►
Description
AGENDA
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION OF THIS MEETING HAS BEEN PUBLISHED, POSTED, AND DISTRIBUTED IN
COMPLIANCE WITH THE SOUTH CAROLINA FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MARCH 21, 2022
6. CITIZEN COMMENTS - (ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK DURING THE CITIZEN COMMENT PORTION OF THE MEETING WILL LIMIT THEIR COMMENTS TO NO LONGER THAN THREE (3) MINUTES (A TOTAL OF 15 MINUTES) AND WILL ADDRESS COUNCIL IN A RESPECTFUL MANNER APPROPRIATE TO THE DECORUM OF THE MEETING, REFRAINING FROM THE USE OF PROFANE, ABUSIVE, OR OBSCENE LANGUAGE)
7. ASSISTANT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT
AGENDA ITEMS
8. RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO AWARD FOR THE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ROOF REPLACEMENT (FISCAL IMPACT: C.E. BOURNE & CO., INC., AN OMNIA PARTNERS CONTRACT HAS PROPOSED A COST OF $1,299,912.00. THE FUNDING SOURCE FOR THIS PROJECT IS ACCOUNT NUMBER 40110011-54422.)
9. RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO AWARD IBF# 013122 H.E. TRASK BOAT LANDING REPAIRS ($288,609.00.)
10. RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO AWARD IFB #021122 DETENTION CENTER COOLER/FREEZER REPLACEMENT($229,840.00.)
Public Facilities Committee Agenda – Beaufort County, SC
11. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT THE 2022 PALMETTO PRIDE LITTER
ENFORCEMENT GRANT AWARD ($3,200.)
12. DISCUSSION OF AN ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE LIMITED WORK ON PRIVATE ROADS.
13. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT GRANT FUNDING AVAILABLE THROUGH THE SOUTH CAROLINA AERONAUTICS COMMISSION FOR BEAUFORT EXECUTIVE AIRPORT EMERGENCY GENERATOR. (FISCAL IMPACT: THIS IS A 60% REIMBURSEMENT GRANT. THE AIRPORT HAS ALREADY PAID THE INVOICE FOR THE GENERATOR WORK SO THERE ARE NO NEW FINANCIAL IMPACTS.)
14. RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO DESIGNATE FINANCIAL BENEFICIARY OF THE BEAUFORT EXECUTIVE AIRPORT (ARW) FLYING FROG 5K RACE HELD ON OCTOBER 22, 2022, TO THE ALTITUDE ACADEMY.
15. UPDATE ON SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING
16. RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO ALLOCATE 2018 ONE-CENT SALES TAX ADDITIONAL REVENUE TO THE SIDEWALKS AND MULTI-USE PATHWAYS PROGRAM. (FISCAL IMPACT: ADDITIONAL REVENUE AMOUNT TOTALING $15,994,638.30.)
17. UPDATE ON HIGHWAY 278
18. CHAIRMAN'S WRAPUP
19. ADJOURNMENT
TO WATCH COMMITTEE OR COUNTY COUNCIL MEETINGS OR FOR A COMPLETE LIST OF AGENDAS AND
BACKUP PACKAGES, PLEASE VISIT:
https://beaufortcountysc.gov/council/council-committee-meetings/index.htm
A
County
public
facilities
committee
monday
april,
the
18th-
please
join
me
for
the
pledge
of
allegiance.
I
pledge
allegiance
to
the
flag
of
the
united
states
of
america
and
to
the
republic
for
which
it
stands.
One
nation,
under
god
indivisible
with
liberty
and
justice
for
all,
well
welcome
everybody!
A
A
C
C
A
A
Well,
we'll
just
get
that
done
and
jared
is.
He
said
he
was
on
spring
break,
so
we're
we'll
have
a
couple
of
comments
as
we
get
to
the
end
that
relate
to
some
of
the
stuff
that
he
might
have
talked
to
so
anyway.
That
brings
us
to
start
the
agenda
items
and
I'm
going
to
take
items.
Eight,
nine
and
ten
together
we
but
talk
about
all
three.
These
are
three
three
contracts.
One
is
for
the
roof
replacement
of
the
administration.
A
F
F
D
D
H
Good
afternoon,
chairman
just
real
quick,
the
he
boat
trask
of
atlantic
repairs.
This
is
for
the
landing
that's
out
there
on
bluffton
and
near
colton,
river
plantation,
the
boat
landing,
basically
sheared
off
the
pile
guides
of
several
months
back
and
we're
looking
to
replace
it
and
put
back
in
the
floating
component.
D
And
the
final
action
item
is
the
recommendation
to
replace
the
detention
center
cooler.
Freezer
bid
was
solicited,
two
proposals
came
in
the
low
bid
from
low
country.
Refrigeration
was
disqualified,
they
did
not
have
a
bid
bond,
so
the
recommendation
is
to
make
the
contract
award
to
coastal
air
technologies
in
the
amount
of
229
thousand
eight
hundred
and
forty
dollars.
Okay
and.
D
I
F
F
F
A
J
I
I
don't
think
the
detention
center
was
included
in
that,
but
the
administration
building
and
the
courthouse
building
all
that
money
went
to
the
redesign
and
re
rebuilding
the
courthouse
building,
so
that
left
the
administration
building
to
suffer
through
for
a
number
of
years,
and
it's
time
now
it
really
is-
has
to
do,
and
so
with
that
in
mind,
sir
I'll
make
a
motion
for
all
three
of
these
great.
Thank
you
in
a
second.
A
K
Speaking
of
boat
landing
neil,
you
and
I
had
a
discussion
several
weeks
ago
about
a
situation
we
had
with
the
harry
tubman
bridge,
landing
there
at
columbia
river,
and
there
was
some
debris
blocking
one
of
the
lanes
of
the
boat
launching
into
the
water.
I
went
down
there.
I
think
it
was
friday
of
last
week
and
it
is
gathered
back
up
again
and
so
at
your
earliest
convenience.
A
A
D
A
F
F
Many
of
those
roads
are
impossible
for
our
emergency
equipment
to
get
down
ambulances,
fire
trucks-
things
like
that.
So
this
policy
that
neil
and
kurt
taylor
have
worked
on
and
I'm
going
to
let
neil
walk
through
the
details
of
it
is
something
that
we
need
you
all
to
consider
as
whether
or
not
you
all
want
to
authorize
the
county
to
do
work
on
private
property,
county
administration.
F
You
know
we
we
take
no
position
one
way
or
the
other.
I
do
feel
compelled
to
tell
you
all
that
this
would
be
a
one-time
obligation
by
the
county
on
individual
private
roads,
but
I'm
not
really
sure
how
effective
we
can
say
that
on
paper,
but
when
it
comes
to
life
safety,
public
safety
issues,
if
the
road
is
private
and
hasn't
been
maintained
by
private
property
owners,
then
you
know,
I
don't
know
how
successful
we
could
be
long-term
telling
folks.
F
H
The
response
back
was
from
about
18
other
public
works
department.
That
provided
me
some
comments.
In
addition,
brittany,
ward
also
reached
out
to
her
counterparts
and
colleagues
throughout
the
state,
and
she
received
that
information
as
well
with
that
kurt,
and
I
basically
curt
compiled
the
agreement
that
we
have
that's
before
you
about
the
one-time
maintenance.
H
H
G
Yes,
sir,
mr
chairman,
I'll
first
start
off
by
saying
this
is
a
close
question.
There
is
a
prohibition
in
state
law
against
using
public
funds
and
private
property.
However,
what
we
have
done
in
the
ordinance
that
we
set
up
here,
is
it
it's
a
bifurcated
concept?
One
is
in
one
part
of
the
ordinance
is
after
natural
disasters
allowing
us
as
a
county
and
or
any
contractors.
We
have
to
go
on
private
property
to
make
roads
passable,
put
debris
on
private
property
order
to
otherwise
make
roads
passable
after
a
storm.
For
example.
G
Second
part
is
the
one-time
approach
to
going
to
private
property
to
make
it
accessible
to
public
safety.
So
what
we've
done
here
is
we
think
we've
gone
as
far
as
we
possibly
can
to
make
an
ordinance,
that's
enforceable
under
that
prohibition
against
using
public
property,
public
public
funds
on
private
property.
It
does
mirror
the
language
from
several
other
counties
in
the
state
that
have
county
attorneys
that,
without
respect
greatly,
I'm
not
telling
you
that
this
could
be
unassailable,
but
I'm
telling
you
that
we've
done
the
best
job
we
can.
L
I
I
H
F
We
just
so
just
so
council's
aware.
We
have
at
least
one
situation
in
the
county
out
in
the
council
member
glover's
district
that
we
cannot
get
an
ambulance
down
that
road.
If
and
there's
an
elderly
person
lives
on
that
road.
So
if
there's
a
need
for
an
ambulance,
we
have
to
instruct
that
family
that
they
have
to
get
that
person
to
the
end
of
that
road
in
order
to
be
transported
into
the
ambulance
yeah.
K
I
I've
had
similar
situations
in
my
district
as
well
to
the
point
where
ems
was
called
and
upon
ems
trying
to
get
to
the
resident
either
they
got
stuck
on.
They
got
to
the
point
where
they
couldn't
go
any
further
and
made
the
determination
that
it
was
ill-advised
to
venture
down
the
road
any
further.
This
this
ordinance
drafted
mirrors
the
intent
of
former
and
past
administrator
cubic
under
under
cubic's
administration.
K
As
far
as
having
to
deal
with
the
frustration
and
the
legalities
and
all
all
that
that
comes
with
our
citizens
saying
well,
you
know
we
pay
taxes
too,
but
we're
not
getting
any
service.
Even
though
it
is
a
private
road,
so
so
I
I,
I
would
encourage
us
to
support
this
just
to
support
the
rural
communities
with
the
adverse
situations
dealing
with
private
roads,
doing
adverse
conditions.
K
M
Mark
I
I
actually
have
a
problem
with
us
spending
public
money
on
private
roads.
Again
you
look
at
taxpayers,
then
we're
paying
to
to
to
to
take
care
of
a
private
road,
because
when
you
read
this
ordinance
it
doesn't
talk
about
who
owns
the
property?
You
could
have
a
large
property
owner
that
wants
his
road
fixed
compared
to
what
what
again
the
circumstances
that
that
mr
glover
and
mr
dawson
are
mentioning.
M
I
think
there
needs
to
be
some
way
that
that
it's
under
some
type
of
as
needed
basis
there
they
apply
for
it
and
there's
money
set.
If
we're
going
to
do
this
as
opposed
to
having
just
a
blanket
ordinance
that
says
we're
gonna
go
in
one
time
and
and
what
happens
you
know
later
on
five
years
from
now?
The
one
time
is
up
and
he's
done
again,
so
you
know
what's
the
limit,
so
is
it
never?
Is
it
sometimes?
M
M
A
L
L
We
could
use
that
as
a
benchmark
in
helping
a
particular
interest,
because
it's
all
it's
private
road
is
all
some
of
it
is
air's
property.
Some
of
it
is
actually
owned
by
individuals,
but
you
know
when
you
have
in
this
case
here
with
tecumseh
lane,
the
people,
the
owners
of
the
front
part,
doesn't
even
live
there,
so
don't
use
that
they
don't
have
access.
L
L
So
I
don't
know
whether
they
answer
your
question
or
not,
but
you
know,
I
think
we
can
put
stipulations
in
there
so
that
we
can
make
sure
that
it's
not
one
or
two
property
owners
who
owns
that
road
and
stuff,
whether
it's
community
that
actually
it
will
be
benefiting
from
the
services
and
stuff
so
just
want
to
throw
that
out.
Thank.
K
You
we
need,
we
need
an
ordinance
of
this
type,
regardless
of
the
tweaking
that
we
do
with
it.
The
administration
needs
some
help
and
guidance
and
how
to
deal
with
situations
like
this.
Last
year
we
had
a
windstorm
that
came
through
and
we
had
a
tree
that
fell
on
rams,
rambling
roads
in
my
in
my
district.
K
Those
folks
were
trapped
in
their
houses
and
in
their
road
couldn't
get
out
to
even
go
to
work.
Let
alone
get
emergency
vehicles
in
for
two
days,
because
the
administration
was
grappling
with
well,
it's
a
private
road
and
we
can't
spend
public
dollars
on
private
road,
and
so
I
I
wouldn't
want
to
see
us.
The
council
put
the
administration
in
that
predicament
again
to
where
they
got
to
make
a
judgment,
call
of
not
assisting
folks
that
live
on
on
the
private
road
in
an
emergency
situation
where
they
actually
need
desperate
help.
I
I
I
You
know
public
dollars
being
spent
on
a
private
road,
and
I
know
that
may
be
a
difficult
thing
to
do
so
that
might
be
something
else
that
we
have
to
do
like.
I
said
somebody's
going
to
make
a
decision
that
yeah
you're
right.
This
is
a
problem.
We
can't
get
a
fire
truck
or
an
emergency
vehicle
down
there,
somebody's
going
to
generate
that
request.
A
C
F
If
that
makes
sense
now
you
know
people
failing
to
maintain
their
property
and
a
tree
falls
over
because
they
let
it
die
or
whatever
that's
a
different
situation.
But
if
it's
a
wind
event
or
something
like
that,
I'd
like
a
little
more
flexibility
built
into
for
our
public
works
crews.
I
don't
want
to
be
responding
to
every
private
property
private
road
issue,
but
I
do
think
there's
some
more
flexibility.
We
can
build
into
this
and
still
maintain
the
integrity
of
what
we
do.
F
A
N
Sure
good
afternoon,
and
thanks
for
accommodating
me
remotely
today
from
hilton
head
island,
as
we
finish
up
getting
all
the
airplanes
out
of
here
for
the
busy
rbc
heritage
weekend.
It
was
a
good
weekend
and
we're
always
happy
to
see
everybody
arrive
and
leave
their
money
behind
when
they
come
all
right.
So
the
two
things
we
have
today,
I
think,
are
fairly
straightforward.
N
The
first
is
just
we've
got
a
resolution
in
there
that
needs
to
be
approved
so
that
we
can
accept
some
grant
money
from
state
aeronautics
and
that
is
actually
to
pay
their
their
pledged
portion
of
a
project
that
we've
already
finished
and
our
portion
has
already
been
paid
for,
so
all
we
need
to
do
is
accept
their
money.
At
this
point,.
N
N
The
only
way
to
complete
these
models
to
the
series
is
to
run
our
race
at
the
end,
so
we
anticipate
a
pretty
solid
attendance
at
our
race,
which
is
towards
the
end
of
october
and
the
22nd
of
october,
and
with
that
happening,
we've
run
the
race
twice
out.
There,
we've
covered
our
expenses
and
everything
and
been
able
to
have
a
little
bit
of
seed
money
for
the
next
year,
but
we
see
as
the
numbers
grow
and
the
excitement
grows
that
we're
probably
going
to
have.
N
You
know
more
revenue
than
we
would
necessarily
need
to
cover
expenses
and
then
cover
some
seed
money,
and
we
got
to
thinking
of
what
you
know.
What
would
be
a
responsible
way
to
to
deal
with
that
money?
Maybe
you
know
share
some
of
the
benefits,
and
ideally
our
airport
teams
that
event
like
this
on
an
airport
ought
to
go
to
support
some
kind
of
aviation
related
activity.
N
Ideally
something
with
youth
and
ideally
something
with
youth.
Who
are,
you
know,
pursuing
a
technical
and
aviation
based
education
or
exploration,
type
activity
and
lo
and
behold
fairly
recently,
the
altitude
academy
which
is
based
on
say,
helena
island
came
to
us
because
one
of
their
officers
works
part
of
his
time
at
our
airport
and
then
part
of
his
time
down
at
savannah.
He
used
an
airplane,
a
mechanic,
an
avionics
technician
and
has
sign-off
authorities
a
pretty
talented
individual
and
he
started
with
a
group
of
other
folks.
A
L
A
D
This
is
specifically
for
a
capital
projects
related
project,
solid
waste
recycling,
happy
to
report
we're
moving
forward
to
build
a
material
recovery
facility.
Murph
is
the
acronym
mrf
in
bluffton
on
county-owned
property
on
bentonfield
road.
It's
about
a
four
acre
parcel,
just
off
alma
road.
Next
to
palmetto,
breeze
and
parks
and
rec
important
to
note
the
murph
will
accept
and
process
only
recyclable
materials.
No
trash
will
be
brought
to
this
facility.
D
The
murph
will
be
about
a
22,
000
square
foot,
building
with
sorting
and
baling
equipment,
and
it's
basically
going
to
to
bail
the
recyclables
and
get
them
ready
to
send
to
the
various
markets.
Our
goal
is
to
be
operational
by
august
1st
of
next
year,
2023
that
coincides
with
the
expiration
of
the
waste
management
contract.
D
So
we
have
two
rfps
we're
going
to
be
issuing.
One
is
out
now
we
have
an
rfp
out
for
architectural
engineering
services
to
design
and
permit
the
building.
Those
proposals
are
due
may
3rd
and
we're
going
to
have
another
rfp
is
going
to
be
issued
this
week
for
the
processing
equipment
and
those
proposals
are
due.
May.
E
D
Initially,
no,
oh,
hopefully
in
the
very
near
future,
the
answer
will
be
a
resounding
yes.
Initially
we're
just
going
to
be
accepting
materials
from
our
centers,
so
they're
going
to
be
the
source
separated
materials,
we're
going
to
bring
them
in
we're
going
to
make
sure
we
work
through
all
the
kinks,
get
everything
going
and
then,
hopefully,
in
the
very,
very
near
future,
we'll
reach
out
to
municipalities
to
get
their
single
stream.
D
F
D
F
C
D
C
C
I
D
Correct
exactly
right:
now
all
the
residents
are
putting
their
recyclables
source
separating
recyclables
at
the
convenience
centers.
Those
materials
are
being
hauled
by
waste
management
to
their
facility,
so
starting,
hopefully
august
the
next
year,
we'll
have
a
contract
which,
with
a
hauler
which
will
bring
the
materials
to
our
facility
and
we'll
be
able
to
process
that
okay.
J
K
D
Limited
on
this
site,
this
site's
only
about
four
acres,
so
this
will
be
a
22
000
square
foot
facility.
That's
about
the
biggest
we
can
build
on
this
site.
There
is
a
two
acre
parcel
next
to
it,
owned
by
ulmer
that
you
know
we
may
be
able
to
acquire,
but
I
think
it's
important
that
we
continue
to
look
for
other
sites
where
we
can
do
something
on
a
bigger
scale,
but
this
is
this
is
something
that's
available
to
us
right
away.
D
The
equipment
is
relatively
portable,
we'll
be
putting
a
baler
sorting
line
in
there.
If
there's
a
need,
an
opportunity
that
we
find
in
another
spot.
You
know
year,
two
years,
three
years
down
the
road,
we
could
pick
that
equipment
up,
move
it
someplace
else
and
that
building
could
still
see
honestly
and
be
reused.
D
M
E
D
So
the
the
sorting
line
is
just
conveyor,
so
no
noise
from
that
the
bailing
equipment
very
little
noise.
So
it's
basically
just
going
to
be
the
rolling
stock.
Skid
steer,
forklift,
backup,
alarms
and
that's
about
it
and
the
volume
of
traffic
will
not
be
that
large.
It's
just
going
to
be
bringing
in
recycled
materials,
they
said
no
trash,
so
there
won't
be
a
large
impact
with
truck
traffic.
M
You
know,
obviously,
you
drive
around
now
and
I've
got
four
or
five
different
ones
that
are
in
my
neighborhood,
and
I
sometimes
wonder
if
those
recyclables
are
really
being
recycled.
I
see
them
going
into
some
of
the
same
dump
trucks
that
pick
up
the
regular
trash.
So
how
is
that?
How
does
that
work?
Or
what's
going
to
happen
with
that,
to
get
people
to
bring
that
to
the
recycling
centers
and.
D
That's
that's
absolutely
the
key
right
now.
I
can't
answer
the
question
or
those
recyclables
that
are
being
picked
up.
You
know
what
is
happening
with
those
and
that's
why
we
want
to
create
this
murph
or
recycling.
So
we
know
once
the
materials
come
in,
they
will
be
recycled,
they
will
be
sent
to
the
market,
so
the
key
is
controlling
the
materials
and
that's
what
we're
going
to
be
able
to
do.
Those
are
going
to
have
to
be
controlled
either
working
with
various
municipalities
or
with
individual
contracts.
D
So
the
gated
communities
we
could
work
with
the
gated
communities.
Typically,
they
have
a
single
hauler.
They
bring
your
materials
to
us
and
work
through
that
individually
in
contracts,
the
municipalities
they
have
a
single
haul
or
two
other
than
hilton
head.
Have
a
single
holder
pick
up
all
the
municipalities.
We
could
easily
work
with
them
that
you
know
bring
everything
to
us
so
that
that's
the
key
absolute
case
of
control.
L
You
know
I
I've
been
working
with
you
ever
since
I
came
on
council
and
to
me
this
is
a
start
in
the
right
direction
for
this
county
to
actually
take
control
of
solid
waste,
and
I
commend
you
and
your
staff
will
bring
us
in
this
direction.
I
think
we'll
we
have
some
other
hurdles
to
cross.
However,
I'm
looking
forward
to
it
what
you're
doing
there
to
be
extended
in
other
places,
particularly
in
singapore,
because
I
see
it
as
a
mini
transfer
station,
but
you
know
for
for
for.
E
L
G
L
With
us
solid
waste,
we
got
a
product
that
we
can
actually
believe
it
or
not.
It's
an
asset
and
that's
how
we
should
treat
it
and
we
can
actually
make
money
off
for
solid
waste,
and
I
think
we
need
to
take
every
opportunity
to
welcome
solid
waste
in
this
county
because
we
can
make
money.
I
make
that
statement.
Thank.
D
I
Yeah
and-
and
I
would
echo
what
he's
saying
we
in
the
long
run-
we
need
a
piece
of
property
that
is
going
to
allow
us
to
do
as
much
recycling
as
we
possibly
can
for
all
kinds
of
waste.
Whether
it
is
tires
batteries,
electronics
paint,
you
name
it.
If
we
have
it
on
a
site
that
we
control
the
volume,
that's
there,
we
can
reduce
our
costs
of
getting
rid
of
it.
D
D
D
A
I
want
to
thank
you
for
and
commend
you
all
for
what
you're
doing
just
two
comments
on
it.
One
is,
as
you
all
have
taught
me,
is
one
of
the
whole
keys
to
this
whole
thing
is
called
waste
con
or
flow
control.
So,
as
you
get
your
hands
around
it,
you
can
do
an
awful
lot
of
things.
If
it's
piecemeal,
you
can't
do
it
and,
secondly,
there's
always
been
the
incentive
in
there
how
widely
it
might
be
abused.
A
D
A
I
A
B
Today
we
have
before
you
an
ordinance
to
reallocate
the
additional
funds
that
we
collected
through
the
sales
tax
program
to
the
sideways
and
multi-use
pathways,
as
you
know
that
category
had
24
pathways
and
only
10
million
dollars.
So
this
will
allow
us
to
complete
the
14
priority
that
you
set
forward
in
resolution
back
in
2019..
B
J
J
B
J
M
B
The
ones
that
we
are
currently
working
on
is
all
joy,
road,
bluffton,
parkway
depot
road,
dr
martin
luther
king,
jr,
middle
road,
rebo,
road,
salem,
road
and
stewart
point.
The
ones
that
we
would
proceed
with
with
the
remainder
of
the
funds
is
big
estate,
road,
broad
river
boulevard,
riley
road,
broad
river
drive
pathway,
burton
hill,
road,
meridian,
road
old,
salem
road,
chad,
avenue
and
ulmer,
and
that
would
be
through
design
and
construction.
L
K
A
I
guess
I
would
just
add
my
comments.
I
I
I
do
think
we
ought
to
prove
this
and
send
it
on
to
council
and
debate
it.
Essentially.
What
we
have
here
is
a
16
million
dollar
over
collection
on
the
referendum
because
of
the
way
to
go
to
the
end
of
a
end
of
a
quarter,
and
so
the
money
has
to
be
used
for
either
the
pathways
the
ladies
island
piece
or
for
the
278
corridor
and
all
three
of
them
you
know,
need
some
money.
A
I've
always
believed
that
the
pathways
are
a
good
one
to
do,
because
we
kind
of
over
promised
in
the
referendum,
and
I
think,
if,
if
we
do
another
referendum,
it'd
be
good
to
have
many
of
those
approved
and
underway.
Secondly,
I
don't
I'm
not
as
up-to-date
as
I
should
be
on
the
ladies
island
one,
but
I
think
we
raised
30
million
for
that,
and
the
last
number
I've
heard
is
that
we
probably
really
need
something
like
sixty.
C
A
And
on
the
278
piece,
I
think
conventional
wisdom
is
that
they're,
with
the
amount
of
inflation
that
we're
seeing
there's
going
to
be
some
tremendous
pressure
there,
plus
some
of
the
smaller
projects
that
were
recommended
by
the
town
might
need
some
nominal
amounts.
So
I
think
it'd
be
an
interesting
debate.
Personally,
I
I
would
think
that
there
ought
to
be
some
way
to
split
it
up
between
the
three
and
and
and
do
well
as
opposed
to
putting
it
all
in
one.
But
I
think
that's
something
for
us
debate
from
a
political
standpoint,
so.
K
If,
if
I
might
comment,
I
I
take
exception
to
your
suggestion
that
we
consider
the
debate
of
spending
some
of
this
surplus
on
278.,
the
bridges
and
the
the
construction
on
sinhelna
took
up
the
bulk
of
the
monies
and
the
onsen
sales
tax,
2018,
one
cent
sale
tax,
and
so
these
pathways
and
and
these
pathways
that
we
promise
our
citizens
there
was
24
of
them.
Initially,
we
only
went
back
and
told
them
we
could
only
do.
I
was
eight
or
ten.
K
We
went
to
looking
at
our
numbers
and
and
so
that
infuriated
a
lot
of
the
citizens
of
the
fact
that
we
pride
with
that.
We
gathered
24,
but
we
could
only
do
14.
And
so
now
that
we've
got
this
surplus
money.
We
need
to
designate
that
surplus
to
the
sidewalks,
or
else
we're
going
to
put
ourselves
in
a
position
and
a
predicament
where
it's
going
to
be
hard
to
convince
many
people
in
this
county
to
support
another
referendum
of
any
source.
C
Well,
I
I
agree
with
councilman
dawson.
Some
of
these
projects
may
need
a
re-look
and
some
public
input
and
it
may
reduce
the
initial
estimates
form,
but
we've
got
to
get
some
public
input
on
the
rest
of
them
and
it
all
I
agree
with
you.
It
all
needs
to
go
where
we
promised
it
would
go
or
we'll
never.
It
will
have
we'll
lose
credibility
on
future.
A
B
A
E
A
That's
exactly
what
he
said.
We
should
do
right
thanks.
Thank
you,
yeah,
okay,
objections.
Seeing
no
objections.
This
is
approved,
move
on
to
counsel
for
first
reading.
The
next
and
last
item
is
really
on
on
on
278
and
just
as
back
up
been
a
lot
of
activity
meetings,
discussions
and
I
believe,
there's
one
next
thursday,
which
is
a
workshop.
A
And
yes
and
hilton
heads
invited
to
be
here,
yes,
and
hopefully
we
can
bring
some
of
this
stuff
to
a
conclusion.
What
I
thought
might
be
useful
today
was
just
give
you
an
update
on
my
take
of
where
these
various
recommendations
are,
and
you
may
remember,
there
was
a
land
planning
x,
company
called
mksk
that
was
retained
to
look
at
the
work
that
dot
was
doing
and
to
bring
forward
their
recommendations.
A
They
did
that
town
has
been
through
it
and
they
came.
There
was
26
recommendations
that
are
before
us.
If
you
can
go
to
the
second
page,
okay,
it
may
be
a
little
hard
to
read,
but
we
can
send
you
a
copy
later.
If
we
need
one
alice,
you
have
this
check
out
one
yeah
yep,
so
I
won't
go
through
all
these,
but
it
appears
to
me
that
about
16
of
these
are
pretty
much
totally
resolved.
A
I
think
what
dot
came
up
with
was
a
pretty
good
transportation
solution,
very
professional.
At
the
end
of
the
day,
I
think
the
mksk
exercise
identified
a
couple
things
that
would
would
be
useful
in
dialoguing
with
d.o.t.
Those
comments
were
incorporated,
which
I
think
enhanced
the
transportation
solution.
A
couple
of
those
were
the
reduced
speed
limit
number
11
up
there,
the
eliminating
the
third
intersection.
It
was
very
controversial
on
old,
wild
horse
elimination
of
the
u-turns
in
in
stoney.
So,
in
my
mind,
those
ones
are
are
pretty
much
done.
A
A
One
of
the
recommendations
which
was
number
12
in
the
upper
right-hand
corner
was
to
evaluate
all
of
the
island-wide
roads,
and
that
needs
to
be
done
from
time
to
time
regardless,
and
I
think
that's
would
be
in
the
long.
It's
in
the
long-range
plans
of
the
so-called
lats
and
in
in
what
the
town
is
doing.
There
were
two
recommendations
in
there
in
the
lower
right-hand
corner,
which
were
to
create
a
gulligici
cultural
center
and
number
24
to
create
a
heritage
visitors
center.
A
A
couple
of
us
have
started
to
have
some
conversations
about
whether
that
concept
could
actually
grow
into
a
a
if
you
will
a
galagachi
national
corridor
visitor
center
and
the
history
on
that
is
that
the
years
ago,
a
national
corridor
within
the
national
park
service
was
created.
That
extends
from
north
carolina
to
northern
florida
narrow
along
the
coast,
which
honors
the
golegi
nation,
and
it's
never
really
had
a
visitor
center
from
what
I
can
tell
at
least
a
national
one.
A
And
so
it
strikes
me
that,
since
beaufort
county
is
right
in
the
dead
center
middle
of
that
corridor,
that,
whether
we
did
it
in
buford
or
on
hilton,
head
or
bluffton
that
it
might
lend
itself
to
that
kind
of
an
activity
which
would
basically
build
on
the
things
that
were
recommendations
coming
out
of
this.
So
that's
a
subject
for
another
day,
but
I
think
it's
one
that's
worth
us
looking
at
on
the
left
hand
side,
as
I
think
about
this-
and
I
learned
this
from
eric
we're
in
the
middle
of
completing.
A
What's
called
the
environmental
assessment
and
it's
you
know
it
requires
national
approval.
It
goes
through
a
long
process,
and
really
the
key
to
it
at
this
point
in
time
is
that
it
is
establishing
the
footprint
for
the
quarter
and
it
basically
affects
the
stony-
and,
I
think,
probably
the
jenkins
island
piece.
A
It
doesn't
doesn't
affect
the
bridge
piece
which
is
which
is
separate,
but
so
the
the
key
is
to
make
sure
we
don't
muddy
up
that
process
and
that
that
gets
done
in
a
timely
manner,
because
that
could
start
to
do
rail
things
like
funding
and
things
like
that.
So
but
then,
once
that
is
done,
there
is
room
to
to
do
modifications
within
that
that
corridor,
and
I
think
sometimes
people
get
hung
up
on
things
that
could
be
done
downstream,
ought
to
be
be
resolved
now.
A
One
is
the
arrival
experience
and
the
I
think
there's
some
some
concern
about
whether
it
looks
too
much
like
just
a
regular
interstate
highway
or
whether
it's
something
that's
going
to
serve
as
a
gateway
to
for
a
arrival
of
all
of
our
folks
and
there's
three
things
that
fall
in
there.
One
is
just
improving
it
in
general.
Secondly,
there's
the
one
about
whether
there's
two
bridges
and
thirdly,
there
would
be
one
about
whether
we
could
design
a
better
bridge
now,
relative
to
the
two
bridges
you
may
remember.
A
We
talked
about
that
at
council.
I
think
back
in
the
february
time
frame,
there
was
concern
about
whether
it
would
infringe
on
the
environmental
approvals
and,
secondly,
whether
it
would
it
would
cost
and
the
cost
is
on
the
order
of
30
million
dollars
from
all
practical
purposes
and
there's
some
folks
who
don't
are
not
convinced
that
that
it
would
actually
look
better
because
from
a
distance
it
would
make
it
look
wider.
A
A
The
other
piece
in
the
lower
left
would
be
the
value
engineering
piece
and
by
federal
law.
There
is
a
what's
called
a
value.
Engineering
phase
that
that
takes
place
before
the
project
is
finished
happens.
I
think
during
the
design
phase
and
there's
a
couple
things
that
were
recommended
there
that
could
be
considered
at
that
time.
A
I
think
when
we
get
you
know
my
thought,
joe
on
the
meeting
on
thursday
is
that
with
such
a
small
number
of
potential
ones
to
talk
about
it
almost
comes
down
to
that
the
town
needs
to
make
a
case
for
any
of
the
ones
that
that
they
think
need
to
be
done
and
aren't
being
fully
considered,
and
I'm
guessing
there's
three
four
or
five
at
the
most
for
that
discussion.
Yeah.
F
F
K
F
Who
has
done
all
the
public
engagement
on
the
project
so
that
questions
can
be
in
a
group
and
answered
in
a
group
so
that
everyone,
both
the
county
and
the
town
councils,
can
hear
those
answers
from
those
folks.
A
lot
of
work
has
been
done
leading
up
to
this,
and
I
don't
think
we've
had
an
opportunity
to
hear
thoroughly
from
those
professionals
in
order
to
make
sure
that
everybody
has
the
same
information
and
that's
why
we
keep
getting
these
requests
for
additional
studies
and
additional
due
diligence.
F
So
those
items
you
can
take
those
if
you
take
the
gateway
arrival
experience
the
bridge
issue,
14
and
18.
number
three,
the
very,
very
the
median
widths
and
the
increased
trail
width
on
the
bridge.
All
of
those
have
already
been
are
being
planned
for
okay,
good,
all
right
all
right,
one
last
top
five
items,
not
all
of
which
can
be,
can
be
solved.
A
Anyway,
I
think
it'll
be
good
discussion.
I'm
always
optimistic
that
we'll
come
out
with
a
good
conclusion.
One
last
comment
from
my
perspective
as
we
wrap
up,
I
looked
at
the
draft
report
that
latz
is
doing
for
the
long
range
roads
that
we
need
over
the
next,
whatever
it
is
25
years,
and
there
were
two
things
that
jumped
out
at
me.
A
One
was
that
there
was
about,
I
think,
40
million,
that
was
targeted
in
the
immediate
area
of
the
roads
going
through
stony,
including
potentially
parallel
access,
roads
and
then
some
of
the
other
roads
that
handle
traffic
off
of
there,
and
we
need
to
make
sure
that
whatever
lats
is
doing
needs
to
be
coordinated
with
what
we're
doing
with
the
the
project
in
in
some
form,
it's
been
the
other
one
that
was
kind
of
the
278
project
or
the
referendum
project.
The
278
project.
F
Yeah
again,
we
can't
we
have
to
be
careful.
I
know
about
adding
things
or
doing
things
outside
of
the
278
project
that
may
lead
the
fed's
federal
highway
administration
into
thinking
that
we're
doing
something
that's
going
to
impair
the
cultural
protected
community
aspect
of
stony.
So
we
got
to
be
real,
careful
about
that.
So
to
the
extent
to
where
we
can
coordinate
those
stuffs
without
reaching
that,
that's
what
we're
doing.
A
And
and-
and
we
really
shouldn't
have
two
things
that
look
like
they're
in
conflict
because
of
if
flats
is
telling
us,
we
need
to
do
one
thing
and
it's
inconsistent
with
the
protecting
the
stony
area.
We
have
to
make
sure
that
those
two
get
coordinated,
but
that's
easy
to
do
the
other.
One
is
kind
of
interesting
to
me.
We've
had
conversation
about
170
over
time
and
jared's
done
some
very
creative
work
on
this.
A
But
essentially,
if
you
look
at
170,
it's
the
most,
probably
the
most
failing
road
that
we
have
and
the
concept
of
adding
argent
and
278
to
form.
That
triangle
makes
a
lot
of
sense,
and
so
there
were
eight
different
projects
in
the
long
range
plan
that
total
up
to
a
quarter
of
a
billion
dollars
in
there
and
leave
it
to
jared
and
people
like
craig
gordon
to
work
on
yourself.
A
But
it
does
seem
to
me
if
they're,
putting
together
their
plan,
it
lends
itself
to
look
at
those
eight
projects
that
are
all
interconnected
and
and
maybe
there's
a
better
way
to
put
those
into
the
long
range
plan.
So
it's
all
tied
together
because,
even
though
those
pieces
could
be
fixed
as
we
go
forward,
it's
always
better
to
have
a
plan,
that's
logical
as
we
go
forward
so
anyway,
I
see
the
hour
is
upon
us,
so
all
business
having
been
concluded.
We
stand
adjourned
and
chairman.
You
want
a
couple
minutes
before
council.