►
Description
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION OF THIS MEETING HAS BEEN PUBLISHED, POSTED, AND DISTRIBUTED IN
COMPLIANCE WITH THE SOUTH CAROLINA FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - October 17, 2022
6. CITIZEN COMMENTS - (ANYONE who wishes to speak during the Citizen Comment portion of the
meeting will limit their comments to no longer than three (3) minutes ( a total of 15 minutes ) and will
address Council in a respectful manner appropriate to the decorum of the meeting, refraining from the
use of profane, abusive, or obscene language)
7. DIVISION UPDATE FROM ASSISTANT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, JARED FRALIX
AGENDA ITEMS
8. A PRESENTATION ON BEAUFORT COUNTY’S PRIORITIZED 5-YEAR SCDOT SECONDARY RESURFACING
PROGRAM
9. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION UPDATING BEAUFORT COUNTY’S PRIORITIZED 5-YEAR DIRT
ROAD PAVING PROGRAM
10. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT SC AERONAUTICS COMMISSION (SCAC) GRANT
FOR THE DESIGN AND BIDDING OF A PROJECT TO REHABILITATE THE BEAUFORT EXECUTIVE AIRPORT
(ARW) RUNWAY
County Council Agenda – Beaufort County, SC
11. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A COMMERCIAL PROPERTY LEASE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN BEAUFORT COUNTY - 36 HUNTER ROAD, HILTON HEAD ISLAND, SC 29926 - AND AVIS BUDGET
GROUP
12. AIRPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (ACIP) LISTS FOR BEAUFORT EXECUTIVE AIRPORT (ARW)
AND HILTON HEAD ISLAND AIRPORT (HXD). (FOR INFORMATION ONLY)
13. RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO NEGOTIATE AND FINALIZE A CONTRACT WITH THE GREEN MACHINE FOR
THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS RECOVERY FACILITY EQUIPMENT - MRF (FISCAL IMPACT: $2,597,700.00)
14. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF COUNTY-OWNED REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 108 CLEAR WATER WAY TO SCDOT FOR A DEDICATED RIGHT TURN LANE ON
GROBER HILL ROAD
15. DISCUSSION CONCERNING THE SCOTT CENTER LEASE AND REQUESTED FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS
16. CHAIRMAN'S WRAP UP
17. ADJOURNMENT
A
B
C
A
So
moved
a
second
any
discretion
or
changes
any
objection,
seeing
none,
it
stands
approved
without
objection.
We
do
have
our
minutes
from
October,
17th
and
I
trust.
You've
studied
those
you're.
Looking
for
a
motion
to
approve
those
so
moved
the
second
second,
we
have
a
second
any
changes.
Discussions
to
that
any
objections,
if
not
they
stand
approved
without
objection
that
takes
us
to
Citizen
comment:
Sarah
wave,
anybody
that
signed
up
to
speak
okay,
so
anybody
that
does
want
to
speak.
A
D
Thank
you,
chairman,
Rodman
and
members
of
the
committee,
so,
as
usual,
a
few
things
to
update
you
guys
on
things
that
are
happening
inside
the
infrastructure
division,
some
of
the
things
that
are
always
ready
for
agenda
approval,
but
just
an
update
on
General
things.
One
of
the
most
prudent
things
that
we
haven't
talked
about.
It's
been
pretty
quiet,
as
of
late
is
us-278.
D
Quiet
doesn't
mean
that
we're
not
working.
It
just
means
we
don't
have
an
action
item
yet,
however,
so
one
thing
is
the
independent
review,
that's
kind
of
front
and
center,
so
we
have
that
proposal
or
that
solicitation
out
right
now.
Proposals
are
due
back
on
Wednesday,
so
we'll
have
a
team
between
the
town
and
and
the
county
that
will
review
those
proposals.
We
had
a
pre-proposal
meeting.
D
We
had
five
Consultants
on
board,
so
our
our
hope
to
have
a
qualified
consultant
here
in
the
short
term
is
stands
ready,
so
that'll
be
coming
to
you
as
soon
as
we
can
get
that
evaluated
and
a
recommendation
made
also
this
past
week
or
so
we
held
a
public
meeting
on
the
Burton
church
project.
That's
to
include
the
widening
and
the
sidewalk
projects,
part
of
the
part
of
the
sidewalks
part
of
the
sales
tax.
It
was
a
very
successful
meeting,
had
a
lot
of
good
public
interaction
and
will
served
by
County
staff.
D
County
staff
is
also
working
on
its
master
plan
as
a
proposal
to
the
last
committee
coming
up
in
December.
So
this
is
intelligent
transportation
system,
so
everything
to
do
with
signals
and
remote
connection
and
just
basically
the
foundation
of
architect
and
and
technology
for
now
and
in
the
future,
so
that,
as
we
move
through
as
you
get
to
intelligent
vehicles
and
and
different
things,
we'll
have
a
plan
in
place
as
those
things
arise
and
then,
lastly,
inside
of
traffic,
is
a
signal
retirement.
D
We
have
a
current
project
with
consultant
for
re-timing
with
signals
along
Boundary
Street
and
reboot
Street
reboot
Road
they're
finishing
up
the
design
on
that
now
currently
and
hope
to
have
some
implementation
in
early
2023.
So
if
you've
noticed
a
little
bit
of
congestion
here
and
there
there's
some
things
that
we
suspect,
maybe
some
detection
Loops
that
aren't
picking
up
and
that'll
be
coordinated
and
choreographed
here
shortly.
So
hopefully,
some
improvement
along
the
way.
D
So
traffic
maintenance
is
making
a
good
good
push
on
that.
Also,
some
irrigation
systems
around
the
admin
building
pricing,
some
of
that
work
going
on
recently
they're
just
finishing
that
up
as
well
as
some
fall
and
winter
planting.
So
the
ground's
maintenance
is
making
some
good
strides
on
their
continued
maintenance
plans
and
thanks
to
some
good
weather
and
a
lot
of
hard
work
by
our
roads
and
drainage,
Crews
we're
back
on
track
with
our
kind
of
six
week
rotation
on
our
County
dirt
roads
as
far
as
the
grading
process.
D
So
thanks
on
that
for
all
their
hard
work
and
lastly,
inside
the
airport,
we've
had
two
good
public
participation,
successful
events
as
of
late
one
was
out
at
Beaufort
Executive
Airport,
our
annual
flying
frog.
This
was
the
third
year
running
happy
to
report
that
John
our
airport
director
finished
second
in
his
age
group.
So
the
way
to
go
John
foreign
I.
D
D
So
it's
pretty
successful
hope
to
keep
gaining
momentum
on
that
and
at
Hilton
Head,
in
partnership
with
the
town
of
Hilton
Head,
hosted
the
Hilton
Head
motoring
event
with
some
activities
taking
place
there
at
the
airport,
it
was
the
most
that
they
had
recorded
over
21
000
people
in
attendance
to
that
event,
so
very
successful
event
and
glad
to
be
a
part
of
it.
So
those
are
all
the
things
that
I
have
just
kind
of
updates
in
general,
but
we'll
gladly
take
any
questions.
Questions.
E
I
would
like
for
you
all
to
consider
reconsidering
the
motion
to
approve
the
agenda,
to
add
that
item
and
John
rimbold
can
come
up
and
explain
that
to
you
about
the
sensitivity
of
that
issue.
A
delay
in
that
item
today
will
delay
our
work
on
doing
the
terminal,
expansion
and
I
understand
your
concern,
but
I.
Think
Mr
rimbo
has
some
information
from
some
additional
information.
Second
item
before
we
get
too
far
in
the
agenda,
because
I'm
gonna
have
to
leave
today
right
at
five
o'clock.
If
we
go
past
that.
B
A
A
A
A
Okay,
okay,
so
with
that
we
are
now
down.
No,
we
have
to.
We
have
to
approve
the
amended
agenda.
I
apologize.
Is
there
a
motion?
You've
already
approved
it
right.
Second,
any
objection,
no
objection.
The
agenda
as
approved
and
modified
is
now
approved
right.
Thank
you,
okay!
Well,
it's
always
great
to
have
Craig
Gordon
with
us
and
he's
got
to
update
us
on
our
roads
and,
as
he's
are
you
gonna
introduce
him.
Okay,.
D
D
Eric
asked
the
questions
like
what
are
we
doing
on
this
I
was
like
well,
it's
something
that
D.O.T
is
mandated,
but
before
we
get
into
it,
I
give
credit
to
Chairman
Gordon
the
CTC
living
by
the
quote
from
Wayne
Gretzky
about
skiing,
where
the
puck
is
going,
not
where
it's
been,
because
this
was
something
that
CTC
and
chairman
Gordon
LED
and
asked
staff
to
look
at
the
secondary
roads
are
obviously
all
owned
by
dot.
Why
are
we
working
on
their
roads
and
coming
up
with
a
plan?
D
They
had
already
started
allocating
some
funds
to
low
ADT
roads
out
of
their
required
33
percent.
So
they
wanted
to
take
this
initiative
on
and
then
about
the
same
time.
Dot
said:
okay,
we're
putting
more
funding
to
ctc's
into
tune
about
150
million
dollars,
so
our
allocation
at
Beaufort
CTC
was
roughly
five
million
dollars
and
then
later
they
said.
Oh,
we
want
you
to
spend
it
all
on
secondary
roads
so
because
they
are
already
moving
in
that
motion.
D
It
just
happened
to
catch
this
just
at
the
right
time
and
again,
I
give
credit
to
Chairman
Gordon
and
the
rest
of
the
CTC
for
that
initiative.
So
this
is
some
work
on
that
and
he
can
explain
that
a
little
bit
further,
as
well
as
invite
our
consultant
ant
and
Richard
Turner.
Who
was
doing
that
work
for
us.
So
chairman
Gordon.
A
B
B
B
We
went
out
and
consulted
an
engineering
firm
along
with
the
firm
that
would
come
in
and
analyze
their
routes,
all
our
roads,
the
200
plus
miles
of
Beaufort
County,
owned
roads
were
analyzed
and
with
that
one
of
the
things
we've
operated
on
from
day
one
is,
we
didn't
want
politics
to
be
involved
in
our
decision-making
process.
We
wanted
to
do
it,
analytically,
the
majority
of
us
are
Engineers,
that's
the
way
we
operate
and
that's
the
way
we
proceeded.
B
B
We
had
1.58
miles
of
very
poor
roads
and
in
the
opposite
side
we
had
zero
on
very
good.
So
there
was
a
bit
of
area
for
improvement
in
all
this.
So
what
basically
passed
is
we
put
our
five-year
program
in
place
very
successful?
We
again
approved
funds
and
put
up
another
five-year
program
in
place
year,
six
through
ten,
but
what
was
very
valid.
We
wanted
to
validate
our
actions
and
in
our
2021
analysis
we
went
from
the
1.58
miles
of
very
poor
to
0.9
miles
and
the
0.9
miles
is
being
fixed
this
year.
B
On
the
very
good
side
we
had
zero.
Before
today
we
have
67.25
miles
of
very
good
roads.
So
we've
made
a
major
stride
in
this,
along
with
starting
a
program
for
our
next
Five-Year
Plan,
we're
required
by
state
statute
to
spend
33
percent
of
the
funds
we
receive
on
state
roads,
State
routes,
no
FM,
butts,
ores.
B
So
it
became
a
decision
point
for
us.
How
are
we
going
to
go
forward
with
spending
our
funds
on
state
routes
and
it
became
a
big
discussion
and
the
CTC
came
to
a
unanimous
decision
that
we
would
be
spending
and
I'm
going
to
give
you
round
numbers
roughly.
We
have
to
spend
a
million
dollars
a
year
on
on
state
routes,
so
we
came
to
con
consensus
that
we're
going
to
spend
a
half
million
dollars
on
low
ADT
routes.
B
B
These
are
also
routes
in
all
our
districts
that
don't
get
attention,
and
so
each
Committee
Member
is
responsible
for
their
District
to
come
up
with
listings
of
routes
and
justify
the
money
that
they're
going
to
spend
on
or
recommend
spending
on
their
disk
in
their
districts.
For
that
500
000.
and
as
Jared
pointed
out,
we
got
5.8
million
dollars
that
came
on
on
to
us
by
the
state
legislature.
B
They
also
knew
that
we
were
doing
this
by
the
way,
but
we
decided
what
we've
hired
a
consulting
firm
to
come
in
and
do
a
study
and
come
up
with
a
five-year
plan
for
us
and
AMT
was
the
selected
firm
to
do
it
and
Richard
Turner
is
here
with
me
today
to
kind
of
give
you
an
oversight
of
what?
What
we're
accomplishing
Richard.
F
Thank
you,
chairman
Gordon,
thank
you,
chairman
Rodman
and
members
of
commitment
committee.
It's
it's
a
pleasure
to
be
here
with
you:
I'm
Richard
Turner,
with
AMT
engineering,
I'm,
a
South
Carolina
program,
Services,
lead
and,
and
we
were
hired
by
the
the
CTC
to
evaluate
the
low
volume
secondary
Road
program
and
develop
a
five-year
five-year
program.
And
the
first
thing
we
really
we
did
in
Norway.
F
Okay,
so
the
the
first
thing
we
went
about
doing
was
reviewing
existing
data
scdot,
provided
that
the
county,
with
a
list
of
the
roads
that
are
less
than
500
or
the
full,
actually
the
full
list
of
secondary
roads
in
Beaufort
County.
We
we
brought
that
down
to
just
the
roads
that
had
a
580
t
or
less
and
which
equated
to
about
400
roads
throughout
the
throughout
the
county
about
182
miles,
and
so
we
looked
at
that
data
to
understand
exactly
what
condition
is
the
system?
What
how
does?
F
How
is
scdot
reporting
that
and
what
you
see
there
is
the
bar
graph.
There
is
about
90
percent
of
the
roads
that
that
they're,
there
they're
about
they're,
fair
or
better
condition,
so
fair,
good
and
very
good
condition,
the
overall
network
of
secondary
roads.
If
you
we
did
a
weighted
average
of
those
based
on
the
payment,
Quality
Index,
the
scdot
uses
on
a
one
to
5
scale
or
zero
to
five.
F
F
F
F
The
the
scale
is
a
little
bit
different,
so
you
said
the
bar
graphs
look
a
little
bit
different,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day,
the
rows
that
are
in
poor,
very
poor
condition
was
very
closely
the
same,
I
think
around
eight
to
eleven
percent
between
the
two.
So
we
overall
what
we,
what
we
found
was
this
piece
of
the
network
is
in
good
condition.
F
F
So
the
next
thing
we
we
did
as
part
of
that
payment
condition
server.
We
also
looked
at
the
land
characteristics
or
the
Land
Development,
what's
actually
happening
on
these
roads.
What
type
of
development
is
that?
Are
there
along
each
of
the
routes
from
and
we
scored?
We?
Basically,
we
took
account
of
the
industries,
churches,
schools,
homes
and
each
of
those
got
a
score,
so
the
ones
that
generated
more
traffic.
You
would
see
those
with
a
higher
score,
which
is
what
you
see
on
the
screen.
F
So
we
totaled
that
and
divided
it
basically
by
the
length
which
creates
a
density.
If
you
will
of
development
per
per
mile
of
road
and
then
we
also
utilize
the
actual
average
daily
traffic
and
we
provided
a
score
to
go
along
with
that
and
that
and
that
what
that
gave
us
was
an
overall
score
for
the
land
use
characteristic
score.
F
So
you,
you
think
about
two
things:
I've
got
here:
I've
got
the
payment
condition
survey
and
the
score
that
that
zero
to
a
hundred,
and
then
you
have
the
the
land
character
you
land
use
characteristic
sword.
So
let
me
go
to
the
next
slide.
So
what
we
use,
what
we
did
with
those
two
numbers
is
we
combined
those
75?
It
was
basically
a
weighted
average.
F
75
percent
of
the
con
of
the
condition
index
was
added
to
25
percent
of
the
land
use
characteristics,
so
we're
we're
bringing
in
the
the
condition
is
the
the
predominant
factor
of
what
with
each
of
the
roads
to
be
ranked,
but
it
also
brings
in
the
land
use
characteristics
as
well.
So
you
get
an
overall
score
and
what,
in
the
table,
it's
hard
to
read
there,
but
the
table
basically
shows
the
roads
as
they
are
listed
from
from.
F
Basically,
worst
condition
or
the
highest
score
to
the
lowest
score,
so
that
was
utilized
to
determine
what
are
our
priorities
and
how
we
how
we
move
forward
with
this
five-year
program
next,
so
the
next
step
was
treatment
types.
How
do
we
want
to?
How
do
we
want
to
treat
these
roads?
Some
roads
are
in
good
condition.
Some
roads
are
fair
and
then
poor.
What
we
landed
on
through
discussions
with
chairman
Gordon,
the
dot
and
County
staff,
was
willing
to
use
basically
a
mix
of
treatments.
G
F
Of
the
roads
in
this
network
were
Rural
and
currently
have
chip
seal
well,
those
roads
would
be
treated
again
with
that
very
similar
treatment
type.
The
roads
in
the
urban
area
you'll
see
those
your
typical
hot
mix
asphalt
roads.
Those
will
be
either
milled
or
overlaid
with
a
new
layer
of
hot
mixed
asphalt
that
that's
what
we
landed
on
and
you
can
go
to
the
five
year
next,
one
so
five
year
plan-
and
this
is
year
one
shown
on
the
screen
year.
One
basically
was
three
and
a
half
million
dollars.
F
What
that
gives
us
is
around
30
miles
of
roads
to
be
to
be
impacted.
In
year,
one
year,
two
we
dropped
down
to
the
500
000
per
year
and
and
subsequently,
through
years,
three
three
four
and
five,
which
is
about
three
miles
per
three
miles
per
year
of
roads.
That
will
be.
That
will
be
resurfaced
well.
What
this
does
in
the
in
the
in
the
big
scheme
of
things
is
all
the
roads
that
are
currently
yellow
and
yellow
and
red
will
all
turn
green
in
a
five-year
program.
C
A
D
Sir,
so
that
was
CTC
and
and
paved
roads
and
those
were
also
dot
open
roads.
This
is
you
typically
paid
out
of
our
tag:
funds
dirt
roads,
and
these
are
county-owned
dirt
roads
so
similar
to
CTC
and
The
Five-Year
Plan.
They
have
Five-Year
Plan
for
our
County
paid
rows
and
now
A
Five-Year
Plan
for
DOT
secondary
roads.
We
have
a
five-year
plan
for
our
dirt
roads,
similar
to
to
the
resurfacing
we've
already
been
through
roads.
D
One
through
five
are
working
towards
the
end
of
the
five
years
and
we're
preparing
for
years
six
through
ten,
so
we
put
out
RFQ
and
we
could
select
a
console
engineering.
The
the
great
thing
is,
even
though
it's
a
different
firm
than
previously
the
project
manager.
Dan
Chisholm,
is
the
same
project
manager
that
helped
in
our
first
year,
one
through
five.
So
there's
a
great
consistency
with
that.
D
Unfortunately,
Brian
Bauer,
fortunately,
and
unfortunately,
Brian-
is
our
project
manager
on
this
project,
but
is
not
present
because
he
and
his
wife
had
their
first
child
last
week
so
kudos
to
those
guys,
but
without
that
Eric
and
Dan
Chisholm.
If
you
guys
want
to
come
and
give
a
presentation
on
where
we
are
and
what's
been
with
that.
H
G
Gentlemen,
thanks
a
lot
for
the
opportunity
to
stand
for
you
today
and
present
The
Five-Year
dirt
road
payment
plan
for
the
next
year.
Consular,
you
guys
probably
never
heard
a
consort
before,
but
we
were
Nationwide.
Basically
international
company
offices,
all
over
the
United
States
two
offices
here
in
South
Carolina
and
a
lot
of
administrator
fralick,
said
I've
been
in
working
in
Beaufort
for
well
more
than
a
decade
now
introduce
our
clinical
team
to
you
next
slide.
G
If
you
would
oh
Josh
gray,
is
our
vice
president,
here
in
charge
of
South
Carolina
he's
working
out
of
our
Charleston
office,
very
close
here
to
Beaufort
County.
Now
my
senior
roadway
inspector
was
minor.
Poppenheiser
reminder
has
been
doing
road
work
now
for
about
20
years
in
the
United
States.
After
coming
from
South
Africa
and
again
Dan
Chisholm
I'm,
the
project
manager
for
it
and,
like
I,
said
I've
been
working
in
Beaufort
for
well
more
than
a
decade
very
first
project
I
did
here
was
Ace
Basin
out
in
gardens.
G
Corner
y'all,
probably
love
the
little
roundabout
that
we
put
up
there.
That
was
one
of
the
very
first
ones
we
ever
did
in
Beaufort.
County
went
on
from
there.
I
did
the
bluff
and
flyover
project
finished
out
in
2016,
and
we
were
finishing
that
up.
We
were
fortunate
enough
to
be
selected
to
do.
Commissioner,
chairman
Gordon's
first
Paving
assessment
for
the
county
roads.
It's
been
working
in
Beaufort
for
a
long
time.
Next
slide.
If
you
will
foreign.
G
Plan
for
chairman
Gordon
for
the
county,
roads,
County
decided
they
also
needed
to
do
the
same.
A
similar
plan
for
the
dirt
road
payment
plan,
so
County
retained
another
consultant
at
that
point
in
time,
and
that
consultant
came
up
with
the
very
first
Five-Year
Plan
county
has
been
very
happy.
Staff
been
very
happy
with
the
way
that
assessment
went.
They
just
wanted
to
do
a
little
bit
of
tweaking
to
some
of
the
things,
just
real,
quick
to
kind
of
explain
a
little
bit.
We
basically
have
two
scoring
components
in
it.
G
The
first
scoring
component
is
comprised
of
what
is
the
physical
characteristics
of
the
road
itself?
What
kind
of
right-of-way
do
we
have
on
the
road?
And
then,
lastly,
you
know
what
is
the
what
we
call
the
daily
traffic?
You
know:
how
do
we
assess
the
daily
traffic?
That's
what
we
call
component
a,
and
there
are
different
percentages
in
that,
but
just
on
the
screen
there,
you
can
see
our
scoring
charts
that
we
had.
We
made
a
little
tweak
to
each
one
of
those.
G
G
We
did
a
little
bit
of
tweaking
to
the
way
that
right
away
was
scored
and,
of
course,
you
guys
understand
that
you've
got
some
roads
that
are
Legacy
roads
in
the
county,
dirt
road
system
and
some
of
the
roads
you've
already
got
all
full
right-of-way
on
it.
Some
roads
are
already
negotiating
for
some
right-of-way
on
those
roads
and
some
Road.
G
You
don't
have
any
right
away
on
them
as
well,
and
then
we
looked
at
the
daily
traffic,
basically
kind
of
we
counted
the
you
know
the
houses
on
the
roads
again,
this
was
the
system
that
was
in
place
before
counted
the
houses,
counted
the
churches
counted
the
you
know
the
businesses
on
the
roads,
kind
of
the
cemeteries,
the
bus
routes.
Things
like
that.
One
of
the
things
that
we
tweaked
with
this
year's
plan
was
the
roads
that
feed
into
the
dirt
road
systems.
G
You
know
we
they
counted
the
road
before,
but
they
really
didn't
count
the
residences.
They
didn't
count
the
businesses,
all
those
other
things
to
factor
into
the
daily
tractor,
so
we
kind
of
made
a
little
slight
adjustment
there.
The
second
scoring
part
of
the
system
is
basically
what
we
call
a
benefit:
cost
ratio
analysis.
G
Basically,
how
much
does
it
cost
to
maintain
the
dirt
roads,
as
they
are
right
now?
How
much
are
you
spending
every
year
to
do
that,
worked
again
with
staff,
a
lot
of
collaboration
with
them?
Regarding
this,
the
maintenance
supervisors?
You
know
work
on
the
roads.
How
much
are
they
spending?
What
kind
of
problems
are
they
seeing
on
the
road
and
then,
lastly,
what
would
it
cost
you
if
you
paved
the
road
and
you
kind
of
come
up
with
a
ratio
of
what
cost
to
maintain
it
versus
what
you
cost
to
to
completely
pay
it?
G
G
Some
of
this,
some
of
the
roads
are
already
in
the
system
to
be
paved
this
year
and
next
year
to
finish
up
the
first
five
year
plan,
and
then
we
already
have
some
agreements
with
some
of
the
landowners
in
place
that
the
landowners
don't
want
their
Road
paved.
So
we
took
out
some
those
roads
that
aren't
applicable,
and
then
we
scored
basically
every
single
Dirt
Road
in
the
in
the
county
and
came
up
with
our
list.
You
know
your
reports
got
that
in
it
we'll
get
the
next
slide.
G
If
you
would,
this
is
kind
of
the
basically
just
the
first
page
of
that
ranking
system.
You
know,
and
every
single
dirt
road
that
you
see
is
going
to
be
in
the
in
the
list
and
from
there
we
finished
up
last
slide.
If
you
would
the
actual
Five-Year
Plan.
So
we
took
those
roads
and
we
were
told
to
physically
constrain
them
to
about
two
million
dollars
worth
of
expenditures
yours
a
year.
So,
basically
year
2025
we're
looking
at
doing
get
Gibson
Road,
Frederica,
Taylor,
Italy,
Farm,
Road
and
Alice
Ladson
Drive.
G
G
Those
roads
were
spread
out
between
districts,
one
districts,
three
and
District
9
as
well;
I'm,
sorry
26.
We
had
district
one
in
district
7
represented
in
that
year;
Paving
plan,
2028,
Cato,
Lane,
glass,
Road
and
North,
Sea,
Pines,
Drive
and
then
the
last
year,
the
plan
fifth
year,
2029,
basically
most
of
the
roads.
On
ladies
Island,
a
lot
of
the
dirt
roads
on
ladies
Island
there
and
again
we
physically
constrained
it
of
roughly
two
million
dollars
in
each
of
the
first
five
years:
1.8
1.7
million
the
last
year.
G
I
I
G
Stop
yeah
one
of
one
of
the
things
I'll
go
ahead
and
address
that,
for
you
real
quickly,
we
did
talk
with
staff
staff
brought
us
to
concerns
right
now.
If
you
look
at
the
way
the
roads
were
analyzed
category
a
which
is
the
one:
that's
got
the
daily
traffic,
the
number
of
houses
Etc
got.
The
condition
of
the
road
got
the
right
way.
All
that
factored
in
is
about
originally
was
66
percent
of
the
scoring
criteria,
with
the
benefit
cost
ratio
being
34.
G
So
you
know
to
add
up
to
100
when
staff
brought
us
here
because
concerns
one
of
the
things
we
did
was
said.
Okay,
what
can
we
do?
Can
we
look
at
this
a
little
differently?
So
one
of
the
things
we
did.
We
said:
okay.
Well,
let's
lower
the
percentage
that
we
apply
to
the
Daily
traffic
to
address
the
rural
and
then,
let's
maybe
up
the
benefit
cost.
You
know,
because
it's
not
going
to
cost
you
much
to
pay
some
of
the
rural
roads
so
give
more
credit
to
that.
We
land
we
analyze
it
again.
G
I
I
At
the
same
time,
we
also
have
what
I
consider
according
to
a
legacy
Road
where
you
may
not
have
the
the
these,
the
the
width
that
you
required
for
an
easement
properly,
but
that
road
can't
go
anywhere
and
it
has
to
be
used
and
maintained.
You
know
it's
because
it's
a
legacy
road,
so
I'm,
assuming
that
you
are
also
considering
Paving
roads
like
that
yeah.
That
may
not
have
the
proper
easements
given,
but
the
road
it
ain't
going.
Nowhere
and.
G
It
has
to
be
used,
it
is
and
again
when
we
look
at
Legacy
roads
that
was
factored
in
on
the
right-of-way
category
and
for
the
roads
were
not
legacy,
they
were
given
basically
a
factor
of
one
where
Legacy
roads
were
given
a
factor,
one
and
a
half,
so
Legacy
roads
are
more
important.
You
know
from
from
that
regard,
okay,.
J
G
C
D
C
D
No,
so
we
have
separate
contracts,
so
we
put
out
a
contract
every
year,
regardless
what
the
ones
doing.
So,
if
it's
taking
us
extra
time
of
Permitting
we're
still
going
to
put
one
out
the
following
year,
so
we're
trying
to
stay
at
a
yearly
schedule
where
we
have
roads
that
are
entering
because
it's
a
two-year
program
program.
Basically,
so
it
takes
a
year
worth
of
design
and
a
year
worth
of
construction.
So
so
we're
trying
to
stay
on
schedule
with
that
and
the
costs
really
they
have.
A
A
H
A
J
See
now
I
might
need
Brittany
to
help
me
on
11.
That's
just
the
for
the
Hunter
Road
two
different
airports
so
but
I'm
happy
to
talk
about
both
of
them.
Number
10
is
just
a
resolution
to
accept
the
Aeronautics
commission.
Grant,
that's
just
standard
grant
that
we
we
partner
with
the
state
on
whenever
we
have
a
project,
so
this
is
to
rehabilitate
the
the
runway
out
at
Beaufort
executive.
It's
for
the
design
and
bidding
for
that
product.
So
it's
not
the
construction.
It's
designed
and
bidding.
J
That's
you
know,
give
or
take
fifteen
thousand
dollars
is
all
that
one
is
so
we're
just
happy
to
accept
that
Grant.
The
second
one
number
11
is
to
approve
a
commercial
property
lease
agreement,
and
this
is
on
the
the
final.
If
you
remember
it,
Hilton
Head
Island
airport,
we
had
a
series
of
properties,
we
were
acquiring.
J
This
is
a
final
property
finally
been
acquired
at
the
end
of
October
and
that
property
had
an
existing
lease
agreement
on
it
with
Avis
budget
run
car
company
and
they
use
that
there's
a
small
billing
there
and
they
use
it
to
basically
service
their
cars
after
their
return,
get
them
ready
for
the
client.
So
we're
going
to
continue
that
lease.
So
that
makes
it
a
recurring
Revenue
item
for
the
airport,
which
is
a
benefit
to
the
to
the
county.
A
A
A
Okay,
is
there
any
further
discussion
on
either
of
these
and
hearing
run?
This
stands
across
stand
approved
without
objection
and
I.
Think
resolutions
do
these
have
to
go
to
council
or
given
the
dollar
amount.
No,
they
have
two
houses.
That's
really
okay,
we'll
send
those
on
to
the
next
meeting.
Hopefully,.
J
Correct
in
this,
if
you
probably
remember
each
year,
we
bring
this
forward
and
what
the
FAA
requires
of
the
airports
who
are
in
the
the
nippies
of
the
transportation
system
is
each
year
to
provide
them
with
a
five-year
plan
for
capital
projects,
infrastructure
projects
at
both
of
the
airports.
So
we've
provided
that
to
the
FAA.
J
This
typically
is
kind
of
a
give
and
take
over
the
next
couple
of
months
where
the
FAA
will
review
our
our
list
and
they'll
have
a
few
adjustments
to
make
to
that
and
then,
by
the
time
we
get
to
about
the
March
time
frame,
there'll
be
finalized
until
we
get
around
to
this
time
next
year
and
then
we'll
do
it
all
again.
Well,
basically,
we
look
at
a
five-year
chunk
each
year,
so
the
FAA
knows
how
to
start
programming
their
near-term
funds
and
then
how
much
you
know
farther
term
money.
J
They
have
to
start
looking
at
to
fund
these
projects,
so
just
just
to
really
make
it
kind
of
in
a
nutshell:
if
we
look
at
Beaufort
executive
airport
in
the
next
in
the
Years
we're
talking
about
which
are
federal
fiscal
year,
24
to
28
inclusive,
that's
about
11.5
million
dollars
worth
of
total
project
cost.
That
includes
the
airport's
costs,
the
state
sharing
costs
and
then
FAA
costs.
Large
majority
of
that
is
fa
cost
and
the
major
projects
there
are
going
to
be
the
runway
Rehabilitation
project.
J
That
will
be
the
construction
phase
of
that
and
then
beyond.
That
will
be
the
extended
Runway
safety
area
permitting
and
construction
so
that
that
actually
takes
us
all
the
way
through
those
are
fairly
comprehensive
projects
and
complicated
projects.
But
that'll
take
us
through
that
full
five
years.
So
that's
about
11
and
a
half
million
is
what
we're
looking
at
there
and
then
at
Hilton
Head
Island
airport,
the
numbers
a
little
bit
bigger
it's
about
18
million
that
excludes
the
terminal,
because
we've
previously
discussed
that.
J
So
that
really
talks
about
the
taxiway
and
Runway
Rehabilitation
projects
and
strengthening
projects.
I
mean
more
and
more
aircraft.
In
larger
aircrafts
we
need
to
strengthen
those
facilities
and
then
also
we'll
reimburse
us
for
the
property
Acquisitions
that
we've
made
on
Hunter
Road
and
the
way
that
works.
You
have
to
acquire
all
the
properties
before
you
can
apply
for
that
that
Grant.
So
it's
in
their
system,
it's
been
in
their
system
and
now
we
can
make
now
that
we've
got
the
the
final
property.
J
A
J
Correct
and
then
the
last
items
are
more
planning
type
items,
but
but
no
less
important.
One
is
the
Airport
layout
Plan
update
and
then
on
the
heels
of
that
would
be
some
of
the
environmental
and
design
documents
that
will
work
on
to
recover
the
displaced
thresholds
at
Hilton
Head.
So
that's
that's
kind
of
what
we're
looking
at
for
the
next
five
years
at
both
airports.
J
J
J
There
is
because,
if
you
recall
the
first
time
we
bid
the
project
back
in
the
early
part
of
the
summer
as
bids
came
in
very
high
due
to
the
inflation
and
so
what
we
decided
to
do
as
a
as
a
team
was
to
basically
look
at
that
project
and
divide
it
up
into
phases
with
that
first
phase,
including
the
project
elements
that
we
already
have
funding
for
already,
have
grant
funding
on
board
for
and
that
we
could
execute.
And
so
this
amendment
is
it's
kind
of
a
two-part
Amendment.
J
It's
got
the
design
component
of
it
that
allows
the
the
engineers
The
Architects
and
all
of
their
subconsultants
to
go
back
through
the
project
and
basically
take
that
building
apart
and
find
those
dividing
areas
and
kind
of
work.
Kind
of
back
into
that
that
rough
number
that
we've
got
so
they'll
do
all
of
that
work,
which
is
pretty
complicated
work
and
then
the
rest
of
that
is
really
the
Lion's
Share
of
the
amendment
about
half
of
it
is
the
it's
an
hourly
number
and
that
is
for
construction,
Administration
and
inspections.
J
That
will
happen
on
that
project
and
the
reason
that's
a
little
bit
higher
now
is
because
we'll
actually
be
executing
a
couple
of
phases
within
that
first
phase.
At
the
same
time,
so
we'll
have
some
site
work
that
happens
at
the
same
time
that
complicated
billing
work
goes
on
and
you
have
to
have
different
inspectors
to
do
that.
A
York
seconds
any
further
comments:
I
just
had
one
or
two
the
background
on.
Why
we
put
this
off,
was
that
I
had
gotten
a
call
from
Anne
Esposito,
who
is
our
representative
for
the
first
congressional
district
on
the
commission,
and
she
relayed
to
me
a
little
bit
of
the
meeting
that
meetings
that
you've
had
and
very
complimentary
to
John
and
how
he,
how
he
defends
us
in
all
of
that.
A
But
my
sense
in
listening
to
it
was
that
they
have
this
pot
of
money.
I
guess
it's
60
million!
Some
of
it
is
carved
out
for
possibility
of
the
future
airport
a
little
bit
less
to
allocate
on
the
first
go-round,
but
in
basically
you
and
your
five
compatriots
will
get
to
make
a
recommendation
as
to
how
to
divvy
up
the
money.
A
Not
the
easy
part,
they
tell
me
you're
doing
a
good
job,
but
it
sounded
like
that
they
want
to
have
a
submission
kind
of
along
the
lines
of
a
grant
type
of
thing,
and
that
would
be
due
I
guess
neat
next
week.
Sometime
and
then
they
were
scheduling
a
meeting
three
weeks
out
to
actually
make
the
decision,
and
it
sounded
like
to
me
that
one
of
their
concerns
is
shovel
ready
or
one
of
the
considers,
and
some
of
the
folks
even
suggested
that
we
as
little
Buford
ought
to
get
a
bigger
share.
A
So
what
I
was
concerned
about
was
that
if
part
of
the
criteria
is
shovel
ready
and
we're
going
back-
and
we
did
it,
would
somebody
be
making
an
argument
that
well
wait
a
minute
buford's,
not
shovel
ready
after
all,
and
therefore
it
would
be
a
tougher
negotiating
position
for
you
with
your
compatriot.
So
that
was
the
only
reason.
A
J
Don't
I
don't
think
it
is
and
just
to
clarify
a
little
bit.
It
was
the
the
amount
starting
out
was
50
million
and
then
20
percent
was
peeled
off
for
those
other
items,
so
we're
down
to
40
million
and
we're
arm
wrestling
over
that
between
the
six
commercial
airports.
As
you
can
imagine,
there's
some
real
heavyweights
in
the
room
with
with
Charleston
Greenville,
Spartanburg,
Columbia
and
and
Myrtle
Beach,
otherwise
known
as
the
big
four,
when
you're,
not
in
the
big
four
you're
fighting
up
a
mud
hill
to
get
some
of
that
funding.
J
We
don't
have
some
of
the
benefits
the
other
airports
have,
but
I,
don't
think,
there's
a
risk
of
being
considered
not
shovel
ready,
particularly
in
in
light
of
the
competition
that
we'll
have
for
those
grants,
because,
whichever
way
we
slice
it
we're
going
to
have
to
rebid
that
project
and
I,
don't
think
that
that
we'll
be
looked
at
as
being
not
shovel
ready
because
we'll
be
able
to
execute
that
project
within
a
matter
of
months.
You
know
once
we
get
into
that
bid
phase.
J
A
J
J
Well,
it's
been
that
same
number.
We've
we've
talked
about
in
the
meetings
and
it's
a
little
bit
rough,
so
they're,
you
know
they're
being
a
little
bit
conservative
on
that.
But
and
again
we
do
have
other
Grant
applications
that
are
out
there
at
this
time,
so
that
we've
asked
the
the
team
to
make
sure
they
put
the
the
plan
together
such
that
there
are,
you
know,
additional
items
that
can
be
added
to
that
bid.
So
should
we
receive
additional
Federal
funding
which
we
have
applied
for
then
we
could
add
to
that
construction
scope.
A
D
Right
we're
moving
forward.
We've
been
talking
about
it
a
long
time.
I
know
everybody's
anxious
as
we
are
to
get
forward
on
the
the
Murph.
The
material
recovery
facility
I
have
Dave
Wilhelm,
he's
your
Deputy
Public
Works
director
to
talk
about
this
he'll.
Also,
in
addition
to
talking
about
the
equipment
and
the
contract
for
that
which
is
on
the
agenda
for
a
recommendation,
other
updates
that
we're
taking
and
that
are
that
are
going
on
currently
inside
Solid,
Waste
and
Recycling,
which
is
now
housed
inside
of
Public
Works.
So
Dave.
D
K
Afternoon
the
item
Neil's
out
of
the
office
today,
that's
why
I've
been
cheating
for
Neil.
The
item
is
for
purchasing
processing
equipment
for
the
material
recovery
facility
or
the
Murph.
As
you
can
see
on
the
AIS
form,
it's
a
qualified
recommendation.
We're
recommending
moving
forward
to
negotiate
a
contract
to
purchase
the
equipment
for
the
Murph
I'll,
give
an
update
on
where
we
are
with
the
actual
Murph
itself
a
little
bit
later,
but
this
is
strictly
for
the
processing
equipment.
K
The
reason
we
want
to
do
this
is
we
want
to
try
to
secure
the
pricing.
So
this
is,
if
you
could
turn
to
page
49
on
the
there.
It
is.
Thank
you
I
think
the
easiest
way
to
describe
what
this
is
so
I
think
it's
important
to
point
out.
This
is
a
material
recovery
facility
for
recyclable
materials.
There
will
be
no
trash
coming
this
facility
and,
what's
shown
on
the
screen,
is
a
picture
of
the
proposed
system.
K
It's
a
very
complete
system,
a
brief
description
of
it,
starting
from
the
right
hand,
Corners
at
end
feed,
conveyor,
there's
a
metering
device
to
to
kind
of
level
out
the
materials
going
through
the
process.
There's
a
cardboard
separator
polishing
screen,
several
magnets
cross
belt
magnets,
pull
out
all
the
ferrous
material
of
the
tin
and
the
steel
eddy
current
separator
pull
out
the
aluminum
and
it
all
goes
to
a
dual
ramp
Baler
at
the
end.
So
it's
a
very
complete
system.
K
In
fact,
if
you
turn
to
page
47,
I
think
that
will
help
us
it's
a
kind
of
a
plan
view
of
the
site
and
that's
important
to
show
how
it
fits
inside
the
building,
so
that
tree
was
kind
of
a
planned
view
of
how
the
equipment
is
laid
out
and
what's
important
to
notice
on
this
slide
is
the
dimension.
So
it's
roughly
200
by
100
feet,
which
is
a
20
000
square
foot
area.
So
when
we're
talking
about
a
Murph,
we've
got
to
size
the
building
about
30
to
40
000
square
feet.
K
This
is
twenty
thousand
square
feets.
What
we
need
for
the
Process
Equipment
itself,
but
it
doesn't
have
room
for
the
Tipping
floor
or
bail
stored.
So
we
need
something.
A
little
bit
larger
green
machine
has
been
making
recycling
systems
for
about
10
years.
Their
main
office
is
in
New
York
they're,
manufacturing
facilities
in
New,
Hampshire
and
I
want
to
recognize
Victoria
Hoffman.
She
actually
attended
some
conferences
and
met
Green
Machine
I
had
not
heard
of
them
before
so
she
talked
to
them
and
and
asked
them
to
submit
a
proposal.
K
I,
don't
think
we
would
have
gotten
their
proposal
without
without
her
help,
so
very
good
system
I
visited
one
of
the
plants
and
saw
it
operating
and
it's
a
first
class.
So
it's
our
staff's
recommendation
to
execute
a
contract
with
green
machine
again
with
contingencies,
to
secure
the
current
pricing
and
the
contingencies
are
we
will
not
move
forward
unless
the
project
itself
moves
forward?
K
K
K
I
can
give
a
quick
update
on
where
we
are
for
the
murder,
so
our
preferred
location
is
the
simmonsville
road
drop-off
center,
that's
the
site
in
Bluffton,
it's
corner
of
simmonsville
Road
and
Bluffton
Parkway
the
site
itself.
The
active
site
is
about
seven
acres,
there's
about
an
acre
behind
the
current
operation.
That's
available
this
facility,
when
it's
finally
designed,
will
need
much
more
area
than
that
we've
got
to
have
roads
coming
in.
K
We
have
to
have
a
scale,
obviously
the
building,
so
we
need
to
acquire
additional
acreage,
it's
about
a
2.65
acre
behind
it
and
then
there's
also
some
additional
acreages
needed.
That's
part
of
the
royal
critical
land
swab.
So
we
need
to
work
through
a
lot
more
details
on
that
process
before
ready
to
make
a
recommendation.
We
do
have
some
meetings
scheduled
internally
with
staff
to
try
to
make
some
make
some
more
decisions
on
that
before
we
come
to
the
committee
or
council
with
a
final,
no
recommendation
on
that
site.
A
J
K
Question
than
anything
very
good
question
on
the
first
one,
I
agree
with
you:
the
Sorting
equipment,
the
optical
sorter,
the
ibots
are
relatively
pricey
they're
in
a
half
million
seven
hundred
fifty
thousand
dollar
range.
If
funding
is
available,
we
can
certainly
move
forward
with
that
and
include
that
in
the
original
or
initial
purchase.
I
think
what
we
have
to
do
is
kind
of
take
a
step
back
and
look
at
the
project
in
its
entirety.
K
To
make
sure
we
have
funding
for
the
property
purchase
the
building
the
site,
work,
the
design
and
then
have
this
processing
equipment.
We
can
add
it
in
at
any
time.
So
this
gets
us
the
base
system.
If
funding
is
available
for
the
total
project
to
add
that
automated
equipment
I
would
absolutely
love
to
do
that.
K
Initially
too,
and
that's
a
very
good
point
about
Labor
everybody's
experiencing
that
everywhere,
you
know
trying
to
find
a
qualified
labor
and,
as
far
as
increases
most
of
this
I,
think
all
this
material
or
equipment
is
going
to
be
steel.
Steel
prices
have
increased
fairly
dramatically.
They
stabled
out
a
little
bit
recently,
but
we
just
want
to
try
to
move
forward
and
secure.
This
just
to
you
know,
make
sure
we
have
try
to
beat
inflation.
If
we
can.
A
A
K
K
That's
what
we're
hoping
to
negotiate
and
we
don't
have
a
contract.
Yet
we
want
to
present
this
to
committee
first
before
we've
reached
out
the
green
machine
and
and
talk
to
them.
So
what
we'd
like
to
do
is
get
approval
to
negotiate
reach
out
to
Green
Machine
we're
interested
in
your
product
they're
aware
of
the
current
status
of
the
Murph,
and
you
know
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
fluid
situation
and
we're
hoping
we
can
get
a
at
least
some
kind
of
commitment
from
them
to
secure
the
pricing.
A
K
E
E
E
E
So
this
next
item
is
the
Scott
Center
situation.
This
is
a
historic
issue
for
me,
as
accounting
administrator
and
probably
the
previous
County
administrators.
We
do
not
own
the
property
that
Scott
Center
sits
upon.
There
was
a
concession
stand
out
there
that
was
damaged
in
a
previous
storm.
The
folks
that
we
engage
with
on
the
Scott
Center
have
asked
for
that
concession
stand
to
be
removed.
We
have
scheduled
that
work.
Many
many
times
to
remove
the
concession
stand
only
to
be
told
hold
up.
E
We
don't
want
you
to
remove
it
until
the
county
commits
to
rebuilding
it.
We
have
a
lease
on
the
property
that
essentially
says
that
if
we
do
any
improvements
that
gives
us
the
right
to
do
the
improvements,
but
if
we
do
improvements
and
the
lease
goes
away,
then
those
are
improvements
remain
on
the
property
so,
and
we're
not
sure
at
this
point
that
the
lease
is
even
in
effect
on
the
property
at
this
point
so
I'm
here
before
you
all
today,
just
to
let
you
all
know
that
situation.
E
If
you
all
want
me
to
rebuild
a
concession,
stand
on
a
piece
of
property
that
we
do
not
own,
that
we
may
or
may
not
have
a
lease
on
I
am
happy
to
proceed
with
the
with
that
construction,
but
I'm
not
going
to
spend
money
on
property
that
we
do
not
own.
Without
you
all
weighing
in
on
and
telling
me
what
your
desire
would
be
as
a
County
Council,
it
would
be.
E
C
I
certainly
believe
we
have
to
a
have.
Our
County
attorneys
take
a
look
at
the
current
lease.
If
that
is
damaged
and
we
are
a
leasing,
a
damaged
piece
of
property
I,
don't
know
the
validity
of
the
lease
and
we
should
not
be
spending
taxpayer
dollars
on
improvements
to
property.
We
don't
own
or
may
never
own.
E
E
I
I
I
C
G
I
E
E
You
have
leases
all
the
time,
yeah
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
that
an
automatic
renewal
language
in
a
lease
like
that
is
sufficient,
without
without
new
councils
voting
to
do
the
extension
and
that
that's
I
think
that's
a
part
of
the
problem.
I,
don't
know
that
Council
has
ever
voted
to
renew
the
lease
since
2010.
I
They
got
you
now
at
the
same
time,
you
have
a
lease
and
I'm
assuming
that
there's
an
automatic
provision
in
there,
but
if
it's
not
most
leases
would
have
that
on
there.
If
or
you
may
have
at
least
to
say
that
if
either
party
desired
not
to
renew
it,
they
will
notify
the
the
the
other
person
that
this
is
not
going
to
be
renewed
or
we
do
not
desire.
Has
that
ever
occurred
from
either
party.
I
And
I
don't
think
I'm,
assuming
that
they
have
not
done
that
either.
No,
they
have
not
right
okay.
So
the
assumption
is
that
we
are
leasing
a
property
to
the
county.
The
county
has
a
lease
on
that
property.
Whether
it's
been
valid
or
not.
It's
just
a
matter
of
us
rectifying
that
at
this
time,
I
don't
think
that
Community
has
a
desire
to
not
renew
the
lease.
Okay,
I,
don't
think
so
now
I
may
be
wrong,
but
if
have
they
said
to
you
that
they
have
a
desire
not
to
renew.
E
I
E
I
E
E
Of
their
community,
no,
these
are
folks
that
I've
met
with
Mr
Miller
in
the
room.
Who's
basically
said
well,
if
the
county
is
not
going
to
do
what
we
want
to
do
on
the
property,
we
should
just
take
it
back
over
and
operate
it
ourselves
now.
These
are
folks
that
Mr
Miller
has
brought
to
to
meetings
with
me
yeah
and.
H
I
G
E
H
I
I
Why
don't
we
go
ahead
and
make
it
one
lease
to
move
forward
and
have
the
young
man
Social
Club
at
the
County
government,
come
up
into
an
agreement
with
Elise
nullify
the
rest
of
it
and
then
move
forward
because
I,
don't
think
yeah
I
think
the
community
is
in
wanting
to
take
on
the
recreation
maintenance
of
this
property.
But
at
the
same
time
the
facility
does
serve
a
purpose
for
recreation
for
the
county.
So.
A
That's
my
take
on
that
Mr
chairman.
Let
me
see
if
I
can
you
know,
does
this
fall
in
the
category
that
you
would
normally
be
able
to
approve
the
funding
at
your
level,
but
you
wanted
to
be
subject
to
the
resolution
of
the
lease
issues
and
if
those
two
things
happen,
it
seems
to
me
you
could
go
ahead.
E
What
I'm,
asking
what
I'm
asking
for
for
you
all
to
understand
is
that
we're
going
to
be
spending
public
money
on
property
that
we
have
a
lease
for.
The
terms
of
that
lease
is
that
whenever
we
build
whenever
we
do
improvements
on
the
property
that
the
improvements
stay
with
the
property.
So
on
one
hand,
we
can
do
what
we're
doing,
because
there's
a
public
benefit.
E
Unless
you
do
what
council
member
Glover
is
stating
and
require,
as
part
of
the
authorization
of
me
to
spend
the
seventeen
thousand
dollars,
that
you
require
a
renewal
and
a
long-term
lease
out
there
on
all
of
the
property,
so
that
it's
clear
going
forward
that
the
that
the
money
that
we're
investing
remains
available
for
the
community
use
and
the
community
good
for
an
extended
period
of
time
and
not
for
a
year
or
so
or
be
built
on
property
that
we
don't
have
a
lease
on.
Currently.