►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
Good
evening,
folks
we're
going
to
get
started
here.
It
is
by
at
least
by
my
watch
6:30,
so
we're
going
to
get
started
with
the
eighth
meeting
of
our
middle
school
boundary
adjustment
committee
and
before
we
start
with
my
usual
comments,
I
want
to
introduce
dr.
Carl
Meade,
who
has
an
announcement
to
make.
C
Good
evening
and
welcome
I
apologize
for
sitting
as
we
don't
have
a
standing
mic
this
evening,
but
I
want
to
just
begin
this
evening
by
welcoming
everyone
appreciate
your
involvement
in
the
process
and,
ultimately,
the
outcome
in
which
this
committee
is
going
to
have
to
reach
I
want
to
emphasize
that
there
has
been
no
recommendation
that
has
been
made
by
this
committee
at
this
point
in
time.
They
are
still
in
the
liberation
and
conversation
around
what
recommendation
they
will
be
making
to
the
superintendent.
So
again,
no
decision
has
been
made
at
this
time.
C
We've
appreciated
the
majority
of
individuals
who
have
been
following
the
guidelines
and
fill
and
filing
testimony
online.
Very
much
appreciate
that
your
voice
is
incredibly
important
and
I
can
tell
you.
The
members
of
this
committee
and
staff
have
been
reading
every
single
one
of
those
they're
looking
for
themes
are
looking
for
the
interest
and
they
really
want
to
know
that
information
from
you
next
element
is.
Your
presence
is
appreciated
very
much
this
evening,
but
we
have
to
remember
this
is
a
committee
process.
C
These
individuals
have
committed
to
the
process
and,
most
importantly,
to
be
able
to
process
to
engage
in
dialogue
without
interruption.
Interruption
comes
in
multiple
ways.
You
may
hear
a
committee
members
say
something
that
you
were
ecstatic
about,
and
you're
happy
in
your
holler
I
promise
you
there
may
be
a
committee
member
who
follows
up
with
a
negative
comments
opposing
that
view.
So
let's
refrain
from
that,
because
any
time
that
we
have
to
take
to
pause
because
of
audience
contributions
this
evening
takes
away
from
the
process.
C
That's
happening
up
here
and
ultimately
this
is
where
our
emphasis
needs
to
be.
We
all
need
to
be
able
to
hear
and
hear
well
the
various
perspectives
of
rings
that
are
being
shared.
Lastly,
I
just
want
to
thank
you,
most
importantly,
for
your
engagement,
but
ultimately
for
the
engagement
of
this
committee
and,
most
importantly,
their
commitment
to
our
public
process
and,
most
importantly,
to
make
sure
that
everybody
is
assuming
positive
intent.
That
means
you
that
means
them.
It
starts
with
positive
intent
and
it
will
also
in
there
so
again,
I.
Thank
you
and
I.
C
B
Thank
you,
dr.
media,
so,
before
we
begin,
I
want
to
announce
that
all
of
the
middle
school
boundary
adjustment,
Advisory
Committee
meetings,
are
being
live-streamed
on
the
district's
YouTube
channel.
A
link
is
posted
on
the
middle
school
boundary
adjustment
webpage
and
is
shared
on
the
district's,
Facebook
and
Twitter
feeds
the
Advisory
Committee
meetings
are
all
public
meetings
and
all
materials
will
be
available
to
the
public
through
the
posting
of
those
materials
on
the
district's
web
page.
B
So
before
I
begin
the
meeting,
we
will
review
our
meeting
expectations
as
over.
Viewed
by
dr.
Mead.
We
assume
best
intentions.
We
all
want
the
best
for
all
of
our
students.
We
listen
intently
to
understand
better.
We
are
open
to
considering
new
ideas.
We
remain
open
to
influence
and
are
not
judgmental.
We
will
consider
all
options.
There
are
no
bad
questions,
our
interactions
will
be
done
with
respect
and
we
will
respect
opposing
evil
viewpoints.
As
dr.
B
So
before
I
open
the
committee's
discussion.
I
want
to
address
on
how
we're
going
to
do
the
pub
testimony
portion
of
the
meeting.
We
will
be
drawing
names
randomly
across
elementary
school
boundaries.
If
your
name
is
called,
you
will
be
providing
the
testimony,
not
another
person.
If
you
as
an
audience,
want
to
have
a
single
representative
to
speak,
then
we
expect
to
have
a
single
yellow
card
from
that
attendance
area,
absent
that
each
person
who
wants
to
speak
will
have
an
equal
opportunity
to
have
their
name
call.
B
So
at
6:45
in
10
minutes
we
will
stop
taking
the
yellow
cards
for
public
testimony.
So
if
you
want
to
testify,
please
fill
out
a
yellow
form
and
submit
it
to
Debbie
in
the
back
over
there.
I
note
for
folks
that
you
have
signs
in
the
back.
Thank
you
very
much.
Just
please
be
mindful
of
folks
who
may
be
behind
you
and
not
block
their
views
it
as
well.
So
with
that
we're
going
to
go
to
our
board
objectives
again.
First,
we
need
to
establish
a
new
boundary
for
the
timberland
neighborhood
school.
B
We
need
to
reduce
the
number
of
students
at
stoller
to
approximately
90
percent
of
the
permanent
capacity
of
that
building.
We
want
to
balance
enrollments
at
other
little
schools,
and
we
are
also
looking
at
possible
minor
amendments
to
other
attendance
boundaries
in
this
phase
of
the
project.
We
are
looking
at
the
policy
JC
factors,
and
these
are
the
student
body
composition,
which
is
self
explanatory,
as
well
as
the
capacity
at
current
and
future
capacity
at
schools,
we're
looking
at
feeder
patterns,
which
is
also
fairly
self-explanatory
and
then
also
neighborhood,
proximity
and
accessibility.
B
B
So
tonight
we
have
five
working
maps.
There
are
variations
on
the
two
working
maps
that
we
saw
at
the
last
meeting
and
I'll
review
those
working
maps
and
those
changes
here
in
just
a
moment,
but
I
know
that
some
on
the
committee
want
to
discuss
their
priorities
for
looking
at
the
boundary
adjustment
proposals.
I
would
recommend
to
all
of
you
that
your
prior
priorities
are
certainly
important,
but
they're
going
to
be
unique
to
each
of
the
boundary
ideas
that
we're
looking
at
each
of
the
proposals.
B
I
think
your
boundary
priorities
will
become
evident
as
you
review
and
talk
about
those
priorities.
So,
for
example,
there
may
be
you
may
prioritize
the
proximity
over
free
reduced
lunch,
or
you
may
have
a
reverse
priority
on
that.
That
is,
okay
and
your
priorities
can
shift,
depending
on
the
situation
that
you're
looking
at
it
doesn't
mean
to
say
that,
because
my
priority
is
capacity,
that
is
the
only
priority
that
you
have
because
it
may
change
depending
on
each
of
the
maps
so
including
this
evening.
B
We
have
three
more
meeting
schedules,
so
we
need
to
start
working
on
getting
towards
a
recommendation
so
starting
tonight,
hard
discussions.
Difficult
options
need
to
be
considered.
I
stated
in
our
cover
memo
that
you
received
that
we
are
looking
for.
A
preliminary
consent
is
on
the
southern
area
of
the
district.
I
emphasize
the
word
preliminary.
There
is
no
vote.
There
is
no
decision.
There
is
nothing
of
that
nature.
B
So
this
is
not
going
to
be
set
in
stone,
call
it
wet
sand
and
then
we'll
be
able
to
consider
the
whole
boundary
discussion
as
one
entity.
So
at
the
end
of
the
meeting,
I
will
ask
if
there
are
any
items
of
consensus.
If
there
aren't
okay,
that's
all
right.
We
can
move
on
and
we'll
be
looking
for
a
specific
direction
on
any
edits
that
you
were
looking
for.
On
these
maps
a
and
C
or
if
you
want
to
bring
back
map
B
that
we
did
not
decide
to
bring
forward
at
the
last
meeting.
B
D
I
just
wanted
to
pick
up
on
some
items
you
just
touched
on
here,
because
I
think
I
know
I
would
benefit
from
more
clarity.
I
have
feelings
from
my
fellow
committee
members
would
and
I'm
quite
certain
that
I
think
some
of
the
some
of
the
concern
we're
hearing
from
the
public
would
benefit
from
greater
clarity
about
what
we
can
expect
as
the
meeting
materials
are
delivered
to
us
and
what
the
agenda
is
for
subsequent
meetings.
I
can
say
for
the
last
two
sets
of
materials
that
came
to
us.
I
was
quite
surprised.
They
were.
D
There
was
not
based
on
the
discussions.
We'd
had
I
mean
a
couple
meetings
ago.
You
would
sort
of
insisted.
You
said,
okay,
that
we're
gonna
pick
two
maps
it
takes.
It
takes
a
lot
of
time
to
do
now.
I
think
so.
We've
got
it
got
to
get
down
to
two.
It
doesn't
mean
we
can't
go
back
to
another
one,
but
it's
gonna
have
to
take
a
vote
of
the
committee.
D
Well
then,
we
got
a
third
and
now
it
today
I
see
we
had
five
new
ones
introduced
and
the
the
changes
to
some
of
them
could
a
and
how
they
were
sort
of
morph
to
see
I
have
no
doubt
there
may
have
been
a
comet
or
two
that
was
picked
up
on
here.
But
my
observation
is
that
there
may
be
some
inadvertent.
D
Not
every
comment
is
getting
resulting
in
a
change
to
a
map,
so
I
would
ask
that
we,
as
you
mentioned
here
very
specific
and
delivered
at
the
end
of
the
meeting
on
what
we're
gonna
get
next
time,
what
we
agree
on
to
change
about
a
given
map
and
and
if
we
can't
come
to
agreement,
maybe
but
there's
enough
to
say
like
okay.
So
now
we're
gonna
have
two
variations
on
this,
but
I
think
if
we
can
eliminate
the
surprises,
the
process
would
look
more
transparent
to
all
of
us.
Thank.
B
You
with
respect
to
map
C
and
the
variations
one
of
our
committee
members
asked
for
a
way
to
you
know,
see
the
progression
of
changes
that
the
committee
asked
for
and
that's
2.0
c
2.0
is
trying
to
show
those
changes
in
2.1
and
2.2.
We
were
inferring
from
the
discussions
of
the
committee
during
the
meeting.
What
the
committee
wanted
to
see
so
was
there
a
poll
at
the
end?
B
B
So
this
is
a
map
see.
This
is
what
we
looked
at
at
the
January
30th
meeting.
This
right
here
walks
through
the
changes
that
we
heard
from
the
committee
about
the
southern
part
of
the
district
when
it
was
talking
about
the
splits
that
we
introduced
and
in
map
C
and
then
how
to
correct
them.
So
one
you
will
see
that
all
of
those
is
now
going
to
Whitford
number
two
northern
side
of
Shoals
Ferry,
our
Shoals
Heights
Elementary
School,
is
all
feeding
to
Conestoga,
the
northern
or
I'm.
B
Sorry,
the
southern
two-thirds,
three-quarters
of
Cooper
mountain
is
going
to
Highland
Park.
This
split
is
reintroduced
as
the
status
quo.
That's
what
is
going
on
today,
number
four.
We
have
called
hazel
Dale
hook
or
Peninsula.
This
was
shown
in
map
a
and
we
are
thinking
that
this
would
make
for
it
to
go
to
Highland
Park.
There
are
no
students
there
right
now
and
once
that
area
starts
developing,
it
would
probably
be
you
know
more
sensible
to
send
them
to
Highland
number.
B
Five
is
the
little
bit
of
Jahannam,
so
call
it
East
Chehalis
that
is
going
to
Highland
Park
right
now,
but
they
are
the
only
students
that
would
go
to
be
ridden
high
school
that
attend
Highland.
So
we
have
suggested
moving
them
all
to
see
her
park
so
that
they
would
be
with
other
students
that
will
go
to
Beaverton
high
school.
That
split
already
exists,
we're
just
really
directing
where
those
students
would
go.
B
So
that's
see
point
two
point:
eight
zero
is
just
those
areas
south
of
26,
now
moving
north
again
you'll
see
in
the
circle
that
we're
still
highlighting
that
area
element
of
Beaverton
high
school.
That's
on
the
west
side
of
178th.
In
2.1
we
have
moved
all
of
Rock
Creek
so
that
northern
part
that
was
highlighted
first
dollar
we've
moved
to
five
Oaks,
and
that
would
be
a
complete
feeder
to
five
Oaks
and
then
all
of
Finley
would
be
included
and
go
to
store
middle
school.
B
These
areas,
we
did
not
address
the
split
of
Oak
Hills
that
still
remains
in
working
map
2.1
in
2.2.
What
we
did
is
again
one
all
of
northern
the
northern
part
of
Rock
Creek,
so
would
be
one
continue
feeder
to
five
Oaks
the
area.
So
you
can
see
here
in
a
two
point,
one
all
of
Finley.
Well
in
this
one.
B
It
is
just
the
walkable
area,
the
walk
zone,
area
of
Finley
that
would
go
to
Stoller
and
then
the
northern
part
of
Springville,
so
grigory
Road
would
be
that
dividing
line
going
north
to
stay
at
Stoller
and
those
points
south
of
burger
road
would
feed
into
five
books.
Miss,
as
everyone
can
see,
creates
a
split
between.
B
It
completes
a
split
feeder
for
Springville
to
Stoller,
so
on
this
right
here
you
can
see
the
capacity
numbers.
Each
of
these
maps
do
have
problems
with
capacity.
So
none
of
them
are
perfect.
They
do
require
more
work.
For
example,
Timberland
is
really
lowly
very
lowly
occupied.
We
need
to
bring
more
their
installer,
for
example,
in
2025
they're,
going
to
be
oversubscribed
in
students
and
Meadow
Park
in
2021,
we'll
have
too
many
students.
So
there
are
issues
that
need
to
be
addressed
in
all
of
map.
B
B
So,
let's
move
here
to
2.0
you'll
see
that
we
have
made
a
couple
of
changes
here
down
in
the
Aral
hassle
area.
There
is
a
little
square
or
more
of
a
triangle
that
is
split
in
feeders,
so
we
have
recommended
all
of
Errol
hassle
at
n,
Mountain
View
middle
school.
Those
students
would
not
have
their
elementary
or
high
school
boundary
changed.
This
will
eliminate
a
split
for
the
Errol
hassel
students.
Number
two
again
is
reinstituting.
The
current
Cooper
mountain
split
between
between
Highland
Park
and
Mountain
View,
the
30.
B
It
will
cost
you
a
llama
last
which
map
a
as
you'll
see
here
showed
going
to
Hyland.
We
have
returned
it
to
its
existing
feeder
pattern
of
going
to
mountain
park
now.
Number
four
here
is
eliminating
a
split
for
Beaver
acres
and
sending
all
of
Beaver
acres
to
five
Oaks.
We
needed
to
create
this
room
because
returning
the
Cooper
mountain
and
the
Shaolin
students
necessitated
to
do
that.
Number
five
here
is
again
you'll
see
on
its
on
map
a
all
in
Finley
is
at.
It
is
proposed
to
go
to
Timberland
runway
in
this
map.
B
It
is
feeding
the
walkable
or
the
walk
zone
area
Finley
to
Stoller
Matt
two
point
one
is:
is
a
lot
like
map
two
point,
two
of
the
seed
category
when
it
comes
to
the
northern
part
of
the
district.
Yet
we
have
these
other
four
changes
down
on
the
southern
part
of
the
district.
So
the
the
change
here
is,
as
you
see
in
2.0,
we
have
all
of
this
area
of
Springville
attending
Stoller
and
then
in
this
one
we
have
that
split
along
burger
road.
B
That
would
separate
Springville,
where
the
northern
part
would
go
to
Stoller
and
the
southern
part
would
go
to
five
Oaks.
So
these
two
have
capacity
issues.
They
are
not
perfect.
In
any
stretch
of
the
imagination
have
work
to
do.
You
can
see
in
work
map
a
2.0
and
2.1
stoller
is
still
over
capacity,
and
that
needs
to
be
addressed.
Timberland
is
also
really
under
involved
and
that
needs
to
be
addressed.
The
other
schools
will
have
problems
just
from
a
perspective
of
that
800
target
that
were
looking
for
in
terms
of
overall
enrollment.
B
So
that's
a
whole
lot
in
a
little
bit
of
time.
I
would
ask
if
you
have
any
questions
about
how
we're
going
to
proceed
or
I
would
like
to
start
with
going
back
to
2.0
of
C
2.0
to
start
our
discussion
to
make
sure
that
we
have
accurately
captured
the
requests
of
the
committee.
And
if
you
have
any
additional
questions
for
us
to
consider
specific
to
map
C
2.0.
B
E
Get
us
started,
I
guess
you
know
there
have
been
some
emails
where
we
said
we'd
really
like
to
know
where
we
stand
on
our
priorities.
For
me
personally,
I
would
make
a
different
decision.
If
I
said
hey,
the
theme
seems
to
be
feeder
patterns.
The
committee
thinks
feeder
patterns
are
a
good
idea.
Let's
focus
on
feeder
patterns.
I
would
go
in
a
different
direction
than
if
I
was
trying
to
accomplish
something
else,
such
as
walkability.
E
A
reduction
in
transportation
cause
socio-economic
equity
I
would
do
different
things,
so
I
guess
I
I
am
hearing
feeder
I
agree
from
a
lot
of
people
said
we're.
Hearing
feeder
patterns
are
very,
very
important,
elementary
to
middle
and
middle
to
high
school,
and
then
you
know
not
isolating
small
groups
of
kids
going
to
certain
high
school
in
a
middle
school.
I
still
think
Meadow
Park
is
going
to
be
our
toughest
one
to
deal
with.
I
really
don't
want
to
split
it
into
three
high
schools,
so
I
guess
for
me.
B
B
Consensus
for
me,
in
terms
of
priority,
is
articulated
by
our
foreign
objectives
in
filling
we're,
not
filling
but
creating
a
boundary
for
Timberland,
and
we
need
to
have
a
population
there
that
is
sustainable.
We
need
to,
you,
know,
create
a
population
for
Stoller
that
is
also
sustainable,
and
then
we
need
to
balance,
to
the
extent
that
we
can
district
in
terms
of
enrollments.
That's
that's
the
priority
and
how
we
get
there
in
terms
of
you
know
the
factors
that
you've
identified.
That's
the
subject
of
the
deliberations
you
have
to
have
on
each
of
the
map.
E
G
If
we
try
to
kind
of
maybe
look
at
the
maps
collectively
and
versus
our
various
priorities,
I
feel
like
the
feeder.
The
feeders
aren't
that
different
between
the
six
or
six
now
there's
one
map
that
has
two
3-way
splits,
but
the
rest
of
them
all
have
a
fare
disbursement
of
either
to
a
splits
or
single
slit.
I,
don't
think
in
terms
of
feeders.
G
When
we
look
at
these
maps,
there's
one
that
stands
out
on
good
or
bad
side
and
I
think
there's
themes
in
all
six
maps
again
of
Stoller
still
needs
to
be
reduced
and
Timberland
still
needs
to
be
filled
and
the
demographics.
If
you
look
at
the
demographics
there's
themes
to
the
maps
where
five
Oaks
free
reduced
lunch
is
drops,
while
Cedar
Park
and
Meadow
Park
take
so
I
think
we
can
kind
of
deduce
where
we
we
start
to
work.
G
B
Think
the
I
think
the
numbers
in
terms
of
capacity
is
the
place
where
you
have
to
start
and
then
once
you,
you
know,
see
those
numbers
and
then
start
looking
at
the
other
factors,
such
as
free
reduced
lunch,
ethnicity,
transportation.
Whatever
else
may
be
there,
that's
when
those
come
in
so
I
think
a
budget.
You
were
next.
H
Hey
come
on:
okay,
I'm,
just
gonna
dive
right
into
it
and
I'm
going
to
Ryu
my
way
around
a
discussion
and
putting
the
priorities
to
help
Michelle
yeah.
So
for
me,
I
think
the
first
one
was
I
need
to
see
maps
where
the
middle
school
boundaries
are
continuous.
They
are
not
doughnut
shaped
like
John,
collee
and
I
walked
through
my
process
of
so
that's
was
then
I
want
to
prioritize
middle
school
high
school,
a
critter.
If
there's
a
clean
feeder
and
timer
it's
worth
waiting
into
a
nice
cool,
that's
great!
H
H
Unless,
of
course
it's
transformative
high
school
split
right
and
there
are
some
other
considerations
that
can
go
into
it,
but
once
you
make
these
and
because
you
want
to
do
continuous
maps-
and
you
are
bounded
by
how
much
you
can
get
on
equity
and
I
said
this
from
day,
one
that
I
always
want
to
prioritize
elementary
school
over
an
options
program.
So
map
see
the
other
maps,
they
started
with
lots
of
split
and
I.
H
Think
map
to
dot
o
started
closing
those,
and
there
is
one
part
that
is
not
close,
which
was
the
rally
part
it
split
here.
If
you
can
just
go
to
2.2,
you
might
say
I'm
just
going
to
talk
about
the
south
side
of
the
boundary
right
say
for
Ally.
Park
split
is
close
like
a
raisin
2.2,
and
it
goes
in
with
for
the
other
splits
that
have
been
made.
H
I
understand
that
will,
if
the
same
thing
is
applied
to
a
2.1
that
actually
makes
Whitford
definition
the
same
and
as
Monique
was
pointing
out
as
we
go
down.
Many
divisions
are
similar,
so
the
one
thing
I
would
do
is
close.
That
and
the
so
mind.
Whitford
either
goes
to
Highland
Park
or
Mountain
View,
and
that
depends
on
which
of
the
mountain
view.
Definition
we
fix.
H
H
I
would
say
that
looking
at
the
numbers,
my
preference
would
be
Mountain
View,
even
though
it's
on
one
side
of
the
district
and
the
reason
is
not
on
what
I
like
to
create
the
word
suma
there,
but
also
take
the
suma
32
kids
from
the
Cedar
Park
boundary
and
add
it
there
and
it
adds
150
gates
mountain.
You
have
that
space
and
a
catechol
leaves
place
to
grow.
H
The
Highland
Park
and
Conestoga
definitions
in
a
2.1
and
c
2.2
are
very
similar
with
some
part
of
Naturals
going
to
Conestoga
versus
Island
and
I.
Don't
really
have
a
strong
opinion
there
and
I
don't
know
the
reason
why
it
is
John
and
I
look
for
other
committee
members
to
weigh
in
on
that
the
Shalem
split,
because
it's
done
for
yes,
no
because
Salem
it
split
between
recorgnize
schools,
I
think
that's
the
right
decision
to
do
Cooper
mountain
split
that
is
done
here.
H
That's
the
part
and
I,
don't
quite
understand
it's
not
done
for
middle
school.
I
see
you
have
retained
that
split
and
I
assume
that's
doing
no
harm
I
suppose,
maybe
that's
not
so
easy.
So
if
we
were
to
retain
the
definition
of
Mountain
View
as
it
is
in
32.2,
the
Meadow
Park,
which
rightly
pointed
out
Crowder,
the
one
thing
I
would
do-
is
move
the
meadow
park
Zuma
because
it
now
does
not
have
the
cedar
for
a
contribution
in
it
to
five
Oaks.
H
Now
the
other
and
I'm
not
about
in
the
outside,
because
that
outside,
but
the
one
point
I
don't
want
to
make
it
in
the
see
definition
of
the
Maps
staff.
Aster
not-so-subtle
thing
where
five
Oaks
south
boundary
is
aligned
with
Westfield
and
what
it
is
doing
is
it's
making
five
Oaks
of
clean
figure
into
Iceland
I.
Think
that's
a
great
thing
to
do.
H
You
should
not
disturb
that
and
when
you
have
that
and
Rock
Creek
and
ethnic
reading
entirely
without
place
to
make
it
good
the
question
that
I
have
for
you
Steve
is
no
to
four.
So
one
is
we
heard
from
Transportation
Department
when
you
move
between
boundaries
create
some
sort
of
a
problem.
So
if
you
look
at
C
2.2,
there
is
one
place
where
that
sort
of
sticks
out,
and
it's
not
a
whole
lot
of
great
course.
H
H
So
that's
one
question
and
the
second
question
and
that's
that's
that
might
switch
things
around
so
like
I
mentioned
once
you
move
the
relief
work
in
which
were
in
both
a
two
dot,
a
2.1
or
1.2
and
c
2.2
syrup
of
definition
remains
the
same.
So
the
question
there
is:
how
does
it
impact
whether
it
impacts
a
not
a
dual
language
program
and
I
know
you
have
given
some
commentary,
but
can
you
talk
about
it?
Is
that
sustainable,
not
sustainable,
because
that
I
think
changes
things
depending
on
what
your
answer
and.
D
D
What
I
see
in
the
south
are
it's
largely
negative
on
the
populations,
impacted
I,
believe
we
have
more
people
more
of
the
current
populations,
leaving
Cedar
Park
and
Meadow
Park,
and
five
Oaks
then
are
leaving
Stoller.
So
it
means
we
know.
We
know,
there's
a
big
change
to
be
made
that
Stoller
we're
forced
to
do
that.
The
sign
that
there's
that
much
change
across
the
board
is
the
sign
we've
kind
of
taken
the
long
way
around
and
in
particular,
as
I
as
I,
try
and
measure
this
change.
D
You
know
it
looks.
We've
had
a
bit
of
a
discussion
of
the
email
about
free
and
reduced
lunch
balance.
The
five
Oaks
situation
improves
we've
kind
of
moved
it
now
to
much
closer
to
this
district
average
and
it's
way
above
the
district's
average
now.
But
what?
What
is
the
cost?
We
have
Beaver
acres
and
we've
got
a
lower
Huber
Park
that
are
essentially
pushed
out
over
the
metal.
Park
Beaver
acres
has
a
longer
commute
by
eight
tenths
of
a
mile
by
my
calculations.
D
D
That
seems
like
an
opportunity
badly
missed.
You
can
look
at
Barnes
you,
as
I
cited
many
times
on
the
mini
maps
that
have
shown
this
you've
got
an
absolutely
crazy
width
to
this
boundary
at
Cedar.
Park
now
has
again
the
folks
there
that
are
being
shifted
out
of
barns
are
being
moved
to
a
farther
school.
D
Now
for
these
populations,
I've
just
talked
about
barns:
beaver
acres,
Lowe,
Huber,
Park,
some
of
our
more
higher-end
reduced
lunch,
eligible
populations,
they're
all
being
given
longer
commutes
outside
of
the
area,
and
hopefully
they're
they're
still
winding
up
in
schools
that
are
way
above
average
in
terms
of
free
and
reduced
lunch.
So
we've
not
the
the
idea
of
sort
of
trying
to
trying
to
put
up
longer
commutes
to
have
a
bit
more
of
a
blended
school,
as
has
really
failed
here
long
as
I
point
out.
D
In
our
view,
you
know
it's
no
more
blatantly
obvious
than
when
you
look
at
the
Cedar
Park
and
Timberland
split.
Cedar
Park
is
old.
You
know
maybe
10
percent
below
the
average
now
so
it
could
stand
it
to
have
a
some
population
shifted
over
to
help
balance
it
out,
but
it
jumps
to
nearly
50
while
Timberland
is
at
10.
These
are
schools
right
next
to
each
other.
There's
some
areas
in
the
district
where
it's
just
not
logistically
feasible
to
get
you
know
a
diversity
population
there.
D
There
there's
been
to
my
observation
a
far
too
great
of
a
focus
on
the
middle
school
to
high
school
splits
and,
and
this
this
what
the
example
I
just
highlighted
perfectly
points
that
out-
and
this
was
clarified
in
our
email
discussion
about
this-
someone
brought
up
that
the
results
of
the
high
school
boundary
change
was
a
gap
in
the
distribution
of
free
and
reduced
lunch
between
the
different
schools.
So
if
we
start
aligning
ourselves
to
those
boundaries,
we
fall
into
the
same
and
that's
exactly
what
happened
here.
D
Timberland
was
conceived
as
sunset
feeding,
so
it
took.
You
know
the
well
call
the
wealthier
schools
for
lack
of
a
better
term
out
of
Cedar
Park
and
what
was
said
in
ended
up
with
good
intentions.
It
was
trying
to
create
clean
feeding
patterns,
but
in
result
it
ended
up
with,
with
a
large
gap
in
the
distribution
of
the
free
and
reduced
lunch
I'm,
going
to
kind
of
repeat
that
what
I
said
be
email
in
that,
where
we've
got
these
schools
that
are
closer
to
26
or
we
can
reasonably
draw
boundaries
to
draw
from
either
side.
D
D
Proximity
and
initial
glance
at
feeder
patterns
and
I
realized
we've
created
the
real
chaos
I
mean
in
terms
of
what
our
our
priorities
are.
I'm.
Looking
for
looking
at
any
of
the
four
factors,
where
do
we
have
a
a
real?
What
I
call
the
sharp
edge?
Well,
we've
really
created
a
bad
situation,
and,
and
how
can
we
do
it?
I
think
we've
clearly
got
options
here
in
terms
of
better
balancing
out
again
a
north-south
split
across.
I
Had
question
about
math,
seated
Otto
and
in
general,
every
map
I
think
the
last
meeting
or
the
one
before
that
we
were
looking
at
Summa
being
present
at
Stoller
and
Timberland.
But
now
we
are
talking
about
only
one
summer
school
in
the
north.
So
what
is
a
decision
from
BSD
about
Summa
one
or
two
schools
on
the
north
of
us
26.
B
F
B
2.1
and
2.2
the
attendance
there's
an
attendance
imbalance
with
those
and
that
you
know
we
we
want
to
have
a
a
minimum
of
60
students
per
grade
with
those.
So
if
you
have
specific
questions
about,
you
know
sumo,
where
it
goes
in
how
we
want
to
do
that.
I
would
suggest
we
need
to
bring
up,
can
start
Meyer
to
talk
about
that
so
Ken.
If
you
would
please
join
us
I.
J
There
we
go
good
evening
of
the
there's,
a
lot
of
different
maps
and
different
movements,
but
generally
our
our
approach
to
post
to
placing
Summa
over
the
years,
we've
really
been
guided
by
an
idea
that
this
is
a
program
as
opposed
to
an
option.
School
and
programs
are
generally
delivered
at
your
neighborhood
school,
but
we
know
that
concentrations
of
Summa
mean
that
we
sometimes
can
provide
that
program
in
the
neighborhood
school,
and
sometimes
we
need
to
gather
kids
from
multiple
schools
to
be
able
to
do
that.
L
H
L
G
J
Generally
speaking,
what
we
see
right
now
is
that
we
have
a
concentration
in
the
north
that
currently
is
housed
at
the
at
the
Stoller
campus,
and
we
also
see
that,
depending
on
where
the
Timberline
zone
is,
we
have
a
concentration
in
that
area
and
generally,
we've
approached
that
now
and
served
all
those
kids
at
Stoller
and
we've
generally
served
five
oaks
and
meadow
and
cedar
at
Meadow
and
we've
had
a
southern
placement
so
whether
that
be
a
Woodford
or
Mountain,
View
or
Highland.
All
of
those
would
be
possible.
M
Hi
and
I
believe
we
may
have
touched
on
this
a
little
bit
at
our
last
meeting
in
looking
at
map
2.1.
If
we
look
at
the
Stoller
timberland
zoom
of
split
with
everything
at
Timberland,
it
actually
does
a
very
good
job
of
reducing
Stoller
to
the
number
to
the
point
where
we've
even
be
able
to
potentially
pull
students
that
are
currently
zoned
into
five
Oaks,
which
is
too
high
back
into
Stoller.
M
J
Yeah
that
that
certainly
is
an
option
again.
So
what
that
does
is
it
creates
a
there's
trade-offs
for
that
right,
so
that
we
have
capacity,
and
we've
reached
that
objective,
that
we
have
kids
moving
out
of
their
neighborhood
school
to
an
adjacent
school
that
is
happening
elsewhere
in
the
district.
That
is
an
option,
but
we
have,
in
the
past,
looked
at
those
concentrations
and
tried
to
be
as
close
to
home
as
possible.
That
still
seems
geographically
close.
M
Okay,
that's
helpful
to
know
and
I,
don't
know
how
the
committee
feels
about
this
I
know
for
me:
I'm
hesitant
to
make
a
recommendation
that
is
purely
driven
by
moving
Summa,
knowing
that
that
may
not
be
a
long-term
possibility
and
I.
Don't
know
how
we
get
to
a
point
where
we
can
only
look
at
in
that
resident
without
taking
those
kids
into
account,
because
clearly,
their
education
is
important.
It's
a
program,
that's
important
to
BSD,
it's
one
that
we
support.
So
how
can
we
attack
that
Steve.
B
Well,
the
the
way
to
attack
it
is
to
include
those
Suman
students
that
are,
in
those
specific
attendant
elementary
school
attendance
boundaries
and
treat
them
as
residents,
students
that
would
be
feeding
to
whether
it's
Stoller
Timberland
or
the
other
middle
schools.
Given
the
number
of
seumas
to
dance
in
the
Springville
Santo
Whismur
Finley
community,
that,
whatever
boundary
you
would
look
at,
would
have
to
account
for
those
students
those
summer
students
staying
with
you
know,
feeding
directly
with
their
general
education
partners
to
that
middle
school.
That's
the
only
way.
I
J
Common
middle
school
experience
is
an
effort
to
ensure
that,
regardless
of
neighborhood
school,
that
we
have
an
academic
program
and
an
academic
schedule
that
is
identical
in
the
same
sumus,
students
will
continue
to
have
assumed
education.
What
will
really
change
is
that
the
bell
schedule
that
that's
delivered
will
be
consistent
for
all
Summa
students
right
now.
It
depends
which
neighborhoods
so
I
don't
see
that
as
changing
eligibility,
changing
the
number
of
students
that
qualify
and
take
part
in
that
it'll
be
more
of
a
technical
change
to
how
we
engage
them
in
learning.
B
I
So
I
am
looking
at
this
data
that
was
provided
by
BSD,
say
Summa
student
by
date,
code,
2019
and
20.
This
is
a
heat
map
thing.
We
all
had
it
from
few
meetings
ago,
so
moving
summer
program
in
Whitford
in
the
south
of
the
district.
If
I'm
looking
at
the
heat
map,
you
know
the
south
of
the
district
is
not
as
intense
as
in
the
north.
I
want
to
go
back
to
Ken's
point
where
he
says:
Summa
is
not
an
option.
It
is
a
program
in
the
neighborhood
school.
I
So
the
if
you
look
at
the
heat
map,
Jacob
is
mur.
Finley
has
the
highest
Summa
students
I,
expect
that
an
wrote,
the
Saito
and
spring
will
will
also
increase
the
zoom
enrollment
in
the
coming
years.
Knowing
that
the
demographic
of
the
area,
now,
if
moving
Summa
from
Stoller
to
Timberline,
it's
not
going
to
be
a
neighborhood
program
anymore
because
of
the
number
of
students
in
the
area,
I'm
going
to
stick
to
the
guns
here
and
say
that
we
should
really
look
at
the
value
of
moving
Summa
program
from.
I
165,
kids,
that
we
are
transporting
and
by
moving
25
percent
of
Jacob,
is
more
and
Finley's
to
Timberland.
We
are
pretty
much
splitting
this
Elementary
School,
not
by
boundary
line,
but
by
taking
away
the
zoo
market
same
would
apply
to
Springville
and
Saito
to
think
about
a
25
students
in
your
schools
are
going
to
be
split
away
from
your
neighborhood.
I
I
Stoller
2.0
is
the
only
map
that
takes
it
about
10%.
We
know
how
hard
it
is
to
achieve.
You
know.
Higher
equity
in
stroller
neighborhood,
but
2.1,
see
through
our
geo,
seems
to
take
stroller
to
higher
levels,
not
still
at
the
district
average,
but
it
seems
to
be
the
one
that
is
with
the
highest
number
among
all
the
map
keys
and
it.
N
Okay,
so
I
think
looking
at
the
maps,
Mouse
stuff
from
maps
see
here
and
just
piggybacking
on
the
discussion
on
Zoomer
I
believe
from
what
you
just
said.
He
said
we
have
to
prioritize
decongestants
dollar,
you
know
and
populating
Timbaland
I
think
so
some
what
I
get
from
that
is
actually
very
important
for
us
to
meet
those
targets
of
90
percent
for
stolen
and
also
make
sure
that
Timbaland
is
not.
You
know
upfield,
so
that
being
said,
I
would
actually
make
it.
N
What
is
yes,
I
think
assume
a
shitty
movie
if
need
be,
to
actually
get
on
the
population
of
downtrodden
ninety
percent.
So
that's
the
first
comment.
I
have
follow-up
comments
is
actually
at
the
objective
of
this
meeting.
You
said
we
should
try
to
come.
You
know,
reach
a
consensus
on
the
southern
part
of
the
district.
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
that
in
whatever
I
would
do
next.
As
you
mean
we're
going
to
move
forward
with
that,
whatever
changes
were
making,
the
notes
will
still
affect
south
of
Rick.
N
B
O
Thanks,
just
a
couple
of
comments
on
on
all
the
map:
C's
I've
stated
I'm,
not
a
fan
of
them
versus
verse,
several
reasons,
but
going
back
to
our
choices
and
our
can
ask
whether
whether
it's
a
program
it's
an
option.
These
are
the
difficult
decisions
that
we're
gonna
have
to
make,
and
it
doesn't
seem
to
me
how
it's
possible
to
achieve
all
the
directors
without
a
larger
group
of
students
being
impacted
by
keeping
suma
at
Stoller.
F
O
P
Bit
more
about
the
option,
programs
I
feel
like
one
option
program
that
we
haven't
talked
about
is
Rachel
Carson
and
we
are
in
five
Oaks
right
now,
and
this
is
the
home
of
Rachel
Carson,
currently
and
in
both
working
maps
that
we've
been
given.
Rachel
Carson
has
been
moved
to
either
Whitford
or
Cedar
Park,
and
we've
heard
from
the
five
books
principle
that
that's
something
that
is
gonna
negatively
impact.
P
These
students
I
mean
I,
think
we
live
in
a
day
and
age
where
environmental
education
is
super
important
and
I
think
taking
away
Rachel
Carr
students
from
the
school,
where
they've
worked
so
hard
to
like
build
a
garden
and
further
their
knowledge
about
the
world.
I
think
that's
super
unfair.
So
in
order
to
like
combat
that
or
trying
to
fix
that,
I
definitely
agree
and
moving
NUMA
out
of
Staller
completely
and
moving
it
to
Timberland.
P
P
Definitely
think
that,
because
we're
looking
at
Stoller
middle
school,
like
that's
like
one
of
our
priorities
here,
we
should
definitely
be
looking
at
the
Sumer
population
as
a
factor
when
we're
making
our
decision,
because
the
reality
of
the
situation
is
is
that
stroller
has
an
immense
population
of
the
co-op
program
in
the
entirety.
The
BSD
I
think
we
would
be
remiss
to
not
look
at
that
when
making
our
final
decision
in
moving
around
populations.
I
think
that
by
moving
all
of
nuuma
to
Timberland
like
in
the
northern
part,
we
create
more
space
up
store.
I'm.
P
Just
looking
at
maps,
see
two
point
one
right
now,
but
it
says
that
the
population
of
store
goes
down
to
75
percent
or
the
capacity
goes
to
75
percent
as
soon
as
mr.
Timberland
and
I
think
that
creates
space
for
Springville
and
because
we
have
we're
creating
space
for
Springville.
We're
then
able
to
give
Rachel
Carson
back
their
spot
at
five
books,
which
I
think
would
be
one
of
my
ultimate
goals.
I
really
want
to
see
Rachel.
F
B
D
D
Of
course
it's
unfortunate,
but
it's
also
equivalent
what's
happening
around
the
district.
My
area
school
Cedar
Park,
had
their
tumor
program
shifted
over
to
meadow
in
art
due
to
capacity
it's
consistent
with
what
was
happening
if
we
had
I
might
feel
differently.
If
we
had
a
similar
program
at
every
other
school
and
we're
talking
about
eliminating
it
only
it's
at
Stoller,
but
since
we've
already
sort
of
set
the
precedent,
we're
really
just
bringing
it
in
line
and
especially
given
the
volume
of
students,
something
we're
talking
about
really
the
equivalent
of
a
very
large
elementary
school.
M
Just
want
to
echo
the
comments
regarding
Summa
egg
for
me
as
well.
I
think
it
would
be
different
to
talk
about
it
as
a
program.
If
we
were
talking
about
it
as
Jason
said
it's
a
program
that
was
at
every
school,
it's
not
and
therefore,
for
me,
it's
an
option
and
that's
matt
said
it's
a
small
percentage
of
our
population,
it's
less
than
10%
and
for
us
to
do
our
best
work.
I
think
we
have
to
do
the
best
work
for
the
broadest
sweep
of
students
that
we
can
do.
We
can
handle
okay.
F
N
So
on
the
topic
of
whom
are
going
out
of
stola
I,
think
that
creates
some
room
in
Sola
right,
I'm,
actually
assitant
to
to
put
Springville
back
into
stola,
because
we
know
that
those
that
that's
going
to
be
like
to
very
high
population
growth
areas
back
installer
and
if
we
were
to
go
there
out
more
likely
than
not
in
a
year
or
two
going
to
be
back
at
this
point
where
we
are
so
looking
at.
What's
going
on
around
the
other
parts
of
the
district?
Still
on
the
nodes,
you
know
I.
N
Think
Apetit
was
mentioning
about
saying
that
we
have
contiguous
schools
in
any
particular
middle
school
I
still
see
the
Okies
elementary.
You
know
just
hang
in
there
alone.
This
was
a
problem
that
we
try
to
avoid
Rock
Creek.
At
the
point
we
try
to
avoid
the
Bethany
elementary
school,
leaving
them
alone
and
they're
not
going
through
school
down
south,
so
I
look
at
the
ochio
elementary
as
something
could
actually
work
with
in
their
respect.
So
we
we
know
right
now
that
if
we
had
to
move
the
soma
to
Timberline,
that
would
be
crazy.
N
N
Currently
in
doing
that,
so
we
can
achieve
two
things,
yeah
one
we
could
minimize
the
effect
of
split
fillers
and,
secondly,
we
could
actually
populate
a
symbol,
and
so
my
suggestion
here
is
that
we
should
and
I
guess
song
in
the
last
nighti
mentioned
something
about
we
not
being
able
to
move
the
high
school
boundary.
So
Hawk
use
right
now
is
actually
being
split
along
that
nipple
divided
to
two
high
schools,
and
so
my
suggestion
is.
N
B
Q
Thank
you,
Steve
I
have
some
concerns
about
the
committee
actually
being
able
to
move
forward.
It
make
progress
here,
I
think
at
this
boy
we
are
now
what
the
issues
are.
I
think
we
all
know
we're
not
all
going
to
agree
on
a
particular
math
I
think
it's
going
to
be
a
divided
vote.
I,
don't
think
the
entire
committee
is
all
going
to
vote
on
the
same
thing,
whether
it
be
priorities
or
actual
Maps
I
think
we
could
spend
the
next
40
meetings
having
the
same
discussions
that
we're
having
tonight
and
get
nowhere.
Q
I
really
think
it's
incumbent
upon
this
committee
at
this
time
to
start
making
the
hard
decisions
and
move
forward,
and
these
decisions
are
not
going
to
be
popular,
but
we
signed
up
for
this.
We
knew
that
so
I'm
just
going
to
dive
right
in
I,
don't
really
like
map
see
I
prefer
a,
but
we're
talking
about
see.
So
with
these
changes,
here's
what
I'm
thinking
I
come
at
it
from
the
perspective
of
let's
not
make
this
too
difficult.
Q
Q
Third,
we
visit
the
number
of
students
that
would
be
that
are
walkable
at
this
point
are
194
students
we've
moved
those
to
Timberland
again,
that's
the
entire
Finley
school,
and
then
we
bring
back
in
about
the
same
number
of
students
from
Springfield,
so
that
in
the
entire
spring,
build
school
goes
to
store
middle
school.
That
takes
care
of
the
problems
on
this
particular
map
and
I
realized
that
that's
not
going
to
be
popular
with
half
the
people
in
this
room.
I
agree.
Q
It
would
be
nice
if
people
could
walk
to
school.
I
think
that
would
be
great.
We
can't
do
everything
here,
though,
and
I
can't
justify
bussing
190
students
much
rather
that
they
know
completely
out
of
their
neighborhood.
So
at
another
190
dude's
gonna,
walk
to
school
I
wish
we
could
I
wish.
There
was
a
way
to
do
all
of
it.
We
can't-
and
so
with
the
committee.
If
we
don't
start
making
these
hard
decisions,
we're
gonna
be
here
another
year.
Okay,.
B
A
Personally,
have
problems
with
that
in
the
sense
that
I
don't
believe
that
Timberland
is
big
enough
I!
Think
when
you
move
Summa
and
you
move
all
of
Finley
I,
don't
I,
don't
think
the
numbers
are
gonna
work
out,
I
mean
I,
guess
it
would
be
nice
to
see
it,
but
have
we
do
we
have
the
same
type
of
data
for
all
of
Finley
with
respect
to
the
bus
routes,
what
the
bus
routes
would
be
for
Finley,
like
we've
done
for
Springville.
B
B
I
2021
vs.
25,
once
you
put
the
northern
part
of
Springville
and
Saito
together,
we
are
back
to
where
we
are
today
in
2025
and
the
not
battery
licenses
issued.
It
I
think
that
data
was
shared
by
BSD
only
to
the
community.
It's
not
on
a
website.
The
number
of
permits
in
year
2025
only
half
way
through
there's
more
development
coming
into
an
area
the
north
of
Bethany.
I
So
the
data
has
initiated
by
BSD
with
the
committee,
so
going
back
to
2.2
we're
25
Stoller
is
121
percent
and
higher
and
one
person
without
Suman,
so
I
have
an
issue
with
putting
these
two
northern
neighborhoods
into
one
middle
school.
Because
of
this
data
point
and
at
the
cost
of
losing
walkability
kids.
F
I
H
H
If
you
allow
at
least
the
eighth
graders
in
the
existing
boundaries
to
complete
their
middle
school
now
that
will
automatically
bring
down
timberlands
2021
number
easily
below
its
permanent
capacity
and
the
reason
being
friendly
alone
has
140
graded
write,
remove
options.
Remove
the
white
will
come
out
around
90.
You
add
to
that.
Bonus
will
appear
to
that.
H
So
I
do
that
so
coming
back
to
the
memo
given
to
us
focusing
on
Southport,
if
we
can
I
think
they're
very
close
to
closing
word
for
it.
If
we
agree
on
the
Rachel
Park,
not
split
like
I
said
Highland
Park
and
Conestoga
definitions
are
very
similar
between
a
2.1,
2.2
and
I.
Look
to
another
committee,
much
to
guide
us
in
there
may
be
cherries
or
Michelle
or
somebody,
and
then
the
last
question
to
really
answer
is
in
terms
of
mountain
view,
there's
a
low
over
three
Mountain
you
or
that's
it.
H
Does
it
automatically,
like
I,
said
just
from
keeping
the
so
mind
mountain
view
or
moving
the
sumata
Mountain
and
allowing
to
grow
and
taking
the
cedar
pot
boundary.
So
my
certificates
in
there
I
feel
like
2.2
definition
of
mountain
view,
is
better
but
again,
I
see
Jason's
point
where
alwah
/
closes
his
mouth,
a
movement.
Why
push
it
como
metaphor,
but
that's
a
decision
we
have
to
make
and
I
think
if
we
don't
spend
any
more
time
on
su
market
I
mean
maybe
we
can
actually
come
to
like
to
see.
Okay,
I
think
all.
G
Was
actually
going
to
go
back
to
Michael's
comment,
I,
I
kind
of
agree
with
them
of
moving
Summa
to
make
room
for
some
of
the
Springville
families,
because
that
to
me
that
just
seems
odd
or
hard
to
ask
those
people
to
travel.
So
far
on
the
bus,
I
mean
I,
granted
I
know
it's
based
on
the
data
we've.
Given
it
I
mean
it's
I
think
the
most
I
saw
it
was
just
over
20
minutes,
I.
Believe
so
I
mean
it's
not
a
huge
difference,
but
it
is
longer
than
than
other.
B
So
I
would
like
to
we're
we're
kind
of
repeating
a
little
bit
here
on
see
I'd
like
to
go
down
to
a
year
and
where
we,
so
we
have
the
a
2.0
and
the
2.1.
So
2.1
is
very
much
like
to
point
to
here,
but
it
does
have.
The
a
maps
do
have
a
lo,
a
Huber
going
to
Mountain
View
and
it
does
have.
It
does
address
the
Springville
stoller
question,
but
I
also
want
to
point
out
some
of
the
you
know.
B
Another
main
difference
here
is
the
Terra
Linda
not
going
to
Timberland
and
when
it
address
what
Abdul
was
just
talking
about
in
terms
of
East
Oak
Hills
going
to
Timberland.
Also
it
does
maintain
the
meadow
part
feeder
for
Bethany
and
Oak
Hills,
but
that
would
be
a
really
pretty
small
school
for
Meadow
Park.
So
it
with
your
indulgence,
I'd
like
to
talk
some
about
math,
a
pros
and
cons
with
it
and
I'm
going
to
go
to
Michelle.
B
E
B
Would
be
happy
with
that,
as
as
I
said,
that
would
be
progress
with
the
full
recognition
that
that
impacts
your
Park
and
you
know
we
may
have
to
come
back
and
revisit
that,
but
for
the
purposes
of
being
able
to
move
the
ball
down
the
field,
a
little
bit
I'm
happy
with
taking
that.
If
the
committee
is
agreeing
in
a
call
at
a
general
consensus,
I
need
head
nodding.
I
do
not
need
a
vote,
but
I
would
like
to
see
some
sort
of
progress.
Yes,.
F
D
Not
the
disagreement
just
on
that
target
thing
of
Woodford.
My
only
question
is
and
I'm
filming
these
numbers
here.
My
recollection
of
a
previous
map
that
had
left
Whitford
as
is
and
only
restored
that
foot
for
ollieing
Park,
which
is
absolutely
desirable,
was
that
it
had
pushed
Whitford
in
2021
over
a
hundred
percent.
That's
that
that's
the
only
obstacle
there
that
that's!
Why
I?
You
know
previous
math
we've
taken
it
back
out.
So
if
we
get
clarification
on
that,
if.
B
You
look
at
map
2.2,
we
have
all
of
Whitford
all
of
those
or
I'm.
Sorry,
all
overall
the
park,
all
of
those
feedings
with
her-
and
you
can
see
here
what
our
numbers
are.
So
in
2021
we're,
projecting
approximately
50
students
over
and
then
in
2025
we'd,
be
fine,
I,
think
I
would
say,
and
I
would
suggest
that
the
principal
at
Whitford
could
probably
find
room
for
52
students
in
2021
and
if
any
of
suma
moved
I'm
getting
the
thumbs
up
back
there.
But
if
cimabue,
you
know
there
would
be.
F
B
Okay,
okay,
so
I
will
I
will
not
try
and
jump
the
gun
here,
but
I
feel
optimistic
that
we
just
made
some
sort
of
can
group
consensus
that
Woodford
would
have
Raleigh
Park,
Raleigh,
Hills,
Montclair
votes
and
the
north
east
side
of
Mackay
is.
Do
I,
see
some
general
head
nodding
in
everybody.
Enough
of
you
have
just
nodded
the
head:
okay,
so
progress.
D
So
I
will
promise
to
circle
back
to
it,
but
I
just
want
to
pick
up
where
Michael
started
and
other
people
picked
up,
but
I
definitely
appreciate
I.
Think
we've
got
to
get
to
it.
I
think
we've
got
to
get
to
the
because
it's
the
decisions
we
make
installer
things
fall
from
there
and
I.
I.
Definitely
concur
with
with
the
moves
proposed
there,
which
is
essentially
were
destroying
to
what
we'd
seen
in
previous
iterations
of
pathway,
which
is
Findlay
and
Summa
coming
to
Timberland.
We
restore
Springville
there
to
notes
I.
Believe
Christy
is
right.
D
That
I,
don't
think
I,
don't
think
in
C.
There
is
enough
I
think
I
think
then
the
next
stage
to
see
like
okay.
What
else
do
we
do?
We
then
take
out
that's
currently
assigned
based
on
C,
and
that's
that's
why
we
just
need
to
know
we
need
to
do
it.
I,
don't
think
we're
back
where
we
started
to
be
in
terms
of
the
following
numbers.
Yes,
it's
going
to
go
over
a
hundred,
remember,
that's
hundred
permanent
capacity.
It
will
still
be
well
under
based
on
projections.
We
have
in
2025.
D
B
D
D
In
any
case,
there
are
by
my
calculation,
looking
at
our
coats
of
copy
the
map
two-and-a-half
grid
codes
that
are
along
its
laid
laws,
the
road
that
runs
in
front.
Yes,
yes,
two
and
a
half
grid
codes,
where
that's
the
really
humanly
painful
process
where
those
folks,
when
you
say
drive
to
Timberland,
have
to
get
out
stare
right
across
they
law
at
at
at
stoller
turn
right
and
drive
further
by
my
calculation,
the
the
the
middle
one
and
the
one
on
the
right
were
totaled
around.
Maybe
fifty.
D
If
I
saw
the
map
we
have
a
freight
and
the
narrow
one
on
the
Left
I
believe
I
see
a
geographic
split
in
the
middle,
where
there's
there's
sort
of
a
couple
of
streets
in
the
northern
part
of
it.
So
I
know
no
left-hand
side,
yet
so
I
believe
the
top
third
of
that
grid
code
falls
in
that
category.
I,
don't
think
the
bottom.
D
Two-Thirds
does
I
believe
that
the
two
and
a
half
grid
codes,
if
we
move
those
to
Jacob
with
Ron
and
then,
if
you
look
at
the
Jacob
Whismur
boundaries,
look
at
the
bottom
left
most
grid
code
of
Jacob
would
I
believe
that
is
an
equivalent
number
of
people
to
that
two
and
a
half
grid
codes
up
there
net
required
busing
it
is.
It
just
doesn't
change
anything
because
all
of
those
are
possible.
You
know,
I
do
not
have
two
Stoller
where
I
think
we
may
pick
up.
D
Something
is
I
believe
those
ones
would
transfer
to
Jacob
Whismur
I
think
would
be
currently
are
bused
to
Finley
and
are
not
possible
would
not
need
a
bus
to
get
to
Jacob
wizard,
possibly
so
there
may
be
a
net.
There
may
be
a
wash
compared
elementary
and
middle
school,
and
the
only
thing
I
would
say
is
we
consider
any
sort
of
elementary
school
change
and
I
think
we're
in
our
scope.
It's
a
funeral
read
codes
that
we
have
really
aggressive
grandfathering.
You
know
I
mean
no.
No,
no
a
child
is
in
the
mountain.
D
Come
a
new
school.
Now
should
be
forced
out
we're
talking
about
swapping.
You
know:
50
middle
schoolers
between
the
two
schools.
There's
no
reason
to
to
rush
that
if
it's
gonna
really
disrupt
the
child,
so
I
offer
that
for
some
consideration
to
to
help
make
that
assignment
of
Finley
as
a
whole
a
little
bit
more
palatable.
So.
B
B
D
And
then
they
would,
it
was
a
follow,
the
the
middle
school
assignment
of
Whismur
and
remain
at
Stoller,
and
then
we
would
counterbalance
that
by
that
what
I
called
that
bottom-left
grid
code
currently
in
Jacob
Whismur,
transferring
that
to
Finley.
So
we've
got
an
even
swap
of
students
between
the
population
and
we're
maximizing
those
people
who
are
literally
right
across.
B
Height
is
something
I
would
I
mean
that's
something
we
can
certainly
investigate.
That's
something
I
would
be
sure
to
observe
to
everybody.
This
part
of
Whismur
right
here
are
apartments,
and
that
is
the
only
area
of
SES
diversity
that
Jacob
Whismur.
It's
not
the
only.
It
is
the
largest
proportion
of
Jacob
whismur's
SES
and
diversity,
so
we
can
certainly
look
at
it
and
bring
you
that
data
if
you
as
the
committee,
want
to
consider
that
so
Monica.
G
So
going
back
closing
in
the
spirit
of
closing
Whitford
I
believe
when
I
look
at
all
the
maps,
Conestoga
is
also
pretty
much
identical,
so
I
think.
As
a
committee
we
could
probably
you're
closing
Conestoga
as
well.
I,
don't
see
any
changes
that
would
impact
Conestoga
and
then
I
have
a
second
comment
about
Finley.
So
when
you
look
through
public
comments
and
testimony
you
get
kind
of
two
populations,
one
one
population
feels
very
strongly
to
keep
the
school
intact
together
and
then
the
other
is
really
focusing
on.
G
B
One
thing
that
I
would
just
point
out
in
terms
of
the
difference
with
between
the
map
see
and
map
a
one
of
you
did
discover
it
Divya
sharp
eyes
way
to
go.
It
is
a
very
subtle
difference
between
maps
a
and
C.
So
since
we
have
map
a
up
here,
this
get
Nancy.
Royals
currently
goes
to
Conestoga
in
map
C.
We
created
the
dividing
line
as
Schultz
Ferry
Road,
but
in
that
Bay
it
would
bring
this
area
back
to
Cooper
mountain
I
mean
it's
a
Conestoga
and
would
maintain
the
existing
the
existing
boundaries.
B
This
area
right
out
here,
the
South
Cooper
mountain
area,
so
the
high
school
and
points
west.
That
right
now
is
in
the
Conestoga
attendance
area.
There
are,
there
might
be
a
student
out
there,
but
given
the
development
it's
going
on
that
there
may
be
no
students
out
there
right
now,
but
because
that's
going
to
develop
here
in
the
very
near
future,
we
wanted
to
create
a
feeder
to
pilot
that
we
think
makes
sense
and
would
and
highly
would
have
the
capacity
to
accommodate.
G
S
Sorry,
there's
a
split
with
Nancy
Ryles
between
Highland
Park
and
Conestoga.
Currently
in
map
a
and
in
map
see,
the
split
is
just
in
a
different
place,
so
under
map
C,
we
have
taken
that
the
northern
portion
of
Nancy
Royals,
that
kind
of
wedge-shaped
area
north
of
Schultz
Ferry
Road
and
assigned
it
to
Highland
Park,
and
you
know
in
a
way
it
provides
some
enrollment
to
Highland
Park.
S
B
M
M
It
is
a
definite
concern
of
the
parents
in
that
northern
part
of
Nancy
rile
to
have
that
split
be
a
bit
more
judicious,
because
the
majority
of
Nancy
RL
students
do
end
up
at
Conestoga,
so
I,
actually
I'm
in
support
of
that
and
I
am
a
southern
part
of
the
split
parent
that
would
for
my
own
kids.
They
prefer
to
have
more
of
his
classmates
go
with
them,
but
it's
not
equitable,
so
I
do
agree
with
the
map
see
version
of
the
kind
of
service.
What
okay.
B
H
That
gives
more
space
in
Island
and
if
we
maintain
the
made
up
of
definition
and
I
think
made
up
of
Summa,
rightly
so,
she'll
go
to
five
Oaks,
in
which
case
the
Cedar
Park
boundary,
so
markets
need
to
move
to
the
today's
Whitford
or
tomorrow's
Highland
Summa
and
again
in
the
same
case,
we'll
need
space
in
highlight.
So
it
really
depends
now
on
what
we
decide
to
do
with
Mountain
View
over.
There
are
lower
feeds
from
Mountain
View
a
treat
because
I
can
change
my
robots
to
models
right.
So
we
slap
ten
minute.
B
O
Thanks
Steve
and
boy
we're
rolling
now
good
I
just
wanted
to
comment
on
map
a
2.0
and
just
offer
the
changes
that
I
see
that
that
would
probably
put
us
in
good
shape
from
the
northern
side
of
it
again.
Moving
suma
to
Timberland
and
all
up
in
leader,
Timberland
Whitford
suma
moves
to
Highland
Park
Rachel
Carson
moves
to
Meadow,
Park
Cooper
mountain
goes
back
to
Highland
Park.
Those
are
those
are
the
suggestions
that
I
have
that
I
think
put
us
kind
of
in
line
and
in
meeting
the
goals
that
we
need
all.
E
Think
going
back
to
Conestoga.
If
you
do
go
along
Scholz
ferry,
it
will
make
it
almost
a
half
half
split
for
Nancy
rails,
which
I
think
would
be
good,
but
it
would
say
either
way
we
decide.
I
mean
that's
a
small
change.
So
even
if
we
say
hey,
you
know
they
or
super
Conestoga.
We
could
always
tweet
that
we
might
try
putting
the
next
map
out
with
the
line
on,
shows
ferry
and
see
if
Nancy
riles
speak.
If
they
start,
you
know
saying:
hey
I
live
here,
don't
move
me
don't
with
me
and
then
we.
L
N
So
it's
going
to
be
centrally
located
in
me
Emira,
but
the
summer
program
can
actually
house
the
five
books,
the
middle
park
and
the
set
up
our
summer
students,
the
the
downside
of
moving
it
so
far
away
is:
if
we
kick
it
out
to
five
books,
for
instance,
then
the
you
know
it
might
have
situation
where
some
kids
might
have
to
start
going
to
maybe
some
not
and
schools
for
for
their
summer
programs
and
I
want
to
avoid
as
much
as
possible.
Okay,
so.
B
I
Which
was
the
school
in
the
south
district
that
is
called
needing
space
to
be
open
for
future
growth?
Was
it
Highland,
Park
or
kind
of
soca?
Okay,
okay,
okay,
so
I
guess
my
question
is
for
Conestoga,
then
2.2
feels
better.
Just
like
we
did
take
votes
per
bit
for
are
in
a
position
to
adrionna
Conestoga.
B
That's
what
we
were
asked,
but
I
also
heard
from
this
side
of
the
table
that,
while
2.2
will
work
for
maybe
will
work
for
Nancy
Rosen,
that
it's
more
of
a
50/50
split.
That
and
neighbors
would
be.
You
know,
divided
by
an
artillery
arterial
road,
not
by
a
local
street,
but
there
is
a
question
of
Whitford
suma
were
to
move
to
Highland
Park.
What
would
that
impact
be?
So
what
I
would
suggest
is
that
we
would
move
forward
with
2.2
for
Conestoga,
but
provide
a
very
specific
graphic
of
okay.
D
Rachel
Carson
is
just
under
200
I.
Think
there's
a
bit
of
a
shuffle
where
we
make
room
for
Rock
Creek
there
at
Meadow
Park
by
moving
that
zoom
program
over
to
five
Oaks,
where
it
could
actually
offload
some
of
the
concentration
of
Summa
rather
than
ultimately
have
all
five
of
the
previous
Stoller
schools,
feeding
them
the
Timberland,
it's
more
shared
between
Timberland
and
five
Oaks
and
then
Rachel
Carson
can
come
over
to
Cedar
Park,
which,
in
a
number
of
scenarios,
will
have
space.
For
that
I
wouldn't
mind.
Seeing
the
map
drawn
up
like
that.
Q
Okay,
thank
you.
So,
with
respect
at
math,
2.0
I
would
suggest
the
following
changes.
At
large
part.
These
tract
life
matt
has
been
saying
and
others
so
we're
making
progress,
which
is
a
good
thing
again.
Finley
would
feed
entirely
into
Timberland,
with
through
to
Timberland
out
of
Stoller
I'm
a
little
unclear.
Why
does
71
students
it
or
actually
Springville
students,
but
end
up
at
five
Oaks
with
the
rest
of
up
down
part
moving.
Q
B
It
is
now
8:10,
at
least
by
my
watch,
so
we're
going
to
do
to
the
public
testimony
portion
the
meeting
as
you
may,
for
those
of
you
who
have
been
here
before
you
will
notice
that
we
do
not
have
a
standing
mic
because
all
of
you
have
phones-
and
all
of
you
are
on
the
wireless
network.
We
were
not
getting
a
signal
to
the
microphone,
so
you
will
sit
up
at
the
table
and
you
will
speak
clearly
and
directly
into
the
microphone.
B
B
We
have
13
cards
this
evening
because
we
have
13
elementary
schools,
so
we're
gonna
go
a
little
bit
longer
on
public
testimony
for
the
schools.
We're
still
going
to
be
doing
the
two-minute
part,
but
I
am
going
to
start
calling
names
here
and
we
have
10
seats
available
up
here.
So
I'm
not
going
to
ask
anybody
to
move,
but
if
you
are
coming
up
to
testify,
please
stay
nearby.
B
T
You,
as
I
said
I
said
my
name
is
Chris
Lindsley
I'm,
a
parent
of
two
children
and
barns,
and
the
two-way
immersion
program.
My
concern
is
that
the
proposed
Maps
lit
barns
into
at
least
two
middle
schools,
but
there
is
no
commitment
to
offering
two-way
immersion
at
both
schools
starting
this
year.
All
kindergarteners
are
in
two-way
immersion.
In
five
years,
all
barns
fifth
graders
will
be
into
a
two-way
immersion.
The
attendance
projections
seem
to
assume
that
either
one
some
students
will
not
be
able
to
continue
in
two-way
emergent
or
to
both
schools.
T
Cedar
Park
and
Meadow
Park
will
offer
two-way
immersion.
Alternatively,
it's
possible
that
the
attendance
guesses
were
made
without
knowledge
that
all
of
our
students
will
be
well
have
the
option
of
being
on
the
two-way
immersion
I'm
not
suggesting
that
Barnes
attendance
should
not
be
split.
There
will
be
students
who
live
in
barns,
who
opt
out
of
two-way
immersion.
There
will
be
students
who
move
into
barns
after
first
grade
and
are
unable
to
join
two-way
immersion.
However,
a
vast
majority
of
students
in
this
area
will
need
to
stay
together.
T
If
there's
only
one
school
as
you
make
your
decisions,
please
review
the
attendance
projections.
Please
note
if
your
attendance
projections
allow
for
two-way
immersion
students
to
stay
together
at
either
school,
my
apologies,
if
I've
misinterpreted
your
projections,
if
I
have
I,
would
appreciate
a
clarifying
note
to
add
it
to
the
projections.
If
you
are
assuming
both
middle
schools
will
offer
two-way
immersion.
Please
add
that
as
well.
It
has
one
final
note,
since
we
you
saw
that
earlier.
I
have
talked
to
parents
who
live
in
that
section
west
of
170th.
T
U
F
U
My
apologies,
my
name
is
JC
Morris
I
have
five
kids
and
my
kids
all
go
to
Bethany.
We
really
like
math
a
are
happy
with
that
options
to
continue
going
to
Meadow
Park
with
Oak
Hills
and
tail
end
I.
Also
like
the
idea,
someone
brought
up
of
bringing
Rock
Creek
with
us
there,
where
I'm
a
little
concerned
with
math
ste,
mostly
because
of
our
neighboring
friends,
I,
hope
Hills
that
become
even
further
divided.
V
Hello,
I'm
Ava
Palmquist
I'm
here
tonight
as
a
resident
of
theater
mill
and
a
Bonnie
slope
parent
to
advocate
for
maps
II
and
for
my
neighbors
in
Terre
Linda.
In
addition
to
keeping
Stoller
to
the
north
from
overpopulation
map,
C
encompasses
the
important
impacts
of
walkability
equity
and
preservation
of
our
tax
dollars
for
the
classroom
rather
than
buses.
Those
of
us
who
live
in
Cedar
Mill
know
that
we
are
a
close-knit
community
of
people
who
the
relationships
transcend
the
boundary
lines
of
our
elementary
schools.
V
Our
relationship
extends
throughout
our
community,
often
multi-generational
and
with
few
degrees
of
separation
between
us
even
beyond
personal
relationships.
We
see
each
other
at
the
store
at
restaurants
at
the
gym.
We
support
the
same
Cedar
Mill
businesses,
Cedar,
Mill
kids,
play
on
extracurricular
teams
together
often
coached
by
parents
from
another
Cedar
Mill
school
taro
Linda
is
not
a
large
school
with
only
60
going
to
middle
school
each
year,
most
families
live
within
a
walking
and
biking
distance
from
Timberland.
V
Removing
Tara
Linda's
small
connected
community
from
its
roots
makes
a
much
larger
impact
on
the
children
and
families
of
Tara
Linda
than
the
impact.
Those
kids
would
make
going
elsewhere.
Tara
Linda
belongs
with
us.
It's
larger
community
at
Timberland.
I
would
also
like
to
advocate
for
Oak
Hill,
an
extension
of
our
community,
to
be
that
in
maps
eeeh
timberland,
the
current
segregation
of
their
25
kids
in
another
school,
has
made
a
large
impact
on
their
community.
V
Having
said
that,
however,
I
want
to
be
very
clear
to
this
committee
and
the
district
that
the
community
of
Cedar
Mill
as
a
whole,
absolutely
under
no
circumstance
supports
uprooting
the
entire
school
of
Terre
Linda
from
its
neighbors,
its
relationships
and
it's
deeply
rooted
connections
in
order
to
be
grouped
with
Oak
Hills.
This
does
much
more
harm
for
our
school
than
good.
Please
do
not
displace
the
relationships
of
an
entire
community.
Tere
Linda's,
kids
and
families
belong
at
Timberland
with
the
rest
of
our
Cedar
Mill
neighbors.
Thank
you.
W
But
that's
not
what
I'm
here
to
talk
about
tonight,
I'm
aware
that,
because
my
neighborhood
is
such
a
small
section
about
75%
of
Cooper
Mountain
would
disagree
with
what
I
say
today,
but
I'm
here
to
talk
about
poverty,
not
to
talk
about
these
boundaries.
I'm
a
sociology
professor
and
I,
know
that
when
we
isolate
poverty
we
create
problems
for
schools
and
neighborhoods.
My
kids
go
to
Mountain
View
I,
looked
at
the
report
card
today
and
saw
that
Mountain
View
last
year
had
61
percent
free
and
reduced
reduced
lunch.
W
That's
not
acceptable
and
when
my
kids
sees
their
friends
that
they
might
elementary
school
with
then
go
to
Highland
Park,
which
has
like
a
VR
machine,
and
they
have
all
this
cool
stuff.
They
hear
about
it
and
they
see
the
differences
between
what
the
rich
schools
have
and
what
the
poor
kids
have.
None
of
my
school
wants
to
go
to
Mountain
View,
because
there's
so
many
bad
rumors
about
Mountain
View
at
Cooper,
Mountain,
I
love,
Mountain
View.
My
son
is
doing
fabulously
at
Mountain,
View
and
I.
W
Don't
want
him
to
switch
schools,
but
I'm
really
really
worried
about
equity
and
if
him
switching
meant
a
more
equitable
arrangement.
I
would
want
that
because
I
know
that
when
we
isolate
poverty,
it
causes
problems
for
communities.
I
teach
this
to
my
students.
Every
semester
in
college
and
I
can't
just
stand
by
and
watch
Mountain
View
get
sidelined
again
when
they
have
61
percent
free
and
release
gents.
When
I
look
at
places
like
Stoller,
which
I
obviously
realize
we're
not
going
to
go
between
Mountain,
View
and
Stoller,
but
they
have
12%.
W
When
we
look
at
Highland
Park,
they
had
31
percent
free
and
reduced
lunch.
That's
half
what
Mountain
View
has
we
need
to
make
some
changes
to
make
Mountain
View
have
options
where
they
have
higher
income
families
that
can
donate
to
the
PTA
that
can
donate
to
fund
raisers
that
can
participate
in
the
band
program.
Our
school
is
suffering
because
we're
a
pocket
of
poverty,
not
because
anything's
wrong
with
the
school
I
love
mountain
view
and
I'd
like
to
see
more.
For
that.
X
Good
evening
I'm,
a
Philly
parent
who
does
not
support
splitting
of
Finland
and
for
that
matter,
any
elementary
school
I
respect
the
perspective
of
parents
who
primarily
support
walkability
and,
at
the
same
time,
understand
vsts,
cost-saving
factors,
keeping
in
mind
three
important
factors.
I
present
my
personal
testimonial
that
aligns
with
no
split
strategy.
Point
number
one
I
do
not
support
splitting
Finland
and
hence
the
best
ideal
requires
root
to
have
be
to
have
entire
friendly
at
solar.
X
This
would
address
three
important
issues:
walkability
emotional
health
of
the
kids
and
budget
point
number
two
to
optimally
address
the
needs
of
other
schools.
It
is
absolute
if
it
is
absolutely
not
possible
for
DSD
to
have
entire
Sunday
as
Stoller,
then
we
would
request
BSD
to
have
entire
finlay
at
Timberland
and
point
number
three:
a
small
percentage
of
Findlay
parents
who
live
in
close
proximity
to
Stoller.
They
may
want
to
walk
to
Stoller
and
these
families
can
be
given
Stoller
as
an
option
school
to
get
exact
head
counts.
X
Bsd
can
conduct
a
survey,
but
rest
of
us
stand
by
no
split
and
want
to
move
to
Timberline
together
and
number
four
working,
maxy
2.1
and
working
map.
A
2.0
aligns
with
all
the
aforementioned
points
and
hence
I
support.
Those
two
maps
and
I
would
like
to
conclude
this
testimonial
by
saying
that
we
have
high
hopes
and
Trust
on
VSD
and
committee
members
that
the
final
solution
would
address
the
three
main
factors
optimally
and
will
mostly
benefit
the
primary
stakeholders
of
the
project,
and
that
is
our
kids.
Thank
you.
F
K
K
That
way
would
make
Mountain
View
the
highest
poverty
school
in
the
district
by
a
lot
math
Amy
would
be
very
damaging
to
Mountain
View.
Not
view
currently
has
60
percent
free
and
reduced
lunch.
So
keeping
the
status
quo
as
in
map
see,
isn't
a
good
solution,
isn't
as
good
a
solution
as
it
sounds.
That
view
is
already
overburdened.
I
would
like
PSD
staff
to
comment
on
the
following.
K
Why
aren't
you
encouraging
equity
more
in
this
process
being
responsible
for
the
entire
district?
It
just
surprises
me.
It
feels
like
you're
leading
the
parents
of
low
poverty
area,
sway
decisions
based
on
their
concerns,
which
doesn't
include
equity.
Why
aren't
you
educated
the
public
on
the
impact
high
poverty
levels
have
on
a
school?
They
might
make
different
decisions
if
they
understood
the
situation.
Better.
K
Mountain
View
currently
has
61
percent
free
and
reduced
lunch,
not
48
percent,
as
shown
in
the
demographics
map.
I,
don't
know
if
that's
due
to
an
inaccurate
calculation
for
split
down
mentary
schools
or
what
and
can
you
please
explain
that
discrepancy
not
they
would
put
Mountain
View
at
54
percent,
so
I
have
no
idea
than
what
the
actual
would
be.
Thank
you.
Y
Good
evening,
everyone
I'm,
a
Jacob,
is
no
parent
and
I
want
to
start
off
by
saying,
thank
you
to
mr.
sparks
and
all
the
committee
members.
We
respect
your
time
and
effort
in
this
exercise.
The
Jacob
is.
The
community
would
like
to
share
our
priorities
when
it
comes
to
policy
JC
factors
starting
off
by
telling
you
that
Jacob
is
most
splits,
two
ways
it
splits
into
both
Westview
and
sunset
for
high
school.
It
is
really
important
for
us
to
have
both
Westview
and
sunset.
Y
Keep
in
mind
that
a
hundred
percent
of
Jacob
Whismur
elementary
school
walks
to
Stoller
in
terms
of
student
body
composition
in
map
C
no
school
is
over
fifty
percent
or
in
single
digits
of
kids
eligible
for
free
and
reduced
lunch.
Unlike
map
a
both
map,
a
variance
still
show
Stoller
overcrowded,
even
without
Summa.
We
understand
that
in
maps
e
2.0,
Meadow,
Park
and
Timberland
are
the
highest
and
the
lowest
utilize
schools
respectively.
However,
given
the
close
proximity,
we
believe
that
the
committee
has
multiple
options
to
make
revisions
that
could
even
out
the
utilization
numbers.
Y
Z
Good
evening
my
name
is
Cindy
pelt
Oh
I've
been
a
member
of
the
Oak
Hills
Elementary
community,
since
2008
I've
served
as
the
PTO
president
and
fundraising
chair
at
both
Oak
Hills
and
Meadow
Park
I
currently
serve
as
the
West
View
band
president
and
I
teach
fifth
grade
full
time
at
McKinley.
Elementary
I
am
no
stranger
to
parent
involvement
and
what
it
takes
to
grow
and
support
a
school
community
when
high
school
boundaries
were
being
adjusted.
The
families
of
Oak
Hills
Elementary
asked
to
stay
together
for
middle
and
high
school.
Z
The
committee
voted
to
place
the
majority
of
our
students
at
West
View
and
a
much
smaller
number
at
sunset.
We
as
parents
accepted
this
decision
and
have
spent
the
last
three
years,
building
up
Meadow,
Park
and
investing
in
our
respective
high
schools
and
their
programs.
We
implore
you
to
strongly
consider
that
Oak
Hills
often
feels
like
a
pawn
in
a
boundary
chess
game
due
to
so
many
changes
over
the
years.
Nap
a
is
the
best
choice
for
our
elementary
school
community.
Z
While
the
high
school
split
will
be
maintained,
the
new
boundaries
for
the
middle
school
will
have
more
sunset,
bound
students
attending
Meadow
Park.
Our
current
sunset
students
have
spoken
of
feeling
isolated
at
sunset,
due
to
social
circles
already
in
place
from
previous
middle
schools.
We
prefer
MEF
a
because
it
increases
the
number
of
students
that
will
make
the
transition
from
middle
school
to
high
school
together.
Z
If
the
committee
determines
that
Matt
C
is
the
best
option
for
our
district,
even
though
this
puts
Meadow
Park
at
116
percent
capacity,
we
plead
for
two
adjustments,
one
our
students
are
split
after
elementary
school
and
the
sunset
bound
students
are
sent
to
a
middle
school
with
Tara
Linda,
their
closest
sunset
neighbor.
The
transition
to
high
school
is
tough.
Please
give
them
more
familiar
faces
in
the
halls
and
classrooms
to
the
west
side
of
Oak.
Hills
Elementary
should
go
to
Stoller
or
five
oaks
and
West
View.
Z
AA
Good
evening
my
name
is
Tom
little
I'm,
a
Rock
Creek
parent
I
wanted
to
thank
all
the
committee
members
for
volunteering
their
time.
I
know
that
you
guys
have
no
small
task
in
this
and
I
appreciate
all
the
work
you're
doing
your
job
is
to
ensure
that
the
will
of
the
people
is
carried
out
during
this
boundary
adjustment
process
by
our
public
school
district.
I
have
two
children
at
Rock
Creek,
but
I'm
here
to
represent
the
entire
Bethany
area.
Although
we
should
be
discussing
only
one
map,
we
have
now
been
provided
with
many.
AA
Your
primary
task
is
to
keep
communities
together,
but
all
these
maps
divide
definitely
communities.
Springville
is
split
in
four
of
these
maps.
Two
of
them
are
removing
their
most
disadvantaged
population
from
friends
to
check
a
diversity
box
somewhere
else
at
the
expense
of
those
friendships.
Four
of
these
Maps
split
Finley,
one
of
them
puts
Rock
Creek,
which
is
less
than
half
the
size
of
state
or
Springville.
We
should
have
learned
from
the
high
school
process.
That's
splitting
a
small
school
like
Oak
Hills
is
wrong.
AA
Three
of
these
maps
and
Oak
Hills
by
themselves
without
a
neighbor
are
two
southern
school.
One
of
them
does
the
same
to
Rock
Creek.
This
egregious
act
was
done
to
West
TV.
During
the
high
school
boundary
process.
No
school
should
be
sent
away
from
its
community
alone.
Your
job
is
to
relieve
overpopulation
at
Stoller.
Yet
somehow
all
of
these
maps
have
stole
are
using
portables
in
2025
to
accommodate
option
students.
AA
Three
have
Meadow
Park
overpopulated
and
three
have
five
Oaks
overpopulated
with
no
portables
all
the
while
the
new
school
in
the
north
is
being
utilized
at
57
to
74
percent
of
its
capacity
I
understand
from
one
thing
to
you
guys
talk
tonight
that
is
very
hard
to
try
and
do
everything
to
have
multiple
priorities.
I
think
that
one
priority
needs
to
be
chosen.
I
think
the
priority
needs
to
be
keeping
populations
together
so
that
children
are
not
thrust
into
a
scary
and
new
situation
when
they
move
from
middle
elementary
school
to
middle
school.
AA
AB
Good
evening
news,
Anand
I
am
a
subtle
parent
and
thank
you
for
this
opportunity
and
thank
you
all
for
your
time
that
you've
been
spending
on
this
so
I'm
here
representing
Sato
and
specifically
the
pirate
Park
community
and
I
specifically
mention
this
and
I
want
to
bring
this
up
again
because
there
have
been,
you
know,
maps
even
in
the
last
meeting
map,
B,
specifically
and
I
and
I.
Think
Maddie
was
alluded
to
in
this
meeting
as
well.
So
I
really
want
to.
You
know
clarify
you
know
our
position
here.
AB
So
we
are
a
community
within
Saros
south
of
Springville
Road
and
across
the
road
from
Stoller
and
closest
to
Stoller.
Within
this
auto-attendant
zone,
generations
of
kids
from
our
neighborhood
have
been
walking
to
Stoller.
There
have
been
revisions
of
map
up
until
the
last
meeting
that
split
the
sorrow
feeder
zone
south
of
Springfield
Road
and
took
kids
that
lived
closest
to
Stoller,
put
them
in
a
bus
and
send
them
to
a
school
miles
away
in
us
out
of
26.
AB
This
is
a
community
that
has
endured
primary
school
changes
with
kids,
having
attended
three
schools
during
their
primary
school
years.
Jacobs
Whismur
Springville
and
sorrow,
while
we
are
glad
that
the
current
maps
and
the
consideration
keeps
hard
together
and
send
some
stroller,
we
want
Weiss
are
concerned
that
any
attempt
to
change
this
alignment
by
splitting
sorrow,
like
Matt,
be
did
and
sending
the
part
of
sorrow
closest
to
Stoller
to
another
school
miles
away.
In
order
to
you
know
justify
whatever
the
reasons
might
be
for
other
communities
would
be
a
complete
travesty
of
justice.
AB
AB
It
makes
no
sense
suggests
if,
by
hosting
a
speciality
program
in
a
school,
when
regular
students
and
communities
in
the
neighborhood
are
separated
and
being
bused
to
a
you
know,
faraway
school
and
it's
hard
to
see
that
we
spent
45
minutes
today
talking
just
about
suma,
which
is
I,
think
unacceptable.
So
thank
you.
AC
I'm
Allison
Zurich
and
I'm
the
PTO
vice
president
at
Schultz,
Heights,
Elementary,
School
and
today,
I'm
speaking
on
behalf
of
the
show's
tight
student
staff
and
families,
as
a
parent
community,
want
to
thank
the
middle
school
boundary
committee
for
all
of
your
work.
It's
a
lot
to
take
on
and
we
appreciate
everything
that
you've
considered
and
also
allowing
all
of
the
schools
in
the
Beaverton
School
District
to
have
a
voice.
AC
During
this
process
we
are
close
to
network
of
students,
staff
and
families
that
show
us
hi,
it's
one
that
thrives
not
only
on
in
our
school
by
supporting
students
and
staff,
but
also
our
neighborhood
community.
We
wanted
to
speak
today
to
share
that.
Although
many
of
the
southern
schools
have
been
quiet
during
this
adjustment
period,
Scholz
type
families
have
been
observing
and
staying
informed.
Our
public
silence
is
not
due
to
indifference,
but
simply
because.
AC
Almost
all
of
the
proposed
maps
have
had
a
minimal
impact
on
the
show
sites,
boundaries
which
we
appreciate
my
fellow
schultz,
I
families-
and
I
are
here
today
to
show
our
involvement
and
voice
our
strong
desire
to
keep
shows
hi
it's
elementary
school
as
a
direct
feeder
to
Conestoga
middle
school.
This
will
maintain
our
school
community
for
the
sake
of
its
students,
as
well
as
continuing
to
work
as
a
highly
functional
parent
community,
as
our
children
transition
to
middle
school,
high
school
and
beyond.
Thank
you
thank.
F
AD
Hello,
my
name
is
Emily
Walker
and
I
have
four
kids
and
we
have
been
in
the
Springville
community
since
it
opened.
Springville
is
an
integral
part
of
the
North
Bethany
community.
If
you
it's
our
primary
task
to
keep
the
community
together
and
if
that's
your
primary
task,
it
is
ours
as
well
and
map
a
is
really
the
only
option
for
us.
AD
We
just
lost
our
middle
school
at
Springville
and
we've
been
yanked
around
to
many
different
places
and
we
are
potentially
having
to
be
bussed
forty
minutes
each
way
across
the
freeway
busy
intersections
and
it
takes
forever
if
you've
ever
done,
that
commute
and
it
just
it's
mind-boggling
that
we
would
be
bused
all
the
way
over
there
and
it's
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
traffic
each
way,
and
it
would
be
a
major
impact
on
our
children's
ability
to
do
extracurricular
activities
after
school.
It
would
just
be
a
huge
burden
on
parents
as
well.
AD
AD
If
you
are
looking
at
map
C,
we
shouldn't
be
punished
for
the
fact
that
the
middle
school
land
wasn't
planned
out
very
well
when
all
that
housing
was
approved
and
saw
Dylan's
finger
were
already
split
and
now
Springville
would
be
made
made
further
in
Island.
If
you
picked
map
C,
we
really
appreciate
all
your
time
and
your
consideration
on
all
these
factors,
and
we
really
just
hope
that
by
looking
at
all
these
maps,
you
really
pick
map
a
for
Springville.
Thank
you.
F
F
AE
AE
Please
talk
about
Carol
Enda,
please
consider
Tara
Linda,
there's
a
huge
difference
with
where
we
go
in
map
a
and
map
see.
The
issue
is
that
neither
of
map
A's
fix
the
stoller
capacity
and
they
put
it
at
their
highest
133
percent
121
percent.
In
2025,
only
map
Z
puts
Stoller
at
a
lower,
feasible
number.
If
you
look
at
the
projections
for
2028,
the
Springville
and
saw
two
combined
attendance
at
Stoller
will
be
around
1500
students.
That's
where
we
are
now.
AE
If
we're
not
here
trying
to
fix
the
capacity
at
solar
while
we're
trying
to
fix
the
capacity
at
stroller
solar,
then
what
are
we
doing
now?
Remember
if
you
try
to
fit
them
together
and
you
move
thinly
out
of
solar,
Jacob
Whismur
will
know
no
one.
At
sunset
now,
I
looked
at
the
transportation
data
provided
by
the
district,
and
the
commute
from
Springville
to
five
Oaks
is
exactly
average
with
what
the
district
is
in
the
morning.
That
means
there
are
other
commutes
that
are
longer
than
what
Springville
will
have
to
five
Oaks.
AE
AE
Did
the
math
and
it
is
longer
by
5
minutes
and
48
seconds
and
what
they
would
go
to
Stoller?
That
means
5
minutes
and
48
seconds
is
more
valuable
than
children
being
able
to
walk
to
schools.
Then
Tara
Linda
at
Cedar
Mill,
then
more
important
than
balancing
socio
and
economic
diversity
and
more
important
than
fixing
the
capacity
of
solar.
B
G
So
I
saw
this
in
the
public
comments
and
I'm
very
glad
that
there
we
had
a
representative
from
barman's
here
tonight,
but
can
we
please
get
some
direction
on
what
it
would
look
like,
because
none
of
our
maps
have
that
I
well?
Most
of
our
maps
have
Barnes
leaving
Meadow
Park,
and
that
seems
like
a
consensus
in
in
what
we're
seeing,
but
the
impact
that
all
kindergarteners
are
in
dual
language
and
projected
all
fifth.
Graders
are
into
language
that
is
even
bigger
than
what
I
was
expecting
coming
from
both
so
I
asked.
P
Was
just
wondering
if
we
could
make
it
a
stipulated
fact
that
the
commute
for
Springville
to
go
to
five
Oaks
is
only
around
like
22
minutes
at
max,
because
I
heard
through
some
testimonies
here,
that
some
people
are
saying
that
it's
40
minutes
and
based
on
the
data
that
was
given
to
us
by
the
Transportation
Department
I,
think
that
we
should-
and
that
was
provided
to
everyone
here
on
the
website.
I
think
the
max
is
like
22
minutes
in
something
seconds.
P
B
D
So
one
thing
going
forward
as
we're
getting
down
to
very
targeted
decisions.
I
have
asked
this
before.
If
we
could
get
a
map
where
for
each
elementary,
it
doesn't
even
matter
what
the
map
is,
but
for
each
elementary
zone
and
maybe
any
commonly
considered
split
if
we
could
just
have
a
number
that
shows
the
net
resident
students
that
way
that's
the
size
of
the
puzzle
pieces
and
we
know
our
options
for
moving
them
around,
that
that
will
aid
this
incredibly
may
I
lobby
briefly
for
a
different
map
in
the
context
of
dark,
but
earlier.
B
B
I
would
before
I
go
to
Divya
and
Charisse.
I
would
like
to
note
that
we
are
a
four-day
week
next
week
and
our
meeting
is
on
Tuesday
the
following
week,
so
we
are
going
to
have
to
turn
in
burnt,
shall
we
say
in
getting
materials
to
you.
So
when
we
get
down
to
you
know
the
the
final
direction
here.
Please
keep
that
in
mind.
So
Divya.
I
They
said
questions
so
that
you
know
we
know
what
the
expectations
are
for
the
next
meeting,
which
mean
more
some
key
decisions.
So
first
stroller
are
we
targeting
90
percent
of
permanent
capacity
or
ninety
percent
of
four
minutes.
That's
portable
I
just
need
an
answer
for
that,
because
that
seems
to
be
a
moving
target.
M
I'm
not
sure
we're
there
yet,
but
I
think
it
would
be
helpful
for
us
knowing
that
we
are
getting
down
to
this,
and
there
is
a
short
ramp
to
our
next
meeting.
First
as
a
committee
to
make
a
decision
on
a
or
C
and
then
within
that
really
start
working
on
one
map,
I,
don't
know
how
everyone
else
feels,
but
I
feel
like
we're
there
and
that
we
need
to
start
doing
that.
B
So
I
think
that's
an
excellent
segue
for
us
proceeding
with
what
we
heard
and
what
our
plan
is
for
moving
forward
a
budget.
Are
you
jumping
ahead,
or
do
you
have
a
question?
Okay,
so
he's
first
in
in
the
line
so
before
I
turn
it
over
to
Robert,
who
was
doing
most
of
the
note-taking
here.
I
did
here,
I
did
see
a
general
consensus.
S
So
a
lot
of
committee
members
tonight
said:
let's
consider
Summa
going
to
to
Timberland
and
that
was
ever
and
I
think
what
we'll
do
is
we'll.
We'll
include
that
as
one
of
the
east
summary
you
know,
stats
in
the
maps,
so
we
always
know
what's
who's
installer
and
who
what
it
would
look
like
if
everyone
went
to
Timberland
like
we
did
with
the
maps
tonight
with
the
room
that
is
with
the
room.
S
B
S
S
We
will
begin
there,
we
who
knows
Apple
in
there.
Okay,
there
was
a
proposal
to
move
the
eastern
portion
of
Oak
Hills
to
Timberland
to
align
it
with
the
sunset
fear.
There
was
also
a
proposal
to
move
Western
oak.
What
the
western
portion
of
Oak
Hills
possibly
does
stoller,
or
we
also
heard
public
comments
about
keeping
it
at
Meadow
Park,
but
maintaining
a
larger
contingent
of
students
at
Meadow
Park
going
to
to
West
View.
D
S
H
So
my
take
is
also
Oak.
Hills
has
a
j9,
brother
and
I
think
making
to
mention
this
at
this
point
will
be
confusing.
I
also
know
for
a
fact
that,
once
you
have
somewhat
friendly
Bonnie
cedar
and
Terra
Linda
and
Timberland,
there's
gonna
be
no
place
in
Timberline,
so
what
I
would
suggest
is,
as
this
starting
point,
let's
start
with
the
premise
that
Oak
Hills
can
be
entirely
converted
to
sunset
now,
which
is
what
you
have
proposed
and
look
at,
how
that
looks.
The
the
one
part
of
that
is
in
the
existing
medical
definition.
S
Mostly
about
whether,
if
it
receives
Asuma
program,
also
a
consideration
of
Aloha
Huber
Park
for
mountain
view,
that
will
have
an
impact
on
its
on
its
poverty
numbers.
I
would
suggest
that
the
list
that
I
already
have
laid
out,
which
starts
at
the
top
and
sort
of
works,
its
way
down
that
we
work
on
that
between
now
in
the
next
meeting
and
that
we
we
basically
leave
Mountain
View
in
stasis.
H
H
If
we
can
put
that
in
the
middle-
and
the
second
part
is,
we
are
to
now
have
the
legacy
student
numbers
because,
especially
for
timber
land,
that's
going
to
swing
and
you
have
gonna
come
up
with
numbers
that
would
be
hundred
about
without
the
legacy
calculation
and
everybody
will
see
us
not
gonna
work,
although
that's
not
gonna,
be
the
case
right.
So
for
the
next
map
that
you
make,
if
you're
at
least
give
like
a
figure,
our
numbers
for
a
trade,
because
I
think
that
might
be
a
consensus
I
want.
H
We
can
debate
and
then
subtract
those
out
all
right
at
least
show
that,
on
the
right
hand,
side
like
you
have
I
can
make
the
picture
clear.
Otherwise
we're
just
gonna
get
okay.
B
Okay,
so
you
heard
the
summary
that
Robert
recommended
I've
heard
some
conversation
about
some
edits
to
that
and
I've
heard
her
Davidge
at
ask
about
the
eighth
grade
numbers
for
the
legacy
discussion.
That
will
be
easy
enough
to
provide
we're.
Gonna
have
to
talk
about
that
at
some
point,
do
be
before
I
go
to
you.
Does
anybody
object
to
the
the
list
of
what
Robert
said
and
Divya
the.
I
Concern
I
have
with
the
changes
offered
are
we
are
trying
to
solve
problems
for
opiates,
but
we
are
creating
a
genuine
problem
elsewhere,
which
is
Jacob
is
ma
su
Minds
moving
out
to
Timberland,
which
I'm
okay
with
by
the
way
yes
I
came
on
board,
but
that
is
25%
of
Jacob
is
not
going
to
Timberland,
which
means
70.
Sorry
25%
going
to
Timberline,
which
is
75%
of
Jacob,
is
more
about.
200
kids
have
no
friends
in
confort.
That's.
B
Along
with
you
know,
the
numbers
that
we're
talking
about,
obviously
transportation
has
to
be
a
part
of
that
in
terms
of
time
and
costume
and
the
like,
and
what
that
impact
is.
So
that's
something
that
we
would
have
to
bring
with
you
to
inform
that
discussion.
As
you
start
making
some
choices,
Abdul.
N
Going
by
the
summary
that
we
have
so
one
of
the
options
I
mentioned
was
picking
the
west
side
of
ochio's
and
putting
in
Timberland
and
the
oh
sorry.
The
west
side
of
okie
was
going
to
get
a
stroller
or
Meadow
Park
and
the
east
side,
and
if,
if
we
did
that,
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
that
that
would
free
up
some
space
in
the
middle
back
and
we
could
potentially
move
bands
back
to
middle
path
and
and
actually
solve
that
problem
over
there.
M
B
B
We
will
be
working
starting
tomorrow
morning
on
what
we
have
heard
here
this
evening
and
we
will
try
and
get
those
materials
to
you
as
soon
as
possible.
The
last
meeting
we
have
here
identified
is
on
March
12th
at
the
district
office.
It
is
going
to
be
more
than
likely
we're
going
to
relocate
the
final
meeting
to
a
larger
venue,
because
our
central
office
has
terrible
parking
so
be
prepared
for
that,
and
so
before
I
gavel
s
closed
Jason.
Do
you
have
a
final
comment
for
us.
D
Just
to
throw
a
minor
wrench
in
the
works
I
had
an
idea
that
I
considered
to
be
outside
of
this
process.
I
believe
it
is
outside
of
this
process,
but
in
talking
to
folks
the
district,
they
felt
it
important
to
raise
it
amongst
today,
since
that
this
is
the
opportunity
for
this
committee
to
provide
community
voice,
and
it
here
in
simple
it
comes
down
to
the
school
district
is
essentially
a
business
with
declining
revenue.
Is
it
will?
We
have
fewer
students
projected
than
we
have
now?
Each
student
is
revenue.
D
We
have
growing
costs,
I,
don't
know
how
many
years
in
a
row
we've
had
eight
digit
budget
cuts.
I
believe
next
year
will
be
another
one.
If
this
were
a
simple
business,
would
we
be
opening
a
ninth
store
with
revenue
expected
falling
in
costly
enough?
We
would
not
so
the
idea
is
we
do
not.
We.
We
have
eight
schools.
Now,
we've
already
built
the
ninth
school,
it's
beautiful,
it's
larger,
but
for
the
sake
of
delivering
services
in
the
most
efficient
way,
maybe
we
don't
need
it.
D
L
D
Park
boundary
is
timberlands,
and
the
sumo
program
comes
down
to
the
two
Timberland
along
the
lines.
I
then
made
a
couple
of
minor
adjustments
just
to
have
the
area
around
Timberland
actually
attended.
It's
not
the
only
way
to
go.
I,
don't
think
we
need
to
spend
a
lot
of
time
compared
to
our
regular
map,
but
I
would
ask
that
maybe
we
get
an
official-looking
map
of
it
and
maybe
again
in
the
last
few
minutes
of
the
next
meeting,
offer
some
some
general
thoughts
just
for
potential
future
guidance
for
the
district.
D
B
B
B
I
would
say
we
have
some
pretty
hard
rows
to
hoe
here
and
I
want
to
spend
be
sure
we
spend
our
time
working
on
that
and
if
we
want
to
do
another
working
group
for
more
of
this
type
of
thing,
perhaps
our
board
will
see
an
advisory
committee
to
do
something
like
that.
But
thank
you
for
being
here.
Thank
you
for
your
comments
and
we
will
see
you
all
on
Tuesday
February
24th
down
at
Wickard
middle
school.
Thank
you.