►
Description
5:00pm Call to Order
• Pledge of Allegiance
• Approval of Agenda
• Public Comments
• Approval of the July 7, 2022 Committee Meeting Minutes
• Discussion of G-3.8, OE8.10 and AR OS-28 in regard to: Naming of schools, mascots, colors, and adjunct facilities including discussion about logos.
• Discussion of Future Meeting Dates
* Adjournment
A
A
A
D
A
C
A
A
E
May
be
a
little
bit
of
confusion
about,
I
think
the
mascot
you
know,
which
is
you
know,
proudly
displayed
all
around
school
and
stuff
and
I'm
not
exactly
sure
whether
the
mascot
is
what's
on
the
field
or
it's
just
a
logo,
and
I
think
that's
something
that
needs
to
be.
You
know
iron,
because
I
think
the
mascot
is
something
that
shows
your
pride.
D
E
D
B
E
F
A
E
B
D
E
That's
why
you
know
I
wanted
to
go
after
so
I
could
understand
you
know
what
was
the
purpose,
but
anyway.
My
purpose
is
that
we
said
that
we
just
gonna
change
one
logo,
but
I
was
concerned
about
the
flying
eagle
being
on
the
field.
That's
what
we
started
with
that's
what
that
was
our
request,
the
mascot
on
the
fields
and
you
I
don't
know,
I
don't
know
what
was
placed
on
the
board
before
you
know
they
got
it
where
they're
going
to
take
it
down,
but
you're
already
approved
that
that's
coming
coming
down.
B
E
E
E
A
A
0.8
and
0e
8.10,
so
let
me
just
set
some
expectations
for
today's
meeting.
Okay,
this
is
a
committee
committees,
don't
decide
anything
committees
bring
forward
recommendations
to
the
full
board
to
decide.
Also.
This
will
be
the
first
time
that
we
will
be
looking
at
these
particular
policies,
so
the
process
will
have
to
be
that
whatever
is
decided
or
recommended
here
to
bring
to
the
full
board
will
have
to
go
to
the
board
for
consideration
and
then
the
board
would
consider
it
and
it
would
have
to
then
have
a
subsequent
meeting
be
voted
upon
again.
A
A
A
The
board
will
name
new
facilities
before
a
final
vote
on
naming
facilities.
The
board
will
contact
local
community
leaders
through
public
notice
of
a
public
hearing.
So
that
is
what
we're
looking
at
right
now,
just
number
eight.
So
kathy.
Do
you
have
some
thoughts?
I
do.
I
think
that
one
of
the
reasons
that
we
decided
to
look
at
these
policies
was
to
bring
them
into
alignment
with
the
administrative
regulations.
A
So
if
we
look
at
administrative
regulation,
os
28
roman
numeral
number
four
appointment
of
board
naming
committee,
it
says
if
the
building
a
new
school
results
in
the
creation
of
a
new
school
attendance.
The
board,
chairperson,
will
appoint
a
naming
committee
and
then
it
goes
on
to
identify
who
will
be
in
the
naming
committee.
So
it
makes
sense
to
me
that
to
our
policy
we
would
add
that
the
board
will,
you
know
so,
naming
new
facilities.
A
The
board
will
appoint
a
naming
committee
to
serve
in
an
advisory
capacity,
and
then
we
could
list
these
things
or
we
could
either
just
say
as
specified
in
district
res
regulations,
an
ar
20
an
ar
os
28..
Okay,
doctor
wisniewski.
That
was
my
thought.
Yeah,
thank
you
rachel.
Do
you
have
any
thoughts
on
that.
C
Yes,
ma'am,
so
I
I
agree.
We
need
to
take
the
totality
of
gc
3.8,
oe
8.10
and
ar
os
28
into
consideration
when
we're
modifying
any
of
our
policies.
The
only
thing
that
I
potentially
disagree
with
that
ms
robine
stated
was
making
a
reference
to
an
ar
in
our
policies,
because
the
ars
could
are
changed
by
the
district
or
the
administration,
and
it's
not
necessarily
something
the
ars
are
supposed
to
be
guided
by
the
policies.
So
we
should
reference
them.
C
I
don't
think
necessarily,
but
I
agree
we
need
to
make
everything
come
into
alignment.
I
think
that
there's
a
bit
of
confusion
when
you
do
look
at
oe
8.10,
because
underneath
the
the
main
heading
where
it
discusses
the
naming
of
facilities,
it
then
references
an
a
or
subpart
a
that's
where
the
mascots
and
the
colors
come
in.
So
we
need
to
make
a
clarification
on.
Is
that
committee
tasked
with
mascots
and
colors
and
naming
because
it
says
that
it's
our
final
authority
so
again
there's
some
confusion.
A
A
A
So,
along
with
what
kathy
was
saying,
and
maybe
to
your
point
too
rachel,
I
would
suggest
that
three
gc
3.8
could
be
could
say.
The
board
will
name
new
schools,
mascots
and
callers.
The
selection
of
a
name,
mascot
or
colors
will
be
made
after
consideration
of
recommendations
provided
to
the
board
by
a
board-appointed
ad-hoc
committee,
serving
in
advisory
capacity.
A
C
I
was
gonna
say
that
sounds
much
more
clear
and
I
think
that
addresses
the
issue.
That's
in
8.10
a.
I
think.
The
only
clarification
that
we
we
need
to
make
is
the
makeup
of
that
ad
hoc
committee,
because
I
know
in
the
ar
presently
it
talks
about
the
the
composition
of
that
committee
and
who
would
be
serving
on
it
and
I
think
it's
even
perhaps
superintendent
appointed
or
board
chair
appointed.
I
can't
remember
so.
H
H
B
G
Excuse
me,
okay,
so
some
of
the
points
have
already
been
made,
but
you
know
yes,
our
the
board
policy.
What
is
what
drives
our
administrative
regulations
and
if
you
look
the
date
on
the
ar
is
june
of
2015
and
as
we
know,
our
coherent
governance
manual
is
much
newer
than
that.
So
that's.
Why
there's
a
discrepancy
right?
I
think
that's
explained
I
so
in
terms
of
let's
go
to
gc38
and
you
know,
I
agree
that
that's
kind
of
doesn't
define
naming
new
facilities
well
enough
and
it
leaves
off
because
we've
already.
G
And
you
know,
I
don't
think
that
before
or
final
and
what
it
says
right
now
is
before
a
final
vote
on
naming
facilities,
important
contact,
local
community
community
leaders
through
public
public
notice
of
a
public
hearing.
This
is
just
naming
only,
and
so
I
think
your
recommendation,
if
you
scroll
back
to
that
robin
what
trisha
has
proposed,
is
much
better.
What
I
see
is
a
problem
by
trisha
is
that
you
have
a
board
appointed
ad
hoc
committee,
and
I
think
that
has
to
be
defined.
Is
it?
D
It
was
a
board
committee
and
it
was
the
board
and
the
school
that
was
going
to
be
in
that
district
or
area.
It
has
been
the
representative
of
that
district
who
led
that
that
committee
and
the
committee
was
made
of
theater
schools
that
were
going
to
we're
talking
about
new
schools
now
right
of
going
to
the
new
school
so
I.e
when
may
river
opened,
it
was
the
bluffton
high.
It
was
community
members
that
were
going
over
to
the
feeder
school.
The
board
member
who
was
representing
chair,
like
pritchardville,
was
miss
eva
anderson.
D
D
Business
partners
at
the
school,
the
community
partners,
was
the
sic.
The
principal
at
the
theater
school
was
the
one
who
reached
out
to
they
had
students
involved
on
it.
They
had
this.
The
community
business
partners,
county
council,
I'm
not
county
council,
but
student
council
and
discovered
involved
in
it.
So
those
are
the
people
that
comprise
the
committee.
G
D
B
G
So
provided
to
the
board
by
a
board-appointed
ad
hoc
committee
serving
in
an
advisory
capacity,
then
you
could
put
that
the
committee
members
will
include
that
effect.
The
the
okay
it
should.
Probably
the
chair
should
be
the
person.
That's
represents
the
geographical
region
where
the
new
school
is
being
recovered.
Yeah.
A
B
D
I
mean
it
was
the
previous.
It
was
the
theater
school
sic
chair
whatever,
but
they
were
also
like.
If
it
was
rising
juniors
they
had
the
sophomore
class
who
were
going
to
be
rising
juniors
over
at
new
school.
They
got
those
students
in
the
grade
level
people
to
be
on
the
committee
because
they
would
be
the
rising
students
into
the
useful.
A
C
I
have
a
couple:
one
suggestion
would
be
just
to
add
the
word
community
in
between
ad
hoc
and
committee,
so
that
it's
called
an
ad
hoc
community
committee.
That
kind
of
implies
that
it's
going
to
be
made
up
of
more
than
just
board
members.
It's
going
to
have
community
member
stakeholders
things
like
that.
That's
my
initial
suggestion.
If
we
don't
want
to
get
into
the
weeds
of
the
composition
of
it,
I
know
that
the
composition
of
the
committee
is
discussed
in
ar
os
28
when
it
lists
out
all
those.
C
A
C
E
A
A
I
A
I
I
A
A
C
A
So
again,
the
board
will
consider
and
decide
on
changes
to
a
school's
name,
mascot
or
colors.
After
receiving
a
recommendation
from
a
committee
comprised
of
the
requesting
schools,
sic
members,
staff,
students
and
community
members
so
tear
it
apart,
I
just
wanted
to
start
with
something,
so
this
would
be
for
anything
that
was
not
a
brand
new
school.
C
Rachel,
yes
ma'am,
so
my
only
question
in
this
process.
So
if
a
just
a
hypothetical,
if
a
school
decided
that
they
wanted
to
form
or
the
principal
wanted
to
form
a
committee
comprised
of
sic
staff,
students
and
community
members,
because
they
saw
a
need
to
change
the
name,
mascot
and
colors,
they
are
creating
their
own
committee
and
then
they're
coming
to
the
board
to
ask
us
to
consider
and
decide.
Those
things
is
that
what
the
process
would
look
like.
A
C
Board
is
directing
the
creation
of
the
committee,
and
so
I'm
just
trying
to
make
sure
I
understand
the
process
of
if
there's
going
to
be
any
existing
facility
that
needs
or
any
existing
school.
That
needs
a
name
change
that
basically
the
school
itself
could
create
a
committee
at
any
point
in
time
and
bring
that
forward.
B
A
All
right,
I'm
just
saying,
I
think
that
what
this
is
trying
to
do
is
you
know
we.
We
currently
have
a
policy
like
this
for
adjunct
facilities
right
a
couple
like
the
committee,
the
sic
committees
get
together.
They
decide.
We
want
something
named
like
when
they
wanted
the
track
named
after
mr
blaze.
A
They
ran
it
through
their
committee,
they
came
to
the
school
board
and
they
sought
approval.
So
that's
so
that's
pretty
hard
yeah
yeah
that
that's
the
same,
and
I
thought
it
was
in
our
policy
as
well.
So
on
number
10,
it
says
oe810
the
superintendent
shall
ensure
that
any
committee
is
appointed
to
recommend
school
names.
A
So
we
just
our
policy,
didn't
signify
how
that
came
about
and
that's
what
this
is
trying
to
do
now
got
it
preparing
for
today's
meeting
and
I
was
reading
through
all
this
and
coming
up
with
some
ideas.
That's
how
I
took
a
kathy,
but
I
I'm
not
sure
everybody's
in
agreement.
So
no,
I
think
that
I
I
agree
with
that.
I
think
I
thought
that
I
had
I've
been
reading
it
so
many
times.
I
thought
that
that
was
already
in
there,
but
must
be
in
the
ar
yeah.
There's.
I
I
Basically,
basically
using
what
you
just
said,
because
what
happens
is
the
same
sick
from
what
I've
been.
We've
been
told,
have
a
couple
conversations
today
that
the
sic
and
that
they
did
talk
about
the
changing
of
of
how
to
even
look
at
that
sic
meeting,
and
they
were
okay
with
that.
So
I
think
that
we
need
this
to
go
deeper.
That
does
a
decision
that
seriously
needs
to
come
to
the
district
level
and
to
the
board,
because
the
people
elect
the
board
to
overlook
things
of
that
nature.
I
I
I
I
I
I
differ
there,
because,
because
that's
what
happened
the
first
time
and
that's
how
I
got
passes
because,
as
I
seen
the
principle
of
them,
they
discussed
the
situation
of
the
ego.
So
if
that,
if
it
came
to
the
war
the
first
time,
then
the
community
would
have
known
about
it,
but
I
mean
that
mean
that
the
principle
did
do.
I
guess
what
they
are
said,
then
that's
why
we
had
no
idea.
So
that's
so,
therefore
you
have
to
get
different
results.
You
have
to
do
something
different.
A
J
D
A
A
This
doesn't
exist
right,
so
they
would
have
to
a
committee
comprise
of
the
requesting
schools,
sic
members,
staff,
students
and
community
members.
They
talk
about
it
and
they
bring
their
recommendation
to
the
board.
That
did
not
happen
in
the
instance
in
which
you
are
speaking
about
what
you're
speaking
right.
I
The
board
should
be
involved,
the
board
shouldn't
be
involved
on
the
back
end
of
it,
because
how
do
I
as
a
board
member
and
I
represent
an
area?
How
do
I
know
that
all
that
that
the
correct
existing
situations
are
on
there
and
also
that's
also
that's
also
alternative
or
in
terms
of
relationships
with
a
board
member-
should
have
a
relationship
with
everyone
along
within
that
process.
So
therefore,
now
you're
shutting
that
board
member
out
because
you're
bringing
it
back
at
the
line
at
the
last
minute,
but.
A
A
C
A
I
I
Matter,
I
can't
go
off
the
assumption
that
every
more
member
is
going
there,
I'm
going
basically
off
of
what's
in
black
and
white,
because
sometimes
we
intend
to
go
straight
up
in
black
and
white,
so
we're
going
to
go
for
black
and
white,
then
it
should
come.
The
bottom
line
is
my
point:
is
that
the
whole
process
should
start
at
the
board
level
and
and
and
they
should
be
working
together
to
get
it
done.
That's
that's
my
point.
No.
J
J
C
A
A
C
I
greatly
appreciate
you
doing
it
too,
because
this
is
it.
It's
gonna
help
us
save
a
lot
of
time,
so
I
think
nine
should
be
existing
schools
and
there
may
need
to
be
some
very
plain
one
in
regard
to
an
adjunct
facility.
I,
like
number
nine.
I
think
the
only
thing
that
I
I
feel
is
strong
in
the
ar
that
I
pulled
out
of
the
the
ar
is
that
it
requires
a
two-thirds
vote.
C
G
B
B
C
B
B
A
A
B
D
E
A
All
right
so
excellent
suggestions,
guys
good
work.
So
let's
talk
now
about
adjunct
facilities
and
if
you
go
down
to
adjunct
facilities
in
oe8,
I
just
suggested
so.
The
oe8
says
the
superintendent
shall
ensure
that
any
committee
is
appointed
to
recommend
to
this
board
school
names,
mascots
or
colors.
Understand
that-
and
it
says
in
here
adjunct
facilities,
including
athletics,
may
be
named
for
individuals,
but
it
doesn't
really
give
us
a
process.
A
I
A
I
B
I
I
I
A
A
Number
nine
we're
going
to
have
someone
in
a
school
level
or
community
that
goes
to
the
school
and
says
we
need
to
change
this
okay.
We
need
to
change
this
and
then
principal
would
say
well
by
order
of
the
policy
right
and
the
ar
that
gives
the
process,
not
the
policy,
but
the
ar
will
give
the
process.
A
B
B
I
C
A
A
I
can't
see
nine
there
you
go,
so
the
board
will
consider
recommendations
for
naming
adjunct
facilities
after
receiving
recommendation
must
be
endorsed
by
at
least
two-thirds
vote
from
a
committee
comprised
of
the
requesting
school
sic
members,
staff,
students
and
community
members.
Yes,
that
works
okay,.
G
A
Know
what
I
think
it
would
be
an
awfully
lengthy
list
to
list
adjunct
facilities,
so
maybe,
like
kathy
just
said,
we
just
used
the
wording
that
we
had
in
oba,
10
to
say,
adjunct
facilities,
including
athletic
facilities
and
then
on
from
there.
That's
my
suggestion.
That
would
be
okay,
yeah
kathy.
I
think
that
otherwise
we
would
be
we'd
have
a
list,
a
mile,
long
tennis,
courts.
H
B
A
B
A
D
A
D
F
B
F
G
F
F
D
F
A
F
A
Well,
to
be
very
honest
with
you,
I
don't
think
that's
our
level
decision.
I
think
the
school
does
us,
and
so
the
school
comes
and
says
yeah
we
had
one
parent,
okay,
we
have
1400
kids,
he
had
one
parent,
one
student,
one
staff
member
and
they
represented
everybody.
I
personally
would
say,
send
it
back
and
get
more
input,
so
I
don't
know
that
we
can
dictate.
It
must
be
comprised
of
13
people
and
six
of
whom
are.
C
F
Say
we
publicly
advertise
and
ask
for
everybody
and
everybody's
in
the
room
you're
all
now
on
a
committee.
So
then
you
vote
with
everybody
in
the
room.
That's
that's
because
that's
a
major
change
sic,
which
is
an
organized
committee.
To
now
it's,
not
an
organized
committee
and
you're
asking
school
to
put
it
together.
B
H
Thanks
a
couple
of
things
on
number
nine
consider
and
approve,
and
then
we
need
to
delete,
decide
on
to
consider
approved
changes
and
then
on
the
theoretical
question
of
policies
and
ars
policies
are
supposed
to
stay
kind
of
broad
and
the
ars
are
the
interpretations
so
right.
You
know
you
can
interpret
it
any
way.
You
want
to
formed
committees
which
you
all
have
done
really
well
in
the
past.
H
J
Yes,
I,
like
robert,
was
talking
about
battery
creek.
If
it's
coming
through
it's
the
recommendation
coming
from
the
sic,
the
principal
and
the
staff
at
the
school.
There's
no
problem,
you
know
they
don't
have
to
vote,
they
will
vote,
but
they
don't
have
to
tell
us
the
vote.
The
number
of
people
that
voted
for
it
or
are
not
because
they're
not
going
to
bring
something
to
the
board
unless
they
have
the
majority
of
the
votes.
K
But
certainly,
I
think
personally,
that
the
sic
is
is
the
fundamental
community
group
in
that
school
and
any
other
support
should
not
override
what
the
sic's
numbers
should
be
so
anytime.
I
don't
agree
with
robert's
interpretation
that
we
bring
in
a
group
of
people
and
we
all
vote
on
this
sic's
got
12
members
and
there's
20
people
coming
in
without
any
real
long
time,
focus
on
on
the
school
improvement,
outboarding
them
in
terms
of
what
direction
we're
going
so
yeah.
K
I
A
I
Oh
and
then
not
just
on
these,
when
we
send
out
these
tools
when
these
types
of
things
come
to
the
board.
What
our
level
like
an
expectation
is
because
this
is
going
around
just
this,
this,
the
people
who
are
on
this
call
and
and
on
this
who's
involved.
In
this
conversation
there
are
several
different
level
of
expectations
and
I'm
not
hearing
much
music,
because
and
and
in
terms
of
it,
robert
good
point,
which
came
back
to
my
point.
I
You
know
in
terms
of
step
one,
how
many
community
members
remember,
because
you
you
want
a
a
very
transparent,
clear
description
of
what's
taking
place
wherever
it's
beginning,
the
committee
committee
will
always
so
it
can
be
fair
and
objective
to
every
every
time.
There's
always
consistency
the
same.
There's
three
parents.
I
I
So
it's
almost
like:
if
we
don't
vote
on
it,
then
we
go
whatever
they
say
at
that
point
once
one
once
once
we
give
them
that
once
we
tell
them
what
we
want
and
how
they
seem
being
necessary,
then
they
do
it,
how
they
want,
and
that
may
not
be
deemed
how
the
board
particularly
wants
it.
But
they
said
that's
what
they
see
and
that's
how
their
interpretation
is,
so
that
there's
a
problem
there
and
the
problem
there
is
that
that's
not
really
what
the
board
want,
but
we're
saying
that
it.
I
It
may
be
make
a
lot
it's
contradictory
and
I
see
a
lot
of
that
going
consistently
and
that
that's
a
problem
because
once
again
we're
not
only
all
on
the
same
on
the
same
page
and
even
to
go
back,
I
remember
rachel
was
was
asking
when
she
said
earlier.
She
said
well
what
about
when
they
want
to
change
the
name
or
something.
What
does
what
does
that?
What
what
does
they
do
have
to
come
back
to
the
board?
I
For
that-
and
I
don't
remember
hearing
exactly
saying
that,
yes
and
they
want
to
change
the
name
or
something
what
that
stupid
stuff
look
like
and
that
that
goes
back
to
the
same
thing
they
go
to
the
air.
I
know
it
needs
to
be
spelt
correctly
by
the
board,
because
the
board
is
the
head.
We
tell
the
superintendent
what
we
want
and
he
and
yes,
he
takes
it
out,
but
how
he
takes
it
out.
It
doesn't
that
it
doesn't
affect
the
results
point
blank
period.
A
Thank
you,
mr
smith.
Kathy!
Yes,
I'm
just
want
to
let
you
know
I
have
to
leave
in
five
minutes,
and
I
did
want
to
just
confirm
that
our
sics
there
are
they're
required
to
have
certain
members
on
them.
They're
required
to
have
a
community
member
they're
required
to
have
parents,
and
that's
spelled
out
in
our
sic
right.
You
know
guidelines
and
that's
a
requirement.
I
mean
those
things
are
required,
so
yeah,
okay,
thank
you,
david.
A
I
A
I
And-
and
I
really
like
that,
because
I
hearing
that
that's
a
very
powerful
statement,
and
so
when
we're
eliminating
that
that
brings
me.
That
brings
me
some
questioning
and
that's
why
I'm
asking
why
we're
while
we
were
eliminating
that,
even
though
it
says
it
in
one
but
right
there.
This
is
clear
out
and
clearly
states
that
under
no
circumstance,
the
board
has
that
authority.
So
even
though
it
may
be
spelled
out
in
one,
but
it's
not
spread
out
with
that
much
authority
written
in
it.
H
D
A
B
A
There
we
go
all
right,
so
this
number
11
is
one
that
uses
it's
a
very
powerful
statement.
It
shows
the
power
in
the
board's
hand,
and
mr
scrivener
suggested
that
it's
already
covered
in
that
we
decide
on
any
change
or
any
name
of
the
facility
or
adjunct
facility.
Anyway,
nothing
can
be
named
or
change
a
name
unless
we
decide
on
it
anyway,
so
he
thought
it
was
redundant.
H
A
A
A
C
A
There
are
four
subsections
abcd.
I
am
recommending
that
we
keep
a
final
approval
of
new
or
requests
to
change.
School
names,
mascots
or
colors
is
the
sole
responsibility
of
the
board.
So
the
superintendent
will
ensure
that
okay
and
be
about
adjunct
facilities,
which
is
really
letter
c.
I'm
suggesting
we
eliminate,
b
and
d
b
says
that
schools
may
not
be
named
for
individuals.
Well,
we
have
robert
smalls
and
we
have
h
mccracken
and.
G
G
A
C
B
G
I
D
A
I
I
mean
that
goes
hand
in
hand
because
it
almost
like
we're
contradicting
ourselves,
because
we
can
name
this.
We
can
name
the
inside
of
this.
This
area,
dr
doolittle
and
dr
doodle,
can
be
living
and
he
did
he
go
out
and
do
something
to
a
kid
then,
whatever?
What
are
we
saying?
That's
the
same
exact
thing
I
mean
our
fruit
is
a
fruit.
Rubbers
are
great,
but
orange.
F
I
just
like
to
note
that
we
haven't
named
any
new
school
after
an
individual
in
over
10
years,
so
that's
kind
of
been
our
policy
except
like
robert
smalls,
because
it
was
a
continuation
of
an
existing
robert
smalls
a.t
mccracken
was
a
continuation
of
h,
mccracken.
That
was
previously
on
demand.
So
we
have.
B
A
I
A
A
C
Yeah,
I
don't
think
we
need
to
include
that
part
because
we've
already
said
above
in
gc,
we
talk
about
the
composition
of
the
committee
that
it's
going
to
require
a
two-thirds
vote
and
things
like
that
and
I
think
the
the
ar
presently
lays
out
pretty
specifically
if
we
were
going
to
name
it
for
someone
living
what
they
have
to
have
contributed
or
what
criteria
they
have
to
meet.
I
don't
think
we
need
to
get
into
that.
C
A
So
to
to
review
all
this
recommendation
is
that
oe
8.10
shall
read
the
superintendent
shall
ensure
that
any
committee's
appointed
to
recommend
school
names,
I'm
going
to
suggest
that
we
include
in
their
mascots
or
colors,
understand
that
a
final
approval
of
school
names,
mascots
and
colors
is
the
sole
responsibility
of
the
beaufort
county
board
of
education
b.
Schools
may
not
be
named
for
living
individuals.
A
C
A
B
A
B
A
G
G
C
G
A
A
As
we
all
know,
for
months,
you
know
we
have
been
grappling
with
a
concern
brought
forward
to
us
by
the
local
community
about
the
I'm
going
to
use
the
term
logo,
because
that's
what
I
believe
it
is
the
logo
that
is
on
the
football
field,
although
I
wasn't
sure
that
was
the
primary
purpose
in
the
beginning,
I
wasn't
sure
it
was
just
all
about
the
football
field.
I
asked
that
question
and
never
got
an
answer.
It
was
just
about
the
football
field,
so
I
thought
it
was
more
about
the
preservation
of
the
history.
A
A
C
I
agree
with
you.
I
think
the
logo
is
the
purview
of
the
individual
principal
and
you
know
whoever
is
making
that
determination
at
the
site.
I
think
what
we
have
clarified,
I
think
today,
in
our
policies,
is
that
the
actual
mascot,
whether
that's
a
tiger
gamecock
or
whatever
the
depiction
of
it,
is
left
at
the
discretion
of
that
facility
or
that
school.
I
don't
think
that's
logos
require
approval
by
the
board.
A
Right
and
for
every
different
sports
team,
and
for
when
I,
when
I
looked
up,
logos
and
I've
been
doing
you
know
the
research
on
it,
you
know
logos
of
companies
and
so
on.
Let's
say
starbucks,
for
example,
you
know
it,
the
logo
has
changed.
You
know,
google
changes
its
logo
and-
and
I
think
in
in
in
this
case,
as
determined
by
the
resolution
voted
on
by
the
board
the
other
night
tuesday
night.
A
The
board
recognizes
that
the
mascot
at
beaufort
high
school,
for
example,
is
the
eagle.
The
colors
are
green
and
white
and,
as
like
you
just
said,
rachel.
The
policies
that
we
are
going
to
propose
to
the
board
that
we've
just
worked
on
are
going
to
suggest
that
the
name
mascot
and
color
is
a
purview
of
the
board,
but
not
the
logo
logos.
Then
the
myriad
logos
tina.
What
are
your
thoughts.
G
And
those
are
going
to
change
with
time
and
it's
not
to
say
that
one's
eliminated
or
they're
going
to
be
they're
gonna
be
different
ones,
and
that's
what
all
these
companies
do?
I
mean
to
say
that
you
could
never.
I
mean,
I
think
if
you
said
there
always
had
to
be
one
logo,
you
have
to
be
trademarked.
A
I
There
are
several
things
that
that
I
hear
what
y'all
say
about
about
change:
changing
their
logo
or,
whatever,
first
off
to
me:
it's
not
a
logo,
it's
about
branding
and
when
you
talk
about
people
who
are
changing,
these
are
companies,
multiple
companies
who
change
their
logos.
That's
why
this
is
not
a
logo.
This
is
a
brand.
This
is
who
you
are.
This
is
how
you
identify
yourself,
no
different
than
your
social
security
number.
You
can't
just
help
and
change
them.
I
I
mean
to
my
knowledge:
there's
you
this,
I'm
sure,
there's
a
diagram,
so
we're
saying
that
when
you
have
a
brand
and
those
companies
would
you
do
change
their
brand
or
they
change
their
logo.
There's
a
reason
it's
probably
because
they've
been
sued
or
they
got
in
trouble
or
something
distasteful
has
rolled
that
branch
or
they're,
trying
to
change
their
image
on
who
they
are
or
people
perceive
them,
as
so
with
the
brand
and
the
then
not
the
logo.
I
think
you
know
the
mascot.
I
I
And
the
superintendent
gives
the
authority
to
that
administrator
to
be
held
accountable
for
what
happens
in
that
house.
Just
because
you
just
because,
when
you're
in
the
house,
when
you
go
out
in
your
house,
you
don't
want
to
stop
tearing
down
the
house
and
putting
stuff
that
you
want
with
the
buddha
without
without
the
the
hormones.
I
A
A
K
We
have
to
somebody
have
to
regulate
that.
We
can't
we
can't
always
put
out
the
fire
after
the
storm,
you
know,
but
somebody
have
to
regulate
what's
going
on
in
the
schools-
and
I
mean
this
situation
got
to
this
point,
because
nobody
defined
how
we're
going
to
utilize
that
logo
per
se
in
terms
of
usage
and
how
it's
gonna
intertwine
with
the
mascot
as
usage.
K
Folks
didn't
get
that
claire
clarified
then,
and
we
went
on
and
did
some
changes
and
the
board's
saying
it's
all
for
our
hands,
but
it's
got
the
community
in
an
uproar
one
way
or
the
other.
You
know
it
could
be
both
ways,
but
it's
it's
good
that,
for
our
sake,
the
other
part
of
it
is
people
are
not
really
trying
to
protect
that
that
logo
will
change
as
much
as
people
are
trying
to
keep
it
from
changing.
K
But
in
my
mind
we
have
to
do
something
from
a
bold
perspective
to
regulate
what
happens
with
the
with
the
logos
too,
and
I
don't
know
what
your
proposal
is,
but
everybody
knows
that
the
logos
not
the
same
as
the
mass
garden.
I
don't
think
that
folks
were
concerned
just
about
football
like
somebody,
as
you
said,
trisha
the
were
concerned
with
the
fact
that
it
was
being
remapped
right
now
at
a
pace
where,
eventually
the
original
eagle
would
disappear.
K
A
C
C
I
feel
like
there
might
be
one
because
a
lot
of
our
logos,
kind
of
overlap
with
university,
trademarks
or
other
nfl
kind
of
trademarks,
and
things
like
that,
and
we
have
to
be
careful
of
those
things.
So
there
might
be
other
pieces
that
were
missing
to
this
conversation
and
if
wendy
or
anybody
else
has
anything
on
that
I'd
be
interested.
B
Need
to
be
careful
because
of
research.
I
could
not
find
any
statutes
that
deal
with
this
in
south
carolina,
but
in
west,
in
nevada
and
in
oklahoma,
be
very
careful
about
my
name.
You
choose
because
especially
there
are
a
lot
of
indian
vibes
there
and
those
names.
You'd
have
to
be
very
careful
and
pick
a
name
as
offenses,
but
I
don't
I
don't
remember
seeing
any
type
of
administrative
regulations.
C
It
be
rachel
yeah,
I
was
going
to
say.
I
think
that
maybe
something
that
could
address
this-
that
isn't
as
firm
as
that
the
board
has
to
approve
every
logo
or
things
like
or
those
individual
changes,
because,
like
I
mentioned,
that
would
probably
be
much
more
frequent
than
a
name
color
or
mascot
change.
C
I
think
that
perhaps
we
direct
the
superintendent
to
adopt
an
ar
that
does
address
the
process
for
logos
so
that
there
is
uniformity
so
that
there
is
a
process
and
then
that's
certainly
within
our
purview
as
a
board
to
say
the
superintendent
needs
to
create
an
ar
that
the
schools
have
to
operate
under.
Regarding
logos,
yep.
C
A
G
Do
I
look
through
the
policies
and
they
aren't
comments,
there's
nothing
addressed
in
logos.
I
concur
that
right
and
I
think
rachel's
ideas
exactly.
I
would
concur
that
too.
I
think
if
the
board
gets
into
approving
every
logo,
that's
going
to
be
our
our
business.
You
know
every
single
meeting,
that's
that
it
should
be
a
process,
that's
consistent,
so
the
public
knows-
and
I
do
think
that
should
be.
G
A
G
So
they
have
the
the
silhouette
of
the
bobcat,
that's
their
kind
of
main
logo,
but
then
they
have
like
claws.
They
have
bees,
for
example,
that
are
green
and
black.
On
the
on
baseball.
Hats,
as
I
recall
they
have
like
cross
country
head,
the
colors
are
are
green
and
white.
I
believe
pretty
sure
it's
green
white,
but
there's
a
lot
of
black
mixed
in
you
know,
there's
a
lot
of
varieties
and
I
don't
design
each
of
those.
Those.
I
K
Logos
could
go
astray
in
a
hurry
and
all
of
a
sudden,
you
don't
recognize
what
the
mascot
is,
but
on
top
of
that
it
could
undermine
the
original
intent
of
the
mascot
so
yeah.
We,
I
think
we
do
need
someone
trying
to
put
some
things
in
place
where
the
thing
that
happened
at
beautiful
live
doesn't
happen
again
without
at
least
the
superintendent
being
fully
aware
of
the
changes
that
were
made.
K
K
That
happened
way
back
in
the
90s
logos
began
to
change
changes
is
his
outlook
from
a
old,
tired,
seahawk
to
a
upscale
seahawk
that
was
crashing
two
blocks
and
that
that
led
to
some
controversy.
But
then
we
started
getting
a
little
bit
more
cerebral,
looking
seahawk,
but
none
of
it
was
vetted
to
any
degree
by
the
board.
K
F
A
A
A
C
C
C
I
I
It
took
me
took
it,
took
the
definition
from
what
it
stood
for,
and
maybe
it
may
have
to
be
a
cartoon
character,
so
they
were
doing
this.
It
does
not
solve
our
problem
and
and
and
then
just
hearing
about
what
we
were
talking.
I
don't
care
we
actually
signed
up
for.
If
we
have
to
come
here
and
meet
every
week,
hell
that's
what
we
signed
up
for,
we
have
to
come
in
and
then
they
do
that.
So
if
every
time
it
changes,
they're
gonna
bring
the
force,
then
that
then
that's
our
job.
I
That's
that
guy!
That's
what
we
sounded
like!
Maybe
some
of
us
it's
time
for
the
right
thing.
I
mean
that
our
job
is
to
ensure
those
things
as
well.
Every
and
I
mean
a
little
fortunate
right
now,
but
now
that's
that
that's
we
will
be
right
back
where
we
started
from
the
get-go.
So
until
doing
this,
it
doesn't
know
there's
no
justice
of
warriors.
It
is
our
job
to
make
sure
that
we
that
we
are
making
sure
that
what
happened
does
not
happen
and
doing
this.
A
A
I
C
Okay,
rachel:
are
we
ready?
Yes,
ma'am?
I
put
it
in
a
chat
but
I'll
I'll.
Read
it
real,
quick.
Okay,
I'm
I
move
that
the
policy
committee
recommends
to
the
board.
The
following
change:
oe
811
to
state
quote
shall
ensure
that
district
administrative
regulations
regarding
creation
or
changes
to
school
logos
and
crests
are
outlined,
monitored
and
followed
and
move
the
current
oe
811
to
be
an
oe812.
C
So
basically,
what
this
is
saying
is
that
the
superintendent
will
be
responsible
for
making
sure
that
there
is
a
process
regarding
logos
and
or
crests,
because
I
know,
there's
press,
I
think,
maybe
at
the
high
school
level
that
there
is
a
process
for
it
it's
outlined
in
an
ar,
because
presently
we
don't
have
one
that
he
monitors
it
and
that
those
processes
are
consistently
followed.
I
I
disagree
with
mr
smith.