►
From YouTube: Town of Bluffton Planning Commission 6PM
Description
.
Planning Commission
Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 6:00 PM
Theodore D. Washington Municipal Building, 20 Bridge Street, Henry “Emmett” McCracken Jr.
Council Chambers
AGENDA
This meeting can be viewed live on Beaufort County Channel, on Hargray Channel 9 and 113 or on
Spectrum Channel 1304.
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. NOTICE REGARDING ADJOURNMENT
The Planning Commission will not hear new items after 9:30 p.m. unless authorized by a majority
vote of the Commission Members present. Items which have not been heard before 9:30 p.m. may
be continued to the next regular meeting or a special meeting date as determined by the
Commission Members.
IV. NOTICE REGARDING PUBLIC COMMENTS*
Every member of the public who is recognized to speak shall address the Chairman and in speaking, avoid disrespect to Commission, Staff, or other members of the Meeting. State your name and address when speaking for the record. COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES.
V. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA
VI. ADOPTION OF MINUTES
1. March 23, 2022 Minutes
VII. PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA*
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
IX. NEW BUSINESS
1. Unified Development Ordinance Amendments (Public Hearing) - Amendments to the Town of Bluffton's Code of Ordinances, Chapter 23 - Unified Development Ordinance, Article 2 –Administration, Sec. 2.2.3.B., Establishment, Boards and Commissions Member Terms, Number of Terms (Staff - Charlotte Moore) Town of Bluffton, SC Planning Commission Agenda April 27, 2022
2. Indigo Cove Townhomes (Preliminary Development Plan): A request by the Applicant, TJ Washburn of Winchester Homes, on behalf of the property owner, PKP Group LLC, for approval of the Preliminary Development Plan for Indigo Cove Townhomes – located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Bluffton Parkway and Buck Island Road. The property is zoned Residential General and consists of approximately 23.84 acres, identified as tax parcel number R610 031 000 0002 000. The project consists of the construction of 83 townhouses with an amenity center and associated infrastructure (DP-05-21-015280). (Staff – Dan Frazier)
3. 1055 May River Road (Certificate of Appropriateness-HCO): A request by Ansley H. Manuel, on behalf of the Owner, Cahill Enterprise, for approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness -Highway Corridor Overlay. The project consists of the addition of a 144 SF wait station area on the right elevation and 960 SF of outdoor covered seating, restroom and wait station area on the left elevation of the existing restaurant at 1055 May River Road. The property is zoned Rural Mixed Use and identified by tax map number R610 039 000 0001 0000, located on the north side of May River Road between Sandy Run Road and Crooked Cove Lane. (COFA-03-22-016498) (Staff- Katie Peterson)
4. Ma Daisy's (Preliminary Development Plan): A request by Daisy's Legacy Holdings, LLC for approval of a preliminary development plan application. The project proposes the redevelopment of a 1.85-acre site to include restaurant, commercial and residential uses in four buildings. The property is zoned Neighborhood General Historic District (NG-HD), identified by tax map number R610 039 00A 0235 0000 and located at 1255 May River Road.(Staff - Jordan Holloway)
X. DISCUSSION
XI. ADJOURNMENT
A
Notice
regarding
adjournment,
the
planning
commission
will
not
hear
new
items
after
9
30
unless
authorized
by
majority
vote
of
the
commission
members
present
items
which
have
not
been
heard
before
9
30
may
be
continued
to
the
next
regular
meeting
or
special
meeting
date,
as
determined
by
the
commission
members
notice
regarding
public
comments.
Every
member
of
the
public
who's
recognized
to
speak
shall
address
the
chairman
and
speaking
avoid
disrespect
to
the
commission
staff
or
other
members
of
the
meeting
state.
Your
name
and
address
when
speaking
for
the
record
comments
are
limited
to
three
minutes.
A
C
A
A
D
D
There
has
to
be
a
year
absence
before
that
member
can
be
reappointed
to
a
board
commission
or
committee
and
under
town
code
there
are
no
term
limits
again,
a
member
would
serve
at
the
pleasure
of
town
council,
and
so
what
we
are
proposing.
As
you
see
here
in
the
proposed
text,
amendment
that's
highlighted
is
to
reference
the
the
portion
of
the
town
code
relating
to
term
limits
and,
as
you
can
see,
the
length
of
the
term
and
the
removal
of
the
member
also
refers
back
to
the
general
town
code.
So
that
would
be
consistent.
D
D
D
And
if
this
moves
forward
tonight,
either
an
approval,
denial
or
a
change
to
what's
proposed,
it
would
go
to
the
town
council
on
may
10th
and
then
for
a
final
reading
and
a
public
hearing
on
june
14th
and
you
choose
to
make
a
recommendation
tonight.
Here's
the
proposed
motion
I'll
be
glad
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
may
have.
E
G
B
Thoughts,
I
have
different
thoughts
on
that.
I,
while
I
respect
the
position
that
it
is
difficult
to
fill
those
positions
at
times
my
concern
is
there
should
there's
a
value
in
having
term
limits
in
terms
of
or
the
number
of
terms,
consecutive
terms
that
you
can
serve
just
from
getting
fresh
blood
in
there
new
ideas,
new
questions
being
asked
opportunities
for
young
professionals
to
be
able
to
step
in
and
in
those
vacancies
is
where
you
start
doing,
the
real
work
of
going
and
finding
those
people
to
fill
those
positions.
B
B
B
There
was
a
point
brought
up
to
me
at
some
point
recently
of
you
know
it
can
take
a
little
while
to
get
your
feet
under
you
in
terms
of
you
know,
right
now.
I
still
feel
like
I'm
a
year
into
this
plus
and
I'm
still
feel
like
I'm
drinking
from
a
fire
hose.
So
again
I
see
value
in
extending
the
term,
but
perhaps
only
three
consecutive
terms,
rather
than
a
no
term
number
of
terms.
That's
where
I
would
fall
on
that
charlie.
I
J
It's
kind
of
a
mixture
of
one
issue
of
being
able
to
you
know,
have
individuals
that
that
potentially
want
to
stay
on
for
those
longer
periods,
but
then
also
being
more
consistent
with
our
town
code,
just
because
of
the
for
whatever
reason,
whatever
many
years
ago,
that
that
was
added
to
the
code
that
it's
just
it
kind
of
hinders
our
ability
to
to
keep
individuals.
And
again
it
doesn't
mean
that
you
know
someone
is,
is
going
to
stay
on
the
board
in
perpetuity.
So
we're
not
stuck
you're
not
stuck
now.
C
J
F
And
that's,
I
think,
that's
what
makes
me
comfortable
with
this.
I
mean
I
respect
kathleen's
point
about
not
wanting
to
lock
up
positions,
especially
with
the
influx
of
new
talent,
but
I
think
there's
two
things
that
are
there.
One
is
the
other
commissions
and
boards
that
need
people
and
at
the
pleasure
of
town
council.
At
some
point
I
may
not
be
at
the
pleasure
of
town
council
and
somebody
else
may
come
in
to
replace
we
might
be
now.
I
I
did
want
to
just
follow
that
up
having
been
on
council
years
ago,
when
we
actually
initiated
this,
the
whole
thought
process
was
it's
a
growing
town
they're
going
to
be
more
people,
they're
going
to
be
beating
down
the
door
to
be
on
these
boards
and
commissions
and
and
unfortunately,
in
the
last
three
years,
I've
seen.
That's
not
true.
I
I
mean
we're
30
000
people
in
the
town
of
bluffton
now
and
to
get
seven
members
on
one
board
is
like
pulling
teeth
sometimes
so
I
I
I
understand,
and
I
share
some
of
your
concerns
I
just
in
a
practical
sense.
I
don't
see
a
way
around
it
at
this
point
in
time,
and
I
do
appreciate
we're
dealing
with
two
different,
basically
conflicting
written
areas
that
we
need
to
clean
something
up.
F
L
Just
for
just
for
some
clarification,
I
I
think
we
had
and
partly
for
interjecting
here.
I
I
think
the
proposed
motion
we
had-
or
I
didn't
hear
it-
I
didn't
hear
whether
it
was
going
to
be
an
approval,
an
approval
with
amendments
or
a
denial.
What
kind
of
recommendation
you
want
to
make
recommend
to
approve?
I.
A
M
Thank
you.
This
is
a
preliminary
development
plan,
indigo
cove
townhomes,
a
request
by
the
applicant
tj
washburn
of
winchester
homes,
on
behalf
of
the
property
owner
pkp
group
llc,
for
improvement
of
the
preliminary
development
plan
for
indigo
cove
town
homes,
properties
located
at
the
northeast
corner
of
the
intersection
of
bluffton
parkway
and
buck
island
road.
M
It
is
the
northeast
corner
of
buck,
island,
road
and
bluffton
parkway
project
description
and
background.
This
application
is
for
preliminary
development
plan
located
within
the
residential
general
zoning
district
and
is
subject
to
the
standards
set
forth
in
the
town
of
bluffton.
Unified
development.
Ordinance
project
consists
of
the
construction
of
83
single-family
attached
units
with
an
amenity
center
sidewalks
and
associated
infrastructure
staff.
Comments
on
the
preliminary
development
plan
were
reviewed
at
the
march
9
2022
meeting
of
the
development
review
committee.
The
applicant
provided
a
response
to
comments
and
updated
exhibits
to
address
the
comments
provided.
M
Review
criteria
the
planning
commission
shall
consider
the
criteria
set
forth
in
section
310
3a
of
the
udo
in
assessing
an
application
for
a
preliminary
development
plan.
The
app
applicable
criteria
are
provided
below,
followed,
not
followed
by
staff
findings.
Staff
findings
were
included
in
the
packet.
M
Planning,
commission
action
planning
commission
has
the
authority
to
take
the
following
action:
approve
the
application,
as
submitted
by
the
applicant,
approve
the
application
with
conditions
tabled
the
application
or
denied
the
application,
as
submitted
by
the
applicant
and
staff
recommendation
staff
recommends
a
preliminary
development
plan
be
approved,
subject
to
the
following
condition
that,
at
the
time
of
final
development
plan
submitted,
the
applicant
shall
provide
documentation
that
the
proposed
overflow
parking
and
community
green
located
in
the
power
line.
Easement
is
permitted
and
I'll
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
N
Hi,
my
name
is
chris
polk,
I
am
official
title
is
vice
president
of
winchester,
but
I'm
a
principal
and
just
wanted
to
come
and
share
our
vision
for
what
this
is.
We've
been
on
this
property
for
a
little
time
now
and
been
working
through
it,
giving
us
the
opportunity
to
see
what
the
town
may
need
more
so
than
other
things
and
and
wanted
to
share
exactly
what
we're
thinking
in
the
way
we
do
business
in
general.
N
A
N
It
happens
I
get
it,
I
get
it
right,
wallace
so
by
education,
I'm
an
architect
and
I've
been
in
the
building
development
business,
all
of
my
professional
career,
and
so
we've
built
a
team
of
incredibly
thoughtful
people
and
because
I
run
the
operations
of
the
company
tj
being
the
other
part,
is
really
the
guy
out
front
making
sure
identifying
properties.
But
because
I
run
the
operations,
I
have
the
latitude
that
we
are
careful
and
we
serve
a
moderate
luxury
product
mid-level
luxury
product
to
everybody.
N
So
because
of
our
buying
power
and
the
number
of
units
we
do
every
year
and
lots
of
pro
on
the
ground,
we're
able
to
provide
these
to
the
majority
of
people
in
the
community,
not
just
an
elite
few.
So
out
of
the
pyramid
of
folks
that
are
building
and
they're
developing,
we
don't
operate
in
the
elite,
I'm
not
at
sea
pines.
That's
just
not
what
we
do,
but
people
from
a
community
can
enjoy.
N
You
don't
have
to
give
up
the
quality
of
life
because
we're
thoughtful
about
the
way
it's
done
and
the
way
it
looks
and
and
the
community
has
been
considered
in
every
way.
So
bluffton
won't
have
to
give
on
design
to
approve
this
because
we've
considered
it
it'll.
Look
coastal
it'll
feel
like
it's
supposed
to
it'll,
have
a
sense
of
community
it'll.
Have
all
these
features
that
it
begs
for
our
townhouse
community,
because
it's
in
bluffton
every
time
we
do
a
community
it.
N
If
we're
going
to
do
one
in
clemson,
we
may
paint
them
orange,
but
that,
but
it
goes
well
beyond
that.
So
we
talk
more
about
technology
wellness,
air
quality
in
in
paul,
our
real
architect,
we'll
speak
to
some
of
these
things,
but
we
want
to
make
sure
that
the
quality
of
life
and
sense
of
community
a
sense
of
place.
So
not
only
do
the
people
that
reside
there
have
a
sense
of
place,
but
it
doesn't
look
out
of
place
in
the
community
of
bluffton.
N
Having
said
that,
everything
that
we
do,
I
believe
from
beginning
to
end,
we'll
give
you
something
to
be
proud
of,
because
we're
already
proud
of
it.
We
can't
put
it
in
the
world.
I
need
to
sleep
at
night,
I'm
as
I'm
a
south
carolina
resident,
I'm
a
native
tj's
from
georgia
just
across
the
river
in
augusta
and
we
care.
So
when
we
leave
a
community
complete
and
ready.
N
I
like
to
be
able
to
drive
my
children,
my
wife,
my
aunts,
my
uncles
and
anybody
else
by
and
be
able
to
say
it
and
not
duck
my
head
thinking.
I
don't
want
them
to
know.
I
was
a
part
of
it.
It's
just
not
the
way
we
do
business
and
it
may
seem
oversimplified,
but
the
truth
of
it
is
is
that
we
want
to
leave
a
legacy
as
winchester
and
be
known
for
what
we
do
in
any
one
of
our
projects
in
athens,
augusta
aiken,
north
augusta.
N
We
now
are
starting
one
in
brunswick,
so
these
communities
we
develop
and
build.
We
take
thoughtful
design
to
levels
that
typical
residential
developers
do
not
do,
and
we
care
that
our
motto
is.
We
do
the
right
thing
for
the
right
reasons,
and
so
that's
where
I'll
stick
it
and-
and
let
paul
got
to
explain
some
of
these
details
to
you.
So,
thank
you
for
your
consideration
and
I
believe
we're
going
to
build
you.
A
beautiful
community,
I
believe
you'll
be
surprised,
is
just
how
beautiful
it
will
be.
O
Yeah
you're
really
not
gonna
like
me,
because
I'm
from
ramblin
wreck
from
georgia
tech,
so
so
I'm
paul
stegenge,
I'm
the
architect,
and
you
know
I
want
to
reiterate
what
chris
said.
Number
one
is
architecture,
we're
not
real
public
speakers,
so
we
get
nervous
but
we're
here
to
tell
you
that
we're
really
trying
to
do
a
quality
development,
that
is,
that
mid-luxury,
which
means
addressing
the
lifestyle
and
the
lifestyle
expectations
of
our
residents,
both
the
ones
that
are
here
and
the
ones
that
are
going
to
be
coming.
O
We'll
have
exterior
elements
that
fit
in
with
what
you
see
around
here
now
we
we
call
it
that
you
know
that
luxury
modern,
which
is
the
white
painted
brick
with
with
masonry.
You
know
on
the
lower
levels
for
durability
and
different
types
of
of
trespa
panels
and
engineered
wood,
metal,
eyebrows
and
metal,
roofing
and
featured
areas,
and
so,
let's
see
what
else
did
I
have
on
here
yeah
there
was
a
nice
development
over
here
off
of
tabi's
shell
road.
That
has
some
kind
about
the
features
that
we
were
talking
about.
O
So
we
had
heard
that
these
meetings
were,
you
know,
full
of
jolly
and
merriment.
So
we
brought
the
whole
team
so
that
if
it
did
break
into
a
dance
party,
we
had
enough
people
to
so,
but
we
have
the
the
the
landscape
architect.
We
have
the
civil
engineer.
We
have
the
owner
myself,
you
know
again,
we
appreciate
your
your
service,
especially
after
item
number
one
and
how
hard
it
is
to
get
you
guys
to
serve
so
we're
here
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
guys
have.
C
E
O
N
Cars
will
fit
for
every
unit,
one
in
the
garage
one
in
the
driveway
not
impede
the
walkway
around,
so
everybody
should
be
able
to
park
for
each
townhouse
and
then
the
overflow
parking,
which
is
more
than
meets
the
needs
of
your
ordinances,
it's
more
than
than
is
required
because
we
know
that's
a
concern.
It's
always
a
concern
to
have
over
for
guests
and
things.
So
I
think
we've
addressed
both
those
pretty
readily.
F
Thank
you.
I
know.
You've
met
the
the
code
requirements
for
parking,
but
at
least
down
here
what
happens
is
a
lot
of
people
from
up
north,
bring
all
their
stuff
and
fill
up
their
garage?
Have
you
given
any
consideration
to
potentially
expand
the
overflow
parking
number
one
or
put
a
place
to
park
where
people
can
get
their
mail?
You
have
nowhere
for
the
mail
kiosk
they're
going
to
be
parking
in
the
middle
of
the
street.
Is
there?
N
So
the
overflow
parking
has
been
adjusted
time
and
time
again
trying
to
get
to
a
place
that
makes
sense
and,
and
the
truth
of
it
is,
we
will
consider
the
overflow
parking.
I
think,
because
of
the
green
areas
that
we
required
and
for
the
kiosk
area
too,
we
can
do
a
pull
in
and
pull
out
kind
of
thing.
I
believe
that
can
be
also
addressed.
We
can
look
at
that,
but
our
best
solution
for
more
parking
is
going
to
be
additional
overflow
parking
in
the
power
lines
in
the
green
area.
F
N
So
there'll
be
the
hoa
office
and
things
up
front
and
the
office
space.
But
then
you
have
the
workout,
we're
not
exactly
sure
we're
trying
to
still
determine
that.
But
it's
gonna
be
a
workout
facility
and
then
maybe
even
a
small
business
facility
where
they
can
people
can
go
in
use
internet
get
away
from
the
house.
So
we're
still
we're
kind
of
working
through
that
amenity
center.
But
it's
primarily
work
out
in
office
area.
F
A
O
C
N
O
Yeah
it's
a
little
calculated.
These
are
single-family
attached
property
lined
for
sale
for
sale.
However,
we
think
we
have
one
buyer
you
hear
about
them
on
the
news.
All
the
time
begin
with
a
color
and
a
rock
in
their
name.
That
would
come
in
and
buy
the
entire
development,
so
we
would
be
selling-
maybe
perhaps
one
sale
instead
of
83
sales,
but
we
are
developing
it
for
83
sales.
J
G
The
reason
I'm
asking
is
that,
for
the
same
reason,
you've
already
heard
twice,
I
am
big
about
the
parking
you
got
visitor
parking,
there's
no
designated
visitor
parking.
You
only
have
I
mean
you
meet
the
requirements,
that's
not
the
question,
but
I
I
agree
that
I
think
that
if
you
could
expand
and
provide
additional
parking,
whether
it
be
for
the
kiosk
or
for
visitor
parking,
because
how
you're
going
to
deal
with
the
hoa
in
the
past,
what
happened?
Are
they
going
to
be
ticketing
people
if
they
are
sitting?
G
O
A
Q
Do
you
have
a
plan
in
place
for
when
people
inevitably
park
on
the
street,
not
in
parallel
parking
spaces
in
terms
of
making
sure
there's
emergency
vehicle
access
or
anything
like
that?
Or
do
you
just
a
lot
of
times
when
there
is
not
street
parking?
People
still
make
street
parking
because
there's
still
a
need
for
it.
P
N
P
I
R
I
I
I
This
project
inevitably
is
going
to
be
a
parking
nightmare,
no
matter
what
we
do,
so
I
just
as
an
individual
to
individuals,
ask
you
to
do
the
best
you
can
to
make
it
so
that
it's
not
as
much
of
a
nightmare
as
it
could
be,
and
then
the
only
other
question
I
have
for
y'all
is:
this
is
a
buy
right
development.
You
have
the
rights
inherent
in
the
property
to
put
this
many
units
there
matter
of
fact,
I
think
you're
putting
a
little
bit
less
than
what
you
could.
O
I
can
speak
to
that
we're
not
setting
aside
workforce,
but
we
are
being
very
economical
on
our
selections
of
building
materials
so
that
these
can
be
afforded
by
more
than
those
people
that
are
mid-career.
Our
price
point
is
intended
to
be
much
more
attractive
than
what
we'd
call
lux
lux:
we're
trying
to
be
mid-lucks.
N
N
Design
in
the
inherent
so
the
floor
plans
are
semi-worked
out.
You
know
we're
still
working
through
a
few
things
trying
to
make
sure
we
include
everything
that
we
can
include
for
people's
today's
desires,
but
the
interior
units
in
a
lot
of
cases
are
smaller
and
it
doesn't
necessarily
buy
into
exact
work
workforce
housing,
but
they
will
be.
You
know,
less
less
bedrooms
more
affordable
as
opposed
to
the
end
units,
which
will
offer
a
little
more
square
footage.
N
You
know
a
little
more
a
little
pricier,
so
I
I
think
we
have
considered
it.
We
will
not
consider
it
again,
but
I'm
letting
you
know
that
we've
been
thoughtful
about
some
of
the
buildings
with
the
interior
units,
making
them
a
more
affordable
product
because
they
are
less
desirable
than
the
end
products,
of
course,
but
but
we've
gone
an
extra
step
in
making
them
considerably
smaller,
so
they're
more
affordable.
Q
O
Q
Just
a
consideration
as
you're,
considering
parking
just
making
sure
that
there's
enough
room
for
all
of
our
outdoor
things
as
well
as
cars,
since
I
we
all
have
kind
of
you
know,
said
this,
but
I'm
worried
that
no
one
will
use
the
garage
for
parking
if
there's
not
enough
storage
for
everything
else.
So
just
one
more
thing
to
consider
as
you're
developing
that
scheme.
A
N
A
J
Madam
chairman,
if
I
may,
as
you
know,
this
will
come
back
as
a
final
development
plan.
At
that
time,
it
will
have
to
go
through
the
development
review
committee,
which
three
of
you
are
members
of
then
you'll
have
an
opportunity
to
see
the
plans
and
then
be
able
to
make
comments
at
that
time
as
well.
Okay,
thank
you.
L
Madam
chair,
if
I
may
just
is
a
reminder,
I
know
we
have
some
new
commissioners
here
so
at
this
point,
what
you
can
do
is
approve.
You
can
improve
the
conditions
or
you
can
deny
what
staff
is
recommended
is,
as
you
can
see
up,
there
is
approval,
subject
to
that
following
staff
condition.
If
you
wish
to
go
with
staff's
recommendation,
you
can
say
something
as
simple
as
I
move
to
approve,
with
the
conditions
that
set
forth
in
the
staff
report.
G
C
A
S
As
amanda,
I
just
read
through
the
request:
this
is
the
request.
It
is
a
request
by
ansley
manuel
on
behalf
of
kale
enterprise,
for
the
addition,
two
small
additions
to
the
existing
structure.
The
project
location
is
here
at
1055
memory,
road,
which
is
the
cahills
restaurant
and
market
that
you
are
likely
all
familiar
with.
This
is
highway,
46
or
may
river
road,
and
you
would
enter
here.
The
chickens
and
the
big
peanut
are
located
on
this
side
here.
So.
S
To
familiarize
you
with
the
side
a
little
bit
closer
up,
this
is
where
all
the
parking
would
be
and
the
any
of
the
field
farm
growing
things.
This
is
all
towards
the
back.
The
property
46
is
at
the
bottom
of
your
screen.
The
existing
market
and
restaurant
are
located
in
this
white
area
and
then
the
red
highlights
the
area
which
would
be
proposed.
S
This
is
the
proposed
landscape
plan.
So
again
you
have
the
proposed
areas.
They
will
be
removing
the
shrubs
and
bushes
here
and
two.
I
believe
they
are
pear
trees.
They
are
small
fruit,
trees
and
replanting.
Some
oak
trees
along
here,
as
well
as
a
crepe
myrtle
on
clues
for
the
crepe
myrtle,
and
then
two
live
oak
trees
towards
the
base
there
along
the
drive.
S
S
So
it's
mostly
unenclosed
space
with
a
small,
enclosed,
restroom
and
weight
station
and
then
they're
enlarging
the
service
yard
by
just
a
little
bit
here.
That
is
already
existing
service
yard
just
to
incorporate
some
of
those
other
utilities
that
you
don't
want
to
walk
right
up
to
on
the
elevations.
This
is
where
you
can
really
see
my
line.
Work
you've
got
the
proposed
front
and
left
elevation.
So
this
is
the
front
if
you
are
standing
on
46.
Looking
up
that
hill,
you
are
going
to
see
this
here
is
your
proposed
porch.
S
There
is
one
bay
of
empty
here,
so
this
wall
that
you're
looking
at
is
actually
set
back
from
the
front
plane
of
this
building
by
one
bay
and
then
on
the
right
hand,
side
you're,
seeing
a
continuation
of
that
roof
for
the
weight
station.
That
is
on
this
side.
If
you
are
inside
the
restaurant
from
here,
you're
going
to
be
looking
at
the
bird
feeders
that
are
outside
the
window,
so
is
that
the
proposed.
I
S
I
will
leave
that
to
the
applicant
when
you
open
up
the
floor
to
them.
However,
I
do
not
believe
so.
This
is
the
one
I
chose
that
you
can
see
really
clearly
the
left
elevation
here,
you're
looking
at
it.
If
you
were
standing
on
the
driveway
as
you
go
into
the
into
the
parking
lot,
you'd
see
this
on
the
right
hand
side
there,
and
then
this
is
the
proposed
rear
and
right
elevation.
So
this
is
the
side
that
doesn't
really
have
a
sidewalk.
S
You
wouldn't
really
walk
up
on
this
one
unless
you're
deciding
to
go.
Look
at
the
chickens
on
this
one
here
this
is,
if
you're
coming
from
the
parking
area.
This
is
the
proposed
port
that
you're
seeing
and
you
will
not
see
the
weight
station
edition
from
the
rear
elevation
looking
at
this,
because
you
only
see
it
from
the
front
and
the
right
side
or
yeah
right
side.
I'm
sorry!
S
So
the
senate
commission
has
the
authority
to
approve
this
application,
as
submitted
by
the
applicant,
approve
the
application
with
conditions
or
approve
the
application
or
deny
the
application,
as
submitted
by
the
applicant
once
they
have
reviewed
the
criteria
which
are
found
in
section
3.17
of
the
unified
development
ordinance.
I've
listed
those
criteria
for
you
on
the
screen
and
in
your
staff
reports.
I
have
gone
into
more
detail
about
staff's
finding
on
those.
S
I'm
stopping
on
this
one
for
just
a
moment,
because
in
the
highway
corridor
the
actual
code
section
says
that
flat
roofs
are
not
permitted
and
then,
in
parentheses,
it
says
a
flat
roof
is
considered
anything
less
than
four
and
twelve
pitch.
So
right
now,
they've
got
it
proposed
as
a
two
and
twelve.
That's
this
right
here.
As
you
can
see,
the
other
side
is
at
a
three
and
twelve
because
that
was
built
with
the
original
structure.
It
ties
into
the
roof
line.
S
Staff
doesn't
find
a
huge
issue
with
this.
Beyond
that,
a
flat
roof
in
the
highway
corridor
is
considered
to
be
a
4
and
12
or
greater
in
the
historic
district.
There
isn't
a
number
that
is
tied
to
it,
and
so
that's
something
that
you
should
just
take
note
of
as
you
as
you
review
this
application,
it
is
a
pitched
roof.
It
is
just
a
low-pitched
roof
that
you
are
looking
at
here,
so
it's
not
an
entirely
flat
roof.
S
The
development
review
committee
had
a
handful
of
comments
for
the
development
plan,
amendment
that
has
already
been
reviewed,
we're
just
awaiting
resubmitted
documents
addressing
those
items.
One
of
those
items
was
that
the
landscape
plan
needed
to
be
updated
to
provide
a
little
bit
more
information
on
that,
and
you
can
see
here
where
that
is
looking
at.
It
is
primarily
the
foundation
plantings
along
this
area
here,
just
providing
the
you'll
need
to
provide
the
species
that
are
going
in
as
well
as
the
sizes
on
that.
S
S
T
L
You
can
the
applicant's
not
going
to
be
here
to
speak
on
their
application,
and
that
creates
an
issue.
Did
the
applicants
say
that
they
were
going
to
be
here
or
confirmed
that
they'd
be
here?
You
can
also
table
it
for
a
moment
and
see
if
you
can
give
answer
a
call,
because
she
is
right
across
the
street.
L
A
A
L
I
they've
been
kind
enough
to
speak
with
me
during
the
recess
about
what
they
would
like
to
do
and
the
request
has
been
made
to
be
able
to
just
speak
to
the
planning
commission
to
let
their
their
concerns
be
heard,
so
that
that
can
assist
both
the
town
staff
and
drc.
When
you
all
are
reviewing
your
final
development
plans
so
that
they
can
perhaps
get
some
of
these
questions
answered
at
some
point.
B
L
Right
now,
all
all
the
applicants
or
all
the
public
comment
has
requested-
is
an
opportunity
just
to
be
heard
on
this
issue.
There's
not
going
to
be
a
this
is
not
a
motion
to
reopen
or
anything
in
that
future.
At
this
point,
so
it's
just
to
bring
that
public
comment
before
y'all,
while
we're
in
this
meeting
and
in
the
event
anything
in
the
public
comment
triggers
you
all
to
do
a
motion
to
reopen
or
reconsider
something
that's
already
been
approved.
You
have
that
right,
but.
L
C
L
A
L
I
K
My
name
is
kathy
bourner
and
I
live
at
five
bento
court
in
bluffton
south
carolina.
We
live
in
the
neighborhood.
If
you
look
at
the
map
on
the
very
top
edge
of
that
which
is
wintry,
so
the
new
development
is
going
to
be
right,
you
can
see
our
homes
right
there
on
the
top.
So
I
think
our
main
concern
is
talking
about
a
buffer
between
the
green
space
and
the
parking
and
where
we
live,
I'm
assuming
that
parking
lot's
going
to
have
lights
on
it,
which
is
going
to
kind
of
diminish
our
quality
of
life.
K
So
I
would
urge
you
to
consider
putting
a
buffer
either
on
one
side
or
the
other
side
of
those
those
areas
which
are
going
to
affect
us,
and
I
already
heard
earlier,
which
I
didn't
know
that
the
traffic
impact
had
already
been
approved.
Of
course,
we're
concerned
also
about
the
traffic,
the
additional
traffic
coming
and
going
both
on
buck
island
road
and
the
bluffton
parkway.
K
So
I
guess
that's
already
been
approved
and
maybe
there's
nothing
we
could
be
done,
but
I
think
everybody
in
the
neighborhood,
especially
on
our
side,
is
very
much
concerned
about
having
a
buffer
placed
there
and
or
possibly
moving
the
parking
further
down.
I
don't
know
where
the
property
ends
there,
but
if
there
be
an
opportunity
to
move
the
parking
away
from
our
homes,
that
would
be
beneficial
for
us
too.
Thank
you.
C
E
A
I
V
That
seems
to
want
us
to
eat
outdoors
these
days
since
the
pandemic.
You
know
we
had
a
makeshift
deal
when
it
was.
It
was
hot
and
heavy,
which
I
guess
found.
You
just
told
us
it's
over
now,
but
still
people
we
have
times
of
the
year
where
it's
nice
to
eat
outside,
so
that
we're
trying
to
offer
that
option.
V
A
V
J
J
That
part
of
that
development
plan
amendment
will
require.
I
think
it
hasn't
been
here
is
to
address
those
issues
from
the
development
plan
amendment
prior
to
final
approval.
So
if
this
evening,
if
you
choose
to
move
forward
with
this,
you
know
these
conditions
right
here
once
they're
met
as
well
as
the
conditions
for
the
development
plan,
then
they
can
be.
S
Staff
found
that,
with
the
following
conditions,
and
again
this
would
be
the
conditions
of
the
approval
if
it
were
to
meet
section
317-3
of
the
unified
development
ordinance.
The
applicant
is
requesting
a
deviation
from
that
roof
pitch
of
4
to
12..
It
is
still
a
pitched
roof
to
tuck
under
the
existing
structures
eve
rather
than
trying
to
tie
it
in
and
and
potentially
create
some
water
challenges
with
the
roof
tie
in
there.
V
Q
B
Okay
and
the
one
up
by
the
corner
at
the
turn
and
the
dirt
road
to
the
parking
lot,
it's
also
existing.
Okay,
that's
I
just
wanted
to
get
clarification
on
that.
My
only
comment
is
again.
I'm
sure
this
is
all
covered
by
drc
is
just
this
needs
to
be
a
real
landscape
plan
with
plant
quantities.
So
I
know
it's
proposed
and
existing
with
a
foundation
plan
and
a
plant
schedule
that
identifies
the
sizes
of
it.
I
I
F
A
I
Okay
item:
four:
on
tonight's
agenda:
ma
daisy's
preliminary
development
plan,
a
request
by
daisy's
legacy
holdings
llc
for
approval
of
a
preliminary
development
plan
application.
The
project
proposes
the
redevelopment
of
a
1.85
acre
site
to
include
restaurant,
commercial
and
residential
uses
in
four
buildings.
W
All
right,
thank
you,
sir,
since
you
read
through
the
applicant
request,
I'm
not
going
to
repeat
that
for
you
just
to
give
a
brief
description
background
is
it
for
for
a
preliminary
development
plan
located
in
neighborhood
general
hd
zoning
district
and
therefore
it's
subject
to
the
standard
set.
Fourth
antenna,
bluffton
udo
subject:
parcel
is
located
between
pin
oak
street
and
schultz
road
with
access
to
the
parcel
from
may
river
road.
The
project
consists
of
two
restaurant
spaces:
two
office
spaces,
two
commercial
services
establishments
and
three
residential
units
staff.
W
Comments
on
the
preliminary
development
plan
were
reviewed
at
the
march
23
2022
development
review
committee
meeting
and
the
applicant
has
since
provided
a
response
to
comments
and
updated
exhibits
to
address
the
comments
provided
due
to
the
project
being
within
the
historic
district
or
a
historic
district.
The
plan
will
be
required
to
go
through
the
certificate
of
appropriateness
process
as
well
just
a
map,
real
quick
just
for
clarification.
The
parcel
we're
talking
about
here
is
highlighted
in
red.
W
Building
three
is
the
retail
services
establishment
with
the
residential
units
on
top
of
it,
and
then
the
commercial
services
in
building
four
up
here
as
well.
They
do
have
an
outdoor
pavilion
area
with
existing
landscaping
shown
here
with
parking
back
behind
in
terms
of
review
criteria.
Planning
commission
shall
consider
the
criteria
criteria
set
forth
in
section
310
3a
of
the
udo
in
assessing
the
application
for
a
preliminary
development
plan.
Applicable
criteria
will
be
all
in
the
next
slide.
So
these
six
criteria,
I
gave
more
detailed
analysis
and
findings
provided
in
the
staff
report.
W
W
You
can
approve
the
application,
as
submitted
by
the
applicant,
approve
the
application
with
conditions
table
the
application
or
deny
the
application,
as
submitted
by
the
applicant
town
staff,
finds
that
the
conditions
noted
below,
which
are
the
requirements
of
section
3103a
of
udo,
will
be
met
and
recommend
that
the
planning
commission
approved
the
application
with
the
following
conditions
met
prior
to
final
development
plan.
Approval
number
one
is
that
per
section
564
of
the
udo
10
residential
open
space
needs
to
be
provided
on
the
plans.
W
Number
two
per
section:
511
4a1
of
the
udo,
a
drive
out
width
of
18
feet
shall
be
provided
number
three
per
section:
537e
building
foundation
planting
shall
be
provided
on
all
applicable
structures.
Number
four
reduce
the
size
of
the
carriage
house
to
be
no
larger
than
1200
square
feet
per
section.
515
6f
and
number
five
per
table
5157c,
one
of
the
udo
provide
required
parking
spaces
for
each
restaurant,
use,
take
taking
porches
and
outdoor
seating
into
consideration
any
questions.
H
Good
evening
folks,
I'm
wallace
milling
with
whitmer
jones
kiefer.
We
are
representing
the
applicants.
The
applicants
here
are
billy
waterson
and
miss
bridget
frazier,
and
we
are
working
for
them
and
real
excited
about
this
project
and
appreciate
y'all's
review
of
it
and
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
have.
F
First
of
all,
I
love
the
I
drove
back
there
the
other
day
and
there's
a
number
of
buildings
that
need
to
be
replaced.
So
I'm
looking
forward
to
this-
and
I
don't
know
the
history
of
the
deer
tongue
building,
but
I
understand
you're
relocating.
That
is
that,
true,
that's
wonderful.
My
question
really
comes
to
the
last
point
on
staff's
thing
that
you
will
provide
enough
parking,
including
for
all
of
the
outdoor
seating,
is
that
on
this
plan,
or
do
you
have
to
change
it?
Well,.
H
W
Unfortunately,
the
whole
porsche
has
to
be
considered
because
it's
not
on
a
per
table
basis,
so
they
can't
just
say:
hey
500
square
feet
of
this
1200
square
foot
porch
is
being
used
for
restaurant,
so
we're
only
allocating
that
much
space,
so
whether
the
porsche
needs
to
be
adjusted
a
little
bit
or
the
numbers
need
to
be
further
refined
a
little
bit.
We.
R
W
Have
any
necessary
concerns
that
they're
not
going
to
be
able
to
meet
the
parking
standards?
We
just
have
to
go
through
that
process
and
refine
that
a
little
bit
more,
which
will
be
all
hashed
out
going
through
the
final
development
plan
process
as
well,
but
just
wanted
to
make
note
of
something.
So
there
was
final
clarification
by
the
time
we
get
to
final
development.
F
B
H
It's
really
very
conceptual
at
this
time.
It'll
definitely
go
through
the
historic
review
board
right
now.
It's
I
mean
the
thought
is
to
have
some
signage
there
and
it
for
it
to
be
an
outdoor
type
garden,
pavilion
type
structure,
open
air,
just
some
garden
elements,
maybe
some
some
planting
on
the
may
river
roadside,
but
opening
up
and
becoming
kind
of
a
landscape
element
on
the
courtyard
side.
H
B
Because
that's
that
relocated,
it's
relocated,
building
which
I
think
is
raised
up
right
now
and
the
looks
of
it
there's
not
a
ramp,
and
I
see
the
boardwalk
in
the
back
and
I
don't
know
if
that's
the
intention,
as
they're
parking
in
the
back
coming
through
building
three
to
get
to
building
four.
I
just
didn't
know
what
the.
H
Yeah
they
could
do
that,
that's
possible
and
we're
still
working
out
all
the
architectural
elements,
but
there's
definitely
enough
run
that
building
will
be
raised
up
but
think
about
the
garvin
house
and
how
it's
raised
up
very
little.
So
it's
not
a
typical
30
inch
elevation
change,
it's
pretty
slight,
so
there
might
even
be
the
opportunity
to
have
a
ramp.
C
B
H
B
Yep,
the
pad
that's
up
there
by
the
water
feature
in
bethel.
I
don't
know,
I
don't
know
how
you're
supposed
to
say
that
bateau.
Thank
you.
I'd
prefer
to
say
that
correctly
from
here
on
out
how's
that
that
where
it
connects
up
to
the
sidewalk
there,
it
appears
right
now.
I
think,
there's
steps
that
go
down
into
the
plaza.
How
is
that
being
addressed?
Is
there
just
going
to
be
a
drop
off?
It
doesn't
look
like
it's
going
to
be
much
more
than
a
step
is
what
it
looks
like.
H
H
Could
potentially,
the
thought
is
that
it
would
be
a
controlled,
and
you
guys
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
I
think
it
would
be
a
controlled
space
so
that
they
could
close
it
off
if
they,
if
they
wanted
to
for
safety
reasons
or
things
like
that.
But
I
think
that
the
idea
is
for
that
to
be
more
of
a
public,
plaza
feeling
element
for
the
for
the
community
to
enjoy
so.
B
B
I
C
I
U
X
I
J
J
F
J
I
And
this
is
just
a
comment
I
think.
Sometimes
we
we
regulate
ourselves
out
of
an
ideal
product,
and
this
may
be
one
of
those
instances
with
the
handcuffs
on
live
music
and
potential
handcuffs
on
square
footage
on
something
that's
going
back
where
something
else
was,
and
that's
just
a
comment,
not
anything
we
can
do
about
it.
Absolutely.
L
Yeah
and
commissioner
went
more
if
I,
if
I
may
again,
because
we
have
a
few
newer
members
of
the
of
the
planning,
commission
and
they're,
it's
relatively
rare,
I
think,
based
off
my
experience
for
y'all
to
have
historic
district
products
come
before
you
on
a
regular
basis.
So
I,
if
I
can
just
provide
a
little
bit
of
context,
the
architectural
aspect
of
it
will.
C
L
As
far
as
the
building
sides
and
the
building
footprint,
when
mr
eichert
spoke
about
form-based
code,
which
which
I
was
not
not
very
familiar
with
before
helping
you
all
out
here,
occasionally
four-based
code
is
essentially,
we
have
identified
a
few
building
types,
a
number
of
different
building
types
that
are
permitted
within
the
various
zoning
districts
and
as
long
as
the
building
type,
which
you
know
could
be
katie,
katie's,
probably
going
to
cover
ears.
When
I
try
to
remember
what
they
are,
but
you
know,
side
yard
cottage,
all
sorts
of
other
ones.
L
N
L
As
the
noise
ordnance,
there
is
a
noise
ordinance
in
place.
That
is
not
part
of
the
udo,
that's
part
of
the
town
code
and
we
had
similar
similar
concerns
and
similar
requests
with
the
site
plan
that
was
approved
off
of
except
blockchain
parkway
upwards
parkway.
Whichever
way
that
was
out
front
woodbridge,
we
had
those
same
concerns
that
were
brought
up.
C
B
B
T
Yeah,
my
name
is
emily,
jane
jones,
with
ward
edwards
engineering,
so
for
the
stormwater
we
are
actually
installing
perforated
pipe
throughout
the
parking
and
then
throughout
the
main
facility
area.
We
do
have
stone
trench
as
well
and
we
have
met
the
compliance
calculator
already
for
the
solo
coordinates
and
we
meet
criteria
for
design.
H
B
B
Yeah,
it's
going
in
the
green
space.
Okay.
That
answers
my
question.
Thank
you
and
then
the
other
question
that
I
had
was
there
was
a
comment
from
the
town
staff
about
the
alignment
of
building
one
and
building
two
being
in
alignment
with
may
river
road,
and
I
this
is
to
me
still
not
in
alignment.
It
doesn't
see
a
major
sticking
point,
but
I
wanted
to
ask
if
it
had
been
explored
an
option
of
rotating
that
so
that
it
did
and
if
what
the
implications
were
as
to
why
that
may
have
been
abandoned.
B
It's
but
it's
not
the
same
alignment
as
the
as
the
deer
tongue
building.
It
was
prior
to
it's
being
relocated,
correct,
it's
being
still,
it's
now
being
more
aligned
with
the
property
line
rather
because,
before
I
don't
think
dear
that's,
your
building
was
yeah.
It
was
not
in
alignment
with
the
property
either.
It
really
wasn't
in
alignment
with
may
river
road
or
the
adjacent
property
line,
which
is
angled.
But
this
is
not
the
same
alignment
either.
H
H
C
H
B
This
is
this
appears
to
be,
and-
and
perhaps
it's
just
a
matter
of
where
that
set,
but
how
that
setback
is
shown.
This
appears
to
be
closer
to
the
property
line
again
like
that
setback,
maybe
throwing
off
that
perspective,
but
that,
but
it's
it's
a
slight
to
me.
It
appears
to
be
a
slight
shift
in
that
rotation
of
the
building,
and
I
was
just
curious
if
you
looked
at
because
one
of
the
comments
was
building.
B
One
and
building
two
are
not
in
align
with
may
river
road
and
the
canopy
is
forward
towards
may
river
road,
but
building
one
still
could
be.
You
could
still
look
at
making
it
in
alignment
with
may
river
road.
I
I
tend
to
think
that
you've
picked
the
right
option,
I'm
just
asking,
because
I
think
what
happens
is
you
compromise
your
open
space?
B
I
was
hoping
to
hear
you
basically
say
that
is
what
I
was
really
trying
to
get
out
of
you,
because
you
wait
and
because
the
reason
and
the
reason
I
say
that
is
because
the
udo
specifically
outlines
it
has
to
be
in
alignment
with
may
river,
when
you
are
breaking
the
rules
and
you're
deviating
from
them.
I
I
don't
have
an
issue.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
it's
clear
as
to
why
we're
doing
that
here
and
why
we're
allowing
that
here
versus
why.