nobody
met
it
because
nobody
built
any
housing
from
2008
to
2012
or
so,
and
so
those
numbers
just
went
in
the
report
on
the
shelf
and
nobody
did
anything.
F
I
mean
the
danger,
though,
is
you,
you
run
the
risk
of
sounding
a
little
tone-deaf.
When
you
say
we
have
people
who
are
in
a
dire
situation,
because
they're
cross-burdened,
if
we
just
help
five
a
year
by
20
years,
we
could
probably
get
them
out,
and
it's
like
who's
going
to
last
20
years
for
waiting
for
intervention.
That.
C
Was
my
complaint
and
I,
I
still
don't
believe
these
numbers,
but
you
know
this
was
the
official
survey
it
went
through
a
you
know,
vetting
process
with
a
steering
committee
made
of
local
officials.
There
was
somebody
who
represented
who
was
it's
on
the
beacon
city
council
who
is
on
this
committee,
so
I'm
still
waiting
for
a
good
explanation
as
to
why
the
numbers
seem
so
low.
C
Their
houses
are
going
to
come
vacant
sooner
rather
than
later,
they're
going
to
age
out
of
all
those
houses
that
are
sitting
with
elderly
population
in
them
and
there's
a
lot
of
them.
When
you
look
at
it,
there's
a
lot
of
places,
particularly
in
central
locations
that
have
a
lot
of
elderly
population
who
are
holding
on
their
homes
until
they
can't
hold
on
to
them
anymore,
and
that's
a
bulge
in
the
in
the
population,
and
so
they
may
anticipate
that
a
lot
of
the
housing
stock
is
going
to
become
available.
C
I
F
The
first,
the
first
thought
that
I
have
that
just
would
be
interesting
to
me
from
a
pragmatic
standpoint.
Has
anybody
ever
published
any
kind
of
numbers
on
what-
and
this
is
maybe
sounds
a
little-
maybe
too
pragmatic
and
a
little
bit
cold?
But
has
anybody
ever
published
numbers
on
what
sort
of
population
of
people
working
in
service
related
industry?
Do
you
need
to
maintain
a
city
of
a
certain
size?
So
when
you
have
a
city
you
have
restaurants,
shops
stores,
you
know
and
everything
that
you've
got
to
do
to
maintain.
F
C
B
Yeah
no,
this
is
all
very
useful,
interesting,
be
curious
to
see
how
it
may
eventually
down
the
road
impact,
how
we
look
at
our
zoning.
Okay.
So
with
that
we'll
open
our
regular
meeting
a
little
bit
early
first
item
of
business
having
to
do
with
last
month's
meeting
notes
any
feedback
for
amanda
on
any
adjustments.
K
B
J
B
Yeah
good
point
for
those
of
you
standing,
you
may
not
be
able
to
see.
There
are
a
good
amount
of
empty
seats,
so
come
on
in
make
yourselves
comfortable
gonna
be
a
long
night,
hi
hi
good
evening.
You
know,
usually
you
did
this
to
yourself.
You
don't
have
such
an
adoring
public
to
present
to
it's
at
the
end
of
the
night
and
everybody's
gone.
So
how
are
you,
and
so
you
have
an
application
for
a
sign
before
us.
B
B
B
B
M
B
K
B
B
B
B
O
I'm
with
the
firm
of
tian
and
constantino
on
behalf
of
the
beacon
views
applicant
we've
been
before
you
for
a
long
time
at
many
meetings.
We
believe
we
have
at
this
point
provided
all
of
the
information
that
the
board
and
its
consultants
have
requested,
made
the
changes
in
the
project
that
the
board
and
its
consultants
suggested.
O
We
now
contemplate
access
through
the
adjoining
13
lot
subdivision,
which
is
to
be
built
out.
The
traffic
reports
were
approved
and
were
just
updated
by
dr
greeley.
The
wetlands
and
mitigation
have
been
discussed
in
detail
as
one-to-one
mitigation
on
on-site
there's
additional
mitigation
off-site,
if
required
by
the
army
corps.
O
O
D
C
A
No,
as
mr
cantor
said,
they
have
to
approach
the
outside
agencies,
department
of
health
for
water
and
sewer
dc
for
sword
also
army
corps.
With
regards
to
the
wetlands,
I
am
asking
them
to
update
their
storm
water
report
based
upon
revisions
to
the
plans,
and
then
I'm
just
asking
for
some
minor
changes
on
the
plans
themselves.
Great.
B
B
B
F
I
have
a
question:
if
no
one
else
does
mr
cantor,
you
just
said
that
the
additional
mitigation
would
be,
if
requested
by
the
army
corps
of
engineers,
and
I'm
just
I
was
reading
the
letter
from
ecological
analysis
from
james
bates,
and
that
letter
says.
Additionally,
the
applicant
has
agreed
to
provide
a
further
one-to-one
mitigation
area
at
another
site
with
the
city
beacon,
doubling
the
net
wetland
area
as
a
result
of
the
project's
construction.
So
that
letter
made
me
think
that
that
decision
had
been
made
and
we
were
going
to
receive
the
additional
mitigation.
D
Q
H
B
H
F
F
H
B
F
P
F
F
You
know
the
area
that's
going
to
be
disturbed
and
the
diversity
of
some
wildlife
that
the
you
know
the
nearby
residents
observed
and
if
we
did
get
the
two
to
one
mitigation
it
wouldn't
you
know
we
would
be
at
least
improving
habitat.
You
know
somewhere
else
in
the
city,
so
it
would
be.
You
know
we're
just
kind
of
getting
the
best
benefit
that
we
can
for
the
you
know
for
our
overall
community,
given
the
the
fact
that
there's
going
to
be
a
disturbance
and.
F
J
J
So
if
you
feel
that
the
one-to-one
mitigation
that's
being
offered
on
site
and
that's
part
of
the
project
now
so
no
net
loss
in
wetland
area
on
site
is
what's
part
of
the
project.
If
you
feel
that's
not
sufficient
to
mitigate
the
disturbances
to
the
wetlands
as
that's
currently
proposed,
then
you
can
then
turn
to
the
off-site
mitigation
and
require
that,
as
part
of
their
required
mitigation
for
your
approval.
B
F
Right
and
I
would
just
be
going
right
now-
I
can
only
do
it
on
the
basis
of
kind
of
anecdotal
information
and
just
you
know,
working
off
the
public
comment
and
you
know
the
public
had
over
the
past.
Several
meetings
commented
that
they'd
observed
a
diversity
of
wildlife
in
the
area
and
the
area
will
be
cleared
and
developed.
There'll
be
some
impact
on
the
wetland.
That's
part
of
the
overall
habitat
and
just
so.
J
J
H
H
We
have
been
prepared
to
provide
more
basically
on
my
understanding
that
that's
you,
usually
the
one
to
one
never
quite
occurs
now.
Also
remember
that,
right
now,
as
it
stands,
that
wetland
gets
a
lot
of
debris
and
things
like
that.
So
as
part
of
this
and
the
rest
excuse
me
as
a
restoration,
you
know
we've
agreed
to
take
out
and
we
will
for
the
army
corps
as
well.
The
garbage
and
stuff
like
that's
in
there
so
in
though
you're
actually
going
to
get
a
better
functioning
wetland,
at
least
temporarily.
H
K
F
B
That's
the
answer,
let
me
ask
you
just
something
just
to
cut
to
the
chase.
If
the
army
corps
doesn't
come
back
and
says:
okay,
one
one's
fine,
but
it
sounds
like
you
anticipate
that
they
won't
it'll,
be
greater
right,
a
greater
request
which
you're
prepared
for
if
by
chance
they
come
back
and
say
one
to
one.
Would
you
accept
or
be
accepting
of
a
planning
board
request
for
one
to
one
and
a
half
or
one
to
two.
O
O
We
have
purchased
an
easement
in
the
city
so
that
we
have
the
legal
right
to
do
additional
wetland
mitigation
to
satisfy
the
army
corps
and
we're
open
to
discussing
with
you
or
mr
russo
and
john
between
now
and
when
we
hopefully
get
approval
whatever
requests
or
concerns
you
have,
if
we
can
do
it
within
reason,
we'll
be
happy
to.
We
gave
up
three
units
in
order
to
be
able
to
do
the
one-on-one
on
site.
That's
a
lot
of
dollars
over
a
period
of
time
to
give
up
three
units.
O
C
C
My
suggestion
is,
if
you
are
in
a
mind
that
you
think
more
than
one
for
one
is
a
good
thing,
you
could
express
that
to
the
army
corps
as
part
of
the
conditions
of
the
adoption
of
whatever
and
having
the
community
say
that
to
the
army
corps
I
think
would
probably
be,
and
they
have
both
the
expertise
and
the
ability
to
make
these
decisions
based
on
precedent
and
experience
and
and
expertise.
So
that's
what
I
would
suggest.
D
G
I
I
appreciate
the
one-to-one
mitigation,
but
that
sort
of
begs
the
question
about
what
happens
once
that's
done.
There's
37
units
now
occupied
with
all
the
accompanying
traffic
and
human
interaction,
and
does
I
mean
you're
you're,
not
on
the
hook
for
long-term
maintenance,
or
anything
like
that,
so
I
it
seems
to
me
sort
of
a
perfunctory
gesture
to
even
to
do
the
one-to-one
or
even
one,
to
two
that
it's
long
term,
it's
inevitable
that
that
environment,
the
ecology
of
that
environment
will
change.
B
B
B
J
D
S
R
D
R
Easement,
that's
recorded
to
allow
us
to
do
the
mitigation
work
on
his
property.
He
has
an
existing
or
he
butts
an
existing
wetland
that
that
would
be
great
to
mitigate
the
other
thing.
I'd
like
to
say
is
jim.
You
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
as
part
of
the
army
corps
of
engineer
mitigation
plan,
it's
a
requirement
of
the
applicant
that
they
monitor
the
mitigation
work
for
a
five-year
period
and
in
fact
it
has
to
be
inspected
on
an
annual
basis
for
five
years
and
a
report
submitted
to
the
army
corps
of
engineers.
H
Sure
it's
not
just
we
have
to
report
no
there's
conditions.
We
have
to
make
sure
that
it
functions
as
design
that
invasive
species
aren't
taking
over
the
mitigation
area
and
if
and
if
the
plants
are
dying
or
invasive
species
that
come
in,
then
we
have
to
go
in
and
clean
them
out.
So
it
is
actual.
You
know
work
that
has
to
be
done
by
the
applicant
as
part
of
permit.
It's
not.
H
B
B
B
U
Good
evening
my
name
is
colleen
cook.
I
live
at
11
hastings
drive,
also
known
as
highland
meadows,
I'm
here
at
the
request
of
quite
a
few
of
the
residents
that
live
there,
I'm
I'm
representing
them,
I'm
not
representing
the
management.
I
want
to
make
that
very
clear,
but
I
have
been
asked
to
come
and
once
again
speak
about
the
concerns
of
using
hastings
drive
as
an
entrance
in
egress.
U
What
hit
me
was
this
past
several
days
with
the
nice
weather,
a
lot
of
our
residents,
who
do
not
have
cars
who
are
stuck
in
were
able
to
sit
out
front,
enjoy
being
social,
getting
to
see
the
wonderful
view
of
the
mountain
etc
with
clean,
fresh
air
and
without
noise
pollution,
and
if
hastings
drive
is
used
as
the
main
entrance
and
egress.
Not
only
is
it
going
to
be
traffic
up
the
kazoo
there's
going
to
be
congestion,
there's
going
to
be
a
carbon
footprint,
there's
going
to
be
noise,
okay,
there's
going
to
be
speeding.
U
U
Now
myself
saw
just
today
where
the
fire
department
and
some
of
the
ambulances
had
to
go
to
wingate
to
pick
up,
unfortunately,
somebody
who
needed
to
be
taken
to
the
hospital.
It's
happened
at
my
residence
several
times
and
things
like
that.
The
ambulances,
the
fire
department,
people
who
are
depending
on
ambulance
to
drive
them
places,
people
who
need
to
get
to
appointments
and
the
children
who
are
waiting
for
their
parents,
and
since
these
are
special
education,
children
they
they
might
tend
to
get
a
little
disruptive
and
upset
if
their
parents
aren't
on
time.
U
How
are
they
going
to
get
to
us?
If,
there's
all
this
traffic
coming
and
going,
there's
going
to
be
37
units,
three
bedrooms?
How
many
cars
are
there
going
to
be
how
much
traffic
is
it
going
to
involve
it's
going
to
be
hard
for
these?
For
the
people
who
need
to
be
taken
care
of
to
get
the
services
they
need?
A
lot
of
the
people
in
my
building
have
aids.
U
U
Okay,
the
other
thing
is
that
there
is
a
volunteer
emt
on
delavan
avenue,
a
very
active
one
and
what
happens
when
they
can't
get
out
to
go
to
a
call,
because
delavan
avenue
is
congested
and
backed
up
there.
There
is
no
way
that
this
can
be
done.
Also,
it's
a
precarious
corner,
there's
a
curve
right
before
it
and
a
lot
of
times.
U
You
can't
see
the
car
coming
around
the
curve,
or
does
the
car
coming
around
the
curve
on
fish
skill
to
see
the
people
coming
out
of
delavan,
so
I'm
not
trying
to
throw
this
at
another
neighborhood,
but
I
think
that
there
is
an
issue.
There
are
issues
here
that
really
have
to
be
considered
as
far
as
the
safety
of
the
people
who
live
in
in
beacon
who
live
in
the
housing,
all
around
hastings
drive,
which
is
it
which
is
actually
an
easement
and
a
trainer
thought.
U
U
V
Thyberg
inside
engineering
surveying
landscape
architecture
pc
the
board
is
aware
for
the
town,
I'm
sorry,
clarity
for
the
public.
The
connection
to
hastings
drive
is
not
contemplated
as
any
kind
of
main
or
continual
regular
entrance
to
the
site.
It
is
specifically
shown
as
a
gated
emergency
access.
Only
that'll
only
have
traffic
on
it.
In
the
case
of
of
an
emergency
fire,
you
know
type.
B
Number
of-
and
I'm
just
not
just
for
you,
though,
but
for
everybody
here
we
have
a
number
of
public
hearings.
So
I'm
going
to
request
that
we
keep
our.
You
know
comments
brief,
that
we
work
as
a
kind
of
a
team
here,
three
minute
minimum,
and
that
if
anyone
excuse
me
three
minute
maximum.
Thank
you
and
that
should
your
comments.
M
B
Just
say
that
you
know
you
would
you
want
to
reinforce
the
prior
point
made?
We
don't
need
to
hear
the
same
points
made
over
and
over
again
and
again.
This
isn't
just
because
we
don't
want
to
it's
more
just
to
help
the
process
along
and
to
make
sure
that
we're
out
of
here
at
least
before
one
o'clock.
L
W
W
W
W
X
X
If
we
look
back
when
they
were
trying
to
subdivide
the
old
knights,
columbus
property
and
when
final
the
final
subdivision
was
approved,
it
was
a
gate
through
a
new
parcel
for
emergency
purposes.
Only
and
let's
not
switch
it
to
the
other
side,
because
the
the
neighborhood
would
have
been
fully
opposed
to
this
here
if
it
was
going
to
be
a
cut
through
property.
If
you
want
to
look
back
at
the
minutes,
we
could
look
back
saying
that
I
was
never
meant
to
have
a
cut
through
property
from
an
adjacent
property.
X
I'm
not
here
to
stop
progress,
I'm
sure
they
want
to
do
their
thing,
but
we
got
to
look
at
the
big
picture:
don't
pull
a
wool
over
people's
faces?
They
agree
that
it's
going
to
happen
to
a
certain
way
and
now
we're
going
to
have
cut
through
property,
because
if
we
look
back
at
the
minutes,
it
was
never
put
for
cut
through
traffic.
X
If
you
look
back
before
the
casey
had
that
property
there,
it
was
just
an
empty
parcel,
be
talking
the
same
talk
right
now.
If
the
knights
of
columbus
was
there
all
right,
so
you
know
to
wrap
it
all
up.
Basically,
is
you
know
I
couldn't
agree
more
than
miss
reynolds
says.
Maybe
certain
things
are
not
meant
to
to
be.
You
know
we're
trying
to
switch
forward
through
to
another.
X
Originally,
that
was
not
a
cut
through
property.
It
was
meant
for
first
responder
emergency
vehicles
that
be
gated,
and
if
they
had
to
get
access
to
a
new
parcel,
they
could
go
through
those
gates
to
provide
emergency
emergency.
For
for
what
was,
on
the
other
side,
now
you're
telling
us
that
you're
trying
to
put
a
cut
through
property,
it
would
really
last
up
a
lot
of
people's.
You
know,
lives
and
way
of
living.
Thank
you
for
hearing
me
out.
Thank
you.
B
L
You
so
I
just
wanted
to
say
this
is
a
secret
determination,
the
traffic
impact
from
going
through
townsend,
it's
going
into
a
neighborhood
that
has
about
50
homes
and
you're,
adding
37
homes
in
addition
to
the
13
from
knights
and
columbus,
so
you're,
basically,
doubling
the
traffic.
That's
going
through
the
neighborhood
and,
like
my
neighbor
said,
townsend
is
very
narrow,
has
no
sidewalk,
and
I
consider
that
a
very
significant
impact.
So,
when
you're
trying
to
determine
the
impact,
please
take
that
into
consideration.
I
Thank
you,
my
name
is
martha
davies.
I
also
live
at
11.
Hastings
drive
highland
meadows
senior
residents.
A
number
of
the
topics
that
my
my
neighbor
colleen
just
mentioned
were
on
my
notes,
but
there
are
a
couple
of
things
that
have
just
come
up
in
discussion
that
just
like
some
clarification,
if
possible.
When
you
mentioned
that
haste,
the
gentleman
mentioned
that
hastings
drive
was
not
going
to
be
the
main
access
and
egress
for
the
beacon
fuse
did
mention
that.
I
As
this
other
gentleman
has
mentioned,
it
was
going
to
be
in
the
case
of
hastings,
drive
just
an
an
entrance
in
egress
for
emergency
vehicles,
and
we
were
just
curious
if
that
does
in
fact
happen
to
be
the
case.
How
far
in
from
the
hastings
drive
land
property
drive
would
the
with?
I
guess
what
I'm
asking
is,
would
there
be
any?
Would
it
be
a
clear
cut
with
the
gate?
I
I
I
We
have
a
number
of
seniors
in
the
building
who
don't
drive,
but
they
do
walk
on
hastings
drive
with
either
the
assistance
of
their
aides
or
a
number
of
them
have
walkers
and
they'll
go
out
on
their
own
on
hastings
drive
and
just
walk
right
about
you
know
up
in
front
of
our
in
front
of
our
building.
They'll
come
down
through
our
parking
lot
and
again,
that's
a
serious
safety
issue
that
we
have
a
concern
for
for
the
number
of
seniors
that
do
walk
out
on
hastings
drive,
and
I
appreciate
your
time
thank.
B
B
D
Y
V
The
gate
would
be
located
just
at
the
very
start
of
the
emergency
access.
You
can
see
it
if
you
kind
of
squint
your
eyes
here,
as
hasting
drive
hooks
up
here
to
the
north
and
to
the
west,
just
as
you
get
to
the
offshoot,
that
is
the
emergency
access.
The
gate
would
be
right.
There,
we've
also
shown
another
gate
at
the
other
end,
so
the
entire
the
entire
length
would
be
gated
off
from
both
ends.
V
There
was
also
a
comment
about
I'm
not
sure
I
picked
it
up
exactly,
but
there's
a
comment
about
sidewalks.
We've
also
shown
an
off-site
improvements
plan
as
part
of
our
site
plan
set,
that
is,
that
includes
improvements
related
to
requirements.
You
know
in
the
easement
agreement
that
includes
a
sidewalk
connection
across
the
roadway
that
goes
by
the
highland
meadows
facility
out
to
delavan.
AA
AA
AA
AA
I
have
witnessed
the
prison
property,
the
drainage
that
comes
down
from
snow
melt
and
it
comes
into
my
neighborhood.
It
comes
on
to
52.
It
makes
a
lot
of
us
inconvenience
because
52
gets
blocked
and
it's
going
to
happen
again
and
it's
going
to
happen
more
often.
I
am
concerned
about
my
neighbors
on
de
soto,
who
have
low
lying
property.
What
this
is
going
to
do
to
their
property,
and
also,
if,
eventually,
maybe
after
five
years,
when
they
don't
care
about
it
anymore,
that
it's
going
to
flood
onto
desoto
avenue?
AA
We
have
the
adjoining
property
of
the
south
for
whatever
reason
they're
not
accessing
that.
I
know
there
is
a
lawsuit
there
because
of
this
situation,
adjoining
property
of
the
north
at
25
townsend,
where
the
knights
of
columbus
just
got
demolished,
I'm
not
sure
if
they've
gotten
into
agreement
with
them,
if
they
can
clarify
that
if
they
have
communicated
with
the
only
other
access
other
than
if
they
have
communicated
with
the
other
property
on
matawan
road-
and
I
just
feel
that
again,
as
someone
said,
we
have
about
50
houses
in
our
neighborhood.
AA
The
13
houses
currently
approved
with
that
emergency
access
only
at
25,
townsend
and
plus,
if
you
add
37
here,
that's
another
fifty
we're
taught
doubling
the
property
we
walk
through
our
neighborhoods
too.
We
have
animals.
We
would
like
to
enjoy
our
neighborhood
with
our
children
and
grandchildren.
Thank
you.
Thank.
B
AB
Hello,
my
name
is
steven
rieger,
I'm
one
of
the
principals
of
vigor
homes.
My
brother
ayan
is
here
with
us
with
me.
We
we
purchased
the
25
townsend
street
property
and
we
took
down
the
knights
of
columbus
hall
and
we're
starting
the
site
development
to
put
in
to
extend
townsend
street
and
to
to
build
13
homes
and
we're
going
to
be
back
shortly,
the
next
month
or
so
to
preview
our
architecture
with
you,
so
that
you'll
be
familiar
with
what
we're
trying
to
do
we're
new
to
this
process.
AB
We
are
putting
in
an
extension
to
townsend
street
and
we've
offered
that
the
50-foot
right-of-way
for
dedication
to
the
city
of
beacon,
and
while
we
are
until
that
road
is
dedicated,
we
own
it
and
we
are
responsible
for
maintaining
it,
repairing
it
and
getting
it
into
shape
for
the
city
to
accept,
and
so
during
that
period
of
time
are
we
are.
Are
we
subject
to
the
construction,
vehicles
and
other
vehicles
of
a
neighboring
property,
or
are
they
gonna
have
to
wait
until
it's
a
city,
road.
J
AB
AC
Good
evening
voice
loud
enough,
my
name
is
peg
o'leary,
I'm
here
this
evening
representing
highland
meadows,
I'm
in
response
to
the
submission
by
the
applicants.
I
see
that
the
wetlands
consultant
had
submitted
a
report
in
that
report.
The
wetlands
consultant
stated
that
the
army
corps
would
not
start
its
review
or
issue
a
permit
without
a
conditional
site
plan.
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AD
AC
AC
It
is
also
highland
meadows
position
that
that
storm
water
easement,
which
clearly
states
drainage
and
discharge,
does
not
permit
a
storm
water
facility
and
that
the
fact
that
the
applicant
put
that
on
their
full
eaf
in
june
of
2020,
which
I
believe
is
the
document
that
this
board
is
basing
its
secret
meetings
on
public
hearings
on.
I
sincerely
ask
you
to
review
those
in
closing.
I
would
ask
that
this
planning
board,
please
not
close
the
seeker
public
hearing
until
all
of
the
information
is
submitted
and
all
of
the
information
verified.
Thank.
B
You
I'll
just
I'll
just
state
for
the
record
that
this
board
does
thoroughly
review
every
aspect
of
every
application.
That
is
our
job.
That's
our
purview!
So
with
that
as
well,
our
planner
and
city
engineer
do
the
same
for
us
on
our
behalf.
So
I'm
going
to
ask
john
or
john
anything
about
the
af
that
you've
found
that's
either
incomplete
incorrect
or
otherwise.
Misstated
by
this
applicant.
H
H
I'm
unaware
of
a
2019
submittal
to
the
army
corps
of
engineers.
I
was
brought
on
afterwards
as
you
all
you
folks
all
know.
The
army
corps
may
or
may
not
look
at
a
submittal
from
it
from
anywhere.
They
will
not
thoroughly
review
and
they
will
not
issue
any
permits
without
at
least
a
conditional
site
plan
approval.
They
will
allow
us
to
start
moving
through
the
process.
H
One
seeker
is
done,
but
quite
frankly,
they're
so
backed
up
that
you
know
they're,
not
they
don't
want
to
look
at
anything,
that's
not
going
to
happen
and
I'm
sure
you
can
understand
that
the
dec
is
the
same
way.
They
require
roughly
the
same
documents
and
now,
with
the
latest
revisions,
we
have
to
file
what's
called
a
joint
application.
H
B
AF
AE
Not
every
piece
of
property
needs
to
be
built
and
developed.
Just
leave
it
alone,
plain
and
simple.
I
understand
they
spent
money.
They
are
looking
for
a
return
on
their
investment,
but
that's
not
in
the
best
interest
of
the
people
that
live
here
currently
and
have
lived
here.
My
entire
life,
my
parents,
bought
the
house
when
they
found
out
they
were
pregnant.
With
me,
I've
lived
here
my
entire
life
I
played
in
that
property
as
a
kid
just
leave
it
alone.
AE
D
V
Of
clarity
with
regard
to
a
previous
application
of
the
army
corps
of
engineers,
we
were
previously
as
the
boards
aware
working
with
a
with
another
wetland
consultant
mike
newicki
who's
no
longer
on
the
project.
He
may
have
started
some
application,
but
we've
never
received
any
response
or
have
seen
any
correspondence
to
the
army
corps.
C
I
I
just
I
guess
I
should
make
the
point
just
for
clarity
purposes.
The
planning
board
doesn't
set
zoning
in
the
city.
I
was
thinking
this
thing.
This
property
was
zoned
for
rd
multi-family
housing
by
the
city
council.
Sometime
back,
including
the
wetlands
we've
done
everything
we
can
to
protect
the
wetlands
as
part
of
this
project,
but
the
the
applicant
and
the
planning
board
has
to
abide
by
the
zoning
law
in
which
the
it
says
that
this
property
is
designated
one
of
the
few
in
the
city.
That's
designated
for
multi-family
housing.
B
Best
possible
yeah.
Thank
you
for
mentioning
that
john.
It's
something
that,
when
appeals
to
not
do
anything
when
an
applicant
is
in
front
of
us,
we
can't
not
do
anything.
That's
simply
not
our
role
and
we
are
an
administrative
body,
not
a
legislative
body.
The
legislative
body
that
creates
the
zoning
is
the
city
council.
So
there
any
appeals
to
have
an
impact
on
zoning.
Those
should
be
directed
toward
your
elected
officials
and
the
city
council.
B
F
V
J
J
J
If
you're
inclined
to
act
upon
that
tonight,
you
would
close
the
secret
public
hearing
adopt
the
secret
documents
that
have
been
provided
to
you
for
review,
and
you
also
have
noticed
tonight
the
opening
of
a
site
plan
and
subdivision
public
hearing
on
the
underlying
application.
That
would
be
your
next
procedural
step.
Okay,.
S
K
There
was
before
I
I
I
have
to
tell
you.
I
we
had
a
request
to
not
close
the
secret
from
one
of
the
who
brought
up
what
I
thought
were
some
questions
that
were
could
have
been
significant
and-
and
to
be
honest
I
didn't
I
didn't
know.
I
don't
know
that
I
understood
that
it
was
that
they
were
addressed
entirely.
B
So
you're
in
record,
as
voting
no,
not
to
close,
we
have
four
in
favor
we're
going
to
close
but
kevin
any
questions
further
that
you
have
in
regard
to
what
you
just
mentioned
here.
Let's
take
those
up
and
make
sure
those
are
answered
for
you
so
you're
very
clear
on
what
we're
talking
about
and
reviewing
here
tonight.
B
F
I
mean:
is
there
anything
john,
that
you
can
just
add
briefly
about
you
know
to
kevin's
question
about
this?
The
core
is
just
going
to
go
through
and
review
the
permanent
application
for
for
discharge
of
fill
to
like
.28
acres
of
wetlands
and
the
proposed
mitigation
and
likely
they're
going
to
you
know.
They'll
they'll
make
some
decisions
on
what
the
ultimate
amount
of
mitigation
that
they
request
we're
going
to
provide
input
to
that
process,
but
but
I
don't
believe,
there's
any
like
kind
of
esoteric
issue
or
in
this
process.
F
B
And
and
as
well,
we
do
have
we
because
last
month
I
understand,
we
authorized
our
attorney
to
draft
a
neg
deck
right.
So
at
that
point
we
were
of
the
thinking
of
the
mind
that
we
were
ready
to
entertain
and
discuss
adopting
a
magdex
so
kevin,
since
that
is
on
the
table
in
front
of
us
now
and
we're
required
to
at
this
point
review
our
position
on
the
neg
deck
based
on
all
of
the
work
all
of
the
review
by
ourselves,
our
engineers
etc.
Up
until
this
point.
B
K
J
B
F
J
The
traffic
impact
studies
that
have
been
submitted
and
reviewed
by
the
board
threatened
endangered
species,
habitat
suitability,
assessment
report,
which
was
submitted
to
the
board
all
prepared
by
the
applicant's
professionals
reviewed
by
the
planning
boards
professionals
and
discussed
at
prior
meetings.
So
this
document
outlines
all
of
that
review
and
concludes
that
the
project
will
not
have
a
significant
adverse
environmental
impact.
B
F
J
J
G
F
So
this
this
goes
back
to
the
the
comment
I
brought
before.
Is
that
the
the
wetland?
If
I
understand
I
understand
correctly,
the
characterization
of
the
wetland
was
that
its
highest
function
was
primarily
for
management
of
stormwater
and
infiltration,
and
it
was
not
ranked
highly
for
habitat
or
diversity
of
species
and
therefore
you
know
getting
getting
some
getting
the
one-to-one
mitigation
on
site
to
ameliorate
the
disturbance
of
the
wetland.
F
Is
you
know
to
to
do
some
additional
mitigation
elsewhere
in
a
more
high
value
habitat?
You
know
that.
That's
why
I
felt
that
that
provides
a
benefit
where
it's
gonna.
It's
gonna
provide
much
more
bang
for
our
buck
and
you
know
it
addresses
people's
concerns
about
any
wetlands
being
disturbed,
but
it
gives
us
some
mitigation
benefit
at
an
off-site
location
where
you
have
a
higher
value,
habitat
and
and
some
mitigation
and
improvement
there
will
pay
off
bigger
dividends,
I
think
than
than
doing
anything
more
on
this
site.
B
S
Jc,
yes,
please,
I
I
appreciate
the
comments
from
the
public.
I
just
wanted
to
reiterate
what
was
said
earlier.
You
know
that
our
role,
sometimes
we
have
to
consider
what's
an
applicant
as
of
right
to
do
development
versus
not
as
of
right
and
so
when
there's
no
variances
being
accepted
and
they
the
development,
is
within
the
constraints
of
the
code.
As
john
clark
pointed
out,
I
give
different.
I
give
a
lot
of
weight
to
when
our
consultants
both
consider
that
their
concerns
were
addressed,
and
so
I
think,
that's
part
of
the
something.
B
B
D
F
Z
W
I
just
want
to
say
I
hope
that
the
public,
what
I
hope,
what
the
public
witnessed
in
the
previous
public
hearing,
showing
how
members
of
this
board
can
persuade
to
change
their
vote
through
a
louder
voice
at
the
table
does
not
set
precedent
to
the
other
four
public
hearings
on
tonight's
agenda,
and
you
wonder
why
the
public
is
upset
with
the
over
development
in
this
city.
Regarding
this
second
public
hearing,
the
development
plan
as
redesigned
is
still
too
big
for
this
parcel.
W
AA
Cam
weatherby
66
mead
avenue.
I
realize
they
left
paper
up
here,
I'm
not
100
sure
of
what
the
difference
is
at
this
moment,
but
I
would
ask
that
you
look
at
the
scope
of
this
the
site
plan
and
consider
the
single
family
residence
all
around
it,
and
you
know
I
know
it
was
mentioned.
They
were
willing
to
cut
it
down
by
another
three.
I
heard
that
earlier.
So
I
hope
they
strongly
consider
that
and
I
don't
agree
with
it,
but
I
guess
that's
just
the
way
it
is
in
the
city
of
beacon.
Thank
you.
L
J
That
that's
been
done,
the
board
had
before
it,
and
it's
also
available
on
the
website.
The
part
two
of
the
eaf,
which
goes
through
each
of
those
impact
categories,
the
board
reviewed
that
had
the
opportunity
to
make
any
revisions
to
that
they
agreed
with
it.
They
didn't
want
to
make
any
revisions,
so
they
moved
on
to
the.
B
We
have
found
that
there
is
no
adverse
environmental
impact
through
our
thorough
review,
so
I
will
also
note
that
there
is
a
mountain
of
available
information.
Some
you
already
know
that
that
is
publicly
accessible
on
every
single
application.
It's
a
lot!
We
cover
it.
It's
part
of
our
job
to
read
it
review
it
you're
welcome
too
as
well
great
I'm.
This
is
less
toward
you,
but
more
for
the
general
public.
So
at
this
point,
if
there's
no
one
else,
I
think
I
think
we
have
a
few
things
just
around.
B
B
G
B
B
AG
J
As
a
matter
of
practice,
your
resolutions
for
subdivision
approval
do
typic,
do
have
that
embedded
into
it.
As
you
know,
subdivision
applications
have
two
really
two
approvals
associated
with
them.
Preliminary
approval
and
final
approval
final
approval
is,
is
more
of
an
administrative
item.
It's
you
know
after
satisfaction
of
several
conditions
in
preliminary
the
way.
J
L
J
B
B
To
continue
public
hearing,
this
is
second
item
on
the
agenda.
This
is
our
continued
public
hearing
for
the
secret
environmental
review
on
applications
for
site
plan
approval,
special
use,
permit
and
subdivision
approval.
This
is
for
multi-family
residential
62
units
at
16,
west
main
street
good
evening.
AH
D
AH
We
responded
to
those
as
best
as
we
could.
We
also
had
some
outstanding
comments
from
the
board's
consultants
that
we
believe
we
responded
to
the
majority
of
them.
There's
still
a
couple
of
kind
of
construction,
related
phase
questions
that
we
still
need
to
chip
away
at,
but
we're
working
with
the
building
department,
water
department,
fire
department
on
those,
but.
B
B
P
Starkip
with
creighton
manning
a
professional
engineer,
the
city's
traffic
consultant
for
the
record
to
answer,
I
guess
I
can
start
with
answering
your
question
as
far
as
monitoring
goes.
You
know
the
first.
What
what
applicants
will
do
is
a
traffic
study
which
is
meant
to
kind
of
look
ahead
and
understand
the
impacts
of
what
a
project,
the
impact
that
a
project
will
have.
P
P
P
B
P
That's
a
misnomer:
no
it
they.
They
collected
their
data
in
february
of
2020.,
so
we
could
say
that
their
the
traffic
data
they
collected
one
is
from
when
they,
when
they
collected,
is
pre-covered,
which
is
something
that
we
have
to
take
into
account
with
traffic
studies
in
the
time
that
we're
in,
but
they
forecast
their
data
to
get
an
understanding
of
what
the
traffic
would
be
like
when
the
project
is
built
and
occupied.
B
Understood:
okay,
thank
you
yep
and
then,
as
far
as
monitoring
I
mean,
I
think,
that's
more
more,
at
least
from
my
perspective,
something
that
we
as
a
board
well
I'll
speak
for
myself.
Anyways
member
of
the
board
are
interested
in
understanding
how
the
aggregate
impacts
of
this
development,
along
with
others
that
would
be
coming
online.
B
I
don't
know
around
the
same
time
sooner
but
relatively
close
to,
but
ultimately
so
adjacent
that
there
may
be
aggregate
impacts
and
and
specifically
edgewater
right
that
that
that
there
is
there
is
a
requirement
I
think,
of
that
particular
applicant
for
monitoring
at
specific
intervals.
Right,
I
believe.
J
So
I
can
speak
to
that
so
for
the
edgewater
application
that
was
approved
several
years
ago
2018
there
was
a
condition
of
that
approval
that,
within
six
to
12
months
after
full
occupancy
the
applicant's
required
to
monitor
two
intersections
to
determine
whether
there
is
the
signal
traffic
signal
is
warranted
by
the
traffic
at
that
time,
and
if
it
is,
then
they're
required
to
pay
their
fair
share
contribution
towards
installation
of
that
traffic
signal.
So
I
think
what
you're
asking
is
whether
that
sort
of
mechanism
may
make
sense.
B
B
So
just
sort
of
putting
it
out
there,
that's
something
that
I
think
personally
is
important
right,
that
there
is
a
level
of
monitoring
and
that
that
the
applicant
that
we
discuss
making
this
part
of
a
requirement
of
the
applicant
around
their
relevant
intersections
and
adjacent
intersections.
Any
thoughts
on
the
subject.
F
And
so
I
understand
that
there's
been
discussion
about
putting
in
a
crosswalk
facility
at
bank
street
to
you
know,
protect
pedestrians
across
there
and
do
we
feel
that
that
is
an
adequate
improvement
to
you
know,
understanding
that
that
pedestrian
access
is
is
a
significant.
You
know
an
important
access
to
the
train
station.
P
Yeah
so
the
the
applicant
we
reviewed
there
was
three
other
improvement
sites
and
one
of
them
or
in
addition
to
the
crosswalk
that
they're
proposing
and
curb
improvements
that
they're
proposing
at
that
bank
street
and
west
main
street
intersection,
because
one
of
our
comments
was
to
clarify
pedestrian
access
to
the
train
station.
Given
that
this
is
a
considered
transit
oriented
development,
so
they
have
proposed
that
crosswalk
and
the
curb
ramp
improvements
there.
They
looked
at
other
improvements
at
bank
street
and
tompkins
and
then
also
at
tompkins
and
walcott.
P
P
The
applicant
responded
saying
that
they
didn't
have
enough
data
to
complete
a
full
analysis.
A
warrant
analysis
for
a
full
four-way
stop
controlled
intersection.
One
of
our
recommendations
is
that
they
obtain
the
data
necessary
to
complete
that
warrant
analysis
to
so
the
board
can
make
it
over
or
have
a
better,
more
complete
information
on
that
installation.
P
B
P
They
would
need
they
need
to
collect
the
the
warrant.
Analysis
is
based
on
eight
hours
of
traffic
data,
so
they
would
need
to
obtain.
You
know
an
additional
four
hours.
If
they're
gonna
put
the
equipment
out,
my
recommendation
would
be
to
just
put
equipment
out
and
collect
data
for
at
least
eight
hours
now,
keep
in
mind
that
it's
data
collected
now
and,
as
I
said
in
the
time
of
covid,
they
can
calibrate
it
accordingly
and
we're
able
to
review
their
methods
for
that
and
confirm
that
the
information
they're
providing
is
not
impacted.
P
B
B
C
AI
A
So,
in
conjunction
with
what
stark
had
said
and
the
concepts
that
they
had
presented
for
safety,
additional
safety
measures
for
pedestrians,
I'm
asking
that
that
be
discussed
in
the
traffic
impact
study
itself.
I
didn't
see
it
mentioned
in
the
report-
anywheres,
not
even
in
the
conclusion,
so
it
should
be
expanded
upon
and
then
all
these
improvements
at
the
proposing
off-site
should
be
part
of
the
formal
plan
set.
AB
A
B
A
AH
I
think,
as
far
as
the
traffic
study
comments
you
know,
as
stark
mentioned,
you
know
the
counts.
Pre-Covered,
we
think
are
better
than
doing
it
now.
So
we
we
think
that
you
know
having
counted
before.
That
is
a
more
conservative
approach.
We're
not
opposed
to
the
warrant
analysis,
of
course,
for
the
traffic
for
that
intersection
it
may
adding
a
full
way.
Stop
may
prove
to
help
there
may
not,
but
you
know
we
certainly
can
do
that.
We
don't
think
it'll
impact.
AH
AH
You
know,
may
decrease
the
delay
a
little
bit
there,
maybe
and
then,
as
far
as
the
build
year
yeah
I
mean
we've
been
here
for
so
many
years.
I
guess
it's
just
we
just
kind
of
have
to
project
it
out
one
more
year,
but
I
think
similarly
there's
there
wouldn't
be
much
impact
on
that
because,
as
you
go
with
a
build,
a
no
build
condition
and
you
project
it
out
one
more
year,
you're
just
going
to
add
the
general
growth.
AH
B
That
you
can
characterize
it
as
it
might
not,
but
I
think
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
dealing
with
the
most
recent
most
current
information
so
that
we
can
be
as
close
to
knowing
as
we
possibly
can.
So
I'm
going
to
again
reinforce
our
recommendation
by
our
consultant
on
those
items.
So
again
we
are
in
secret
public
hearing.
G
AH
Yeah,
I
think,
regarding
that,
you
know
we
we
definitely
acknowledge.
There
is
a
good
amount
of
tree
removal,
especially
in
the
two
areas
on
the
west
side
where
bank
street
is
and
on
the
north
rear
lot,
at
least
on
the
north
rear
lot.
We
tried
to
keep
a
lot
of
the
existing
trees
on
the
perimeter,
but
certainly
along
bank
street.
Those
are
going
to
come
out
because
the
buildings
proposed
there
retaining
walls
they
will
need
to
be
removed.
AH
AH
Yes,
so
well,
I
don't
believe
we're
removing
all
of
them,
but
we
are
removing
a
good
amount
on
that
side.
Most
of
them
are
smaller
trees
that
have
vines,
and
you
know
kind
of
invasive
and
overgrown.
But
there
are
a
couple
of
trees
there
that
are,
you
know
fairly
large,
and
they
are
you
know,
they're
within
a
construction
easement
that
we're
seeking
from
the
adjacent
property
owner
in
order
to
build
the
project.
G
There
was
a
there
was
a
at
least
one
small
business
owner.
I
remember
at
the
last
meeting
who
raised
an
issue
about
the
impact
of
construction
dust
on
her
business
because
she
has
open
windows
and
doors
in
a
pilates
studio
there
and
that
that
she
was
concerned
about
that
during
construction.
So
anything
that
could
be
done
to
mitigate
that,
I
think
would
be.
AH
Yes,
in
the
co,
in
the
conversations
with
that
neighbor
next
door,
the
owner
of
the
property
next
door
for
the
easements,
you
know,
we've
talked
to
them
about
replacing
some
trees
and
obviously
trying
to
you
know,
put
back
vegetation
along
that
right
side
near
the
building
the
future
proposed
building
they
haven't.
Given
us
any
feedback.
I
don't
think
exactly
what
they're
looking
for,
but
there
has
been
talks
about
that.
AH
AH
AH
AH
AJ
I
actually
came
for
another
item,
but
I
just
learned
about
this
one:
a
new
homeowner
in
the
area
young
child
would
like
to
have
another
child,
so
we
live
right
on
on
beekman
right,
and
so
I
just
want
to
voice
my
concern
about
the
extra
traffic
from
this.
I
don't
know
if
there's
still
opportunity
to
lower
the
amount
of
units
that
are
being
built
there
or,
if
that's
beyond
that
in
the
process,
but
I
just
would
like
to
advocate
for
that.
AJ
It's
already
sort
of
dangerous
for
our
children
in
our
little
development
to
play
on
the
grass
near
beekman
because
of
all
the
train
traffic
and
then
also
the
pollution
and
the
from
the
cars,
and
then
the
noise
traffic,
with
the
train
and
newberg
and
the
planes
and
the
boats.
So
to
add
to
that
is
just
a
little
bit
concerning
in
terms
of
like
quality
of
life
and
then
all
the
other
development.
That's
happening
right
around
the
same
area.
W
Teresa
craft,
this,
the
large
build-out
plan,
is
still
too
big
for
this
parcel's
footprint
beacon
does
not
need
another
generic
looking
block
of
apartments
building,
making
a
visual
wall
along
that
road
take
into
account
how
congested
this
area
is
and
will
become
when
you
throw
an
edge
water
into
the
mix.
This
is
a
continuation
of
beacon
allowing
over
development
to
strip
our
historic
view
sheds
from
the
river
view.
W
Q
L
AH
Yes,
yeah,
I
mean
all
I
can
say
is
you
know
we
really
want
to
close
the
public
hearing,
so
we
can
move
on
to
get
the
special
permit.
That
john
mentioned,
it's
been
a
long
process,
and
it's
just
you
know.
We
really
just
want
to
take
that
next
step.
So
we
think
that
we
obviously
commit
to
addressing
these
comments,
but
we're
just
hoping
that
it
wouldn't
you
know
you
know,
hold
up
the
process
in
terms
of
the
seeker.
AH
B
J
B
AB
AB
B
B
D
AK
Necessarily
we
had
a
great
meeting
with
the
zoning
board
that
gives
the
variance
your
positive
recommendation
from
our
previous
meeting
was
very
helpful.
So
thank
you
for
that.
We
believe
we've
addressed
all
the
issues
that
were
brought
up
by
mr
russo
and
mr
clark
and
their
letters
with
our
designs.
D
AK
AL
AK
K
AK
C
B
B
B
W
Hi
teresa
craft
I
previously
previously
spoke
to
support
this
project
at
the
planning
board
meeting
and
the
maze
zba
public
hearing
looking
at
the
architectural
plans
with
this
application,
I
believe
this
owner's
occupied
property
is
exactly
the
type
of
quality
design
accessory
apartment
residents
would
hope
to
see
from
other
applicants
that
come
before
the
city
board.
This
project
sought
only
138
square
foot
variants
which
was
granted,
and
the
applicant
is
reducing
the
overall
footprint
of
that
existing
garage.
I
don't
believe
this
new
accessory
apartment
will
change
the
character
of
this
neighborhood.
B
G
D
B
J
B
AD
G
Q
Q
AL
Z
AL
Of
the
members
of
the
italics
commercial
condo
association
this
evening,
I
believe
that
the
president
of
the
board
is
on
his
way
here
now
I
was
tech.
He
asked
me
to
let
him
know
when
the
public
hearing
before
mine
started,
so
he
could
head
over
so
they'll
be
here
this
evening
and
they
will
speak
to
that.
AL
We
are
moving
along
they've
had
some
other
issues
that
they've
been
dealing
with
and
in
one
of
those
I
ran
into
john
russo
on
the
property
last
week
and
we
had
a
good
conversation
about
some
of
these
things
and
and
yeah.
So
we
I
you
know,
I
think,
we're
in
good
shape.
On
that.
The
one
issue
I
wanted
to
respond
to
john
clark's
latest
comment.
AL
Letter
comment,
number
two:
you
brought
up
pedestrian
access
and
I
wanted
to
first
thank
the
city
for
the
new
three-way,
stop
at
maine
and
herbert
as
well
as
the
crosswalk
there.
Once
the
hannah
lane
sewer
project
is
completed
and
hana
lane
is
repaved.
I
think
we
have
pretty
good
accessibility
from
that
end
of
main
street
there.
AL
I
think
the
reality
of
hannah
lane
is
that,
ever
since
the
dog
park
went
in,
there
has
been
enough
daily
foot
traffic
on
hannah
lane
to
warrant
a
crosswalk
across
fishkill
avenue
there
for
the
people
going
to
and
from
the
dog
park,
whether
a
curb
cut
out
on
fishkill
avenue
on
the
far
side
and
a
crosswalk
across
right.
There
would
alleviate
your
concern
about
pedestrian
accessibility
to
the
yard
and
would
serve
the
many
people
who
go
to
the
dog
park
who
come
from
the
different
facilities
over
on
the
other
side
over
off
of
delavan.
AL
C
AL
C
C
The
one
thing
that
I
did
want
to
bring
up
that's
different
this
time
is
that
you've
reduced
the
size
of
the
calculation
for
parking
on
the
outdoor
venue
space,
and
it
didn't
seem
to
me
that
reflects
the
full
volume
of
how
people
would
use
that
space.
There's
there's
a
sort
of
a
dotted
line
here
that
reduces
it
from
what
was
it
5850
square
feet
to
3
860
square
feet.
It
seemed
kind
of
arbitrary
in
order
to
reduce
the
number
of
required
parking
spaces
rather
than
to
reflect
how
the
space
might
be
used.
Q
Yeah,
I
think,
when
I
originally
had
that
outline
that
that
was
more
arbitrary,
just
trying
to
generally
locate
that
area
where
the
audience
would
be
sitting
and
then,
when
we
looked
about
at
you
know
how
it
would
it
would
actually
work
with
the
stage
area
and
keeping
some
reasonable
amount
of
circulation
around
where
people
might
be
sitting.
I
I
pulled
that
in
a
little
bit
and
also
because
the
you
know
the
building
inspector
determined
that
it
was.
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
C
A
Q
AA
B
B
Great
so
we'll
go
to
the
public.
First,
we
have
a
number
of
written
comments
submitted.
There
are
eight
that
we
have
on
record
all
on
the
same
subject,
meaning
they're
exactly
the
same
they're
just
signed
by
different
people,
so
those
are
in
the
record.
I
will
note,
though,
these
do
make
mention
of
the
fact
that
the
applicant
has
right.
You
know,
as
they
should
obtain
noise
permits
or
permits
for
events
and
that
no
noise
complaints
have
been
at
least
recorded.
B
B
AM
Good
evening
my
name
is
katie
shee
and
lopez.
I'm
a
homeowner
homeowner
at
16,
blackburn
ave.
I
also
have
two
young
children
living
with
me
and
I
just
want
to
say
that
in
general,
I'm
in
support
of
local
events
and
local
businesses
and
the
noise
from
the
yard
normally
doesn't
bother
me.
But,
however,
I
do
live
directly
across
the
street
and
over
the
last
year
or
so
there's
been
a
few
instances
where
the
noise,
the
music,
has
gone
on
quite
loud
and
quite
late.
AM
In
one
case,
it
was
past
11
pm
I
did
not
ever
make
a
formal
complaint
just
because
it
was
infrequent
and
it
didn't
seem
really
worth
it.
But
my
concern
is
that
with
the
expansion,
these
loud
events
are
going
to
go
on
more
often
and
maybe
later.
So.
What
I'm
asking
is
that
not
I'm
not
in
opposition
to
the
build-out,
but
I
am
asking
that
the
noise
and
amplified
music
have
a
really
strict
end
time
in
compliance
with
the
city
ordinance,
which
my
understanding
is
9
pm
and
that
they're
limited
in
frequency.
AM
B
AL
It
depends
on
the
noise
permit
for
which
we've
applied.
The
latest
we've
ever
applied
for
is
11..
There
was
there
was
one
dj
once
at
a
fundraiser
who,
at
11
sort
of
in
defiance,
turned
it
up
for
a
minute
until
somebody
got
to
it
and
turned
it
off,
but
no,
we
we
enforce
these
things.
We
take
them
very
seriously.
If
our
neighbors
hate
us
we're
going
to
fail.
AL
C
C
AL
I
would
say
that
there's
a
difference
between
a
concert
with
amplified
music
and
you
know
an
event
with
a
tent
outside
and
a
small
pa
playing
inside
the
tent,
no
outdoor
music.
You
know-
and
so
I
think
that
there's
a
there's
a
difference
there
and
what
the
neighbors
here
for
we
have
a
tent
up
right
now
we
had
at
we
cut
the
music
at
11
at
10
30.
We
cut
the
music
outside
at
11
p.m.
I
walked
the
entire
perimeter
of
the
property.
AL
B
That's
good,
that's
good!
I
mean
it
looks,
sounds
like
you're
doing
the
right
thing.
Noise
is
noise.
People
perceive
it
differently.
You
know
your
neighbor
to
other
people.
So
it's
just
a
matter
of
being
very
cognizant
of
the
fact
that
I
agreed
some
kids
have
to
get
to
sleep
early.
Some
adults
have
to
get
to
sleep
early.
AN
Hi,
my
name
is
bridgette
flaherty.
I
live
at
7
franklin
avenue,
which
is
diagonal
from
where
this
venue
is
going
to
be
taking
place.
I
have
a
problem
with
their
noise.
I
get
up
at
two
o'clock
in
the
morning.
Every
day
I
am
the
property
owner
of
the
house.
I've
lived
there
for
23
years.
I
shouldn't
have
to
relocate
me
and
my
family,
because
somebody
wants
to
operate
an
all-night
business.
AN
Last
summer
I
was
interrupted
with
my
sleep
and
my
schedule
with
noise
that
was
coming
on
from
across
the
street.
I'm
not
the
only
one
with
kids
on
my
block,
there's
several
young
families
that
have
recently
moved
in
approximately
six
within
the
past
four
years.
On
my
block
alone,
I
live
on
a
one-way
block.
AN
Okay
and
these
children
are,
I
would
say,
five
and
under
we
don't
need
this
in
our
neighborhood.
They
didn't
buy
their
homes
to
have
other
people
come
in
and
have
music
blasting
all
night.
You
want
to
do
that.
Take
it
down
the
block.
It
doesn't
need
to
be
on
our
block,
and
I
wish
you
to
review
this
very
seriously.
AD
AD
He
had
bought
this
large
property
on
hannel
lane
that
used
to
be
part
of
the
italics
foundry.
There
was
a
big
warehouse
building
there
with
a
large
grassy
area
on
the
side.
He
calls
the
property
lnj
and
the
yard.
For
the
past
nine
years,
jesus
jason
has
been
holding
many
different
types
of
events
on
the
property.
AD
AD
AD
AD
Groups
such
as
fairground
beacon
for
black
lives,
the
firefly
festival
for
common
ground
farm
land
to
learn
when
it
was
hudson
valley,
seed
and
a
comedy
benefit
show
for
planned
parenthood
fundraisers
that
provide
enrichment
for
the
community
as
well
as
financial
support
for
the
yard,
such
as
concerts
films
and
community
parties.
For
example,
a
wonderful
halloween
party
last
year
called
the
undead
bazaar
which
maybe
some
of
you
attended.
AD
AD
AD
I
hear
the
music,
but
it
doesn't
bother
me,
but
I'm
not
sure
why?
Maybe
because
I
don't
have
little
kids,
he
notifies
us
ahead
of
time
with
his
events
and
asks
permission
to
use
some
of
our
parking
areas
when
it
is
needed.
He
helps
keep
parking
organized
with
songs
that
he
provides.
He
does
what
he
can
to
minimize
any
disruption
into
our
condo
community
across
the
street.
AD
AD
Jason
is
already
for
the
past
nine
years,
proving
himself
capable
of
handling
all
of
these
events
in
the
safe
responsible
and
considerate
manner.
He
is
a
pleasure
to
have
him
and
the
yard.
As
my
neighbor,
he
has
helped
italics
community
owners
with
our
interest
in
developing
a
neighborhood,
with
a
cooperative
spirit
and
the
spirit
of
equality
and
diversity.
AD
B
B
Appreciate
it
thank
you,
and
so,
but
anyone
else
who's
just
mentioned
this
out
of
exp.
You
know
a
spirit
of
expediency,
not
to
you
necessarily,
but
anyone
else
who's
already
submitted
in
writing,
don't
feel
it
necessary
that
you,
unless
you
really
feel
you
need
to
don't
feel
it
necessary
to
also
then
repeat
your
comments
here.
W
W
I
have
concerns
about
noise
from
this
venue
late
in
the
early
evenings
for
the
neighboring
residents,
and
I
also
hear
it
across
the
creek.
I
hope
they
follow
city
noise,
ordinance
codes
and,
if
necessary,
that
they
are
enforced
by
the
city
with
this
type
of
permanent
event
space.
Like
most,
I
want
the
city
to
install
a
flashing,
crosswalk
system
on
route,
52
and
blackburn
for
their
patron
and
visitors,
who
will
eventually
go
to
and
from
memorial
park,
as
well
as
all
park,
visitors
and
school
children.
W
C
AL
Well,
there
isn't,
I
mean,
as
I've
stated,
that
a
couple
of
previous
meetings
there
isn't
a
set
stage
configuration
we
have
had
in
our
last
three
concerts.
We
had
the
stage
in
three
different
locations.
We
learned
things
from
those
one
of
those
locations
was
unsuccessful
from
a
noise
mitigation
standpoint.
We
would
never
do
that
setup
again.
AL
AL
AL
What
I
can
say
that
we've
learned
is
that
we
need
less
base,
we've
cut
the
subwoofers
from
most
of
our
setups
and
and
then
the
other
thing
that
I
would
think
is
that
some
of
what
we're
getting
with
that
setup
with
the
setup
that's
shown
in
ra's
drawing
the
biggest
concern,
is
reflection
off
of
our
building
audio
wise.
I
think
that
our
food
service
container-
that's
that
is
proposed
to
be
added
over
on
the
other
side,
is
actually
at
a
good
spot
to
dampen
reflections
to
help
with
some
of
that
noise
mitigation.
AL
I
think
that
there
are
some
things
that
can
be
done
on
the
property
and
I
think
that
we
are
already
I
mean.
I
know
that
we're
already
doing
those
things
whenever
we
do
a
setup,
we
walk
around
and
listen.
We
I
mean
not
just
on
the
property
off
the
property
as
well,
so
this
is
something
that
we
are
conscientious
about.
This
is
something
we
take
very
seriously.
C
B
AL
B
I
B
Them
so
just
just
just
to
highlight,
though-
and
this
is
part
of
the
statement
in
israel
making
the
same
statement-
we
appreciate
that
proper
permits
were
obtained
for
the
three
concert
events
already
held
at
four
hana
lane.
However,
it
is
a
logical
fallacy
to
assume
that,
since
none
of
the
setups
resulted
in
noise
complaints,
no
one
was
disturbed
and
therefore
the
introduction
of
comparable
events
on
a
routine
basis
will
be
problem-free
right.
B
The
event
organizers
may
have
obtained
proper
permits,
but
to
our
knowledge,
no
one
reached
out
to
homeowners
in
the
surrounding
area
to
inform
them
about
the
outdoor
events
that
were
planned.
Nor
was
there
any
other
follow
up
with
neighbors
afterward
to
inquire
about
any
adverse
reactions
had
either
either
of
these
measures
been
taken,
they
would
have
received
a
vocal
negative
response.
B
It
should
also
be
noted
that
many
among
us
who
know
and
respect
the
owners
of
lnj
we're
trying
to
be
good
neighbors
as
well.
We
do
not
want
to
create
trouble
for
our
friends
in
the
community
and
we
hoped
and
assumed
this
would
be
rare
or
ideally
one
time
happening.
I
just
I
highlight
this
part
of
it
there's
more
to
the
letter
just
so
that
you're
aware
of,
though
I
understand
you're,
taking
great
lengths
to
be
a
good
and
respectful
neighbor.
AL
AL
AL
F
I
just
agree
with
that.
You
know
that
concerns
it
sounds
like
more
work
has
to
be
done
to
figure
out
exactly
what
are
the
regs
for
the
noise.
You
know
hours
decibel
levels
and
then
understand
you
know,
because
the
applicant
is
saying
that
they're
monitoring
with
a
decimal
meter
at
the
perimeter,
so
either
the
standards
aren't
enough
to
protect
the
neighbors
sensitivities,
where
there's
some
disconnect
there
right.
So
we
need
to
figure
out
what
that
is,
so
that
we
can
proceed
accordingly.
B
H
B
AO
B
AO
AO
This
is
no
subdivision
involved
in
this
application.
For
the
record,
as
this
is
a
public
hearing,
we
did
notice
the
application
with
the
signage,
the
appropriate
mailings
and
notice
required
by
the
beacon
zoning
code.
Just
by
way
of
brief
update,
we
did
provide
a
supplemental
submission
to
you
dated
may
31st.
We
did
also
include
a
june
8
submission
which
just
included
some
of
the
additional
letters
of
support.
So
we've
had
more
than
a
dozen
letter
of
support
that
we've
submitted
to
you.
AO
We
just
also
provided
some
additionals,
and
we
note
that
amanda
also
posted
some
more
to
the
website.
We
did
want
to
point
out.
One
item
I
did
want
to
give
a
quick
background.
Of
course
is
this
is
a
public
hearing
for
the
benefit
of
the
public?
There
may
have
been
some
misinformation
that
has
been
circulated
about
the
project,
so
we
hope
that
tonight's
presentation
can
help.
Some
of
those
here
with
us
this
evening
understand
the
project
more
fully.
AO
AO
The
property
consists
of
a
through
lot
from
walcott
avenue
through
to
beekman
street,
just
up
the
road
or
down
the
road.
I
guess
for
those
that
parked
the
back
end
of
city
hall
tonight,
it's
presently
improved
by
a
historic
church
as
well
as
directory
in
the
cemetery,
it's
collectively
known
as
the
reformed
church
of
beacon.
AO
The
refined,
programic
scope,
programmatic
scope.
Excuse
me
that
has
been
reduced
from
the
original
envishment
of
this
project,
so
we
have
reduced
it
significantly
since
the
beginning
of
the
project,
collectively
the
adaptive
reuse
of
the
project.
Excuse
me,
the
adaptive,
reuse
of
the
church
and
the
property
involves
expanding
the
existing
two
and
a
half
story.
AO
Third
excusing
expanding
the
rectory
into
a
two
and
a
half
story:
30
room
hotel
with
31
off
street
parking
spaces
on
the
site,
we'll
also
be
renovating
the
existing
church
into
an
accessory
use,
space
that
includes
conference
events,
dining
facilities
for
a
cafe.
Restaurant
bar
we're
also
restoring
the
cemetery
to
a
public
park
which
will
be
including
a
walk
through
from
beekman
to
walcott
avenue.
AO
The
previous
capacity
that
was
proposed
for
those
accessory
events
was
440
420
people
for
larger
weekend
events
and
that
expected
capacity
had
been
reduced.
As
is
presently
before
your
board
to
a
maximum
for
the
limited
events
of
350
people,
so
we
did
want
to
note
importantly
that,
notwithstanding
that
capacity
that
maximum
capacity
on
the
site
for
these
occasional
larger
weekend,
events
that
typically
are
expected,
we're
typically
expected
to
have
far
fewer
people
from
events
ranging
from
125
people
to
200.
AH
AO
Along
that
same
line,
instead
of
hosting
events
seven
days
a
week,
they're
a
fine
scope
of
our
project
that
has
conference
center
programming
would
like
to
be
limited
only
to
weekends,
with
smaller
functions
and
seminars.
Workshops
generally
held
wednesday
to
friday,
ranging
from
50
to
200
people.
So
again,
those
larger
events,
those
the
maximum
capacity,
are
limited
and
limited
to
those
days.
As
noted,
the
hotel
will
of
course,
be
two
365
days
a
year.
24
7.
AO
the
dining
facilities
will
also
be
situated
in
a
portion
of
the
historic
church
and
we'll
serve
reception
guests
for
the
hotel
and
offer
breakfast
lunch
and
dinner
to
hotel
guests
and
members
of
the
public.
The
dining
facilities
are
expected
to
operate
again
seven
days
a
week,
but
they
will
also
align
with
the
hotel
operations
and
guests.
AO
AO
A
few
more
procedural
items,
as
I
did
see
a
member
of
the
zoning
board
of
appeals
here
this
evening.
This
application
was
previously
referred
to
the
building
department,
who
made
a
determination
associated
with
the
application
for
the
use
and
ultimately
made
a
determination,
determination
of
the
off-street
parking
requirement.
AO
The
application
does
require
a
parking
variance
from
the
zoning
board
of
appeals,
so
as
part
of
that
your
seeker
review,
which
we're
currently
under
at
your
board
as
an
involved
agency,
we
referred
over
to
zoning
for
their
comments
and
they
provided
a
memo
to
your
board.
Much
of
that
discussion
with
the
board,
of
course,
focused
on
the
the
parking
which
is
the
the
issue
that
zoning
would
face
if
that
application
is
ultimately
referred
to
them.
AO
AO
AQ
AQ
The
church
building
predates
all
of
beacon's
modern
developments,
including
the
two
adjacent
developments.
The
original
church
built
on
this
site
in
1813,
was
determined
to
be
too
small
for
the
growing
congregation
and
in
1861
the
existing
church
was
completed,
thereby
increasing
its
size
to
accommodate
the
growing
number
of
attendees.
AQ
This
came
at
a
time
when
many
people
regularly
attended
religious
services
and
when
churches
were
at
the
heart
of
a
community,
providing
people
with
a
sense
of
belonging,
education,
hope
and
song
in
1861
100
years
before
lyndon
b
johnson's
program
to
combat
poverty.
Churches
were
also
places
where
people
sought
help
in
times
of
need.
This
is
to
say
that
churches
were
very
important
and
busy
institutions
accordingly.
Accordingly,
the
church
was
built
to
accommodate
over
330
people.
AQ
AQ
AQ
AQ
Importantly,
our
plan
includes
a
way
to
preserve
the
church
by
using
it
as
a
cultural
space
which
will
be
open
to
the
public
like
any
religious
congregation.
Would,
however,
we
need
to
meet
a
certain
threshold
of
revenue
to
preserve
the
church.
Our
proposed
plan
is
not
immune
to
the
need
for
patrons.
Let
me
elaborate
on
this
further.
AQ
AQ
AQ
AQ
Furthermore,
we
have
planned
for
and
taken
the
necessary
actions
required
to
meant
to
manage,
improve
and
improve
upon
the
needs
associated
with
the
mitigation
of
parking
and
neighborhood
related
issues
required
for
this
special
use
permit
and
now
I'd
like
to
take
a
moment
to
speak
about
parking
and
how
it
relates
here.
With
the
expansion
of
the
parsonage
house,
our
plan
includes
a
30
room,
boutique
hotel
and
on-site
parking
to
accommodate
as
an
accessory
to
the
hotel
use
of
the
event.
AQ
Space
will
be
limited
because
of
the
size
of
the
existing
church
and
the
desire
to
preserve
green
space.
It
was
decided
that
we
would
rather
not
propose
to
pave
paradise
for
an
additional
parking
that
would
remain
empty
most
of
the
time.
Our
parking
and
traffic
studies
show
that
our
need
for
additional
off-site
parking
is
more
than
adequately
accounted
for
by
nearby
available
parking
within
a
five-minute
walking
distance
due
to
limited
frequency
of
use.
It
is
common
for
event,
spaces
to
rely
on
off-site
parking,
especially
those
of
historic
significance.
AQ
Beacon
is
a
pedestrian
friendly
city
and
has
worked
hard
to
provide
a
safe
network
of
crosswalks
and
paths
that
already
connect
our
site
with
available
parking.
We
will
ensure
the
safety
of
our
patrons
and
neighbors
by
designating
security
to
oversee
and
ensure
a
smooth
and
non-disruptive
operation
outdoors
and
indoors.
AQ
AQ
The
church
was
purchased,
with
the
blessing
of
the
former
congregation,
who
also
weighed
in
and
supports
our
plan
for
adaptive
reuse.
Our
decision
to
pursue
this
project
was
further
solidified
by
support
from
city
officials
and
the
mayor
who,
at
the
time,
were
also
contemplating
the
future
of
this
property.
They
had
voiced
their
opinion
that
the
church
and
parsonage
would
be
well
served
as
a
commercial
establishment
which
would
help
link
the
mta
station
to
main
street
and
be
woven
into
the
fabric
of
downtown
beacon.
AQ
I
am
deeply
sympathetic
to
my
neighbors
and
I
know
that
change
is
hard
and
scary.
Sometimes
I
can
assure
you
that
I
have
read
each
and
every
letter
and
take
their
concerns
seriously.
I
regret
that
the
reformed
church
was
no
longer
able
to
sustain
itself,
and
that
said,
the
future
of
the
building
is
and
has
to
be,
an
active
one
for
the
building
to
survive,
and
this
is
your
chance
to
weigh
in
on
that
future.
Our
intent
to
pursue
a
non-exclusive
operating
model
is
significantly
hindered
with
a
reduction
in
capacity.
AQ
I
hear
our
neighbors
and
understand
that
some
would
rather,
we
host
events
with
substantially
less
people
and
cater
to
a
more
exclusive
affluent
crowd,
but
I
object
to
that
exclusion.
Churches
have
historically
opened
their
doors
to
their
communities
and
we
wish
to
do
the
same.
Coming
from
background
rooted
in
non-profit
theater.
It
is
of
upmost
importance
that
we
are
not
shutting
out
members
of
our
community
by
establishing
a
cultural
institution
which
can
only
function
by
catering
to
people
with
substantial
wealth.
AQ
We
plan
to
have
a
flexible
seating
to
accommodate
a
maximum
audience
of
approximately
320
people
and
limit
these
maximum
capacity
events
to
weekends.
At
other
times.
The
church
facility
will
be
available
for
workshops,
rehearsals,
retreats
seminars,
art
exhibitions,
classes
and
smaller
talks
or
lectures.
AQ
I
have
read
our
neighbors
letters
carefully
and
have
spoken
with
many
of
them
in
person
and
can
relate
to
their
concerns.
I
too
am
a
member
of
this
community
with
small
kids
of
my
own
and
cherish
quiet
nights.
I
also
see
that
there
is
substantial
support
from
our
neighbors
for
cultural
use
of
the
church.
To
me,
this
is
a
choice
to
prioritize
cultural
and
inclusive
community
engagement
over
more
development.
That
would
give
nothing
back
to
the
community
change,
especially
for
the
church
is
inevitable,
and
I
am
asking
for
the
support
to
make
it.
A
change.
B
AQ
B
AR
AS
AS
AL
AS
Is
sufficient
parking
in
the
vicinity
to
accommodate
the
parking
for
the
for
the
special
events?
The
hotel
itself
is
is
accommodated
by
the
parking.
The
parking
needs
for
the
hotel
itself
are
accommodated
by
the
on-site
parking,
and
the
cafe
would
also
in
the
times
when
there's
not
events,
there
would
also
be
a
need
for
off-site
parking
for
the
cafe
as
well.
That's
another
that's
17
spaces.
AS
AS
Since
the
last
meeting,
we've
adjusted
the
circulation
on
the
on
the
project
on
the
site
to
be
a
one-way
clockwise
circulation,
all
traffic
entering
only
at
all
times
at
the
southern
entrance
at
the
southern
driveway,
all
traffic,
exiting
only
at
all
times
at
the
northern
driveway.
That
was
something
that
we
discussed
heavily
at
the
last
meeting.
We've
heard
that
that
concern
from
the
board
and
made
that
adjustment
so
that'll,
be
the
the
onside
circulation
at
all
times
during
regardless
of
events,
that'll
be
the
circulation.
AS
That's
part
of
the
traffic
and
management
parking
management
plan
we
still
propose
to.
As
as
gavin
mentioned,
we
still
propose
to
have
on-site
monitors
to
manage
the
traffic
flow,
manage
the
pickup
and
drop
off
throughout
the
those
events
which
we
understand
is
a
necessity
for
the
larger
events
that
we
were
proposing
and
that
traffic
and
market
parking
management
plan
not
only
deals
with
the
on-site
circulation,
but
also
how
do
we
mitigate
the
parking
off
site?
AS
You
know
what
that
plan
identifies
as
a
way
to
disseminate
information
to
the
attendees
on
where
the
optimum
locations
are
for
parking,
where
we
we
should.
We've
shown
that
there's
readily
available
parking
in
in
the
area
and
that
information
will
be
also
be
available
through
the
the
on-site
parking
attendants
to
just
disseminate
it,
as
well
as
people
are
driving
in
for
part
pickup
and
drop
off.
One
of
the
other
things
that
we've
identified
in
the
traffic
impact
parking
management
plan.
AS
I
AS
Indicate
that
there's
no
parking
in
those
facilities
and
we
don't
want
people
parking
there
and
also
some
signage
to
identify
other
locations
off-site
for
for
where
the
parking
is
identifying
parking
at
tompkins
lot.
Identifying
parking
in
municipal
lot
at
other
off-site
locations
that
we've
identified
so
that
that's
all
included
in
the
traffic
and
parking
management
plan,
and-
and
we
feel
that,
together
with
that
plan
and
what
we
have
identified
as
available
parking,
that
we
we've
shown
that
there
is
sufficient
parking
in
the
area
to
accommodate
these
occasional
events
of
of
larger
size.
B
So
just
a
few
two
things
one
I
heard
you
make
mention
of
traffic
and
that
your
analysis
concludes
that
there
is
no
significant
impact
to
traffic.
I'm
assuming
you're,
stating
that,
based
on
a
maximum
capacity,
350
person
event
correct
help
me
understand
that
okay,
so
I
guys
I
would
appreciate
no
either
you
know
verbal
or
otherwise
clapping.
AS
AS
We
looked
at
friday
evenings
and
saturdays,
which
we
identified
to
be
the
peak
times
when
these
events
would
likely
occur,
and
we
looked
at
the
peak
traffic
during
those
time
periods
on
friday,
evenings
and
saturdays.
What's
the
highest
existing
background
traffic,
that's
out
there.
Today
we
made
a
projection.
We
then
made
projections
of
what
the
project
will
generate
during
those
events.
AS
Okay,
so
we
we
conservatively
assume
that
the
events
could
overlap
with
the
friday
evening
commute.
Is
that
necessarily
what's
going
to
happen?
No,
it's
likely
that
those
events
may
start
later,
but
to
provide
a
conservative
analysis.
We
assumed
that
on
a
friday
evening,
those
events
would
occur
at
the
same
time
as
the
commuter
peak.
AS
We
looked
more
at
the
midday
hours
when
traffic
volumes
are
higher
generally
than
on
a
saturday
even
later
in
the
day
or
evening
to
conservatively
assess
those
those
traffic
impacts
for
those
projects.
So
once
we
identified
what
those
background
traffic
volumes
were,
we
made
projections
of
the
future
traffic
volumes,
including
other
developments
in
the
area,
making
growing
the
volumes
by
standard
yearly
growth
rate
and
then
making
projections
of
what
the
project's
going
to
generate
itself
for
traffic
into
and
out
of
the
site.
B
AS
AS
AS
So
we
actually
did
it
two
ways.
In
our
initial
study,
we
assumed
that
everybody
was
going
to
come
to
the
site
and
everybody
was
going
to
leave
the
site
to
get
an
idea
of
if
we
had
all
that
pickup
and
drop-off
happening
at
this
site.
What
are
the
impacts
there
and
does
the
does
the
access
at
the
site
work
right
then,
in
the
sensitivity
analysis,
we
did
separate
analysis
with
different
distributions
where
we
divided
it
up
and
said.
Okay,
this
number
of
people
are
going
to
go
to
the
municipal
lot.
AS
AS
M
AS
F
AS
M
AS
F
AS
So
the
traffic
analysis
is
is
built
over
an
hour-long
period
right,
so
the
the
traffic
coming
in
the
traffic
coming
out
in
our
modeling
accounts
for
that
entire
hour,
and
that's
so
there's
no
and
the
assumption
is
that,
as
part
of
this
yeah
there's
going
to
be
a
probably
a
peak
15-minute
period
where
they're
gonna
there's
going
to
be
more
cars
coming
in.
But
there
is
going
to
be
some
disbursement
of
the
time
period
to
where
they
come
in
and
out.
AS
F
A
separate
analysis-
I
just
want
to
say
right
now
at
the
moment
I'm
not
asking
for
anything,
but
I
think
it
would
be
good
for
everybody
who's
here
and
has
an
interest
in
the
you
know
and
wants
to
make
comments
at
the
public
hearing
to
kind
of
understand.
No,
and-
and
so
if
you
can
give
like
a
just
a
really
quick
summary
and
say
something
like
you
know,
a
typical
scenario
would
be.
F
You
know:
90
vehicles
bringing
concert
goers
and
we
had
30
of
those
proceed
directly
down
beekman
and
park
at
the
train
station
20
did
drop-offs
10
of
them
went
and
tried
to
park
on
rhombout.
Where
there
was,
you
know,
side
street
parking
because
they
didn't.
You
know
they
just
figured
they'd
go
for
it
rather
than
try
to
hit
one
of
the
public.
Lots
and
20
went
to
tompkins
and
is
this
I
think
it
would
just
help
people
to
grasp
probably
what's
being
modeled
right
if
they
knew.
AO
You
know
if
I
may
just
to
touch
on
that.
I
think
what
would
be
particularly
effective
if
I
understand
your
comment
line
specifically
is
if
we
highlight,
for
example,
a
typical
large
event
scale
like
taylor's,
going
to
be
coming
from
uber
john's
going
to
be
coming
from.
You
know
the
train
station,
you
know
rich,
is
going
to
be
riding
his
bike.
You
know,
and
all
those
analyses
kind
of
understanding
how
what
that
traffic
management
plan
does
because
we're
we're.
AO
Speaking
of
it,
you
know
as
it's
we
have
been,
which
we've
been
reviewing
this
with
your
consultant
for
for
a
prolonged
period
of
time.
So
there's
a
lot,
that's
gone
into
it.
So,
as
we
mentioned,
there's
a
sort
of
a
twofold
way
that
the
study's
been
developed.
It
was
the
worst
case
scenario,
but
then
your
consultant
suggested
well,
don't
just
take.
You
know
there
are
people
that
are
staying
at
this
hotel
that
you
know
we're
conservatively
and
in
our
case
not
taking
credit
for
that
will
be
patroning
this
you
know
the
accessory
use.
AO
That's
that's
sort
of
the
nature
of
how
this
function.
That's.
Why
so
so
so
we,
but
we
went
to
the
sensitivity
analysis
to
say:
okay,
throw
that
assumption
out,
make
it
worse,
make
it
more
conservative
so
that
you
have
even
more
people.
You
know
no
one
at
the
everybody's
just
staying
at
the
hotel
because
they
want
to
go.
You
know
to
some
other
event.
You
know
that
that
part
of
it
that's
why
we
did
the
sensitive
analysis.
AO
So
if,
if
the
board
sees
fit,
you
know
we're
taking
the
comments
from
you
tonight
and
certainly
going
to
work.
This
is
not
a
one
public
hearing
meeting.
We
understand
that
we're
early
in
this
review
process.
We
encourage
the
public's
participation
because,
as
the
applicant
mentioned,
we
want
to
hear
the
public's
comments.
We
want
to
work
it
into
our
design.
So
I
think
when
we
come
back
to
you,
we
might
be
able
to
make
a
tonight's
more
about
the
the
higher
level
getting
into
those
those
details.
AO
These
comments,
I
think
we
can
work
into
that
presentation.
So
it's
it's
a
real
world.
This
is
an
event.
This
is
it's
managed.
You
know
taylor's
out
there
with
his
flag
jacket
on
saying
here's
where
you're
going
handing
out
the
pamphlets
jill's
pamphlets
from
you
know,
metro
north.
Are
there
saying
you
know
this
is
how
you
should
get
to
the
event.
So
I
think
those
are
the
ways
that
can
better
explain
what
that
management
study
says.
B
I
I
think
it
would
be
extremely
helpful
that,
because
you
know,
modeling
is
somewhat
theoretical
right
and
it's
all
based
on
the
inputs
right
and
that
we
have
a
good
sense
of
how
potential
real
world
scenarios
model
out
beyond
you
know
a
single
sort
of
data
set
input
and,
to
that
end
the
larger
scale,
events
different
scenarios
as
far
as
availability
of
parking
and
some
of
these
sort
of
random
unintended
right.
So
you
know
and
again
we're
gonna
get
to
parking
in
a
second.
B
But
you
know
this
idea
of
an
established
available
parking
based
on
off-site
presupposes
that
everybody's
going
to
do
that
right
as
opposed
to
come
and
park
on
rhombout
or
or
whatever
right
these
unintended
consequences
as
well.
An
understanding
on
our
part
of
when,
at
what
point
does
the
management
plan
kick
in
right?
AS
AS
AO
Q
AO
B
Yeah,
I
think
I
think
again
we'll
get
to
this,
but
I
think
we
want
to
have
a
conversation
about
some
of
these
larger
scale.
Events
right
what
the
intent
around
a
frequency
is
right
is
this
once
a
year,
is
it
twice
a
year,
and
we
want
to
establish
that
so
there's
a
clear
understanding
that
this
isn't
hopefully
every
other
weekend
where
we're
seeing
a
max
out
event.
So,
hopefully
we
can
drill
down
into
that
with
your
help
as
well.
AT
P
P
And
that's
what
has
been
our
continued
review
of
their
technical
materials
and
that's
kind
of
what
our
comment
letter
hits
on
is
that
we
have
no
further
technical
comments
regarding
traffic.
It's
more
of
about
how
they're
going
to
handle
the
variance
they're
requesting
for
parking
parking
is
the
big
item
and
that
kind
of
plays
into
the
parking
management
plan
that
we're
going
to
keep
discussing.
Yeah.
B
The
good
segue,
because
there
would
be
no
conversation
about
traffic
without
this
concept
of
the
need
for
additional
parking,
and
let
me
just
also
clarify
when
you,
when
you
shared
with
us,
the
what
you're
seeking
in
terms
of
additional
off-street
parking
you
set
a
variance
from
the
planet.
Excuse
me:
zoning
board
of
104,
correct.
AS
AS
AO
So
just
we
have,
we
don't
have
an
active
application
before
the
zoning
board,
because
we're
still
before
the
board
for
this
hearing,
but
the
board
would
have
to
make
a
secret
determination
before
the
zoning
board
could
act
as
it
is
understood.
So
we
are
not
actively
before
we
were
on
a
secret
referral,
but
not
for
a
particular
variance
application.
B
AO
AO
I
mean
it
was
a
referral
based
on
that
discussion,
but
I
would
say
that
that
the
communications
or
the
discussions
with
the
board
were
you
know
we
provided
them
with
a
with
copies
of
our
studies
and
the
the
notions
were
more
of
a
perceived
than
they
were
a
technical
nature.
So
again,
the
concerns
that
were
represented
back
to
this
board.
AO
Having
appeared
at
that
that
board
for
the
three
months
that
that
took
place
there,
the
discussions
about
what
was
taking
place
on
the
site,
the
activities
those
are
accounted
for,
and
we
really
put
together
the
responses
technically
to
those
concerns,
but
they're
they
remain.
I
think
what
I
would
refer
to
as
perceived
impacts,
not
those
that
are
are
you
know,
that's
that's
part
of
where
we
were,
but
again
with
the
zoning
board.
We
tried
to
present
the
application
for
for
the
relief
for
the
parking
we
didn't
agree
with
the
building
inspectors.
AO
AQ
AO
AO
So
they,
I
think
the
perception
was,
for
example,
there
was
a
comment
in
the
the
memo
referred
to
your
board
about
whether
someone
would
walk
from
a
parking
lot
and
that
that
closing
a
door
of
a
car
was
a
potential
community
character
impact.
You
got
a
train
that
I
can
hear
during
our
meetings
while
we're
talking
so
I
you
know,
some
of
those
comments
were
perceived
impacts.
The
closing
of
a
car
door
in
a
parking
lot
isn't
shouldn't
rise
to
the
level
of
a
significant
environmental
impact.
B
Thusly,
suffice
it
to
say
that
the
potential
for
significant
adverse
environmental
impacts
would
increase
if
the
applicant
sought
a
parking
variance
for
more
than
104
off-street
parking
spaces.
So
I
think
I'm
hearing
you
correctly
and
saying
that
that
you,
you
sense
that
the
basis
for
them
saying
that
is
somewhat.
AO
Applicant,
I
should
say
the
applicant
has
provided
the
technical
reports
and
materials
and
supports
in
their
studies
that
adequately
address
off-street
parking
and
traffic.
The
comments
that
were
made
by
the
board
were
of
absolutely
appropriate
from
a
zoning
board
perspective
of
we
live
in
the
city.
We
we
know
what's
going
to
happen,
but
your
studies,
you
know
the
studies,
identify
and
say
what
they
say:
they
don't
there's.
AO
B
AO
B
In
regard
to
how
they've
characterized
again
in
further
summation
they're
sharing
with
us,
significant
uncertainty
remains
regarding
parking
availability
during
large
events,
impacts
on
vehicle
and
pedestrian
traffic
and
the
ability
of
parking
enforcement
to
ensure
patron
park
in
designated
off-site
locations.
Something
I
just
addressed
before
a
parking
variance
of
104
off
street
parking
spaces
would
be
substantial.
B
Based
on
this
input
of
city
planner
john
clark
we'd
love
to
draw
you
into
this
stuff.
It
appears
that
the
only
action
that
would
avoid
significant
adverse
impacts,
as
opposed
to
mitigating
against
them
and
again
they're,
not
they're,
not
saying
environmental
impacts
here,
they're
saying
adverse
impacts.
Generally,
that's
how
I'm
reading
this
so
keep
that
in
mind
would
be
to
reduce
or
eliminate
the
amount
of
off-site
parking
needed.
B
This
whole
law
of
unintended
consequences-
I'm
referring
to
the
zoning
board,
is
generally
in
support
of
the
reuse
of
this
historic
building,
but
the
zoning
board
has
major
concerns
and,
as
discussed
above,
ultimately
believes
that
the
project
may
result
in
significant
adverse
impacts
to
the
community.
Okay,
so
there's
a
distinction
there
and
the
way
I
sort
of
read
that
and
sum
it
up.
It's
in
align
with
our
observation
that
a
request
for
104
off
street
parking
spaces
variants,
for
that
is
significant
okay.
U
B
AO
And
I
think
we
had
at
least
the
preliminary
discussion.
I
can't
recall
if
it
was
with
your
board
or
if
it
was
the
zoning
board
of
appeals
in
that
concept
or,
for
example,
other
discussions
we've
had
about
whether
or
not
the
pri,
the
public
lots
became
otherwise
utilized.
As
a
you
know,
another
development
or
did
was
not
available
not
again
taking
credit
for
any
future
new
parking
that
the
city
creates.
You
know,
there's
the
ability
of
this
board
as
conditions
to
appropriately
address
that
we
have
already
pro
offered.
AO
Proof
the
proof
is
in
the
pudding
would
would
go
to
show
that
the
operations
as
we've
designed
them
and
that
management
plan
work
and
the
sensitivity
analysis
addresses
that
so
beyond
the
approval
we've
identified,
that
there
are
mechanisms
through
whether
it's
conditions
or
otherwise,
if
necessary,
to
incorporate
those.
I
mean
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
we're
doing
here.
That
management
plan
is
not
a.
You
know.
It's
like
your
comprehensive
plan,
it's
a
living
document.
So
ultimately,
it's
designed
to
be
adaptive
to
the
conditions
on
the
site.
AO
You
know
other
development
that
could
come
in
the
future,
other
things
that
work
or
or
don't
work,
but
we
are,
you
know,
we've
pro
offered
things
like
a
post-monitoring
study
that
would
help
you
know
with
these
exact
questions
that
len
mentioned
whether
there
is
you
know
a
night
where
a
car
went
on
to
90
what
happened.
Did
somebody
get
a
flat
tire
in
the
you
know
something
to
pinpoint
what
went
wrong?
That's
not
a
you
know:
a
blimp
falls
from
the
sky
that
might
be
tougher
to
control
the
traffic.
I
mean.
AO
AO
The
plan
is
here
designed
to
reflect
that,
but
we
hear
you
on
the
size-
and
I
think
you
know
we're
going
to
take
that
back
and
the
applicants
are,
of
course
here
and
of
course,
we're
going
to
hear
from
the
public
too
on
their
feelings
and
hopefully
we'll
be
able
to
work
that
in,
but
we
have
been
providing
and
we're
working
with
those
other
areas.
You
know
private,
you
know
other
lots
to
try
and
manage
it,
but
conditionable
to
bring
us
back
to
court
so
to
speak.
If,
in
fact,
those
things
were
to.
B
Yeah
no
clear
and
you
have
shared
in
the
past
before
the
fact
that
there
are
post
development
mechanisms
for
monitoring
and
analyzing.
You
know
what
then
the
real
world
situation
ends
up
being
you
can
you
can,
I
hope,
completely
understand
as
the
applicant
our
concerns
as
this
board
representing
the
community
on
an
ask
this
large
right
for
a
variance
this
large
and
look
it's
it's
it's
taking
out
of
the
conversation
right
now.
All
of
the
you
know
stated
benefits
of
you
know
community.
B
AO
AO
F
And
from
you
know,
from
a
safety
perspective,
if
you
have
a
hazardous
condition
and
workers
are
being
exposed
to
it,
you
know
sometimes
someone
might
say:
let's
just
have
everybody
work,
a
four-hour
shift
and
just
change
people
out
more
frequently,
and
then
they
you
know
they
don't
get
for
exposed
as
long.
We
don't
have
to
do
anything
else
and
that
that's
very
undesirable
compared
to
fixing
the
problem
with
engineering
controls,
like
you
know,
getting
you
know
or
substituting
the
chemical
or
doing
something
to
protect
people,
and
I
just
I
just
think
I
would.
F
So
I
think
we
should
move
away
from
trying
to
put
a
cap.
You
know,
or
put
some
unrealistically
small
cap
on
the
larger
events
that
are
going
to
be
profitable
and
and
make
sure
that
we
address
the
the
the
issues
and
if
that
includes
something
like
considering
you
know,
some
cities
have
resident
parking
zones
where
you
don't
get
to
park
on
a
street.
Unless
you
have
a
residence
sticker
and
they
you
know
it
can
differ
by
neighborhood.
F
B
No,
I
think
I
think,
you're,
obviously
working
toward
what
I'm
hoping
for
for
us
to
be
able
to
confidently
and
with
certainty
leave.
Yes,
understanding
that
we're
not
setting
the
city
up,
not
just
the
city,
but
also
this
very
you
know
almost
dense
community
surrounding
the
church
for
problems
right
right.
So
I'm
uncertainty.
So
that's
that's
just
so
with.
AO
That
I
did
just
want
to
point
out
just
because
I
know
the
public
is
here
as
well:
I'm
going
to
speak
for
rea
and
play
mike
for
just
a
minute.
We
also
have
incorporated
renderings,
which
are
now
up
on
the
screen
of
the
of
the
proposal
involving
the
hotel.
So
I
just
want
to
highlight
just
for
the
benefit
of
the
public.
We
have
also
changed
the
design
of
this
site
to
also
mitigate
and
manage
potential
impacts
to
adjoining
property.
So
we've
incorporated
landscaping,
we've
pulled
away.
AO
AO
Or
has
prepared
our
landscaping
plan,
so
we've
taken
a
lot
of
thought
of
our
surrounding
neighbors,
based
on
meetings
that
we've
had
some
more
productive
than
others
about
how
to
address
those
concerns.
So
a
lot
of
those
other
community
character
potential
impacts.
We
are
mitigating
and
managing
through
those
other
implementations.
So
I
know
that
the
focus
is
on
parking
for
for
good
reason,
we've
heard
you
and
and
and
of
the
other,
the
zoning
board
with
respect
to
the
size
of
the
larger
events.
AO
M
C
D
C
Y
C
C
B
A
B
Okay,
so
some
work
to
do
there
so
we'll
go
to
the
public.
There
have
been
a
significant
number
of
and
including,
as
you
mentioned,
12
letters
in
support
that
the
applicant
has
submitted
those
are
in
the
record.
They
are
all
of
the
same
form
by
myriad
different
residents.
We'll
go
to
the
list.
There
was
a
sign
up
sheet,
so
we'll
go
to
that
in
a
second.
I
just
want
to
acknowledge.
B
B
We
had
asked
and
thank
you
folks,
that
people
sign
up
so
we'll
go
in
order
and
I'll
again
ask
that
we
limit
our
comments
to
three
minutes
and
that
we're
always
hopefully
respectful
and
that
again,
if,
if
a
previous
speaker
has
made
a
point
and
that
you'd
like
to
make
the
same
point,
take
that
into
account
acknowledge
that
point
and
keep
it
as
brief
as
you
possibly
can.
So.
Thank
you
first
item
on
the
excuse
me
first,
individual
on
the
list
is
I'm
assuming
this.
Is
you
jane.
AT
AU
AT
Everyone
for
bringing
all
these
issues
forward,
and
I
don't
want
to
repeat
them-
and
I
really
do
appreciate
this-
this
team
here
and
the
the
hard
work
that
you
do
and
I
think
you've
been
very
thorough
in
summarizing
these
requests
and
bringing
forward
your
opinions.
So
I
want
to
thank
you
for
that.
The
thing
that
I'm
mostly
concerned
with
is
the
off-site
parking
on
stratford
avenue.
This
is
where
I
live.
I've
been
there
over
three
decades
and
it's
pretty
much
a
quiet
area
and
I
like
to
keep
it
that
way
if
possible.
AT
So,
as
I
said
before,
a
lot
of
things
have
been
mentioned.
That's
my
primary
concern
and
that
I
really
don't
want
to
see
tension
at
the
time
of
these
events,
because
people
are
looking
for
a
place
to
park
and
they
don't
have
one,
and
it's
just
going
to
be
a
major
concern,
and
the
other
point
I
wanted
to
make
is
the
noise.
That's
also
going
to
be.
A
big
concern
is
the
noise
that
was
it.
AI
Now,
on
stratford
avenue,
where
we
live
years
ago,
we
used
to
have
curbs,
they
took
all
the
curbs
away.
So
when
people
come
down
there-
and
I
know
if
I
was
going
to
a
concert-
I
go
by
their
first
street
on
the
right-
you
pull
right
into
stratford
avenue
and
you
just
start
parking
park
on
our
lawns,
because
there's
no
curbs
you
know
late
at
night
after
the
concerts
are
over,
people
are
wandering
and
meandering
through
the
neighborhood.
AI
AI
As
a
matter
of
fact,
I
don't
know
what
the
police
are
going
to
be
doing.
During
this
whole
thing,
they're
going
to
have
to
be
managing
the
traffic
they're
going
to
have
to
be
managing.
What's
going
on
as
people
are
stopping
and
dropping
people
off,
it's
9-d,
it's
a
one-lane
highway.
You
know
it's
a
state
road.
They
don't
have
another
road
to
go
down
to
handicapped
parking.
AI
AO
But
we
do
have
80,
we
have
worked
in
ada
parking
to
the
design.
That
was
a
comment
actually
by
the
board
that
was
added
to
the
to
the
site
line,
so
it
has
been
adjusted,
which
is
how
why
we
lost
a
parking
space
from
account
in
the
recirculation
but
we'll.
We
will
also
provide
written
responses
to
the
comments
this
evening
so
as
to
get
those.
But
but
thank
you
for
that
comment.
We
will.
We
are
providing
that
on
the
site.
AI
AI
I
guess
that's
really
all
I
have
to
say
you
know.
I
just
know
that
if
I
was
going
to
a
concert
bango,
you
know
you
guys
are
living
in
a
perfect
world.
You
know
what,
if
it
snows
what
if
it
rains,
how
many
people
are
going
to
be
down
there,
how
many
people
going
to
want
to
park
in
the
in
the
in
the
train
parking
lot?
You
know
it's
raining.
It's
snowing.
I
know.
AI
Bango
I'd
park
at
the
first
spot,
I
could
okay
and
and
not
to
say,
say
anything
against
it
being
in
business.
How
many
big
events
are
we
going
to
have
to
me
every
every
day
could
have
been
a
big
event,
the
bigger
the
event,
the
more
money
you
make.
So
I
would
imagine
eventually
it's
going
to
be
if
it
doesn't
start
off
that
way.
Every
weekend,
there's
going
to
be
a
big
event.
D
AO
AO
B
AB
D
AV
AB
D
D
D
AV
AV
D
AV
D
AW
AV
AV
AV
L
AV
Members
of
this
board
have
repeatedly
raised
serious
concerns
about
how
so
few
on-site
parking
spaces
could
work
for
what
the
developer
has
in
mind
for
the
hotel
and
entertainment
event
venue
to
be
held
principally
within
the
church.
You
have
expressed
doubt
about
how
persons
entering
the
premises
could
find
park
parking
spots
and
easily
maneuver
in
or
out
of
them,
and
you
have
likewise
observed
that,
in
short
order,
this
would
cause
serious
traffic
jams
on
walcott
avenue.
AV
If
not
beyond
that,
in
turn,
those
individuals
driving
to
the
site
from
the
south
will
find
it
nearly
impossible
to
make
a
left
turn
into
the
church,
causing
a
traffic
jam
all
the
way
down
to
south
avenue
those
same
vehicles
will
block
or
seriously
hamper
the
ability
of
the
owners
in
our
community
and
the
one
across
the
street,
among
others
to
gain
access
to
northern
travel.
It
is
unlawful
to
continuously
ride
in
the
middle
lane,
created
for
east
or
west
turns
arising
up
and
down
9d.
AV
AV
And
while
your
role
is
to
address
the
interest
of
all
parties
to
ascertain
the
propriety
of
an
application
with
all
due
respect,
there
comes
a
time
when
the
true
and
objective
facts,
facts
of
things
known
or
proved
must
prevail,
and
when
so
patent,
as
we
believe,
is
the
case
here,
you
have
the
duty
as
fiduciaries
to
declare
that
this
applicant's
ideas
do
not
work
for
the
subject
site.
Despite
the
applicant's
many
attempts
to
convince
you,
otherwise,
with
promises
to
return
to
the
planning
board
with
new
ideas
and
amended
ones.
AV
AP
AV
AV
B
B
AX
AX
I
have
submitted
a
letter
from
river
ridge
views
to
the
planning
board,
including
a
survey
taken
by
all
of
our
residents.
Several
months
ago,
I
have
submitted
a
petition
signed
by
all
18
homeowners
at
river
ridge
views
and,
as
you
mentioned,
I
am
saying
over
125
local
beacon
residents
who
live
close
by
voicing
our
concerns
about
safety,
noise,
parking
and
traffic.
AX
I've
also
submitted
a
letter
as
a
resident,
but
tonight
I
would
like
to
read
a
letter
from
one
of
my
neighbors
who's
out
of
town
who
faces
and
shares
a
common
lawn
with
the
church.
So
this
letter
is
from
my
neighbor
as
the
owner
of
16
river
ridge
court
at
river
ridge
views.
Our
front
yard
is
directly
adjacent
to
the
side
yard
of
the
goodwill
church.
AX
AX
We
were
then
initially
enthusiastic
to
learn
that
the
property's
new
owners
planned
to
give
the
church
new
life
as
a
hotel,
restaurant
and
entertainment
venue.
Unfortunately,
as
the
scope
of
the
project
was
revealed,
our
enthusiasm
quickly
turned
to
dread.
We
are
now
anticipating
that
just
steps
away
from
our
front
door,
there
may
be
as
many
as
350
people
congregating
every
weekend
for
concerts
and
weddings
and,
of
course,
smaller
events
for
up
to
200
people
on
weekdays.
AX
AX
AX
There
are
vague
plans
for
shuttle
buses,
but
this
creates
its
own
set
of
problems
when
events
end
and
a
horde
of
revelers
congregate,
outdoors
weddings
and
concerts
engender
inebriation
and
tipsy
attendees
would
have
no
problem.
Stumbling
onto
our
property
fallout
might
include
include
excessive
noise.
Cigarette
smoke,
physical
damage
and
even
altercations
police
will
be
overburdened
with
complaints.
AX
The
idea
of
reinventing
the
church
is
a
good
one,
and
a
small
hotel
and
a
restaurant
would
be
welcome
additions
to
beacon,
but
prophecy
is
being
cavalier
and
it's
overly
in
its
overly
ambitious
plan
for
large
events.
They
have
no
place
on
the
site
situated
on
the
city's
most
trafficked
ordering
and
with
neighbors
living
within
a
hundred
feet.
We
urge
you
to
reign
in
this
project
to
ensure
that
it
is
an
asset
to
our
community
and
not
a
detriment,
sincerely
may
skidmore
and
married
luke
carlin.
Thank.
N
N
N
I'm
thinking
about
the
fact
that
residential
homes
are
controlled
environments
and
we
are
thinking
about
and
discussing,
plans
for
an
uncontrolled
environment.
I'm
thinking
about
the
fact
that,
to
the
point
about
smoking,
you
have
folks
with
health
issues,
that's
going
to
impact
them
as
well.
I'm
also
thinking
about
traffic,
I'm
also
thinking
about
the
designs
that
don't
necessarily
incorporate
or
include
the
people
who
are
living
around
it.
When
I
look
at
the
scale
of
this
property,
it's
actually
not
accurate
church
is
further
back.
That
hotel
is
in
line
with
my
front
door.
N
I
share
a
lawn
next
to
it,
so
I
say
to
say
that
everything's
gonna
flood
into
our
existing
neighborhood
and
I'm
just
concerned
about
the
size
of
that,
because
again
we're
off
a
one-way
street
or
our
street.
That
only
has
traffic
going
in
both
directions
with
one
lane.
So
how
are
we
going
to
actually
change
that
or
how
are
we
going
to
improve
the
things
that
we
can't
change,
which
we
can't?
N
So
I
think
I
am
in
support
of
the
church
getting
what
it
needs,
but
I
think
there
needs
to
be
a
better
plan.
That's
actually
functional
because
the
existing
design
is
not
functional.
It
does
not
speak
to
the
community.
The
community
was
not
surveyed
about
how
we
wanted
to
preserve
the
actual
property,
in
which
case
I
just
feel
like
it's
a
push
to
save
the
church
while
pushing
out
the
community
that
lives
and
occupies
the
space
around
it.
B
B
AY
AY
B
B
AY
AY
AY
So
that
being
said,
I
did
also
know
the
church.
Partial
was
for
sale,
but
the
beacon
I
bought
into
was
one
that
four
inches
was
just
a
mere
four
inches
of
deviation
of
space
was
that
that
was
heavily
contentious
fought
over.
So
the
fact
that
we
have
wait,
so
I
guess
what
I'm
trying
to
say
is.
I
don't
believe
in
this
project.
I
also
don't
believe
in
the
business
model.
AY
AY
AY
And
it's
one
bathroom
for
all
315
attendees,
so
I'm
not
stating
the
obvious
traffic
this
this
and
that
besides
infrastructure,
which
I
don't
know,
if
beacon
even
has
infrastructure
to
hold
regarding
water
sewage
electrical,
we
helped
gather
those.
We
did
a
grassroots
campaign
that
was
my
age
for
those
petitions
and
they're
all
residents
here.
D
AZ
Everybody
eleven
ten
rivers,
river
court
and
you
know
two
years
loved
the
city
for
12
years
and
beyond
that,
though
it
was
just
a
beautiful
area,
I'm
not
getting
into
like.
You
know
why
things
could
change.
I
would
just
say
this:
having
lived
in
the
city,
I'm
a
lawyer,
I
work
in
insurance
world.
I
just
can't
imagine
with
a
scale
and
then
there's
an
issue
as
such
as
a
fire
such
as
some
calamity
and,
more
importantly,
an
insurance
world.
AZ
I
will
tell
you
that,
like
new
york
city,
the
pedestrian
knockdowns
due
to
congestion,
they've
reduced
traffic,
you
know
to,
I
think
it's
like
20
25
miles
an
hour
in
the
city
per
se
because
of
pedestrian,
knockdowns
and
fatality.
I
just
think
in
general
to
me-
and
you
know
with
rachel-
you
know,
obviously
it's
about
what's
best
for
the
city
and
also,
I
think,
also
for
all
all
of
us
who
are
you
know.
AZ
Sir,
mr
warner,
something
I'll
just
close
it
with
that-
I
just
think
it
just
it
seems
like
the
scale
it's
already
been
discussed
and
I
think
it
could
present
a
lot
of
different
potential
issues.
And
lastly,
though,
not
religious,
but
a
good
friend
of
mine,
I
he
was
going
to
come
talk
a
little
bit,
but
I
mean
there's
something
to
be
said
about
the
church.
AZ
B
W
After
all,
the
facts
we're
still
looking
at
a
proposal
for
a
dense
commercial,
complex
that
will
compound
current
traffic
congestion
and
replace
the
scenic
gateway
to
the
city.
With
into
a
potential
danger
zone,
it
will
alter
bocalic
grounds
to
become,
in
theory,
an
overburdened
parking
lot
when
the
cars
can't
move
in
or
out
of
that
small
lot
onto
90,
let
alone
bringing
in
buses
and
delivery
trucks.
If
allowed,
the
historic
church
will
undergo
significant
interior
changes.
To
this
magnificent,
frederick
clark,
withers
structure,
listed
on
the
national
register
of
historic
places.
W
W
Its
overscale
proposal
will
affect
the
quality
of
life
for
every
surrounding
neighbor,
young
and
old,
and
every
resident
of
this
city,
one
when
done
properly
smart
growth
and
historic
preservation
go
hand
in
hand.
I
hope
the
planning
board
and
council
do
not
rush.
This
thinking.
They'll
fill
another
void
and-
and
I
hope
it's
not
a
done
deal
as
some
would
like
us
to
believe.
The
applicant's
business
plan
is
lacking
and
its
parking
dilemma
needs
to
work
for
everyone.
W
They
should
not
be
taking
it
from
peter
to
park
paul.
This
board
must
not
consider
taking
public
parking
spaces
into
its
calculations
to
solve
the
applicant's
failure
to
meet
its
parking
requirements
required
by
city
code.
Like
my
fellow
beacon
community
residents,
neighbors,
family
and
friends,
I
believe
we
should
be
able
to
live
work
and
breathe
in
the
most
beautiful
livable
community.
Possible
residents
should
not
have
to
cry
foul
and
continuously
battle
over
development
and
beacon,
listen
to
the
outcry
of
the
residents
here,
not
just
those
involved
in
the
prophet.
B
BA
BA
So
last
friday,
my
mom
and
I
were
walking
down
rhombo
coming
back
from
town.
It
was
one
of
these
beautiful
sunsets.
All
these
things,
the
kids
were
running
across
the
street,
and
I
had
this
moment
of
like
yeah.
This
is
it
like
this.
Is
why
we're
here
you
can
let
the
kids
run
around
it's
a
nice
neighborhood
and
I'm
not
here
saying
you
know,
don't
build
anything.
I'm
not
saying
don't
turn
this
into
a
restaurant,
I'm
not
saying
don't
turn
it
into
some
kind
of
public
space
that
can
suit
everybody.
BA
What
I
am
saying
is
that
let's
do
something
that
keeps
this
area
magical
you
know,
so
I
don't
think
the
proposal
that
we
see
in
front
of
us
today
really
does
that
at
all
one
of
the
things.
I
think
we
should
admit
that
people
aren't
really
talking
about.
I
think,
is
that
this
isn't
just
about
a
hotel
and
a
conference
center.
This
is
really
about,
like
I
think,
like
a
kind
of
music
venue
right
and
a
wedding
space
and
a
place
for
like
live
music.
BA
That's
what
everyone's
talking
about,
and
you
hear
it
outside
of
here.
It's
not
yoga
retreats
and
corporate
off
sites.
It's
bands
like
big
loud,
maybe
awesome,
shows
that,
like
some
of
us
would
really
want
to
go
to,
maybe
if
they
weren't
right
across
the
street
from
us.
Unfortunately,
I
think
that
crosses
the
line
from
something
that
betters
the
neighborhood
to
something
that
maybe
like
creates
like
a
little
bit
of
resentment.
You
know
and
sort
of
like
a
bad
feeling
for
most
of
us
who
live
here.
BA
I
know
you
guys
really
care
about
the
character
of
the
neighborhood.
This
whole
board.
This
is
what
you
do
and-
and
you
know
I
I
love
to
you-
know-
hear
how
we
can
kind
of
develop
like
a
mitigation
plan
for
what's
going
on
here.
We
also
know
that
you
know
I'm
not
gonna
like
beat
a
dead
horse
here,
but
like
there's,
this
parking
problem
and
while
the
traffic
survey
commissioned
by
the
developer
says
that
there's
gonna
be
a
preferred
parking
area,
that's
not
true.
Either
people
are
going
to
park
where
it's
convenient.
BA
That
means
roundabouts,
stratford,
academy,
beacon,
south
right,
because
there's
no
enforcement
everyone's
going
to
park
there.
It's
going
to
be
easy.
I
did
it
the
other
day
in
town
like
I
don't
look
for
the
lot
because
you
drive
into
the
lot
and
the
lot
is
full
and
you
have
to
turn
around
and
you
know
go
to
the
other
lot.
BA
No,
you
find
your
parking
spot
and
you
go,
and
I
read
in
one
of
these:
I've
read
everything
online
and
one
of
the
things
was
saying
how
this
is
like
a
high
density
urban
residential
area,
maybe
but
like
if
you're
in
what
are
we
in
r140
right,
which
is
like
my
residential
zoning?
That's
like
an
acre
a
lot.
BA
That's
not
supposed
to
be
like
a
high
density
place,
so
supporters
of
this
project
are
saying
that
this
has
always
been
a
church
and
they're
daily
events
in
weddings,
but
it
is
a
matter
of
scale
and
frequency
and
there's
big
differences
between
a
church
and
a
hotel
performance,
space
and
conference
center
and
a
wedding
venue
so
a
church.
What
does
it
do?
BA
Small
crowds
open
daily
community
events
when
there
are
weddings
or
big
events
they're,
usually
a
single
day
they
often
last
a
few
hours.
The
purpose
is
generally
the
ceremony
or
the
service,
and
not
the
ceremony.
It's
not
about
the
party
they're
inside
people
come
and
go
once
they
don't
go
in
and
out
all
day
being
shuttled
from
like
different
locations
in
the
city.
It's
usually
a
non-alcoholic
event
and
the
church
that
was
here
at
least
had
more
parking
space
than
the
one.
That's
gonna
be
here
when
it's
a
wedding
venue
hotel
performance-based
music
space.
BA
You
have
multiple
days
full
time.
The
purpose
is
to
party
you,
have
people
come
and
go
multiple
times
a
day,
it's
boozy
and
in
the
end
you
just
have
like
a
place.
That's
you
know
really
sort
of,
I
think,
degrading
the
character
of
the
neighborhood.
So
what
I'm
asking
is
to
work
on
it
more
just
keep
keep
keep
working
on
it,
make
it
work
right
cut
it.
I
know
it
might
not
be
as
financially
viable
cut
it
in
half
a
get
agreement
on
the
number
of
events
per
year.
What
does
this
mean?
BA
Like
occasional,
is
not
a
number
set
up
an
enforcement
mechanism
mechanism
for
noise
and
create
an
enforcement
mechanism
to
avoid
on-street
parking
like?
Is
there
a
residential
permit
parking
pass
whatever
like?
What
can
we
do
so
that
this
is
good
for
everyone,
and
that
this,
you
know
beautiful
church
gets
to
stay
and
be
restored
thanks.
BC
BB
Is
paul
manso,
19,
hammond
plaza
and
I'd
like
to
say
that
with
this
project
as
it
stands
right
now,
I
had
a
delightful
conversation
with
gavin
and
the
pastor
outside
it
was
nice
to
speak
to
him.
It
was
informative,
I
hope,
on
both
sides,
but
living
at
hammond
plaza.
We
have
experienced
development
development
for
the
last
five
or
six
years
consistently,
including
right
now,
we've
had
blasting
we've
had
digging.
BB
BB
I
BB
BB
BB
You
expect
people
jet
skiing
on
the
river.
You
expect
claims.
Those
are
things
that
you
anticipate,
but
when
it
comes
to
your
quality
of
life,
especially
if
those
things
were
already
there
when
you
purchased,
you
know
what
the
variable
is,
what
I
will
say
with
some
of
the
developments,
and
I
I
not
pointing
out
to
anyone
who's
done
the
modeling
on
this
particular
venue,
but
the
assumptions
versus
the
practicality,
the
time
studies
it's
it's
made
to
fit
the
narrative
that
you
want
to
promote.
BB
BB
BB
Now
you
see
certain
things
in
that
cul-de-sac
that
weren't
there
before
you
have
the
police
doing
their
due
diligence,
trying
to
get
a
little
extra
trafficking
up
to
keep
the
it
from
turning
to
just
paraphernalia
to
an
actual
potential
crime.
The
through
traffic
from
the
train
station
dear
we've
dealt
with
all
of
this.
BB
So
when
you
look
at
it,
don't
necessarily
look
at
it
just
as
a
situation
where
probability
possibility
look
at
it
being
worse
than
it
is
right
now,
and
I
thank
you
for
the
advocates
that
have
been
you
know
taking
time
to
give
a
balanced
profile
on
this.
I
agree
with
you,
mr
clark,
on
what
you
mentioned
about
possibly
looking
at
the
purposes
of
this
venue
being
maybe
revisited,
and
I
thank
you
all
for
your
time.
Thank.
AE
I
BD
Of
the
30
week,
mystery
condo,
to
my
knowledge,
no
one
from
this
project
has
met
with
us
as
they
claim
they
have.
But
let
me
just
say
that
I
think
that
gavin's
project
is
a
great
idea.
You
know
for
a
commercial
zone,
not
for
a
residential
area.
Luckily,
I
don't
have
to
go
on
too
long,
because
everything
I
wanted
to
say
really
has
been
said
already
very
eloquently.
BD
B
AR
AR
We've
been
giving
been
given
a
very
nice
description
of
events
that
may
take
place
at
this
venue,
and
we
have
some
non-binding
assurances
that,
even
though
capacity
can
be
up
to
now
350.,
it's
projected
to
events
to
be
typically
closer
to
one
or
two
hundred.
First
of
all,
in
situations
like
this,
we
as
residents
have
to
hope
for
the
best
but
be
prepared
for
the
worst.
We
have
to
understand
what
can
happen
now
or
down
the
road.
AR
I
don't
know
what
assurances
were
given
to
philadelphia,
but
within
two
years
mr
hecker
had
relocated
to
new
york
city,
a
quick
look
at
the
philamoco
website.
These
days
reveals
that
in
september
of
2019,
it
was
closed
for
zoning
and
fire
safety
issues.
Two
years
later,
it
reopened
with
a
showing
of
the
supernatural
horror,
film,
mausoleum,
rated
r.
Its
current
lineup
includes
offerings
by
the
philadelph
philadelphia,
psychotropic
film
society
it
includes
offerings
include.
AR
Excuse
me,
numerous
alternative
rock
groups,
including
a
group
called
gloss,
which
is
girls
living
outside
of
society,
a
trans,
feminist,
hardcore,
punk
band.
Is
this
what
I'm
not
saying
it's
the
same
thing?
Don't
misunderstand
me,
but
I'm
saying
is
this
what
we
want
to
open
ourselves
up
to
in
the
middle
of
a
residential
neighborhood,
what
we're
being
promised
now?
What
we
may
have
now
or
for
a
couple
of
years,
may
not
be
what
we
have
down
the
road.
AR
There
are
no
assurances
once
we
open
this
open
ourselves
to
this
open
the
door
to
this,
what
we
have
in
the
future
and
that's
problematic.
Just
as
mr
gunn,
you
mentioned
the
parking
situation,
it
may
work
now,
but
there
are
no
assurances
once
we
set
this
in
motion
that
those
public
lots
may
be
available
down
the
road.
That
kind
of
thing
is
a
problem.
I
see
this
is
a
big
problem.
Thank
you
very
much
and
thank
you
for
your
time.
BE
BE
D
BE
AC
BE
It
out,
but
when
you
have
it
on
all
sides,
it's
pretty
distressing.
It
used
to
be,
and
still
is
a
nice
place
to
live.
I
have
a
beautiful
view,
but
the
music
from
across
the
river,
the
festivals,
the
traffic
I
mean
I
almost
could
not
get
into
my
development
the
other
day
because
there
was
cops
directing
for
the
strawberry
festival.
BE
D
BE
Thinking
on
how
to
get
around
all
the
traffic,
the
traffic
is
horrendous.
It
just
has
gotten
worse
and
worse,
there's
not
a
parking
spot
on
main
street.
I
mean
I
just
can't
I,
with
all
due
respect
for
your
study.
I
lived
there
for
21
years.
I
know
what
the
traffic's
like
claire
came
to
pick
pick
me
up
tonight.
She
said
we
better
walk
because
the
traffic
is
horrible.
So
if
it's
happening
tonight,
it's
going
to
happen
every
night.
Y
I
don't
care
what
the
studies
say.
I
back
out
of
my
driveway
and
traffic
is
coming
from
four
different
directions.
Plus
there
are
two
turning
lanes.
In
addition,
there
is
not
a
no
parking
thing
across
the
street
so
with
all
the
traffic
and
all
that
directions,
and
then
someone
parks
there
it
it's
it's
very
dangerous
for
me
and
for
the
pedestrians
who
are
also
walking
around
there.
There
are
school
buses
coming
up
and
down
that
street.
Y
Now,
obviously
they
wouldn't
they
probably
wouldn't
be
there
during
the
times
of
the
venues,
except
perhaps
the
workshops,
or
something
like
that.
I
love
that
church
beautiful
church.
They
were
wonderful
people.
I
love
the
idea
of
culture
in
the
area,
but
it's
a
residential
area
and
like
everyone
else,
the
parking
and
the
noise
is
is
a
problem.
Y
Quite
honestly,
I'm
scared
to
death
somebody's
going
to
go
over
there,
they're
going
to
be
drinking
or
whatever
somebody's
going
to
fall,
and
I'm
going
to
get
sued.
I'm
going
to
say
right
now,
somehow
I'm
saying
I'm
not
responsible
for
that
somebody's
going
to
be
responsible.
It's
not
going
to
be
me.
Y
Y
B
Z
South
chestnut
street-
I
just
want
to
say
I'd
like
to
see
the
project
downsized.
It's
too
grandiose.
350
is
ridiculous
parking
traffic,
one
possible
suggestion
to
help
them
financially.
Maybe
the
city
can
give
them
some
kind
of
tax
abatement,
but
that's
basically
all
I
have
to
say
and
thank
you
for
your
patience.
Thank.
BF
Hello,
I
am
dennis
edson
at
20,
south
cedar
street.
First,
I'm
very
excited
about
this
project.
My
wife,
who
is
a
shakespearian
actor,
is
chomping
at
the
bit
to
perform
there,
and
I
promise
the
community
that
she
will
make
sure
that
they're
not
throwing
beer
cans
or
anything
around.
You
know
those
people
to
barred
where
I
live.
I
live
right
across
from
st
rocco's,
a
lar.
I
imagine
everyone
here
knows
that
plenty
of
parties
lots
of
weddings,
often
occasionally,
maybe
once
per
month,
large
events.
BF
BF
Again
I
walked
with
my
daughter
across
90,
had
no
issues
there
and
yeah.
I
don't
think
I
have
anything
else
to
say
other
than
like
people
here
bring
up
some
very
systemic
issues.
I
don't
think
this
really
has
anything
to
do
with.
I
mean
we're
growing
as
a
community,
and
I
think
len
you
mentioned
earlier.
We
need
to
start
tackling
things
more
holistically,
rather
than
like
this
piecemeal
approach.
I
will
stop
talking
have
a
great
day.
T
T
T
I
think
of
bsp
in
kingston.
Neither
of
those
two
venues
have
parking
for
the
for
the
venues
themselves,
so
people
have
to
find
parking
throughout
the
community.
It
is
what
it
is
like
the
will
has
been
invented,
and
we
just
kind
of
need
to
learn
from
that.
I
respect
like
all
of
these
community
members
who
have
come
out
like
against
the
project,
but
the
fact
of
the
matter
is
like
this
project
is
what
this
community
needs.
T
E
So
I
won't
reiterate
or
repeat
that,
but
what
I
will
express
is
my
worries
as
it
relates
to
the
13
000
plus
people
who
live
in
beacon,
and
one
is
the
potential
burden
that
this
could
place
on
the
police,
and
second,
is
the
reputational
damage
to
the
community
in
terms
of
beacon,
getting
a
reputation
of
being
simply
because
of
the
congestion
kind
of
a
bottleneck
from
a
traffic
perspective
and
kind
of.
Sometimes
there
are
some
communities
in
hudson
area.
E
I
stay
away
from
on
weekends
because
I
just
know
it's
going
to
be
such
a
hassle
to
navigate
the
landscape.
So
I
do
worry
that
potential
exists
if
this
project
is
approved
going
forward.
So
I
concur
with.
I
think
the
gentleman
with
black
t-shirt
love
the
concept
and
maybe
consider
downsizing
thanks.
Thank.
B
AJ
Hi
again
I'm
anne-marie
calucci
I
live
at
23
hammond
plaza
real
quick.
I
just
want
to
say
I
love
the
project
and
the
spirit
of
it.
It's
some
place.
I'd
want
to
go,
I
get
the
need
to
offset
the
costs
of
it,
but
I
don't
think
it's
safe
to
have
it
where
it
is
on
90
and
main
street.
I
do
cross
with
my
two-year-old
on
90
and
I've
we've
almost
gotten
hit.
I
honestly
I'm
not
over
exaggerating
that,
so
I
don't
think
that's
a
safe
spot.
B
B
AO
I
think
that'll
do
it.
Mr
chairman,
I
think
we'll
put
some
written
comments
together
in
response
to
these
good
comments
that
were
brought
up
by
the
public
this
evening.
We
appreciate
those
comments
and
obviously
your
time
tonight
going
through
this
with
us.
I
think
we're
all
hearing
it
we've.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
we
incorporate
these
things
in
and
understand
that
what
we
do
could
have
an
impact,
but
we're
doing
everything
we
can
to
make
sure
we
manage
mitigate
that,
notably,
of
course
this
is
an
adaptive
reuse.
These
are
existing
structures.
AO
We
are
adaptively,
reusing
them.
So,
unlike
much
of
the
development
surrounding
it,
it
is
not
a
it's
a
new,
but
it's
a
repurposed
and
redeveloped
property.
So
we
do.
You
know,
encourage
of
investigating
that
we
will.
You
know,
address
again
the
ada
comments.
Noise.
Again,
this
is
internal
to
the
building.
You
know
we
also
have
comments
from
chippo
the
state,
historic
preservation
office.
AO
So
there's
a
number
of
things
that
we'll
be
sure
to
put
in
writing,
but
we
look
forward
to
continuing
this
dialogue
with
the
board
with
the
public
and
certainly
we'll
reach
out
to
those
they're.
Certainly
welcome
to
contact
mr
hecker
with
respect
to
any
comments
too.
I
know
we're
going
to
maintain
that
direct
communication
with
your
board,
but
we
certainly
do
encourage
that
to
try
and
put
it
all
together,
great.
B
D
AW
AW
Garage
in
the
proposed
house,
with
a
with
a
parking
parking
spot
off
to
the
side
of
the
house
between
the
between
the
existing
and
the
proposed
houses,
so
the
the
applicant
and
the
applicants
architect
have
developed
a
a
modified
plant
where
the
the
garage
is.
The
this.
The
house
is
gonna,
be
shifted
back
towards
union
street
to
the
to
the
15
foot
to
the
15
foot
offset.
If
it's
appropriate,
can
I
quickly
hand
out
the
the
sketch
that
the
architect
has.
AW
That,
yes,
of
course,
so
the
garage
has
been
detached,
so
the
house
has
been
shifted
over
towards
the
has
been
shifted
towards
the
to
towards
the
union.
It's
been,
the
garage
is
detached,
moved
back
and
and
between
the
two
houses,
so
anyways,
we're
gonna
that
that
may
lead
to
some
other
changes
with
regard
to
grading
and
drainage
and
it
will
in
storm
water.
So
you
know
we're
going
to
revisit
that
with
the
with
the
changes
to
the
to
the
house
and
in
the
garage
and
the
garage
layout.
C
AW
AW
A
A
A
A
Okay,
so
that's
going
to
have
to
be
looked
at
the
drainage,
you're
shifting
everything
around.
I
know
you
were
starting
to
do
it,
but
please
be
aware:
the
rain
gardens
you
had
there
they're
not
going
to
work,
no
they're
not,
but
you
are
going
to
need
to
do
soil
testing
for
that,
but
they
were
also
you
had
a
larger
drainage
area
to
them
than
dec
allows.
You
allowed
a
thousand
square
feet
unless
you
start
switching
to
some
sort
of
bioretention
system.
AW
B
B
A
Just
but
right
now
we're
yeah,
so
there's
one
of
the
neighbors
requested
additional
catch
basin
be
put
in
on
union
more
or
less
at
the
high
back
corner
of
the
site
and
to
bring
everything
out
when
everything
is
actually
draining
towards
judson.
So
I'm
putting
a
structure
up
a
hill
and
trying
to
get
everything
there
when
there's
an
actual
structure
at
the
intersection
of
union
and
judson.
Now
that
could
be
connected
to.
F
No
not
yet
I
haven't
looked
at
it
that
closely,
but
I
just
you
know
just
especially
when
there's
shallow
rock,
I
feel
like
some
of
the
the
locations
around
that
neighborhood
that
have
some
of
the
biggest
problems
with
water
management
or
areas
where
there's
outcrops
like
at
the
back
of
the
st
luke's
church
property
or
just
other
you
know
so
I'm
just.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
take
a
robust
look
at
the
impacts
to
other
parcels,
potentially
yeah.
A
One
of
our
recommendations
was
that
they
take
roof
leaders
and
what
they
can
and
actually
bring
them
into
the
existing
drainage
system.
So,
if
they're
not
shedding
off,
they
were
also
looking
at
doing
rain
gardens
also,
and
then
I
couldn't
tell
from
the
layout
on
the
plans
whether
they
were
ultimately
tying
in
or
not.
J
B
K
B
U
D
AF
AF
B
M
J
AF
AW
B
BG
BH
Thank
you
henry
thomas
principal
and
landscape
architect
with
the
lrc
group
in
poughkeepsie.
First
slide
that
we
have
in
front
of
you.
There
is
the
existing
conditions
which
we've
walked
through
before,
but
just
to
touch
real
quickly,
64
acres,
more
or
less
bounded
on
the
west
by
fishkill
creek
on
the
east,
by
route,
90
wolcott
avenue
on
the
south
grand
view
avenue.
BH
B
B
B
BH
We
had
submitted
previously,
essentially
all
the
components
are
the
same
as
this
submission,
except
that
in
this
one
you
will
notice
that
there
were
a
lack
of
detail
and
a
couple
of
the
future
components,
one
being
the
farm.
Second,
being
the
cottage
neighborhood
and
in
the
proposed
or
the
current
master
plan.
BH
There
were
a
number
of
comments
that
we've
refined
and
responded
to
in
the
detail
plan
which
we'll
get
to
in
just
a
second,
but
those
have
primarily
to
do
with
parking
and
other
organizing
things.
Although
the
the
basic
bones
are
similar,
we've
distributed
things
and
refined
things,
why
don't
you
move
ahead?
So
again,
this
is
the
previous
master
plan.
BH
A
couple
of
the
comments
that
we
got
last
time
were
concerns
about
parking
in
the
front
yard
and
specifically,
we've
responded
by
removing
parking
adjacent
to
the
cottage
in
front,
and
that
gave
us
the
latitude
to
make
some
adjustments
in
the
entrance
drive
and
move
it.
North
also
yielded
the
ability
to
increase
the
size
of
the
islands
in
the
arrival
drive
and
adjacent
to
it.
We
also
had
or
heard
some
concerns
with
the
parking
that
is
adjacent
to
the
large
beach
tree.
BH
That's
in
the
upper
right
part
of
that
drawing
the
crescent-shaped
parking,
and
there
was
concern
about
the
visibility
of
that
that's
on
the
east
side
of
the
big
beach
tree,
so
we've
attended
to
that
and
then
modified
some
other
parking
in
response
to
those
changes.
Whoops
one
more
back
so
proposed
plan,
and
I
know
it's
a
little
hard
to
see,
but
so
we
did
delete
the
parking
adjacent
to
the
cottage
at
the
front
entrance.
BH
BH
But
those
are
the
larger
evolutions
in
terms
of
the
parking
and
distribution
there.
Other
plan
evolutions
have
been
refinement
in
the
cottages.
We
have
footprints
that
are
a
little
more
realistic
and
based
on
a
plan.
We've
provided
a
sidewalk
from
the
cottages
to
the
hotel
now
and
to
the
greatest
extent
we
could.
We've
got
that
off
of
the
driveway
and
tried
to
make
it
in
the
green
spaces.
R
BG
With
parking,
our
approach
to
parking
was
to
first
of
all,
try
to
put
parking
where
there's
already
blacktop
there's
a
great
deal
of
laptop
at
the
property
entrance
circle.
There's
parking
out
in
front
of
the
the
mansion
there's
parking
down
on
the
west
side,
which
will
primarily
be
employee
parking.
So
we
tried
to
you,
know,
say:
okay,
you
know.
Where
is
this?
I'm
not
sure
mike
has
done
the
swift
report,
so
we
know
what
the
the
pre
and
the
post
conditions
are
in
terms
of
impervious
and
that's
all
that's
all
in
the
data.
BG
BG
And
it's
all
really
driven
by
overnight
guests
and
spa
guests
for
the
most
part?
So
if
we
can
go
to
the
table,
so
rich
dandrea
did
a
study
of
all
of
our
mirabeau
properties.
So
we
have
skinny.
Atlas
is
the
smallest
of
the
properties
with
34
rooms
and
14
spa
rooms,
so
everything
traffic
and
parking
are
generated
by
those
two
items.
You
know
the
restaurant
spaces
are
really
secondary
to
those
two.
BG
BG
It
has
some
more
restaurant
spaces.
Their
restaurant
is
mostly
used
by
overnight
guests
like
our
restaurant
and
rhinebeck
is
used
by
local
guests,
local
members,
so
we
came
up
with
beacon.
You
know
this
is
we're
just
trying
to
draw
a
comparison,
but
the
the
fact
that
is
most
telling
is
that
the
very
bottom
beacon
will
have
2.95
spaces
per
room
which
is
under
plymouth
at
4.34
under
skinny
atlas.
At
3.62,
reinbeck
is
the
lowest
ratio
and,
unlike
rheinbeck,
we're
on
an
island
with
this
site.
BG
We
don't
have
shared
parking,
there's
not
parking
on
the
streets.
If
we
don't
provide
enough
parking
for
all
of
our
demands,
all
of
our
guests,
all
of
our
employees,
there's
nowhere
else
to
go.
You
know
we
can't
shuttle
people
to
the
train
station
ladder,
it's
totally
the
opposite
of
the
application.
You
just
heard
a
couple
so.
B
BG
BG
The
code
shows
233,
so
we
we've.
You
know:
we've
met
the
minimum
standard
for
zoning
in
terms
of
meeting
the
parking
requirements
by
zoning,
but
what
this
this
really
shows
is
the
ratio
of
parking
spaces
to
rooms
across
all
of
our
properties
and
we've
lived
with
these
properties.
Skinny
atlas
is
22
years.
Old
plymouth
is
seven,
reinbeck
is
three,
so
we
have
historical
experience.
BG
L
BG
We
can
go
to
that
okay,
so
we
can
go
to
the
next
slide
so
that
with
the
parking
table,
so
we
went
to
zoning
and
you
know
zoning
says
we
need
233
spaces
we're
showing
251.
So
we
only
have
18
extra.
You
know
what
isn't
in
zoning
is.
You
know
some
of
the
special
events
we
might
have
again.
Most
of
the
special
events
will
be.
People
will
be
staying
there.
We
have
85
rooms
right
now,
so
there's
plenty
of
space
to
stay
there.
BG
You
know
there
might
be
a
tent
on
the
north
lawn,
so
that's
not
even
included
here,
but
there's
really
only
18
spaces
extra
but
again
we're
standalone
there's.
If
we
don't
have
adequate
parking,
then
you
know
the
whole
project
suffers.
So
we
need
to
just
take
care
of
ourselves
on
that
piece
of
property.
It's
isolated!
BG
If
you
look
at
the
density
of
parking,
you
know
we
average
about
350
square
feet
of
paved
area
per
parking
space.
That
equates
to
about
two
acres
of
total
paved
area
and
there's
already
a
lot,
that's
paved.
You
know
the
whole
mirabeau
lane
or
craighouse
lane.
That's
700
feet
long,
we're
widening
it
by
five
feet.
So
there's
already
a
lot
of
asphalt
there,
but
it's
two
acres
on
65
acres.
So
it's
not
an
overwhelming
amount
of
parking
relative
to
the
size
of
the
site.
BG
So
we've
exceeded.
You
know
your
minimum
standard,
which
is
which
was
the
goal,
and
we
also
had
to
make
certain
that
we
had
the
parking
where
we
needed
the
parking.
We
couldn't
just
have
parking,
you
know
down
by
the
creek
and
they
wouldn't
make
any
sense.
So
we
needed
you
know
where
our
customers
and
where
our
employees
are
going.
BG
C
C
Agree
that
it's
very
it
was
the
centerpiece
of
my
comments,
and
you
know
the
number
of
parking
spaces
is
not
as
important
as
the
location
of
where
they
are
in
my
comments,
but
the
number
is
also
a
little
suspicious,
because
these
are
shared
uses
to
a
certain
degree.
The
hotel
guests
are
going
to
be
some
of
the
spa
guests,
and
so
so,
by
accumulating
all
the
parking
and
not
accounting
for
any
shared
parking
discount,
it
seems
to
me
we
may
be
over
parking
the
site.
I
think
we
could
deal
with
that.
I
C
BG
So
why
not
replicate
that
parking
plan?
That
was
there
now
right,
but
let's
let
david
you
know,
show
you
the
entrance
renderings,
which
we've
presented
and
we've
improved
since
then
to
show
that
how
this
parking
fits
in
it
protects
the
view
of
the
mansion.
It's
well
buffered.
So
maybe
we
go
to
that.
Then
we
can
go
back
to
the
discussion
on
parking,
but
this
this
is
really
it's
critical,
david.
BC
BC
BC
This
is
the
the
proposed
view
and
what
you
see
is
some
cleanup
of
some
of
the
the
pines
and
some
of
the
dead
trees,
as
well
as
the
improvements
to
the
front
entry
drive
and
henry's
going
to
talk
about
the
sections
along
the
screen,
parking
that
same
front
door
parking
for
for
the
spa
entrance
piece,
because
those
sections
have
been
carefully
considered.
We
do
believe
this
is
a
an
accurate
representation.
C
Have
I've
looked
at
the
site
and
this
is,
you
know,
go
back
the
other
one,
the
existing
views?
This
is
the
worst
view
of
the
mansion,
because
you've
moved
it
far
enough
that
the
trees
are
blocking
the
view
of
the
mansion.
If
you
go
to
the
left
side
of
the
driveway,
that's
the
primary
public
view
of
the
mansion.
F
I
would
like
to
see
the
preserve
I've
drew.
You
know,
obviously
not
since
the
pandemic,
but
I've
driven
past
this
site
for
25
years,
going
to
work
every
day
on
my
commute-
and
this
is
the
weirdest
view
you're
so
far
north-
that
the
mansion,
this
rendering
looks
like
a
minuscule
spec,
and
it's
it's
when
you
drive
past
it.
You
know
when
you're
right
across
from
it
that
you're
looking
at
it
and.
C
F
F
D
C
Think
there's
a
life
out
of
it.
I
think
there's
three
three
views
that
really
are
important.
One
is
that
view
from
the
street.
So
people
can
see
the
mansion,
it's
not
hidden
away.
You
don't
have
to
pay
for
the
hotel
room
in
order
to
see
the
mansion,
it's
important
to
preserve
that
for
the
people
and
and
then
there's
the
view
south
coming
from
the
mansion
and
north
coming
from
the
mansion
on
those
big
open
fields.
C
F
BG
D
B
B
You're
hearing
very
specific
concerns
from
the
board
about,
and
we
understand
your
case
regarding
the
need
by
mayor
beau
for
a
certain
number
of
parking
spots.
That
makes
sense.
It
really
is,
and
it
comes
down
to
you
know
now
that
we're
looking
at
this
and
doing
it
in
a
way
that
is
sensitive
to
the
views.
Let's
talk
about
doing
it
right
relative
to
these
views
that
the
board
has
raised
concerns
about
there's
nothing
here
about
what
I'm
seeing.
That's
that's
doing
anything
to
help
us
understand
how
you're
mitigating
those
views
that
rendering
didn't
do
it.
E
B
B
F
F
B
B
I
BG
BI
BI
C
I
mean
there
is:
there
is
a
prohibition
in
the
residential
district.
This
is
in
the
residential
district,
even
though
it's
in
the
historic
overlay
district
that
says
no
front
yard
parking
now
you
know
that
to
me
is
the
epitome
of
front
yard
parking
it's
right
there
at
the
entrance,
it's
between
the
historic
mansion
and
the
in
this
public
view
from
the
street.
C
BI
I
BI
AH
F
B
So
so
just
want
to
make
clear
what
we've
expressed
as
far
as
our
concerns
and
again
this
was
two
meetings
ago
now
that
john
raised
this
as
an
observation
relative
to
front
yard
parking
and
that's
view
of
the
sea
of
cars.
So
as
long
as
you're
you're
all
clear
on
what
concerns
we're
expressing,
I
hope
we
can
move
on.
Thank
you.
BH
Well,
so
what
our
strategy
was
going
to
be
or
is
recommended
in
terms
of
any
parking
that
is
in
that
side
of
the
property
would
be
to
not
necessarily
put
a
screen.
That
is
a
big.
You
know
kind
of
a
screening,
the
dumpster
kind
of
an
approach,
but
to
do
a
little
bit
of
gentle
filling
and
a
little
bit
of
low
planting
to
sort
of
take
the
edge
off
of
grills
and
bumpers.
BH
So
in
this
case
it
would
rise
just
a
little
bit
so
that
it
takes
off
the
face
of
those
cars
and
beyond
the
long
view,
would
still
be
there
as
as
route
90
goes
south.
It's
actually
rising
as
you
go
past
this
area,
so
the
next
slide
would
show
sort
of
a
parked
car
relative
to
the
landforms.
This
is
getting
down
into
the
next
section
is
just
before
the
ginkgo
tree,
where.
BH
So
in
that
location,
the
parking
is
below
the
street
much
more
substantially,
so
it
doesn't
require
very
much
soil
to
sort
of
disguise
the
fronts
of
the
cars
or
the
presence
of
the
cars
and
then
still
see
over
it.
So
that
was
generally
our
strategy
not
to
try
to
screen
cars
by
something
that
would
screen
all
views
but
just
mitigate
their
presence.
C
BG
C
BG
BG
BG
BG
These
comments,
I
think
rich,
has
had
a
conversation
with
the
d.o.t
and
in
response
to
creighton
manning's
comments
that
it's
crystal
clear,
creighton
manning
has
jurisdiction
over
the
traffic
on
9d
in
terms
of
reviewing
and
permitting,
as
opposed
to
the
d.o.t
d.o.t
wants
to
be
involved
in
terms
of
seeker,
so
we'll
continue
to
give
them
information,
but
I
think
those
are
a
lot
of
the
highlights
of
all
of
these
comments,
so
I
think
for
tonight
you
know
we're
you
know.
We've
still
got
a
lot
more
work
to
do,
but
it
would
be.
BG
B
D
D
B
BG
BC
Our
miscellaneous
business
I'm
going
to
skip
over
these-
these
are
historical.
I
just
wanted
to
mention
that
we've
been
continuing
to
work
to
develop
this
keeping.
You
know
in
keeping
with
the
the
site
plan
the
things
that
we
talked
about
previously
reducing
the
the
mass
of
this
building
from
90,
making
it
feel
small
and
and
trying
to
work
with
complimenting,
but
not
not
detracting
from
the
historic
mansion.
It's
quite
simply,
and
we
have
been
starting
to
look
at
materials
and
we're
collecting
those
materials,
so
we
can
bring
them
to
you
in
future
meetings.
Great.
C
BC
B
P
BG
D
F
One
one
really
quick
question:
will
the
chef
garden
use
the
native
soils
or
is
it
gonna
be
like
raised
beds?
Do
you
think,
or
what
the
garden
that
you're
envisioning
along
90
to
the
south
of
the
the
hotel?
Is
that
going
to
be
perhaps
raised
beds,
or
is
it
going
to
be
native
soil?
I'm
just
wondering
if
there's
any
thought
of
testing
the
soil
for
lead.
Just
due
to
the
you
know
the
very
long
term
traffic.
BI
BG
B
B
AP
I'm
sorry,
that's
I've
only
said
that
twice
in
my
career,
both
at
this
board
by
the
way,
but
thank
you
so
my
name
is
scott
olson.
I'm
from
young
summer
I
represent
verizon
wireless
and
what
you
have
here
before
you
is
an
application
for
we
call
a
small
cell,
that's
what's
defined
by
the
federal
laws,
a
small
cell.
It
was
actually
presented
to
the
board
about
four
or
five
years
ago
give
or
take
it's
an
application
where
we
want
to
put
an
antenna
on
an
existing
wooden
utility
pole
down
by
the
train
station.
AP
It's
a
redflyn
drive.
I
believe
long
story
short.
We
couldn't
do
it
at
the
time
there
were
fee
issues.
Those
have
gotten
resolved
it's
in
the
right
of
way,
so
it's
not
on
private
property
and
it
has
everything
to
do
with
our
plan.
That's
been
five
six
years
in
the
making
to
decommission
our
site
on
mount
beacon.
AP
That
was
one
of
our
early
legacy
sites.
You
can
see
it
up
there.
Obviously
those
sites
don't
work
in
the
network
anymore,
so
we've
because
they
just
create
too
much
interference
and
they
just
go
too
far.
Actually,
I
won't
bore
you
with
all
that,
so
we've
been
working
in
beacon
over
years
to
develop
new
sites
to
make
up
for
that
loss
once
it
happens.
AP
AP
We've
given
you
some
renderings
photo
sims
to
show
you
what
it
looks
like
it's
an
exhibit
six.
We
think
it
looks
really
good
I'll.
Just
go
right
into
the.
I
can
address
some
of
the
comments
yeah
from
the
planner,
please
planners
or
the
engineering
planners.
So
mr
russo's
letter
statement
of
intent,
I
will
correct
that
and
then
there
basically
are.
It
looks
like
four
other
comments
that
really
have
to
do
with
the
plans.
I
spoke
to
our
the
tectonic
engineering
they'll.
AP
Make
those
revisions
we'll
get
those
taken
care
of
wants
to
make.
Some
changes,
in
terms
of
you
know,
show
us
the
antenna
height
in
terms
of
the
where
the
bottom
of
the
antenna
is
to
the
ground
level
was
a
20
foot
requirement
in
your
code,
we'll
take
care
of
that
and
all
the
other,
a
e
items
from
that.
AP
Moving
on
to
mr
clark's
letter,
one,
the
environmental
assessment
form
a
couple
changes
there
we'll
make
those
changes,
not
a
problem,
we'll
explain
why
we
can't
be
at
a
different
location
from
the
rf
perspective.
Our
engineer
he's
on
vacation
out
of
state.
He
couldn't
be
here
tonight.
You
wouldn't
want
to
hear
him
anyway,
given
a
late
hour.
AP
AF
AF
Two
poles
south
there's
an
underground
utility
running.
You
can
see
the
telco
line
running
on
that
pole,
so
that
one
is
not
attachable.
Only
two
poles
are
attachable,
the
one
that
we're
currently
selected
on
and
the
one
directly
south
of
it,
which
rf
engineer
didn't
select
because
there's
a
lot
of
vegetation
and
large
trees
on
the
west
side.
So
he
chose
the
one
right
in
front
because
he's
trying
to
penetrate
north.
F
AP
Is
the
issue
of
the
meter
is
at
six
foot
level
and
apparently
chg
and
e
will
not
go
any
higher
if
it
was
national
grids
territory,
their
minimum
meter
height
is
eight
feet.
I
personally
don't
understand
it.
We
had
this
issue
in
kingston
with
chng
recently
and
they
wanted
to
put
the
meter
higher
and
they
said
no
we're
not
putting
the
meter
higher.
We
said
we
have
to
and
they
refuse
to
do
it.
I
don't
understand
it
isn't.
AF
Yeah
more
on
the
the
technical
side
of
it.
So
it's
it's
verizon's
meter
bank,
but
cagini
still
provides
a
power.
They'll
simply
tell
us
that
the
the
top
height
it's
six
foot
and
under
if
we
say
we
liked,
because
generally
we
do
eight
or
nine
that
just
so
we
won't
power.
They
just
won't,
give
us
any
power
to
the
site,
so
the
in
there
I
even
have
a
copy
of
it
in
there
have
all
the
criterias
to
attach
to
a
pole
and
it
states
there.
It
has
to
be
six
foot.
J
I
spoke
to
to
mr
olson
about
this
earlier
this
afternoon
evening.
At
this
point,
I
can't
even
remember
when
it
was
sometime
in
the
last
24
hours,
and
I
offered
that
if
there's
anything
the
city
can
do
to
help,
you
know
be
part
of
those
conversations
with
chgne
to
try
to
encourage
them
to
change
that
policy
that
we're
we're
happy
to
do
that.
I'm
happy
to
get
on
the
phone
with
anybody
at
chgne.
I'm
sure
the
city
administrator
would
would
be
willing
to
help
as
well.
So.
B
C
AP
And
it's
not
going
to
be
on
the
part.
That's
it's
going
to
be
on
the
part.
That's
facing
the
sidewalk,
so
it's
not
going
to
be
kind
of
on
the
in
the
sidewalk
right
away
per
se.
You
know
what
I
mean
like
it's.
The
pole
is
right
there
and
I
on
other
I
other
streets
that
I've
seen
you
actually
have
equipment
at
the
six
foot
level
and
I
was
walking
on
the
sidewalk
and
almost
hit
my
head.
I.
BH
AP
AP
We
call
it
cliff
and
willow,
and
I
forget
what
the
street
name
is
now,
but
it
was
right
off
main
street.
Basically,
it's
a
parking
area
cross
street
and
we
did
a
metal
decorative
pole
and
we
did
it
because
you
have
metal
decorative
poles
along
main
street
city,
wanted
it
made
sense
in
this
case.
I'm
not
sure
it
would
make
sense
because
it
wouldn't
blend
right.
You
have
all
wooden
poles
down
there.
So
we
think
if
you
did
a
metal
decorative
pole,
it
kind
of
stands.
AP
AF
AF
C
C
C
D
B
D
D
B
K
B
K
B
BG
AP
AQ
Q
F
B
AL
BH
B
AB
B
J
AG
D
AG
Two
lot
subdivision
located
at
67
grove
street
there's
an
existing
dwelling
located
on
the
property
and
we
are
subdividing
one
additional
residential
lot
from
the
property
we've
received
the
comment,
letters
from
both
consultants:
we
don't
have
any
issues
with
them,
no
need
to
discuss
if
you
don't
wish
to-
and
I'm
just
here
to
ask
the
board
to
declare
their
intent
to
be
lead
agency
and
possibly
set
a
subdivision
public
hearing
at
the
next
meeting.
Great
so.
C
B
AI
B
S
B
AG
B
AO
Yes,
that
has
been
already
filed,
the
subdivision
was
filed,
but
the
timing
of
the
filing
after
it
been
signed,
was,
was
going
to
be
after
the
expiration,
so
we
submitted
preemptory
the
extension.
So
it's
a
bridge
extension
so
as
to
have
been
able
to
file
that,
but
that
has
been
since
filed
that
we
have
submitted
the
certified
copies.
Okay,.
B
AO
J
AO
D
AO
Same
same
exact
circumstance
this
one,
the
county
health
department,
so
we
just
got
a
full
sign
off
by
your
consultants.
Last
week,
through
the
check
set
county
today,
county
health
signed
off
now
they
require
you
to
get
a
sign
off
before
signing
off,
but
they
have
their
own
checks
in
process
now,
so
they
signed
off
today.
Those
plans
will
be
to
you
within
the
next
48
hours,
for
filing.