►
From YouTube: Beaufort County Board of Education Policy Committee 2PM
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
July,
7th,
it's
2022.:
this
meeting
is
being
held
by
remote
video
conferencing
and,
as
is
our
custom,
we
are
going
to
start
with
the
pledge
of
allegiance,
so
we
can
all
stand.
A
I
pledge
allegiance
to
the
flag
of
the
united
states
of
america
and
to
the
republic
for
which
it
stands.
One
nation,
under
god
indivisible
with
liberty
and
justice
for
all.
Thank
you
very
much.
Let's
see
we
have
policy
committee
members,
dr
wisniewski
is
joining
us
through
and
kathy
robine
and
myself
are
here
in
the
building.
A
We
also
have
mr
earl
campbell
online
with
us,
mr
david
stribenger
and
robin
cushingberry
is
in
the
room
with.
C
A
Right
so
any
we
need
to
approve
the
agenda
so
rachel
I
move.
We
approve
the
agenda.
A
A
A
Okay,
hearing
no
discussion,
all
in
favor,
aye,
aye,
right,
unanimous
and
miss
wendy
cartlist
just
joined
us
in
the
room
here.
So
thank
you.
Thank
you
wendy.
This
is
great
appreciate
you
all
appreciate
being
here
to
be
here
with
you
all
right.
The
very
first
thing
on
our
agenda
is
to
discuss
gc
2.15.
A
A
And
so
in
preparing
for
today's
meeting,
so
it
was
sent
to
us
to
take
a
look
at
it.
So
in
preparing
for
today's
meeting,
I
looked
at
gc250
and
that
talks
about
how
to
revise
or
amend
a
policy.
A
I
my
recollection
back
when
we
were
working
on
these
policies
two
years
ago.
My
recollection
is
that
we
got
rid
of
the
required
three
readings
and
put
this
in
its
place.
Does
anyone
else
have
that
recollection,
because
I
did
not
see
anywhere
else
in
our
policies
that
required
three
readings
rachel
remember
and
please.
D
Guys,
let's
make
this
like
a
conversation,
so
you
know
rachel
yeah.
No,
I
remember
it
used
to
be
three
readings
and
then,
when
it
went
through,
I
think
we
talked
about
knocking
it
down
to
two,
and
then
this
was
the
final
result
was
that
there
could
be.
I
think,
a
proposal
made
at
a
meeting.
It
would
go
to
policy
for
massaging
and
then
would
come
back
for,
like
full
board
approval
to
be
incorporated
or
codified
right.
A
D
I
was
trying
to
pull
up
the
old
version.
Do
we
have
that
one
in
board
docs
too.
A
The
board
by
majority
vote
may
revise
or
amend
its
policies
at
any
time,
and
that's
right
got
it.
Okay
and
proposed
policy
revision
will
be
discussed
at
one
session
of
the
board
prior
to
being
approved
at
a
subsequent
board
meeting.
So
a
draft
recommendation
is
that
we
change
that
language
to
the
board
by
majority
vote
may
revise
or
amend
its
policies.
At
any
time
a
proposed
policy
revision
will
be
discussed
at
a
board
meeting
and
remanded
to
the
policy
committee.
The
policy
committee
will
bring
forth
a
recommendation
to
the
full
board.
D
A
E
D
It
was
written
previously
is
whether
or
not
you
know
this
could
just
be
something
that
comes
up
in
a
conversation
at
a
board
meeting
on
an
agenda
topic
or
does
a
board
member
or
committee
need
to
pres
like
have
it
put
on
an
agenda
so
that
it's
reviewed
ahead
of
time
by
the
board?
That
would
be
my
only
question
is:
is
it
something
that
can
just
come
about
in
general
conversation
or
is
it
something
that
should
be
more
formalized
on
an
agenda?
First.
A
C
D
D
I
mean
I
don't
know
how
much
I
guess,
depending
on
what
it
is,
there
may
or
may
not
be
information
to
be
even
attached
in
board
docs.
It
could
just
be
very
much
conceptual,
so
I
really
don't
know
what
the
appropriate
answer
is.
I
think
the
way
it's
written
right
now
definitely
does
make
it
more
clear
that
it's
going
to
go
to
policy
committee
policy
kennedy
isn't
going
to
bring
forward
the
recommendation
in
the
full
board
with
the
vote
on
it
to
codify
it.
D
A
F
F
F
I
think
the
wording
you
have
here
is
fine,
like
the
word
remanded,
as
opposed
to
assigned
it
just
sounds
more
legal,
oh
good.
I'm
glad
I
got
a
smile
out
of
your
age.
A
A
A
Committee
maybe
brings
defense
right
so
yeah,
okay,
so
then
do
we
have
a
motion
to
bring
this.
C
D
Go
ahead
rachel
I
was
going
to
say
so
moved.
I
think
the
only
question
I
have
is
procedural
because
we're
bringing
forward
from
as
policy
committee
a
change
to
policy
to
the
full
board
so
we're
still
operating
under
the
current.
D
The
current
policy,
which
is
that
the
proposed
policy
revision
would
be
discussed
at
one
session
prior
to
be
being
approved
at
a
subsequent.
So
is
the
procedure
now
that
we're
bringing
forward
this,
how
we
change
policies
to
the
board
and
it's
going
to
be
discussed
at
one
meeting,
maybe
our
next
meeting
and
then
it
can
be
approved.
So
basically,
two
readings
of
this
is
that
everybody
else's
understanding
yeah.
I
think.
A
I
think
you're
right.
That
makes
sense,
so
we
would
need
a
motion
coming
out
of
here
to
at
least
bring
it
to
the
full
board,
with
with
hopefully
unanimous
approval
from
this
committee
for
a
kind
of
a
first
reading
like
what
you
just
said
right
rachel
yesterday.
A
D
If
you
can
just
copy
and
paste
that
revision
to
gc
2.15
with
the
blue.
A
You
know
maybe
maybe
molly
connelly
yeah.
I.
A
A
This
this
was
brought
up
because,
due
to
coded
19
and
our
our
use
of
zoom,
we
instituted
the
ability
for
our
constituents
to
contact
us
in
a
board
meeting,
make
public
comment
via
phone,
but
that
is
not
included
in
our
policy
manual,
and
so
the
discussion
was.
Should
it
be?
A
A
Basically,
what
it
is
is
on
the
initial
agenda
that
is
published
and
sent
out.
These
are
the
directions
that
say
how
to
participate
in
public
comment
via
phone,
so
my
thought
was
to
put
that
into
the
policy
so
that
everyone
will
understand
that
it
is
one
of
those
changes
that
we
are
keeping
the
conversation
about,
doing
it
via
zoom.
I
discussed
that,
as
I
I
told
you
guys,
I
would
with
robin
and
a
little
bit
with
molly,
and
that
is
a
logistical
nightmare
to
send
out
the
zoom
link
to
everybody.
A
So
we
decided
not
to
go
down
that
road
and
just
go
down
the
road
with
the
phone
calls
so
comments.
B
A
A
B
D
A
A
C
A
Yeah
sector
during
public
comment,
section
of
the
agenda
period.
C
A
Is
that
right?
Okay,
then,
where
are
you
starting
and
then
you
know
individuals
will
address
the
board
for
maximum
three
minutes
on
issues
within
the
board
domain
individuals
will
address
the
word,
our
maximum
issues
within
the
board
of
forums,
okay
and
then
on
that
first
one,
it's
gonna,
say
you're
you're.
Here
we
would
need
to
say
kathy
and
rachel.
What
do
you
think
by
saying
an
email
with
the
individual?
A
B
C
A
A
A
C
B
B
A
A
Okay,
oh
because
we
have
the
second
part
request
between
seven
and
seven.
B
A
Will
address
the
board
for
a
maximum
of
three
minutes
on
issues
within
the
board's
domain?
The
forum
will
be
limited.
Everything
else
is
the
same
right.
Okay,
great.
I
think
those
are
great
changes,
everybody
and
then
we
have.
The
second
comment:
section
request
for
the
second
public
comments:
okay,.
D
Minute,
mr
smith,
rachel,
what
are
you
saying?
The
second
paragraph?
Still
it's
duplic,
it
has
individuals,
will
address
the
board,
be
able
to
speak
and
address
the
board
for
a
maximum.
So
it
should
just
say:
individuals
will
address
the
board.
I'm.
B
What
she
read
is
the
correct
I,
what
we
have
up
there
is
me
just
trying
to
catch
up
and
make
the
changes
gotcha.
Okay,.
C
B
Read
it
or
you
just
you
can
go
ahead
and
reread
it
and
I'll
write
it.
Okay
right,
it
is
okay,.
A
A
A
A
G
G
A
Okay,
I
can
give
you
an
example
of
what
is
not
in
the
board's
domain.
I
was
running
the
meeting
and
I
let
this
person
speak,
but
I
think
I
was
I
had
every
right
not
to
he
was
a
candidate
for
beaufort
county
council
and
he
wanted
to
use
our
forum
to
introduce
himself.
Well,
that's
not
in
our
domain.
A
So
I
think
I
should
have
said
I'm
sorry,
but
your
comments
are
not
in
within
our
domain.
We
don't
have
anything
to
do
with
that.
G
Yeah,
but
how
likely
is
that
to
happen,
and
how
regular
does
that
that
does
that
ever
happen?
I
mean
I
mean
that
that
only
happened,
maybe
once
out
of
every
blue
moon,
I
mean
some
people,
take
it
as
they're
trying
to
figure
out
like
like
what
do
you
mean
to
some
people
that
that
that
that
verbiage
comes
across
to
them
that
has
offensive
and
and
and
now
we're
not
really
as
intimidating.
G
A
Okay:
okay,
thank
you
for
your
comments.
C
A
H
A
A
Yes
yeah,
mr
mr
campbell,
I
think
miss
robin's
example,
was
strong.
We
also
had
a
speaker
talk
about
his
mortgage
business.
I
know
he
tied
it
into
being
available
for
teachers,
but
that
was
a.
A
So
anyway,
I
I
personally
feel
that
within
the
board's
domain
explains,
you
know
it's
pretty
pretty
clear
and
I
don't
find
it
off-putting.
No
okay,
dr
wiznessy,
any
thoughts
on
that.
C
D
B
A
All
right,
so,
if
we
move
on
to
the
next
agenda
item
and
then
come
back
to
this
for
the
vote
and
and
a
motion
to
bring
it
to
the
full
board
and
replicate
kind
of
the
same
wording
as
the
previous
one,
so,
okay,
so
we'll
come
back
to
this
one
all
right.
The
next
one
that
we
were
asked
to
look
at
is
basically
to
compare
the
ar
the
process
of
the
ar
on
naming.
A
A
A
E
I
think
my
concern
is
that
we
don't
have
a
policy
about
renaming
or
revising
all
of
our
policy
center
on
a
new
facility.
That
is,
you
know,
to
my
understanding,
unnamed
right,
so
we're
giving
it
a
name.
We
don't
really
have
a
policy
on
if
someone
wants
to
change
a
name-
and
I
know
that
on
our
agenda
is
a
naming
of
a
facility
that
we're
rebuilding.
E
I
missing
here.
No,
I
I
mean
I
don't
know
if
I
brought
this
up,
but
I
did
mention
at
the
time
as
we've
looked
at
things
like
and
I'm
looking
at
what
you're
saying
here
that
that
does
seem
to
come
cover
changing
of
the
name
so
yeah.
I
guess
that
was
my
concern.
We
were
talking
about
this
a
while
ago,
so
that's
why
we
brought
it
up
and
sorry
I'm
at
work.
So
I
gotta
meet
you
here
for
a
sec.
A
And
we
did
already
rename
a
facility,
we
did.
They.
C
A
F
Thanks
the
two,
the
two
passages
that
we
just
looked
at
don't
seem
to
be
consistent.
I
think
you
have
to
take
out
new.
You
know
out
of
that
first
passage
because
they're
not
consistent,
and
so
it
causes
confusion.
F
A
A
A
D
D
A
A
D
Right,
I'm
trying
to
understand
like
the
process
and
the
steps
and
if
we
are
doing
naming
renaming,
what
have
you
it
looks
like
the
oe
speaks
to
committees
and
the
board
policy
speaks
to
us,
notifying
and
having
a
public
hearing.
So
that's
two
different
processes.
Now
they
may
serve
together
in
some
capacity,
but
I
just
don't
understand
what
it
is.
A
David,
do
you
know
when
may
river
high
school
was
named
and
with
our
two
latest
schools,
do
you
know
what
type
of
procedure
was
used.
F
I
can't
I
can't
remember,
but
you
know,
rachel's
point
is
well
taken.
I
think.
F
A
F
C
A
B
When
the
schools
were
named
the
board
the
committee
members,
they
were
volunteered
at
the
school
and
the
board
ran
the
the
meetings
like
eva
anderson
was
the
chair
of
the
committee.
I
think
when
we
did
pritchardville
laura
bush
was
the
chair
of
the
committee.
When
we
did
one
of
the
schools,
so
they
had
sic,
they
had
community
members
and
they
had
like
teacher
or
whatever
that
was
on
there.
B
A
B
Well,
there
was
some
community
letters
that
was
on
it
like
lisa
sulka,
I
mean
so
they
were
on
there,
but
they
came
through
the
the
theater
school
in
getting
them
to
be
on
there.
D
But
the
regulation
doesn't
say
that
so
the
ar
the
the
regulation
talks
about
the
appointment
of
board
naming
committee
and
it
says
that
the
board
chairperson
will
appoint
a
naming
committee
to
serve
an
advisory
capacity
yeah.
So
it's
it's
very
inconsistent
across
the
regulation.
The
oe
and
the
board.
D
I
think
there
may
be
some
easy
changes,
though,
on
the
board
side
of
things,
because
it
seems
like
the
regulation
and
the
oe
are
more
in
alignment.
I
think
on
on
the
board.
Policy
is
simply
making
it
just
say,
naming
facilities
and
then
that
second
sentence,
if
that
is
changed,
to
speak
to
the
naming
committees,
then
it
might
be
fixable.
B
A
D
D
A
D
Insurer,
but
not
name,
it
doesn't
say
that
he
appoints
them
just
that
anyone
that
is,
it's
basically
he's
his
oversight
role
or
his
role,
checks
and
balances.
If
you
will,
you
know,
he's
checking
to
make
sure
that
the
committees
that
are
formed
meet
this
criteria,
that
is
in
the
the
regulation
as
well,
because
the
regulation,
I
think,
also
speaks
to
who
is
included
in
that.
A
A
B
C
A
Okay,
so
david
as
chair,
how
do
you
see
this?
Do
you
agree
with
this?
The
board
will
appoint
the
ad
hoc
committee.
F
D
F
I
agree
with
change
I
I
just
I
mean
we
just
had
that
flaw,
so
I
mean,
like
I
still
get
to
use
that
word.
B
A
A
F
A
Right
right
so
there
on
number
eight,
what
is
still
in
black
name
facilities,
comma
mascots
and
colors.
A
A
B
B
H
H
C
D
C
B
And
earl,
but
we
did
have,
but
we
did
have
a
committee
that
the
board,
because,
like
richard
eva
anderson,
was
the
chair
of
that
committee
and
laura
bush
was
the
chair
of
the
committee.
When
we
were
naming
the
school.
So
we
did
have
a
committee.
We
did
have
committees
with
those
different
people
on
it,
but
there
were
board
members
who
chaired
those
committees.
C
A
Where'd,
mr
campbell
go
earl
he's
still
there
are
you
still
there
and
david's
handy?
So
so
earl,
I'm
not
sure.
I
understand
your
point
because,
as
I
understand
this,
whoever
would
be
on
that
committee
would
include
community
members,
students,
teachers,
sic
members,
all
of
those
people.
So
can
you
repeat
what
you
said.
H
D
Madam
chair,
yes,
yes,
rachel,
I
was
going
to
suggest
in
the
in
the
ar
it
has
who's
supposed
to
be
on
that
advisory
committee.
So,
if
we
want
to,
we
can
codify
that
as
a
subpart
under
gc
3.8
and
say-
and
I
put
it
in
chat-
because
it's
rather
lengthy,
but
it
says
it's
supposed
to
include
but
not
be
limited
to
sics
student
representatives,
such
as
student
council
presidents,
a
total
of
four
community
leaders
from
those
attendance
areas,
principals
and
district
office.
D
D
H
It
could
become
a
headache.
Sometimes
I
I
understand
picturesville
wasn't
a
problem,
you
know,
but
you
know
whatever
committed
people.
That's
fine
with
me.
F
Thanks,
do
we
want
to
tackle
logos
here.
A
C
A
I
mean
I
yes,
I
think
we
need
to
have
a
conversation
about.
It
is
a
mascot
and
a
logo.
The
same
thing
is
a.
C
H
B
F
Are
your
thoughts
on
this
I
mean
I
I
mean,
I
think
it's
an
elephant
in
the
room
because,
yes,
we
just
had
the
brew
about
about
the
logo
was
the
mascot
of
color.
So
you
know,
maybe
we
should
just
define
the
logo
and
either
say
it
is
or
is
not
under
our
purview.
And
if
it's
time
for
you,
then
whose
view
is
it
is
the
community?
A
E
One
thing
is:
if
you
guys
are
going
to
take
on
logos,
I
have
a
little
bit
of
concern
of
it
not
being
on
the
agenda
per
se,
because
there
may
have
been
other
people
that
would
want
to
participate,
because
it
is
such
a
big
topic
that
you
know
is
coming
around
right
now,
so
it
might
be
something
for
the
next
policy
meeting.
A
E
I
think
that
my
concern
would
be
if
it
came
to
the
board
that
the
policy
committee
added
language
or
deleted
language
or
changed
language
regarding
logos,
given
the
tremendous
amount
of
attention
that's
getting
on
the
board,
it
was
not
clear
to
me
looking
at
the
agenda
that
we
were
going
to
branch
into
that
area.
So.
E
To
it,
I'm
here,
if
you
guys
want
to
talk
about
it,
but
one
of
the
you
know
it's
public
comments.
It's
you
know
all
those
things.
This
is
a
pretty
touchy
subject
to
not
have
it
clearly
delineated
on
the
agenda
so
that
if
anybody
wanted
to
have
to
speak
on
this
issue,
they
could.
E
A
Yeah
no
point
well
taken
if,
if
the
committee
thinks
you
know
that
it
probably
would
be
better
to
make
sure
that
we
have
it
more
delineated
on
the
agenda,
I
would
recommend
that
we
do.
We
cease
working
on
this
entire
part
and
make
it
more
comprehensive,
including
logos
at
our
next
meeting.
A
A
A
B
A
Well,
I
I
think
I
personally
don't
think
mascots
and
logos
are
the
same
thing
and
I
think
that
if
you're
a
middle
school
principal
or
a
high
school
principal,
your
mascot
can
be
a
bear
and
one
year
the
bear
is
you
know
on
one
unit,
that's
and
that's
what
we
got
into
at
beaufort
high
school,
but
I
think
if
we
take
away
the
school's
individual
ability
to
interpret
their
medicine,
I
I
don't
agree
with
that.
A
Having
been
a
school
principal
and
when
the
kids
come
and
and
the
coaches
say
okay
this,
so
I
think
it's
that
very
conversation
that
ingrid
is
suggesting
needs
to
be
notified
and
noticed
to
the
public
so
that
people
can
have
public
comment
and
not
necessarily
saying
that
we
have
purview
over
logos,
but
having
this
discussion
ingrid.
Am
I
encapsulating
that
yeah
very
nice,
okay,
rachel.
D
A
C
A
That
right,
rachel,
yes
ma'am!
What
do
you
think
happy?
I
agree.
Okay,
all
right!
So,
let's
move
forward
then
with
making
these
changes
based
strictly
on
this,
and
the
conversation
about
logos
will
be
a
future
topic
for
our
next
meeting
and
how
does
it
play
into
what
are
our
policies
and
ars.
E
Can
I
ask
a
clarification
because
I
I've
been
missing,
we've
got
vampire
thunderstorms,
so
it
kind
of
froze
up
here
for
a
minute.
Did
we
talk?
Does
when
we
talked
about
naming
of
schools?
I
think
that
you
took
the
word
facility
out.
Does
that
apply
to
gyms
fields,
music,
halls
performance?
Are
those
separate.
A
A
Ar
it's
under
oe8
and
c
right,
yeah,
so
oe810
c
talks
about
adjunct
facilities,
including
athletic
facilities,
may
be
named
for
individuals
as
specified
in
the
ar
so
bar
os
28
roman
numeral.
Five
talks
about
naming
adjunct
facilities,
names
of
adjunct
facilities
are
sole
responsibility
of
the
board,
and
then
it
goes
on
to
has
a
few
more
paragraphs.
A
A
Naming
adjunct
facilities
will
be
made
to
the
sic
of
the
school
where
the
adjunct
facility
is
located
and
must
be
endorsed
by
at
least
a
two-thirds
vote
of
the
school
improvement
council.
Before
the
request
is
presented
to
the
board.
Okay,
the
presentation
shall
include
a
descriptive
history
and
so
on.
So
so,
how
does
that
comport
with
what
we
have.
D
E
A
Right
right,
the
sic
it
goes
through
the
sic.
E
Yeah,
because
one
of
the
things
that
I
reason
I
mentioned
a
while
ago
about
you
know
having
a
good
policy
as
I'm
watching
robin
type
in
real
time.
You
know
about
this
stuff
is
there's
a
lot
of
controversy
about
it
right
now
and
where
school
boards
have
you
know,
gotten
mixed
up
in
in
bad
situations
is
when
the
community
feels
like
they
were
not
participants,
so
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
it
sounds
like
I.
I
think
that
that
makes
all
kinds
of
sense.
A
Well,
I
I
misspoke,
though
b
says,
may
be
named
in
honor
of
worthy
individuals,
community
organizations
or
local
businesses,
so
things
could
be
made.
Names
could
be
in
honor
of
community
organizations.
It
doesn't
say
that
communities
involved
in
that,
but
I
I
do
see
the
school
improvement
council.
You
know
every
school
improvement
council
has
at
least
one
community
number.
E
No,
I
think
if
it
becomes,
if
the
naming
comes
out
of
the
school
improvement
council,
I
think
that's
that
to
me,
that
constitutes
adequate
community
involvement,
because
people
can
come
to
sic
meetings
and
listen
and
talk
and
send
emails
just
like
they
can
to
the
board.
So
you
know
just
so.
We
don't
end
up
in
a
controversial
situation
that
we
weren't
aware
of.
A
Well
in
ingrid,
it
goes
on
to
say
to
the
board
letter
e
the
last
statement
on
this.
The
board
may
choose
to
consider
the
school
improvement
council's
request
without
further
community
involvement,
which
also
means
you
can
send
it
right
back
to
them
and
say
you
know.
Only
three
people
were
at
your
meeting
that
voted
on
this.
You
know
go
back
and
look
at
it
and
come
back
to
us
again.
E
Yeah,
I
think
that's
important
and
given
the
climate
of
today
to
to
make
sure
that
everyone
has
a
chance
to
weigh
in
if
they
want
to.
D
Rachel-
I'm
sure
my
apologies,
I
I
do
have
a
hard
stop
and
I
have
to
leave
in
just
a
second,
but
I
wanted
to
say
this
real
quick.
It
seems
that
on
the
naming
of
schools,
whether
new
or
not,
is
is
referenced
in
the
ar
presently,
as
well
as
the
adjunct,
facilities
or
sports
facilities
is
also
referenced
and
they
seem
to
follow
two
different
types
of
guiding
principles.
D
So
I
think
that
we
may
need
to
also
discuss
adding
some
language
into
gc
that
is
referencing
the
adjunct
facilities
and
the
process
for
that,
because
the
ars
are
really
supposed
to
be
guided
by
policy.
So
I
just
wanted
to
make
a
comment
that,
in
along
with
the
logo
conversation,
I
think
we
need
to
discuss
the
adjunct
facilities
as
well
at
a
future
meeting.
A
D
D
D
I
don't
think
presently
what
we
have
here
for
the
changes
to
gc
3.8,
fully
encompass
the
adjunct
facilities.
C
A
Edge
on
facilities,
it
seems
that
when,
when
a
facility
is
built,
we
go
through
this
process
and
from
my
experience,
the
naming
of
the
adjunct
facilities
comes
after
the
facilities
built
right
and
people
like
when
herbic
lays,
and
they
wanted
to
navy
mistake.
So
they
came
through
the
sic,
but
I
think
rachel's
boyfriend.
A
A
Obviously
ballooning
and
we
need
to
maybe
just
I
mean-
maybe
even
next
week,
if
anybody's
available,
just
to
focus
just
on
this,
because
I
do
believe
we're
going
to
have
some
adjunct
facility.
Renaming
requests
come
in
front
of
us
very
soon.
So
are
you
okay?
I
mean
we're.
Not
gonna
have
any
board
action
on
this
particular
thing
today,
but
we'll
address
it
and
agile
facilities
and
logos
at
a
soon
to
be
scheduled
meeting.
A
A
A
This
is
the
one
that
just
didn't
make
sense
to
me
with
the
way
that
we
currently
are
doing
like
our
capital
improve
8,
because
I
thought
they
conflicted
so
oe
6.16
says
roll
all
unused
8
funds
forward
to
the
current
bonding
cycle
and
reduce
the
current
bond
issuance
accordingly,
david
not
put
words
in
your
mouth
and
trying
to
recall
your
words.
A
You
didn't
see
there
as
any
conflict
with
this,
but
a
draft
recommendation
to
add
on
to
this
is
just
unless
otherwise
directed
by
the
board,
which
is
a
recommendation
and
which
would
cover
all
possibilities
of
if
there
are
any
question
about
how
to
use
any
unused
eight
percent
funds-
and
this
is
what
we
did
this
past
time
when
we
decided
not
to
roll
those
spot
forward
into
the
bonding
cycle
and
reduce
the
amount.
Because
of
the
the
enormity
of
what
needs
to
be
done.
A
We
had
money
left
and
we
said,
let's
put,
that
we
took
a
vote.
There
was
a
motion
and
we
voted
the
board
voted
to
use
it
on
additional
projects
or
that
were
below
the
line
or
whatever
to
add
it
to
that
pot.
So
by
adding
this
statement
says
that
the
board
decides
to
do
that
gives
us
the
room
to
make
the
decision
based
on
our
economic
needs.
A
This
works
for
me
in
cementing
it
and
clarifying
it
kathy.
I
you
know
kathy
came
up
with
the
wording
and
I
thought
it
was
succinct
but
david.
We
I'd
really
appreciate
your
input
on
this
and
mr
campbell,
I
don't
know
who
else
is
on
ingrid.
F
I
think
that's
a
very
valuable
addition.
You
know
the
point
of
it
was
that
the
board
needs
to
be
able
to
decide
where
unused
funds
go.
You
know
they
were
languishing,
we
didn't
even
know
about
them,
which
is
what
prompted
that
forward
motion.
A
Okay,
cool
right
and
mr
smith
or
miss
vote
right.
Any
other
thoughts
on
this.
A
A
motion:
yes,
so
what
I'm
I'm
making
a
move?
I
move
that
we
present
to
the
full
board
amendment
oe
616.,
adding
the
words
unless
otherwise
directed
by
four
I'll.
Second,
that
okay
put
that
right
here,
yeah!
Well,
no!
I
you
know
what
just
one
second,
so.
A
A
Okay,
all
right
excellent,
thank
you
all,
and
then
I
did
ask
robin
just
to
put
in
oe17,
because
this
is
what
was
brought
to
us
with
the
question
about.
How
do
we
pass
this?
How
do
we
you
know?
Does
this
have
to
go
because
through
three
readings-
and
I
feel
that
we
took
care
of
that
with
our
very
first
motion
today-
gc
215-
that
it
has
been
sent?
A
A
E
And
miss
fidgets,
just
as
a
comment.
This
was
discussed
in
technology
committee
and
approved.
C
E
A
A
A
B
A
B
And
this
will
be
this
changes
because
it
will
go
from
administrative
technology
to
technology
services
and
the
in
the
whole
oe
has
now
changed.
So
that's
changing
your
pop.
That's
changing
your
policy.
So
since
we've
changed
other
policies,
do
we
put
this
in
as
one
of
the
addition,
one
of
the
other
policies
that
have
been
changed,
we've
changed.
C
A
D
B
The
old
17
would
go
away
and
be
replaced
with
this
one,
along
with
the
other
changes
that
we've
made
to
the
gc,
the
other
policies,
additions
and
subtractions
that
we
have
made.
Thank.
A
H
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
I
knew
that
the
oe17,
the
current
oe17
administrative
technology
being
replaced
by
a
a
new
by
a
new.
C
C
B
I
have
I
know
that
the
current
oe17
administrative
technology
will
be
replaced
with
technology
services
yeah.
A
Take
out
the
world
being
just
put
be
replaced
that
will
be
be
replaced.
B
C
A
C
A
So
discussion
of
future
meeting
dates
I
would
like
to
meet
center
then
later,
because
I
think
I
mean
we
need
to
get
this
so
finance.
B
A
A
A
I
think
you
know
we
should
say
we
should
say,
discuss
discussion
of.
B
B
A
A
Okay,
so
now
I
have
a
little
note
to
myself
right
here:
go
back
to
gc23.
Did
we
get
all
that
typed
in?
I
wrote
it
down.
Go
back
to
that.
I
can't
I
need
to
do
that
so
23..
All
these
yeah.
C
C
B
A
B
B
B
A
A
G
C
A
A
That
sounds
really
good
good.
So
did
we
have
a
vote
on
this?
No
okay,
so
we
need
to
okay.
I
move.
Let's
see
here,
you
see
two
five,
two
three.
A
To
the
full
board,
does
that
really
want
to
say
present
the
changes
yeah
I'll?
Second,
that,
let's
present
to
them
any
other
discussion,
kathy
nope
nope,
all
in
favor,
unanimous.