►
Description
Planning Commission Meeting Wednesday, October 19, 2022, 2:00 p.m.
Meeting Agenda available at https://hiltonheadislandsc.gov/boards/plngcom/
A
Member
of
the
town
of
Hilton
Head
Island's,
Planning
Commission
we
now
have
a
quorum.
I
was
waiting
for
that.
That's.
Why
we're
a
couple
minutes
late,
we'll
start
with
the
call
to
order
and
then
the
Pledge
of
Allegiance.
If
you
will.
A
You
we
we'll
start
we're
swearing
in
two
members
of
the
commission,
Mr
John,
Campbell
and
Mr
Mark
O'neal
and
the
swearing-in
will
be
by
Mr
Josh
Gruber.
C
C
D
C
F
G
H
B
A
Few
minutes:
late:
okay,
great
we'll
start
with
the
approval
of
the
agenda
for
today's
meeting,
so
moved.
Okay,
I
have
a
second.
C
A
You
it's,
the
all
in
favor
of
approving
the
agenda,
raise
your
right
hand,
a
unanimous
approval
of
minutes
of
the
last
meeting
of
August,
the
17th
every
all
ahead
of
those
in
your
kit
and
is
there
a
motion
to
accept
the
amendment.
I
mean
the
minutes
as
read:
Mr.
I
Chairman
may
I
make
a
correction
sure
you
mean
the
the
minutes
referred
to
commissioner
Henson's
Mike,
hence
rather
than
Tom.
Hence
so
with
that
change,
I
would
move
the
approval
of
the
minutes.
All.
A
Right
Steph
you've
got
that
I
hope.
Thank
you
may
I
have
a
second
all
in
favor
of
approving
the
the
minutes
of
last
meeting
is
unanimous
as
well.
A
A
Fair
enough,
thank
you.
So
is
there
anyone
else,
that's
going
to
plan
to
speak.
He
had
to
pre-register
right
and
for
speaking,
okay,
fair
enough
all
right.
We
have
no
unfinished
business
before
us
today,
so
we'll
move
into
a
new
business.
If
you
will
the
first
one
is
the
mid
Island
district
and
track
a
presentation
by
Sean,
Collins
and
Missy
lewick.
A
K
J
Then,
on
November
1st,
the
mid
Island
District
plan
and
the
mid
Island
tract
master
plan
will
be
back
before
Town
Council
for
their
consideration
of
approval.
So
we'll
share
share
with
you
the
details
on
the
mid
Island
track.
So
we'll
try
to
keep
this
as
smooth
as
possible
and
I'll.
Let
you
hear
from
Missy
as
much
as
possible
too,
as
we
go
forward.
L
Thank
you
Sean,
so
the
the
strict
is
grounded
in
the
tenants
and
principles
from
our
plan.
Our
plan
really
lays
a
really
great
foundation
for
future
planning
for
the
island
and
also
the
galagichi
culture
preservation.
Project
report
was
one
of
the
guiding
documents
that
was
looked
at
strongly
for
some
of
the
recommendations
within
the
historic
neighborhoods.
L
L
J
L
So
again,
the
next
two
slides
reiterate
the
stakeholder
involvement
list,
some
of
the
the
groups
and
and
representatives
that
we've
met
with
I
know.
You
probably
can't
read
this
screen,
but
there's
also
identifies
stakeholder
Outreach
and
and
the
breadth
of
those
that
we
saw
input
from
here.
We
have
some
of
the
results
from
the
survey
a
park
was
the
number
one
thing
that
was
responded
to
on
the
survey,
but
also
all
of
these
components
are
Incorporated
within
the
district
plan:
Waco
streets,
dining
community
events,
shopping,
Workforce,
Housing,
mixed-use,
Development
and
residential.
L
L
The
three
main
themes
that
resulted
from
the
work
are
protect
and
enhance,
connect
and
involve
so
to
both
protect
people,
neighborhoods
culture,
our
environment,
connect,
people,
connect
the
spaces,
our
neighborhoods,
create
Community
hubs
or
District
centers,
and
then
to
look
at
evolving
over
time.
So
look
at
what
the
future
land
uses
could
be:
mixed-use,
development,
retail,
infill
and
and
how
we
see
the
residential
neighborhoods,
expanding
and
growing
I'm.
J
J
The
town
owns
103
acre
property
and
the
the
conversation
about
what
should
happen
on
that
property
has
been
had
throughout
the
community
for
a
few
years,
once
we
complete
a
low
country
Celebration
park,
it
was
time
to
kind
of
have
that
discussion
and
Earnest
and
build
on
the
parks
and
rec
master
plan
our
plan
and
to
come
up
with
a
plan
and
program
for
that
that
Park
is
an
anchor
for
this
mid
Island
District.
J
We
have
a
lot
of
large
master
plan
communities,
but
we
also
have
about
30
percent
of
the
island
that
hasn't
had
that
same
level
of
planning
and
sophistication
to
help,
inform
our
policies
and
our
Land
Management,
ordinance
and
subdivision
right,
all
that
sort
of
built
environment,
and
so
it's
building
on
the
anchor
that
we
have,
that
can
become
the
park
and
Center
to
leverage
the
other
investment
within
this
District.
So
it's
to
the
first
district
of
many
to
do
and
Stitch
together
through
a
growth
framework
and
a
true
Island
Wide
master
plan.
J
L
So
this
slide
just
identifies
some
of
the
direction
that
the
district
plan
is
looking
to
project
and
it
is
of
course,
to
expand
the
park
connect.
The
neighborhoods,
like
we
said,
create
the
mixed-use
center
or
mixed-use
District,
as
well
as
look
at
Future
land
uses
and
then
establish
that
framework
for
implementation,
which
is
what
we'll
see
in
the
district
plan
on
November
1st.
L
So
here
outline
are,
is
the
district
itself,
so
it's
a
fairly
large
land
mass
that
goes
down
to
the
Marshland
neighborhood,
all
the
way
up
to
Mitchellville
up
to
the
ocean.
The
airport
is
at
the
center
of
the
district.
There
are
five
historic
neighborhoods
within
the
district
and
and
they're
labeled
here.
So
this
is
an
overview
of
the
district
as
well
as
labels,
some
Town
owned
property
within
the
district
in
green.
L
This
slide
shows
some
of
the
neighborhoods
and
historic
churches
that
are
labored
labeled
within
the
district
and
here's
our
existing
zoning
that
we
have
today.
So
we
looked
at
both
the
layers
of
existing
zoning,
as
well
as
all
of
the
existing
land
uses
within
the
district,
and
you
can
see
here
by
the
many
colors
on
the
map.
We
have
a
lot
of
existing
land
uses
and
we
were
looking
at
with
the
consultant
team
and
through
the
stakeholder
meetings.
L
Are
these
the
best
land
uses?
Should
we
look
to
condense?
Some
of
these
land
uses
for
a
more
predictable
future
land
use
as
the
island
matures
in
this
area
on.
J
This
illustration,
if
I
was
looking
at
it
from
a
medical
perspective,
and
this
was
sort
of
the
whatever
MRI
valuation
of
my
of
my
condition,
I'd
be
like
gosh.
It
looks
like
there's
a
lot
of
things
wrong
right,
there's
a
lot
of
pockets
of
color
that
don't
make
a
lot
of
sense,
and
so
it's
to
create
some
consistency,
so
that
you
understand
expectations
if
you
own
property
or
you
own
property.
J
Next,
to
one
of
these
different
shaded
colors
on
the
map
and-
and
so
yes,
this
does
not
look
like
a
healthy
system
from
a
land
use
and
Zoning
standpoint,
and
the
idea
is
to
make
it
a
healthy
system.
L
So
this
is
where
we
get
to
the
Evolve
part
where
we,
the
plan,
looks
at
condensing
those
land
uses
and
looking
at
a
possible
future
land
use
map.
That
would
include
mainly
what
you
see
in
the
center
is
a
new
mixed-use,
District
or
District
Center
area,
consolidating
some
of
the
residential
and
neighborhood
commercial
areas,
a
retail
service,
lodging
area
that
borders,
Dillon,
Road
and
the
airport.
J
This
and
this
from
a
future
land
use
map
and
strategy
makes
more
sense
to
me.
Okay
as
a
planner.
If
you
look
at
the
the
green
shaded
areas,
those
are
parks
and
protected
areas
and
then
the
the
yellow
are
residential
neighborhoods
that
could
have
some
neighborhood
commercial,
that's
consistent!
But
if
you
look
at
the
green
and
the
yellow
combined
that
to
me
looks
like
a
nice
healthy
community
and
then
the
concentration
of
mixed-use
District
Center
in
the
purple.
J
The
airport
is
the
airport
with
some
support
in
that
paint.
Color,
it
just
seems
more
cohesive
and
if
you
took
the
land
area
from
the
green
and
the
yellow,
it's
a
significant
majority
of
property
in
there.
That's
preservation
and
protection
of
neighborhoods
in
the
environment,
so
it
allows
you
to
do
some
more
intense
use
in
the
district
Center
in
those
areas
around
the
airport.
A
J
A
L
So
the
next
couple
of
slides
go
through
a
little
bit
of
the
evolution
and
and
drill
down
into
some
of
these
areas.
That
Sean
highlighted
here
are
the
Commercial
Services
areas
where
you're
consolidating
some
of
that
service
area,
that's
in
and
around
the
airport.
J
L
So
here
you
see
highlighted
the
new
mixed
use
or
District
Center
in
purple,
and
then
the
residential
neighborhood
commercial
areas
are
highlighted
in
yellow
and
then
we'll
fold
into
the
district
Center
itself,
each
of
the
three
main
areas,
the
district
Center,
the
neighborhoods.
L
They
they
all
have
some
goals
that
guided
how
those
sections
were
reviewed
and
the
district
Center
really
focused
on
compact
walkable
neighborhood
patterns,
more
of
a
hub,
a
public
space,
an
anchor
and
a
mix
of
uses,
sidewalk
good,
complete
streets
within
these
areas,
probably
integrated
parking
or
structured
parking,
and
really
looking
at
the
context
of
the
area
to
support
that
that
mixed-use
environment.
J
We
we
have
for
a
long
time
through
our
code
and
maybe
even
attitudes
really
moved
to
a
Suburban
style
of
development
right.
So
we
drive
to
everything.
It's
surface
parked
it's
a
lot
of
horizontal,
taking
up
a
lot
of
land
horizontally
and
I,
always
say
if
you
think
of
a
string
on
a
map-
and
you
say:
there's
a
there's-
some
hubs
that
make
sense
to
increase
activity
because
you
want
to
have
more
than
one
single
use.
J
So
if
you
pull
the
string
up
on
the
map
and
say
Here's
where
we
want
to
have
activity
activity,
the
string
has
to
get
shorter
in
some
other
areas.
So
when
we
go
back
to
that
green
Area
Preserve
and
protect
there's
a
lot
of
protection
within
this
District
that
would
lead
us
to
have
these
more
High
intense
activity.
Centers
these
hubs
that
can
deliver
these
things
beyond
the
traditional
Suburban
Style
I
want
to
drive
here
and
then
I'm
going
to
leave
here.
I'm
going
to
drive
200
feet
down
the
park
here.
J
H
D
J
A
lot
of
that
will
come
out
in
the
implementation
steps
to
do
to
develop,
develop
more
of
the
recommendations
is
develop
a
parking
management
strategy
year.
We
have
one
for
the
parking
management
company
for
our
beach
parking
that
we're
currently
working
with
to
help
manage
that
system.
But
I
think
if
we're
going
to
be
intentional
with
public
investment
and
maybe
public
streets
within
the
you
know,
maybe
Port
Royal
Plaza
is
something
different
with
some
public
streets
and
and
reconfigure
Northridge
as
well,
but
our
parking
parking
management
strategy
there
that
makes
sense
on
Street.
J
J
There
was
some
preliminary
Market
evaluation
study
done
as
this
concept
program
was
brought
forward
and
since
the
the
workshop
on
September
14th
with
Council
they've
done
a
much
more
detailed
market
analysis
to
understand
how
much
of
these
types
of
uses
could
be
supported
by
the
market
and
that'll
help
determine
parking
and
ratios,
and
all
that
so
that'll
be
part
of
the
next
thing.
Thank
you.
L
So
the
recommendations
within
the
district
Center
are,
of
course,
mixed
use.
So
a
mix
of
uses
density
in
the
range
of
12
to
18
dwelling
units
per
acre.
You
know
one
to
three
stories
again
structured
parking
and
then
looking
to
keep
that
that
green,
landscaped,
Edge
or
buffer
that's
important
to
providing
violent
character.
L
L
So
looking
at
organizational
tools
to
guide
this
implementation,
you
know
with
the
town,
have
a
role
in
providing
the
public
streets
or
the
structured
parking,
and
how
would
we
fund
that
also
looking
at
leveraging
some
public
investment
in
making
those
connections
so
connecting
these
spaces
throughout
the
district,
our
Parks,
our
open
spaces
and
and
so
that,
there's
a
hub
of
activity
that
that
is
drawn
to
the
center?
The
district
Center.
J
J
We've
been
successful
in
redevelopments
in
the
past,
like
larger
scale
and
and
we'll
take
Shelter,
Cove
mall,
for
example.
The
one
reason
that
was
successful
is
the
town
owned
property
adjacent
and
can
integrate
that
into
a
mixed
use,
so
it
enhanced
the
public
space
and
the
private
space
and
we
have
some
articulated
streets.
You
know
and
shops
there
so
with
this
and
I
just
want
to
point
out.
J
It's
going
to
be
interesting
on
an
acquisition
and
utilization
of
town
resources
to
intentionally
participate
in
these
Partnerships,
where
we
might
not
own
the
property
next
door
to
make
it
easy,
but
we've
done
it
in
caligny,
we've
done
it
in
Shelter
Cove,
so
we
know
how
that
it
can
be
done
and
we
can
leverage
both
public
resources
and
Elevate,
both
public
and
private
space.
So
it's
important
to
make
sure
it's
important
that
you
know
where
I'm
coming
from
on
that
part
of
it.
L
Here
is
the
the
District
boundary
kind
of
zoomed
in
to
the
district
Center
area,
it's
Northridge,
Plaza,
sea
turtle,
Marketplace
and
Port
Royal
Plaza,
and
here
again
you
can
see
the
the
Ring
of
green
around
it.
That's
highlighted
and
again
here's
the
mixed-use
center
that
we're
talking
about
where
the
district
Center
is.
J
And
we
and
we
have
a
corridor
study
underway
that
will
look
at
the
entire
William
Parkway
corridor
from
the
North
End
to
Sea,
fine
Circle
that
include
Palmetto,
Bay
Road,
a
few
other
secondary
roads
for
this
pattern
book
and
consistency
for
crosswalks,
intersections
connectivity,
and
so
this
will
all
be
part
of
it's
one
small
segment,
but
what
we
well.
The
good
thing
is
we're
in
the
same
consultant
and
a
lot
of
the
same
team
members,
so
that
will
all
be
all
be
translated
into
this
mid
Island
section.
Maybe.
L
So
this
slide
shows
a
concept
of
how
we
might
integrate
William
Hilton
Parkway
as
more
of
a
feature
that
goes
through
the
two
public
spaces,
the
mid
Island
tract
and
Ashmore
tract,
and
not
just
bisects
them
so
reimagining
it
and
making
the
parkway
part
of
the
park
and
offering
some
more
landscaping,
and
it
feels
like
you're
going
through
a
park
in
this
space
instead
of
on
a
highway.
So
we're
looking
at
Gateway
opportunities
as
well
as
additional
enhanced
intersections
here.
L
This
shows
some
of
the
surrounding
development
and
destinations
such
as
the
library
that
are
within
the
vicinity
of
the
district
Center,
and
here
are
some
of
the
the
trio
connections
that
are
proposed
to
offer
connectivity
to
the
green
spaces,
as
well
as
our
main
arterials
major
and
minor
materials.
L
So
then
we
looked
at
some
of
the
existing
uses
and
and
future
capacity
of
these
sites.
So
here
are
the
parcels
within
the
district
Center
outlined
in
red,
and
here
is
imagining
different
uses,
configuration
and
capacity
within
these
areas.
This
envisions
a
different
street
Network,
a
more
connected
mixed-use
development
pattern
on
these
sites
and
what
circled
there
are
some
of
the
new
intersection
types
that
would
accommodate
more
of
a
urban
feel,
more
of
a
place
making
environment
where
you
could
have
a
mix
of
uses
and
some
Street
activity
in
these
areas
and.
L
J
Was
based
on
some
of
that,
the
I
would
say
the
preliminary
market,
analysis
or
assessment,
and
the
program
was
built
based
on
kind
of
what
was
projected.
That
would
be
supported
from
a
from
a
demand
standpoint
and
then
they're
refining
this
a
little
bit.
So
you
know
one
of
the
pink
buildings
might
become
a
yellow
building
or
something.
But
this
there's
some
truth
in
the
ability
to
implement
this
based
on
current
marketing
conditions.
L
And
these
are
certainly
concept
drawings
and
further
analysis
survey
would
need
to
take
place,
but
it
shows
the
the
desire
to
have
buildings
that
face
the
new
Street
Network
to
have
parking
toward
the
rear
of
the
buildings
to
create
that
more
mixed
use.
A
little
bit
more
urban
street
environment
in
place.
J
And
it
may
take
many
years
right
to
get
to
this
product.
I
would
say.
Northridge
right,
based
on
ownership
and
occupancy
might
have
the
greatest
opportunity
in
the
short
term,
then
maybe
Port
Royal,
although
most
of
the
space
is
leased
and
occupied,
and
then
sea
turtle
which
much
of
the
property
had
been
redeveloped,
but
not
all
of
it,
there's
still
some
opportunity
for
some
additional
space,
Maybe
residential
that
could
be
programmed
there.
So
you
know,
as
you
move
forward,
you
lay
the
foundation
on
how
things
be
intentional.
J
What's
the
partnership
opportunity
with
the
town
to
to
articulate
some
public
streets
other
Investments?
Does
the
town
have
an
acquisition
strategy
that
can
help
acquire
and
leverage
over
time
to
make
things
happen
faster?
So
there's
a
little
bit
of
timing,
but
over
a
long
period.
This
is
the
idea
of
how
to
articulate
and
build
more
meaningful
mixed-use
space
that
can
accommodate
this
type
of
product.
L
There's
a
couple
other
renderings
that
show
some
different
angles
of
how
this
could
build
out
and
here's
a
character
image
that
shows
what
it
what
it
could
look
like,
and
this
would
be
one
of
those
areas
that
had
a
Street
intersection
where
you're
looking
at
mixed
use.
One
to
three
story,
really
a
place:
making
location
cut
up
on
street
parking,
different
type
of
streetscape
environment
to
really
Foster
mixed
use
and
place,
making
environments.
J
Any
questions
on
the
district
have
you
been
asking
all
along,
but
we
can
move
on
to
the
neighborhoods,
but
so
this
right
here,
if
you,
if
you
were
to
sort
of
drop
yourself
in
the
middle
of
North,
Ridge
Plaza
in
the
middle
of
the
parking
area,
this
could
be
kind
of
the
the
contact
and
aesthetic
there.
You
know
what
I
mean
then
you'd
have
these
Street
fronts
and
activity
and
open
space
and
outdoor
dining
and
events
and
everything
so
a
little
bit
more
meaningful
than
that.
Suburban
large
surface
parking,
big
box
strip
center
do.
A
J
J
Comments
cover
the
certain
neighborhoods
kind
of
is.
L
L
L
L
So
then,
again,
like
we
looked
at
before
these
neighborhood
areas
are,
are
highlighted
with
the
black
outline.
You
can
see
the
the
range
of
existing
land
uses
within
all
of
those
neighborhoods
and
the
existing
zoning
that
that
we
have
on
the
books
right
now
for
these
five
neighborhoods.
L
So
really
what
the?
What
the
recommendations
in
the
plan
look
at
is
to
modify
just
the
arm.
4
zoning
areas,
Within
These,
five
neighborhoods,
so
as
you
can
see
from
this
side
slide,
there
are
many
different
zoning
districts
again
we're
just
looking
at
the
rm4
district
and
the
recommendations
that
we're
going
to
talk
about
in
this
section
are
for
arm
four.
L
So
right
now
in
arm
four,
it's
four
dwelling
units
per
acre.
However,
if
you
have
a
larger
parcel
size
of
three
acres
or
larger,
you
can
have
six
swelling
units
per
acre
and
eight
dwelling
units
per
acre
if
your
parcel
is
at
least
five
acres
in
size.
So
we
currently
have
a
range
of
four
to
eight
dwelling
units
in
the
arm.
Four
District.
L
And
then
we're
going
to
go
through
the
the
existing
land
use
and
Zoning
in
each
of
the
five
neighborhoods.
We
can
kind
of
drill
through
these
pretty
quickly.
So
here's
the
grassland
neighborhood
it
has
some
multi-family
single
family
and
open
space.
It
has
two
zoning
districts
arm,
4
and
arm
12.
again,
this
plan
would
would
focus
on
the
green
arm
four
area
again
we
looked
at
the
Gullah
culture
preservation
report
to
provide
guidance.
L
Big
hill
has
light
industrial,
single
family
and
open
space.
It
has
arm
4
and
light
industrial
areas
and
again
we're
looking
at
the
arm.
4
areas
for
the
recommendations
in
the
report.
Mitchellville
has
quite
a
few
existing
land
uses,
as
well
as
the
most
existing
zoning
districts
within
this
neighborhood
rm4
Mitchellville
arm,
12,
Light,
commercial
and
Parks
and
Rec
again.
The
application
of
these
recommendations
are
in
the
arm.
4
section.
J
It's
been
on
the
books
for
an
awful
long
time
and
before
the
acceleration
of
the
Sewer
Master
Plan,
it
used
to
be
had
a
quarter
acre
lot
to
have
a
septic
tank
and
drain
in
a
drain
field.
But
as
and
so
it
was
an
incentive
to
consolidate
property
to
connect
onto
the
sewer
system.
By
going
to
three
acres
or
five,
you
you
get
that
density.
J
The
ability
to
build
additional
dents
you'd
have
to
connect
to
sewer,
but
it
didn't
penalize
someone
that
could
only
do
four
units
an
acre
but
as
we've
accelerated
the
sewer
plan
and
are
pushing
for
100
connection,
we're
not
really
raising
density,
we're
creating
a
more
consistent
development
pattern,
and
rather
four
next
to
eight
or
four
next
to
six.
It
is.
You
can
have
six
to
eight
dwelling
units
and
we'll
get
what
we'll
find
in
that
number
with
some
neighborhood
commercial.
J
J
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we
understand
the
context
of
why
it
was
on
the
books,
why
you
know
what
was
the
origination
and
and
that
this
can
this
consistent,
but
not
necessarily
just
raising
density,
providing
a
better,
more
consistent
development
pattern
and
increases
opportunities,
especially
for
properties
that
are
smaller
than
three
acres.
So
so.
L
Like
Sean
just
mentioned,
the
the
recommendations
for
the
historic
neighborhoods
in
the
armed
for
districts
currently
is
to
allow
neighborhood
commercial
opportunities
or
expansion
of
home-based
businesses
and
a
mix
that
would
be
you
know.
You'd
have
75,
residential
and
25
would
be
that
commercial
opportunity
and
then
to
look
to
expand
the
density
in
the
rm4
parcels
between
a
range
of
four
to
six
dwelling
units
per
acre,
and
to
do
that,
we
would
look
to
create
those
uniform
development
patterns
and
create
standards
to
ensure
that
that
pattern
exists
throughout
the
neighborhoods.
L
We
would
make
an
amendment
to
allow
for
the
additional
density,
and
then
we
would
look
at
calibrating
setback
and
buffering
and
open
space
requirements,
also
through
an
amendment,
but
also
making
sure
that
we're
still
achieving
Island
character
in
those
amendments
and
then
the
mix
again
for
the
commercial
opportunity
is
residential
at
75
and
Commercial
at
25
percent
and.
G
L
Existing
densities
within
the
historic
neighborhoods
in.
L
Here's
an
example
within
the
grassland
neighborhood,
where
you
can
see
an
existing
development.
That's
5.7
dwelling
units
per
acre.
The
parcel
size
itself
is
about
3.12
acres
and
there's
a
there's,
an
image
here
of
of
the
of
the
unit
and
what
that
looks
like
and
feels
like.
So
the
the
plan
or
document
shows
examples
of
neighborhoods
that
are
right
around
that
six
dwell
unit
per
acre
and
allows
you
or
the
reader
to
look
at
what
those
neighborhoods
look
like
on
the
ground.
L
L
This
is
a
duplex
development
called
tidal
Bluff.
Currently
it's
owned
rm12,
it
wasn't
at
the
time
it
was
developed,
it's
30
duplex
units
on
five
acres
and
it
rounds
out
to
be
5.9
12
units
per
acre.
This
is
in
the
Marshall
neighborhood.
This
is
within
the
marsh
run,
mixed-use
zoning
district,
and
this
is
23
single
family
units
and
it
rounds
out
to
being
about
4.4
dwelling
units
per
acre,
I'd.
L
Yeah,
so
you
would
have
looked
at
where
the
tidal
Wetland
boundaries
are
and
the
buffer
that
you
have
to
set
back
from
that.
And
so
that
would
have
been
reviewed
during
development
review
and.
J
While
we're
on
on
this
one,
we
went
on
a
tour
this
morning
with
Town
Council
and
a
few
others,
some
media.
And
while
this
one
of
the
review
that
we've
looked
at
is
the
least
dense
when
we
toured
them,
it
seemed
like
the
most
sense
right.
So
we
talked
about
performance
standards
and
site
planning
is
going
to
win
here
and
so
making
sure
that
the
we
have
that
right
calibration.
So
it's
got
to
be
density
with
the
other
parts
of
the
site,
planning
that
are
make
this
appropriate.
So
one.
N
Other
since,
since
we're
on
this,
one
has
clear
cutting
been
brought
up
with
any
of
the
changes
in
in
the
density
in
the
areas
you've
talked
about.
Yes,
yes,
to
eliminate,
clear
cutting.
J
Yes,
okay,
yeah
to
to
go
back
to
a
stricter,
more
comprehensive
look
at
natural
resource
protection
on
subdivision.
Yes,
sir.
A
L
L
So
now
we
get
to
the
last
two
slides
with
way
too
many
words,
but
these
are
the
majority
of
the
recommendations
that
the
plan
is
recommending,
starting
with
the
adoption
of
a
future
land
use
map,
so
that
creates
the
palette
with
which
all
of
the
rest
of
the
policy
framework
would
would
come
from.
So
the
future
land
use
map
would
be
the
first
step
and
then
really
to
create
the
enabling
legislation
or
policy
so
that
we
can
build
this
new
environment.
So
they
include
what
we've
discussed
with
creating
those
uniform
development
pattern.
L
Standards
create
an
infill
development
strategy.
How
do
we
target
properties
for
redevelopment?
How
do
we
promote
mixed
use?
Mixed
income
housing
within
the
district
working
to
align
all
of
our
zoning
to
conform
to
the
new
future
land
use
map,
Economic
Development
strategies,
a
range
of
policy
framework
that
would
lift
this
idea
up
and
put
it
into
place.
J
You
know
this,
this
plan
and
the
presentation
on
the
plan
focused
on
Focus
areas
right
the
district
Center,
the
neighborhoods
and
the
park
there's
a
lot
of
other
opportunities
for
anchors
and
we
were
out
today
and
we
visited
Mitchellville
right
and
so
the
town
investing
and
parking
and
other
infrastructure
that's
needed
to
support
Mitchellville
Freedom
Park.
J
We
talked
about
Barker
Fields,
a
first
reading.
Last
night,
Town
Council
approved
a
land
swap
with
with
the
county
to
acquire
Barker
field.
Autumn
Bagel
Townhomes
barkerfield
extension
on
the
Waterside
of
bringing
in
the
county-owned
park
down
to
the
town
system,
opportunity
to
re-imagine
that
as
an
anchor,
so
modern
classic
motor
site,
355
William
Wilton
Parkway
was
a
an
auto
dealer
and
service
station
for
for
many
many
years.
The
town
acquired
that
but
the
opportunity
to
have
that
be
another
anchor
between
hospital
and
the
high
school.
J
So
it's
a
series
of
hubs
and
anchors
Beyond,
just
the
park,
the
Redevelopment
of
those
major
commercial
centers
and
then
just
neighboring.
So
it's
it's
looking
at
the
whole
that
whole
district
and
these
recommendations
are
not
exhaustive,
but
they
give
an
idea
of
a
much
bigger
picture
than
just
the
focus
areas.
We've
already.
L
J
Was
funny
when
we
had
the
district
plan
coming
forward,
it
was
like
gosh.
We
don't
have
a
recommendation
to
implement
the
park
because
it
because
it
was
going
in
parallel
when
it's
connected,
but
I,
think
the
district
without
the
park
is
difficult
to
to
create
energy
and
private
investment.
So,
yes,
invest
in
this
part,
create
that
anchor
as
one
of
many
but
the
probably
the
biggest
one,
and
then
your
Redevelopment
district
will
capitalize
and
build
around
that.
So
good.
A
Point
does
that
conclude
your
presentation?
Okay,
for
the
benefit
of
the
public.
Here
we've
been
joined
by
three
Commissioners
during
your
presentation,
commissioner
hands
commissioner
darienzo
and
commissioner
Alfred
they're.
Here
now,
let's
see
in
terms
of
discussions
or
questions,
let
me
call
on
the
members
of
the
panel
here.
Mr
darienzo.
Do
you
have
any
questions
or
comments?
A
M
J
I
think
it's
to
to
understand
from
a
conceptual
standpoint
what
they
could
be
understand,
the
attitude
and
appetite
for
certain
mix
and
density
and
intensity
levels,
and
then
to
be
able
to
move
forward
on
implementation
strategies
to
move
toward
Meeting
those
expectations.
So
a
lot
of
the
property
that's
privately
held.
What
we're!
What
we're
saying
is:
let's
talk
about
moving
from.
J
What's
there
today
to
something
that
probably
is
more
relevant
in
today's
market
is,
is
probably
a
more
profitable
arrangement
for
for
for
the
owner
and
then
we're
going
to
intentionally
be
involved
in
public
space
and
enhancements
to.
J
Not
only
that,
but
we
were
committing
to
investment
in
the
mid
Island
Park,
which
again
I,
don't
know
the
number
the
range
Council
was
somewhere
between
a
50
and
70
million
dollar
long
range
right
implementation
through
phasing
investment
in
that
area.
So
it
is,
we
can
comfortably
market
and
say
Here's
the
new
development
levels
that.
J
Entitled
through
the
LMO
through
the
zoning
change,
here's
a
here's,
the
expectation
from
a
performance
centers
on
kind
of
the
look
and
feel
and
relationship
with
the
public
space
and
I.
Think
if
we
make
an
investment
on
Place
making
and
in
areas
that
residents
would
be
proud
to
visit
and
patronize
than
visitors
will
come,
it
will
generate
more
excitement.
So
it's
a
framework
so.
M
N
Yeah,
just
can
you
talk
about
the
the
input
you
received
from
from
those
within
that
area?.
J
Absolutely
so
we
did
meet
with
stakeholders
both
on
the
the
non-residential,
the
commercial
space,
and
you
know-
and
some
of
is,
we
don't
currently
have
the
policy
framework
in
order
to
make
it
profitable
right
to
reinvest
in
some
of
that
space
and
so
I
think
this
provides
the
opportunity
where
it's
not
a
penalty,
to
to
reinvest
in
something
different
right.
So
it's
always
been
sort
of
single-use
uniform
Suburban.
So
it
was
positive
and
it's
always
always
comes
back
to
timing.
J
You
know,
if
someone's
just
invested,
you
know
20
million
dollars
in
a
commercial
center
they're-
probably
not
out
the
next
day,
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
implement
this
plan,
but
they
know
that
they
can
incrementally
get
there.
We
talked
to
many
about
the
historic
neighborhood
recommendations
and
again
because
it
goes
back
to
our
plan
and
that
galagichi
task
force
report
we've
translated.
All
of
that
work
and
input
into
the
recommendations
that
are
now
in
part
of
this
plan.
We
had
some
additional
meetings.
J
I
G
J
J
You
know
more
fine-tuned,
cost
estimation
and
then
here's
you
know
Council,
ultimately,
as
part
of
the
budget
cycle
and
capital
program
decide
what
they
want
to
do
in
a
year
one
year
three
year,
five,
how
long
it
might
take,
because
we
also
have
to
put
together
the
funding
strategy
short
term
and
then
over
time
to
be
able
to
implement.
So
the
estimates
because
Council
asked
for
it
for
that
September
meeting,
we
need
to
order
magnitude
cost.
J
We
need
also
an
order
of
magnitude
cause
for
each
phase
and
how
you
would
how
how
you'd
implement
it,
and
so
there's
a
logic
and
sequence
to
what
they
presented
and
there's.
Also
some
a
la
carte
options
like
you
could
do
this.
But
if
you
want
to
add
this
Pavilion
or
this
this
option
it
so
there's
a
little
bit
of
a
range
in
each
one.
So
long
answer
to
say:
yes,
the
range
seemed
right
around
50
to
70
million
over
a
long
term.
J
Now
we
spent
14
million
in
the
park
at
Lowcountry
celebration,
a
little
country
Celebration
park
at
10
acres
and
so
at
a
100
acres
right,
10
times
that
we're
at
a
much
lower
per
acre
cost,
and
we
can
accommodate
a
lot
of
programming
and
opportunities
in
each
phase
and
then
not
impact
that
phase
with
the
next
subsequent
phase.
So
there's
ability
to
get
it
underway,
a
phase
one
have
some
opening
use
of
the
park
and
then
build
around
that
and
and
not
disrupt
it
for
a
long
long
period.
Okay,.
G
With
the
stork
neighborhoods
I'm
curious,
what
the
percentage
of
that
property
would
be:
that's
heirs,
property
and
then
how?
How
does
the
Redevelopment
work
when
you,
when
you
have
a
percentage
of
airs
property,
that's
likely
pretty
large.
J
The
so
in
the
in
the
galagichi
task
force
report,
you
know
part
of
well
the
recommendations,
including
included
mechanisms
to
try
to
try
to
address
or
clear
property.
J
We
don't
publicly
say
here's
who
owns
it
and
here
who
doesn't
here's
properties
on
our
own
through
Ayers
properties,
but
the
town
just
adopted
our
authorized
creation
of
the
Community
Development
Corporation
to
help
us
assist
Community
historic
communities,
neighborhoods.
So
there's
some
funding
mechanisms
that
are
now
in
place
that
can
help,
and
by
the
this
District
plan
it
creates
an
opportunity
for
property
owners
to
be
more
sustainable
in
the
use
of
their
property.
J
So
if
it's
just
residential
and
that's
because
we've
heard
that
right,
I'm
happy
I
have
a
house
here-
that's
all
I
all
I
need
and
we've
also
heard.
We
would
like
to
have
the
ability
to
sell
some
small
Wares
I
heard
at
the
meeting
on
at
the
library
last
Monday.
Someone
makes
their
own
barbecue
sauce
and
I
was
like
man.
J
I
can't
wait
to
try
it
and
he's
waiting
for
this
opportunity
to
be
able
to
make
barbecue
sauce
and
sell
it
in
a
little
spot
on
this
property
that
that
is
his
family's
own
for
Generations,
so
there'll
be
more
devil
in
details.
We
move
these
things
along,
but
there
wasn't
an
objection
to
the
concept
of
of
consistent
density,
a
little
higher
level
for
the
lower
smaller
properties,
and
then
this
neighborhood
commercial,
home
occupation,
okay,.
O
Yeah
sorry
I'm
late
missed
the
beginning
of
your
presentation
and
perhaps
you
covered
this.
Is
this
proposal
designed
to
lead
to
changes
in
the
LMO
and
the
zoning
ordinance,
or
is
it
designed
to
seek
Developers
for
these
particular
types
of
projects
that
you
showed
on
the
screen?
That's.
J
Well,
that's
a
great
question
and
no
matter
what
you
said:
I
was
gonna.
Yeah
I
covered
it
before
you.
J
So
it's
both
really
right
so
I
hope
right.
The
outcome
of
this
is
to
calibrate
the
Alamo,
finally,
with
our
comprehensive
plan
and
and
the
expectations
of
the
community.
So
that's
where
we're
trying
to
move
so
to
set
the
expectations
from
the
LMO
standpoint
to
re
reset-
and
you
know,
I,
don't
know
if
the
if
half
the
LMO
gets
thrown
out
or
more,
but
some
of
it
gets
re-revamped
to
be
able
to
meet
this.
J
These
expectations
and
these
recommendations,
but
it's
also
about
the
marketing
and
excitement
around
investment
in
the
district,
so
to
be
able
to
go
out
and
say
with
these
changes
here
are
opportunities
that
you
don't
have
today,
but
you
will
have
through
the
entitlements
to
reinvest
to
to
come
up
with
a
different
program
and
concept
for
commercial.
Mixed
use
could
be
Workforce
housing
elements
that
are
now
possible
that
were
probably
cost
prohibitive
because
of
the
horizontal
Suburban
lower
intensity
options.
So
yes,
absolutely
LMO
changes
and
then
intentional
Economic
Development
activity.
A
Mr
Campbell,
that's
one
quick
comment.
I
know
we
went
to
this
presentation.
J
Like
that
and
I'll
say
that
that
development
would
be
would
be
approved
based
on
even
the
current
right,
because
those
are
three
acre
lots.
So
that's
it's
almost
six.
We,
we
took
a
tour.
That
was
one
of
our
stops
today
and
we
got
a
lot
of
positive
feedback
about
silby
tub,
especially
in
comparison
some
of
the
others
right,
even
though
it's
maybe
a
slightly
higher
density
than
some
of
the
others.
We
saw.
D
J
H
Yeah,
just
a
couple
of
chicken
and
egg
type
questions
Sean,
you
mentioned
the
the
mix
and
the
density
issue.
All
the
way
through
this
thing
and
I
will
admit
that
I
couldn't
follow
it,
but
I'm
sure
somebody
is,
but
in
there
at
some
point
along
the
way
someone
is
going
to
have
to
talk
about
well,
this
change
to
the
Alamo
and
this
density
figure
helps
a
certain
group
and
perhaps
creates
problems
for
another
and
I.
Think
Clarity
of
that
pretty
early
in
the
process
is
is,
is
very
important.
H
So
that's
more
common
than
a
question,
but
the
second
one
is
just
as
chair
of
the
capital
committee,
another
chicken
or
egg
right.
Is
it
the
policy
and
procedure
stuff
that
you've
got
to
make
the
decisions
on
before
you
can
make
the
capital
decisions?
And
can
you
comment
it
all
on
the
timing
of
both
of
those
especially
Capital,
because
yeah.
J
That's
a
great
question
and
I
did
a
presentation
with
Jennifer
Ray
our
Capital
program
administrator
for
Ali
class
earlier
this
week,
and
we
talked
about
the
process
about
using
our
plan
as
sort
of
the
guide,
and
then
we
get
into
our
strategic
plan
our
strategic
initiatives.
How
that
informs
budget.
D
J
Also
budget
then
helps
to
inform
the
Strategic
plan,
and
then
you
know
the
capital
program
is
sort
of
an
outcome
and
how
we
the
strategy,
get
there
so
yeah.
We
have
to
understand
an
idea
what
the
program
is
and
a
good
question
about:
hey.
Is
it
what
how
big
is
it
50
to
70
million
dollars?
Well,
it's
a
scary
number
right.
You
know
when
you
put
it
up
there
gosh.
If
you
did
everything
and
cost
some
materials
and
if
they
could
be
70
million
dollars.
J
Well,
then
you
back
into
it
and
say
you:
you
can't
do
70
million
dollars
of
development
all
at
once,
right
I
mean
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
find
contractors
materials
to
do
a
Hundred
Acre
development
all
at
once,
so
it
is
back
to
based
on
the
resources
that
we
have
the
funding
sources.
We
can
identify
the
resources
to
implement
the
project
right,
surveyors
and
designers
and
contractors
and
all
of
that
design
professionals.
J
What
can
we
effectively
manage
in
a
capital
program
right,
and
so
we
adopt
a
budget
with
a
one-year
Capital
plan
for
that
year
this
year
was
a
45
million
dollar
program.
We
will
not
spend
45
million
dollars
this
year,
but
we
are
setting
and
teeing
up
to
where
we
will
do
accelerate
the
the
program
to
to
deliver
more
product.
So
it's
part
of
that
Mark
that
we
will
inform
our
Capital
program
with
the
programming
that
was
approved
to
the
master
plan
and
vice
versa.
Right,
so
you
have
to
understand
the
big
picture.
J
Then
you
understand
how
much
you
can
do
and
the
timing
it'll
take
to
get
there
and
then
you
move
through
sort
of
a
cycle.
So
if
it's
a
five
five
phases,
here's
phase
one
we're
going
to
move
through
schematic,
construct,
detailed
design,
permitting
construction.
So
as
the
first
one
gets
someone's
schematic,
then
you
start
the
next
phase,
so
they're
ready
to
go
and
then
based
on
resource
allocation
availability
of
contractors,
competitors
of
the
market
other
things,
then
you
decide
how
to
move
forward
through
that
environment,
it'll.
A
Lastly,
I
take
it
to
the
current
recycling
convenience
center
lives
within
the
district.
Is
that
correct?
Yes,
sir
yeah?
What
are
the
long-range
plans
there
that
were
discussed.
J
That's
a
that's
an
excellent
question
and
we're
going
to
outline
in
front
of
the
public
planning
committee
of
Town
Council
in
our
strategic
action
plan,
there's
a
strategic
item
about
a
swap
strength,
strengths,
weaknesses,
opportunities
and
threats
of
solid
waste
and
recycling.
J
There
have
been
two
resolutions
now:
second
one's
coming
forward
to
that
same
committee
on
October
27th,
both
those
items
on
October
27th
from
the
GIC
to
work,
the
Town
to
work
with
the
county
on
a
material
recycling
facility,
restoring
facility
on
the
mainland
and
then
to
look
at
the
whole
program
of
solid
waste
and
recycling,
County
and
town
Collective,
and
so
part
of
that
will
be
an
evaluation
of
the
on
Island
County
Run
convenience
center.
That's
on
Town
property!
J
A
Okay,
the
last
thing
is,
is
looking
at
the
slides
there
is
it.
Is
it
part
of
the
the
proposal
or
the
plan
that
you
would
widen
the
median
on
William
Hilton
Parkway
right
near
the
the
mid
Island
track,
so
that
it
looks
like
your
lines
were
going
into
Parkland
area?
There
is
that
is.
J
A
J
Of
the
eye
to
kind
of
shift
it
from
a
like
a
four-lane,
divided
highway,
even
though
it's
a
Parkway
through
there
shift
it
from
a
four-lane,
divided
highway
way
to
a
little
bit
more
integration
of
the
experience
as
you
travel
through
the
park
right,
so
not
just
being
in
there
on
your
bike
or
on
foot.
But
if
you
actually
traveled
and
got
to
experience
some
of
the
parks.
A
Also
one
real
small
thing,
but
inside
the
the
main
part
of
the
park
there
it
looked
like
you
had
Pathways,
it
didn't
seem
like
to
be
one
continuous
round
pathway
in
there.
It
seemed
to
me
that
for
joggers
and
and
other
people
that
it
might
be
better
to
have
a
kind
of
a
circular
situation,
so
you
can
take
a
long,
walk
or
a
jog
or
ride
your
bike
or
whatever
just
I
just
noticed
that
I
just
thought
it
seemed
silly
that
we
didn't
have
a
complete
Loop
there,
all
right,
I
I.
A
Thank
you,
Sean
and
Missy
for
your
presentation.
This
is
for
informational
purposes
to
the
commission,
and
we
thank
you
for
the
detailed
presentation
that
you
provided
for
us.
Thank
you.
P
Right,
Mr
chairman:
yes,
when
we
did
the
appearance
by
citizens,
we
did
not
speak
about
the
portal.
The
online
portal
comments
and
we
have
some
Representatives
here
who
submitted
that
comment
that
would
like
to
speak.
Yes,.
A
Absolutely
I've
I've
read
that
comment
that
was
on
the
portal
and
I
was
very
interested
in
it
and
as
their
spokesperson
for
that.
Q
Q
Keith
and
I
are
full-time
residents
here
and
we
live
at
North
Forest
Beach
Court,
which
is
part
of
our
development
of
13
homes
and
three
streets
over
from
us,
is
Capri
Lane
and
it's
six
Capri
has
been
built
a
huge
structure.
Do
you
want
to
show
the
photo
I'm?
Sorry,
we
don't
have
a
presentation,
but
Keith
does
have
a
photo.
Q
Did
I
don't
know
if
y'all?
Yes,
we
do.
Yes,
we
did
I'm
not
going
to
read
the
whole
thing,
but
basically
we
have
loved
Hilton
Head
because
of
its
preservation
of
the
neighborhood,
the
beauty
of
the
island,
the
low
signage-
and
this
is
anything
but
this
looks
like
Myrtle
Beach
and
we're
very
concerned
about
it.
It's
our
understanding
that
it's
five
Parcels
of
property
that
have
been
conjoined
believe
me,
I,
don't
have
all
the
information,
it's
just
kind
of
what
I've
heard.
Q
Q
I.
Don't
know
how
this
got
in
under
the
radar,
but
certainly
everyone
that
I've
talked
to
every
neighbor,
every
friend
I'll
say
go
down
and
look
at
six
Capri
and
they
go
down
and
they're
shocked,
because
it's
so
antithetical
to
what
the
neighborhood
is,
and
so
our
concern
is.
How
did
this
happen?
How
do
we
prevent
it
in
the
future?
Q
Why
is
it
allowed
that
so
many
Parcels
it
looks
like
so
many
Parcels
were
combined
for
one.
What
we
keep
calling
a
a
compound,
and
how
was
this
structure
which
we
understand
it
was
called
a
playground
that
somehow
they
got
around
zoning
issues
by
calling
it
a
playground
which,
of
course,
the
North
Forest
Beach
zoning
laws
when
they
were
formed,
would
have
been
way
before
somebody
could
foresee.
You
know
a
30-foot
30.
A
Well,
first
of
all,
thank
you
for
speaking
up
and
thank
you
for
sending
in
I
was
a
well-read
piece
that
you
sent
us,
and
we
appreciate
that
Mr
Vice
chairman
any
comments
or
thoughts.
Yeah.
N
Q
Q
N
I
think
we
need
to
really
find
out
from
town
staff
what
had
transpired
with
this,
because
that's
I
don't
see
that
in
the
in
the
realm
of
being
acceptable.
Any.
A
Other
comments
from
the
Commissioners
they
want
to
get
in
on
this.
Q
P
I
was
just
gonna
add
that
the
staff
is
aware
of
this.
They
did
pull
a
permit,
it
does
meet
all
of
the
Town
LMO
requirements,
I
mean
setback
buffers,
it
meets
the
maximum
height
and
we
have
added
it
to
our
list
of
LMO
amendments
to
address
this,
so
it
does
not
occur
in
the
future.
P
You
know
it
they
did
have
to
get
appointment
for
it,
so
that
it
met
all
of
the
building
code
requirements
and
it
does
meet
all
other
small
apartments.
There's
nothing
in
our
code
that
has
Provisions
for
residential
accessory
structures
is.
A
P
A
N
So
it
sounds
like
to
me
that
it's
it
was
a
buy
ride
structure,
so
it
didn't
come
before
any
of
the
the
committees
or
commissions
which
in
turn
leads
to
the
the
question,
as
we
were
just
speaking
about
with
the
LMO
changes
and
what
needs
to
be
addressed
revamped.
What
worked
before
doesn't
work
now,
yeah
yeah
I
think
I
would
say
that
we
need
to
send
a
message
on
this.
A
Absolutely
if
somebody
gets
away
with
this,
then
you're
going
to
have
an
awful
lot
of
copycatters
they're
going
to
be
looking
at
how
to
do
it
with
their
properties,
and
so
my
suggestion
and
see
if
I
can
get
a
voter
of
a
consensus
of
the
commission.
That
staff
should
check
into
this.
So
you
know
very
closely
and
also
the
maybe
the
board
of
zoning
appeals
should
take
a
look
at
this
thing.
A
I
I,
don't
know
if
there's
some
way
that
this
violates
the
community
standard
of
a
neighborhood
residential
area
to
be
putting
this
kind
of
a
so-called
amusement
park
or
in
the
middle
of
it,
and
if
they
try
to
rent
it
room
by
room
as
a
hotel.
That's
a
whole
nother
thing:
it's
supposed
to
running
a
home.
Q
K
N
So
I
will
speak
to
the
the
room
by
room
that
that
will
be
addressed
if
it
is
happening.
It'll
be
discovered
and
found
out
next
year
when
gov
OS
starts
providing
services
to
the
town
and
they
start
monitoring
all
that.
But
I
do
have
a
question
about
the
the
four
speech
Owners
Association.
Did
it
come
before
them.
Q
K
Said
that
their
Covenant
did
not
address
any
of
this
when
it
was
written
back
in
the
70s
nobody
foresaw.
This
is
one
of
the
statements
of
hey.
There's,
nobody
foresaw
something
like
this
happening,
and
so
it
wasn't
specifically
addressed
within
their
covenants,
so
they
couldn't
really
do
anything
about
it.
However,
I
have
a
friend
of
mine.
That
was
a
lawyer
who
visited
last
week
and
he
was
saying
it.
He
said
there.
K
N
Say
by
right,
meaning
that
but
by
right
was
the
Alamo
and
what
was
down
there,
that
they
didn't
have
to
come
before.
Committee
of
the
town
they
just
went
to
through
staff
approval
and.
A
To
name
a
new
access,
easement
off
Spanish
Wells
Road,
there
are
no
other
affected
Parcels
presented
by
fire
rescue
staff.
S
S
All
right
so
Illinois
Island
fire
rescue
on
behalf
of
Nadine
Chaplin,
proposes
to
name
a
vehicular
access,
easement
Nadine
Manor,
it's
located
off
of
Spanish
Wells
Road
Nadine
Manor
provides
direct
access
to
the
possibility
of
nine
dwelling
units.
Staff
recommends
that
the
Planning
Commission
approved
the
application
based
upon
the
criteria
that's
outlined
in
the
LMO
foreign.
S
S
And
this
is
the
development
the
development
was
submitted
with
four
homes,
but
there
are
the
parcel
is
big
enough
to
have
the
possibility
of
nine
homes
on
it.
S
So
criteria
a
it
does
it's
not
do.
The
street
name
is
not
duplicated
within
the
town
or
Beaufort
County
we've
determined
that
the
proposed
street
name
is
is
not
phonetically
similar
to
any
existing
Street
or
access
easement,
and
we
also
have
determined
that
it
will
not
be
confused
with
any
existing
Street
or
access
easement.
So
the
proposed
street
name
Nadine
Manor
meets
the
requirements
of
this
criteria.
S
Criteria
b
we
have
determined
that
it's
simple,
logical
and
easy
to
read.
It
is
clear
and
brief
and
it
does
not
have
frivolous
or
complicated
words
or
an
unconventional
spelling,
so
it
meets
criteria
B.
S
The
proposed
street
name,
Nadine
Manor,
was
selected
because
it
represents
the
history
of
the
parcel
using
the
owner's
first
name,
Miss
Chaplin.
That
was
her
first
request
for
naming
the
street.
S
Criteria:
d:
it's
there
are
no
other,
it's
the
only
Street
in
that
property,
so
it
does
meet
this
requirement.
B
S
So,
criteria
G
requests
that
certain
streets
use
alley,
Avenues,
Boulevard
Circle,
the
proposed
street
name
is
Manor,
and
so
this
criteria
does
not
apply
to
that
app.
This
application
and
the
LMO
asked
that
the
suffice
suffix
is
Manner.
Trace
in
common
shall
be
typically
used
for
Access
easements,
which
this
is
an
accents
easement,
and
that's
why
we
added
manner
to
the
name.
So
it
does
need
that
requirement.
S
The
subject
street
is
not
broken
into
two
streets,
so
this
criteria
does
not
apply,
and
so
in
summary,
that
the
street
name
has
been
vetted
and
meets
the
correct
criteria
set
out
in
the
LMO
and
I
will
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
If
you
have
them.
A
Commissioners
any
questions
or
comments,
no
World
online.
All
right!
Thank
you
at
this
point,
I
will
entertain
a
motion,
move
approval,
move
approvals
or
second
Mr
Campbell.
Second
on
you
need
public
comment.
Oh
we,
oh
yeah,
that's
right!
Are
there
any
com,
yeah,
yeah,
I'm?
Sorry,
I'm!
Sorry!
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
who
want
to
comment
on
this
particular
proposal.
T
And
she
sent
me
here
all
the
way
from
Frankfurt
Germany
to
make
sure
that
this
get
approved
and
if
it
doesn't,
I
cannot
go
home.
So
I
think
you
you
want
me
to
go
home.
You
don't
want
to
come
up
here
and
have
to
talk
to
you
again
and
try
to
get
something
approved
so
I'm,
just
asking
you
on
behalf
of
my
sister.
Please
do
the
right
thing.
A
We'll
put
you
down
is
for
the
proposal
all
right
film
of
approval.
We
have
an
approval.
We
have
a
second
for
Mr
Campbell.
All
in
favor
of
approving
this
particular
motion
raise
your
hands
any
against
all
in
favor.
Do
we
have
a
unanimous
vote
on
this
Karen
and
thank
you
for
the
presentation
and
your
comments,
sir?
All
right.
Next
we
have
the
STV.
A
S
Again,
I
am
Joe
Haida
Fister
and,
on
behalf
of
fire
rescue
and
the
Hilton
Head
Island
acquisition
Partners,
we
propose
to
name
the
vehicular
driveway
memories,
Lane,
it's
located
off
of
Folly,
Field
Road
and
it
provides
direct
access
to
nine
buildings
on
the
parcel
staff
recommends
that
the
Planning
Commission
approved
the
application
based
on
the
review
criteria
outlined
in
the
LMO.
S
So
this
is
the
parcel
it's
currently
addressed
as
15
Wimbledon
Court,
because
it
is
the
tennis
courts
and
that's
how
they
were
accessed
at
that
point
in
time.
It
is
a
development
that
will
the
access
will
come
off
of
Folly,
Field
Road
and
there
are
proposed
to
be
nine
buildings.
S
I'll
just
show
you
a
little
bit
more
like
this
is
the
surrounding
area
across
from
it
is
Island
Club,
and
it
is
fronted
by
Folly,
Field
Road.
S
And
then
this
is
a
picture
of
what
the
development
would
look
like
and
the
we
are
proposing
to
name
the
driveway
through
it
so
that
we
can
have
address
numbers
to
number
each
bill
building
individually.
S
So
we
have
vetted
the
names
that
they
proposed.
They
are
not
duplicated
within
the
town
or
the
county,
they're,
not
phonetically,
similar
to
any
existing
Street
or
easement,
and
they
it
will
not
likely
be
confused
with
any
existing
Street
or
easement.
S
S
S
I
cut
and
pasted
not
too
good
in
this
one,
so
the
the
proposed
street
name
is
reflective
of
Island
character
as
that
it
they
are
creating
memories.
Here
the
proposed
memories
Lane:
it
does
not
continue
through
any
intersection.
S
It
does
not
make
a
right
angle
turn
it.
It
is,
it
all
is
all
one
length
with
that.
Little
circle
in
it.
S
We
chose
Lane
for
it,
it
does
meet
the
criteria
of
the
Alamo
and.
S
And
we
are
just
asking
that
you
all
approve
the
name
for
the
access.
Thank.
A
You
other
any
public
comments
on
this
particular
proposal.
U
U
A
A
A
A
Right
can
we
put
the
map
back
up
again?
Is
that
possible.
S
Planning
portion
of
it
because,
as
I
said,
we're
just
I
am
looking
for
approval
for
the
street
name,
but
if
somebody
has
questions
about
where
the
where
it
stands
at
this
point,
you
probably
could
answer
that.
U
A
U
A
M
P
P
Applicant
is
here
today
if
he
wants
to
speak
on
the
number
of
units.
I,
don't
remember
it
offhand,
but
all
we're
here
today
to
talk
about
is
the
naming
of
the
drive
aisle
all.
P
Plan
is
not
being
presented
to
you
yet
until
we
are
ready
to
present
it
to
you
all
for
information
purposes,
and
it
is
not
ready
to
be
pretty
good.
A
Okay,
fair
enough.
Well,
thank
you
for
your
comments
appreciate
your
stepping
forward.
Somebody
else
have
a
comment.
No
I
guess!
Yes,.
R
R
R
A
To
happen
all
right,
well,
thank
you
for
your
comments.
I,
don't
think
we're
at
the
point
where
we're
going
to
be
discussing
the
actual
up
and
down
of
the
development,
but
merely
the
naming
of
the
street
as
the
we've
been
supervised,
and
so
we
will
only
stick
today
to
our
discussion
on
the
naming
of
the
street
Commissioners.
Are
there
any
comments
along
the
way
from
left
to
right
here
on
the
naming
of
the
street.
M
A
Right
and
that
will
be
coming
before
various
authorities.
S
I
think
that
is
our
plan
going
forward
is
that
we
will
try
to
coordinate
them
together,
but
again,
like
once
it
gets
submitted.
We
have
a
time
frame
to
get
them
before
you,
so
we
will
just
have
to
work
with
the
applicants
going
forward
to
try
to
bring
them
both.
At
the
same
time,
all.
A
F
F
Before
we
started
the
meeting-
and
she
said
that's
what
this
being
a-
and
she
just
told
me
that
she
gave
me
wrong
information.
So
that's
why
I
say
that
before.
F
Suggesting
a
name
different
than
that.
A
Right,
fair
enough:
well,
your
objection
is
noted,
then.
Thank
you,
sir
I
think
what
we
need
to
do
is
to
take
an
up
or
down
vote
as
to
whether
or
not
this
proposal
moves
forward
with
this
particular
name.
I.
N
I
have
a
comment
before
we
do
that,
since,
since
the
applicant
has
made
application
and
that
naming
needs
to
be
part
of
the
application
and
there's
a
time
frame,
our
only
responsibility
is
to
say
yay
or
nay
on
on
the
naming
of
the
street
and
nothing
else
to
do
with
the
potential
project.
That'll
be
coming
forward
at
a
later
date,
at
which
time
the
Planning,
Commission
and
others
will
have
time
to
review
it
to
discuss
egress
and
entrance.
But
from
a
standpoint
of
of
giving
the
the
applicant
the
opportunity
to
fill
his
his
request.
R
Let's
say
it
opens
it
up
in
different
entrances
and
exits
that
nationalized
thinking
is
might
be
incorrect,
but
if
it's
a
court
it
comes
in,
it
goes
out
with
the
same.
S
A
S
S
O
Question
sure,
if
it
point
in
time
in
the
future,
the
development
of
this
particular
but
a
point
in
time
in
the
future
that
this
particular
development
comes
before
a
various
administrative
authorities.
And
there
are
changes,
is
it
possible
to
go
back
and
rename
the
street
afterwards?
If,
if
Court
becomes
more,
for
example,
appropriate
than
lame,
could
it
be
Revisited?
O
S
I
mean
there
like
we
until
it
is
plotted
and
we
assign
addresses,
we
can
change
it
it.
This
helps
us
like
in
the
building
permit
process
and
as
we
move
forward,
to
stop
calling
it
15
Wimbledon
Court,
because
that's
really
not
where
it's
going
to
be
accessed
from
so
you
know
it
helps
in
our
permitting
process
for
it
to
have
a
another
address
to
use
and
so
that
following
it
through
the
process,
it
doesn't
get
continued
to
be
called
15
Wimbledon.
So.
N
S
I,
don't
know
if
you
I,
don't
know
what
the
rules
are,
but
could
you
all
vote
to.
A
All
right
with
all
of
this
in
mind,
I
think
we
should
take
a
vote
on
whether
or
not
to
name
this
thing,
memories
lame
and
that
after
the
discussion,
if
we
find
there's
only
going
to
be
one
entrance
to
this
possible
development,
then
it
will
be
corrected
as
a
court
or
some
other
one
entrance
kind
of
development
Road,
the
other
is
there
a
motion.
I
will
accept
emotion
at
this
point,
Mr
Alfred
moves
that
we
adopted
that
we
we
approve
this
Memory
Lane
Memories
like
a
second.
A
Is
there
a
second
okay,
all
in
favor
show
raise
of
hand
all
in
favor
I'll
opposed.
We
have
one
opposite:
two
oppositions
Mr,
O'neill
Mr
dirienzo
are
not
voting
in
favor.
Now
the
motion
does
pass.
Thank
you
all
right.
We
have
one
more
request
from
it's
a.
A
Stdv002403
2022
request
from
Octavio
Roman
Gonzalez
owner
of
RS.
A
10003000169000
to
name
a
new
driveway
located
at
24
orange
Lane,
there
are
no
other
affected
Parcels,
as
presented
Again
by
fire
and
rescue
staff.
A
S
So
they
had
submitted
six
different
names.
They
all
had
conflict
except
for
armadillo.
S
A
S
So
yeah
I've,
so
this
is
right
at
almost
the
intersection
of
Squire
Pope
and
Gumtree
Road.
Okay,.
S
All
right,
and
then
this
is
the
site
plan
for
their
development.
They
are
adding
three
additional
homes
to
the
side
of
the
lot
that
will
get
the
street
name.
A
S
S
It
is
simple,
logical
and
easy
to
read
and
pronounce.
It
is
clear
and
brief,
and
it's
not
frivolous
or
complicated
does
not
have
frivolous
or
complicated
words
or
unconventional
spelling.
S
It's
very
the
screen's
very
touchy.
It
does
not
make
a
right
angle
turn.
S
This
does
not
apply
to
the
application,
because
it
is
not.
We
did
not
choose
any
of
those
we
went
with,
even
though
it
is
not.
It
is
a
driveway,
but
we
are
naming
it
because
we
need
addresses
to
give
it
and,
in
addition,
in
our
addressing
guidelines,
once
there
are
more
than
two
homes
off
of
a
driveway,
it
becomes
hard
for
fire
rescue
to
determine
the
multiple
addresses
that
are
off
of
that.
So
once
there
are
more
than
two
homes,
we
asked
to
name
the
driveway,
as
we
would
in
easement
all
right.
S
It's
not
broken
into
two
separate
streets
and
again
we
just
asked
that
it
meets
the
criteria
that
is
set
up
in
the
LMO
and
we
ask
for
your
approval.
Thank.
E
Jackson
and
I've
noticed
a
change
on
this
street
name
that
we're
talking
about
just
now
that
I'm
trying
to
get
an
understanding,
my
property
versus
the
new
street
name
and
what
it
is.
My
property
is
I,
there's
easement
to
get
to
my
property
through
orange
Lane,
and
if
you
see
what
it
properties
design
is
going
to
show
that
he's
going
to
have
a
piece
here
that
I'm
going
to
be
beside
him.
E
What
I'm
questioning
about
is
that
going
to
change
my
name,
which
is
original
name
originally
from
the
family
members
100
years
ago,
because
if
you
had
this
land
for
years
and
this
guy
just
got
piece
of
it,
but
we
concerned
about
34
of
the
part
on
the
left
side.
As
you
approaching
this
new
name,
he's
got
brought
up
here.
The.
S
G
E
S
No,
no,
so
he
has
to
as
part
of
his
project.
He
has
to
improve
his
access
and
make
it
20
feet
wide
in
an
all-weather
driving
surface,
so
it
will
become.
It
will
look
like
a
road
at
that
point
and
there
will
be
a
street
sign
that
goes
at
the
intersection
of
orange
and.
A
Right,
but
it
says
here
this
is
to
be
replaced
by
an
all-weather
yeah.
A
S
Person
that
is
improving
that
parcel
okay,
yeah.
S
S
Well,
as
on
an
access
easement,
which
that
orange
is
typically
each
part
of
the
easement
is
owned
by
an
individual,
so
the
this
parcel
goes
across
what
is
Orange
playing
right
now,
so
as
part
of
them
putting
the
home
on
the
other
side,
they
will
improve
and
maintain
their
access.
That
is
orange
and
then
goes
to
armadillo.
So.
S
S
D
A
E
S
S
It
creates
a
a
difficulty
for
us
that
when
once
we
pass
that
driveway
like
there's
four
addresses
back
there
and
they're
all
orange
Lane
then,
and
it
makes
it
hard
for
us
to
find
things,
because
once
you
get
past
one
or
two
you're
passing
the
numbers,
because
the
numbers
are
going
to
go,
you
know
say
it's
20
and
then
those
are
22
24,
26
28
that
go
that
way
and
then
I.
A
Understand
we've
had
this
problem
with
Firethorne
way
down
in
South
Forest
Beach
not
too
long
ago.
Let
me
ask
you
if,
if
it
were,
if
or
could
it
be
called
orange
court
or
something
like
that
off
of
orange.
A
S
So
I
think
that
we
could
go
back
to
the
drawing
board
and
ask
them,
but
like
typically
whoever
owns
that
piece
of
property
is
who
submits
for
the
name.
And
these
were
the
names
that
they
chose.
So.
E
E
We
28
34
36
East
plot
for
27,
which
is
a
circle
back
to
that's
all.
It
is
well
we've
argued
about
the
fire
department
coming
in
and
making
a
U-turn
right,
but
apparently
it
hasn't
passed
because
they're
putting
all
these
fences
up
everywhere
and
it's
created
a
big
issue.
All
right.
Tell
me
what
a
new
name
that's
going
to
interrupt
me
in
UPS.
E
S
S
It's
an
orange
Lane
address
right
now,
because
they
are
the
only
home
there.
Yeah.
N
S
G
S
M
A
All
right,
I
think
the
feeling
of
the
commission
of
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
is
that,
would
fire
and
rescue
go
back
to
the
proposed
of
Mr,
Gonzalez
and
say
the
commission
is,
would
ask
that
you
consider
orange
court,
and
would
that
be
something
that
you
would
do?
Is
Through
Fire
and
Rescue.
A
Sure,
okay,
I
think,
can
I
get
a
motion
from
members
of
the
commission.
A
Mr
Campbell
is
your
second
Mr
Alfred
seconds
that
we
are
requesting
fire
and
rescue
to
go
back
to
Mr
Gonzalez
and
ask
you
know
in
a
neighborly
way
that
since
we
already
have
origin,
that
has
a
history
on
the
island
that
maybe
we
could
make
this
storage
court
and
I
think
it
sounds
a
lot
better
in
armadillo
anyway
may
I
add
all
right
all
in
favor
of
that
motion
we
have
a
unanimous
vote
Karen
in
favor
of
having
fire
and
rescue
go
back
to
Mr
Gonzalez.
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you
both
thank
you
for
speaking
up,
sir
all
right.
Let's
see
what
do
we
have
next
on
the
agenda?
Commission
business
committee
assignments:
we
have
a
Mr
Collett
is
no
longer
on
the
LMO
committee,
and
so
we
have
an
opening
on
the
LMO
committee
and
rather
than
just
call
somebody
up
in
the
middle
of
the
day
and
ask
you:
is
there
anybody
who
would
want
to
volunteer
to
be
on
the
LMO
committee,
replacing
Mr
call
Sweet
all
right,
Chairman's
report
I
have
nothing
new
to
add.
A
Are
there
any
committee
reports
CIP
comprehensive
plan,
gulagichi
LMO,
Mr
Perry,
anything
there,
rules
of
procedure,
Mr
Alfred,
anything
new
there
all
right
under
staff
reports,
we,
the
Robert,
Trent
Jones
driving
range
net
height
interpretation.
Sean,
is
back
before
us.
J
J
Activity
at
that
range
was
intensified
with
the
top
Tracer
technology
and
that
element
that
was
added
to
increase
some
additional
balls
that
were
leaving
the
driving
range
and
impacting
some
properties
that
neighbor
the
driving
range,
and
so
we've
been
working
over
a
period
of
time
to
come
up
with
some
solutions.
There's
been
some
really
crazy,
gnat
treatments,
there's
been
some
vegetation
improvements
that
were
made,
and
then
some
of
the
the
air
balls
I
can't
believe
in
the
driving
range.
J
We
met
with
the
neighbors
an
operator
and
talked
about
some
additional
opportunities
that
they
could
take
advantage
of,
including
low
low
flight
balls
and
at
the
time
of
the
meeting
we
said
well,
there's
a
75
foot,
height
restriction
in
the
pd-1
district,
and
you
could
maybe
go
to
the
bza
and
go
and
ask
for
a
variance.
Well,
we
reviewed
the
Alamo
a
little
more
deeply.
We
did
some
research,
the
the
driving
range
at
Sea
Pines
at
Harbor.
J
Town
has
has
been
Bryson
dechambeaued
and
they
elevated
their
nuts
there
and
so
under
Section
1610
102
C
2A,
not
to
get
too
technical
of
the
LMO
I
have
the
authority
to
determine
that
certain
facilities
do
their
operation
intrinsic
functional
nature
that
they
can
exceed
that
height
limit.
So
we
we
again
we
looked
at
some
other
operations,
including
the
Harbor
Town
driving
range
and
I've
authorized
up
to
130
feet.
That's
what
it
is
there
for
the
operator
to
extend
poles
and
Nats
up
to
130
feet.
J
J
So
that
elevated
them
to
the
7,
70
or
75
feet
maximum,
they
were
a
little
lower.
They
added
another
panel
I
think
20-ish
feet
through
previous
action,
but
it's
not
mitigating
it's
up
front
of
mitigation.
To
stop
I,
don't
know,
stop
every
ball
so.
J
A
A
J
A
Thank
you,
Sean
all
right.
We
have
one
last
item
on
a
quarterly
report:
Missy
Luke,
please.
L
Again,
the
quarterly
report
was
in
your
packet,
it's
for
the
period
between
July
and
September.
In
that
time
line,
you
had
a
presentation
about
the
beach
management
plan
that
was
given
to
you
by
Jeff
Buckaloo,
the
town
engineer
during
this
time,
staff's
reviewing
two
subdivision
applications
they're
both
on
Jonesville
Road.
One
is
a
proposed
25
lot
subdivision
called
tidelands
and
the
other
is
a
proposed
22
lot
subdivision
called
Twin
Oaks.
L
Also
you
had
several
committees
that
have
met
the
rules
and
procedure
committee,
amended
your
rules
of
procedure
and
we're
down
to
one
one
meeting
per
month.
L
Also
the
LMO
committee
met
and
and
will
be
meeting
on
November
1st
to
review
the
two
proposed
text,
amendments
that
were
reviewed
back
on
September
one
so
they're
coming
back
before
the
LMO
committee.
The
gulliguchi
task
force
has
met
several
times
within
this
time
period,
and
then
we
included
a
link
for
Capital
Improvement
project
updates
to
go
to
rcip
dashboard
on
the
website
where
you
can
get
the
most
current
up-to-date
information
on
the
status
of
CIP
projects.
A
Thank
you,
missy
appreciate
it.
May
I
ask
Karen
or
ever
Missy
to
check
with
the
council
and
find
out
if,
if
I'm
allowed,
to
appoint
myself
to
the
LMO
committee
I'm
ex
officio
now,
but
since
we
have
a
vacancy
I,
don't
know
what
the
rules
are
on.
That
would
somebody
please
let
me
know:
can
that
be
done?