►
From YouTube: Beaufort County Board of Education 5PM
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Vacation
july
12th,
to
order
participating
in
this
meeting
before
I
I
go
on
in
person,
is
mel
campbell,
tina
guards,
dick
geyer
trisha
friedrich,
earl
campbell
and
via
zoom.
The
chair,
mr
david
stribinger
secretary
angela
middleton,
and
dr
rachel
request
for
public
comments.
Participation
will
be
accepted
between
5
and
5
30
by
sending
an
email
with
your
name
phone
number
and
topic
to
robin.cushionberry
beaufort.k12.sc.edu.
A
You
will
receive
a
phone
call
during
public
comments
where
you
will
be
able
to
speak
and
address
the
board
for
a
maximum
of
three
minutes
on
issues
within
the
board's
domain.
The
forum
will
be
limited
to
30
minutes.
If
you
are
in
person,
you
may
address
the
board
for
a
maximum
three
minutes
on
issues
within
the
board's
domain.
Each
speaker
must
fill
out
a
public
comment
card.
Please
see
the
board
clerk
for
a
card
request
for
the
second
public
comments
will
be
accepted
between
7
and
7
30
pm
in
the
same
manner.
A
As
just
stated,
the
second
public
comments
will
take
place
prior
to
adjournment
no
later
than
9
pm.
The
second
forum
will
be
limited
to
15
minutes.
In
the
event,
the
board
has
not
finished.
Addressing
all
items
listed
on
this
agenda.
The
board
will
reconvene
at
6
pm
on
july
13th
to
finish
the
agenda
items
at
this
time.
I
need
a
motion
to
go
into
executive
session.
Dr
guads.
B
Thank
you,
mr
obine.
I
move
that
we
go
into
executive
session
for
the
following
reasons:
receipt
of
legal
advice
on
bonds
covered
by
the
attorney-client
privilege
pursuant
to
south
carolina
code,
anal,
section
34782,
employment
matter,
ray
personal
ratification
report
pursuant
to
south
carolina
code,
anal,
six
section
3470a1,
adult
education,
homeschool
report
pursuant
to
south
carolina
code,
annal,
section
3440a4,.
B
Receipt
of
legal
advice
regarding
two
pending
legal
claims
covered
by
the
attorney-client
privilege
pursuant
to
south
carolina
code,
annals,
section,
34782
and
receipt
of
legal
advice
and
attorney-client
privileged
communication
regarding
pending
workman's
compensation
claim.
Pursuant
to
south
carolina
code,
anal
section,
eight
3470a2.
C
C
A
Is
there
something
miss
dr
wisniewski?
Maybe
you
can
put
something
in
chat.
A
I'd
like
to
call
the
beaufort
county
board
of
education
july
12th
meeting
to
order
for
those
of
you
that
are
watching.
I
will
let
you
know
that
in
person
attending
the
meeting
we
have
mr
melvin
campbell,
dr
christina
guaj,
dr
rachel
wisniewski,
kathy
robine,
colonel
guyer,
patricia
fidrich,
earl,
campbell
and
william
smith
is
in
the
building.
A
Also
attending
online
are
the
chair,
david
stribinger
and
secretary
angela
middleton.
As
vice
chair.
I
will
be
coordinating
the
meeting
but
will
turn
over
specific
parts
to
the
chair.
Miss
ingrid
boatwright
is
not
in
attendance
tonight.
So
at
this
time,
are
there
any
actions
as
necessary
or
appropriate?
Regarding
matters
discussed
in
executive
session.
A
Okay,
mrs
cushingberry,
can
you
put
the
motion
up.
E
F
On
this
motion,
I'm
not
fully
understanding
the
whole
thing
of
it
and
I
wasn't
there
for
that
part,
so
I
will
be
abstaining
on
this.
I
will
abstain.
B
So
colonel
guyer,
you
you
when
you
read
the
motion,
you
said
anticipated
inflation
or
unanticipated
yep
and
that's
what's
up
there.
Thank
you
for
clarification.
A
Any
other
comments
at
this
time.
I'd
like
to
take
the
vote,
all
those
in
favor
of
the
motion
that
states
the
board
of
education
accept
the
administrative
way.
I
can't
read
it
sorry
folks,
the
administration's
recommendation
to
utilize
bond
premiums
from
the
2019
referendum
bonds
to
fund
the
increased
referendum
project
costs
due
to
unanticipated
inflation
and
amount
not
to
exceed
31.1
million
those
in
favor.
Please
say
I
I
middleton
eye.
B
E
A
B
A
Okay,
see
none
we'll
wait
for
the
motion
to
come
up.
A
G
A
Okay,
that
passes
unanimously
10-0
dr
quads,
madam.
A
For
a
second,
dr
wisniewski.
A
G
B
A
A
During
this
moment
of
silence,
we
would
like
to
recognize
a
a
staff
member,
a
valued
staff
member
tammy
vidalia,
who
passed
away
last
week,
tammy
started
working
for
the
beaufort
county
school
district
on
january
31st
2012
at
robert
smalls
middle
school
as
a
professional
school
counselor,
she
was
instrumental
in
implementing
a
comprehensive
school
count
counselor
program
at
robert
smalls
during
school
year,
2014
2015.
She
was
reassigned
to
hilton
head
high
school
island
high
school,
where
she
remained
until
her
passing.
A
She
was
a
dedicated
and
compassionate
professional
who
put
forth
100
every
day
on
a
daily
basis.
She
worked
extended
hours
and
worked
during
the
summer
to
ensure
a
smooth
opening
to
each
school
year.
She
loved
being
a
school
counseling,
a
school
counselor,
because
she
knew
she
made
a
difference
in
the
lives
of
our
students.
She
will
be
sorely
missed
by
the
hilton
head
community
and
the
professional
school
counselors
of
beaufort
county
school
district.
A
H
Thank
you,
mrs
robin
board,
members
and
guests
this
evening.
We
get
to
recognize
the
2022
class,
a
champions
from
whale
branch,
early
college,
high
school
girl
track
team
whale
branch,
early
college
high,
school's
girls
track
team
was
crowned
the
2022
class.
A
state
champions
here
to
tell
us
more
about
their.
This
accomplishment
is
whale
branch
early
college's
athletic
director,
carlos
cave
and
the
young.
Ladies
head
coach,
brad
chuck.
Gentlemen.
Please
come
on
down.
I
Good
evening,
it
is
indeed
a
pleasure
to
stand
before
you
on
behalf
of
well
branch
early
college,
high
school
and
our
principal
ms,
patricia
brantley,
to
bring
our
young
ladies,
who
worked
extremely
hard.
This
past
track
and
field
season
and
earning
the
title
of
class
a
state
champion
the
previous
year.
They
were
state
runner-ups
and
they
were
highly
motivated
going
into
this
season.
I
We
we
fell
short
by
12
points
the
previous
year
and
were
state
runner-ups,
but
we,
these
young,
ladies,
that
you
have
the
chance
to
to
meet
and
coach
territory,
will
talk
about
them,
really
really
bought
in
and
and
locked
into
the
fact
that
the
talent
was
there.
They
just
had
to
put
the
work
in
the
beautiful
thing
about
this
group
young.
Ladies
coming
tonight.
I
J
Good
evening,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
to
actually
be
up
here
again,
it's
been
10
years,
since
we
were
back
here
for
the
class
a
for
boys
back
in
2012.
So
it
is
indeed
a
privilege
to
be
back
here
again
celebrating
the
very
first
time.
Our
girls
have
actually
won
a
state
title
at
whale
branch,
not
just
for
track
and
field,
but
for
all
sports
out
there.
J
This
is
again
my
11th
year
here,
I'm
also
a
teacher
out
there.
So
I'm
indeed
proud
to
be
here
to
have
seen
where
these
girls
have
come
from,
where
they
have
been
going,
and
what
I'm
going
to
do
is
I'm
actually
going
to
bring
them
up
here?
I'm
actually
going
to
have
one
of
our
young
ladies
introduce
herself
she's
a
sophomore
with
us
again,
as
coach
cave
had
mentioned,
but
she's
also
one
of
our
students
who's
taking
a
part
in
our
tcl
program
out
there.
J
So
she's
actually
earning
her
degree
getting
credit
through
the
college
program,
just
wonderful
opportunity
that
we
have
with
our
girls.
So
I'm
gonna
have
them
come
on
up
and
I'm
gonna
have
ayanna
reid
wright,
introduce
herself
and
just
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
season
and
where
they're
gonna
be
going.
K
Good
evening,
everyone,
my
name,
is
ayanna,
read
wright
and
I
ran
the
4x8
at
the
state
championship
and
I
would
just
like
to
talk
a
little
about
it.
So
this
was
our
first
year
winning
not
only
region
state
championship,
but
also
the
lower
state
and
the
state
championship,
and
we
also
broke
a
lot
of
school
records
such
as
the
4x8,
the
4x1
100
meter
hurdles,
100,
200
and
so
on,
and
this
is
my
team,
so
I'm
gonna,
let
them
introduce
themselves.
I
So
in
closing
again
just
want
to
acknowledge
these
young.
Ladies,
like
I
said-
and
I
made
a
mistake,
so
you
have
a
sophomore,
sophomore,
sophomore,
eighth
grader
and
a
ninth
grader
that
word
that
that
you
have
standing
in
front
of
you
at
this
time.
Also
the
track
program
and
the
young
ladies,
would
like
to
present
one
of
our
biggest
fans
always
calls
and
checks
on
what
we
have
going
on
athletically.
I
So
at
this
time
we
would
like
to
present
him
with
a
state
championship.
Gold
medal
for
this
past
track
state
championship
this
spring.
So,
mr
campbell,
have
you
come
forward.
I
A
I
heard
mr
campbell
say
he
would
like
to
fill
in
on
that
four
by
eight.
If
you
needed
it,
you
needed
an
extra.
A
That's
just
spectacular:
it's
it's
just
awesome
student
athletes.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
Okay,
next
on
our
agenda,
er,
the
first
public
comments
before
I
call
up
the
speakers.
As
is
customary
I'd
like
to
review
our
guidelines,
our
rules
for
public
speaking
speakers
must
confine
comments
to
issues
within
the
domain
of
the
board,
refrain
from
racial
comments,
obscenities,
vulgarities
and
references
to
specific
individuals
by
name
and
not
commit
other
breaches
of
respect,
not
exceed
three
minutes.
A
M
M
M
M
Why
in
the
world,
would
you
want
to
encourage
elementary
school
kids
or
middle
school
kids
to
read
books
that
get
them
into
a
good
kind
of
trouble?
I
understand
the
lesson.
I
support
the
lesson.
However,
those
lessons
are
for
college.
I
don't
know
any
parents
who
want
our
schools
to
have
books
that
are
teaching
kids
to
become
social
activists
in
the
third
grade.
M
That's
crossing
the
line
because
all
it
takes
is
one
child
to
say
that
what
he
did
was
read
a
book
that
his
guidance
counselor
told
him
to
read,
as
he's
being
interviewed
by
the
fbi,
after
being
arrested
for
participating
in
a
protest
that
erupted
into
violence
and
destruction
of
private
property.
So
do
we
want
a
policy
to
be
in
place
that
keeps
these
books
and
encourages
students
to
defy
authority
and
become
social
activists?
M
I
support
free
speech
right
up
to
the
point
where
you're
not
allowed
to
yell
fire
in
a
crowded
theater.
Nor
are
you
allowed
to
disseminate
obscene
material
or
explicit
language
to
a
minor
free
speech
has
its
place
within
the
context
of
the
law.
The
same
goes
for
materials
that
are
in
the
schools
and
in
the
libraries.
M
I
don't
believe
that
soft
core
teenage
porn
written
in
any
book
should
be
protected
speech
in
your
directions.
Tonight
you
even
said
we're
not
allowed
to
use
racial
comments
profanity,
but
it's
going
to
be
tough
to
have
those
books
removed
from
our
library
that
have
that
exact
content,
I'm
pretty
sure,
I'm
pretty
sure.
M
School
district
support
freedom
of
speech,
but
I'm
guessing
there
might
be
some
parents
who
wouldn't
be
so
supportive
of
the
third
grader
being
taught
that
it's
okay
to
defy
authority.
It's
a
slippery
slope
and
dr
stratto
said
to
me
in
a
phone
call
yesterday
and
I
couldn't
agree
with
her
more
let
children
be
children.
Thank
you.
N
N
The
chief
officer
I
can't
aura
his
initial
is
ro,
go
from
there,
the
after
the
athletic
director
and
the
football
coach
to
come
forward
or
get
with
the
superintendent
and
the
board
and
tell
us
why
and
who
directed
them
to
replace
the
original
eagle
with
the
new
one
who
designed
the
new
eagle
and
how
many
designs
did
they
review?
Did
they
do
the
required
action
of
presenting
the
design
of
the
new
eagle
to
the
board
for
approval?
N
N
We
also
want
to
thank
the
board
for
considering
an
orientation
for
the
ninth
graders,
who
are
entering
beaufort
high
and
all
new
incoming
students
9th
through
12th,
to
let
them
know
the
history
of
the
school
and
how
three
schools
were
combined.
We
wanted
documented
that
the
original
eagle
is
the
mascot
and
that
our
school
colors
are
green
and
white.
N
Our
request
to
the
board
is
to
remove
the
new
eagle
from
the
field
press
board
scoreboard
and
wherever
the
new
eagle
is
located
and
replace
it
with
the
original
flying
eagle,
take
the
new
eagle
down
from
the
athletic
website
and
replace
it
with
the
only
original
eagle.
Lastly,
all
future
athletic
uniform
should
be
ordered
in
green
and
white.
The
school
agreed
over
50
years
ago
that
the
mascot
would
be
the
flying
eagles
and
the
colors
would
be
green
and
white.
N
N
A
O
Good
evening,
thank
you,
I'm,
madam
vice
chairman,
chairman,
scrivener
good
evening
to
you
as
well.
I
know
you're
visiting
remotely
this
evening.
So
thank
you.
This
is
our
second
quarter
update.
O
O
So
if
I
was
taught
math
in
school
properly,
that's
two
and
a
half
years
right,
so
we're
two
and
a
half
years
into
where
we
are
with
a
little
more
time
to
go,
and
tomorrow
night
we
will
conduct
our
31st
meeting
since
we
were
formed.
So
that's
where
we
are
in
the
time
frame
associated
with
that
with
our
four-year
term
that
we
were
asked
to
serve
all
right.
Let's
give
an
update
on
where
we
are
with
our
large
scope
projects
and
how
we
stand
with
those
projects.
O
At
this
time
now,
beaufort
elementary,
the
referendum
amount
that
was
funded,
was
20
million,
we're
at
20
million
seven
seven
we've
paid
the
date
right
at
19.6,
so
it's
under
budget
none
to
schedule,
so
beauford
l
is
coming
along
very
well
beautiful
location,
beautiful
campus.
O
This
is
kind
of
give
you
an
update
of
where
we
are
all
the
all
of
our
traffic.
Lights
are
green
when
it
comes
to
the
project
around
safe
security,
the
renovations
and
the
technology
upgrade
we'll
get.
The
occupancy
certificate
has
been
received
by
osf
in
columbia,
we'll
get
all
the
closeout
documents
and
finish
this
project
up
very
quickly.
So
good
news
on
buford
now
we're
pleased
with
where
it
is
today
all
right.
Let's
go
to
some
of
our
bigger
projects.
O
Battery
creek
high
school
battle,
creek
scott
high
school,
is
a
56
million
dollar
project.
So
far,
we've
paid
25
million
of
that
project.
We
have
a
few
photographs
here
to
share
with
those
who
are
online
as
those
in
the
room.
You
can
see
the
progress
on
battery
creek
extensive
renovation
to
that
that
school
it
is
under
budget.
We
are
having
some
schedule
issues
associated
with
that
that
is
noted
on
the
next
slide
and
the
main
reason
is
around
the
renovation
area.
O
As
we
are
in
this
times,
we
are
having
trouble
with
supplies
a
personal
story.
I
ordered
a
new
refrigerator
in
december
of
2021.
O
I've
now
been
told
I
may
get
it
at
the
end
of
this
month,
so
that
spills
over
right
into
the
construction
industry.
Our
project
managers
are
doing
a
good
job
of
managing
that
doing
long,
lead
items,
but
our
schedule's
slipping
a
little
bit
they'll
work
to
improve
it
on
battery
creek
high
school,
so
all
in
all,
going
well
just
little
challenges
with
materials
all
right.
Let's
talk
about
robert
smalls.
This
is
the
largest
project
that
is
underway
today.
O
This
is
a
new
replacement
school,
as
many
of
you
are
not
familiar
with
it.
It's
a
68
million
dollar
project.
It's
going
very
well
again
we're
having
some
scheduled
challenges
with
robert
smalls,
as
you
can
see
on
the
next
slide.
The
main
issue
again
is
around
the
some
of
the
materials
and
some
of
the
scope
issues
we're
dealing
with
with
this
school.
It's
you
can
imagine
the
size
of
the
school
being
built
in
the
rear
of
the
current
school
is
a
big
challenge,
they're
staying
on
top
of
it
as
best
they
can.
O
O
Now
I
have
personally
visited
both
of
these
schools.
Last
week,
both
of
those
sites
they're
very
well
maintained.
The
contractors
are
doing
a
good
job,
there's
good
supervision.
Just
for
a
point
of
reference
of
the
344
million.
These
schools
represent
over
33
percent,
that's
being
used
from
that
referendum.
Just
for
these
two
schools,
so
they're
very
important
projects
and
we'll
stay
on
top
of
them
or
report
any
findings.
Okay,
let's
move
on
to
what
we
call
our
projects,
what
we
call
our
medium
small
scope
projects.
O
These
are
all
the
other
schools
that
are
receiving
I.t
safety
security
updates.
They
may
be
in
a
design
phase
for
next
referendum
or
they're.
They
contain
athletic
renovations
and
etc.
So
we
have
28
projects
across
the
district
that
are
in
various
phases.
We've
closed
out
18
projects,
so
we're
doing
well
on
a
time
frame
associated
with
those.
I
give
those
a
green
traffic
light
this
evening.
O
Now
supply
issues
still
are
concerned
in
these
small
areas,
especially
around
some
of
the
safety,
security
and
I.t
equipment
that
we're
trying
to
secure,
but
the
the
project
managers
are
managing
the
issues
closely
to
keep
these
projects
on
schedule,
so
big
challenges
but
they're
doing
a
great
job
on
those.
So
that's
the
remainder
of
those
across
the
district
of
those
28
projects.
O
Let's
talk
about
where
we
are
in
closing
out
projects,
projects
are
not
completed
until
they're
closed
out,
and
that
doesn't
mean
not
only
getting
the
occupancy
requirements
met
by
osf
in
columbia,
but
in
columbia,
but
also
making
sure
that
we
have
all
the
paperwork,
because
the
job
is
not
finished
until
the
paperwork
is
completed.
As
you
can
see,
we
have
a
few
of
these
that
are
in
the
yellow
status,
we're
working
on
some
final
paperwork
either
from
the
vendors
or
from
the
actual
construction
companies
as
well.
O
So
the
project
managers
stay
on
this
and
making
sure
that
they
have
all
the
paperwork
and
all
the
close-out
documentation,
as
required
for
these
projects.
So
we're
tracking
these
and
you
can
see-
we've
closed
out
quite
a
few,
but
we
have
more
to
go
and
we
work
they
work
on
those
as
we
go
all
right.
Let's
talk
a
little
bit
about
where
we
are
financially.
O
I
think
this
is
where
most
people
want
to
talk
about
the
financial
status
so
far
through
april,
because
we
run
about
a
month
behind,
with
reconciliation
of
the
actual
spend
per
month,
all
budgeted
items
for
the
project
equal.
The
dollar
amounts
approved
by
the
referendum.
At
this
point
in
time,
the
4
30
22
appropriation
amounts
for
project
did
not
change
from
their
rich
original
220
to
228
20
number.
O
However,
individual
budgets
have
been
adjusted
and
those
have
been
supported
by
contingency
as
we
have
talked
about.
We
have
contingency
not
only
at
the
project
level,
for
each
individual
school,
but
also
there
is
a
program
contingency
that
is
also
maintained.
At
the
district
level,
the
dollar
spent
and
encumbered
do
not
exceed
the
budget.
Budgeted
project
totals
so
we're
not
committed
to
more
than
what
we
have.
The
dollar
spent
per
project
did
not
exceed
the
estimated
project
percent
complete,
so
we're
not
overpaying
so
we're
right
on
time
again.
O
Material
and
construction
costs
continue
to
challenge
cost
control
and
schedule,
so
I'm
giving
that
a
yellow
overall
right
now,
mainly
because
of
cost
control
around
materials,
as
those
materials
continue
to
increase
all
right.
So
let's
talk
a
bit
about
where
we
are
on
spin
today,
of
course,
344
610
is
our
original
number
encumbered
and
paid
it's
247
million.
537
remaining
budget
is
97
million.
O
Now,
at
the
end
of
april,
the
program
contingency,
which
is
maintained
at
the
district
level,
was
8.4
million
dollars.
There
were
no
project
level
transfers
into
the
contingency
here
at
the
home
office,
so
that
money
has
not
been
swept
back
from
the
program
for
the
project
level
to
fund
the
program
level
program.
Contingency
was
voted
on
by
this
august
body
to
use
5.1
million
dollars
which,
which
remains
now
remaining
in
the
contingency,
is
3.2
million.
I
am
giving
that
a
red
light
because
of
the
amount
of
projects
that
we
have
remaining.
O
So
there
is
a
concern
now,
tomorrow
night,
we
will
be
meeting
as
a
clock
with
the
operations
staff
and
with
the
project
managers
to
review
the
program.
What
we
call
the
program
reset,
so
they
would
be
looking
at
the
project
level
contingencies
and
determine
how
much
of
that
money
will
be
swept
back
at
to
the
program
level.
To
assure
we
can
close
out
all
the
projects
that
we
have
planned
for
them
for
the
year
and
a
half.
O
Now
this
evening,
this
body
agreed
that
they
would
use
the
bond
premiums
that
they
received
from
the
bond
sales.
It
is
your
bond
money
that
you
let
and
it's
your
appropriation
to
do
that,
so
that
will
assist
the
pro.
The
project
managers
going
forward
any
increases,
and
we
will
track
that,
as
that
comes
back
into
the
clock,
we'll
use
that
and
watch
that
as
part
of
the
overall
program
contingency
and
will
be
kept
abreast
of
how
that
is
used.
O
O
O
So
with
that,
I
will
entertain
any
questions
that
you
may
have.
I
will
make
a
comment,
mr
campbell,
when
you
and
I
ran
track
back
in
the
day,
we
did
not
run
on
a
nice
new
composite
track.
We
ran
on
those
old
cinder
tracks.
Remember
that
I
remember
those
days
so
now,
I'm
showing
my
age.
So
if
the
young,
ladies
in
the
room,
if
you
don't
know
what
a
cinder
track
asks,
is
ask
someone.
That's
older
and
they'll
tell
you
what
a
cinder
track
is,
but
that's
what
I
ran
on.
O
So
I
don't
look
like
I
used
to
run
track,
but
I
did
at
one
time
so
anyway
I'll
entertain
questions
and
congratulations
to
the
ladies,
that's
a
great
honor
for
you
to
be
the
track
champions.
Thank
you
so
much
for
doing
that
representing
beaufort
county
now
I'll
take
questions.
A
A
O
We
will
probably
go
over
on
some
of
the
project
closeouts
into
2024
because
of
the
scheduled
drag
and
with
the
problem
with
some
of
the
supplies
so
expect
me
to
be
reporting
once
we
get
closer
into
this
later
this
year
and
into
2023,
I
suspect,
we'll
be
closing
some
of
these
things
out
in
24..
That's
my
projection,
but
thanks
for
your
question,
yeah.
F
First
I'll
just
start
off
by
saying
thank
you
and
your
staff
for
what
you
do
and
all
that
you
do.
My
question
is
when,
when
the
staff
have
these
meetings
like
they
have
over
in
hilton
head,
when
they
have
those
meetings,
do
y'all
go
over
to
those
meetings
and
how
active
are
you
are
involved
in
those.
O
We
do
we
attend
some
of
those,
for
example.
I
believe
mr
odding
just
had
a
meeting
in
hilton
head.
I
guess
a
provisioning
committee
to
kind
of
update
where
we're
doing
hilton
head
sky
with
hilton
head
high
school.
Mr
warco,
I
believe
you
were
at
that
meeting.
So
if
we
have
the
opportunity
to
be
at
some
of
those
community
what
we
call
community
outreach
meetings,
we
do
attend
those
either
in
person
or
sometimes
we
attend
them
remotely
as
well.
So
we
listen
to
what
the
citizens
are
saying
at
that
time.
O
F
Right,
yeah,
and,
and
and
also
for
people
listening
all
my
people
have
asked
me-
is
on
us
on
somewhere
in
these
printouts
that
you
like
that
that
y'all
give
us
is
there
something
where
it
can
tell
from
the
how
much
the
original
amount
was
and
how
much
we
are
from
year
to
date
that
has
been
spent
at
this
time?
Is
there
somewhere?
We
can
find
that
at
you
talking.
O
For
each
school
and
project,
yes,
we
can
report
on
that.
That
number
changes
as
we
add
contingency,
but
we
can
go
back
and
look
at
the
original
and
we
do
look
at
that
and
we
can
track
it.
We
just
don't
report
it
because
if,
if
this,
if
you
vote
to
approve
the
change
and
add
contingency,
then
that
changes
the
actual
budget
for
that
for
that
school.
F
Right,
well,
let
me
let
me
let
me
react
to
my
question
another
way.
Okay,
is
there
some
place
on
here
when
you
give
out
your
reports
that
reports
from
at
the
beginning
of
when
y'all
took
when
y'all
first
started
the
project
and
you
have
the
exact
amount
that
was
given
and
when
and
when
and
when
the
district
spends
every
spend
every
penny
is
there
something
that
that
sells
you
an
itemized,
an
itemized
list
of
where
every
dollar
has
went
and
10
and
how
it's
spent
and
I
spent
and
where
it's
at.
Q
Q
And
it's
put
out
by
who
it's
approximately
a
seven-page
report
and
it's
grown
since
we
first
started
it.
I
think
it
started
out
as
five
pages
it's
now
seven
because
they
have
delineated
some
of
the
individual
items
within
within
the
in
with
the
actual
schools
right.
F
Okay,
remember
my
question:
was
the
committee
was
running
by
the
clock?
If
there's
a
clock
did
y'all,
do
I
have
anything
to
outline
every
single
dollar
or
penny
that?
That's
that
that's?
That
was
my
question.
Yes,
I
I
know
I
I
I
understand
that
that
form
is
talking
about
the
district,
about
talking
about
the
clock
in
general.
Q
Well,
and
of
course,
we
we
test
that
schedule
to
make
sure
that
the
information
they're
giving
us
is
accurate
and
we
tie
it
back
to
we
tie
it
back.
We
put
it,
we
cross-footed,
and
we
also
tie
it
back
to
the
annual
audited
financial
statements.
A
Okay,
then
we'll
go
to
mr
strivinger
for
the
chairman's
report.
A
Okay,
all
right
so
from
there.
We
move
to
the
committee
reports
and
first
up
is
the
legislative
report
and
I
believe
we
have
lynne
stokes
murray
waiting
to
talk
to
us,
dr
guads
I'll
turn
it
over
to
you.
B
Yes,
thank
you.
Vice
chair
robine,
we
have
our
legislative
lobbyist
lynn,
stokes
murray,
joining
us
this
evening
to
give
the
board
an
update.
R
Thank
you
so
much,
and
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
be
with
you
all
tonight.
I
did
submit
our
legislative
year
in
report
which
you
will
see
on
your
screen,
and
I
have
consolidated
in
that
my
comments,
which
I'm
happy
to
share
with
you
guys
after
we
go
through
everything
and
feel
free.
If
you
need
to
interrupt
to
ask
any
questions,
so
the
general
assembly
adjourned
sunny
day
on
may
12th,
we
returned
in
june
to
consider
gubernatorial
vetoes
and
we
concluded
our
work
on
june
28th.
R
R
R
R
There
were
six
republicans,
including
the
long-standing
chair
of
the
house,
education
committee,
rita
allison,
who
were
defeated
in
the
primary
we've,
had
a
couple
of
democratic
incumbents
that
were
defeated
as
well.
So
there
are
51
contested
house
seats
in
the
general
election
to
be
held
on
november,
the
8th,
and
we
anticipate
that
the
freshman
class
of
the
general
assembly
next
year
to
be
about
a
fourth
of
new
members.
R
We've
had
several
leadership
changes
that
have
occurred
in
the
house
in
the
past
month,
a
long
time
spooker,
speaker,
four-term,
speaker,
jay,
lucas,
resigned
and
merle
smith,
who
is
a
republican
from
sumter
and
the
former
chair
of
the
ways
and
means
committee
was
elected,
the
speaker
of
the
house
and
as
a
result
of
him.
Moving
to
that
new
position,
chair
of
ways
and
means
is
now
gary
simrill
who
is
not
seeking
reelection,
but
he's
been
elected
to
that
post
until
a
new
ways
and
means
chairman
will
be
elected
in
the
reorg
session
in
december.
R
In
the
gubernatorial
race.
We
expect
that
governor
mcmaster
will
be
re-elected
to
a
second
full
term.
He
won
the
primary
handily
and
just
interestingly
enough,
governor
mcmaster
is
the
first
governor
that
will
have
served
as
10
years
because
of
his
fulfilling
the
unexpired
term
of
governor
nikki
haley.
When
she
was
selected
to
become
the
ambassador
to
the
u.n
congresswoman
nancy
mace
won
her
bid
in
the
republican
primary.
R
Of
course,
all
of
you
are
aware
that
our
incumbent
superintendent
of
education,
molly
spearman,
is
not
seeking
reelection
and,
as
a
result
of
a
runoff,
ellen
weaver
beat
kathy
manus
and
mrs
weaver
will
face
a
democratic
challenger
in
the
fall
she
has.
Mrs
weaver
has
not
yet
completed
her
master's
degree
requirement,
which
is
required
in
order
for
her
to
be
sworn
into
office,
but
understand
she's,
working
on
that
and
she's
indicated
that
she'll
have
the
necessary
requirements
fulfilled
if
she
should
win
and
will
be
sworn
in.
R
In
january,
the
2022
legislative
session
has
been
long
and
contentious.
The
debates
on
the
house
and
senate
floor
not
only
included
certificate
of
need.
The
restructuring
of
dhec
medical
marijuana
mask
and
vaccine
mandates.
Education
and
savings
accounts
save
the
sports
act.
Those
are
just
a
few
of
the
things
that
we
considered.
R
In
addition,
this
house
and
senate
concluded
their
work
on
the
2022-23
appropriations
bill
and
the
governor's
vetoes
last
month.
The
spending
plan
took
effect
july
1..
The
budget
raises
minimum
teacher
salary
from
36
000
dollars
per
year
to
40
000.
It
gives
state
employees
a
three
percent
raise
and
a
fifteen
hundred
dollar
bonus.
R
The
14
billion
dollar
budget
includes
a
cut
in
the
income
tax
rate
from
seven
to
six
and
a
half
percent,
and
over
a
five-year
period
gradually
lowers
that
down
to
six
percent.
Also,
the
budget
includes
a
billion
dollar
income
tax
rebate,
which
means
taxpayers
will
receive
an
800
christmas
check
by
the
end
of
the
year.
R
The
bill
also
includes
an
income
tax
cut
the
bracket,
six
percent
to
three
percent
and
a
billion
dollar
appropriation
for
roads
to
accelerate
construction
and
expansion.
So
it's
been
a
busy
year,
I'm
going
to
talk
about
education,
savings
plans
and
some
other
specific
things,
education
funding
which
are
all
in
the
information
that's
before
you.
But
let
me
talk
about
the
esa
plan,
which
ultimately
did
not
pass
because
the
house
and
senate
could
not
agree
on
a
conference
report,
but
in
essence
the
esa
is
a
voucher
program.
R
R
The
bill
will
definitely
be
in
play
next
session
and
I
fully
anticipate
there
to
be
some
hearings
in
the
senate
education
committee
on
that
issue.
During
the
fall,
the
bill
would
have
provided
eligibility
for
students
that
are
currently
enrolled
in
public
school
and
those
applicants
would
include
children
from
low-income
military
or
foster
families,
children
with
special
needs
and
children
who
are
homeless
with
an
esa
parents
can
direct
the
state's
education
funding
for
their
child
into
tuition
or
books
or
therapies
and
services
of
their
choice.
R
R
G
R
He
felt
very
strongly
that
the
the
the
senate
included
an
accountability
provision
and
their
version
of
the
bill.
The
conference
committee
did
not
adopt
that
provision,
so
he
felt
very
strongly
that
it
was
lacking.
There
was
also
some
you
know,
consternation
over
the
amount
of
money
that
the
program
would
cost,
so
he
held
it
up,
so
we'll
be
back
at
it
on
that
without
a
doubt.
R
Next
year,
moving
on
school
bus
funding
is
in
the
appropriations
bill,
12
million
dollars
on
the
line
with
a
5
pay
increase
for
school
bus
drivers
and,
as
I
mentioned
before,
the
teachers
will
receive
an
increase
in
pay
from
36
to
40
000.
I
think
there
was
some
confusion
along
the
way
that
potentially
all
teachers
would
receive
a
four
thousand
dollar
pay
increase,
but
that
is
limited
to
those
that
are
at
that
36
000
starting
minimum.
R
R
Next,
the
debate
over
the
south
carolina's
40
year
old
funding
formula
really
began
with
governor
mcmaster's
executive
budget,
his
plan
touted
the
ability
to
increase
flexibility
and
accountability
and
help
poor
districts.
It
sent
money
based
on
to
student
teacher
ratio
and
minimum
teacher
salaries,
as
in
lieu
of
an
array
of
formulas
formulas
that
are
being
used
presently.
R
The
house
budget
plan-
and
we
have
talked
about
this
in
the
past,
also
included
a
provision
that
would
allow
districts
to
hire
non-certified
teachers
and
critical
needs
areas,
geographic
and
subject
areas.
If,
if
a
teacher
is
not
available,
the
non-certified
teachers
must
possess
a
bachelor
of
arts
degree
or
a
graduate
degree
from
a
regionally
accredited
college
university
and
subject
matter
in
which
they're
hired
to
teach.
So
that
does
provide
some
flexibility
when
you're
having
a
difficult
time.
R
The
formula
specifies
that
no
local
match
is
required
for
state
aid
to
classrooms
and
eia
distributions
for
base
funding
is
rolled
up
from
the
previous
year.
It
also
directs
that
the
department
of
fiscal
and
revenue
accountability
instead
of
the
department
document
expenditures,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
on
an
online
financial
dashboard
that
includes
three
and
four-year-old
students
with
disabilities
registered
in
brick
and
mortar
charter,
schools
are
included
and
student
accounts
to
receive
additional
weighting.
R
The
formula
revises
people,
classification,
weightings
and
local
districts
are
required
to
provide
a
per
25
match
in
new
funding.
All
school
districts
are
to
be
held
harmless
this
year.
Nobody
receives
less
than
what
they
received
last
year.
You'll
have
flexibility
and
ability
to
allocate
funding
as
you
see
fit,
and
the
money
follows
the
child
based
on
population.
R
R
I
think
the
funding
formula
without
a
doubt
will
be
revisited
next
year
this
year,
serving
as
a
trial,
with
an
expectation
that
there
may
be
changes
made
next
session.
R
So
just
a
couple
other
things
I
wanted
to
mention
that
are
in
the
year-end
report,
three
areas
of
interest
in
specific
that
passed,
the
family
leave
bill
passed
for
state
employees,
which
has
not
ever
been
done
before
senate
bill
946,
which
provides
unencumbered
time
for
teachers
elementary
school
at
least
30
minutes
per
day
and
the
save
women
sports
act,
which
I
mentioned
earlier,
which
was
very
controversial
but
ultimately
passed
and
was
signed
into
law
on
may
16th
and
then.
R
Finally,
I
just
wanted
to
mention
house
bill
3591,
which
is
the
teacher
preparation
report
card
that
provides
education,
prep
courses
and
evaluates
the
ability
of
education,
educator
preparation
programs
to
train
new
teachers.
So
those
are
really
the
highlights
of
what
happened
this
year.
Happy
to
attempt
to
answer
any
questions.
If
you
have
any
and
thank
you
again
for
the
opportunity
to
present.
A
T
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much.
I
just
have
a
quick
question
greatly
appreciate
this
packet
that
you
provided
us
with
with
this
detailed
information,
the
section
that
is
headed
up
with
pending,
just
because
I
really
don't
know
the
entire
process
of
how
these
bills
get
passed
through.
R
A
Sir,
I
have
a
question.
I
thought
I
saw
that
governor
mcmaster
I'm
signed
into
law
the
requirement
of
a
financial
literacy
credits
for
our
students,
personal
financial
literacy.
But
I
don't
see
that
listed
here.
U
B
Thank
you,
lynn.
I
just
want
to
personally
thank
you.
As
the
legislative
chair,
your
updates
have
been
very
much
appreciated.
I
concur
with
miss
fidrich.
This
is
very
helpful.
This
summary
document
you
provided
tonight
and
I'm
jealous
you're,
going
to
the
see
alicia
keys
next,
one.
R
One
thing
I
I
can't
tell
y'all
how
much
I
appreciate
it
y'all
coming
up
to
the
general
assembly
this
year
and
making
time
from
your
busy
schedules
to
meet
with
delegation.
That
was
terrific.
I
think
we
spoke
with
just
about
everybody
in
the
delegation
and
they
really
appreciated
y'all
taking
time
to
come
up
and
and
visit
with
them.
So
thank
you
very
very
much.
It's
it's
very
helpful
and
we
appreciate
your
participation
so
much.
V
B
Grants
that
concludes
our
legislative
update.
A
Okay,
so
next
in
the
committee
reports
is
academics
and
I'm
the
chair
of
that
committee,
so
I
will
give
the
report
and
then
I
will
turn
it
over
to
dr
stratos
and
her
team
to
talk
about
two
specific
ars
at
the
june
22nd
academic
committee
meeting
the
following
ars
were
discussed.
A
Changes
were
made
in
mostly
in
significant
changes
to
bring
them
into
laws.
They're
posted
you
had
access
to
them
on
board
docs
and
encourage
you
to
to
look
at
them,
and
then,
if
you
have
any
additional
questions
to
to,
let
the
academic
committee
know
ar
is
9
instructional
program.
The
difference
in
that
one.
The
change
in
in
that
ar
was
additional
info
on
dual
enrollment
was
added
is43
the
grading
assessment
systems.
Again
there
was
clarification
on
dual
enrollment
and
is
49
graduation
requirements.
A
This
is
kind
of
interesting
for
you
to
look
at.
I
think
there.
The
state
now
has
seals
of
distinction
on
their
diplomas,
and
this
ar
brings
us
into
compliance
with
the
state
and
once
again
ars
administrative
regulations.
We
don't
approve
them,
we
don't
accept
them.
They're
the
work
of
the
superintendent
and
his
staff
and
they're
presented
to
us.
We
can
certainly
ask
questions
about
them
or
comment,
but
that
they're
not
something
that
we
approve
or
adopt.
They
are
re-um,
visited
from
time
to
time
to
bring
into
compliance
with
new
state
regulations.
A
So
that's
the
ars,
so
our
next
academic
committee
meeting
is
july
26
at
5
pm,
so
you
are
all
invited
to
attend
and
dr
stratos,
I
will
turn
it
over
to
you
to
present-
is
38
school
library,
materials,
selection
and
adoption
and
is
38.1
procedures
for
handling
questioned
or
challenged
school
library.
Materials
is
38.1
is
a
new
procedure.
So
that's
why
we
felt
it
was
important
for
the
whole
board
to
have
this
presentation.
H
Thank
you
very
much,
madam
vice
chair
and
good
evening
board
members.
Tonight's
presentation
is
led
in
person
by
colleen
beckenbarsky,
our
director
of
education
technology
and
supported
virtually
by
one
of
our
stellar
educational
technology
coaches,
and
I
I
tell
I
may
not
have
said
or
less
say
it
again,
aita
all
right.
So
with
that,
mrs
beckinvarsky.
Thank
you.
X
Good
evening,
thank
you
all
so
much
for
having
me
tonight
to
share
with
you
about
is
38
and
is
38.1.
So
the
first
thing
I
wanted
to
just
address
is
why
we
are
updating
this.
As
ms
robin
mentioned,
that
there
was
a
model
policy
that
came
from
the
state
department
of
education,
it
was
released
in
december
of
2021
to
reflect
the
material
selection
as
well
as
the
reconsideration
process.
X
When
we
started
that
review
process,
we
did
notice
that
is
38
was
rather
long
and
we
made
the
decision
to
break
those
into
two
for
clarity
of
understanding
of
the
two
separate
pieces
of
this
ar
and
to
just
make
sure
that
we're
as
clear
as
possible
on
how
those
processes
will
work.
So
that's
where
those
two
came
into
play
so
I'll
start
with,
is
38
and
highlight
the
updates
that
we
have
on
that
particular
ar
so
most
of
this
was
about
organization
of
the
ar
it
also
wanted.
We
all
wanted
to
condense.
X
Most
importantly,
we
wanted
to
make
sure
we
added
the
language
that
aligned
to
that
model
policy
that
came
from
the
state
department
of
education,
so
we
captured
all
of
that
in
there
as
well.
We
did
want
to
make
sure
to
include
that
the
deselection
or
weeding
process
in
selection
and
collection
materials.
X
That
is
a
really
important
process
for
our
libraries,
to
make
sure
they're
current
to
make
sure
that
you
know
materials
are
flowing
in
and
out
as
needed.
So
we
did
include
that
that
was
not
initially
in
is
38
before
and
then,
as
previously
mentioned,
we
took
a
large
portion
of
that
to
create
the
is
38.1,
which
is
that
reconsideration
process
so
looking
at
is
38.1.
X
That
is
the
newly
created
ar
this
again
was
taken
from
the
south
carolina
department
of
education
model
policy.
So
we
brought
that
language
over
and
then
we
made
sure
just
to
make
sure
it
was
clear
and
organized
well,
we
did
add
another
option,
which
is
an
opt
out
option
for
parents
or
guardians,
so
you'll
see
that
looks
a
little
different
from
the
state
model
policy.
That
is
just
a
way
for
parents
or
guardians
to
submit
a
form.
X
If
there's
a
particular
library
material,
they
don't
want
their
child
to
necessarily
have
access
to
checking
out
at
the
library.
So
we
have
that
as
an
additional
one
there.
If
that
is
something
that
they
want
to
partake
in,
they
fill
out
a
form
they
turn
into
the
school
level.
For
it
to
be
addressed
at
the
school
level,
then
there
is
a
request
for
a
more
broad
reconsideration
and
there's
an
additional
form
on
that
one
as
well
as
part
of
38.1.
X
So
that
is
a
form
that
comes
here
to
the
district
office,
to
the
chief
instructional
services
officer
and
then
we've
outlined
directly
from
the
state
model
policy
kind
of
what
that
looks
like
once.
We
receive
that
form
so
that
once
it
is
formed,
a
committee
is
formed
based
off
of
the
recommendations
of
who's
on
that
committee
from
the
state
policy.
X
And
then
the
committee
reviews
that
material
meets
discusses.
It
discusses
the
form
that
was
received
and
then
within
15
days
submits
their
report
back
out
to
the
superintendent,
the
board
and
the
complainant
about
there's
a
seven
day
appeal
period
once
that
is
submitted
and
once
that
full
process
is
complete,
that
same
instructional
material.
Our
library
material
cannot
be
revisited
for
reconsideration
for
five
years
and
that's
the
general
process
of
what
that
reconsideration
looks
like.
C
Because
this
was
a
lot
to
digest
and
thank
you
so
much
for
y'all's
work
on
this.
I
know
that
a
lot
of
thought
and
effort
went
into
creating
an
ar
that's
all-encompassing.
So
I
appreciate
your
work.
The
cataloging
that's
going
to
be
available.
Is
that
going
to
be
publicly
available
to
any
citizen
parents
is
that
online
at
the
school
district
website?
It's
my
understanding
that
it
is
available
right
now.
Yes,.
C
Okay
and
then
what
I'm
sorry
go
ahead,
what
materials
are
generally
not
available
for
removal?
I
know
I've
had
some
conversations
and
there's
certain
ones
that
are
tied
to
federal
programs
or
things
like
that
that
are
not
available
for
removal.
H
H
C
C
H
Could
affect
the
end
result
right
of
the
sitting
for
the
testing
from
one
of
those
three
accelerated
course
areas.
Yes,
ma'am,
okay,.
A
A
Forward
are
there
any
other
questions
comments?
Okay,
I
have
one
question,
mr
campbell
and
then
I'll
come
back
to
you.
Okay,
I
would
just
like
you
to
state
what
b1
says.
I
think
this
is
important
for
the
public
to
know.
Once
a
parent
or
community
member
fills
out
one
of
those
pieces
of
paper
asking
that
the
book
be
removed
or
whatever
what
happens
to
that
book.
X
Oh,
it
is
removed
during
the
reconsideration
process.
Thank.
A
Y
Y
X
Correct
so
the
way
the
policy
the
state
policy
read
was
that
once
it
goes
through
that
full
reconsideration
process,
it
can't
be
re-submitted
for
complaint
for
five
years.
Y
So
it's
fully
vetted
with
that
one!
Okay:
my
question
was
about
rachel's
comment
about
some
of
the
advanced
courses
and
how
their
curriculum
might
be.
I
have
outliers
in
terms
of
content
and
it's
okay
to
have
those
outliers,
because
the
programs
cambridge
got
its
own
program.
We
adopted
it.
Y
H
So
what
I
am
hearing
that
we're
not
excluding
the
books
at
the
accelerated
level,
mr
campbell,
we
do
want
to
make
the
public
recognize
that
some
of
the
books
listed
on
syllabi.
Should
there
be
a
test
that
you
have
to
sit
that
is
specifically
tied
to
that
book.
It
will
come,
has
a
great
likelihood
of
compromising
the
outcome
of
that
student.
Also
recognizing-
and
I
I
appreciate
the
emphasis
on
for
students
who
may
not
be
our
goal-
is
that
we
should
have
as
many
students
as
possible
in
high
school
taking
sitting
for
accelerated
coursework.
H
Y
My
question
questions
the
equity
involvement
program.
Every
student,
who
I
may
not
be
able
to
read
that's
just
throughout
a
crazy
book
like
native
son,
all
right
because
it's
not
in
the
regular
curriculum
but
has
a
student
id.
It's
allowed
to
read
that
book
because
it
is
in
the
cambridge
curriculum.
H
Right
but
it
would
be
available
in
the
library-
and
I
don't
believe
this
ar
is
talking
about
restricting
what
our
children
will
have
access
to
right,
so
it
doesn't
restrict
to
that
regard.
This
is
basically
a
request
from
someone
who
may
not
be
in
alignment
to
what
we
may
have
in
a
library,
and
we
tried
to
put
a
process
in
place
so
that
we
could
have
the
voice
for
some
parents.
H
So
may
I
met
madame
one
of
the
opportunities
we
brought
forward,
we're
bringing
cambridge
ace
programs
to
our
schools,
which,
right
now
we
have
two
high
schools
who
are
sitting
with
these
courses,
and
one
middle
school
has
taken
on
the
opportunity
to
pre-cambridge
at
the
sixth
grade
for
social
studies.
That
would
be
robert
smalls,
the
passing
rate,
especially
for
the
general
knowledge
tests
course
that
is
established
with
cambridge,
has
a
significant
high
passing
rate.
It
is
highly
recommended
through
cambridge,
that
all
students,
all
students,
have
that
opportunity
to
sit
for
that
accelerated
course.
H
Y
H
Y
I'm
asking:
is
that
equitable,
it's
not
plus,
because
we
have
these
programs.
Does
the
state
allow
it
to?
Does
the
state
allow
that
book
to
be
okay
for
every
particular
student,
but
not
okay
for
the
other
students
and
three,
how
many
books
of
that
level
do
we
have
that's
available
to
certain
students?
That's
not
really
going
to
be
available
if
vetted
to
other
students.
H
I
don't
have
a
direct
answer
for
you
only
because
we
haven't
gone
through
this
process
of
requesting
books
to
be
reviewed
right
right,
but
I
think
what
you're
stating
is
the
purpose
of
having
a
large
membership
group
to
bring
that
type
of
questioning
to
the
table,
because,
as
one
makes
it
request,
how
does
it
impact
all
of
our
other
students?
Yes,
sir,.
A
Okay,
mr
campbell,
back
to
you,
mr
earl
campbell.
P
Yes,
am
I
correct
you
saying
that
one
person
can
have
a
book
removed
from
a
library.
H
P
P
P
History,
I
don't
care
whether
you
talk
about
this,
the
state,
the
united
states
or
world
history,
there's
going
to
be
some
part
of
that
history
going
to
be
negative,
and
I
think
that's
the
reason
why
we're
having
so
much
problem
in
this
country
today,
because
people
don't
know
the
history,
you
have
adults
in
beaufort
county,
don't
know
the
history
of
this
county
until
that
change,
nothing
else
is
going
to
change.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
V
C
I
think
I
just
wanted
to
provide
a
point
of
clarification
that
we're
talking
about
library
books,
not
necessarily
textbooks
so
to
mr
campbell's
point.
I
think
that
may
or
may
not
be
maybe
apples
and
oranges
but
they're.
I
know
there's
certainly
some
books.
I
would
not
my
elementary
child
reading
that
are
out
there
for
public
consumption.
So
that's
if,
as
a
parent,
I
would
like
the
opportunity
to
have
that
reviewed,
but.
P
C
So
my,
but
my
comment
was
in
regard
to
the
process
of
the
materials
recommendation
committee
on,
I
believe
it's
roman
numeral,
four
b,
the
part
where
the
board
comes
into
play
is
after
the
committee
has
reviewed
the
book
and
made
its
recommendation.
So
basically
their
report
will
be
sent
to
the
complainant,
the
superintendent
and
the
board.
I
would
just
ask
that
that
the
complaint
be
provided
to
the
board
before
the
committee
does
its
work,
and
my
rationale
for
that
is.
C
I
received
a
request
regarding
a
book
that
wasn't
for
distribution
in
the
school
district
and
I
asked
for
a
copy
of
the
book,
so
I
could
read
it
myself,
so
I
wouldn't
want
to
as
a
board
member
get
to
the
point
where
the
materials
committee
has
already
done.
Their
work
and
they've
already
assessed
this
book,
and
I
haven't
even
had
an
opportunity,
as
board
member,
an
elected
representative,
to
review
that
myself.
So
just
a
suggestion,
I'm
not
sure.
C
If
that's
something
that
you
all
would
consider,
but
I
think
that
we
should
be
involved
a
little
bit
earlier,
as
opposed
to
after.
H
F
X
So
that's
that's
where
the
committee
comes
together
to
meet
so
the
committee,
the
outline
of
who
was
could
be
represented
on
the
committee,
so
that's
laid
out
here.
Then
they
meet
to
discuss
and
again
since
we
haven't
gone
through
the
full
process.
Yet
we're
not.
We
haven't
done
it
yet
to
know
all
the
parts
and
pieces
yet,
but
they
meet
to
discuss,
look
at
the
form
of
the
complaint
and
then
depending
on
what
the
form
reads
and
what
they're
questioning
that
will
drive
what
their
committee
has
to
discuss.
X
They
develop
a
report,
that's
then
submitted
to
the
complainant,
the
school
board
and
the
superintendent.
So
whatever
the
decision
is
out
of
that
committee,
they
can
submit
that
to
them
so,
depending
on
what
that
decision
is,
if
it
is
to
remove
it
stay
removed,
it
stays
removed.
It's
to
return,
they
return
the
book.
D
The
finance
committee,
the
operations
committee,
the
academics
committee,
the
technology
committee,
all
of
whom
are
going
to
be
looking
at
the
pieces
of
this
referendum,
and
so
again
it
is
redundant.
The
only
thing
that
the
members
have
an
advantage
of
is
the
members
have
visited
every
school,
some
one.
At
least
one
of
the
member
has
been
in
every
school
or
you
know,
between
between
the
group,
but
so.
J
U
D
Staff
so
again
it's
kind
of
redundant
what
we
are
going
to
be
doing
and
when
you
really
look
at
it
it's
kind
of
outside
the
bounds
of
the
coherent
governance
model.
D
So
I'd
like
to
ask
the
other
committee
members
for
their
input-
and
I
got
a
kind
of
a
maybe
a
possible
suggestion
after
they've
had
a
chance
to
say
something
so,
dr
gwaz,
would
you
like
to
start.
B
Sure,
thank
you,
colonel
guyer,
your
your
summary
just
now
is
excellent
and
it
was
a
brainstorming
meeting
and
afterwards
you
kindly
kind
of
summarized
what
had
been
discussed
and
put
that
into
the
believe.
It
was
like
eight
bullet
points,
or
so,
as
you
know,
thinking
more
about
it.
B
I
I
corresponded
with
you
some
by
email
after
that,
and
I
also
think
that
the
the
committee
listings
that
you
had
or
excuse
me
the
responsibilities
or
I
don't
know
exactly
what
word
to
use
really
under
coherent
governance
should
be
the
work
of
the
ceo,
ier
superintendent
and
his
staff,
as
opposed
to
being
a
board
committee
and
and
the
responsibility
of
board
members,
and
as
I
also
mentioned,
I
really
think
we
have
a
blueprint
for
a
successful
referendum
with
the
2019
referendum
and
I
think
we
should
follow
that
process.
B
Rather
than
try
to
reinvent
the
wheel
and
a
big.
I
think
there
are
two
main
important
things
with
a
successful
referendum
and
those
are,
I
got
them
here
in
my
notes:
public
involvement
and
board
superintendent
trust
those
are
key
to
getting
a
referendum
press
and
we
saw
that
in
2019
and
dr
you
know,
berg
solicited
board
members
to
provide
him
constituents
recommendations.
B
I
think
it
was
two
for
each
of
us
to
so
he
could
form
a
community
project
review
committee,
so
that
would
be
a
superintendent
committee,
not
a
board
committee,
and
they
can
incorporate
into
their
work
review
of
the
of
the
projects
that
weren't
placed
on
the
2019
referendum
list
that
was
put
together
by
dr
berg
and
ultimately,
the
board
approved-
and
you
know
dr
rodriguez-
can
do
it
in
a
similar
manner.
B
He
may
well
need
to
get
consultants
involved
to
do
this
and
he
we
already
have
some
real
estate
consultants
on
board.
With
our
with
our
district.
We
have
somebody
who's,
basically
an
expert
in
school,
real
estate.
That's
not
local,
then
we
have
a
local
realtor.
So
I
think
we
have
a
good
combination
of
everything
and
I
really
think
ultimately,
the
the
dr
rodriguez
will
put
together
a
a
good
committee
and
and
ultimately
and
as
you
said,
the
other
committees
will
perhaps
reach
the
standing
committees
of
operations,
finance,
etc.
B
Will
end
up
reviewing
some
of
the
issues
that
arise.
So
I'm
really
starting
to
think
we.
We
really
don't
need
this
committee,
and
that
was
not
my
initial
thought
so
and
I
appreciate
dick
you
put
it
in
a
lot
of
effort
and
thought
to
to
the
committee.
P
Well,
I
agree
with
dr
ross
because
I
think
superintendent
can
have
a
committee
and
then
come
back
to
the
board
with
their
recommendation.
D
D
This
committee
might
be
called
an
ad
hoc,
true
ad
hoc
committee,
that
the
superintendent
would
go
to
the
chair
and
say
you
know
I'd
like
to
have
a
group,
a
committee
listen
to
our
first
draft
before
I
bring
it
to
the
full
board,
so
I
can
kind
of
have
a
little
feedback
and
then
maybe
make
some
changes
before
the
full
board
gets
it.
So
it
would
be
just
a
pure
ad
hoc
committee
that
would
be
called
based
on
when
the
superintendent
felt
that
he
just
needed
to
get
a
little
bored
input
for
the
whole
package.
D
Now
there's
going
to
be
incremental
pieces
that
will
be
talked
about
in
the
technology
and
operations
and
so
on,
but
it
would
just
be
a
tool
for
him
to
say.
Oh,
I
hadn't
thought
about
that
or
the
board
wouldn't
be.
You
know
too
excited
about
that
particular
piece
or
have
you
thought
about
such
things
from
a
board
perspective
and
but
that's
the
only
perhaps,
and
that's
not
really
up
to
the
full
board
if
they,
if
they
even
want
that
to
happen,
that's
just
a
suggestion.
A
Do
you
have
any
motion,
or
are
you
just
you
know,
leave
it?
I.
D
C
Thank
you,
madam
vice
chair.
I
think
the
only
comment
and
concern
that
I
have
is
that
this
is
all
we
drive
the
district
by
policy
and
by
the
creation
of
committees
that
provides
for
an
additional
level
of
transparency
with
the
public
and
people
to
be
engaged
in
the
process
to
see
the
process
when
you
house
things
predominantly
just
at
the
district
administrative
level
that
may
or
may
not
happen,
and
so
I'm-
and
this
is
not
a
that's-
not
a
slight
or
anything.
C
I'm
just
saying
that
the
committees
provide
for
an
additional
level
of
openness
for
public
involvement,
and
that
is
one
of
the
things
that's
very
important
for
a
successful
referendum.
Public
trust
in
the
superintendent
and
in
the
board
comes
from
transparency,
and
that
leads
to
accountability.
On
things,
I
understand
the
purpose.
I
think
that
the
only
thing
is
we
need
to
be
clear
what
the
process
looks
like.
C
Are
we
saying
now
that
the
ad
hoc
combined
north
south
of
the
broad
committee
is
going
to
be
a
sort
of
kind
of
committee
for
right
now
until
dr
rodriguez
decides
to
call
upon
it
or
what
is
the
directive?
Is
my
question:
what
is
the
board
saying?
We
want
to
be
the
future
of
this
committee?
What
do
we
want,
dr
rodriguez,
to
use
this
committee,
for
I
think
we
just
need
to
be
clear
in
what
we're
directing
dr
rodriguez.
G
Thank
you.
I
move
that
we
dissolve
this
committee
until
a
need
arises.
We
can't
have
committees
according
to
coherent
governance,
we
can't
have
committees
that
are
called
by
the
superintendent,
so
until
we
feel
that
there's
a
definite
need,
I
would
just
dissolve
this
committee.
It
doesn't
seem
like
we're
going
anywhere
with
it.
Y
Y
I
think
it's,
I
think
our
goal
would
be
to
project
where
we're
going
to
be
beyond
the
next
referendum
that
he
might
bring
in
and
and
what
kind
of
growth
we're
going
to
have.
What
kind
of
schools
we're
going
to
have
open
what
kind
of
schools
we
got
going
to
have,
and
I
think
that's
why
north
of
the
broad
people
visited
those
schools
to
see
what's
closable
and
what's
not
closable,
and
it
may
not
be
happening
in
the
next
referendum.
Y
So
I
think
these
these
these
committees
protection
committees
for
the
board
of
education,
not
necessarily
the
superintendent
can
use
it.
Y
You
know
with
his
projection
and
which
his
protection
is,
is
minimized
to
a
10
year
plan
right
now,
and
we
can,
you
know,
relate
to
where
that
is,
but
what
we
see
and
how
we
might
want
to
change
some
of
those
things
from
what
we
see.
So
I
don't
you
know,
concur
that
it's
absolutely
useless,
but
if
its
scope
was
was
finite
in
terms
of
the
next
referendum
yeah,
then
it
is
useless
that
committee
I'm
talking
about.
T
Thank
you.
I
I
don't
agree
with
the
dissolution
of
this
committee.
When
you
go
back
to
when
we
met
in
may
at
whale
branch
early
college
high
school,
there
was
some
some
real
excitement
around
the
table,
but
what
this
joint
committee
could
look
like
and
what
its
purpose
could
be,
and
so
I'm
going
to
read
some
of
the
the
notes
from
the
draft
meeting
notes
and
it
says,
and
we
had
miss
carol,
crutchfield
and
mr
robert
odding,
that
suggested
some
ideas
about
the
process
of
what?
Where
do
we
go?
T
Next,
you
know
we
have
a
whole
lot
of
information
from
the
south
of
the
broad,
a
whole
lot
of
information
from
the
north
abroad,
and
some
of
the
information
that
came
forth
was
community.
T
Another
committee,
like
the
community
project
review
committee
to
vet
projects,
so
it
was
agreed
upon
that
there
would
be
a
joint
committee
to
transition
from
separate
committees
to
move
forward
as
one
regarding
referendum
and
future
facilities
planning.
T
T
What's
your
vision
for
the
schools
in
north
of
the
broad,
what's
your
vision
for
the
growth
in
bluffton
and
just
start
compiling
that
information
and
bringing
it
back
to
the
full
board.
So
I
know
it
sounds
like
there's
a
lot
of
work
put
into
it.
I
listened
to
the
to
your
original
committee
for
the
the
first
joint
one.
T
I
think
there's
a
need
for
it
for
this
committee.
Perhaps
you
you
know
the
scope
needs
to
be
revised.
A
little
bit
maybe
go
back
to
the
original
intent
behind
the
development
of
this
committee,
so
I
will
not
be
voting
for
the
dissolution
of
this
committee.
F
As
I
sit
here,
and
I
listened
to
what
the
committee
bought
today,
I
was
shocked.
F
F
Dissolve
it
which
comes
in
my
it
comes
back
to
question.
What
will
they
will
we
go
back
to
the
to
the
north
and
the
south
and
to
figure
some
more
out
to
have
more
have
the
area
representatives
to
deal
with
that
with
their
constituents
to
bring
them
and
bring
them
up,
and
I
can
keep
them
abreast
on
things
that
are
coming
within
their
areas
and
regarding
to
where
we're
at
to
me
that
wouldn't
be
a
bad
thing,
but
to
even
bring
it
together
and
start
doing
some
of
what?
What
we're
doing
now.
F
It
just
tells
me
that,
on
this
board
that
we
have
a
lot
of
people
that
are
in
in
different
places
and
have
different
ideas
and
different
visions
of
where
they
are
in
terms
of
committees,
and
things
are
aligning
the
steps
to
take
this
district
to
the
next
level.
F
This
right
here
is
definitely
a
a
tell
tale
to
show
that
things
that
some
that
what
we
said
that
this
committee
might
not
might
have
before
is
is
not
the
vision
of
what
some
people
might
have
wanted
to
use
this
committee
to
get
certain
things
done
and
to
me
this
right
here.
Some
of
the
to
telling
of
that.
F
F
It
appears
to
me
just
in
in
in
my
vision,
is
what
I
see
that
is
this,
that
some
that
some
people's
visions
of
this
committee
is
to
do
strictly
to
what
a
lot
of
people
been
talking
about.
What
I've
been
saying
eight
and
two
months
ago
I
mean
eight
months
and
a
year
ago,
is
that
some
of
us
on
this
board
has
been
pushing
for
a
referendum
wherever
we're
there.
F
I'm
not
I'm
not
sure,
but
that's
exactly
what
we're
talking
about
coming
up
with
a
a
referendum
group
that
do
what
we
did
years
ago,
it
seemed
like
that's
is.
That
is
what
we're
pushing
to
there's
a
way
how
to
do
it,
but
timing
is
everything
I
just
won't.
Let
my
colleagues
know
timing.
Timing
is
everything
so
with
that
I've
said
a
lot,
but
but
mainly
to
bring
it
home.
My
point
is
this
is
why
I
was
not
ready
to
move
forward
since,
firstly.
F
Secondly,
if
we're
going
to
go
back
to
two
small
committees,
I
have
to
have
no
problem
with
it,
because
I
think
there
is
there.
There
is
work
that
could
that
could
be
done
on
norfolk
abroad
and
south
vietnam.
We
could
have
open
discussions
with
our
constituents
are
moving
forward,
but
to
just
keep
it
right.
F
The
work
see
that
there's
no
work
to
be
done,
so
I
would
definitely
have
to
support
support
that
because,
if,
if
we
as
a
board
member,
if
we
gave
our
colleagues
the
task
to
to
go
out
and
do
to
go
out
and
meet
about
it-
and
this
is
what
they
came
back
and
said
that
there's
no
work
then
at
this
point
in
time.
I
guess
if
we
trust
them
on
other
things,
and
I
guess
we
trust
the
more
this
and
see
where
we
go.
Thank
you.
D
Well,
this
is,
this
is
good.
This
is
more
brainstorming
and
that's
good.
D
I
think
it
and
I
would
go
back
to
the
chair
and
say
you
know.
Perhaps
this
needs
to
be
a
full
board
discussion
and
and
have
the
board
tell
the
committee
what
you
want
us
to
do,
because.
D
J
G
Well,
thank
you.
I
think
colonel
guyer
hit
the
nail
on
the
head.
The
board
did
not
give
this
committee
clear
direction.
Obviously,
so
we
need
to
have
a
discussion
in
work
session
and
develop
a
clear
scope
for
the
committee
so
that
they
know
they
know
what
the
board
wants.
So
I
you
know
it's.
G
C
C
I
gave
that
report
in
my
apologies.
If,
if
I
was
not
clear,
but
I
do
remember
the
meeting
well
where
we
all
discussed
with
both
committees,
so
I'd
be
happy
to
discuss
it
further
and
make
it
more
clear.
I
agree
with
trisha.
F
I
would
definitely
have
to
disagree.
I
believe
that
there
was
clear
intention
in
dr
ranewski
and
when
this
the
people
they
were
adamant
because
I
I
remember
me
begging
the
board
not
to
even
bring
this
up
and
take
a
vote
on
this.
So
there
was
cl
there
was
clear
direction
on
it,
but,
like
I
said,
that's
why
I
asked
the
board
not
to
bring
those
two
commands
together,
because
I
feel
that
we
were
not
ready
to
come
together,
so
there
was
cleric
declare
and
what
that
and
what
mrs
frigid
just
read.
F
It
makes
it.
Obviously,
if,
if,
if
the
thing,
if
what
she
just
read
was
it
was
things
that
were
told
and
that
was
brought
forth.
Then
how
could
we
not
understand
that
this
is
what
those
were
things
that
that
that
committee
moving
forward
was
supposed
to
be
putting
together
and
brainstorming
on
and
figuring
out?
How
way
to
put
that
together
I
mean,
maybe
I'm
not
understanding,
or
maybe
I
maybe
I
have
laryngitis
or
something,
but
I
mean
I
do
remember
it
being
clear,
but
just
saying
that
there
was
no
clear
direction.
F
B
I
I
move
that
we
postpone
this
motion
until
we
have
the
discussion
at
at
the
next
work
session.
A
Okay,
second
by
mr
mel
campbell.
A
C
Wisniewski
just
a
brief
comment:
I'd
encourage
all
board
members
to
go
back
and
watch
that
joint
committee
meeting
just
so
that
we're
all
very
clear
prior
to
bringing
it
back
up.
A
All
right,
so
the
motion
on
the
floor
is
to
postpone.
H
L
A
A
Until
the
discussion
until
discussion
takes
place
or
the
discussion
until
discussed
well,
whatever
yeah
motion
to
postpone
just
maybe
until
the
discussion
takes,
if
we're
going
to
put
that
way,
put
takes
put
an
s
on
it.
Oh
okay,
it's
not
showing
up;
okay,
all
right,
all
right,
all
right
turtle,
guy
or
anything
else.
A
Nothing
else,
mel.
F
Actually,
manchester:
how
how
how
long
are
we
postponing
it
too,.
F
A
A
Okay,
so
we
will
move
on
operations,
trish,
fidrich
and
just.
F
Two
thank
you
and
just
to
to
mrs,
mr
chairman,
just
to
your
point
to
your
to
your
point
of
order,
I
was
calling
I
read.
I
was
calling
for
clarity
to
make
sure
that
we.
F
Hold
on,
I
was
making
sure
that
we
voted
on
it
in
its
entirety
in
this
current
the
correct
way,
because
I
know
there
were
some
things
that,
if
you
that,
if
we,
I
was
thinking
of,
I
just
remember,
if
you
table
it,
you
can
only
table
it
with
a
certain
period
of
time.
Thank
you
for
my
education
and
for
my
clarity
I
may
not
be
maybe
with
some
other
with
some
and
where
others
are.
I.
T
A
T
Okay,
thank
you
yes,
miss
ingrid
boatwright,
who
is
the
chair,
is
not
able
to
be
here
this
evening,
so
I
will
bring
forward
the
operations
report
we
met
last
week
and
you'll
see
in
the
consent
agenda.
We
received
oe,
16.1
and
16.2
second
quarter
foia
report,
so
that
was
being
that
was
sent
the
consent
agenda.
T
T
They
brought
forward
five
recommendations
for
that
realignment.
We,
the
operations
committee,
had
met
with
those
engineers.
Oh,
I
think
the
last
time
we
met
with
them
was
in
april
and
at
that
time
they
had
brought
forward
three
recommendations,
so
we
have
never
seen
the
entire
five
recommendations
and
also
at
that
meeting
in
april,
we
did
ask
some
questions
about
right-of-way
and
easements,
and
things
like
that
and-
and
we
have
yet
to
receive
the
answers
so
in
your
packet.
T
T
T
While
this
project
will
have
substantial
impact
on
the
school
campus
and
student
safety,
the
school
district
was
not
a
part
of
the
discussion.
In
april
of
2021,
the
beaufort
county
school
board's
operations
committee
had
a
similar
presentation
from
the
j
braggs
consulting
group.
At
that
time,
we
shared
our
concerns
and
asked
questions
that
remain
unanswered.
T
None
of
this
feedback
or
the
issues
raised
by
the
school
district
were
part
of
the
discussion
with
county
council.
We
concur
with
the
opinion
of
the
county
council
members
that
there
is
no
perfect
solution
to
this
problem.
However,
the
beaufort
county
school
board
is
committed
to
ensuring
that
issues
of
student
safety
are
at
the
forefront
of
any
traffic
planning
proposals
until
the
school
district
receives
more
clarification
and
a
response
to
the
issues
regarding
safety,
right-of-way
and
a
clearer
understanding
of
the
proposed
designs.
We
cannot
support
any
of
the
alternatives
as
currently
presented.
T
The
intent
of
this
letter
is
to
make
the
beaufort
county
council
aware
of
impediments
that
could
arise
from
moving
forward
without
taking
the
impact
of
the
school
campus
into
consideration.
We
feel.
Instead,
this
project
could
present
an
opportunity
not
only
to
solve
a
long-standing
traffic
problem,
but
for
county
council
and
the
beaufort
county
school
district
to
come
together
and
act
in
the
best
interest
of
our
community
as
a
whole.
We
request
that
further
discussions
regarding
the
beaufort
high
entrance
realignment
include
input
from
the
beaufort
county
school
district,
so
I
move
that
this
letter
be
accepted.
F
A
Second,
by
will
smith
discussion,
dr
wisniewski.
C
Thank
you,
madam
vice
chair.
I
just
had
a
couple
questions
that
I
wanted
to
get
clarification
on.
So
you
said
this
would
go
to
the
committee,
the
public
facilities
committee
and
to
eric
greenway.
C
My
suggestion
would
be
that
it
goes
to
full
council
because
it
seems
in
in
some
of
my
experience
or
our
experience
that
things
that
aren't
seen
by
full
counsel
or
sent
to
committees
may
or
may
not
be
shared
amongst
all.
I
also
think
that
in
the
first
sentence
we
need
to
be
clear
about
who
presented.
I
know
we
mentioned
the
j
braggs
consulting
group,
but
it's
not
clear
in
the
first
sentence
that
that's
who
presented
to
the
beaufort
county
council's
public
facilities
committee
is
that
it's
the
same
correct.
C
Okay,
I
just
think
maybe
we
need
to
add
their
name
in
the
first
sentence,
to
make
it
clear
that
that
we
receive
the
same
info
and
then
the
last
sentence
where
it
requests
further
discussions
regarding
this
include
input
from
it
says
the
beaver
county
school
district,
and
I
don't
know
if
we
want
to
add
the
board
as
well,
since
we
are
the
one
making
sending
the
letter
and
those
are
just
my
suggestions.
T
The
reason
that
we
had
talked
about
setting
it
to
the
public
facilities
committee
is
because
they
just
recently
had
the
presentation
from
the
engineers
and
they
had
many
questions
themselves,
so
we
know
that
they,
the
engineering
group,
is
going
to
go
back
to
that
committee
and
with
some
of
their
thoughts
and
answers
to
the
question.
My
only
concern
about
sending
it
to
the
full
county
council
at
this
time
is
that
any
council
members
that
were
not
present
at
that
would
just
kind
of
be
like
what
you
know.
T
What
is
what
is
this
letter,
so
I
mean
whatever
the
board
wants,
but
that
was
just
the
recommendation
of
the
yeah
go.
C
T
Thank
you
and
I
do
appreciate
that,
because
yeah
I
was,
I
did
not
attend
that
meeting,
but
I
watched
it
later
on
and
there
were
several
county
council
members.
Mr
glover
miss
howard,
just
to
name
a
few
that
had
so
many
questions
about
all
five
alternatives,
because
the
engineers
are
recommending
alternative
number
four.
T
B
Dr
grads,
so
trisha
did
you
write
the
letter?
No,
I
did
not.
T
Okay,
can
I
ask,
who
did
it
was,
I
think,
kind
of
a
joint
effort
between
miss
boatwright
and
mr
odding
provided
some
input?
Okay,.
B
So
my
comments
would
be.
I
really
think
the
letter
would
be
fine
with
removing
everything
in
the
last
paragraph,
except
for
the
last
sentence,
and
I
just
feel
like
it's.
The
rest
is
a
little
bit
almost
implying
that
we
don't
come
together
and
act
in
the
best
interest
and
I
would
just
remove
everything
except
for
that
last
sentence.
So
I'll.
I
will
make
a
motion
to
amend
the
letter
to
remove,
as
I
just
said,
the
last
paragraph,
except
for
the
last
sentence.
A
F
Yeah,
madam
chair,
I
am
not
really
in
tune
to
support
this
motion,
just
because
of
the
matter
of
which
this
letter
was
was
written
in.
I
believe
that
they
wanted
to
make
it
clear
and
from
my
from
what
I
got
from
watching
the
meeting,
I
don't
know
if
I
was
there,
I
was
I
was
there
fully,
but
I
watched
it.
I
watched
this
part
of
it.
F
I
believe
I
watched
that
and
what
what
what
the
reason
why
they
were
saying
this,
and
I
believe
that
that
our
chair
as
well,
was
he
interjected
as
well
in
it
as
well,
but
I
believe
the
the
the
point
of
of
saying
that
is
to
let
them
know
that
we
do
understand
that
we
do
hold.
F
We
do
hold
just
as
much
skin
in
the
game
as
they
do
so.
Therefore,
this
is
something
that
we
should
work
on,
and
I
I
think
that
that's
that
that
this
is
not.
This
is
in
line
with
the
letters
that
we've
sent
them
in
the
past,
and
I
don't
think
that
is
that
much
much
different
than
just
letting
them
know
that
we
and
then
this
point
time.
We
have
a
lot
of
skin
in
the
game
as
well,
and
this
will
affect
us
in
how
we
operate
our
schools.
F
My
my
memory,
who
was
at
that
meeting
in
terms
of
what
was
written
in
in
this
in
this
in
that
bottom
paragraph.
Thank
you.
D
A
Any
other
comments
miss
middleton,
mr
strippinger.
I
don't
see
any
hands,
no
okay
right.
So
the
motion
on
the
floor
right
now
is
the
amended
motion
made
the
motion
to
amend
the
letter
by
removing
the
contents
of
the
last
paragraph,
with
the
exception
of
the
last
sentence.
A
A
Okay,
all
those
opposed,
so
it's
five
five,
so
it
fails
okay.
So
we
go
back
to
the
original
motion,
which
is
to
send
the
letter
that
was
read
into
the
record.
A
Do
with
the
suggested
changes
I
mean.
What
are
we
going
to
do
with
that?.
C
V
A
So
doctor
it's
an
amendment
doctor
just
add
a.
C
A
So
all
those
in
favor
of
the
mr
were
you
trying
to
say
something,
and
I
didn't
see
you.
G
A
Okay,
so
the
motion
on
the
table
is
to
submit
the
letter
as
written
with
the
amending
of
the
edition,
with
the
addition
of
the
last
the
board
to
the
last
sentence.
U
L
U
A
E
A
A
Q
A
Reads:
okay:
I
move
that
the
board
of
education
approve
the
letter
and
have
it
sent
to
the
county
council
public
facilities
committee
regarding
beaufort
high
school
entrance
redesign
with
the
addition
of
adding
and
board
to
the
last
sentence.
Okay,
so
all
those
in
favor.
Yes,
mr
smith,
oh.
F
And
I
was
gonna
actually
I
know
she
said
she
went
just
to
donavonewski
said
that
she
wanted
to
go
to
county
council.
I
didn't
have
a
problem
with
that.
Did
that
need
to
be
in
there
or
no.
T
E
A
Okay,
all
right
at
this
time,
we'll
vote
on
the
motion.
All
those
in
favors
hi.
A
T
Okay
and
lastly,
the.
T
That's
why
I
was
like
and
because
I
knew
there
was
more
I
I
will
seriously
try
to
make
this
concise.
We
have
several
recommendations
for
changes
to
policy
to
bring
forward
so
the
first
one,
let's
just
jump
right
into
it.
The
first
one
is
gc
2.15.
T
You
guys
will
see
that
in
your
packet
and
that
policy
actually
says
the
board
by
majority
vote,
may
revise
or
amend
its
policies.
At
any
time
a
proposed
policy
revision
will
be
discussed
and
then
the
change
we're
recommending
is
in
blue.
As
you
can
see
at
a
board
meeting
and
remanded
to
the
policy
committee,
the
policy
committee
will
bring
forth
a
recommendation
to
the
full
board.
T
So
the
reason
this
even
came
up
was,
if
you
all
recall
that
the
technology
committee
brought
forward
and
a
change
to
the
oe,
they
want
to
change
the
name
and
some
of
the
the
policies
within
and
our
old
policies
used
to
say
we
had
to
have
three
readings
so
when
they
brought
that
forward,
we
were
all
kind
of
like
okay,
so
I
believe
that's
been
changed.
So
let's
go
back
and
review
that.
So,
as
you
can
see
from
here,
we
don't
need
three
readings.
T
B
Two
things
so
I
understand
this
and
the
intent,
and
I
think
it's
fine,
I
just
don't
think
the
word
remanded
is
the
best
is,
is
correct.
It.
B
Court
used
to
so
we
decided,
and
it's
never
been
there
at
the
policy
level
so
and
assigned,
I
think,
is
a
better
word
to
the
policy
committee
to
bring
forth
the
recommendation
to
the
full
board.
I
also
think
that
and
miss
cartilage
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
if
you're
changing
a
policy,
I
believe
you
have
to
have
it
posted
on
the,
even
though
you
don't
necessarily
have
to
have
three
readings.
I
believe
a
foia
requirement
is
to
post
it
on
the
agenda
that
it
there's
going
to
be.
B
You
know
a
consideration
of
changing
policy,
so,
but
I
guess,
when
the
policy
committee
came
back
to
the
full
board,
it
could
be
posted
right.
T
So
you're
suggesting
that
when
we
said
recommended
motion
for
change
to
gc
2.15
on
the
agenda
that
doesn't
satisfy
that
requirement,
I'm
sorry
say
that
again,
if
I
understood
you
correctly,
dr
watts,
you
said
that
there's
a
foia
requirement
that
the
policy
has
to
be
on
the
agenda.
Correct
has
to
be
posted.
B
T
B
No,
no
yeah,
no,
but
I
mean
going
forward.
No,
I
think
it's
fine
on
today's
agenda,
but
if
we're
going
to
be
changing
policies
in
the
future,
it
has
to
be
posted
on
the
agenda.
The
actual
wording
is
that
or
that
there's
consideration
for
am
I
right.
B
Yeah
that
you
know
the
board
is
considering
a
change
to
policy
on
on.
I
don't
know,
teacher
leave
or
I
don't
know
whatever
it
is,
but
I
do
think
you
have
to
have
it
posted
you
can't
just
not
not
tonight.
You've
got
it
on
there,
but
going
forward
so.
T
B
Not
communicating
well,
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
the
way
it's
presented
tonight.
Just
if
the
policy
committee
comes
back
to
the
full
board
and
they
think
we
need
to
change
gc
2.15
again,
then
it
needs
to
be
stated
as
such
on
the
agenda.
B
They
can't
just
come
back
and
hear
the
policy
committee
you
know,
has
recommendations
that
aren't
posted
in
advance.
The
public.
The
whole
idea
is
the
public
needs
to
be
informed
in
advance
of
policy
changes,
and
I
think
you
did
it
here
and
I
just
I
just
think
remanded
is
the
wrong
word.
I
think
it
should
be
assigned
okay,
okay,
that's
it.
A
So
I'll
just
yeah
and
dr
wisniewski,
oh
gee,
okay,
david.
G
I
agree
as
tricia
knows.
I
agree
that
assigned
is
a
better
word
than
remanded
and
and
I
don't
I
don't
see
any
posting
issue,
you
know
because
we
have
discussions
at
the
word
meeting
and
somebody
says:
hey.
A
A
C
Sorry
point
of
order:
yes,
so
our
current
policy
states
that
to
change
policies,
this
is
going
to
get
a
little
confusing
the
board
by
my
majority
vote
may
reviser
amend
its
policies
at
any
time.
A
proposed
policy
or
vision,
which
this
is
will
be
discussed
at
one
session
of
the
board
prior
to
being
approved
at
a
subsequent
board
meeting.
So
whatever
we're
doing
right
now
is
technically
a
first
reading.
It's
a
discussion
on
this
proposed
policy
and
it
needs
to
be
approved
at
a
subsequent
meeting
two
readings.
C
Well,
that's
what
that's
what
our
present
policy
is.
I
think
that
we
did
fine
with
the
way
we've
posted
it
on
our
agenda.
We've
done
our
first
reading,
we've
got
trisha,
has
the
language
change
on
remanded,
and
so
at
the
next
meeting,
when
it
comes
forward,
it'll,
say
assigned,
and
that
will
be.
The
finalization
of
that
policy
is
my
understanding
of
how
the
process
should
work.
A
T
You
know
what
it
really
is,
I
think,
a
matter
of
interpretation
but
yeah,
but
I
really
thought
that
we
discussed
having
to
have
this
in
policy
committee.
So
when
the
technology
thing
came
up
the
other
meeting,
oh,
I
think
we
need
to
revisit
the
policy
on
how
many
times
you
have
to
bring
something
up
regarding
change
of
policy,
and
so
it
kind
of
was
discussed
at
that
it
got
sent,
not
remanded,
got
sent
to
the
policy
committee
and
now
we're
bringing
it
back.
I
I
don't
I
I
don't
know.
T
G
I
agree:
I
think
that
the
initial
discussion
was
had
it
was
assigned
to
committee.
I
think
that
the
stat-
that's
you
know
that
initial
reading
and
voting
it
has
been
satisfied,
but
I
would
say
that
if,
if
that's
the
interpretation
we
agree
upon,
then
we
wouldn't
we
wouldn't
be
accepting
this.
We
approve
it.
G
A
V
A
T
C
T
Things:
okay.
I
appreciate
you
checking
my
six,
so
all
right.
So
the
next
item
is
gc
2.23
and
that
has
to
do
with
public
comment
that
was
brought
up
at
a
previous
meeting
about
now
that
we
have
instituted
having
public
comment
by
phone,
and
that
was
a
silver
lining,
perhaps
out
of
the
covet
era,
to
be
able
to
have
people
that
you
know
have
public
health
and
not
have
to
be
here
in
person,
and
so
we
had
nothing
in
our
policy
that
talked
about
requesting
to
have
public
comment
by
phone.
T
So
the
discussion
we
had
was
that
basically,
what
you
see
here
in
blue
was
taken
directly
from
what
is
written
on
the
agenda.
Okay,
that
is
distributed
so
that
everyone
knows
how
to
contact
ms
cushingberry
cushionberry
to
have
public
comment
by
phone.
So
I'm
bringing
this
for
your
consideration
and
for
a
motion
to
accept
approve
to
approve
the
changes
to
gc
2.23.
T
T
Y
T
So
thank
you
for
that,
mr
campbell.
I
see
where
you're
going.
I
don't
have
a
problem,
because
if
you
get
rid
of
a
lot
of
those
prepositional
phrases,
it
says
requests
will
be
accepted
and
then
you
know
by
sending
an
email
I
mean
it
just
kind
of
if
you,
if
you
narrow
it
down,
so
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
it.
But
if
you'd
like
to
add
language,
please
make
a
recommendation.
B
Yeah,
so
I
think
something
that
would
streamline
this
and
make
it
more
general,
because
this
is
assuming
that
the
that
the
meeting
is
always
starting
at
six.
Okay,
that's
one
thing
this
this
this
or
paragraphs
here
because
of
the
time
frames
that
were
put
in
here.
So
I
just
think
requests
for
public
comments,
participation
by
phone
or.
B
Is
it
will
be
made
or
will
be
posted
on
the
agenda
or
the
the
method
for
making
just
just
make
cut
all
this
and
just
make
it
real,
simple
and
just
say
that
the
you
know
public
comments,
participation
can
be
made
by
phone
and
the
process
is
posted
on
the
agenda,
and
that
way
you
cover
whether
the
meeting's
at
4
pm
2
p.m.
Right
you.
T
C
T
You
guys
probably
are
okay,
we're
talking
about
this
once
again-
and
I
admit
I'm
the
one:
that's
been
the
dog
with
the
bone
about
this
one.
I
just
thought
that,
with
our
current
processes
with
eight
percent
that
this
motion,
this
policy
was
not
clear.
So
this
certainly
has
been
in
front
of
us
several
times.
T
Dr
wisniewski
and
I
have
to
give
credit
where
credit's
due
I
miss
robin
miss
robine,
made
a
recommendation
for
what
you
see
in
blue
there
unless
otherwise
directed
by
the
board,
and
I
believe
that
is
a
beautiful
thing,
and
that
makes
it
all
very
clear.
So
I
make
a
motion
or
to
accept
the
changes
to
0e
6.16
as
written.
A
A
Okay,
all
right
any
discussion
about
the
motion
on
the
floor.
Okay,
at
this
time,
we
are
voting
on
approval
of
the
change
to
policy
oe
6.16,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye,
aye
middleton.
U
T
Okay
and
lastly,
from
the
policy
committee,
we
also
bring
forward
a
motion
to
accept
to
approve
the
changes
for
oe
17..
T
Now
you
know
this
is
this
gets
into
a
little
bit
of
that
foggy
foggy,
because
this
was
brought
forward
by
the
technology
committee
to
have
administrative
technology.
Oe17
now
changed
to
technology
services,
oe
17..
T
F
T
T
C
Thank
you,
madam
vice
chair.
I'm
gonna
be
down
on
this
sorry,
I'm
gonna
be
down
on
this,
because
I
I
think
that
the
present
policy
includes
some
stronger
language
in
regard
to
protection
of
minors
and
there's
certain
things
that
are
named
in
there.
That
and
and
full
disclosure
too.
I
had
to
leave
the
policy
committee
prior
to
the
vote
being
taken
on
this
one,
so
I
I
did
not
engage
in
the
conversation
there,
but
I
don't
agree
with
the
full
swap
so
I'm
going
to
be
down
on
this
today.
Thank
you.
T
Yes,
and
also
just
for
everybody's
awareness-
I
am
not
on
the
technology
committee,
so
any
of
those
types
of
questions
that
were
brought
to
technology
I
mean
to
the
policy
would
probably
have
to
go
back
to
technology
and
say
what
did
you
mean
by
that?
So
how
do
you
want?
What's
your
recommendation
on
handling
this,
then
you're
just
going
to
vote
against
this?
C
To
us
understood-
and
I
didn't
engage
in
any
conversations
with
technology
on
that
I
just
I
think
that
it
needs
to
be
tighter
when
we're
talking
our
technology
and
the
amount
of
dollars
that
we
expend
there
and
students.
Thank.
B
Yes,
so
I'm
rachel,
I
think,
you've
made
a
very
good
point
because
you're
basically
like
on
this
old
policy,
oe17
number
eight
was,
you
know,
unauthorized
on
online
disclosure
and
really
safety
issues.
So
I
agree
with
you.
I
I
don't.
I
think
it
it
needs
still.
Some.
F
Smith,
actually
I'm
on
the
technology
committee,
and
I
believe
there
was
the
reason
I
believe
there
was
a.
There
was
a
reasoning
that
it
was
worried.
The
way
it
was
worded-
and
I
I
can't
remember-
because
this
meeting
was
so
long
ago-
that
they
gave
respect
that
the
technology
committee
I
mean
the
the
technology
department
gave
a
certain
warning
to
to
a
certain
direction
to
because
also
we
were
in
in
in
terms
of
being
in
compliance
over
the
coh,
the
coherent
governance
that
we're
up
on
under
as
well.
F
F
Corresponding
to
the
things
that
that,
on
the
on
on
the
second
form-
so
I
I
do
I
do
remember-
and
I
I
do
remember-
which
means
I
do
remember
some
of
those
questions
I
was
talking
about.
Possibly
we
talked
about
some
of
these.
F
Some
of
those
questions
that
you
just
I
just
posed
before
us
that
possibly
would
come
would
come
before
it
would
come
before
us
when
we
brought
that
up,
but
also
one
of
the
things
that
I
do
remember
that
I
think
it
was
more
in
terms
of
it
being
a
under
coherent
governance
state.
It's
like
changing
from
twin.
G
E
A
T
T
Okay,
as
if
you
haven't
heard
enough
about
policy,
however,
you
know
what
we
we
decided,
that
we
needed
one
meeting
solely
dedicated
to
the
discussion:
gc
3.8,
oe,
8.10
and
ar
os28
in
regard
to
naming
of
schools,
mascots
colors
and
adjunct
facilities,
including
discussion
about
logos.
So
that
will
be.
That
is
the
sole
agenda
item
thursday
five
o'clock
here
at
the
district
office
or
hybrid.
Thank
you.
A
Okay
results
committee,
dr
quads.
B
Yes,
thank
you,
madam
vice
chair,
so
the
results
committee
met
last
week
and
the
superintendent
was
in
attendance.
Daniel
fallon
presented
beaufort
county
school
district's
relative
rankings
within
the
state
of
south
carolina
for
the
2018-2019.
B
The
2021
superintendent
annual
evaluation
instrument
is
included
in
your
packet
tonight.
It
was
developed
and
then
modified
to
include
the
coronavirus,
pandemic-related
adjustments
approved
by
the
superintendent
and
the
full
board.
The
pandemic
responses
were
added
to
each
of
the
five
areas
of
professional
practice
and
the
measurable
components
of
the
evaluation
were
not
used.
B
The
results
committee
now
recommends
to
the
full
board
for
the
2021-2022
superintendent
evaluation
and
that
will
be
used.
This
fall
that
the
modified
professional
practice
portion
continue
to
be
used
and
the
measurable
component
of
financial
oversight
be
reinstated
with
the
professional
practice
portion
weighted
at
85
percent
and
the
financial
oversight
measurable
component
weighted
at
15
percent.
F
Okay,
I
actually,
I.
Q
F
Question
at
this
time,
I
I
can't
support
it
because
of
the
fact
of
of
us
putting
the
over
the
financial
oversight
back
into
it,
because
we
know
it
benefits
a
benefit
benefit.
It
benefits
us.
You
know,
I
think
that
we
tell
the
superintendent
a
year
out
what
we're
going
to
evaluate
him
on
for
a
reason,
and
that
and
that's
that's-
that's
almost
like
saying.
F
If
my
question
was,
if
we
start
this
year,
do
we
it's
almost
like
we're
opening
pandora's
box
next
year?
If
we
know
that
something
does
not
benefit
him,
do
we
do
we?
Do
we
pull
it
out
because
that's
kind
of
what
we
did
this
year?
We
put
it
in
because
we
know
that
that
that
he
was
in
the
finance
that
he
was.
He
was
in
the
the
financing
and
it
looked
good.
So
we
added
because
we
know
that
we
know
the
job
was
done.
F
Okay,
if
we
know
the
job
was
done
and
that
that's
that's
understandable
and
you
know
what
we
understand
and
have
to
be
said.
I
mean
you
can
put
that
in
this
print
and
in
your
personal
opinions
or
on
your
personal
evaluation,
but
to
me
to
put
that
in
there
it's
kind
of
I
think
that
there's
like
there's
a
great
there's,
a
gray
area
there.
F
So
I'm
a
little
area,
I'm
a
little
I'm
a
little
larry
about
about
adding
that
finance
piece
in
there,
because
at
the
meeting
it
would
say:
well
we
know
that
he
that
he
did
it
even
through
the
pandemic
and
so
on
and
so
on.
So
that's
why
we're
going
to
add
it
back.
So
I'm
I'm
a
little.
F
You
know
if
we
told
him
that
it
was
that
this
is
what
you're
going
to
be
be
judged
on
next
year
and
he
gave
him
that
time
and
now
because
that
it's
almost
like
you
tell
a
kid
well
but
yeah.
Let
me
give
you.
Let
me
give
you
an
idea.
I
can
give
you
exactly
what
I'm
going
at
with
it
every
time.
A
kid
look
here:
you
need
to
read
five
books
to
go
on
the
trip
and
and
and
and
and
the
kid
reads.
A
B
Yes,
it
was
and
we
had
it
full,
it
was
discussed.
You
know
by
the
committee
and
yes,
it
was
unanimous
and
dr
rodriguez
was
present
because
he's
got
to
approve
any
changes
and
he
did
not
object.
Okay
and
the
percentages
were
calculated.
B
T
B
After
the
meeting
kathy-
and
I
had
a
discussion
about
what
was
the
fairest
way
to
have
the
waiting,
because
you
had
to
include
waiting
back-
and
we
didn't
add
all
the
things
back,
so
you
couldn't
use
the
prior
weighting
necessarily
right,
but
we
did
end
up
using
the
15,
which
therefore
made
the
other
part.
The
practice,
let
me
just
be
sure
the
practice
professional
practice
areas
had
to
make
then
be
eighty-five
percent
to
make
the
hundred
percent.
B
T
That
I
think
that,
in
evaluating
a
superintendent
of
a
quarter
billion
dollar
budget,
you
have
to
have
financial,
a
score
for
finance
and
also
to
as
far
as
you
know,
I
I
think
in
teaching.
You
know
you
never
want
to
do
a
gotcha.
You
know
the
best.
The
best
way
is
you
tell
the
kids.
What
are
you
gonna
be
tested
on?
What
are
you
gonna
be
tested
on
you
know
and
give
them
the
opportunity
to
succeed.
So
thank
you
for
all
your
hard
work.
T
G
G
You
know
that's
just
obnoxious
that
you
would
say
that
I
don't
think
you
know
what
you're
talking
about
and
I'm
sorry
I'm
a
little
emotional
on
that.
But
I'm
tired
of
hearing
that
kind
of
stuff
I
put
a
lot
of
time
and
effort,
as
other
members
did
in
coming
up
with
measurable.
G
C
Thank
you,
madam
vice
chair.
I
I
appreciate
all
the
work
that
you
all
did,
and
I
agree
with
david
about
bringing
us
more
back
towards
measurable
results,
and
to
that
point
I
do
think
that
the
teacher
recruitment
and
retention
component
score
should
be
added
back
in
that's
just
my
personal
belief.
I
think
sorry.
I
think
that
there
was
a
a
lot
of
work
that
was
done
during
the
course
of
the
pandemic
to
make
sure
that
that
we
tried
to
lessen
the
impact.
C
The
district
brought
forward
some
great
recommendations
for
compensating
our
teachers
during
that
time
and
the
board
heard
them,
and
I
think
the
superintendent
and
his
staff
did
a
great
job.
I
know
that
we've
consistently
asked
too
throughout
that
course
of
the
pandemic.
You
know
what
is
what
do
we
look
like
now
in
terms
of
staffing
in
comparison
to
the
prior
years,
so
I
think
that
is
something
that
we
can
measure
and
something
we
can
call
I'll
objectively.
C
Look
at
engage
dr
rodriguez
on,
so
I
would
be
of
the
mindset
that
we
add
back
in
teacher
recruitment
and
retention
at
this
time.
Thank
you.
B
Dr
glads,
yes
I'd
like
to
address
that
first,
david
strippinger.
I
agree
100
with
the
remarks
you
just
made
two
dr
wisniewski,
the
committee
did
discuss
the
teacher
recruitment
and
retention
and
felt
unanimously-
or
I
shouldn't
say,
felt
agreed
unanimously
that
it
would
be.
It
should
be
added
back
in
the
next
evaluation
instrument,
because
now
we
have
a
baseline
after
this
year.
We
don't.
B
We
didn't,
really
have
a
baseline
during
the
pandemic,
for
which
to
measure
the
improvement
or
progress
with
teacher
retention
and
recruitment,
so
that
that
is
our
plan
is
to
in
the
fall,
bring
back
to
the
full
board
like
we
are
tonight.
B
The
recommendation
to
add
back
teacher
recruitment
and
retention
from
this
gosh
from
this
measurable
component
for
the
2023
instrument
and
the
reason
we're
holding
off
till
then
is
because
we're
waiting
for
the
state
assessments
to
come
in
because
then
also
we
probably
hopefully
will
be
able
to
recommend
adding
back
the
student
achievement
portion
as
well.
So
that,
yes,
we
agree.
Y
Yeah,
we
actually
looked
at
the
retention
data
too,
and
it
wasn't
significant
in
terms
of
what
you
would
have
expected
during
pandemic,
but
we
looked
at
it
in
terms
of
at
the
end
of
the
pandemic.
Y
We're
here
and
we've
created
a
lot
of
a
incentive
to
really
focus
on
teacher
retention
and
be
a
better
time
to
start
a
baseline
from
this
year
going
forward
in
terms
of
teacher
retention,
and
he
had
that
the
same
thing
with
the
finance
but
the
financial
part.
We
decided
that
you
know
no
better
time
to
put
it
back
in
so
it
always
has
been
a
part
and
then
now,
when
you
know
he
had
some
money
that
he
had,
you
know
to
caretake,
particularly
the
essa
fund.
Y
So
we
need
to
look
at
that
and
see
what
happened
with
that
in
terms
of
what
our
opinion
was
of
how
it
was
how
it
was
handled,
not
because
he
did
anything
favorable
or
unfavorable.
But
at
the
time
we
get
a
different
little
scope
to
look
at
in
terms
of
what
we
would
be
looking
at.
So
that
was
part
of
how
he
made
those
decisions.
F
Mr
smith
yeah,
so
I'm
gonna,
I
have
a
question
for
clarification,
so
teacher
retention
will
not
be
in
this
evaluation.
Correct.
F
Right
right,
okay,
so
now
so
my
question
is,
since
they
felt
so
strongly
about
the
comment
mr
scribblers
just
made
about
me.
What's
the
process,
then,
when
you
first,
when
you
first
made
this
tool
till
now,
the
reason
why
you
re-added
the
financial
piece
because
there
wasn't
there
was
a
comment
made
because
I
attended
the
meeting
and
I
listened
and-
and
I
was
but
I
I
long
and
slept
on
it
and
thought
about
it.
So
my
question
to
you
is:
what's
the
what
was
the
process
and
what
was
it?
What
was
the
process?
F
The
first
time
making
this
this
this
the
this
this
this
recommendation?
I
mean
this,
this
evaluation
packet.
What
was
the
process
the
first
time
and
then
what
was
different
about
the
process?
The
second
time
to
make
you
want
to
add
the
financial
piece
on
there,
because
I
remember
I
also
mentioned
at
the
meeting
about.
I
talked
to
us
as
well
about
putting
the
teacher
retention,
and
I
agree
when
you
said
when
y'all
said:
no,
we
won't
put
it
in
there
this
year,
we'll
put
it
in
the
next
year.
F
I
had
no
problem
with
that.
I
didn't
dispute
you
on
that,
but
after
I
put
further
thought
into
it,
now
listen
some
of
the
comments
at
the
meeting.
Then
that's
where
I
kind
of
felt
like.
Maybe
we
could
wait
on
that.
So
my
question
to
you
is:
what
was
what's
the
problem?
What
was
the
process
of
that
and
what?
What
was
different
about
the
process?
The
second
go-around
in
the
first
quarter
round
that
brought
you
to
that
conclusion,
to
bring
that
back.
What's
the
process
for
clarification,
so.
F
I'm
I'm
actually,
mr
scribbler,
that
I
believe
he
was.
I
believe
he
was.
He
was
the
chair
at
that
time
and
he
made
the
comment.
So
I'm
just
I'm
just
understanding
it
and
and
me
trying
to
understand
what
the
process
was,
because
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
how,
if
you
went
through
the
process-
and
you
went
the
long,
extensive
process-
and
he
said
he
put
time
in
and
you
made
it
with
that
process
and
you
came
up
with
this
tool.
F
G
I'll
try
but
I'm
having
a
hard
time
understanding
it.
The
very
first
time
we
did.
This
was
pre-covered.
We
developed
statistics
for
all
of
the
pieces
when
covet
hits.
Certain
statistics
were
no
longer
available
to
us,
so
things
were
pulled
out.
Teacher
retention
and
financial
were
pulled
out
because
there
were
no
reliable
statistics.
G
P
Yeah
when
we
first
came
up
with
this
instrument,
because
I
was
on
the
committee-
the
original
one-
a
lot
of
stuff
happened
since
that,
and
that
is
the
reason
why
it
changes.
You
know
we
don't
have
to
beat
this
later
all
night
long
talking
about
this,
it's
common
sense!
You.
C
A
Okay,
all
those
opposed
okay,
dick's
back
all
those
opposed
rachel
and
mr
smith,
so
8-2.
A
So
now
we
are
at
the
superintendent's
report,
update
on
profile
of
the
beaufort
graduate.
H
Z
So
much
dr
stratus
and
thank
you
board
members.
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
give
you
a
short
summary
on
what's
happening
with
the
profile
of
the
beaufort
county
graduate
as
part
of
our
work.
We
have
began
to
align
the
profile
units
with
the
south
carolina
standards
at
each
grade
level
and
within
each
content
area.
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
The
calendar
will
ensure
that
each
one
of
the
beaufort
county
school
district
profile
pillars
and
each
of
those
components
will
be
showcased
each
month.
Schools
are
going
to
receive
a
monthly
showcase
component,
a
description
of
that
component,
aligned
resources
and
sample
standard
based
units
that
correspond
to
that
monthly
component.
Z
Z
Z
The
first
month
of
component
program
materials
will
be
provided
to
teachers,
coaches
administrators,
throughout
our
district
from
september
2022
to
april
2023.
We
will
continue
our
monthly
updates
to
our
schools,
which
will
include
resources,
components
and
videos
will
be
taken
of
student
participation
in
the
units
of
instruction
and
those
will
be
published
at
that
time.
Z
Z
Z
E
C
My
only
question
is
so
it's
my
understanding
that
it's
south
carolina
or
it's
it's
guided
by
south
carolina
state
standards,
but
it's
the
content
is
based
on
our
local
area.
C
Z
We
will
have
a
committee
so
we'll
what
be
several
of
us
in
the
instructional
services
department.
Okay,
so
that's
how
we'll
we'll
maintain
that.
T
Not
miss
mckenzie,
not
not
a
question
as
much
as
a
comment
of
it's
really
such
a
proud
moment,
to
know
that
this
amazing
idea
that
mr
campbell,
mr
mel
campbell,
came
up
with
and
said,
but
what
should
our
high
school
graduates
know
about
their
community
and
then
to
see
what
you
and
your
team
and
dr
stratos
what
your
team
has
developed
with
this
and
extrapolate
that
out
to
the
impact
it's
going
to
have
on
the
students
and
and
how
they
feel
about
their
communities
and
so
on?
It's
incredibly
exciting.
So
thank
you.
Y
I
applaud
the
effort
and
I
I
mean
I
intend
for
you
to
go
to
those
degrees
to
to
get
a
new
curriculum
set
up,
but
you
did-
and
I
I
want
to-
I
want
to
encourage
you
to
continue
to
focus
on
the
specifics
of
beaufort
county
also
than
the
general
concept
of
you
know.
I
see
character,
but
you
know
character
is
great,
but
how
does
it?
Y
How
is
it
defined
from
a
beautiful
county
profile,
as
opposed
to
a
lexington
county
profile,
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
that
that
student
is
is
leaving
with
beaufort
county
stuff
in
mind
and
intact,
along
with
you
know,
some
of
the
worldly
concepts
that
also
we
obviously
engage
them
in
anyway.
I
just
want
to
commend
to
us
to
keep
that
that
that
eye
on
that
sparrow.
Okay,
thank
you.
H
I
do
want
to
share
that
it
was
a
conversation
between
both
mr
campbell's
that
brought
this
forward.
Actually,
I
could
tell
you
that,
logistically,
both
gentlemen
were
seated
at
this
side
facing
forward,
so
both
of
the
gentlemen
actually
went
significant
in
conversation
about
how
we
need
to
bring
the
awareness
of
our
children
of
the
history,
our
local
history,
so
I
I
want
to
make
sure
that
both
gentlemen
are
I
made
note
of
this.
Secondly,
that's
the
whole
essence.
H
Z
Okay:
okay,
we
have
a
unit
on
the
mather
school.
L
K
G
Thank
you.
I
I
just
want
to
ask
for
whatever
this
is
a
big
big
deal.
We
are
creating
ambassadors
for
the
area.
You
know
our
graduates
are
going
to
be
proud
of
being
a
beaufort
county
graduate
and
they
take
that
with
them.
G
So
this
is
just
a
huge
benefit
to
the
entire
community
that
we're
creating
folks
who
are
going
to
go
out
there
and
talk
to
other
folks
about
how
amazing
this
area
is
and
how
rich
it
is
in
history.
You
know
you
just
you
can't
buy
that
kind
of
stuff.
So
this
is
a
huge
huge
deal
and
I
applaud
where
you've
gone
with.
D
This
is
going
to
be
something
that
people
your
students
are
going
to
strive
to
attain
this.
This
is
what's
this
goes
on
a
a
college
application,
but,
more
importantly,
I
hope
that
we
really
get
the
community
involved
in
giving
the
award
it
this.
This
needs
to
be
pastors
and
community
leaders,
and
so
on
that
are
standing
up
there
on
the
stage
giving
it
to
these
students
that
are
awarded
this
and
make
it
a
big
deal,
because
it
really
is.
Thank
you.
Z
F
Yeah,
I
I
applaud
you
for
your
air
force
and
the
union,
dr
krabs,
and
your
staff.
However,
I
do
have
some
concerns
along
the
terms
of
what
mr
campbell
and
some
of
what
miss
colonel
guyer
said
in
terms
of
I'm
looking
for
it
to
speaking,
as
you
said,
there's
the
malford
piece,
but
the
fishing
and
swimming,
and
we
live
right
here
on
the
coast.
F
I'm
looking
for
some
of
that
to
when
we
when
we
originally
said
that
was
what
that's,
how
this
whole
conversation
got
initiated,
and
that
is
the
part
that
I'm
looking
forward
to
that
that
embraces.
F
If
another
student
of
my
color
that
embraces
my
culture
and
embraces,
who
I
am
and
I
understand
what
robert
smalls
high
school,
I'm
rob,
bobasmal's
high
school
was
and
who
robert
smalls
was-
and
I
can
speak
to
that
because
I
understand
that
and
I've
come
up
through
the
ranks
in
the
beaufort
county
school
to
understand
what
that
is
to
be
able
to
speak
to
that,
no
matter
where
I'm
at
in
america.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
that
that
is
some
things
that
will
be.
F
That
will
be
coming
from
this
piece
and
all
your
efforts,
because
I
mean
give
giving
awards,
is
good,
but
also
it's
also
about
being
able
to
know
and
be
able
to
speak
it.
When
someone
comes
to
you
and
being
being
able
to
exemplify
exactly
what
you
said
you
possess.
That's
that
that's
my
point.
Z
Every
student
who
loses
beaufort
county
should
know
what
pluff
mud
is
where
it
came
from
what
every
school
is
named
and
why
why
our
streets
are
named
the
way
they
are
important.
People
who've
come
and
gone
who've
paved
the
way
for
others.
All
of
that
is
part
of
the
profile.
B
B
Great,
I
think
it's
great,
so
I'm
gonna,
if
I'm
gonna,
make
a
motion
that
we
move
to
public
comments
because
nine
o'clock
and
that
we
finish
tonight's
meeting
tonight.
A
A
Okay,
so
now
we
move
down
to
second
public
comments
and
first
is
miss
pristine,
hernandez
or
alexander
sorry.
W
Well,
good
evening,
everyone
thank
you
for
allowing
me
to
speak.
I
will
make
it
relatively
short,
because
my
stomach
is
telling
me
it's
time
for
me
to
go
home
so
anyway,
I
would
like
to
say
a
few
things
about.
W
My
biggest
issue
with
all
that
has
gone
on
is
that
everything
that
seemed
to
have
been
done
has
apparently
been
done
from
listening
to
all
of
you
without
the
board's
permission-
and
I
don't
understand
how
that
happened
and
in
reality,
one
of
the
things
that
I
would
really
like
to
come
out
of.
All
of
this
is
getting
to
the
bottom
of
all
of
that
figuring
out
how
that
happened
and
fixing
it
so
that
it
never
happens
again.
W
Yes,
as
far
as
I'm
concerned,
I
was
a
big
injustice
and
an
insult
to
robert
smalls
and
saint
helena.
W
W
So
I
don't
understand
why
it's
such
a
big
deal,
and
I
was
at
another
board
meeting
where
there
was
quite
an
issue
with
board
members
stating
that
they
had
to
be
careful
about
how
they
spend
taxpayers
money.
W
W
So
I
think
when
you
talk
about
how
you
spend
the
taxpayers
money
on
something
like
this,
I
think
you
need
to
think
about
those
people
also
and
talk
to
some
of
those
people
and
ask
them.
I
mean
you,
don't
normally
concern
yourself
with
how
you're
spending
taxpayers
money
with
other
things,
but
suddenly
this
is
an
issue,
and
I've
spoken
to
a
lot
of
people
who
have
left
here
and
have
who
have
returned
here
and
they
want
it
done.
W
They
want
it
put
back
to
the
way
it
was
so
you
know
I
don't
think
we
should
get
wrapped
up
in
in
really
all
wrapped
up
in
how
you're
spending
the
taxpayers
money,
because
I'm
one
of
those
taxpayers-
and
so,
if
you
ask
me
if
we
should
do
it,
my
answer
is
going
to
be.
Yes,
if
you
ask
those
thousand
people
that
sign
that
petition,
the
answer
is
yes.
S
Good
evening
I
am
detonal
drake
calling
from
detroit
michigan.
I
am
a
member
of
the
1971
graduating
class
of
stanford
high
school.
I
am
also
one
of
the
three
black
students
that
was
initially
accepted
to
integrate
beaufort
county
schools
in
1964
by
attending
moscow's
elementary
school
cotton.
There
is
a
petition
with
over
1
000
signatures,
supporting
our
cause,
a
good
majority
being
voters
of
beaufort
county,
which
I'm
sure
the
board
has
received.
S
We
have
been
asked:
why
are
we
not
more
concerned
with
teachers?
Pay
our
class,
who
has
many
educators,
made
a
generous
donation
at
our
meet
and
greet,
and
also
pretend
presented
the
check
for
a
thousand
dollars
during
halftime
to
the
athletic
department
during
our
reunion
weekend
we
love
our
school,
but
the
teacher's
salary
issue
did
not
just
derive
the
leak
of
our
class
reunions
in
one
meeting
after
the
superintendent's
report,
someone
indicated.
E
S
S
None
of
this
discussion
even
started
until
the
first
graduating
class
of
dhs
eagles
brought
it
to
the
attention
of
the
dhs
principal
during
our
50th
class
reunion,
and
I
was
appalled
that
he
made
that
accusation
to
board
member
smith.
I
am
in
total
agreement
with
my
classmate
geraldine
doe,
who
spoke
earlier
during
public
comment.
S
I
have
heard
too
many
excuses,
such
as
white
uniforms
are
hard
to
clean
and
the
students,
and
I
don't
know
how
many
not
the
percentage
of
students
who
are
told
who,
like
the
cartoon
character
eagles,
but
no
one
is
taking
credit
for
the
design
who
approved
it
and
what
will
be
done
to
remove
it.
No
one
is
taking
the
time
to
go
into
the
archives
and
present
the
original
documentation,
and
if
so,
why
has
it
not
been
presented
to
the
board
by
the
way?
S
I
was
a
major
at
a
beautiful
high
school
band
and
our
uniforms
were
white
and
the
band
wore
white
pants.
We
were
proud
to
wear
our
green
and
white
colors
and
we
never
complained
about
getting
our
uniforms
cleaned.
That
was
just
a
sidebar.
Ignoring
our
history
is
not
acceptable.
We
will
not
be
silenced.
We
will
not
go
away.
A
Okay,
so
that
brings
us
to
our
board
business
action.
First
is
a
resolution
to
memorial's
beaufort
high
school's
history,
miss
frederick.
T
Thank
you,
miss
robine.
Yes,
I'm
bringing
forward
this
motion
and
I'd
like
to
have
the
motion
up
on
display
and
then
discussion
later
so.
T
T
Okay,
I
think
it's
fairly
well
known
that
the
board
was
not
involved
in
any
change.
I
personally
personally,
don't
think
there
was
a
change
as
far
as
the
mascot
itself,
the
the
depiction
of
the
mascot
has
changed,
but
it
has
always
been
when
my
my
two
children
graduated
from
beaufort
high
school.
It
was
the
eagle
and
it
was
green
and
white
and
the
name
is
beaufort
high.
I
I
don't
think
it's
going
to
bode
well
to
to
play
the
blame
game.
Any
longer
is
how
this
happened.
T
So
I
I
would
hope
that
my
colleagues
would
not
see
this
motion
as
redundant
to
anything
that
dr
rodriguez
proposed
at
his
regarding
preservation
of
the
history,
but
actually
a
declaration.
A
resolution
of
the
board's
recognition
of
the
historic
events
when
the
selection
of
the
colors,
the
name
and
the
mascot.
T
I
mean
to
create
a
resolution
declaring
the
board's
recognition,
okay
of
the
history
and
selection
of
beaufort,
high's
name
school
mascot
and
school
of
color,
so
dr
rodriguez
will
direct
his
staff
to
create
this
resolution.
That
will
that
will
enumerate
all
of
the
important
aspects
of
how
it
came
to
be.
That
resolution
will
come
in
front
of
the
board
the
board.
Will
it
will
be
red
and
we'll
have
to
agree
whether
it
is
comprehensive
enough,
but
to
actually
you
know
that
which
we
hold
important.
T
We
write
down
right,
we
write
it
down,
and
so
I
too,
just
like
that.
Caller
I've
been
waiting
to
see
where
was
it
written
down
that
the
colors
were
green
and
white
and
the
mascot
from
1971
so
so
far
that
has
not
been
produced.
So
by
god,
let's
write
it
down.
Let's,
let's,
let's
be
resolute
about
this
resolution
and
say
this
is
it
these
are
the
colors
these
are.
This
is
the
mascot,
and
this
is
the
name,
and
I
have
extreme
confidence
that
a
beautifully
written
resolution
can
be
crafted.
T
A
D
D
I
I'm
not
really
interested
in
finding
out
who
to
point
the
finger
to
I'm
interested
in
fixing
this
and
we
need
to
fix
it
and
and
fix
the
the
eagle
we
need
to
fix
and
say
this
is
what
the
uniform
is
and
be
done
with
it,
and
so
we
now
we
just
have
to
figure
out
how
to
pay
for
it
and
how
to
make
it
happen,
but
I
figure
we
have
talent
enough
to
figure
that
out.
Thank
you.
F
And
in
terms
of
this
motion
well,
actually,
first
before
we
even
go
to
the
motion,
let
me
say
this:
I
don't
think
that
it's
a
blame
game
or
always
pointing
fingers,
because
the
fact
is
that
I
I
remember
when
I
was
in
rotc,
colonel
colonel
johnson
used
to
have
us
then
sergeant
clown
used
to
have
her
do
something
called
an
after
action
review
and
then,
after
action
review,
what
you
do
is
you
go
through
and
you
figure
out
how
you
got
what
you
got
and
figure
out?
F
How
could
you
make
sure
that
you
not
get
there
better
or
you
not
get
back
there?
And
since
saying
that?
I
think
that,
because
the
community,
the
public
is
asking
us
to
have
an
after-action
review,
because
if
we
don't
have
an
action
and
after
action
review
and
understand
how
we
got
here,
then
possibly
we're
gonna
end
up
back
here
again,
so
we
must
figure
out
what
loophole
or
what
was
done
and
how
we
got
here
so
that
we
could
correct
the
mistake.
F
You
can't
correct
a
part.
You
can't
correct
the
problem.
They
tell
you
alcoholic
can't
correct
that
they're
not
called
they
won't.
First
admit
that
they're
an
alcoholic
point
blank
period
so
that
that
that's
my
status.
So
I
don't
think
that
my
my
community,
I
think
the
people
where,
in
my
district,
is
pointing
and
saying
that
there's
a
blame
game,
but
what
they're
saying
is
that
how
did
it
happen?
And
how
could
we
stop
it
from
happening
again?
Because
this
is
a
hurtful
feeling
and
they
don't
we.
F
We
don't
want
to
revisit
it
ever
again
in
our
lifetime.
So
we
just
want
a
clear
understanding
of
making
sure
that
it
doesn't
happen
again
and
understanding
how
it
happened
that
that's
it.
I
don't
think.
I
think
my
community
is
blaming
anyone.
I
think
that
they
want
after
action
review
and
some
answers
no
different
than
those
in
those
schools,
things
that
are
going
on
people.
You
have
parents
who
want
answers
to
know
what
went
wrong
and
why
their
baby's
here
today,
that's
no
death.
F
F
I
can't
support
this
motion
today,
because
the
fact
that
we've
already
given
dr
rodriguez
we've
already
directed
the
superintendent
to
come
back
to
us,
the
last
meeting
with
our
resolution
to
this
to
decision
to
this
and
situation,
the
the
last
vote
that
we
had
basically
was
doing
the
same
thing
so
and
he
and
I
I
think
he
bought
us
something
back.
I'm
not
sure.
I'm
not.
I
remember
exactly
what
happened,
but
we
it's
like.
We
keep.
F
We
keep
spending,
we
just
keep
spinning
our
wheels,
and
here
at
this
level
the
board
we
have
the
right
to
just
say:
hey,
look.
We
have
the
right
to
direct
the
superintendent
to
to
to
go
ahead
and
put
like
what
like
like.
This
is
like
one
of
the
first
people
just
spoke
at
public
speaking,
say:
take
that
take
our
tax,
take
their
tax
dollars
and
put
replace
the
eagle
back.
F
The
original
eagle
back
on
the
field
and
back
on
the
press
box
like
that,
like
that's
in
this
picture
right
here
and
then
restore
and
restore
the
colors,
we,
the
boy,
can
take
a
photo
on
that
and
get
that
done
right
now.
We
don't
have
to
ask
the
superintendent
if
we
want
to
move
further
and
put
in
and
go
into
the
history,
then
we
can
do
that
later.
F
But
but
this
motion,
that
is
being
said,
we
have
already
directed
the
superintendent
to
do
this.
So
we
just
we
just
spit
like
we're
just
spinning
our
wheels,
we're
just
kicking
the
can
down.
There
kicking
the
can
down
the
road.
I
hate
to
say
tonight
and
I
really
appreciate
miss
fiji
for
bringing
this
motion
forward.
F
G
Thank
you.
I
agree
with
colonel
guyer.
I
believe
the
policy
committee
is
working
on
the
fix
this
thursday.
I
think
it's
videos
to
mention
they
were
going
to
tackle
this
issue
on
thursday
and
they
were
devoted
that
meeting
to
to
resolving
so
that
this
would
not
slip
through
any
loopholes
in
the
future.
So
I
think
I
think
the
fix
is
being
taken
care
of,
and
I
do
agree
with
one
of
the
callers
by
the
way
that
money
is
really
not
the
issue
here.
But
that's
just
my
personal
opinion.
G
A
T
T
T
F
P
Okay,
I
want
to
say
this:
it's
not
just
your
community,
mr
smith.
People
from
dale
went
to
beaufort
high
school
burton
grace
hill,
so
it's
the
whole
community.
A
Thank
you,
okay.
So
I'd
like
to
call
the
question
and
the
motion
on
the
floor,
I
moved
at
the
beaufort
county
board
of
education
directs
the
superintendent
to
create
a
resolution
declaring
the
board's
recognition
of
the
history
and
selection
of
beaufort,
high's
name
school
mascot
and
school
colors.
All
those
in
favor
indicate
by
saying
aye
aye.
T
Miss
fidridge,
thank
you,
miss
robin.
I
bring
jen
and
various
motions
have
been
made
in
the
past
regarding
this
subject,
and
the
reason
I
did
not
support
them
is
that
they
were
not
defined
enough.
They
were
ambiguous
and
and
not
defined.
T
T
It's
a
start,
so
I
moved
that
the
beaufort
county
school
district
board
of
education
directs
a
superintendent
to
replace
the
current
depiction
of
the
eagle
on
the
parking
lot
side
of
the
beaufort
high
school's
football
field.
Press
box
with
the
following
phrase,
written
in
the
school's
colors
home
of
the
beaufort
high
school
eagles.
T
So
if
you
would
look
in
your
packet
when
I
went
over
to
beaufort
high
school
several
months
ago
and
took
pictures
of
all
the
different
depictions
of
the
eagle
on
the
football
field,
I
was
not
able
to
get
down
on
the
football
field.
I
could
not
see
it
from
the
stand
anyway.
T
This
is
as
you'll
see.
This
is
one
of
the
pictures.
This
is
the
parking
lot
side
of
the
of
the
press
box,
and
I
believe
this
would
be
a
a
great
start
to
removing
this
depiction
of
the
mascot
and
replacing
it
with
the
script.
As
noted
in
the
motion.
T
I'm
so
glad
you
asked
that
gives
me
a
chance
to
tell
everyone
here
I
met
with
the
principal
the
new
principal
of
beaufort
high
school
and
was
incredibly
impressed
with
her
openness
and
willingness
and
eagerness
to
involve
the
community
in
all
decisions,
and
she-
and
I
don't
want
to
put
words
in
her
mouth
and
she
has
graced
us
with
her
presence
tonight.
So
I
don't
want
to
put
you
on
the
spot,
miss
shelton,
but
I
thank
you
for
the
45
minutes.
T
You
gave
me
today
to
talk
about
this
topic
and
I
thank
you
for
your
eagerness
to
involve
the
community
in
any
change
that
will
occur,
but
you
you
are
the
one
that
said
to
me
it's
a
process.
It
is
absolutely
a
process
and
it
has
to
start
somewhere
so
not
to
put
words
in
your
mouth.
The
principle,
mr
strippinger,
felt
that
this
was
a
reasonable
accommodation
and
a
visual
manifestation
of
our
beginning
of
an
intent
to
hear
what
the
community
wants.
Y
I'm
gonna
vote
for
it
too,
but
I'm
concerned
with
how
slow
the
process
goes.
I
mean,
if
you
can,
do
that,
one
change.
Why
can't
you
do
a
number
of
changes
at
the
same
time?
I'm
on
you
know
I
don't
you
know
I
mean
I
think
we
have
to
be
decisive
and
make
decisions
that
that's
going
to
be
direct
and
and
and
both
calling
in
terms
of
this
this
issue
so
moving
that
right
away
says
that
you,
you
probably
disapprove
of
that,
whoever
over
placed
it
there
on
on
that
press
box
and.
T
T
So
I
what
I'm
trying
to
do
here,
mr
campbell,
is
that
we
have
had
motions
worded
such
as
direct
the
superintendent,
to
turn
everything
back
to
the
way
it
was.
I
don't
know
what
that
meant.
So
I'm
trying
very
hard
here
to
move
this
conversation
forward
and
starting
with
something
very
concrete
and
then
allow
a
new
principal
to
work
with
the
community
and
decide
and
and
move
forward
with
this.
So
that's
why
I
chose
to
go
with
just
this
one.
I
didn't
see
any
other
motions
coming
forward
about
this
understand.
T
Y
A
Any
other
comments,
mr
smith,.
F
You
know
so
we
have
teams
that
are
representing
our
school
and
great
excuse
me
and
great.
We
have
teams
that
are
wearing
gray,
uniforms
and
green
that
are
representing
our
school
and
those
are
not
our
colors,
so
those
things
need
to
be
restored
effectively
immediately
as
soon
as
possible.
I
mean
you
know.
F
F
So
I
am
I'm
really
on
the
fence
on
this,
but
once
again
I
just
want
to
put
it
out
there,
because
I
I
am
going
to
continue
to
bring
this
up
and
say,
as
in
my
community
and
my
constituents
who
are
reaching
out
to
me
and
other
constituents.
F
A
Any
other
comments:
okay,
I'd
like
to
make
a
comment
I'll
support
this
motion
tonight,
because
the
principal
has
supported
it.
I
concur
with
mr
stribinger
and
as
a
ex-school
administrator
myself,
I
don't
think
it's
the
board's
job
to
tell
principals
how
to
run
their
schools
and
what
decisions
that
they
need
to
make.
A
A
I
think
that
we
have
to
respect
the
students
that
are
current
there,
as
well
as
respect
the
history,
and
I
think
that
the
resolution
to
memorialize
the
school's
history
helps
with
that
and
puts
that
in
perspective.
But
I
will
vote
to
support
this
tonight
only
for
that
reason.
A
B
B
We,
this
the
class
of
1971,
needs
to
have
their
their
history
memorialized,
and
I
do
believe
that
a
lot
of
that
is
already
present
in
the
school
and
I
I
just
can't
imagine
it
must
have
been
just
unbelievable
for
a
child
to
go
through
that
at
that
time
to
integrate,
like
that,
I
can't
imagine
what
it
would
be
like
it.
It
would
be.
You
know.
Obviously
it's
it's
a.
It
is
a
big
deal,
a
very
big
deal.
B
We
are
following
our
policy.
We
have
the
board
our
current
policy.
We
have
absolutely
followed,
as
ms
robine
just
mentioned,
this
evolution
of
mixing
in
different
logos
and
mixing
in
different
colors,
the
school
name
has
not
been
changed,
has
been
a
process
has
occurred
over
about
50
years.
I
believe
one
of
the
other
board
members
showed
me
all
the
different
variations
of
the
of
the
logos
that
have
have
come
about
over
that
whole
time
period.
B
So
if,
in
the
interest
of
diversity,
equity
and
inclusion,
I
don't
think
it's
right
that
going
forward
the
students
that
are
currently
at
beaufort
high
school,
we
are
telling
them.
Your
story
is
not
important.
That's
just
not
right!
B
I'm
not
denying
that
the
past
story
of
1971
is
not
important.
I've
just
already
started
out
my
my
discussion
that
way,
but
I
just
don't
think
that's
fair
to
future
students
or
current
students.
If
you
look
at
the
nfl
what
if
we
said
to
the
washington
redskins,
you
can
never
change
your
name,
you
can
never
change
your
colors.
People
would
be
irate
now.
B
You
know
you
have
to
time
time
evolves
and
we
have
to
be
accepting
and
willing
to
move
forward,
and
I
so
that
is
why
I'm
not
supporting
it
and
I
know,
nobody's
going
to
agree
with
me.
That's
fine!
You
don't
have
to
agree
with
me,
but
I
have
my
reasons
for
for
why
I
think
that's
the
right
thing
to
do
for
the
community
as
a
whole.
A
C
Vice
chair,
I'm
I'm
also
going
to
be
a
dissenting
vote
this
evening
and
it's
for
a
few
reasons.
Some
that
have
already
been
named,
but,
in
my
opinion,
there's
there's
a
few
important
parts
to
this,
and,
like
you
mentioned
ms
robine,
is
that
the
principal
is
already
on
board
with
this
idea,
and
I
think
that
that's
within
her
purview
to
make
this
change
on
her
own.
C
I
think
when
we
begin
to
start
delving
into
making
those
changes
at
a
board
level
when
it's
not
explicit
in
our
policies
which
we're
going
to
review
on
thursday.
So
if
something
changes
on
thursday,
I
certainly
could
change
my
mind.
Then
I
think
that
there's
the
resolution
also
forthcoming.
C
That
could
include
information
or
historical
context
that
I'm
just
simply
not
aware
of
so
I'm
I'm
weary
to
make
a
change
like
this,
when
our
policies
right
now
that
are
speaking
to
naming
and
mascots
and
colors,
speak
to
committees
and
student
input
and
all
those
kinds
of
things
I'm
leery
to
make
a
change.
So
I
also
will
be
down
on
this
this
evening,
but
my
mind
could
be
changed
in
the
future.
Thank
you,
colonel.
A
D
I'm
going
to
support
this
motion
as
a
first
step,
I'm
supporting
it
because
I
asked
my
two
grandsons
one,
who
just
graduated
from
beaufort
high
one's
a
rising
senior
in
beaufort
high.
I
said
what
do
you
think
about
the
logo?
He
said
it's
an
eagle,
I
said.
Well,
do
you
know
it's
real
important
to
the
class
of
71?
I
told
them
the
story.
I
said
what
do
you
think
and
I
asked
them
both
they
said.
Well,
we
got
to
put
it
back
the
way
it
was.
We
don't
really.
D
Y
One
high
school
student
has
said:
hey
it's
big
enough
for
us
to
fight
it
the
other
way.
It's
not
big
enough
for
them
to
fight
it.
The
other
way.
It
is
big
enough
for
these
folks
to
say
it's
historic.
In
our
viewpoint,
it
was
something
that
really
should
remain
a
big
part
of
the
history
of
beaufort,
county
and
history
of
beaufort
high
school
and
something
that
we
should
embrace
as
a
part
of
the
diversity.
Y
You
know-
and
you
know
it
depends
on
how
you
look
at
all
of
the
stuff
that
we're
talking
about.
If
you
throw
that
away,
then
that's
insignificant
change
that
really
took
place
will
diminish
all
of
the
things.
Historically.
That
happened
in
that
time
period
from
brown
versus
board
of
education
on
up.
Y
A
Okay,
I'd
like
to
call
the
question
robin:
can
you
put
up
the
motion.
A
I
move
that
the
beaufort
county
board
of
education
directs
the
superintendent
to
replace
the
current
depiction
of
the
eagle
on
the
parking
lot
side
of
the
beaufort
high
school's
football
field.
Press
box
with
the
following
phrase:
written
in
the
school's
colors
home
of
the
beaufort
high
school
eagles,
all
those
in
favor,
please
say:
aye
hi.
A
Okay,
so
that's
nine
zero
one,
william
smith,
abstained.
Future
agenda
topics.