►
Description
Planning Commission Wednesday, August 23, 2023 can be found here: https://bluffton-sc.municodemeetings.com/
A
Here,
commissioner,
Lydia
de
Paul,
commissioner
Michael
we're
off
here
notice
regarding
adjournment,
the
Planning
Commission
will
not
hear
new
items
after
9
30
PM
unless
authorized
by
a
majority
vote
of
the
commission
members
present
items
which
have
not
been
heard
before
9
30
may
be
continue
to
the
next
regular
meeting
or
a
special
meeting
date,
as
determined
by
the
commission
members
notice.
Regarding
public
comments.
Every
member
of
the
public
is
recognized
to
speak,
shall
address
the
chairman
and,
in
speaking,
avoid
disrespect
to
the
commission's
staff
or
other
members
of
this
meeting
state.
A
C
A
D
First,
item
on
the
agenda
for
new
business
is
JC
Cove,
JC's,
Cove,
Recreation
Center
development
plan,
a
request
by
Nathan
Stir
of
stir
engineer
am
I,
saying
that
right
of
story,
engineering
on
behalf
of
the
property
owner,
James
Saba,
for
approval
of
a
preliminary
development
plan
application.
The
project
proposes
construction
of
a
2786
square
foot
recreation
building
to
serve
the
six
single-family
residences
at
JC's
Co.
The
property
is
Zone
Agriculture
and
consists
of
1.53
Acres
identified
by
tax
Mac
number.
As
stated
in
this.
E
This
is
a
preliminary
development
plan,
application
for
JC's,
Cove
recreation
building.
It's
a
request
by
Nathan
Surry
of
Surry
engineering
on
behalf
of
the
property
owner
James
Saba,
for
approval
of
a
preliminary
development
plan.
Application
project
proposes
the
construction
of
a
2786
square
foot
recreation
building
and
it
is
exclusive
to
serving
the
six
single
family
resident
residences
on
JC's
Cove
1.53,
acre
property
zones
Ag,
and
it's
located
at
one
JC's
Cove,
but
actually
is
Parcels
up
front
from
May
River
Road
property
is
currently
vacant.
E
E
A
little
background
on
August
11
2015,
the
town
of
Bluffton
adopted
Town
ornaments
2015-17,
which
annexed
all
of
the
parcels
on
JC's,
Cove
and
rezone
the
parcels
to
AG
zoning
District
as
specified
in
the
adoption
by
Town
Council.
This
lot,
meaning
the
subject
lot.
We're
talking
about
right
now
that
front
coming
River
Road
can
only
be
utilized
for
a
common
open
space,
but
it
can
include
a
recreational
building
to
serve
the
six
single-family
residences
at
JC's.
Cove
staff
comments
on
a
preliminary
development
plan
were
reviewed
at
September
6
2023
development
review
committee.
E
E
E
What's
being
proposed,
is
a
two-story
recreation
building,
totaling
2786
square
feet,
the
six
residential
lots
max
out
the
residential
density
of
the
JC's
Cove
subdivision
as
it
was
brought
into
the
town.
I
mentioned
it's
in
the
highway
Corridor
overlay,
there's
a
50-foot
conservation,
easement
adjacent
to
the
cemetery
buffer.
That's
shown
on
the
plan.
E
E
E
Planning
Commission
has
the
authority
to
take
the
following
action.
They
can
approve
the
application
as
submitted
by
the
applicant.
You
can
approve
the
application
with
conditions
you
can
table
the
application
or
you
can
deny
the
application
as
submitted
by
the
applicant.
The
staff
recommendation
is
finds
out.
The
requirements
of
section
310
3A
of
the
Udo
is
met.
It
recommends
that
the
Planning
Commission
approve
the
application
as
submitted
and
then
I'll
open
up
for
any
questions
you
may
have
for
me
or
the
applicant.
G
I'll
just
say
that
and
identify
yourself:
okay,
it's
very
scary,
engineering,
I'm,
a
civil
engineer
on
the
project.
Mr
Saba
is
just
trying
to
develop
the
site
which
was
originally
approved
with
the
annexation.
It
had
to
remain
open
space,
and
so
the
town
approved
a
rec
center
and
we're
within
the
guidelines
of
the
annexation.
Restructible.
F
Just
one
question
in
the
DRC
comments:
you
weren't
sure
about
the
size
of
the
Ada
parking.
Did
you
confirm
that
we're
sure
about
the
in
the
in
the
in
the
DRC
comments
you
said
specifically
could
not
tell
the
dimensions
of
the
accessible
parking
it
must
be
such
and
such
and
so
forth.
That
did
you
confirm
the
size
of
the
Ada
parking.
F
D
D
Okay,
you
know
my
one
concern
right
and
just
to
say
it
in
public
when
this
was
passed
by
Town
Council.
The
original
request
included
a
commercial
building
up
front
for
offices,
and
that
is
not
what
we're
talking
about
approving
just
to
make
sure
we're
all
clear
we're
talking
about
a
recreation
building
for
use
of
the
six
homes,
not
for
them
to
have
businesses
or
offices
in
this
building
just
trying
to
stick
with
Town
council's
approval.
That's
why
we
had
that
conversation.
C
D
D
The
second
item
on
the
agenda
is
Magnolia
Square
development
plan,
a
request
by
Willie
Powell
of
Ward
Edwards
engineering
on
behalf
of
Ed
ois.
Thank
you,
a
vrb
Enterprises
LLC
and
Trevor
Wells
for
approval
of
a
preliminary
development
plan.
Application
the
applicant
proposes
to
construct
site
infrastructure,
including
an
internal
streetscape,
drives
parking
walks,
utilities,
drainage
and
storm
water
to
serve
four
mixed-use
Lots,
two
commercial
lots
and
four
residential
lots.
D
The
subject
property
contains
three
lot
zone:
neighborhood
General,
two
lot
zone,
neighborhood
core
and
two
lots:
zoned
residential
General
and
consists
of
boy
you're
up
for
punishment.
There
aren't
you
three
different
zoning
consists
of
3.86
Acres
identified
by
the
following
tax
map
numbers
referenced
on
our
agenda
and
is
located
at
1195
to
1217,
May,
River,
Road
and
15
to
19
Jason,
Street,
Mr,
Frazier.
E
The
preliminary
development
plan
for
Magnolia
Square,
it's
a
request
by
Willie
Powell
of
Ward
Edwards
engineering
on
behalf
of
the
property
owners,
Ed
goas
of
Erb
Enterprises
and
Trevor
Wells
for
approval
of
a
preliminary
development
plan
project
proposes
the
construction
of
an
internal
streetscape,
drives
parking
walks,
utilities,
drainage
and
storm
water
to
serve
four
mixed
use.
Lots,
two
commercial
lots
and
four
residential
lots.
E
The
application
is
a
preliminary
development
plan
request,
subject
to
the
standard
set
forth
in
the
town's
unified
development.
Ordinance
Parcels
within
the
nghd
district
will
require
certificate
of
appropriativeness
historic
district
review
and
approval
and
Parcels
within
the
NC
districts
are
also
within
the
highway
Corridor
overlay.
So
they
will
require
a
certificate
of
appropriateness,
Highway,
Corridor
overlay
review
and
approval.
So
all
of
the
properties
with
Frontage
on
May
River
Road
will
be
coming
back
for
one
or
the
other
on
the
kofas.
E
The
reason
for
we,
the
originally
this
parcel
that
Trevor
Wells
property
property
at
1195,
May,
River
Road,
which
which
is
developed,
they're,
proposing
additional
off-site
originally
providing
off,
proposing
off-site
improvements
where
the
where
that's
this
would
share
a
property
line.
It
would
actually
there's
some
existing
Landscaping
out
here
now
and
bio
swell
drainage
out
here
now.
So
this
would
be
moving
the
entrance.
It
would
also
be
providing
parking
on
both
sides.
After
internally
discussing
this,
we
we
decided
it
would
be
a
better
approach
to
include
that
parcel.
E
As
part
of
this
whole
development
and-
and
that
was
the
reason
for
the
second
submittal-
that
they
provided.
As
mentioned,
we
have
residential
in
the
back
at
slot.
Six
seven
and
eight
up
front
are
four
mixed-use
Lots
on
the
east
side,
Lot
five,
five,
a
and
5B
is
neighborhood
commercial
and
then
the
existing
development
that
that
I've
already
talked
about
the
the
road
would
be
coming
out
of
the
May
River
row
parking
lot
across
here.
The
first
four
parking
spaces
are
will
actually
be
dedicated
spaces
allocated
to
May
River
row.
E
There'll
be
some
off-site
improvements
tying
in
sidewalks.
There's
good
good
sidewalk
circulation
within
the
project
opposite
stock
Farm
Road
would
be
the
entrance,
so
this
would
become
a
little
bit
busier
intersection.
There
would
have
to
be
some
striping
on
stock
Farm
Road
they've
already
recognized
that.
E
This
was
included
in
your
packet.
It's
a
good
description
of
the
development
summary
they're,
showing
what,
within
this
table,
I
hope
you
had
a
chance
to
look
at
it.
They
are
are
showing
the
proposed
building
sizes
which
which
in
most
cases
is
smaller
than
what
would
be
allowed
on
the
property
they're.
Providing
the
parking
required
access
for
the
residential
will
be
three
drives,
and
then
let
me
jump
back
will
be
from
three
driveways
from
Jason
Street
for
the
mixed-use
lots
and
the
commercial
lot.
E
E
E
Find
a
commission
shall
consider
the
criteria
set
forth
in
section
3103a
of
the
udl
and
assessing
the
application
for
preliminary
development
plan.
Same
criteria
I
showed
you
a
moment
ago
with
the
other
project.
Owning
commission.
Has
the
authority
to
approve
the
application
is
submitted,
approve
the
application
with
conditions
table
the
application
or
deny
the
application,
as
submitted
by
the
applicant
found.
E
The
reason
we
added
that
condition
with
we
understand
that
the
infrastructure
is
going
to
go
in
basically
phase
one
is
making
it
a
a
pad
ready
development
stubbing
to
the
parcels,
but
as
each
of
these
come
in
there's
a
little
bit
of
a
concern
on
how
these
get
built
staging
areas
as
as
more
command.
You'll
have
I
anticipate
there'll
be
existing
businesses,
while
construction
is
going
on
on
other
Parcels.
I
Willie
Powell,
with
what
Edwards
engineering
with
the
applicants
I
also
have
the
client.
We
have
witness
keeper
and
Walter
Nester
here.
If
you
have
any
questions
for
other
members
of
us,
I
think
they
did
a
really
good
job
of
kind
of
going
through
canopies
and
tree
coverages
as
well.
So
the
way
the
roads
kind
of
do
Meander
a
little
bit,
is
to
go
around
existing
trees.
I
I
We
just
can't
proceed
to
get
Cricket
permits
until
we
get
through
the
preliminary
DRC
stage,
but
we
have
reviewed
those
with
Dot
and
have
written
approval
of
their
locations
as
as
shown,
and
yesterday
we
worked
with
both
the
neighboring
properties
to
coordinate
the
points
of
access
to
help
make
this
as
interconnected
as
possible.
I
think
really.
The
goal
was
to
really
create
an
infill
piece
that
really
connects
itself
to
the
surrounding
pieces.
I
I
think
one
thing
to
note,
too,
is
that
there's
not
any
kind
of
connectivity
from
May
River
Road
to
Jason
Street
via
vehicular
connection,
there's
pedestrian
connections
which
we
wanted
to
have,
but
there's
no
ability
for
a
vehicle
to
go
from
May
River
to
Jason
street.
Through
the
property
Dan
mentioned,
we
do
a
line
across
from
stock
Farm
Road
and
we
will
do
some
restriping
of
the
existing
access
on
stock
Farm
Road
to
help
accommodate
that.
H
I
love
the
plan.
I
think
it's
well
thought
out.
I
do
see
the
notes
on
the
potential
area
for
trash
enclosures.
It
just
looks
like
it's.
Maneuverability
is
going
to
be
a
little
tight.
If
these
are
restaurants,
I
see
the
service
yards
or
those
going
to
also
be
used
for
trash
and
for
trash
pickup.
It's.
I
D
H
F
F
Specifically,
we
talk
about
tree
21,
17,
19
and
22.,
and
you
know
I
think
22
you're
you're
going
to
try
to
save
321.
You
says
it
was
approved
for
me
for
removal
by
Town
staff
on
the
next
comment.
Tree
17
is
called
out
and
you,
the
same
response
was
please
note:
321
was
approved
for
removal.
Same
thing
for
19
21
was
removed,
was
approved
for
removal,
so
my
question
is:
are
17
and
19
and
and
21
all
going
or
was
that
a
misprint
in
the
DRC
response
that
you
provided?
Those.
J
J
The
21,
17
and
19
were
ones
that
that
we
reviewed
in
the
field
and
can
be
removed.
There
were
a
couple
of
them
had
holes
in
the
Trunks
and
they
were
based
on
site
visit,
no
question
about
it.
Remove
them
the
22
was
the
one
that,
as
we
move
forward
with
the
final
plans,
we're
going
to
get
arborist
out
there.
It's
a
I
think
it's
a
white
oak
yeah.
It
was
a
big
white,
a
beautiful
looking
tree,
but
you
look
up.
J
You
start
seeing
the
branches
that
are
dying
off
and
there's
some
around
the
trunk
there's
some
sort
of
some
Decay
around
the
tree
and
the
White
Oaks,
no
matter
what
we
do
around
them
are
our
decline,
basically
declining
the
Live
Oaks,
look
like
they're
declining,
but
they'll
live
for
a
long
time,
but
the
White
Oaks
and
the
Laurel
Oaks
and
several
other
species
are
declining.
Okay,.
F
K
F
F
So
it's
going
to
have
to
really
when
you,
when
you
look
at
the
canopy
and
the
root
protection,
those
are
trees
that
you
know
we're
going
to
have
to
make
sure
that
we
have
your
arborist
there
we're
doing
the
right
protection
according
to
5-3-d-1,
because
those
are
big,
beautiful
trees
and
again
the
way
they're
situated
and
that's
I'm
18
24,
25
and
4.
they're,
pretty
close
to
some
buildings
and
some
construction.
That's
going
to
have
to
go
on
so
I.
J
J
F
J
C
J
A
point
I
mean,
obviously
you
don't
have
any
tenants
yet,
but
no
I
mean
at
this
point
that
and
speaking
to
the
restaurants
right
now,
it's
there's
a
small
ice
cream
shop
and
coffee
shop.
There's
a
base
of
the
two
buildings
that
are
allocated
for
parking
and
again
they're
they're
in
historic
districts,
there's
strict
requirements
on
parking
on
the
lots
and
other
things
that
we
got
to
follow
for
for
those
we
did.
J
As
far
as
the
the
back
to
the
dumpster
question
that
we,
where
we
had
the
dumpster
previously
we
picked
up
a
couple
parking
spots.
There
were.
There
is
a
question
like
well
instead
of
internally,
whether
we
take
out
those
four
spaces
and
put
in
a
dumpster
or
a
service,
maybe
more
of
like
a
service
area
for
trash,
but
I
I
would
suggest
we
keep
the
parking
if
it's
a
couple
extra,
knowing
the
oh.
D
D
I
want
to
camp
for
a
second
on
the
1195
May
River
Road
that
was
brought
in
here
was
that
a
town
decision
was
that
a
joint
decision.
How
did
we
how
and
why
I
know
you
mentioned
the
roads
getting
realigned
in
additional
parking,
but
it
is
I
want
to
understand
the
owner
of
1195's
involvement
in
this.
An
agreement
to
this
and.
E
And
it
had
to
do
with
the
off-site
improvements
that
were
being
proposed
for
for
the
project,
which
was
realigning
the
access
point
and
it
impacts
the
existing
Landscaping
as
well
as
adding
parking
on
it.
We
met
with
them
again.
We
said
it
would
make
more
sense
to
bring
that
parcel
in
they
agreed.
They
confirmed
with
Mr
Wells
Who
provided
a
letter
on
the
front
end,
and
so
he
signed
on
to
the
application
officially
as
part
of
the
project.
E
D
Does
that
apply,
let's
go
down
the
road
15
years
and
1195
wants
to
sell
their
parcel
to
somebody
else.
Is
there
a
common
area?
Is
there
a
POA
that
they
now
are
a
part
of
that's
maintaining
that
driveway
in
between
or
do
we
have
an
issue
where
they
don't
have
access?
Are
there
easements
being
put
in
you
see
where
I'm
going
with
this
yeah.
D
The
thing
we
don't
want
is
for
one
of
the
two
parties
to
sell
and
the
new
owners
to
go.
Wait.
I
don't
have
to
give
you
that
I'm
dealing
with
an
access,
easement
myself,
my
own
property,
so
okay
and
then
the
just
out
of
curiosity-
and
it
was
already
brought
up
about
pervious-
please
use
as
much
pervious
as
possible,
especially
that
close
to
May,
River
and
drainage
issues,
but
did
I
see
there
is
going
to
be
underground
retention
here
there.
I
I
D
F
Sir
yeah
I
was
I
did
want
to
ask
the
same
question.
It
seems
like
you,
have
three
bio
retention
bmps
and
about
six
underground
infiltration
things
throughout
this
area
and
again
I.
Don't
know
this
I'm
not.
Is
that
going
to
be
enough
for
the
amount
of
impervious
roofs
that
we're
adding?
Second
follow-on
question
to
that
I
can't
read
your
grading
plan.
Does
this
move
water
towards
Jason,
Street
or
towards
May
River
Road
I
mean
how
how
do
those
elevations
in
the
grading
work
not.
I
Your
property
right,
so
all
the
the
mirror
of
a
road
is
about
two
foot
higher
than
the
property.
The
streetscape
itself
raised
that
road
up
and
so
what
we're
seeing
now,
based
on
photography
and
sidewalks
and
drainages
all
that
water
goes
to
the
rear
toward
Jason
Street,
and
so
we're
going
to
collect
it
all
throughout
the
site.
Do
the
treatments
and
the
kitchen
reduction,
and
ultimately
it
ties
in
to
the
existing
system.
I
That's
on
Jason,
Street
and
from
there
it
goes
east
or
pet
Oak
and
then
from
there
Works
itself
back
down
and
out
and
ties
into
the
local
park
system
as
it
comes
to
outs.
So
all
that
does
go
to
the
rear
door.
Jason
Street,
not
toward
May,
River,
Road,
there's
kind
of
a
break
where
the
deli
and
its
parking
lot
kind
of
comes
into
the
front
and
goes
out.
This
is
going
to
go
to
the
back
and
goes
out
that
way.
C
D
D
Murder,
your
cope
specifically
has
had
issues
throughout
the
years
with,
and
it
it's
not
y'all,
but
with
Bluffton
Park
having
a
lot
of
runoff
coming
off
it,
and
so
there's
been
some
erosion
on
some
of
the
properties
there.
So
I
just
ask
you
human
to
human
here,
be
as
responsible
as
you
can
to
keep
as
much
of
that
runoff
away,
because
it'll
it'll
make
life
easier
on
the
people.
Downstream.
I
D
Part
of
part
of
this
parcel,
just
because
it's
in
three
different
zoning
districts
part
has
to
go
through
historic
preservation.
Part
has
to
go
through
Highway,
Corridor,
overlay
and
part
has
to
go
through.
Nothing,
so
I
think
that's
going
to
tell
us
which
way
it's
going
to
get
developed
as
we
go
through
it.
F
D
Did
the
Huffman's
live
directly
across
the
street?
They
live
at
either
18
or
20
Jason
Street,
and
they
said
it's
wonderful.
They
love
what
they
saw.
I
showed
them
your
initial
mock-up
when
there
were
10
or
11,
not
nine,
and
they
just
said
to.
Please
pay
attention
to
run
off
and
pay
attention
to
trees
and
traffic
and
by
not
having
a
cut
through
Road.
You
help
the
traffic
and
it
looks
like
you're
saving
the
larger
Laurel,
Oaks
and
other
trees
on
there
and.
D
J
F
I
move
that
Town
staff
finds
requirements
of
this
section
of
the
unified
development.
Orders
have
been
met
and
recommends.
Planning
Commission
approved
the
application
with
the
following
condition.
At
the
time
of
final
development
plan,
submittal
provide
a
construction
sequencing
plan
that
demonstrates
the
proposed
phase
construction
of
the
development.
B
Katie
good
evening,
commissioners,
as
chairman
Denmark
just
indicated,
this
is
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
for
the
highway
Corridor,
so
keeping
in
mind.
This
is
a
review
of
the
architecture,
landscaping
and
lighting
for
this
site.
The
site,
design
elements
are
all
reviewed
through
the
development
plan
process.
B
This
is
the
site
plan.
I
have
zoomed
it
out
really
far
here,
because
while
the
street
that
leads
in
is
a
portion
of
the
review,
so
the
landscaping
that's
associated
there
is
included.
Most
of
what
we
are
looking
at
is
on
the
right
half
of
your
screen
here
in
the
area
that
has
pickleball
courts
and
the
building
that
is
associated
with
it.
So
I've
zoomed
in
a
little
bit
closer
here,
because,
while
that
street
portion
is
important,
the
more
important
stuff
that
we're
looking
at
is
this
section
right
here.
B
B
This
is
the
roof
plan,
so
I
have
labeled
in
red
on
the
screen
which
direction
it's
facing
because
it's
longer
than
it
is
wide
if
you're
looking
at
it
like
the
site
plan,
but
that
doesn't
fit
on
a
screen
very
well,
so
I
rotated
it
for
you.
The
parking
lot
will
be
at
the
bottom
here,
which
is
facing
the
out
parcels
and
Highland
Crossings
Drive.
The
area
that
is
at
the
top
of
your
screen
faces
cane
Drive,
which
is
the
faces
all
of
the
courts
and
then
came
Drive.
B
These
are
the
elevations,
so
these
are
the
front
which
is
technically
the
right
hand
side,
because
everything
is
in
the
corridor.
Highway,
170
or
46
is
going
to
be
your
front.
However,
this
is
the
front
of
the
building
which
is
facing
towards
the
parking
lot
towards
Highlands
Highland,
Crossing
Drive,
and
then
the
rear
elevation
here
is
what
is
facing
towards
the
courts
and
then
beyond
the
courts
cane
Drive.
B
This
is
the
zoomed
in
oh
I
like
this
is
I'm.
Sorry,
these
are
the
side
elevations
here,
so
you've
got
the
the
right
side
which
faces
towards
a
state
drive
and
the
left
side,
which
is
the
front
facing
Highway,
170,
again
labeled
in
red
for
you,
because
it
does
get
a
little
bit.
Confusing
I
have
a
Post-It
note,
which
I've
drawn
a
beautiful
day
to
be
proud
picture
of
this
building
footprint,
so
that
I
can
keep
these
things
all
straight.
B
I've
already
confused
them
a
couple
times
so
I've,
hopefully
labeled
them
all
so
that
you
guys
have
a
better
understanding
of
what
is
facing,
which
direction
I've
included
the
sections
through
the
building
which
were
included
in
the
submittal
documents,
I
cut
and
paste
these
so
that
they
fit
better
on
a
screen.
Your
packet
includes
everything
that
was
in
there,
including
title
blocks
Etc,
but
I've
only
included
some
of
the
sections
through
here
I
do
have
access
to
your
entire
packet.
Should
you
need
something
that
is
not
on
one
of
these.
B
Competitions
floor
plan
and
roof
plan,
so
you've
got
Highway.
170
would
be
at
the
top
of
the
screen.
You
can
see
the
little
picnic
tables
under
the
roof
which
will
be
exposed
here
on
the
bottom
of
your
screen
that
faces
towards
the
courts.
Then
the
single
door
here
is
facing
towards
Highway
ones.
Oh
no,
I'm,
correct,
okay,
I'm,
sorry,
that's
facing
towards
the
building
and
this
side
that
has
the
surface
area
is
facing
towards
The
Far
Side
of
the
Court
away
from
the
building
and
170.
B
so
again
facing
the
courts
in
a
state
drive.
Is
this
section
here
facing
towards
170?
Is
the
top
right
facing
cane
Drive?
Is
the
bottom
right
and
facing
the
out
Parcels
in
Highland
Crossing,
but
it
is
located
behind
the
primary
structure,
so
you
will
not
see
it
from
Highland
crossing.
That's
just
the
way
it's
facing
and
the
sections
that
go
along
with
that
confessions.
B
Building
I've
also
included
the
details
for
you
again
they're
small,
on
the
screen
and
they
are
cut
up
very
small,
but
I
can
zoom
in
if
we
need
them
as
well
as
a
great
3D
view
that
has
been
provided.
I
included
that
little
site
plan
with
an
arrow
for
how
you
would
be
looking
at
this
on
the
site
plan
here,
Highway
170
is
at
the
very
top
of
your
screen.
B
B
I've
included
the
landscape
plan
on
the
slides
here
for
you,
so
we
have
again.
This
is
the
primary
structure
which
does
this
is
again
a
large
site,
so
it
cuts
off
of
this
page
and
will
continue
on
to
the
next.
The
outdoor
courts
are
here.
This
is
your
dumpster
enclosure
over
here
in
your
little
concessions
building
here.
B
Again,
the
entire
submittal
documents
are
in
your
packet,
I
just
cut
and
paste
some
of
that
information.
That
is
specific
to
the
staff
report.
You've
received
the
colors
and
materials
have
been
proposed
here,
so
they've
got
all
neutral
tones
with
a
little
bit
of
Savannah
gray,
brick
in
a
Cherokee
color.
B
The
color
scheme
matches
the
requirements
and
then
the
parking
and
quartzite
lighting
plan
this
one
is
impossible
to
get
on
a
screen
for
you.
That
is
in
front
of
you.
It
would
fit
on
this
here,
but
it
is
a
lot
of
numbers.
So
I've
only
included
these
two
on
here.
Your
packet
does
have
all
of
it.
Jason
sent
me
an
email
earlier.
I
did
see
that
he's
gone
for
a
variously.
That
indicated.
B
I
I
made
an
error
in
the
staff
report
on
the
maximum
for
the
parking
area,
so
I
apologize
in
advance
for
that
they
have
their
lighting
expert
here
to
speak
on
behalf
of
the
project
as
well.
However,
for
the
parking
area,
the
maximum
is
actually
8.32,
which
is
within
the
the
range
for
the
it's
under
the
maximum,
the
under
the
maximum
maximum
for
the
site
and
their
minimum
does
exceed
that
minimum.
B
So
they've
met
that
as
well,
so
their
average
is
still
proposed
as
2.7
foot
candles
and
it's
permitted
to
be
2.4
so
they're
over
a
little
tiny
bit
on
that.
But
the
other
two
numbers
for
the
parking
area
are
within
the
range
that
is
permitted
by
our
ordinance.
The
quartzite
is
well
over,
however,
as
we've
discussed
through
the
development
plan
process
and
staff
has
discussed
with
the
applicant.
This
is
a
determination,
that's
going
to
need
to
be
made
by
the
Planning
Commission,
because
this
is
not
something
that
is
accounted
for
in
our
ordinance.
B
We
have
a
lot
of
different
uses
that
can
be
there
and
they
mostly
include
walking
paths,
parking
areas,
landscaped
walking
paths,
unlandscaped
walking
paths.
Basically,
just
walking
paths
is
what
I've
summarized,
but
sporting
Sports
fields
and
courts
are
not
something
that
we're
accounted
for.
So
they've
brought
someone
in
to
speak
more
educatedly
than
I
can
on
the
lighting
plan
that
they've
submitted.
B
If
you
look
specifically
on
the
ones
that
are
near
the
championship,
Court
since
that's
set
into
the
property
and
away
from
some
of
the
other
courts,
you
can
see
how
abruptly
those
numbers
drop
off
so
right
at
the
light
you're
going
to
get
a
really
high
count,
but
it
does
drop
off
fairly
quickly
behind
it.
So
they
are
cut
off
bulbs
that
are
going
to
be
successful
in
at
least
that
approach.
Whether
or
not
the
number
is
appropriate
is
up
to
y'all,
as
this
is
a
certificate
of
appropriateness,
the
HPC
considered
I'm.
B
Sorry,
the
Planning
Commission
hi
guys
considers
the
criteria
which
are
found
in
section
317
3
of
our
unified
development
ordinance,
which
speaks
to
the
design
standards,
the
in
Article
5,
which
are
not
applicable
to
this
site,
as
it
is
located
within
a
PUD.
The
application
needs
to
be
in
conformance
to
the
development
agreement,
PUD
concept,
plan,
master
plan,
subdivision
plan
and
any
other
agreements
and
plans
that
are
applicable.
That
would
include
the
development
plan
and
then
the
application
must
comply
with
the
requirements
of
the
applications.
B
Manual
staff
went
through
the
items
and
have
some
conditions.
However,
the
Planning
Commission
has
the
authority
to
approve
the
application,
as
submitted
by
the
applicant
approve.
The
application
with
conditions
deny
the
application
is
submitted
by
the
applicant
or
at
request
of
the
applicant,
could
potentially
table
the
application
should
they
find
that
they
need
additional
information.
B
Staff's
recommendation
is
that,
with
the
following
items,
it
could
meet
the
requirements
of
section
317-3
and
could
potentially
be
approved
with
conditions.
Should
you
see
fit
I
would
love
to
run
through
those
conditions
quickly
before
we
open
up
to
the
applicant,
if
that's
all
right
with
you,
madam
chairman,
so
for
the
architecture.
B
Are
going
to
be
this
rear
elevation
here
or
left
side
if
you're
talking
Highway
Frontage
this
area
here
that
has
the
vertical
lines
is
the
metal
board
and
batten
siding?
It
is
labeled
on
the
zoomed
in
version
of
the
elevations,
but
in
the
full-size
one.
It's
this
vertical
lined
area
here
it
is
on
only
this
side
and
it
is
stepped
back
from
the
edges,
so
it
doesn't
change
material
on
a
flat
plane.
There
is
a
eight
inch
or
so
I.
The
lines
were
thicker
than
I.
B
B
Thank
you.
So
this
is
the
overall
when
the
math
was
done
on
this.
It
is
based
on
the
information
that
we
have
with
this
plan.
With
this
plan
it
shows
the
existing
buffer
and
some
of
the
trees
are
called
out.
However,
as
on
most
tree
surveys,
that
count
usually
stops
at
either
8
or
14,
depending
on
who's
doing
the
tree
survey
that
is
used
as
the
base
here.
So
we
counted
the
trees
that
we
could
that
existed
on
the
plan.
B
B
They're
being
shown
at
10
to
12,
so
while
the
maximum
does
show
that
it
needs
to
be
the
minimum,
so
it
could
be
12
to
14
if
they'd
like
or
it
can
be
a
minimum
of
12
maximum
of,
however
big
they
want,
but
it
needs
to
meet
those
minimum
requirements
and
then
the
shrubs
are
not
meeting
the
height
requirement
at
time
of
planting,
except
for
the
shrubby
U
H.
So
those
just
need
to
be
increased
in
size.
B
B
Landscaping
between
the
courts
and
Estates
Drive
also
need
to
be
increased
to
provide
a
buffer
there.
There
are
some
trees
there.
They
just
are
not
quite
tall
enough
to
really
disguise
the
fencing
that
is
going
to
go
around
the
courts,
and
so
this
is
this
area
here,
specifically,
that
needs
to
be
a
little
bit
taller
at
time
of
planting
to
ensure
that
that
fence,
which
it
is
a
chain
link
fence.
B
It
is
a
coated
and
and
screen.
Thank
you,
Shield
is
the
word.
I
was
coming
up
with,
but
screened
fence.
However,
that
type
of
fence
was
not
permitted
in
this
District.
While
we
know
it's
a
requirement
of
a
pickleball
facility
like
this
or
another
sporting
field,
and
understand
that
we
just
need
to
make
sure
that
it's
going
to
be
adequately
screened
from
the
start,
rather
than
having
to
wait
a
couple
years
to
get
that
height
in
there
to
prevent
that
from
a
state
drive.
B
The
lighting
I
already
went
over
the
the
parking
area.
It
is
up
to
the
Planning
Commission
to
make
a
determination,
the
appropriateness
of
the
illumination
levels
for
the
quartz
area,
and
then
the
last
item
under
lighting
is
that
it
is
up
to
you
all
to
make
a
determination
on
the
appropriateness
of
the
use
of
LEDs
again
this
code
written
before.
B
That
was
a
thing,
so
we
have
to
make
that
determination
every
single
time,
since
it
is
a,
it
is
a
contractual
agreement
that
is
set
in
place
rather
than
something
that
we
can
amend
quite
easily
to
reflect
that.
So
those
are
the
only
items
that
I
have
under
the
lighting
for
the
additional
requirements.
Again,
these
are
things
that
we've
kind
of
gone
over,
but
the
sidewalk
needs
to
be
provided
along
a
state
drive.
It
was
condition
of
the
preliminated
development
plan.
B
It
has
since
been
added
to
the
development
plan
documents,
but
because
these
came
in
a
month
and
a
half
ago,
or
so
they
do
not
reflect
that.
So
we'll
need
to
see
the
Estate
Drive
sidewalk
at
the
base
of
your
screen.
Here
the
designated
shuttle
bus,
slash,
pull
out
location
was
indicated
on
the
preliminary
development
plan
as
well,
and
it
I
believe
is
showing
up
as
that
here,
but
it's
not
showing
up
on
our
plans.
So
we
just
need
clarification
of
that.
B
However,
it
can
also,
if
you
choose
to
Omit,
that
one
it'll
we'll
still
need
to
be
shown
on
the
development
plan
and
then
the
final
one
is
that
or
second
to
final
sorry.
Is
that
all
comments
from
the
DRC
and
Planning
Commission
for
the
development
plan
will
need
to
be
addressed
and
compliant
before
you
can
issue
a
certificate
of
appropriateness.
B
My
always
statement
is
that
if
they
have
to,
for
some
reason,
change
the
whole
site,
because
the
development
plan
has
to
change,
this
kofo
would
need
to
potentially
start
again
if
it
cannot
be
amended,
because
something
that
is
not
approved
cannot
be
amended
and
then
the
last
one
is
that
sign
permits
are
separate
and
will
need
to
be
pulled.
So
any
signage
that
you
see
on
the
elevations
is
purely
for
for
ideas
and
not
necessarily
something
that
could
be
approved.
It
will
have
to
be
reviewed
separately.
K
B
The
ordinance
allows
or
does
not
allow
for
flat
roofs.
It
does
allow
for
roofs
that
have
a
4
and
12
pitch
or
greater
and
those
concealed
by
a
pediment.
In
the
past,
a
parapet
has
been
permitted
to
be
something
that
we
allow
to
cover
those
flat
roofs.
The
Planning
Commission
has
seen
several
of
those
come
through
the
challenge
that
we
have
with
it
or
I
have
I'm
sorry.
Staff
has
with
it
on
this
specific
one.
Is
that
the
parapet?
B
Sorry
I
almost
said
pet
them
in
again
parapit
proposed
on
this
section
here,
is
very
shallow
and
actually
falls
below
the
roof
line,
as
it
would
meet
up
with
the
rear
of
that
flat
or
0.5
and
12
sloped
roof
of
this
portion
of
the
building.
So
the
parapet
Falls
here,
which
actually
falls
below
the
edge
of
the
roof
line,
while
it
is
understood
that
the
human
standing
on
the
courts
looking
up
at
the
building
won't
ever
get
the
perspective
where
they
are
standing
in
line
with
that
parapet
as
flat.
B
A
B
F
B
So
some
of
them-
yes,
some
of
them
know
because
this
is
the
first
time
that
the
certificate
appropriateness
has
formally
been
presented.
Steph
has
had
a
couple
conversations
about
some
of
these
items,
but
as
things
evolve,
so
specifically
it's
going
to
be
the
lighting
and
the
architecture.
This
is
the
first
time
that
those
have
been
put
down
on
paper
because
they're
the
first
time
they've
been
there,
the
Landscaping
at
conceptual
it's
fairly
minimal
for
the
development
plan.
A
L
Jackie
Atkins
with
court
Atkins
group
and
I
have
a
host
of
people
over
here.
The
owner
developer,
Rick
Megan
I've
got
the
lighting
and
electrical
experts
Warren
and
Jason
and
Mr
tiller
over
here
for
landscaping
and
then
I.
Don't
think
we
have
any
legal
things
but
Walter's
here
to
support
us
since
he
was
already
here.
So
he
wanted
to
because.
K
D
L
Couple
big
picture
things
just
from
the
highway
quarter,
just
to
kind
of
give
you
a
little
insight
into
how
we
ended
up
with
this
plan.
We
did
intentionally
Orient
the
building
this
way
so
that
again
from
the
corridor
perspective,
which
is
Highway
170,
it
would
have
a
minimal
impact
to
the
corridor.
When
we
get
into
lighting
levels.
L
And
then
we
can
talk
about
lighting,
but
I
just
wanted
to
give
you
a
little
bit
of
background
on
that
and
then
I
know.
Josh
has
some
things
in
regarding
the
buffer
and
we
did
talk
to
staff,
it's
essentially
an
opaque
buffer,
and
so
the
we
have
photographs
of
it
or,
if
you've
been
out
to
the
site,
like
you
can't
see
through
it.
So
the
discussions
with
the
town
were
during
development
plan
was
we're
going
to
leave
that
opaque
buffer
and
protect
it
and
then
work
with.
L
If,
for
some
reason,
something
dies
that
we,
but
it
really
didn't,
seem
appropriate
to
come
in
and
tear
out
the
buffer
in
order
to
calculate
everything
that
was
there
when
it's
already
100
opaque.
So
just
a
couple
things
conversations
have
happened
with
staff
on
the
development
specific
to
the
architecture,
which
is
what
my
parts
are
a
couple
things.
L
But
considering
that
we
have
a
lot
of
party
Plank
and
everything
in
here
we'd
actually
be
happy
to
switch
that
to
party
siding.
If
we
felt
like
that
was
a
more
appropriate
material.
We
can
just
cross
it
off
the
list,
but
we
did,
as
Katie
mentioned,
tried
to
provide
a
break
in
those
materials,
but
I'll
just
offer
that
up.
If
that's
something
that
you
feel
strongly
about,
that
we
can,
since
we've
got
Hardy
on
the
other
side,
we
can
consider
Hardy
on
this
side
as
well
and
I'll.
L
A
D
I
am
sorry,
I
love,
three
of
the
elevations
I,
think
they're,
fine
I,
don't
have
the
problems
or
concerns
that
some
people
with
the
parapets
might
have,
and
that
and
I
understand
and
I'll
agree
but
looks
like
an
auto
repair
shop
on
the
one
side.
Are
these
roll-up
garage
doors
with
Landscaping
right
in
front
of
them
and.
L
D
A
L
L
L
L
A
L
I
think
the
hearty
we've
already
got
it
there.
I
haven't
seen
Amazon
warehouses
are
usually
tilt
up
construction,
but
you
know
I
I
think
we
can
get
some
some
shade
and
Shadow
there
and
some
articulate
the
the
height
of
that
and
the
storefront,
and
you
know
again
it's
the
back
of
the
building,
but
it
is
an
important
side
and
we
don't
want
it
to
be
unattractive
from
the
other
courts,
but
we
certainly
wanted
to
highlight,
as
you
come
down,
that
Boulevard
on
the
site.
L
D
A
L
A
L
Yeah
and
you've
got
there's
some
connecting
walk
there
as
well.
So
again
we
could
maybe
it's
already
pulls
out.
If
I
don't
know,
I
can't
zoom
in
here,
but
there's
already
that
little
Bay
pops
out
I
think
three
or
four
feet
already.
So
we
could
begin
to
just
articulate
that
further
up
and
and
Define
it
and
keep
everything
else
again,.
L
F
C
C
L
You
mean
the
the
kind
of
octagonal,
so
inside
I
don't
know
there,
you
go,
there's
a
there's.
A
bar
restaurant
there's
an
event
space
up
there
and
in
concert
it
there's
a
restaurant
building.
That
kind
of
attaches
to
this
thing
with
an
outdoor
dining.
But
it's
not
part
of
this
project,
but
I'm,
just
kind
of
describing
what's
happening
there
and
that's
the
parking
lot.
No
it
attaches
to
this
building
was.
L
Oh
there
we
go
right,
so
there
is
a
pad
right
here
and
that
that
is
a
restaurant
building.
That
then
ties
into
this
piece
and
so
that
that
porch
extends
around
that
and
it
becomes
this
outdoor
viewing
platform
through
the
tournament
court
and
they
do
televise
things
up
there.
So
it's
a
hip
hexagon,
it's
a
hexagon
with
a
it's,
not
really
rounded
Dome,.
A
A
L
L
A
A
A
A
A
M
D
A
C
A
A
H
F
A
L
A
L
A
B
A
D
L
F
D
F
F
N
A
N
A
L
N
C
P
A
O
One:
okay,
all
right,
my
name
is
Josh
tiller
I'm,
the
land,
planner
landscape,
architect,
I've
been
involved
with
this
property
a
long
time
and
the
property
owner
going
back
almost
20
years,
and
at
that
time,
Highway
170
was
just
a
two-lane
Shady
Country
Road
hard
been
wide
in
the
four
lanes
like
it
is
now
in
the.
If
we
go
back
to
the
when
the
Jones
estate
was
approved
and
planned,
that
was
two
thousand
almost
24
years
ago.
O
The
intent
of
the
buffer
was
to
be
an
opaque
buffer
as
it
existed
at
the
time,
and
we
still
have
that
original
opaque
buffer.
This
is
we're
on
the
east
side
of
170.
That's
the
original
Corridor
for
Highway
170
to
two
lane.
Road
I
said
that
what
you
see
there
in
those
photographs
is
the
same
exact
buffer.
That
was
there
20
years
20
years
ago,
plus
probably
going
back
a
century
I,
don't
know
you
can
look
at
Aerials.
O
We
as
we
were
going
through
DRC,
because
it's
visually,
you
can
see
it.
It's
an
opaque
buffer.
We
felt
that
it
was.
It
would
be
a
little
too
cumbersome
to
have
to
go
out
there
and
survey
every
little
shrub
every
little
understory
tree
every
little
sapling
to
meet
the
standard
because
visually
it
already
meets
the
standard
because
under
the
Jones
agreement,
if
you're
planting
a
if
you
had
a
naked
buffer
there,
if
you're
planting
it,
it
only
has
to
be
at
50
opacity
after
three
years
and
that's
the
extent
of
it.
O
If
you
look
at
the
Corridor
standards,
there's
two
different
there's
buffer
planting
standards
and
there's
parking
lot,
planting
standards
and
the
sizes
plant
material
sizes
are
different
and
the
buffer,
the
shrubs
minimum
two
feet
in
the
parking
lot
and
around
the
building.
It's
one
foot,
so
we
kept
to
those
standards
because
all
the
plant
material
were
showing
here
applies
to
the
parking
lot
and
the
foundation
plantings.
O
Additionally,
in
the
Jones
estate,
the
modified
Highway
Corridor
salons,
the
minimum
tree
size
is
10
feet
and
that's
everywhere,
including
the
buffer
and
all
the
all
the
parking
lot
plant
material.
So
the
sizes
meet
the
standard,
the
the
sizes
for
shrubs.
Only
the
parking
lot
of
sizes
relate
to
that.
So
we
feel
that
we
meet
the
landscape
requirement,
we're
willing
to
go
back
out
after
land
disturbance
to
determine
if
there's
any
additional
plantings
needed
in
the
buffer.
As
far
as
state
drive
goes
during
DRC.
O
M
O
So
as
far
as
the
location
I
think,
there
was
a
comment
about
the
location
of
the
shuttle
that
is
here
is
just
like
in
under
the
same
spot
as
what
was
approved
at
DRC
and
all
that
was
spelled
out
in
the
Civil
plans.
The
same
goes
for
the
sidewalk.
That
Sidewalk
actually
falls.
It
ends
here
down
here,
going
into
the
residential
portion
of
Palmetto
Point
That
Sidewalk
Ends
on
the
east
side
of
Estate
Drive
we're
going
to
connect
there
that
will
connect
and
go
all
the
way
through
to
gibbett
Road.
O
O
F
O
F
O
K
O
L
Going
to
start
and
then
you're
going
to
introduce
okay,
James,
Adkins,
Court,
Atkins
group
and
then
Warren
is
left.
Corn,
Jr
and
Jason
is
the
lighting
expert.
As
we
kind
of
started
working
through
the
lighting,
a
unique
situation.
We
didn't
have
again
when
the
Jones
PUD
that
stuff
didn't
really
exist.
Pickleball,
probably
wasn't
even
really
a
thing,
and
so
we
had
to
consult
the
experts.
L
So
we
fooled
all
of
the
the
standards
for
different
play
for
pickleball
and
I.
Think
one
of
the
priorities
and
I
think
you
all
know
and
I'll
just
kind
of
read
the
quote
that
you
know
pickleballs
for
all
ages.
It
is
a
sport
that
a
lot
of
older
people
do
partake
in
that
maybe
enjoy
tennis,
but
have
smaller
courts.
L
And
so
there
are
standards
in
place
for
safety
and
light
levels
for
the
general
courts
which
are
in
that
kind
of
40
to
50
range
foot,
candle
wise,
there's
some
categories
that
we've
provided
this
to
staff
of
what
those
are
that
would
be
similar
to
let's
say
the
ball
fields
at
Oscar,
Frazier,
Park,
now
they're
set
right
within
a
residential
neighborhood.
We
do
have
the
I
guess,
good
graces,
that
we
are
kind
of
set
back
in
next
to
a
large
storage
unit.
L
So
you
know
we're
not
going
to
be
interrupting
residential
neighborhood
or
have
bright
lights
and,
as
you
can
see,
it's
designed
there's
some
significant
cutoffs.
This
I
thought
this
picture
here
was
a
great
picture.
I
mean
that's
kind
of
what
this
thing
does
on
the
tournament
court
that
does
bump
up
and
is
recommended
to
be
75-foot
candles,
rather
than
the
40
to
50
range.
L
For
you
know,
tournament
play
and
the
standards
that
come
in
from
that
host
tournaments
and
such
we
do
have
the
ability
and
again
these
tournaments
are
not
going
to
be
a
weekly
thing.
There
may
be
I,
don't
know
six
four
six
eight
a
year
maybe
tops,
and
so
we
do
have
the
ability,
probably
to
put
some
lighting
controls
on
those
so
that
it
would
only
be
amped
up
during
tournaments
and
then
it
would
be
more.
N
D
P
D
L
Building
to
the
left
is
a
two-story
restaurant
building,
and
so
when
that
gets
built,
you
won't
even
it
it's
not
removing
the
lighting
around
the
cord
or
anything.
In
fact,
it
will
end
up
hiding
all
of
it.
The
poles
will
be
lower
than
the
building,
but
the
polls
are
specific
to
the
court.
So
they're
sitting
right
at
the
court
shining
onto
the
course
it
will
be
independent
of
the
future
restaurant
building.
D
B
D
F
L
Well,
I
did
the
development
Christian,
and
that
was
a
topic
of
conversations
of
the
cutoff
and
everything
very
so
special,
and
it's
probably
pretty
close
to
that
about
40
and
change,
and
you
know
where
you're
out
in
the
field
and
then
the
strong
cut
off
and
you've
been
there
in
that
game.
I
was
like
absolutely
amazing
how
they.
L
C
K
B
E
Worked
through
that,
we
have
they
they
have
very
recently
coming
in
and
what
they're
doing
as
a
separate
project.
It's
going
to
be
the
extension
of
the
sidewalk
on
the
opposite
side
of
the
state
from
from
the
pickleball
development,
and
we
are
not
going
to
issue
a
certificate
with
our
occupancy
for
for
building
or
public
private
access
to
the
courts
until
that
is
installed,
and
that's
in
agreement
with
without
presented
to
us.
F
For
one
undulate,
the
elevation
facing
Court
in
Craig
Street,
as
we
discussed
number
two
increase
the
parapet
height
to
hide
the
back
wall,
number
three
change:
the
Dome
to
traditional
Ridge,
three-sided,
hip,
roof
number
four
service
yard,
not
on
170
side
number.
Five
put
a
note
in
about
roof
material
change.
On
the
on
the
drawings
to
correct
it.
Number
six
coordinate
with
staff
on
permanent
bleachers
location.
F
A
M
A
K
B
A
B
Part
of
the
plans,
but
it's
not
installed
currently,
if
that's
what
your
question
is:
we're
good?
Okay,
so
my
understanding
of
the
architecture
is
that
the
real
elevation
is
going
to
be
revised
to
create
articulation
in
the
center,
similar
to
the
front
elevation
and
the
roof
line,
parapet
revised
or
pitched
Roots
added.
But
it's
not
going
to
be
your
pitched
groups
added
right.
B
G
B
B
Born
in
Baton,
okay,
we
have
the
hip.
Roof
is
going
to
be
fixed
to
not
be
a
dome
that
is
magically
done
by
AI.
We
have
a
label
for
the
service
yard.
That's
going
to
be
fixed,
as
well
as
the
labels
for
the
concession
stand.
Consistent
weather
is
asphalt
as
it's
currently
shown,
or
standing
seam
either.
One
is
okay
as
long
as
it
is
what
it
says.
It
is
yes,
okay,
anything
else
for
architecture
that
I'm
missing.
Where.
B
That's
a
word
too
guys.
Don't
worry,
I
can
in
fact
type
the
next
One
Landscaping
we're
crossing
two
three
and
four,
but
we're
adding
a
note
to
indicate
that
if
there
are
holes,
we'll
fix
them
with
staff
in
the
field
after
clearing
has
taken
place,
lighting
LEDs
are
appropriate.
The
illumination
levels
for
the
parking
area
are
appropriate,
or
are
we
dropping
the
middle
to
the
0.3
down
from
what
is
proposed
for
the
parking
area.
B
D
P
I
mean
it's
the
difference
between
2.7
2.4
foot
candles.
You
cannot
be
seen
with
the
human
eye.
Oh
that
being
said,
trying
to
achieve
a
2.4
unit
will
either
you
know,
living
live
fixtures
around
changing
light
fixtures.
You
know
reducing
reduce
the
output
of
each
fixture
or
specific
fixtures.
You
know
it
could
affect
the
whole,
lay
out
the
whole
uniformity
of
the
light
levels
and
everything.
So
you
know
a
good
result
in
the
minimums
dropping
below
the
required
minimum.
It's
just
you
change.
P
P
F
B
D
F
B
F
B
B
F
B
B
B
F
I'm
not
gonna,
read
all
that,
but
could
you
give
me
the
first
part
of
your
your
first
part
of
this
for
making
the
motion
so
I
move
that
we
approve
the
the
the
recommendation
in
front
of
us
for
the
pickleball
construction,
with
all
of
the
conditions
that
we've
identified
I'm
going
to
say,
there's
six
architecture,
conditions.
There
are
one
one
landscape
condition
and
three
three,
no,
two,
no
three
landscape,
three
lighting
conditions
that
are
included
in
this
recommend
is
in
this
motion
is.