►
From YouTube: Historic Preservation Commission Wednesday, November 02, 2022 at 6:00 PM Theodore D. Washington
Description
Historic Preservation Commission
Wednesday, December 07, 2022 at 6:00 PM
Theodore D. Washington Municipal Building, 20 Bridge Street, Henry “Emmett” McCracken Jr.Council Chambers
AGENDA
This meeting can be viewed live on Beaufort County Channel, on Hargray Channel 9 and 113 or on Spectrum Channel 1304.
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. NOTICE REGARDING PUBLIC COMMENTS*
Every member of the public who is recognized to speak shall address the Chairman and in
speaking, avoid disrespect to Commission, Staff, or other members of the Meeting. State your name and address when speaking for the record. COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3)MINUTES.
IV. NOTICE REGARDING ADJOURNMENT
The Historic Preservation Commission will not hear new items after 9:30 p.m. unless authorized by a majority vote of the Commission Members present. Items which have not been heard before 9:30 p.m. may be continued to the next regular meeting or a special meeting date as determined by the Commission Members.
V. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA
VI. ADOPTION OF MINUTES
1. November 2, 2022 Minutes
VII. OLD BUSINESS
VIII. PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA*
IX. NEW BUSINESS
1. Certificate of Appropriateness: A request by Colleen Lawrence as owner, for a Certificate of Appropriateness to allow the rehabilitation of the 775 SF Contributing Resource, known as 38 Boundary Street, in the Old Town Bluffton Historic District and zoned Neighborhood Center -HD. (COFA-09-22-017206) (Staff-Glen Umberger)
2. Certificate of Appropriateness: A request by Robert Breger as owner, for a Certificate of
Appropriateness to allow the construction of a new 1,200 SF Carriage House at 30 Lawrence Town of Bluffton, SC Historic Preservation Commission Agenda December 07, 2022 Street, in the Old Town Bluffton Historic District and zoned Neighborhood General - HD. (COFA-07-22-017007) (Staff-Glen Umberger)
3. Certificate of Appropriateness - Demolition: A request by Nathaniel Pringle, on behalf of the owner, Daisy B. Pringle, to allow the demolition of the structure of approximately 884 SF
located at 12 Dubois Lane in the Old Town Bluffton Historic District and zoned Neighborhood General-HD. (COFA-09-22-017227) (Staff - Glen Umberger)
4. Certificate of Appropriateness - Demolition: A request by Kurt Weinberger for a Certificate of Appropriateness - HD to allow the demolition of the structure of approximately 1,882 SF located at 25 Bruin Road in the Old Town Bluffton Historic District and zoned Neighborhood General-HD. (COFA-09-22-017228)(Staff - Glen Umberger)
5. Certificate of Appropriateness. A request by William Court, on behalf of the owners, Bo
Holland and Susan Soper, for approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness – HD application to allow the construction of a new 2 story Single-Family Residential structure of approximately
2,610 SF and Carriage House of approximately 126 SF located at 6 Wild Spartina Street, Lot 43 of the Tabby Roads Development, in the Old Town Bluffton Historic District and zoned
Neighborhood General-HD. (COFA-10-22-017241) (Staff - Glen Umberger)
X. DISCUSSION
XI. ADJOURNMENT
A
A
And
we
do
have
a
quorum.
Is
that
correct?
We
have
a
quorum,
so
we
could
proceed
forward.
Note
regarding
public
comments.
Every
member
of
the
public
is
recognized.
Speech
shall
address
the
chairman
and
speaking
avoid
disrespect
to
commission
staff
or
other
members
of
the
meeting
state.
Your
name
and
address
in
speaking
for
the
record
comments
are
limited
to
three
minutes
notice
regarding
a
German,
historic
preservation.
A
Commission
will
not
hear
new
items
after
9
30
PM
unless
authorized
as
a
majority
vote
of
the
commission
members
present
items
which
do
not
have
which
have
not
been
heard
by
9
30,
maybe
continue
to
the
next
meeting
or
special
meeting
date
as
determined
by
the
commission.
Members
can
I
get
a
motion
to
adopt
the
agenda
as
written
in.
B
A
C
A
Excuse
me
now
we're
looking
for
the
adoption
of
the
minutes
for
the
November
2nd
2022,
which
they
were
attached
to
our
packet
and
I
hope
everyone
read
through
them
for
mistakes,
but
it
looks
like
they.
They
have
no
mistakes.
Thank
you.
Carrie
you
do
a
wonderful
job.
Can
I
get
a
motion
to
adopt
the
minutes.
A
I
have
a
first
I'm
looking
for
a
second
you
weren't
attending
or
you
were
always
weren't,
okay,
so
I'll.
Second,
thank
you
all
in
favor,
aye
aye,
any
opposed
it
looks
like
the
adoption
of
minutes
is
written.
Thank
you.
Do
we
have
any
old
business
I,
don't
believe
so.
So
it
looks
like
we're
in
the
new
business
and
Glenn.
You
are
up
today
for
all
of
these
I
believe.
A
D
Right,
okay,
good
evening,
everybody,
our
first
item
up
tonight,
is
38
Lawton
Street.
This
is
a
request
by
Colleen
Lawrence
as
owner
for
a
certificate
appropriateness
to
allow
the
rehabilitation
of
775
square
feet
and
contributing
resource
known
as
30
Boundary
Street
located
at
38
Lawton
Street.
This
might
don't
get
too
confusing,
but
this
is
the
law
college
at
38,
Lawton
Street,
to
remind
you
where
it
is
location
map
is
on
you,
your
left
is
there.
Any
map
is
on
the
right.
D
You
may
recognize
this
one
recently
they
did
some
yard
cleanup.
This
is
current
conditions
of
the
property.
As
of
October
from
a
front
elevation
side
elevation,
rear
elevation,
which
now
you
can
see
from
Boundary
Street
and
I'm,
giving
you
some
historic
photographs.
This
is
the
survey
photograph
from
2008.
D
And
the
second
from
also
from
2008.
This
is
the
view
looking
in
from
the
corner
of
Lawton
and
Calhoun,
looking
to
the
north
and
west,
just
to
remind
you,
Rehabilitation
the
active
process
of
making
possibly
compatible
use
for
a
property,
Through
Repair
alterations
and
additions,
while
preserving
Those
portions
or
features
which
conveys
historical,
cultural
or
architectural
values.
D
The
applicant
has
given
us
some
elevations
that
she
Drew,
which
are
fantastic.
These
are
the
proposed
proposed
elevations
of
the
front
facade
the
East
Elevation,
the
rear
elevation
and
the
west
elevation.
She
included
color
schemes
which
we
were
not
improving,
because
we
don't
look
at
color
through
HBC,
but
she
tells
the
colors
of
the
property
that's
going
to
be
painted.
D
As
HPC.
You
saw
consider
the
eight
review
criteria
set
forth
in
section
318-3
of
the
Udo
we're
assessing
an
application
for
certificate
for
perfectness.
You
can
approve
the
application
as
submitted.
You
can
approve
the
application
with
conditions
or
you
may
deny
the
application
as
submitted
when
we
looked
at
the
relevant
review
criteria
for
this
323
application
review
criteria.
This
application
meets
all
those
criteria
under
Section,
515
6
under
architectural
standards.
The
application
also
meets
all
these
criterias.
D
A
I
just
want
to
make
one
note
that
it's
really
wonderful
to
see
that
you
did
this
all
on
your
own.
You
didn't
hire
any
architectural
firms,
so
I
think
it's
a
good
example
to
use.
Is
you
know
you
if
you
do
it
properly
and
you
follow
the
Udo
everything
that
you've
done
in
here
was
just
really
wonderful.
So
thank
you
for
doing
such
a
thorough
job
and
and
I
just
think.
It
needs
to
be
noted
that
you
did
it
on
your
own
too.
I.
B
E
F
F
A
B
A
D
D
Thank
you.
Okay
item
number
two:
this
is
a
certificate
of
appropriateness,
Robert
breger
as
owner
requesting
the
short
preservation
commission
through
the
following
application.
This
is
a
certificate
appropriateness
to
allow
the
construction
of
a
new
1200
square
foot,
Carriage
House,
located
at
number
30
Lawrence
Street
in
the
old
town,
Bluffton
Historic,
District
zone,
neighborhood,
General,
HD
location
up
on
your
left
should
location,
Lawrence
Street
with
the
zoning
matter
to
write
current
conditions.
This
is
the
house
as
it
stands
on
Lawrence
Street
from
the
front.
D
D
Hpcs
are
consider
the
eight
review
criteria
set
forth
in
section
318-3
of
the
Udo
when
assessing
an
application's
first
certificate
of
appropriateness.
Furthermore,
you
can
approve
the
application,
is
submitted,
approved
with
conditions
or
deny
the
application,
as
submitted
by
the
applicant
for
the
proposed
elevations.
We
do
have
a
couple
things.
We
want
to
point
out
that
you
will
have
to
address
this
evening
under
Section.
5156
H
will
need
additional
information
to
provide
to
ensure
that
the
porch
columns
are
permitted.
D
A
D
F
D
A
D
B
G
D
D
G
D
D
H
H
H
Okay
and
I
know
that
those
windows
are
not
exactly
what's
proposed,
though
you
can't
even
tell
whether
they're
casements
or
not,
but
that's
my
style
and
I
like
them.
That
I
think
it's
more
important
that
things
match
that
somebody
can
barely
could
see
that
it's
250
people
and
said
well.
That
might
not
be
a
casement,
so
I'm
asking
the
committee
to
consider
allowing
me
to
have
horizontal
rolling
windows.
H
I
was
going
to
use
those
same
Windows
pretty
much
and
and
I'm
the
object.
The
characters
will
match
this,
except
for
the
bridge.
Roof
pitch
will
be
a
little
bit
greater
because
that's
nobody
wants
to
go
to
the
312
on
a
two-story
house,
but
otherwise
we'll
match
all
the
detail,
and
they
can
do
this
about.
H
Okay,
the
samples
are,
it
looks
like
board
on
board,
but
it's
not
you'll,
never
get
the
same
detail
out
of
wood.
You
can't
really
tell
the
difference,
so
those
were
the
two
exceptions.
Obviously,
because
we
have
a
we
base
their
conflicting
guidelines.
Once
it's
matched
the
house.
One
says
this:
vinyl
is
not
disallowed.
H
It's
not
recommended,
but
it's
not
this
loud.
The
windows
aren't
I,
don't
know
if
they're
not
allowed
or
not
recommended,
but
it's
hard
to
say
not
to
match
the
windows.
When
you
can't
tell
their
casements
are
rollers
so
I'm
asking
for
those
two
things
of
forgiveness.
The
place
is
250
feet
from
that
from
the
road
behind
the
carport.
A
H
A
K
H
K
H
H
H
K
H
G
E
A
E
C
A
E
E
And
that
comes
from
my
experience
of
being
on
the
historic
board
and
where
I
used
to
live,
but
I
feel,
like
my.
My
big
concern
is
that
the
things
that
are
on
either
my
property
or
his
property
or
wherever
it
is,
we
still
don't
believe
that
he
has
certain
groups
on
our
property.
Although
he's
not
meant
to
have
them,
there
should
really
conform
and
Mark.
E
A
L
Here
as
Council
for
the
HBC,
so
the
question
you're
asking
is
about
what
is
you
know,
also
I?
Guess
your
review
criteria
and
you
can
take
in
puzzle,
comment
into
your
consideration
of
the
review
criteria.
One
of
those
criteria
is
Conformity
with
the
applications
manual
and
correct
me:
I'm,
going
to
defer
to
staff
somewhat
on
this
one,
but
in
reviewing
the
application
and
the
application's
manual.
L
L
Adequate
information
to
rely
upon
in
determining
whether
the
proposed
location
is
on
that
property
or
is
going
to
be
within
the
setback
requirements,
in
particular,
in
fact,
on
that
property
because
of
the
Cove
that
runs
behind
it,
and
you
know
that
we
have
by
Miss
Harvey's
property.
There's
the
Sarah
hooks
Riley
house,
and
you
have
the
code
that
kind
of
circles
behind
it.
You're
going
to
have
some
sort
of
River
buffer
protection.
I
would
assume
from
the.
L
L
G
L
L
M
J
J
E
A
E
So
I'm
just
questioning
you're,
relying
on
a
survey
that
isn't
current
so
I,
don't
know
what
it
says
of
concern
to
what
we're
put
and
if
it
is
a
current
survey,
he
can't
have
it
both
ways.
He
can't
have
a
survey
show
that
the
cheese
chicken
coops
are
on
my
property
and
leave
them
there
and
actually
I
get
I.
Get
that
this
crap's,
not
the
right
menu,
correct.
A
D
L
C
L
Are
getting
engaged,
and
particularly
the
neighboring
Property
Owners,
because
the
more
public
involvement
is
obviously
tends
to
create
a
better
project
and
better
outcomes,
so
just
to
thank
Miss
Harvey
for
coming
in
and
speaking,
but
Mr
chairman
I
you're
right
in
the
extent
that
jealous
Authority
is
very
limited
and
can't
resolve
disputes
between
neighbors.
Unless
that
dispute
involves
that
new
construction-
and
maybe
some
you
know
like
we
have
with
concerns
about
sound
or
light
intrusion,
things
of
that
of
that
type
of
nature.
L
But
as
long
as
staff
and
the
commission
are
adequately
convinced
that
the
setbacks
will
be
meet
and
will
be
met
and
that
the
survey
is
accurate
enough
to
rely
upon
that
information.
Obviously
I
think
an
up-to-date
survey
is
preferable,
but
if
and
I
don't
think
we
have
a
date
on
that
survey.
But
if
we
do
I'm
sure
it
can
be
provided
with.
A
H
L
A
A
I
think
that's
a
good
question,
but
I
think
what
you
need
to
do
in
regards
to
that
is
that's
why
I
was
looking
for
that
particular
area
that
was
being
discussed
and
what,
if
that's
brought
forward
the
precedent
is
saying-
and
we
have
approved
other
things
that
say
because
of
the
existing
location
or
the
existing
building
or
the
what's
present.
Is
that
that's?
Why
we're
going
to
approve
it?
We're
not
just
approving
it
willy-nilly
for
everyone
to
start
putting
their
slider
in
is
that
pretty
much
Glenn.
D
D
D
A
I
D
I
A
I
Yes,
typically
with
a
vinyl
house
or
a
vinyl
soffit
you're,
not
using
wood
for
the
actual
fascia
board
that
runs
up
the
rig.
It's
it's
typically,
it's
bent
broke
material
on
of
aluminum,
a
pre-finished
material
and
that's
that's.
What
I
would
expect
foreign
to
go
the
direction
of
changing
the
facial
material
to
a
wood
just
because
aluminum
is
not
allowed.
H
H
Know
what
I'm
saying
is
I
can
make
build
this
new
Cottage
house
without
them
about
without
aluminum,
facing
and
paint
it
and
it'll
still
match
the
house
to
the
eye.
But
if
I
change
the
soffit
nothing's
going
to
match
that
that
little
board
on
baller
pattern
of
the
Viner,
that's
why
I'm
asking
that
I.
I
Understand
what
you're
saying,
but
the
existing
structure
is,
it
has
materials
that
are
not
allowed,
and
this
structure
that's
going
to
be
built.
It
will
be
seen
by
your
neighbors,
even
though
it's
not
visible
easily
from
the
street
and
in
large
part,
some
of
the
stipulations
that
we
have
before
us
and
that
we
have
to
abide
by
are
for
that
purpose.
Correct
Now,.
H
H
A
H
H
L
Myself
I,
so
we
have
the
proposed
motion
here,
there's
a
little
bit
of
uncertainty
that
I
still
have
with
Gordon,
obviously
I.
It
may
be
worthwhile
for
y'all
to
discuss
about
yourself
for
a
moment
as
to
what
you
want
to
do
about
the
proposed
and
as
Mr
Simpson
pointed
out,
you
have
a
provision
in
your
code
that
requires
the
Carriage
House,
be
in
substantial
Conformity,
the
architectural
view
or
the
arc.
L
The
look
of
care
tiles
to
be
in
substantial
Conformity
with
the
main
house
doesn't
require
an
exact
replica
and
the
exact
materials
to
be
well.
What
you
have
in
this
case
is
a
quest
for
a
deviation
from
the
Union
and
a
you
know,
mismatch
materials.
So
ultimately,
it's
it's
on.
I
think
I
need
a
little
bit
more
information
from
the
board
as
to
how
y'all
feel
the
commission
how
y'all.
A
J
G
A
I
I
A
Second,
is
there
any
discussion
further
discussion
on
that?
Is
that
a
clear
motion,
in
other
words,
everything
else
that
we
have
listed
you've
had
discussion
and
we
were
talking
about
so
it
was
discuss
about
the
gutters
and
the
spacing
and
everything
else,
so
the
applicant
understands
just
making
sure
so
I'm
looking
for
both,
then
all
in
favor
aye,
any
opposed,
looks
like
it
was
approved
with
the
extra
emotion
added.
Thank
you
all
right.
Thank
you.
Can
I
just
say
something:
I.
H
A
D
C
D
This
is
the
the
subject
from
the
front
from
the
rear,
the
right
elevation
and
more
the
right
elevation
left
elevation
HPC
has
their
Shopping
Center
Eight
review
criteria
set
for
the
section
318-3
of
the
unified
development
ordinance
when
assessing
an
application
for
certificate
of
perfectness.
For
the
more
you're
authorized
to
approve
the
application
is
submitted,
approve
the
application
with
conditions
or
deny
the
application.
In
this
case,
this
is
a
non-contributing
non-historic
structure.
D
I've
expected
review
criteria
is
not
eligible
to
be
included
in
a
contributing
resources
list,
so
it
will
always
be
forever
Hereafter
a
non-contributing
non-historic
structure
that
finds
that
the
application
meets
the
requirements
of
the
section
3
team,
3A
and
the
unified
development
ordinance
and
recommends
that
you
improve
the
application
as
as
presented.
Thank.
F
A
A
A
D
D
I
think
I
know
all
right
item
number
four.
This
is
a
request
for
certificate
recruitment,
for
a
demolition
to
allow
the
demolition
of
the
structure
of
approximately
882
square
feet
located
at
number
25
Rowan
Road
and
the
Old
Town
Bluffton
historic
district,
so
neighborhood
General
HD
again
an
aerial
view
of
the
property
on
the
left.
Is
there
any
maps
on
the
right
current
front,
elevation,
never
reptiles
the
photo
yet
rear
elevation.
D
Left
elevation
of
the
property
current
right
elevation
of
the
property
more
the
right
elevation
HCC
again
shall
consider
eight
review
criteria
set
more
than
section
3
18
3
of
the
unified
development
Ordinance
one
assessing
an
application
for
a
certificate
of
appropriateness.
Furthermore,
you're
authorized
to
take
the
following
actions:
you
can
improve
the
application.
That's
submitted,
approve
the
application
with
conditions
or
deny
the
application
is
submitted
by
the
applicants.
M
A
A
K
A
A
J
F
A
D
Okay
last
item
on
the
agenda
this
evening.
This
is
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
to
allow
the
construction
of
a
new
two-story
single-family
residential
structure
of
approximately
2
610
square
feet
and
a
Carriage
House
of
approximately
126
square
feet
located
at
number
six
wild
spartina
Street,
which
is
currently
Lot
number
43
of
the
Tabby
roads,
development
in
the
old
town,
Bluffton,
historic
district
and
Zone
neighborhood
General
HD
current
site
plan
to
your
left.
I
mean
I'm.
D
D
All
the
elevations
floor
plans
were
on
that
page
and
then
they
also
include
the
architect
also
included
some
composite
elevations.
To
give
you
a
better
idea
of
what
the
building
will
actually
look
like
as
it's
built,
Katie
also
included
in
your
packet,
some
sections
for
the
structure,
the
main
structure,
with
the
sections
going
through
details
and
we'll
address
some
of
these
in
a
minute
winners
and
doors,
the
landscape
plan
and
the
canopy
plan.
D
Hpcs
are
considered
the
game
review
criteria
set
forth
in
section
318
3
of
the
unified
development
Awards
when
assessing
an
application
for
a
certificate
of
appropriateness.
Furthermore,
you're
authorized
to
approve
the
application
is
submitted,
approve
the
application
with
conditions
or
deny
the
application
has
submitted.
We
do
have
several
staff
recommendations
on
this
one.
We
found
that,
with
the
conditions
noted
below
the
requirements
in
section,
318-3
have
been
met
or
could
be
met.
Town
staff
finds
that
with
the
conditions
have
been
met.
Actually
that's
are.
D
F
D
Above
grade
number,
two
The
Advocate
request
determination
on
the
impertiness
of
the
use
of
oral
rack
columns
as
a
substitute
for
the
materials
listed
in
section
515
6h2a
of
the
Edo.
Just
as
to
remind
the
board,
you
approved
Boral
I-
guess
that
was
two
months
ago
now:
good,
partly
not
in
the
Udo
as
permitted
immature,
but
you've
just
approved
that
use
of
that
material.
D
D
Section
5
15
6K
we'll
need
a
clarification
on
the
accurate
fence
detail
and
at
the
landscape
plan
details
the
intended
one,
that's
being
used.
That
will
need
to
be
revised
to
include
a
board
rail
on
the
on
the
top
section.
515
6m
provide
information
on
the
composite
shutter
material
proposed
for
review,
which
ensure
is
a
wood,
composite
material
and
it's
equal
or
better
quality
than
the.
D
F
N
K
N
N
D
A
J
A
A
L
L
A
vermacular
house
and
since
so
forth
in
your
code,
and
it
has
a
maximum
height
one
and
a
half
stories
with
air
what
they
have
submitted
as
a
two-story
vernacular
house,
and
so
when
it
does
not
fall
within
the
category
within
the
explicit
regulations.
For
that
particular
house,
you
can
review
it
as
an
additional
building
type,
which
serves
as
kind
of
a
catch-all.
D
K
I
E
I
It's
not
shown
it's
going
to
be
visible
on
the
front
elevation
I'm,
not
saying
anything
other
than
it's
better,
to
go
ahead
and
address
that
now
than
be
surprised
for
what
a
hood
for,
if
you
have
a
grill
on
this
underneath,
the
porch
has
to
have
has
to
be
surrounded
by
non-combustible
materials
and
it
has
to
have
ventilation.
It's.
A
M
I
M
A
A
Except
I
have
some
discussion
and
it's
like
the
discussion
is
not
coming.
You're
you're
leaving
us,
oh
yeah,
your
business,
your
things
in
life
and
such
as
not
allowed
you
to
continue
on
and
we're
very
disappointed
not
to
have
you
continue
because
you've
had
so
much
insight
and
additional
information
always
appreciate
your
insights.
So
we
have
to
say
it's
along
farewell,
see
you
in
town,
yep.